Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
One of the best in the biz, it's our good friend
0:02
Darren Dregger, TSN Hockey Insider. What's going
0:04
on, Dreggs? Yeah, I'm doing alright.
0:07
Got back from Kamloops last night, settled
0:10
in on the Stanley Cup final now, and just
0:13
kind of pulled out of a hole this morning and
0:15
realized what's going on in golf
0:17
with the PGA and the live merging
0:20
and everything that's just erupting
0:23
on social media. I mean, we saw that coming.
0:25
Obviously the stars of the PGA Tour didn't
0:27
see it coming, but a fascinating story
0:29
to watch unfold. Absolutely.
0:32
You bring that up like I was on
0:34
my way into the studio and I was listening back
0:37
to some of the hits on First
0:39
Up, as I typically do, and immediately
0:41
I saw the news pop up and I'm like,
0:43
I gotta go listen to Golf Talk Canada and
0:45
figure out what the heck is going on here. And
0:47
yeah, that's a crazy, crazy story
0:50
for anyone. and PGA Tour
0:52
now merging as one
0:54
entity of some kind. You're gonna have to
0:56
definitely go check out the Golf Talk Canada
0:58
podcast to find out exactly what's going on
1:00
there. Dreggs, Vegas,
1:03
putting up a touchdown last night,
1:05
just put the pedal to the metal
1:07
on Florida. I mean, has the bubble burst
1:10
here for the Panthers, or are you more
1:12
of a believer that
1:13
series not quite over until the team
1:15
loses on home ice? Yeah, I'm
1:18
not convinced the series is over yet. I have too much
1:20
respect for the
1:22
work that's been done by the Florida Panthers and the momentum
1:24
that they rode right up to the Stanley Cup final,
1:27
but the task is obviously daunting.
1:30
And in some ways, it's
1:32
a bit like the Florida Panthers
1:34
are imploding and they've become their
1:37
own worst enemy, be it being undisciplined,
1:40
the penalties that they've taken, how
1:42
they were credited with having
1:44
so much structure through, I would
1:46
say, most of the playoffs. Seemingly,
1:49
they're lost. They can't counter what
1:51
the Vegas Golden Knights are doing
1:53
in Florida's defensive
1:56
zone. And
1:58
I'm not a goalie whisperer.
1:59
by any stretch of the imagination, but
2:02
I follow a few on social media, Mike
2:04
McKenna and others, and it was interesting to get there,
2:06
take on some of the goals that we saw scored last
2:09
night that ultimately
2:11
led himself
2:13
to Brabavski getting pulled,
2:16
and how many of those are clearly
2:18
his fault? Well, I think it's a combination
2:20
of things, but that was what was
2:23
so significant going into this series
2:25
was how well the Florida Panthers
2:27
played in all
2:29
zones
2:29
and allowed Brabavski
2:32
the opportunity to make the saves, and
2:34
he found another level. So now that Vegas
2:37
has gotten to Brabavski, gotten to the goaltending,
2:40
gotten to the structure of the Florida Panthers,
2:42
it's going to be a problem for sure. Well,
2:45
ultimately, I mean, if Brabavski
2:47
is coming down to earth, and we're actually going to have Mike McKenna
2:49
on the show in about an hour or so, we'll
2:51
definitely get his thoughts on this as well.
2:54
But if he is coming back down to earth, and I know
2:56
obviously the defensive structure in Florida has a lot
2:58
to do with it,
2:59
but does this team really stand a chance
3:02
here if he goes back to being just
3:04
a slightly above average goaltender, or
3:06
does he have to play out of his mind
3:09
much to the way he did in Carolina and in Toronto
3:11
for them to stand a chance?
