Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Live life at your pace.
0:02
Click the banner or go to visit williamsburg dot
0:04
com to discover how. Because here in
0:06
Williamsburg, life moves at one
0:08
pace. Yours. Scramble through
0:10
our world class golf courses or shop
0:12
your way through the square, be one with nature
0:14
as you hike or bike through our parks and trails,
0:17
or hunker down at one of our breweries. And
0:19
when it's time to eat, be sure to buy it into
0:21
our eclectic food scene. It's all waiting
0:23
for you in
0:24
Williamsburg. Book your trip today and
0:26
live life at your pace.
0:29
What will it take to conserve ten billion
0:31
acres of ocean, one point six
0:34
billion acres of land, and over six
0:36
hundred thousand miles of river. What
0:38
will it take to protect and restore natural
0:40
habitats in over seventy countries
0:42
around the world? And in all fifty
0:44
states here at home? What will it
0:47
take? You. Together,
0:49
we will make it happen. It's in our
0:51
nature. See how your gift can help.
0:54
At nature dot
0:55
org, the nature conservancy. Protecting
0:57
nature, preserving life. You
1:01
and Betty and the Nazis and
1:03
pills and Joe's and James will
1:05
find in the study of science a
1:07
richer, more rewarding life.
1:11
Welcome to enquiring minds. I'm Andrei
1:14
Vascontas. This is a podcast that
1:16
explores space where science and society
1:18
collide. We want to find out what's true,
1:20
what's left to discover, and why it
1:23
matters. It's
1:32
not every day that you get to talk
1:35
to one of the world's most successful
1:37
record producers. And
1:39
it's even rarer
1:42
that the person we're gonna talk to today.
1:44
Also, in her mid forties, shifted
1:47
and went and got a PhD in cognitive neuroscience.
1:51
You can probably already imagine why I
1:53
am so excited to talk to
1:55
Susan Rogers today. Now,
1:57
you might wonder what a record producer
1:59
would bring to a PhD in neuroscience.
2:02
But in order to find out, you just have to read
2:04
her book. This is what it sounds
2:06
like. What the music you love says
2:08
about you. Because of course,
2:11
she spent her career listening and
2:13
figuring out which tracks, which
2:16
aspects of sound are gonna make the next
2:18
hit. And then she went and studied
2:20
psychoacoustics. And learned exactly
2:23
how the brain turns a sound wave
2:25
into the sublime experience of music.
2:28
can't imagine a better person
2:30
to walk us through the music that we love,
2:33
why it matters, and the science
2:35
behind this almost
2:37
universal human obsession. Susan
2:40
Rogers is now a professor at Berkeley College
2:42
of Music, as well as a multi
2:45
platinum record producer.
2:51
Susan Rogers, I am so thrilled
2:53
to welcome you to inquiring minds. Thank
2:55
you very much for having me on this
2:57
podcast. I'm really looking forward to our
3:00
conversation. I love the
3:01
topic, and there's lots to say about
3:03
it. I wanna jump right into
3:05
one part of your book that
3:08
when I read it set off so many
3:10
light bulbs in my head, you know,
3:13
metaphorically speaking, and really
3:15
just got me hooked. So tell us about
3:17
the time that you met Miles Davis
3:19
in Princess Studio.
3:22
I'll never forget that day. It was pretty
3:24
exciting. So
3:26
the year was this would have been early nineteen
3:29
eighty seven, and I was working for prints
3:31
as his full time audio
3:33
technician recording engineer. So
3:37
he Prince called he
3:39
said, come on over to the house pull out
3:41
these tapes out of the vault because Miles
3:43
Davis is coming over for dinner and I wanna
3:46
be able to play some music downstairs
3:48
when we're done in the studio. So I
3:50
pulled the tapes and I was waiting downstairs
3:52
in the home studio. And
3:55
I could hear the voices up above me.
3:57
It was Prince Miles and
4:01
Prince's dad, John Nelson, who's
4:03
a who's a piano player about
4:05
Miles' age. So anyway, I
4:07
heard the the feet on the stairs and Prince
4:09
came running downstairs and he looked at me and they
4:11
had that face that just said, you will
4:13
not believe this and kinda pointed
4:15
over his shoulder. So his dad and
4:17
miles came down, and miles
4:20
parked himself right in front of me.
4:23
I was standing next to the tape machine, and
4:25
miles stood right in front of me. I could have just reached
4:27
out and put my hand on his shoulder. And he
4:29
had his back to me. And he was facing
4:31
John Nelson, and they were talking about
4:34
pants. And John Nelson was
4:36
telling miles, I love those pants
4:38
you have. They both gotta talk about this. I love
4:40
those strip pants. Miles, what
4:42
strip pants? You know, strip pants? Where'd you
4:44
see me in strip pants? On TV? Where on
4:46
TV? I saw you hit the Grammy's. And then going
4:48
back and forth about these striped pants. And
4:51
all of a sudden, you know, miles is insisting
4:53
he doesn't have any striped pants, but all of sudden
4:55
he spins around miles does.
4:58
And he put his face, that
5:00
incredible face with those big
5:02
eyes, that intense stare that he had.
5:04
He put his face right in front of my face
5:06
And he said, yes, I do. They're made out
5:08
of eel like Vietnam. And
5:12
I said, eel like in Vietnam.
5:14
Because those words just don't go together.
5:17
pants made of eel like
5:19
in Vietnam, so I just held my ground
5:21
and I kept my face right there and he started
5:23
firing off questions who are
5:25
you? Where are you from? What do you do? How long have you been
5:27
here? And I
5:29
fired back answers.
5:31
And we're going back and forth. Back and forth really quickly.
5:33
And then he goes to you musician. And I said,
5:35
no, I'm not. And he
5:36
said, that's okay. Some of the best musicians
5:38
that I know aren't musicians. And that
5:40
was the moment. Where I
5:42
knew that your book was gonna tell us something
5:44
that no one else is either capable
5:47
of doing or has told us before. That
5:50
makes me that makes me glad to hear.
5:52
Yeah.
5:53
You know, I'm I'm not a musician, but my
5:56
relationship to music my entire life
5:58
from childhood till till today
6:01
has been as a listener. And
6:03
it eventually over
6:05
the years, slowly donged on me that
6:08
what Miles said could
6:10
apply to me. So I'm a non musician.
6:12
I don't play a writer sing. But
6:15
I'm musical as a
6:17
listener. I'm a good interpreter of
6:19
music. That's what you do in the recording studio.
