Podchaser Logo
Home
James Carville Says Wokeness “Is Over,” 2024 Will Be “Dangerous”—and Much More from the Democratic Political Icon

James Carville Says Wokeness “Is Over,” 2024 Will Be “Dangerous”—and Much More from the Democratic Political Icon

Released Wednesday, 4th October 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
James Carville Says Wokeness “Is Over,” 2024 Will Be “Dangerous”—and Much More from the Democratic Political Icon

James Carville Says Wokeness “Is Over,” 2024 Will Be “Dangerous”—and Much More from the Democratic Political Icon

James Carville Says Wokeness “Is Over,” 2024 Will Be “Dangerous”—and Much More from the Democratic Political Icon

James Carville Says Wokeness “Is Over,” 2024 Will Be “Dangerous”—and Much More from the Democratic Political Icon

Wednesday, 4th October 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

This episode is brought to you by Shopify.

0:04

No matter how big you want to grow, Shopify

0:06

gives you everything you need to take your business

0:08

to the next level. Shopify is

0:10

the commerce platform that makes it easy

0:13

to show up and sell exactly the

0:15

way you want to.

0:16

No need to code or design. Sign

0:18

up for your $1 per month trial period

0:20

today. Visit shopify.com slash

0:23

offer 23 to get started.

0:25

Hi, Honestly listeners. Mary here

0:27

with some amazing news. Many

0:30

of you have been asking when you'll be able

0:32

to watch the sold out debate we hosted

0:34

in Los Angeles a few weeks ago. You

0:37

know the one we've been talking about, the one where we finally

0:39

and definitively answer the question of whether

0:41

the sexual revolution failed. The

0:44

great news is that you can finally

0:46

watch it for yourself. All you

0:48

have to do is become a free press subscriber

0:50

for $8. It's less than the price of

0:52

a decent sandwich. You get to support all

0:55

of our journalism and of course this

0:57

show. We're releasing the film

0:59

of the debate this week for free

1:01

press subscribers and you are going to love

1:03

it and not just because of Grime's unforgettable

1:06

outfit. So head over to thefp.com

1:10

forward slash debate and become

1:12

a subscriber to the free press today.

1:15

Okay, onto the show.

1:17

I'm Mary Weiss and this is Honestly. Two

1:24

weeks ago I was in Austin for the Texas

1:26

Tribune Festival where I interviewed

1:28

America's best known democratic

1:31

political consultant.

1:32

He is so yesterday if I think of yesterday,

1:34

if I think of an old calendar, I think of George Bush's

1:36

face on it. James Carville.

1:41

You've probably heard of Carville. He's been on the scene for

1:43

a very long time. He's almost 80 and

1:46

has worked on countless campaigns.

1:47

Somebody who's been through a lot of tough elections,

1:49

James Carville is known as the raging Cajun

1:52

in the business. But his most prominent victory

1:54

was Bill Clinton's improbable run for

1:56

the presidency in 1992, which

1:59

was captured in the

1:59

incredible documentary, War Room.

2:02

It's about George Bush and Roger

2:04

Ailes and George S. Mosbacher

2:07

and the whole sleazy little cabal of them that

2:09

want to keep hold of anything and that want to knock

2:11

anybody off that we believe in and

2:14

anything that we care about and if we beat

2:16

them.

2:17

Some people I know watch Notting Hill as a

2:19

comfort movie. For me, it's War

2:21

Room, which tells you a lot about who I am. Because

2:23

if they knock us off, then so what?

2:25

The next one that comes up, they're going to knock the next one

2:27

off. So

2:33

you can imagine my excitement when I went to meet

2:35

Carville backstage before the interview and

2:38

noticed that he was wearing the exact same

2:40

purple, gold and green LSU

2:43

striped polo that he wears throughout

2:45

War Room. I laughed because it's

2:47

pretty ridiculous

2:48

to show up wearing a 30-year-old shirt

2:49

and I'm pretty convinced it was the same one. But

2:52

really it was also fitting and symbolic. A

2:54

whole lot has changed in American politics

2:56

over the last 30 years. But Carville's

2:58

style, blunt, unconventional,

3:01

often right, has not.

3:03

The Western far

3:05

left is habitually

3:07

the most stupid naive people you could

3:09

have had.

3:12

The people closest to Carville have other

3:14

ways of describing the

3:15

political icon. Political consultant

3:17

James Carville, who is Bill Clinton's top campaign

3:20

strategist, is, quote, a pathetic and

3:22

stupid country bumpkin. His

3:25

former

3:25

business partner, Paul Bagala, has

3:27

said that James lives in a border

3:29

town between genius and madness.

3:32

His wife has said simply, he really

3:34

is a nut. Speaking

3:37

of his wife, Carville's famous for a lot

3:39

of things. He coined the phrase,

3:40

it's the economy, Susan.

3:42

But perhaps what he's most well known for

3:45

is his marriage to Mary Matlin. They

3:47

presume and they accuse conservatives

3:50

of racism and they rush to judgment. A

3:52

Republican Party political consultant

3:55

who served under Reagan and was campaign

3:57

director for George H.W. Bush.

3:59

I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm

4:02

sorry. And then they want to have a national

4:04

dialogue. I'm not having this conversation as safe as

4:06

him does. I'm sorry. You want to have a conversation.

4:09

I know.

4:09

I'm sorry. But the

4:11

person... When he married Mary in 1993, the press

4:13

called it a stunt marriage and speculated

4:16

it would end soon after. But

4:18

three decades later, Carville

4:20

and Matlin have proven them wrong. What's

4:22

the number one thing you fight about? The

4:24

air conditioning house.

4:27

We don't really fight. We're not

4:29

good fighters. We're kind of powered

4:31

or passive aggressive. And I think the reason

4:33

for that... At a time where most single people indicate

4:36

their partisan preferences right next to their height

4:38

requirements on dating apps, Carville's

4:40

high profile bipartisan marriage

4:43

is a pretty rare thing to witness. And

4:45

like his striped LSU shirt, it

4:47

says a lot about who he is and what

4:49

he truly values. Our

4:53

conversation was a blast. And in large part,

4:55

that's just because James Carville is an incredible

4:57

talker. He comes up with these phrases I've never

4:59

heard of. Some of them are maybe Southern.

5:02

Others are just incredibly funny.

5:04

But it was also fun because of the people

5:06

in the room that day in Austin. I want

5:09

you to picture an auditorium crammed,

5:12

standing room only, with about 300 Rachel

5:15

Maddow diehards. This

5:17

room hissed when I mentioned RFK Jr. They

5:21

booed before I could even get Joe Manchin's

5:23

full name out of my mouth. When

5:25

I asked if anyone in the room identified as a

5:27

conservative or even a libertarian, only

5:30

one hand went up and belonged to

5:32

a free press staffer. All

5:34

of which is to say it made the interview more

5:37

contentious than it would otherwise have been and

5:39

that made it more fun. Today

5:42

you'll hear James Carville and I talk about 2024,

5:46

whether or not he thinks Joe Biden is too

5:48

old to run again. Why he thinks Kamala

5:50

Harris has been given unfair treatment in

5:53

the press, I disagree. The

5:55

direction of the Democratic Party, why

5:57

he thinks Woke-ness is over, I also

5:59

disagree. And of course little

6:01

things like Trump his indictments

6:04

and the future

6:05

of America We'll be right

6:07

back

6:20

James Carville really happy to have you here. Well, thank

6:22

you I

6:26

Love doing this event I get to see

6:28

so many people and you know enough

6:30

I love Austin so it's great all the way

6:32

around and you know If you're really communities really

6:34

fortunate to have something like

6:36

the Texas Tribune and it puts on events

6:39

like this This is a nice deal thing, you

6:41

know, plus, you know, you know, you are

6:43

you know border some college You were telling me and

6:46

I think there's a college down the street here You

6:49

know, honestly, I love college at

6:51

the best four years of my life was spent as a sophomore

6:53

at LSU

6:59

Okay, let's get right into it I want

7:01

to read you Part of a speech

7:03

that the president gave about a week ago in

7:05

Vietnam The Indian looks

7:08

at John Wayne and points to the Union

7:10

soldier and says he's a lying dog-faced

7:12

pony soldier Well, that's a lot of

7:14

lying dog-faced pony soldiers out there

7:17

about global warming remember the famous

7:19

song. Good morning Vietnam I

7:21

could go on with examples, but I'll give you just a

7:23

few more on September 11th The president claimed

7:25

that he was at the World Trade Center the day of the

7:28

attacks. He was not last

7:30

month He claimed to have witnessed the bridge collapse

7:32

in my hometown of Pittsburgh in 2022 He

7:35

didn't in another speech recently He claimed

7:38

that his grandfather had died just days

7:40

prior to his own birth at the same hospital, which never

7:42

happened I could go on so a

7:44

Wall Street Journal poll taken last month found

7:46

that 73% of voters said

7:48

that Biden is simply too old to run

7:51

for reelection Do you agree if

7:53

Biden too old to be president and if he's certainly

7:55

too old to be president again

7:57

in your view So let me make a macro

7:59

statement in our land answer your question. I

8:01

checked this morning, according to the clock

8:03

at the Census Bureau, there are 333 million, 495,611 people

8:05

currently live

8:11

in the United States. I

8:13

think we could find two under 75 to run for President.

