Podchaser Logo
Home
The Science of Why You Fall in Love With Music

The Science of Why You Fall in Love With Music

Released Saturday, 24th December 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
The Science of Why You Fall in Love With Music

The Science of Why You Fall in Love With Music

The Science of Why You Fall in Love With Music

The Science of Why You Fall in Love With Music

Saturday, 24th December 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Live life at your pace.

0:02

Click the banner or go to visit williamsburg dot

0:04

com to discover how. Because here in

0:06

Williamsburg, life moves at one

0:08

pace. Yours. Scramble through

0:10

our world class golf courses or shop

0:12

your way through the square, be one with nature

0:14

as you hike or bike through our parks and trails,

0:17

or hunker down at one of our breweries. And

0:19

when it's time to eat, be sure to buy it into

0:21

our eclectic food scene. It's all waiting

0:23

for you in

0:24

Williamsburg. Book your trip today and

0:26

live life at your pace.

0:29

What will it take to conserve ten billion

0:31

acres of ocean, one point six

0:34

billion acres of land, and over six

0:36

hundred thousand miles of river. What

0:38

will it take to protect and restore natural

0:40

habitats in over seventy countries

0:42

around the world? And in all fifty

0:44

states here at home? What will it

0:47

take? You. Together,

0:49

we will make it happen. It's in our

0:51

nature. See how your gift can help.

0:54

At nature dot

0:55

org, the nature conservancy. Protecting

0:57

nature, preserving life. You

1:01

and Betty and the Nazis and

1:03

pills and Joe's and James will

1:05

find in the study of science a

1:07

richer, more rewarding life.

1:11

Welcome to enquiring minds. I'm Andrei

1:14

Vascontas. This is a podcast that

1:16

explores space where science and society

1:18

collide. We want to find out what's true,

1:20

what's left to discover, and why it

1:23

matters. It's

1:32

not every day that you get to talk

1:35

to one of the world's most successful

1:37

record producers. And

1:39

it's even rarer

1:42

that the person we're gonna talk to today.

1:44

Also, in her mid forties, shifted

1:47

and went and got a PhD in cognitive neuroscience.

1:51

You can probably already imagine why I

1:53

am so excited to talk to

1:55

Susan Rogers today. Now,

1:57

you might wonder what a record producer

1:59

would bring to a PhD in neuroscience.

2:02

But in order to find out, you just have to read

2:04

her book. This is what it sounds

2:06

like. What the music you love says

2:08

about you. Because of course,

2:11

she spent her career listening and

2:13

figuring out which tracks, which

2:16

aspects of sound are gonna make the next

2:18

hit. And then she went and studied

2:20

psychoacoustics. And learned exactly

2:23

how the brain turns a sound wave

2:25

into the sublime experience of music.

2:28

can't imagine a better person

2:30

to walk us through the music that we love,

2:33

why it matters, and the science

2:35

behind this almost

2:37

universal human obsession. Susan

2:40

Rogers is now a professor at Berkeley College

2:42

of Music, as well as a multi

2:45

platinum record producer.

2:51

Susan Rogers, I am so thrilled

2:53

to welcome you to inquiring minds. Thank

2:55

you very much for having me on this

2:57

podcast. I'm really looking forward to our

3:00

conversation. I love the

3:01

topic, and there's lots to say about

3:03

it. I wanna jump right into

3:05

one part of your book that

3:08

when I read it set off so many

3:10

light bulbs in my head, you know,

3:13

metaphorically speaking, and really

3:15

just got me hooked. So tell us about

3:17

the time that you met Miles Davis

3:19

in Princess Studio.

3:22

I'll never forget that day. It was pretty

3:24

exciting. So

3:26

the year was this would have been early nineteen

3:29

eighty seven, and I was working for prints

3:31

as his full time audio

3:33

technician recording engineer. So

3:37

he Prince called he

3:39

said, come on over to the house pull out

3:41

these tapes out of the vault because Miles

3:43

Davis is coming over for dinner and I wanna

3:46

be able to play some music downstairs

3:48

when we're done in the studio. So I

3:50

pulled the tapes and I was waiting downstairs

3:52

in the home studio. And

3:55

I could hear the voices up above me.

3:57

It was Prince Miles and

4:01

Prince's dad, John Nelson, who's

4:03

a who's a piano player about

4:05

Miles' age. So anyway, I

4:07

heard the the feet on the stairs and Prince

4:09

came running downstairs and he looked at me and they

4:11

had that face that just said, you will

4:13

not believe this and kinda pointed

4:15

over his shoulder. So his dad and

4:17

miles came down, and miles

4:20

parked himself right in front of me.

4:23

I was standing next to the tape machine, and

4:25

miles stood right in front of me. I could have just reached

4:27

out and put my hand on his shoulder. And he

4:29

had his back to me. And he was facing

4:31

John Nelson, and they were talking about

4:34

pants. And John Nelson was

4:36

telling miles, I love those pants

4:38

you have. They both gotta talk about this. I love

4:40

those strip pants. Miles, what

4:42

strip pants? You know, strip pants? Where'd you

4:44

see me in strip pants? On TV? Where on

4:46

TV? I saw you hit the Grammy's. And then going

4:48

back and forth about these striped pants. And

4:51

all of a sudden, you know, miles is insisting

4:53

he doesn't have any striped pants, but all of sudden

4:55

he spins around miles does.

4:58

And he put his face, that

5:00

incredible face with those big

5:02

eyes, that intense stare that he had.

5:04

He put his face right in front of my face

5:06

And he said, yes, I do. They're made out

5:08

of eel like Vietnam. And

5:12

I said, eel like in Vietnam.

5:14

Because those words just don't go together.

5:17

pants made of eel like

5:19

in Vietnam, so I just held my ground

5:21

and I kept my face right there and he started

5:23

firing off questions who are

5:25

you? Where are you from? What do you do? How long have you been

5:27

here? And I

5:29

fired back answers.

5:31

And we're going back and forth. Back and forth really quickly.

5:33

And then he goes to you musician. And I said,

5:35

no, I'm not. And he

5:36

said, that's okay. Some of the best musicians

5:38

that I know aren't musicians. And that

5:40

was the moment. Where I

5:42

knew that your book was gonna tell us something

5:44

that no one else is either capable

5:47

of doing or has told us before. That

5:50

makes me that makes me glad to hear.

5:52

Yeah.

5:53

You know, I'm I'm not a musician, but my

5:56

relationship to music my entire life

5:58

from childhood till till today

6:01

has been as a listener. And

6:03

it eventually over

6:05

the years, slowly donged on me that

6:08

what Miles said could

6:10

apply to me. So I'm a non musician.

