Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:07
My
0:07
Jewish story is one of refugees.
0:10
Family on my dad's side escaped
0:10
the antisemitism in what was
0:12
once Galicia and is now part of
0:12
Ukraine during the pogroms of
0:15
the early 20th century and came
0:15
to the United States. Family on
0:19
my mother's side escaped Poland
0:19
in the 1930s, before World War
0:22
II, to allude the genocidal
0:22
violence of the Nazis and found
0:25
themselves in France, Brazil,
0:25
Israel, and the U.S. Many, of
0:30
course could not escape. As with
0:30
other groups of refugees and
0:33
migrants, many Jewish
0:33
communities, including my own
0:36
faced or complied with the
0:36
pressures to assimilate to their
0:38
new spaces, to forget or even
0:38
abandoned certain religious,
0:42
linguistic and cultural
0:42
practices. One of the problems
0:45
of assimilation is that it
0:45
requires an intentional
0:47
forgetting, a deliberate
0:47
exclusion and erasure of the
0:50
stories that explain how we got
0:50
here and why we're here. In my
0:54
case, this meant that there was
0:54
much I did not know about my
0:56
past until I started to ask
0:56
questions. Even the brief story
0:59
of my family I just shared is a
0:59
product of many years of
1:02
ambivalence, and recently those
1:02
of renewed energy, interest, and
1:05
a need to know who I am with
1:05
this has led to is not just
1:08
learning more about me, but of
1:08
the millions of Jewish stories
1:11
out there, those that reflect my
1:11
own as part of the Ashkenazi
1:14
diaspora in the late 19th and
1:14
20th century, and those from
1:17
Sephardic, Mizrahim and other
1:17
Jewish communities that in many
1:20
cases, dates centuries before.
1:20
So what happens when we begin to
1:25
recover our stories to gather
1:25
them, document them and revive
1:28
them? How does the reclaiming of
1:28
stories we are told to forget
1:31
shift the narrative of not just
1:31
understanding the community such
1:34
stories represent, but also our
1:34
understandings of the places we
1:37
are in our history and therefore
1:37
our collective future? Welcome
1:42
to Fulbright Forward, a podcast
1:42
that explores the concepts of
1:44
diversity access, equity,
1:44
inclusion and justice in the
1:48
Fulbright Program and the work
1:48
of Fulbright participants around
1:51
the world. I am Jeremy
1:51
Gombin-Sperling the Fulbright
1:54
Diversity and Inclusion Liaison
1:54
for programs in the Western
1:56
Hemisphere. On today's podcast,
1:56
we feature esteemed Jewish
2:00
Uruguayan anthropologist,
2:00
teacher, fiction author, and
2:04
Fulbright alumna, Dr. Teresa
2:04
Porzecanski. During today's
2:08
episode, Dr. Porzecanski and I
2:08
talk about her history of
2:11
anthropological work and it
2:11
would require on the Uruguayan
2:13
Jewish population. In tracing
2:13
this genealogy, we learn about
2:17
Dr. Porzecanski's efforts to
2:17
preserve the stories of many
2:21
Uruguayan Jews through her
2:21
qualitative research and the
2:23
impact that it had. This
2:23
discussion also led us into
2:27
reflecting on the nation state
2:27
as a concept, how nations build
2:30
narratives to advance certain
2:30
goals often at the cost of those
2:33
most marginalized by it often
2:33
intending to erase their
2:36
stories. Finally, we talk about
2:36
Dr. Porzecanski his career as a
2:40
writer of novels, and how her
2:40
work as a Jewish academic and
2:43
author have informed each other.
2:43
What becomes clear in this
2:47
conversation is that academic
2:47
research, fiction writing can
2:51
all have a social consciousness.
2:51
The stories we gather can do
2:54
more than just preserve the
2:54
diverse histories of communities
2:57
and people. The sharing of
2:57
stories are a mode to shift
3:00
consciousness, to reevaluate
3:00
much of what many of us thought
3:03
to be true, to better realize
3:03
the complexity of those around
3:06
us, and those who lived before
3:06
us. I hope you enjoy this
3:10
wonderful episode with Dr.
3:10
Porzecanski.
3:15
Teresa, thank you so much for
3:15
being part of this episode of
3:17
Fulbright forward.
3:19
Thanks to
3:19
you for inviting me.
3:22
I'm just curious if you could talk a little bit about just like, what
3:24
experiences led you to your
3:28
research and work in
3:28
anthropology, and you know, to
3:32
your Fulbright grant and just
3:32
kind of what led you to begin to
3:35
study the Jewish community?
