Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hey everybody, it's love it here. We have
0:02
something a little special for you today and
0:04
episode of Inside Twenty Twenty Four. This is
0:06
our new show for members of the friends
0:08
of the Pod community. We were joined by
0:10
campaign and political experts from The Crooked Family
0:12
to tell behind the scenes stories of high
0:14
highs and lows and weird weird that happen
0:16
on campaigns and in politics. In this episode,
0:18
our intrepid producer Caroline Reston. Who's. Here
0:20
in this recording looming over as like the
0:22
Baba Duke joins me and my just straight
0:24
from the cock zone Tim Miller to unpack
0:26
are tear stained scotch soak memories of Primary
0:28
defeats past like the one eyewitness when I
0:31
worked for Hillary and the several Tim experienced
0:33
including when he worked for Jab exclamation Point
0:35
Bush find out what liquor got Jeb cracking
0:37
wise and how to spot a secret gay
0:39
or simply pro gay republican my just how
0:41
much their heart is in in it's take
0:43
a listen, enjoy the conversation and above all
0:45
please clap. And. Subscribe to, Friends
0:47
have a pod to hear this show and
0:49
so much more. A crooked.com/friends haven't got time
0:51
over there? Yeah and the at the front
0:53
of the Potter. First time inside to Miller
0:55
to two different our it that we all
0:57
know where that was going. Third,
1:05
blaze is a ticket to ride.
1:07
Ladies and gentlemen, I. Present
1:10
Obama to congratulate you about his
1:12
victory. If we can blast fifty
1:14
women into space, we will someday. Lots
1:17
hey, Guam and Hansen, the. White House.
1:21
Welcome to Inside Twenty Twenty Four! Every month
1:23
show will take you behind the scenes of
1:25
what it's like to work on a campaign
1:27
and share stories from the people who have
1:29
lived it. I'm John. Love It! I was
1:32
a speechwriter for President Barack Obama and a
1:34
speechwriter. For. Then Sen. Hillary
1:36
Rodham Clinton and joining Us. He
1:38
was communications director for Jeb Bush's
1:40
presidential campaign and twenty six seen.
1:42
He's a writer and podcast host
1:44
for The Bulwark. Tim. Miller.
1:46
Good to see I I've never been
1:49
more prepared for podcast and this one.
1:51
Com on it and chests. And
1:54
if your life either area well suited
1:56
to the topic of the day and
1:58
as always moderating discussion. is
2:00
COOKRID MEDIA's favorite producer. What?
2:03
Favorite song? Caroline Reston. All
2:06
right. I didn't write that. What are we here
2:08
for? What we're doing today is talking
2:10
about what it's like to be a
2:12
big ol' loser in
2:16
campaign primaries. So, so
2:18
happy you were able to gather our
2:21
two favorite losers on the
2:23
COOKRID MEDIA universe. Or you could consider
2:25
a podcast about making lemonade. Yeah, look at
2:27
where you guys are both now. Producing pods. Or
2:30
hosting pods, even to step up. I
2:33
mean, we're just, it's what everyone aspires to be.
2:36
A podcaster. That's when I was sitting in my
2:38
bed, in my high school bed, dreaming about what
2:40
I was gonna be. When I grew up, I
2:42
was thinking, man, I would like to
2:44
be an infrequent guest on John Lovett's podcast. Look,
2:46
the way that I think about it is, I
2:49
don't think we've gone from the heights
2:52
of politics to podcast hosts. I
2:54
think that we do the job
2:56
that Prince Harry, Barack Obama, and
2:58
Bruce Springsteen aspire to. And
3:01
have all failed. Yeah, you know? That's
3:04
a great point, Lovett. That is a great point. Man,
3:06
I love your spin so far today. Let's
3:08
keep this up as we go through all my losing
3:11
campaigns. Yeah, so I actually just wanna
3:13
first let listeners know what were the
3:15
campaigns that each of you have worked
3:17
on where you did lose. Tim,
3:20
you wanna go first? How long you got? Yeah, your list
3:22
is a little bit longer. Let's start with you. Well,
3:25
in 2005, I worked on Jerry
3:27
Gilgore's. I don't know if we're
3:29
going all the way that deep,
3:31
but we'll keep it at the
3:33
presidential level. And oh, and I
3:35
worked for John McCain. I was
3:37
an Iowa spokesperson. You might know Barack
3:39
Obama's Iowa spokesperson at that time. He was
3:42
a guy named Thomas Vitor.