6:12

I don't play a writer sing. But

6:15

I'm musical as a

6:17

listener. I'm a good interpreter of

6:19

music. That's what you do in the recording studio.

6:22

That's what you do as a as a die

6:24

hard music lover. You

6:27

get really good. It's scanning.

6:30

That signal that you're hearing and

6:32

interpreting, this is what it sounds

6:35

like to me. And

6:38

I I hoped with this book to

6:41

make it clear to the readers, I

6:43

don't need you to think

6:45

about my own taste in music because

6:47

this book isn't about

6:48

that. Why would you care? It's

6:50

about your taste in music, and I'm

6:52

helping you to go through

6:54

that that mental process of

6:57

understanding why you like

6:59

what you like. And there's

7:01

a two reasons why I found this so compelling.

7:03

One is just that I don't think that up until

7:06

you know, I read your book, I understood

7:08

how much we already know about

7:11

the way in which music

7:13

listening is a skill that gets developed

7:15

and that can, you know, essentially

7:18

just like learning to play an instrument

7:21

learning to listen to music has

7:24

its own training patterns,

7:26

its own, you know, peaks

7:28

and valleys, etcetera. But

7:30

also because it gets at the one part

7:33

of music that I find, you

7:36

know, pretty pretty aggressive and cautious.

7:38

And that is that you know, I

7:40

I was trained as an opera singer. Uh-huh.

7:43

And, you know, that you know, for for

7:45

a lot of my life and still today,

7:47

you know, I spent a lot of time printing

7:49

and and thinking about how to produce this

7:51

vocal sound that I hear in my head.

7:54

And when people find that out or or often

7:56

actually after they heard

7:58

me sing. They will come

8:00

up and and say to me, you

8:03

know, I really

8:05

like Adele. Can

8:08

she sing? I'm

8:10

like, what does it matter

8:13

if some, like, nobody opera

8:15

singer that you know, yeah, like

8:17

in my own little niche, there's this thing

8:19

that I've spent a lot of time trying

8:22

to do thinks

8:25

about your taste

8:27

in singing. Like, it's it's like, what?

8:29

Sure. I can talk about how

8:31

she's using her diaphragm or whether her

8:33

soft palate is lifted. But that

8:36

ultimately has nothing to do with

8:38

singing. You know, with like

8:40

this expression. That's such

8:42

an interesting comment. It

8:44

reminds me of many years

8:45

ago, early in my professional career,

8:48

I asked a singer, an

8:50

experienced singer, to please

8:53

tell me about Barbara Streisand.

8:55

Tell me why Barbara Streisand was

8:57

regarded as being such a great singer.

8:59

Can you tell me technically what

9:01

is it she's doing that lifts her above

9:04

others? And it's a it's

9:06

a valid question because the person

9:08

is wanting to say, I

9:11

hear this as being great.

9:14

But I'm untrained. I don't know

9:16

what I'm talking about. Can you tell

9:18

me, is it truly great? Or or

9:20

is it just me? Or is it just you know, a cultural

9:22

phenomenon. Everyone says she's great, so she must

9:24

be great. And this person was

9:26

kind enough to explain to me. Here

9:29

are the technical skills

9:31

that Barbara Streisand possesses that

9:35

lead us to call her great. And that

9:37

that was a generous kind of a

9:39

generous response because she was giving me

9:41

something. She was teaching me something about

9:44

how vocals work and what we listen

9:46

for. And guess maybe I

9:48

I should see it that way and think about

9:50

what it is that I can add. I think the thing that

9:52

shaves at me is that somehow my

9:55

opinion seems to matter on

9:57

something so personal. And,

10:00

you know, III wanna reach out and give

10:02

the person a hug and say, it's okay k

10:04

to like the music you like regardless

10:06

of what anyone else thinks. I

10:09

know. And II1 of the things

10:11

that makes me feel so sad is

10:13

when people will preface a

10:15

conversation about music by saying, oh,

10:17

you know, I don't I don't know much about music

10:20

or I'm not. I don't have very good musical

10:22

taste. I just like pop. Hang

10:24

on just a minute here because

10:27

pop music is made by

10:29

some of our most successful and virtuouso

10:31

and talented and trained music

10:33

makers. To have a hit record

10:36

on the pop charts is no accident.

10:38

Like having a hit movie. So

10:41

if if all you liked cinematically was

10:43

was the blockbusters or maybe the Avengers

10:45

or whatever the superhero movies are, if

10:47

that's all you like, What's wrong with

10:50

that? So you don't go to art

10:52

house films. So what? Who cares? You

10:54

like what you like, and it's good. I

10:56

don't like to hear people put down

10:58

their taste in

10:59

music. Totally agree.

11:02

And so I wanna talk a little bit, you know, one of

11:04

the other things that that that really struck me the

11:06

beginning is that you

11:08

were an audio engineer

11:11

and you're you are

11:13

a woman. And that was

11:15

a rarity at the time. I think it's

11:17

still relatively, you

11:20

know, I think there's still a skew, you

11:22

know, in terms of the population of

11:24

of audio engineers. And

11:27

prints happen to be one of your favorite

11:30

musicians. And then this opportunity

11:32

came up. And I wonder if you could just talk a

11:34

little bit about what it was like to be a woman

11:37

audio engineer. And

11:39

then what it was like to to

11:42

be lifted up in a sense by

11:44

someone, you know,

11:46

like Brent's. Oh my gosh.

11:49

Yeah. Really amazing. So I

11:51

was living and working in Hollywood

11:53

at that time and at that time was

11:56

nineteen eighty three, when I got the call,

11:58

I'd been at it for about five years working

12:00

as an audio technician, which is even

12:02

more rare female audio technician

12:04

is even more rare than a recording engineer.

12:07

I was the person who repaired the equipment.

12:09

I repaired consoles and taped machines.

12:11

And That was that was my job,

12:14

self taught in audio electronics, and

12:16

taught by some really great technicians out in

12:18

LA. Anyway, at that time, Prince

12:20

my favorite artist in the whole world. I had all

12:22

his albums. I'd seen him live on the

12:24

dirty mind tour and the nineteen ninety

12:26

nine tour. I just was a huge

12:29

fan. And one day, I got a phone

12:31

call from another technician in

12:33

LA who said, you know, your dream job is

12:35

waiting for you. Prince is looking for

12:38

an audio technician, someone to

12:40

be his full time tech, moved to Minnesota.