8:19

That's my general view. Look,

8:21

I think there's a lot of things that

8:23

I would culturally do like

8:25

about Biden. He's tenacious,

8:27

he's been in politics, he's been

8:30

beat up, he's survived, he's come

8:32

back,

8:33

he's a state school guy, but deep

8:37

down inside, I wish

8:39

I wish you wouldn't do this.

8:41

I just feel like the country is just

8:43

busting at the seams to

8:46

get a new generation in there. I mean,

8:49

I can't do anything about the other

8:51

guy, but I do think that

8:53

different times in a country's history where it just

8:55

goes through periods, and I

8:57

do think that right now this country is the period

9:00

where, and I'll say this, if somebody's

9:02

gonna be 79 in about a month from now, sometimes

9:06

you got to give other people a shot at this, and

9:08

people see the Democratic

9:10

Party and they think we're open. The truth of

9:12

the matter is we got talent just screaming

9:15

all over this party, and I'd like to see some of

9:17

it get out and get showcased.

9:19

I think a lot of us imagined

9:21

when we were younger this idea of,

9:23

you know, the smoke-filled rooms, the party

9:25

machine sort of stepping in and making

9:28

decisions. One of the things I think a

9:30

lot of us maybe naively

9:32

have sort of been confronted with this idea that no

9:34

such machine exists, that the party

9:37

is simply voters, but are there people

9:39

around Biden trying to get

9:41

him to step aside?

9:42

Well, I'm not,

9:43

I think that what President Biden has, he's been

9:45

in politics a long time, I think he has employees. I

9:48

don't know how many actual peers he

9:50

has. Sometimes people have been in politics, they have friends,

9:52

they said, look, do this, you can't do that, and

9:55

the people that have been around him the longest I know are very

9:57

close friends of mine. I mean, don't talk to him that much

9:59

anymore. of Mike Doddlin, you

10:01

look at the war room, he was right by

10:04

my side in the 1982 campaign. We worked

10:06

together and started in 1986 in Pennsylvania

10:08

for Governor Casey, but they worked

10:11

for him. And it's like

10:13

he comes in and says, this is what we're going to do, and

10:15

they go do it.

10:17

And I think that they think, what they

10:20

say is, look, if you give where the economy

10:22

is and look at all the stuff we've got done, I think

10:25

by any standard measure we deserve

10:27

reelection. And if

10:30

he was 60, I would agree with that totally.

10:33

But my own sense is

10:36

that it's just one of these periods

10:38

in the United States where people

10:41

are looking for something different. And I think that

10:43

Biden, the Trump, if

10:45

we broke, if somebody gave people

10:47

an actual vote,

10:50

I think we'd do much better. But to

10:52

be fair, there's no evidence that he's

10:54

thinking about not running. And

10:57

there's no evidence that someone is thinking

10:59

about getting in. You

11:01

know, I've read most of my political life saying what

11:03

I think, and I'm probably not going to stop now.

11:07

So unless something dramatic

11:09

changes, we're looking at Trump

11:11

v. Biden, kind of rematch from hell in

11:13

a little under 14 months from now. And

11:16

many people believe that this is sort of set

11:18

in stone. We talked recently to Liz Smith,

11:20

a Democratic strategist, and she said

11:22

these parlor games are fun for some people to play,

11:24

but Joe Biden is going to be the presidential nominee

11:27

full stop. Let's indulge though

11:29

in a little bit of parlor games, if you

11:31

wouldn't mind, like, is there anything that

11:33

could upset what feels like a fiat

11:35

company?

11:35

I don't know. And

11:38

I really like Liz. I think she's

11:40

really smart. I think she's one of the really,

11:42

I call her up and comers. I guess she's

11:45

positive respected. And a

11:47

lot of people say, what are you doing? This

11:49

is decided, you know,

11:51

fall in.

11:54

And

11:55

I'll probably will have to. But

11:57

let me tell you, if this election were held

11:59

in to be very frank with you. I think if

12:01

Trump were reelected to be catastrophic, I

12:03

think it'd be the end of the Constitution. Okay?

12:06

And I don't think they're very,

12:09

they're telling you that. All

12:11

right? So we've been to the Constitution, I think

12:13

we've been living up to like March the

12:15

4th, 1789. And,

12:18

you know, we've had a pretty good run. So

12:21

we're not looking at somebody, we're not looking at Mitt Romney,

12:23

you know, George H.W.

12:25

Bush, Eisenhower. We're looking

12:28

at a

12:29

corrupt,

12:30

treasonous

12:32

guy that would ruin the country. So, but,

12:34

but if we said the election was

12:37

just November, let me just give you a hypothetical,

12:39

just to be fair, the election was just November.

12:41

I know it's not, you don't have to remind me. And

12:44

in candidates for Joe Biden, the

12:46

Democrat, Donald Trump, the Republican,

12:50

Joe Manchin, no labels, and Cornel

12:52

West, Green Party, Biden

12:54

would be an underdog. Okay.

12:57

He would be an underdog. Would be an underdog

12:59

that you would have a catastrophic

13:02

event in American history of

13:04

the first order. And

13:07

they're already saying, I'm going to get rid of everybody.

13:10

I'm going to get rid of civil service. I'm

13:12

going to get rid of an independent judiciary. I'm going to get

13:14

rid of everything. And they're telling you, they're

13:16

not hiding it from you. You

13:19

know, people say, well, James, Biden's

13:21

going to probably win if you get him and

13:23

Trump and you look at, you know,

13:26

so you go to the doctor that says we're

13:28

going to farm this test. You're probably going to be

13:30

okay. For the 60% chance it's fine. But the 40% chance you're going

13:32

to be paralyzed. You know, if you're going to say, shit, no, get

13:34

out of here, get away from me

13:37

with that. And that's

13:39

the way that

13:41

this thing

13:42

feels like to me, anything that we can do

13:44

to lessen the chance

13:46

for our old remained in time and

13:48

our children's remained in time or whatever, we have

13:51

a constitution. Cause that's, that's really what's, that's

13:53

what we're talking about. We shouldn't

13:55

kid ourselves and sugar coat this and

13:58

you know, we're two great parties and two today. and

14:00

Americans come together in the

14:02

tradition of, you know, going in a posh and buggy

14:05

and driving 20 miles and

14:07

canceling each other's boat. And you know, the other thing,

14:09

you hear these

14:10

assholes like the Cosmos Club,

14:13

and they're all around Washington, they go,

14:15

ah, it's institutions and

14:17

the rule of law, and democracy. And

14:22

shit, if you don't give people a choice

14:25

they want, that's the first role

14:27

of a democracy,

14:28

of a strong democracy, you give people

14:30

a choice at least some people are excited

14:33

about.

14:34

And if you look at the polls, I'm

14:37

just telling you what the polls say, and I'll say

14:39

it, it never changes. Somewhere

14:42

between 72 and 77 percent don't want

14:44

this charge. I will just give you

14:46

a consensus number of 75, between 72, 77, 75, 74 and a half,

14:48

I don't care.

