Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This is the BBC. This
0:03
podcast is supported by advertising outside
0:05
the UK. This
0:11
episode is brought to you by Progressive.
0:14
Most of you aren't just listening right
0:16
now. You're driving, cleaning, and even exercising.
0:19
But what if you could be saving money by switching to
0:21
Progressive? Drivers who save by
0:23
switching save nearly $750 on average, and auto customers qualify
0:28
for an average of seven discounts. Multitask
0:30
right now. Quote today at
0:33
progressive.com. Progressive Casualty
0:35
Insurance Company and affiliates. National average 12-month savings of
0:37
$744 by new customers surveyed who saved with Progressive
0:39
between June 2022 and May 2023. Potential
0:43
savings will vary. Discounts not available in all states and situations.
0:49
BBC Sounds. Music
0:51
radio podcasts. This is In
0:53
Our Time from BBC Radio 4, and this
0:55
is one of more than a thousand episodes
0:58
you can find on BBC Sounds and on
1:00
our website. If you scroll down the page
1:02
for this edition, you'll find a reading list to
1:04
go with it. I hope you enjoy the program.
1:08
Hello. Until their demise in the 19th century,
1:10
the Barbary Corsairs were a source
1:12
of great pride and wealth in North
1:14
Africa, where they sold the people and
1:16
goods they'd seized from European ships and
1:19
coastal towns. Nominally, these
1:21
Corsairs were from Algiers, Tunis
1:23
or Tripoli, outreaches of the
1:25
Ottoman Empire, but often their Turkish names
1:28
concealed their European birth. And
1:31
in the imagination and experience of their
1:33
enemies, they were pirates who
1:35
represented the values and threats of North
1:37
Africa to be tolerated only
1:39
until gunboats could destroy them.
1:42
With me to discuss the Barbary Corsairs
1:44
are Joanna Nolan, a research associate at
1:46
SOAS, University of London, Clare
1:49
Norton, former associate professor of history
1:51
at St Mary's University Twickenham, and
1:54
Michael Talbot, associate professor in the history of the
1:56
Ottoman Empire and the modern Middle East at
1:58
the University of London. Michael
2:01
Tolbert. It's a complex situation, but
2:03
let's start with something simple. What,
2:05
at the very worst, was the
2:07
European experience of the Barbary Corsairs?
2:10
In the European imagination, and we're talking
2:12
across the whole of Western and Northern
2:14
Europe, the Barbary Corsairs
2:16
were bogeymen. They were the
2:18
opposite of everything that European
2:21
Christian civilization had to offer.
2:23
They were painted as pirates,
2:27
as anarchic states,
2:29
as really the worst of
2:31
humankind. And this
2:34
happens both on sea and on
2:36
land in the encounters between Europeans
2:39
and people from North Africa. And
2:41
this is mostly around encounters of
2:43
piracy, privateering, enslavement. And
2:46
what tends to happen in the narratives that
2:48
get constructed about North Africa is that the
2:50
things that the North Africans do, the
2:52
Europeans also do, are painted in the
2:55
worst possible light. So
2:57
whereas Europeans go around engaging
2:59
in glamorous privateering, the
3:01
North African states are vicious pirates.
3:05
Whereas it's acceptable in an 18th century
3:07
mind for Europeans to enslave hundreds of
3:09
thousands, millions of people on the west
3:11
coast of Africa, it's unacceptable for Europeans
3:14
to be taken and sold in the
3:16
slaves' markets of North Africa. What
3:18
period of time are we talking about, the 16th to the
3:21
19th century? Is that what you're talking about? That's the main
3:23
period. So the Barbary Corsairs,
3:25
there's a prehistory that goes back as
3:27
far as the 13th century in
3:29
some respects. But the
3:31
period that we call the Barbary Corsairs,
3:34
that really starts with the Ottoman conquests
3:36
of North Africa that start at the
3:38
beginning of the 16th century. The
3:40
real height, I suppose, of corsairing activity is
3:43
at the end of the 16th and the
3:45
first quarter, first half of the 17th century.
3:48
And then there's a very brief but violent resurgence at
3:50
the start of the 19th century. What
3:53
do the Europeans understand by the word
3:55
Barbary? The term Barbary is the
3:57
same, essentially, as the word Barbary. what
4:00
we would call the Berber people
4:02
in North Africa. They wouldn't call
4:04
themselves that often these days. They
4:06
call themselves Amazigh because Berber and
4:09
Barbary have this negative connotation of
4:11
uncivilised and that is
4:13
rooted in both a
4:15
sort of a European understanding of that
4:17
coast as being a place of uncivilisation
4:20
as I just mentioned before. It's also
4:22
because North Africa is a place that's
4:24
repeatedly conquered and colonised
4:27
by outsiders. So it's surprising
4:29
in some ways that it's persisted as
4:31
long as it has in describing the
4:33
complex states and societies of North Africa.
4:35
Yeah and Corsair? Corsair
4:38
is a really complex word.
4:40
It tends to denote violence at
4:43
sea that is legitimate violence. So
4:45
we tend not, if we do refer to the
4:48
North African states, we tend not to use the
4:50
word piracy anymore because piracy has the moral
4:53
and legal implication that it's not right,
4:56
it's illegal. Whereas what was happening
4:59
in the Western Mediterranean was
5:01
legal. These were not rogue pirates, they
5:03
were employees of a state and so
5:05
although they were committing violence it
5:08
was legitimate violence. So Corsairing is
5:10
kind of a link to privateering
5:12
and being legitimate maritime warfare. These
5:14
North African places that we alluded
5:16
to and that we will be talking about
5:18
were Muslim. How did that play in? This
5:20
plays into the the Barbary Pirates narrative very
5:22
much. As I mentioned before, North
5:25
Africa becomes the opposite of everything
5:27
that Western European civilisation represents and
5:29
that includes the fear of Islam.
5:31
It's at this time, particularly in the
5:33
16th century, that the Ottoman Empire is
5:36
getting towards the height of its power. Vienna
5:39
gets besieged in the 1520s, it will
5:41
get besieged again in the 1680s. This
5:43
is a time when the Ottoman armies
5:46
are really threatening the borders of the
5:48
states in the West of Europe. So
5:50
in the imagination of European
5:52
intellectuals and in many respects the
5:54
general populace, Islam is this
5:56
looming figure of threat. So the Barbary Corsairing
5:59
is a very important part of the world. says come to represent
6:01
a very real manifestation of that threat.
6:04
Thank you. Claire Norton, what were the rules
6:06
of engagement for these ships sailing out from
6:08
the ports in North Africa? Okay,
6:11
so very similar to the
6:13
rules of European Christian privateering.
6:15
First of all, a privateer, the ship,
6:17
the captain, the crew had to be
6:19
issued with a letter of mark or
6:21
an ottoman and a letter of mark.
