Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
M. This
0:02
is Mesters in Business with Very
0:04
Renaults on Bloomberg Radio.
0:07
Here this
0:09
week on the podcast, I have a special
0:11
guest. Brad Stone is the
0:14
editor at Bloomberg News who covers technology
0:17
and the author of a number of books. The
0:19
one that just came out, Amazon Unbound,
0:22
Jeff Bezos and the Invention of a Global Empire
0:25
really quite fascinating. I had
0:27
previously read his um
0:30
his first book on Amazon, The Everything Store,
0:33
and when that had come out, I think it was Amazon
0:37
was still a
0:39
successful company, but not
0:42
the dominant juggernaut it's
0:44
become. And this book
0:47
really is, you know, the sequel
0:49
to that that talks about how
0:52
from the low point in when
0:56
Amazon actually had a pretty
0:58
substantial negative year in the stock
1:00
market down over all
1:04
of these new drivers of revenue
1:06
and growth, we're just teeing
1:09
up. And what ends up
1:11
happening is the
1:13
company just starts to hit on
1:15
all cylinders. And that's before
1:18
the pandemic, and then the pandemic
1:20
essentially doubles so many different
1:22
sectors within Amazon. They
1:24
were a company that was made for
1:27
a work from home lockdown situation,
1:30
UH, perfectly positioned and took
1:32
full advantage of it. Over
1:34
the course of those years, Amazon became
1:37
the second largest employer in
1:39
the country behind Walmart. Bezos
1:42
became the wealthiest man in the world. And Amazon
1:45
just dominates so many
1:47
areas of our everyday lives, from
1:50
uh supermarkets and
1:52
and delivery of just about everything
1:54
to Amazon web servers
1:56
too. You you just go
1:59
through everything they do, Amazon Prime, in Amazon
2:01
Video, and it's it's just endless.
2:03
They have changed the fabric
2:06
of our society and our economy,
2:08
and Stone does a fantastic job
2:11
telling the story of how that happened. I really
2:13
enjoyed the book, and I think you'll really
2:15
enjoy our conversation. So, with
2:18
no further ado, my interview
2:21
with Amazon Unbound author
2:23
Brad Stone. This
2:27
is Mesters in Business with Very
2:29
Results on Bloomberg Radio.
2:34
My special guest this week is Brad Stone.
2:37
He is the senior executive
2:39
editor for Technology at Bloomberg
2:41
News. Previously, he
2:43
was the Business Week writer covering
2:46
tech in Silicon Valley,
2:48
and before that he was the tech correspondent
2:51
for The New York Times and Newsweek.
2:53
He is the author of four books,
2:55
including The Everything Store, Jeff
2:58
Bezos, and The Age of Amazon From.
3:01
His most recent book is Amazon Unbound.
3:04
Jeff Bezos and the invention of
3:07
a global empire. Normally,
3:09
at this point I would say, brad Stone,
3:12
welcome to Bloomberg. But since you worked
3:14
for Bloomberg, let me just
3:16
say welcome to Masters in
3:18
Business. Thank you very great
3:20
to be here. So I have to start
3:23
off with the simple question,
3:25
and I know you define this in the
3:28
earlier book, Bezos
3:31
or Bezos? How do you pronounce his name?
3:34
It is Bezos, yes,
3:36
and I have encountered uh and I'm
3:38
sure he has as well, numerous
3:41
alternative pronunciations, but indeed
3:43
it is Bezos. Interesting.
3:45
So so let's start out a little
3:47
bit with your background. I mentioned
3:50
you're the senior executive editor
3:53
at Bloomberg News. You were a writer at Business
3:55
Week for ten years, and
3:57
before that the New York Times and
4:00
and Newsweek. How did you
4:02
start covering technology? What led
4:04
you into that space? Yeah,
4:06
well, Verry, I was way back before
4:09
the New York Times. I was had a once
4:11
proud magazine known as Newsweek,
4:13
and um, I was a
4:16
junior reporter kind of just looking
4:18
for an avenue, um, something
4:20
that I could you know, write about, where
4:23
my my articles would appear and what was a very
4:25
competitive magazine at the time.
4:28
For for journalists. And
4:30
this was the nineties and the Internet was becoming
4:32
more popular. And I had, you know, used
4:35
the Internet and become familiar with it
4:37
while I was in a college and
4:40
I just started writing about it. And then they moved me out
4:42
to Silicon Valley in good
4:45
timing, just just in time for the crash.
4:47
So I read, I read a
4:49
bunch of your New York time pieces.
4:52
Um, but they were YouTube
4:55
and iPads and Google
4:57
Search. How did you ultimately
5:00
you happened on to Amazon as
5:02
a subject matter. I
5:04
was covering Amazon at the time.
5:07
Um, it was it was
5:09
a little bit overlooked. If we go back
5:11
to two thousand and six, two seven, you
5:13
know, the eBay market cap was larger
5:15
than Amazon's at the time. It's really remarkable
5:18
to remember that the Amazon was stopped
5:20
as maybe haven't picked the wrong business
5:22
model for the Internet age. You know, Google
5:25
was a much more high profile and
5:27
interesting company, it seemed like. And
5:29
yeah, I remember doing a couple of stories about
5:32
the introduction of prime and fulfillment
5:34
by Amazon and and
5:36
and Amazon Web Services. And
5:39
I mean I basically I was I would talk
5:41
to Bezos. Um. When when Amazon
5:43
got into the fight with the book publishers
5:45
around kindle pricing. He was.
5:48
He was on the phone quite a bit arguing
5:50
Amazon's case, and I was always fascinated
5:52
by the company. I was fascinated by Bezos.
5:55
And then when I went over to Business Week and wrote a
5:57
couple of stories about Amazon there it
5:59
was it was really just sort of opportunistic
6:02
writing my first book. I felt like nobody had
6:04
really done the great Amazon story,
6:06
and books had been devoted to the other big
6:08
tech companies. Of course, I had no idea
6:11
what kind of juggernaut it was still to become,
6:14
but it seemed to me that it had been a little bit overlooked.