3:44
So he won in that one. And
3:47
then 2012, I was on John Huntsman's
3:49
primary campaign. We finished in last place.
3:51
And then I begged my way onto
3:53
Mitt Romney's losing general election campaign. Technically,
3:55
I worked at the RNC. And
3:58
then in 2016, for
4:00
Jeb Bush. That
4:02
didn't go so well. And then after that,
4:04
I joined on to a super PAC aimed
4:06
at stopping Trump from winning the presidency. And
4:08
I don't really remember how that worked out.
4:11
Well, you made a lot of great content. Yeah, I
4:13
did. I did. Love it. You're famously
4:16
on one campaign that lost. Yeah, pretty
4:18
big one. I worked
4:20
for, so I was a speechwriter
4:22
in Hillary Clinton's Senate
4:24
office. From there,
4:27
went to sort of helped on
4:29
her winning 2006 Senate campaign against
4:31
a person. Yeah,
4:34
who did it even run against? It
4:36
was supposed to be Rudy Giuliani, actually.
4:38
And then it ended up being Rick
4:40
Lazio. Rick Lazio. Rick Lazio.
4:43
And then I worked on
4:45
Hillary Clinton's 2008 primary
4:47
campaign against Barack Obama. Actually, we both worked
4:49
on campaigns that lost to Barack Obama in
4:51
a sense. That's something that we have in
4:54
common. And
4:56
after Hillary Clinton lost in 2008,
4:58
I went back to working in
5:02
the Senate office full time and
5:05
ultimately was hired by John
5:07
Favreau to be a speechwriter in the White House
5:09
for President Obama. So for me, I
5:11
got the same job that I would have
5:13
gotten either way.
5:15
So that was a cool twist for me.
5:17
So you weren't the lead speechwriter. Is that
5:20
the correct terminology? I wasn't too speechwriter.
5:24
So what does it mean when you're a
5:26
speechwriter below the chief? And
5:28
how is speechwriting different on
5:33
a... What are you laughing at? What
5:35
does it mean to be like the low to midman? I'm
5:38
trying to have a through line here. The
5:44
candidate has tons of
5:46
events and you're working on a bunch of
5:49
different speeches at all the time. And so
5:51
I ended up doing either comedy speeches or
5:53
policy speeches. Nobody cared about that was sort
5:55
of my favorite thing to end
5:57
up doing. So what were your favorite Hillary comedy speeches?
6:00
speeches? Well she didn't do as many
6:02
of those. She didn't do the correspondence
6:04
dinners. She actually hated those famously. Anyway,
6:06
I also worked on policy speeches. I
6:09
remember one time I did on the campaign.
6:11
She went to Iowa and Bill Clinton
6:14
was very at the time focused on energy policy.
6:16
I'm sure he still is. And so I remember
6:18
sort of doing a draft of a speech for
6:21
her to give on climate and
6:23
energy in Iowa and
6:25
then getting sort of late night edits
6:28
from Bill Clinton from wherever. How
6:30
is he sending you the edits?
6:32
That's the claim. Yeah, okay. I
6:34
saw your face working on that.
6:36
But he would basically
6:39
do notes. He has
6:41
a beautiful but
6:43
incomprehensible penmanship. Just this beautiful
6:45
squiggle. And then
6:48
one of his advanced people, one of his people that was
6:50
always on the roads with him, you
6:53
know, making sure that the island has sprites or
6:55
whatever, would
7:00
call and kind of help be
7:03
a Rosetta Stone for his incomprehensible notes.
7:06
And yeah. I feel like Boomers Plus
7:08
are the last generation of good handwriting. And
7:10
so my last question on like the time
7:12
on the Hillary campaign is I
7:14
feel like famously Hillary has had
7:16
a harder time landing a joke.
