0:00

Hello friend, thank you so much for downloading

0:02

this podcast and I hope you hear something

0:04

truly. I mean this from the bottom of my heart. Something

0:06

that edifies equips, enlightens,

0:08

encourages, and then gently

0:10

but firmly gets you out there into the marketplace

0:13

of ideas. I so appreciate you're taking the time to

0:15

listen, but before you start the broadcast, let

0:17

me just take a moment and explain that this month's truth

0:19

tool is called Sikh. Sikh,

0:22

written by my friend David Robertson, my

0:24

favourite Scottish apologist who is currently serving

0:26

the Lord in Australia. He comes and

0:28

visits with us once a month and

0:30

he wrote a book called ask, and

0:32

now he's written a follow up book called Seek

0:34

Real Word Answers

0:37

to Real World Questions. And

0:39

so he literally goes through a whole series of

0:41

questions like, is there ever a good lie?

0:43

Or does the Bible have mistakes? Or

0:45

what does the Bible say about climate change? Or

0:47

what's the difference between capitalism

0:50

and communism? And the list goes on

0:52

and on and on. So it is a fabulous

0:54

reference book that I know you're going to

0:56

want to put in your legacy library. So if

0:58

you'd like a copy of Seek and we are a

1:00

listener supported radio, I'd love to

1:02

send one to you. When you give a gift of any amount

1:05

to support in the market with Janet partial,

1:07

simply call 877 Janet

1:09

58. That's 877 Janet

1:11

58 and offer a gift of any

1:13

amount. We'll send you a copy of David's book, seek

1:16

or if you'd rather do it online, go

1:18

to in the market with Janet partial.org.

1:21

Scroll to the bottom of the page. There's the cover.

1:23

It has a brain on the cover so you can't

1:25

miss it. Click on the cover of the book, make

1:27

your gift right through the website, and

1:29

we'll send you a copy of Seek by

1:31

David Robertson. Great tool to have

1:34

one of those important little volumes in

1:36

your ready reference library. And I know you're going

1:38

to be blessed. By the way, when you're on the website, you

1:40

might want to consider being a partial partner. Those

1:42

are people who give every single month at a level

1:44

of their own choosing. They always get whatever

1:46

the truth tool is that particular month. And in addition

1:48

to that, they get a newsletter that contains

1:51

an audio piece from me as well. So

1:53

partial partner or just this month's truth tool.

1:55

Either way, it helps us financially to

1:57

keep moving forward. 877

1:59

Janet 58 877

2:01

Janet 58 or online at in the market with

2:03

Janet partial.org. Now

2:05

please enjoy the broadcast.

2:08

Important and all that.

2:16

Hi, friends. Welcome to In the Market with Janet

2:18

partial it's Heart to Heart Friday,

2:20

where Craig and I share some of the stories making

2:22

headlines this week. And then we'll offer

2:24

our insight and analysis. If you'd

2:26

like to join in the conversation on what we're talking

2:29

about, please call (877) 548-3675.

2:33

That's (877) 548-3675.

2:36

Now let's take a quick look back at some of the other

2:39

topics we discussed this week.

2:46

Maybe this is going to sound like an irony,

2:49

but I have watched over the years

2:51

that usually the people that are wanting

2:53

to walk close with God, usually

2:56

the people that have been on a high with God,

2:59

you know, something really wonderful has happened,

3:01

can expect somebody sooner

3:04

or later lobbing grenades at them, saying,

3:06

no, I don't want you excited about Jesus.

3:08

And I certainly don't want you to think about walking with

3:10

him. So when people say, when I

3:12

get thoughts like this, how evil

3:15

am I? I say, well, all sinned and come short

3:17

of the glory of God. So if you're saying

3:19

how many of us missed the mark, it's all of us.

3:21

But if you're saying, must I be

3:23

one who is is, you

3:25

know, the most horrible person

3:28

you know, et cetera, etc. because I had

3:30

thoughts A, B or C, I go if it's from demons.

3:32

Usually they bother the ones that they think represent

3:35

Christ.

3:35

We live in a culture that

3:37

loves to pride itself on tolerance

3:40

and love, but in

3:42

my lifetime, this is the

3:44

most rigid cancel culture

3:46

that I've ever lived in. This

3:49

is it's it's crazy. And

3:51

so we have to be careful that

3:53

we listen carefully to

3:55

the narrative that's being presented. I think we're

3:57

being loved, shamed as Christians.

4:00

And I think it's the perfect tool

4:02

for Satan to get at us.

4:04

And it's sort of the Achilles heel, because

4:06

the world will know that we're his disciples

4:08

by our love. Well, if

4:11

you're Satan, what are you going to do? Well, I'm going to

4:13

give a twisted definition of love,

4:15

and then I'm going to paralyze the church

4:18

to do what is true.

4:20

When he came to earth and made his

4:22

home among us, he was full of unfailing

4:25

love and faithfulness. See,

4:27

that is the image. Now that

4:29

is the full picture of who

4:32

God is. Thanks to what Jesus

4:34

did on the cross, he has 100%

4:36

unfailing love. The Greek word there is Keras.

4:38

It means pure grace. So

4:40

we don't have to be afraid anymore of

4:42

him zapping us dead for our every

4:45

sin. We don't have to be afraid or looking over

4:47

our back. Or like I used to grow up hearing

4:49

from my school teachers and even some

4:51

of my family, watch out or God's going to get you back.

4:53

No, no no no. God dealt

4:55

with the sin issue on the cross with Jesus.

4:58

Now we get to live in

5:00

his love.

5:01

I would tell you that I'm a recovering

5:03

perfectionist, meaning that I'm constantly

5:06

battling perfectionism

5:08

or the longing of perfectionism

5:10

in my life. I overachieve

5:13

or over kick the goal most of the time,

5:15

at least in my mind, even before I've kicked it

5:17

right. I'm just constantly putting

5:20

some kind of standard up there

5:22

that I want to achieve and and

5:24

notice my language. It's usually something I

5:26

want to do or something that I think is best,

5:29

rather than relying upon the strength of Christ

5:31

that's in me and relying

5:33

upon the who Christ wants me

5:35

to be. So one of the things I wrote about in my

5:38

book is remember who you are and

5:40

who you are not. And I think at times

5:42

our battle with perfectionism is

5:44

remembering who we are not. We are not

5:47

our own perfect savior.