14:53

I keep telling you this over

14:55

and over and over again.

14:58

So

15:00

that's the way I feel, Barry. I feel like this

15:03

would be catastrophic, and if you look at

15:05

what's going on,

15:06

there's some chance this guy could win

15:09

this election if we don't play this

15:12

really smart.

15:12

So if those are the stakes, and you look at

15:14

people who clearly want to

15:16

run for president at some point, whether

15:18

it's Gavin Newsom, Gretchen Whitmer,

15:21

Josh Appear, the governor in Pennsylvania,

15:23

why aren't they doing it?

15:25

You know,

15:27

first of all, and this sounds weird,

15:30

but people really like President Biden.

15:33

Okay, I know it sounds like if you

15:35

want a friend, buy a dog. I know

15:37

all that's true. To

15:39

some extent, and Democrats,

15:42

and I'm one myself, that's kind of

15:44

mean. You really shouldn't do

15:47

that. He's older. He's been

15:49

president.

15:50

You know, you got to let him decide

15:52

on his own terms.

15:53

I

15:56

don't know. I do notice

15:58

that the state of town...

15:59

talent in the Democratic Party right

16:02

now, right now,

16:04

is this higher level of talent I've seen in

16:07

any political party. I was

16:09

doing Bill Custer's podcast, as

16:11

he's here, and I said, you know, the 80

16:13

Republican field had all the experience.

16:15

I mean, it was Reagan and Dolan Bush

16:17

and I got all. But this, in

16:20

terms of just raw political talent, the

16:22

modern Democratic Party is full of it. Now, you

16:25

wouldn't know it

16:26

because it's like watching Secretariat

16:28

in the barn. Every horse looks the

16:30

same in the barn. You got to get it on the goddamn

16:33

track and see what it can do. But

16:38

trust me, there's real, real—and

16:41

it's not Bobby Kennedy, by the way. Well,

16:45

let's talk about Kennedy, actually, for a minute. No,

16:47

we have to. Go ahead. Why

16:50

not?

16:51

How do you explain his poll numbers?

16:53

Because he's not Biden,

16:56

okay? If somebody's like something and they

16:58

say, this system doesn't hear

17:00

me, and it was like Eugene McCarthy

17:02

against Lyndon Johnson. He was kind

17:04

of halfway—he was a senator from Minnesota, but he looked

17:06

like he was the kind of guy going to corner and read a book

17:09

before he'd like—and he

17:11

got 42 percent. No

17:14

one pays attention to Bobby Kennedy's crazy

17:17

things he says or does. To some people, he says,

17:19

well, he's a Kennedy. He must be okay. You know,

17:21

I remember them. But

17:24

to be generous, to give him the most

17:26

generous read, isn't the reason that

17:28

Kennedy is resonating because he is picking

17:30

up on so many of the themes that, frankly,

17:33

Democrats don't talk about anymore. The

17:35

power of big tech, for example,

17:37

in people's lives. The dignity of

17:39

the working class. Things that I thought

17:42

growing up were mainstays of

17:44

the Democratic Party that, frankly, they're not talking

17:46

about

17:46

as much anymore. Look,

17:49

the Democratic Party has kind of changed and become

17:52

more educated.

17:54

We've probably lost

17:57

a little of that. But you know, in terms

17:59

of the tech— stuff. What

18:01

did Trump do about the tech business when he was president?

18:03

Nothing. I don't know what you can do.

18:07

I think it's

18:09

a fair thing to say that

18:11

Democrats have sort

18:13

of lost their connection with working people.

18:15

Biden is the last thing

18:18

but a kind of coastal guy. I mean, you

18:20

couldn't explain to him what all this stuff was.

18:22

I mean, he's as regular

18:25

a guy as you can think, but that's so

18:28

not who

18:30

the people that vote in the party are.

18:32

And that's why I'd like to see a bunch of these

18:34

new candidates out there and people seeing

18:37

what they had to say.

18:38

Who are you most excited about? I'm not that.

18:40

Right. So just sound. I'm excited about

18:42

whoever Democrats pick. I'd like to

18:44

see seven people running

18:46

on a stage that had ideas

18:49

and had energy that could string a sense

18:51

together and then y'all decide who the hell you

18:53

like. But give somebody your choice.

18:55

Well, you know, she makes sense. He makes sense. I like that.

18:59

People think of it. I know this. You

19:02

go talk to people around the country. What

19:04

do you think of the Democratic party? They

19:06

think we're an urban old

19:08

party that we are there for people in the

19:10

cities and all of our leadership is old.

19:13

That's not true, but you

19:15

have to put people out there

19:17

and start talking about things where you will

19:19

change people's minds because the Republicans will

19:23

tell you all over again. It's just their old

19:25

sovereign just they care about people

19:27

not like you and the cities and that

19:30

kind of stuff. And good candidates

19:32

will give you sharp definition, will give you

19:34

concise messaging, will do things that good

19:36

candidates can do. And

19:38

that's why we need this.

19:40

The name you hear a lot among sort

19:42

of centrist Democrats and never Trump Republicans

19:44

these days is Joe Manchin. And there's this kind

19:46

of fantasy that Joe Manchin, I'm

19:48

just, okay.

19:50

Wow.

19:53

I am first of all, people say, what

19:55

is it like to be a moderate Democrat? And I have no idea because

19:57

I'm a liberal Democrat. Okay.

19:59

I'm pretty liberal, but mansion is

20:03

not. Are you with the crowd on that? I

20:05

like Senator Manchin. If you look, you

20:07

know, I'm not gonna like argue this, if you look

20:09

at the votes that he's been key on, judges,

20:12

Bill Backbatter,

20:14

all of the different stuff, and

20:16

a Democrat has not carried a county

20:19

in West Virginia

20:21

since 2008. And

20:23

so you have all of these people that

20:25

don't have to run in West Virginia, criticizing

20:29

Joe Manchin for trying to stay alive

20:32

in a state that you can't carry counties. I have

20:34

great, but he's not gonna be

20:37

a Democratic nominee or a factor

20:39

in national Democratic politics. Now

20:42

you could be in no labels, which

20:45

could in effect take some people

20:47

who can't stand Trump, but can't stand Democrats,

20:50

but maybe might vote for us. I don't think, I think

20:52

that, I don't know the happy ending of no

20:55

labels. I understand the

20:57

whole thing, but I don't think in

20:59

terms of national Democratic politics, Senator

21:02

Manchin wouldn't be that big a factor. He

21:04

probably ran no labels, but he's

21:07

got his own politics and they're not easy at

21:09

all.

21:09

I mentioned him only because he's one of

21:11

this kind of wish casting fan

21:14

fiction type stories that feel like

21:16

are happening right now in the conversation. Another

21:19

one of them is about Kamala Harris. There's a

21:21

lot of people who are saying, you

21:23

know what, we're stuck with Joe Biden. What

21:27

if we changed out Kamala Harris? What if Biden dumped

21:29

Kamala Harris and took a vice presidential

21:31

candidate who was more exciting to the base?

21:33

What do you make of that? Why are people throwing

21:36

out that idea? Is there anything to it at

21:38

all?

21:38

Well, first of all, if you

21:41

change with Harris, if people win the base that

21:43

really like her, secondly, it's a little bit unfair

21:46

because the president's approval rating is like 41.

21:49

Well,

21:49

the vice president can't go any higher,

21:52

so she has a kind of a ceiling of 41. So

21:54

she has the funds, but I

21:57

don't think that

21:58

we can flush all that. What I'd like

22:01

to see is

22:02

her and

22:03

about five or six other people start

22:06

running to acquire delegates and be on TV

22:09

and be on your own and see what

22:11

you can do and how good your ideas are to stand

22:13

up. But I think to some

22:16

extent she's being defined by

22:18

being in administration. Maybe

22:20

her approval is 35 and you say that's not very

22:22

good, but she couldn't be any higher than 41 if

22:25

she was perfect.

22:26

But come on. I mean, when she speaks, it's like veep.

