Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Did you know that students get it
0:02
free? The Irish Times offers a free digital
0:05
subscription to all four time undergraduate's, keep
0:07
up to date, For free with quality journalism
0:10
and reporting, claim yours today at
0:12
iris times dot com slash subscribe slash
0:14
student. Last
0:16
week, a mysterious act of sabotage
0:18
with all the hallmarks of what's known as
0:20
hybrid warfare was carried out
0:22
in the Baltic Sea.
0:24
bubbling to the top of the Baltic
0:26
Sea gas leaching from Russia's
0:29
Nord Stream pipelines. European
0:31
officials believe this was the result
0:33
of savage.
0:34
The four separate gas leaks
0:36
posed a safety risk to ships, threatened
0:38
ecosystems, and sent energy
0:41
prices spiraling again. But
0:44
the event also has a sinister implication
0:46
for Russia's war in Ukraine. and
0:48
it's a relationship with Europe. Irrespective
0:50
of who actually did
0:52
that, if that's now a
0:54
new arena of conflict, that means
0:56
that all the member states in the
0:58
EU are going to be looking at what their vulnerabilities
1:01
are.
1:01
If sabotaging critical infrastructure
1:03
is now on the table,
1:05
just how vulnerable
1:06
is Ireland. Attention
1:08
is turning to the submarine cables off
1:10
Ireland's coast, the digital arteries
1:13
that travel across the Atlantic and
1:15
keep our world connected. This
1:17
is how international financial transactions
1:19
are done. It's how, you know, for example,
1:21
video streaming works, It's obviously
1:23
really important, particularly for Ireland
1:26
because of our tech industry. And it throws
1:27
new light on those so called naval
1:30
drills carried out by Russia in Irish
1:32
waters earlier this year. In
1:34
the modern day David and Goliath
1:36
story, I just love this story. Irish fishermen
1:39
are celebrating after Russia backed
1:41
off a plan for live naval exercises
1:43
off the Irish coast. I'm
1:45
Connor Pope, and this is in the news from The Irish
1:47
Times. Today, What does the
1:50
North Stream sabotage mean for Ireland,
1:52
for Europe, and for the world? Naomi
1:56
O'Leary is the archtime's Europe correspondent. Naomi,
1:58
can we start maybe with an Nord Stream one
2:00
and two gas pipelines. They're the
2:02
major gas connections between Russia and
2:04
the EU. And last week, multiple explosions
2:06
were detected along the pipelines. What
2:09
do we know about those explosions and the damage
2:11
that was done?
2:14
Suddenly, there was a
2:16
a loss of pressure. detected along
2:19
the Nord Stream pipelines one
2:21
and two. This
2:22
all happened in a very short
2:25
space of time. and it was established
2:27
that there were a number of leaks where
2:29
initially reported as three. Now
2:31
Sweden is saying it's actually four leaks.
2:34
the Swedish Coast Guard is now clarifying
2:37
that there was this fourth leak already
2:39
to smaller leak than the first one they detected.
2:42
That one This caused huge bubbles
2:45
of gas to rise up
2:47
through the Baltic Sea, which is actually quite
2:49
dangerous for ships. as well as being
2:51
an environmental environmentally damaging.
2:54
Because these leaks suddenly
2:56
happened all at the same time in different locations,
2:59
the conclusion has been that this was deliberate.
3:02
That's what European leaders have been saying.
3:06
We have Swedish intelligence, but we have
3:08
also received information in our contacts
3:10
with Denmark. And based on this concluded
3:13
that this is probably a deliberate act.
3:15
It is probably a matter of sabotage. But
3:18
as to the context of how it was done,
3:20
who did it, that's still very much in
3:23
the air.
