Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
ABC Listen, podcasts,
0:02
radio, news, music and
0:05
more. The
0:09
The Anne
0:28
Giuseppe joins me in welcoming my
0:30
gladdies and bodies to another week
0:33
of the Little Wireless Program coming to
0:35
you from Caddigal Land. Behold
0:38
the brilliance and significance of
0:40
George Orwell from, well, Animal
0:42
Farm to 1984. Oh,
0:45
and that riveting, riveting account
0:48
of his experiences in the
0:50
Spanish Civil War homage to
0:52
Catalonia. But next
0:54
to nothing has been written
0:57
about the influence of his brilliant
0:59
wife, Eileen, who not
1:01
only looked after the practicalities of
1:03
their life, who not
1:05
only typed all his works, but
1:08
was his editor. Our award-winning
1:11
author Anna Funder has
1:13
written a beautiful book of
1:16
Eileen's life and role in George's
1:18
life, and we're looking
1:20
forward to a chat later.
1:22
And with the drug wars,
1:24
the wars on terror and
1:26
the culture wars waging in the US, Bruce
1:30
Shapiro is here to
1:32
give us some interesting background to
1:34
one of the hottest topics about
1:37
abortion rights. Now, Bruce is, of
1:39
course, contributing editor with The
1:41
Nation magazine, executive director
1:43
of the DART Centre for Journalism
1:45
and Trauma and at
1:48
Columbia University. And
1:51
Bruce, welcome back and please
1:53
annunciate carefully. That's a little
1:55
private joke. So I
1:57
understand, I understand that a
1:59
lot of people, The forgotten Law.
2:01
As my to surprise
2:03
return to the supreme
2:05
court tell me about
2:07
the com stop. This.
2:11
Is this is really
2:13
truly remarkable? an activity
2:16
of perhaps a judicial
2:18
resurrection that is actually
2:20
roiling American politics at
2:22
this moment. You know,
2:24
regular listeners to our
2:27
Now do understand that.
2:30
The Us courts have been packed
2:32
with abortion rights cases go away
2:35
after the Supreme Court ever since
2:37
Roe versus Wade was overturned couple
2:39
years ago. Of the most recent
2:41
case. The Calm before the Supreme
2:43
Court that was argued last week
2:45
involves mess of priests Stone The.
2:49
Abortion, drug and whether.
2:53
That can be banned in the males
2:55
that the latest front of anti abortion
2:57
wounds tried to ban mess up for
3:00
stone or from being sent from states
3:02
where abortion is legal to states where
3:04
it isn't. And
3:06
in the arguments
3:09
over this the
3:11
lawyers representing. The.
3:13
Anti Abortion movement and. Justices
3:15
Samuel Alito on Clarence Thomas
3:18
of Only To Impress Where
3:20
Our Home ah kept. Bring
3:22
up this law. a law
3:24
that is a hundred and
3:26
fifty years old past and
3:28
eighteen Seventy Three Call But
3:30
Com Stock Act a law
3:32
that most Americans know nothing
3:34
about a wall. In fact,
3:36
the prior Supreme court decisions
3:39
like Row Vs Wade and
3:41
earlier decisions about contraception had
3:43
essentially made irrelevant, but that
3:45
is still on the books
3:47
and is therefore suddenly relevant.
3:49
Again, it's a law passed
3:51
at the behest of well
3:53
and amazing character named Anthony
3:55
Comstock who maybe we'll talk
3:57
about a special Us Post.
4:00
Inspector which
4:02
effectively ban
4:04
contraception. Abortion.
4:08
Have seen literature litter to was
4:10
deemed had seen at the time
4:12
of a effect kind of sweet
4:14
been. Asleep Interest
4:17
City Law firm eighteen Seventy
4:19
Three that no one had
4:21
taken seriously, but that now
4:23
is suddenly being seriously discussed.
4:26
As. The direction the anti
4:28
abortion movement may wanna go
4:30
legally and as justification for
4:32
further constricting. Reproductive.
4:34
Rights in the Us. I
4:37
feel like a home in arms.
4:39
Honestly like forming a comstock same
4:41
club. Tell me about my hero.
4:45
But Anthony Com Stock was.
4:48
A is a kind of
4:50
hapless shop clerk of to
4:52
New York City from a
4:55
new Canaan, Connecticut after serving
4:57
in the Civil War. Were
4:59
two things really seem to
5:01
royal him. One was the.
5:04
The sexual behavior of his
5:06
his fellow soldiers and the
5:08
other was the what he
5:11
thought was the the popery
5:13
the over theatrical. displays
5:16
of Roman Catholicism among
5:18
Irish immigrants. He himself
5:20
was a Protestant activist and
5:22
after a friend died for
5:25
reasons that are a little
5:27
mysterious with he attributed
5:29
to various kinds of
5:31
debauchery Com Stock went
5:33
on a one man crusade
5:36
and ultimately teamed up with
5:38
Seen Them Pretty New Y
5:41
M C A The Young
5:43
Men's Chorus Association. to
5:46
campaign against what they saw
5:48
as vice and he ended
5:50
up with the y m
5:53
see his help being appointed
5:55
and eighty and seventy three
5:57
special postal inspector and held
6:00
that job well into
6:02
the 20th century. He
6:06
confiscated literature like the
6:08
writings of Bernard Shaw. He
6:12
chased down and drove to suicide.
6:14
A famous legendary
6:16
woman in New York
6:19
at that time, Madame Rustel, who
6:22
provided abortion services, among other things,
6:25
at a time when they were
6:27
not otherwise available or legal, brought
6:30
together and really originated
6:32
in some ways the
6:35
integrated far-right
6:37
agenda that we still see, in which
6:39
on the one hand there's
6:41
the crusade against reproductive rights.
6:44
There's the crusade that
6:47
we see now in Florida and
6:49
other states against, in book banning
6:52
in libraries, against sexually explicit literature,
6:55
and also, and a lot of people
6:57
forget this, the anti-immigrant hysteria. Comstock's
7:00
writings and
7:03
career were
7:05
really notable for their
7:07
persistent persecution of, well,
7:10
largely Irish immigrants, people with
7:12
names like Conroy just pepper
7:14
his writings and his indictments.