6:16
And that book really I read
6:18
it on vacation. I think in like it
6:22
was a good read, and you had
6:25
fairly decent access to
6:28
Bezos prior to
6:30
that. How cooperative was he for the
6:34
book Everything Store Right. I
6:36
can't quite remember the timeline, but I went in there
6:38
to meet with him to pitch the book, and
6:41
he was very receptive. You know, Amazon
6:43
has this weird cultural ritual
6:47
where they start every meeting with a dot with by
6:49
reading a document. So I brought him
6:51
a document to read and spiking
6:53
the book and yeah, and he read it in sort of
6:56
silence, and then he said, you know, it's too
6:58
early to write the Amazon book. I
7:00
did talk to him a couple of times on news things
7:03
while I was reporting on it, and he allowed me to
7:05
talk to his parents and friends and employees,
7:07
but he was pretty distant. It was limited
7:10
access for the first book. Uh that
7:12
that's really kind of interesting. So
7:14
tell us a little bit about your research and writing
7:17
process. The new book, Amazon on
7:19
Bound is very much
7:22
told chronologically. How
7:25
do you go about putting together this
7:27
monstrous
7:30
right? Well, let me continue the story.
7:32
So after after the last book, the Everything
7:34
Store comes out in twos and thirteen, and Bezos
7:37
does not like it very I don't know if you recall
7:39
this, but he had his wife at the time,
7:42
Mackenzie Um and some employees
7:44
like including Andy Jafsey, the
7:46
new CEO. They all wrote one star
7:48
reviews, and I thought,
7:50
I thought Amazon was wasn't aren't
7:52
they against people buying reviews
7:55
that that violates their policies? I
7:57
guess it was on the arm, So right
8:00
they been, and they bought it and read it, I guess.
8:02
Um. So anyway, there was a chill, and
8:05
and a couple of years went by, and
8:08
and then I and then at some point I realized
8:10
that, you know, the books took off and had
8:13
come to be seen as kind of the definitive history
8:15
of early Amazon. But I realized
8:17
that so much had happened Alexa and the
8:20
global marketplace and Bezos becoming
8:22
the wealthiest person in the world, that there were simply
8:24
more story to tell. And so I went
8:26
back to Amazon, probably a
8:29
little cheekily and just told them that
8:31
I was going to do it. And this time there was
8:33
no meeting with Bezos, but they
8:35
did allow they did allow me to talk to more
8:38
more than a dozen senior executives,
8:41
members of the Senior Leadership team, the FES
8:43
team. Yeah, and and they basis a lot
8:45
of going to talk to friends, and so
8:48
the access wasn't all that different. But the foundation
8:50
of the book of both books really were
8:52
the employees who had been
8:54
there, had participated
8:56
in key projects, and then who had left
8:59
or were there. But we're willing to sort of talk carefully
9:02
because obviously Amazon and most
9:04
companies these days they try to lock up
9:06
former employees or current employees and nondisclosure
9:09
agreements. I'd like to say that Amazon
9:11
has a lot of surface area, right more
9:13
so than a lot of other companies. It does
9:16
so many things, and there's actually
9:18
very few people with any kind of a bird's
9:20
eye view over it. Maybe really
9:22
just Jeff Bezos, I mean Andy Chassis
9:25
and Jeff Wilkie, the former head
9:27
of the retail business, you know, certainly,
9:29
but they're extremely disciplined and
9:32
careful in what they say. So it's really
9:34
just it was almost like aggregating
9:37
enough interviews, enough conversations
9:39
that I could start to piece together enough
9:42
of a picture of this entire company.
9:44
And then also, and by the way, very
9:46
not just Amazon, put the Washington Post
9:49
blue Origin Bezos and Space company
9:51
his basis, his personal type of the natural
9:53
Enquirer, like lots of different avenues
9:55
to go down. So it's really almost just a sheer
9:58
exercise and talking to as many people as it could.
10:01
And so people went on the record, even fail
10:03
the inner circle of people without giving you
10:05
a lot of pushback.
10:07
Did you find this book
10:09
was a little more challenging because
10:12
it's such a moving target
10:15
Compared to the first version,
10:17
the version that you wrote in Yes
10:20
and no, it was easier,
10:22
and that the Everything Store was kind of a calling
10:25
card so I could talk I
10:27
could reach out to hundreds of
10:29
people, and they instantly knew who I was and what I
10:31
was up to, right and and and
10:33
in some cases I had earned a measure of trust
10:35
by what they saw as a as
10:37
an accurate retelling of the company's
10:40
early years. But it was more difficult
10:42
in that it was it posted an enormous
10:45
organizational and structural challenge.
10:48
So in the Everything Store, it was a
10:50
very linear story. It was
10:53
a group of it was one guy in Wall Street
10:55
and then a group of people in a garage and bellevue
10:57
with an idea to sell books on the
10:59
Internet straight through, you
11:01
know, through the dot com boom, almost cratering
11:04
in the dot com bust, and then a revival. It
11:06
feels iconic that that story in a
11:08
way. And then this story is a sprawl of
11:10
things happening at the same time. I mean, it's
11:12
Alexa at the and the entry
11:15
in the India and Prime Video
11:17
and the marketplace, and the grocery business
11:19
and the logistics operation and
11:22
adds and and all the other stuff
11:24
I mentioned. So it was an organizational
11:26
challenge. But in some ways this story was
11:28
actually the better story. I mean, when you
11:31
think about it from a pure value creation point
11:33
of view, you know, the Everything Store covers
11:35
the creation of about eighty billion
11:38
dollars in market capitalization,
11:41
and this this story covers
11:43
the creation of one point six trillion. So
11:45
in some ways, you know, this was the more dramatic
11:48
business story. Sure,
11:50
just the numbers are just mind blowing, and we'll
11:52
talk about some of the numbers a little later. Any
11:55
chapter stand out as particularly
11:57
challenging to write or particularly
11:59
fun to dive into. I
12:02
started this book in two dozen seventeen,
12:05
so this was before h G two,
12:07
before um the Antitrust
12:09
Subcommittee report into the big tech
12:11
companies, before obviously before the pandemic.
