Podchaser Logo
Home
The Barbary Corsairs

The Barbary Corsairs

Released Thursday, 7th December 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
The Barbary Corsairs

The Barbary Corsairs

The Barbary Corsairs

The Barbary Corsairs

Thursday, 7th December 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

This is the BBC. This

0:03

podcast is supported by advertising outside

0:05

the UK. This

0:11

episode is brought to you by Progressive.

0:14

Most of you aren't just listening right

0:16

now. You're driving, cleaning, and even exercising.

0:19

But what if you could be saving money by switching to

0:21

Progressive? Drivers who save by

0:23

switching save nearly $750 on average, and auto customers qualify

0:28

for an average of seven discounts. Multitask

0:30

right now. Quote today at

0:33

progressive.com. Progressive Casualty

0:35

Insurance Company and affiliates. National average 12-month savings of

0:37

$744 by new customers surveyed who saved with Progressive

0:39

between June 2022 and May 2023. Potential

0:43

savings will vary. Discounts not available in all states and situations.

0:49

BBC Sounds. Music

0:51

radio podcasts. This is In

0:53

Our Time from BBC Radio 4, and this

0:55

is one of more than a thousand episodes

0:58

you can find on BBC Sounds and on

1:00

our website. If you scroll down the page

1:02

for this edition, you'll find a reading list to

1:04

go with it. I hope you enjoy the program.

1:08

Hello. Until their demise in the 19th century,

1:10

the Barbary Corsairs were a source

1:12

of great pride and wealth in North

1:14

Africa, where they sold the people and

1:16

goods they'd seized from European ships and

1:19

coastal towns. Nominally, these

1:21

Corsairs were from Algiers, Tunis

1:23

or Tripoli, outreaches of the

1:25

Ottoman Empire, but often their Turkish names

1:28

concealed their European birth. And

1:31

in the imagination and experience of their

1:33

enemies, they were pirates who

1:35

represented the values and threats of North

1:37

Africa to be tolerated only

1:39

until gunboats could destroy them.

1:42

With me to discuss the Barbary Corsairs

1:44

are Joanna Nolan, a research associate at

1:46

SOAS, University of London, Clare

1:49

Norton, former associate professor of history

1:51

at St Mary's University Twickenham, and

1:54

Michael Talbot, associate professor in the history of the

1:56

Ottoman Empire and the modern Middle East at

1:58

the University of London. Michael

2:01

Tolbert. It's a complex situation, but

2:03

let's start with something simple. What,

2:05

at the very worst, was the

2:07

European experience of the Barbary Corsairs?

2:10

In the European imagination, and we're talking

2:12

across the whole of Western and Northern

2:14

Europe, the Barbary Corsairs

2:16

were bogeymen. They were the

2:18

opposite of everything that European

2:21

Christian civilization had to offer.

2:23

They were painted as pirates,

2:27

as anarchic states,

2:29

as really the worst of

2:31

humankind. And this

2:34

happens both on sea and on

2:36

land in the encounters between Europeans

2:39

and people from North Africa. And

2:41

this is mostly around encounters of

2:43

piracy, privateering, enslavement. And

2:46

what tends to happen in the narratives that

2:48

get constructed about North Africa is that the

2:50

things that the North Africans do, the

2:52

Europeans also do, are painted in the

2:55

worst possible light. So

2:57

whereas Europeans go around engaging

2:59

in glamorous privateering, the

3:01

North African states are vicious pirates.

3:05

Whereas it's acceptable in an 18th century

3:07

mind for Europeans to enslave hundreds of

3:09

thousands, millions of people on the west

3:11

coast of Africa, it's unacceptable for Europeans

3:14

to be taken and sold in the

3:16

slaves' markets of North Africa. What

3:18

period of time are we talking about, the 16th to the

3:21

19th century? Is that what you're talking about? That's the main

3:23

period. So the Barbary Corsairs,

3:25

there's a prehistory that goes back as

3:27

far as the 13th century in

3:29

some respects. But the

3:31

period that we call the Barbary Corsairs,

3:34

that really starts with the Ottoman conquests

3:36

of North Africa that start at the

3:38

beginning of the 16th century. The

3:40

real height, I suppose, of corsairing activity is

3:43

at the end of the 16th and the

3:45

first quarter, first half of the 17th century.

3:48

And then there's a very brief but violent resurgence at

3:50

the start of the 19th century. What

3:53

do the Europeans understand by the word

3:55

Barbary? The term Barbary is the

3:57

same, essentially, as the word Barbary. what

4:00

we would call the Berber people

4:02

in North Africa. They wouldn't call

4:04

themselves that often these days. They

4:06

call themselves Amazigh because Berber and

4:09

Barbary have this negative connotation of

4:11

uncivilised and that is

4:13

rooted in both a

4:15

sort of a European understanding of that

4:17

coast as being a place of uncivilisation

4:20

as I just mentioned before. It's also

4:22

because North Africa is a place that's

4:24

repeatedly conquered and colonised

4:27

by outsiders. So it's surprising

4:29

in some ways that it's persisted as

4:31

long as it has in describing the

4:33

complex states and societies of North Africa.

4:35

Yeah and Corsair? Corsair

4:38

is a really complex word.

4:40

It tends to denote violence at

4:43

sea that is legitimate violence. So

4:45

we tend not, if we do refer to the

4:48

North African states, we tend not to use the

4:50

word piracy anymore because piracy has the moral

4:53

and legal implication that it's not right,

4:56

it's illegal. Whereas what was happening

4:59

in the Western Mediterranean was

5:01

legal. These were not rogue pirates, they

5:03

were employees of a state and so

5:05

although they were committing violence it

5:08

was legitimate violence. So Corsairing is

5:10

kind of a link to privateering

5:12

and being legitimate maritime warfare. These

5:14

North African places that we alluded

5:16

to and that we will be talking about

5:18

were Muslim. How did that play in? This

5:20

plays into the the Barbary Pirates narrative very

5:22

much. As I mentioned before, North

5:25

Africa becomes the opposite of everything

5:27

that Western European civilisation represents and

5:29

that includes the fear of Islam.

5:31

It's at this time, particularly in the

5:33

16th century, that the Ottoman Empire is

5:36

getting towards the height of its power. Vienna

5:39

gets besieged in the 1520s, it will

5:41

get besieged again in the 1680s. This

5:43

is a time when the Ottoman armies

5:46

are really threatening the borders of the

5:48

states in the West of Europe. So

5:50

in the imagination of European

5:52

intellectuals and in many respects the

5:54

general populace, Islam is this

5:56

looming figure of threat. So the Barbary Corsairing

5:59

is a very important part of the world. says come to represent

6:01

a very real manifestation of that threat.

6:04

Thank you. Claire Norton, what were the rules

6:06

of engagement for these ships sailing out from

6:08

the ports in North Africa? Okay,

6:11

so very similar to the

6:13

rules of European Christian privateering.