7:17
He was a really
7:20
powerful, sort of a national, moral
7:24
policeman whose
7:26
influence didn't end
7:29
really until after World War I
7:31
and his own death in the
7:33
20th century. Now, let's go from
7:35
Mad Anthony to Mad Robert. Robert
7:37
Kennedy, of course, is running
7:40
as an independent candidate in
7:42
the upcoming presidential campaign, and
7:45
he's just announced his running mate, another
7:48
Madie. Tell me about Nicole
7:50
Shanahan, if you please. Well,
7:54
we should say that this is not
7:56
a mad choice from
7:58
Robert F. Kennedy. because Nicole Shanahan,
8:02
one suspects, was picked because of
8:05
her considerable wealth. She's the ex-spouse
8:07
of one of the founders of
8:09
Google. She has
8:11
bankrolled already some of RFK
8:14
Jr.'s early
8:17
campaign phases. But
8:19
it's fascinating because
8:22
while he is famous for
8:24
his anti-vaccine stance
8:27
long before COVID, he was one of these folks
8:29
who was arguing that
8:32
without evidence, the vaccinations are
8:34
tied to autism and other
8:36
problems. Nicole
8:38
Shanahan, who's Silicon
8:41
Valley billionaire, formerly a
8:43
Democratic donor, has
8:46
her own crusade against
8:48
in vitro fertilization. She
8:52
describes it as a massive lie told about
8:54
women's health and claims it's at
8:58
the root of various health problems and
9:00
that there are alternatives like getting sunlight
9:03
every day that can help women
9:06
remain fertile. I'm
9:09
not even going to go down the evidence-free
9:12
pathway that she
9:15
describes, but it's a sort of
9:17
a parallel obsession
9:19
to RFK's anti-vax
9:22
conspiracy monitoring. So they
9:24
fit well in that way. She's
9:28
not someone who will
9:30
have any name recognition
9:32
or do his campaign any political
9:35
good in the traditional sense. She's
9:38
there because she can help bankroll
9:41
his, what would otherwise be
9:43
a fringe campaign. Now
9:45
does the Robert and Nicole
9:47
Panto horse gain
9:49
any traction or will it gain
9:51
traction? Well
9:55
they first need to get on the ballot. One of
9:57
the reasons that she was named now is that in
9:59
many cases, the The state he can't
10:01
even begin to petition your
10:03
way onto the bow or
10:06
to qualify. I'm unless the
10:08
both the president and vice
10:10
presidential candidates have been packed
10:12
so I'm bill that the
10:14
it was essential for Kennedy's.
10:17
Marginal aspirations. I'm that he
10:19
do this on you know,
10:23
The question that's interesting is
10:25
not will they get traction
10:27
Alternative candidates always get traction
10:29
but which way they pull
10:31
from Donald Trump is the
10:33
really a little bit nervous
10:36
about Rfk? He is now
10:38
starting to attack him saying
10:40
that he's just liberal democrat
10:42
but the do this fear
10:44
on the democratic side is
10:46
just the as great. That
10:49
are kg her could turn out
10:51
to be some kind of magnet
10:53
for disaffected democrat or independent voters
10:55
who might stay home, might not
10:58
vote but may be. Oh maybe
11:00
this works. He beginning to see
11:02
the Biden campaign take this. Rfk
11:05
threat a little more seriously. no one
11:07
really thinks of course that are of
11:09
cage when you're will. Despite.
11:11
In a murky mission, get
11:13
more than a small number
11:16
of votes, But in a
11:18
close election closely divided in
11:20
an electoral college states a
11:22
few thousand or a few
11:25
million votes can make a
11:27
very big difference. And you
11:29
know, indeed, we're seeing one
11:31
issue after another pile up
11:34
that could swing some of
11:36
these highly volatile states. Either
11:38
way, to go back to
11:40
abortion. For example, I'm in
11:43
Florida, the State supreme Court
11:45
just a loud a referendum
11:47
about abortion rights. onto the.
11:51
November ballot in Florida virtually
11:53
guaranteeing that reproductive rights will
11:56
be in play and that
11:58
state as a kid. Swing
12:00
issue will Rfk junior or
12:02
other alternate and candidates like.
12:06
The A Scholar Cornell
12:09
West. Or. Green Party's
12:11
Jill Stein. Will they swing enough
12:13
for the few votes to have
12:15
a nadir affects them all? To
12:17
the outcome of the election is
12:19
why we all know about the
12:22
Butterfly Effect. So I guess you
12:24
could be a clickable now Small
12:26
America continues to see arms Israel
12:28
and by no means it's it's
12:30
more mind doing so. Stay was
12:32
surprising support for an end to
12:35
the war in Gaza from role
12:37
of drums Donald Trump. Indeed,
12:40
In a culture. Shock.
12:42
And Awe! Interview
12:45
with a couple
12:47
of Israeli journalists
12:49
right aligned with
12:51
I'm Premise and
12:53
Netanyahu. Thera
12:56
President Trump said and I quote
12:58
you have to finish up your
13:00
war You have to get it
13:02
done. We have to get peace.
13:04
We can't have this going on
13:06
on. This was a. Particular.
13:09
Shock because of course
13:11
President Trump has. Up
13:14
till now fashioned himself as the
13:16
greatest ally Israel ever had in
13:18
particular a Prime Minister Netanyahu. It
13:20
was Trump who are ordered moving
13:23
the Us embassy from Tel Aviv
13:25
to Jerusalem, fulfilling a long long
13:27
dream of the Israeli Right arm.