5:50

It's hard to heart Friday. Here are some of the other

5:52

stories making headlines this week.

5:55

Hundreds marched through Niger's Agadez

5:57

on Sunday to demand the departure of U.S.

5:59

troops from a military base there.

6:01

A sweeping foreign aid.

6:02

Package easily passed the Senate overnight.

6:05

It was after months of delay. President Biden

6:07

is expected to sign the legislation today. Now,

6:09

once the president signs it, it will start

6:11

the process of sending weapons to Ukraine.

6:13

This week, Kim Jong un's.

6:14

Sister promised to build what she

6:17

called overwhelming and the most

6:19

powerful military power to

6:21

protect North Korea and peace

6:23

in the region.

6:25

It's heart to heart Friday on in the market

6:27

with Janet Partial. Craig and I have lots

6:29

to share, and we'll put the first story on the table

6:31

when we return. To join the conversation

6:33

on the topics we're discussing, call (877) 548-3675.

6:38

That's (877) 548-3675.

6:53

The Bible says those who seek will find.

6:56

That means if you're looking for biblical answers

6:58

to questions the world is asking, you will find

7:00

them. And it's why I've chosen seek

7:02

as this month's truth tool. Get biblical

7:04

answers to multiple questions on God, society,

7:07

theology, and more. As for your

7:09

copy of seek, when you give a gift of any

7:11

amount to in the market, call 877

7:13

Janet 58. That's 877 Janet

7:15

58 or go to in the market with Janet partial.

7:18

Org. Happy

7:21

Friday to you friends. Craig partial is with

7:23

me. Fridays we take a look at the stories making

7:25

news, and we look at them

7:27

through the lens of scripture. So always a different kind

7:30

of a perspective. By the way, we spent the entire

7:32

last hour doing some analysis

7:34

of the mounting anti-Semitism

7:37

in this country and discovering that it wasn't

7:39

happening organically, as many of us thought

7:41

that, in fact, folks like George Soros

7:43

are backdoor funding to the tunes of a whole

7:45

lot of money to train these

7:48

next generation Marxists how to

7:50

rise up and cause revolution. If you want

7:52

to hear that conversation in its depth,

7:54

just go to in the market with Janet, partial.org

7:57

and the right hand side bunch of words. Look for these

7:59

two sitting right next to each other, past

8:01

programs clicking on and download

8:04

last hour or any hour we

8:06

do. Going back a full year, we do

8:08

two hours every day, and then it's at your

8:10

convenience and your perusal that you can find

8:12

something you want to listen to. But if you do want to hear our

8:14

analysis of what's been going on

8:17

all across the country, from California to New

8:19

York, on these, these revolts,

8:21

these ignorant revolts, people who

8:23

just had the most obscure understanding

8:25

of what's going on in the Middle East. And it really

8:27

doesn't have anything to do with the Middle East. It has everything to

8:29

do with Marxist revolution. You're

8:32

going to want to listen to what we said in our program. But now I'm

8:34

going to turn to another topic, and this kind of piggy tails

8:36

off of pigtails, off of a conversation

8:38

I had yesterday with doctors Carl Eisner

8:40

and David Legates. They wrote

8:42

a brand new book, both associated with the Cornwall

8:44

Alliance, and this

8:46

deals with looking at the

8:49

client, the climate rather, and

8:51

understanding that we have a biblical imperative

8:53

to practice stewardship, but that we never

8:55

trample underfoot our fellow man under

8:57

the guise of trying to protect the planet. That's

8:59

an alienation of affections. Romans

9:02

speaks to this, and if whatever proposal

9:04

you have out there is going to hurt the least

9:06

among us, then it's a bad proposal right

9:08

out of the gate. But it's also a religion.

9:10

Don't think for one minute it isn't an ideology

9:13

steeped in a religious worldview. It

9:15

is worshipping the creation

9:17

rather than the creator. And this is a

9:19

bizarre new angle I wish I had had this

9:21

yesterday to be able to share when I was talking

9:23

to David and tackle. There's a new

9:25

study from the University of California Law

9:27

School that's UCLA, their School

9:30

of Law. Now, I don't know why this would come out of the School

9:32

of Law, because it has to do with sexuality

9:34

and the environment. But stick with me. Apparently,

9:37

they are claiming that LGBT couples

9:40

are at greater risk

9:42

of being impacted adversely

9:44

by climate change. You heard me. I'll say it

9:46

again. A law school at UCLA

9:49

is saying that LGBT couples are

9:51

at greater risk of being impacted adversely

9:54

by climate change.

9:56

And so here's what they found.

9:58

They said that those living in

10:00

LGBT relationships are,

10:02

quote, disproportionately located

10:04

in coastal areas and cities

10:07

such as Washington, D.C.,

10:09

which they wrote is at an increased

10:12

risk. Sorry, but I live

10:14

here, so it's hard to read this with a straight face

10:16

is at an increased risk of heat

10:18

waves, flooding, and dangerously

10:21

strong winds. Apparently, same

10:23

sex couples also tend to reside in areas

10:25

of poor infrastructure, researchers have noted.

10:28

So I went to the major findings

10:30

of this report, and I'm literally

10:32

UCLA School of Law, Williams Institute.

10:34

What this has to do with law I don't get.

10:37

And by the way, I'll give you my DC observations

10:39

in a minute. They're saying that gay couples

10:42

are at greater risk of

10:44

exposure to the negative impacts of

10:46

climate change compared to straight couples.

10:49

Okay, so when those winds blow,

10:51

when those floods come in Washington DC,

10:53

when it gets hot, apparently

10:56

it blows around

10:58

the heterosexual couple. It does not

11:00

flood the monogamous heterosexual

11:02

couple that are married. It only hits.

11:04

There. They're impervious, apparently.

11:07

Okay, I'm.

11:08

Trying desperately to see where they're coming from on

11:10

this, and it's so vacuous. It is ridiculous.