6:22
That's what you do as a as a die
6:24
hard music lover. You
6:27
get really good. It's scanning.
6:30
That signal that you're hearing and
6:32
interpreting, this is what it sounds
6:35
like to me. And
6:38
I I hoped with this book to
6:41
make it clear to the readers, I
6:43
don't need you to think
6:45
about my own taste in music because
6:47
this book isn't about
6:48
that. Why would you care? It's
6:50
about your taste in music, and I'm
6:52
helping you to go through
6:54
that that mental process of
6:57
understanding why you like
6:59
what you like. And there's
7:01
a two reasons why I found this so compelling.
7:03
One is just that I don't think that up until
7:06
you know, I read your book, I understood
7:08
how much we already know about
7:11
the way in which music
7:13
listening is a skill that gets developed
7:15
and that can, you know, essentially
7:18
just like learning to play an instrument
7:21
learning to listen to music has
7:24
its own training patterns,
7:26
its own, you know, peaks
7:28
and valleys, etcetera. But
7:30
also because it gets at the one part
7:33
of music that I find, you
7:36
know, pretty pretty aggressive and cautious.
7:38
And that is that you know, I
7:40
I was trained as an opera singer. Uh-huh.
7:43
And, you know, that you know, for for
7:45
a lot of my life and still today,
7:47
you know, I spent a lot of time printing
7:49
and and thinking about how to produce this
7:51
vocal sound that I hear in my head.
7:54
And when people find that out or or often
7:56
actually after they heard
7:58
me sing. They will come
8:00
up and and say to me, you
8:03
know, I really
8:05
like Adele. Can
8:08
she sing? I'm
8:10
like, what does it matter
8:13
if some, like, nobody opera
8:15
singer that you know, yeah, like
8:17
in my own little niche, there's this thing
8:19
that I've spent a lot of time trying
8:22
to do thinks
8:25
about your taste
8:27
in singing. Like, it's it's like, what?
8:29
Sure. I can talk about how
8:31
she's using her diaphragm or whether her
8:33
soft palate is lifted. But that
8:36
ultimately has nothing to do with
8:38
singing. You know, with like
8:40
this expression. That's such
8:42
an interesting comment. It
8:44
reminds me of many years
8:45
ago, early in my professional career,
8:48
I asked a singer, an
8:50
experienced singer, to please
8:53
tell me about Barbara Streisand.
8:55
Tell me why Barbara Streisand was
8:57
regarded as being such a great singer.
8:59
Can you tell me technically what
9:01
is it she's doing that lifts her above
9:04
others? And it's a it's
9:06
a valid question because the person
9:08
is wanting to say, I
9:11
hear this as being great.
9:14
But I'm untrained. I don't know
9:16
what I'm talking about. Can you tell
9:18
me, is it truly great? Or or
9:20
is it just me? Or is it just you know, a cultural
9:22
phenomenon. Everyone says she's great, so she must
9:24
be great. And this person was
9:26
kind enough to explain to me. Here
9:29
are the technical skills
9:31
that Barbara Streisand possesses that
9:35
lead us to call her great. And that
9:37
that was a generous kind of a
9:39
generous response because she was giving me
9:41
something. She was teaching me something about
9:44
how vocals work and what we listen
9:46
for. And guess maybe I
9:48
I should see it that way and think about
9:50
what it is that I can add. I think the thing that
9:52
shaves at me is that somehow my
9:55
opinion seems to matter on
9:57
something so personal. And,
10:00
you know, III wanna reach out and give
10:02
the person a hug and say, it's okay k
10:04
to like the music you like regardless
10:06
of what anyone else thinks. I
10:09
know. And II1 of the things
10:11
that makes me feel so sad is
10:13
when people will preface a
10:15
conversation about music by saying, oh,
10:17
you know, I don't I don't know much about music
10:20
or I'm not. I don't have very good musical
10:22
taste. I just like pop. Hang
10:24
on just a minute here because
10:27
pop music is made by
10:29
some of our most successful and virtuouso
10:31
and talented and trained music
10:33
makers. To have a hit record
10:36
on the pop charts is no accident.
10:38
Like having a hit movie. So
10:41
if if all you liked cinematically was
10:43
was the blockbusters or maybe the Avengers
10:45
or whatever the superhero movies are, if
10:47
that's all you like, What's wrong with
10:50
that? So you don't go to art
10:52
house films. So what? Who cares? You
10:54
like what you like, and it's good. I
10:56
don't like to hear people put down
10:58
their taste in
10:59
music. Totally agree.
11:02
And so I wanna talk a little bit, you know, one of
11:04
the other things that that that really struck me the
11:06
beginning is that you
11:08
were an audio engineer
11:11
and you're you are
11:13
a woman. And that was
11:15
a rarity at the time. I think it's
11:17
still relatively, you
11:20
know, I think there's still a skew, you
11:22
know, in terms of the population of
11:24
of audio engineers. And
11:27
prints happen to be one of your favorite
11:30
musicians. And then this opportunity
11:32
came up. And I wonder if you could just talk a
11:34
little bit about what it was like to be a woman
11:37
audio engineer. And
11:39
then what it was like to to
11:42
be lifted up in a sense by
11:44
someone, you know,
11:46
like Brent's. Oh my gosh.
11:49
Yeah. Really amazing. So I
11:51
was living and working in Hollywood
11:53
at that time and at that time was
11:56
nineteen eighty three, when I got the call,
11:58
I'd been at it for about five years working
12:00
as an audio technician, which is even
12:02
more rare female audio technician
12:04
is even more rare than a recording engineer.
12:07
I was the person who repaired the equipment.
12:09
I repaired consoles and taped machines.
12:11
And That was that was my job,
12:14
self taught in audio electronics, and
12:16
taught by some really great technicians out in
12:18
LA. Anyway, at that time, Prince
12:20
my favorite artist in the whole world. I had all
12:22
his albums. I'd seen him live on the
12:24
dirty mind tour and the nineteen ninety
12:26
nine tour. I just was a huge
12:29
fan. And one day, I got a phone
12:31
call from another technician in
12:33
LA who said, you know, your dream job is
12:35
waiting for you. Prince is looking for
12:38
an audio technician, someone to
12:40
be his full time tech, moved to Minnesota.
12:42
And I said, well, then his search is over
12:44
because that's my job. And I got
12:46
that job. So it was friends
12:49
who transitioned me from being a technician.
12:51
That's who I was when he hired me into
12:53
the role of recording engineer. He liked
12:55
working with women. He liked working with
12:57
outsiders. And as you said, being a
12:59
woman in in the recording
13:02
studio, you were pretty rare bird.
