Podchaser Logo
Home
What does the Nord Stream sabotage mean for Ireland?

What does the Nord Stream sabotage mean for Ireland?

Released Monday, 3rd October 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
What does the Nord Stream sabotage mean for Ireland?

What does the Nord Stream sabotage mean for Ireland?

What does the Nord Stream sabotage mean for Ireland?

What does the Nord Stream sabotage mean for Ireland?

Monday, 3rd October 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Did you know that students get it

0:02

free? The Irish Times offers a free digital

0:05

subscription to all four time undergraduate's, keep

0:07

up to date, For free with quality journalism

0:10

and reporting, claim yours today at

0:12

iris times dot com slash subscribe slash

0:14

student. Last

0:16

week, a mysterious act of sabotage

0:18

with all the hallmarks of what's known as

0:20

hybrid warfare was carried out

0:22

in the Baltic Sea.

0:24

bubbling to the top of the Baltic

0:26

Sea gas leaching from Russia's

0:29

Nord Stream pipelines. European

0:31

officials believe this was the result

0:33

of savage.

0:34

The four separate gas leaks

0:36

posed a safety risk to ships, threatened

0:38

ecosystems, and sent energy

0:41

prices spiraling again. But

0:44

the event also has a sinister implication

0:46

for Russia's war in Ukraine. and

0:48

it's a relationship with Europe. Irrespective

0:50

of who actually did

0:52

that, if that's now a

0:54

new arena of conflict, that means

0:56

that all the member states in the

0:58

EU are going to be looking at what their vulnerabilities

1:01

are.

1:01

If sabotaging critical infrastructure

1:03

is now on the table,

1:05

just how vulnerable

1:06

is Ireland. Attention

1:08

is turning to the submarine cables off

1:10

Ireland's coast, the digital arteries

1:13

that travel across the Atlantic and

1:15

keep our world connected. This

1:17

is how international financial transactions

1:19

are done. It's how, you know, for example,

1:21

video streaming works, It's obviously

1:23

really important, particularly for Ireland

1:26

because of our tech industry. And it throws

1:27

new light on those so called naval

1:30

drills carried out by Russia in Irish

1:32

waters earlier this year. In

1:34

the modern day David and Goliath

1:36

story, I just love this story. Irish fishermen

1:39

are celebrating after Russia backed

1:41

off a plan for live naval exercises

1:43

off the Irish coast. I'm

1:45

Connor Pope, and this is in the news from The Irish

1:47

Times. Today, What does the

1:50

North Stream sabotage mean for Ireland,

1:52

for Europe, and for the world? Naomi

1:56

O'Leary is the archtime's Europe correspondent. Naomi,

1:58

can we start maybe with an Nord Stream one

2:00

and two gas pipelines. They're the

2:02

major gas connections between Russia and

2:04

the EU. And last week, multiple explosions

2:06

were detected along the pipelines. What

2:09

do we know about those explosions and the damage

2:11

that was done?

2:14

Suddenly, there was a

2:16

a loss of pressure. detected along

2:19

the Nord Stream pipelines one

2:21

and two. This

2:22

all happened in a very short

2:25

space of time. and it was established

2:27

that there were a number of leaks where

2:29

initially reported as three. Now

2:31

Sweden is saying it's actually four leaks.

2:34

the Swedish Coast Guard is now clarifying

2:37

that there was this fourth leak already

2:39

to smaller leak than the first one they detected.

2:42

That one This caused huge bubbles

2:45

of gas to rise up

2:47

through the Baltic Sea, which is actually quite

2:49

dangerous for ships. as well as being

2:51

an environmental environmentally damaging.

2:54

Because these leaks suddenly

2:56

happened all at the same time in different locations,

2:59

the conclusion has been that this was deliberate.

3:02

That's what European leaders have been saying.

3:06

We have Swedish intelligence, but we have

3:08

also received information in our contacts

3:10

with Denmark. And based on this concluded

3:13

that this is probably a deliberate act.