11:12

Orwell would call this new science. Oh my goodness.

11:15

Apparently homosexual couples are

11:17

disproportionately located in coastal cities

11:19

in areas. Great. Can I tell you something? Washington,

11:22

D.C. is one of the most expensive

11:24

cities in the world to

11:26

live. Not just the state, not even the country,

11:29

the world to live in, as is San

11:31

Francisco and New York coastal

11:34

cities, by the way. So again,

11:36

what you're hearing is critical theory

11:39

oppressor oppressed because you're

11:41

a homosexual. Somehow the climate

11:43

impacts you more because you're disproportionately

11:45

choosing to live in expensive cities.

11:48

If you find logic in this, send me an email because I'm

11:50

struggling. Well.

11:51

Well, can I just make an observation

11:53

here, please? I'm not that great at math,

11:56

but I do know what the top for

11:59

the highest populations in states

12:01

are among our 50 states,

12:03

California is the first. That's why they get

12:05

55 electoral votes, by the way, more than

12:07

any other state. Next

12:10

comes Texas, also coastal.

12:13

Then comes New York and Florida

12:16

states, both coastal. Well,

12:19

that means that most

12:22

people live in coastal states,

12:24

whether they're heterosexual or

12:27

homosexual. Well, back to your point.

12:29

So as human beings tend to

12:31

go to coastal. I mean, really states apparently.

12:33

You talked about George Orwell. Okay. And

12:35

I remember most of us when we were

12:37

taught like this, it was part of our required

12:40

reading. Most of our English Lit classes

12:42

would have us in high school, junior or senior year,

12:44

had to read this book because we had this idea

12:46

of what a utopian world would look like, and

12:48

it was anything but utopian. It was exactly

12:51

the antithesis of that. The only utopia

12:53

will be when we are in the New Earth. Okay,

12:55

not until then. Man can't do this

12:57

because the book of Jeremiah says, we got a hard problem.

12:59

Okay, but what I find ridiculous

13:02

is that with a straight face, these lawyers.

13:04

Okay. That's why Shakespeare says.

13:06

Dare you. How very

13:09

dare you.

13:09

Shakespeare penned the words. First thing we do, let's

13:12

kill the lawyers.

13:12

Anyways, by the way, that was spoken in

13:15

in that play by Shakespeare, by

13:17

a villain. Oh.

13:19

Aha. Doesn't mean a villain can't be right.

13:23

One of the one of the few times that the villains are

13:25

right is when they they disown lawyers.

13:27

But let me go back.

13:27

To this, Craig. It is because we're in DC.

13:30

So I guess the story is very personal. So the saying

13:32

because you're in DC, you have an increased

13:34

rate of risk of heat waves,

13:36

flooding and dangerously strong

13:39

winds. And the paradox of that is, so

13:41

when you're walking down K Street, where

13:43

all the lobbyists are, you're going down Ambassador

13:45

Row, or you're on Constitution or independence,

13:47

and the wind blows.

13:48

When the iceberg melts. Look

13:51

out, honey. Okay, but run

13:53

to the mountains.

13:54

How does the iceberg know to go more

13:56

after the gay people than the straight people? So

13:58

let me tell you what the recommendations are. You know, this is

14:00

going somewhere, right? To combat

14:02

this, the study recommends first

14:04

responders, quote, be

14:06

inclusive when planning

14:08

disaster recovery plans to, quote, address

14:11

the specific needs and vulnerabilities

14:14

facing LGBT people.

14:16

It is also the responsibility of emergency

14:19

responders to ensure LGBT

14:22

couples have access to

14:24

HIV medication in the event of a

14:26

natural disaster. How about.

14:27

Protecting humans?

14:33

Isn't that the job of public safety?

14:35

More importantly, I mean.

14:36

Really, I think there is a safety issue.

14:38

We've gotten to the point in this culture where you can make

14:40

ridiculous statements and get away

14:42

with it. Covid taught us this. You can

14:44

have government officials, people who are in

14:46

fact, this is the cult of the expert we

14:48

did an interview on in the market with this not too

14:50

long ago about we are now in a stage

14:52

where it is the cult of the expert. Mostly

14:54

the experts have given themselves their

14:56

own ascendancy to the throne. I am the expert.

14:58

Look at the initials. Look at where I've been published. I've been

15:01

platformed on MSNBC and

15:03

CNN. Ipso facto, I am an expert. That's

15:05

why we're Bereans, not experts. I'd rather be

15:07

a Berean than an expert any day of the week.

15:09

So these experts, now and again, I

15:11

fail to see the contingency, the connection

15:14

between UCLA School of Law

15:16

and homosexuals and climate change. You

15:19

know, read Blackstone's law, see

15:21

if you can really understand the Constitution and apply

15:23

it appropriately. What that has to do with the climate

15:25

and homosexuals, I don't know, but this this

15:27

is a laughable report to

15:29

say that somehow winds and

15:31

heat and floods are

15:34

more impactful for people because

15:36

they're homosexual than there are people

15:38

who are heterosexual.

15:39

I think the idea. Behind

15:41

some of this, if not a lot of it,

15:44

is the fact that certain groups

15:46

or political movements or social,

15:49

uh, movements have.

15:52

They've increased to the point where they

15:54

have a certain amount of media bulletproof

15:57

protection. That if

16:00

you say, well, wait a minute, are

16:02

you against protecting gays

16:04

in the in the event that New York City

16:06

gets submerged by the icebergs

16:08

that have melted and you say, well, wait a

16:10

minute. No, I want all humans to

16:12

be protected. But that that that you're

16:15

assuming that the flood is going to happen. Let's

16:17

number one but even hypothetical

16:20

hypothetical is say it happens. Okay. All humans

16:22

should be protected.

16:23

Let me take their argument and turn it right back on him again.

16:25

Isn't it sexist to say that a

16:27

certain group of people predicated on their sexual

16:30

activities should have better protection than

16:32

people who engage in a different kind of sexual

16:34

activity?

