Podchaser Logo
Home
Trump Tower Fire Sale?

Trump Tower Fire Sale?

Released Thursday, 21st March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Trump Tower Fire Sale?

Trump Tower Fire Sale?

Trump Tower Fire Sale?

Trump Tower Fire Sale?

Thursday, 21st March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

Is Trump out of cash to form a president faces

0:03

a deadline to arrange a $454 million bond while

0:08

his legal team is signaling we may

0:10

not be able to show New York

0:12

the money? Georgia DA

0:14

Fonny Willis can remain on, but that

0:16

whole saga has raised major uncertainty on

0:19

the timing and future of that case.

0:21

And then down in Ohio, Trump once

0:24

again proved he is the Republican party

0:26

period. His hand-picked candidate for Senate beat

0:28

out the more moderate candidate endorsed

0:30

by the Republican establishment. And

0:33

then a battle is raging in federal courts over

0:35

a controversial Texas immigration law will tell you what's

0:37

going on and why it will matter for 2024.

0:41

Finally, Democrats have become more vocally

0:43

critical of Israel's Netanyahu will explore

0:45

the moral and political implications of

0:47

that trend. Welcome back to

0:49

the podcast for the 54% of Americans who

0:52

vote for progress in every election and want

0:54

to convince the conservative friends and family members

0:56

to join our majority. This is

0:58

majority 54. Again,

1:00

I'm really excited because we have a

1:02

special guest today. Jason is

1:05

in an undisclosed location. So we are welcoming

1:07

on an army veteran, the

1:09

former head of the Lincoln project,

1:11

host of on democracy here at

1:14

the Midas network, the self described

1:17

and objectively devastatedly handsome Fred

1:19

Wommen. Welcome to the podcast.

1:23

That wasn't supposed to be added, but I appreciate it. You

1:26

told me I took the notes. I know

1:28

that's what I get for being cocky. Well,

1:31

welcome to the podcast. I'm a

1:34

big fan and we've got some stuff to

1:36

talk about today. I think let's start with

1:38

some Trump legal. There

1:41

it is. All right.

1:44

So we've got this. Let's start with some

1:46

unfortunate news for the former president. He

1:49

has a couple of days now to comply

1:52

with a New York court ruling to

1:55

arrange a bond of $454 million. And

2:00

his lawyers are basically saying he's not going to be

2:02

able to make this bond. Fred, are

2:05

we going to be able to

2:07

buy some of these Trump properties at a fire sale

2:09

prices in New York? I'm pretty excited. I've always

2:11

wanted the Mulby Beach Club. Now, I

2:13

did shed almost an entire tear. You

2:16

know, it's interesting. You know, he sat on his hands for

2:18

25 days, right? I

2:21

don't think he's ever had to face consequences, Robbie,

2:23

right? So he literally thought he'd

2:25

get out of this. So he's made no moves

2:27

to like sell or liquid, you know, getting

2:29

a liquid assets. He's been claiming he has them,

2:31

but now we're getting filings saying, you know,

2:34

nobody has those. He goes, no, you literally

2:36

said you had them. So, uh, yeah, it'll be

2:38

interesting. I mean, uh, I saw a story today.

2:41

I thought maybe you saw that there literally is

2:43

talk about selling Trump tower, which would be amazing.

2:46

Yeah. I mean, I personally would

2:48

love to see his name off

2:50

of every possible property in New

2:52

York. Right. And now he goes

2:54

up. I'm not sure about that. Yeah. I

2:57

mean, these are some really, I mean, despite,

2:59

you know, his motif is not mine, but

3:01

you could imagine you could

3:03

probably, you could probably do some sprucing up,

3:06

uh, at a certain point, but, but these

3:08

are some really like great properties. So

3:10

somebody's going to scoop in here and

3:13

grab these things. It'll be really fascinating

3:15

to see. We'll know in a few

3:17

days what happens here. Uh, news organizations

3:19

have estimated that Trump has about $300

3:21

million in liquid assets. He's

3:23

already put aside a hundred million for the

3:25

Eugene Carroll case. So he's a running out

3:28

of money. Now, of course, like he's not

3:30

going to be bankrupt unless there's truly something

3:32

weird going on behind the scenes, but he,

3:34

you know, as we're talking about,

3:36

the first thing we'll see here is him

3:38

selling things off. If you can't

3:41

get somebody else or going hat

3:43

and hand to the Saudis, Russians,

3:45

who knows who else, you know, I think people

3:47

should keep an eye on, uh, if

3:50

he does wind up posting bonds, who these people

3:52

are, who are guaranteeing him.

3:54

And there've been already some questions of

3:56

the insurance company that he used

3:58

for the Eugene Carroll case. So this is

4:01

just another opportunity for corruption for him. Well,

4:03

there's a story about how Chubb, the

4:06

CEO of Chubb sent out a

4:08

note to investors and investors saying

4:11

that, hey, we didn't take a position here. It's

4:13

just a reasonable bond. But when they came to

4:15

the second one, it appears Trump was really sure

4:17

that Chubb wouldn't insure him again. They said, nah,

4:19

we can't take bills. We can't

4:21

take property, which is so ironic because he's been

4:23

inflating his pride for so long. They don't trust

4:25

him now, right? I mean, you're right. Trump

4:28

Tower isn't a great location. I'm not into

4:30

the whole Saddam decoration. I served in Iraq.

