Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
You do anything to keep your vehicle happy.
0:02
Let's make sure it stays running smoothly. With
0:04
eBay Guaranteed Fit, you'll find the right
0:07
parts that fit your vehicle the first time. From
0:09
air filters to headlights to batteries and
0:11
bumpers. When you see the green check, you
0:13
know that part will fit. Get the right parts
0:16
at the right prices. At theebamotors.com,
0:19
let's ride. Eligible items only,
0:21
exclusions apply.
0:23
As if the McChrissy
0:25
couldn't get any better. Bacon
0:27
and Ranch just entered the chat. The
0:30
Bacon Ranch McChrissy, available
0:33
and participating with Donald's for a limited time.
0:39
You and Betty and the Nancy's
0:42
and Bill's and Joe's and Jane's will
0:44
find in the study of science a
0:46
richer, more rewarding life.
0:50
Welcome to Inquiring Minds. I'm
0:53
Andrea Viscontis. This is a podcast
0:55
that explores the space where science and society
0:57
collide. We want to find out what's true, what's
0:59
left to discover, and why it matters.
1:11
We're coming up to the 400th episode
1:14
of this podcast. And so I'm revisiting
1:17
some of my favorite topics with new
1:19
guests, sometimes with a co-host,
1:22
with multiple guests.
1:24
And so this week I thought it would be appropriate
1:26
to talk about a major scientific
1:28
discovery. Physics is definitely
1:31
not my forte, but I always love
1:33
talking to experimental physicists or theoretical
1:36
physicists, not just because
1:38
they helped me feel insignificant,
1:42
but also because they put things into perspective.
1:44
All of a sudden when
1:46
you're talking about discovering
1:48
a whole new way of powering our
1:50
world, or our place
1:53
in this vast universe, the everyday
1:55
problems that I'm facing seem less
1:57
important. So this week
1:59
I- the pleasure of talking to two
2:02
physicists, yep two at the same
2:04
time, both from Lawrence Livermore National
2:06
Labs. And they were part of the team
2:09
that had this huge breakthrough back in December 2022
2:12
when essentially in a series of experiments
2:15
they showed that fusion is actually
2:17
a viable potential energy source. Sabrina
2:20
Nagel is a group leader in the physics division
2:23
at Lawrence Livermore National Labs and she's the
2:25
lead scientist for the National
2:27
Ignition Facilities Dynamic X-ray
2:29
detectors group. And then Dr. Matthias
2:31
Hohenberger is an experimental scientist
2:34
and group leader working on inertial confinement
2:36
fusion at the NIF, at the Lawrence Livermore
2:38
National Labs. He's been working on performing
2:40
experiments in the pursuit of, and now
2:43
on the accomplishment of, fusion
2:45
ignition for the last 13 years.
2:51
Sabrina and Matthias, welcome
2:54
to Inquiring Minds. I'm so excited to talk
2:56
to you. Well, thank you very much for having us.
2:59
Yeah, thank you for having us. It's exciting. So
3:01
let's start with, first
3:03
of all, in terms of your respective roles,
3:06
can you each just tell me, maybe we'll start with Sabrina, what
3:09
your roles are on the sort of grand
3:12
thermonuclear
3:13
fusion project? Sure.
3:15
So yes, I am
3:19
one of the scientific leads in
3:22
developing some of the diagnostics, the
3:24
experimental diagnostics for the
3:26
National Agression Facility. And we have optical
3:29
diagnostics, nuclear
3:31
or particle diagnostics, as well as x-ray diagnostics.
3:34
And so I'm kind of heading a part of a
3:36
co-head, so to speak, for
3:38
developing some of those systems.
3:42
And as, yeah,
3:44
I've been working on this for over 10 years
3:46
now. And it's great to see
3:48
that we're getting
3:50
exciting results. And yeah, as
3:53
you might imagine, the diagnostics
3:56
are what measures
3:59
what's going on.
4:00
in the experiments and helps
4:02
us tweak and change
4:04
the input parameters so that we were
4:06
able to achieve ignition. All right.
4:09
And so, Mathias, are you the one that pushes the button? Is
4:12
there a big red button that you push? Unfortunately
4:15
not. That would be so exciting. No,
4:18
I'm what's generally referred
4:20
to as an experimental physicist. So I'm
4:24
one of the many people that would
4:27
tell the facility operators how
4:29
to set up experiments, what
4:32
we want to measure, how to set up the diagnostics
4:34
that Sabrina and her team has developed,
4:37
and what it is that we're trying to do in
4:39
this particular experiment. And
4:41
so I'm doing experiments in the ICF,
4:43
the National Confine Refusion Program,
4:47
and I'm also a group leader for inclusion
4:49
in stagnation physics, which means the
4:51
people in my group also do experiments in this area.