22:29

Well, to you, sorry. I

22:31

mean, I'm

22:32

sorry. That's the way to you. Some

22:34

young person came to me and said that

22:36

that really, you know, some of that,

22:38

you

22:39

know, I don't not saying it is in your case

22:41

or in different cases, but I went through

22:44

this with Hillary every time a female

22:47

gets big in national politics, they

22:49

get accused of shrieking or, you

22:51

know, being fingernails

22:54

on the whiteboard. I think maybe

22:57

she's not the greatest public speaker in the world,

23:00

but a lot of the stuff that's been

23:02

heaped on her, I

23:04

think is telling about some of

23:06

it is stereotyping. And every time

23:09

I see that with a

23:11

female politician, it's

23:13

always fingernails

23:16

on a blackboard. And

23:18

I don't know, because I'm a male.

23:19

I think I might be among the last people

23:22

that would be turned off by a powerful woman politician,

23:24

considering that I am a woman and gay. I'm just

23:27

saying that I don't say you were turned

23:28

off by her or turned off by

23:30

a powerful woman politician. I'm

23:33

just saying that

23:35

sometimes

23:37

voters, and we know this, you know,

23:39

if I just take a vote of female, if

23:42

I take Sue Jones and

23:44

Joe Johnson,

23:46

and that certain things that just the

23:48

male of female political science knows that,

23:50

that certain qualities that just

23:52

will get attributed to you based

23:55

on your gender.

23:56

And I don't know this very, but it

23:58

does seem to be.

23:59

I never hear about males talking

24:02

in a shrieky voice. But

24:04

I'm not saying that you've been thinking. Do

24:06

you think she's

24:06

a good politician?

24:09

I'd be fair.

24:11

She's not one of the all-time greats

24:13

now. But the

24:17

only thing that I know her, her presidential

24:19

campaign, was she wanted

24:21

to run for president in the worst possible way and

24:24

she succeeded. But

24:30

a lot of people run

24:33

for president and don't do very well. Biden

24:36

ran for president and didn't do very

24:38

well. I mean, failure

24:41

is

24:42

to politics what air

24:45

is to life. I mean, I'm going

24:47

to get off of this. But

24:51

I think she's not fulfilled her potential.

24:53

Well, let's talk about a happier subject, which is Donald

24:55

Trump. So

24:58

Trump is currently polling at 55%. The

25:01

next closest candidate is Florida Governor Ron

25:03

DeSantis, I think at 14%, right

25:05

around there. Every indictment

25:07

seems to make him more popular among his base.

25:10

Is there any scenario in which

25:12

you see one of these other candidates

25:14

in the race

25:14

unseating Trump? So

25:18

MAGA was there before Trump.

25:21

The idea that

25:23

people were under assault from immigrants,

25:26

from people of color, from

25:28

whatever, all right,

25:31

it was always a feeling in that world losing

25:33

the country. Trump came in

25:36

and stoked that

25:38

up, a feeling that already existed. So the whole

25:41

Republican Party is, I'm sorry. I

25:44

mean, Lauren Bovitt, Ken Paxton,

25:46

great. So we really want to talk

25:49

about Kamala Harris being the problem. I

25:51

mean, next to Lauren Bovitt, she's

25:54

Joan of Arc. All

25:56

right.

25:58

I feel like I'm at a rally.

25:59

Okay, so the Republican Party

26:02

magnified, but again to the question, is

26:05

there anyone in the race that you just

26:07

as a political strategist that you

26:09

think has a chance of unseating Trump?

26:13

Right now, no.

26:14

But he's in such legal jeopardy.

26:17

If a jury comes back,

26:18

that will affect people. And you

26:21

starting to see when things move,

26:24

Litton once said, history

26:26

goes decades with nothing happening,

26:29

and then history goes weeks with decades

26:32

happening. All right?

26:34

Okay, so I'll quote it in Litton. Great.

26:38

So when things start to move,

26:41

like in Iowa,

26:42

and I was looking at something, he

26:44

got 42 in New Hampshire.

26:47

Well, 42 is not that great a

26:49

number for a former president and their

26:52

own party. Honestly,

26:54

in a normal year, you would see

26:56

a sitting president in their own

26:58

party in New Hampshire be a lot higher than that. So

27:01

I'd be an idiot if I didn't say the most likely

27:04

outcome

27:05

is that the Republicans nominate Trump.

27:09

But

27:09

you know, DeSantis

27:11

is the greatest disaster I've

27:13

ever seen in my life. Y'all

27:15

see the latest story. I agree with that. I can

27:17

kick Tucker Carlson's dog. What? Well,

27:20

he went to Michael Wolf has

27:22

a story that DeSantis decided

27:24

he wanted to go see Tucker and Susie Carlson.

27:26

I know well, he should do Crossfire with my kids with the

27:28

school gala

27:30

and dog

27:32

people.

27:33

And DeSantis kicked one of the dogs. I

27:36

guess he ate his with his fingers

27:39

too. I mean, he had,

27:41

I mean, there's something wrong with that boy. I

27:45

think I don't think he's potty trained to tell

27:47

you the truth.

27:49

What do you think was the

27:51

most foolish thing he did sort of looking back

27:54

at his candidacy so far? Was it the

27:56

war with Disney? So

27:58

this woman, her name is Suzy Wilds.

28:01

Actually her dad was Pat Summeroff, who

28:03

was a real guy, who was a big sports

28:05

fan. And she literally

28:07

made DeSantis his career. She

28:11

let him elect to Congress and she got him elected

28:13

governor. And then Mrs.

28:16

DeSantis knocked her

28:18

off.

28:20

Bad move.

28:21

She went down to Morlago.

28:24

And all of this stories on DeSantis

28:28

is coming from

28:29

Suzy Wilds. You talk to any reporter

28:32

that she's on everybody's speed

28:34

now. She's leaking the pudding

28:36

story. She's leaking every story that

28:39

there is. And she's just sticking pins

28:41

in DeSantis'

28:43

voodoo doll. You

28:46

know, in life I always tell people,

28:48

enemies and necessity. That's okay. You got

28:50

to have those. Those are people if you're running for an

28:52

office and somebody else is, well,

28:55

be careful about enemies of choice.

28:57

And

28:59

DeSantis, and

29:01

Casey DeSantis made

29:03

a bad decision because

29:05

she knows, you know,

29:08

all the private flights. She knows what's

29:10

on the state dime. And she knows she's

29:12

got every journalist in the country

29:15

on her cell phone.

29:18

That's what's going on with bro DeSantis. He's

29:20

getting cut up and he don't know which way to turn.

29:24

A lot of never Trump Republicans

29:27

really are looking to Virginia,

29:30

to the governor Glenn Yunkin

29:32

who has not entered the race, who shows basically

29:34

no signs of entering the race, but are convinced that

29:37

he is going to. Are you hearing anything

29:39

about that? Do you think that's a possibility?

29:40

Well, there's a big, big

29:43

election coming up in Virginia, November. Because

29:46

at their state house, the

29:49

Republicans have the house, 52 48, the Democrats have Senate 22

29:54

to 18, and

29:56

there is enough in play

29:59

to make a difference.

30:00

Yuck. And he's going all in, but

30:02

the Democrats call him, but I would point

30:04

this out. The Democrats

30:06

have not lost an election since dogs

30:09

anyway.

30:10

We just wanted to go back Tuesday

30:12

night and

30:15

they really trying to,

30:19

you know, flip the Senate

30:21

and you got big race in Mississippi

30:24

that, you know, I'd call a Democrat

30:26

an underdog, but not overwhelmingly

30:28

a big race in Kentucky.

30:31

I'd probably call

30:32

incumbent Democrat a little bit of a favorite,

30:34

not overwhelmingly Louisiana

30:37

doesn't look all that promising for Democrats. Virginia

30:39

state legislative places, you watching

30:41

the election returns that night, watch

30:44

that one closely.

30:46

Let's talk about the legal issues hanging over

30:49

Donald Trump, obviously facing four

30:51

indictments and want to know from you, which

30:53

of those do you think is the most serious and then separate

30:56

some sort of from the moral and ethical

30:58

and legal matter of it. Do you think politically

31:01

it matters to him?