4:32

I actually lived in two of Saddam's palaces

4:34

in my four, two, or three tours. I'm

4:36

not into the gold, but it's okay. It

4:39

takes me back. You know, it's funny. I've been to one of

4:41

those. I went to Iraq when I was at the State Department.

4:44

I was at wherever Oderino was in Baghdad. I went

4:46

to one of those weird looking spots. I was there.

4:49

I was there in 2005. I started there. I worked

4:51

at Boeing. So

4:53

I've lived in some Saddam palaces. It's not my style.

4:56

You're right, but they are great locations, and

4:58

they will sell for money. I think you

5:00

have to look for me on the political

5:02

hack here as opposed to the lawyer. As

5:05

a political hack, I know he's freaking out

5:07

because he has made his entire political persona

5:09

that he's a billionaire, that he's rich. Alina

5:12

Haava was up until last week saying, oh, of

5:14

course he's a billionaire. He's got plenty of cash. Even

5:17

if he has to go hat in hand with the

5:19

Saudis or anybody, he's admitting he does not have the

5:22

billions of dollars to make ends meet. I'm

5:25

hearing – I think I saw an article today saying

5:27

that he really is freaking out at this point, that

5:29

he knows that come Monday he's going

5:31

to have to admit he's not a

5:33

billionaire like he says he is. And

5:35

I think that's interesting. I don't know if that

5:38

will change the cult much, but it is a

5:40

big chip in his whole facade of being this

5:42

maid millionaire. It's not true

5:45

at all. Well, the stakes couldn't be higher

5:47

for this guy coming into this election. He's got all

5:49

these cases that – the

5:52

assumption in the political

5:54

debates and in the media, which is –

5:57

I understand we've been operating on this assumption as

5:59

– Anything that happens

6:01

after November really doesn't matter because like

6:04

you have to kind of hold this guy accountable before the

6:06

election because once he gets in the White House, he's

6:08

going to be able to use the machinery of the White

6:10

House and the power that he has to

6:13

duck any accountability. That's true.

6:15

But I don't think people are spending enough

6:17

time thinking about, well, what if this guy

6:19

loses? Like he will run out of money

6:22

and he'll potentially have multiple opportunities

6:24

to go to prison, and he won't have

6:26

the cover of the White House to

6:30

drop the charges or the immunity of the

6:32

executive office unless the Supreme Court steps in

6:34

and says he's got that. I

6:36

mean it's quite something to think about, which

6:38

is why he's pretty urgent about winning this

6:40

election. It seems like he has no other

6:42

out except winning the – I

6:46

mean we're really at the deadline, and as

6:50

we close the election and especially as polls –

6:52

as we know, if you saw polls this week,

6:55

average polling now has Biden ahead in a

6:57

slight couple of decimal points. But for the

6:59

first time, I think in the whole time,

7:01

Biden is coming out on top of the

7:03

polling, so he's going to get crazier and crazier

7:05

I think. I think we're going to see – I

7:08

mean as the loss – as more suits start, we're

7:10

going to have Fonnie Will will start. We're going to

7:12

have Alvin Bragg start at some point, right? Man,

7:15

can you imagine? He's going to be freaking out.

7:17

And as we get closer, I mean, God, he

7:19

is – I mean I worry – I was

7:22

literally just having a conversation with a journalist about

7:24

political violence. I do worry about his

7:26

– I mean his right is freaking out,

7:28

right, Robbie? I mean it's – He's already

7:30

saying it though. He's already saying – Yeah,

7:32

now. And speaking

7:34

of the Bragg and Willis cases, on the

7:36

Bragg front, that case

7:39

looks like it's going to be delayed at

7:41

least a month. There was a document dumped

7:43

from the US Attorney's Office. It's just a

7:45

Keystone Cops kind of situation here when it

7:48

comes to these cases. So you got Bragg

7:50

who – and this particular one wasn't his

7:53

fault. I blame the US Attorney's

7:55

Office in part and Trump's lawyers for some

7:57

clever delay tactics, which seems to be their

7:59

specialty. But that one looks like it's

8:01

going to be delayed at least a month, which in

8:03

and of itself is not an issue because we're going

8:05

to see that trial before the election in all likelihood.

8:08

But it's on the appeal is going to be the

8:10

issue. We've talked about this previously. We were talking about

8:12

with Tristan Snell. We were talking to him about this,

8:14

and he thinks that the appeal will play out probably

8:18

after the election. Now, Willis case is the

8:20

one that's really turbulent, I

8:22

guess is the right word to say. So the

8:24

judge overseeing that case has

8:28

allowed Willis to stay on under

8:30

the condition that Nathan

8:33

Wade, who is the lead prosecutor who she allegedly

8:35

had a romantic relationship with, had to exit the

8:37

case. And this just out

8:40

this morning, the

8:43

judge McAfee has allowed an appeal to

8:45

go forward against his ruling, but he's

8:47

going to continue on with the case.

8:49

So it's not going to delay the

8:51

case at least for now. But

8:55

I haven't – that just came out. I haven't done

8:57

my homework on what the sort of appellate judges

8:59

in Georgia look like, but I can't

9:01

imagine that they're Democrats. No.