13:04
You should have seen what it looked like back in eighty three.
13:06
He just didn't see a lot of women in
13:08
those roles, but I was one and I
13:10
knew my stuff. And he liked that.
13:12
And I was a a
13:14
Prince fan. I I liked the same kind of
13:16
music he liked, and I could
13:18
hang. I could hang those late
13:20
night hours with him and do those twenty
13:22
four hour sessions because I was I
13:24
was in my dream job.
13:26
So Yeah. Unless anyone
13:29
who's listening, thanks. Oh, it
13:31
must be some lesser known
13:33
Prince album.
13:35
Why don't you tell us, what was the album
13:37
that you wanted him on? Well,
13:40
the very first recording I did with him is
13:42
on the purple rain album. So
13:44
he had just come off the nineteen ninety nine
13:46
tour and he was he'd
13:48
gotten the green light from Warner Bros. To make
13:50
his movie purple rain and He had already
13:53
recorded some of the songs for the album Purple
13:55
Rain. He was planning the movie and the tour and all
13:57
that, so I jumped right in. Do
14:00
an intense work environment. That train was
14:03
moving really fast. We didn't
14:05
know at the time, you never know if a record's
14:07
gonna be a hit, certainly didn't know if the movie
14:09
was gonna be a hit. It turned out that they
14:11
both were. And that
14:13
album had I think the six
14:16
longest run-in all of the
14:18
Billboard magazine's history. It was number
14:20
one for twenty four weeks. So
14:23
we worked on together, we worked on purple
14:25
rain and around the world in a day, and
14:27
the parade album, and sign of
14:30
times, which is considered by critics to
14:32
be his other masterpiece. And
14:35
we did all the recording with all the
14:37
other artists that he worked with at that time, his
14:39
protege bands like The Time and
14:42
Vanity six, later Apollonia six
14:45
and Sheila
14:45
E, and we did a lot of
14:47
work in those four years when I was
14:49
with him. So tell me what
14:52
it's like for you or what it was
14:54
like for you. In the studio, he's
14:57
playing your listening. How
15:01
are you using your skills to
15:03
do your
15:03
job? Can you describe that?
15:06
Well, with prints, you always have to
15:09
issue a qualifier and you have to say
15:11
the way it was with prints is not the way it
15:13
is with most recording artists.
15:16
Maybe he was truly, truly exceptional.
15:18
And now with my neuroscience training, I
15:21
believe that he is what we would label
15:23
a hyper creative, which involves
15:25
some, which we can talk about in
15:28
another moment. But It involves some
15:30
different circuits in the brain.
15:32
Anyway, he was so
15:34
fastile on so many different instruments.
15:37
He was so quick his decision
15:40
making process was so instantaneous
15:42
and usually spot on that
15:45
he moved really quick from one
15:47
instrument to the next to the next to the next.
15:49
That's if we were in a recording studio. If
15:51
we were at rehearsal, he'd be directing his band
15:54
on stage. And then we'd be recording
15:56
there. But at a typical day in the studio
15:58
would often involve him coming in
16:00
either playing an acoustic drum
16:02
kit or programming the drum machine,
16:04
adding base, adding keys, adding guitars,
16:07
adding his lead vocal, adding all his background
16:09
vocals, he might call in Eric Leads
16:11
or someone to do horn parts or Wendy and
16:14
Lisa to do additional parts
16:16
or backing vocals, but he he frequently
16:19
played and saying everything on the
16:21
record. Now, as we're working
16:23
this way, I'm simultaneously sculpting
16:26
the sound to help it be exactly
16:28
what he wants it to be. Because
16:31
I joined him as a technician, I had
16:33
no artistic ear of my own.
16:36
So I had no preconceived
16:38
notion of how a recording
16:40
engineer
16:42
selects what's good and what's bad when
16:44
it comes to sound. That was perfect for
16:46
Prince because he could teach me his ear.
16:49
And so, like, would he come over and say, I want
16:51
it to sound like this and you should boost this level
16:53
and you should turn that down or was
16:55
it, you know, how how did how did that communication
16:58
work? He Prince was very,
17:00
very hands on sitting behind the
17:01
console, but he couldn't always have his hands on the
17:03
console because most of the time he had his hands on
17:06
a musical instrument. So I
17:08
would push sound around a bit
17:11
conforming to his ear while he
17:13
was playing. And then after he finished playing
17:15
and we were mixing, he'd take
17:17
what I had started with and
17:19
he would lean over and add a
17:21
little more reverb or add a
17:24
a little less of this or that. But if he wanted
17:26
something, he'd asked me, can we get more of this
17:28
or less of that and he didn't technically know
17:30
how to achieve that. So I
17:33
would dial in sounds that I
17:35
think this this would think
17:38
he would like. You know, I'd try different reverb
17:40
settings and things like that. And I
17:42
I knew when to use a compressor and when to
17:44
use a limiter. And that
17:46
sort of thing. So it
17:48
sounds like maybe like I'm being overly modest,
17:51
but I'm not. I'm emphasizing that
17:53
he very much push that
17:55
paint around on that canvas to
17:57
get the ultimate picture he was aiming
18:00
for. What I supplied
18:02
and other engineers supplied was
18:04
a technical knowledge that he didn't know.
18:06
So he would ask for something, and we knew how
18:09
how to achieve the thing he was asking
18:11
for. And as you've described it, in
18:13
a sense he taught you his ear. And
18:16
so I wanna talk a little bit about ears.
18:18
What that means? Because, of course,
18:20
a lot of the hearing
18:22
that we do is not in our ears,
18:25
it's in our brains. And there are
18:27
these loops between our brains
18:29
and our inner ear So can you
18:31
just walk us through for
18:33
those of our listeners who who maybe aren't familiar?
18:36
You know, how does the sound
18:39
waves get translated into the
18:42
neural language and then how
18:44
does the brain go back
18:46
and influence what it is that
18:48
the that the inner ear pays attention
18:50
to.
18:50
It's so marvelous.
18:53
How that happens. The more I
18:55
learn about it, the more excited I
18:57
get about it, because it's so beautiful.
19:00
So every sound you've ever heard in
19:02
your life has started with
19:04
an acoustic pressure wave in the air.
