Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:11
Welcome to this
0:11
latest FSB monthly round-up
0:14
podcast brought to you by the
0:14
Federation of Small Businesses
0:17
and the go to podcasts for news
0:17
tips and important information
0:21
for small businesses and the
0:21
self employed. This episode is
0:25
our December Small Business
0:25
Round-up, in which we'll take a
0:29
look at some of the important
0:29
issues hitting the headlines at
0:32
the moment, and which you need
0:32
to be aware of right now, as
0:35
small business owners this month
0:35
will be looking in particular at
0:40
the latest developments around
0:40
energy costs for small
0:43
businesses and some steps FSB is
0:43
taking to try to help ease the
0:47
pain of that. And we will also
0:47
unpick the recent autumn
0:51
statement to understand the
0:51
impact of the big announcements
0:54
on small businesses, as well as
0:54
what the government should be
0:57
doing to support small
0:57
businesses more in 2023. To
1:02
discuss those issues. I'm joined
1:02
by Paul Wilson, Policy Director
1:06
at FSB and Alan Soady, head of
1:06
Media and Communications. Thank
1:11
you both for joining. Paul,
1:11
starting with the ongoing issue
1:17
of energy costs, which seems
1:17
like it's, it's going to run for
1:21
some time, can you give us a
1:21
sense of how badly these energy
1:25
prices have been affecting small
1:25
businesses so far?
1:28
Sure. Absolutely.
1:28
And we know from FSB's quarterly
1:32
Confidence Survey, the Small
1:32
Business Index, that cost
1:35
pressures this year have been
1:35
more severe than any time we've
1:38
seen before in the last 10 years
1:38
of doing the SBI. Record numbers
1:42
of small businesses are
1:42
reporting cost increases record
1:45
numbers, saying those increases
1:45
have been significant, i.e. more
1:48
than 10% across the year, and
1:48
energy or utilities is the top
1:52
driver of these cost pressures
1:52
cited by 60% of small
1:56
businesses. Now, it is affecting
1:56
a majority, the energy price
2:00
increases are not affecting all
2:00
small businesses at the moment,
2:04
I'll explain why that is - 23%
2:04
of small businesses are in the
2:08
position where they agreed a
2:08
fixed contract before prices
2:11
started rising significantly a
2:11
year ago. And I guess due to
2:14
that combination of some good
2:14
risk management and a bit of
2:17
good luck as well, that 23% are
2:17
currently insulated from the
2:22
price rises until their fixed
2:22
contract ends. But for those who
2:25
have seen their fixed contracts
2:25
come to an end, the impact has
2:28
been jarring. A quarter have
2:28
seen their energy cost double. A
2:32
further 19% have seen their
2:32
energy costs triple or more as a
2:36
result of these price increases.
2:36
And of course, that means small
2:39
firms have to take a range of
2:39
difficult decisions in order to
2:43
try and deal with those. Around
2:43
half have raised their prices
2:46
reluctantly, because there's a
2:46
cost of living crisis at the
2:49
moment, and they know that
2:49
customers can't necessarily
2:51
afford big price increases. FSB
2:51
has been saying for months now
2:55
that you can't solve the cost of
2:55
living crisis without first
2:58
solving the cost of doing
2:58
business crisis. And I think
3:00
this is a classic example of how
3:00
those two things are linked. In
3:03
fact, 18% of small firms tell us
3:03
that they can't pass further
3:07
price increases on because
3:07
customers simply cannot afford
3:10
to pay, you know, take the
3:10
example of the laundrette that
3:13
realised they'd have to more
3:13
than double their prices, just
3:16
to cover their energy bills, or
3:16
the pizza restaurant that
3:18
realised they'd have to increase
3:18
their charges to £25 a pizza to
3:22
cover their costs. But of
3:22
course, they haven't done that
3:24
because they know their
3:24
customers simply couldn't afford
3:26
it. Other firms are taking
3:26
another decision. So around a
3:29
third of cutters scale back
3:29
investment plans, which of
3:32
course will affect their chances
3:32
of growing their business. And
3:35
we've heard about companies
3:35
protecting the decision to
3:37
import or as previously, they'd
3:37
have made stuff in the UK. So a
3:40
manufacturer told us that they
3:40
did used to make the plastics
3:44
that they used in their processes, but now they're going to have to import them from
3:46
abroad. So these are really
3:49
difficult decisions. And the
3:49
fact is that the price increases
3:52
that many firms have seen are
3:52
too severe to deal with. And
3:55
that's why FSB lobbied
3:55
government to introduce the
3:58
energy bill relief scheme, which
3:58
runs to the end of March 2023.
