Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Time for a quick break to talk about
0:02
McDonald's. Mornings are for mixing and matching at
0:04
McDonald's. For just $3, mix and match two
0:07
of your favorite breakfast items, including a
0:09
sausage McMuffin. Hello
0:36
Welcome to How to Win Twenty Twenty
0:38
Four It's Thursday, April twenty third. I'm
0:40
Jennifer Palmieri and I'm here at my
0:42
cohost Claire Mccaskill with Olive oil froggy
0:44
this morning. hi Claire he doing Now
0:46
I will be able to cheer all
0:49
the amazing receivers Were gonna draft night
0:51
in the online the Raf from my
0:53
man Patrick Mobs but maybe even as
0:55
big as the Nfl draft. We had
0:57
the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame
0:59
inductees this week and my heart beats
1:01
faster Is nothing better than share. If.
1:04
You've never seen either. An answer?
1:06
I. Mean, share his frickin' amazing. And she's like,
1:08
I think she's older than I am. I
1:10
mean, that's all she's that. She's definitely older
1:13
than yeah. And yeah, she's way older than
1:15
you. I'm psyched about that. offers. I'm sorry
1:17
for the drug. As you know, I'm the
1:19
Morning Joe Nfl draft analysts and unfortunately I
1:21
cannot be in Detroit tonight because I had
1:23
to pick between my legs. And.
1:25
I love Bruce Springsteen more than I love
1:27
the Nfl. Who. Threw in addition to
1:30
the Rock Roll Hall of Fame been an ounce.
1:32
I went to the Bruce Springsteen Archive Center for
1:34
American Music. American. Music Honors
1:36
Cool, You know? like it was incredible?
1:38
M N like it's kind of a
1:41
small deal Minutes: At Monmouth University there's
1:43
like maybe four hundred people in the
1:45
auditorium. John Mellencamp. To this amazing acoustic version
1:47
of Jack and Diane and just like stopped in
1:50
the middle of it and let us all saying
1:52
sound lot of music We gotta stop on music
1:54
and get to the Bread Mccullers or cause there's
1:56
a lot. There's a lot and there's a lot
1:58
which is why you can. So
2:00
between the contrasts, consider stark relief
2:02
we're biden. Is out. My husband's in Florida.
2:05
last week it was Pennsylvania. The sick of Florida,
2:07
Virginia and from from Manhattan court rooms Mclaren. I
2:09
want to drill down on that contrasts and how
2:11
to use it effectively in a campaign that we're
2:13
gonna catch up with a law professor. Missile good
2:15
one sees the author of Policing the
2:17
Womb, and she's really a foremost expert
2:19
on how to interpret the law when
2:21
it comes to women's reproductive rights. Will
2:23
look at the state by state bans
2:25
and what's at stake for Twenty Twenty
2:27
Four as well as what the Supreme
2:29
court is pondering right now and to
2:32
very important abortion related. Cases and Arizona
2:34
Tex Mex on abortion. The Secure.
2:36
Talk about. Bad stars that
2:38
strategy session. So right now,
2:40
Scotus as here. In the community
2:42
appeal arguments, this is your deal claire
2:44
former prosecutor would you make it arguments
2:46
as far less Cheney had not been
2:49
the Mit this week. Same that they
2:51
need to decide the swiftly get a
2:53
Jan Six trial done before the election.
2:55
etc. Well interesting thing about this.
2:57
Is for small sort of my are
3:00
immediately when after the biggest weakness. In
3:02
the case and that is if a president. Orders
3:04
the military to. Assassinate his
3:06
political opponents, Clearly that's
3:08
an official act. Disease ordering the military
3:11
as prisoners in the United States or
3:13
she is. As will apply to all
3:15
presidents and we will have demonstrated Etti
3:17
yes we will associate medial He went
3:19
without weakness. But really the importance of
3:22
this case and there is now lot
3:24
of pressure around this issue because I
3:26
think Liz Cheney has emphasized that most
3:28
as illegal minds that the Supreme Court
3:31
reads about. It every publication of said
3:33
this is all about timing. So what
3:35
I'm looking for is not whether or
3:37
not the Supreme Court is gonna say
3:39
the President can murder his opponents who
3:41
the military. I don't think they will decide death.
3:43
What? I'm worried about isn't They will send the
3:45
case back to. The trial court to
3:48
determine what is any of the
3:50
acts that the President is accused
3:52
of was in fact part of
3:54
his official duties In what was
3:56
not because that's of satchel determination.
3:58
If they do that, the ban
4:00
Trump has a chance to avoid
4:03
responsibility and legal accountability for what
4:05
he did. Around his failure
4:07
to allow power. To transfer peacefully
4:09
in this country because if he wins now,
4:11
he doesn't win. You know he is. He
4:13
still in jeopardy in terms of these
4:15
federal cases. But if. He wins. They
4:17
all go away so. It's the time
4:20
in here that's important and I thought
4:22
Liz Cheney did a great job of
4:24
highlighting that and what he'd what she
4:26
did this week. And so it's Thursday
4:28
were four days and to the actual
4:30
Hush Money trial. So it does feel
4:32
to me a little more unhinged then
4:34
I might have anticipated or that it's
4:36
of wearing on Trump more. What are
4:38
your big take away from the week
4:41
and as it does it feel that
4:43
way to you like this is really
4:45
having an impact on him psychologically. He.