31:03

This is the second verse first, as

31:06

of now, it doesn't matter. He said that he could

31:08

shoot someone in the middle of fifth Avenue

31:10

and it wouldn't matter. Remember

31:12

that he was found in a court

31:15

of competent jurisdiction to

31:17

have raped someone on fifth Avenue.

31:20

Understand that

31:21

the judge said by any definition, what

31:23

the jury found is

31:25

right. This woman,

31:28

it didn't matter. So I guess it, I don't, it

31:30

break don't count in this country. I don't know what

31:32

does, but I was, you know,

31:35

raised to think that's not a very good thing.

31:37

So when

31:39

you're a criminal defendant, potential defendant comes

31:42

in, the first thing you look for is defenses. I

31:45

cannot think of a single defense. He

31:47

has a moral. I go, I mean, understand.

31:49

They said he took this stuff that came to him

31:52

and it said, this doesn't belong to you and

31:54

he wouldn't give it back. Then they wrote him a letter

31:57

and he wouldn't give it back. Then they sent us a subpoena.

32:00

And he wouldn't give it back.

32:01

And then he hid the documents

32:03

under the subpoena.

32:05

And he showed the documents

32:08

that were to someone else. What's

32:11

the defense?

32:13

You don't own it.

32:15

If I leave here and I take this chair,

32:17

and

32:19

I say that it's mine because

32:22

I sat in it, and

32:25

the Omni people are going to say, no,

32:27

that's not yours. Give it back to us. And

32:30

they act nice. And they tried everything they could.

32:34

It's going to be interesting to see if we ever

32:36

find out why some people say that he's

32:39

a pack rack. So I

32:41

go to the jury store and I take a Rolex and say, why

32:43

are you doing this? I'm a pack rack. I just like to

32:45

have... I really... You know. I

32:48

mean, I just don't... I have no earthly

32:51

idea how he's going to defend this.

32:54

And I don't think they do either, to tell you the truth.

32:58

Let's talk about President Biden's son, Hunter,

33:01

just received his own indictment after the very

33:03

public collapse of his plea deal. If

33:05

the case does end up going to trial, how

33:08

much of a headache or distraction will that be

33:10

for the president? Could it seriously

33:12

damage his chances of reelection?

33:15

Well, okay. First of all, the Republicans

33:17

have opened an

33:19

impeachment inquiry.

33:21

Which you said you're excited about. I could

33:23

not be more excited. I

33:26

just... But only if they call

33:28

witnesses. Okay. Because,

33:31

let me tell you,

33:32

Jim Comer is not very

33:34

smart man. In fact, I think he's pretty stupid.

33:38

Okay. Jim Jordan, G-Y-M,

33:42

Jim Jordan, not

33:44

very smart. Dan Goldman, smart.

33:48

Delegate Plaskett, smart.

33:50

Jamie Raskin, smart. They

33:52

will eat their ass alive.

33:55

Alive. And remember,

33:57

when you call the witness... The

34:00

other guy gets to play. And

34:03

Dan Abrams, who's not hardly

34:06

a liberal,

34:07

and he's right. There has not been one,

34:09

I owe to evidence to say

34:12

that president Biden's got any of this

34:14

money. Now, if you want to say, when

34:16

Biden did some really stupid things.

34:20

Yeah. I mean, if you're going to

34:22

make an $80,000 a month while your dad

34:24

is vice president from a energy

34:26

company. But I can't tell you

34:28

that he lied on

34:30

a gun application. It's the

34:33

only time that Republicans

34:35

never liked, ever wore against a gun

34:37

app. But he did. And

34:40

they've investigated this guy for what?

34:42

How many years? And

34:45

you know, you just got to live with it,

34:47

but it's not any, any evidence whatsoever.

34:49

And I personally wish open

34:52

hearings, call witnesses. Let's air

34:55

this thing out.

34:56

Let's talk a little bit about the state of the Democratic

34:58

party. Democrats,

35:01

as we touched on earlier in this conversation, used

35:03

to be very much perceived as the

35:05

party of the everyday ordinary American.

35:08

There's a book that's about to come out from John Judas

35:11

and Ray Teshara called Where

35:13

Have All the Democrats Gone? And it's about sort of the

35:15

defection of working class voters from the party.

35:18

Reflect a little bit on how that happened.

35:20

How did it come to be that the Democratic

35:22

party is the party of educated,

35:25

elite,

35:26

somewhat older voters? Right. Oh,

35:29

not, I wouldn't say older, but definitely,

35:32

uh,

35:33

uh, definitely become much more of

35:35

an educated party

35:37

over the course of this century that that's

35:39

true. Uh, become,

35:41

uh,

35:43

you know, less of a presence in

35:45

places in mid America. That is definitely

35:47

true. Some of it was

35:50

our own making, which

35:53

is true. And you

35:55

know, the,

35:56

one of the best

35:58

books that I can recommend.

35:59

on this. It was done, believe it or not,

36:02

a Berkeley academic by the name of Ollie Russell

36:04

Harshio, who did a book called

36:06

Strangers in Their Own Land about

36:08

people in Southwest Louisiana, same thing as Southeast

36:11

Texas, and how they

36:13

became Trump

36:15

people. Another

36:17

one is,

36:18

I can't think of the name of it, but it's by a Wisconsin

36:21

academic, Kathy Kramer on

36:25

non-college voters in northern Wisconsin.

36:28

But a lot of this is cultural. A

36:30

lot of it is Democrats gave off

36:32

heirs that we thought that we

36:34

were smarter than other people and Republicans

36:38

did a good job of exploiting

36:40

that.

36:41

Now, having said that,

36:43

again, I point out we haven't lost an

36:45

election

36:46

since

36:47

June of last year. If

36:50

you look at—you're right, you could

36:52

say we have all kind of internal contradictions

36:55

within the party, although I will caucus

36:57

folks down the lines as Pelosi's then

36:59

speaker, and now Hakeem is speaker.

37:02

But understand this, if you're a Democrat,

37:05

you know this. If

37:06

you're really in a coalition—and

37:08

I like coalitions.

37:10

I really do. I don't want to be in the frickin'

37:12

cult,

37:13

all right? I don't want my

37:15

entire life to be defined

37:17

by my own ideology. But if

37:20

you're in a coalition of nature,

37:22

you have to be a little uncomfortable,

37:25

because the bigger your coalition is,

37:27

the more things that come up that

37:30

will make you uncomfortable.

37:32

And

37:33

what we did have is a

37:35

significant number of working

37:38

class people, more

37:40

specifically we're working class whites, that

37:42

we have lost ground considerably. However,

37:46

and people point out, West Virginia used to

37:48

vote Democratic, or

37:50

any other state that used to

37:53

have Democratic senators from the Dakotas.

37:55

True. And New Jersey and California

37:58

used to vote Republican.

37:59

You had one tradeoff, and

38:02

in one sense it wasn't a good tradeoff.

38:04

In the other sense, it was

38:06

a tradeoff we should have never have

38:09

made.

38:11

And we allow a

38:13

small part of our party, people

38:16

that described themselves as, quote, progressive

38:19

liberal, which is about 10 percent of the entire

38:21

Democratic Party, compared

38:23

to 65 percent of

38:25

the Republican Party that thinks the election

38:28

was stolen, or that the earth is 5,000

38:30

years old, or

38:33

climate with some hoax out

38:35

of a PR person in Beijing.

38:39

The stuff that we get tagged

38:41

with is kind of silly.

38:43

I never saw a Democrat that ever wanted to burn

38:46

a book.

38:47

And the day I do, then I'll reconsider.

38:52

These sons of bitches have banned more

38:54

books this year

38:56

than any year in American history.

38:59

And they fired some teacher from Galveston

39:01

or somewhere for

39:02

reading Andy Frank.

39:06

But I got to worry about somebody

39:09

talking about Latinx, which no one even knows

39:11

what it was. It's not,

39:13

it's just kind of a goofy thing they came up

39:15

with. But why do Democrats pay

39:17

such a price for 10 percent

39:21

of the eccentric people in our party, and the

39:23

Republicans don't pay a price to the 65 percent

39:25

of the people in their party that are just out

39:27

and out nuts?