3:15

It is probably a matter of sabotage. But

3:18

as to the context of how it was done,

3:20

who did it, that's still very much in

3:23

the air.

3:25

Naomi,

3:31

last week during a ceremony to annex four

3:33

regions of Ukraine and to Russia, Putin

3:36

openly accused Western states of

3:38

blowing up the pipelines. Angela

3:40

Saxons are not happy

3:43

with the sanctions, they

3:45

moved to terrorist

3:46

attacks having

3:48

arranged explosions on

3:50

the gas pipelines in

3:53

the sea. But

3:54

really, I suppose the suspicion is still

3:57

very much that Russia is behind the sabotage

3:59

So

3:59

what have other European leaders said

4:02

about the incidents and have they actually pointed the

4:04

finger at Putin's Russia? They

4:06

just have in general been quite careful not

4:09

to get into attribution at this stage.

4:12

They did come out quite quickly to say that

4:15

this was deliberate. Now,

4:17

Russia, a spokesperson from

4:19

the from Kremlin to Mitra Pescoff

4:21

has said that it's not in their interest to

4:23

do this. The EU said the leaks had been caused

4:26

by sabotage. Russia dismissed those suggestions

4:28

that have attacked its own pipelines as

4:31

predictable and stupid. These

4:34

are the pipelines that deliver gas

4:36

or were delivering gas to the

4:38

EU before the energy disputes. So

4:41

they say, you know, it's not in our interest for this gas

4:43

to be bubbling out into the sky.

4:46

This is we've just lost a way to sell

4:48

our gas to Europe. However, this does

4:50

common context when the

4:52

EU and Russia are in a major energy

4:55

dispute. Mhmm. And so what it's seen as

4:57

is an escalation in that kind of

4:59

dangerous escalation with infrastructure, critical

5:02

infrastructure being hit, which

5:05

just really brings this conflict to a new level.

5:07

And of course, we all know that

5:09

gas markets have been extremely volatile

5:11

in recent months. and we've seen

5:13

price spikes of more than a thousand percent.

5:16

And this news sent prices spiraling

5:18

again, and that's despite the fact that

5:20

the pipelines currently supply very little

5:22

gas to the EU, I think around twenty

5:24

percent. So this

5:26

has been another big step in disrupting

5:29

the energy markets in Europe. And I wonder

5:30

Is it a sign maybe Naomi that

5:33

the market has changed permanently or

5:35

at least for the long term? Yeah. Especially

5:37

if we don't get any kind of gas supplies from Nord

5:39

Stream. So

5:40

neither of these pipelines were at the

5:43

time that they were hit, actually delivering

5:45

gas to the EU. One, because it was

5:47

never switched on due to,

5:49

essentially, the conflict and the changed

5:51

dynamic regarding Russian gas.

5:54

The other one because Russia had

5:56

already turned it off. So

5:58

the gas that's spilling out is just remaining

6:01

gas that was actually inside the pipeline that

6:03

wasn't actually flowing. what this does,

6:05

therefore, it doesn't it doesn't reduce the amount

6:08

of Russian gas that's currently flowing

6:10

to the EU, but it sort of draws a

6:12

line, a full stop on the prospect

6:15

of that supply resuming. So

6:17

really what it's quite serious for

6:20

is next winter. That's what we're hearing is

6:22

that Supply will be very difficult next winter.

6:24

The EU has already filled up all of its

6:27

storage capacity to nearly completely

6:29

full using Russian gas. while

6:32

it was still flowing. But next winter,

6:34

they won't have that option. They'll be relying mostly

6:36

on LNG. So there's very,

6:39

very little Russian gas coming to Europe now.

6:41

It's already dropped to from about forty percent

6:43

of the EU's gas needs to about nine

6:45

percent and -- Okay. -- and

6:47

the Russian energy giant gas from

6:49

has suggested it may turn off the

6:51

last remaining tap or

6:53

a route which runs through Ukraine.