19:06
Just those air molecules sitting there minding their
19:08
own business, nobody's bothering them until
19:11
something in that room starts to vibrate,
19:14
which can be a loud speaker, or it can be someone's
19:16
voice, or whatever, there's something vibrating,
19:19
and now those four little molecules are getting pushed
19:21
back and forth. Ugh. I
19:23
answer Primorifies everything. So they're going
19:25
back and forth in this little pattern. And
19:27
that ultimately results in a pattern
19:29
of back and forth activity on your eardrum.
19:32
And then from there, it's connected to the three bones
19:34
of the middle ear and they're doing
19:36
their little thing going back and forth, and
19:38
that's connected. To
19:41
inside the cochlear, there's like it kinda
19:43
looks like a long tongue. It's a long membrane
19:45
that runs through that snail shaped cochlea.
19:48
And that little membrane, the basilar membrane
19:51
is being bounced up and down and
19:53
down in that pattern of
19:55
activity. And
19:58
sitting on top of that basilar
20:01
membrane, there's a single row of inner
20:03
hair cells, which I like to think of as your
20:05
analog to digital converter. Because
20:07
those little things, little hair cells, they're so
20:09
called because they have Stereocilia. They
20:12
look like hairs on top of the little
20:14
cell. They're bouncing up and down.
20:16
And as they bounce up and down in that pattern,
20:19
here's where it gets really cool. The
20:22
little hairs on the top are
20:24
swinging back and forth and back
20:26
and forth with every up and down motion
20:28
of the wave. Add us the
20:30
little hairs swing back
20:32
and forth. Those wee little hairs
20:35
are connected by wee little springs
20:37
called tip links. And those
20:40
on the one half of the cycle.
20:42
The little springs expand and on the
20:44
other half of the cycle, when it goes negative, they
20:46
contract. So positive negative positive
20:49
negative, expand contract, expand contract,
20:51
which opens little pores
20:54
in the little hairs, which lets charged
20:56
ions, sodium potassium,
20:59
things like that. Calcium. Come
21:01
into the little hairs, which
21:05
drifts down to the bottom of the inner hair cell,
21:08
releases neurotransmitters, and they're
21:10
waiting at the base of the inner hair
21:12
cell. Is the auditory nerve bundle.
21:15
So for each inner hair cell, there's between
21:17
six and ten nerves sitting
21:19
there, waiting for that signal. And
21:21
those neurotransmitters get released
21:23
from the base of the inner hair cell into the
21:25
gap. Oh, and then
21:28
exciting. Then the the
21:31
nerve cells, the receptive end,
21:33
the dendrites, they open their
21:35
own little channels, now you got
21:38
nerve spike. So on each side,
21:40
coming out of our left and our right ears
21:43
is an auditory nerve bundle that you
21:45
can think of as your wiring. Thirty thousand
21:47
roughly auditory nerves
21:49
on each side. So
21:51
now this signal which is now a digital
21:54
signal is coming up as
21:56
a pattern of activity collected
21:59
from the three thousand five hundred
22:01
inner hair cells in each cochlea, and
22:03
now that pattern of activity is going up Now,
22:05
the interesting thing about the auditory system
22:08
is if that weren't interesting enough, is that
22:10
compared to visual, there's a lot
22:12
of little processing stations way
22:15
stations would have to deal with that signal
22:17
and make decisions about it on the way
22:19
up to the brain. Starting with
22:21
the cochlear nucleus, It's
22:24
analyzing your low frequencies, your mids
22:26
and your highs, and it goes up. The
22:28
next station is the superior olive.
22:30
And that's super cool because it's
22:32
comparing the signal from the left and right ears
22:35
and figuring out where in space that sound
22:37
source is coming from, then it goes up
22:40
to your inferior colliculus and
22:42
that little homegirl using a
22:44
nineties colloquialism here. That
22:46
little homegirl is getting
22:48
inputs from your two ears, but
22:50
also getting the efferent
22:53
signal that's coming down from your
22:55
brain to help you decide
22:57
what it is you wanna pay attention to and what
22:59
you wanna ignore. So that little thing,
23:01
the inferior colloquialist is getting all kinds of
23:03
inputs And then the signal on this part's
23:05
cool, leaves the inferior colliculus
23:08
and goes up through the
23:10
limbic system, it goes up through through the thalamus,
23:13
the medial geniculate nucleus of the
23:15
thalamus, and that region then
23:17
compares what you're hearing with what you're seeing,
23:19
and it finally gets up to your auditory
23:21
cortex. And once it's up here right
23:24
above your ears, then higher
23:26
order circuits can decide,
23:28
is this familiar or unfamiliar? Do
23:31
I like it or hate it? Do
23:33
I wanna listen to it? Do I wanna turn this
23:35
off? Is there something else that's taking precedence?
23:38
So those higher order circuits can
23:40
then tell your auditory cortex, ignore
23:43
this. I wanna hear that. You
23:46
send a signal back down the chain,
23:48
which terminates at the outer
23:50
hair cells of the cochlea.
23:52
And those little things are even more amazing.
23:55
They function a little bit like your d to
23:57
a converters. They get a digital input
24:00
of nerve spikes. Their output is
24:02
mechanical. Pushing and pulling on
24:04
regions of the basilar membrane
24:07
that correspond to the source
24:09
you wanna be listening to. It's
24:12
absolutely incredible because
24:15
so many things have to
24:17
happen, and yet your auditory
24:19
system is working so hard for
24:21
you. Is it kind of beautiful thing?
24:24
And it's so fast. And
24:26
that does allow us to selectively
24:29
hear things. Like, if you're, you know, we call it
24:31
the cocktail party effect. You're in a
24:33
room with a whole bunch of people
24:36
and somebody says your name from
24:38
across the room at the same decibel
24:40
level the people around you, normally,
24:42
you would think you should not be able to hear
24:45
that particular sound because
24:47
there's all this noise that you're that
24:49
you're listening to. And of course, we are limited into
24:51
how much we can pay attention, and
24:53
yet you're you pick it
24:55
up, and then you tune in
24:57
Yeah. I remember learning in grad
24:59
school that there are certain circuits
25:01
in our auditory brain that are
25:04
particularly sensitive to
25:06
sounds that are very important
25:08
in our world. So when people are talking
25:10
about money, about sex,
25:13
or when they're talking, they mention our
25:15
name, there are circuits that
25:18
pick up on that nerve
25:20
pattern that corresponds to your name or corresponds
25:22
to some exciting conversation
25:25
and that alerts higher
25:27
order executive circuits to
25:31
this this this guys talking to you about this
25:33
basketball game you just went to. Forget about that
25:35
for just a moment because somebody is talking
25:37
about money and I wanna hear this stock tip
25:39
or I just heard someone say my name. And
25:41
it will override that. Now you
25:43
mentioned the loop and that's
25:45
exactly why we have a loop. So higher
25:47
order circuits are sending a signal back
25:50
down to the cochlea, just like we
25:52
send signal to our eyes, to focus on
25:54
something that's near or far left and right,
25:56
we tell our body, this this is
25:58
the signal that I'm interested it in right
26:00
now. Hone in on that. See if you
26:02
can suppress the activity that
26:04
comes from something I'm not interested in.