6:15

First of all, a privateer, the ship,

6:17

the captain, the crew had to be

6:19

issued with a letter of mark or

6:21

an ottoman and a letter of mark.

6:25

It's a written permission from the state

6:27

authority, be that an empire, the Ottoman

6:29

Empire, or a city state saying

6:32

that this crew, this ship

6:34

could go out and legitimately,

6:36

legally attack the ships of

6:38

a designated nation, a

6:41

designated state that the authorizing

6:43

state was at war with.

6:45

And they were allowed to attack this

6:47

state during a particular period of time

6:49

when they might be at conflict. So

6:51

an example might be in

6:54

the 1570s, the Ottoman Venetian

6:56

War. At that time, the

6:58

Ottomans gave letters of mark

7:00

or this izharzet to Ottoman

7:02

privateers, which allowed them to

7:04

attack the shipping both mercantile

7:06

and naval shipping of the

7:08

Venetians because they were at

7:11

war with them and to capture the

7:13

ship, the goods and the people. But

7:15

as soon as that war ends, as

7:18

soon as the peace treaty is agreed,

7:20

these same actions by the privateers would

7:22

slip over the line and become seen

7:24

as piracy, which would be illegal and

7:27

punished. And the second

7:29

difference between piracy and

7:31

privateering is that all goods

7:33

taken during a privateering raid

7:35

would have to then be

7:37

checked and were subject to

7:39

a tax payable back to

7:41

the authority, the state that had

7:43

issued the letter of mark. How

7:46

far were these rules followed? Well,

7:49

well, that is a thing, isn't it?

7:51

In theory, they should be followed strictly,

7:53

but in practice, they weren't and they

7:56

weren't by any state in the Atlantic

7:58

and the Mediterranean. many Ottoman

8:00

privateers after the conclusion of peace

8:03

with Venice, for example, although they

8:05

could legitimately still attack the Habsburgs

8:07

and not the Venetians, often

8:10

did still attack people. And often

8:12

with the collusion of local officials

8:14

as well as them turning a

8:17

blind eye, there was considerable effort

8:19

at times put in for the

8:22

illegal systems in place to offer

8:24

redress to people and free people

8:26

taken illegally and to provide restitution

8:29

or compensation for goods taken, but

8:31

that wasn't always the case. So

8:33

they set off the corsairs, they set sail.

8:35

What could their rulers, who had given them

8:38

these letters of mark, these permissioners to attack

8:40

anybody they thought was an enemy, what could

8:42

they expect back at home? So

8:45

one of the key benefits of

8:47

this was that you could quite

8:49

cheaply and dramatically increase your military

8:52

force at a time of conflict

8:54

by bringing in these private, privateers,

8:56

by bringing in these ships, which

8:58

allowed you not only to harass

9:01

enemy shipping across a broader geographical

9:03

space, but also these ships could

9:05

participate in large naval battles. They

9:08

would bring in intelligence as well

9:10

from their travels around, so that

9:12

was another positive. And also the

9:14

tax taken from the captives

9:16

and the goods and the

9:19

ships brought in allowed the

9:21

building of considerable infrastructure around

9:23

the Mediterranean world, fortifications, towns,

9:25

urban infrastructure, and of course

9:27

manpower with the captives of

9:29

the enslaved people too. That

9:31

was a big part of it, the enslavement. Yeah, yeah.

9:33

Another thing that gave it its merciless

9:36

image. Yes, I mean

9:38

on all sides, I mean everybody within the

9:40

Mediterranean was subject to privateering attacks,

9:42

be they Christian or Muslim. That's one

9:44

thing we have to remember, it wasn't

9:46

simply something that North Africans participated in.

9:49

Thank you, Joe. What evidence do we

9:51

have for the variety of people who

9:53

might be corsairs? There's

9:56

a Spanish abbot who was taken hostage

9:58

in Algiers in... of the late 16th

10:01

century and he

10:03

wrote of the most powerful

10:05

corsairs stationed in Algiers

10:07

and of the 35 who

10:09

had galleots which were the most expensive ships,

10:12

25 of them were

10:14

European and drawn from predominantly

10:16

they were Venetians, Genoese and

10:18

Greeks. Are these people who had been

10:20

captured? No, these are

10:23

renegades. These are Europeans

10:25

who for whatever reason have either

10:27

been exiled or have sought exile

10:29

from their home country because they

10:31

were in trouble for presumably some

10:33

form of corsaring or privateering elsewhere

10:35

and they sought refuge in Algiers

10:38

or Tunis or Tripoli in the

10:40

sense that they could be harbored

10:42

by the state because they were

10:44

useful to the state there. Because

10:46

we think of the corsairs as a situation

10:48

in North Africa but you're basically saying

10:51

it was flooded with Europeans. Absolutely flooded

10:53

with Europeans. Two of the most

10:55

famous corsairs operating during the period

10:57

that we've outlined were known

10:59

as Morad Rice the Elder and Morad

11:01

Rice the Younger. They weren't related at

11:04

all. Morad Rice the Elder allegedly lived

11:07

to the age of 104. He was an Albanian born in Rhodes. So

11:12

already you have the sense of

11:14

a multilingual, multicultural, multinational

11:17

background. He worked for the Ottoman Empire.

11:19

He worked for himself. He worked out

11:21

of Salih, the port in Morocco and

11:23

then Morad Rice the Younger was a

11:26

Dutch Jansian Thun who is a

11:28

Dutch corsair who based himself again

11:30

at times in the Barbary Regencies.

11:32

At times after Salih he conducted

11:34

land raids as well as sea

11:36

raids. So there is this incredibly

11:39

multicultural, multinational and crucially

11:41

multilingual element to the

11:44

corsairs. You'd have to be an

11:46

intrepid person to take a ship into the

11:48

Mediterranean wouldn't you? You would, or foolish potentially.

11:50

Yeah or up and down that part of

11:52

the Atlantic Front as well. Yes. How

11:55

did they communicate with each other? There's a lot of

11:57

Europeans but a lot of Europeans have a lot of

11:59

different languages. and then there are languages of North Africa.

12:01

And then Leslie, you tell me how they communicated with

12:03

each other. You're absolutely right, obviously. There

12:06

were many, many nationalities, and this extended

12:08

not only to the Corsairs, but then

12:11

obviously the slaves who

12:13

they had captured aboard multinational ships.