12:14
But the funnest and the most unexpected
12:16
story was bezos is tangled with
12:19
the National Enquirer and Medium
12:21
post about the bodies and the Washot
12:23
post I had never expected. Well,
12:25
let me step back, because you'll appreciate this. Most
12:29
most companies will draw, you
12:31
know, we'll build a spense around the private lives
12:34
of their key executives. Right, it's seen
12:36
as maybe a no go area.
12:38
And Amazon was fiercely is fiercely
12:41
protective of bezos Is privacy, and
12:43
Bezos and is seriously protective
12:45
of his family's privacy. And so
12:47
for this thing to blow up at
12:49
the end of two thousand, a pen as I'm writing the book,
12:52
you know, and an alleged affair,
12:55
a trashy tabloid newspaper
12:58
accusations of political interfere
13:00
inspired the Trump administration, a
13:02
hall of mirrors, of crazy
13:04
characters and private detectives and
13:07
you know, unethical Hollywood characters
13:10
and perhaps mbs. I mean, it was
13:12
beyond anything that I had imagined, so
13:15
in terms of like challenge and and maybe
13:17
entertainment value. And I just
13:19
couldn't sort of couldn't believe that this is where not
13:21
only this is where, you know, something that I had pried
13:24
open, but this is where Bezos had kind of led
13:26
the world and lead his own story.
13:28
Was astonishing to me. Let's
13:30
talk a little bit about that empire
13:33
and put some some flesh
13:35
on the bones. In terms of numbers,
13:38
I like the way you broke the book up
13:41
into three sections, and
13:43
each section starts with four
13:46
data points. Annual
13:48
revenues, number of employees,
13:51
the market cap of Amazon and
13:53
and Bezos is net worth, and
13:56
some of the numbers from just over
13:58
a decade, they were doing thirty
14:00
four billion in sales in and
14:03
then by it's a hundred and
14:05
thirty six billion, and then by last year
14:08
it's two hundred and thirty three billion.
14:11
And along the way, they went
14:13
from thirty three thousand employees to three
14:15
hundred fifty two. Now they have about
14:18
six hundred fifty thousand employees.
14:21
Uh, and Bezos went from a mere
14:24
fifteen billion in net worth today's
14:26
worth well over UM
14:30
was one five. Now he's coming
14:32
up on two hundred billion. And
14:34
by the way, very employees, it's over a
14:36
million now over a million. Yeah.
14:41
Sword So so that
14:43
was the question I was gonna ask, is how much
14:45
of the numbers are pandemic
14:48
related and how much of this is just
14:50
an acceleration of all these trends
14:53
at Amazon that were in place before
14:56
last year even you know began. I
14:59
mean, I think it's both the pandemic
15:01
was an accelerant and that growth
15:03
might have happened, and the pandemic
15:06
just moved everything forward. If
15:08
if people are wondering, doesn't roll back
15:10
to Amazon, let people go, I
15:13
don't think so. I think what the pandemic
15:15
did is that it made people more
15:17
familiar with UM,
15:19
you know, next Amazon's next day delivery,
15:22
UM possibilities, grocery
15:25
shopping. It increased Amazon's
15:28
profits, and what they always
15:30
do with that is they reinvested in the more
15:32
Amazon So it created profilming centers
15:34
closer to major cities, closer to our homes,
15:37
more trucks on the highway, more events in our
15:39
neighborhoods, more data centers. And what
15:41
that means is, you know, Amazon spent the pandemic
15:45
basically capturing more advantages,
15:48
uh, the advantage advantages of
15:50
performance centers close order to our
15:53
homes and faster delivery. And
15:55
it's not going to unline that. And it just means
15:57
that shopping offline for food and
15:59
for everything else is going to be more convenient,
16:01
and that is probably frightening
16:04
for offline competitors
16:06
supermarkets. The other thing Amazon's
16:09
doing is creating physical retail stores,
16:11
so that's still capturing of
16:13
all retail people shopping in actual stores,
16:16
and Amazon itself stamping out these Amazon
16:18
Fresh grocery stores. So it had
16:21
a productive pandemic. You might you
16:23
might say it was sort of perversely lucky because
16:25
it had all the advantages going into it, and
16:28
now it has even more. So
16:30
we're gonna get to some of the acquisitions. We'll
16:32
talk about Amazon Prime and Whole Foods,
16:34
but before we do that. Early
16:37
in the book, you talk about sort of the tens
16:40
low point for Amazon, which
16:43
was October. They
16:46
had kind of stumbled with the Amazon
16:48
Phone and a lot
16:50
of the big growth engines
16:52
were just starting to ramp up. I
16:55
have to ask, who is possibly
16:57
worse at assessing padditors
17:01
then Microsoft, Steve Balmer? Is
17:03
there anybody who is? I
17:06
mean, if this guy, this guy missed
17:09
everything from the iPhone to the
17:11
iPod two
17:13
and and he was dissing Amazon
17:16
in like they
17:18
don't make a profit? Who nobody's interested
17:21
in those guys? I mean, I
17:23
love your usage of him. What attracted
17:25
you to using him as the
17:27
uh, the patsy and as I think
17:29
I call him the contrarian indicator. Um,
17:31
but let me give a little bit of the defense of
17:34
Steve Balmer and lay to us in fourteen.
17:36
Um, he wasn't alone, right, There were
17:38
there were investors like David Einhorn who
17:40
were who were adding Amazon to the to
17:43
the bubble stock basket. Um
17:45
analyts we were mixed.
17:47
At the time. There was a lot of speculation
17:50
about the underlying profitability of Amazon
17:52
Web Services, which the company was disguising
17:54
on its income statement. At the R and
17:57
yet we have to have to understand that Amazon
17:59
is deliberately opaque, and you
18:01
know, in a way that it's sort of surprising the
18:03
sec You know, our other regulatory authorities
18:06
haven't been more aggressive
18:08
in getting the company to reveal more, but
18:11
it is. It doesn't want the world to know how
18:13
profitable a business Amazon Web Services
18:16
is, and it's not showing profits.