3:25
Naomi,
3:31
last week during a ceremony to annex four
3:33
regions of Ukraine and to Russia, Putin
3:36
openly accused Western states of
3:38
blowing up the pipelines. Angela
3:40
Saxons are not happy
3:43
with the sanctions, they
3:45
moved to terrorist
3:46
attacks having
3:48
arranged explosions on
3:50
the gas pipelines in
3:53
the sea. But
3:54
really, I suppose the suspicion is still
3:57
very much that Russia is behind the sabotage
3:59
So
3:59
what have other European leaders said
4:02
about the incidents and have they actually pointed the
4:04
finger at Putin's Russia? They
4:06
just have in general been quite careful not
4:09
to get into attribution at this stage.
4:12
They did come out quite quickly to say that
4:15
this was deliberate. Now,
4:17
Russia, a spokesperson from
4:19
the from Kremlin to Mitra Pescoff
4:21
has said that it's not in their interest to
4:23
do this. The EU said the leaks had been caused
4:26
by sabotage. Russia dismissed those suggestions
4:28
that have attacked its own pipelines as
4:31
predictable and stupid. These
4:34
are the pipelines that deliver gas
4:36
or were delivering gas to the
4:38
EU before the energy disputes. So
4:41
they say, you know, it's not in our interest for this gas
4:43
to be bubbling out into the sky.
4:46
This is we've just lost a way to sell
4:48
our gas to Europe. However, this does
4:50
common context when the
4:52
EU and Russia are in a major energy
4:55
dispute. Mhmm. And so what it's seen as
4:57
is an escalation in that kind of
4:59
dangerous escalation with infrastructure, critical
5:02
infrastructure being hit, which
5:05
just really brings this conflict to a new level.
5:07
And of course, we all know that
5:09
gas markets have been extremely volatile
5:11
in recent months. and we've seen
5:13
price spikes of more than a thousand percent.
5:16
And this news sent prices spiraling
5:18
again, and that's despite the fact that
5:20
the pipelines currently supply very little
5:22
gas to the EU, I think around twenty
5:24
percent. So this
5:26
has been another big step in disrupting
5:29
the energy markets in Europe. And I wonder
5:30
Is it a sign maybe Naomi that
5:33
the market has changed permanently or
5:35
at least for the long term? Yeah. Especially
5:37
if we don't get any kind of gas supplies from Nord
5:39
Stream. So
5:40
neither of these pipelines were at the
5:43
time that they were hit, actually delivering
5:45
gas to the EU. One, because it was
5:47
never switched on due to,
5:49
essentially, the conflict and the changed
5:51
dynamic regarding Russian gas.
5:54
The other one because Russia had
5:56
already turned it off. So
5:58
the gas that's spilling out is just remaining
6:01
gas that was actually inside the pipeline that
6:03
wasn't actually flowing. what this does,
6:05
therefore, it doesn't it doesn't reduce the amount
6:08
of Russian gas that's currently flowing
6:10
to the EU, but it sort of draws a
6:12
line, a full stop on the prospect
6:15
of that supply resuming. So
6:17
really what it's quite serious for
6:20
is next winter. That's what we're hearing is
6:22
that Supply will be very difficult next winter.
6:24
The EU has already filled up all of its
6:27
storage capacity to nearly completely
6:29
full using Russian gas. while
6:32
it was still flowing. But next winter,
6:34
they won't have that option. They'll be relying mostly
6:36
on LNG. So there's very,
6:39
very little Russian gas coming to Europe now.
6:41
It's already dropped to from about forty percent
6:43
of the EU's gas needs to about nine
6:45
percent and -- Okay. -- and
6:47
the Russian energy giant gas from
6:49
has suggested it may turn off the
6:51
last remaining tap or
6:53
a route which runs through Ukraine.
6:56
And of
6:56
course, some analysts have been suggesting in
6:58
recent days this Russia is behind
7:00
this and they're behind
7:02
it because they want to threaten European
7:04
infrastructure and they're making this point
7:06
that they could attack other pipelines. For example,
7:09
there's a new pipeline between Norway and Poland
7:11
that could be similarly targeted. if
7:14
that's true, it's kind of frightening, isn't it? Because
7:16
that would mean that Russia is now
7:19
willing to escalate the conflict in
7:21
a way that could make life very uncomfortable
7:23
for us, but could also see the conflict
7:26
spilling over into Europe in a more meaningful
7:28
way.