4:02
Yes some startling
4:02
statistics around how you know,
4:06
the numbers of firms that are going to have to pivot their strategies or indeed, that are
4:07
completely at risk as a result
4:11
of some of these pressures. And
4:11
a lot of the rhetoric, Paul, I
4:15
think has been about, you know,
4:15
winter, it's kind of getting us
4:18
up to and through winter in
4:18
terms of sort of government
4:21
support, but how important is it
4:21
for that energy to support from
4:26
the government to continue
4:26
beyond the winter period? And
4:29
what would you like that to look like?
4:30
Well, for many small firms, it's just absolutely vital that some form
4:32
of support continues beyond
4:35
March 2023. We asked small firms
4:35
what they would have to do if
4:38
the support were to run out in
4:38
March next year, this sort of
4:41
cliff edge type scenario, and
4:41
really starkly, 24% of small
4:44
businesses said they would need
4:44
to either close, downsize or
4:48
radically restructure if the
4:48
support ends and there's no
4:51
successor. And for some sectors
4:51
that goes even higher, so look
4:54
at accommodation and food, 42%
4:54
of small firms, so they'd have
4:57
to close, downsize or
4:57
restructure. That's the size of
5:00
the risk here, if government
5:00
doesn't get the decisions right
5:04
on the successor scheme. So what
5:04
we're asking for is some sort of
5:07
continuation of government
5:07
support beyond March 2023, at
5:10
least for the smallest firms.
5:10
And you might think: 'well, FSB,
5:13
you would say it's the smallest
5:13
firms who need it more'. But we
5:17
have good reasons for that.
5:17
Small firms are frankly, unable
5:20
to protect themselves against
5:20
the impact of these price
5:23
increases in the way that bigger
5:23
businesses can. Small firms tend
5:27
to have much lower cash
5:27
reserves, their ability to
5:29
invest in things like energy
5:29
efficiency measures is lesser,
5:32
and they have no ability to
5:32
negotiate with big energy
5:35
suppliers or indeed, hedge their
5:35
risk. So we think the government
5:39
did a good job with the design
5:39
of the energy bill relief
5:42
scheme. And FSB is proposing
5:42
they use a similar model for the
5:45
successor, even if it only
5:45
applies to smaller firms. And
5:48
the good thing about the Energy
5:48
Bill Relief Scheme, or EBRS is
5:52
that it's applied directly to
5:52
bills. So small business owners
5:55
don't need to do anything to
5:55
make sure that they benefit from
5:58
it. It's also quite well
5:58
designed from a taxpayer
6:01
perspective. And we know that
6:01
the government have to be
6:04
careful about how they spend
6:04
their money. But the way that
6:07
the scheme is designed, it means
6:07
that a reduction won't be
6:10
applied to a company's bill, if
6:10
they happen to be on one of
6:13
those longer term, fixed
6:13
contracts. That's a reasonable
6:16
price that I mentioned earlier.
6:16
So that's what we're calling for.
6:20
Yeah, that's the
6:20
call on government. And we talk
6:23
a lot on this podcast about what
6:23
we would like to see from the
6:26
government. But I understand FSB
6:26
has been writing to some of the
6:30
big energy companies as well
6:30
with your concerns about the
6:34
experiences as some of the small
6:34
businesses in the FSB network,
6:40
what what is it that you're
6:40
hoping to achieve with that?