6:25
It's a written permission from the state
6:27
authority, be that an empire, the Ottoman
6:29
Empire, or a city state saying
6:32
that this crew, this ship
6:34
could go out and legitimately,
6:36
legally attack the ships of
6:38
a designated nation, a
6:41
designated state that the authorizing
6:43
state was at war with.
6:45
And they were allowed to attack this
6:47
state during a particular period of time
6:49
when they might be at conflict. So
6:51
an example might be in
6:54
the 1570s, the Ottoman Venetian
6:56
War. At that time, the
6:58
Ottomans gave letters of mark
7:00
or this izharzet to Ottoman
7:02
privateers, which allowed them to
7:04
attack the shipping both mercantile
7:06
and naval shipping of the
7:08
Venetians because they were at
7:11
war with them and to capture the
7:13
ship, the goods and the people. But
7:15
as soon as that war ends, as
7:18
soon as the peace treaty is agreed,
7:20
these same actions by the privateers would
7:22
slip over the line and become seen
7:24
as piracy, which would be illegal and
7:27
punished. And the second
7:29
difference between piracy and
7:31
privateering is that all goods
7:33
taken during a privateering raid
7:35
would have to then be
7:37
checked and were subject to
7:39
a tax payable back to
7:41
the authority, the state that had
7:43
issued the letter of mark. How
7:46
far were these rules followed? Well,
7:49
well, that is a thing, isn't it?
7:51
In theory, they should be followed strictly,
7:53
but in practice, they weren't and they
7:56
weren't by any state in the Atlantic
7:58
and the Mediterranean. many Ottoman
8:00
privateers after the conclusion of peace
8:03
with Venice, for example, although they
8:05
could legitimately still attack the Habsburgs
8:07
and not the Venetians, often
8:10
did still attack people. And often
8:12
with the collusion of local officials
8:14
as well as them turning a
8:17
blind eye, there was considerable effort
8:19
at times put in for the
8:22
illegal systems in place to offer
8:24
redress to people and free people
8:26
taken illegally and to provide restitution
8:29
or compensation for goods taken, but
8:31
that wasn't always the case. So
8:33
they set off the corsairs, they set sail.
8:35
What could their rulers, who had given them
8:38
these letters of mark, these permissioners to attack
8:40
anybody they thought was an enemy, what could
8:42
they expect back at home? So
8:45
one of the key benefits of
8:47
this was that you could quite
8:49
cheaply and dramatically increase your military
8:52
force at a time of conflict
8:54
by bringing in these private, privateers,
8:56
by bringing in these ships, which
8:58
allowed you not only to harass
9:01
enemy shipping across a broader geographical
9:03
space, but also these ships could
9:05
participate in large naval battles. They
9:08
would bring in intelligence as well
9:10
from their travels around, so that
9:12
was another positive. And also the
9:14
tax taken from the captives
9:16
and the goods and the
9:19
ships brought in allowed the
9:21
building of considerable infrastructure around
9:23
the Mediterranean world, fortifications, towns,
9:25
urban infrastructure, and of course
9:27
manpower with the captives of
9:29
the enslaved people too. That
9:31
was a big part of it, the enslavement. Yeah, yeah.
9:33
Another thing that gave it its merciless
9:36
image. Yes, I mean
9:38
on all sides, I mean everybody within the
9:40
Mediterranean was subject to privateering attacks,
9:42
be they Christian or Muslim. That's one
9:44
thing we have to remember, it wasn't
9:46
simply something that North Africans participated in.
9:49
Thank you, Joe. What evidence do we
9:51
have for the variety of people who
9:53
might be corsairs? There's
9:56
a Spanish abbot who was taken hostage
9:58
in Algiers in... of the late 16th
10:01
century and he
10:03
wrote of the most powerful
10:05
corsairs stationed in Algiers
10:07
and of the 35 who
10:09
had galleots which were the most expensive ships,
10:12
25 of them were
10:14
European and drawn from predominantly
10:16
they were Venetians, Genoese and
10:18
Greeks. Are these people who had been
10:20
captured? No, these are
10:23
renegades. These are Europeans
10:25
who for whatever reason have either
10:27
been exiled or have sought exile
10:29
from their home country because they
10:31
were in trouble for presumably some
10:33
form of corsaring or privateering elsewhere
10:35
and they sought refuge in Algiers
10:38
or Tunis or Tripoli in the
10:40
sense that they could be harbored
10:42
by the state because they were
10:44
useful to the state there. Because
10:46
we think of the corsairs as a situation
10:48
in North Africa but you're basically saying
10:51
it was flooded with Europeans. Absolutely flooded
10:53
with Europeans. Two of the most
10:55
famous corsairs operating during the period
10:57
that we've outlined were known
10:59
as Morad Rice the Elder and Morad
11:01
Rice the Younger. They weren't related at
11:04
all. Morad Rice the Elder allegedly lived
11:07
to the age of 104. He was an Albanian born in Rhodes. So
11:12
already you have the sense of
11:14
a multilingual, multicultural, multinational
11:17
background. He worked for the Ottoman Empire.
11:19
He worked for himself. He worked out
11:21
of Salih, the port in Morocco and
11:23
then Morad Rice the Younger was a
11:26
Dutch Jansian Thun who is a
11:28
Dutch corsair who based himself again
11:30
at times in the Barbary Regencies.
11:32
At times after Salih he conducted
11:34
land raids as well as sea
11:36
raids. So there is this incredibly
11:39
multicultural, multinational and crucially
11:41
multilingual element to the
11:44
corsairs. You'd have to be an
11:46
intrepid person to take a ship into the
11:48
Mediterranean wouldn't you? You would, or foolish potentially.
11:50
Yeah or up and down that part of
11:52
the Atlantic Front as well. Yes. How
11:55
did they communicate with each other? There's a lot of
11:57
Europeans but a lot of Europeans have a lot of
11:59
different languages. and then there are languages of North Africa.
12:01
And then Leslie, you tell me how they communicated with
12:03
each other. You're absolutely right, obviously. There
12:06
were many, many nationalities, and this extended
12:08
not only to the Corsairs, but then
12:11
obviously the slaves who
12:13
they had captured aboard multinational ships.
12:15
You could see just in the
12:17
microcosm of individual ships that there
12:19
were many, many nationalities across
12:22
and on the Mediterranean. A Belgian
12:24
diplomat who was imprisoned in Algiers,
12:27
I think in the 1660s, wrote that of the 550
12:30
slaves in his banjo, there
12:32
were... Banjo. I beg your
12:35
pardon, banjo is a jail that was established
12:37
for the slaves because they were in such
12:39
numbers that they had to create sort of
12:41
a barracks-type scenario for them. Of
12:43
the 550 slaves captured there, he heard 22 separate languages. So
12:48
they needed some form of communication. And
12:50
there had been this nautical mercantile jargon
12:52
that had evolved over the Mediterranean from
12:55
probably about the 13th, 14th century onwards,
12:59
which is what we know as
13:01
lingua franca. Can you give us
13:03
some notion of what lingua franca sounded
13:05
like? I can do my
13:07
best. Obviously, we don't know.