7:29
with attacks like this, mysterious
7:32
sabotage, a lot of the time
7:35
in order to place attribution, context
7:37
is relied upon. And that's probably
7:40
why analysts are looking to Russia
7:42
because the context is that the
7:44
EU and Russia are in a dispute over
7:46
energy. And the
7:49
reasons that you come up with why Russia
7:51
might want to do this is to
7:53
again send gas prices higher,
7:56
which their previous
7:58
acts in terms of further switching off pipelines
8:01
and stuff, they had had unlimited ability
8:04
to do so. So they were sort of hitting
8:06
a wall with how much further they could push
8:08
the gas price up. This reintroduced
8:12
serious instability. It also,
8:15
like you say, it raises the atmosphere
8:17
of tension and insecurity. It
8:19
has EU leaders asking
8:22
themselves, where else might be vulnerable?
8:25
What else could be hit? They're
8:27
scrambling now to increase security on
8:29
other critical infrastructure. And
8:31
so this does have some of the hallmarks
8:34
of a hybrid war and
8:36
attack in that it's
8:38
difficult to place attribution, and
8:41
it seems to be seeking to influence
8:44
the decision making of the target. while
8:47
falling below the thresholds of attribution
8:50
of the kind of level
8:53
of attack that would trigger retaliation.
8:56
Now, you mentioned a phrase there hybrid
8:58
war, and you've been writing in
9:00
the Irish times about this hybrid warfare
9:03
tool kit. I'd say for a lot of
9:05
people that phrase is entirely new.
9:07
So what does it mean?
9:09
Hybrid word refers to this
9:11
gray area. which is
9:15
it's a it's a characteristic of
9:17
current day conflict in that you
9:19
don't have the traditional clear cut
9:22
a hot and cold complex, but you have
9:24
a whole area of attacks
9:26
which are difficult to classify. Sometimes
9:29
it's unclear where they're coming
9:31
from, they might not even be detected.
9:34
And as I say, there's a lot of
9:36
dancing around the level of
9:39
severity of attacks that would trigger
9:41
response. So in recent years,
9:43
we've seen an increase in
9:46
these methods that become more characteristic
9:49
of current geopolitics. And
9:51
we've also seen an increase
9:53
in the phenomenon of mysterious critical
9:56
infrastructure sabotage. So
9:58
a tax on infrastructure which are really quite
10:00
hard to pin down in terms of who
10:02
was responsible.
10:03
Can
10:06
you
10:06
give me any examples in Naomi of these
10:08
kind of attacks? Like, where
10:11
have we seen them and who's been targeted? Sure.
10:13
Well,
10:14
a major turning point in this was
10:16
the attacks in Estonia in two thousand and
10:19
seven. That happened at
10:21
a time of tension when the local
10:23
Russian population
10:24
of Estonia were
10:26
rioting over the proposed
10:29
removal of a Soviet
10:30
era monument.
10:33
So it came at a time of tension. Suddenly,
10:36
there were waves of really extreme cyberattacks
10:40
on all key Astonian critical
10:42
infrastructure. So banks, media,
10:45
telecommunications, waves of
10:47
them all happening at the same time. This
10:50
was attributed to Russian
10:52
sources, mostly due to context,
10:55
and it's seen as a turning point in
10:59
kind of a demonstration of what hybrid
11:01
attacks can do. This really
11:03
it grind the country to hold and
11:06
it also It was a turning point
11:08
for Estonia in terms of building its
11:10
digital security. Since
11:12
then, we've seen
11:15
cyberattacks have become a feature. of
11:17
of modern life. And just as
11:19
in Estonia, it's often very difficult
11:21
to distinguish. Are they criminal
11:24
groups acting independently? Are
11:26
they criminal groups that have the backing of a state?