18:18
It's disguising its profits on
18:21
its income statement by investing
18:24
in more data centers, more fulfillment
18:26
centers, expansion. At that point,
18:28
the expansion in the India begins, and
18:31
it's spending a billion dollars a
18:33
year at that point a prime video. So no
18:35
one has any idea because Bezos
18:37
is sitting there at the craft table making new
18:40
bets, and you know, Balmer just
18:42
happens to be a bit of a loud mouth and expressed
18:44
it at exactly the wrong time. Because
18:47
you can go back and march the exact moment
18:49
when Amazon has to finally reveal
18:51
a WS as financials and the thing
18:54
starts to take off. Huh. It's
18:57
interesting that it was such a strategic
18:59
advantage, uh, to not
19:01
discuss Amazon
19:04
Web Servers for so long, and
19:06
they were able to to get away with that
19:08
because of um it
19:11
wasn't more than ten percent of the revenues. Is that
19:13
was that the rationale for hiding that. I
19:17
think that's right. That they could another
19:20
business. Another CEO is
19:22
going to want to show that off. It's going to want
19:24
to impress investors, particularly
19:26
because if you look at the stock performance in
19:29
two thousand fourteen, I mean my recollection is
19:32
the stock went down and you
19:34
know, or at least it was embattled, and
19:37
you know, another CEO is going to say, well,
19:39
it's gonna like cater to their own ego, uh
19:42
and to their recruitment needs of their company into
19:44
the image and want to release that. But Basos,
19:46
across the ten years
19:49
of this of a WS growth, you
19:51
know, he thinks long term, he thinks competitively.
19:54
He didn't want to tip off competitors to how
19:56
good of a business this was, and he kept
19:58
it hidden. I mean that takes a little bit of
20:00
a remarkable act of CEO patients
20:02
and bravery to do that. But they
20:05
felt like they had a gold mine there and they
20:07
wanted to mine it for whatever it was worth.
20:10
Let's see in let's
20:14
see what the stock price looks like.
20:16
Bear with me one second while I pull
20:18
this up. Oh
20:20
no, this was this was not a
20:24
good year. They were down for
20:26
the full year, and you're right
20:28
the bottom while there was a low over
20:30
the summer in in May, and then there was
20:33
another low in October.
20:36
But yeah, that doesn't surprise me that
20:39
that bomber nailed the bottom.
20:41
But a lot of people were pretty skeptical
20:44
in an otherwise pretty decent year
20:46
for the market, right
20:49
right, And and when you look back
20:51
at two thousand fourteen, it's so remarkable
20:54
that that there was such skepticism
20:57
because that that is the year that Amazon
20:59
introduces Alexa. It is the
21:01
year that they started preparing to to introduce
21:04
the financials of aws
21:06
UM. I think I think that might have been
21:08
the first year that Amazon Studios originals
21:11
start to come out, So the first batch
21:13
of TV shows that weren't all that good,
21:15
but I think it marked a transformation
21:17
of Amazon Prime into more of a content
21:20
service. So uh and and
21:22
then and then the expansion in the India really
21:24
begins in earnest in two thou fourteen, and
21:26
so they're placing a lot of vests
21:28
there and to the public markets and
21:30
two investors. Everything looks kind of dire,
21:33
but it's really the beginning of probably the most
21:36
impressive wealth creation, maybe
21:38
even in the history of business. I mean, Um,
21:41
it's just it's such a perhaps perhaps
21:44
alongside Apple, you know, the kind of scale
21:46
that we haven't really seen before. Right, So
21:48
so let's talk about some of the big winners that
21:50
are driving that growth.
21:52
Um, Amazon Prime. This
21:55
really turned out to be quite a
21:57
game change or not only making
22:01
clients stickier, but
22:04
really taking Amazon to a whole new
22:06
level. It really has evolved.
22:08
So back into thousan five, you know,
22:11
when they conceived it, Um
22:13
Basis wanted to kind of take shipping charges
22:15
off the table. Like he knew Amazon could compete
22:17
with selection, it could be
22:19
competitive with prices, but the convenience
22:22
just wasn't there to take many days for
22:24
people to get their packages. And at
22:26
the time Amazon had maybe a dozen fu filment
22:28
centers in the US. So taking shipping
22:31
off the table, trying to offset
22:33
it with what was the seventy nine dollar
22:35
a year charge it made
22:37
It made a lot of sense. And then you you wrap
22:39
people up into the Prime ecosystem UM,
22:42
and they spent more. And then
22:44
you fast forward five seven
22:47
years and Basis sees that maybe
22:49
shipping isn't going to be that much of a
22:51
differentiator anymore in a world where
22:53
Amazon has hundreds of fulfilment
22:56
centers around the country where one day or two day
22:58
shipping might be possible even without Prime membership.
23:00
And so we kind of surprises all of his executives
23:03
by saying we're gonna put free TV
23:06
shows and movies into this. And
23:08
now today I would say that's probably more more
23:11
important to the prime to Prime membership,
23:13
the fact that you get access to prime
23:15
video, prime music. I
23:17
mean, they've got I think it's Amazon Music,
23:20
mkindle club. People don't even
23:22
know what it gets to you, and maybe that's part of it. They're
23:24
sort of this hazy, ambiguous
23:26
it's a lot of it. That's a lot
23:29
of things, and people tend to maximize
23:31
the value. It's want to maximize the value
23:33
of any club they belong to. So it's
23:35
a sort of neat psychological trick
23:38
and and and the center of the
23:40
Amazon operating model. And
23:43
and then related to the expansion of
23:45
groceries, but as well as
23:47
coming up with um physical
23:50
locations near I think it was prime
23:53
members was the purchase of whole
23:55
foods, which you discussed in the
23:57
book. You know, remind me a little bit of
23:59
the Google YouTube purchase. The
24:01
increase in stock price essentially
24:04
made the purchase free. To tell us about
24:06
the whole Foods purchase. I
24:09
so I devote a whole chapter to Amazon's
24:12
adventures slash misadventures
24:14
in groceries. And it's really interesting
24:16
because this is one area where Bethos
24:19
wasn't as far sighted as some of his executives.