13:10
And the accents were
13:12
very varied. Part of the diversity of
13:14
the language was that although it had
13:17
a sort of grammar and fixed
13:19
vocabulary, there was variation
13:21
across time and across space. But
13:23
for example, there is a ritualistic
13:26
phrase. The language
13:28
is by nature ritualistic. There's a lot of
13:30
sort of implied violence and imperatives in it.
13:33
But there was this very standard
13:35
ritualistic phrase that allegedly the corsairs
13:37
would say to their captives, which
13:39
is, dios forte,
13:41
non telar santasia,
13:44
mondo cruzi se
13:47
veneer ventura andar
13:49
acaza. And that means God is
13:51
great. Don't delude yourselves. The
13:53
world is thus. If the
13:55
wheel of fortune turns, you will return home.
13:59
Thank you very much. Michael, to
14:01
the outsiders, the Cossairs were
14:03
Turks or Ottomans. So
14:05
let's talk about the Ottomans. What was their
14:08
relation to the Cossairs? We have
14:10
to first of all contextualize Ottoman
14:12
North Africa within the broader expansion of
14:14
the Ottoman Empire in the 16th century.
14:17
So at 1500, the Ottoman Empire
14:19
is still very much a Balkan
14:21
and Anatolian Empire. Then,
14:23
thanks to the conquest of Selim I, who
14:26
smashes through the Mamluk Empire in Syria,
14:28
Palestine, and Egypt, the Ottomans become
14:30
very much an Asian and Middle
14:32
Eastern empire. Then throughout the 16th
14:34
century, they are expanding constantly in
14:36
all directions, as far in the
14:38
east as Indonesia and in the
14:41
west to places like
14:43
Algeria. And so the
14:45
Ottoman North African states start
14:47
to become a crucial part of the
14:49
Ottoman Empire in the west as a sort
14:51
of frontier zone. The biggest
14:54
challenge facing the Ottomans in the 16th
14:56
century were the Habsburgs, and particularly the
14:58
very powerful fleets of Spain. And
15:01
so what they really needed was a kind of
15:03
filtration system in the west
15:05
of the Mediterranean to ensure that the
15:07
Ottoman trade and peaceful commerce in the
15:09
east was protected. And to some extent,
15:12
all three of the three
15:14
regency, so Algeria, Tunis, and
15:16
Tripoli, they fulfilled this role
15:18
as a kind of frontier zone, a barrier
15:20
to protect the proper Ottoman Empire to the
15:22
east. So from near the very beginning, if
15:25
we can call it the beginning, in the
15:27
16th century, that beginning, not the even early
15:29
beginning, they're drawing in the privateers. They're drawing
15:31
in these licensed persons to help them in
15:34
their empire building and holding. Absolutely. I
15:36
mean, the proper Ottoman navy was quite
15:38
busy in the 16th century. I mean,
15:40
if you think about the great clashes,
15:42
such as Lepanto later on, the Ottomans
15:45
have plenty to keep their own galleys busy
15:47
with. But by bringing in the North African
15:49
states, and as we've heard
15:51
already, by attracting the expertise of mariners
15:54
from across Europe, they're able to develop
15:56
this huge defense mechanism over in
15:58
the west of the Mediterranean. And
16:00
that is really important not just for
16:03
warfare, but also for peaceful commerce. Because
16:05
what these corsairs are doing, they're not
16:08
just raiding enemy shipping, they're checking the
16:10
shipping of nominal allies to make sure
16:12
they're not smuggling the goods or people
16:15
of their enemies on board. And the
16:17
Algerians themselves, when they refer to themselves
16:19
in their diplomatic letters, they call themselves
16:22
Dar el-Jihad, so the abode of holy
16:24
war. And that really gives
16:26
us a sense of how they viewed themselves
16:28
within this wider Ottoman system. Another
16:31
way to view them is that they become
16:33
a sort of state on sea. They absolutely do.
16:35
And very quickly, because they are so important, and
16:37
also if you think about it quite distant from
16:40
the center of power in Istanbul, the
16:43
three North African states are able to develop
16:45
quite a lot of autonomy. All
16:48
three of these entities become essentially
16:50
independent states by the
16:52
final quarter of the 17th century. This
16:55
is intriguing, Claire. Can you give us
16:58
a closer example of the way these
17:00
privateers, pirates, as they were
17:02
called by some people, mercenary pirates, were
17:04
drawn in to the great states of
17:06
the time, were drawn into the system
17:09
and became part of the system, and in some
17:11
cases rose to run the system. Absolutely.
17:13
So privateering offered a really
17:16
good way for both Muslims and
17:18
Christians, free and also enslaved people,
17:20
to rise to positions of power
17:22
within the Ottoman state or the
17:24
North African polities as well. So
17:27
this could be that they could
17:29
be talent spotted while participating in
17:31
large military campaigns or while rowing
17:33
on galleys that is an enslaved
17:35
person. They could be people who
17:37
migrated to North Africa from
17:40
Christian European countries to sell their
17:42
services and their skills. Or
17:45
they could be, in the case of
17:47
the Barbarossa brothers, people who found themselves
17:49
almost like the de facto rulers of
17:51
an area in North Africa. So if
17:53
I give you a couple of examples
17:55
from the different places, the Barbarossa brothers,
17:57
or a dress and hydrogen belt, Pasha
18:00
came from a mercantile maritime family
18:02
on Lesbos. They had a Christian
18:04
mother and a Muslim father, and
18:07
they were engaged in various merchant
18:09
and privateering activities. And Ored Schreis,
18:12
in the beginning of the 16th
18:14
century, found himself active
18:16
around our jeers, and
18:18
with a group of privateers managed
18:20
to defeat the Spanish there and
18:23
also the locala emir, and then
18:25
found himself, in a way, as
18:27
the de facto ruler of our
18:29
jeers. But fearing retribution, he thought
18:31
that the best move might be to
18:33
offer his loyalty to the
18:35
Ottoman state. And so, in a way,
18:37
he became appointed as the first governor,
18:40
the first belebe of our jeers. And
18:42
he does this for two years until he dies.