11:29
Or are they just state forces
11:31
which are masquerading as criminal groups? This
11:33
is very difficult to sort out. And
11:36
like I say, a lot of the time you rely
11:38
on context to interpret who
11:40
could be responsible. So
11:42
there's been a large scale attacks
11:44
on electricity networks. For
11:46
example, the Dutch electricity network
11:49
was taken offline not too long ago.
11:52
And something that might be relevant to
11:54
our discussion now is the
11:56
attacks in France on fiber optic
11:59
cables.
12:01
France's internet is down after
12:03
suspected strikes. Internet
12:05
success was delayed or unavailable in
12:07
numerous French towns on Wednesday
12:09
as result of suspected attacks on
12:12
fiber optic cables. According
12:14
to media report Can you tell me little bit about
12:16
those attacks in France nearly?
12:17
Yeah. So to run through what happened there
12:19
earlier this year, fiber optic
12:22
cables were essentially dug up and caught
12:25
in a number of key
12:27
locations in a coordinated way
12:29
overnight. This
12:32
came to light in April. It knocked
12:34
out Internet access and phone
12:36
access in different regions of France.
12:38
And what had been targeted were the these
12:41
important sort of highways of information that
12:43
connect different French regions to
12:45
the Internet? So these
12:47
cables were dug up in several
12:49
locations all at once and they
12:51
were cut in a way that made them really difficult to
12:54
repair. so that they would be taken offline
12:56
for, you know, a significant period.
12:58
And what's kind of even stranger is that a
13:00
similar thing happened in twenty twenty
13:02
in the Paris region Again,
13:05
fiber optic cables were dug up
13:07
and cost in this coordinated way.
13:09
Like, it was planned, like someone knew how
13:11
it had looked at how the system worked. and
13:14
had deliberately attacked in several
13:16
points once in order to cause the maximum
13:18
disruption and tens of thousands of people
13:20
lost their Internet connection. temporarily
13:22
due to that incident. Mhmm.
13:25
Both of the incidents of
13:27
sabotage are are mysterious. They're
13:29
mysterious critical infrastructure attacks
13:32
that haven't been clearly attributed. I
13:34
suppose
13:34
a question then is, what's the point of an
13:36
attack like that? I mean, if no one claims responsibility
13:39
for it, what does it achieve? because
13:41
I would imagine digging up fiber optic
13:43
cables and cutting them in in such a
13:45
way as to make them very difficult
13:47
to to reattach. Like, that's a complex
13:50
operation. Who does this and why?
13:52
What
13:52
we don't know is the short answer.
13:55
If a state wanted to do something like
13:57
that, it could be an interest doing exercise
13:59
to find out information, to
14:01
test out the results of
14:03
a certain action, and to,
14:06
yeah, to figure out where the weak points
14:08
are. That's one of this this sort
14:10
of deciding factors in in this kind of
14:12
infrastructure attack. It's opportunistic.
14:15
what tend to be targeted are weak points
14:17
and whether
14:19
these are cyberattacks or
14:21
physical sabotage. So
14:23
we we don't know is the short answer
14:25
to that.
14:29
Coming up, just how vulnerable
14:32
is Ireland to these kinds of critical
14:34
infrastructure attacks.
14:42
And I suppose you
14:44
mentioned cyberattacks and we're all too familiar
14:46
with the consequences of a cyber attack in this country.
14:48
I mean, it it seems like a long time ago now, but
14:50
the the HSE ransomware attack was
14:52
a really big deal. The HSE
14:55
says it's working to contain a very
14:57
sophisticated human operated ransomware
15:00
attack on its IT systems. However,
15:02
no ransom demand has yet been made.
15:05
Is there any sense that that was a kind of an
15:07
opportunistic testing of our systems?