12:15

You could see just in the

12:17

microcosm of individual ships that there

12:19

were many, many nationalities across

12:22

and on the Mediterranean. A Belgian

12:24

diplomat who was imprisoned in Algiers,

12:27

I think in the 1660s, wrote that of the 550

12:30

slaves in his banjo, there

12:32

were... Banjo. I beg your

12:35

pardon, banjo is a jail that was established

12:37

for the slaves because they were in such

12:39

numbers that they had to create sort of

12:41

a barracks-type scenario for them. Of

12:43

the 550 slaves captured there, he heard 22 separate languages. So

12:48

they needed some form of communication. And

12:50

there had been this nautical mercantile jargon

12:52

that had evolved over the Mediterranean from

12:55

probably about the 13th, 14th century onwards,

12:59

which is what we know as

13:01

lingua franca. Can you give us

13:03

some notion of what lingua franca sounded

13:05

like? I can do my

13:07

best. Obviously, we don't know.

13:10

And the accents were

13:12

very varied. Part of the diversity of

13:14

the language was that although it had

13:17

a sort of grammar and fixed

13:19

vocabulary, there was variation

13:21

across time and across space. But

13:23

for example, there is a ritualistic

13:26

phrase. The language

13:28

is by nature ritualistic. There's a lot of

13:30

sort of implied violence and imperatives in it.

13:33

But there was this very standard

13:35

ritualistic phrase that allegedly the corsairs

13:37

would say to their captives, which

13:39

is, dios forte,

13:41

non telar santasia,

13:44

mondo cruzi se

13:47

veneer ventura andar

13:49

acaza. And that means God is

13:51

great. Don't delude yourselves. The

13:53

world is thus. If the

13:55

wheel of fortune turns, you will return home.

13:59

Thank you very much. Michael, to

14:01

the outsiders, the Cossairs were

14:03

Turks or Ottomans. So

14:05

let's talk about the Ottomans. What was their

14:08

relation to the Cossairs? We have

14:10

to first of all contextualize Ottoman

14:12

North Africa within the broader expansion of

14:14

the Ottoman Empire in the 16th century.

14:17

So at 1500, the Ottoman Empire

14:19

is still very much a Balkan

14:21

and Anatolian Empire. Then,

14:23

thanks to the conquest of Selim I, who

14:26

smashes through the Mamluk Empire in Syria,

14:28

Palestine, and Egypt, the Ottomans become

14:30

very much an Asian and Middle

14:32

Eastern empire. Then throughout the 16th

14:34

century, they are expanding constantly in

14:36

all directions, as far in the

14:38

east as Indonesia and in the

14:41

west to places like

14:43

Algeria. And so the

14:45

Ottoman North African states start

14:47

to become a crucial part of the

14:49

Ottoman Empire in the west as a sort

14:51

of frontier zone. The biggest

14:54

challenge facing the Ottomans in the 16th

14:56

century were the Habsburgs, and particularly the

14:58

very powerful fleets of Spain. And

15:01

so what they really needed was a kind of

15:03

filtration system in the west

15:05

of the Mediterranean to ensure that the

15:07

Ottoman trade and peaceful commerce in the

15:09

east was protected. And to some extent,

15:12

all three of the three

15:14

regency, so Algeria, Tunis, and

15:16

Tripoli, they fulfilled this role

15:18

as a kind of frontier zone, a barrier

15:20

to protect the proper Ottoman Empire to the

15:22

east. So from near the very beginning, if

15:25

we can call it the beginning, in the

15:27

16th century, that beginning, not the even early

15:29

beginning, they're drawing in the privateers. They're drawing

15:31

in these licensed persons to help them in

15:34

their empire building and holding. Absolutely. I

15:36

mean, the proper Ottoman navy was quite

15:38

busy in the 16th century. I mean,

15:40

if you think about the great clashes,

15:42

such as Lepanto later on, the Ottomans

15:45

have plenty to keep their own galleys busy

15:47

with. But by bringing in the North African

15:49

states, and as we've heard

15:51

already, by attracting the expertise of mariners

15:54

from across Europe, they're able to develop

15:56

this huge defense mechanism over in

15:58

the west of the Mediterranean. And

16:00

that is really important not just for

16:03

warfare, but also for peaceful commerce. Because

16:05

what these corsairs are doing, they're not

16:08

just raiding enemy shipping, they're checking the

16:10

shipping of nominal allies to make sure

16:12

they're not smuggling the goods or people

16:15

of their enemies on board. And the

16:17

Algerians themselves, when they refer to themselves

16:19

in their diplomatic letters, they call themselves

16:22

Dar el-Jihad, so the abode of holy

16:24

war. And that really gives

16:26

us a sense of how they viewed themselves

16:28

within this wider Ottoman system. Another

16:31

way to view them is that they become

16:33

a sort of state on sea. They absolutely do.

16:35

And very quickly, because they are so important, and

16:37

also if you think about it quite distant from

16:40

the center of power in Istanbul, the

16:43

three North African states are able to develop

16:45

quite a lot of autonomy. All

16:48

three of these entities become essentially

16:50

independent states by the

16:52

final quarter of the 17th century. This

16:55

is intriguing, Claire. Can you give us

16:58

a closer example of the way these

17:00

privateers, pirates, as they were

17:02

called by some people, mercenary pirates, were

17:04

drawn in to the great states of

17:06

the time, were drawn into the system

17:09

and became part of the system, and in some

17:11

cases rose to run the system. Absolutely.

17:13

So privateering offered a really

17:16

good way for both Muslims and

17:18

Christians, free and also enslaved people,

17:20

to rise to positions of power

17:22

within the Ottoman state or the

17:24

North African polities as well. So

17:27

this could be that they could

17:29

be talent spotted while participating in

17:31

large military campaigns or while rowing

17:33

on galleys that is an enslaved

17:35

person. They could be people who

17:37

migrated to North Africa from

17:40

Christian European countries to sell their

17:42

services and their skills. Or

17:45

they could be, in the case of

17:47

the Barbarossa brothers, people who found themselves

17:49

almost like the de facto rulers of

17:51

an area in North Africa. So if

17:53

I give you a couple of examples

17:55

from the different places, the Barbarossa brothers,

17:57

or a dress and hydrogen belt, Pasha

18:00

came from a mercantile maritime family

18:02

on Lesbos. They had a Christian

18:04

mother and a Muslim father, and

18:07

they were engaged in various merchant

18:09

and privateering activities. And Ored Schreis,

18:12

in the beginning of the 16th

18:14

century, found himself active

18:16

around our jeers, and

18:18

with a group of privateers managed

18:20

to defeat the Spanish there and

18:23

also the locala emir, and then

18:25

found himself, in a way, as

18:27

the de facto ruler of our

18:29

jeers. But fearing retribution, he thought

18:31

that the best move might be to

18:33

offer his loyalty to the

18:35

Ottoman state. And so, in a way,

18:37

he became appointed as the first governor,

18:40

the first belebe of our jeers. And

18:42

he does this for two years until he dies.