16:35

Look, here it goes back to an argument

16:37

that the Supreme Court dealt with when

16:39

Colorado said, uh, the state

16:41

of Colorado passed a referendum and they said,

16:44

uh, the majority of citizens

16:46

at that time, uh, we don't believe

16:48

that special protections, uh, in terms

16:50

of nondiscrimination protections should be

16:52

given to a group based on

16:54

their sexual preference. Um,

16:57

so we believe in maintaining

16:59

the historic protections in civil

17:02

rights groups for things like

17:04

sex, meaning man or woman,

17:06

uh, race, national origin, religion.

17:09

But those are the foundational.

17:11

Those are the fundamental and foundational

17:14

categories of protection in civil rights history.

17:17

Uh, but when they did, they said,

17:19

we don't think special protection should be afforded

17:22

in nondiscrimination laws to people

17:24

based on their sexual preferences.

17:26

The Supreme Court in

17:28

a divided court decided that

17:31

was unconstitutional. You were targeting

17:33

that particular group for

17:35

mistreatment. Well, now we now

17:37

you and I have seen targeting on this show.

17:40

We've just talked about people being

17:42

targeted for their beliefs, Israel

17:45

and Jews being targeted because they're Jews.

17:47

So this is the great time of targeting,

17:50

apparently. Apparently. And and if you're

17:52

viewed as someone who's targeting the wrong group,

17:54

then you're verboten.

17:56

Well, I think the study also underscores that this

17:58

is the death of reason. We're witnessing

18:00

the death of reason and common sense back

18:02

after this. This

18:09

is in the market with Janet. Partial. Partial is

18:12

with me again. This really follows

18:14

on the heels of the conversation we had yesterday

18:16

with the doctor's business and doctor

18:18

David Gates.

18:20

They've written a brand new book about the environment,

18:23

and they really talk about looking at climate

18:25

and energy with a realistic approach that doesn't

18:27

put a terrible burden

18:29

on the least among us. It's a very important book

18:32

to read. But now this ridiculous report

18:34

coming out of UCLA law school, to

18:36

this moment, I still don't understand what they

18:38

have to do with either sexual proclivities

18:40

or the climate. But either way, they've got this report

18:42

that says because homosexuals

18:45

have a propensity to live in coastal

18:47

cities, which tend to be, by the way, very

18:49

expensive cities, that somehow they're disproportionately

18:52

at risk from climate change, which is ludicrous

18:54

because they use Washington, D.C., our town,

18:57

as an example, saying, because there are

18:59

dangerously strong winds, waves

19:01

and flooding, winds and floods

19:04

and rain don't

19:06

stop and ask what your sexual activity is before

19:08

it hits. So that this is

19:10

an argument that falls flat under its own weight.

19:12

Just to put a capstone on this, the issue is

19:14

one, apparently, according to the researchers, that

19:16

NASA is concerned about,

19:19

because the recommendation is being made

19:21

that the space agency include homosexuals

19:23

in its climate risk assessment

19:26

and assign them higher

19:28

social vulnerability scores.

19:31

That's prejudicial. Counselor, would you like

19:33

to address that?

19:34

All right. Now, if I were arguing their

19:36

case, I would say,

19:38

well, no, no, no, no. And by the way, I'm not sure

19:40

what I'm about to say is true. That would

19:42

be a shock for a trial lawyer. But, um,

19:45

let's fantasize and I'm going

19:47

to make an argument to the jury and say, ladies and

19:49

gentlemen of the jury, really? What the

19:51

study is saying is that

19:53

let's not discriminate against

19:55

gay people in these areas

19:58

that may be facing climate

20:01

catastrophe. Make sure

20:03

that we provide comfort,

20:05

acceptance and the same

20:07

level of protection for them

20:09

as, uh, heterosexuals.

20:13

That's what we're saying now,

20:15

my argument falls flat because

20:18

that's not what the study said. The

20:20

headline, the headline was designed,

20:22

I think, to again,

20:25

remind our culture

20:27

that there are certain

20:29

categories that are untouchable,

20:32

certain issues that can't be debated,

20:34

certain unreasonable, illogical

20:37

premises that should not be challenged.

20:40

Determined by the liberal elites, by the way.

20:42

Exactly right. So the elite ideas

20:44

may not be touched. It is the sacred

20:47

cow among several. And there are a lot of

20:49

them right now, not just dealing with sexual

20:51

preference, but all kinds of sacred

20:54

cows that if you wade

20:56

into a debate about those issues,

20:58

you know, I think back to the statement

21:00

by Samuel Adams, um,

21:03

who during the founding year in the Revolutionary

21:05

War, he used to say, look, I don't know

21:07

any issue. Uh, that

21:09

isn't worth a public fierce

21:12

debate between people who don't agree with each

21:14

other. All those days are gone

21:16

because we are more and more now

21:18

living in a silenced,

21:21

uh, culture and society

21:24

where certain things can't be brought up for

21:26

fear that there's going to be retribution, cancellation,

21:29

um, retaliation. Um,

21:31

and, uh, you know, being penalized,

21:34

uh, losing your job and so forth. Exactly.

21:36

So let's go from one flawed report to another

21:38

flawed report. First one coming out of UCLA

21:40

law, this one coming out of the journal

21:42

science. Apparently they did a study

21:45

and they decided that they would analyze the six

21:47

most widely used high school biology

21:49

textbooks in the US. And what they

21:51

found is that most of them conflate

21:54

sex and gender. How dare

21:56

they? They believe those are two

21:58

separate concepts, according to

22:00

scientists. Instead, these

22:02

textbooks focus on more essentialist

22:05

view of sex and gender, the idea that

22:07

sex and gender are interchangeable, and

22:10

men and women are fundamentally different, which

22:12

the researchers note may lead

22:14

to discrimination toward women and gender

22:17

non-conforming people. The whole

22:19

world is bowing at the altar of transgenderism

22:22

now, by the way, making up less than 2%

22:24

of the population. But now what they're

22:26

saying is, you can't say that sex is

22:28

different. These are scientists. This is this should scare

22:30

you. Okay? This is your tax dollars at work

22:32

buying these textbooks, at least the ones

22:34

that the science journal wants you to

22:36

buy. They're saying now that sex

22:39

and gender need to have greater interplay.