15:09
Or was that just a criminal enterprise? Or do
15:11
we know? It's
15:12
very difficult to distinguish in many cases
15:14
because you could have the simple profit
15:16
motive, or yes, it could be
15:18
a test. In that case, there's
15:20
a, you know, there's a lot of valuable data,
15:23
which was probably stolen in that occasion.
15:25
And so there's, you know, there's motive
15:28
for whether it's criminal actors or whether
15:30
it's state actors to do it or some
15:32
sort of combination of the two. But,
15:34
yes, certainly in I
15:36
won't speak about the HSE attack
15:38
specifically, but in general, yes, cyber
15:40
attacks can
15:43
have that kind of blend of criminal
15:45
and state backing where it's difficult to
15:47
distinguish the two, but they're probably going after
15:50
data. causing insecurity, testing
15:52
for weak points, figuring out what
15:54
the responses could be, generally increasing
15:57
security, and yeah,
15:59
changing the decision making of the target is
16:01
key.
16:05
You can imagine of the two of us right here
16:07
and in Iraq because flying over
16:09
your head and you're going Jesus what was that?
16:11
Irish fishermen worried about rockets that would
16:13
be fired as part of a Russian military
16:16
exercise off the Irish post this
16:18
week. We don't want anyone doing life where
16:20
in our water's life. It's it's
16:22
our backyard. It's where we make our living.
16:25
Now earlier this year, just before
16:27
Russia invaded Ukraine, in fact, Irish fishermen
16:29
made headlines when they sought to stop
16:32
this Russian fleet carrying out exercises
16:34
in Irish waters.
16:35
Irish fishermen are celebrating
16:37
after Russia backed off a plan for
16:39
live naval exercises off the Irish
16:42
coast. The fishermen worried about their
16:44
livelihoods and called the Russian ambassador.
16:47
Some even declared they would peacefully disrupt
16:49
the war games.
16:50
And there was speculation at the time
16:52
that those exercises were effectively a
16:55
Russian fact finding mission. A test
16:57
of EU weak spots when it comes to critical
16:59
underwater infrastructure Do we have any
17:01
more clarity now as to whether that might
17:03
have been the case?
17:05
I think the suspicions were raised about
17:08
that being an intelligence gathering operation
17:10
by Russia because Russian
17:13
has spy ships, spies submarines
17:15
that undertake surveillance. and
17:17
the particular geographical location
17:20
that the naval exercises were planned
17:22
for happens to be where these
17:24
crucial submarine cables
17:27
come up over the Atlantic shelf
17:30
and are at their shallowest point. So if you wanted
17:32
to go and look at them, try and figure out
17:34
how many cables are there, what kind
17:36
are they? Where are they exactly pinpoint
17:38
the location? That would be a good point to
17:40
do it. So for those reasons, there
17:42
were suspicions that the true intention behind
17:44
those exercises was intelligence
17:47
gathering. Now
17:48
you mentioned cables and I suppose one of the difficulties
17:50
we might have getting our heads around this
17:52
kind of stuff is all of this stuff is invisible
17:54
to us. We don't see all of these cables. Are
17:57
there many of them running across the Atlantic?
17:59
And, like, are are is there much
18:01
of that critical infrastructure in Irish
18:03
waters aren't close to Ireland?
18:06
Yeah. Ireland is a really significant a confirmed
18:08
fulcrum for data
18:10
flows. In total, there's roughly
18:13
four hundred of these submarine fiber
18:15
optic cables around the world. And what
18:17
they are is really the arteries of
18:19
the digital age. This is how international
18:21
financial transactions are done. It's
18:23
how, you know, for example, video streaming
18:26
works. if you're accessing your
18:28
documents online, if they're still stored in
18:30
some sort of cloud service, they may
18:32
well be traveling to along these cables.
18:34
they're not very wide.
18:37
They're only about the width of a garden hose.
18:39
So they are quite physically vulnerable.