9:05

No, I mean, I can't imagine the art, but the same

9:07

token to one end. I mean, this

9:09

one's kind of – now, again, I'm not the lawyer on this show.

9:13

But to one end, I mean, again, it

9:15

is delay tactics, but

9:17

prosecution is going to get

9:19

prosecuted. No matter if she's sitting in the courtroom or not, they

9:22

really are just sort of throwing whatever they can against the wall to

9:24

push it out. But I think there's

9:26

danger. I mean, at a certain point, we're in a danger zone for them

9:28

too. I'm a political hack

9:30

again. If he thinks he

9:32

can survive this and he has survived everything, right, Rod?

9:34

I mean, he's – nothing is knocked him down. Then

9:36

maybe he should just get the damn court case over

9:38

with, win, lose, appeal long before the election. Part of

9:41

the thing is that I don't think they're doing

9:43

a good job in their calculation

9:45

is the more they drag out, we

9:47

may be in the middle of actual

9:49

prosecutions during the RNC convention, right?

9:52

Or during the act, people can start early voting

9:55

with his happy ass sitting in a court. You know

9:57

what I mean? And I tell you, that's quite a

9:59

visual. to be sending out as

10:01

you're voting for a guy in early voting

10:03

that he's spending his days instead of on

10:05

the campaign trail, he's sitting across more prosecutors.

10:08

So I do wonder about the legal tactics

10:11

and the political tactics that come together in

10:13

almost a perfect storm. So for me

10:15

as a political hack, I keep saying,

10:18

man, your delay may actually blow up in your face because they're

10:20

not gonna be able to delay it without

10:22

some miracle past the election, right? Either

10:24

case, because there's state cases. I

10:27

just, this one may

10:29

end up with the number one candidate, the

10:34

Republican candidate sitting at the courtroom.

10:39

Yeah, yeah, no, I hear you. Well,

10:42

that's the sort of Trump legal update,

10:44

getting to the political side of 2024.

10:49

There's some, I would say

10:51

interesting news coming out of Ohio this

10:53

week. So this guy, Bernie Moreno, who's

10:55

a wealthy former car dealer and political

10:58

newcomer are merged as the victor in

11:00

the three way race

11:02

for the Ohio Republican primary.

11:05

And this was fascinating because you had

11:08

Mike DeWine, very, very popular Republican governor

11:10

in Ohio and former Senator, and

11:13

former Senator Rob Portman, who

11:15

are both like what we would call in

11:17

this day and age moderates in Ohio.

11:22

Whatever that is. Yeah,

11:26

but two very well respected, at least within

11:28

the state of Ohio amongst the sort of

11:30

independent voters and Republican electorate you'd think, both

11:34

back a different candidate, Matt Dolan, who

11:36

is another wealthy politician there.

11:39

And Trump won this race, basically just

11:41

showing once again that the Republican party

11:43

is Donald Trump, Donald Trump is the

11:45

Republican party. Yeah, yeah,

11:47

and again, yet another weak candidate, of

11:49

course, right before the primary last week

11:51

came out, that this gentleman

11:54

apparently had an adult friend finder profile

11:57

that was set up in

11:59

his. email address at his parents home

12:02

in Fort Lauderdale for gay

12:04

hookups, which was quite scandalous the weekend before

12:06

the election, which reminds me a lot of

12:08

what just happened with the guy in North

12:10

Carolina, Robinson. We find

12:12

out this really stuff about him. Again,

12:15

you've got a MAGA candidate they've

12:17

put in place who very

12:19

well could just end up costing them the election.

12:21

They keep doing this to themselves, but you're right.

12:23

It is Trump's party to pick these people, but

12:25

Trump also has a history of picking the absolute

12:27

just most terrible people. Yeah, and

12:30

in case anybody's wondering in the audience, what

12:32

you're saying is it's no scandal to

12:34

be gay. It's a scandal to be a

12:37

hypocrite. There you go. Bingo.

12:39

Bingo. And the story, as

12:43

a political guy, I love the story. Like they

12:45

actually had, I don't know if you followed it,

12:47

but they say it was an intern who

12:49

played a prank on him at his car dealership who

12:52

had access to his email and set up this thing

12:54

as like a joke. And that intern just so happens

12:56

to be a major donor to the campaign now. Okay.

13:00

And you're like, okay. And

13:02

then they actually came out with a guy who was

13:04

the founder of Adult Friend Finder. You can't make this

13:07

up, who also has to be a donor. And

13:09

he came out with letters saying, oh yeah, that's totally

13:11

plausible. It's been really

13:14

fascinating. It's a fascinating case study in

13:16

the spin machine trying to get out of

13:18

it. But in the end, you've got a

13:20

guy who's very MAGA, who's inexperienced. He's never

13:22

been a political candidate before. Now he's the

13:24

nominee in a critical state. I mean, it's

13:27

got to get Ohio. And look,

13:29

Sherrod Brown's no joke, man. He's

13:31

a good, he's a good politician. He's been

13:33

off for a long time. He's super

13:35

strong. Super hardworking. He's got a

13:37

clear message. Founder earth. Just a

13:40

regular dude. In the sane world,

13:42

he will win this race. It's a tough, it's an uphill

13:44

battle in Ohio, but let's go. He actually, he immediately

13:47

is on TV talking about

13:49

this head to head race. Let's go to this clip. Yeah.