4:47
Doesn't look good, you know I mean
4:49
by the head of Embarrassing Gas this
4:51
week. But Trump looks bad every day
4:53
and were seen him every day. He
4:55
looks haggard, he looks tired, he looks
4:58
angry, but keep in mind that he
5:00
is just trying to play the victim.
5:02
I've never before seen a criminal defendant
5:04
is you know many people view as
5:06
a victim Typically. It's the victim of
5:08
the crime. School is seen
5:11
as the this is not that
5:13
ascendant to commit a crime. But
5:15
they've done a really good job. I
5:17
thought the opening statements were very good
5:19
on that part of the prosecution. they've
5:22
promised a lot now. they've gotta deliver
5:24
on that evidence. By my biggest take
5:26
way was that the lawyers for Trump
5:28
have already damaged their credibility by saying
5:31
he was a family man in their
5:33
opening statement, laugh out loud Funny, I
5:35
mean every person on that jury is
5:37
Go and was no, no he's not
5:39
a family man. Each changes wise. these
5:42
as serial adulterer he is not said
5:44
that he. Is ever emphasize his family,
5:46
his wife not even their me a
5:48
who the I believe my minute left
5:50
like she doesn't believe them disease or
5:52
even they are in court with him
5:54
So i just think. So far I
5:56
think that trials going very well for the
5:58
prosecution will see. His time, though gone, is
6:00
quite a contrast. So did you notice that Trump
6:02
complains about having to be. In court. Now
6:05
he should be campaigning, but then he
6:07
cancelled because of rally last weekend. A
6:09
guess why Chancellor John. This is
6:11
Mrs. Claire's favorite story of a week. Because
6:13
he was worried about his hair was raided
6:16
him he can't. Go Out in this
6:18
starts to brew font Atheists rating events
6:20
with the or if it's raining a
6:22
he is off the sealed I am
6:25
sorry. He is on the injured reserve. List
6:27
if there's any problem with his air yeah,
6:29
there you have the receipt to back it
6:31
up Then saying that yep, you've are lego
6:33
the deal child as A matters his supporters.
6:35
but there's evidence that A does this a
6:37
Quinnipiac poll this week. Nearly seven out of
6:40
ten voters. Say they are following the news
6:42
regarding the trial either very closely are
6:44
somewhat closely, or sixty nine percent of
6:46
them and in the same poll, six
6:48
in ten voters think the the charges
6:50
a fourth time. This since records including
6:52
the hush money payment when adult film,
6:54
actress or either very serious are somewhat
6:56
serious, and forty six percent of voters
6:58
believe former President Trump did something illegal.
7:00
Or in all three of those stats,
7:02
you are talking about some measure of
7:04
Trump's supporters paying attention thinking that the
7:06
charges a serious and even some of
7:08
them thinking that he did. Something illegal.
7:11
So. I just don't believe that it
7:13
doesn't have an impact on public spending
7:15
and on the race. and plus all
7:17
David Pecker stuff was bonkers to and
7:19
just understanding how that works and how
7:21
the whole cats until scheme worse with
7:23
the National Enquirer and how corrupt it
7:25
is I think that was pretty eye.
7:27
Opening to listen to you know
7:30
there is a big contrast in.
7:32
Think about this for a minute was
7:34
just like put everything aside, it's so
7:37
much news about Trump's so much scandal
7:39
when I was a younger politician and
7:41
running for office. If somebody what is
7:44
said to me you know the candidate
7:46
for president of one of the major
7:48
parties was named in Arizona criminal charge
7:51
last night as an unindicted coconspirators I
7:53
would say well it's over. You.
7:55
Can be named as an unindicted
7:58
coconspirators. You're running for president and like. The
8:00
to fight nobody is nobody's even bulky.
8:02
Well yeah is another unindicted tokens beer.