18:42
They can sometimes be certainly snapped
18:44
by fishing craft, for example. And
18:46
yet Ireland has roughly sixteen
18:49
of them running off its coast
18:51
It's obviously really important, particularly
18:54
for Ireland because of our tech industry. Mhmm.
18:56
We have the headquarters of
18:58
the major multinational tech companies
19:01
for all of Europe based in Ireland.
19:03
So it's particularly important for that. And because
19:06
we have so many data centers and we have
19:08
quite a digitalized economy, the
19:10
importance of these cables is that
19:13
it's really how international communication
19:15
works. Now, we
19:17
could look at some past examples of times
19:20
when cables were damaged
19:22
or cut to look at what could
19:24
happen. were they to be targeted in
19:27
a critical infrastructure attack?
19:31
Vietnam at one point, last
19:34
one of its two major submarine
19:36
cables, one connecting it with Hong
19:38
Kong. And the government at
19:40
the time blamed it on fishermen. They
19:42
said that fishermen had accidentally
19:45
actually pulled it up for scrap. And
19:47
this took many, many weeks to prepare,
19:49
but luckily Vietnam had another alternative
19:52
connection running to China, which
19:54
it was able to rely on for that period.
19:57
So you might see, say, a slowing down
19:59
in the Internet, but it wouldn't
20:01
be caught outright. Now
20:03
that underlines something important, which
20:05
is that there because there's a network of these
20:08
cables which has become more
20:10
and more complex. You could
20:12
have Internet traffic reroofed
20:14
if a cable was to be caught or damaged and
20:16
actually that does happen all the time because they do, as I
20:18
say, accidentally get cut by things like Machine Craft.
20:21
So you could have data flows rerouted. If
20:24
an actor wanted to cause
20:27
the maximum disruption through
20:29
sabotage. What they would want to do
20:31
is study this network carefully
20:33
and hit several places at once
20:36
in order to prevent data traffic
20:38
simply being rerouted and to make it
20:40
as onerous as possible to
20:42
repair. And
20:44
do you think Naomi Ireland is particularly
20:47
vulnerable to attacks on this critical
20:49
infrastructure because of our island status
20:51
and are relatively small
20:54
military setup?
20:55
Yeah. Ireland, think it's
20:58
broadly considered to be particularly vulnerable
21:01
because we don't actually currently have much capacity
21:04
to monitor those cables or
21:06
indeed our our fishing waters or,
21:08
you know, our territorial waters. We
21:10
don't have the ability to actually see
21:13
and know what's going on because of
21:15
our limited naval capacity in like
21:17
radar and so on. And we also
21:19
apart from monitoring and just like
21:22
seeing gathering information and so on.
21:24
We don't have much of a ability
21:26
to guard and defend that infrastructure
21:29
either. So, yeah, we are particularly vulnerable.
21:32
We would probably need to rely on
21:34
international allies if such thing
21:36
were to happen. which is something that
21:38
happened to happen actually in the
21:40
cyber attack on the HSE where
21:43
we we did get help from from
21:45
the EU in terms of bringing everything back
21:47
online. So, yeah, it's
21:49
definitely a vulnerable point.
21:51
And is that vulnerability concern
21:54
in the corridors of power in the EU. I mean,
21:56
is it something that people within the European
21:58
Union are talking about? Like, what do we do about
22:00
Ireland and is Ireland the weak
22:02
underbelly of the European Union's information
22:04
architecture. I
22:06
don't think it is top of
22:08
mind for most people at the moment,
22:10
mostly because Ireland is relatively geographically
22:12
distant from the sort of hot spots
22:16
at the moment. You do definitely
22:18
hear from analysts, the military analysts
22:21
that Ireland is a bit of a weak point.
22:23
We de facto kind of fall under
22:25
the NATO umbrella because the
22:27
British RAF is
22:29
called out to has scrambled
22:31
jets to escort, for example,
22:34
Russian craft out of our airspace
22:36
when they've been there probably
22:38
testing RAF response times.