13:29
You know what it it proves
13:32
a couple of things out. One
13:34
of them is that when and
13:36
Israel is no different. Than
13:40
any other one of Trump's
13:42
causes, as he. Will. Turn on
13:44
you in a minute if he
13:47
thinks it's own interest. but also
13:49
he is, if nothing else, a
13:51
shrewd analyst of publicity. And he
13:53
understands that as well as President
13:56
Biden does, I think that this
13:58
war has been pro. Family
14:00
costly. To. Israel's image
14:03
and could be profoundly costly
14:05
to a presidential campaign. That's
14:08
a sober. If I were
14:10
an Israeli politicians I would
14:12
take that as a sobering
14:14
indication of where things are
14:16
to wonderfully in muncie his
14:19
wounds of we should Be
14:21
Roots contributing to do with
14:23
The Nation Magazine and Executive
14:25
Director of The Dots Into
14:27
Pigeons Month, two months at
14:29
Columbia University and now and
14:31
fund. On I'm the know
14:33
soon see of the was known
14:35
as George or. As
15:09
I think a problem read
15:11
you beloved The Smiths. Christopher
15:14
Hitchens was in my very
15:16
first. My
15:18
first like.live thirty three years
15:20
ago and we went into
15:23
him. well. Oscillating
15:26
friendship sometimes friend, sometimes
15:28
not than reunited shortly
15:30
before his death to
15:32
celebrate his memory. I've
15:34
been listening to oodles
15:36
of essays he wrote
15:38
in. the last couple of
15:41
years before his demise mainly
15:43
literary his own every imaginable
15:45
topic and one of the
15:48
first was inevitably an essay
15:50
own he's a while he
15:52
was nice is pretty be
15:55
headed go to reduce door
15:57
and not only does he
16:00
talk about Orr with great love
16:02
and affection, but he manages to
16:04
drag George into almost every
16:06
interview he does. There's always an
16:09
Orwellian mention, but dear
16:12
listener, no mention
16:14
of Mrs. Orr. And
16:17
we are going to attempt to
16:19
correct that singular omission.
16:23
She's described her book Wyftham as an
16:26
intervention in history, an
16:28
exercise in making visible
16:31
the extraordinary woman who
16:33
was, well, far too long hidden in
16:35
the shadows of George, not
16:38
only his life but his works. Anna
16:41
Funder is our next guest,
16:43
the award-winning Australian writer of
16:45
Wyftham, Mrs. Orr's
16:47
invisible life, as
16:49
well of course as Starzy Land
16:52
and all that I am. Anna's
16:55
a crusade
16:57
to uncover history, for better
17:00
or worse, well, seen in
17:02
Notchup, numerous awards and are
17:04
now a long
17:06
listing for the International
17:08
Women's Prize for Nonfiction.
17:11
Anna, welcome back and congratulations. Thank
17:13
you, Philip, lovely to be here.
17:16
Over a 20-year writing career,
17:18
you've tackled the Nazis, now
17:21
Orwell and the patriarchy. What
17:24
is it about power that fascinates you?
17:27
Such a good question. Yes, my husband said
17:29
to me at the end of his
17:32
six-year writing process for Wyftham, first
17:34
you take on the Starzy, then
17:36
the Nazis and now patriarchy. Are
17:39
you done? I don't know
17:44
exactly what it is. I mean, you're asking
17:46
me a question to look kind of deep
17:48
into my psyche, but
17:50
as a storyteller, as a
17:53
writer, certainly untold stories or
17:55
stories that have not
17:57
been told or that are in the process of of
18:00
being erased like the
18:02
ones of
18:05
the victims of the Stasi or the sort of hero
18:07
resistors of the Stasi are
18:09
the most exciting to uncover and
18:11
the most interesting to tell because
18:14
what happens in a power situation is you
18:16
have people who resist it, who
18:19
are very easily seen
18:21
as heroes, not least
18:24
by me, and then the people
18:26
who are implementing power and they are
18:28
much more often much
18:30
more compromised, much more responsible and
18:33
much more interested in having a
18:36
previous regime or a previous system
18:38
invisibilised. So
18:40
just as a writer those situations are hugely
18:43
interesting. Invisibleised, is
18:45
that a coinage of yours? Oh no,
18:47
I think I just did that now,
18:49
that's terrible. No, it's terrific. Now
18:52
talking about the invisibleised, Wifetop
18:54
paints a picture of a brilliant young
18:56
woman who studied under Tolkien,
18:59
who understood politics intimately
19:01
and who played an important role
19:04
in the Spanish Civil War. But
19:07
who has been remembered in the annals
19:09
of history simply as a wife.
19:13
Tell us about Eileen
19:15
O'Shaughnessy. So
19:17
I started, I mean I'm a big
19:19
fan, I was always
19:21
a big fan and I still am a big
19:24
fan of Orwell's writing and at a
19:27
moment that I kind of remember in
19:29
my own life as peak wifetop kind
19:31
of young teens and a pre-teen and
19:33
so on, I started reading my way
19:35
again through Orwell and then the
19:37
six biographies of Orwell. When I
19:39
finished reading those I came across
19:41
these letters which had only been
19:43
found after those biographies were written from
19:46
Eileen O'Shaughnessy, Orwell's first wife,
19:48
to her very best friend
19:50
from their days at Oxford together. And
19:53
in the first one of those she's writing
19:56
six months after marrying Orwell and
19:59
they're living in a tiny Kind
20:01
of London. She writes. Her.
20:03
Friend: The Nora. I'm
20:05
sorry it's taken me so long
20:08
to write to you that we
20:10
have quarreled so continuously and really
20:12
bitterly since the wedding that I
20:14
thought I'd just right one letter
20:16
to everyone wants to murder or
20:18
separation was accomplished. I
20:20
read that and I just thought, you
20:22
are you. You're hilarious and what are
20:24
you quarreling about in these early days
20:26
as marriage? What is it that you're
20:28
having to get is T and I
20:31
wondered whether from her point is you
20:33
if I could find out more about.
20:35
What that metics looked like. There
20:41
was so. Little about her in the
20:43
biographies. It was astonishing to me. So I
20:45
set off to do two things: find out
20:47
who she was. Look at that
20:49
marriage from her point of view. And
20:51
then look at the ways in which she
20:54
has been erased. Up into the
20:56
present day on prisoners disease lucid
20:58
list Laces disappeared her really rude
21:00
to school. They. Were
21:02
I don't know a lot of that
21:04
that I didn't sign them myself. They
21:06
were written snow and know I had
21:09
no children and when she dies. Ah
21:11
they were. Given to us
21:13
and nephews and I think they would
21:15
discover as in and nephews garage your
21:17
house or something is in two thousand
21:19
and and early two thousand. Now
21:22
in are not into the
21:24
seek She meets every player
21:26
for years to man known
21:28
as soon as all and
21:30
soon after the Mary she
21:32
follows him to Spain with
21:34
a during the war against
21:36
the first is no. She
21:39
played a consequence roads and
21:41
well as well. George Russell
21:43
probably listen for. Look.