26:11
By giving, people will be helping Nationwide
26:14
Children's Hospital find cures brighten
26:16
patients holidays, and people will be able
26:18
to support their neighbors when they need it most.
26:20
When they donate, they will activate in real
26:22
time a butterfly inspired light show
26:24
for patients this holiday season. They will
26:26
add holiday cheer to the lives of kids
26:29
who really need a reason to smile. No
26:31
one wants to think about their child being sick.
26:33
But should that day come, the donation they make
26:35
this year could help the care their child could need
26:37
in the future. Please give now at
26:39
nationwide children's dot org slash
26:41
give.
26:43
You're finally at that hot new spot,
26:45
the one your friends keep raving about,
26:48
sitting across from your date, It's going.
26:50
Another round? Really well.
26:52
And that dish you've been dying to try. Oh,
26:55
it's headed your way. You can smell it.
26:57
Hear it sizzling fresh off that skillet
26:59
as it comes closer, closer
27:01
and served. Go ahead.
27:03
Enjoy. After your phone sneaks a
27:05
bite first. When you're with Amex, it's
27:08
not if it's going to happen, but when?
27:10
American Express, don't live life without
27:12
it.
27:14
Today is your lucky day. You could
27:16
redeem sweeps coins for a fifty thousand
27:18
dollar cash prize at Chumba Casino. Join
27:21
over one million players at jumba casino,
27:23
America's favorite online social casino.
27:25
It's your turn. Play for free at
27:28
jumba casino dot com. That's CHUMBA
27:31
casino dot com. No purchase
27:33
necessary, voidware prohibited by law,
27:35
eighteen plus Terms and conditions apply.
27:38
See website for details.
27:46
And I think this is where training, education,
27:49
experience can have a massive
27:51
impact on developing an
27:54
ear. Right? And
27:56
so, you know, I I've been podcasting for ten
27:58
years. I can hear things, I
28:00
think, that people who
28:02
maybe aren't as into the medium
28:05
literally can't because they're not
28:07
attuned to, you know, those particular
28:10
sort of sounds or those differences. Just
28:13
like someone who is a concert
28:15
violinist can hear
28:17
things in other, you know, violin
28:19
performances that I can't hear. And
28:22
so I wonder if you could talk a little bit about,
28:24
you know, the that and that to me is the
28:26
is the musicality of
28:29
listening. And, you know,
28:31
how it is that do we you know, how does that
28:33
people develop this kind of an ear?
28:35
Does it happen by chance?
28:37
You know, working with musicians like, Prince
28:40
or, you know, talking to Miles
28:42
Davis. I mean, there's lots of really spectacular
28:45
musicians who didn't go through a formal
28:47
music theory training program. I
28:49
don't know if either of those two did, but they
28:51
developed their ear, you know,
28:53
by listening, by doing. And
28:55
so so can you tell us a little bit about how does
28:57
that work? How does a
28:59
how do you craft a really
29:01
good ear? There's so much
29:03
good stuff in there in
29:06
that question. So when
29:09
we're young, our auditory system,
29:11
this something I didn't know until fairly
29:13
recently. Our auditory system hasn't
29:15
even finished developing. It's
29:17
not even fully online until
29:20
just before puberty. Age eight to
29:22
twelve, and that's when the brain says, alright,
29:24
I gotta tighten down these last nuts and
29:26
bolts because all hell is about to break loose with
29:28
puberty here. I got other things to worry
29:30
about. So let's get on with it. But
29:32
in the first ten or twelve years of our lives,
29:35
we're learning spatial
29:37
localization, amplitude
29:39
modulation and detecting that in a
29:41
signal and detecting frequency modulation and
29:44
gap detection and all that, little kids actually
29:46
don't hear all that well. I mean,
29:48
nothing wrong with their ears. They don't they can't
29:51
compute the signal very well. So
29:54
for most of us, unless we have
29:56
formal musical lessons, that's
29:58
where our music listening development basically
30:01
stops. Kids are about eleven years old,
30:04
perform music perception tasks
30:07
about the same as adults, unless
30:09
they have formal musical training and
30:11
or to a lesser extent
30:14
foreign languages bilingual.
30:16
So If
30:20
they're taking music lessons, their auditory system
30:22
is getting more and more developed and they become
30:24
what I like to call auditory athletes.
30:27
So the auditory nerve bundle grows some
30:29
extra branches. They get more dendritic
30:31
spines. More branches
30:34
on the on the nerve. The nuclei
30:36
that I talked about a moment ago get fatter
30:38
and thicker and musicians, trained musicians
30:40
are really good at listening analytically.
30:44
As I'm sure you can do, listening
30:46
analytically and detecting real
30:49
subtle differences in sounds.
30:51
Now you would have thought that
30:54
as a recording engineer, I'd
30:56
have that ability too. But,
30:58
no, I was disappointed to learn that I
31:00
don't have that ability because Once
31:03
that clay starts to harden, not
31:05
having had music lessons in my youth,
31:08
I can't listen analytically. I
31:10
don't have the neural architecture. I
31:13
can listen synthetically to
31:15
the global whole of
31:17
a record. So that's
31:20
actually for record producers a little bit of
31:22
an advantage. So I've developed
31:24
an ear that allows me to
31:26
hear intentionality in
31:29
a vocal performance or in
31:31
a base performance or drum
31:34
performance or guitar solo. I
31:37
Because I can't pick it apart
31:39
to the same extent that you
31:41
can. I'm pretty good
31:43
at hearing the big picture. I
31:46
would like to be able to listen analytically, but
31:49
since I can't, I'm good with
31:51
what I've got. Now developing
31:53
an ear to hear music
31:55
performance. That does
31:58
require an awful lot of listening and
32:00
it also requires having
32:02
expert friends kind of walk you through
32:04
with their hearing and
32:06
point out, this is what's
32:08
great about this performance. Knowledge
32:11
greatly mediates our
32:13
perceptions. That's well established
32:15
now. Yeah. And that's sort of what
32:17
I like to say is a difference between purposeful
32:20
practice where you're trying really hard
32:22
to get better at something, but you don't
32:24
have a guide and deliberate
32:26
practice, where you have an
32:28
expert who's helping you. So
32:30
I wanna you you have these sort of seven
32:33
dimensions that you write about in your book
32:36
of the listener profile. And
32:39
Four are the kind that I think are little bit
32:41
more predictable, melody rhythm,
32:44
lyrics, and timbre, and we can talk about
32:46
those. And then three are the ones
32:48
that I think most of us don't
32:51
really understand how we hear authenticity,
32:54
realism, and well,
32:57
now I'm blanking on the seventh. Novelty
32:59
versus Novelty. Novelty. Sorry. Of Of course.