18:45

When he succeeded by his brother,

18:47

Hyridin Pasha, who, because

18:49

of his great seamanship and

18:51

skills, rises very quickly to

18:54

become the Cappadonidaria, the grand

18:56

admiral of the Ottoman fleet, where

18:59

he oversaw all sorts of

19:01

biplimactic and military alliances with

19:03

the French and the Ottomans

19:05

against the Habsburgs, but also

19:07

expanded the might of the

19:09

Ottomans into the Mediterranean. It

19:12

seems to me that in some cases, people

19:14

who did better than if they'd

19:16

stayed at home and tried to work their way up the

19:18

system. Absolutely, and another example of

19:20

that is John Ward, who

19:23

became quite notorious in English folk

19:25

literature and

19:28

plays, so he was a privateer under

19:30

Queen Elizabeth I, fighting against

19:32

the Spanish during the end

19:35

of the 16th century. And when the war

19:37

finished, he found himself

19:39

impressed into forced labor in

19:41

the navy, and he didn't

19:43

like that so much. So he

19:45

mutinies and flees with some

19:47

other people, working as a

19:49

pirate for a number of years,

19:52

before deciding that he's going to

19:54

best align himself with the local

19:56

Ottoman official in Tunis, and

19:58

then he sails under the flag of... Tunis as

20:00

a privateer, again

20:03

getting great wealth and commanding a

20:05

number of ships before converting eventually

20:07

to Islam and then retiring a

20:10

wealthy happy person. This is

20:12

Muslim territory but a lot of Christians or

20:14

non-believers, whoever they are, are coming into this

20:16

Muslim territory. A lot of them are converted.

20:18

Did that mean that they were in trouble

20:20

when they went back to their own countries?

20:22

What did it mean? It was

20:25

relatively fluid. I think you needed

20:27

to demonstrate conceivably that you had

20:29

converted and that was also a

20:31

way of buying your way out

20:33

of slavery as well. The minute

20:35

you had converted you were no

20:37

longer a slave. As

20:39

a Christian who had been captured,

20:41

if you converted to Islam you

20:43

could be freed in the regency

20:45

of Algiers, Tunis and Tripoli. I

20:47

think those people who

20:49

returned could plead very much

20:52

that this was something they had to do in order

20:54

to save their lives. This

21:24

BBC podcast is sponsored by BBC Maestro. Learn with

21:26

world-class online courses from Alan

21:38

Moore, Lee Child, Brian Cox,

21:40

Jojo Moyes, Sir Billy Conley

21:42

and more. Whether you want

21:44

to write a best-selling novel or cook like

21:47

a Michelin star chef, choose

21:49

BBC Maestro. And here's

21:51

the best part. Use the code LEARN40 to

21:53

get a whopping 40% off

21:56

your favourite course or a BBC

21:58

Maestro subscription. miss out.

22:00

Let the greatest be your teacher with

22:03

BBC Maestro. So

22:06

can we talk a bit more about the slaves? They

22:08

were enslaved and there were different gradations of

22:11

what happened to you when you were enslaved.

22:13

Can you go through them? What happens

22:15

when you get enslaved depends a lot on

22:17

your background and your

22:20

class. So you

22:23

might be captured to be ransomed. If

22:25

there was any thought that you might

22:28

be wealthy enough or your nation state

22:30

or your community might be able to

22:32

raise enough money to ransom you, then

22:34

you wouldn't be necessarily put out to labour.

22:36

You would be kept in this manual, this

22:39

prison that we heard about before and waiting

22:41

for money to be paid. And there are

22:43

several unfortunate incidents around this. So one

22:46

of the raids by this Jan Janssen character

22:49

is to Iceland in 1627 when

22:51

a huge number of Icelandic

22:54

civilians are captured and taken

22:56

back to Algiers to

22:58

be ransomed. And twice the

23:00

Icelandic communities are able to

23:02

raise the money to free them and twice the

23:04

people who are in charge of the money

23:06

spend the money on other things. So ransom doesn't

23:09

always work out. That's if

23:11

you're lucky. This is what will happen to you. If

23:13

you are unlucky, there are other forms of

23:15

enslavement that you might be subjected to. The

23:18

most unpleasant, not that any enslavement is pleasant,

23:20

but the most unpleasant would be put to

23:23

work in the galleys and in

23:25

the industrial facilities in places like

23:27

Algiers, Tunis and Tripoli. And

23:29

being a galley slave was incredibly

23:32

hard work. If we remind ourselves

23:34

what a galley is, it's an

23:36

all powered ship. So very

23:38

much like Roman triremes, that same

23:40

sort of technology, it's

23:42

based on physical manpower. And so you could have

23:45

a very, very miserable time,

23:47

a relatively short life expectancy for

23:49

a number of reasons. So the

23:51

industrial and galley slave is

23:53

a particularly nasty form. Then there

23:55

are other forms of enslavement that might see you

23:57

put into domestic service. was

24:00

both a blessing and a curse. You

24:03

had the opportunity potentially if you

24:05

had a kind enough master and

24:07

if they saw enough potential in

24:09

you and they maybe encouraged you

24:11

to convert to Islam that this

24:13

could be your way to socially

24:15

climb within the North African Regencies.

24:17

There wasn't such a rigid

24:19

as class system as we saw back

24:22

in Europe. So your talents meant something.

24:24

So if you were very lucky you

24:26

might be in that position but for

24:28

the vast majority of enslaved people in

24:30

domestic servitude it meant that. It meant

24:32

working in people's houses. For women of course

24:34

that could mean sexual slavery as well very

24:37

often it did. So none

24:39

of this was particularly pleasant but

24:42

there are different forms of enslavement. And as Claire

24:44

mentioned earlier we talk about

24:46

this happening in North Africa. The exact

24:48

same thing was happening in France, in

24:51

the Italian states and in Spain where

24:53

North African Muslims would be captured and

24:55

go through very much the same process.

24:59

Thank you Claire. What do we learn,

25:01

there were accounts of captivity accounts weren't

25:03

there. What do we learn from those

25:05

I suppose there were books? Yes

25:07

they were printed as books. They were also

25:10

transmitted as all tales. Captured as a literature

25:12

it's called. Yes, I think

25:14

one of the maybe, we

25:16

get quite a rich description of

25:18

what life was like in North

25:20

Africa. What the military

25:23

capabilities of the North African

25:25

states were in the different

25:27

polities of their naval capacity,

25:29

their geography, the socio-cultural situation,

25:33

the politics. Largely

25:35

because a lot of the captives telling their

25:37

tale when they came back wanted

25:39

to demonstrate that their time in

25:41

captivity had not been a waste. That they were

25:43

able to produce some useful

25:47

information, intelligence that would be of

25:49

use to their country.