6:43
Well, this comes back to that point that I mentioned about the imbalance of
6:44
power between small business
6:47
customers have very large energy
6:47
companies. And we're very
6:51
conscious of that. So we've
6:51
asked for a few things. And the
6:53
first is to explain how the
6:53
discounts are being applied on
6:57
customer's bills. The energy
6:57
bill relief scheme is a good
6:59
scheme, but it is also
6:59
complicated. So we've called on
7:02
energy companies to explain to
7:02
customers how discounts are
7:05
being applied to bills. And you
7:05
know, just looking at my
7:07
household energy bill, I've had
7:07
some pretty good comms from my
7:10
energy supplier as to how the
7:10
government discounts have been
7:12
applied, we want the same for
7:12
small business customers. Next,
7:16
it's fair to say that some
7:16
charges are not covered by the
7:19
government scheme. So things
7:19
like daily standing charges
7:23
aren't kept. But FSB is called
7:23
on suppliers not to increase
7:26
those charges, even though
7:26
technically they can, as it
7:29
would completely undermine the
7:29
purpose of the energy bill
7:32
relief scheme and add further
7:32
pressure to energy bills. And
7:36
lastly, even with the support of
7:36
the energy bill relief scheme,
7:39
we know that this winter is
7:39
going to be very tough for many
7:42
small businesses and indeed
7:42
households. What we don't want
7:45
to see is energy companies
7:45
making unreasonable demands of
7:48
small business customers. And
7:48
you know, what, what type of
7:51
thing am I talking about there?
7:51
We heard from a laundry business
7:54
who had a good credit rating and
7:54
who was nonetheless asked for a
7:56
£16,000 deposit by their energy
7:56
company that sort of request for
8:01
a huge upfront deposit risks
8:01
putting firms out of business
8:05
and undermines the good work
8:05
that the government's put in
8:08
with the support with Bill. So
8:08
the point of FSB writing to the
8:12
energy companies is to ensure
8:12
that they do their utmost to
8:15
support their small business
8:15
customers and give the small
8:18
business customers the best
8:18
possible chance of surviving the
8:21
winter. And also to let the
8:21
energy companies know that FSB
8:24
is watching as I'm sure
8:24
government and Ofgem are too.
8:27
Yes well, let's
8:27
hope that multi-pronged approach
8:31
has some some impact. Thanks
8:31
very much, Paul. That's really,
8:34
really good. Good insight into
8:34
the current situation around the
8:38
the ongoing energy challenges.
8:38
Alan, Hi, thanks for joining. I
8:42
also want to cover off the
8:42
fallout from last month's Autumn
8:46
Statement, if we can and also to
8:46
look forward to what comes next.
8:51
And what FSB would like to see
8:51
from government going forward.
8:53
Let's start with the big
8:53
takeaways. What were the big
8:57
announcements for for small
8:57
businesses in that statement?
9:00
Well, there was a
9:00
lot of stealthy tax rises in
9:03
there, a lot of talk of
9:03
thresholds being frozen, which
9:07
in effect actually means in real
9:07
terms, taxes going up for a lot
9:11
of small businesses. One good
9:11
thing that for me to pick out
9:15
here is that the planned rise in
9:15
National Insurance contributions
9:20
for employers, for self
9:20
employed, for employees, that
9:24
happened earlier this year, that
9:24
was reversed that was something
9:27
FSB had campaigned a lot on to
9:27
achieve that it had been
9:31
something that was announced at
9:31
the time that Liz Truss was
9:34
briefly Prime Minister and that
9:34
was one of the very few things
9:37
from her brief era, that
9:37
actually stayed when we got to
9:40
the Autumn Statement, so that
9:40
was good. However, there's
9:45
always a but isn't there with
9:45
budgets and Autumn Statements
9:47
and things. There was a freezing
9:47
of the threshold thresholds
9:52
again, for employer National
9:52
Insurance, and that, in effect
9:56
is a stealthy rise in what we
9:56
call the Jobs Tax, because it's
10:00
at a time of where wages are
10:00
going up. If you freeze the
10:03
point at which the tax on the
10:03
National Insurance tax kicks in,
10:07
through employers, then it means
10:07
that they're having to pay a
10:10
bigger proportion in tax for
10:10
their employees. There was a
10:14
saving grace that the employment
10:14
allowance was kept at its
10:17
current level that was something
10:17
hard fought for by FSB, first of
10:21
all, to get the employment allowance in the first place a few years ago, but then for it
10:23
to be increased along the way.