18:45
When he succeeded by his brother,
18:47
Hyridin Pasha, who, because
18:49
of his great seamanship and
18:51
skills, rises very quickly to
18:54
become the Cappadonidaria, the grand
18:56
admiral of the Ottoman fleet, where
18:59
he oversaw all sorts of
19:01
biplimactic and military alliances with
19:03
the French and the Ottomans
19:05
against the Habsburgs, but also
19:07
expanded the might of the
19:09
Ottomans into the Mediterranean. It
19:12
seems to me that in some cases, people
19:14
who did better than if they'd
19:16
stayed at home and tried to work their way up the
19:18
system. Absolutely, and another example of
19:20
that is John Ward, who
19:23
became quite notorious in English folk
19:25
literature and
19:28
plays, so he was a privateer under
19:30
Queen Elizabeth I, fighting against
19:32
the Spanish during the end
19:35
of the 16th century. And when the war
19:37
finished, he found himself
19:39
impressed into forced labor in
19:41
the navy, and he didn't
19:43
like that so much. So he
19:45
mutinies and flees with some
19:47
other people, working as a
19:49
pirate for a number of years,
19:52
before deciding that he's going to
19:54
best align himself with the local
19:56
Ottoman official in Tunis, and
19:58
then he sails under the flag of... Tunis as
20:00
a privateer, again
20:03
getting great wealth and commanding a
20:05
number of ships before converting eventually
20:07
to Islam and then retiring a
20:10
wealthy happy person. This is
20:12
Muslim territory but a lot of Christians or
20:14
non-believers, whoever they are, are coming into this
20:16
Muslim territory. A lot of them are converted.
20:18
Did that mean that they were in trouble
20:20
when they went back to their own countries?
20:22
What did it mean? It was
20:25
relatively fluid. I think you needed
20:27
to demonstrate conceivably that you had
20:29
converted and that was also a
20:31
way of buying your way out
20:33
of slavery as well. The minute
20:35
you had converted you were no
20:37
longer a slave. As
20:39
a Christian who had been captured,
20:41
if you converted to Islam you
20:43
could be freed in the regency
20:45
of Algiers, Tunis and Tripoli. I
20:47
think those people who
20:49
returned could plead very much
20:52
that this was something they had to do in order
20:54
to save their lives. This
21:24
BBC podcast is sponsored by BBC Maestro. Learn with
21:26
world-class online courses from Alan
21:38
Moore, Lee Child, Brian Cox,
21:40
Jojo Moyes, Sir Billy Conley
21:42
and more. Whether you want
21:44
to write a best-selling novel or cook like
21:47
a Michelin star chef, choose
21:49
BBC Maestro. And here's
21:51
the best part. Use the code LEARN40 to
21:53
get a whopping 40% off
21:56
your favourite course or a BBC
21:58
Maestro subscription. miss out.
22:00
Let the greatest be your teacher with
22:03
BBC Maestro. So
22:06
can we talk a bit more about the slaves? They
22:08
were enslaved and there were different gradations of
22:11
what happened to you when you were enslaved.
22:13
Can you go through them? What happens
22:15
when you get enslaved depends a lot on
22:17
your background and your
22:20
class. So you
22:23
might be captured to be ransomed. If
22:25
there was any thought that you might
22:28
be wealthy enough or your nation state
22:30
or your community might be able to
22:32
raise enough money to ransom you, then
22:34
you wouldn't be necessarily put out to labour.
22:36
You would be kept in this manual, this
22:39
prison that we heard about before and waiting
22:41
for money to be paid. And there are
22:43
several unfortunate incidents around this. So one
22:46
of the raids by this Jan Janssen character
22:49
is to Iceland in 1627 when
22:51
a huge number of Icelandic
22:54
civilians are captured and taken
22:56
back to Algiers to
22:58
be ransomed. And twice the
23:00
Icelandic communities are able to
23:02
raise the money to free them and twice the
23:04
people who are in charge of the money
23:06
spend the money on other things. So ransom doesn't
23:09
always work out. That's if
23:11
you're lucky. This is what will happen to you. If
23:13
you are unlucky, there are other forms of
23:15
enslavement that you might be subjected to. The
23:18
most unpleasant, not that any enslavement is pleasant,
23:20
but the most unpleasant would be put to
23:23
work in the galleys and in
23:25
the industrial facilities in places like
23:27
Algiers, Tunis and Tripoli. And
23:29
being a galley slave was incredibly
23:32
hard work. If we remind ourselves
23:34
what a galley is, it's an
23:36
all powered ship. So very
23:38
much like Roman triremes, that same
23:40
sort of technology, it's
23:42
based on physical manpower. And so you could have
23:45
a very, very miserable time,
23:47
a relatively short life expectancy for
23:49
a number of reasons. So the
23:51
industrial and galley slave is
23:53
a particularly nasty form. Then there
23:55
are other forms of enslavement that might see you
23:57
put into domestic service. was
24:00
both a blessing and a curse. You
24:03
had the opportunity potentially if you
24:05
had a kind enough master and
24:07
if they saw enough potential in
24:09
you and they maybe encouraged you
24:11
to convert to Islam that this
24:13
could be your way to socially
24:15
climb within the North African Regencies.
24:17
There wasn't such a rigid
24:19
as class system as we saw back
24:22
in Europe. So your talents meant something.
24:24
So if you were very lucky you
24:26
might be in that position but for
24:28
the vast majority of enslaved people in
24:30
domestic servitude it meant that. It meant
24:32
working in people's houses. For women of course
24:34
that could mean sexual slavery as well very
24:37
often it did. So none
24:39
of this was particularly pleasant but
24:42
there are different forms of enslavement. And as Claire
24:44
mentioned earlier we talk about
24:46
this happening in North Africa. The exact
24:48
same thing was happening in France, in
24:51
the Italian states and in Spain where
24:53
North African Muslims would be captured and
24:55
go through very much the same process.
24:59
Thank you Claire. What do we learn,
25:01
there were accounts of captivity accounts weren't
25:03
there. What do we learn from those
25:05
I suppose there were books? Yes
25:07
they were printed as books. They were also
25:10
transmitted as all tales. Captured as a literature
25:12
it's called. Yes, I think
25:14
one of the maybe, we
25:16
get quite a rich description of
25:18
what life was like in North
25:20
Africa. What the military
25:23
capabilities of the North African
25:25
states were in the different
25:27
polities of their naval capacity,
25:29
their geography, the socio-cultural situation,
25:33
the politics. Largely
25:35
because a lot of the captives telling their
25:37
tale when they came back wanted
25:39
to demonstrate that their time in
25:41
captivity had not been a waste. That they were
25:43
able to produce some useful
25:47
information, intelligence that would be of
25:49
use to their country.