12:42

And I said, well, then his search is over

12:44

because that's my job. And I got

12:46

that job. So it was friends

12:49

who transitioned me from being a technician.

12:51

That's who I was when he hired me into

12:53

the role of recording engineer. He liked

12:55

working with women. He liked working with

12:57

outsiders. And as you said, being a

12:59

woman in in the recording

13:02

studio, you were pretty rare bird.

13:04

You should have seen what it looked like back in eighty three.

13:06

He just didn't see a lot of women in

13:08

those roles, but I was one and I

13:10

knew my stuff. And he liked that.

13:12

And I was a a

13:14

Prince fan. I I liked the same kind of

13:16

music he liked, and I could

13:18

hang. I could hang those late

13:20

night hours with him and do those twenty

13:22

four hour sessions because I was I

13:24

was in my dream job.

13:26

So Yeah. Unless anyone

13:29

who's listening, thanks. Oh, it

13:31

must be some lesser known

13:33

Prince album.

13:35

Why don't you tell us, what was the album

13:37

that you wanted him on? Well,

13:40

the very first recording I did with him is

13:42

on the purple rain album. So

13:44

he had just come off the nineteen ninety nine

13:46

tour and he was he'd

13:48

gotten the green light from Warner Bros. To make

13:50

his movie purple rain and He had already

13:53

recorded some of the songs for the album Purple

13:55

Rain. He was planning the movie and the tour and all

13:57

that, so I jumped right in. Do

14:00

an intense work environment. That train was

14:03

moving really fast. We didn't

14:05

know at the time, you never know if a record's

14:07

gonna be a hit, certainly didn't know if the movie

14:09

was gonna be a hit. It turned out that they

14:11

both were. And that

14:13

album had I think the six

14:16

longest run-in all of the

14:18

Billboard magazine's history. It was number

14:20

one for twenty four weeks. So

14:23

we worked on together, we worked on purple

14:25

rain and around the world in a day, and

14:27

the parade album, and sign of

14:30

times, which is considered by critics to

14:32

be his other masterpiece. And

14:35

we did all the recording with all the

14:37

other artists that he worked with at that time, his

14:39

protege bands like The Time and

14:42

Vanity six, later Apollonia six

14:45

and Sheila

14:45

E, and we did a lot of

14:47

work in those four years when I was

14:49

with him. So tell me what

14:52

it's like for you or what it was

14:54

like for you. In the studio, he's

14:57

playing your listening. How

15:01

are you using your skills to

15:03

do your

15:03

job? Can you describe that?

15:06

Well, with prints, you always have to

15:09

issue a qualifier and you have to say

15:11

the way it was with prints is not the way it

15:13

is with most recording artists.

15:16

Maybe he was truly, truly exceptional.

15:18

And now with my neuroscience training, I

15:21

believe that he is what we would label

15:23

a hyper creative, which involves

15:25

some, which we can talk about in

15:28

another moment. But It involves some

15:30

different circuits in the brain.

15:32

Anyway, he was so

15:34

fastile on so many different instruments.

15:37

He was so quick his decision

15:40

making process was so instantaneous

15:42

and usually spot on that

15:45

he moved really quick from one

15:47

instrument to the next to the next to the next.

15:49

That's if we were in a recording studio. If

15:51

we were at rehearsal, he'd be directing his band

15:54

on stage. And then we'd be recording

15:56

there. But at a typical day in the studio

15:58

would often involve him coming in

16:00

either playing an acoustic drum

16:02

kit or programming the drum machine,

16:04

adding base, adding keys, adding guitars,

16:07

adding his lead vocal, adding all his background

16:09

vocals, he might call in Eric Leads

16:11

or someone to do horn parts or Wendy and

16:14

Lisa to do additional parts

16:16

or backing vocals, but he he frequently

16:19

played and saying everything on the

16:21

record. Now, as we're working

16:23

this way, I'm simultaneously sculpting

16:26

the sound to help it be exactly

16:28

what he wants it to be. Because

16:31

I joined him as a technician, I had

16:33

no artistic ear of my own.

16:36

So I had no preconceived

16:38

notion of how a recording

16:40

engineer

16:42

selects what's good and what's bad when

16:44

it comes to sound. That was perfect for

16:46

Prince because he could teach me his ear.

16:49

And so, like, would he come over and say, I want

16:51

it to sound like this and you should boost this level

16:53

and you should turn that down or was

16:55

it, you know, how how did how did that communication

16:58

work? He Prince was very,

17:00

very hands on sitting behind the

17:01

console, but he couldn't always have his hands on the

17:03

console because most of the time he had his hands on

17:06

a musical instrument. So I

17:08

would push sound around a bit

17:11

conforming to his ear while he

17:13

was playing. And then after he finished playing

17:15

and we were mixing, he'd take

17:17

what I had started with and

17:19

he would lean over and add a

17:21

little more reverb or add a

17:24

a little less of this or that. But if he wanted

17:26

something, he'd asked me, can we get more of this

17:28

or less of that and he didn't technically know

17:30

how to achieve that. So I

17:33

would dial in sounds that I

17:35

think this this would think

17:38

he would like. You know, I'd try different reverb

17:40

settings and things like that. And I

17:42

I knew when to use a compressor and when to

17:44

use a limiter. And that

17:46

sort of thing. So it

17:48

sounds like maybe like I'm being overly modest,

17:51

but I'm not. I'm emphasizing that

17:53

he very much push that

17:55

paint around on that canvas to

17:57

get the ultimate picture he was aiming

18:00

for. What I supplied

18:02

and other engineers supplied was

18:04

a technical knowledge that he didn't know.

18:06

So he would ask for something, and we knew how

18:09

how to achieve the thing he was asking

18:11

for. And as you've described it, in

18:13

a sense he taught you his ear. And

18:16

so I wanna talk a little bit about ears.

18:18

What that means? Because, of course,

18:20

a lot of the hearing

18:22

that we do is not in our ears,

18:25

it's in our brains. And there are

18:27

these loops between our brains

18:29

and our inner ear So can you

18:31

just walk us through for

18:33

those of our listeners who who maybe aren't familiar?

18:36

You know, how does the sound

18:39

waves get translated into the

18:42

neural language and then how

18:44

does the brain go back

18:46

and influence what it is that

18:48

the that the inner ear pays attention

18:50

to.

18:50

It's so marvelous.

18:53

How that happens. The more I

18:55

learn about it, the more excited I

18:57

get about it, because it's so beautiful.

19:00

So every sound you've ever heard in

19:02

your life has started with

19:04

an acoustic pressure wave in the air.