4:54
So let's talk about fusion. And just
4:56
for our listeners who maybe are
4:58
not as familiar, what
5:00
exactly are we talking about here? What's
5:03
the fundamental
5:04
idea behind it? So
5:07
fusion is a nuclear
5:09
process, which means it's happening with
5:12
the nucleus of the atom, which is the heavy part in
5:14
the center that's surrounded by electrons.
5:18
It basically changes the configuration of the
5:20
nucleus. There's two main ways of doing this.
5:23
One is fission, that's what most people are familiar with, and
5:25
the other one is fusion.
5:26
Fission is the part where you
5:28
split up the nucleus into smaller
5:31
parts, and then fusion is the
5:33
opposite process where you take two light
5:36
elements, two light nuclei,
5:38
and push them together hard
5:41
enough that they stick together because they don't want to be together,
5:44
that they stick together and form a heavier.
5:47
And so in the fusion process here,
5:49
we're taking two deuterium
5:52
and tritium ions. That's basically
5:54
hydrogen, hydrogen is the lightest element we had with
5:57
a few extra neutrons and we're squeezing them.
6:00
together under very intense pressures
6:03
and temperatures. And then when they stick
6:05
together, they form helium, which is the second lightest
6:07
element that we have. And
6:10
when we weigh the helium
6:12
atom at the end, it's actually lighter
6:14
than the sum of its part, the
6:16
sum of the elements that we squeeze together. And
6:19
by Einstein's
6:19
equation,
6:22
energy equals mass times
6:24
the speed of light square, that means that
6:27
difference in mass has to go somewhere. And that's
6:29
the energy that is being released as heat
6:32
is it? So that's what fusion. And
6:34
so the ultimate idea here, potentially
6:37
in terms of an application, is that you could
6:39
create a lot of energy
6:41
with this process. And it
6:44
how, you know, can you tell us a little bit about so
6:46
like the kind of grand hundred
6:48
years from now vision, or
6:50
whatever that is, maybe it's five years from now, I don't know,
6:54
that you know, you could capture that energy and
6:56
use it and is it is it how is it better
6:58
than
6:58
some of the other energy sources that we have today?
7:01
So the fusion energy
7:03
is basically held
7:07
to promise of a clean, carbon-free,
7:11
robust energy source for
7:14
everyone. And basically,
7:16
it's also clean in
7:19
the sense of that it doesn't produce
7:21
radioactive waste with long half
7:23
nights.
7:25
And then it is not reliant
7:29
on the sun being out or the
7:32
wind blowing for us to have
7:34
it. You can have it at the push of a button, hopefully
7:37
in the future.
7:38
And so with that, and
7:41
then the fuel that we need for it is
7:43
also very fairly abundant. So hydrogen isotopes,
7:47
you can get them from seawater.
7:49
And so they're fairly readily available
7:52
for people to use.
7:53
Yeah, so maybe the vision in the future would be that
7:56
you could use some amount of seawater and
7:58
create an abundant energy.
8:00
source that could cleanly
8:02
power our lives without
8:04
the danger that some of the other power
8:07
sources have. Is that right? That
8:09
is right. It doesn't produce greenhouse
8:13
gas emissions. It
8:14
doesn't produce these long-lived half-life for
8:17
radioactive isotopes that
8:19
people are rightly worried about. You
8:21
don't have things that are still radioactive
8:24
in 20,000 years.
8:26
And also it doesn't have
8:28
this runaway reaction process that can
8:31
happen immediately a reactor like Chernobyl
8:33
just cannot fundamentally happen with
8:36
the reaction,
8:36
with fusion reactions. So I want
8:39
to learn a little bit more about like, you
8:41
know, what the actual
8:43
experiment or what the work is like. So first
8:46
of all, you've got these tiny
8:48
atoms,
8:48
right? So how, I mean, where
8:50
do you get them from? How do you know they're there?
8:53
I mean, this is such a, having the two of you here
8:55
is such a gift because I feel like, you
8:57
know, you can, you can teach me a lot about
9:00
sort of how you're detecting that they're actually there, that
9:02
it's actually going and how you put it all together.
9:04
So can you just walk me through
9:06
like the steps of,
9:08
you know, one of these experiments?
9:10
Okay, so the fundamental
9:12
target is basically
9:15
a small capsule. It's about
9:17
two millimeters in diameter, and
9:20
it's made out of diamond. In
9:23
that hollow capsule, in that sphere,
9:25
is a cryogenic layer of deuterium
9:28
tritium ice. Deuterium tritium are
9:30
these heavy hydrogen isotopes.
9:32
There's a very thin layer of
9:34
ice, so it's like 14 Kelvin or so, so
9:37
very close to absolute zero. But like,
9:39
do you put that in there? Like do you have the capsule,
9:41
you have like a whole bunch of these diamond capsules and you
9:43
stick a little bit of. Yeah. So
9:47
the capsule has a little filter.