8:04
This is like the second or third
8:06
time he is an unindicted co spirit
8:08
or unease in court. For a crime
8:11
I mean it is amazing to
8:13
me how. Solid, the
8:15
cold is de mars and
8:17
all. In the ten and
8:19
they can see daylight they are
8:21
so submerged in his be as
8:24
it is unbelievable. But the other
8:26
thing that happened this week. Is
8:28
and B C news poll that has
8:30
by school of five points from January
8:32
I wanted a lot of forty two
8:34
percent that some low relative to other
8:36
presidents and general but given other like
8:39
how popular in of other world leaders
8:41
right now that's pretty high. So is
8:43
that a thread and his mom, he
8:45
and his success and B C like
8:47
realclearpolitics average have some it that way
8:49
to going up from that from January
8:51
and February is instead union is it
8:54
the contrast of by down the trail
8:56
doing his job in president. While Trump
8:58
said in a court room leg maybe look at
9:00
all I'm saying but able to he gets. Yell
9:02
and obviously Biden was in Florida really
9:05
hammering on the issue that we think
9:07
is and we've gotta be honest, man
9:09
is to and there's a real enthusiasm
9:11
problem with younger voters. Younger voters are
9:13
not excited about voting. I'm not saying
9:16
they're not with Biden, I think they
9:18
are. I think they will vote for
9:20
Biden if they go. By the
9:22
one thing we have that is really
9:24
important is this abortion issue and he
9:26
did a great job in Florida this
9:29
week saying hey, I'm fighting here. I'm
9:31
side yeah for the women at this stage and the men
9:33
who. Support them that you should have
9:35
control over the most personal and private
9:37
and painful decision of your life. And
9:40
when By was in Florida this week, he had this
9:42
to say. About Trump. For. Fifty
9:44
years. The. Court ruled that
9:46
was a fundamental constitutional right
9:48
to privacy. or two years
9:51
ago I was taken away
9:53
was a real claire one
9:55
person responsible as nightmare. And.
9:57
is acknowledged and he brags about donald
9:59
trump I
10:02
think, you know, if I were in the room, I would, you know,
10:04
this is what you would have him doing. You know, there's also some
10:06
like a psychological warfare to some of this stuff too that I think
10:08
is smart. It's like, I'm going to go to
10:11
Pennsylvania last week. I'm going to stay there for
10:13
three days. I'm going to have it really take
10:15
effect. I'm going to go to Florida, your home.
10:17
You can't be there because you're in a courtroom
10:19
in New York and I'm going to talk about
10:21
the issue that is you are most vulnerable on
10:23
and that's abortion. And you know,
10:26
it feels like it's having an impact. The
10:28
bottom line is I think if I were in the room,
10:30
I think they're doing the right thing. Yeah. Okay.
10:33
Speaking of another major abortion argument before the high court
10:35
this week was about whether the
10:38
Biden administration can penalize hospitals that
10:40
failed to provide emergency. I'm talking
10:42
about emergency abortion care. I'm not talking
10:44
about, hey, I want to have an abortion
10:46
because I don't want to have a child. I'm
10:48
talking about somebody whose health is in danger that
10:51
it qualifies as a medical emergency. And
10:53
a perfect segue to our next guest.
10:55
When we come back, Michelle Goodwin joins
10:57
us. She's a constitutional law and global
11:00
health policy professor at Georgetown Law. I'm
11:02
the author of the book, Policing the
11:04
Womb, Invisible Women and the Criminalization of
11:06
Motherhood. My God. My God is not
11:08
part of the most vital. I'll back Michelle
11:11
Goodwin in a moment. Time
11:19
for a quick break to talk about McDonald's.
11:21
Mornings are for mixing and matching at McDonald's.
11:23
For just $3, mix and match two of
11:25
your favorite breakfast items, including a sausage
11:28
McMuffin. Single
11:41
item at regular price. Welcome
11:49
back. I will continue to apologize
11:51
for my voice. I promise it will be better next week.
11:53
As we mentioned before the break, the Supreme
11:56
Court heard arguments this week over a case
11:58
that sets a very strict Idaho
12:00
abortion ban against a federal law
12:02
that requires that hospitals in order
12:04
to receive federal money, they must
12:06
provide emergency care. This is the
12:08
second abortion related case. The justices
12:10
have heard this term after the
12:13
March case, where they listened to
12:15
arguments around the FDA's approval of
12:17
the abortion bill, Mephistone. It's interesting
12:20
because the Supreme Court, Jen said
12:22
they wanted the states to decide. And now we've
12:24
been in front of the Supreme
12:26
Court twice since Dobbs, with the Supreme Court
12:29
being forced to make even more decisions around
12:31
women's freedom. And after Roe was reversed by
12:33
the Supreme Court in 2022, there has been
12:35
this nonstop, consistent
12:38
effort to chip away every productive rights from
12:40
every corner. So we wanted to talk to
12:42
someone who can break down how the law
12:45
is being used to tamp down women's basic
12:47
health choices and how pivotal the issue will
12:49
be in November. Professor Michelle Goodwin is the
12:51
perfect person to help us with that. She
12:53
is a constitutional law and global health policy
12:56
professor at Georgetown Law School,
12:58
an acclaimed bioethicist, and is the
13:00
author of the award-winning book, Policing
13:03
the Womb, Invisible Women, and the
13:05
Criminalization of Motherhood. Professor Goodwin, thank you
13:07
so much for joining us. It's my
13:09
pleasure to be with you. Before
13:12
we get to the Supreme Court, we want to look
13:14
at where the states are. So we have
13:16
a map, talked to us about where it, and
13:18
we will have a link to this map in
13:20
the show notes, about what it currently looks like
13:22
to live in any of the states in the
13:24
South if you need reproductive care. So if
13:27
we were to do a Venn
13:29
diagram, we would see ourselves trapped
13:31
in the period of American slavery.