3:12
Yeah, well, again, I give him a little
3:15
bit more credit than that, Mike. You
3:17
clearly need above average goaltending
3:19
to hoist the Stanley Cup. I mean, that's
3:22
far from breaking news, but you need help
3:24
along the way too. You know, it was
3:26
4-0, so it's not like the
3:28
offense of the Florida Panthers was
3:31
doing anything to help their goaltending, and it
3:33
seemed like they were a little bit in panic
3:36
mode at times last
3:38
night as well. So it starts
3:41
with that. I mean, I don't think
3:42
there's a question of trust though when it comes to goaltending,
3:45
be it Brabavski or Lyon, who relieved
3:48
him yesterday. I think everybody
3:50
that plays in front of the Florida net realizes
3:53
that their goaltending is fine, and
3:55
to this point has been one
3:57
of the main storylines. I mean, coming in with this
4:00
series. We soundly talk about
4:02
Sergei Borovski being a
4:04
top cons mic contender and
4:06
now we're shifting over and we're looking at what John
4:08
Marshall's doing and we're looking at what
4:11
Jack Eichel is doing and all those things. And I
4:13
bring up Eichel not just because of the
4:16
point parade that he's been on and how good he's
4:19
been both ways, both sides of the puck
4:22
but also that near devastating hit last
4:24
night delivered by Matthew Kachuk.
4:27
And man, Eichel, I mean obviously
4:29
he was stung but he looked hurt.
4:32
And as he described after the game,
4:35
he got absolutely flushed, he toe
4:37
picked, put himself in a bad spot, he
4:39
gets cranked by
4:41
Matthew Kachuk, gets winded on the
4:43
play even though it looked more heinous than
4:45
that. That could have been
4:47
a series turning point, right? I mean, taking
4:51
Jack out of the game for that stretch, you
4:54
know, that had to have given Florida a
4:56
little bit of hope that, hey, this is a window that's
4:59
opening for us and they didn't take advantage of it. Eichel
5:01
comes back and kind of picks up where
5:03
he left off. But if
5:05
he left the series entirely because of injury
5:07
and thankfully he wasn't hurt on the play
5:09
then maybe we're having a different conversation.
5:12
But Florida doesn't seem to have the right answer
5:14
to what Vegas is doing.
5:15
I'm not convinced he toe picked. To me
5:17
when I watched it and I saw it 15 times,
5:19
I was like, okay, I see this guy
5:22
last minute coming at me. How do I get off the tracks
5:24
and get out of the way? And then he got
5:26
blown up. But Dreykes, how surprised
5:28
were you
5:29
that Eichel came back in the game? I believe
5:31
it was four nothing at the time. And
5:34
in my mind, I'm thinking, okay, this game's probably
5:36
put away. Maybe give him
5:38
the rest of the night. You know, you
5:41
don't really, I mean, he came back and made an impact.
5:43
He had a nice assist, but why not just give
5:45
the guy another 20 minutes to breathe and move
5:47
on to game three?
5:48
Yeah, I'm with you. Unless, and
5:50
Peter, you would know this, unless the player just
5:53
says, forget it, I'm going back in and medically,
5:55
there's no reason I can't go back
5:57
in. And if that is the case,
6:00
I think that has to be the case. And kudos
6:02
to Jack Eichel because if
6:04
he doesn't come back in, then it becomes a
6:06
story. Right. And whether
6:09
he's dinged up or not, I mean, every player
6:11
is at this point of the playoffs. But in
6:13
Jack's case, it's extra
6:16
sensitive because of the
6:20
neck surgery that he had, everything
6:24
that goes into the year and plus
6:27
that Eichel has experienced. So I think
6:29
that that was a part of it. I think he
6:31
was obviously well enough that the medical
6:34
people for the Vegas Golden Knights said, well, if you
6:36
feel up to it, man, we don't have any reason to
6:38
hold you back and back in egos. So I
6:41
guess that's the type of player that he's evolved into
6:43
at this stage. Yeah, I agree.
6:45
From a former player perspective, coming
6:48
back into the lineup, it just gives your team a little bit
6:50
of confidence knowing that, hey, I'm all right, I'm here,
6:52
I can still play. So I think there's
6:54
something to be said for that.
6:55
What about moving on to Radko Goudes
6:58
and the Barbashev hit there? I mean, again,
7:00
just another big, big collision.
7:03
And tell me a little bit about your thoughts on
7:05
what Barbashev is setting himself up for following
7:08
maybe his next contract. Well, a
7:11
contract that Vegas isn't going to be able to afford.
7:15
They always find a way, they always find
7:17
a way. Well, they always do seem to find a way.