33:01
Novelty. Yes. So I wanna actually start
33:03
you and and as you do in your book, to talk
33:05
about authenticity. Like, how
33:08
do we what does that mean? And how do
33:10
we hear it? And why is it important?
33:15
Of these seven dimensions of any
33:17
type of record in any style of music,
33:20
these any one of these aspects
33:23
of of the record can independently
33:25
of the others give you
33:27
a sonic treat little release
33:30
of dopamine and make you say, oh, I love that
33:32
record. So you you might you might
33:34
love certain records in your collection just
33:36
for the groove. Just for the rhythm. You might like
33:38
other records in your collection for the lyrical
33:40
message and other records for the melodies. Now
33:43
the records for the sound design Other
33:46
records for your cognitive
33:48
appraisal of them, that's would
33:51
be novelty and familiarity. You
33:53
might say, no. No. I I just love music in
33:55
this style, and that's why I love this
33:57
new Bluegrass record. Or while
34:00
that was really innovative, I never would thought of
34:02
that. That's why I love this record. Realism
34:05
and abstraction has to do with with
34:07
visualizations. I like
34:10
to when I listen to my favorite music,
34:12
I like to visualize the performers, so
34:14
I like records made with real musical
34:16
instruments and real human beings. But
34:20
other people prefer abstract records
34:22
that are made in the box or made entirely
34:25
with software where there's no instrument there.
34:28
So we have our preferences. Authenticity
34:31
though is the one dimension that I learned
34:33
more about in the recording studio than in
34:35
the laboratory. Authenticity refers
34:38
to where you perceive the performance
34:40
gestures as coming from and whether
34:42
or not you perceive them as being. Felt
34:46
intentional. Is that
34:48
singer singing her heart
34:50
out? Or is she just going through the
34:52
motions? Is that guitar
34:54
player playing a solo that
34:57
he's suddenly inspired by and inventing
34:59
right here on the spot? Or
35:01
is he just playing notes that he's played elsewhere
35:03
a million times? Where do
35:05
you since this performance
35:07
is coming from? Some of us have preference
35:10
from music that we might label cerebral.
35:13
Music that comes shall we say from the neck
35:15
up because it's just so damn brilliant.
35:18
Just so damn brilliant and
35:22
that part of your brain that appreciates great
35:24
virtuality can say
35:26
wow that just kills me. How do
35:29
you get to sing like that? How do you get
35:31
to be like that? Other times
35:34
or other people might have
35:36
a preference that for music
35:38
that just seems to come straight from the heart or
35:40
straight from the gut or straight from
35:43
the groin. Someone can bar
35:45
band, for example, can play dared it, and
35:47
and and and and and
35:49
if they play it in the right context and with the
35:51
right gusto, that can feel great.
35:54
Not because it's brilliant, but it just
35:56
might appeal to another
35:58
sort of craving that you're experiencing
36:01
right. Experiencing right now, which could be
36:03
lust or it could be, you
36:05
want your heartstrings pulled
36:09
This is what we mean by authenticity. Is
36:12
is your perception that
36:14
that music performance was
36:16
genuine? And
36:19
was coming from a
36:21
place of authenticity or sincerity in
36:23
the
36:23
performer. There you go. There's this. There's this. And
36:25
I'm gonna butcher it. There's quote, you know, from
36:27
some Hollywood exec that said, like, you
36:29
know, the key to a great acting performance is,
36:31
you know, sincerity. And if if you can
36:34
fake that, you've made you've made
36:36
it. I wonder if you could
36:38
talk about, do do
36:40
people agree? Like, is there something
36:42
in the sound wave that
36:45
we can point to and say, uh-huh, that
36:47
sounds authentic or is it
36:49
subjective? Like, would could could if
36:52
you take a hundred people, and they
36:54
all listen to the sound wave. Is it
36:56
gonna be fifty fifty? Is it gonna be
36:58
eighty five fifteen? Like, how
37:00
do people agree? And can we
37:03
quantify or qualify what
37:05
that is?
37:06
Great, great question. And that's why I
37:08
prefaced its explanation by saying
37:10
that of the seven men that's the one
37:12
I know more about from the studio
37:14
than I know from my
37:17
my neuroscience studies. So, yeah,
37:19
it's a great question. And I think the answer
37:21
is kind of maybe. It is subjective.
37:24
Authenticity is subjective, but I believe
37:26
that authenticity learning
37:28
to detect it is something
37:30
that can be learned. You can
37:33
develop an ear for it, and that's what
37:35
makes record producers successful
37:37
or not at their job. So you're record
37:40
producer. Right? You're in the control room.
37:42
The musicians are on the other side of the glass. You've
37:44
just heard of performance and there technically
37:46
no wrong notes, and every note
37:48
was in time, no sounds okay.
37:51
Is that the one? Is that the take?
37:53
Is that gonna be it? You have to
37:55
learn to hear intentionality
37:58
in that performance. When I worked
38:01
with the great producer, Tony
38:03
Burke, I was his engineer. I learned
38:05
a lot about production from him and one of
38:07
the most frequent feedback
38:09
bits that he'd give the band the
38:12
other side of the glass is he'd lean on that
38:14
talk back button and he'd say, hey, dig
38:16
in dig in
38:19
meaning that the band has gone through the motions
38:22
enough times, and he can hear that they're
38:24
bored. They're bored. Come on. Grab
38:26
that instrument and talk to me.
38:28
Communicate. With that instrument.
38:30
I want to hear intentionality from
38:33
each and every one of you. The
38:35
researcher Ellen Winter at Boston
38:37
University is looking at that with painting.