9:49
The filter was two microns in diameter. So
9:51
that's 50 times smaller than the width of a
9:53
hair. And so that you, you basically
9:55
pump gas, deuterium, deuterium gas in
9:57
there. And then you cool it down and you...
10:00
form this layer in a very complicated, intricate
10:02
process that,
10:03
in fact,
10:05
no, very little about there are experts to
10:07
do this. And then, so
10:10
that's your target, that contains the fuel. And
10:12
this little pellet sits inside a whole
10:15
realm, which is about, it's a
10:17
little, a gold cylinder
10:19
about a centimeter in size.
10:22
And so what happens now, we have this massive
10:24
laser facility, the National Ignition Facility, It
10:27
has 192 laser beams, and we take these
10:30
laser beams, it's the most powerful laser in the world,
10:33
we take these laser beams and we
10:35
focus them into that tiny target. Laser
10:37
beams, half at the top, half at the bottom, 96 beams
10:39
on each side. They're focused through
10:41
a little hole in the cylinder
10:44
onto the walls of the cylinder, and
10:46
in a very short time, about 10 nanoseconds
10:48
or so, we
10:50
put 2 megajoules of energy
10:52
into the cylinder.
10:54
And so that laser energy
10:57
heats up this little cylinder to ridiculous
11:00
temperatures.
11:02
Basically it gets an
11:04
incredibly hot oven of about 3 million degrees.
11:07
And that then starts ablating
11:10
the outer wall
11:12
of the capsule that sits in the center. Because
11:14
it gets so hot, right, the things just sort of fly apart. And
11:16
because the stuff on the outside of the capsule
11:19
flies apart,
11:20
the stuff on the inside gets compressed.
11:23
reaction and reaction via
11:26
neutron. It's the same way that
11:28
a rocket works. It pushes a lot of stuff out at one
11:30
side and the rest of the rocket goes up.
11:33
And so that's how this thing gets compressed.
11:35
And so the
11:37
thing basically implodes, that's what
11:39
we call it, and the center
11:41
of that capsule, the DT, gets
11:44
to a pressure of about 500 gigabars,
11:47
which is 10 times
11:49
higher than the sun, and about 150
11:51
million degrees, which
11:54
is also about 10 times hotter than the sun. And
11:57
that is the conditions that you need but these three
11:59
reactions. take place. Okay,
12:02
so now I have a sense of like, you know,
12:04
there's this little tiny thing in this big room
12:07
with all of these lasers pointed at it. It
12:09
creates, you know, this big
12:12
sort of almost like I think of it as maybe like
12:15
a little explosion when all these lasers are hitting
12:17
it and that causes the pressure
12:19
that puts these
12:21
two atoms together. So
12:24
Sabrina, now I'm assuming that
12:26
this is maybe where you come in in terms
12:29
of making sure this all happened the way it was supposed
12:31
to
12:31
or, you know, what, so, so
12:33
what happens next? That's right. I
12:36
mean, in addition to what, to the experimental diagnostics,
12:40
I should add, like there's also already diagnostics
12:42
going on at the beginning of the experiment
12:44
before the
12:44
experiment actually happens while this ice
12:47
layer is being grown. There's already X-ray
12:50
radiography of that capsule to
12:52
make sure that the layer is very uniform
12:54
and thicknesses and it's growing as it's
12:56
supposed to be growing and that we know that we have an
12:59
ice layer.
12:59
And then there's alignment
13:02
systems, etc. So there's a lot of diagnostics
13:04
that are
13:05
facility diagnostics that are on every
13:07
experiment that we do.
13:09
And that tell
13:11
us that the targets in the right place, that
13:14
the lasers are hopefully going to give you the right energy,
13:16
etc.
13:17
And then
13:20
when the laser fires and that system
13:22
heats up and and everything. So we have
13:25
different diagnostics
13:30
and the ones that in particular
13:32
for these ignition
13:35
type experiments, the ones that are telling
13:37
us that we got the
13:39
neutron yield or the energy out that
13:41
we expected or
13:43
the number of the three megajoules
13:45
out, above three megajoules out, we
13:47
got that mainly from the neutron detectors.
13:50
And so those are basically measuring the
13:53
in this fusion reaction that Matthias
13:55
was talking about earlier, where we diffuse
13:57
these deuterium and tritium isotopes.
14:00
and put them in, they make a helium
14:02
and a neutron. So the helium generally
14:04
stays in this hotspot or this
14:07
hot gas, continuing the
14:09
heating because it's such a big particle.
14:11
And the neutron that we get out is fairly high energy,
14:14
about 14 mV, and that escapes.
14:16
And so we can measure those escaping
14:18
the interaction. And basically
14:21
we count neutrons. And that's
14:23
how we know how much energy we got. So
14:25
there's a...