7:19
You're right on that. I shouldn't have been so quick
7:22
to get to that conclusion. But
7:24
at the end of the day, if the Vegas Golden
7:25
Knights win that Stanley Cup, he's
7:28
going to be a big part of it, because he has been to this point.
7:31
And if they can't afford or. Oh,
7:36
might've lost him there.
7:37
We definitely did. See if we can get him
7:40
back on the horn there. It
7:42
was like, goes like completely
7:44
dead. So I don't know if he's just gone or hung
7:46
up. Let's see if we can, yeah, we'll see if we can try
7:48
and call him back. Maybe he didn't like the question. That was it. He's
7:51
like, I'm out of here. Yeah, I mean,
7:53
it's a good question though. Like we were talking
7:56
about it last night the group chat was, man,
7:58
what type of contract is barbershed? have set
8:00
himself up for here. And I mean,
8:02
I think that he's going to make himself
8:04
a lot of money this summer. Is it UFA? Someone
8:07
who, you know, Toronto, I think would
8:09
maybe have some interest in like I think
8:11
there's going to be a lot of teams that have interest
8:13
in a player like him. I would imagine so. We
8:15
got you back, Drax. Yeah, sorry about
8:18
that. Um, so we were talking
8:20
about barbershop and, uh, I was
8:22
just finishing up my thought. I like he,
8:24
and this didn't come as a surprise. I don't think,
8:26
you know, he was.
8:28
Arguably the most sought after available player
8:30
in St. Louis prior to his deal to, uh,
8:33
to the Vegas Golden Knights, just because of everything
8:35
that he is capable of doing.
8:38
Um, so he's going to get paid whether they can afford
8:40
it, get creative enough. We're going to have to wait and see,
8:42
you know, Ray and I, Ray Ferraro and
8:45
I talked about this on the podcast, which we recorded
8:47
earlier today. Um, I don't
8:49
like that hit. I don't, I, and,
8:51
and Ray believes it's interference
8:54
all day long. I don't know what you guys think, but that
8:56
reverse hit. It's not
8:59
dirty or anything like that. I'm
9:01
not suggesting that department of player safety
9:03
should get all good. It wasn't that,
9:05
but it's a hit that we've seen many times
9:08
before the reverse. Right. And
9:11
it's, it's, it's borderline
9:13
dangerous, borderline dangerous. And in
9:15
this case, you know, Radco, Gouders took
9:17
the brunt of it, you know, only after he delivered
9:19
what two or three bone crunching
9:22
body checks in that game,
9:24
when he was somewhat of a question mark
9:26
going into game two because of his own
9:29
top health.
9:29
And so now if you, if you look
9:31
forward to game three, as we all are,
9:34
you got to wonder, um, you know,
9:36
he, the extra day maybe helps
9:38
the Florida Panthers, maybe helps Radco
9:41
Gouders, they're a different team when he's not on
9:43
the ice or in the lineup, there's no doubt about that. Greg's,
9:45
I respectfully disagree. I love
9:48
the head as a, as a former
9:50
player who
9:51
attempted a few of those at times and was the
9:53
victim of a few of those at times.
9:55
It's a physical game. You're in the Stanley cup final.
9:57
Well, it doesn't matter really what time of the year.
10:00
year it is, it's a physical game. You want to create
10:02
space for yourself. And quite frankly,
10:04
if you're the person in Gudas' position
10:06
there where you're going to make body contact,
10:08
you're preparing for a physical interaction.
10:11
You should be prepared for the other guy to defend
10:13
himself. And in the same instance,
10:16
it is Radko Gudas. You're expecting
10:18
to get hit and get hit hard because
10:20
he plays that type of game. And if I see Radko
10:22
Gudas coming, coming towards me to finish his
10:25
check, you know, I'm going to, I'm going to drop my
10:27
shoulder too, and make sure that I stand my ground.
10:29
So I don't have an issue with the hit. I
10:32
get, I get what you're trying to say, maybe a little
10:34
borderline, but I personally don't see it that
10:37
way.