38:40
And she has shown that
38:43
people can look at an abstract
38:46
painting. And say whether or not
38:48
it was done by an artist or
38:50
done by a four year old. Because you know how sometimes
38:52
you see abstract art and people say, oh, my kid
38:54
could have done that. Actually know your kid
38:56
couldn't have done that because when
38:59
children's abstract art
39:01
is shown to viewers, we
39:03
can tell. On some level,
39:05
we can tell, call it a gut instinct
39:07
or whatever, but these small
39:09
gestures add up to
39:11
or point back to an
39:14
intention to communicate something.
39:17
Humans are pretty good at picking up on it.
39:20
Yep. And and there's obviously a
39:22
lot of chatter right now about these
39:24
various AI art generators. It'll
39:26
be interesting to see how the if if
39:28
and, you know, if and how that
39:30
might shift in the next decade. But
39:33
I wanna talk little bit about the four
39:35
dimensions that I think most of us are
39:37
familiar with in terms of music. And you just have
39:39
this great analogy of sort
39:42
of the different body parts that are associated
39:45
with these, like, say, in a record. So so
39:47
tell us about that. Yeah. This
39:49
is the kind of kind of thing we'd talk about
39:51
in the recording studio when you're making a record.
39:53
To talk about music because it's the love of
39:55
your life and you're raising a musical baby
39:57
here and it's really all you're interested in.
40:00
And So there you go. So
40:03
we talk about sometimes
40:05
Melody as being the heart of
40:07
a record because Miss Prince
40:10
would say Beethoven had an area drum
40:12
kit. It's not like Beethoven had needed a funky
40:14
drummer or lyrics Melody
40:17
itself can just make us
40:19
swoon. It can melt our hearts. It
40:21
can convey power or strength
40:24
or Even subtle emotions like
40:26
jealousy or or even disgust,
40:29
melodies are are are kind of going
40:31
straight to our hearts. Wordlessly. Rhythm,
40:34
of course, is a record's hips because
40:38
rhythm on a popular record or
40:40
even on a classical record is going to
40:42
get your body to
40:44
want to move in a certain way. It
40:46
might be up and down. It might be front to back.
40:48
It might be side to side might be syncopated
40:51
or not in that group, but you're going to want to move
40:53
a certain way to it. So rhythms,
40:55
music's hips. Definitely
40:58
lyrics would be music's
41:00
head or music's brain because that's
41:02
words and languages human
41:05
beings most. Some most
41:07
clever skill. And with all these
41:09
words we have, lyrics
41:12
cause us to think things we
41:14
might have never thought before, they give us solutions
41:17
to problems that we needed
41:19
at the moment. And we say that timber
41:21
is a record space
41:23
because the timber of individual instruments
41:27
says something about
41:30
well, allows you to visualize. It says something
41:32
about about who played it and or what
41:34
was being played. You can tell the difference
41:37
between a guitar and a violin, but not
41:39
only that you have associations for
41:41
these certain timbers and attack
41:44
piano, let's say, is gonna
41:47
evoke different images than
41:49
a bosendorfer or a steinway grand
41:51
piano will evoke. So, chambers
41:55
timber conjures up memories because there's
41:57
so many associations
41:58
with having heard that that those
42:00
sounds in the past. And I think
42:02
that's just a beautiful way to help people
42:04
understand their own musical preferences. You
42:07
know, why you can love one album because
42:09
you just love the timbre and the face
42:11
of it. But, you know, maybe
42:13
you don't really love the lyrics. Maybe
42:15
they're a bit, you know, derivative in your mind, etcetera.
42:18
And then you can have another album that actually
42:20
hits all four. And then it just becomes
42:22
this like just blast
42:24
of, you know, reward in your
42:27
brain that it's so satisfying I
42:29
love when that happens. I just
42:31
I just love that. I'm thinking right now of one
42:34
that I mentioned in the book, and it just makes
42:36
me swoon. Just even thinking about it and playing
42:38
it in my head from memory makes me
42:40
think, oh, it's so good.
42:42
I mean, I think for a lot of people when we included
42:44
Purple Rain is is But
42:47
I just wanna remind our listeners that Susan
42:49
Rogers book cooperate with with OG Ogus.
42:51
Is that how you pronounce other name?
42:54
Ogli. Ogli, Ogli. Yeah.
42:56
This is what it sounds like. What the
42:58
music you love says about you is
43:00
available booksellers everywhere and would make
43:02
a great holiday gift. For
43:04
anyone, including those
43:07
of your family and friends who
43:09
don't consider themselves musicians but
43:11
still are passionate about music. This will
43:13
really, I think, make them feel
43:15
seen and heard and appreciated
43:19
And I wanna sort of end with like, you know, what
43:21
the music you love says about you part
43:23
of it. I want you know, IIII
43:25
wanna delve a little bit back into neuroscience
43:28
if we could if we could for a minute to
43:31
pull together sort of what we talked about at
43:33
the beginning of the episode about this
43:35
sort of, you know, the the very
43:37
beginnings of how
43:39
we perceive sound, and
43:42
then how that relates to
43:45
our sense of self and
43:47
the default mode network. And so maybe
43:49
you could tell us about the default mode network,
43:51
how, you know, how it works, and then the
43:54
role of the little gatekeeper.
43:56
Yeah. So the subtitle
43:58
turns out to be a little bit misleading
44:01
because sometimes people have asked me, okay,
44:03
these are the records that I like, what does that say
44:05
about me? And what my intention
44:07
was and I didn't pull it off. My
44:09
intention was to give you the language
44:12
so you can tell me what the
44:14
music you love says about you. You tell
44:16
me about the melodies you like and the
44:19
realism that you like on a record or
44:21
the abstraction or whatever. So
44:23
So the reason we do
44:25
this is because music listening
44:28
is private. No
44:30
one else is up there in our heads. No
44:32
one else can see what we see in our minds
44:35
eye or experience what we're feeling when
44:37
we're listening to a record that we love.
44:39
So neuroscience has recently
44:42
started investigating something that they call
44:44
the default network. The default
44:46
network is a collection of brain nuclei
44:48
and their interconnections that turn
44:50
on and get active whenever we
44:53
go into our own heads. And
44:55
if you ask people are you thinking
44:57
about something other than what you're doing right now?
44:59
Thirty to fifty percent of
45:01
the time, people say yes.