14:26
because the energy that comes out
14:28
of these reactions is known. And
14:31
so we count
14:33
neutrons to know how much energy we got out. And
14:37
that's fairly simple. And in addition to that,
14:39
we also try and look at the
14:41
X-rays, so this hotspot that's very hot
14:44
now, and it's hotter than
14:46
the center of the sun. And
14:49
so it emits this bright
14:52
light in X-rays, and
14:55
that allows us to image them. We're
14:57
using X-ray cameras. Okay, so
14:59
this whole process happens. How long does it take?
15:02
Like is this something that happens in like
15:05
a couple nanoseconds, or
15:07
is it like,
15:07
you know, you get the thing
15:09
going and it takes three days, and
15:12
then you get your result? So the
15:14
experiment is like in the blink of an eye, right?
15:16
So the, as Matthias mentioned,
15:18
the laser that drives it is about 10 nanoseconds
15:21
long, which is about
15:23
the time that it takes
15:24
light to travel about 3 meters
15:26
or just under 10 feet. And
15:29
then the interaction itself where the fusion
15:31
happens, that time scale is on the order
15:34
of 100 picoseconds. So
15:37
that is the time it takes
15:38
to travel about 3 centimeters, a little
15:40
bit more than an inch. And then
15:42
for spatial scales, we
15:45
mentioned that this experiment sits in the center of this
15:47
big chamber. And
15:49
the chamber, this vacuum chamber has
15:51
a diameter of 10 meters. And
15:53
so we have to, at that
15:56
center is this one centimeter
15:58
large pore realm.
16:00
And so we have to align the lasers
16:02
into that.
16:03
And then the compression of the capsule
16:06
that is starting out at the two millimeter scale,
16:08
which is about a peppercorn size, we
16:11
have to compress that,
16:12
or that gets compressed to the order of
16:15
the width of a hair, so about 50 microns.
16:17
And so that's the scale that we're kind of trying to measure, like
16:19
the 50 micron scale width,
16:22
and we're trying to measure that with some resolution,
16:24
so our resolution has to be below
16:26
the 10 micron
16:29
resolution.
16:31
And yeah, and then in addition,
16:33
the whole experiment because so if
16:35
you think about it, the two millimeter pellet
16:39
compressing to the 50 micron hotspot,
16:42
basically,
16:42
that's similar to trying to compress
16:44
uniformly compress a basketball to
16:46
the size of a P. And
16:49
so that's kind of, and we're trying to do this
16:51
uniformly
16:51
so that It doesn't
16:53
burst out at one point and it won't get the heat
16:56
and the density that you need in the core
16:58
to get the fusion going. SL.
17:00
Sabrina talked about neutrons a lot and we haven't
17:03
actually mentioned that yet. So
17:07
when we fuse the deuterium and the tritium together,
17:09
so we create helium,
17:10
but then we also create a whole bunch of other stuff. We create
17:13
a lot of radiation,
17:14
x-rays are flying out, we can see those, we
17:16
can measure those, we create
17:19
particles as well that we can see neutrons
17:21
predominantly.
17:22
And so that is the
17:24
neutrons that are being emitted at
17:26
a specific energy, that is the signature of fusion
17:28
reactions taking place.
17:30
And it is one of our key ways
17:32
of measuring the performance of this experiment.
17:36
So we essentially count the number of neutrons
17:38
that we're getting out, and that tells
17:40
us exactly about
17:42
conditions in the hotspot. You
17:44
can measure the velocity of the neutrons essentially, that tells
17:46
you about the temperature, how many neutrons
17:49
did you get out, that tells you about
17:50
how good was your reaction, how efficient
17:53
was your reaction.
17:55
And so that's why Sabrina was talking
17:57
about
17:57
measuring neutrons. signatures.
18:00
Where is the energy
18:02
that then ultimately like let's say
18:05
this goes to scale that we would use
18:07
to power it? Is it in the release
18:09
of the neutrons? Like what is
18:12
it that ultimately we would want to capture and use
18:14
to power our
18:15
refrigerator or
18:17
whatever? So
18:20
the funniest thing is that
18:23
we do all these really amazing
18:25
things and then at the end
18:27
of the day, we basically boil the kep.
18:30
So that's how a fission reactor works
18:32
as well. Right? You have these fission
18:34
reactions that creates heat,
18:36
which then essentially boils water and
18:38
without water you dry the turbine and
18:40
that generates electricity for the grid.
18:43
And you would do exactly the same thing with a fusion reactor,
18:45
which is, I think is hilarious
18:48
because we have a state of the art scientific
18:50
understanding. And then we do the same thing that
18:52
humans have been doing for, I don't know, millions
18:55
of years.