13:52

So that they know what's at stake in this

13:54

election between these two candidates for Senate. Well,

13:56

they, they know that, that, um, Bernie

13:59

Marino, I so. out for himself. I

14:01

mean, he has said in this campaign

14:03

that he won't work with Democrats. He

14:06

just is going to go to Washington and do

14:08

his own thing. He's illustrated that

14:10

by again calling for a national

14:13

abortion ban with no exceptions, even

14:15

though Ohio overwhelmingly last November voted

14:17

by 13 points for

14:20

a for a constitutional amendment on

14:22

abortion rights and the arrogance

14:24

of he doesn't really care what the voters

14:26

want. That's really who

14:28

he is and we will make

14:31

that contrast of I fight for Ohio. I

14:33

listen to people. I do roundtables all over the

14:36

state. That's how we that's how we help Senator

14:38

Tester write the packed act. That's

14:40

how we got a good infrastructure bill. That's

14:42

how we got the chips bill. It's going

14:44

to create thousands of jobs in Ohio. That's

14:46

how you do this job. You go county

14:48

to county. You listen to people. You come

14:51

back with ideas. You convince your colleagues to

14:53

pass the child tax credit. You convince your

14:55

colleagues on a whole host

14:57

of issues like on the pension bill

14:59

where we save the pension of 100,000 Ohio

15:01

workers, Ohio union workers. That's how you

15:05

do this job. You don't approach it arrogantly

15:07

and I know best. I don't care that

15:10

women have said that they

15:12

want control with their doctors of their own

15:14

health care. I know better and I'm going

15:16

to do. I'm going to override that, overturn

15:18

that. Well,

15:20

this map, the context here is that the

15:23

map is brutal for Democrats in 2024. So

15:25

there are 34 seats

15:27

up for grabs, including 20 held

15:30

by Democrats, 11 held by

15:32

Republicans, three by independents.

15:35

One of those independents of course is

15:37

Kyrsten Sinema who won't be running again.

15:39

And look, Democrats have to

15:41

win in states like Ohio. They have

15:43

to keep Tester's seat. And

15:46

then potentially we're probably going to need at

15:48

least one upset like Texas or something. And

15:50

so we really need to do

15:52

everything we possibly can here. And the

15:55

context is that we're looking much

15:57

better in the house. And so…

16:00

You know, if we could somehow pull off some miracle in the

16:02

Senate and went back

16:04

to House, we'll be sitting pretty. And I do think

16:07

it's possible. I mean it's hard, but it's possible. I

16:10

agree. I think the Senate map is hard. We've

16:12

got great candidates. I mean, the nice thing you're

16:14

seeing, what I'm watching, and I've got a new

16:16

series I'm doing on the network here. I've got

16:18

a plug, shameless plug, called In

16:20

the Hot Seat, where I've been interviewing these

16:22

candidates for Democratic office. I

16:25

interviewed Colin Allred against Ted Cruz. I interviewed

16:27

Debbie Mccarsal-Powell who was running against Rick Scott

16:29

in Florida. Obviously, these are tough battles, but

16:31

really good quality candidates are coming out of

16:33

the Democratic field this year that we can

16:35

feel good about getting behind that are going

16:38

to do well. I shared Brown's

16:40

terrific. John Tester is just a great, genuine

16:42

guy who's got a good chance. So

16:45

if we add, then, the layer of Roe

16:48

v. Wade Dobbs portion, hopefully we'll get a

16:50

boost out of that, a presidential year. Look,

16:53

I was skeptical too, but I do think we've got

16:55

a winning shot, and the numbers are off. I mean,

16:57

geez, even here in Missouri, I live in Missouri, the

17:01

numbers are good for Lucas. Yeah, I'm done.

17:03

The polls, if you believe polls, which of

17:05

course, obviously, but it is out of

17:07

the ear. It

17:09

is out of possibility against Josh Hawley, who

17:11

nobody likes. Nobody likes Josh Hawley. So I think

17:14

if you add in that layer of abortion, men

17:16

on the ballot, Democrats keep winning. We

17:19

keep winning races over and over these last three

17:21

years. I don't know. There is cause for optimism.

17:23

I always say this weird – you probably don't

17:25

see a ride, this weird streak of optimism that

17:27

came out. I love it. I'm fried. I

17:30

don't even love that. They say that tragedy requires

17:32

hubris, and I think for the Republicans, there's a

17:34

lot of hubris on their side. They think that

17:36

they can continue to get away with, especially places

17:39

like Missouri, where they just – they don't even

17:41

believe that they have to worry about general elections

17:43

there. At some point,

17:45

they may get shocked, and the key is just

17:47

to keep fielding great candidates and keep hoping and

17:50

working really hard on the ground. Well, with that, we're

17:52

going to take a short break. When we come back,

17:54

we're going to talk about this Texas border battle, and

17:56

then we're going to talk about some of the Israel

17:59

politics in the Senate. at all this and more when we

18:01

come back. Candidly,

18:05

finding the right life insurance to protect

18:07

my family has never been more important.