10:26
And we were very pleased that we
10:26
were listened to on that, and it
10:29
stays at £5,000. I do want to
10:29
touch on directors of limited
10:34
companies who are paid mainly
10:34
through dividends, this was not
10:37
a good, awesome statement for
10:37
them. Because unlike employer,
10:40
employers, self employed, they
10:40
were not taken out of the
10:45
increase in National Insurance
10:45
or rather the equivalent for
10:48
them, at least. And also there
10:48
was a cut in the allowances for
10:52
dividend taxation. That in
10:52
effect, again, is a tax rise for
10:57
them. And let's bear in mind
10:57
that this is the same group who,
11:00
during the earlier days of the
11:00
pandemic were left out and
11:03
excluded from direct financial
11:03
support from the government. So
11:07
I think they will, that group
11:07
would have been left feeling
11:10
pretty bitter by some of this in
11:10
that Autumn Statement. Quickly
11:13
on business rate, it was
11:13
actually reasonably good news,
11:16
but in the sense that there's
11:16
not going to be a massive of 10%
11:19
plus inflationary hike. The
11:19
revaluation that underpins what
11:24
your business rates actually
11:24
are, is going to go ahead next
11:27
year. But the winners from that
11:27
will be I know, this sounds like
11:30
I'm stating the obvious will be
11:30
those whose valuation goes down
11:34
and therefore their their rates
11:34
bill goes down. Obviously,
11:37
that's good news in itself. But
11:37
there's also been a change in
11:40
the way that's administered. So
11:40
that reduction will happen in
11:43
full from year one, whereas
11:43
previously, it came in
11:47
gradually, over the course of a
11:47
few years, there was also an
11:50
expansion of rates relief for
11:50
retail, hospitality, and
11:53
leisure. So good news for
11:53
businesses in in those sectors.
11:57
But then shall I shall I end,
11:57
this bid on another negative
11:59
there was the freezing of the
11:59
VAT threshold. Now, that is
12:03
another stealthy measure more
12:03
small businesses will be dragged
12:08
into VAT, or for others, it will
12:08
act as a deterrent to growth
12:11
already, we knew from our
12:11
research that nearly a quarter
12:14
of small firms and self employed
12:14
are held back by the VAT
12:17
threshold. And this really is an
12:17
anti-growth decision such as to
12:22
freeze that at a time when costs
12:22
and prices are going up.
12:26
You know, Thanks, Alan, you mentioned that sort of VAT threshold being a sort of
12:28
stealth move. Why is that so
12:32
significant? Have you got an example of that?
12:34
Yeah, I mean, if
12:34
you're below that threshold, and
12:38
particularly if you're just
12:38
below you, a lot of small
12:41
businesses do not want to get
12:41
dragged to profit, partly
12:44
because they then have to charge
12:44
that 20% tax and potentially put
12:47
their prices up make themselves
12:47
less competitive. There's also
12:51
both the admin and the costs
12:51
around administering being part
12:55
of VAT, we estimate it takes
12:55
about on average, about a week a
12:58
year to do the admin for that.
12:58
So let me give you a couple of
13:01
examples. And these are
13:01
absolutely real life examples of
13:05
FSB members facing this right
13:05
now; let's take the fish and
13:08
chip shop. That is at the moment
13:08
in terms of the amount that it's
13:12
taking, it stays below the VAT
13:12
threshold, but not usually much
13:17
below. In the course of a
13:17
typical year. Now their prices
13:20
like everyone else's for what
13:20
they have to buy for the
13:22
everything from the fish to the
13:22
energy it takes to cook it has
13:26
been going up. But if they pass
13:26
on those extra costs in the form
13:31
of higher prices to their
13:31
customers, that means their
13:34
turnover goes up a bit. And that
13:34
pushes them above the VAT
13:38
threshold, suddenly, they've got
13:38
to add another 20% onto the
13:42
price of a cod and chips that
13:42
makes them less competitive than
13:45
the fish and chip shop down the
13:45
road. And they've got all the
13:47
tax costs and admin that would
13:47
go along with that they're
13:50
dealing with that scenario right
13:50
now. I was also talking to one
13:53
of our members who runs a small
13:53
hotel in the Lake District and I
13:57
say how's it going? He said,
13:57
'Well we're shut at the minute'.
