Podchaser Logo
Home
Everything you need to know about that fusion breakthrough

Everything you need to know about that fusion breakthrough

Released Tuesday, 4th April 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Everything you need to know about that fusion breakthrough

Everything you need to know about that fusion breakthrough

Everything you need to know about that fusion breakthrough

Everything you need to know about that fusion breakthrough

Tuesday, 4th April 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

You do anything to keep your vehicle happy.

0:02

Let's make sure it stays running smoothly. With

0:04

eBay Guaranteed Fit, you'll find the right

0:07

parts that fit your vehicle the first time. From

0:09

air filters to headlights to batteries and

0:11

bumpers. When you see the green check, you

0:13

know that part will fit. Get the right parts

0:16

at the right prices. At theebamotors.com,

0:19

let's ride. Eligible items only,

0:21

exclusions apply.

0:23

As if the McChrissy

0:25

couldn't get any better. Bacon

0:27

and Ranch just entered the chat. The

0:30

Bacon Ranch McChrissy, available

0:33

and participating with Donald's for a limited time.

0:39

You and Betty and the Nancy's

0:42

and Bill's and Joe's and Jane's will

0:44

find in the study of science a

0:46

richer, more rewarding life.

0:50

Welcome to Inquiring Minds. I'm

0:53

Andrea Viscontis. This is a podcast

0:55

that explores the space where science and society

0:57

collide. We want to find out what's true, what's

0:59

left to discover, and why it matters.

1:11

We're coming up to the 400th episode

1:14

of this podcast. And so I'm revisiting

1:17

some of my favorite topics with new

1:19

guests, sometimes with a co-host,

1:22

with multiple guests.

1:24

And so this week I thought it would be appropriate

1:26

to talk about a major scientific

1:28

discovery. Physics is definitely

1:31

not my forte, but I always love

1:33

talking to experimental physicists or theoretical

1:36

physicists, not just because

1:38

they helped me feel insignificant,

1:42

but also because they put things into perspective.

1:44

All of a sudden when

1:46

you're talking about discovering

1:48

a whole new way of powering our

1:50

world, or our place

1:53

in this vast universe, the everyday

1:55

problems that I'm facing seem less

1:57

important. So this week

1:59

I- the pleasure of talking to two

2:02

physicists, yep two at the same

2:04

time, both from Lawrence Livermore National

2:06

Labs. And they were part of the team

2:09

that had this huge breakthrough back in December 2022

2:12

when essentially in a series of experiments

2:15

they showed that fusion is actually

2:17

a viable potential energy source. Sabrina

2:20

Nagel is a group leader in the physics division

2:23

at Lawrence Livermore National Labs and she's the

2:25

lead scientist for the National

2:27

Ignition Facilities Dynamic X-ray

2:29

detectors group. And then Dr. Matthias

2:31

Hohenberger is an experimental scientist

2:34

and group leader working on inertial confinement

2:36

fusion at the NIF, at the Lawrence Livermore

2:38

National Labs. He's been working on performing

2:40

experiments in the pursuit of, and now

2:43

on the accomplishment of, fusion

2:45

ignition for the last 13 years.

2:51

Sabrina and Matthias, welcome

2:54

to Inquiring Minds. I'm so excited to talk

2:56

to you. Well, thank you very much for having us.

2:59

Yeah, thank you for having us. It's exciting. So

3:01

let's start with, first

3:03

of all, in terms of your respective roles,

3:06

can you each just tell me, maybe we'll start with Sabrina, what

3:09

your roles are on the sort of grand

3:12

thermonuclear

3:13

fusion project? Sure.

3:15

So yes, I am

3:19

one of the scientific leads in

3:22

developing some of the diagnostics, the

3:24

experimental diagnostics for the

3:26

National Agression Facility. And we have optical

3:29

diagnostics, nuclear

3:31

or particle diagnostics, as well as x-ray diagnostics.

3:34

And so I'm kind of heading a part of a

3:36

co-head, so to speak, for

3:38

developing some of those systems.

3:42

And as, yeah,

3:44

I've been working on this for over 10 years

3:46

now. And it's great to see

3:48

that we're getting

3:50

exciting results. And yeah, as

3:53

you might imagine, the diagnostics

3:56

are what measures

3:59

what's going on.

4:00

in the experiments and helps

4:02

us tweak and change

4:04

the input parameters so that we were

4:06

able to achieve ignition. All right.

4:09

And so, Mathias, are you the one that pushes the button? Is

4:12

there a big red button that you push? Unfortunately

4:15

not. That would be so exciting. No,

4:18

I'm what's generally referred

4:20

to as an experimental physicist. So I'm

4:24

one of the many people that would

4:27

tell the facility operators how

4:29

to set up experiments, what

4:32

we want to measure, how to set up the diagnostics

4:34

that Sabrina and her team has developed,

4:37

and what it is that we're trying to do in

4:39

this particular experiment. And

4:41

so I'm doing experiments in the ICF,

4:43

the National Confine Refusion Program,

4:47

and I'm also a group leader for inclusion

4:49

in stagnation physics, which means the

4:51

people in my group also do experiments in this area.