18:10

And you should make life insurance a part of

18:12

your financial planning this year, and you should start

18:15

shopping now with PolicyGenius to find the right policy

18:17

to protect your family. Getting life insurance

18:19

today means you'll have peace of mind so that if

18:21

something were to happen to you, your family can cover

18:23

expenses while getting back on their feet. Luckily,

18:25

PolicyGenius helps you compare your options with

18:28

top companies and their team of licensed

18:30

experts, and they're on hand to

18:32

help you talk through it. I have life insurance

18:34

and it's given me a tremendous peace of mind.

18:37

PolicyGenius technology makes it easy to compare

18:39

life insurance quotes from America's top insurers

18:42

in just a few clicks

18:44

to find your lowest price. So

18:46

even if you already have life insurance policies through

18:49

work, it may not offer enough protection for your

18:51

family needs and it may not follow you if

18:53

you leave your job. With PolicyGenius, you can go

18:55

find life insurance policies that start at just $292

18:58

per year for

19:00

$1 million of coverage. Some

19:02

options offer same-day approval and avoid

19:04

unnecessary medical exams. PolicyGenius

19:07

has licensed, award-winning agents who can help

19:09

you find the best fit for your

19:11

needs. They work for you,

19:13

not the insurance companies, and that means they don't

19:15

have an incentive to recommend one insurer over

19:17

the other so that you can trust their

19:19

guns. No wonder they have

19:21

thousands of five-star reviews on Google and Trustpilot.

19:25

provide your family with a financial

19:27

safety net using PolicyGenius. Head to

19:30

policygenius.com/majority or click the link in

19:32

the description to get your free

19:34

life insurance quotes and see how

19:37

much you could save.

19:39

That's policygenius.com/majority. Most

19:46

clothes are uncomfortable, they may be too tight, they

19:49

never actually fit your size

19:51

because a lot of us are not exactly

19:53

small, medium, large, or actual large. We're complicated.

19:56

Sometimes when you find something you like, you can only wear it

19:58

for a few hours before you're at home. important meeting

20:00

or dinner and then you have to change

20:02

into something else and everyone wants to dress

20:04

their best. You want to look good at

20:06

all times and frankly it's a confidence booster.

20:08

So here's the deal men's closets

20:11

were due for a radical reinvention and

20:13

Roan stepped up to the challenge. Roan's

20:15

commuter collection is the most comfortable, breathable

20:17

and flexible set of products known to

20:20

man and here's why. Roan helps you

20:22

get ready for any occasion with the

20:24

commuter collection which offers the world's most

20:27

comfortable pants, dress shirts, quarter

20:29

zips and polos. You never have to

20:31

worry about what to wear when you have the

20:33

Roan commuter collection and here's some anecdote. I'm wearing

20:35

my Roan pants right now and

20:37

last week I was at a wedding. I

20:39

wore my Roan button-down shirt to the wedding

20:42

at a formal wedding and I

20:44

will also wear it tomorrow when I just

20:46

you know go into a coffee shop to

20:49

have a meeting. It's that versatile. So

20:51

it's time to feel confident without the hassle

20:53

with Roan's wrinkle release technology. Wrinkles disappear as

20:55

you stretch and wear the products. It's that

20:57

easy. Yeah I actually you know not

21:00

so neatly folded that shirt in my bag for

21:02

the wedding and I was able to take it

21:04

out and automatically I was able to put

21:06

it on that looked like I had ironed

21:08

it but I didn't you know it's

21:11

an inside secret between us. So with

21:13

Gold Fusion anti-order technology you'll also be

21:15

smelling fresh and clean all day on

21:17

top of that. Roan is a hundred

21:19

percent machine washable so you can dish

21:21

the dry cleaner all together. We're on

21:23

the move a lot and the Roan

21:25

commuter collection has never let me down.

21:27

The versatility and overall comfort of the

21:29

collection is undefeated. I absolutely love it

21:32

and even after I wear it all day

21:34

I feel super fresh because that Gold Fusion

21:36

anti-order technology at that wedding I was dancing up a

21:38

storm wore it no problems.

21:40

So the commuter collection can get you

21:43

through any work day and straight into

21:45

whatever comes next. So head to roan.com/majority

21:47

and use the promo code majority to

21:49

save 20% off your entire

21:51

order. That's 20% off your

21:54

entire order when you head

21:56

to rhone.com/majority and use the

21:58

code majority. It's time to

22:00

find your corner office conference. All

22:07

right. Well, there's a lot of action

22:09

going on at the

22:11

border. So the Supreme Court temporarily

22:15

paved the way for

22:17

a controversial Texas law that basically allows

22:19

them to enforce the

22:23

nation's immigration laws or, you know,

22:27

or defy them, depending on how you look at the law.

22:29

Down in Texas, basically locked up

22:32

people who cross over the border.