7:18
You may have seen that I
7:21
recently launched a Snapchat account. I
7:23
love it. I love it. Those
7:26
messages disappear all by
7:28
themselves. What's it
7:30
like to speech right for someone who
7:33
very publicly has that kind of
7:35
reputation? I think most, I think Barack
7:37
Obama was exceptionally good at telling jokes.
7:39
He just had a natural rhythm that
7:42
made him very good at events like
7:44
the correspondent center. Hillary Clinton
7:46
is more, I think, in the standard
7:49
deviation of a typical
7:53
politician in that they're
7:56
not inherently very
7:59
good at doing
8:01
stand-up, it's just tougher.
8:04
Yeah. She gets them all into a
8:06
UCB 101 class. Yeah, I
8:08
mean, I don't know Tim, how was
8:10
Jeb with comedic material? Jeb was bad
8:12
at jokes. Jeb was really funny after
8:14
a couple of scotches in
8:18
the hotel lobby, but not a
8:20
natural joke teller. I did do
8:22
a little, because we ran out of money, I
8:24
did end up doing a little speech writing for Jeb
8:26
at the end. And I had
8:29
our election night losing speeches. So
8:31
do we have that in common on this Losers
8:33
podcast? Did you do Hillary's New Hampshire? I guess
8:35
she won New Hampshire, like South Carolina losing speech.
8:37
I did a couple, I don't honestly, it really
8:39
is hard to remember now because there were so
8:41
many primary nights. There
8:44
were so many losing speeches. I
8:46
had so many more losing campaigns, but you
8:48
had one of those primary nights at a
8:50
time. That's such an
8:52
important point. We packed in a year
8:54
more losing than you did in a
8:56
decade. The thing that we
8:58
figured out, I remember as the 2008 primaries
9:02
were unfolding, you could basically guess
9:04
what was gonna happen, because
9:06
what would happen is the
9:09
results would be bad
9:11
enough to not
9:13
change the dynamic, but
9:15
good enough to justify staying in the
9:17
race. That there was
9:19
like a, basically you couldn't hope for
9:22
results good enough so that
9:24
suddenly there's a chance that this fucking thing
9:26
is gonna turn around, but never
9:28
could you get a result so dispositive
9:31
that we could all go home. So
9:34
we just, that's why we ended up in this thing
9:36
till June. We ended up in this primary till June,
9:38
but it was a lot of training doing kind of,
9:41
I think in the end, because
9:43
the race was so static, that
9:46
we kind of, you know, Al
9:48
Gore has that joke, there's wins and there's losses,
9:50
and then there's that third category. I feel like
9:52
we did a ton of third category speeches. A
9:55
lot of speeches were like, you
9:57
know, America's ready for change
9:59
and it. and strength plus experience equals
10:01
change and the fight goes on. Yes,
10:05
yes. Thank you, Michigan. And thank you a
10:07
little less, Nebraska. Depending on
10:09
the demographics of the next few contests,
10:13
we'll see what happens. Tim, so you
10:15
were the cons director for Jed,
10:18
but once he was losing and everyone
10:20
wasn't working, you were saying that you
10:22
wrote the speech. We do have a
10:24
clip of the speech and there is
10:26
one line I specifically want you to
10:28
answer to. Finally, I am so
10:30
grateful to Senator Lindsey Graham of South
10:32
Carolina here for his steadfast support. And
10:41
his amazing
10:43
humor. Amazing
10:46
humor, Lindsey Graham. Did you write that
10:48
line? Yes, I did. And I did not have to. You can
10:51
tell I wrote it because he read it for some reason. Usually
10:53
the thank yous you can just riff on. But
10:56
every candidate has their strengths. Jeb
10:58
was an on-script kind of man. Lindsey
11:02
is hilarious. I think that at his
11:04
core, he is a kind
11:06
of funny wingman. He
11:09
needs a daddy and he needs a front
11:11
man and he's the sort of funny side
11:13
character. And when the front man is John
11:15
McCain, like that's not
11:18
kind of minimal damage except maybe
11:20
some of the bombings. And
11:22
when the front man is Donald Trump, like you
11:24
go to a very dark place, I think. That's
11:27
probably the best coherent Lindsey Graham theory
11:30
I've got. Yeah, I think that's right. So
11:32
before we get into like really the bigger flops of different
11:35
candidates, in Jeb's 2016 primary run and
11:39
in Hillary's 2008 run,
11:41
both were campaigns that felt like had
11:43
a lot of promise and
11:46
were likely going to be the nominees, at
11:48
least early on. So when you joined those
11:50
campaigns, like what was your attitude going in?