4:54

So let's talk about fusion. And just

4:56

for our listeners who maybe are

4:58

not as familiar, what

5:00

exactly are we talking about here? What's

5:03

the fundamental

5:04

idea behind it? So

5:07

fusion is a nuclear

5:09

process, which means it's happening with

5:12

the nucleus of the atom, which is the heavy part in

5:14

the center that's surrounded by electrons.

5:18

It basically changes the configuration of the

5:20

nucleus. There's two main ways of doing this.

5:23

One is fission, that's what most people are familiar with, and

5:25

the other one is fusion.

5:26

Fission is the part where you

5:28

split up the nucleus into smaller

5:31

parts, and then fusion is the

5:33

opposite process where you take two light

5:36

elements, two light nuclei,

5:38

and push them together hard

5:41

enough that they stick together because they don't want to be together,

5:44

that they stick together and form a heavier.

5:47

And so in the fusion process here,

5:49

we're taking two deuterium

5:52

and tritium ions. That's basically

5:54

hydrogen, hydrogen is the lightest element we had with

5:57

a few extra neutrons and we're squeezing them.

6:00

together under very intense pressures

6:03

and temperatures. And then when they stick

6:05

together, they form helium, which is the second lightest

6:07

element that we have. And

6:10

when we weigh the helium

6:12

atom at the end, it's actually lighter

6:14

than the sum of its part, the

6:16

sum of the elements that we squeeze together. And

6:19

by Einstein's

6:19

equation,

6:22

energy equals mass times

6:24

the speed of light square, that means that

6:27

difference in mass has to go somewhere. And that's

6:29

the energy that is being released as heat

6:32

is it? So that's what fusion. And

6:34

so the ultimate idea here, potentially

6:37

in terms of an application, is that you could

6:39

create a lot of energy

6:41

with this process. And it

6:44

how, you know, can you tell us a little bit about so

6:46

like the kind of grand hundred

6:48

years from now vision, or

6:50

whatever that is, maybe it's five years from now, I don't know,

6:54

that you know, you could capture that energy and

6:56

use it and is it is it how is it better

6:58

than

6:58

some of the other energy sources that we have today?

7:01

So the fusion energy

7:03

is basically held

7:07

to promise of a clean, carbon-free,

7:11

robust energy source for

7:14

everyone. And basically,

7:16

it's also clean in

7:19

the sense of that it doesn't produce

7:21

radioactive waste with long half

7:23

nights.

7:25

And then it is not reliant

7:29

on the sun being out or the

7:32

wind blowing for us to have

7:34

it. You can have it at the push of a button, hopefully

7:37

in the future.

7:38

And so with that, and

7:41

then the fuel that we need for it is

7:43

also very fairly abundant. So hydrogen isotopes,

7:47

you can get them from seawater.

7:49

And so they're fairly readily available

7:52

for people to use.

7:53

Yeah, so maybe the vision in the future would be that

7:56

you could use some amount of seawater and

7:58

create an abundant energy.

8:00

source that could cleanly

8:02

power our lives without

8:04

the danger that some of the other power

8:07

sources have. Is that right? That

8:09

is right. It doesn't produce greenhouse

8:13

gas emissions. It

8:14

doesn't produce these long-lived half-life for

8:17

radioactive isotopes that

8:19

people are rightly worried about. You

8:21

don't have things that are still radioactive

8:24

in 20,000 years.

8:26

And also it doesn't have

8:28

this runaway reaction process that can

8:31

happen immediately a reactor like Chernobyl

8:33

just cannot fundamentally happen with

8:36

the reaction,

8:36

with fusion reactions. So I want

8:39

to learn a little bit more about like, you

8:41

know, what the actual

8:43

experiment or what the work is like. So first

8:46

of all, you've got these tiny

8:48

atoms,

8:48

right? So how, I mean, where

8:50

do you get them from? How do you know they're there?

8:53

I mean, this is such a, having the two of you here

8:55

is such a gift because I feel like, you

8:57

know, you can, you can teach me a lot about

9:00

sort of how you're detecting that they're actually there, that

9:02

it's actually going and how you put it all together.

9:04

So can you just walk me through

9:06

like the steps of,

9:08

you know, one of these experiments?

9:10

Okay, so the fundamental

9:12

target is basically

9:15

a small capsule. It's about

9:17

two millimeters in diameter, and

9:20

it's made out of diamond. In

9:23

that hollow capsule, in that sphere,

9:25

is a cryogenic layer of deuterium

9:28

tritium ice. Deuterium tritium are

9:30

these heavy hydrogen isotopes.