10:37
No, and I guess I
10:40
don't want to be too specific to that hit
10:42
because, but that
10:44
hit in general, the reverse, I
10:47
think you could build a case, make a case for it being
10:49
an interference penalty. But
10:52
I also agree with you and it depends on
10:54
the players involved here. You
10:56
know, lower than his
10:59
share. So any player
11:01
out there almost automatically, you
11:03
know, instinctively, aren't you
11:05
thinking, okay, well, if I'm anywhere
11:08
near this guy, I got to be prepared to
11:10
get hit. So in this case,
11:12
it's, you know, it's the reverse. So for
11:14
me, generally,
11:15
generally that reverse hit is questionable,
11:18
but the league doesn't see it that way. And
11:21
as far as the official saw, it was a good
11:23
clean hit and everyone
11:25
moved on except for Radco Goodis. With
11:28
Darren Dreger. So how do you get it back on
11:31
the rails? If you're Florida, you're down to, oh, you're
11:33
going back to your home building. Like
11:35
what, what's the game plan have to be Thursday
11:37
night for them to get back into the series? Well,
11:40
I think they have to learn and get back
11:42
to taking advantage of opportunities. And
11:45
their power
11:45
play didn't look good in the first
11:48
game, early on in the second game, I thought
11:50
it looked pretty sharp. They had a few opportunities
11:52
there where they could capitalize on the power
11:54
play and just they couldn't find a way to beat
11:56
Aiden Hill and they had Vegas
11:59
on their heels. with the man advantage.
12:01
So you look at the game sheet and what were they both for four?
12:04
And I think Vegas was two for four. Well,
12:07
those are big goals, right? Those are big goals.
12:09
So maybe something like that. Florida
12:11
for the most part has been pretty opportunistic
12:14
to this stage, be it with
12:16
a man advantage or a timely
12:18
goal. I mean, go down the list. Carter
12:21
Verhege had a chance early in the hockey
12:23
game. They get one early. Maybe
12:25
that again shifts that momentum back on Florida
12:28
side and Vegas tightened up
12:30
a little bit. But Florida wasn't able
12:32
to do that. So I think it's just the simple
12:35
sort of routine stuff that you
12:37
need to be able to deliver on at
12:39
this point in the Stanley Cup postseason and
12:42
getting that early goal, especially on the
12:44
road, can make a heck of a difference.
12:46
Let's bring around the league a little bit here,
12:48
Dregs. You were just out in Kelowna watching
12:50
the Memorial Cup. Patty Woz, Quebec Remparks
12:53
came out on top and immediately
12:55
speculation starting to run rampant
12:57
with him and his future and potentially
12:59
getting back into the NHL with many vacancies
13:02
still available. Do you expect for
13:04
him to be coaching in the NHL next year? What
13:06
are you hearing about Patrick Waugh and his future?
13:08
Well, I know he wants to coach in the NHL
13:11
next year, but it's pretty quiet
13:13
around Patrick Waugh. I mean, we in the media
13:16
have speculated until the weekend
13:18
that well, why wouldn't the New York Rangers be right?
13:21
I mean, an enormous
13:23
market, Patrick Waugh can handle
13:26
all of the responsibility that goes along
13:28
with that. He's got the history with Chris
13:30
Dury, the general manager. They were teammates
13:32
on championship teams in Colorado,
13:35
but then the reporting out of New York, and
13:37
I'm assuming it's coming from sources within the
13:40
New York Rangers is that now they're not interested
13:42
in Patrick Waugh. He talked
13:44
to Columbus. It clearly
13:46
didn't go that far, but I think
13:49
he felt, they felt like it was a decent
13:51
conversation. So now you look
13:53
at some of the empty chairs and wonder
13:56
whether or not he could fit there.
13:59
Doesn't fit.
13:59
seem likely that he'd end up in Calgary
14:02
for me. So
14:04
then we look at some of the other spots.
14:07
Greg Cronin, named head coach in
14:09
Anaheim. Anaheim would have made some sense.
14:11
I thought so too. Young team, yeah.
14:16
I don't know what the relationship might be between Verbeek
14:18
and say a Patrick Waugh. You know Patrick Waugh
14:21
is a strong-minded dude. I don't think
14:23
that he's disruptive or needs
14:26
to run his own show or
14:28
any of that, but he's a big personality.
