Podchaser Logo
Home
Railroad Unions Are Holding America Hostage | Congressman Rick Crawford

Railroad Unions Are Holding America Hostage | Congressman Rick Crawford

Released Wednesday, 30th November 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
Railroad Unions Are Holding America Hostage | Congressman Rick Crawford

Railroad Unions Are Holding America Hostage | Congressman Rick Crawford

Railroad Unions Are Holding America Hostage | Congressman Rick Crawford

Railroad Unions Are Holding America Hostage | Congressman Rick Crawford

Wednesday, 30th November 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

old is true to be self evident. That

0:02

all men are free.

0:03

There's a number of congress I get to

0:05

have a lot of really interesting people in the office.

0:07

Experts on what they're talking about. This is

0:09

gonna podcast for insights into the issues.

0:11

China, bio terrorism, Medicare for

0:13

all. In-depth discussions, breaking

0:16

it down into simple terms. We old.

0:18

We hold We hold these truce. We hold these

0:20

truce. With Dan Crenshaw. We hang on.

0:23

Since

0:24

the start of this pandemic, our country has been

0:26

repeatedly impacted by supply chain issues

0:28

that have impacted every mode of transportation. While

0:31

some of this was unavoidable, the problems are exacerbated

0:33

by COVID shutdowns and restrictions on energy

0:35

production. Latest crisis to erupt

0:38

is with railroads which are on the brink of a

0:40

labor strike that has the potential to grind

0:42

the country to a halt. This may catch

0:44

you by surprise since in September of the

0:46

Biden administration celebrated a tentative

0:48

deal suspiciously close to the election.

0:50

Now at the very last moment, the administration is

0:52

urgently pleading help from Congress

0:55

with the crisis that they created. So

0:57

how did we get here? What are the complicated

1:00

issues at hand? We're gonna ask

1:02

help for help with that to explain it. We're gonna be

1:04

joined by congressman Rick

1:06

Crawford from Arkansas first congressional district.

1:09

He serves as the ranking member on the

1:11

railroads. pipelines and hazardous materials

1:13

sub committee. Rick, thanks so much

1:15

for showing up. Yeah. We're

1:17

here in between votes and

1:20

back room trying to get this sorted out because this is

1:23

a this is a hot topic at the moment. Just

1:25

quick a couple of things about you, I think, or or

1:27

in just you listed the US Army Strata High School.

1:30

You served as an EOD tax. So appreciate

1:32

your your service there. I love our EOD

1:34

tax. That's for sure. Graduated

1:36

from Arkansas State with degree in agricultural business

1:39

and economics. I competed in

1:41

rodeos. You're

1:44

a a songwriter, song, guitar player

1:46

as well. I've just learned. So and

1:49

when did you get elected? When did you get elected? I got

1:51

elected in twenty ten. So this is some finishing

1:53

six turbines. Okay. So let's

1:55

just jump right into it. mean, what the heck is going

1:57

on? We've got a potential

1:59

strike to declines, December ninth.

2:02

Mhmm. Things we voted on today were

2:05

were basically congress

2:07

telling the the the unions

2:09

and the railroads that they have to take the deal

2:11

that is currently on the table. Where

2:14

do we even begin on this to help people understand

2:16

Yes. I don't I don't like that. This goes back to

2:18

a a nineteen twenty six law

2:21

that has to do with the Rail Labor Act.

2:23

That is what it's called. So the underpinnings

2:26

are there. I mean, there's statutory authority for

2:28

us to do what we did today, and there's precedent for it. It's

2:30

happened two or three times in the hundred years roughly.

2:32

that that law has been in effect. Doesn't necessarily mean

2:34

it's always the right thing to do per se.

2:37

We had a lot of people talking about the comparisons

2:39

to the FAA strike. years

2:41

ago under the with the Reagan administration, Apple's

2:43

and Orange's comparison because the FAA was

2:45

a federal workforce. Whereas, this

2:48

is a private sector. So I don't necessarily

2:50

like us weighing in on a private

2:53

sector matter. President Reagan had

2:55

a couple of things on his side that that

2:57

that Joe Biden doesn't have one. He had the,

3:00

you know, intestinal fortitude to say,

3:02

you come to work or don't come back at all.