14:00
I said, 'Do you normally close
14:00
for the winter? Is it just you
14:02
know, out of season?' They said
14:02
no, no, you get a lot of
14:04
visitors to the Lake District
14:04
through through the winter. A
14:07
lot of people like going walking
14:07
in the hills when it's a bit you
14:09
know when the weather is colder
14:09
or they'd like to come and see
14:11
see the lakes in the snow and
14:11
the and the frost because it's
14:14
beautiful. But so far in this
14:14
financial year, he's already
14:20
taken enough in that brings him
14:20
close-ish to the VAT threshold.
14:24
He's taken 70 odd 1000. He's got
14:24
a few bookings for March. So
14:28
that's still going to be within
14:28
this financial year. He was
14:31
saying if he does any more this
14:31
because he's had to put the
14:35
costs up himself to cover his
14:35
own increasing costs. It's going
14:39
to push him over that VAT
14:39
threshold. So in other words, if
14:41
he stays open over the colder
14:41
months of the winter, he's got
14:45
all the costs and the hard work
14:45
of doing that. But in effects
14:49
that does it for absolutely
14:49
nothing because come April he's
14:52
then dragged into the VAT
14:52
threshold has to put his prices
14:55
up, might get fewer bookings as
14:55
a result next year, and also has
14:59
all that tax costs and admin to
14:59
do as well. So two real-life
15:02
examples there, where you can
15:02
see it's actually a deterrent
15:05
for a business to grow and take
15:05
more money.
15:08
Yeah, that's a really good example. Actually, we've talked there a bit about
15:10
the things that were announced.
15:14
What was FSB disappointed not to
15:14
see perhaps and what would you
15:18
like to see the government
15:18
prioritising in the next period?
15:22
Overall, there was a
15:22
lack of pro-growth, pro
15:26
enterprise strategy underpinning
15:26
this autumn statement. And of
15:29
course, there'd been a lot of
15:29
political turbulence, a lot of
15:32
economic turbulence leading up
15:32
to it. And the government had
15:35
wanted to steady the ship. But
15:35
what was missing was how to get
15:41
the growth in the future. In
15:41
terms of the policies, yes,
15:43
there were a few glimmers of
15:43
good news in there, but nowhere
15:45
near enough given the economic
15:45
situation that we're in. And
15:49
even worse than that there was
15:49
actually something in there that
15:53
was willfully potentially going
15:53
to stifle innovation and growth.
15:57
And that was basically gutting
15:57
the research and development tax
16:01
credit system for small
16:01
businesses, that potentially
16:04
could lead to 1000s of small
16:04
businesses that are R&D heavy,
16:08
from no longer existing. And
16:08
part of the argument for that
16:13
was, oh, well, some of the
16:13
people claiming these R&D tax
16:17
credits is fraudulent. Now, our
16:17
response to that would be if the
16:22
system is not robust enough, and
16:22
the government is not capable of
16:27
policing its own system. Is it
16:27
really fair to penalise the
16:31
majority by getting rid of it
16:31
completely? And taking a
16:34
sledgehammer to it? Surely the
16:34
answer is to address the
16:37
problems that allow any fraud to
16:37
happen. So the vast majority,
16:41
who actually have benefited from
16:41
this, been using this in their
16:45
businesses been using it to
16:45
drive growth not only in their
16:47
business, but in the economy as
16:47
well, and driving innovation, to
16:51
just take that all away at a
16:51
time when surely innovation and
16:54
growth is needed most.
16:57
Yeah, brilliant. Thank you. And look, you know, while I have you here, it would
16:58
be remiss of me not to ask you,
17:02
as we move towards a new year to
17:02
highlight one or two things that
17:06
you think are going to be
17:06
particularly important for small
17:09
businesses going into 2023, and
17:09
that you think might dominate
17:14
the early part of the year.
17:16
Well, unfortunately,
17:16
I think this cost of doing
17:18
business crisis is going to be
17:18
the dominant thing. Still, it
17:22
shows no signs of going away.