22:41

We're saying there are two separate and distinct

22:43

things. Gender is a made up idea.

22:45

Your gender could be a two spirit,

22:48

um, furry if you wanted to.

22:51

Based on the 96 and counting

22:53

opportunities to define your gender.

22:55

Sex. Sorry, God's in charge.

22:57

You come into the world with a certain number

23:00

of chromosomes. It's non-negotiable. Non

23:02

debatable.

23:02

Now you know, I read this article same one that

23:05

you're talking about that you read and

23:07

something jumped out of me. Though they

23:10

said they made the statement this study

23:12

that according to current

23:16

the consensus of scientists, they use that

23:18

word consensus, the consensus

23:20

of science.

23:21

Sure, there was a consensus at one point that there were no

23:23

such things as germs, too.

23:24

But but again, this is the scientific

23:27

elite. Yeah, exactly. They are bulletproof.

23:28

The cult of the expert.

23:30

Yes. Got it. So, um,

23:32

the consensus they said in this report

23:34

is that the word sex means

23:37

the biological makeup of male or female

23:39

gender. And I'm quoting from them

23:41

is the social and cultural construct.

23:44

And you should be free

23:46

to pick a gender that's different

23:49

from your sex. But what's interesting

23:51

is science. According to them,

23:54

according to them, the word science

23:56

means biology of maleness

23:58

or femaleness. Now, if you follow

24:01

that logic that that's

24:03

what sex means, then what

24:05

was the majority of the court doing in the

24:07

Bostock case when they took

24:09

title seven, which used the word

24:11

sex, and they said, we're going to give it the common

24:14

understanding. It means gender

24:16

as well.

24:17

But don't you know, counselor, that's the quote,

24:19

essentialist view. We need to move

24:21

beyond the essentialist view

24:23

into a more fluid understanding.

24:25

And gender is bulletproof. You

24:27

can't touch that.

24:29

And that's a little scary. So again,

24:32

what's happening is you got to propagandize

24:34

the kids. So if you change the textbooks, you got

24:36

enough teachers out there that are being

24:38

advocates for this craziness.

24:40

Now we're going to change the textbooks and we're going to lie

24:42

to kids about scientific. Remember science.

24:44

This is biology. This is biology textbook.

24:47

That's exactly.

24:47

Right. Why are you worried about cultural norms in a

24:49

biology textbook?

24:51

Shouldn't it just be? This is the way a cell works. This

24:53

is what a gene is. This is the DNA helix.

24:55

A bigger agenda at play?

24:56

That wouldn't be happening, would it? How

24:59

could that be? Take a break.

25:02

Be right back after this. If

25:11

what you hear on in the market with Janet partial encourages

25:13

you, enlightens you, and gauges you and equips

25:15

you, I want to ask you to become a partial partner

25:18

today. This program depends on the faithful

25:20

and ongoing support of listeners just like you.

25:22

By supporting this program on a regular, ongoing

25:25

monthly basis, you'll receive several benefits

25:27

that only my partners receive. So

25:29

please call today 877

25:31

Janet 58 or go online

25:33

to in the market with Janet partial.org.

25:38

So we were just talking about the

25:41

ideas that are out there. So I'm going to take

25:43

you to Germany now because Germany has passed

25:45

something called the Gender Self-identification

25:48

law, and it allows

25:51

infants to transition.

25:54

The new law will enable parents

25:56

to transition their babies starting from

25:58

the moment they're born. So I guess, Craig,

26:00

if you don't want to kill the child in utero because

26:02

it's not the sex of the baby that you wanted,

26:05

you can have that baby regardless. But

26:07

then just transition that baby the minute he

26:09

or she draws their first breath. And

26:11

not only that, they put a little fine attached

26:13

to this. By the way, it's

26:16

there's a €10,000.

26:18

That translates to about $10,800

26:20

fine for exposing a transgender

26:23

person's biological sex or

26:25

saying their dead

26:27

name. That's, in other words, the name

26:29

they were given by their parents. So

26:31

it establishes gender identity.

26:34

And remember, 96 plus last time

26:36

I looked including literally, I'm not making this up

26:38

two spirit furries,

26:40

whatever that is. So that's why it's LGBTQ

26:43

plus because they keep adding stuff all

26:45

the time, which is why I'm not buying it.

26:47

It's like the plus is like pi.

26:50

It's the number with no ending. Exactly.

26:52

Right. Um, it apparently

26:55

establishes gender identity as a protected characteristic.

26:58

Allows parents to change the sex marker.

27:00

Those would be called chromosomes on their

27:02

child's document from birth. It's

27:05

supported by the

27:07

leading party there. It's puts

27:09

forth this penalty for revealing a person's

27:11

given name and birth sex without

27:13

that person's permission. Um,

27:15

arguing arguably the most troubling aspect

27:18

of the law relates to a portion of the bill which permits

27:20

parents to alter the recorded sex of children

27:22

beginning for births. You know that your biological

27:25

birth, your birth, remember assigned

27:27

at birth. These are the people going off the cliff.

27:30

Now we're going to literally forget what

27:32

makes itself self-evident the moment

27:34

baby is born. Forget with

27:36

the genetics coded by God,

27:38

say Mom and dad, she'll

27:40

be like gods. And they're going to say Abracadabra.

27:42

Boom! That boy is now a baby girl.

27:44

Congratulations. Uh, $10,800

27:47

for misgendering or dead naming

27:50

Greg. Ludicrous.

27:51

Well, and now here's

27:53

the deal. It doesn't go into effect

27:55

until October. You

27:57

see, I actually kind of wondered whether it was

27:59

written in October. And at first

28:02

that just too much guzzling of

28:04

the beer over there when they wrote

28:06

this thing. But no, no, it becomes

28:08

in effect, I'll tell you from

28:11

a serious standpoint, one of the really,

28:13

really and there's so many flaws in this

28:15

bizarre law, but

28:17

one of the most troubling ones is the fact

28:19

that if you don't change,

28:22

um, the, the gender of this child

28:25

from 0 to 4

28:27

and a half, but at five, yes,

28:29

you want to change it and also

28:32

begin a physical transformation

28:35

into a boy from a girl or girl from boy.