21:47
i that's homage to catalonia george's account
21:49
of fighting ad assassins spanish civil war
21:51
as a teenager and then more recently
21:53
when i was working on this book
21:56
and it's a simplistic pope but you
21:58
can read it twice in my case, did
22:01
not have a sense that he wasn't there alone,
22:03
that they were both there. And you
22:06
certainly wouldn't realise that Eileen
22:08
had a job writing propaganda
22:10
and in supply and communications
22:12
at the headquarters of
22:15
the little left-wing party that he was
22:17
fighting for. So she's at HQ in
22:19
Barcelona, and he is off literally in
22:22
a trench in the ground in the back
22:24
blocks of Aragon bored out of his mind.
22:26
So, and you don't understand that
22:29
from the biographies either, which say things like,
22:32
you know, she wasn't political at all. She
22:34
went to Spain to support her husband and
22:36
sent him treats to the front,
22:38
four-stop. As you researched
22:40
this period in their lives,
22:42
you started to see there
22:44
were numerous omissions in the
22:46
history books, and most particularly
22:48
in all his own memoir,
22:50
as you say, Homage to
22:52
Catalonia. Can you give me
22:55
a taste of what is missing? Sure.
22:58
So the one of
23:00
it sort of occurred to me after I'd
23:02
done all this work, I mean, I spent
23:04
longer trying to untangle
23:06
Homage to Catalonia to find
23:08
her in the absences and gaps
23:11
than they actually spent in Spain,
23:14
which is hugely embarrassing to me.
23:17
But I can give you an example. When
23:20
Stalin starts to crack
23:22
down on this revolution in Spain, and
23:25
he starts to round up left wingers
23:27
who he doesn't control, and
23:29
there are murders in the streets and machine
23:31
guns and so on. All
23:33
while the street fighting breaks out
23:36
outside their hotel, he happens to be walking
23:38
along outside the hotel, and he runs
23:40
away from the hotel instead of to it
23:43
where I learn is in their room. He's
23:45
on leave from the front, which is why he's in Barcelona.
23:47
And he spends a night away from the
23:50
hotel. The fighting, he says, is too bad
23:52
to get back up to the hotel, but
23:54
he leaves the place where he is and
23:56
goes out to dinner with an unnamed friend
23:58
to his hotel. comes back.
24:00
When he comes back, he says, in
24:03
homage to Catalonia, I tried
24:05
to make contact with my wife because the
24:07
telephones were up and running again. I couldn't
24:10
reach her, but I reached John
24:12
McNair. So I tell you,
24:14
Philip John McNair was Eileen's boss at HQ.
24:18
He's Orwell says, I reached John McNair. He
24:20
said to me, everything
24:23
was all right. Nobody had been hurt.
24:25
So that's what Orwell writes in a
24:28
paragraph. What he's not saying is, I
24:31
rang our hotel room. Eileen wasn't there. So
24:33
I rang her office, but he
24:35
can't tell the reader that she has an
24:37
office because he can't. He doesn't want the
24:40
reader to understand that she's there working in
24:42
a political job at headquarters. So
24:44
he rings the office, readers McNair. Well,
24:47
why? That is the big question.
24:50
Would it somehow take away from
24:52
his adventures in Spain if it
24:56
were clear that he could make it sound a
24:58
bit domestic or
25:00
that he perhaps relied on her for informing
25:03
him about the political situation
25:05
in Spain? She had an
25:07
excellent political now. And she
25:10
was receiving from him from the
25:12
trenches on the backs of
25:15
envelopes and toilet paper and goodness knows
25:17
what the notes that she was then
25:19
typing, which would form the basis of
25:21
Amish to Catalonia, that she edited. But
25:23
she also informed it because she knew
25:26
she had spies, Stalinist spies in her
25:28
office. She knew what was going on
25:31
in the politics in the hotel, in the
25:33
town and so on. So she really informed
25:35
that book. At the end of their time
25:37
in Spain, she saved his life to get
25:39
them out of there. Because after
25:42
six Spanish policemen controlled
25:44
by the Stalinists searched
25:47
their hotel room while she was in bed.
25:51
Under the bed, she had thought to put
25:53
their passports and checkbook. She stayed in that
25:55
bed for two hours while the room was
25:57
searched. Orwell does tell us that. But
26:00
he tells us that not as an example
26:02
of her courage, but as an example of
26:04
the tendency, he says, of Spanish
26:07
men, even when they're being controlled
26:09
by Stalin. So at every point he finds it
26:11
very difficult to see her or to talk about
26:13
her or to give her any credit. I
26:17
did wonder at times what it
26:19
felt like for her to be
26:21
typing herself out of the manuscript
26:23
of Armistice Catalonia that she had
26:25
informed. But at the end of
26:27
their time in Spain, she then manages
26:29
to get these vital
26:31
stamps in their passport from the
26:34
prefecture of police so that
26:37
they can high tailor it out of Spain. And
26:40
Stalin has issued an arrest warrant for the two of them.
26:43
He names her very clearly in
26:45
that arrest warrant. And she
26:47
manages to go into this Stalinist controlled
26:49
headquarters and get the stamps. So she
26:52
saves his life getting out of Spain. But
26:56
I think there's a sense in which he
26:58
would have felt diminished had he acknowledged that. So
27:01
homage to Catalonia, but not homage
27:03
to Eileen. Now, how
27:06
did she influence his writing? You've
27:08
found quite a lot of strong
27:10
suggestions, haven't you? Yes,
27:12
it's interesting. So as soon as they got
27:15
married, people remarked that his writing got much
27:17
better. She has an English degree from Oxford.