25:51

And also to some extent to prove their

25:54

loyalty to say no, no we didn't tell

25:56

them when we were over there. We

25:59

were their spies. seeing for you

26:01

in effect. So that's very useful

26:03

information. We also get an insight

26:06

as to what life was like

26:08

for captives. But this can be

26:10

a little bit problematic in captivity

26:12

narratives because of the different functions

26:14

that they served within

26:16

sort of amongst their audiences. So

26:18

to start with, many captivity narratives

26:21

would tell a tale of extreme

26:24

violence, especially

26:26

attempts either on the captive or people

26:29

that the captive might have heard

26:31

of or knew to force them

26:33

to convert to Islam through torture

26:35

and other threats. And

26:38

the problem with this is that that

26:40

doesn't really cohere with other

26:42

evidence we have both from

26:44

Ottoman sources and other Christian

26:47

European sources. And it

26:49

also doesn't cohere with what

26:51

the captives themselves say about their

26:53

captivity. So while they might start

26:55

off with descriptions about it being

26:57

a very violent place and Christians

26:59

being persecuted, they will often then

27:02

go on to describe what looks

27:04

very much like an

27:06

interfaith tolerant society where Christians,

27:08

Jews and Muslims lived alongside

27:11

each other and worshipped

27:13

freely. So William Oakley, for

27:15

example, says that he used to meet

27:17

with up to 50 or 60 other

27:20

Christian captives three times a week to

27:22

hear a preacher give a sermon and

27:25

to worship the Christian God.

27:28

And he never had any problem and he was

27:30

allowed by his owner, his patron, to do that.

27:33

He also says that his patron

27:35

treated him like a son and

27:37

loved him and would give him

27:39

provisions from the farm to celebrate

27:41

Christian festivals and also

27:43

set him up in

27:45

employment. So he worked as

27:47

selling tobacco and wine and

27:50

the profits, he says, were

27:52

shared equally according to the

27:54

investment that he and his owner had put

27:56

in between them both. So we've got

27:59

sort of this inside information which

28:01

shows it being a religiously

28:03

much more tolerant place than

28:06

Christian European countries for example.

28:09

I would agree with Claire entirely. There

28:11

were anecdotally within

28:13

Banyos the jails, there

28:16

were chapels, there

28:18

were taverns, allegedly Christians

28:20

were in charge of contraband,

28:23

the cartoons within the Banyos

28:25

could sell tobacco

28:27

and alcohol. And

28:29

in fact what you say about patrons

28:32

or as they know in New them, their

28:34

padrons, their masters, allowing them

28:36

to progress beyond just the kind

28:38

of servitude of domesticity, a

28:40

lot of the slaves sort of rose

28:43

through the ranks and really became quite

28:45

senior within influential households and

28:47

would hold high positions

28:49

and would be treated with responsibility

28:51

and dignity. So I

28:53

think while there were probably plenty

28:56

who suffered and there was

28:58

definitely a level of embellishment and

29:00

exaggeration in these captivity narratives because as

29:02

Claire's point starts it served that purpose.

29:05

You wanted to come in Michael. Yeah, we

29:07

often, we shouldn't be so

29:09

surprised by what Jo and Claire have just

29:12

told us about the treatment of non-Muslims in

29:14

North Africa because we need to remember this

29:16

is not a homogeneously Muslim space. There

29:19

are local indigenous populations of

29:21

Christians and especially Jews who

29:24

live and work in Algiers, Tunis

29:26

and Tripoli within the limits of

29:29

Ottoman models of toleration which

29:31

means that they are second class citizens compared

29:33

to Muslims but they are allowed

29:35

a huge amount of communal autonomy in having

29:37

their own laws, the freedom of worship, the

29:39

right to trade and so forth. So if

29:42

we only think of North Africa as being

29:44

homogeneously Muslim and anti-Christian then that leads us

29:47

into the trap of

29:49

being surprised when non-Ottoman Christians

29:51

were treated relatively well occasionally.

30:00

I really thought about whether I

30:02

was going to return to England

30:04

when I was freed and indeed

30:06

many of them chose to stay

30:08

or maintain their business ties to

30:10

their patron, their owner, once they

30:12

were freed. And I think Jacques

30:14

Massé also says that although they

30:16

were depicted as the devils to

30:18

us, I found that actually their

30:21

humanity, their charity and their kindness

30:23

were not only as good as

30:25

those of Christian Europe, but actually

30:27

better. They treated us better. Jo,

30:30

do you have anything to add to the picture

30:32

of people coming back to

30:34

their native land and what they brought back

30:36

with them? What I've come

30:39

into contact with more through

30:41

what I've read is people

30:43

choosing to stay, people not

30:45

finding that a return to

30:47

England or to France or

30:49

Italy or Spain was actually

30:51

really what they wanted. Not

30:54

only the captivity now, but a lot of the

30:56

witnesses, the diplomats who were

30:59

imprisoned then from a preferment,

31:01

once they were freed

31:03

from prison, they were noticed for

31:06

having diplomatic skills. Potentially they were

31:08

useful because they already had links to

31:10

their homeland and they often preferred to

31:12

stay. When they stayed, did they

31:14

form a particular card of their own or

31:16

did they mix in? No, they mixed

31:18

in. Often they would marry

31:21

the daughter of the bay or

31:23

the day in the

31:25

particular state. They would be appointed to

31:27

some position. There was a lingua

31:30

franca term for the captain

31:32

of the sea, which was

31:34

rice marina. Often

31:36

a European would be elevated to

31:39

that position. Christians were

31:41

often executioners and they

31:43

would hold certain positions within households.

31:45

The executioners, it's just the pennies

31:48

you've dropped. Given

31:51

a big sword and somebody's head was on

31:53

the block and you chopped it off. Pretty

31:56

much. That sort of execution. Why did they

31:58

pick Christians? They didn't. want

32:00

to soil their hands. That's a stopper

32:02

isn't it? In

32:04

every sense. When they

32:06

stopped being slaves,

32:09

was there any temptation for them to go back to

32:12

being privateers? I think probably there

32:14

was a circularity to everybody's life.

32:16

I think there was a fluidity

32:18

in every domain of

32:21

life and at every level. I think

32:23

quite often, privateers who had been also

32:26

themselves captured once

32:29

freed returned to being privateers. I

32:31

think it was potentially in the

32:33

cultural DNA of the

32:35

era. Michael, go to a

32:37

stage where people are sending diplomats out

32:40

to the corsairs. What

32:42

effect did that have? It had

32:44

the effect of ensuring that the

32:46

country who had a treaty with

32:48

these different states was able to better protect

32:51

their shipping and therefore their goods and their

32:53

people from being attacked. So

32:55

as I mentioned earlier, in theory,

32:58

all three of these North African

33:00

Ottoman Regencies are subjects of the

33:02

Ottoman Sultan, Tunis, Algiers and Tripoli.

33:06

To begin with, the countries like

33:08

England, France and Holland assumed that

33:10

their treaties with the Ottoman Sultan

33:12

would protect them in dealing with

33:14

the North African corsairs. Of

33:17

course, because these are, as we said

33:19

before, autonomous de facto independent states, they

33:21

developed their own foreign policy and therefore

33:23

tend to ignore whatever the Sultan says.