13:33
We'd see ourselves tethered to a
13:35
system where there were women
13:37
who were forced into pregnancies
13:40
because it provided for the
13:42
wealth of the people that
13:44
kept them enslaved. And we would
13:46
see that there were federal laws that
13:48
protected those individuals who forced
13:50
those women into pregnancy because
13:52
if those women tried to
13:54
escape, they could be returned.
13:56
And if we look at the narratives between
13:58
then and now, see a new Jane
14:01
Crow where there is so much that looks
14:03
like the old that is now trapped in the
14:05
new. And I should say for anybody
14:07
who might say, well, no, that's not exactly the
14:09
same. That's not what was happening. Thomas
14:11
Jefferson famously wrote that he preferred
14:13
to have women on his plantation
14:15
because they turned to profit every
14:17
year or two rather than men.
14:19
He wasn't talking about women are
14:22
better cotton pickers, women are better
14:24
tobacco pickers. Instead, what he was
14:26
explicitly saying is that he could
14:28
use exploit, coerce their
14:30
reproductive capacities to make profit
14:33
for him to exploit his
14:35
own interest. And we see much of
14:37
the same taking shape these days. Since
14:40
Dobbs, we have seen a 10-year-old girl having
14:42
to flee one state to get to another
14:44
in order to terminate a pregnancy after
14:46
rape. We've seen children now
14:49
going into elementary and middle schools
14:51
as mothers. We've seen
14:53
judges say that 17-year-old girls lack the
14:55
capacity to have an abortion that somehow
14:58
they have the maturity to become a
15:00
mother when they can't take Mipha Pristone to
15:02
terminate a pregnancy. It is
15:04
just a travesty and a lack
15:07
not only of justice but fundamental
15:09
human rights. It's brutal. Dr.
15:12
Goodwin, would you do our listeners a
15:14
favor and would you compare and
15:16
contrast as only a law professor
15:19
can? The difference between abortion bans,
15:21
which are very common across the
15:23
country, and personhood statutes, which is
15:25
certainly the law in my state
15:28
and I know in many other
15:30
states, how do those two
15:32
compare and why is personhood
15:34
even more dangerous than an
15:36
abortion ban? That's a great
15:38
question. So these abortion bans
15:41
came into effect after the 2022 Dobbs decision. There
15:45
were states that were already teasing these
15:47
up and many had gestational limitations. What
15:49
states were trying to do when Roe
15:51
was still the law of the land
15:54
was to create what would be trigger laws
15:56
such that when Roe would fall and they
15:58
were hoping that it would be it would
16:00
that those laws would then go into
16:02
effect. Most of those
16:04
laws had not gone into effect
16:06
because district court and appellate court
16:09
judges said, well Rowan, Planned Parenthood,
16:11
B. Casey is still a law
16:13
of the land. These laws that
16:15
you just created are struck down.
16:18
But the question that you ask
16:20
about these personhood measures is really
16:22
important because they're what you have
16:24
are anti-abortion movement leaders seeking to
16:26
establish constitutional rights, legal rights, and
16:29
fetuses and embryos even. So we
16:31
had recently the Alabama Supreme Court
16:33
ruling that an embryo rather
16:36
cryo-preserved in refrigeration or
16:38
in a uterus has
16:40
personhood and that
16:43
any destruction of an
16:45
embryo could be a wrongful death.
16:47
So if you are trying to become
16:50
pregnant and you're using assisted reproductive technologies,
16:53
65% of the time there's going to be embryo
16:56
demise and even fetal demise
16:58
and that could mean criminal
17:00
and civil punishment perhaps against
17:03
the couples who are actually trying to
17:05
become pregnant. The bottom line of it is
17:07
that you have a kind of barbarism
17:09
and lunacy now parading as
17:11
American law and science which
17:13
it is not. You see
17:15
a complete devoid of an
17:17
understanding of health and science
17:19
and basic biology. It'd make
17:21
you wonder if any of
17:23
these people studied biology, basic
17:25
biology in middle school and high
17:27
school. But they have an ultimate goal
17:29
here, right? This effort started a long
17:31
time ago. What's that ultimate goal
17:33
of what they are pursuing now and who are some
17:36
of these people that are doing it? So
17:38
the ultimate goal is truly
17:41
one of power. It's
17:43
something that I've studied. It's a question that
17:45
I've asked over and over again in my
17:47
own scholarship as I've written about this. So
17:51
let's distinguish a few things because there is
17:53
a rhetoric that this has always been part
17:55
of a Republican campaign and that is not
17:57
true. It is true that Republicans right now
17:59
have... leaned into this but Roe
18:01
v. Wade was a 7-2 decision.