9:32

There's a very thin layer of

9:34

ice, so it's like 14 Kelvin or so, so

9:37

very close to absolute zero. But like,

9:39

do you put that in there? Like do you have the capsule,

9:41

you have like a whole bunch of these diamond capsules and you

9:43

stick a little bit of. Yeah. So

9:47

the capsule has a little filter.

9:49

The filter was two microns in diameter. So

9:51

that's 50 times smaller than the width of a

9:53

hair. And so that you, you basically

9:55

pump gas, deuterium, deuterium gas in

9:57

there. And then you cool it down and you...

10:00

form this layer in a very complicated, intricate

10:02

process that,

10:03

in fact,

10:05

no, very little about there are experts to

10:07

do this. And then, so

10:10

that's your target, that contains the fuel. And

10:12

this little pellet sits inside a whole

10:15

realm, which is about, it's a

10:17

little, a gold cylinder

10:19

about a centimeter in size.

10:22

And so what happens now, we have this massive

10:24

laser facility, the National Ignition Facility, It

10:27

has 192 laser beams, and we take these

10:30

laser beams, it's the most powerful laser in the world,

10:33

we take these laser beams and we

10:35

focus them into that tiny target. Laser

10:37

beams, half at the top, half at the bottom, 96 beams

10:39

on each side. They're focused through

10:41

a little hole in the cylinder

10:44

onto the walls of the cylinder, and

10:46

in a very short time, about 10 nanoseconds

10:48

or so, we

10:50

put 2 megajoules of energy

10:52

into the cylinder.

10:54

And so that laser energy

10:57

heats up this little cylinder to ridiculous

11:00

temperatures.

11:02

Basically it gets an

11:04

incredibly hot oven of about 3 million degrees.

11:07

And that then starts ablating

11:10

the outer wall

11:12

of the capsule that sits in the center. Because

11:14

it gets so hot, right, the things just sort of fly apart. And

11:16

because the stuff on the outside of the capsule

11:19

flies apart,

11:20

the stuff on the inside gets compressed.

11:23

reaction and reaction via

11:26

neutron. It's the same way that

11:28

a rocket works. It pushes a lot of stuff out at one

11:30

side and the rest of the rocket goes up.

11:33

And so that's how this thing gets compressed.

11:35

And so the

11:37

thing basically implodes, that's what

11:39

we call it, and the center

11:41

of that capsule, the DT, gets

11:44

to a pressure of about 500 gigabars,

11:47

which is 10 times

11:49

higher than the sun, and about 150

11:51

million degrees, which

11:54

is also about 10 times hotter than the sun. And

11:57

that is the conditions that you need but these three

11:59

reactions. take place. Okay,

12:02

so now I have a sense of like, you know,

12:04

there's this little tiny thing in this big room

12:07

with all of these lasers pointed at it. It

12:09

creates, you know, this big

12:12

sort of almost like I think of it as maybe like

12:15

a little explosion when all these lasers are hitting

12:17

it and that causes the pressure

12:19

that puts these

12:21

two atoms together. So

12:24

Sabrina, now I'm assuming that

12:26

this is maybe where you come in in terms

12:29

of making sure this all happened the way it was supposed

12:31

to

12:31

or, you know, what, so, so

12:33

what happens next? That's right. I

12:36

mean, in addition to what, to the experimental diagnostics,

12:40

I should add, like there's also already diagnostics

12:42

going on at the beginning of the experiment

12:44

before the

12:44

experiment actually happens while this ice

12:47

layer is being grown. There's already X-ray

12:50

radiography of that capsule to

12:52

make sure that the layer is very uniform

12:54

and thicknesses and it's growing as it's

12:56

supposed to be growing and that we know that we have an

12:59

ice layer.

12:59

And then there's alignment

13:02

systems, etc. So there's a lot of diagnostics

13:04

that are

13:05

facility diagnostics that are on every

13:07

experiment that we do.

13:09

And that tell

13:11

us that the targets in the right place, that

13:14

the lasers are hopefully going to give you the right energy,

13:16

etc.

13:17

And then

13:20

when the laser fires and that system

13:22

heats up and and everything. So we have

13:25

different diagnostics

13:30

and the ones that in particular

13:32

for these ignition

13:35

type experiments, the ones that are telling

13:37

us that we got the

13:39

neutron yield or the energy out that

13:41

we expected or

13:43

the number of the three megajoules

13:45

out, above three megajoules out, we

13:47

got that mainly from the neutron detectors.

13:50

And so those are basically measuring the

13:53

in this fusion reaction that Matthias

13:55

was talking about earlier, where we diffuse

13:57

these deuterium and tritium isotopes.

14:00

and put them in, they make a helium

14:02

and a neutron. So the helium generally

14:04

stays in this hotspot or this

14:07

hot gas, continuing the

14:09

heating because it's such a big particle.