3:38
Yeah, of
3:38
course, well, I had experiences
3:41
of several anti, antisemitism,
3:41
when I was a young girl in
3:47
public school, two or three
3:47
experiences. Then when I grew
3:51
up, I realized that the Jewish
3:51
community, in Uruguay and being
3:55
a minority, you know, was
3:55
receiving in subtle ways. I
4:01
wouldn't say that it was
4:01
apparent or really a
4:07
manifestation, but in several
4:07
ways, all these accumulated
4:14
social prejudices that had been
4:14
during the Second World War and
4:19
before much before that, I first
4:19
became a social worker. Because
4:27
I thought, things I could change
4:27
some things and help people to,
4:33
you know, to read reality in a
4:33
different way. But soon I
4:37
realized that that the deep
4:37
causes for for social prejudice
4:43
had to be identified and
4:43
researched in each society in
4:49
each social group, very
4:49
specifically. So I became an
4:53
anthropologist and then also, I
4:53
studied hermeneutics and also
5:00
The communication tools and
5:00
philosophy are also because I
5:06
wanted to really discover why
5:06
why societies create social
5:13
prejudice, I guess ethnicities,
5:13
minorities, small social groups
5:21
that are seen as different,
5:21
including the afrodescendant
5:26
groups, or including religions,
5:26
religious groups that are not
5:32
traditional, or were not
5:32
traditional in the history of
5:36
Uruguay, and Latin America,
5:36
like, for example, the beliefs
5:41
that the slaves brought and
5:41
recreated in Latin America. So
5:47
all these questions led me to
5:47
Anthropology and then then I
5:52
realized that Anthropologycan
5:52
give some hypotheses. But
5:57
anthropology doesn't have the
5:57
ultimate, the ultimate reason or
6:04
explanation for these.
6:07
Thank you so much. Yeah, no, I think that's a really helpful answer
6:08
this kind of understanding what
6:11
led you to anthropology as a way
6:11
of doing this sort of analysis
6:15
that came in-- sounds like from
6:15
experiences you had, but also
6:18
began to look at some of the
6:18
different communities you wanted
6:20
to help or support. I had a
6:20
personal interest, of course, in
6:24
doing an episode on this theme
6:24
around, um, specifically
6:27
understanding the history of
6:27
Jewish communities in Latin
6:30
America. And you know, one thing
6:30
I know that a lot of your work,
6:34
as you named earlier has
6:34
revolved around doing that work
6:37
and doing that study through an
6:37
anthropological lens in Uruguay,
6:40
particularly, you know, as me as
6:40
a US as a US person who's
6:46
Jewish, whose family, you know,
6:46
has the diaspora story of
6:49
escaping the Holocaust and
6:49
terror in Poland. You know,
6:53
many, most of my family ended up
6:53
in the united states, but some
6:57
also ended up in Brazil. And
6:57
some of that was because the US
7:00
was not letting in Jewish folks
7:00
who are trying to escape at the
7:03
time. And what I've learned is
7:03
that I think many folks in the
7:07
diaspora, especially those in
7:07
the US don't always know about
7:10
the history of the Jewish
7:10
communities in Latin America,
7:13
which is just not Ashkenazi
7:13
communities, it's also Sephardic
7:16
communities and other groups
7:16
within the Jewish Diaspora that
7:19
also came in waves prior to, you
7:19
know, the 30s into the 40s. So
7:24
I'm just curious, as you know,
7:24
as a scholar, like, what do you
7:27
believe are just important
7:27
aspects or historical moments
7:31
that people should know more
7:31
about in order to understand the
7:35
Latin American Jewish
7:35
experience? And again, knowing
7:37
it's a large question if you'd
7:37
rather use or just speak to
7:40
Uruguay, as the example and what
7:40
you know, from your work
7:43
absolutely fine, but really just
7:43
want to explore that, that
7:46
question of the important
7:46
historical moments in sort of
7:49
the development of Jewish
7:49
communities throughout Latin
7:51
America, or specifically
7:51
Uruguay.
7:54
Well, I was
7:54
led to, to research and to make
7:59
visible this situation minority.
7:59
You know, like, I understood
8:04
that prej- social prejudice has
8:04
many reasons in order to
8:10
recreate it. But one of the
8:10
reasons is, one of the reasons
8:14
is that people knows little or
8:14
nothing about this minorities.