22:35

The Supreme Court basically paved the way for that implementation

22:37

of that law. Like a appeals court temporarily seems to

22:39

have frozen implementation

22:41

of that law. Yeah. My reading on

22:43

this, it looks like this is going

22:45

to go through and it's

22:47

going to be an interesting new

22:50

phase in an immigration debate in this

22:52

country where essentially states now will be

22:54

empowered to do something that just previously

22:56

the purview of the federal government, which

22:59

is immigration enforcement. I

23:02

find this slippery slope, you know, and I talk about

23:04

this a lot that especially as a veteran, you

23:06

know, I've read in Iraq. One of the things I did in

23:08

Iraq, you know, Jason was in Afghanistan doing similar things. I interact

23:10

a lot with the population, especially the early days, that first tour

23:12

I did in 2003, 2004, where

23:15

I did civil affairs. And, you know, I talked

23:18

to a lot of these

23:20

civilians and how they experience under Saddam

23:22

Hussein, you know, the life under an

23:24

authoritarian where the black SUVs

23:26

pull up your neighbor's house and scoop everybody up and take

23:28

them off. It's just for me, I

23:30

live in, I remember saying my Iraqi

23:32

friend saying, you know, hey, guy, I live in

23:34

America. And now we've got a state

23:36

that's passed a law. Well, you look kind

23:39

of Latino. You show us your papers. It's literally

23:41

to show us your papers law. And

23:44

you can ruin people's lives just by picking them up off

23:46

the street and throwing them in jail till they show you

23:48

your papers. I mean, if you've ever been arrested, it's not

23:50

a great experience. Okay. And so I'm

23:52

horrified. I'm just gonna and I think

23:54

it's a very short, very,

23:56

very short trip to much more.

24:00

dangerous and scary things where we're

24:02

being divided against each other. I'm

24:04

so disappointed with the Supreme Court. I'm

24:07

happy that the appeals court stopped it once again,

24:09

but these laws, this is such a slippery

24:12

slope. It makes me very, very, very nervous.

24:14

It really does. Well, the

24:16

Supreme Court's three liberal justices dissented,

24:18

and they said this law

24:20

invites further chaos and crisis in the

24:22

immigration enforcement. They said, quote, this law

24:24

will disrupt sensitive foreign relations, frustrate

24:26

the protection of individuals fleeing persecution,

24:29

hamper active federal enforcement efforts, undermine

24:31

federal agencies' abilities to detect and

24:33

monitor imminent security threats and deter

24:36

non-citizens reporting abuse or

24:38

trafficking. I do think this is going to

24:40

be, this is one step, I think, in

24:42

a long line of a trend that we're going to

24:44

only see more of, which is a sort of clash

24:46

between the federal government and local

24:48

authorities. Jason and

24:51

I have been long speculating that there's

24:53

like a, there's like an interstate extradition

24:55

issue that's looming in some of this

24:57

Trump stuff, whether or not

24:59

he wins the presidency. At some point, there's going

25:01

to be judgments against him in some certain cases,

25:03

civil judgments against him in certain cases, criminal, probably,

25:06

judgments against him. Some of those will be state,

25:08

some of those might be federal. And

25:10

I could see him being in places like

25:12

Florida and basically fighting

25:14

the equivalent of interstate extradition.

25:19

And if I were him and I'm in

25:21

a difficult flat, I'm going to a place

25:23

like Alabama or something. And I'm like enjoying

25:25

the protection of a state that is going

25:27

to fight the federal government or other states

25:30

every step of the way. And

25:32

I think there's like a nonzero chance that

25:34

that could be like an unprecedented federal standoff

25:36

that we have in this country. Even

25:39

if he loses, I agree. And you know, there's

25:41

hints of that already. I believe there was a

25:43

case just recently where a person was accused

25:45

of murder in New York. The

25:49

local prosecutor refused to extradite them

25:51

from Arizona to New York. And

25:53

he stated specifically because Alvin Bragg

25:55

is a political prosecutor. So, I

25:58

mean, if there are... I'm

26:00

still in shock about it. It's like, holy,

26:02

an actual guy accused of murder, and they're

26:05

injecting the politics into it. So you're right.

26:07

It is – no, there's a

26:09

non-zero chance. I mean, I would even say

26:11

there's even a damn near majority chance that

26:13

that is definitely in the realm of possible.

26:15

And like you said, we get some really

26:18

weird places pretty quick when we have states

26:20

asserting their rights against the federal government or other

26:22

states. I mean, as a historian –

26:25

I guess a student of history, if you will, all

26:27

I can say is yikes, right? I mean, Jesus, man.

26:30

Unbelievable. Well, okay, going

26:32

international now. Chuck Schumer

26:35

turned some heads. So

26:39

he basically called out Netanyahu.

26:41

He says he's lost his way. He's too

26:43

willing to tolerate the civilian toll in Gaza.

26:46

And he really went in on Netanyahu. He's

26:48

traditionally been an ally to Israel and Netanyahu.

26:52

Let's go to a clip from Schumer on

26:54

the Senate floor. The fourth

26:56

major obstacle to peace is

26:59

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,

27:02

who has all too frequently bowed to

27:04

the demands of extremists like

27:06

Ministers Smotrik and Ben Gevir and

27:09

the settlers in the West Bank. I

27:12

have known Prime Minister Netanyahu for a very

27:14

long time. While we

27:16

have vehemently disagreed on many occasions,

27:19

I will always respect his extraordinary bravery

27:21

for Israel on the battlefield as a

27:23

younger man. I

27:26

believe in his heart he has

27:28

his highest priority as

27:30

is the security of Israel. However,

27:33

I also believe

27:36

Prime Minister Netanyahu has lost his

27:38

way by allowing

27:40

his political survival to take

27:42

the precedence over the best

27:44

interests of Israel. So

27:47

he called for early elections. Biden

27:49

called that, as Schumer's speech, a good speech.