39:33

I'll just push back on

39:35

none of the characterizations. I can't compete

39:37

with that. But couldn't

39:39

the reason be that that 10

39:41

percent has an unbelievable

39:43

amount of cultural power in

39:45

America? They control publishing

39:48

houses, Hollywood studios, media

39:51

companies, all of the sense-making

39:54

institutions of American life.

39:56

So that's the difference. First of all, I

39:58

honestly.

39:59

I think YouTube, I was

40:02

very outspoken. It's over.

40:04

It's over. The

40:07

identity left is lost. They're sitting

40:09

there sputtering around in some art museum

40:11

or some

40:13

foundation. No one wants to

40:15

defund the freaking police. No

40:18

one wants to call people Latinx

40:21

for any of that nonsense. My greatest

40:23

is cultural appropriation. So

40:26

if you come to New Orleans

40:27

and you walk out and you have a sweatshirt and say,

40:29

I got bourbon face on shit street,

40:32

am I going to say, oh my God, you appropriated my

40:34

culture. How dare you say that? I

40:38

come to Austin and

40:40

I go like I did last night and

40:42

eat brisket and coleslaw and baked

40:44

beans and God knows, you don't say,

40:47

well, you're not supposed to be eating that. You're not from

40:49

Texas.

40:50

It all

40:52

became so idiotic.

40:55

So the term, give you a little

40:58

history here, because the term woke

41:01

first time that at least in my

41:03

limited research skills came

41:05

up was by a guy named Ledbelly

41:08

Ledbetter, who was a jazz musician who

41:10

was born in right outside of Shreveport.

41:13

I think he died in a jail in Houston. And

41:16

the term woke

41:18

was in a song telling black people

41:20

in Texas and Louisiana that

41:23

you should be aware in your interactions

41:25

with the police, which I think would be sound advice

41:28

about I wasn't a black person in Houston

41:30

in 1925, but if I got stopped by

41:33

the cops, I would have, as you say, in the

41:35

Marine Corps, situational awareness. And

41:40

then, like everything else, some

41:43

over-educated white people got ahold

41:45

to it and thought then they'd woken to some entirely

41:48

different word than it was supposed

41:50

to be. And that's, and then

41:52

that causes us, you

41:55

know, 20 house seats.

41:57

They can appropriate, but they won't appropriate.

42:00

I think that everybody knows that

42:02

this whole thing was not a very

42:05

good idea and

42:06

most people have moved on for it. Now,

42:09

if you some

42:10

deputy art instructor at some under

42:12

attended overpriced college, oh man,

42:15

they'll run your ass out, but they're not going to fool with

42:17

you if any power. They're not going to fool with me. They're

42:19

not going to fool with Bill Moore.

42:21

All

42:22

right? They're just not.

42:23

And they find, and

42:25

when I was at LSU, I

42:29

was going to class. And

42:31

somebody called and said that one

42:33

of my students had got in. I don't know.

42:36

UT law school. I forgot what he was.

42:38

So I stopped at the

42:41

wine store and I get

42:43

a $25 bottle of champagne and some

42:47

champagne flutes at Rags. So I

42:49

said, okay, you're not going to

42:51

be, get out of one of my classes unless

42:53

you know how to properly open a bottle

42:56

of champagne. That's

42:58

just something that you have to know in life.

43:02

And so I had the student come up. I said, okay,

43:04

now don't put the wine bottle

43:06

away from your face because you don't want to lose your

43:09

eye over this. And I take the foil

43:11

off, not take the wire.

43:13

Okay. Now what you're going to do is you're going to take

43:16

the caulk in the bottle

43:18

and you're going to, we don't pop the caulk

43:20

and you just

43:21

easily twist opposite

43:23

ways. And then when

43:26

the caulk comes out, the sound

43:28

you're looking for is the sigh of a satisfied

43:31

woman of which has been, and it

43:34

broke me up for this. Okay. And

43:38

I'm like, Oh God, I mean, I never say that

43:41

again. I mean, but that is the way

43:43

that people have been teaching people to open

43:45

champagne bottle forever.

43:50

So I guess I would change now to,

43:52

I don't know, I hadn't heard the sigh

43:54

of a satisfied woman been in 50 years.

43:59

But I

44:02

guess I'd say like a mild burp. I

44:09

got written up and I said,

44:12

well, maybe it's time for me to move

44:14

on to do something else in my life.

44:22

After the break, James Carville takes

44:24

questions from the crowd and then indulges

44:26

us in a fan-favorite lightning round in

44:29

which he reveals who he thinks Lauren Boebert

44:31

should date next and what he

44:33

thinks is his wife's worst opinion.

44:37

Stay with us.

44:45

Okay, we want to take some questions from you guys.

44:48

You can stand up at the microphones that are

44:50

situated in these middle aisles and then at

44:52

the end we're going to end with a quick lightning round. Please

44:55

try and keep it to a tight question if

44:57

you don't mind. Yes. Can you speak

44:59

to the role of abortion rights in the upcoming

45:01

election? Yes,

45:04

August. I was the only

45:06

national Democrat to go to Kansas. And

45:10

once I got there, I could

45:12

feel I didn't think it was going to end

45:14

up like this. And

45:16

what's happened is, there's

45:19

been, and I can say Democrats have not

45:21

lost an election since this. I mean, this

45:24

issue is like

45:26

golden, like nothing I've seen in politics.

45:29

And you're having this, well, maybe we can be this. And

45:31

now they're trying to figure out Trump's attacking

45:34

DeSantis on this. And they're

45:36

all falling apart because they

45:38

had presented this issue is so

45:41

simple. And there's nothing

45:43

simple at all. You know, I just said

45:45

my daughter just had a, you know, my

45:48

first grandson, but there's nothing,

45:49

and of course living in Louisiana,

45:51

you know, first things she got pretty, you know, the first thing I did

45:53

is

45:54

called the head of the largest hospital

45:57

and say, who is the best lawyer on this in

45:59

Louisiana? Because

46:00

if you're having, if somebody

46:02

in your family is having a baby in a place like Louisiana

46:05

or Texas, you better hire a lawyer in case

46:07

something,

46:08

isn't that a shame? And that's something like the thinking,

46:11

daughter tells you she's pregnant and you

46:13

have your first grandchild and your first instinct

46:15

is we've got to get a lawyer. Now

46:18

we got one, we didn't need it, thank God.

46:21

But that's the real effect of this stuff.

46:24

I ask, thank you for your question. Go ahead.

46:26

Yes, I'll get from there. I was wondering if a solid

46:28

Democrat presidential candidate wanted

46:31

to initiate a primary, how would

46:33

they do that and how could a Democrat voter

46:36

help that process? Each

46:39

like the New Hampshire primary, you go in

46:41

there, they have a secretary of state to legislate

46:44

you make certain requirements. I don't know, you got to pay

46:46

a thousand fee, you might have certain signatures. But

46:48

when you run for president,

46:51

it's 50 separate elections. All

46:54

right. There's no national, there's no office

46:56

of national filing where you go in and do

46:59

like you're going to run for Travis County,

47:01

you know, be a judge. They

47:03

call them judges, they're headed in Texas.

47:05

We call them police jurors, but everybody's got their

47:07

own sort of name for it. But

47:10

so you know, there's a lot of rigmarole you'd

47:12

have to go through, but

47:14

it's not so

47:15

familiar because nobody could do it.

47:18

So it's not going to happen.

47:19

You know, I guess

47:23

as old as I am, you learn to seldom

47:25

say never. No, you

47:27

can't say never say never because you just said never.

47:33

But all things are possible.

47:34

That doesn't make them probable, but possible.

47:38

In the media, there's not much coverage

47:40

of the possibility of President

47:43

Trump going to prison

47:46

or fleeing the country to avoid

47:49

that. And

47:52

in the extradition

47:54

treaties with some of these countries

47:56

such as Hungary, which is a

47:58

country that he's been there's

48:01

an exception to

48:04

the extradition treaty.

48:06

And if

48:09

the person is fleeing because

48:11

of political persecution.

48:13

The two words that he uses

48:16

every time, all the time.