19:06

Just those air molecules sitting there minding their

19:08

own business, nobody's bothering them until

19:11

something in that room starts to vibrate,

19:14

which can be a loud speaker, or it can be someone's

19:16

voice, or whatever, there's something vibrating,

19:19

and now those four little molecules are getting pushed

19:21

back and forth. Ugh. I

19:23

answer Primorifies everything. So they're going

19:25

back and forth in this little pattern. And

19:27

that ultimately results in a pattern

19:29

of back and forth activity on your eardrum.

19:32

And then from there, it's connected to the three bones

19:34

of the middle ear and they're doing

19:36

their little thing going back and forth, and

19:38

that's connected. To

19:41

inside the cochlear, there's like it kinda

19:43

looks like a long tongue. It's a long membrane

19:45

that runs through that snail shaped cochlea.

19:48

And that little membrane, the basilar membrane

19:51

is being bounced up and down and

19:53

down in that pattern of

19:55

activity. And

19:58

sitting on top of that basilar

20:01

membrane, there's a single row of inner

20:03

hair cells, which I like to think of as your

20:05

analog to digital converter. Because

20:07

those little things, little hair cells, they're so

20:09

called because they have Stereocilia. They

20:12

look like hairs on top of the little

20:14

cell. They're bouncing up and down.

20:16

And as they bounce up and down in that pattern,

20:19

here's where it gets really cool. The

20:22

little hairs on the top are

20:24

swinging back and forth and back

20:26

and forth with every up and down motion

20:28

of the wave. Add us the

20:30

little hairs swing back

20:32

and forth. Those wee little hairs

20:35

are connected by wee little springs

20:37

called tip links. And those

20:40

on the one half of the cycle.

20:42

The little springs expand and on the

20:44

other half of the cycle, when it goes negative, they

20:46

contract. So positive negative positive

20:49

negative, expand contract, expand contract,

20:51

which opens little pores

20:54

in the little hairs, which lets charged

20:56

ions, sodium potassium,

20:59

things like that. Calcium. Come

21:01

into the little hairs, which

21:05

drifts down to the bottom of the inner hair cell,

21:08

releases neurotransmitters, and they're

21:10

waiting at the base of the inner hair

21:12

cell. Is the auditory nerve bundle.

21:15

So for each inner hair cell, there's between

21:17

six and ten nerves sitting

21:19

there, waiting for that signal. And

21:21

those neurotransmitters get released

21:23

from the base of the inner hair cell into the

21:25

gap. Oh, and then

21:28

exciting. Then the the

21:31

nerve cells, the receptive end,

21:33

the dendrites, they open their

21:35

own little channels, now you got

21:38

nerve spike. So on each side,

21:40

coming out of our left and our right ears

21:43

is an auditory nerve bundle that you

21:45

can think of as your wiring. Thirty thousand

21:47

roughly auditory nerves

21:49

on each side. So

21:51

now this signal which is now a digital

21:54

signal is coming up as

21:56

a pattern of activity collected

21:59

from the three thousand five hundred

22:01

inner hair cells in each cochlea, and

22:03

now that pattern of activity is going up Now,

22:05

the interesting thing about the auditory system

22:08

is if that weren't interesting enough, is that

22:10

compared to visual, there's a lot

22:12

of little processing stations way

22:15

stations would have to deal with that signal

22:17

and make decisions about it on the way

22:19

up to the brain. Starting with

22:21

the cochlear nucleus, It's

22:24

analyzing your low frequencies, your mids

22:26

and your highs, and it goes up. The

22:28

next station is the superior olive.

22:30

And that's super cool because it's

22:32

comparing the signal from the left and right ears

22:35

and figuring out where in space that sound

22:37

source is coming from, then it goes up

22:40

to your inferior colliculus and

22:42

that little homegirl using a

22:44

nineties colloquialism here. That

22:46

little homegirl is getting

22:48

inputs from your two ears, but

22:50

also getting the efferent

22:53

signal that's coming down from your

22:55

brain to help you decide

22:57

what it is you wanna pay attention to and what

22:59

you wanna ignore. So that little thing,

23:01

the inferior colloquialist is getting all kinds of

23:03

inputs And then the signal on this part's

23:05

cool, leaves the inferior colliculus

23:08

and goes up through the

23:10

limbic system, it goes up through through the thalamus,

23:13

the medial geniculate nucleus of the

23:15

thalamus, and that region then

23:17

compares what you're hearing with what you're seeing,

23:19

and it finally gets up to your auditory

23:21

cortex. And once it's up here right

23:24

above your ears, then higher

23:26

order circuits can decide,

23:28

is this familiar or unfamiliar? Do

23:31

I like it or hate it? Do

23:33

I wanna listen to it? Do I wanna turn this

23:35

off? Is there something else that's taking precedence?

23:38

So those higher order circuits can

23:40

then tell your auditory cortex, ignore

23:43

this. I wanna hear that. You

23:46

send a signal back down the chain,

23:48

which terminates at the outer

23:50

hair cells of the cochlea.

23:52

And those little things are even more amazing.

23:55

They function a little bit like your d to

23:57

a converters. They get a digital input

24:00

of nerve spikes. Their output is

24:02

mechanical. Pushing and pulling on

24:04

regions of the basilar membrane

24:07

that correspond to the source

24:09

you wanna be listening to. It's

24:12

absolutely incredible because

24:15

so many things have to

24:17

happen, and yet your auditory

24:19

system is working so hard for

24:21

you. Is it kind of beautiful thing?

24:24

And it's so fast. And

24:26

that does allow us to selectively

24:29

hear things. Like, if you're, you know, we call it

24:31

the cocktail party effect. You're in a

24:33

room with a whole bunch of people

24:36

and somebody says your name from

24:38

across the room at the same decibel

24:40

level the people around you, normally,

24:42

you would think you should not be able to hear

24:45

that particular sound because

24:47

there's all this noise that you're that

24:49

you're listening to. And of course, we are limited into

24:51

how much we can pay attention, and

24:53

yet you're you pick it

24:55

up, and then you tune in

24:57

Yeah. I remember learning in grad

24:59

school that there are certain circuits

25:01

in our auditory brain that are

25:04

particularly sensitive to

25:06

sounds that are very important

25:08

in our world. So when people are talking

25:10

about money, about sex,

25:13

or when they're talking, they mention our

25:15

name, there are circuits that

25:18

pick up on that nerve

25:20

pattern that corresponds to your name or corresponds

25:22

to some exciting conversation

25:25

and that alerts higher

25:27

order executive circuits to

25:31

this this this guys talking to you about this

25:33

basketball game you just went to. Forget about that

25:35

for just a moment because somebody is talking

25:37

about money and I wanna hear this stock tip

25:39

or I just heard someone say my name. And

25:41

it will override that. Now you

25:43

mentioned the loop and that's

25:45

exactly why we have a loop. So higher

25:47

order circuits are sending a signal back

25:50

down to the cochlea, just like we

25:52

send signal to our eyes, to focus on

25:54

something that's near or far left and right,

25:56

we tell our body, this this is

25:58

the signal that I'm interested it in right

26:00

now. Hone in on that. See if you

26:02

can suppress the activity that

26:04

comes from something I'm not interested in.