33:26

So from the middle of the 17th

33:28

century onwards and really starting in the

33:30

1660s, places in England,

33:32

France and Holland start to negotiate

33:35

treaties with Algiers, Tunis and Tripoli.

33:37

And this does two things. First

33:40

of all, it ensures that their subjects will

33:42

be protected against corsairing activities. So if an

33:44

Algerian ship sees an English flag, they know

33:46

that that's the flag of a friend and

33:49

they're not to attack it. However,

33:51

on the other hand, these treaties give

33:53

huge amounts of rights to the North

33:55

African navies to search those

33:58

friendly ships for enemy goods. And

34:00

in every single one of these treaties,

34:02

from the end of the 17th century

34:04

until the beginning of the 19th century,

34:06

it gives Algerian, Tunis and Tripoli ships

34:08

the right to search enemy

34:11

and friendly ships anywhere in the world. So

34:13

if an Algerian ship is somewhere in the middle

34:15

of the Atlantic and sees an English ship, they

34:18

have treaty rights to search that ship looking for

34:20

enemy goods. And so this

34:22

is kind of intolerable for proud

34:25

states like England, France and Holland.

34:28

And so they constantly try to renegotiate

34:30

these treaties to get better terms. And

34:32

I use the word renegotiate very lightly

34:35

because what we see in fact from

34:37

the end of the 17th century are

34:39

the first instances of European gunboat diplomacy.

34:42

So that these consuls, these diplomats

34:45

who arrive in these three North

34:47

African ports are always accompanied by

34:49

warships of their states who threaten

34:51

and in some cases actually carry

34:54

out bombardments of these cities. Claire

34:57

Norton, was this still the surface of

34:59

chaos and violence? We're

35:01

beginning to talk in rather cosy

35:03

structured legalistic terms now. Are

35:06

we in the right place? Well,

35:09

in theory, yes, there was

35:12

a legal framework for dealing

35:14

with privateering and for providing

35:16

recompense for people who had

35:18

been captured illegally. Are they

35:21

goods taken illegally? But

35:23

to the extent to which that functioned

35:25

in reality. Well, we're not really sure.

35:27

But people did have recourse to the

35:29

court of law. So

35:32

all of the major towns would have had

35:34

Muslim courts, which would be open to Christians

35:36

and Muslims who could bring a case saying,

35:38

well, we think we were enslaved

35:40

illegally or our goods have been

35:43

taken illegally. Now, of course, if

35:45

you're an experienced captain or seafarer

35:47

in the Mediterranean, you've got connections,

35:49

you speak the language or you're

35:51

familiar with some of the languages

35:54

that you can make use of

35:56

that court. If however, you're taken

35:58

from the coast of... Italy from

36:00

a tiny village and then transported across

36:03

the Mediterranean to sort of the East

36:05

Mediterranean coast, you're going to have no

36:07

idea of the court system and what

36:09

you can do. So in that case,

36:12

people could be illegally enslaved and

36:15

just disappear. Thank you. Joe,

36:17

after centuries, two or three centuries of corsairing,

36:20

how did anything basically change for these

36:22

North African countries? They were

36:24

in such constant flux throughout those

36:27

centuries that I'm not sure

36:29

that they looked, say, in the early

36:31

19th century, how they had in

36:33

the late 16th century. Nevertheless,

36:36

there's no point along

36:38

those three centuries that you can

36:40

say this was representative of Algiers

36:43

or this was representative of Tunis,

36:45

because there were these vast swathes

36:47

of population flux and

36:49

the different nationalities, the

36:52

different language communities coming in. And

36:54

for example, in 1600, there were 60,000 people living in Algiers and

36:57

25,000 of them were

37:00

Christian slaves. By

37:02

the kind of late 18th century, that would have

37:05

been very different, but there would have still been

37:07

this diversity of nationality.

37:11

And as such,

37:13

I'm not sure how much they

37:15

would have evolved in an ethnographic

37:17

sense. Certainly, the corsairing provided

37:20

the resources to build cities. There was

37:22

a huge amount of infrastructure that was

37:25

built. The cities had a

37:27

mint, they had fountains, they had

37:30

streets, they had sewage, they had all

37:32

kinds of infrastructure that hadn't existed when

37:35

they were first conquered by the

37:37

Barbarossa Brothers. Thank you very

37:39

much. The stage where

37:41

the European powers, including

37:43

American powers, took this

37:45

in hand and decided that they would

37:47

exercise their authority and superior strength and

37:50

organization in this and as it were,

37:52

get rid of privateers. Can

37:54

you tell us how that happened? It's

37:56

a pretty long process. So as I mentioned

37:58

at the end of the 17th century. we see

38:01

the first bombardments of North

38:03

African ports by Britain

38:05

and France, particularly. And these can be...

38:07

Which ports were they? So specifically Algiers,

38:09

Tripoli and Tunis. So these three ports,

38:11

the main centres of these states. And

38:14

these could be catastrophic. We have a

38:16

number of Algerian sources who remember

38:19

constantly these events as

38:21

examples of brutality of

38:23

European states against their

38:25

civilised multicultural cosmopolitan cities.

38:28

Because when we're talking about bombardment, we're

38:30

not talking about carefully aimed cannons against

38:32

fortifications. They're using bombard ships.

38:35

So mortars on a ship aimed roughly

38:37

in the direction of the port. So

38:40

mosques are destroyed, civilian houses are

38:42

destroyed, civilians are killed. And

38:44

so as early as the 17th century, the North

38:46

African states get a taste of

38:48

this European violence. The

38:50

18th century is a period of relative

38:53

peace comparatively. The North African states settle

38:56

down a little bit and their

38:58

commerce diversifies beyond coursering and they

39:00

become very important nodes in the

39:02

Mediterranean trade. By the end of

39:04

the 18th century, this changes again. And that's

39:07

in no small part due to the

39:09

huge tumult in Europe itself. The French

39:11

Revolutionary Wars changed the balance

39:13

of power. We see arms races. And

39:16

we also have a decline as a result

39:19

of the war in peaceful commerce. And that

39:21

starts to force the North African

39:23

states to once again send out their

39:25

coursering boats to try and get

39:27

some money in. And this brings

39:29

them into conflict once again with European

39:32

states. And as you mentioned, after their

39:34

independence, the United States of America, except

39:37

naval technology has come on a huge

39:39

way in the past century. And whereas

39:41

in the end of the 17th century,

39:44

the Algerians, Tunisians could hold their own

39:46

to some extent against European navies, by

39:48

the end of the 18th century, they

39:50

are massive and outgunned. And so it's

39:52

no longer an equal fight of

39:54

any description. And so this

39:57

marks the beginning of the end for

39:59

coursering. an activity and there are

40:01

some really key moments in this

40:03

struggle. The United States

40:06

has two wars in

40:08

North Africa to try

40:10

and stop their subjects being enslaved.