8:20
So it is seen as something that
8:20
they cannot understand, no, it's
8:27
going to be created as a virtual
8:27
enemy, or it's going to be
8:32
created. I am a constructionist,
8:32
that's why I'm speaking in this
8:37
way, like, of all the hypotheses
8:37
that are on this problem of
8:41
social prejudice. The main thing
8:41
is that you create this enemy,
8:47
whatever it is, the enemy you
8:47
create the people creates this
8:51
enemy, in order to find their
8:51
own identity as we, as we have
8:58
sent us. And so So I started to
8:58
make this of all the reasons to
9:04
research on the Jewish community
9:04
through qualitative research,
9:09
that is oral history and
9:09
autobiographies of people that I
9:15
well, I have. Now this is the
9:15
third edition of this book. Life
9:20
started here, tuition me grant
9:20
in your way. When they tell
9:25
their own stories, it's visible
9:25
that they weren't the voluntary
9:30
migrants. They didn't come from
9:30
Europe and because they wanted
9:34
to make a better life as was, as
9:34
you could say about the
9:40
migrations before the First
9:40
World War. No, these people came
9:44
because they were pursued,
9:44
because they couldn't stay,
9:47
because they were expelled. And
9:47
then the this concept of
9:52
migrants in the case of the
9:52
Jewish minority is more near to
9:58
the concept of refugees. So not
9:58
voluntary migrants, you could
10:02
think of voluntary migrants when
10:02
the Spaniards and the Italians
10:07
came during the 19th century. So
10:07
there's a saying in Uruguay, you
10:12
know, where did the Uruguayans
10:12
come from. And there's a famous
10:17
author who said, they come from
10:17
the boats, because that, they
10:21
indigenous and native peoples
10:21
had been, they were
10:24
exterminated, their demography
10:24
was very low, so they weren't
10:29
many. And so this land was void
10:29
practically. And so the
10:35
Spaniards and the Italians, the
10:35
two big immigrations during the
10:40
19th century were founders of
10:40
the, of the country and creators
10:46
of the culture. Okay, so this
10:46
minority of Jewish immigrants
10:51
that comes after the First World
10:51
War, and during the 20s, and the
10:56
30s, were refugees that were
10:56
expelled from their countries.
11:03
And many times, they were at the
11:03
limits, at the limits of being
11:10
murdered or being exterminated
11:10
by other means. So that's why
11:16
what I showed through the,
11:16
through the autobiographies is
11:22
they really are telling how, how
11:22
did they immigrate and why, why.
11:28
In those times, of course, this
11:28
parting was saying forever, I
11:33
will not see you, like the old
11:33
people had to stay there, old
11:37
people, the elders have to stay.
11:37
And there was a real parting and
11:42
a real transculturation, I would
11:42
say in their own life. The first
11:48
edition was like, you know,
11:48
immediately everybody, the, the
11:52
Jewish community read about
11:52
themselves also, and the
11:56
non-Jewish people read about the
11:56
Jewish community, which is a way
12:01
of, you know, learning history,
12:01
is a way of bringing conscience
12:06
about who is who. Also, it had
12:06
great, great consequences for
12:14
the Jewish community, Ashkenazi,
12:14
Spehardic, Mizrahim in Uruguay,
12:21
because when the Jewish
12:21
community was able to see that
12:25
somebody wrote about them, and
12:25
that their their own lives were
12:29
important, as an experience,
12:29
that is not only individual, but
12:35
collective. This was a change
12:35
for them. They acquire more
12:39
strength to be eh in this new
12:39
country. And they're their
12:45
descendants also that are
12:45
Uruguayan, got the ability to
12:51
recognize that they have the
12:51
right they have the right to be
12:55
Jewish in a country that's free
12:55
of cults. I don't know that the
13:00
right translation is you can be
13:00
of any religion, according to
13:04
the Constitution in your work.
13:04
So you also can be Jewish.
13:09
Then when I realized that other
13:09
minorities came in, to knock to
13:14
my house and said, the
13:14
Armenians, we want to do a
13:19
bookexactly. Then
13:19
Afrodescendants, so we want to
13:22
do a book and you have to teach
13:22
us and they did. This was a real
13:27
experience, I was able to put on
13:27
the general agenda, the ex, the
13:33
existence, existence of
13:33
different histories of different
13:40
minorities, and they that change
13:40
the whole were way of looking at
13:48
the Uuguayan society instead of
13:48
being a homogenous sort of
13:54
collective, they could realize
13:54
there were differences and the
13:59
differences should be recognized
13:59
and respected. So I did a book
14:05
of history, of the exclusion of
14:05
Afrodescendants. Also, I did
14:10
this with the autobiographies
14:10
and with oral history together
14:16
with a colleague, Beatriz Santos
14:16
and the Armenians did their own
14:22
book. And then something
14:22
wonderful happened, like the
14:26
government decided to to honor
14:26
this differences of minorities
14:32
having Day of the Immigrant.