11:52
Were you like excited? Were you feeling confident?
11:54
Were you like, holy shit, this might go
11:56
all the way. Where were you before things
11:58
started heading in different directions? Yeah,
12:00
sure. I really like Jeb. And
12:02
so I was feeling excited to work for
12:05
him. And I thought we had a chance
12:08
for about a week. We had a really good first day of the
12:10
campaign. Like our
12:13
first day was really strong. And
12:17
yeah, I knew
12:19
probably by
12:21
the fall that things
12:23
had gone, we're going a different direction.
12:25
Oh, pretty early on. Yeah.
12:28
Oh, yeah. I remember where I was when I knew. Where
12:30
were you? I was my
12:32
brother's bachelor party. I took two days off
12:34
the campaign. I was really hung over. And
12:37
we had a private poll coming.
12:40
And I had asked the pollster to put
12:42
one question on for me, which was
12:45
what do you like least about Jeb Bush?
12:48
And I'd saved it. I didn't want to
12:50
ruin the bachelor party weekends. I had an
12:52
open poll. And I looked at
12:54
it and we were like, Trump's killing us. Marco's killing
12:56
us. And then I scrolled all the way down
12:59
to my question, which is the last one. And it was like,
13:01
45% didn't like him because he was a Bush. You know, 48%
13:03
didn't like him because he
13:09
was low energy. It was like four other random
13:11
things. And I was like, Oh, so they don't
13:13
like his name or
13:15
his personality. And we're in a distant third. I
13:17
don't think there's going to be a path back
13:20
from that. When did Please Clap happen? At what
13:22
point in the campaign? Very end. Very end. And
13:24
that's all Ashley Parker's fault. But that happened at
13:26
the very end. I think the next president needs
13:29
to be a lot quieter, but send a signal
13:31
that we're prepared to act in the national
13:33
security interests of this country to get back
13:35
in the business of creating a more peaceful
13:37
world. Please Clap.
13:42
Yeah, there's also I think a habit of like,
13:45
Please Clap or the Dean scream were
13:48
not causes. They were
13:52
moments. Basically, you know, if you're in a bad mood and
13:54
it's raining out, you blame the rain. If you're in a
13:56
bad mood and it's sending out, you look for another explanation.
13:58
And I do think. I think that
14:01
like when campaigns
14:03
are at a kind
14:05
of downward slope, when things
14:07
like that happen, they get
14:10
sort of outsized attention because
14:12
they are fulfilling the
14:14
narrative. Yeah, people are looking for things to
14:17
sum up, Jeb being sad. Jeb's sad. Our
14:19
numbers are going down, right? Like it was
14:21
self-deprecating, right? Yeah. In a
14:23
room where we had just one New Hampshire and
14:25
he kind of gets interrupted and he's like, go
14:27
ahead, please clap. Nobody remembers that.
14:29
Like people, you know what I mean? But it
14:32
was because we were sad, people were looking for
14:34
a meme that Jeb just didn't come up with
14:36
a sad. Yeah, I never took it as
14:38
like a please clap. I always thought like he
14:40
understood like, just come on, work with me here
14:42
guys. It was charming. It was
14:45
charming. So Tim, here's a question that I wanted to
14:47
ask you about this, which is, so
14:50
obviously in
14:52
2016, there was
14:55
a kind of like, I think a
14:57
wider range of ideological outcomes, let's
14:59
say, right? Jeb becomes the kind
15:01
of for a time, the
15:03
main alternate, the
15:05
main sort of place you could go if you didn't want to
15:08
go to Trump. In 2012, it's
15:12
a narrower ideological band, right? Like what
15:14
you and Sarah Longwell, you have a
15:16
podcast with Sarah on the bulwark and
15:19
I thought there was a you, you, you do
15:21
have like an interesting discussion the other day about
15:24
what it was like being gay people in the
15:26
Republican party, listening for clues,
15:29
listening for people who whose heart really wasn't in
15:31
it. Can you
15:33
talk a little bit about that and how it
15:35
factored into how you ended up with Jon Huntsman
15:37
in 2012? Yeah, sure. I
15:40
mean, so in only that word for McCain,
15:43
he loses. And
15:45
then I like took a break from being
15:47
an active politics came out of the closet
15:49
and like, you know, focused on myself for a
15:51
while did a little self care, as
15:54
they say, and I didn't realize it was that late that
15:56
you're coming out of the closet. It was late.