17:22
And that's why it's very
17:25
important that the government
17:25
when it comes to the budget in
17:28
the spring, take steps to
17:28
address that and to get growth
17:31
going in the economy. And Paul
17:31
talks about the the energy
17:35
situation again, that is not
17:35
going away. Even you know
17:38
longer, longer term, there are
17:38
no signs of energy prices likely
17:41
to come down anytime soon to
17:41
anything like what they weren't
17:45
before, they will still be
17:45
unaffordable. I think also,
17:48
access to finance is looking
17:48
like it is going to be a growing
17:51
issue or at least access to
17:51
affordable finance with interest
17:55
rates going up. And with firms,
17:55
you know, more and more of them
17:58
having to turn to finance just
17:58
for cash flow. Just just to keep
18:02
the finances going day to day, I
18:02
think that is going to be a
18:05
focus, we are seeing an increase
18:05
in late payments. In some cases,
18:09
bigger businesses paying their
18:09
smaller suppliers late again, as
18:12
belts are being tightened. And
18:12
the financial squeeze is felt by
18:16
businesses big and small, there
18:16
will be a temptation by some of
18:19
the bigger businesses to hold
18:19
back payments even more so and
18:23
that could become an even bigger
18:23
problem unless it's addressed.
18:26
That's why we're saying to the
18:26
government, this is something
18:30
that actually would not cost the
18:30
taxpayer anything but would be
18:33
pro growth for you to address to
18:33
crack down on that. The strikes
18:37
have been yet another thing
18:37
thrown at small businesses,
18:40
particularly recently, things
18:40
like the the postal strike with
18:43
Royal Mail, rail strikes have
18:43
been hitting certain kinds of
18:47
businesses from those in online
18:47
retail, those whose supplies are
18:50
being interrupted through
18:50
disruptions to deliveries. And
18:54
then particularly a hospitality,
18:54
for example, with the rail
18:57
strikes in that run up to
18:57
Christmas, really hoping to have
19:00
a good and lucrative period,
19:00
particularly with Christmas
19:03
parties and so on. And yet when
19:03
the trains are on strike, in
19:07
some cases, some of those
19:07
Christmas parties are being
19:10
cancelled. But also, if you look
19:10
within small business employers
19:13
themselves, there have been
19:13
difficulties throughout much of
19:17
this year with recruitment and
19:17
retention with staff shortages
19:20
with skill shortages. Again,
19:20
that looks likely to continue
19:23
and there will be a challenge I
19:23
think for a lot of smaller
19:27
employers to perhaps find other
19:27
ways other than wage increases
19:30
or bigger wage increases other
19:30
ways of of improving recruitment
19:34
and retention of staff into
19:34
their businesses through perhaps
19:37
non wage benefits from cycle to
19:37
work schemes to discounted gym
19:41
memberships, that kind of thing,
19:41
for example, that often in the
19:44
past with something only bigger
19:44
businesses were able to
19:47
negotiate an offer. There are
19:47
ways now that smaller businesses
19:51
can source that without having
19:51
to do it all individually,
19:54
themselves and actually at FSB,
19:54
that was something we recognised
19:58
a little while ago and have
19:58
recently introduced something
20:01
that our members can access if
20:01
they if they want to go down
20:04
that route if they think it
20:04
would help to be a benefit for
20:07
the recruitment and retention of
20:07
staff. So I think that is
20:11
another challenge that is still
20:11
going to be there as we go into 2023.
20:15
Yeah, brilliant,
20:15
lots of challenges, but also
20:18
plenty of solutions, ideas and
20:18
lobbying going on in the
20:21
background, Paul and Alan, thank
20:21
you so much for for taking us
20:25
through the key Small Business
20:25
announcements in the headlines
20:29
right now as part of our monthly
20:29
small business round up podcast
20:33
series. That was really good.
20:33
Thank you also to our audience
20:37
for listening to this episode.
20:37
While I have your attention, I
20:41
would just like to remind you
20:41
that you can subscribe to the
20:44
FSB podcast to receive regular
20:44
updates and guidance on the big
20:48
issues affecting small
20:48
businesses. And do please also
20:51
remember that you can find a
20:51
whole host of additional
20:55
webinars, podcasts and other
20:55
content at the first voice
20:58
website at firstvoice.fsb.org.uk
20:58
and on the FSB website
21:01
fsb.org.uk Many thanks for listening.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More