14:32
With that in this day of the
14:37
immigrant that was going to be
14:37
every years of celebration. So
14:43
so the thing that started as a
14:43
research on the small Jewish
14:49
community in your way that got
14:49
bigger and bigger and changed in
14:54
many ways, their way of
14:54
interpreting differences and in
14:59
my own way of seeing this, also
14:59
brought a less possibilities of
15:05
growing social prejudices. All
15:05
things are related, one to the
15:11
other. And when an intellectual
15:11
presents real research that is
15:18
academic, but it's also moving
15:18
the conscience, the social
15:23
conscience, I think that's why
15:23
social sciences are for. Now
15:28
they are not for writing papers
15:28
that no one reads; is for
15:33
changing the social reality is
15:33
her letting prejudice not to
15:38
exist? Isn't understanding isn't
15:38
understanding who I am? Who are
15:44
we? That that's it?
15:46
I guess what I'd like to ask this back to the Jewish communityin
15:48
Uruguay and your research is, it
15:52
makes sense because we come from
15:52
so many different places in the
15:55
world and different ways of
15:55
understanding Judaism. And that
15:57
not not every Jewish person
15:57
realizes the true diversity of
16:01
Jewish people. And so I'm
16:01
curious in your research, how
16:06
that has impacted both your
16:06
experience as an Uruguayan
16:10
Jewish woman and also just like,
16:10
how the Jewish communities
16:14
perhaps within Uruguay have
16:14
reflected on that as well too,
16:17
of just like learning about that
16:17
history, learning about that
16:20
diversity and learning more
16:20
about like the existence of
16:23
other Jewish people, if that
16:23
makes sense.
16:26
Of course,
16:26
the Jewish community didn't know
16:30
except for their own
16:30
intellectuals that weren't many,
16:34
how they they came, why they
16:34
came. They knew their own lives,
16:40
they, each individual's, but
16:40
they didn't know that the
16:44
Sephardic had different ways of
16:44
praying and different rituals
16:49
from the Ashkenazi. They didn't
16:49
know that there were Yiddish
16:55
elementary schools that were
16:55
making emphasis on the Yiddish
17:01
learning and not the Hebrew
17:01
lamb. They didn't know that the
17:04
Mizrahim had different ways of
17:04
performing the rituals, and
17:12
practicing religions. So this,
17:12
this book also made this
17:17
affirmation. In a way this is
17:17
kind of saying, okay, we are we
17:24
but inside a we, there's a lot
17:24
of differences. And there were
17:29
groups that are Zionist, there
17:29
are groups that are not Zio,
17:34
Zionist, there are groups that
17:34
are left wing groups that are
17:38
against the left wing, there are
17:38
groups are groups, por-Yiddish,
17:42
and there are groups pro-Hebrew.
17:42
And so this was able to be seen
17:48
in the book. Then there were
17:48
other students of mine, and
17:54
colleagues that started to go on
17:54
specifically, on the Jews that
18:00
came from Germany. There were
18:00
theses and PhD papers about
18:07
specifically some of these
18:07
subcommunities inside the Jewish
18:13
community. So when I started the
18:13
gateway to a lot of
18:18
developments, and then also what
18:18
I started as qualitative
18:25
research was very much accepted,
18:25
because you cannot work with
18:29
statistics. It doesn't mean the
18:29
statistics do not show what was
18:35
the real reason why the Jews
18:35
came to Latin America and to
18:39
Uruguay. And then then we I had
18:39
the opportunity two years ago to
18:45
go to the University of Florida,
18:45
who was doing an exhibition of
18:50
the publication, publications of
18:50
the Jewish communities, all over
18:55
Latin America. We found all
18:55
kinds of books in Hebrew, in
19:00
English, of all kinds of
19:00
ideologies, within Judaism, like
19:05
those that are not religious,
19:05
that those are very, very
19:09
religious. So, what is important
19:09
as you ask is to see this
19:14
diversity, and not to stereotype
19:14
a Jewish community as a
19:20
homogeneous, collective, because
19:20
they aren't. So every-- all
19:25
these is a lot in terms that if
19:25
my first book about this subject
19:34
was in 1986, all that has
19:34
happened in in the Uruguayan
19:40
society since 1986 to the
19:40
present there has to do with
19:46
this new way of moving thoughts
19:46
and moving the social
19:51
constructions to, to... from
19:51
homogeneity, to diversity, and
19:58
indirectly to lower social
19:58
prejudice.
20:01
I think what's interesting for me is I've tried to do more to
20:03
learn about the histories of my
20:06
family. And I think what I've
20:06
also learned is just a lot of...
20:10
a lot of people in my family
20:10
still carry a lot of trauma from
20:13
growing up at a time where, you
20:13
know, it will and this may lead
20:16
into the next question of just
20:16
the focus was, for example, my
20:19
mom's generation of trying to
20:19
just be as American as possible,
20:23
trying to be as much in the U.S.
20:23
as possible, to assimilate as
20:26
much as possible because of past
20:26
antisemitism abroad. And then
20:32
new anti semitism, or maybe some
20:32
of the same in the U.S. At the
20:36
same time, the moment that I
20:36
would ask the question to family
20:39
of like, can you tell me the
20:39
story, I would get the story.