25:51
And also to some extent to prove their
25:54
loyalty to say no, no we didn't tell
25:56
them when we were over there. We
25:59
were their spies. seeing for you
26:01
in effect. So that's very useful
26:03
information. We also get an insight
26:06
as to what life was like
26:08
for captives. But this can be
26:10
a little bit problematic in captivity
26:12
narratives because of the different functions
26:14
that they served within
26:16
sort of amongst their audiences. So
26:18
to start with, many captivity narratives
26:21
would tell a tale of extreme
26:24
violence, especially
26:26
attempts either on the captive or people
26:29
that the captive might have heard
26:31
of or knew to force them
26:33
to convert to Islam through torture
26:35
and other threats. And
26:38
the problem with this is that that
26:40
doesn't really cohere with other
26:42
evidence we have both from
26:44
Ottoman sources and other Christian
26:47
European sources. And it
26:49
also doesn't cohere with what
26:51
the captives themselves say about their
26:53
captivity. So while they might start
26:55
off with descriptions about it being
26:57
a very violent place and Christians
26:59
being persecuted, they will often then
27:02
go on to describe what looks
27:04
very much like an
27:06
interfaith tolerant society where Christians,
27:08
Jews and Muslims lived alongside
27:11
each other and worshipped
27:13
freely. So William Oakley, for
27:15
example, says that he used to meet
27:17
with up to 50 or 60 other
27:20
Christian captives three times a week to
27:22
hear a preacher give a sermon and
27:25
to worship the Christian God.
27:28
And he never had any problem and he was
27:30
allowed by his owner, his patron, to do that.
27:33
He also says that his patron
27:35
treated him like a son and
27:37
loved him and would give him
27:39
provisions from the farm to celebrate
27:41
Christian festivals and also
27:43
set him up in
27:45
employment. So he worked as
27:47
selling tobacco and wine and
27:50
the profits, he says, were
27:52
shared equally according to the
27:54
investment that he and his owner had put
27:56
in between them both. So we've got
27:59
sort of this inside information which
28:01
shows it being a religiously
28:03
much more tolerant place than
28:06
Christian European countries for example.
28:09
I would agree with Claire entirely. There
28:11
were anecdotally within
28:13
Banyos the jails, there
28:16
were chapels, there
28:18
were taverns, allegedly Christians
28:20
were in charge of contraband,
28:23
the cartoons within the Banyos
28:25
could sell tobacco
28:27
and alcohol. And
28:29
in fact what you say about patrons
28:32
or as they know in New them, their
28:34
padrons, their masters, allowing them
28:36
to progress beyond just the kind
28:38
of servitude of domesticity, a
28:40
lot of the slaves sort of rose
28:43
through the ranks and really became quite
28:45
senior within influential households and
28:47
would hold high positions
28:49
and would be treated with responsibility
28:51
and dignity. So I
28:53
think while there were probably plenty
28:56
who suffered and there was
28:58
definitely a level of embellishment and
29:00
exaggeration in these captivity narratives because as
29:02
Claire's point starts it served that purpose.
29:05
You wanted to come in Michael. Yeah, we
29:07
often, we shouldn't be so
29:09
surprised by what Jo and Claire have just
29:12
told us about the treatment of non-Muslims in
29:14
North Africa because we need to remember this
29:16
is not a homogeneously Muslim space. There
29:19
are local indigenous populations of
29:21
Christians and especially Jews who
29:24
live and work in Algiers, Tunis
29:26
and Tripoli within the limits of
29:29
Ottoman models of toleration which
29:31
means that they are second class citizens compared
29:33
to Muslims but they are allowed
29:35
a huge amount of communal autonomy in having
29:37
their own laws, the freedom of worship, the
29:39
right to trade and so forth. So if
29:42
we only think of North Africa as being
29:44
homogeneously Muslim and anti-Christian then that leads us
29:47
into the trap of
29:49
being surprised when non-Ottoman Christians
29:51
were treated relatively well occasionally.
30:00
I really thought about whether I
30:02
was going to return to England
30:04
when I was freed and indeed
30:06
many of them chose to stay
30:08
or maintain their business ties to
30:10
their patron, their owner, once they
30:12
were freed. And I think Jacques
30:14
Massé also says that although they
30:16
were depicted as the devils to
30:18
us, I found that actually their
30:21
humanity, their charity and their kindness
30:23
were not only as good as
30:25
those of Christian Europe, but actually
30:27
better. They treated us better. Jo,
30:30
do you have anything to add to the picture
30:32
of people coming back to
30:34
their native land and what they brought back
30:36
with them? What I've come
30:39
into contact with more through
30:41
what I've read is people
30:43
choosing to stay, people not
30:45
finding that a return to
30:47
England or to France or
30:49
Italy or Spain was actually
30:51
really what they wanted. Not
30:54
only the captivity now, but a lot of the
30:56
witnesses, the diplomats who were
30:59
imprisoned then from a preferment,
31:01
once they were freed
31:03
from prison, they were noticed for
31:06
having diplomatic skills. Potentially they were
31:08
useful because they already had links to
31:10
their homeland and they often preferred to
31:12
stay. When they stayed, did they
31:14
form a particular card of their own or
31:16
did they mix in? No, they mixed
31:18
in. Often they would marry
31:21
the daughter of the bay or
31:23
the day in the
31:25
particular state. They would be appointed to
31:27
some position. There was a lingua
31:30
franca term for the captain
31:32
of the sea, which was
31:34
rice marina. Often
31:36
a European would be elevated to
31:39
that position. Christians were
31:41
often executioners and they
31:43
would hold certain positions within households.
31:45
The executioners, it's just the pennies
31:48
you've dropped. Given
31:51
a big sword and somebody's head was on
31:53
the block and you chopped it off. Pretty
31:56
much. That sort of execution. Why did they
31:58
pick Christians? They didn't. want
32:00
to soil their hands. That's a stopper
32:02
isn't it? In
32:04
every sense. When they
32:06
stopped being slaves,
32:09
was there any temptation for them to go back to
32:12
being privateers? I think probably there
32:14
was a circularity to everybody's life.
32:16
I think there was a fluidity
32:18
in every domain of
32:21
life and at every level. I think
32:23
quite often, privateers who had been also
32:26
themselves captured once
32:29
freed returned to being privateers. I
32:31
think it was potentially in the
32:33
cultural DNA of the
32:35
era. Michael, go to a
32:37
stage where people are sending diplomats out
32:40
to the corsairs. What
32:42
effect did that have? It had
32:44
the effect of ensuring that the
32:46
country who had a treaty with
32:48
these different states was able to better protect
32:51
their shipping and therefore their goods and their
32:53
people from being attacked. So
32:55
as I mentioned earlier, in theory,
32:58
all three of these North African
33:00
Ottoman Regencies are subjects of the
33:02
Ottoman Sultan, Tunis, Algiers and Tripoli.
33:06
To begin with, the countries like
33:08
England, France and Holland assumed that
33:10
their treaties with the Ottoman Sultan
33:12
would protect them in dealing with
33:14
the North African corsairs. Of
33:17
course, because these are, as we said
33:19
before, autonomous de facto independent states, they
33:21
developed their own foreign policy and therefore
33:23
tend to ignore whatever the Sultan says.