18:04
Five of those seven justices were
18:06
Republican-appointed including Justice Blackmon who wrote
18:08
the opinion in Roe
18:10
v. Wade. He was put on
18:13
the court by Richard Nixon. Consistently,
18:15
there had been Republicans including George
18:17
H. W. Bush who
18:19
spearheaded Title X through Congress making
18:22
sure that reproductive healthcare could be
18:24
provided for the poorest of Americans.
18:26
He said that this was basic
18:29
fundamental public healthcare. His father
18:31
Prescott Bush was the treasurer of
18:33
Planned Parenthood. And I think that
18:35
that's important to just establish as
18:37
a baseline which tells us how
18:39
extreme it is, what's taking shape
18:41
today, and the way in which
18:44
there are politicians that have been
18:46
co-opted into this fundamentalist,
18:49
extremely hardcore, hardcore,
18:52
hardcore conservative movement that
18:54
never been able to elevate itself
18:56
in law or in the court.
18:59
One of the things we don't
19:01
talk about is how violent this movement
19:03
has been. And then if it were any
19:05
other group, they would be on national watch
19:07
lists, they would not be able to operate in
19:09
the United States, they would be gone. There have
19:11
been over 50 bombings of
19:14
clinics that provide abortions in
19:16
the United States since the time of Roe
19:19
v. Wade. Roe v. Wade
19:21
decriminalized abortion, it made it legal
19:23
just as Blackmon said that it
19:25
was important for the autonomy, the
19:28
dignity, the mental health, the physical
19:30
health of women that
19:32
they have this healthcare option for
19:34
themselves. And since that time, bombings,
19:37
arson, there are doctors who
19:39
have been murdered in their churches, murdered
19:42
at their homes. I
19:44
have friends who are obstetricians and
19:47
gynecologists who fear being
19:49
on shows like this or being
19:51
recorded on video because they have
19:54
children and they fear reasonably so
19:57
that someone could come to their home and kill
19:59
their children. children. And so before going
20:01
on, I just thought it was important
20:03
to actually place to the readers that
20:05
this has not been just a matter
20:07
of political difference. This has
20:09
been a movement that has been steeped
20:12
in violence, the threats of violence. I
20:14
know so many people who even do
20:16
the work that I do, we receive
20:18
threats all the time. So. But
20:20
you said it's about power. If I get to say that
20:22
first, I want to ask you about power. Do you think
20:25
that I mean, I think about this a lot. We're getting
20:27
beyond politics now, but I think it's important to get
20:29
to the root of this. Like, is it that women
20:31
have had too much power and this is the backlash
20:33
against it? It's about trying to control women. Is
20:35
that what is happening here? That's a part
20:37
of it. So that's such a great question.
20:39
So let's dive into what power has looked
20:42
like in the United States, because it
20:44
can be obscured by the fact that women
20:47
have been able to successfully run for Congress
20:49
and be in the Senate and be in
20:51
the House, that there are women who are
20:53
CEOs. There are women
20:56
who are taking charge of their lives
20:58
like never before. And even around the
21:01
world, not yet in the United States
21:03
being president, but women in other countries
21:05
being president. So that can obscure the
21:07
fact that women are still on the
21:09
pathway towards full citizenship in the United
21:11
States. Now that would seem strange to
21:13
people. And you see, of course, women
21:16
have citizenship. Let's be clear that Roe
21:18
v. Wade came 100 years
21:20
after the Supreme Court said that women
21:22
could not become lawyers. There is a
21:25
case, Bradwell v. Illinois, where a woman
21:27
said, okay, slavery's over. There's a 14th
21:29
Amendment. I want to become a lawyer.
21:31
My husband is a lawyer. I'm qualified.
21:34
And the Supreme Court said, no, what
21:37
you women can do is take care
21:39
of your husbands and your children. You
21:41
may not become lawyers. In the same period,
21:43
the Supreme Court said, no women, you may
21:46
not vote. Now, even though folks would
21:48
say, well, that was a long time
21:50
ago, things are truly different now. Let's
21:53
be clear that when Mississippi brought this case
21:55
before the United States Supreme Court,
21:57
the Dodge decision, the lower court, Judge
21:59
Carl Henry's made clear. What
22:01
Mississippi's history has been Mississippi as
22:04
denied women from serving on juries
22:06
in Mississippi women couldn't. Get credit
22:08
cards and their own name. Couldn't open up checking
22:10
accounts in their own names and we thought through
22:12
a laundry list of things. Including voter
22:14
suppression, The Supreme Court said wealth women
22:17
don't like this, just go vote. Let's
22:19
remember that when black women try to
22:21
go vote in Mississippi last November. It's
22:24
a state where ballots. Were.
22:27
Not available to black communities and
22:29
they ran out and there were
22:31
many black women not able. To.
22:33
Participate in the election process.
22:36
Much. Like over a hundred years ago.
22:38
I mean, this is happening in real
22:40
time, so part of it yes is
22:42
a concern about women and women seizing
22:44
power and being able to be more
22:46
authoritative in their lives. But it's also.
22:49
About. Holding onto a power
22:51
that intergenerational in the United States.