40:12

The North African states also demand

40:14

tribute from this new United States

40:16

that they don't want really to

40:18

pay. And so there's

40:20

a kind of a combination of factors leading up

40:22

to a very important bombardment

40:25

in 1816 by the British

40:27

and Dutch navies that essentially

40:29

eradicate the military force of the

40:31

North African states, which paves the way

40:34

in 1830 for the French invasion

40:36

of Algeria, which is the start

40:38

of North African colonisation. So

40:41

finally all of you, how does the idea

40:43

of the corsair or the myth of the

40:45

corsairs play nowadays? The stereotypes

40:48

of the corsair or the

40:50

privateer do live on and

40:52

they have provided an excuse

40:54

for people to narrate the

40:56

history of the Mediterranean almost

40:58

as this clash of two

41:00

qualitatively different but mutually antagonistic

41:02

civilisations, the Christian West and

41:04

North and an Islamic South

41:07

and East, where the Islamic

41:09

world is somehow lawless because

41:11

they're engaging in piracy or

41:13

corsairing rather than the more

41:15

legal privateering and they're violent

41:17

and they're religiously intolerant because they're trying

41:19

to force Christians to

41:21

convert. And then this spills

41:23

over I think into how

41:25

we can look at this

41:27

geographical region today and also

41:29

Muslim communities today and that's

41:31

problematic because if we instead

41:33

see privateering as something that

41:36

was spread throughout the Mediterranean,

41:38

that was engaged in by

41:40

all maritime states, we

41:42

can think of the Mediterranean more

41:44

as a shared world where all

41:46

the communities around contributed to

41:48

developments in legal and political

41:51

and maritime sciences

41:54

and institutions and

41:56

we can to some extent move away from

41:59

this idea. of Christian European

42:01

exceptionalism? I think part of the

42:03

issue is that the vast majority

42:05

of the sources that we have

42:07

are European. And so we do

42:10

have a European centric understanding

42:12

of the corsairs. And Claire's point is really

42:14

well made that in fact, there

42:17

were mirror images across the Mediterranean. If

42:19

you looked at the ethnographic makeup of

42:21

Marseille and the structures there and the

42:24

way that different communities were treated, it

42:26

wasn't so different from what

42:28

Algiers, genus and Tripoli looked like. And

42:30

likewise other sort of Western European

42:32

ports on the Mediterranean. I

42:36

think the legacy is actually still a

42:38

very dangerous one. So we

42:40

mentioned earlier that the conquest of Algiers in 1830

42:42

by France, and

42:45

they used the Barbary Pirates narrative

42:47

as a justification for the imperialism

42:49

and colonization of North Africa. In

42:51

1758, a writer called Ahmed de Vatel wrote

42:55

a book on international law in

42:57

which he called the North African states

42:59

an enemy of humanity. Just

43:01

think of those words, an enemy of

43:04

humanity, who you had a

43:06

right, if not a duty to kill

43:08

and eradicate. And so

43:10

the narrative of the Barbary Corsairs,

43:12

first of all, became a justification

43:14

for 19th century imperialism. It

43:17

was revived again at the beginning

43:19

of this century. So after the

43:21

9-11 attacks, historians

43:25

with an agenda started looking

43:27

back to find other clashes

43:29

between Islam and Christianity, and

43:31

particularly in the United States. They

43:33

found in their history books, this

43:36

long forgotten story of American Marines

43:38

storming Tripoli and attacking Algiers. And

43:41

it became a kind of justification for more

43:43

recent wars. Well, thank

43:45

you all very much indeed. Thanks Claire

43:47

Norton, Joanna Nolan, and Michael Talbot. And

43:49

to our studio engineer, Duncan Hennant, next

43:52

week, the theory of the leisure class,

43:55

Ponsdine Weyblin's critique of

43:57

conspicuous consumption from 1890 to 1990. taken

46:00

this ship by force, we don't have

46:02

a letter of mark, and they'll punish

46:04

us, they'll put us in the galleys

46:06

and we'll have to row as galley

46:08

slaves. Shall we go to Algiers? No,

46:10

they're too greedy, they will tax us

46:12

too much. Shall we go to Tripoli?

46:15

They're too poor. So they

46:17

settled on going to Tunis, where they

46:19

thought that they would make the best

46:21

possible life. So you've got

46:23

the French captain, who's a Christian, he

46:25

later converts to Islam, with a mixed

46:27

crew, as you were saying, Joe, of

46:29

Christians and Muslims, now sailing a

46:31

friendship but out under the flag

46:33

of Tunis. And I think that,

46:35

although a fictitious story, sort of

46:37

exemplifies what probably did go on. Oh,

46:40

there's so much I would have loved to have

46:42

said. I mean, because it's so complicated, right? I

46:44

mean, we're talking about three very distinct states that

46:46

we wouldn't talk about France or Spain or Portugal

46:48

in the same breath in this period, yet we

46:50

talk about Algiers, Tunis and Tripoli in the same

46:53

breath. But one thing I guess we focus quite

46:55

a lot on the sea, which makes sense because

46:57

we're talking about corsairs. But

46:59

the land is really interesting and the military forces

47:01

on land in both, in all three of those

47:03

states are really interesting because they are Ottoman

47:06

Janissaries. And so

47:08

this... Janissaries being... So the Janissaries are,

47:10

this is why I didn't bring it up because it's such

47:12

a complicated subject in its own right. They

47:14

start off as enslaved Christian children

47:16

who are recruited to be the

47:18

Sultan's private army, kind of like

47:20

the Praetorian guard of the Ottoman

47:22

Empire. However, by the

47:24

17th century, they're so powerful that Muslims

47:27

are volunteering their children to join this

47:29

thing. So it's no longer doing

47:31

what it was meant to do in the first place. And

47:33

the Janissaries become, particularly in these

47:35

three North African ports, a

47:38

huge political and economic power in their

47:40

own rights. And they have massive

47:43

impacts on the political structures. So

47:45

Algiers, for example, has a weird kind

47:48

of democracy in not for everyone, but

47:50

the rulers are elected by the Corsairs

47:52

and the Janissaries. And

47:54

so it's a really interesting

47:57

insight into complicating this Barbary-Corsairs

47:59

narrative. They're not

48:01

just North African, these people are from Anatolia,

48:03

from Greece, from Crete and so forth, and

48:05

they're not just on the sea, you have

48:07

this huge power on land too. But

48:10

yeah, I think we need to do a whole other show on the Janissaries

48:12

to be honest with you.

48:15

Was there any communication between

48:17

the North African states? Yes,

48:20

and it was again incredibly complicated

48:22

and it wasn't always friendly. So

48:24

particularly between Algiers and Tunis, they

48:26

have several pretty major wars between

48:28

them at the end of the

48:30

17th and into the 18th century. They

48:32

mostly result in Algiers winning and Tunis becoming

48:34

a sort of vassal state. But

48:37

they have a huge amount of competition over

48:39

economic resources, both on land and on sea.