33:26
So from the middle of the 17th
33:28
century onwards and really starting in the
33:30
1660s, places in England,
33:32
France and Holland start to negotiate
33:35
treaties with Algiers, Tunis and Tripoli.
33:37
And this does two things. First
33:40
of all, it ensures that their subjects will
33:42
be protected against corsairing activities. So if an
33:44
Algerian ship sees an English flag, they know
33:46
that that's the flag of a friend and
33:49
they're not to attack it. However,
33:51
on the other hand, these treaties give
33:53
huge amounts of rights to the North
33:55
African navies to search those
33:58
friendly ships for enemy goods. And
34:00
in every single one of these treaties,
34:02
from the end of the 17th century
34:04
until the beginning of the 19th century,
34:06
it gives Algerian, Tunis and Tripoli ships
34:08
the right to search enemy
34:11
and friendly ships anywhere in the world. So
34:13
if an Algerian ship is somewhere in the middle
34:15
of the Atlantic and sees an English ship, they
34:18
have treaty rights to search that ship looking for
34:20
enemy goods. And so this
34:22
is kind of intolerable for proud
34:25
states like England, France and Holland.
34:28
And so they constantly try to renegotiate
34:30
these treaties to get better terms. And
34:32
I use the word renegotiate very lightly
34:35
because what we see in fact from
34:37
the end of the 17th century are
34:39
the first instances of European gunboat diplomacy.
34:42
So that these consuls, these diplomats
34:45
who arrive in these three North
34:47
African ports are always accompanied by
34:49
warships of their states who threaten
34:51
and in some cases actually carry
34:54
out bombardments of these cities. Claire
34:57
Norton, was this still the surface of
34:59
chaos and violence? We're
35:01
beginning to talk in rather cosy
35:03
structured legalistic terms now. Are
35:06
we in the right place? Well,
35:09
in theory, yes, there was
35:12
a legal framework for dealing
35:14
with privateering and for providing
35:16
recompense for people who had
35:18
been captured illegally. Are they
35:21
goods taken illegally? But
35:23
to the extent to which that functioned
35:25
in reality. Well, we're not really sure.
35:27
But people did have recourse to the
35:29
court of law. So
35:32
all of the major towns would have had
35:34
Muslim courts, which would be open to Christians
35:36
and Muslims who could bring a case saying,
35:38
well, we think we were enslaved
35:40
illegally or our goods have been
35:43
taken illegally. Now, of course, if
35:45
you're an experienced captain or seafarer
35:47
in the Mediterranean, you've got connections,
35:49
you speak the language or you're
35:51
familiar with some of the languages
35:54
that you can make use of
35:56
that court. If however, you're taken
35:58
from the coast of... Italy from
36:00
a tiny village and then transported across
36:03
the Mediterranean to sort of the East
36:05
Mediterranean coast, you're going to have no
36:07
idea of the court system and what
36:09
you can do. So in that case,
36:12
people could be illegally enslaved and
36:15
just disappear. Thank you. Joe,
36:17
after centuries, two or three centuries of corsairing,
36:20
how did anything basically change for these
36:22
North African countries? They were
36:24
in such constant flux throughout those
36:27
centuries that I'm not sure
36:29
that they looked, say, in the early
36:31
19th century, how they had in
36:33
the late 16th century. Nevertheless,
36:36
there's no point along
36:38
those three centuries that you can
36:40
say this was representative of Algiers
36:43
or this was representative of Tunis,
36:45
because there were these vast swathes
36:47
of population flux and
36:49
the different nationalities, the
36:52
different language communities coming in. And
36:54
for example, in 1600, there were 60,000 people living in Algiers and
36:57
25,000 of them were
37:00
Christian slaves. By
37:02
the kind of late 18th century, that would have
37:05
been very different, but there would have still been
37:07
this diversity of nationality.
37:11
And as such,
37:13
I'm not sure how much they
37:15
would have evolved in an ethnographic
37:17
sense. Certainly, the corsairing provided
37:20
the resources to build cities. There was
37:22
a huge amount of infrastructure that was
37:25
built. The cities had a
37:27
mint, they had fountains, they had
37:30
streets, they had sewage, they had all
37:32
kinds of infrastructure that hadn't existed when
37:35
they were first conquered by the
37:37
Barbarossa Brothers. Thank you very
37:39
much. The stage where
37:41
the European powers, including
37:43
American powers, took this
37:45
in hand and decided that they would
37:47
exercise their authority and superior strength and
37:50
organization in this and as it were,
37:52
get rid of privateers. Can
37:54
you tell us how that happened? It's
37:56
a pretty long process. So as I mentioned
37:58
at the end of the 17th century. we see
38:01
the first bombardments of North
38:03
African ports by Britain
38:05
and France, particularly. And these can be...
38:07
Which ports were they? So specifically Algiers,
38:09
Tripoli and Tunis. So these three ports,
38:11
the main centres of these states. And
38:14
these could be catastrophic. We have a
38:16
number of Algerian sources who remember
38:19
constantly these events as
38:21
examples of brutality of
38:23
European states against their
38:25
civilised multicultural cosmopolitan cities.
38:28
Because when we're talking about bombardment, we're
38:30
not talking about carefully aimed cannons against
38:32
fortifications. They're using bombard ships.
38:35
So mortars on a ship aimed roughly
38:37
in the direction of the port. So
38:40
mosques are destroyed, civilian houses are
38:42
destroyed, civilians are killed. And
38:44
so as early as the 17th century, the North
38:46
African states get a taste of
38:48
this European violence. The
38:50
18th century is a period of relative
38:53
peace comparatively. The North African states settle
38:56
down a little bit and their
38:58
commerce diversifies beyond coursering and they
39:00
become very important nodes in the
39:02
Mediterranean trade. By the end of
39:04
the 18th century, this changes again. And that's
39:07
in no small part due to the
39:09
huge tumult in Europe itself. The French
39:11
Revolutionary Wars changed the balance
39:13
of power. We see arms races. And
39:16
we also have a decline as a result
39:19
of the war in peaceful commerce. And that
39:21
starts to force the North African
39:23
states to once again send out their
39:25
coursering boats to try and get
39:27
some money in. And this brings
39:29
them into conflict once again with European
39:32
states. And as you mentioned, after their
39:34
independence, the United States of America, except
39:37
naval technology has come on a huge
39:39
way in the past century. And whereas
39:41
in the end of the 17th century,
39:44
the Algerians, Tunisians could hold their own
39:46
to some extent against European navies, by
39:48
the end of the 18th century, they
39:50
are massive and outgunned. And so it's
39:52
no longer an equal fight of
39:54
any description. And so this
39:57
marks the beginning of the end for
39:59
coursering. an activity and there are
40:01
some really key moments in this
40:03
struggle. The United States
40:06
has two wars in
40:08
North Africa to try
40:10
and stop their subjects being enslaved.