14:31
No doubt about that. And that may not be
14:33
for everyone. So he may have to be
14:35
patient, but let's see what the next several
14:37
days bring forward
14:41
and then we can kind of assess from there. But what
14:43
more can he do with Major Junior Hockey? I
14:45
mean, there's nothing more he can do. And
14:48
I'll tell you guys from having a front
14:50
row seat at the Memorial Cup, I
14:52
think many thought with the star power of
14:54
the Seattle Thunderbirds that they were gonna come in
14:57
and just run the table with the Memorial Cup.
15:00
And they pretty much did
15:03
until they ran into the Quebec Remport.
15:05
That team is as structured as
15:07
any good team in the Stanley Cup playoffs.
15:11
That's just how they play. So that
15:13
has to be a reflection of not only Patrick Waugh,
15:15
but the coaching staff of the Remport as well. So
15:17
he's ready to get back whether there's an opportunity
15:21
to wait and see.
15:23
Well, I think you said it well, that
15:25
what more can you accomplish at the Junior
15:27
Hockey level? And one of the things that I really
15:29
like to see as well when they did win was
15:32
going up to his players and the players going up to him
15:35
and just the bear hugs. And you could tell how much they just really
15:37
enjoyed playing for him. And so for me as a former
15:39
player and getting to share that with your coach,
15:42
that's a pretty special thing. And Dregs,
15:44
I guess elsewhere around the league as well, we saw Cole
15:46
Caulfield sign an eight year extension with the
15:48
Habs. Yeah.
15:50
How soon before we see
15:52
this contract, in terms
15:54
of looking like a steal, and maybe you could
15:56
also relate that to a potential
15:59
Matthews extension.
15:59
and potentially leaving some money on the table
16:02
there.
16:02
Yeah. Well, look, I think Polk
16:05
Offield got paid well. I mean,
16:07
just over 7.8 million annual average
16:10
salary, come on. I mean, that's a lot of money
16:12
over a maximum extension
16:14
eight years. He's a pure gold
16:16
score. That's what he is. There are parts of his game
16:18
that he knows he's got to work on. He's still very
16:21
young and to a point still underdeveloped.
16:24
And his comps to get
16:26
Tim Stuckelot, now it's probably
16:28
a little bit lofty. But I think that that is
16:31
excellent and fair value.
16:32
Brad Trilliving, he's
16:34
working it. I guarantee
16:37
you, he's had several conversations before
16:40
and since getting the job as general
16:42
manager of the Toronto Maple Leafs with Judd
16:44
Moldaver, who represents Auston Matthews.
16:46
Of course you would. There's
16:48
nothing more that Trilliving would
16:51
like to get done than a contract
16:53
extension with Matthews on
16:56
or around July 1st. As
16:58
we've reported on an insider trading, that doesn't
17:00
mean it's going to happen. Matthews
17:03
has a say in all of this. And even though
17:05
July 1st no move clause kicks
17:07
in, likewise for Mitch Marner, at
17:09
the end of the day, it's got
17:11
to be right. Everything about it, the extension,
17:14
has to be right. Maybe they get there. They
17:16
might. Again, Matthews has to be a
17:19
top priority for Brad
17:21
Trilliving along with getting to know Shelton
17:24
Keith to hit coach of the Maple Leafs as quickly
17:26
as he can. But yeah, some
17:28
of these deals happen, but if we look back
17:30
quickly to Caulfield, it's not like they got
17:33
that deal done at the last second. Ken
17:35
Hughes and Pat Prison have been negotiating
17:38
on Caul Caulfield for several
17:40
months to be fair. So
17:43
these things can take time. Yeah, and I
17:45
guess
17:45
coming back to the one point you made there, does
17:48
Matthews hold all the cards in
17:51
this negotiation with the Leafs? Or do the
17:53
Leafs have any leverage in terms
17:55
of working that AAV?
17:57
Yeah, not really.
18:00
But that's where Brendan Pridham, the
18:03
cap guru of the Toronto Maple Leafs is at his
18:05
finest. And he
18:07
would have multiple versions of what
18:09
a contract extension looks like ironed
18:12
out long before now. Right?