20:42
But it was just an interesting
20:42
thing of just sometimes asking
20:45
the question, because even with
20:45
my father, I asked about our
20:48
family's history, and he just
20:48
said, "we never talked about it
20:51
growing up." And so it's just
20:51
one of those things that, you
20:53
know, finding ways to access the
20:53
stories is so important, because
20:56
we don't want to-- I don't want
20:56
them to be lost. And I think
21:00
that's such a powerful thing
21:00
that you have done such work to
21:03
keep these stories alive for
21:03
people in so many ways.
21:06
One
21:06
consequence of this research and
21:10
this book, and all these change
21:10
in the way of seeing the
21:14
Uruguayans seeing themselves up
21:14
as diversity, as a diverse
21:20
society was at an elementary
21:20
school, there was a new task
21:26
that was given to the children
21:26
that was a genealogic tree, no?
21:32
Do your genealogical tree. Not
21:32
the, not only the Jewish
21:38
schools, but all schools, it
21:38
started to be important for the
21:42
teachers and for the persons
21:42
that you know that are
21:48
interested in origins and
21:48
sources that the children could
21:52
know where do they come from,
21:52
where they come from? Who was
21:57
your grandfather? He was
21:57
Italian. Where did he come from?
22:01
From this little town in Italy.
22:01
Okay, what language did he
22:06
speak? aAnd everything on that.
22:06
So I think the notion of being
22:15
foreign, it could be positive,
22:15
is positive, is positive, in the
22:21
way that the children started to
22:21
learn that they weren't born in,
22:28
like a plant. They are not
22:28
plants, they had their roots.
22:33
And the rotts was, well, the
22:33
grandfather and great grandfath-
22:37
fathers, and also including the
22:37
Jewish people. So every person
22:43
that's Jewish now, in your way,
22:43
will tell you okay, my
22:47
grandfather came from me from
22:47
Ukraine. Where in Ukraine? Well,
22:51
this little town, this schtetl
22:51
in Ukraine, that doesn't exist
22:57
anymore. And so this is a kind
22:57
of education that children in
23:02
all countries should have.
23:04
Yeah, I mean, that is, that is not part of, I know, a lot of
23:05
people's experiences actually
23:09
being asked to sort of really do
23:09
that building of your history at
23:13
such a young age, which I feel
23:13
like can deeply shape you know,
23:16
how you also value yourself if
23:16
you're able to learn more about
23:19
that. Moving on to the topic of
23:19
Uruguay, I think, just in
23:24
learning more about you and
23:24
doing some research, you know, I
23:27
came across some different
23:27
writings about just even how you
23:30
have uh taken time to sort of
23:30
look at Uruguay as sort of a
23:34
nation state, the political
23:34
project of constructing what is
23:38
Uruguayanness, what does it mean
23:38
to be Urugyayan? And, and a lot
23:42
of times that what that does is
23:42
it creates narratives and
23:45
stories, some that have truth,
23:45
some that may be to push
23:50
political means or certain
23:50
goals. And I know that you've
23:53
done a lot of these studies is
23:53
you've named right through the
23:56
extent setting the experiences
23:56
of others groups and communities
24:00
that have been marginalized by
24:00
the state, whether that's women,
24:03
indigenous people, you've talked
24:03
a lot about Afr descendant
24:06
communities. So I'm just
24:06
curious, like, how does that
24:10
work you've done on sort of
24:10
studying the kind of history
24:14
will require as a nation state,
24:14
how is that related to or just
24:18
informed the study you've done
24:18
of Jewish diasporic communities?