14:11

And the neutron that we get out is fairly high energy,

14:14

about 14 mV, and that escapes.

14:16

And so we can measure those escaping

14:18

the interaction. And basically

14:21

we count neutrons. And that's

14:23

how we know how much energy we got. So

14:25

there's a...

14:26

because the energy that comes out

14:28

of these reactions is known. And

14:31

so we count

14:33

neutrons to know how much energy we got out. And

14:37

that's fairly simple. And in addition to that,

14:39

we also try and look at the

14:41

X-rays, so this hotspot that's very hot

14:44

now, and it's hotter than

14:46

the center of the sun. And

14:49

so it emits this bright

14:52

light in X-rays, and

14:55

that allows us to image them. We're

14:57

using X-ray cameras. Okay, so

14:59

this whole process happens. How long does it take?

15:02

Like is this something that happens in like

15:05

a couple nanoseconds, or

15:07

is it like,

15:07

you know, you get the thing

15:09

going and it takes three days, and

15:12

then you get your result? So the

15:14

experiment is like in the blink of an eye, right?

15:16

So the, as Matthias mentioned,

15:18

the laser that drives it is about 10 nanoseconds

15:21

long, which is about

15:23

the time that it takes

15:24

light to travel about 3 meters

15:26

or just under 10 feet. And

15:29

then the interaction itself where the fusion

15:31

happens, that time scale is on the order

15:34

of 100 picoseconds. So

15:37

that is the time it takes

15:38

to travel about 3 centimeters, a little

15:40

bit more than an inch. And then

15:42

for spatial scales, we

15:45

mentioned that this experiment sits in the center of this

15:47

big chamber. And

15:49

the chamber, this vacuum chamber has

15:51

a diameter of 10 meters. And

15:53

so we have to, at that

15:56

center is this one centimeter

15:58

large pore realm.

16:00

And so we have to align the lasers

16:02

into that.

16:03

And then the compression of the capsule

16:06

that is starting out at the two millimeter scale,

16:08

which is about a peppercorn size, we

16:11

have to compress that,

16:12

or that gets compressed to the order of

16:15

the width of a hair, so about 50 microns.

16:17

And so that's the scale that we're kind of trying to measure, like

16:19

the 50 micron scale width,

16:22

and we're trying to measure that with some resolution,

16:24

so our resolution has to be below

16:26

the 10 micron

16:29

resolution.

16:31

And yeah, and then in addition,

16:33

the whole experiment because so if

16:35

you think about it, the two millimeter pellet

16:39

compressing to the 50 micron hotspot,

16:42

basically,

16:42

that's similar to trying to compress

16:44

uniformly compress a basketball to

16:46

the size of a P. And

16:49

so that's kind of, and we're trying to do this

16:51

uniformly

16:51

so that It doesn't

16:53

burst out at one point and it won't get the heat

16:56

and the density that you need in the core

16:58

to get the fusion going. SL.

17:00

Sabrina talked about neutrons a lot and we haven't

17:03

actually mentioned that yet. So

17:07

when we fuse the deuterium and the tritium together,

17:09

so we create helium,

17:10

but then we also create a whole bunch of other stuff. We create

17:13

a lot of radiation,

17:14

x-rays are flying out, we can see those, we

17:16

can measure those, we create

17:19

particles as well that we can see neutrons

17:21

predominantly.

17:22

And so that is the

17:24

neutrons that are being emitted at

17:26

a specific energy, that is the signature of fusion

17:28

reactions taking place.

17:30

And it is one of our key ways

17:32

of measuring the performance of this experiment.

17:36

So we essentially count the number of neutrons

17:38

that we're getting out, and that tells

17:40

us exactly about

17:42

conditions in the hotspot. You

17:44

can measure the velocity of the neutrons essentially, that tells

17:46

you about the temperature, how many neutrons

17:49

did you get out, that tells you about

17:50

how good was your reaction, how efficient

17:53

was your reaction.

17:55

And so that's why Sabrina was talking

17:57

about

17:57

measuring neutrons. signatures.

18:00

Where is the energy

18:02

that then ultimately like let's say

18:05

this goes to scale that we would use

18:07

to power it? Is it in the release

18:09

of the neutrons? Like what is

18:12

it that ultimately we would want to capture and use

18:14

to power our

18:15

refrigerator or

18:17

whatever? So

18:20

the funniest thing is that

18:23

we do all these really amazing

18:25

things and then at the end

18:27

of the day, we basically boil the kep.

18:30

So that's how a fission reactor works

18:32

as well. Right? You have these fission

18:34

reactions that creates heat,

18:36

which then essentially boils water and

18:38

without water you dry the turbine and

18:40

that generates electricity for the grid.

18:43

And you would do exactly the same thing with a fusion reactor,

18:45

which is, I think is hilarious

18:48

because we have a state of the art scientific

18:50

understanding. And then we do the same thing that

18:52

humans have been doing for, I don't know, millions

18:55

of years.