18:15
What's a five-year extension look like? Hey,
18:19
not to throw shade
18:21
at Kyle Lubas because he would have
18:23
had all kinds of input
18:26
from all the management types within
18:29
the Leafs organization, including Brendan
18:31
Shanahan.
18:32
But you can't be upset
18:34
with having to give off to Matthews potentially
18:37
another five-year deal when you gave him
18:39
one right out of the entry-level contract. Right?
18:42
Isn't it weird that Austin Matthews,
18:44
one of the best goal-scorers in the NHL,
18:46
is going to have two five-year deals and
18:48
not a max eight-year contract? I believe that
18:50
was by design by Austin Matthews though. I agree, yeah. Potentially.
18:54
Well, and that'll put him up in
18:56
position for another
18:58
contract, which will be yet another mega
19:00
deal. So
19:02
it's going to be what makes
19:04
sense to both, both in annual
19:06
average salary and in term. You know,
19:08
let's say the annual average salary is 13
19:10
fives. You know, okay,
19:13
well, that makes him the highest paid player in the game.
19:16
But maybe because of that, he's
19:18
willing to take less term. Or
19:22
he wants the 15 million or whatever
19:24
that number is, and you've got
19:26
to stretch that out over a longer term. So
19:28
there are many options that I'm sure Brad Treliving
19:31
has scraped holes in
19:33
his forehead trying to think about over the
19:35
last number of days here.
19:37
Really quickly before you leave, since we're
19:39
on the conversation of extensions
19:42
and whatnot, our burning question yesterday
19:44
that we've been doing had to do with us digging into
19:47
the goaltending situation in Toronto
19:49
next season. What do you
19:51
think a fair deal
19:54
would look like for Ilyas Samsonov next year? Like,
19:57
it's kind of one where it's like he's had...
19:59
breakout season I suppose and
20:02
but it's only been one year you ready to give
20:04
him some term just still kind
20:06
of see what's up there?
20:08
I'm not not unless you know
20:10
again the AAV is is
20:13
team friendly and what does that look like?
20:16
You know Samsonov may feel like
20:19
he's played enough played enough in
20:22
in Washington and then was
20:24
the starter for the Toronto Maple Leafs maybe he
20:26
feels that he's proved enough that he can get
20:29
a bigger deal than the one that I envisioned I envision
20:32
a shorter term in in the high threes that's
20:35
that's kind of what I look at. Like what
20:37
Merazics deal kind of ended up being? Yeah
20:39
yeah you get around four maybe
20:42
low fourth that's getting
20:44
up there that's getting up there so I haven't
20:47
heard a whole lot about that to be fair
20:50
but it's you know
20:52
put in situation into the same grouping with
20:55
the rest of these guys he doesn't get the same
20:57
sort of fanfare for
21:00
the obvious reasons but he's certainly deserving
21:02
of attention he's probably getting out already
21:04
from Maple Leafs management. Yeah
21:06
I'd assume he's down the list a little though an RFA
21:09
so they have after they just got to qualify
21:11
him and then they can figure it out at some point in the offseason
21:13
there's a couple more guys I think that that
21:16
are ahead of him. I'd expect we'll
21:18
hear some I mean some UFA's got
21:20
to get signed to in the next little bit so
21:22
hopefully we get some news that we can
21:24
break or break down next
21:26
week when you have you on again. Appreciate
21:28
the time as always Dregs. Alright guys have
21:31
a good one. You as well.
21:32
There he goes.
21:33
Darren Dreger TSN hockey
21:35
insider he
21:37
was it's
21:40
it's it is interesting because I find that
21:43
there's less love for Samsonov
21:46
than I thought. Mmm
21:48
like we were talking about this yesterday about whether
21:50
or not we were comfortable with the goaltending
21:52
situation going into next year if it was going
21:54
to be Ilya Samsonov and Joseph
21:57
Wall and it appears
21:59
to me just based on the conversations that
22:01
I've had with people. I had Dave Festruck
22:03
yet last week. We were talking about it. He's
22:05
not quite sold on Samsonov as a long-term
22:08
solution. CJ even said like,
22:10
yeah, there's still some question marks if you go in with that
22:12
tandem and Dregs didn't seem like he was
22:14
sold either. So there seems to still be
22:17
a little hesitancy for Ilya
22:19
Samsonov. And I wonder how much of that has
22:21
to do with the struggles that he had come
22:23
post-season. I think that must be it because
22:26
leading up to that point, it sure
22:28
felt like there was a lot of confidence. His numbers
22:31
after the regular season, and this is the problem with
22:33
Toronto. It's all regular season
22:35
success, but he was a top 10 goaltender
22:38
in terms of the underlying numbers.