48:18

Do you think

48:19

it's a possibility that

48:21

he could try? Thank you, a lot of people

48:23

thought it's actually, I think it's the

48:26

UAE

48:27

that we don't have an extradition treaty with.

48:30

But we follow him,

48:32

I'd go to

48:33

take the top floor to Ritz-Calden, Moscow. Now

48:37

the danger is if

48:38

Putin

48:39

dies, it gets knocked off, they're

48:41

gonna come get you. But I'm serious,

48:44

if I was Trump and I'm knowing the

48:46

legal jeopardy that he's in, I'd

48:49

get the hell out. I would really think about

48:51

blowing this pop sand. All

48:55

right, I'm serious. I

48:57

think your question is relevant.

49:00

And when you start looking

49:02

at the accretion of stuff, yes, he could win,

49:05

assume the courts would allow him to part himself, which

49:07

is not a guarantee. It's not a guarantee, he's no any. He

49:09

still can't do anything about Georgia and

49:12

he's still got all this stuff in Manhattan. And

49:15

he's a career criminal.

49:17

And you know what career criminals do?

49:20

They commit crimes. That's

49:22

the nature of

49:24

what they are. And

49:27

they'll keep pursuing him,

49:29

but he's in a

49:30

bucket load of legal trouble.

49:32

The people around him are in

49:34

a bucket load of political trouble. I

49:36

mean, look at Rudy Giuliani. The guy's broke

49:38

and he's gonna be broke-a. My

49:42

idea for him is to date Lauren Boebert.

49:44

Yeah.

49:47

They

49:49

could go see Beetlejuice a second time. Yeah,

49:51

right. Yeah, go ahead. God, man,

49:53

that was some, that morning Barry,

49:56

Washington loves the story. And so, so,

49:58

we're gonna have to say about it. and moderate

50:01

and becoming an effective legislation.

50:03

And that night, because Washington

50:05

loved the story about how they civilized people. People

50:08

come here and then they see us

50:10

and, you know. James,

50:14

in 92, it was, it's the economy

50:16

stupid. In 24, what

50:19

is the Democratic catch line? Very

50:22

straight question.

50:23

You know, something, you remember, it

50:26

was the first thing was change versus mortising.

50:29

Second thing was economy stupid. Third is don't

50:31

forget healthcare.

50:33

I think what

50:35

people feel, and I think the economy's

50:37

good. You can't, it's kind of hard not to

50:40

argue that. But people don't,

50:43

they're not starting to feel it yet. Now,

50:45

is it because they think that the president

50:48

is too old, they can't think beyond that? Is

50:51

it because the gas prices are high,

50:53

it cuts into whatever gains it might have,

50:56

some income growth or some moderate

50:58

inflation?

51:00

I don't know that I know the answer

51:02

to that. But I guess

51:04

if it was

51:06

Biden v. Trump, you

51:09

know, we can't go back.

51:11

I mean, forge ahead or anything kind

51:14

of forward looking. As of right now,

51:16

you don't get enough credit for the economy.

51:18

Now, the hard thing you do in politics is, you're

51:21

at a meeting and says,

51:22

we're not getting credit for economy. And somebody says, you

51:25

know, actually the unemployment rate's lowest

51:27

expense is 1969. Or,

51:30

you know, et cetera, et cetera.

51:33

And so, well, if we don't take credit for

51:35

it, how are we gonna get credit? But

51:37

then if you go out and you tell people

51:40

the economy is good and they don't

51:42

think it's good, they say, well, if that person doesn't

51:44

even know what's going on in my life, how can he

51:46

go there and say the economy is good when I'm working

51:48

two jobs, I'm paying $4

51:51

a gallon for gas,

51:53

no one knows the right answer

51:55

to the right time. So what

51:58

the president's people would say is, Reagan was

52:00

at 82 in September

52:02

of 83, at 42, and

52:04

Clinton was at session search in September of 95,

52:08

Obama in September 2011. But

52:12

right now, the perception of people—I

52:14

don't know if it's the actual economy or people

52:19

just looking for some kind of change.

52:22

But that's just where we are.

52:24

And you can statistically—we had

52:26

a good economy. It's tough not to

52:28

convince people. Go ahead. Yes, sir.

52:31

You guys are great, by the way. So

52:33

I would just point out that Biden came

52:35

out of that race with all that talent

52:38

that you were talking about. I'm not even someone who supported

52:40

him in the primary, but he did come out of one of those.

52:43

I share some of your concerns. But the thing that I would

52:45

ask is, there's a lot of talk about

52:47

who can win, but I'm concerned

52:50

that the results are going

52:53

to be such that they might not matter with what's going

52:55

on in Wisconsin and other places. How

52:57

much concern do you have that they figured

52:59

out what went wrong last time and they're

53:02

going to try to get away with it this

53:04

time with a lot of Republicans

53:06

that did the right thing have been replaced by

53:08

people who have committed to doing the wrong

53:10

thing next time? So how much concern do you have about

53:13

that? So,

53:14

Barry, you have any thoughts on that?

53:16

Yeah, see, I said, do you have any thoughts on that? They want to know

53:18

your thoughts, not mine. They

53:20

don't give a shit about me. Right,

53:23

Lisa. Of course,

53:25

in Wisconsin,

53:27

the Democrat wins a Supreme Court seat by 13

53:29

points and they

53:31

want to impeach him before he takes

53:33

office.

53:34

Look at what they did to redistrict

53:36

him. I mean,

53:38

and then you had three

53:41

votes

53:42

for an independent legislative theory

53:44

in the Supreme Court. I mean, how

53:46

many Supreme Court justices are away from that? I

53:49

think the most significant event

53:51

in American politics of my lifetime,

53:54

and I was born

53:56

when Franklin Roosevelt was president,

53:59

was Bush v. go in 2000. Because that

54:01

just said we can get away with it. We're just

54:04

going to stop a goddamn vote count. And

54:06

you know what these liberals are going to do? They're just going to

54:08

go, whoo, they're going to jump in highly, they're going to go around

54:10

in circles, and they'll all

54:12

fall in line. And guess what happened?

54:15

We took it, they stopped the vote count,

54:17

that Gore was going to win

54:19

without any doubt. They were going to order

54:21

a statewide vote count. And then they said,

54:24

well, we'll just gerrymand every seat, there's nothing

54:26

they're going to do about it. Then they said, we'll

54:28

just do away with voting rights. And John Roberts

54:31

in 2013 said the absolute

54:34

shock of anybody who lives in this country has no racism

54:36

left in America. Really Jesus Christ,

54:38

man. Do you really believe that?

54:41

Then they

54:43

come with

54:44

Citizens United and just

54:46

let this,

54:47

you know, the Koch brothers turn a goddamn country

54:50

over to them. And they kept doing one thing

54:52

after another. And people said, now,

54:54

I think

54:56

the Dobbs thing finally

54:58

lit at a cooking jar, kind of slammed on

55:00

them.

55:01

But it had not happened since

55:03

then. And you know, Bush v. Gore,

55:06

we started a war. Do

55:08

you know that from 1994 to 2004, assault weapons

55:13

were illegal in the United States? Did

55:15

you know you couldn't buy one? All

55:18

right. And how many people

55:20

would be alive? You know what people do in 1996?

55:23

Hunting, going fishing, going

55:25

to target practice,

55:27

marksmanship, they're blowing the gun cups. You

55:29

just couldn't buy an assault

55:31

rifle and go shoot up 40 kids with

55:33

it.

55:35

And that's the truth. And

55:37

they didn't care. Because the people

55:39

I think like the people in this room

55:41

think

55:43

we were not tough enough, we were not active

55:45

enough. We didn't say, no, you can't

55:47

do this in this country. You can't stop a freaking

55:49

boat count in the middle of it. Because,

55:52

you know, we were taught to salute

55:55

the flag and move on. And

55:59

just watch it.

55:59

goes wrong. The Constitution

56:02

of

56:03

the United States is not going to be a factor.

56:07

I

56:10

want to say welcome back

56:13

to Texas and we're looking forward to joining

56:15

you next year.