22:54
Has. Been given to men in that men
22:56
have taken for themselves and it is only
22:58
been in the case where women have fought
23:00
hard. That and firing. Orders given some
23:02
very hard. And even criminally punished
23:05
for it where women have been
23:07
able to scrape and scrape. And.
23:09
Get pieces of power and the United
23:11
States. Professor Missile
23:13
did when please stay with us for tickets cause
23:15
here but when we're passing want to talk about
23:18
the Supreme Court's role in invalidating Women of Care
23:20
rights will be right. Time
23:29
for a quick break to talk about
23:31
Mcdonalds mornings or for mixing and matching
23:33
at Mcdonalds. for just three dollars Mix
23:35
and match to have your favorite breakfast
23:37
items including a sausage Mcmuffin, sauces, biscuit,
23:39
sauces, burrito in hash browns make it
23:41
even better. Was a delicious medium iced
23:44
coffee was Mcdonalds mix and match. He
23:46
can't go wrong. Price ever dissipation may
23:48
vary. cannot be combined with any other
23:50
offer combo meal single item at regular
23:52
price. let
23:59
back We've been speaking with Michelle
24:01
Goodwin. She's a Constitutional Law and
24:03
Global Health Policy Professor at Georgetown
24:05
Law School and the author of
24:07
the award-winning book, Policing the Womb,
24:09
Invisible Women and the Criminalization of
24:11
Motherhood. Let's zoom out now and let's
24:13
look a little bit at what the Supreme Court
24:15
is up to. So let's talk first
24:18
about the emergency abortion care case that
24:20
the justices heard arguments about this week.
24:22
What's your take on the case and
24:24
what is your sense after
24:27
listening to the arguments about where the
24:29
court will come down on this
24:31
important battle between states
24:33
rights and federal authority
24:35
to withhold funds? It's
24:37
troubling that the Supreme Court
24:40
has weighed into this decision
24:42
in the way in which it has. The
24:44
Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor
24:46
Act was one that
24:49
was passed by Congress in order
24:51
to protect Americans who are in emergency crisis,
24:53
such that they would be able to get
24:55
the care that they need and not be
24:57
turned away. It's worth noting
25:00
that explicit within the title of
25:02
the act is the recognition of
25:04
women and reproductive health care because
25:07
it says and Labor Act. And
25:09
for a Supreme Court that
25:11
is claimed to pay close attention
25:13
to texts, we have in both
25:15
the text and the legislative history
25:18
the fact that members of Congress were
25:20
deeply concerned about patient dumping.
25:22
And that is women not getting the
25:25
life-saving, life-stabilizing care that they
25:27
needed if they presented at
25:29
hospitals and didn't have insurance
25:31
or even if they did and hospitals wanted to
25:34
turn them away. In the wake
25:36
of the Dodge decision, the president,
25:38
President Joe Biden, said well,
25:40
Intala still applies. This important
25:42
federal law still applies. And
25:44
so people who need abortion
25:47
care in order to stabilize
25:49
their health, in order to save their
25:51
health, save their lives, still have access
25:54
to abortion given this federal law.
25:56
Now, it's just a basic 101 in civil.
26:00
X. Federal. Law pre amp
26:02
state law. That means federal. Law
26:04
trumps any state laws and we could
26:06
talk about this show. Another show Why?
26:08
that is. But. Now, the state
26:11
of Idaho challenged whether that had
26:13
any relevance in it Stayed given
26:15
it's abortion ban. Their claim was
26:17
that Federal law couldn't intervene on
26:20
their abortion ban. The Supreme court
26:22
has decided to take this up.
26:25
And perhaps not shockingly to some
26:27
conservatives on the court seem to
26:29
be leaning into this idea that
26:31
even. Though there is federalism and
26:33
federal preemption. That it may not
26:35
apply. As applies to women
26:38
who may die in needing.
26:40
Abortion Care Services will again. This
26:42
exposes whether there is a care
26:45
for the fundamental personhood of women.
26:48
You. Know I gotta just sort of peace
26:50
in here because we don't have law professors
26:52
on very often in. Even though I
26:54
have a little Ptsd when it comes. To Law
26:56
Professors Assist Assist Sticky! Back to
26:58
my law school experience If he
27:00
gets really important to talk about
27:03
how hypocritical. The. Members of the
27:05
court have been around sexual as. You
27:07
know, as somebody who had to vote on the
27:09
confirmation of supreme. Court Justices I
27:12
watched righteous indignation spew.
27:14
From these folks about how you
27:16
cannot legislate from the beds. About
27:18
how we have to respect as
27:21
a language of the constitution and
27:23
the language The. Actual text
27:25
of law. And. That
27:27
courts have run amok. Because.
27:29
They're busy interbreeding and
27:31
legislating. And. How much respect they
27:33
had for President. Will. All of
27:35
those things have gone up in flames under
27:37
the. Roberts Court. Can. You
27:40
speak a moment about how hypocritical
27:42
these folks are. About the
27:44
original language. Uma touched on it with this
27:46
law, but it's happened over and over again
27:49
with these guys. That's. True
27:51
and it is deeply frustrating
27:53
and what it is. consistent.