6:56

And of

6:56

course, some analysts have been suggesting in

6:58

recent days this Russia is behind

7:00

this and they're behind

7:02

it because they want to threaten European

7:04

infrastructure and they're making this point

7:06

that they could attack other pipelines. For example,

7:09

there's a new pipeline between Norway and Poland

7:11

that could be similarly targeted. if

7:14

that's true, it's kind of frightening, isn't it? Because

7:16

that would mean that Russia is now

7:19

willing to escalate the conflict in

7:21

a way that could make life very uncomfortable

7:23

for us, but could also see the conflict

7:26

spilling over into Europe in a more meaningful

7:28

way.

7:29

with attacks like this, mysterious

7:32

sabotage, a lot of the time

7:35

in order to place attribution, context

7:37

is relied upon. And that's probably

7:40

why analysts are looking to Russia

7:42

because the context is that the

7:44

EU and Russia are in a dispute over

7:46

energy. And the

7:49

reasons that you come up with why Russia

7:51

might want to do this is to

7:53

again send gas prices higher,

7:56

which their previous

7:58

acts in terms of further switching off pipelines

8:01

and stuff, they had had unlimited ability

8:04

to do so. So they were sort of hitting

8:06

a wall with how much further they could push

8:08

the gas price up. This reintroduced

8:12

serious instability. It also,

8:15

like you say, it raises the atmosphere

8:17

of tension and insecurity. It

8:19

has EU leaders asking

8:22

themselves, where else might be vulnerable?

8:25

What else could be hit? They're

8:27

scrambling now to increase security on

8:29

other critical infrastructure. And

8:31

so this does have some of the hallmarks

8:34

of a hybrid war and

8:36

attack in that it's

8:38

difficult to place attribution, and

8:41

it seems to be seeking to influence

8:44

the decision making of the target. while

8:47

falling below the thresholds of attribution

8:50

of the kind of level

8:53

of attack that would trigger retaliation.

8:56

Now, you mentioned a phrase there hybrid

8:58

war, and you've been writing in

9:00

the Irish times about this hybrid warfare

9:03

tool kit. I'd say for a lot of

9:05

people that phrase is entirely new.

9:07

So what does it mean?

9:09

Hybrid word refers to this

9:11

gray area. which is

9:15

it's a it's a characteristic of

9:17

current day conflict in that you

9:19

don't have the traditional clear cut

9:22

a hot and cold complex, but you have

9:24

a whole area of attacks

9:26

which are difficult to classify. Sometimes

9:29

it's unclear where they're coming

9:31

from, they might not even be detected.

9:34

And as I say, there's a lot of

9:36

dancing around the level of

9:39

severity of attacks that would trigger

9:41

response. So in recent years,

9:43

we've seen an increase in

9:46

these methods that become more characteristic

9:49

of current geopolitics. And

9:51

we've also seen an increase

9:53

in the phenomenon of mysterious critical

9:56

infrastructure sabotage. So

9:58

a tax on infrastructure which are really quite

10:00

hard to pin down in terms of who

10:02

was responsible.

10:03

Can

10:06

you

10:06

give me any examples in Naomi of these

10:08

kind of attacks? Like, where

10:11

have we seen them and who's been targeted? Sure.

10:13

Well,

10:14

a major turning point in this was

10:16

the attacks in Estonia in two thousand and

10:19

seven. That happened at

10:21

a time of tension when the local

10:23

Russian population

10:24

of Estonia were

10:26

rioting over the proposed

10:29

removal of a Soviet

10:30

era monument.

10:33

So it came at a time of tension. Suddenly,

10:36

there were waves of really extreme cyberattacks

10:40

on all key Astonian critical

10:42

infrastructure. So banks, media,

10:45

telecommunications, waves of

10:47

them all happening at the same time. This

10:50

was attributed to Russian

10:52

sources, mostly due to context,

10:55

and it's seen as a turning point in

10:59

kind of a demonstration of what hybrid

11:01

attacks can do. This really

11:03

it grind the country to hold and

11:06

it also It was a turning point

11:08

for Estonia in terms of building its

11:10

digital security. Since

11:12

then, we've seen

11:15

cyberattacks have become a feature. of

11:17

of modern life. And just as

11:19

in Estonia, it's often very difficult

11:21

to distinguish. Are they criminal

11:24

groups acting independently? Are

11:26

they criminal groups that have the backing of a state?