27:20
She studied under Tolkien and she
27:22
knew a lot about fables, also
27:24
fables and Chaucer. And
27:28
one of the biologists said, well,
27:30
whether by coincidence or influence,
27:32
we don't know, but his writing suddenly
27:34
improved all these kinds of things. It's
27:37
particularly with regard to Animal Farm that
27:39
we know the most because during
27:42
the Second World War in London, Eileen
27:44
was working for money to support them
27:46
first up at the
27:48
Department of Censorship in the Ministry
27:51
of Information and then
27:53
later at the Ministry of Food. How
27:55
perfect. How perfect. So when she was at the
27:57
Department of Censorship, that was in Senate House. in
28:00
London which Orwell later took as the
28:02
model for the Ministry of Truth, i.e.
28:05
of Lies, in 1984. Before
28:09
they were married, I should say, she
28:11
published a poem that she'd written for her
28:13
school called 1984, end of the century 1984, so I don't know
28:15
whether his 1984 much later was
28:20
some sort of homage to that. But
28:23
we know most about her influence on
28:25
Animal Farm, which he considered the best
28:27
of his works, and many people do.
28:29
It's an outlier in all of his
28:31
works because it doesn't have the usual
28:34
kind of underdog,
28:36
every man slightly grumpy Orwell
28:39
stand-in figure who,
28:41
you know, is often so charming, who we see
28:43
the world through. It has an ensemble
28:45
cast of characters and is witty and
28:47
whimsical and not sadistic, and
28:50
they wrote it effectively together. So he wanted
28:52
to write an essay critical of Stalin,
28:55
and Stalin at that point was helping the
28:58
Allies win the war, and having worked in
29:00
the Department of censorship earlier in the day, and look, you'll
29:02
never get that published. So
29:04
I don't know what the best of that conversation was,
29:06
but the result of her saying to him, don't
29:09
make it an essay, was that together they
29:11
made it into the novel that was Animal
29:13
Farm. A friend
29:16
of George has said he
29:19
never really looked at another human
29:21
being and was
29:23
not a reliable judge of character,
29:26
whereas that Eileen clearly
29:28
was. Yes, I
29:30
think George wasn't
29:33
really interested in people. He didn't really have
29:35
the knack of seeing
29:38
people. So the person who said that of him
29:40
was his very closest friend Richard Rees, and
29:43
looked after him until the end of his life. Whereas
29:47
people said of Eileen, you know, one
29:50
of her close friends said of her, we
29:53
thought she was affected at first because we would ask
29:55
her a question and it took her so long to
29:57
respond to us, but then we realized that she She
30:00
was taking in what we said to her and
30:02
she could see through people as if
30:04
their faces and manners were glass, what
30:06
she saw were their feelings and
30:09
she would give you a response that was from your own
30:11
point of view in a way. So
30:14
I think she was able to perhaps
30:16
interpret people or the world to
30:19
him and certainly she was able to make
30:21
him write characters or help him
30:23
write characters in Animal Farm that
30:26
are different from those in any
30:28
of his other works. Going down,
30:30
Funder, back to invisibilisation, you say
30:33
that the six
30:35
great hawl biographers, all men,
30:37
it should be noted, consciously
30:40
or unconsciously conspired
30:43
to make Aileen invisible. Tell
30:45
me what you mean when you say
30:47
the biographies were fictions
30:50
of omission. I
30:53
think the
30:56
most, I came to
30:58
think that what happens is
31:01
many, many women in
31:03
Orwell's life are
31:05
either left out on the cutting room
31:08
floor, you don't know about them or
31:10
their influence, or
31:12
they are trivialised, minimised,
31:15
reduced to footnotes, their accounts
31:17
are doubted and
31:20
so on. When I saw grew up in
31:22
a female led family,
31:25
his mother
31:27
and aunt, to whom he was very
31:30
close, were feminists. His aunt was
31:32
a suffragette who had been imprisoned along with
31:34
the Pankers. She was
31:36
an Esperantist, his aunt Nellie. I
31:39
didn't know that. She ran a
31:41
literary salon in London for which
31:43
H.G. Wells and Nesbitt and other
31:45
luminaries were invited. She was
31:47
in Paris the whole time he was there writing down
31:49
and out. They were
31:51
Fabians and suffragettes. So Orwell Is
31:54
growing up in a family of
31:56
women who are politically and intellectually
31:58
interested in acting. Feminist and
32:00
left wing and he becomes a man
32:03
who sees things from this as I
32:05
say underdog point of view and is
32:07
left wing so one would sink and
32:09
his father was a bit of a.
32:12
Dolt to put no
32:14
bones. About it's. At
32:16
one would think that that was the inheritance
32:18
that was most interesting for the man who
32:21
became oh well, but you will never learn
32:23
that about those women have made him in
32:25
the biographies let alone about Eileen. In
32:27
her enormous influence or go
32:29
Euros the Christian move those
32:32
characters use a relentless for
32:34
main room had she cope
32:36
with. And.
32:40
I. Don't really know how she coped
32:42
with. We sat at. I'd.
32:44
People have different arrangements. There's
32:46
no evidence. From her letters
32:48
and. About that
32:50
in particular I'm some us
32:53
the. Some. of what he
32:55
did was. In ways and
32:57
beyond philandering. So he slept ways
32:59
one of her closest friends and
33:02
then wanted her to know about
33:04
that, an Easterner. He brandished a
33:06
less half from this woman Lydia
33:09
in front of I Lane and
33:11
Eileen's either pretended. Not to notice
33:13
or. Really didn't notice
33:15
so his time to kind of
33:17
isolate has and from the woman
33:19
who later we know was very
33:21
critical of oil he also is
33:24
a lot of things that were.
33:26
About buses coin this term which is
33:29
the all well pounds so we're not
33:31
talking to I'm sorry run the post
33:33
review yes. Indeed, the Orwell Pump.
33:36
So what they mean by
33:38
that is. Essentially a
33:40
kind his. Sexual. Assault
33:42
Really? Which is. Being euthanized into
33:44
something that is perhaps and
33:46
a know pussy cat like
33:49
or us natural or I'm.
33:53
An unwilling or something that he
33:55
really did and have this sawdust.
33:57
M E what he was. Making.
34:00
Sexual advances quite forced to
34:03
play to women in workplaces.