40:12
The North African states also demand
40:14
tribute from this new United States
40:16
that they don't want really to
40:18
pay. And so there's
40:20
a kind of a combination of factors leading up
40:22
to a very important bombardment
40:25
in 1816 by the British
40:27
and Dutch navies that essentially
40:29
eradicate the military force of the
40:31
North African states, which paves the way
40:34
in 1830 for the French invasion
40:36
of Algeria, which is the start
40:38
of North African colonisation. So
40:41
finally all of you, how does the idea
40:43
of the corsair or the myth of the
40:45
corsairs play nowadays? The stereotypes
40:48
of the corsair or the
40:50
privateer do live on and
40:52
they have provided an excuse
40:54
for people to narrate the
40:56
history of the Mediterranean almost
40:58
as this clash of two
41:00
qualitatively different but mutually antagonistic
41:02
civilisations, the Christian West and
41:04
North and an Islamic South
41:07
and East, where the Islamic
41:09
world is somehow lawless because
41:11
they're engaging in piracy or
41:13
corsairing rather than the more
41:15
legal privateering and they're violent
41:17
and they're religiously intolerant because they're trying
41:19
to force Christians to
41:21
convert. And then this spills
41:23
over I think into how
41:25
we can look at this
41:27
geographical region today and also
41:29
Muslim communities today and that's
41:31
problematic because if we instead
41:33
see privateering as something that
41:36
was spread throughout the Mediterranean,
41:38
that was engaged in by
41:40
all maritime states, we
41:42
can think of the Mediterranean more
41:44
as a shared world where all
41:46
the communities around contributed to
41:48
developments in legal and political
41:51
and maritime sciences
41:54
and institutions and
41:56
we can to some extent move away from
41:59
this idea. of Christian European
42:01
exceptionalism? I think part of the
42:03
issue is that the vast majority
42:05
of the sources that we have
42:07
are European. And so we do
42:10
have a European centric understanding
42:12
of the corsairs. And Claire's point is really
42:14
well made that in fact, there
42:17
were mirror images across the Mediterranean. If
42:19
you looked at the ethnographic makeup of
42:21
Marseille and the structures there and the
42:24
way that different communities were treated, it
42:26
wasn't so different from what
42:28
Algiers, genus and Tripoli looked like. And
42:30
likewise other sort of Western European
42:32
ports on the Mediterranean. I
42:36
think the legacy is actually still a
42:38
very dangerous one. So we
42:40
mentioned earlier that the conquest of Algiers in 1830
42:42
by France, and
42:45
they used the Barbary Pirates narrative
42:47
as a justification for the imperialism
42:49
and colonization of North Africa. In
42:51
1758, a writer called Ahmed de Vatel wrote
42:55
a book on international law in
42:57
which he called the North African states
42:59
an enemy of humanity. Just
43:01
think of those words, an enemy of
43:04
humanity, who you had a
43:06
right, if not a duty to kill
43:08
and eradicate. And so
43:10
the narrative of the Barbary Corsairs,
43:12
first of all, became a justification
43:14
for 19th century imperialism. It
43:17
was revived again at the beginning
43:19
of this century. So after the
43:21
9-11 attacks, historians
43:25
with an agenda started looking
43:27
back to find other clashes
43:29
between Islam and Christianity, and
43:31
particularly in the United States. They
43:33
found in their history books, this
43:36
long forgotten story of American Marines
43:38
storming Tripoli and attacking Algiers. And
43:41
it became a kind of justification for more
43:43
recent wars. Well, thank
43:45
you all very much indeed. Thanks Claire
43:47
Norton, Joanna Nolan, and Michael Talbot. And
43:49
to our studio engineer, Duncan Hennant, next
43:52
week, the theory of the leisure class,
43:55
Ponsdine Weyblin's critique of
43:57
conspicuous consumption from 1890 to 1990. taken
46:00
this ship by force, we don't have
46:02
a letter of mark, and they'll punish
46:04
us, they'll put us in the galleys
46:06
and we'll have to row as galley
46:08
slaves. Shall we go to Algiers? No,
46:10
they're too greedy, they will tax us
46:12
too much. Shall we go to Tripoli?
46:15
They're too poor. So they
46:17
settled on going to Tunis, where they
46:19
thought that they would make the best
46:21
possible life. So you've got
46:23
the French captain, who's a Christian, he
46:25
later converts to Islam, with a mixed
46:27
crew, as you were saying, Joe, of
46:29
Christians and Muslims, now sailing a
46:31
friendship but out under the flag
46:33
of Tunis. And I think that,
46:35
although a fictitious story, sort of
46:37
exemplifies what probably did go on. Oh,
46:40
there's so much I would have loved to have
46:42
said. I mean, because it's so complicated, right? I
46:44
mean, we're talking about three very distinct states that
46:46
we wouldn't talk about France or Spain or Portugal
46:48
in the same breath in this period, yet we
46:50
talk about Algiers, Tunis and Tripoli in the same
46:53
breath. But one thing I guess we focus quite
46:55
a lot on the sea, which makes sense because
46:57
we're talking about corsairs. But
46:59
the land is really interesting and the military forces
47:01
on land in both, in all three of those
47:03
states are really interesting because they are Ottoman
47:06
Janissaries. And so
47:08
this... Janissaries being... So the Janissaries are,
47:10
this is why I didn't bring it up because it's such
47:12
a complicated subject in its own right. They
47:14
start off as enslaved Christian children
47:16
who are recruited to be the
47:18
Sultan's private army, kind of like
47:20
the Praetorian guard of the Ottoman
47:22
Empire. However, by the
47:24
17th century, they're so powerful that Muslims
47:27
are volunteering their children to join this
47:29
thing. So it's no longer doing
47:31
what it was meant to do in the first place. And
47:33
the Janissaries become, particularly in these
47:35
three North African ports, a
47:38
huge political and economic power in their
47:40
own rights. And they have massive
47:43
impacts on the political structures. So
47:45
Algiers, for example, has a weird kind
47:48
of democracy in not for everyone, but
47:50
the rulers are elected by the Corsairs
47:52
and the Janissaries. And
47:54
so it's a really interesting
47:57
insight into complicating this Barbary-Corsairs
47:59
narrative. They're not
48:01
just North African, these people are from Anatolia,
48:03
from Greece, from Crete and so forth, and
48:05
they're not just on the sea, you have
48:07
this huge power on land too. But
48:10
yeah, I think we need to do a whole other show on the Janissaries
48:12
to be honest with you.
48:15
Was there any communication between
48:17
the North African states? Yes,
48:20
and it was again incredibly complicated
48:22
and it wasn't always friendly. So
48:24
particularly between Algiers and Tunis, they
48:26
have several pretty major wars between
48:28
them at the end of the
48:30
17th and into the 18th century. They
48:32
mostly result in Algiers winning and Tunis becoming
48:34
a sort of vassal state. But
48:37
they have a huge amount of competition over
48:39
economic resources, both on land and on sea.