27:52

It seems like there's alignment now, even

27:55

amongst some of the more

27:57

pro-Israel Democrats out there

27:59

essentially. has been a line that Jason and

28:01

I have had on this podcast for a long time, which is

28:04

you could believe in the

28:06

existence of Israel, you could be quote

28:09

unquote pro-Israel, whatever that means, while

28:11

still thinking that Netanyahu is a

28:14

right-wing, you know,

28:16

authoritarian-esque leader who is not

28:19

good for the world or for the

28:21

people of Israel. And although there is

28:23

like daylight, I think, between certain members

28:25

of the Left Coalition on, you

28:28

know, whether people are harder or

28:30

easier on the Israelis or the

28:32

Palestinians and how people feel about

28:34

Hamas or about the existence of Israel

28:36

borders. I do think there's broad alignment now

28:38

that Netanyahu is bad for that country and

28:41

that he has lost his way, in the

28:43

words of Schumer. And I

28:45

do think that this is a positive

28:47

development to see leaders

28:49

of the Democratic Party coming out and saying what I

28:51

think is obvious to anybody who's looking at that conflict.

28:55

Yeah, and I think they've been fishing for a message

28:57

in a lot of ways, don't you think? I mean, I

28:59

feel like the Democratic leadership has struggled a bit. We do

29:01

want to support our allies. We do want to support their

29:03

right to defend themselves from October 7th. We do want them

29:05

to support themselves and defend

29:07

themselves from terrorism. But there is a fine

29:09

line when you see so much death and

29:11

so much destruction. Again, and Jason, I share

29:14

the same view on that. I mean, we

29:16

do, we have to abide by the laws

29:18

of war. We have to go overextreme to

29:20

ensure that civilians caught in the crossfire are

29:22

fed and have safety. And unfortunately, with this

29:25

method of war, which was the word

29:27

we had when it went to Gaza, that that's

29:29

not something. They're just not happening like it should.

29:31

I mean, and we could argue all day about

29:33

whether or not there are laws of war, etc.

29:35

That's a better case. But I do think you're

29:37

right to say at least a and look, Netanyahu's

29:39

made it clear. He's made it

29:41

clear. He constantly says, oh, no, you know, no elections,

29:43

this war is over. Okay, when's the war going to

29:45

be over? You

29:49

know, they have not defined

29:51

the aims of that war like that.

29:54

And part of the issue and

29:56

I think Schumer's getting to this

29:59

is like The personal

30:01

interests of Netanyahu are getting in the

30:03

way of the larger interests of his

30:05

country, and it reminds me of what

30:07

we have back home. It's

30:09

like the personal interests of Donald Trump,

30:12

the interests of either his party or the country.

30:15

And there – Maharka

30:18

is out to the people in Israel and Gaza

30:20

who have to deal with this guy who's, I

30:23

think, standing in the way. And

30:26

he's been standing in the way – we've talked

30:28

about this on the spot. He's been standing in

30:30

the way of peace since I was in probably

30:32

elementary school. So this

30:35

guy, it would be great to see him go,

30:37

and it would also be great to see him

30:39

replaced by somebody who's actually legitimately committed

30:42

to peace because we

30:44

need people to take bold action. People

30:48

like Rabin, people like Ehud Barak,

30:51

who were willing to put their – in the case

30:53

of Rabin, he put his life on the line and

30:55

lost that life because he was

30:57

willing to push for peace. And

30:59

I'm hoping we can see a new generation of

31:02

Israeli and Palestinian leaders who are willing to do

31:04

that. Nobody wins the

31:06

war. And look, a lot of people have an

31:08

experience, especially – it all looks very

31:10

noble, and it looks like the right answer. When

31:12

they say these huge statements like, we must destroy

31:14

them utterly and kill Hamas, and we learn this

31:16

– and I keep harping on it. I apologize

31:19

for going back to it, but I worked for

31:21

a guy named Petraeus when I was in the

31:23

army. I was actually General Petraeus' spokesman. And

31:26

the one thing that he said often that I took

31:28

with me is an experience we had in northern Iraq

31:30

in 2003 that carried through the rest of the war

31:32

there in Iraq was that every time I killed –

31:34

it used to say, in

31:36

an industrial – in an industrial grade

31:38

insurgency, every time I kill one, I create three more.

31:41

And what

31:43

that means is, when you're fighting someone like

31:46

Hamas, when you're fighting someone like al-Qaeda

31:48

in Iraq, when you're fighting someone like an

31:51

Islamic state, as you are

31:53

killing them, and what the means you do, especially as

31:55

a large army like we do, where you blow up

31:57

a whole building, look, if I kill somebody who's grabbed

31:59

me, I'll kill them. You know,

32:01

he's going to want to kill people back, right? And

32:04

so it's just a never-ending

32:06

cycle of slaughter that

32:09

you're right. At some point, someone needs to stand

32:11

up. And look, Hamas is dirtying

32:13

this. I mean, the enemy – this

32:15

is on Hamas. This

32:18

is Hamas allowing their – again, Hamas has

32:20

a very, very dark goal here. They

32:22

have made the decision that killing their

32:25

civilians is okay. And so no one's

32:27

hands are clean here. This

32:29

is no way of apology for Hamas.