28:37

You need the quote, mutual consent

28:39

of the.

28:40

Five year.

28:41

Old now.

28:41

Ridiculous.

28:42

Our rape laws. As an example,

28:44

our criminal laws require

28:47

the ability of a person to give consent

28:50

and under not just,

28:53

you know, hundreds of law of years of

28:55

English common law, but also American common

28:57

law that was built on English common law.

29:00

The idea is minors, those

29:02

under the age of adulthood, however

29:04

you define it. But generally, you know, 18 to

29:07

21 are incapable.

29:09

They may think they have the ability

29:12

to intelligently and maturely consent

29:14

to something important, but

29:16

they're deemed in unable

29:19

to give consent to a number

29:21

of important decisions in life. This,

29:23

now says a five year old, has

29:25

ludicrous. One of the most important things you

29:27

can do to, to, to against

29:29

a child is to, uh,

29:31

really damage their ability to

29:33

identify who they are at the age

29:35

five. But now we're going to say, well,

29:37

do you consent to this little Johnny?

29:39

Well, Craig and the country right now, when

29:41

they get.

29:42

Through playing with their Play-Doh, then you bring them over

29:44

and ask them for.

29:45

Said, we're not doing this anymore. We now know

29:47

there's mental illness. We need to be taking care

29:49

of a child. The puberty blockers can call irreparable

29:51

damage. Exactly. So

29:53

another part about this is that apparently

29:55

the child, like you said, uh, has

29:58

to give consent at the

30:00

age of five. At the age of 14,

30:02

minors can do it all by themselves,

30:05

but they would require the consent of

30:07

their guardians. This is where it also gets

30:09

pernicious parents who don't want to

30:11

go along with this crazy game. Uh,

30:13

they say through the law that a family

30:15

court would decide the best interests

30:17

of the child and therefore overruled

30:19

the wishes of the parents. This

30:22

is draconian. This is one of the worst. I thought Scotland

30:24

was bad. I think Germany now has just bumped up to first

30:26

place. But let me contextualize it again. In the European

30:29

continent, Finland, Sweden,

30:31

the UK, France, all

30:33

of these. The Cass report that just came

30:35

out 388 pages. Longitudinal

30:37

study. 2400 patients. Now

30:39

they're talking definitively about there's

30:41

mental illness. How you think the DSM to

30:43

this day still calls gender dysphoria a mental

30:46

illness, although there'll be assault in an

30:48

attack like the APA was in 72 on

30:50

the gay issue. But for the time being, it's

30:52

still categorized as a mental illness. And

30:54

this is just an outward manifestation of the

30:56

inward confusion of mental illness. And so

30:59

the compassionate approach is to deal

31:01

with the child's mental illness issues. And by

31:03

the way, the longitudinal studies show that

31:05

the adolescents outgrow

31:07

this. The majority, less than

31:09

2%, still struggle with

31:11

the idea that they're in the wrong body.

31:13

So, you know, it's amazing. I don't see laws

31:15

in Germany, by the way, that says when your baby

31:17

is born, I just follow through the logic. It sounds crazy,

31:20

but the same logic would have to apply. And if it

31:22

applies here, it should apply there. So Mom

31:24

and Dad can say, we have determined that we

31:26

are going to decide what the sex of our child is.

31:29

Not biology, not God. Far more importantly,

31:31

but we. Let's decide that your proclivity

31:33

as a parent is you're into

31:35

body mutilation, mutilation

31:37

and we know that body dysphoria is

31:40

another manifestation of gender dysphoria. Only

31:42

this time you believe that you're supposed to be in a wheelchair

31:44

or you're supposed to be blind.

31:46

I'm an amputee.

31:47

I remember Doctor Phil interviewing somebody

31:49

who blinded herself because

31:51

she felt that she should be blind. What

31:53

if the parents, at the time of birth decided

31:55

that they want their child not to be sighted,

31:58

but to be blind? And they have the right

32:00

to say, I want that child blinded,

32:02

or at the age of five, taking the same guidelines

32:04

from the new law. Germany says that the five

32:07

year old, with the consent of the parent, says, I want

32:09

to be blind. Or the 14 year old

32:11

says, I want to be blind and has

32:13

to be. The guardians have to be told.

32:16

And if the Guardians won't go along with the

32:18

blinding of the child, then

32:20

the court will step in and make

32:22

the best interests of the child.

32:24

We don't do this with any other part of the

32:26

human body or any other form of this mental

32:29

illness. Why are we doing this?

32:31

Again, I hate to sound redundant, but

32:33

if you walk through life with the Bible in one hand in

32:35

the newspaper and the other at its core,

32:37

this is a spiritual issue.

32:39

It is about your identity

32:42

and all of the mutilation on the outside.

32:44

And the pills you swallow on the inside cannot

32:46

fill the hole in the human heart.

32:48

It was never designed to be filled with those things.

32:51

Blaise Pascal, 17th century

32:53

French mathematician, God shaped, void,

32:55

designed to be filled by a relationship with God.

32:57

Well, and opposite to that

33:00

which I believe to be the truth

33:02

is the delusion of

33:04

self-determination. That

33:06

if I want it, society,

33:09

law, government, yes, or

33:11

or logic and yes,

33:14

appropriate reasoning, you

33:16

know, should not come into play to

33:18

stop me from self-determining.

33:20

What I want to do with challenge that my

33:22

face, a newborn.

33:23

Doesn't have any self-determination.

33:25

Well, let's put it this way. The self-determination

33:27

that I remember, uh, among

33:30

our children, uh, until they became

33:32

adults, that even after that, uh, well,

33:34

you're born and basically, uh,

33:36

you have to be taught manners. You have to

33:38

be taught not to be selfish. You have to be

33:41

taught to be obedient. You have to be

33:43

taught to do the tough things

33:45

in life that are necessary

33:48

to be a member of a productive society

33:50

and show respect for others.