19:26
When you're behind the wheel,
19:28
it's okay to rock out to your music,
19:31
but it's not okay to interact with your phone
19:33
screen and electronic devices while
19:35
driving. In most cases, anything
19:37
more than a single touch or swipe is
19:40
against the law. That means no
19:42
texting, no typing, no scrolling,
19:45
no shopping, no browsing. If
19:47
an officer sees a violation, they can
19:49
pull you over. So remember,
19:52
Ohio, phones down. That's
19:54
the law.
20:00
get any better. Bacon and Ranch
20:02
just entered the chat. The
20:05
Bacon Ranch McChrispy, available
20:07
at participating McDonald's for a limited time.
20:19
So, um, there was a lot of press,
20:22
uh, a little while ago about, you know, it finally
20:24
being successful. Can you walk me through
20:26
like how many times was it unsuccessful
20:29
or was it like Like this was actually the
20:31
10th successful run because that's what you need
20:33
in order to publish a paper. Like what sort
20:35
of like the, what was it, or was it like,
20:37
oh, finally it worked after the hundredth time that
20:40
it didn't work. Um, what, what, what, how did
20:42
this discovery kind of come about?
20:44
So the,
20:46
the important takeaway is that this
20:49
is, this has been, uh, about
20:51
six decades in the making. Um,
20:53
so there's been a countless number of scientists
20:55
and engineers that have been working on
20:57
this all over the world. This is
20:59
a US-only project.
21:02
It took a lot of learning
21:04
to get to the point where we are today. I
21:07
don't know how many times have we tried it and failed. That's
21:10
a very difficult question to answer, but 60 years.
21:14
It took all this time to understand
21:16
the limitations
21:19
of the laser capabilities that
21:21
we had 50 years ago or so,
21:23
what we needed to do better, how smooth
21:26
this laser have to be, how uniform does the
21:28
compression have to be?
21:28
How perfect do these targets have to be? What
21:31
are the processes that
21:33
are going on at these very, very extreme conditions
21:36
that we're creating?
21:38
Temperatures and pressures like
21:40
the sun, and
21:41
how do we overcome these instabilities?
21:45
Ultimately, it's a race. If
21:47
you make something very, very hot, it doesn't
21:49
want to stay hot. It wants to
21:51
become cold, part of boiling water
21:53
out, it gets cold again. And
21:56
so the race is to compress
21:59
it fast. of keep the reaction
22:01
going for long enough before the
22:03
whole thing falls apart again, because that's what it
22:05
will do. That's why it
22:07
can't have this runaway reaction. It wants
22:10
to stop again.
22:11
And so being able to control that reaction
22:14
at a sufficient level, that's what took so
22:16
long.
22:17
And to the outside, this looks like a breakthrough,
22:19
and it is,
22:21
but really it's a series
22:23
of incremental steps over several
22:25
decades.
22:27
And really within the program,
22:29
people that are close to these experiments, we've
22:31
known that we're really, really close to getting this
22:34
for the last couple of years. There's
22:37
always an element of
22:38
surprise when it actually does
22:40
happen. But
22:43
we've known that we've been close for a
22:45
while. And
22:47
actually, I want to point out how incredible
22:50
the
22:50
requirements are. So for example,
22:53
the
22:53
capsules that we're shooting are
22:56
just marvelous
22:58
products of engineering. For example,
23:00
they're so smooth, so these are about two millimeters
23:03
in diameter, they're
23:04
smooth to about three
23:06
to four nanometers. And
23:08
just to put that in perspective, if you were to blow
23:10
that capsule up to the size of the earth, the
23:13
biggest hill you'd see would be about 100
23:16
feet. That's
23:18
how smooth they
23:19
are. And that's what's required
23:21
for this implosion to be clear,
23:24
because otherwise what happens is you get basically
23:26
jets forming and material being ejected
23:29
into the hotspot
23:30
and you don't want that because it disturbs the reaction.
23:33
They're not entirely perfect. One of the issues
23:35
we've been having over the last couple of years is that there
23:37
are what we call
23:39
defects in these capsules. There are little
23:42
pits or maybe little bubbles, little voids
23:44
in the wall of the target, things
23:46
like that. some high-set materials
23:48
that you don't want tons or something like that
23:51
at a place where you don't want it. All of that is
23:53
important. All of that will make the implosion
23:56
of fall
23:57
less good. And so that's
24:00
part of the process of learning how to do this right.
24:02
Sabrina, anything you want to add in terms
24:05
of what Mathias was just talking about?
24:07
Yeah, I mean, this is, I guess, we've
24:10
had a lot of fusion reactions in
24:12
the lab, right? I mean, we've been counting, we
24:14
know how to fuse deuterium
24:16
and tritium, but that has happened.
24:20
It's the amount of energy that
24:22
we get out, so the amount of fusion reactions
24:24
that we see.