19:26

When you're behind the wheel,

19:28

it's okay to rock out to your music,

19:31

but it's not okay to interact with your phone

19:33

screen and electronic devices while

19:35

driving. In most cases, anything

19:37

more than a single touch or swipe is

19:40

against the law. That means no

19:42

texting, no typing, no scrolling,

19:45

no shopping, no browsing. If

19:47

an officer sees a violation, they can

19:49

pull you over. So remember,

19:52

Ohio, phones down. That's

19:54

the law.

20:00

get any better. Bacon and Ranch

20:02

just entered the chat. The

20:05

Bacon Ranch McChrispy, available

20:07

at participating McDonald's for a limited time.

20:19

So, um, there was a lot of press,

20:22

uh, a little while ago about, you know, it finally

20:24

being successful. Can you walk me through

20:26

like how many times was it unsuccessful

20:29

or was it like Like this was actually the

20:31

10th successful run because that's what you need

20:33

in order to publish a paper. Like what sort

20:35

of like the, what was it, or was it like,

20:37

oh, finally it worked after the hundredth time that

20:40

it didn't work. Um, what, what, what, how did

20:42

this discovery kind of come about?

20:44

So the,

20:46

the important takeaway is that this

20:49

is, this has been, uh, about

20:51

six decades in the making. Um,

20:53

so there's been a countless number of scientists

20:55

and engineers that have been working on

20:57

this all over the world. This is

20:59

a US-only project.

21:02

It took a lot of learning

21:04

to get to the point where we are today. I

21:07

don't know how many times have we tried it and failed. That's

21:10

a very difficult question to answer, but 60 years.

21:14

It took all this time to understand

21:16

the limitations

21:19

of the laser capabilities that

21:21

we had 50 years ago or so,

21:23

what we needed to do better, how smooth

21:26

this laser have to be, how uniform does the

21:28

compression have to be?

21:28

How perfect do these targets have to be? What

21:31

are the processes that

21:33

are going on at these very, very extreme conditions

21:36

that we're creating?

21:38

Temperatures and pressures like

21:40

the sun, and

21:41

how do we overcome these instabilities?

21:45

Ultimately, it's a race. If

21:47

you make something very, very hot, it doesn't

21:49

want to stay hot. It wants to

21:51

become cold, part of boiling water

21:53

out, it gets cold again. And

21:56

so the race is to compress

21:59

it fast. of keep the reaction

22:01

going for long enough before the

22:03

whole thing falls apart again, because that's what it

22:05

will do. That's why it

22:07

can't have this runaway reaction. It wants

22:10

to stop again.

22:11

And so being able to control that reaction

22:14

at a sufficient level, that's what took so

22:16

long.

22:17

And to the outside, this looks like a breakthrough,

22:19

and it is,

22:21

but really it's a series

22:23

of incremental steps over several

22:25

decades.

22:27

And really within the program,

22:29

people that are close to these experiments, we've

22:31

known that we're really, really close to getting this

22:34

for the last couple of years. There's

22:37

always an element of

22:38

surprise when it actually does

22:40

happen. But

22:43

we've known that we've been close for a

22:45

while. And

22:47

actually, I want to point out how incredible

22:50

the

22:50

requirements are. So for example,

22:53

the

22:53

capsules that we're shooting are

22:56

just marvelous

22:58

products of engineering. For example,

23:00

they're so smooth, so these are about two millimeters

23:03

in diameter, they're

23:04

smooth to about three

23:06

to four nanometers. And

23:08

just to put that in perspective, if you were to blow

23:10

that capsule up to the size of the earth, the

23:13

biggest hill you'd see would be about 100

23:16

feet. That's

23:18

how smooth they

23:19

are. And that's what's required

23:21

for this implosion to be clear,

23:24

because otherwise what happens is you get basically

23:26

jets forming and material being ejected

23:29

into the hotspot

23:30

and you don't want that because it disturbs the reaction.

23:33

They're not entirely perfect. One of the issues

23:35

we've been having over the last couple of years is that there

23:37

are what we call

23:39

defects in these capsules. There are little

23:42

pits or maybe little bubbles, little voids

23:44

in the wall of the target, things

23:46

like that. some high-set materials

23:48

that you don't want tons or something like that

23:51

at a place where you don't want it. All of that is

23:53

important. All of that will make the implosion

23:56

of fall

23:57

less good. And so that's

24:00

part of the process of learning how to do this right.

24:02

Sabrina, anything you want to add in terms

24:05

of what Mathias was just talking about?

24:07

Yeah, I mean, this is, I guess, we've

24:10

had a lot of fusion reactions in

24:12

the lab, right? I mean, we've been counting, we

24:14

know how to fuse deuterium

24:16

and tritium, but that has happened.