11:29

Or are they just state forces

11:31

which are masquerading as criminal groups? This

11:33

is very difficult to sort out. And

11:36

like I say, a lot of the time you rely

11:38

on context to interpret who

11:40

could be responsible. So

11:42

there's been a large scale attacks

11:44

on electricity networks. For

11:46

example, the Dutch electricity network

11:49

was taken offline not too long ago.

11:52

And something that might be relevant to

11:54

our discussion now is the

11:56

attacks in France on fiber optic

11:59

cables.

12:01

France's internet is down after

12:03

suspected strikes. Internet

12:05

success was delayed or unavailable in

12:07

numerous French towns on Wednesday

12:09

as result of suspected attacks on

12:12

fiber optic cables. According

12:14

to media report Can you tell me little bit about

12:16

those attacks in France nearly?

12:17

Yeah. So to run through what happened there

12:19

earlier this year, fiber optic

12:22

cables were essentially dug up and caught

12:25

in a number of key

12:27

locations in a coordinated way

12:29

overnight. This

12:32

came to light in April. It knocked

12:34

out Internet access and phone

12:36

access in different regions of France.

12:38

And what had been targeted were the these

12:41

important sort of highways of information that

12:43

connect different French regions to

12:45

the Internet? So these

12:47

cables were dug up in several

12:49

locations all at once and they

12:51

were cut in a way that made them really difficult to

12:54

repair. so that they would be taken offline

12:56

for, you know, a significant period.

12:58

And what's kind of even stranger is that a

13:00

similar thing happened in twenty twenty

13:02

in the Paris region Again,

13:05

fiber optic cables were dug up

13:07

and cost in this coordinated way.

13:09

Like, it was planned, like someone knew how

13:11

it had looked at how the system worked. and

13:14

had deliberately attacked in several

13:16

points once in order to cause the maximum

13:18

disruption and tens of thousands of people

13:20

lost their Internet connection. temporarily

13:22

due to that incident. Mhmm.

13:25

Both of the incidents of

13:27

sabotage are are mysterious. They're

13:29

mysterious critical infrastructure attacks

13:32

that haven't been clearly attributed. I

13:34

suppose

13:34

a question then is, what's the point of an

13:36

attack like that? I mean, if no one claims responsibility

13:39

for it, what does it achieve? because

13:41

I would imagine digging up fiber optic

13:43

cables and cutting them in in such a

13:45

way as to make them very difficult

13:47

to to reattach. Like, that's a complex

13:50

operation. Who does this and why?

13:52

What

13:52

we don't know is the short answer.

13:55

If a state wanted to do something like

13:57

that, it could be an interest doing exercise

13:59

to find out information, to

14:01

test out the results of

14:03

a certain action, and to,

14:06

yeah, to figure out where the weak points

14:08

are. That's one of this this sort

14:10

of deciding factors in in this kind of

14:12

infrastructure attack. It's opportunistic.

14:15

what tend to be targeted are weak points

14:17

and whether

14:19

these are cyberattacks or

14:21

physical sabotage. So

14:23

we we don't know is the short answer

14:25

to that.

14:29

Coming up, just how vulnerable

14:32

is Ireland to these kinds of critical

14:34

infrastructure attacks.

14:42

And I suppose you

14:44

mentioned cyberattacks and we're all too familiar

14:46

with the consequences of a cyber attack in this country.

14:48

I mean, it it seems like a long time ago now, but

14:50

the the HSE ransomware attack was

14:52

a really big deal. The HSE

14:55

says it's working to contain a very

14:57

sophisticated human operated ransomware

15:00

attack on its IT systems. However,

15:02

no ransom demand has yet been made.