24:25
And as Matthias mentioned,
24:28
the first time that we
24:30
get more of the fusion energy
24:32
out than we put in, that's the real thing
24:35
that happened in December. We were really
24:37
close before then on a number of experiments
24:40
that were in kind of what we called the burning regime,
24:42
which is very
24:44
close. And you could, from that step,
24:47
say, okay, we're getting there and
24:49
it's just a matter of time. And
24:51
what happened was we basically got a little
24:53
bit more energy. we made the capsules, I think,
24:55
a little bit thicker, a little bit more
24:57
robust, and that pushed us over the edge, basically.
25:01
And so how replicable is it now?
25:03
Like, do you feel like, OK, well, now we know exactly what
25:05
to do, and if we did it again tomorrow, it
25:07
would work exactly the same way? Or is it
25:09
more like, well, you know, we were kind of lucky
25:11
because we didn't have any tungsten on that particular
25:13
part of the capsule that time.
25:16
But like, you know, I think about like how hard it
25:18
is to put one of those, you know, glass
25:20
protectors on an iPhone, like one of those bubbles
25:22
come, you know, it's super annoying. like.
25:27
Yeah, so
25:29
like talking to target fabrication, they're
25:31
very fairly confident that they
25:32
can create, recreate like
25:35
capsules with that quality again.
25:38
And same for the laser, they are very confident
25:40
that they can deliver
25:43
same type of laser pulse shapes. So
25:45
from that perspective, we are very confident
25:46
that we could reproduce
25:48
it as a team, right? So there's
25:51
definitely plans to do that at least one time this
25:53
year, probably maybe a couple
25:56
of times this year.
25:57
And you know, what is the major hurdle?
26:00
in terms of just doing it over and over again. Like
26:02
what is it? It sounds expensive.
26:03
You've got a lot
26:05
of person power, but like, you know,
26:07
so like, why aren't you doing it every
26:09
day? Like, you know, what's the... Yeah,
26:12
it's a little bit of people power. Then the other thing
26:14
is that the facility is not just used
26:16
for this. There's also other
26:18
shots on there. So these are not the only
26:20
shots. We have like 400 shots a year roughly
26:22
on the facility and ignition
26:25
shots or like ICF related shots,
26:28
especially these more
26:31
involved experiments, they're on
26:33
the order of every two weeks to four
26:36
weeks. So maybe once a month, really,
26:38
the high kind
26:40
of on that time scale. But
26:42
the other limiting thing is,
26:44
yeah, you have to like after these shots,
26:47
you have to stay out times for personnel
26:49
safety,
26:50
et cetera, because there is some
26:52
activation
26:54
from the neutrons short-lived, but
26:56
you don't want to get in there too quickly.
26:59
And then there's some time that we have
27:01
to do data collection as well and
27:03
the laser cannot, I think,
27:05
at this point, shoot at
27:08
these high energies
27:09
on a high
27:13
repetition rate for us, it's like once a day. But we
27:16
can't really shoot at that rep
27:19
rate for the laser at this point. Because this was,
27:21
and I think, yeah, the laser
27:23
was built in the,
27:25
on 80s, 90s laser technology.
27:28
So you could make it more efficient
27:30
nowadays, but that's when the facility was,
27:33
or the technology was established
27:34
for this technology, for this facility.
27:37
Okay, so now that you've proven
27:40
that it's possible, you got more energy than you
27:42
put in, what are the next
27:44
steps that have to be done before
27:46
this is going to be, you know, an option
27:48
that people can use?
27:50
Do we know what those next steps are? Is there like
27:53
a clear trajectory or is it still
27:54
like, you know, unclear? Well,
27:58
I'd say yes and no. certainly some things
28:01
that we know that need to be done.
28:04
It's certainly not at the point where you expect
28:06
a future power plant to happen tomorrow.
28:09
I think
28:10
what we did demonstrate is that
28:12
the science works. You can
28:14
get more energy out of the system than
28:16
you put in, and that's important because
28:19
it moved the whole thing from a science problem
28:21
to an engineering problem.
28:23
But really, so we put two megages of energy
28:25
in. We got three megajoules of fusion
28:27
energy out, but
28:29
that's really not good enough for a power plant.
28:31
You really want something like, say, 50, maybe 100
28:34
megajoules, so much, much higher efficiency
28:37
than we demonstrated. The other
28:39
thing you want to do is you want to be able to shoot this 10
28:41
times a second, which with the
28:44
laser that we have here is not possible.
28:46
The targets are much too complicated to do that.
28:49
So there's a lot of problems
28:52
that have to be simplified, a lot of things that have to simplified
28:54
before we can do this.
28:56
And then it's also not clear
28:58
what the best approach is to a power plant.
29:01
So we use lasers to compress these targets.