3:04

And number two, I had the authority to do that as

3:06

the chief executive of the federal workforce. President

3:11

Donald Trump does with the FAA. on the FAA.

3:13

President Biden has neither of those. He doesn't have

3:15

any authority despite his claims of being

3:17

the most labor friendly union friendly

3:19

president in history. Yeah. He was not able to

3:21

close the deal. So he negotiated

3:23

a deal, a settlement that

3:26

was adopted by eight of the twelve unions.

3:28

Mhmm. And they they

3:31

did what was called a cooling off period to

3:33

review this tentative agreement. And

3:36

so as you mentioned in your opening comments, this goes

3:38

back to the fall prior to elections. And

3:41

that was, you know, saved the day because we've

3:43

got midterm elections coming up and we don't

3:45

need a rail strike prior to midterm elections even

3:47

further. So you mentioned this this particular

3:49

law. I mean, the law's intent is good. Right? It's

3:52

it's to make sure that if in case in

3:54

case unions and business and railroads can't

3:56

come to, like, some kind of deal government

3:58

steps in and says we will not stop having

4:01

railroads, like, because that would be devastating to our economy.

4:03

So I get it. Right? And it it it I

4:05

understand the intent probably not perfect. Maybe

4:07

maybe maybe anyone we're in power next year,

4:09

we should have. We can update that. Yeah. But

4:12

do they what so how often did these renegotiations

4:15

happen between the railroads the union. Well, and

4:17

that's the thing that I think probably traps most

4:19

people. It's somewhat arbitrary when

4:21

and when they can decide they want more money.

4:23

when can they say we're gonna we're gonna get into another

4:26

collective bargaining agreement because we're not

4:28

happy with our deal. Right? And so there was

4:30

some really some some negative information that

4:32

was put out there out of context about

4:34

paid time off related to sick days.

4:37

And, you know, most of these rail contracts had

4:39

at least three weeks as a baseline.

4:41

Yeah. And and as your senior already

4:43

grows, then that goes you you might go

4:45

to four weeks and five weeks and so on. The other

4:48

thing is where else can you go?

4:50

with with nothing more than a high school education

4:52

and make a hundred thousand dollars a year or even

4:54

more. Actually, like, the I'm sorry. I think the average

4:57

salaries we were looking at prior to this

4:59

deal, really a hundred and thirty thousand. I know. It's

5:01

it's it's and it's, like, not bad. It's not

5:03

bad. And so

5:04

then they get a twenty four percent raise.

5:06

They get, you know, fourteen percent of which would have been

5:08

immediate with the phase in of

5:10

the balance over forty five percent twenty

5:12

four percent raise is the deal

5:15

that Biden's PEB Of

5:17

of Yeah. The residential Residential emergency

5:20

board. Mhmm. So they come

5:22

in when when the industry is just not

5:24

working it out. Right? So so Biden signs these

5:26

people come in and negotiate

5:28

something. And this is what they came up. They kinda met in

5:30

the middle. Mhmm. And was

5:33

is sort of some broad agreement from industry

5:35

railroads and and unions. Like, okay. We kinda

5:37

met the middle. But then the unions or at

5:39

least the big unions got greedy again. Right.

5:41

and said, no, a twenty four percent increase.

5:43

It's not good enough. And pay is

5:46

not good enough. And so that chaps the ass of a

5:48

lot of Republicans here. Actually, we had a big

5:50

debate about it earlier this morning. Republicans were kind

5:52

of on both sides of this issue and the foe. Mhmm.

5:55

You know, those are the poll and there were some interesting

5:57

arguments about why. you

5:59

know, I I personally have certainly split because

6:02

I've got a lot of certain chemical industries

6:04

in my district. So they they cannot handle

6:06

rail stopping. No. on the

6:08

other hand, it's like we know Democrats are gonna pass it because

6:10

it's their mess that they created. And the truth the truth

6:12

of the matter is, you know, from what I'm hearing, I

6:14

wanna get your opinion on this. the Biden

6:16

administration negotiated this in a

6:19

way that was way too favorable to unions,

6:21

which made them greedy -- Mhmm. -- in the first place

6:23

-- -- as unions there's a particular

6:25

union culture that is very unique to America.