24:22
He had people advocating
24:24
for an expansion in the grocery delivery as
24:26
far back because two thousand and seven he
24:29
thought that this would be an opportunity
24:31
that would be there for Amazon. Um
24:33
and and executives were writing papers and
24:35
I quote some of them in the book. UM, I
24:38
love the one that was called Amazon's futurist
24:40
crap, which stood for can't
24:42
realize the profits and was a lot of basically
24:45
consumables and grocery store items.
24:47
And it wasn't until Google
24:49
introduces Google Express and instat
24:52
Cart kind of comes unto the scene, starts raising
24:54
torrents of money that he starts
24:57
moving faster. And the
24:59
challenge with fresh food is that is
25:01
that you need to hold different fulfillment network
25:03
refrigerated and rapid
25:05
deliveries Mainly people want
25:07
to be at their homes when they when they get
25:10
when they get their deliveries. And
25:13
um and and nothing that Amazon was trying
25:15
is working very well. There was Prime Now and Amazon
25:17
Fresh, and so Whole Foods comes along in
25:19
two seventeen. It's a distressed asset
25:22
um. John mackew is beset
25:25
on all sides by activists investors clinging
25:27
to his organic selection in an
25:30
age of broader selection
25:32
and prevalent junk food
25:34
and supermarkets. And and
25:37
Bezos buys it. Now. It's
25:39
interesting because amazon s futuring groceries
25:41
isn't necessarily whole food. They're creating these
25:43
Amazon Fresh supermarkets. But I think they realized,
25:46
or Bezos realized, that he was going to need to
25:48
learn a lot about the grocery businesses if
25:51
Amazon was going to fill its potential there. So
25:54
let's talk a little bit about some of their products.
25:56
Um that we're winners, will talk about Kindle,
26:00
go on, Alexa and fire TV. It's
26:02
kind of amazing to think a CEO
26:05
said, I have an idea
26:07
for a reader and we're going to build
26:10
this from scratch. Tell us
26:12
a little bit about the genesis
26:14
of Kindle and what it meant
26:17
for Amazon, whose roots were in book
26:20
selling, right right.
26:22
So we're going back now to to some
26:24
of the material I cover in the Everything Store,
26:27
And this is probably about two four
26:30
and Bezos is basically watching
26:32
Apple vaporized his music business
26:34
with the iPod and itube store,
26:37
and he understands that a digital transformation
26:40
is coming from media and that Amazon's
26:42
brand is still very tightly intertwined
26:45
with the book business, and concludes
26:47
that if Apple were to ever move
26:49
into digital books, that Amazon
26:51
would be vulnerable. And so he basically
26:54
tells his leadership team, the f team, that
26:56
they're going to build a knee reader. At
26:58
the time, Sony had tried to do it and had
27:00
sort of failed with the Sony Reader. And
27:03
there's all sorts of objections because what does
27:05
Amazon at the time know about building devices,
27:07
And Beza says, I know it's hard, We're
27:10
going to do it, and it's a
27:12
three year process. It's actually very similar
27:14
to the Alexis story which I tell him in Amazon
27:16
Unbound. But he drives the initiative,
27:19
he sponsors it, he authorizes all sorts
27:21
of investments, he harangued,
27:23
He gets his his sales folks
27:26
to go to New York City and harangue
27:28
the book publishers and the unlocking more
27:30
of their catalogs for the for the e book
27:32
business. They had been very hesitant because
27:34
it wasn't a major business for them. Amazon
27:37
uses its leverage and strength with the
27:39
publishers to basically get them to
27:41
digitize their books, and then
27:43
they announced the thing into two thousand and seven,
27:45
and that is the beginning. Um that
27:48
is the beginning of Amazon and devices at
27:50
leads to everything from Alexa to the failed
27:52
fire phone, to the fire TVs to all
27:54
sorts of things we haven't seen yet. And it's a
27:56
great illustration of Bezos really
28:00
inventing his company in every turn and
28:02
thinking ambitiously
28:04
in an unbound way about
28:06
what Amazon could become. It wasn't
28:08
just a retailer, it wasn't
28:10
just a bookseller. It wasn't just an
28:13
enterprise software company. When it's cloud business,
28:15
he doesn't he doesn't place
28:18
any limits, it doesn't seem to me, and what
28:20
what Amazon can be, and
28:22
that kind of tease up the Echo, which
28:25
is its own product category.
28:27
If this was a standalone product
28:29
from a new startup company
28:31
that had sold hundreds of millions
28:33
of units, they would be a really
28:35
successful company. Tell us
28:38
how how did the echo come about?
28:41
Well, it's interesting that you see
28:43
the very I don't I don't
28:45
know if it would be. Um,
28:49
Amazon probably sells those units at
28:51
close to cost. And
28:53
and this will get to the origin. You
28:56
know, it's the brains of Alexa
28:58
are in Amazon webster uses and
29:01
and I'm sure it gets a nice wholesale
29:04
rate on that. And that's where Beza
29:06
started with this. He sent an email to his his
29:09
colleagues and late to us in ten we
29:11
should build a computer whose brains
29:13
are in the cloud that's completely controllable
29:15
by your voice. Because he's thinking at
29:17
the time, how does he exploit Amazon's
29:20
advantage in cloud computing, and how
29:22
does he create some consumer facing
29:24
applications. And he's a big science
29:26
fiction fan and he's totally engrossed
29:28
with the possibilities and improvements
29:31
and voice search at the time. And
29:33
that's that email spawns Alexa, and very
29:35
much like the kindle, he gets in
29:37
the in the weeds, and he sponsors it, and
29:39
he authorizes the hiring of all
29:41
sorts of oppressive voice scientists
29:45
and they bring it out into the world and collect
29:47
data in a very surreptitious and interesting way.