27:55
With. As Americans having a very low
27:57
view of the core, they have the
27:59
lowest. Labour Ability Rating The Supreme
28:01
Court sense polling has ever taken
28:04
place. And. I think this cynicism
28:06
that we can all see in the court.
28:08
You can see it in just looking at
28:11
dogs will. let's put dogs. And brewing together.
28:13
So the day before the dogs decision the
28:15
supreme court issued a ruling in the brew
28:17
in case. The. Bruins cases one about
28:19
a New York gun control law that
28:22
was more than a century old controlling
28:24
guns in that state for public health
28:26
and safety. Here's a court that's as
28:28
a cares about originalism well and cares about things
28:30
that are old. would say over a century that's
28:33
pretty old but in the Bruins decision courts a
28:35
while we don't really care about old anymore. And
28:38
here's what's interesting to have Justice Clarence
28:40
Thomas in the Bruins decision saying we
28:42
need a prologue. Here is very rare that
28:44
you seen a supreme court decision prologue and he
28:46
spends. Five paragraphs talking about. How
28:49
important a Black male bodily autonomy?
28:51
it has to have a gun
28:53
And that black males bodily autonomy
28:55
is placed in jeopardy if they
28:58
don't have guns and that we
29:00
should all and supreme court's care
29:02
about black male bodily. Autonomy. He
29:04
writes a majority opinion in striking down
29:06
this New York Gun Control Laws. The.
29:08
Next day is the dogs decision
29:11
where the Supreme court doesn't say
29:13
anything about bodily autonomy whatsoever. Justice
29:15
Thomas. In. Clues a concurring
29:18
opinion were bodily autonomy. So's
29:20
two words you will never
29:22
see. The. Other thing that you
29:24
won't see his at the day before.
29:26
Justice Thomas cares about black men. One.
29:28
Day later he has nothing to say. About
29:31
black women in a case that comes
29:33
out of Mississippi. A case that was
29:35
notorious for the lynching a black women.
29:37
Were. The enslavement of black women. For.
29:39
Denying black women the right to vote,
29:42
Denying black women access to schools and education
29:44
Than Nine Black women The right to be
29:46
able to contract. Denying black women the right
29:48
to be able to go into parks and
29:51
swimming pools. You can't make it up and
29:53
so no reference. At all to
29:55
their lives. and even more. On.
29:57
Your question President goes out the
29:59
way though in rest of time
30:02
through our supreme court jurisprudence. Precedent.
30:04
Matters And I will say that there are
30:06
times in which President. Needs to be scrutinized.
30:09
We. Would never have gotten to Brown v Board
30:11
of Education. If in fact, we held
30:13
on to policy. But that said, this was a
30:15
court. That was cherry picking through
30:17
history. Unbelievable. Yeah, unbelievable. Now let
30:19
me. I'm not a lawyer. I'm
30:21
the hack someone to take us
30:24
back to Twenty Twenty Four. That
30:26
good, I'm given. The options President
30:28
Biden has before him in terms of
30:30
what he can do administratively and what
30:32
he can advocates Congress do if he
30:35
wins the election, what should he be
30:37
advocating for and terms of legislation and
30:39
is there more that he could be
30:42
doing administrative lead to try to protect
30:44
women's health? Well, There are a number
30:46
of arguments that are being made explicitly
30:48
on that. For example, There's the
30:50
Women's Health Protection Act. It has
30:53
strong support and the senate and
30:55
Congress. And the house and needs to get
30:57
over the line. That would essentially clarify row. But
30:59
there are many who say that that doesn't
31:01
even go far enough that that should be
31:03
a baseline. And that row was a baseline
31:06
itself. There's also the Equal
31:08
Rights Amendment. and strange that here. We
31:10
are in twenty twenty four when
31:12
so many other countries around the
31:14
world have instantiated equal rights for
31:17
women in their constitution. And.
31:19
The Ratification. They say that the field
31:21
theory has been ratified. now. There are
31:24
thirty eight states when Donald Trump was
31:26
in office, He ordered. Through.
31:28
A letter to the Archivist not to
31:30
file the he are A and so
31:33
the archivists didn't. Share. Those that say
31:35
that look even if it might. Be talent show
31:37
bite and should feel state to the archivist.
31:39
Now call file their so that the
31:41
Ers is in effect and if there
31:44
are those are going to challenge at
31:46
let them then go Challenge This. There.
31:48
Are other concerns that have come up
31:50
Her has thera spaces with then federal
31:53
lands where abortion clinics could be established
31:55
and so that individuals who are within
31:57
states where there are federal lands could.
32:00
Go and terminate pregnancies are get the
32:02
reproductive health care and those spaces that
32:04
they could. What? Is clear is
32:06
that the president and vice President have
32:08
been articulating. Even more, the
32:11
importance of respecting reproductive autonomy.