6:28

Mhmm. I I remember doing research on this when I was

6:30

in undergrad. Like, the differences between Germany

6:32

and the US and some of it, like, why are

6:34

are aware of exactly what I was researching about. The way the

6:36

reason our manufacturing, culture

6:38

was different. One of the main reasons in the

6:40

literature, it shows simply that the way unions

6:43

caves. Mhmm. The behavior of unions in

6:45

Europe is very, very different than it is here

6:47

here. It's like a it's like hostage taking. Oh, and

6:49

that's exactly what's happening here. Basically,

6:51

we have a two billion dollar gun at our head

6:53

every day -- Mhmm. -- if they

6:55

stop. Because let's be honest about it.

6:57

We we have problems with our throughout

7:00

transport mission. So you can't rely on

7:02

trucking to pick up the slack. Number one, we have

7:04

AAA deficit of drivers. Yeah. Some eighty

7:06

thousand drivers that we don't have positions

7:09

filled for. Number one, number two, they can't handle

7:11

the bulk commodity at the scale that the rail does. That's

7:13

the value proposition of rail. Number

7:15

three, pipelines aren't

7:17

pumping those commodities like they should be in.

7:20

You can't pump coal through a pipeline. Yeah. So,

7:22

you know, a lot of things you

7:24

can't go through a pipeline. And so you

7:26

can't what we have historically relied

7:28

on is that, you know, the interconnectivity of

7:30

our of our modes of transportation, you

7:33

know, rail is an extricable part of that.

7:35

take that out of the equation. And, yeah, you're looking at

7:37

about a two billion dollar hit per day, and this

7:39

is not about Christmas. Although, you

7:42

know, the timing is is is terrible. Yeah.

7:44

It's about the season. It's about we're

7:46

approaching winter or, you know, the northeast corridor

7:48

that relies heavily, say, for example, on heating oil.

7:50

Yeah. which is crazy. By the way, that's

7:53

a whole other conversation. Yeah. We can we can offer

7:55

that. We build pipeline for natural gas. Exactly.

7:58

You know, so I mean,

7:59

it it really

7:59

it it tees up a huge problem

8:02

for our economy.

8:03

But, you know, really

8:06

at the heart of this is the failure of the

8:08

president to

8:09

be able to negotiate this deal. This is a guy who's been

8:11

here since nineteen seventies. You knew Joe. We thought

8:13

he knew what he was doing. Yeah. And and he's the

8:16

guy that can fix everything. he

8:18

said that he was directly involved

8:20

with negotiations. And in his press secretary

8:23

came out twice and said he was not

8:25

directly by our vice versa. And and

8:27

but the point is one of the two of them thought he was

8:29

on the moon yesterday. So I mean So one of

8:31

the two of them were lying. I mean, and and

8:33

possibly both. Who knows? But the point

8:35

I'm trying to make is that this was punted to

8:37

congress to save face

8:39

for the administration. Right. Because he

8:41

couldn't close the deal. I'll make congress be

8:43

the bad guy here, but in the end, they

8:46

piled on this other bill.

8:48

Yeah. The h con res one nineteen,

8:50

which was basically a

8:53

a technical way for Pelosi

8:56

to say, I didn't add anything to the

8:58

bill. She said there will be no poison pills.

9:00

Mhmm. But then she put separate piece of legislation

9:02

supplementing it. Which is also why a lot of

9:04

Republicans voted again. Exactly right. The quote unquote

9:07

good piece of legislation, which is it's

9:09

still arguable whether it's good, but Right? But

9:11

but the basically what we were was a lot of political

9:13

insidership here. You're basically giving

9:16

them the base from which to

9:18

ad and the crap. It kinda feels like

9:20

this is this feels like sort of what happened

9:22

with the Mansion deal and IRA. It feels

9:25

a little bit like that. And so and so

9:27

let's let's explain the complicated political

9:30

procedure here now, the legislative procedure.

9:32

So those both pass out of the house.