15:58
Yeah. during McCain
16:00
really. So anyway, I was kind of
16:02
happy. I was at a PR firm and
16:05
I was attracted to Huntsman's campaign
16:07
because he was a Tim
16:10
Miller, right? He was moderate, he was center-last at
16:12
the time. He's for civil union. He basically has
16:14
the Obama 08 position in the Republican party four
16:16
years later, like I'm four civil unions and I
16:18
think gay people have dignity and all that. So
16:20
he was taking the most progressive
16:24
view among the candidates in that
16:26
ideological band in the Republican party.
16:29
And so to me, 2012 was like, I'm
16:31
getting back in this for
16:35
like the most earnest reasons possible. Like I
16:37
kind of know this is gonna be a
16:39
loser probably. Let's take the shot. It's worked
16:41
for somebody that like is really aligned with
16:43
me politically, you know, because
16:45
he's probably gonna be a loser. I got to
16:47
be the national spokesman. Like that's not a job
16:49
I would have gotten for a candidate that was
16:51
more likely to win because I was young. And
16:54
so like to me, that was re-entered,
16:56
I re-entered it for Huntsman. And
16:58
then, you know, after that, I kind of got
17:01
a little bit more career-rest about things. Just
17:03
to go back, when I went into politics, it
17:06
was really very kind of cavalier. I
17:09
like had been doing like math when
17:11
I was in college. I was
17:13
thinking about maybe being a lawyer. I
17:15
was so unexamined and so anxious and
17:19
insecure and
17:21
unprepared for these responsibilities that
17:24
like the idea that I was
17:26
like thinking about like, oh, Barack
17:28
Obama versus Hillary Clinton. I was just hanging on
17:30
for dear life. Like this is where I was.
17:32
I worked, it wasn't like I thought to myself,
17:34
ah, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, I'm gonna choose the
17:37
one that'll be a better president and that's the
17:39
one I'm gonna work for. It's like, this is
17:41
just where my desk was. And I believed in
17:43
her campaign and my, like
17:46
the way in which, you know, Tim was talking
17:48
about like, you kind of find the justification, not
17:50
the justification, but you kind of find the emotional
17:52
reason you're investing so much time. You kind of
17:54
do some cognitive dissonance. Like if I'm working this
17:57
hard, it must be for a reason. What is the reason?
17:59
Here are the reasons. And I
18:01
had those reasons and for me, a lot of it was
18:03
rooted in the fact that that was
18:05
a very rhetorical primary.
18:07
Their differences on policy were
18:10
very, very minor. Obviously there was a
18:12
big disagreement on Iraq. That was the
18:14
core of it. But by the time
18:16
they're running, their position isn't actually very
18:18
different. His view is that- That's the
18:20
same. His view is I wouldn't have
18:22
voted yes on the authorization. She had
18:24
voted yes on the authorization and then
18:26
came to view it as a mistake.
18:29
That's sort of like the core kind
18:31
of difference
18:33
in their sort of approach to
18:35
politics. And from that, a bunch of
18:37
other things happen. But so much of
18:39
that campaign was Hillary Clinton and
18:42
like the consultants around her trying to
18:44
make an argument that in
18:46
an electorate that desperately wants change, experience is
18:49
the thing that makes change possible. While Barack
18:51
Obama is saying, if you want change, I'm
18:53
change. And that was simpler and worked much
18:55
better. Did you develop any animosity for him?