15:05

Is there any sense that that was a kind of an

15:07

opportunistic testing of our systems?

15:09

Or was that just a criminal enterprise? Or do

15:11

we know? It's

15:12

very difficult to distinguish in many cases

15:14

because you could have the simple profit

15:16

motive, or yes, it could be

15:18

a test. In that case, there's

15:20

a, you know, there's a lot of valuable data,

15:23

which was probably stolen in that occasion.

15:25

And so there's, you know, there's motive

15:28

for whether it's criminal actors or whether

15:30

it's state actors to do it or some

15:32

sort of combination of the two. But,

15:34

yes, certainly in I

15:36

won't speak about the HSE attack

15:38

specifically, but in general, yes, cyber

15:40

attacks can

15:43

have that kind of blend of criminal

15:45

and state backing where it's difficult to

15:47

distinguish the two, but they're probably going after

15:50

data. causing insecurity, testing

15:52

for weak points, figuring out what

15:54

the responses could be, generally increasing

15:57

security, and yeah,

15:59

changing the decision making of the target is

16:01

key.

16:05

You can imagine of the two of us right here

16:07

and in Iraq because flying over

16:09

your head and you're going Jesus what was that?

16:11

Irish fishermen worried about rockets that would

16:13

be fired as part of a Russian military

16:16

exercise off the Irish post this

16:18

week. We don't want anyone doing life where

16:20

in our water's life. It's it's

16:22

our backyard. It's where we make our living.

16:25

Now earlier this year, just before

16:27

Russia invaded Ukraine, in fact, Irish fishermen

16:29

made headlines when they sought to stop

16:32

this Russian fleet carrying out exercises

16:34

in Irish waters.

16:35

Irish fishermen are celebrating

16:37

after Russia backed off a plan for

16:39

live naval exercises off the Irish

16:42

coast. The fishermen worried about their

16:44

livelihoods and called the Russian ambassador.

16:47

Some even declared they would peacefully disrupt

16:49

the war games.

16:50

And there was speculation at the time

16:52

that those exercises were effectively a

16:55

Russian fact finding mission. A test

16:57

of EU weak spots when it comes to critical

16:59

underwater infrastructure Do we have any

17:01

more clarity now as to whether that might

17:03

have been the case?

17:05

I think the suspicions were raised about

17:08

that being an intelligence gathering operation

17:10

by Russia because Russian

17:13

has spy ships, spies submarines

17:15

that undertake surveillance. and

17:17

the particular geographical location

17:20

that the naval exercises were planned

17:22

for happens to be where these

17:24

crucial submarine cables

17:27

come up over the Atlantic shelf

17:30

and are at their shallowest point. So if you wanted

17:32

to go and look at them, try and figure out

17:34

how many cables are there, what kind

17:36

are they? Where are they exactly pinpoint

17:38

the location? That would be a good point to

17:40

do it. So for those reasons, there

17:42

were suspicions that the true intention behind

17:44

those exercises was intelligence

17:47

gathering. Now

17:48

you mentioned cables and I suppose one of the difficulties

17:50

we might have getting our heads around this

17:52

kind of stuff is all of this stuff is invisible

17:54

to us. We don't see all of these cables. Are

17:57

there many of them running across the Atlantic?

17:59

And, like, are are is there much

18:01

of that critical infrastructure in Irish

18:03

waters aren't close to Ireland?

18:06

Yeah. Ireland is a really significant a confirmed

18:08

fulcrum for data

18:10

flows. In total, there's roughly

18:13

four hundred of these submarine fiber

18:15

optic cables around the world. And what

18:17

they are is really the arteries of

18:19

the digital age. This is how international

18:21

financial transactions are done. It's

18:23

how, you know, for example, video streaming

18:26

works. if you're accessing your

18:28

documents online, if they're still stored in

18:30

some sort of cloud service, they may

18:32

well be traveling to along these cables.