24:23
Yeah, well,
24:23
you started studying, studying,
24:26
researching minorities and you
24:26
and you and researching the
24:31
whole society. Because for
24:31
example, if you compare your way
24:36
to, to Peru, or to Mexico, right
24:36
the two big nations that I have
24:43
a lot of native, native citizens
24:43
coming from surviving cultures
24:51
after the conquest, but Uruguay
24:51
doesn't have that. Doesn't have
24:56
native. Yes Uruguay wanted eh,
24:56
the Uruguayan society after the
25:02
end of the dictatorship. They
25:02
created m,yths, you know, they
25:07
wanted to be more Latin American
25:07
because they were called like,
25:10
European, like a European
25:10
country. They did-- you wouldn't
25:14
come, you wouldn't see any
25:14
natives. So where are the
25:18
natives? They have been
25:18
exterminated. They were very
25:21
few. So you're surprised by the
25:21
emergence of this, like clubs or
25:28
ONGS that are revindicated,
25:28
revindicate. Reclaiming, for,
25:34
for for the native identity. We
25:34
are descendants from the
25:39
Charruas, we are descendants
25:39
from the Guaranis. Actually, the
25:43
Guaranis, we're not completely
25:43
exterminated. And some of them
25:49
could live inside the Catholic
25:49
societies. But they are not a
25:54
number that could change this
25:54
European face of the Uruguayan
25:59
society. But where I then
25:59
started studying why the
26:05
Uruguayans needed myths, myths
26:05
with which be more like the the
26:12
nations in Latin America that
26:12
really had really a great big
26:16
component of native cultures
26:16
like Mexico where they speak
26:23
more than 300 hundred dialects,
26:23
Peru, Bolivia, even a part of
26:28
Brazil in the north. So I
26:28
started to write a why the
26:34
Uruguayans wants wanted to be
26:34
more like the other nations of
26:38
Latin America. And that's
26:38
because they had a sense of
26:42
guilt. And there were then the
26:42
artists were start, start to
26:49
write some dramas, some plays
26:49
about extermination, the last
26:55
one extermination of natives at
26:55
Salsipuedes. Salsipuedes is a
27:01
place. They were trapped and
27:01
exterminated by the descendants
27:07
of Spaniards. And when I wrote
27:07
this, I realized I was
27:11
researching like, like the
27:11
constructions that societies do
27:17
in order to solve eh, problems
27:17
of blame or guilty, or
27:24
insecurities. Okay, that changed
27:24
the whole Uruguayan mentality. I
27:30
wouldn't say that my writings,
27:30
not only me, is what I work with
27:36
two great important historians
27:36
Gerardo Caetano and Barr√°n. We
27:43
wrote three books about the
27:43
sensibility. What are the
27:48
sensibilities? The way of
27:48
feelings, the way the society
27:54
thinks about itself. Okay, so so
27:54
that was very important,
28:00
especially when the dictatorship
28:00
ended. And there was a need of
28:05
reframe the national identity.
28:05
Who are we? So? Are we really
28:11
democratic? Are we really not
28:11
religious like atheism in the
28:17
government? Do we have beliefs?
28:17
What are those beliefs to? Do?
28:22
We wish that the native what
28:22
would., wouldn't have been
28:26
exterminated? So, so all these
28:26
constructions were a matter of
28:33
research. So understanding what
28:33
is Uruguay also gave me light
28:40
into why they should have
28:40
construct prejudice. And what
28:44
were the problems they have to
28:44
be part of this kind of
28:49
European, so different from
28:49
Middle America from, from these
28:55
big countries with a lot of
28:55
native population.
29:00
What I hear what I hear you're talking about is this series of
29:01
dictatorships that happened in
29:05
Latin America in the 20th
29:05
century in particular, right?
29:08
You know, Uruguay being one of
29:08
those countries as well, too,
29:11
but just sort of like the
29:11
rebuilding moment of like, how
29:14
do we kind of recover? It sounds
29:14
like also, there's these
29:17
questions of what is our kind of
29:17
like, collective guilt In some
29:22
ways? You know, what, what
29:22
questions do we have to resolve?
29:25
And I think what you have named
29:25
to is like, what myths or
29:28
stories do we either have to not
29:28
necessarily recreate, but keep
29:32
reproducing, to make this nation
29:32
story a "reality." And I use
29:38
that with quotes just to say
29:38
like, as you've named, right,
29:41
like, every person's experience
29:41
is different based on who they
29:44
are. So that reality of being
29:44
Uruguayan may feel much more
29:49
accessible or real to some
29:49
people than others, depending on
29:52
what their experiences in a
29:52
community but also as they're
29:55
treated by the state.
29:57
Yeah, I
29:57
guess you just said it very
30:00
well, also, what is the mirror
30:00
in which you look, you're, you
30:09
look at yourself as a society.
30:09
Uruguayans have had, according
30:15
to my point of view, had to
30:15
remake their own identity after
30:20
the end of the dictatorship.
30:20
There are many things that
30:23
happened during the dictatorship
30:23
that showed the country the way
30:30
they were interpreting
30:30
themselves. So many people
30:35
didn't want to recognize that
30:35
they collaborated with a
30:38
dictatorship. And not everybody
30:38
thought it, it was so bad,
30:44
because before that, we had a
30:44
years of terrorism, years of how
30:50
do you say, disorder? Then
30:50
there's also, there was a
30:53
research, not by me, but other
30:53
like reporters about how not
31:01
honest they were. So that now
31:01
everything is coming to light,
31:06
because there was time enough
31:06
for the people to confess how
31:11
they worked, and where they get
31:11
the money, how they, what they
31:16
do with the stolen money, stolen
31:16
from the government, and stolen
31:21
from the private sphere. And so
31:21
everything is coming to light
31:26
now. It's not a beautiful
31:26
photograph, it's ugly. It's
31:33
ugly.