29:50
Um and and now it's so tightly
29:53
interwoven into the Amazon empire
29:56
that we don't know if that if it makes
29:58
money. I don't think it's been as evolutionaries
30:00
maybe they have hoped. It's
30:03
certainly not a conversational computer or
30:05
or really a useful every day
30:08
assistant in the way that they hoped. And there's not
30:10
really a productive app ecosystem
30:12
as there is with the iPhone. So
30:14
it's interesting. Um. It certainly has helped
30:16
to change Amazon's image, and they market
30:18
the thing, and I think it helps their their image
30:20
as an innovator. Alexa.
30:23
What's the title of brad Stone's new
30:25
book? I don't have
30:27
an answer. I
30:30
guess Masos is not too happy
30:32
with you these days. I didn't hear. It's
30:34
sorry. I don't have an answer to that. All
30:37
right, we'll go after the get
30:40
get it to fix it. Did you see in the new
30:42
book, I I fleuped
30:44
out the identity of the voice Alex.
30:46
I was very proud of that. Yes, that was
30:48
really interesting. It's a woman
30:50
who's a voiceover artist in Colorado?
30:53
Is that right? What's right? Right? Na?
30:56
Nina Raleigh? And you
30:58
know I had I had recalled that the
31:00
identity of theory had been unveiled
31:02
a couple of years ago, and so I was very curious. Okay,
31:04
who's voice is springing from Alexa?
31:07
And and before we move on from the section
31:10
of of what's been driving Amazon's growth,
31:13
I mean, Amazon Web Services is
31:15
just a monster, isn't it.
31:18
Oh, it's it's it's there's a
31:20
I think it's a fifty billion dollar run rate. Um.
31:24
You know, it's a ten year
31:26
old division and tide Amazon.
31:29
It's in and it's changed the way companies
31:32
and universities and governments compute
31:34
and run their businesses. Um, it's
31:36
it's created, you know, massive new business opportunities
31:39
from Microsoft and IBM and Google.
31:42
It is and and it's showing no signs of
31:44
slowing down. So when you when
31:46
you think about you know, Bethos
31:49
who really had some of the initial ideas,
31:51
and and Andy Jassey's success running
31:53
it over the past ten years. And yes, it's it's
31:55
been remarkable. Earlier we
31:57
were talking about some of the drivers
32:00
of growth of Amazon. There are two other
32:03
areas that help drive growth,
32:05
but not without some problems. And let's
32:08
talk about both of them.
32:10
The first is the third party market
32:13
sort of turning Amazon
32:15
into a quasi eBay
32:18
in some ways tell us a little bit about
32:20
what that did, opening Amazon
32:22
up to basically anyone
32:24
who wants to sell goods on
32:26
their site. I would say
32:28
in the first years it was it
32:31
was it was pretty positive. I mean, um,
32:34
creating a third credit marketplace, added
32:36
selection, and added product categories that
32:38
Amazon wasn't going to touch itself create
32:41
minted a lot of success, particularly in
32:43
the West. And the key turning
32:46
point, and the story that I'm telling in the
32:48
book and the chapter devoted to marketplace,
32:50
is when Amazon quite consciously
32:53
in about two thousand fifteen, started
32:56
pursuing the global selling opportunity
32:58
of basos stalk companies like Ali Baba
33:01
with all the express and a startup called
33:03
wish dot com basically conducting
33:05
a form of geographic arbitrage, allowing
33:08
sellers and manufacturers and China
33:10
and other other parts of the world to sell
33:12
in the West and and to lower lower
33:14
prices and increased selection. And
33:17
they pursued task in a very Amazon like
33:19
way, building systems, self service systems
33:21
and translation tools, aggregating
33:24
inventory and lowering the cost of ship and
33:26
then suddenly the marketplace tilt
33:29
in favor of of overseas sellers,
33:31
and you have a lot of disgradled sellers in the
33:33
West, and an explosion selection
33:36
lower prices and all kinds of casks,
33:38
counterfeits, fraud, exploding cover
33:40
boards, UM, and and perhaps
33:43
a real depreciation and the quality
33:45
of products that are sold on Right. That's
33:47
where I wanted to get to, is that. Look,
33:50
my my first Amazon purchase was
33:53
when my college roommate gave me a
33:55
gift certificate and I
33:57
actually hunted down with that. First purchase
34:00
was in December. UM
34:02
burn Rate was the book. But I'm
34:06
I'm kind of surprised at after
34:09
working so hard to maintain
34:12
quality and to guarantee lowest
34:14
prices and to guarantee
34:17
a very high level of customer service,
34:20
suddenly there's just fakes
34:22
and stuff that's poorly made and falls apart.
34:25
You mentioned the hoverboard. Um,
34:28
a number of houses had burned down,
34:30
and half of the you write in the book
34:32
half the houses that burnt down due
34:35
to hoverboard fires, they
34:37
were purchased on Amazon. How did
34:39
the company respond to to
34:41
this problem? Well, in terms of
34:43
the hoverboard challenge, I mean they stopped
34:46
selling them a little a little bit too late, and now
34:48
they're involved in endless litigation,
34:51
and in terms of the overall problems
34:53
of fraud and counterfeit and fake
34:56
reviews, they've been a very Amazon
34:58
and Silicon Valley type. They've created
35:01
systems, they've they've tried to use technology
35:03
to an artificial intelligence
35:05
to weed out fraud, to increase
35:08
the level of the quality of
35:10
of sellers on the platform, and
35:12
with with I think some mixed results.
35:15
On a related issue to that,
35:18
I recall sending an email to
35:20
to Bezos after I'm
35:23
trying to remember which Michael Lewis book
35:25
it was that had come out.