24:20

It's the amount of energy that

24:22

we get out, so the amount of fusion reactions

24:24

that we see.

24:25

And as Matthias mentioned,

24:28

the first time that we

24:30

get more of the fusion energy

24:32

out than we put in, that's the real thing

24:35

that happened in December. We were really

24:37

close before then on a number of experiments

24:40

that were in kind of what we called the burning regime,

24:42

which is very

24:44

close. And you could, from that step,

24:47

say, okay, we're getting there and

24:49

it's just a matter of time. And

24:51

what happened was we basically got a little

24:53

bit more energy. we made the capsules, I think,

24:55

a little bit thicker, a little bit more

24:57

robust, and that pushed us over the edge, basically.

25:01

And so how replicable is it now?

25:03

Like, do you feel like, OK, well, now we know exactly what

25:05

to do, and if we did it again tomorrow, it

25:07

would work exactly the same way? Or is it

25:09

more like, well, you know, we were kind of lucky

25:11

because we didn't have any tungsten on that particular

25:13

part of the capsule that time.

25:16

But like, you know, I think about like how hard it

25:18

is to put one of those, you know, glass

25:20

protectors on an iPhone, like one of those bubbles

25:22

come, you know, it's super annoying. like.

25:27

Yeah, so

25:29

like talking to target fabrication, they're

25:31

very fairly confident that they

25:32

can create, recreate like

25:35

capsules with that quality again.

25:38

And same for the laser, they are very confident

25:40

that they can deliver

25:43

same type of laser pulse shapes. So

25:45

from that perspective, we are very confident

25:46

that we could reproduce

25:48

it as a team, right? So there's

25:51

definitely plans to do that at least one time this

25:53

year, probably maybe a couple

25:56

of times this year.

25:57

And you know, what is the major hurdle?

26:00

in terms of just doing it over and over again. Like

26:02

what is it? It sounds expensive.

26:03

You've got a lot

26:05

of person power, but like, you know,

26:07

so like, why aren't you doing it every

26:09

day? Like, you know, what's the... Yeah,

26:12

it's a little bit of people power. Then the other thing

26:14

is that the facility is not just used

26:16

for this. There's also other

26:18

shots on there. So these are not the only

26:20

shots. We have like 400 shots a year roughly

26:22

on the facility and ignition

26:25

shots or like ICF related shots,

26:28

especially these more

26:31

involved experiments, they're on

26:33

the order of every two weeks to four

26:36

weeks. So maybe once a month, really,

26:38

the high kind

26:40

of on that time scale. But

26:42

the other limiting thing is,

26:44

yeah, you have to like after these shots,

26:47

you have to stay out times for personnel

26:49

safety,

26:50

et cetera, because there is some

26:52

activation

26:54

from the neutrons short-lived, but

26:56

you don't want to get in there too quickly.

26:59

And then there's some time that we have

27:01

to do data collection as well and

27:03

the laser cannot, I think,

27:05

at this point, shoot at

27:08

these high energies

27:09

on a high

27:13

repetition rate for us, it's like once a day. But we

27:16

can't really shoot at that rep

27:19

rate for the laser at this point. Because this was,

27:21

and I think, yeah, the laser

27:23

was built in the,

27:25

on 80s, 90s laser technology.

27:28

So you could make it more efficient

27:30

nowadays, but that's when the facility was,

27:33

or the technology was established

27:34

for this technology, for this facility.

27:37

Okay, so now that you've proven

27:40

that it's possible, you got more energy than you

27:42

put in, what are the next

27:44

steps that have to be done before

27:46

this is going to be, you know, an option

27:48

that people can use?

27:50

Do we know what those next steps are? Is there like

27:53

a clear trajectory or is it still

27:54

like, you know, unclear? Well,

27:58

I'd say yes and no. certainly some things

28:01

that we know that need to be done.

28:04

It's certainly not at the point where you expect

28:06

a future power plant to happen tomorrow.

28:09

I think

28:10

what we did demonstrate is that

28:12

the science works. You can

28:14

get more energy out of the system than

28:16

you put in, and that's important because

28:19

it moved the whole thing from a science problem

28:21

to an engineering problem.

28:23

But really, so we put two megages of energy

28:25

in. We got three megajoules of fusion

28:27

energy out, but

28:29

that's really not good enough for a power plant.

28:31

You really want something like, say, 50, maybe 100

28:34

megajoules, so much, much higher efficiency

28:37

than we demonstrated. The other

28:39

thing you want to do is you want to be able to shoot this 10

28:41

times a second, which with the

28:44

laser that we have here is not possible.

28:46

The targets are much too complicated to do that.

28:49

So there's a lot of problems

28:52

that have to be simplified, a lot of things that have to simplified

28:54

before we can do this.

28:56

And then it's also not clear

28:58

what the best approach is to a power plant.

29:01

So we use lasers to compress these targets.