34:05
At parties in parks am when they
34:07
didn't want it and they are accounts
34:09
from those women of what that felt
34:11
like. Those of course are all minimized
34:13
in the biographies. Seminole or not
34:16
mentioned by Christopher Hitchens, I
34:18
assume he resists. Oh no,
34:20
We never seen that one would imagine. I
34:23
don't know if Across the Hitchens was interested
34:25
in this, but many of Orwell's fans, including
34:27
a woman who had been his patron mabel
34:29
See It who had got seventeen this test
34:32
agents and. Money.
34:39
As he knew him very well and
34:42
see thought. An Aimless on the
34:44
six whole, as did many else. Ah.
34:47
All. Those other friends and am.
34:50
I don't know that that's ever really.
34:52
Put into the kind. Of public
34:54
discourse about him and at an A with
34:56
a Hitchens did because it might be settling
34:59
into. To. Him while I'm from.
35:01
trust him different reasons A
35:03
to realize how extraordinary smell
35:05
the book takes a port
35:07
unique for a breeding new
35:10
for think some sections in
35:12
and now was shining a
35:14
light on oh I lean
35:16
and yourself know what led
35:19
you to write the book
35:21
in this old was assess.
35:23
Assess odd is right or this
35:25
right. I didn't some it's and
35:27
sustained. I didn't want to do
35:30
it like that. I didn't choose
35:32
to the I les mis and
35:34
we obviously I did bed with
35:36
Aids is am my books I'm
35:38
trying to say something in as.
35:41
As. True away as possible. So Staci
35:44
land for instance I wanted to
35:46
write a novel then when I
35:48
was younger but I sort of
35:50
event sleep with completely realms and
35:52
use other people's stories that that
35:54
when those people of walking. round berlin
35:56
and destroys white thing called for had to
35:58
put the whole thing as
36:00
a way of showing contemporary Berlin in
36:02
the 90s as it was making itself
36:05
back together. In this one, I'm only
36:07
in this book really to say
36:10
some of these methods by which
36:12
women and women's
36:14
voices and women's work and the work
36:16
of life and love that women do
36:18
in heterosexual relationships are made
36:21
invisible, taken for granted, assumed
36:24
to be willingly given and written
36:27
out of history. Some of those methods,
36:29
primarily among them the
36:32
passive voice, where people
36:34
say we did this and we did that or it
36:36
was arranged that or the Christmas dinner was cooked
36:38
or the
36:41
life was saved, the manuscript was typed, conditions
36:43
were idyllic, all of these other ways of
36:46
passive voicing away conditions
36:49
which exist because of the work of women. I wanted to
36:51
bring that into the present tense so that's why
36:53
there's a bit of kind of present tense narrative
36:55
in it. I wanted to show
36:57
who Eileen and George really were and
37:00
I wanted to show how it
37:03
is that we don't know who Eileen
37:05
is despite six biographies of
37:07
Orwell and her extraordinary importance
37:10
in his life and work. As
37:12
we sit here together and talk
37:14
I remember programs who have done
37:16
on over in invisibilised
37:19
women like Einstein's wife
37:21
for example, another
37:23
great example. You say in
37:26
the book that you wanted to
37:28
write fiction that tries not to
37:31
lie. Yes, to get back to
37:33
your question about fictions of omission, these
37:36
six biographies all of which are material
37:38
and wonderful and which I
37:40
rely on and
37:43
I'm then critiquing
37:45
in a way, my
37:48
information comes from them. What I am saying
37:50
is not really for the most part new,
37:53
it's just that I'm looking at things from
37:55
the point of view of what it was like to be that
37:57
woman rather than from the point of view of what it was
37:59
like. of you of the
38:01
biographers who in general and I'm
38:04
generalizing would like to
38:06
make Orwell seem like the decent man
38:08
that he would have liked to
38:11
have seen himself as. But you've
38:13
already made it clear that he wasn't
38:15
a decent man. Doublethink. Doublethink
38:17
indeed. So you have to hold in
38:20
your mind two things. So we learn
38:22
from Orwell, he remains unbelievably valuable. We
38:24
hold in our minds two things. As
38:27
he said, doublethink was you
38:29
have to hold one is a conscious level.
38:31
This is what he did and the other
38:34
at an unconscious level. This is also what
38:36
he did. How do we square those things?
38:38
And I think the fact is
38:40
that we have to look at you
38:43
can't get a full picture of the man unless you
38:45
can see also his wife and what he
38:47
got from her and what he did to
38:49
her. Did you
38:51
have rules of engagement for
38:53
the almost true scenes?
38:56
Yes, I did. So what I'm
39:00
saying is that the biographers are writing a
39:02
fiction of omission in that you have to
39:05
get rid of the mother and the aunt
39:07
and trivialize the women who he pounced on
39:09
and their account and so on in order
39:11
to make him seem decent. So that's the
39:13
way that they construct the most decent hero
39:16
writers that they love. And
39:18
that's a fiction of omission. My fiction
39:20
is of inclusion. So I
39:22
was lucky enough to get permission to use
39:25
Eileen's letters, some of them. So six letters
39:27
that she wrote to her best friend which
39:29
cover the course of this marriage. So
39:32
the scenes that I'm writing
39:34
are mostly scenes where she is
39:36
writing the real letters that she wrote to
39:38
Nora and I know where she
39:40
was. I know what she's leaving out of the letters,
39:43
you know, that George is off with someone else or
39:45
that he's about to go to Spain or
39:47
whatever it is or that she's very ill. And
39:50
so I write her back into being.
39:52
It felt like I could allow myself
39:54
to write a fiction of inclusion so
39:57
that she would live again Writing these letters.
40:00
She really right that does seem
40:02
that clearly invented in the work
40:04
net. The lead a noise immediately
40:07
that you're going into something. It is a
40:09
presentation of her. To. Times
40:11
described. As
40:14
I passionately past summer to for
40:16
the tree reparations, how do you
40:19
feel of of the word part
40:21
assess? Assess assess it's so interesting
40:23
isn't it vs am I feel
40:25
about that in a way you
40:28
know sentences that slice around the
40:30
world today like women and other
40:32
minorities in a all put together
40:35
and in a way that makes
40:37
no sense at all. I sail
40:40
that partisan is trying to make
40:42
this point is you because applied
40:44
to see that as test their
40:47
with he people in the marriage
40:49
the lack of them. And
40:51
studied the biographies or disk with of
40:54
our professor described as partisan. Tag is
40:56
in their credit for representing a tree
40:58
as they see it. So I think
41:01
it's a telling word to use. and
41:03
I suppose it does to my point
41:05
about the world that we listen. You
41:09
seem to find the right
41:11
into sexual sections the easiest
41:13
and most to some. Ideas
41:16
Exactly what that says. Yes,
41:18
I definitely. I definitely days.