26:11

By giving, people will be helping Nationwide

26:14

Children's Hospital find cures brighten

26:16

patients holidays, and people will be able

26:18

to support their neighbors when they need it most.

26:20

When they donate, they will activate in real

26:22

time a butterfly inspired light show

26:24

for patients this holiday season. They will

26:26

add holiday cheer to the lives of kids

26:29

who really need a reason to smile. No

26:31

one wants to think about their child being sick.

26:33

But should that day come, the donation they make

26:35

this year could help the care their child could need

26:37

in the future. Please give now at

26:39

nationwide children's dot org slash

26:41

give.

26:43

You're finally at that hot new spot,

26:45

the one your friends keep raving about,

26:48

sitting across from your date, It's going.

26:50

Another round? Really well.

26:52

And that dish you've been dying to try. Oh,

26:55

it's headed your way. You can smell it.

26:57

Hear it sizzling fresh off that skillet

26:59

as it comes closer, closer

27:01

and served. Go ahead.

27:03

Enjoy. After your phone sneaks a

27:05

bite first. When you're with Amex, it's

27:08

not if it's going to happen, but when?

27:10

American Express, don't live life without

27:12

it.

27:14

Today is your lucky day. You could

27:16

redeem sweeps coins for a fifty thousand

27:18

dollar cash prize at Chumba Casino. Join

27:21

over one million players at jumba casino,

27:23

America's favorite online social casino.

27:25

It's your turn. Play for free at

27:28

jumba casino dot com. That's CHUMBA

27:31

casino dot com. No purchase

27:33

necessary, voidware prohibited by law,

27:35

eighteen plus Terms and conditions apply.

27:38

See website for details.

27:46

And I think this is where training, education,

27:49

experience can have a massive

27:51

impact on developing an

27:54

ear. Right? And

27:56

so, you know, I I've been podcasting for ten

27:58

years. I can hear things, I

28:00

think, that people who

28:02

maybe aren't as into the medium

28:05

literally can't because they're not

28:07

attuned to, you know, those particular

28:10

sort of sounds or those differences. Just

28:13

like someone who is a concert

28:15

violinist can hear

28:17

things in other, you know, violin

28:19

performances that I can't hear. And

28:22

so I wonder if you could talk a little bit about,

28:24

you know, the that and that to me is the

28:26

is the musicality of

28:29

listening. And, you know,

28:31

how it is that do we you know, how does that

28:33

people develop this kind of an ear?

28:35

Does it happen by chance?

28:37

You know, working with musicians like, Prince

28:40

or, you know, talking to Miles

28:42

Davis. I mean, there's lots of really spectacular

28:45

musicians who didn't go through a formal

28:47

music theory training program. I

28:49

don't know if either of those two did, but they

28:51

developed their ear, you know,

28:53

by listening, by doing. And

28:55

so so can you tell us a little bit about how does

28:57

that work? How does a

28:59

how do you craft a really

29:01

good ear? There's so much

29:03

good stuff in there in

29:06

that question. So when

29:09

we're young, our auditory system,

29:11

this something I didn't know until fairly

29:13

recently. Our auditory system hasn't

29:15

even finished developing. It's

29:17

not even fully online until

29:20

just before puberty. Age eight to

29:22

twelve, and that's when the brain says, alright,

29:24

I gotta tighten down these last nuts and

29:26

bolts because all hell is about to break loose with

29:28

puberty here. I got other things to worry

29:30

about. So let's get on with it. But

29:32

in the first ten or twelve years of our lives,

29:35

we're learning spatial

29:37

localization, amplitude

29:39

modulation and detecting that in a

29:41

signal and detecting frequency modulation and

29:44

gap detection and all that, little kids actually

29:46

don't hear all that well. I mean,

29:48

nothing wrong with their ears. They don't they can't

29:51

compute the signal very well. So

29:54

for most of us, unless we have

29:56

formal musical lessons, that's

29:58

where our music listening development basically

30:01

stops. Kids are about eleven years old,

30:04

perform music perception tasks

30:07

about the same as adults, unless

30:09

they have formal musical training and

30:11

or to a lesser extent

30:14

foreign languages bilingual.

30:16

So If

30:20

they're taking music lessons, their auditory system

30:22

is getting more and more developed and they become

30:24

what I like to call auditory athletes.

30:27

So the auditory nerve bundle grows some

30:29

extra branches. They get more dendritic

30:31

spines. More branches

30:34

on the on the nerve. The nuclei

30:36

that I talked about a moment ago get fatter

30:38

and thicker and musicians, trained musicians

30:40

are really good at listening analytically.

30:44

As I'm sure you can do, listening

30:46

analytically and detecting real

30:49

subtle differences in sounds.

30:51

Now you would have thought that

30:54

as a recording engineer, I'd

30:56

have that ability too. But,

30:58

no, I was disappointed to learn that I

31:00

don't have that ability because Once

31:03

that clay starts to harden, not

31:05

having had music lessons in my youth,

31:08

I can't listen analytically. I

31:10

don't have the neural architecture. I

31:13

can listen synthetically to

31:15

the global whole of

31:17

a record. So that's

31:20

actually for record producers a little bit of

31:22

an advantage. So I've developed

31:24

an ear that allows me to

31:26

hear intentionality in

31:29

a vocal performance or in

31:31

a base performance or drum

31:34

performance or guitar solo. I

31:37

Because I can't pick it apart

31:39

to the same extent that you

31:41

can. I'm pretty good

31:43

at hearing the big picture. I

31:46

would like to be able to listen analytically, but

31:49

since I can't, I'm good with

31:51

what I've got. Now developing

31:53

an ear to hear music

31:55

performance. That does

31:58

require an awful lot of listening and

32:00

it also requires having

32:02

expert friends kind of walk you through

32:04

with their hearing and

32:06

point out, this is what's

32:08

great about this performance. Knowledge

32:11

greatly mediates our

32:13

perceptions. That's well established

32:15

now. Yeah. And that's sort of what

32:17

I like to say is a difference between purposeful

32:20

practice where you're trying really hard

32:22

to get better at something, but you don't

32:24

have a guide and deliberate

32:26

practice, where you have an

32:28

expert who's helping you. So

32:30

I wanna you you have these sort of seven

32:33

dimensions that you write about in your book

32:36

of the listener profile. And

32:39

Four are the kind that I think are little bit

32:41

more predictable, melody rhythm,

32:44

lyrics, and timbre, and we can talk about

32:46

those. And then three are the ones

32:48

that I think most of us don't

32:51

really understand how we hear authenticity,

32:54

realism, and well,

32:57

now I'm blanking on the seventh. Novelty

32:59

versus Novelty. Novelty. Sorry. Of Of course.