32:32

But the decision to let these people die, and

32:35

that's what always my heart goes, especially having

32:37

had the opportunity to work with the civilians

32:39

who suffer from it. That's what I did. I

32:41

was literally on Facebook yesterday with

32:44

one of the young men that was a civilian

32:46

in my village that I served in in Iraq

32:48

that first tour. He sent me one of my

32:50

own pictures from Facebook of a – I'm writing

32:52

a sub-sac about it right now. He

32:54

circled this young man in this picture under my

32:56

arm, and he said this young man

32:58

died fighting the Islamic State

33:02

in the Iraqi army. So I'm still in touch with

33:04

the civilians I served with. So knowing that, having an

33:06

experience of seeing what war does

33:08

and the long tail of war, keep in

33:10

mind that conversation, that young man I met,

33:13

I had my armor on that picture, that

33:15

was 21 years ago. 41

33:18

years. And so those guys – It's

33:20

crazy how long it took to end that war.

33:23

I know, right? So the long

33:25

tail of war, it's generational. I'll

33:27

never forget the fact that my own

33:30

son-in-law served – I served in the

33:32

first invasion, and my son-in-law served

33:34

in the exit. And it's

33:36

just – Israel and Hamas and everyone

33:38

in that, at some point, everyone's going to have to

33:40

say, our people are dying. At

33:43

what point do we figure out not to start killing each other all the

33:45

time? Yeah. Well,

33:47

on that rosy note, the – Such

33:50

a lovely show. For

33:53

Grabenor this week, I want to point

33:56

people in the direction of this

33:58

organization called ARENA, which actually – is how

34:00

Jason and I met back in the

34:03

weeks after the 2016 election. This

34:05

arena puts on summits. So

34:08

these are opportunities for people to

34:10

come together and galvanize towards action.

34:12

We've had basically every conceivable person

34:14

from rank and file, Democratic operatives

34:17

to senior leaders and

34:19

everybody from Kamala Harris to Jason and all these

34:21

types of people may appear to show up to

34:23

these things. And we're doing an arena summit April

34:26

18th to 21st in Atlanta, Georgia.

34:30

And this is going to be an opportunity to convene Democratic

34:33

changemakers and independents as well

34:35

and never trumpers, anybody, to

34:37

come together to brainstorm and

34:40

collaborate about the everyday urgency

34:42

of this movement work. You

34:44

can go to arena.run or

34:46

arena.run slash events

34:50

and just check out. You can find the summit

34:54

information. We also do academies, which are more

34:56

extended trainings, which are upended to these. You

34:58

can come, you can see us. Jason

35:00

might come by. We may do a live recording of majority

35:02

54. We're talking about it. So

35:05

come by arena.run and

35:08

get ready. Let's cut through the apathy

35:10

in this election. Let's commit to action.

35:13

And so with that, Fred, thank you

35:15

so much for

35:18

joining us today. Really

35:20

wonderful for everybody out there. Oh, is there anything you want

35:22

to plug? I mean, let's get plug. I was going to

35:24

bust in and plug. So

35:26

obviously my show on democracy with FP Wellman every

35:28

Friday night right here in the Myes Tush network

35:31

at 11 p.m. Eastern APM Pacific. We talked to

35:33

the newsmakers, the folks talk about from media to

35:35

authors. This week I've got a great guest. We're

35:37

going to talk about moms for Liberty and how

35:40

she has been dealing with them for many years.

35:42

The infiltration of the far right, the lowest levels our

35:44

government. I'm really excited about the new series I'm doing

35:46

called In the Hot Seat with FP Wellman,

35:48

where I'm talking with Democratic candidates for

35:51

office. I've talked to Colin Orr

35:54

and I've talked to Debbie McArles-Wau. I've talked

35:56

to the one you haven't heard of, like

35:58

this one young, wonderful young woman. Kaylee

36:00

Thederson running for Idaho 1 for

36:02

Congress for a second time who her very

36:05

first event she had she had armed white

36:07

supremacist militia showed up around her event. Fascinating.

36:09

So people you know the next one coming

36:11

out we just put up Gloria Johnson who's

36:13

amazing behind us. Blackbird, yeah, Gloria's been epic

36:15

and then and then Lucas Coates is in

36:18

the can. You'll see Lucas Coates this week

36:20

talking to him in his run against Josh

36:22

Hawley. So those are on the Midas Touch

36:24

network. They're called in the hot seat. Just

36:27

put Midas Touch FB Wellman and you will

36:29

find me and man I just enjoyed joining you and

36:31

I'm always available if you need me. All

36:33

right well thank you my friend. For everybody

36:35

out there go out there and leave a

36:38

review for us. Five stars preferably just say

36:40

what you love about the show and omit

36:42

anything you hate about it. It

36:45

just helps us out you know it

36:47

helps us kind of rise up the charts and

36:49

build awareness for this pod. But thank you very

36:51

much everybody. We will be back next week. Thank

36:54

you to the Midas Mighty. Remember we all have a

36:56

platform. Make sure to use yours today.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features