41:20
I mean, I Mass. ah.
41:24
I didn't seal. I didn't feel it would be that to
41:26
write a novel about island which I could have done. And
41:29
would have been a lot easier for
41:31
a couple of reasons. I am: she's
41:33
sort of so clever and so we
41:35
t I didn't think I could really
41:37
get him signed. The voice to match,
41:39
pass or do it justice. Ruth I
41:41
wanted to be clear about not only
41:43
his she was in. This is nothing
41:46
but why it is that we don't
41:48
know about. This is
41:50
her husband, The because of the biographies and because
41:52
the Patriarchy south. The book had to do two
41:54
things that it was really. Very joyous to
41:56
right there since I think that's really
41:58
where my. heart lies. I
42:02
know you still hold all in
42:04
the highest regard and
42:06
you liked his self-deprecating humour and
42:09
that laser vision about our
42:11
power work so you're not
42:13
interested in cancelling him. No,
42:16
not remotely. I think he's very important and
42:18
today we live in an age
42:21
of rising authoritarian and totalitarian dictatorships,
42:23
blanket surveillance. We carry in our
42:25
pockets what Winston Smith would have
42:28
recognised as a telescreen in 1984
42:30
at all times and I
42:33
think what
42:36
Orwell has to say about power in 1984
42:39
and about surveillance and totalitarianism
42:43
is extremely important.
42:45
I can
42:47
hold in my mind the two
42:49
things so I can also
42:52
see quite clearly that the man who
42:54
wrote, say, 1984 and its
42:56
vision of, which is
42:58
a kind of paranoid vision,
43:00
projecting a surveillance state of
43:02
total surveillance, total power and
43:04
dictatorship, it's
43:07
also a simplistic vision with all of the rats.
43:10
He has fantasies about Winston, has fantasies of
43:12
raping a woman and slitting her throat at
43:14
the moment of climax and so on. It's
43:16
quite misogynistic. So to expect
43:18
that to come from a man who
43:20
is a hail fellow, well-met, vanilla
43:23
kind of every man is
43:25
a mistake on the reader's part. I think it's much
43:27
more interesting to see a more
43:30
realistic complex view of the
43:32
man who drew that vision from
43:34
himself and his experiences. So
43:37
there's nothing about cancelling. Something I would
43:39
say is Orwell is
43:41
extraordinarily useful. Terms
43:43
like doublethink is very useful.
43:46
I had a recent
43:48
experience of an
43:50
article being published in a paper where all of the
43:52
quotes from me were invented and
43:54
they were put into quote marks
43:57
and they were saying wrong things
44:00
that I never said. And
44:02
so I wrote to the newspaper and said,
44:04
you know, to the
44:06
editor, said, these are wrong. And
44:09
then they, without saying
44:11
anything to me, changed the quotes, still
44:13
in quote marks, still wrong, different version
44:15
of wrong, and then put a note at the bottom
44:18
of the piece saying, they didn't publish my
44:20
letter, put a note at the bottom of
44:22
the piece saying, this article has been changed
44:24
due to an error
44:26
in the editing process. So
44:29
I just thought, wow, I
44:31
don't know whether that I've been buried in
44:33
a memory hole. So this
44:36
piece which exists on the internet, there's no
44:38
evidence that it's wrong that I never said
44:40
those things that it has
44:42
been so called corrected. And
44:45
I've just gone down Winston Smith's shoot.
44:49
You say that Eileen's
44:51
contribution challenges the genius
44:53
myth. Well,
44:56
I think, I don't know that
44:58
Orwell was a genius. And,
45:02
you know, the biographers are debating it and so
45:04
on. I don't really enter into that. What
45:07
was really very interesting to me, and I guess
45:09
it goes also to Einstein and his wife and
45:11
to all of these pairings. Sometimes
45:14
this discussion is reduced to, oh, well,
45:17
Eileen cleaned the privy and made all
45:19
the meals. Sometimes it's extended
45:21
to the fact that she supported them financially, or
45:24
whatever a wife is doing in a couple
45:26
where there's a brilliant man. But
45:29
one of the things certainly for writers that's so
45:31
important is to imagine
45:33
yourself as important
45:37
enough to have something to say. And
45:40
that requires, as Orwell occasionally
45:42
acknowledged, what he
45:44
called encouragement. So after
45:47
marriage was over, he wanted to
45:49
find immediately another woman to encourage
45:51
him. And I think that
45:53
that's what happens in these couples. You can
45:55
have a deeply brilliant woman and her
45:58
support internationally. That's funny and
46:01
psychologically is what allows the man in
46:03
his case survive as he did to
46:05
me. Well, I mean stays. Yes,
46:09
Well, potentially took. That is because
46:11
this is the. Main ah
46:13
of suspense and such as
46:15
it is in life Them.
46:18
However, as
46:20
Eileen. When. I
46:22
got married. Over that
46:24
as they thought they'd although read her
46:26
friend saying the got Married in that.
46:29
Search. In Wellington with his traditional and
46:31
the consume and he said that there's a
46:33
killer the list of hey. So
46:36
that was a to at all. Obviously
46:38
Eileen as has only the catch is
46:40
often as the wedding and and she
46:42
has had a chat with the thicker
46:44
and said. Listen to Strike a
46:46
Day on the South as he starts off
46:48
as a woman with this. Brilliant.