35:27
Maybe it was Flashboys or
35:29
The Big Short and I always it had
35:31
to be after the Kindle because there
35:33
were all these one star reviews
35:36
of a Michael Lewis book, because
35:38
the Kindle release was
35:40
set by the publisher to take
35:42
place like three months or six months
35:45
later, it was it was after
35:47
the book public It was kind of insane
35:49
that these Kindle fan boys were
35:52
one starring reviews. Since
35:54
then, we've had like a much bigger
35:56
problem with reviews, fake
35:58
reviews, purchase reviews. How
36:01
is Amazon responding to that? My takeaway,
36:05
I just can no longer rely on
36:07
reviews. I just assume most
36:09
of them are nonsense. That's
36:12
true. And as a as an author whose
36:14
sales are are taking place, uh
36:16
predominantly, And I was getting to test
36:19
the I just I just saw
36:21
a I think it was a two star review because
36:24
somebody felt that there were fingerprints smudges
36:26
on the cover. You's
36:29
like, you gotta be getting me but doing
36:33
Yeah, I mean, I think you know. They they've
36:35
done a couple of things. They prioritize
36:38
UM actual purchases, the reviews
36:40
from yeah,
36:42
verified reviews, but they've also i think lowered
36:45
the significance of reviews. And
36:48
when when you think back a couple of years ago,
36:50
and this leads into advertising. Um,
36:52
the search engine was this taxonomy
36:55
of useful products UM that a
36:58
very secretive and is on algorithm
37:01
would order. And one of the big
37:03
variables was the number and the quality
37:05
of reviews that a product got. And of
37:07
course that just opened it up to third
37:10
party sellers gaming the system,
37:12
buying fake reviews, generating their own,
37:15
and you know, and that variable ended up
37:17
being less useful. And now it's basically
37:19
the Amazon Church results are essentially
37:21
pay for play people by
37:24
search ads to appear there, and reviews
37:26
are no longer important. The advertising
37:29
is a little bit of a fail also, because you
37:32
know, I was searching for a lithium battery
37:34
the other day. It's number thirty four fifty
37:36
and up pops during cell and I click it and buy
37:39
it. And it's only after it arrives
37:41
that I realized this isn't
37:43
this is the you know, three thousand
37:46
and twenty three. Why would that show
37:48
up in a search for a very specific
37:51
and so I've I've kind of learned
37:53
be aware of sponsored results,
37:56
and really it's best to start
37:58
your search off of Amazon.
38:01
I never approached Amazon
38:03
shopping that way. Now it's
38:06
look for what you want to get and then if Amazon
38:08
has it, great, But don't begin
38:11
your search on Amazon. I wonder are
38:13
they trading off advertising
38:15
revenues for sales. I
38:18
told the story of the evolution
38:21
of the ad business inside Amazon and
38:23
the decision to move sponsored search
38:26
results up to the top. Sponsored
38:28
listing to the top of search results was a
38:30
very specific decision made by days
38:32
Os, and I think he understood
38:35
how profitable the search business could be
38:37
inside Amazon and simply wanted
38:39
the cash to go, you know, to make
38:41
his investments in Prime video and satellite
38:44
internet access and the other ambitious
38:46
plans that he has. They saw that it
38:48
would lead to a decrease in
38:50
in customer satisfaction. I
38:53
believe that this might even be seen as a turning
38:55
point in Amazon's history. Um
38:57
He judged that the
39:00
impact on customer satisfaction would
39:02
have to be so large as to outweigh
39:05
the benefit that AMA Amazon would be getting.
39:07
I call this the gold mine in the back gyard. But I
39:09
do think there's some cough. And I just did
39:11
a lithium battery search the one Barry that you just
39:13
described, and it's a mess. Yeah,
39:16
it's a debacle, absolutely. Yeah.
39:18
It's all sponsored a private label brands,
39:21
and I have, you know, just absolutely no
39:23
idea here, right. If you don't know exactly
39:25
what you're looking for, the Amazon
39:27
search is as often as not
39:31
unhelpful. Let's let's talk about
39:33
two of the biggest failures
39:36
um and I'm going to use those terms loosely,
39:39
A new one and an old one. The
39:41
latest debacle h
39:44
Q two. I mean, how tone
39:46
deaf was that? That was just such
39:48
an avoidable self
39:50
inflicted wounds? How did they
39:52
blow that so badly? So
39:55
it's interesting. I have a chapter in the book
39:58
about HQ two and
40:00
and one I think easy answer is
40:02
that the political environment kind of drastically
40:05
changed under them as they
40:07
as they embark on this
40:10
um on, this on the search,
40:13
which lasted much longer than they thought. And
40:15
it starts with a kind of political earthquake
40:18
in Seattle, the city council
40:20
turning hospital, Amazon being
40:22
blamed for all sorts of ills, and Bezos think looking
40:24
at Elon with the giga factory in Nevada
40:27
and fox Kind in Wisconsin and thinking
40:29
this process is going to underscore who wants
40:32
us? And in the year plus
40:34
as they do this, Amazon hits
40:37
the trillion dollars in market cap, Bezos becomes
40:39
the wealthiest person in the world. AOC gets
40:41
elected, the progressive political movement
40:43
gathers steam and a sense, and the tech
40:45
lash begins. And as they announced,
40:48
um, you know New York City, in Washington,
40:51
d c um, they you know,
40:53
they realize that it's it's not just
40:55
gonna be expression of who whats us. It's going to be
40:57
a verdict about the role that tech company,
41:00
me and even big companies are playing in our
41:02
community. So that's a much different discussion
41:04
than the one they wanted to have. Huh.
41:06
So, So to two things about that,
41:09
I'm gonna push back a little bit. First, the
41:12
tech lash had been ramping up
41:15
for a good couple of years before
41:18
h Q two. Remember
41:22
Bernie Sanders almost bat
41:24
Hillary Clinton to be
41:26
the nominee. So issues
41:29
of wealth inequality and income inequality
41:32
and and the halves and the half nots. I
41:34
mean, that's been an ongoing discussion
41:36
for at least since the Great
41:38
Financial Crisis. Uh, it's
41:40
certainly accelerated. But but the other
41:43
thing is when you look at when
41:45
they started the search, they
41:47
were already a giant and
41:49
wildly successful company.