18:34

they're not very wide.

18:37

They're only about the width of a garden hose.

18:39

So they are quite physically vulnerable.

18:42

They can sometimes be certainly snapped

18:44

by fishing craft, for example. And

18:46

yet Ireland has roughly sixteen

18:49

of them running off its coast

18:51

It's obviously really important, particularly

18:54

for Ireland because of our tech industry. Mhmm.

18:56

We have the headquarters of

18:58

the major multinational tech companies

19:01

for all of Europe based in Ireland.

19:03

So it's particularly important for that. And because

19:06

we have so many data centers and we have

19:08

quite a digitalized economy, the

19:10

importance of these cables is that

19:13

it's really how international communication

19:15

works. Now, we

19:17

could look at some past examples of times

19:20

when cables were damaged

19:22

or cut to look at what could

19:24

happen. were they to be targeted in

19:27

a critical infrastructure attack?

19:31

Vietnam at one point, last

19:34

one of its two major submarine

19:36

cables, one connecting it with Hong

19:38

Kong. And the government at

19:40

the time blamed it on fishermen. They

19:42

said that fishermen had accidentally

19:45

actually pulled it up for scrap. And

19:47

this took many, many weeks to prepare,

19:49

but luckily Vietnam had another alternative

19:52

connection running to China, which

19:54

it was able to rely on for that period.

19:57

So you might see, say, a slowing down

19:59

in the Internet, but it wouldn't

20:01

be caught outright. Now

20:03

that underlines something important, which

20:05

is that there because there's a network of these

20:08

cables which has become more

20:10

and more complex. You could

20:12

have Internet traffic reroofed

20:14

if a cable was to be caught or damaged and

20:16

actually that does happen all the time because they do, as I

20:18

say, accidentally get cut by things like Machine Craft.

20:21

So you could have data flows rerouted. If

20:24

an actor wanted to cause

20:27

the maximum disruption through

20:29

sabotage. What they would want to do

20:31

is study this network carefully

20:33

and hit several places at once

20:36

in order to prevent data traffic

20:38

simply being rerouted and to make it

20:40

as onerous as possible to

20:42

repair. And

20:44

do you think Naomi Ireland is particularly

20:47

vulnerable to attacks on this critical

20:49

infrastructure because of our island status

20:51

and are relatively small

20:54

military setup?

20:55

Yeah. Ireland, think it's

20:58

broadly considered to be particularly vulnerable

21:01

because we don't actually currently have much capacity

21:04

to monitor those cables or

21:06

indeed our our fishing waters or,

21:08

you know, our territorial waters. We

21:10

don't have the ability to actually see

21:13

and know what's going on because of

21:15

our limited naval capacity in like

21:17

radar and so on. And we also

21:19

apart from monitoring and just like

21:22

seeing gathering information and so on.

21:24

We don't have much of a ability

21:26

to guard and defend that infrastructure

21:29

either. So, yeah, we are particularly vulnerable.

21:32

We would probably need to rely on

21:34

international allies if such thing

21:36

were to happen. which is something that

21:38

happened to happen actually in the

21:40

cyber attack on the HSE where

21:43

we we did get help from from

21:45

the EU in terms of bringing everything back

21:47

online. So, yeah, it's

21:49

definitely a vulnerable point.

21:51

And is that vulnerability concern

21:54

in the corridors of power in the EU. I mean,

21:56

is it something that people within the European

21:58

Union are talking about? Like, what do we do about

22:00

Ireland and is Ireland the weak

22:02

underbelly of the European Union's information

22:04

architecture. I

22:06

don't think it is top of

22:08

mind for most people at the moment,

22:10

mostly because Ireland is relatively geographically

22:12

distant from the sort of hot spots

22:16

at the moment. You do definitely

22:18

hear from analysts, the military analysts

22:21

that Ireland is a bit of a weak point.