46:50
Mind and Oxford degree and
46:52
assessed radical after the editing
46:55
genius that would come to
46:57
define the marriage was to
46:59
delete. A base. wonderful. The
47:01
end. Of her life,
47:03
she's thirty nine, excess,
47:05
nineteen, forty four in
47:07
London, and a half
47:10
caste adopted. Or she's
47:12
alone. Actually, this baby
47:14
boy bitches and and
47:16
although decides. He wants to go
47:18
us am and have a look at. It
47:22
the into little with the war, the collapse
47:24
of Europe as is when the baby's am
47:26
almost. A year old and so he
47:28
goes off. He knows I Lane is
47:31
very los on well she has some
47:33
his head. With a know
47:35
exactly but it looks I am
47:37
endometriosis bat. Mass.
47:39
A. Lot and her nice at this
47:41
point is cuts and cancerous tumors
47:43
and her uterus and she needs
47:45
to have an operation. That
47:48
although cause of leaving her with
47:50
a baby ah and very ill.
47:52
before he left she had collapsed
47:55
bleeding on the ground in London
47:57
and so and so he just
47:59
goes. And she has to organize
48:01
with her sister nor his a
48:03
doctor who was helping an operation to
48:06
remove these tumors. and she does that
48:08
Some of the last places she writes
48:10
to allow she is organizing his life
48:13
the last of the baby her will
48:15
ah who will look after the baby
48:17
in event that. Oh well, his
48:20
to that lytic had not very well in
48:22
the event that he dies first or she
48:24
dies first on the operating table. And
48:27
she wrote to him one of
48:29
the most tragic lines I think
48:32
I've ever read. path way she
48:34
says. It is
48:36
almost sort of self deprecation
48:38
taken to an unholy is.
48:41
An extent he says am just
48:43
deciding between the present in London.
48:47
She's she weighs forty five kilos and operation
48:49
in london with such as want to set
48:51
her up and. Says
48:53
before she goes under the knife or
48:56
up in youth hostel in the northwest
48:58
he is and she says we're just
49:00
going to be cheaper. And. She has
49:02
supported them. Her family has more money than
49:04
he she has made. That
49:06
if of is to his to. Control.
49:10
And she writes to him. You know the thing
49:12
about this is I really don't. Think and with
49:14
the money. You
49:18
know could very few Rise is
49:20
hop on that was soon to
49:22
the moon. I mean to transgress
49:25
Shakespearean depends you know will be
49:27
him. As a result of my
49:29
encounter, our encounter with your book
49:32
A will never mean the same
49:34
thing. You're good. To
49:37
know I feel very bad about
49:39
that because I think to work.
49:42
Remains as valuable as as I,
49:44
as important as as. If not
49:46
more. And I feel so myself when
49:48
I read something that means a great
49:50
deal. To. Me I want
49:52
to rip the rise of
49:55
that to be as wonderful.
49:57
To be worthy of having moved me so much
49:59
as. In In had me in his
50:01
infinite way. It means so much to
50:04
me. I admire them so much. I
50:06
want them to be this hero that
50:08
no one not all. well, probably not
50:10
Shakespeare and. And most definitely
50:12
Not me. Is. That
50:15
it because right is right out
50:17
of their flaws as well as
50:19
desert. She's obviously so I distinctly
50:21
need to use a bit of
50:23
doublethink and hold the work and
50:25
the man her at and the
50:27
Man and the Life and the
50:30
Wife in our minds at. The. Same.
50:33
Time person rent. One
50:38
hopes. To restore
50:40
it's go on a different your
50:42
to boob costars he bus and.
50:46
Or new. Much acclaim including
50:48
the Samuel Johnson products from
50:50
a non fiction and I
50:52
hear rumors that a may
50:54
soon be your home screen.
50:57
Yes, I have sacked. I
50:59
don't think so imminently that
51:02
Ten. Yes, it's been turned
51:04
into a television series And
51:06
it's and Australians British says
51:08
see saw Us policy And
51:10
and you can an American
51:12
company called whip spend ten
51:14
into seriously sea grass at.
51:16
Unbelievable. Good
51:18
fortune of having Elizabeth
51:20
to be Keep playing
51:22
in it and your
51:24
exec producer I am
51:26
full! Congratulations again Snow
51:29
if you weren't busy
51:31
and love your also
51:33
speaking and an international
51:35
conference about artificial intelligence
51:37
and.predicts. Yes, Ah,
51:39
about which I know extraordinarily
51:41
settle that I was asked.
51:43
This is an amazing organization
51:46
Run out of Washington, is
51:48
eighty thousand members and they
51:50
comprise people who are. Responsible
51:53
in big companies. And
51:55
Google, Microsoft Banks, and so
51:58
on for ah, managing. vast
52:00
amounts of data within the
52:02
privacy protection regimes of the
52:04
countries that they operate in. The
52:08
International Association of Privacy Professionals run conferences
52:10
all over the world where these people
52:12
get together to inform themselves of the
52:14
latest in privacy protection. And
52:18
they asked me, I guess, to
52:20
speak. And I think that they asked me to
52:22
speak partly because on the basis of Stasi land,
52:25
I'm in a strange position of having
52:27
walked into a room full
52:30
of sacks of the
52:33
shredded and hand-ripped remains of Stasi
52:35
files that the Stasi had kept
52:37
on people. So these stolen
52:39
biographies. And that
52:42
was a physical representation in a way
52:44
of what you
52:46
can see after the demise of a
52:48
surveillance regime. Now we can't see any
52:51
physical representation of the data that's kept on us.
52:53
But I think they wanted me to tell a
52:55
few stories about a
52:57
koala stamp to you to add to your
52:59
pile of honors. It's been
53:02
a great privilege to have you here, Anna.
53:05
My guest is Anna
53:07
Funder, whose exceptional book,
53:09
Wifedom, has been long
53:11
listed for the inaugural Women's
53:13
Prize for Nonfiction. And
53:15
Anna, let me remind
53:17
you, is appearing at
53:20
the upcoming Sydney Writers
53:22
Festival. Thanks, Anna. Such
53:24
an honor, Philip. Thank you. On
53:27
our next, we will welcome back
53:29
Viet Thanh Nguyen, the
53:32
Pulitzer Prize winning author, has
53:34
now written a memoir of his
53:36
life as a refugee. You've
53:55
been listening
53:57
to an ABC podcast. Discover
54:00
More Grey A B C Podcasts,
54:02
live radio and. Exclusives on the
54:04
A B C listened amp.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More