56:16

We don't

56:18

play all next year. Y'all owe us a

56:20

game in Baton Rouge. But

56:25

we're ready. Go ahead. I'm sorry.

56:27

As someone who has worked on campaigns

56:31

before, the Democrats would say to

56:33

each other, we just have to get

56:35

out the vote. And now

56:37

I'm wondering, do you think that that is

56:39

still the truth or are we even past

56:42

just getting out the vote?

56:44

That's a very good question.

56:46

And wouldn't we, you know, so

56:49

you see this and it's always, I can

56:51

give you it's

56:52

election day and it's

56:55

whatever. Okay. And now we're going

56:57

to go

56:58

to James and sitting outside

57:01

in suburban Philadelphia. What's

57:03

going on? Well, I'll tell you what, it's all about turnout.

57:06

You know, you talk to the Republicans and they say it's about

57:08

turnout. You talk to the Democrats about turnout.

57:10

Well, we went to a voting booth in North

57:12

Philadelphia and they said they were

57:15

at 45 percent of turnout in the election before. Of

57:18

course, it's about who votes

57:21

in what proportion. And the problem

57:23

that we have right now is black

57:27

voters are not turning out. And

57:29

this is over

57:30

a series of elections, very

57:32

under reported and

57:35

under 30 are not that excited.

57:39

A Democrat can't win without

57:42

robust black turnout and robust

57:44

youth turnout. And right now

57:48

we're not getting it.

57:50

So

57:51

in 1992 there

57:54

are 3100 plus county or county

57:56

equivalents of the United States. So you

57:58

have counties, we have parishes.

57:59

something from independent cities.

58:02

Of that 3100 plus in 1992, 96 were super majority.

58:07

That meant that one party carried it by 75 or 25 or more,

58:09

more than 50. In 2020 there

58:12

were almost 1,400. I would show

58:16

you that the geographical polarization

58:18

is in, but also how

58:20

of that 1,400, the ones that

58:22

are democratic, how they turn out compared

58:24

to the Republicans is

58:27

a big issue. And that's

58:29

why enthusiasm is such a, clearly

58:32

should be a part of strategy everywhere.

58:34

But thank you for the question.

58:35

Okay, one last question. Thank you.

58:37

Yes, keep it really short and then we're gonna do a one-minute

58:39

lightning round where we're gonna ask about Mary Madeline

58:42

and her worst

58:42

viewpoint. Yeah. Alright,

58:45

so I keep hearing this narrative

58:47

that we're not having a primary. There's no one running,

58:49

but there are in fact people running. I'm not

58:51

just talking about RFK Jr. Mary Ann

58:54

Williamson is running. And

58:56

this election really is about

58:58

a fight for democracy. So why

59:00

did the Democratic Party, why did they keep

59:02

trying to sell us the idea they're gonna save us

59:04

from democracy

59:05

by preventing a democratic primary?

59:07

Okay, maybe she's not the one, maybe

59:09

Biden is

59:10

the one. Can I give you a job? Yeah,

59:13

we should have a primary. Thank

59:16

you for framing it. Yeah. I

59:18

get what we want. We gotta give people,

59:20

you know, if this is my kind of message is

59:23

patriotic people will come out and vote

59:25

just to stop the

59:26

end of the Constitution. But it'd

59:28

be better if people were excited

59:30

about it. I couldn't agree with them more.

59:32

Okay, we're doing a quick lightning round. Sorry, we

59:34

couldn't get to all of the questions. James, very

59:37

short answers, one sentence. What is

59:39

your wife's worst opinion? My

59:42

wife's what worst opinion? Her worst opinion? I

59:44

was thinking that the Iraq war was any good.

59:47

What is one thing she has changed

59:49

your mind about?

59:51

You

59:55

know, always bringing a gift when you go

59:57

to somebody's house.

1:00:01

And given me kind

1:00:04

of an appreciation I never had before

1:00:06

for like spatial issues. So

1:00:09

if my wife, let me say you this, when

1:00:12

she dies, of course, and let's

1:00:14

assume there's a heaven,

1:00:16

and you get to do it, heaven would make you happy.

1:00:19

St. Peter's going to say, he wants

1:00:21

you to move furniture between now and the turn.

1:00:25

Just move this around and move that around.

1:00:28

Every time I turn I got my chair and I watched

1:00:30

my games in and I got everything by

1:00:33

it. And I was sitting the chairs in a different

1:00:35

place. Well, you didn't have enough back there. Okay, fine.

1:00:38

And I've just learned that

1:00:40

wherever something is today is not going to

1:00:42

be that hard.

1:00:44

What is the best book you read recently?

1:00:47

The book I'm reading right now called The Identity

1:00:50

Trap by Yasha Monk. And

1:00:52

it really deconstructs this

1:00:55

identity politics, which I think was

1:00:58

a giant mistake, not just politically,

1:01:00

but a giant mistake. Your

1:01:02

identity will never, to me, will never trap

1:01:05

your philosophy or your quality as a person.

1:01:09

Your favorite American president of all time?

1:01:11

Clinton second, Lincoln

1:01:14

first, by far.

1:01:14

Okay, one word, one single

1:01:17

word for the following people. Donald Trump.

1:01:19

Joe DiCiello. One

1:01:22

word,

1:01:22

Joe Biden.

1:01:24

Man one word. One word.

1:01:26

Think about it. I guess there's three. Okay.

1:01:29

The Vake Rama Swamy. Well, I

1:01:32

gotta say, so

1:01:35

here's the thing. He's everything. He's

1:01:38

everything that they like. He's got

1:01:40

a name you can't pronounce. He went to Harvard.

1:01:42

He's a tech bro. He's a fricking

1:01:45

idiot. I'm going

1:01:47

to

1:01:47

go with idiot. Cornel West. Very

1:01:51

dangerous.

1:01:52

Chris Christie.

1:01:55

Dedicated. Josh

1:01:57

Shapiro.

1:01:59

Clinton-esque talent.

1:02:01

Wow. Last question. If you had to

1:02:03

vote right now, money on the table,

1:02:06

who's going to win in 2024? Who's it going to be?

1:02:09

Well, I say the Democrats. My

1:02:12

rationale is we're just not losing elections. And

1:02:15

I don't know, of course, if something happened

1:02:18

dramatically between now and 2024, but

1:02:21

you know, I am a horse degenerate and

1:02:24

we do pay some attention to past performances.

1:02:27

But right now, if

1:02:30

we were to nominate, you

1:02:33

know, we would have an open process. We'd

1:02:36

get 54. I mean, the country doesn't, they

1:02:38

don't like Dobbs. They don't like the Republican

1:02:40

authoritarianism. They

1:02:42

don't like this stuff. But

1:02:44

remember, you got Cornell West and you got

1:02:46

no labels and it's not, it's not

1:02:49

matched up one to one. It's dangerous.

1:02:51

I'll tell you that. Very dangerous. James

1:02:53

Carville, all of you. Thank you so

1:02:55

much. Thanks

1:03:04

for listening. If you liked this conversation,

1:03:06

if you felt like you got to know James

1:03:08

Carville in a new way, if

1:03:10

his ideas annoyed you, if they worried

1:03:13

you, if this conversation made you question

1:03:15

your assumptions or consider a different point of view,

1:03:18

that's all great. That's what we're

1:03:20

trying to do here on this show. Share

1:03:22

this episode of Honestly with your friends and family

1:03:24

and use it to have an honest conversation

1:03:26

of your own about 2024. Last

1:03:29

but certainly not least, if you want to support

1:03:31

Honestly, there is just one way to

1:03:33

do

1:03:33

that. Go to vfp.com

1:03:36

and become a subscriber today.

1:03:53

Okay, round two. Name something

1:03:55

that's not boring. Laundry? Oh,

1:03:58

a book club.

1:04:00

Computer Solitaire, huh? Oh,

1:04:04

sorry, we were looking for Chumba Casino.

1:04:08

That's right, Chumbacasino.com

1:04:09

has over 100 casino style games.

1:04:12

Join today and free for free for your chance

1:04:14

to redeem some serious prizes. Chumbacasino.com,

1:04:18

the resistance for the final game to restrict the

1:04:21

volume of the produce.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features