22:40
You could argue he was a top 10 goal in the NHL
22:42
this year through the regular season. And
22:45
then the playoffs came and
22:46
he was a sub 900 goalie.
22:48
Yeah. But in the regular season, he was about
22:50
a 920 save percentage. He was good. He
22:52
was great.
22:54
Yeah. I think the Leafs had a lot of reasons
22:56
to believe that he was going to be there for them throughout
22:58
the regular season. And he seemed to prove that right.
23:01
So it's interesting how the narrative of sort
23:03
of shifted. But again, it's a performance-based business.
23:05
It's what have you done for me lately. And if we're judging
23:08
him off of his post-season playing,
23:10
then perhaps it's fair to be looking for a more
23:12
friendly number than perhaps may have been warranted if
23:15
we were only basing this off of the regular season. Yeah.
23:17
And look, I think because you're also
23:19
getting such a cheap deal in
23:22
Joseph Wall, like he's making, you
23:23
know, I love that contract. $775 grand
23:26
or something like that. $766. I think
23:28
even a little less.
23:30
You feel good
23:32
if you can get another goaltender at
23:34
under 4 million. And all of a sudden you're
23:36
like, we're under 4.5 basically
23:39
for tandem. Yeah. I think if you can
23:42
wrap up two goalies, so you have a lot of
23:44
trust and belief in for under 4.5 million,
23:46
I think you're doing really, really well. Well, it allows
23:49
you to address the other parts of the roster, right?
23:51
It allows you to maybe put an extra one
23:53
or $2 million into a top four defensive
23:56
end instead of having to go off the scrap heap.
23:58
Well, exactly. Well, depending where
23:59
Again, you can save your shekels. You can apply
24:02
them elsewhere to potentially a,
24:04
somewhere that has a little bit more of a need. So
24:06
I agree with you that
24:08
getting two guys on the back end, who you have
24:10
trust in, if one goes down, the other one can come in
24:12
less of an A and B and maybe more of a
24:15
one A, one B type situation.
24:18
I think that that just provides you a little bit
24:20
more flexibility. Yeah. And we saw
24:22
a lot of goaltenders last off season
24:24
who were in this similar situation
24:27
where they were tandem goaltenders younger. But,
24:29
you know, showed out, showed well,
24:31
you know, I'm thinking Georgiev was one of those guys.
24:33
Billy Huse was one of those guys and they
24:35
all got, you know, between three and a half and 4 million.
24:38
So I would think that that's roughly
24:40
the range that I would look at for Samsonov,
24:42
you know, a three year deal, maybe in the
24:44
three and a half range. And all of a sudden that's your tandem
24:47
going forward. You know, you've got
24:48
Joe Wall and, and, and you know, the Samsonov for,
24:50
for, you know, a few seasons and see
24:52
where that takes you. Yeah. There's the
24:54
other option of trying to get into the Connor
24:57
Helbeck sweep stage. But then one of the
24:59
different, that's a completely different conversation. And
25:01
it also involves moving some bigger pieces
25:03
as well, because you got to make room for him. Right. We'll
25:06
see. We'll see what happens. Lots of
25:08
stuff to get into this off
25:10
season. And I think that Samsonov
25:12
extension is probably far down on Brad
25:14
Chilivings list. Austin Matthews. That
25:17
guy is definitely high on the list. And that is
25:19
our feature question of our Leafs
25:22
burning question today, which we'll get to in a little
25:24
bit. We'll also be joined by Mike McKenna later
25:26
on today. I'm Mike DiStefano with
25:29
Peter Holland. You're listening to Leafs Lunch here
25:31
on TSN 10 50.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More