48:41

And we haven't even talked about Morocco,

48:43

which is the other part

48:46

of this story, which we haven't covered because

48:48

obviously we've covered the Ottoman world, but there

48:50

are frequent conflicts between Algiers

48:52

and Morocco and they have

48:54

their own corsairing culture. But

48:57

also which overlaps at times with

48:59

vast vajirs. The only other

49:01

thing I wanted to also bring up was the

49:04

democratisation, as it were, within the

49:07

households as European slaves made their

49:09

way up through

49:11

sort of performance is reflected

49:14

also in the language, in the use

49:16

of lingua franca. It was often used

49:18

because it offered this sort of neutral

49:20

form of communication. No one

49:22

was demeaning themselves that the Arab elites

49:24

or the Ottomans weren't demeaning themselves by

49:27

speaking the European language,

49:29

a pure European language,

49:31

Toscan or Venetian. And

49:34

at the same time, it allowed the slaves

49:36

to find this sort of middle ground whereby

49:39

they could communicate successfully with their

49:41

masters. I would add one

49:44

more thing while we were talking about Morocco. We've

49:46

got the sort of the city state

49:49

of Salih, which is often seen or described

49:51

as a pirate city.

49:54

And that sort of illustrates the double standard

49:56

that we have that they're described as a

49:58

pirate city. than say a

50:01

city-state in the way that Venice or

50:03

other Mediterranean cities where it was a

50:06

powerful privateering polity really, I mean smaller

50:08

but independent from Morocco for much of

50:10

the time we're talking about and it

50:12

was issuing its own permissions for its

50:15

privateers to work rather than being a

50:17

nest of pirates. So I think we

50:19

have to be careful with vocabulary when

50:21

we talk about it. There were clear

50:24

structures, I mean yes there was spillover

50:26

and overlap and not everybody adhered to

50:28

their rules but in all the

50:30

different cities there were clear

50:33

structures of governance and I

50:36

guess where they sit through the cracks is

50:38

that the corsairs were the economic powerhouse across

50:41

the board so they could write their

50:43

own rules at times. That's right and we

50:45

know from the sort of, I mean we talked about sources

50:47

before so much of this history has only

50:49

been written using the European sources but there's hundreds

50:52

of documents in Arabic and in Turkish in

50:54

the European archives of documents,

50:56

letters from the North African states to

50:58

the British king or queen to the

51:01

French king and they have

51:03

a real sense of injustice when their rules

51:05

aren't being followed by Europeans so I think

51:08

that as Queen Anne gets a letter

51:10

from Hajj Muhammad who's the day of

51:12

Algiers and he's complaining you know your

51:14

ships are meant to be our friends

51:16

but you're smuggling our grain to our

51:18

enemy in Spain and you're smuggling weapons

51:20

to give to our enemies why are you doing

51:22

this so they have a real

51:24

sense of justice of their own rules.

51:27

Anybody else? I'm talking

51:29

about Lingua Franca's legacy in

51:31

Palari so there

51:33

are various words within

51:35

Palari which is a

51:38

language that sort of

51:40

existed throughout the 19th and some of

51:42

the 20th century it was a language

51:44

of initially performers, street performers, circus performers

51:47

and then in the theatre and then

51:49

it became the sort of in language

51:51

of the gay community particularly in

51:53

Britain and Palari obviously

51:56

the name itself comes from

51:58

Palare allegedly the Italian name. but also

52:00

potentially lingua franca and there are

52:03

lots of elements of the vocabulary

52:05

which stem from lingua franca so

52:07

and bona tavada which means nice

52:10

to see you is almost lingua

52:12

franca exactly and with

52:14

the structure of lingua franca bona

52:17

nocchi good night, scarpa

52:19

to escape, vogue

52:23

a cigarette comes from fogo which is

52:25

fire and lingua franca so there are

52:27

all kinds of little

52:30

pockets of lingua franca in well across

52:32

various european nations but even in a

52:34

language like um palari which obviously was

52:37

made particularly current at mark i was

52:39

made particularly popular by round the horn

52:41

the radio force series with um kenneth

52:44

williams and hugh paddock and they spoke

52:46

a lot of palari within that and

52:48

a lot of the expressions they use

52:51

stem from lingua franca much good

52:53

our back issues around the horn yes

52:55

indeed it means for the word simon

53:01

asked me to say something about the island of lundey

53:03

which is so the island

53:05

of lundey is in the britain channel

53:07

and it's it was briefly a part

53:09

technically of the ottoman empire i suppose

53:11

a very far reaching outpost of it

53:14

yan yansen who took on this name

53:16

muslim name murad race who we've

53:18

heard about a few times in this show he

53:21

set up base on lundey island and we

53:24

thought for a long time it was kind of like

53:26

an urban myth but in the state papers the british

53:28

state papers there are actual

53:30

minutid documents from the

53:32

cabinet of states complaining and concerned

53:34

of the presence of north african corsairs off the

53:37

coast of england and

53:39

uh for quite a while they're raiding

53:41

along the coast of cornwell the south

53:43

of wales the west coast and east

53:45

coast of ireland um and

53:47

it's it's kind of weird to think about

53:49

it that the ottoman crescent flew over the

53:51

island of lundey in the bristol channel we're

53:54

going to be not interrupted so

53:56

she's joined our producers armantillists

53:58

and bearing gifts It doesn't want

54:01

to be a coffee. Sounds

54:03

amazing. I'm fine, thank you. Yes, please, thank

54:05

you, it was very kind. Teeth sounds great.

54:07

Teeth, that's lovely. Teeth, please. Thank

54:09

you. Thank you, please. Maybe this is a

54:12

bit more water, if there were. Yeah, thank you. From

54:15

BBC Radio 4, life

54:18

can be unexpected. It was big. This

54:20

was not a wind, this was not a storm,

54:22

this was a tsunami. But

54:26

when confronted with change, humans

54:28

are remarkably resilient. I knew in

54:30

that moment as I fell to

54:32

the ground that I would recover

54:34

more. I'm Dr. Sharn Williams,

54:36

psychologist and presenter of Life Changing, the

54:39

programme that speaks to people whose worlds

54:41

have been flipped upside down and transformed

54:43

in a moment. If I had to

54:45

live my life again, would I ever

54:48

want to go through what I went

54:50

through? There's a very simple answer

54:52

to that. I would go through it

54:54

again. Subscribe to Life Changing on BBC

54:57

Sounds. Thanks

55:25

for watching. Subscribe for fresh

55:27

takes on history's most famous

55:29

figures and compelling deep dives

55:31

into lesser-known events. Just

55:33

search for History Extra to

55:35

listen wherever you get your podcasts.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features