29:03

That's not the only approach that you can use. It's

29:06

the one that we're doing and it's the one we understand

29:08

the best, obviously. But there are other ways to do

29:10

this. There you can use magnetic fields

29:12

to confine the hot dense plasma. There's

29:15

things like proton

29:18

ignition where you use the accelerated protons

29:20

to hit a little capsule and make it hot that way.

29:23

So there may be other approaches that may or

29:25

may not work better and there's

29:28

work that needs to be done to figure out what's the best approach,

29:30

what's the most viable, commercially

29:33

approachable, the

29:35

best way to approach this commercially.

29:37

And so I think we're still certainly

29:40

years away from this, from having something

29:42

like a fusion power plant. But

29:44

I like the comparison to the Wright

29:46

Brothers

29:47

demonstration of flight in 1903 because

29:50

they flew 100

29:51

feet or so, which, you know,

29:53

that's not useful. But the

29:55

implications were enormous. And now of course,

29:57

flight is everybody.

30:00

uses flights for transporting

30:02

cargo and people and

30:04

defines society in the event today.

30:06

Yeah, in addition to that, I mean, just to note

30:08

for this shot, ignition shot, the

30:11

actual energy I think that NIF took from the grid

30:13

in order to achieve the shot was 300 megajoules. So

30:16

that went into two megajoules

30:18

of the lift of the laser, which then got

30:20

one and a half out. So the laser that drives the

30:22

target was the two megajoules and

30:24

then about three megajoules out of

30:26

fusion energy.

30:27

So that's where the one and a half times comes from. So

30:29

we're not wall pluck even,

30:32

we're not at that point. And

30:34

NIF wasn't really built to do this. This is a science

30:37

facility. So this was shown

30:40

to prove the principle. And

30:43

so yeah, we would have to have

30:45

way more efficient lasers. And

30:47

I think nowadays the laser

30:49

technology also is like, the

30:52

efficiency I think is coming to 20% wall

30:54

pluck efficiency for laser technology. So

30:57

that's a lot better than the NIF can do at this point.

31:00

And the repetition rate for these high-energy lasers

31:03

has gone up as well, which is something that you

31:04

would need for a power plant, right? You would need

31:07

a high repetition rate. You have to have this

31:09

kind of type of interaction every second.

31:11

And so you need a very robust

31:14

and easy to manufacture targets for that. And

31:16

so the

31:16

approach that NIF is taking might not

31:19

be the approach that a power plant has

31:21

as well. But there's currently

31:23

people looking at that. What would be the efficient

31:25

way to

31:26

do? But you still think that in the power

31:28

plant, it would be some version of

31:30

lasers shooting a small thing

31:34

or maybe a mid-sized thing that

31:37

would still be the kind of conceptually

31:39

the same idea?

31:40

If we were to design it, yes.

31:45

And then the magnetic confinement people

31:47

would say

31:47

it's more like a tokamak. Got it.

31:50

It's like more that magnetically confined doughnut. And

31:53

then some other, yeah, so it depends

31:56

on who you talk to, I think.

31:57

that different technologies have different...

32:00

risks, different technological risks

32:02

that need to be addressed, I think, at

32:03

this point. And there's people both

32:05

in the industry as well as in laboratories and

32:07

in national laboratories working on it and

32:10

kind of collaborating on it as well. Yeah,

32:12

so I was going to ask about- But they're all doing the same thing. Sorry.

32:15

Yeah. Like, what is the

32:17

industry's reaction to this? Are they all

32:19

kind of now rushing in to be

32:21

the first to, you know, kind of create

32:24

a commercially viable

32:26

version of this, or are they

32:28

still sitting back on the sidelines, letting

32:30

the scientists figure out and make

32:32

it more efficient?

32:34

There has been a lot

32:36

of commercial interest. There are a number

32:39

of companies, startups,

32:43

some of them have been around for a couple of years now,

32:45

that are

32:46

trying to get a foot in this

32:48

commercial space and working on potential

32:51

viable plant designs.

32:54

the recent

32:56

results that we've had in 2021,

32:58

we demonstrated a megajoule of yield.

33:00

In

33:01

December 22, we demonstrated

33:03

a gain of one and a half, three megajoule

33:06

yield.

33:06

That has certainly invigorated the space,

33:09

but it's been pretty active for a couple of years

33:11

now.

33:12

I think more investment has probably

33:14

been made in the magnetically

33:16

confined, if you will, approach the

33:18

Tokamak. But

33:21

yeah, there's a lot of activity and there's a lot of money from

33:23

private investors that has been pumped into this.

33:25

Absolutely. So when

33:27

you look to the future, I mean, I know you have at

33:30

least one child, if not more than one child,

33:32

and you think about sort of how, you know,

33:35

we're

33:35

facing some major climate

33:38

issues, some major environmental

33:41

issues. How do you feel

33:43

like, you know, in terms of, do you think

33:45

that this ultimately is going to be the

33:48

answer or is it one of the answers

33:51

or like how do you feel in terms of

33:54

what the future looks like when it comes to

33:56

energy. So

33:57

yeah, so we have two children and yes.