18:58
There was some sour grapes because
19:00
I remember, I
19:02
remember like, I think my frustration
19:04
was actually not with him. It
19:08
was with the coverage. It was
19:10
a very frustrating campaign to be a part of
19:12
because you're like, wait a
19:14
second. Like he is an inspirational figure,
19:16
promising generational change. She is an establishment
19:18
figure that represents the status quo, but
19:21
her healthcare policy is to the left
19:23
of his. Her energy policy is to
19:25
the left of his. Why
19:28
is Maya the only person who understands that? And so
19:30
I think the only time it became a
19:32
kind of, I think like frustration with the
19:35
Obama campaign or with Barack
19:37
Obama, it was like when
19:40
that was the message, it
19:43
felt insulting to us inside the campaign because
19:45
like, it
19:47
was really like, it was an
19:49
unusual arrangement. Speech writing in the 2008 Hillary
19:52
Clinton campaign ran out of policy.
19:54
And here's something that you don't always
19:56
hear enough of from Democrats, a big
19:58
part of the campaign. of our plan
20:01
will be unleashing the power of
20:03
the private sector to create
20:05
more jobs at higher pay.
20:08
She really viewed speeches to her detriment
20:10
ultimately as a means of conveying policy,
20:14
chops, history
20:16
and proposals. And obviously I
20:18
think Barack Obama put a
20:21
lot more poetry on top
20:23
of that prose and basically made
20:25
the argument that like inspiration is what you
20:27
need and inspiration is what I offer. The
20:30
title of every creed and color from every
20:32
walk of life is that in America
20:35
our destiny is inextricably linked.
20:38
That together our dreams can
20:40
be won. We
20:42
cannot walk alone, the
20:45
preacher cried. So I think that like the
20:48
like how can he be the one offering change if she's
20:50
on the left like that doesn't make sense that doesn't make
20:53
sense. Of course there was so little difference it was it
20:55
was we were dancing on the edge of the pen. You're
20:58
losing bitterness was more focused on the
21:00
fake news media than on Barack Obama.
21:02
Yes, especially because like I
21:04
was in the convention in 2004 when he spoke. I
21:08
was at the Boston
21:11
convention in 2004 and I saw
21:13
that speech. I
21:15
was a volunteer
21:18
boom mic person for
21:21
a documentary of
21:25
a bunch of left wing like gadflies
21:27
who were running around the convention calling
21:30
Madeleine Albright a war criminal. And I'm
21:32
just like chasing Madeleine Albright was I
21:34
remember Madeleine Albright was sitting on a
21:37
golf cart. You know the seats on
21:39
the golf cart that face the face
21:41
the back backward and I just remember
21:43
I'm like there's somebody chasing Madeleine Albright
21:46
with a with a camera and I'm chasing behind
21:48
them as the golf cart pulls away. So
21:51
she didn't have to answer questions. I don't even remember what
21:53
they were what they were. It was it was I don't
21:55
know what during the Clinton administration they were focused on at
21:57
that time. So I was on the during
22:00
that speech and so I like would oh I
22:02
remember like you know there's a kind of like
22:04
team mentality so you're it's sort of but it's
22:07
like in quieter moments I remember being on the
22:09
Hillary campaign you'd be like you know walking to
22:11
your car with somebody and just talking about it
22:13
and just be like Jesus
22:15
Obama's good I'm in the McCain
22:17
office and I'm watching it on
22:19
streaming the Obama speech I just
22:22
walked out to the rest of
22:24
the people I was like we
22:26
are fucked it does not matter
22:28
if we win this primary I was
22:30
like we are fucked I remember saying like I
22:33
don't know what's
22:35
it like to lose to Kennedy it's like that
22:38
is that what this feels like because I think
22:40
this might be what it feels like okay so
22:42
Tim was saying earlier that on Jeb's campaign there's
22:44
like a clear moment where he was like oh
22:46
fuck we're gonna lose this when did that happen
22:48
on Hillary's campaign to Obama I know you were
22:50
saying like we there kept being hope during the
22:52
primary race but not really enough to sustain whether
22:54
one thing that happened where you're like it's over thanks
22:58
for listening to hear the rest of this
23:00
episode plus a ton of other great exclusive
23:02
content consider joining the Friends of the Pod
23:04
community the tier to get even further inside
23:06
we haven't released yet head
23:09
to crooked comm slash friends to learn
23:11
more
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More