33:01

Novelty. Yes. So I wanna actually start

33:03

you and and as you do in your book, to talk

33:05

about authenticity. Like, how

33:08

do we what does that mean? And how do

33:10

we hear it? And why is it important?

33:15

Of these seven dimensions of any

33:17

type of record in any style of music,

33:20

these any one of these aspects

33:23

of of the record can independently

33:25

of the others give you

33:27

a sonic treat little release

33:30

of dopamine and make you say, oh, I love that

33:32

record. So you you might you might

33:34

love certain records in your collection just

33:36

for the groove. Just for the rhythm. You might like

33:38

other records in your collection for the lyrical

33:40

message and other records for the melodies. Now

33:43

the records for the sound design Other

33:46

records for your cognitive

33:48

appraisal of them, that's would

33:51

be novelty and familiarity. You

33:53

might say, no. No. I I just love music in

33:55

this style, and that's why I love this

33:57

new Bluegrass record. Or while

34:00

that was really innovative, I never would thought of

34:02

that. That's why I love this record. Realism

34:05

and abstraction has to do with with

34:07

visualizations. I like

34:10

to when I listen to my favorite music,

34:12

I like to visualize the performers, so

34:14

I like records made with real musical

34:16

instruments and real human beings. But

34:20

other people prefer abstract records

34:22

that are made in the box or made entirely

34:25

with software where there's no instrument there.

34:28

So we have our preferences. Authenticity

34:31

though is the one dimension that I learned

34:33

more about in the recording studio than in

34:35

the laboratory. Authenticity refers

34:38

to where you perceive the performance

34:40

gestures as coming from and whether

34:42

or not you perceive them as being. Felt

34:46

intentional. Is that

34:48

singer singing her heart

34:50

out? Or is she just going through the

34:52

motions? Is that guitar

34:54

player playing a solo that

34:57

he's suddenly inspired by and inventing

34:59

right here on the spot? Or

35:01

is he just playing notes that he's played elsewhere

35:03

a million times? Where do

35:05

you since this performance

35:07

is coming from? Some of us have preference

35:10

from music that we might label cerebral.

35:13

Music that comes shall we say from the neck

35:15

up because it's just so damn brilliant.

35:18

Just so damn brilliant and

35:22

that part of your brain that appreciates great

35:24

virtuality can say

35:26

wow that just kills me. How do

35:29

you get to sing like that? How do you get

35:31

to be like that? Other times

35:34

or other people might have

35:36

a preference that for music

35:38

that just seems to come straight from the heart or

35:40

straight from the gut or straight from

35:43

the groin. Someone can bar

35:45

band, for example, can play dared it, and

35:47

and and and and and

35:49

if they play it in the right context and with the

35:51

right gusto, that can feel great.

35:54

Not because it's brilliant, but it just

35:56

might appeal to another

35:58

sort of craving that you're experiencing

36:01

right. Experiencing right now, which could be

36:03

lust or it could be, you

36:05

want your heartstrings pulled

36:09

This is what we mean by authenticity. Is

36:12

is your perception that

36:14

that music performance was

36:16

genuine? And

36:19

was coming from a

36:21

place of authenticity or sincerity in

36:23

the

36:23

performer. There you go. There's this. There's this. And

36:25

I'm gonna butcher it. There's quote, you know, from

36:27

some Hollywood exec that said, like, you

36:29

know, the key to a great acting performance is,

36:31

you know, sincerity. And if if you can

36:34

fake that, you've made you've made

36:36

it. I wonder if you could

36:38

talk about, do do

36:40

people agree? Like, is there something

36:42

in the sound wave that

36:45

we can point to and say, uh-huh, that

36:47

sounds authentic or is it

36:49

subjective? Like, would could could if

36:52

you take a hundred people, and they

36:54

all listen to the sound wave. Is it

36:56

gonna be fifty fifty? Is it gonna be

36:58

eighty five fifteen? Like, how

37:00

do people agree? And can we

37:03

quantify or qualify what

37:05

that is?

37:06

Great, great question. And that's why I

37:08

prefaced its explanation by saying

37:10

that of the seven men that's the one

37:12

I know more about from the studio

37:14

than I know from my

37:17

my neuroscience studies. So, yeah,

37:19

it's a great question. And I think the answer

37:21

is kind of maybe. It is subjective.

37:24

Authenticity is subjective, but I believe

37:26

that authenticity learning

37:28

to detect it is something

37:30

that can be learned. You can

37:33

develop an ear for it, and that's what

37:35

makes record producers successful

37:37

or not at their job. So you're record

37:40

producer. Right? You're in the control room.

37:42

The musicians are on the other side of the glass. You've

37:44

just heard of performance and there technically

37:46

no wrong notes, and every note

37:48

was in time, no sounds okay.

37:51

Is that the one? Is that the take?

37:53

Is that gonna be it? You have to

37:55

learn to hear intentionality

37:58

in that performance. When I worked

38:01

with the great producer, Tony

38:03

Burke, I was his engineer. I learned

38:05

a lot about production from him and one of

38:07

the most frequent feedback

38:09

bits that he'd give the band the

38:12

other side of the glass is he'd lean on that

38:14

talk back button and he'd say, hey, dig

38:16

in dig in

38:19

meaning that the band has gone through the motions

38:22

enough times, and he can hear that they're

38:24

bored. They're bored. Come on. Grab

38:26

that instrument and talk to me.

38:28

Communicate. With that instrument.

38:30

I want to hear intentionality from

38:33

each and every one of you. The

38:35

researcher Ellen Winter at Boston

38:37

University is looking at that with painting.

