The Supreme Court has denied Remington's move to block a lawsuit filed by the families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims. What does this mean? The case against the arms maker will proceed in a Connecticut court. Does this mean that gun manufacturers will now be held responsible when the items they make are used to kill? Or is this a specific instance of an arms maker using marketing strategies to drive someone to choose a particular product for use in a horrific crime? Check out what Franz and Rich have to say about this one. We're sure we haven't heard the last on this topic but you can say you heard it here first! Until next time, keep it Unfiltered!