29:03
That's not the only approach that you can use. It's
29:06
the one that we're doing and it's the one we understand
29:08
the best, obviously. But there are other ways to do
29:10
this. There you can use magnetic fields
29:12
to confine the hot dense plasma. There's
29:15
things like proton
29:18
ignition where you use the accelerated protons
29:20
to hit a little capsule and make it hot that way.
29:23
So there may be other approaches that may or
29:25
may not work better and there's
29:28
work that needs to be done to figure out what's the best approach,
29:30
what's the most viable, commercially
29:33
approachable, the
29:35
best way to approach this commercially.
29:37
And so I think we're still certainly
29:40
years away from this, from having something
29:42
like a fusion power plant. But
29:44
I like the comparison to the Wright
29:46
Brothers
29:47
demonstration of flight in 1903 because
29:50
they flew 100
29:51
feet or so, which, you know,
29:53
that's not useful. But the
29:55
implications were enormous. And now of course,
29:57
flight is everybody.
30:00
uses flights for transporting
30:02
cargo and people and
30:04
defines society in the event today.
30:06
Yeah, in addition to that, I mean, just to note
30:08
for this shot, ignition shot, the
30:11
actual energy I think that NIF took from the grid
30:13
in order to achieve the shot was 300 megajoules. So
30:16
that went into two megajoules
30:18
of the lift of the laser, which then got
30:20
one and a half out. So the laser that drives the
30:22
target was the two megajoules and
30:24
then about three megajoules out of
30:26
fusion energy.
30:27
So that's where the one and a half times comes from. So
30:29
we're not wall pluck even,
30:32
we're not at that point. And
30:34
NIF wasn't really built to do this. This is a science
30:37
facility. So this was shown
30:40
to prove the principle. And
30:43
so yeah, we would have to have
30:45
way more efficient lasers. And
30:47
I think nowadays the laser
30:49
technology also is like, the
30:52
efficiency I think is coming to 20% wall
30:54
pluck efficiency for laser technology. So
30:57
that's a lot better than the NIF can do at this point.
31:00
And the repetition rate for these high-energy lasers
31:03
has gone up as well, which is something that you
31:04
would need for a power plant, right? You would need
31:07
a high repetition rate. You have to have this
31:09
kind of type of interaction every second.
31:11
And so you need a very robust
31:14
and easy to manufacture targets for that. And
31:16
so the
31:16
approach that NIF is taking might not
31:19
be the approach that a power plant has
31:21
as well. But there's currently
31:23
people looking at that. What would be the efficient
31:25
way to
31:26
do? But you still think that in the power
31:28
plant, it would be some version of
31:30
lasers shooting a small thing
31:34
or maybe a mid-sized thing that
31:37
would still be the kind of conceptually
31:39
the same idea?
31:40
If we were to design it, yes.
31:45
And then the magnetic confinement people
31:47
would say
31:47
it's more like a tokamak. Got it.
31:50
It's like more that magnetically confined doughnut. And
31:53
then some other, yeah, so it depends
31:56
on who you talk to, I think.
31:57
that different technologies have different...
32:00
risks, different technological risks
32:02
that need to be addressed, I think, at
32:03
this point. And there's people both
32:05
in the industry as well as in laboratories and
32:07
in national laboratories working on it and
32:10
kind of collaborating on it as well. Yeah,
32:12
so I was going to ask about- But they're all doing the same thing. Sorry.
32:15
Yeah. Like, what is the
32:17
industry's reaction to this? Are they all
32:19
kind of now rushing in to be
32:21
the first to, you know, kind of create
32:24
a commercially viable
32:26
version of this, or are they
32:28
still sitting back on the sidelines, letting
32:30
the scientists figure out and make
32:32
it more efficient?
32:34
There has been a lot
32:36
of commercial interest. There are a number
32:39
of companies, startups,
32:43
some of them have been around for a couple of years now,
32:45
that are
32:46
trying to get a foot in this
32:48
commercial space and working on potential
32:51
viable plant designs.
32:54
the recent
32:56
results that we've had in 2021,
32:58
we demonstrated a megajoule of yield.
33:00
In
33:01
December 22, we demonstrated
33:03
a gain of one and a half, three megajoule
33:06
yield.
33:06
That has certainly invigorated the space,
33:09
but it's been pretty active for a couple of years
33:11
now.
33:12
I think more investment has probably
33:14
been made in the magnetically
33:16
confined, if you will, approach the
33:18
Tokamak. But
33:21
yeah, there's a lot of activity and there's a lot of money from
33:23
private investors that has been pumped into this.
33:25
Absolutely. So when
33:27
you look to the future, I mean, I know you have at
33:30
least one child, if not more than one child,
33:32
and you think about sort of how, you know,
33:35
we're
33:35
facing some major climate
33:38
issues, some major environmental
33:41
issues. How do you feel
33:43
like, you know, in terms of, do you think
33:45
that this ultimately is going to be the
33:48
answer or is it one of the answers
33:51
or like how do you feel in terms of
33:54
what the future looks like when it comes to
33:56
energy. So
33:57
yeah, so we have two children and yes.