33:52

Those are things that need to be taught. They

33:54

don't come full born into

33:56

those kinds of values. They need

33:59

to be shared. They need to be taught. Which

34:01

is why, you know, the Hippocratic Oath supposedly

34:03

used to apply to doctors first, do

34:05

no harm. Apparently that has been,

34:08

uh, they've retreated from that and a number of different

34:10

areas. But there's a kind

34:12

of Hippocratic oath there should

34:14

be for parents as well. First,

34:17

don't harm. And as a matter

34:19

of fact, the common law for centuries

34:21

said unless the parent

34:24

has committed harm or risk

34:26

of harm to the child in

34:29

terms of neglect or abuse, the government

34:31

should not interfere with the

34:33

the parent's determination of best interests.

34:36

The problem is we have social movements,

34:38

we have entertainment world,

34:41

we have, uh, music artists

34:43

and celebrities and internet

34:46

influencers who have created

34:48

the delusion that self-determination

34:51

should mean you can change your sex

34:53

if you want to. If you feel uncomfortable

34:56

as a ten year old in your body

34:58

as a boy, then you ought to join

35:00

the gang. That's saying it's great

35:02

to turn into a girl. That's the

35:04

kind of self-determination argument that they're making.

35:07

And unfortunately, those that push

35:09

back and say, no, wait a minute. If

35:11

you look at the medical science in this, in

35:13

the biology, the studies have shown

35:15

that hasty decisions

35:18

or pressure on the part of parents or children

35:20

to, uh, undergo these

35:22

kind of mutilations in terms of surgical

35:25

changes are met with huge

35:27

regret in later years.

35:30

High percentages. Um, so

35:32

all the science seems to be against it,

35:34

but all the politics and the social.

35:37

Pressure seems to be for this very

35:39

bizarre movement.

35:40

And don't forget the money. This is a very profitable

35:42

business right now. You've got doctors

35:45

and hospitals and clinics that are handing these

35:47

things out like M&Ms, and it's

35:49

profitable. And money doesn't talk. It shouts.

35:51

Under these circumstances, it

35:53

is requiring us to give more and more scrutiny.

35:55

By the way, the new report out of Finland, and I've cited

35:58

this report on several times, I do believe there's

36:00

a pushback, and I praise God for this. That pendulum

36:02

seems to be sweeping the other way now.

36:04

And now we've got detransition ers

36:06

who are speaking out and clearly I

36:08

think, uh, Keira Bell in the

36:11

U.K., who sued the U.K.

36:13

health system there and as a result, I think brought

36:15

up, brought about this pause because

36:17

of the damage that she went on, her irreversible

36:19

damage, by the way, that she will suffer the rest of her life.

36:22

So when you start seeing what happened

36:24

in Finland, that lie that is perpetuated

36:27

to parents all the time, you better transition

36:29

this child. What would you rather have, a dead son

36:31

or alive daughter? The Finland study

36:33

said exactly the opposite. That in fact,

36:35

very often jumping into these

36:37

mutilations, the surgery, the

36:40

pharmaceuticals that radically change the

36:42

body in its natural functions actually

36:44

causes an uptick in suicidal ideations,

36:46

doesn't mitigate, actually becomes causal.

36:49

That's something worth considering when we

36:51

come back. What about those new title nine

36:53

rules and what some states are saying

36:55

now that the administration has rewritten the

36:57

rules again around this issue, that abracadabra,

36:59

boom, boys and girls, girls and boys,

37:01

and they can play in each other's teams back after

37:03

this. So

37:08

we talked to Sarah not too long ago about

37:10

the rewrite of title nine, and it went

37:13

exactly as we thought it would go,

37:15

which is basically adulterated the definition

37:17

of the word sex, leaving wide open the

37:19

idea now that boys can use a girls locker

37:21

room and that boys can cheat

37:24

and they can compete against girls. And

37:27

it's interesting because it's going to be challenged

37:29

legally sooner or later, because there are all kinds

37:31

of constitutional flaws. Sarah and other legal minds

37:33

have pointed out that this is just saturated

37:36

with legal landmines, and so they're going to be

37:38

taking it to court soon. Well, I

37:40

want to tell you how one state, in fact, there's several states that are reacting.

37:42

And I'm going to give you a short list in a minute. But Oklahoma,

37:45

in particular, their superintendent of public Instruction,

37:47

is directing all the local school districts in

37:49

that state not to comply with the administration's

37:52

rewrite of title nine, because, in his

37:54

perspective, any spot on it puts women

37:56

in danger. In a letter just this

37:59

week to all the local superintendents in the state.

38:01

Apparently, this Superintendent of Public

38:04

Instruction called on districts not

38:06

to make policy changes based on the controversial

38:09

title nine overhaul, which redefined

38:11

sex to include claimed

38:13

gender identities. In

38:15

other words, this is self-defined. No, not

38:17

scientifically substantiated, not objective truth

38:19

self-identified, calling

38:22

the rewrite illegal and outside

38:24

compliance with Oklahoma law. This is what I mean when I said

38:26

it's rife with legal challenges. In fact,

38:28

here's what he said. He said in Oklahoma, we don't

38:31

bend to the senseless will of Biden and his

38:33

posse, eradicating women's rights and putting women

38:35

in danger. That's why I've instructed

38:37

every superintendent in my state to completely ignore

38:39

Biden's new title nine, title

38:42

nine changes that allows

38:44

males to roam in female locker rooms, dorms

38:46

and bathrooms places where women should

38:48

feel safe. He is urging

38:50

other states to follow in fighting the changes.

38:53

And it's interesting because

38:55

again, this new finalization

38:57

is out there. But this is not the only

39:00

state that's responding. Louisiana

39:02

has now penned a letter to the state

39:04

boards saying that

39:06

the changes are, quote, recklessly endangering

39:09

students and seeks to dismantle opportunities

39:12

for females. I've already

39:14

told you about Oklahoma, and

39:16

then it is not the only state South Carolina

39:19

is weighing in as well. Their

39:21

state superintendent, uh, his

39:23

concerned about women's rights, uh,

39:26

sent out a letter to the district. She asserted the regulations

39:28

are contrary to the, quote, undisputed

39:31

original understanding of the

39:33

law, in fact, went on to say,

39:35

worse yet, it turns the statute on its head and

39:37

would rescind 50 years of progress

39:39

and equality of opportunity by

39:41

putting girls and women at a disadvantage

39:43

in the educational arena. Florida

39:45

first governor to sign against

39:48

this, Ron DeSantis, announced

39:50

that his state is not going to comply

39:52

with the title nine regulations and said,

39:54

we are not going to let Joe Biden try to inject

39:56

men into women's activities. We're not going

39:58

to let Joe Biden undermine the rights of parents.