32:13
And freedom and the backdrop of it. There.
32:16
Are Republicans that are supporting
32:18
this? to. Even if privately so maybe
32:20
these are republicans were voting at home.
32:22
Not. Necessarily writing op eds about this,
32:25
but I say that in relation to
32:27
the ballot initiatives that have been successful
32:29
time and time again weather and red
32:31
states. Or. And Blue State when
32:34
abortion as been on the palate. It's.
32:36
Been a winning issue. Though
32:38
it's. Great to have somebody
32:41
who knows so much more than
32:43
we do on his podcast. About.
32:45
A subject said Belgian and I care
32:47
deeply about. and frankly, most Americans care
32:49
deeply about. Thank. You for your
32:51
scholarship on this. Thank you for all
32:53
your hard work around this issue. It
32:56
is greatly appreciated. Michelle. Goodwin.
32:59
Sushil Law Professor and author of Policing
33:01
the Womb, Invisible Women and the Criminalization
33:04
of Motherhood. Is been terrific. To get
33:06
your perspective we thank you very much thank you
33:08
very much you're inviting me on your show. It's
33:10
pleasure to be with. You. Before. We
33:12
wrap we want to answer listener questions.
33:14
As they come up and we thought this. One. From Ram
33:16
in Kansas was worth noting. Is.
33:19
Not really a question that it's a comment.
33:21
That. Shows you what people are thinking
33:23
out here in the heartland. One.
33:26
Thing that seems to be missing is a
33:28
call to President Bush to come out and
33:30
show some backbone. He. Needs to come
33:33
out like lose cheney. Against Trump. He's
33:35
been sitting in his Texas ranch say
33:37
nothing, although his brother, Jeb Bush is
33:39
awfully quiet and Florida. For the
33:42
sake of our history, democracy, and standing in
33:44
the world. George. Bush needs to
33:46
come out and openly ask people to
33:48
vote for Biden to save democracy. Mitt.
33:51
Romney is said it but not Bush
33:53
know what is asking. These conservative
33:55
republicans to support the Biden
33:57
agenda but not supporting democracy.
34:00
Thanks. Ram. Yeah. I heard
34:02
as a couple things that is my understanding
34:04
is one that President Bush does not believe
34:07
it was so bad because of his unpopularity
34:09
within the Republican party. would just be like
34:11
see another establishment Republicans have it on on
34:13
the side of Trump Big deal. Know the
34:15
establish are homeless or on the site of
34:18
Trump. I still think it would matter. You
34:20
know it just helps. It helps that like Vice President
34:22
Pence a saying he won't vote for him and held
34:24
set A lot of the former cabinet members are saying
34:26
that and. There. Is something there's
34:28
a difference between democrats republicans
34:30
as assaults dangerous make generalizations
34:33
where I find. Them.
34:35
That might rally around issues more
34:37
and Republicans loyalty is really chords
34:39
to them and their some party
34:41
leaders from Hurley there to set
34:43
to smoke break that pledge so
34:45
I don't know what the combination
34:47
of concerns As for President. Bush.
34:50
But you know I think it would help. Well I think if
34:52
for. Every republic and that thinks that won't
34:54
help to speak out. They Bella Company and
34:56
to me, whether it helps or not, it's
34:58
the right thing to do. Yep! Yep!
35:01
Amount of. Thanks. So
35:03
much less nice if you a question for as
35:05
you can send it to how to when questions
35:07
at Nbc Un I. Dot Com or you
35:09
can leave us a voicemail Six four
35:12
six nine seven four for One Nine
35:14
Four and we might answer it on
35:16
the pod. And remember to subscribe to
35:18
Msnbc How To Win newsletter to get
35:21
weekly insights on this you ski racers
35:23
sent straight to your inbox says it's
35:25
a link and are soon as to
35:27
sign up. This show is produced by
35:30
The Keyboard a leader Samir as for
35:32
as is or associate producer with production
35:34
support from Elisa Timely Catherine Interest in
35:36
A Bomb Our Yard Audio Engineers. Or.
35:39
Said of audio production is Bryson bars say
35:41
have a hard work to do this week
35:43
with my voice rate of us are you
35:45
should. Surrender is the executive producer for
35:47
Msnbc Audio and Redacted Color is the
35:49
Senior Vice President for clutch and Strategy
35:51
at Msnbc. Search for how to win
35:54
Twenty Twenty Four wherever you get your
35:56
podcast and follow the series. Time.
36:03
For a quick break to talk about
36:05
Mcdonalds, mornings are for mixing and matching
36:07
at Mcdonalds for just three dollars Mix
36:10
and match to of your favorite breakfast
36:12
items including a sausage Mcmuffin, sauces, biscuit,
36:14
sauces, burrito and hash browns make it
36:16
even better with a delicious media. My
36:18
coffee with Mcdonalds mix and match he
36:20
can't go wrong. Price and participation may
36:22
vary. cannot be combined with any other
36:25
offer. combo meal single item at regular
36:27
price.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More