22:41
So it's not a major topic of conversation.
22:44
But yeah, it definitely there definitely, I think, is
22:46
an awareness that, you know, Ireland isn't
22:48
doesn't have much military means.
22:51
That's that's definitely the
22:53
case. I think there's also an
22:55
awareness that this is a really delicate domestic
22:58
debate in Ireland -- Mhmm. -- and something that
23:00
Irish politicians and the Irish public
23:02
have to sort of talk about and
23:05
decide among themselves.
23:08
So as you say, we're we're kind reliant
23:10
on others the US, the UK, NATO,
23:13
the European Union,
23:15
can we rely on these people? And where
23:17
there to be a major crisis or
23:19
whether to be a major terrorist attack
23:21
on this critical infrastructure coming
23:23
into Ireland. Do you reckon they come
23:25
and help us out? I
23:27
think definitely yes. That's
23:30
part of the deal I think of
23:32
being in the EU that allies would
23:35
would come to our aid. It's also in the interests
23:38
of the U. S. and
23:40
also the UK and the EU not
23:42
to have Ireland's and
23:44
vulnerable are suffering from an attack, so I think
23:46
they definitely would be help for sure.
23:49
So something that military analysts point
23:52
out, though, is that there is a cost
23:54
to that kind of reliance. And
23:57
it's that Ireland has to
23:59
ask for help and it doesn't necessarily
24:01
get to set its own strategic objectives.
24:04
So it's others who are sort of
24:06
setting the strategic objective
24:08
and then Ireland has to just
24:10
go along with it. You can you can ask
24:12
for help, but it does it limits
24:15
the amount of maneuver that Ireland
24:17
has strategically.
24:19
And I suppose finally, Naomi, with
24:22
this Sabotage
24:25
on the Nord Stream pipelines, and
24:27
this increased targeting of critical
24:29
infrastructure Across
24:31
the European Union, is there now more tension
24:34
over
24:34
the relationship that exists between the EU
24:36
and Russia than the Wars even?
24:38
six weeks ago, like, are things getting worse? because
24:40
it certainly seems on the surface like they are getting
24:42
much worse.
24:43
Yes. Definitely, this
24:46
sabotage on the pipelines is
24:48
viewed as having brought this conflict
24:51
to the new level. If infrastructure
24:53
sabotage is now on the table, irrespective
24:56
of who actually did that,
24:58
who actually damaged the Nord Stream pipelines,
25:01
if that's now a new arena
25:03
of conflict, that means that
25:06
all the member states in
25:08
the EU are going to be looking at what their vulnerabilities
25:10
are. It's just another thing
25:13
for them to have to worry about. You
25:15
mentioned, you know, there was
25:17
some talk of the vulnerability potentially of
25:19
the new Baltic pipe between Poland
25:22
and Norway. that was
25:24
opened pretty much simultaneously as
25:27
these attacks occurred. So that's a kind
25:29
of a significant context. That
25:31
pipeline that was open between Norway and
25:33
Poland was celebrated as a way for
25:35
the EU to move away from energy
25:37
dependence on Russia So
25:40
it's kind of a meaningful moment
25:42
for such an attack to happen. And
25:45
it underlines that you
25:47
know, what's what's being
25:49
targeted here is Europe's energy security.
25:52
It's proved a very effective thing
25:55
for Russia to target in terms of getting
25:57
results. It's really had very
25:59
significant economic and
26:02
social and political result
26:05
playing on the vulnerabilities of
26:08
Europe's energy needs.
26:09
Naomi, Larry. Thank you very much for talk
26:11
to us. Thank you.
26:16
That's it for today. This episode
26:19
of In The News was juice by Suzanne Brennan,
26:21
Decathlon Conlon and Nadine Finnegan. We'll
26:24
be back on Wednesday.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More