40:01

Now, I do believe that other schools

40:03

will. Other states rather will follow as

40:05

well. But let me tell you why this issue is

40:07

very important. This is one of those stories that a

40:09

lot of the alphabet soup outlets didn't want to talk

40:11

about. And this comes out of a suburb

40:13

of Boston where the middle schoolers

40:15

there are really very concerned.

40:17

A whistleblower has come forth about

40:19

some terror activities that have taken place. And

40:21

I do believe that is the appropriate word in this case.

40:24

Apparently, a troubled trans student

40:26

came to class after naming 45

40:29

fellow students on a list that

40:31

was entitled a hit list.

40:33

The parent of a child at Watertown Middle

40:35

School said that students now

40:38

fear for their lives, worrying each day that

40:40

they will be going home in a body

40:42

bag. We're still school officials

40:44

have silenced criticism of the trans

40:46

student, a seventh grader. Parents say they

40:48

can't talk about school safety without being accused

40:51

of being trans phobic. So

40:53

apparently this kid has a 40

40:55

plus person hit list who was

40:57

who has faced minimal consequences and been

40:59

favored at every turn. Uh, obviously

41:01

has a lot of anger, doesn't know what they will

41:03

do, said one parent. I saw the

41:05

testimony of a young girl whose name was

41:07

on that list. She warned a teacher. The

41:10

teacher said, I'm paraphrasing what she said

41:12

in her very powerful video. She

41:14

said the teacher told, don't worry about

41:16

it. It's all been taken care of. The next thing you know, she

41:18

was being battered and bloodied, even though

41:20

she told the teacher I'm afraid for my safety.

41:23

The teacher basically said, go away kid,

41:25

you bother me. Not a problem, not a problem

41:27

whatsoever. So they know the hit list is

41:29

out there. They know students have been hurt and the school

41:31

won't do anything. Students

41:33

on the hit list have prepared to fight for

41:35

their lives according to the parents. They

41:37

know that the school is not protecting

41:39

them. Craig, your thoughts on this? Yeah.

41:42

You know, when you target people,

41:44

generally speaking, and I just

41:47

had recently researched this

41:49

for a legal case. Um,

41:52

I went through the number of Supreme Court

41:54

cases where the court denounced,

41:56

rightfully so, as a violation

41:58

of the First Amendment whenever government

42:01

targets anybody based

42:04

on their fundamental rights. So

42:06

if. If you're right, of free speech as an example,

42:09

and you say, well, I don't agree with

42:11

this or I believe in that, and

42:14

then the government targets you. That's

42:16

a very egregious violation

42:18

of the First Amendment targeting by

42:20

government, because government has more power than

42:23

the individuals do. I can tell

42:25

you right now that school districts have massive

42:27

budgets. They have a

42:29

large number of faculty. They have

42:31

a board behind them, and they have the federal

42:33

government behind them because federal dollars

42:35

find them way into public education.

42:38

And then you have these parents

42:40

of 45 students or 40 students, whatever

42:42

the number is, uh, facing

42:44

that onslaught of targeting.

42:46

So what's really disheartening

42:49

is the response of the school was to

42:51

take the list from this. Apparently,

42:54

this student who said he was or

42:56

she was a trans and

42:58

said, these are my enemies. And

43:00

then they said, okay, what are we going to do

43:02

about this? Well, we're going to I

43:04

know we'll build an what they called an

43:07

affinity group to confirm

43:09

and support that trans

43:12

report that these 40

43:14

to 45 students should

43:16

be targeted because they're the enemy.

43:18

They're the enemy of the state. They're the enemy

43:20

of the school district. They're the enemy of

43:23

good order and peace in

43:25

the community. Now that that

43:27

is nasty stuff. That's troublesome

43:29

stuff. I think it's unconstitutional.

43:31

If there were a lawsuit brought,

43:33

I think they might have a

43:35

grief, a grievance to

43:37

bring to a course attention. Not sure

43:39

how it play out because we don't know all the facts. But

43:41

I do know this. These students were

43:43

targeted for their disagreement

43:46

with the idea of a

43:48

person transitioning in terms of

43:51

their gender. Once again, gender

43:53

becomes the special protected.

43:55

We can't discuss or debate or

43:58

disagree with category and

44:00

that's dangerous in a constitutional

44:02

republic, I think.

44:03

Well, that's that's my point. I think what happens to

44:05

the child that's not trans? What if the child says, I'm

44:07

not going to use that pronoun because you're not

44:09

you're a boy, you're not a girl. And

44:11

that's enough to get on this trans hit list. I'll tell

44:14

you the other thing that hits me. And I live in a world

44:16

of pragmatics. Again, I argue

44:18

there is mental illness in

44:20

this issue. So if this person creates

44:22

a hit list, if this person is physically acting

44:25

out and they are all of a sudden

44:27

the issue of that person's self-identified

44:30

gender all very fluid and

44:32

wrongheaded terms, apparently has

44:34

a transcendence that's socking another tooth

44:36

in the head doesn't carry.

44:38

So in other words, forget the basic deportment

44:40

and assault and battery. Your pronouns

44:43

are far more important.

44:44

In other words, it's the heckler's veto. Yeah, one

44:46

heckler can silence thousands

44:48

of people if it's the right heckler with the right

44:50

worldview or the wrong one, I should say.

44:52

And it's a popular worldview now. Wow. Go

44:55

through the book, keep it in your heart. Keep

44:57

it in your mind. Use it as your guide. As you get out

44:59

there in the marketplace. I'll meet you there. Have a great

45:01

weekend, friends.