31:34
When you say the mirror, I think it makes me think that if you are
31:36
going to look at the mirror, you
31:39
have to be ready to see
31:39
everything. You can't just look
31:43
at some pieces and ignore the
31:43
rest. Working off of this sort
31:47
of discussion, I think I'm
31:47
curious in the work that you've
31:51
done and even understan, even
31:51
just this, this different type
31:54
of analyses you put forward
31:54
around the Uruguayan nation
31:57
state like where where do you
31:57
understand as Jewish Uruguayans
32:02
kind of seeing themselves,
32:02
right, and the different
32:04
understandings of race, of
32:04
gender, of class, of nationality
32:09
within Uruguay. Knowing that, of
32:09
course, like Jewish people, like
32:13
any community carry multiple
32:13
identities and different
32:16
experiences that we, as we
32:16
discussed, but I'm just curious,
32:19
like, you know, because I think,
32:19
obviously, the U.S. is different
32:21
in many ways. But you know, we
32:21
have this very specific
32:24
understandings of race and
32:24
gender. Like we've had a lot of
32:26
conversations in the US about,
32:26
you know, are white Jewish
32:30
people white, things of that
32:30
nature. So I'm just curious,
32:33
like, in Uruguay, yeah, what,
32:33
when it comes to these
32:36
conversations of how Jewish
32:36
people see themselves within the
32:39
nation state, what does that
32:39
look like? Or what are those
32:42
conversations'
32:43
There's a
32:43
lot of assimilation, as the new
32:47
generations, there's a lot. And
32:47
also, there's a lot of going
32:52
back to the rituals and becoming
32:52
more religious. That's the other
32:57
trend as the young people, like,
32:57
trying to go back to the roots
33:03
of Judaism. Judaism has certain
33:03
values and ways of thinking and
33:09
interpreting the world that that
33:09
certain the new generation, some
33:13
of them, they don't want to
33:13
lose, then it is easier to
33:20
adjust and to disappear. That's
33:20
easier, because then you don't
33:25
care about antisemitism, you
33:25
don't care about anything. But
33:29
the foundation of of Israel was
33:29
very important for the Jewish
33:35
community in Uruguay. It was a
33:35
small community but many people
33:41
decided, well, I have to
33:41
collaborate with Israel. It's,
33:46
it's not any country. It's not a
33:46
country like all other
33:49
countries. It's a country that
33:49
for many is a result of this
33:55
long, long, long waiting to come
33:55
back to coming back. For the
34:01
very religious is, is it's a
34:01
prophecy that theJewish people
34:07
would go back to this place. Not
34:07
to any place, to this place. And
34:13
so there was a lot of Alliyah,
34:13
from the Jewish community, to
34:19
Israel, especially young people.
34:19
There were these Jewish younger
34:24
youth organizations like,
34:24
Hashomer Hatzair, like Idema,
34:31
like all kinds of youth
34:31
organizations that were
34:37
preparing to come to live in the
34:37
kibbutzim. There's going to be
34:42
this place where there is not
34:42
any antisemitism. So. so there
34:47
was a lot of Alliyah from the
34:47
Jewish so it was from 40,000
34:52
people like in the middle of the
34:52
of the 50s or at 1950, 4, 40,000
35:01
Jewish people. They descended to
35:01
12,000 because their elders
35:08
would stay. I don't say that
35:08
everyone in the Jewish community
35:13
came to Israel. I'm saying that
35:13
they left for different places,
35:18
mainly to Israel. But some of
35:18
them went to the U.S., some of
35:23
them to Europe, some of them to
35:23
look for their roots in Germany,
35:29
where they have been expelled in
35:29
Spain, where they have been
35:34
expelled from, right? And so
35:34
that's, that's why Judaism is so
35:40
interesting historically.
35:40
Because there's a lot of things
35:46
going on at the same time to to
35:46
build this kind of identity. Who
35:51
are we?
35:52
You
35:52
know, something I think I think
35:54
about two, which is something I
35:54
think you talked about in your
35:57
answer is also like, where is
35:57
our home? Yeah. You know, which
36:02
is an interesting question to, I
36:02
think, for any Jewish person to
36:05
kind of ponder because, you
36:05
know, we have the power of
36:08
making any place our home, and
36:08
what you also referencing is the
36:11
fact that there are lots of
36:11
people who, in the wake of the
36:15
end of World War II and other
36:15
things, were trying to either
36:19
find new places where
36:19
antisemitism did not exist or
36:22
also rebuild other places as
36:22
well.
36:25
Yes, yeah.