38:40

And she has shown that

38:43

people can look at an abstract

38:46

painting. And say whether or not

38:48

it was done by an artist or

38:50

done by a four year old. Because you know how sometimes

38:52

you see abstract art and people say, oh, my kid

38:54

could have done that. Actually know your kid

38:56

couldn't have done that because when

38:59

children's abstract art

39:01

is shown to viewers, we

39:03

can tell. On some level,

39:05

we can tell, call it a gut instinct

39:07

or whatever, but these small

39:09

gestures add up to

39:11

or point back to an

39:14

intention to communicate something.

39:17

Humans are pretty good at picking up on it.

39:20

Yep. And and there's obviously a

39:22

lot of chatter right now about these

39:24

various AI art generators. It'll

39:26

be interesting to see how the if if

39:28

and, you know, if and how that

39:30

might shift in the next decade. But

39:33

I wanna talk little bit about the four

39:35

dimensions that I think most of us are

39:37

familiar with in terms of music. And you just have

39:39

this great analogy of sort

39:42

of the different body parts that are associated

39:45

with these, like, say, in a record. So so

39:47

tell us about that. Yeah. This

39:49

is the kind of kind of thing we'd talk about

39:51

in the recording studio when you're making a record.

39:53

To talk about music because it's the love of

39:55

your life and you're raising a musical baby

39:57

here and it's really all you're interested in.

40:00

And So there you go. So

40:03

we talk about sometimes

40:05

Melody as being the heart of

40:07

a record because Miss Prince

40:10

would say Beethoven had an area drum

40:12

kit. It's not like Beethoven had needed a funky

40:14

drummer or lyrics Melody

40:17

itself can just make us

40:19

swoon. It can melt our hearts. It

40:21

can convey power or strength

40:24

or Even subtle emotions like

40:26

jealousy or or even disgust,

40:29

melodies are are are kind of going

40:31

straight to our hearts. Wordlessly. Rhythm,

40:34

of course, is a record's hips because

40:38

rhythm on a popular record or

40:40

even on a classical record is going to

40:42

get your body to

40:44

want to move in a certain way. It

40:46

might be up and down. It might be front to back.

40:48

It might be side to side might be syncopated

40:51

or not in that group, but you're going to want to move

40:53

a certain way to it. So rhythms,

40:55

music's hips. Definitely

40:58

lyrics would be music's

41:00

head or music's brain because that's

41:02

words and languages human

41:05

beings most. Some most

41:07

clever skill. And with all these

41:09

words we have, lyrics

41:12

cause us to think things we

41:14

might have never thought before, they give us solutions

41:17

to problems that we needed

41:19

at the moment. And we say that timber

41:21

is a record space

41:23

because the timber of individual instruments

41:27

says something about

41:30

well, allows you to visualize. It says something

41:32

about about who played it and or what

41:34

was being played. You can tell the difference

41:37

between a guitar and a violin, but not

41:39

only that you have associations for

41:41

these certain timbers and attack

41:44

piano, let's say, is gonna

41:47

evoke different images than

41:49

a bosendorfer or a steinway grand

41:51

piano will evoke. So, chambers

41:55

timber conjures up memories because there's

41:57

so many associations

41:58

with having heard that that those

42:00

sounds in the past. And I think

42:02

that's just a beautiful way to help people

42:04

understand their own musical preferences. You

42:07

know, why you can love one album because

42:09

you just love the timbre and the face

42:11

of it. But, you know, maybe

42:13

you don't really love the lyrics. Maybe

42:15

they're a bit, you know, derivative in your mind, etcetera.

42:18

And then you can have another album that actually

42:20

hits all four. And then it just becomes

42:22

this like just blast

42:24

of, you know, reward in your

42:27

brain that it's so satisfying I

42:29

love when that happens. I just

42:31

I just love that. I'm thinking right now of one

42:34

that I mentioned in the book, and it just makes

42:36

me swoon. Just even thinking about it and playing

42:38

it in my head from memory makes me

42:40

think, oh, it's so good.

42:42

I mean, I think for a lot of people when we included

42:44

Purple Rain is is But

42:47

I just wanna remind our listeners that Susan

42:49

Rogers book cooperate with with OG Ogus.

42:51

Is that how you pronounce other name?

42:54

Ogli. Ogli, Ogli. Yeah.

42:56

This is what it sounds like. What the

42:58

music you love says about you is

43:00

available booksellers everywhere and would make

43:02

a great holiday gift. For

43:04

anyone, including those

43:07

of your family and friends who

43:09

don't consider themselves musicians but

43:11

still are passionate about music. This will

43:13

really, I think, make them feel

43:15

seen and heard and appreciated

43:19

And I wanna sort of end with like, you know, what

43:21

the music you love says about you part

43:23

of it. I want you know, IIII

43:25

wanna delve a little bit back into neuroscience

43:28

if we could if we could for a minute to

43:31

pull together sort of what we talked about at

43:33

the beginning of the episode about this

43:35

sort of, you know, the the very

43:37

beginnings of how

43:39

we perceive sound, and

43:42

then how that relates to

43:45

our sense of self and

43:47

the default mode network. And so maybe

43:49

you could tell us about the default mode network,

43:51

how, you know, how it works, and then the

43:54

role of the little gatekeeper.

43:56

Yeah. So the subtitle

43:58

turns out to be a little bit misleading

44:01

because sometimes people have asked me, okay,

44:03

these are the records that I like, what does that say

44:05

about me? And what my intention

44:07

was and I didn't pull it off. My

44:09

intention was to give you the language

44:12

so you can tell me what the

44:14

music you love says about you. You tell

44:16

me about the melodies you like and the

44:19

realism that you like on a record or

44:21

the abstraction or whatever. So

44:23

So the reason we do

44:25

this is because music listening

44:28

is private. No

44:30

one else is up there in our heads. No

44:32

one else can see what we see in our minds

44:35

eye or experience what we're feeling when

44:37

we're listening to a record that we love.

44:39

So neuroscience has recently

44:42

started investigating something that they call

44:44

the default network. The default

44:46

network is a collection of brain nuclei

44:48

and their interconnections that turn

44:50

on and get active whenever we

44:53

go into our own heads. And

44:55

if you ask people are you thinking

44:57

about something other than what you're doing right now?

44:59

Thirty to fifty percent of

45:01

the time, people say yes.