48:41
And we haven't even talked about Morocco,
48:43
which is the other part
48:46
of this story, which we haven't covered because
48:48
obviously we've covered the Ottoman world, but there
48:50
are frequent conflicts between Algiers
48:52
and Morocco and they have
48:54
their own corsairing culture. But
48:57
also which overlaps at times with
48:59
vast vajirs. The only other
49:01
thing I wanted to also bring up was the
49:04
democratisation, as it were, within the
49:07
households as European slaves made their
49:09
way up through
49:11
sort of performance is reflected
49:14
also in the language, in the use
49:16
of lingua franca. It was often used
49:18
because it offered this sort of neutral
49:20
form of communication. No one
49:22
was demeaning themselves that the Arab elites
49:24
or the Ottomans weren't demeaning themselves by
49:27
speaking the European language,
49:29
a pure European language,
49:31
Toscan or Venetian. And
49:34
at the same time, it allowed the slaves
49:36
to find this sort of middle ground whereby
49:39
they could communicate successfully with their
49:41
masters. I would add one
49:44
more thing while we were talking about Morocco. We've
49:46
got the sort of the city state
49:49
of Salih, which is often seen or described
49:51
as a pirate city.
49:54
And that sort of illustrates the double standard
49:56
that we have that they're described as a
49:58
pirate city. than say a
50:01
city-state in the way that Venice or
50:03
other Mediterranean cities where it was a
50:06
powerful privateering polity really, I mean smaller
50:08
but independent from Morocco for much of
50:10
the time we're talking about and it
50:12
was issuing its own permissions for its
50:15
privateers to work rather than being a
50:17
nest of pirates. So I think we
50:19
have to be careful with vocabulary when
50:21
we talk about it. There were clear
50:24
structures, I mean yes there was spillover
50:26
and overlap and not everybody adhered to
50:28
their rules but in all the
50:30
different cities there were clear
50:33
structures of governance and I
50:36
guess where they sit through the cracks is
50:38
that the corsairs were the economic powerhouse across
50:41
the board so they could write their
50:43
own rules at times. That's right and we
50:45
know from the sort of, I mean we talked about sources
50:47
before so much of this history has only
50:49
been written using the European sources but there's hundreds
50:52
of documents in Arabic and in Turkish in
50:54
the European archives of documents,
50:56
letters from the North African states to
50:58
the British king or queen to the
51:01
French king and they have
51:03
a real sense of injustice when their rules
51:05
aren't being followed by Europeans so I think
51:08
that as Queen Anne gets a letter
51:10
from Hajj Muhammad who's the day of
51:12
Algiers and he's complaining you know your
51:14
ships are meant to be our friends
51:16
but you're smuggling our grain to our
51:18
enemy in Spain and you're smuggling weapons
51:20
to give to our enemies why are you doing
51:22
this so they have a real
51:24
sense of justice of their own rules.
51:27
Anybody else? I'm talking
51:29
about Lingua Franca's legacy in
51:31
Palari so there
51:33
are various words within
51:35
Palari which is a
51:38
language that sort of
51:40
existed throughout the 19th and some of
51:42
the 20th century it was a language
51:44
of initially performers, street performers, circus performers
51:47
and then in the theatre and then
51:49
it became the sort of in language
51:51
of the gay community particularly in
51:53
Britain and Palari obviously
51:56
the name itself comes from
51:58
Palare allegedly the Italian name. but also
52:00
potentially lingua franca and there are
52:03
lots of elements of the vocabulary
52:05
which stem from lingua franca so
52:07
and bona tavada which means nice
52:10
to see you is almost lingua
52:12
franca exactly and with
52:14
the structure of lingua franca bona
52:17
nocchi good night, scarpa
52:19
to escape, vogue
52:23
a cigarette comes from fogo which is
52:25
fire and lingua franca so there are
52:27
all kinds of little
52:30
pockets of lingua franca in well across
52:32
various european nations but even in a
52:34
language like um palari which obviously was
52:37
made particularly current at mark i was
52:39
made particularly popular by round the horn
52:41
the radio force series with um kenneth
52:44
williams and hugh paddock and they spoke
52:46
a lot of palari within that and
52:48
a lot of the expressions they use
52:51
stem from lingua franca much good
52:53
our back issues around the horn yes
52:55
indeed it means for the word simon
53:01
asked me to say something about the island of lundey
53:03
which is so the island
53:05
of lundey is in the britain channel
53:07
and it's it was briefly a part
53:09
technically of the ottoman empire i suppose
53:11
a very far reaching outpost of it
53:14
yan yansen who took on this name
53:16
muslim name murad race who we've
53:18
heard about a few times in this show he
53:21
set up base on lundey island and we
53:24
thought for a long time it was kind of like
53:26
an urban myth but in the state papers the british
53:28
state papers there are actual
53:30
minutid documents from the
53:32
cabinet of states complaining and concerned
53:34
of the presence of north african corsairs off the
53:37
coast of england and
53:39
uh for quite a while they're raiding
53:41
along the coast of cornwell the south
53:43
of wales the west coast and east
53:45
coast of ireland um and
53:47
it's it's kind of weird to think about
53:49
it that the ottoman crescent flew over the
53:51
island of lundey in the bristol channel we're
53:54
going to be not interrupted so
53:56
she's joined our producers armantillists
53:58
and bearing gifts It doesn't want
54:01
to be a coffee. Sounds
54:03
amazing. I'm fine, thank you. Yes, please, thank
54:05
you, it was very kind. Teeth sounds great.
54:07
Teeth, that's lovely. Teeth, please. Thank
54:09
you. Thank you, please. Maybe this is a
54:12
bit more water, if there were. Yeah, thank you. From
54:15
BBC Radio 4, life
54:18
can be unexpected. It was big. This
54:20
was not a wind, this was not a storm,
54:22
this was a tsunami. But
54:26
when confronted with change, humans
54:28
are remarkably resilient. I knew in
54:30
that moment as I fell to
54:32
the ground that I would recover
54:34
more. I'm Dr. Sharn Williams,
54:36
psychologist and presenter of Life Changing, the
54:39
programme that speaks to people whose worlds
54:41
have been flipped upside down and transformed
54:43
in a moment. If I had to
54:45
live my life again, would I ever
54:48
want to go through what I went
54:50
through? There's a very simple answer
54:52
to that. I would go through it
54:54
again. Subscribe to Life Changing on BBC
54:57
Sounds. Thanks
55:25
for watching. Subscribe for fresh
55:27
takes on history's most famous
55:29
figures and compelling deep dives
55:31
into lesser-known events. Just
55:33
search for History Extra to
55:35
listen wherever you get your podcasts.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More