45:05
We're in our own heads a lot. That's
45:07
what a brain does. It focuses on the outside
45:09
world and goes back to the inside world. Outside
45:11
inside back and forth all day long. It's a good
45:13
thing. But the default
45:15
network turns out is
45:17
really excited, really happy, really
45:20
active when we're listening to a
45:22
record we love. So
45:25
a record that you like and especially
45:27
your favorite records will
45:29
light up that default network and
45:31
cause you to turn inward
45:34
and go to that private place in your
45:36
psyche, where you and that record
45:38
are essentially alone together? Such
45:40
a beautiful thing to think about. It's
45:43
conjuring up memories and feelings,
45:45
making you wanna move a certain way,
45:48
making you wanna sing along or
45:50
not. That's your private
45:52
world. Now, you mentioned the
45:54
precunious. Because that little
45:56
thing, it's like
45:58
in most of our brain structures, we've got two of them,
46:00
one on the left, one on the right, and the one on the right
46:02
has got a very important job to do. It's
46:05
not part of the default network,
46:07
but it's connected to the network.
46:09
So it's kinda like a little bit of a gatekeeper.
46:12
The little pre cutaneous is very important for
46:14
creative thought. If you need to do something
46:16
creative, whether it's designer poster or a t
46:18
shirt or just whatever, The bikinis
46:20
has to get active because it has to open
46:22
its little gates that are normally shut,
46:25
open those gates and allow new ideas
46:28
to Flow. It's essential for creativity.
46:31
Anyway, Robin Wilkins at
46:33
Wake Forest University ran a brilliant
46:35
FMRII experiment where she had participants
46:38
come in and bring with them into the into
46:40
the lab, bring some records you
46:42
like, bring a favorite record, and
46:44
bring some music you dislike. And
46:46
she watched their active brains as they're
46:49
listening to these three categories of music.
46:51
And the love recunies get all excited and
46:53
connected to the default network
46:56
when people were listening to liked and favorite
46:58
music. But when they listen to music,
47:00
they dislike The precunier said
47:03
no, do not want, and
47:05
it cut itself off from
47:07
the default network. And as Robin
47:09
Wilkins wrote, it became connected
47:11
primarily just to itself.
47:14
In other words, it's like, get away
47:16
get away. Stay away from me. I don't want
47:18
this. I won't integrate
47:21
this record that I dislike in
47:23
my psyche. That's
47:25
a really astonishing finding
47:29
because it's saying to us and we know
47:31
from other studies that our
47:33
auditory brain and
47:35
our our musical brain is
47:38
shaping itself over time to
47:40
get more and more and more fine tuned. This
47:43
work has been done also in in the last decade
47:45
or so. We now know that when
47:47
you get those dopamine hits from
47:49
listening to music that you like, when you get that
47:52
opiate release, There
47:54
are lack of opiates from
47:56
music that gives you chills or doesn't.
47:59
That's shaping your auditory cortex to
48:02
get better and faster at recognizing the
48:04
music of you that belongs in your
48:06
private head space. And so
48:09
if we want, to open
48:12
our minds and our ears to learning
48:14
a new type of music that we previously
48:17
disliked. We gotta find
48:19
a way to convince that little precunious that
48:22
it needs to connect to the default
48:24
network from personal experience, and
48:26
this is where I'm stepping out of
48:28
empirical research reports and stepping
48:30
into personal experience, but my
48:32
personal experience tells me this
48:34
happens when we're experiencing a
48:36
little bit of love, little bit of dopamine.
48:39
So let's say, for instance, well,
48:42
I'll describe. I love
48:44
my students at Berkeley College of Music. In
48:46
the first semester, I was there, I met
48:48
couple of kids, Andrew and Alex, who
48:50
turned me onto American Hardcore.
48:53
It's kinda like a more sophisticated version
48:55
of punk. I never would have paid any attention
48:57
to it before. I would have turned it off if it had been
48:59
in your shot. These guys
49:01
love this music so much. And
49:04
they taught me how to listen to it. And
49:06
together, we formed like a triangle. They
49:09
loved this music. I loved
49:11
them. And so the third leg of the
49:13
triangle formed where
49:16
their generosity, their sweetness
49:18
and sharing this music that they loved with
49:20
me caused me to feel
49:22
good And as I
49:25
felt good while listening, it
49:27
may have convinced the little precunious
49:30
This is not poison. It will not
49:32
kill you. Be cool.
49:36
Just listen and and And
49:38
as a result, I learned to like hardcore.
49:40
Other students did that for me with electronic
49:43
music. You can
49:45
change your mind, but it it takes a little
49:47
bit of a little bit of persuading.
49:50
I mean, I think that's such a beautiful way too
49:52
to go into the holiday season where, of
49:54
course, music plays a big role no matter
49:56
what you celebrate. When people
49:58
get together, there's often music involved.
50:01
And if it's music that you don't like,
50:03
maybe seek out the people that you
50:05
love who love that music to
50:08
help you connect. And it's
50:10
yeah. It's just it's such a beautiful
50:12
sentiment and Susan Rogers,
50:15
thank you so much for being in on
50:17
inquiring minds. I could talk to you forever.
50:20
Thank you so much for inviting
50:23
me on, letting me talk about
50:25
this wonderful topic that I love
50:27
so well. And and I
50:29
I'm I'm I'm very grateful and
50:31
I hope people do take
50:33
a closer listen to the music that
50:35
they love best and go into that
50:37
little private space in your head and
50:39
try to analyze what it is about this
50:41
record that just makes you weaken the knees
50:44
you'll discover something about yourself in the
50:46
process.
50:50
So that's it for another episode. Thanks
50:53
for listening. And if you want to hear more, don't
50:55
forget to subscribe. If you'd like to get
50:57
an ad free version of the show, consider supporting
50:59
us at patreon dot com slash inquiry minds.
51:02
I want to especially thank David Noelle,
51:04
Herring Jang, Sean Johnson, Jordan
51:06
Miller, Kyle Ryhala, Michael Galgul,
51:08
Eric Clark, Yuchy Lynn, Clark
51:11
Lindgren, Joel, Stephen Meyer, Eyewall,
51:13
Dale Master, and Charles Boyle. Inquiring
51:15
Mines is produced by Adam Isaac. I'm
51:18
your host, Andreyvus Contus, See you
51:20
next time.
51:39
By giving, people will be helping nationwide
51:41
children's hospital find cures, brighten
51:43
patient's holidays, and people will be able
51:45
to support their neighbors when they need it most.
51:48
When they donate, they will activate in
51:50
real time a butterfly inspired light
51:52
show for patients this holiday season. They
51:54
will add holiday cheer to the lives of kids
51:56
who really need a reason to smile. No
51:58
one wants to think about their child being sick,
52:00
but should that day come, the donation they make
52:02
this year could help the care their child could need
52:05
in the future. Please give now at
52:07
nationwide children's dot org slash
52:09
give.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More