9:34

Mhmm. That that second kind of poison

9:36

pill passed over one But it was just two

9:38

separate pieces of legislation. So do they get how does

9:40

this work with the senate? So the senate will can

9:43

either can pass either one or vote either one

9:45

down. Okay. I was under the impression would be combined? No.

9:47

It was not. They're not. And so I'm

9:49

not sure. Despite an awful

9:51

lot of populace over on the other side, I'm

9:54

not sure they have the votes to pass the

9:56

the hcon res one nineteen. Okay.

9:59

That's extraneous.

9:59

I think they will pass the underlying

10:02

bill but I don't know that they're gonna

10:04

have the votes to pass the big ugly mess.

10:07

And a lot of questions members had this morning.

10:09

They were good questions, and I I don't know that they

10:11

really got answered. lot of people this

10:14

is a complicated issue that has been thrust upon

10:16

a lot of us who don't deal with it every day really,

10:18

really quickly. And so we had a lot of interesting

10:20

questions, like, what happens if nothing gets

10:22

passed today? That that question wasn't

10:24

really answered. Right. What happens

10:27

if nothing gets passed today? can we propose

10:29

something else? Can we propose a a

10:31

twelve percent increase in pay? And so and

10:33

I understand why unions want an increase in pay

10:35

with inflation. I guess we're at. The

10:37

labor costs are increasing everywhere. Everybody,

10:39

whether you're in a union or not, know,

10:42

pay is increasing. I I would argue it

10:44

would increase just fine. a normal market rate

10:46

without unions and their meddling, but -- Mhmm. -- which

10:48

it is. And anyways, can you know,

10:50

that was the question some people had. Can we

10:52

propose a bill as Congress? Obviously,

10:54

wouldn't help us with this. That was just a twelve percent increase

10:57

in pay. Is is there precedent for

10:59

that? Sure. And and and that's the authority

11:01

that we have under the nineteen twenty So we can

11:03

go into that much detail. we could do that.

11:06

What

11:06

was done initially by

11:08

myself and and Sam Graves,

11:10

he's the the Republican leader on transportation.

11:13

we put the bill out there that basically

11:16

said the

11:16

PEB deal. Mm-mm.

11:19

Then the dim

11:19

set up crap, we're gonna have to pass this bill

11:22

Let's add one day of paid sick

11:24

leave. Okay. I mean,

11:27

one

11:27

day. Alright. What I mean, what

11:29

are you trying to do here? It's I'll go along with

11:31

that if that's what you gotta do. But

11:33

she says she speaker close. She says, but

11:35

we're not gonna have to do poison pills. And

11:37

then she follows up with a great

11:39

big voice of bill. Well,

11:41

there was no talk about what they already have

11:43

as a current contract. Of the three weeks

11:46

But that's such a typical thing in government

11:48

and all issues. Right? Democrats always make it

11:50

seem like program x never existed

11:52

before. Turn down. It was, like, twelve of them. They actually

11:54

want start another zero. They always There's every

11:56

issue. Every issue issue. That's why they had

11:58

an existing contract. They

12:00

were getting an improvement in their in their wages

12:02

-- Mhmm. -- and an additional day

12:04

off, and it wasn't good enough without them telling

12:06

us what the deal was that they had in the first place. That's

12:08

that was also some of the confusion. And

12:11

really what what really made a lot of

12:13

members mad was not knowing the

12:15

answers to these questions, and they weren't forthcoming.

12:17

We had to go to the rail carriers ourselves, ask

12:19

those questions. Really? Yeah. To because

12:22

the unions won't tell us. Yeah. So we had

12:24

to go to the rail companies to find this out.

12:26

And then all you know, the union contracts are essentially

12:28

the same. The rails do things differently. They might work

12:30

on different shifts, all those other kind of thing. But union

12:33

contracts, a union contract. So

12:35

eight of the twelve said yes to this

12:37

deal, by the way. Mm-mm. It was the

12:39

four big ones that control

12:41

a plurality of the union membership. So

12:44

they've got the inordinate influence. They

12:46

said no, and that's really where

12:48

the sticking point was. One one question

12:50

I have is unions work? Like, who said no?

12:52

Like, did they actually have to take a vote from their members?