22:23

We de facto kind of fall under

22:25

the NATO umbrella because the

22:27

British RAF is

22:29

called out to has scrambled

22:31

jets to escort, for example,

22:34

Russian craft out of our airspace

22:36

when they've been there probably

22:38

testing RAF response times.

22:41

So it's not a major topic of conversation.

22:44

But yeah, it definitely there definitely, I think, is

22:46

an awareness that, you know, Ireland isn't

22:48

doesn't have much military means.

22:51

That's that's definitely the

22:53

case. I think there's also an

22:55

awareness that this is a really delicate domestic

22:58

debate in Ireland -- Mhmm. -- and something that

23:00

Irish politicians and the Irish public

23:02

have to sort of talk about and

23:05

decide among themselves.

23:08

So as you say, we're we're kind reliant

23:10

on others the US, the UK, NATO,

23:13

the European Union,

23:15

can we rely on these people? And where

23:17

there to be a major crisis or

23:19

whether to be a major terrorist attack

23:21

on this critical infrastructure coming

23:23

into Ireland. Do you reckon they come

23:25

and help us out? I

23:27

think definitely yes. That's

23:30

part of the deal I think of

23:32

being in the EU that allies would

23:35

would come to our aid. It's also in the interests

23:38

of the U. S. and

23:40

also the UK and the EU not

23:42

to have Ireland's and

23:44

vulnerable are suffering from an attack, so I think

23:46

they definitely would be help for sure.

23:49

So something that military analysts point

23:52

out, though, is that there is a cost

23:54

to that kind of reliance. And

23:57

it's that Ireland has to

23:59

ask for help and it doesn't necessarily

24:01

get to set its own strategic objectives.

24:04

So it's others who are sort of

24:06

setting the strategic objective

24:08

and then Ireland has to just

24:10

go along with it. You can you can ask

24:12

for help, but it does it limits

24:15

the amount of maneuver that Ireland

24:17

has strategically.

24:19

And I suppose finally, Naomi, with

24:22

this Sabotage

24:25

on the Nord Stream pipelines, and

24:27

this increased targeting of critical

24:29

infrastructure Across

24:31

the European Union, is there now more tension

24:34

over

24:34

the relationship that exists between the EU

24:36

and Russia than the Wars even?

24:38

six weeks ago, like, are things getting worse? because

24:40

it certainly seems on the surface like they are getting

24:42

much worse.

24:43

Yes. Definitely, this

24:46

sabotage on the pipelines is

24:48

viewed as having brought this conflict

24:51

to the new level. If infrastructure

24:53

sabotage is now on the table, irrespective

24:56

of who actually did that,

24:58

who actually damaged the Nord Stream pipelines,

25:01

if that's now a new arena

25:03

of conflict, that means that

25:06

all the member states in

25:08

the EU are going to be looking at what their vulnerabilities

25:10

are. It's just another thing

25:13

for them to have to worry about. You

25:15

mentioned, you know, there was

25:17

some talk of the vulnerability potentially of

25:19

the new Baltic pipe between Poland

25:22

and Norway. that was

25:24

opened pretty much simultaneously as

25:27

these attacks occurred. So that's a kind

25:29

of a significant context. That

25:31

pipeline that was open between Norway and

25:33

Poland was celebrated as a way for

25:35

the EU to move away from energy

25:37

dependence on Russia So

25:40

it's kind of a meaningful moment

25:42

for such an attack to happen. And

25:45

it underlines that you

25:47

know, what's what's being

25:49

targeted here is Europe's energy security.

25:52

It's proved a very effective thing

25:55

for Russia to target in terms of getting

25:57

results. It's really had very

25:59

significant economic and

26:02

social and political result

26:05

playing on the vulnerabilities of

26:08

Europe's energy needs.

26:09

Naomi, Larry. Thank you very much for talk

26:11

to us. Thank you.

26:16

That's it for today. This episode

26:19

of In The News was juice by Suzanne Brennan,

26:21

Decathlon Conlon and Nadine Finnegan. We'll

26:24

be back on Wednesday.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features