45:05

We're in our own heads a lot. That's

45:07

what a brain does. It focuses on the outside

45:09

world and goes back to the inside world. Outside

45:11

inside back and forth all day long. It's a good

45:13

thing. But the default

45:15

network turns out is

45:17

really excited, really happy, really

45:20

active when we're listening to a

45:22

record we love. So

45:25

a record that you like and especially

45:27

your favorite records will

45:29

light up that default network and

45:31

cause you to turn inward

45:34

and go to that private place in your

45:36

psyche, where you and that record

45:38

are essentially alone together? Such

45:40

a beautiful thing to think about. It's

45:43

conjuring up memories and feelings,

45:45

making you wanna move a certain way,

45:48

making you wanna sing along or

45:50

not. That's your private

45:52

world. Now, you mentioned the

45:54

precunious. Because that little

45:56

thing, it's like

45:58

in most of our brain structures, we've got two of them,

46:00

one on the left, one on the right, and the one on the right

46:02

has got a very important job to do. It's

46:05

not part of the default network,

46:07

but it's connected to the network.

46:09

So it's kinda like a little bit of a gatekeeper.

46:12

The little pre cutaneous is very important for

46:14

creative thought. If you need to do something

46:16

creative, whether it's designer poster or a t

46:18

shirt or just whatever, The bikinis

46:20

has to get active because it has to open

46:22

its little gates that are normally shut,

46:25

open those gates and allow new ideas

46:28

to Flow. It's essential for creativity.

46:31

Anyway, Robin Wilkins at

46:33

Wake Forest University ran a brilliant

46:35

FMRII experiment where she had participants

46:38

come in and bring with them into the into

46:40

the lab, bring some records you

46:42

like, bring a favorite record, and

46:44

bring some music you dislike. And

46:46

she watched their active brains as they're

46:49

listening to these three categories of music.

46:51

And the love recunies get all excited and

46:53

connected to the default network

46:56

when people were listening to liked and favorite

46:58

music. But when they listen to music,

47:00

they dislike The precunier said

47:03

no, do not want, and

47:05

it cut itself off from

47:07

the default network. And as Robin

47:09

Wilkins wrote, it became connected

47:11

primarily just to itself.

47:14

In other words, it's like, get away

47:16

get away. Stay away from me. I don't want

47:18

this. I won't integrate

47:21

this record that I dislike in

47:23

my psyche. That's

47:25

a really astonishing finding

47:29

because it's saying to us and we know

47:31

from other studies that our

47:33

auditory brain and

47:35

our our musical brain is

47:38

shaping itself over time to

47:40

get more and more and more fine tuned. This

47:43

work has been done also in in the last decade

47:45

or so. We now know that when

47:47

you get those dopamine hits from

47:49

listening to music that you like, when you get that

47:52

opiate release, There

47:54

are lack of opiates from

47:56

music that gives you chills or doesn't.

47:59

That's shaping your auditory cortex to

48:02

get better and faster at recognizing the

48:04

music of you that belongs in your

48:06

private head space. And so

48:09

if we want, to open

48:12

our minds and our ears to learning

48:14

a new type of music that we previously

48:17

disliked. We gotta find

48:19

a way to convince that little precunious that

48:22

it needs to connect to the default

48:24

network from personal experience, and

48:26

this is where I'm stepping out of

48:28

empirical research reports and stepping

48:30

into personal experience, but my

48:32

personal experience tells me this

48:34

happens when we're experiencing a

48:36

little bit of love, little bit of dopamine.

48:39

So let's say, for instance, well,

48:42

I'll describe. I love

48:44

my students at Berkeley College of Music. In

48:46

the first semester, I was there, I met

48:48

couple of kids, Andrew and Alex, who

48:50

turned me onto American Hardcore.

48:53

It's kinda like a more sophisticated version

48:55

of punk. I never would have paid any attention

48:57

to it before. I would have turned it off if it had been

48:59

in your shot. These guys

49:01

love this music so much. And

49:04

they taught me how to listen to it. And

49:06

together, we formed like a triangle. They

49:09

loved this music. I loved

49:11

them. And so the third leg of the

49:13

triangle formed where

49:16

their generosity, their sweetness

49:18

and sharing this music that they loved with

49:20

me caused me to feel

49:22

good And as I

49:25

felt good while listening, it

49:27

may have convinced the little precunious

49:30

This is not poison. It will not

49:32

kill you. Be cool.

49:36

Just listen and and And

49:38

as a result, I learned to like hardcore.

49:40

Other students did that for me with electronic

49:43

music. You can

49:45

change your mind, but it it takes a little

49:47

bit of a little bit of persuading.

49:50

I mean, I think that's such a beautiful way too

49:52

to go into the holiday season where, of

49:54

course, music plays a big role no matter

49:56

what you celebrate. When people

49:58

get together, there's often music involved.

50:01

And if it's music that you don't like,

50:03

maybe seek out the people that you

50:05

love who love that music to

50:08

help you connect. And it's

50:10

yeah. It's just it's such a beautiful

50:12

sentiment and Susan Rogers,

50:15

thank you so much for being in on

50:17

inquiring minds. I could talk to you forever.

50:20

Thank you so much for inviting

50:23

me on, letting me talk about

50:25

this wonderful topic that I love

50:27

so well. And and I

50:29

I'm I'm I'm very grateful and

50:31

I hope people do take

50:33

a closer listen to the music that

50:35

they love best and go into that

50:37

little private space in your head and

50:39

try to analyze what it is about this

50:41

record that just makes you weaken the knees

50:44

you'll discover something about yourself in the

50:46

process.

50:50

So that's it for another episode. Thanks

50:53

for listening. And if you want to hear more, don't

50:55

forget to subscribe. If you'd like to get

50:57

an ad free version of the show, consider supporting

50:59

us at patreon dot com slash inquiry minds.

51:02

I want to especially thank David Noelle,

51:04

Herring Jang, Sean Johnson, Jordan

51:06

Miller, Kyle Ryhala, Michael Galgul,

51:08

Eric Clark, Yuchy Lynn, Clark

51:11

Lindgren, Joel, Stephen Meyer, Eyewall,

51:13

Dale Master, and Charles Boyle. Inquiring

51:15

Mines is produced by Adam Isaac. I'm

51:18

your host, Andreyvus Contus, See you

51:20

next time.

51:39

By giving, people will be helping nationwide

51:41

children's hospital find cures, brighten

51:43

patient's holidays, and people will be able

51:45

to support their neighbors when they need it most.

51:48

When they donate, they will activate in

51:50

real time a butterfly inspired light

51:52

show for patients this holiday season. They

51:54

will add holiday cheer to the lives of kids

51:56

who really need a reason to smile. No

51:58

one wants to think about their child being sick,

52:00

but should that day come, the donation they make

52:02

this year could help the care their child could need

52:05

in the future. Please give now at

52:07

nationwide children's dot org slash

52:09

give.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features