12:55

Well, this is a question that has bothered me for

12:57

a long time. I from a a right to work state.

12:59

So I'm not necessarily with us. We really

13:01

have a union presence. Yeah. And so the union

13:03

presence in our state is very limited.

13:06

you know, rail is obviously an exception, but my concern

13:08

has been and and kinda always will be,

13:11

how much do the rank and file members actually

13:13

getting to weigh in on these issues? And

13:15

are they just blindly paying these union dues

13:17

as cost of doing business? Yeah. And who's to

13:19

say if they were just when independent, they couldn't get a

13:21

better deal in that market, especially for these

13:24

kinda skills. I'm gonna tell you something exactly. I'm gonna

13:26

tell you something that might make a real difference. If

13:29

your union dues were not withheld

13:31

in your check if you had to physically

13:34

write the check -- Mhmm. -- for your union

13:36

dues, you

13:37

might rethink a value proposition

13:39

of what you're paying the union bosses to do

13:41

on your behalf. Should make that a lot. That's I've talked

13:44

about it a bit. First off, I wanna

13:46

know is that a tax deductible item?

13:49

Is it is it a pretax withholding? But

13:51

is it a is it a withholding that is sort

13:53

of administratively handled so you don't feel it?

13:55

And you can't even get hired to these he's, if you're

13:58

not It's a real time union. He has to be. And so

14:00

it just goes against everything free

14:02

market. Oddly. self

14:05

esteem. Amazon's holding down union

14:07

in several locations. They didn't want party union.

14:09

You know why? because people wanna more of their money. That's

14:11

why. Yep. That's interesting. didn't know. And another

14:13

think it was you brought it up in conference too, is

14:16

that just a little fun fact for

14:18

the environmentalists out there that in the IRA,

14:21

they made any legal to build more rail without

14:23

union contracts, which would make it illegal

14:25

to build the this new interesting

14:27

electric autonomous railway

14:30

system being developed by Elon Musk is that? Right.

14:32

Sure. I mean, it was, like, they they want it doesn't mean they

14:34

brought it up, but that's a good point that they that

14:36

they have their hands and everything, and we sit back

14:38

and talk about how we need advance infrastructure investment

14:40

and all these things. What do you think the biggest cost of

14:42

infrastructure investment is labor? Yeah.

14:44

You know, so what we need to think

14:47

about in in terms of structure investment

14:49

by America. I mean, why are we allowing foreign

14:51

countries to come in and and even have a seat

14:53

at the table? The conversation we've been having just

14:55

as country over the last couple of years is

14:57

automation gonna kill jobs. Like, or nobody's gonna

14:59

have a job anymore. And I'm like,

15:01

look around. It is completely the

15:03

opposite problem. You need more automation because

15:06

we have It improves the labor shift

15:08

because the skill set improves. And and and that's

15:10

kinda what you want. Right? I mean, you you

15:12

want people with a fuller complement

15:14

of skills to be able to address these issues and be

15:16

able to grow into technology and do things

15:18

more efficiently. And and and and the more efficient

15:21

we are, the more environmental friendly we And I

15:23

guarantee, if you ask, even I I bet I bet

15:25

I can find something that we agree with on the unions. Is that

15:27

they probably don't have enough workers? Yeah. No. I think

15:29

that's But we can go into any category.

15:31

I think that's true. So, you know, this this this this this

15:33

strange fear of automation whether it's trucking

15:36

or rail or literally anything

15:38

is is always been a strange one to me. I mean,

15:40

nobody can find workers. That that's separate topic.

15:43

Alright. I we went through that pretty quick, and

15:46

I think I got the down and dirty, which is what

15:48

I wanted to do. What about is there anything we're

15:50

missing on the politics of this and the policy. Where

15:52

where now that this has passed, is it the

15:54

presidential signing is just kinda over, but that's

15:56

not really true either. They could come to a different deal

15:58

December ninth. So December

15:59

ninth is a drop dead day, but I can tell you this and

16:02

you mentioned this before and you're just you have the petrochemical

16:04

industry that's moving. has met.