34:00

We are very hopeful,

34:02

of course, especially now with this ignition result,

34:04

that a fusion power plant

34:06

is

34:07

in their lifetime

34:09

at least, something that is

34:12

viable and comes on and

34:14

helps with the

34:15

energy security for all

34:18

countries as well. And

34:22

in the meantime, the solar

34:24

and wind power, but again, these might be dependent

34:27

on where you live and storage

34:30

capabilities as well, right? It's

34:33

not the switch of a button

34:35

sometimes. If the sun doesn't shine in

34:37

your area or you have very

34:40

short days, you have to be very limited

34:42

in that.

34:43

I think

34:44

we have to be realistic about the

34:46

timescales. I mean,

34:49

I'm certainly not an expert in climate science,

34:51

but

34:52

I would say we probably have to act

34:54

faster here than

34:56

we will be able to act with fusion

34:58

power.

34:59

I certainly think and hope that

35:01

it

35:01

will be one of the solutions in the

35:03

future, but

35:04

we should not

35:06

rely on it and say, all right, we'll

35:09

just wait till fusion is a viable

35:11

power source and then we'll go from there. That's

35:13

probably going to be the

35:15

wrong approach. So I

35:17

have one last really

35:19

stupid question that probably you're

35:22

going to be like, that's for an

35:24

astronomer, which is,

35:27

you know, NASA a few weeks back

35:30

told us there is a part of the sun that

35:32

kind of broke off, but don't worry, everything's

35:34

fine. I've been dying

35:37

to ask a physicist, it seems like somebody who's

35:39

like creating little tiny suns

35:42

in their laser beam

35:45

world might be the person to ask, should

35:48

we not be worried about this or

35:50

what's going on there?

35:52

unlikely that that's going to create fusion. So

35:57

the sun, as you mentioned, I don't think we mentioned

35:59

it yet.

36:00

But yeah, the Sun is a fusion

36:02

power plant, right? That's what happens. But

36:04

the Sun basically is,

36:08

because of its big mass, it's confined

36:10

and it creates these hot dense

36:13

areas in the center of it where the fusion happens,

36:15

right? So if you have a little bit of

36:17

deuterium, tritium gas, you're not going to get, just

36:20

floating around in space, you're not going to get fusion

36:22

by itself.

36:23

I don't think something flying

36:25

off of the sun is an immediate

36:28

problem for us.

36:30

And I don't think it's a model for what we're doing

36:32

in the lab as well. As Breena said, the sun

36:34

does a,

36:35

it creates fusion, but it does it in a slightly different

36:38

way. It's confined through its own

36:40

mass because it's so heavy, it all sticks

36:42

together.

36:43

Whereas what we're doing, as I said, is,

36:46

you know, it's flying apart. It's not one, doesn't

36:48

want to stay together because it's only a little bit. Yeah.

36:50

And then if it's coming our way, right, then

36:53

the like, if it's charged particles, the magnetic

36:55

field's going to hopefully do its thing. Okay.

36:58

And, and what? Yeah. So, so, okay,

37:01

great. So not, not, not,

37:03

not, astronauts

37:03

might be a bit more worried, but. I

37:06

think they're more worried about, yeah, it's

37:08

true. Well, Mathias

37:10

and Sabrina, thank you so much for being an uninquiring

37:13

minds. It's been really incredible to

37:15

get this inside view of this really

37:17

kind of, you know, major

37:18

or 60 years in the making

37:20

discovery. Yeah. Thank

37:22

you so much. I think it's, it's a really inspiring

37:25

time and you know, it's,

37:27

we spend our careers working on this and many

37:29

people have

37:30

spent their careers working on it. And we never

37:32

got to see it because they retired. So

37:34

it's fantastic to be part of this.

37:36

Yes. Thank you very much for having us. Yeah.

37:38

Thank you for having us.

37:43

So that's it for another episode. Don't worry about

37:45

parts breaking off the sun. Thanks for listening.

37:48

and if you want to hear more, don't forget to subscribe.

37:51

If you'd like to get an ad-free version of this show, consider

37:53

supporting us at patreon.com slash

37:55

inquiring minds. I want to especially

37:58

thank David Noel, Herring Cheng, Sean

38:00

Johnson, Jordan Millar, Kyle Royhala,

38:02

Michael Galgoul, Eric Clark, Yushi

38:04

Lin, Clark Lindgren, Joelle,

38:06

Stephen Meyer, AWOL, Dale LeMaster, and Charles

38:09

Blyle. Inquiring Minds is produced

38:11

by Adam Isaac. I'm your host, Indre

38:13

Viscontis. See you next

38:15

time!

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features