36:25
Yes. So so it's looking for the
36:30
promised land. And this promised
36:30
land is in your mind, because in
36:38
the real world, it's not so easy
36:38
to find the promised land, but
36:43
it's a nice idea for Judaism,
36:43
the looking for the promised
36:48
land. And this diaspora is, the
36:48
almost, is a way, a school where
36:57
we all have learned during
36:57
millennials, a lot of things we
37:02
have learned a lot of things,
37:02
things all over the world, as
37:07
all cultures, and then bringing
37:07
this back to this promised land.
37:14
I know you've done a lot of different kinds of work, that
37:15
your your your academic work is
37:19
not strictly on anthropology,
37:19
you've also been a writer of
37:22
novels and poetry. How was doing
37:22
that work formed everything else
37:26
that you've done?
37:27
Yeah, well,
37:27
they both informing each other.
37:32
They just like academic work has
37:32
its rules, it's meth-
37:38
methodology. But at this other
37:38
way of interpreting reality is
37:43
fiction, it's fiction. All
37:43
fiction still has some touch
37:49
with real experiences, there is
37:49
not a fiction completely
37:55
divorced, by personal
37:55
experiences, even if those
38:00
experiences are not shown
38:00
realistically, in a work of art.
38:07
I've written about seven novels.
38:07
They all have a Jewish
38:11
character, or more than one. And
38:11
it's funny because that many
38:18
writers, many Jewish writers are
38:18
maybe afraid or shy to write
38:24
with about Jewish characters. In
38:24
being born in Uruguay or in
38:30
Latin America. So of course, I
38:30
had this need to write stories
38:39
about, that are connected to my
38:39
personal life, either my
38:45
Sephardic family on my mother's
38:45
side, or on my father's side,
38:51
but so transformed that you
38:51
wouldn't recognize it. But of
38:56
course, then then there is this
38:56
relationship, or I feel there is
39:02
this relationship with these
39:02
characters that I, I've, I've
39:07
met so well. So I um, what is
39:07
uh, rather is surprising for me
39:14
that all the prizes I was
39:14
awarded in Uruguay they don't
39:21
ever mention I am Jewish. He'll
39:21
say, Well, they say Teresa
39:26
Porzecanski wrote this novel
39:26
that analyzed the text. They
39:31
should write, someone should
39:31
write that I'm really Jewish.
39:36
And because also the novel is a
39:36
Jewish novel. This is not any
39:41
novel. And this shows how I
39:41
think they don't touch this
39:46
subject. It's a way of putting
39:46
into a void the subject of my
39:52
Jewish identity, the fact that
39:52
led me to write about this
39:57
Jewish characters. It's not a
39:57
coincidence. So I'm very
40:02
grateful for their words and
40:02
everything. But I would have
40:06
liked somebody to study this
40:06
relationship between being
40:10
Jewish and going into specific
40:10
subjects.
40:15
What
40:15
would you like in the audience
40:17
listening to this episode to
40:17
take way from the conversation,
40:20
whether that's a particular
40:20
point you've made a mark, just
40:23
something you want people to
40:23
even think about who are
40:26
Yeah, well,
40:26
the obvious thing is that the
40:26
listening? Jewish migration is not just any
40:31
migration. It was, it came to
40:37
Uruguay, because of specific
40:37
reasons. They were refugees. The
40:43
government in those years, would
40:43
forbid, some, some boats and
40:49
some people to get into Uruguay
40:49
like denying the visas, the
40:54
visas, for getting into Uruguay.
40:54
So, this shows how the
41:00
Uruguayana society wasn't
41:00
different of all societies with
41:04
this accumulation of prejudice.
41:04
And when what I would like to
41:10
the people to understand is that
41:10
social prejudicethis is a
41:16
construction of stereotypes, a
41:16
simplification and
41:20
generalization that no society
41:20
can afford to have to maintain.
41:27
Because it's dividing. It's
41:27
going against the community, and
41:33
it's dangerous. It's dangerous.
41:33
And I want to thank you. I will
41:40
recommend the Fulbright
41:40
Commission to go on awarding
41:46
these scholarships, I think they
41:46
are very useful. So thank you, a
41:50
lot. Jeremy,
41:51
Thank you so much, Teresa, for your time today.
41:56
And that's all for this episode
41:56
of Fulbright forward. Thank you
41:59
so much for listening. For a
41:59
list of resources mentioned in
42:01
today's episode, you can go to
42:01
the Fulbright Forward website
42:04
hosted on our Buzzsprout page.
42:04
Remember also, you can subscribe
42:08
to Fullbright Forward through
42:08
your favorite podcast app like
42:10
Apple podcasts or Spotify, as
42:10
well as follow the podcast and
42:13
Instagram. Again I'm Jeremy
42:13
Gombin-Sperling Fulbright
42:17
Diversity and Inclusion liaison
42:17
for programs in the Western
42:19
Hemisphere. Be well stay safe,
42:19
and until next time,
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More