16:06

They're

16:06

gonna stop right now. They're

16:08

not waiting to descend just doesn't get signed

16:10

because they've gotta they've gotta move their product

16:13

back to home base, and they don't have time. That was

16:15

a problem for me. This is why I was torn on this legislation.

16:17

So the hazmat carriers have

16:20

really they're really under the gun on this deal.

16:22

So they're not waiting till December ninth because

16:24

they can't afford to wait. They can't. Right.

16:26

So they have to start moving now. So this

16:28

is somewhat of a lifeline to the hazmat carriers.

16:30

However, between now and December

16:33

ninth, the

16:34

unions could come to some other agreement, and

16:36

as long as they agree with it, it trumps our

16:38

our legislation. Sorry to imagine

16:40

that. I really mean, why would why would why

16:42

would the the rail companies now

16:44

having this deal? companies have no they have

16:46

no incentive to to to go back to

16:48

the table and say, okay, we'll give you more. Yeah.

16:51

And and they've shown bad faith because eight

16:53

out of the twelve said yes, and the four whole unions

16:55

have shown The unions have show bad

16:57

faith. And so why would they go back to the table?

16:59

Now another good argument that a lot of

17:01

Republicans made, and this is because

17:03

this is frustrating. This is inflationary. I

17:05

mean, you're you're getting a twenty four percent you're adding

17:08

a twenty four percent extra cost to

17:10

the cost of doing business. this

17:12

is inflationary. And it never goes back. Yeah.

17:15

It'll never go back to the baseline. We're not this

17:17

isn't Walmart. We're rolling back prices to

17:19

serve you better. I mean, that's never gonna happen.

17:21

Yeah. So we have set, you know,

17:23

the race to the bar now for the cost

17:25

of rail and who pays for that to

17:27

consumer. And then the question

17:29

is because people are gonna be mad about that. Okay. Republicans

17:32

and why why did some Republicans vote for it? And

17:35

could we have done anything better. Like because

17:37

even I'm I'm thinking I'm trying to think through this even

17:39

if we were completely united against

17:41

it. The democrats still would have passed out of the house.

17:44

not sure, but Democrats could have passed that underlying

17:47

bill on their own. They had a bunch of Should we have said

17:49

should we have stood stronger? I don't I don't

17:51

know. It's The problem is then you risk shutting it

17:53

down. When you have this two

17:55

billion dollar, right, sword of Damocles

17:58

hanging over your head, that's it. Yeah.

18:00

That's the motivator. I mean, nobody likes

18:02

these are the kind of choices we have. Right. And nobody

18:04

likes being in that position. And And

18:06

so That's why I do those podcast is

18:09

because I like I like to to help people understand,

18:11

like yeah. You know,

18:14

it's it's easy to call somebody a rhino for

18:16

this or that. These things are issues

18:18

like this are actually very interesting. It's actually

18:21

rare that we get to have these kind of debates Well, you

18:23

know and I know that you

18:25

can devote no and you're fine. Yeah.

18:27

You can vote no on it. Why even hire a staff?

18:29

if you guys remember why the guys have voted no higher

18:31

staff. Just just get that money back to the taxpayer.

18:34

It's the entire staff. That's what I mean.

18:36

The point is it's hard sometimes to

18:38

vote. Yeah. This is one of those times when

18:40

you just gotta hold your nose and do it and look,

18:43

folks back home get it. We can't hold

18:45

this economy hostage as frail and

18:47

fragile as it is, courtesy of president Biden.

18:49

We can't hold this economy

18:51

hostage at

18:52

at a cost of two billion dollars a day. Right. And that's and

18:54

that's the argument for it. The argument's against

18:56

it. You've heard,

18:58

you

18:58

know, I'll I'll be honest, I voted against it.

19:01

But but, you know, we're I'm

19:03

on an iFetch here. Right? Just just like we

19:05

all are. A lot of Republicans are split

19:07

on this. And so I wanted to explain

19:09

that to the public. Mhmm. think it's an interesting topic.

19:11

Right? Thank much for being on. They're calling us back in because

19:13

we gotta go vote on. Yet another contentious

19:15

subject. We gotta have a podcast on that one too.

19:18

That is a perfect episode. Thanks, man. Appreciate

19:20

it. Of course, Rick. Thanks.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features