34:00
We are very hopeful,
34:02
of course, especially now with this ignition result,
34:04
that a fusion power plant
34:06
is
34:07
in their lifetime
34:09
at least, something that is
34:12
viable and comes on and
34:14
helps with the
34:15
energy security for all
34:18
countries as well. And
34:22
in the meantime, the solar
34:24
and wind power, but again, these might be dependent
34:27
on where you live and storage
34:30
capabilities as well, right? It's
34:33
not the switch of a button
34:35
sometimes. If the sun doesn't shine in
34:37
your area or you have very
34:40
short days, you have to be very limited
34:42
in that.
34:43
I think
34:44
we have to be realistic about the
34:46
timescales. I mean,
34:49
I'm certainly not an expert in climate science,
34:51
but
34:52
I would say we probably have to act
34:54
faster here than
34:56
we will be able to act with fusion
34:58
power.
34:59
I certainly think and hope that
35:01
it
35:01
will be one of the solutions in the
35:03
future, but
35:04
we should not
35:06
rely on it and say, all right, we'll
35:09
just wait till fusion is a viable
35:11
power source and then we'll go from there. That's
35:13
probably going to be the
35:15
wrong approach. So I
35:17
have one last really
35:19
stupid question that probably you're
35:22
going to be like, that's for an
35:24
astronomer, which is,
35:27
you know, NASA a few weeks back
35:30
told us there is a part of the sun that
35:32
kind of broke off, but don't worry, everything's
35:34
fine. I've been dying
35:37
to ask a physicist, it seems like somebody who's
35:39
like creating little tiny suns
35:42
in their laser beam
35:45
world might be the person to ask, should
35:48
we not be worried about this or
35:50
what's going on there?
35:52
unlikely that that's going to create fusion. So
35:57
the sun, as you mentioned, I don't think we mentioned
35:59
it yet.
36:00
But yeah, the Sun is a fusion
36:02
power plant, right? That's what happens. But
36:04
the Sun basically is,
36:08
because of its big mass, it's confined
36:10
and it creates these hot dense
36:13
areas in the center of it where the fusion happens,
36:15
right? So if you have a little bit of
36:17
deuterium, tritium gas, you're not going to get, just
36:20
floating around in space, you're not going to get fusion
36:22
by itself.
36:23
I don't think something flying
36:25
off of the sun is an immediate
36:28
problem for us.
36:30
And I don't think it's a model for what we're doing
36:32
in the lab as well. As Breena said, the sun
36:34
does a,
36:35
it creates fusion, but it does it in a slightly different
36:38
way. It's confined through its own
36:40
mass because it's so heavy, it all sticks
36:42
together.
36:43
Whereas what we're doing, as I said, is,
36:46
you know, it's flying apart. It's not one, doesn't
36:48
want to stay together because it's only a little bit. Yeah.
36:50
And then if it's coming our way, right, then
36:53
the like, if it's charged particles, the magnetic
36:55
field's going to hopefully do its thing. Okay.
36:58
And, and what? Yeah. So, so, okay,
37:01
great. So not, not, not,
37:03
not, astronauts
37:03
might be a bit more worried, but. I
37:06
think they're more worried about, yeah, it's
37:08
true. Well, Mathias
37:10
and Sabrina, thank you so much for being an uninquiring
37:13
minds. It's been really incredible to
37:15
get this inside view of this really
37:17
kind of, you know, major
37:18
or 60 years in the making
37:20
discovery. Yeah. Thank
37:22
you so much. I think it's, it's a really inspiring
37:25
time and you know, it's,
37:27
we spend our careers working on this and many
37:29
people have
37:30
spent their careers working on it. And we never
37:32
got to see it because they retired. So
37:34
it's fantastic to be part of this.
37:36
Yes. Thank you very much for having us. Yeah.
37:38
Thank you for having us.
37:43
So that's it for another episode. Don't worry about
37:45
parts breaking off the sun. Thanks for listening.
37:48
and if you want to hear more, don't forget to subscribe.
37:51
If you'd like to get an ad-free version of this show, consider
37:53
supporting us at patreon.com slash
37:55
inquiring minds. I want to especially
37:58
thank David Noel, Herring Cheng, Sean
38:00
Johnson, Jordan Millar, Kyle Royhala,
38:02
Michael Galgoul, Eric Clark, Yushi
38:04
Lin, Clark Lindgren, Joelle,
38:06
Stephen Meyer, AWOL, Dale LeMaster, and Charles
38:09
Blyle. Inquiring Minds is produced
38:11
by Adam Isaac. I'm your host, Indre
38:13
Viscontis. See you next
38:15
time!
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More