41:52
Um. It just seems and
41:55
and kudos to Scott
41:57
Galloway at n y U
42:00
who basically said, all these
42:02
things are are affront and
42:04
the areas that are gonna win are gonna
42:07
be where the CEO has a
42:09
home or one to live and and
42:11
he literally said it will either be New York or
42:13
d C. And lo and behold it was both.
42:16
Um. So the question is why
42:18
not why not be small? Are
42:20
they just at a at a certain point you
42:23
become so wealthy, you just out of touch. Why
42:25
not say Hey, we're gonna come in and
42:27
here's what we're gonna do for the community, and
42:29
we're gonna build a waterfront park, and we're
42:31
gonna help expand um mass
42:34
transit, and we're gonna do this, and we're gonna do that.
42:36
This looks like it was
42:38
just sold so poorly. And
42:42
I want to actually agree agree with you that
42:44
there were there worked some quite clear,
42:46
invisible signs that the political climates
42:48
and shifted. But I think it's a
42:51
function of how reclusive and
42:53
maybe self absorbed by us and other
42:55
Amazon executives were, so they just kind
42:57
of failed to see it. And you know,
42:59
the fact they you know, they
43:01
wanted to be wooed by communities. But
43:04
I think you're making a pretty good point, which is
43:06
that they actually were going to be the ones that would
43:08
have to do the wooing. And seeing
43:10
two hundred thirty regions prostrate
43:12
themselves, sorry, prostrate
43:15
themselves in front of Amazon, a
43:17
big, wealthy technology company, was just unseemly,
43:20
I think exactly
43:25
exactly. It's amazing. And then
43:27
the other failure I have to talk about,
43:29
which is kind of shocking, is
43:32
Blue Origins has just been a mess
43:35
from day one. It was preordained
43:37
to fail. How how could you say we're
43:40
going to set up a private company to
43:42
reinvigorate space travel,
43:45
but we're going to do it on the cheap. It's just it's
43:48
so opposite of the Amazon approach.
43:50
What was he thinking? Yeah,
43:53
well, this is um he sets up Blue
43:55
Origin in two thousand. He is a
43:57
relative popper by
44:00
by today's standards in terms of his
44:02
his wealth and this whole saying
44:04
in the space business, Um that
44:06
the quickest way to become a millionaire is
44:08
the start off as a billionaire. So I think he
44:10
went into it knowing that building
44:13
rockets is not for the faint of heart, and so
44:15
he righte he sets out to constrain the
44:17
investment, to keep the headcount small.
44:20
He's going to privately fund it, and he's going to think
44:22
long term, all the sort of Bezos hallmarks.
44:24
And what happens is Elon Musk comes in
44:27
and Um literally you know, starts
44:29
going quickly raising
44:31
money from venture capitalists, UM,
44:33
funding space X with government
44:36
contracts, and and Bezos's
44:38
approach seems you know, kind of meager
44:40
and tame. In response, then Bezos
44:42
changes gears, starts selling a billion dollars
44:44
worth of Amazon stock every year to
44:46
fund it, and sees a lot of dysfunction
44:49
at the company. Right, Yeah, that this
44:51
function was ongoing. There's a data point
44:53
you mentioned the book that was mind blowing. Elon
44:56
Musk's SpaceX wins
44:58
a contract for FO forty million
45:00
dollars, but like so many Defense
45:03
Department and government contracts,
45:05
there are some price over
45:07
rides and he ends up,
45:09
according to an inspector general, getting
45:12
paid seven point seven billion
45:15
dollars went to space X, which
45:17
which makes every time he complains kind
45:19
of laughing. Right. I think
45:22
that's more that that first, that
45:24
was the first installment of a contract
45:27
than that then kind of continued to evolve
45:30
UM and that Bezos was looking at back
45:32
go and you know, we should have we should have been
45:34
on this UM. He he was ultimately
45:37
I think jealous, probably a strange
45:39
position for Jeff Bezos to be in that
45:42
that musque was getting paid to play.
45:44
You know, they have similar dreams in space
45:47
UM. And here the government is funding SpaceX
45:50
and its ambitions and helping Elon scale
45:52
the company, and and Bezos is still
45:55
shelling out personally for Blue Origins
45:57
Amazing and our final discussion
45:59
on failure UM. They
46:01
had an internal process of reviewing
46:04
employees called stacked
46:06
ranking that led to what you
46:08
described as a quote informal
46:10
cruelty unquote that is
46:14
definitional for the company's
46:16
corporate culture. Explain what
46:19
that was about and why they ultimately had
46:21
to change it right
46:24
and and different companies have experimented
46:26
with different versions of this. Bezos
46:29
early on never wanted Amazon
46:31
to become a country club, a
46:33
place where employees got comfortable.
46:36
He was particularly worried in the fulfillment
46:38
center is that if people stuck around for too long,
46:40
they could be susceptible to organizing
46:43
efforts from unions. And
46:45
the review process really encouraged
46:48
managers to you know, to
46:50
to evaluate and then and
46:52
then um dismissed the lowest
46:54
performers. And this is a management practice
46:57
that has wreak havoc everywhere Microsoft,
47:00
off, the General Electric etcetera.
47:03
Um, there were there was one element
47:05
that led to I think these
47:07
sort of negative evaluations of Amazon,
47:09
Amazon's culture. That was a theme in the
47:11
Everything Store. It was obviously there was that high
47:14
profile New York Times article into those
47:16
of jifteen and yes, I
47:18
think after the Times article they
47:21
re evaluated it. I still
47:23
get reports periodically that a form of
47:25
it still exists. And the Amazon so big
47:27
of a company right now, there are lots of different
47:29
pockets of of employee
47:33
you know, experiences and reviews.
47:36
Um, but I think you know, this
47:38
is part of the basis is philosophy. He he
47:40
wants people to come to Amazon, to
47:42
have the most productive years of their career, to
47:45
move at breakneck speed, and when
47:47
they when they slow down, to move
47:49
on, he doesn't mind. He doesn't mind
47:51
that even the compensation systems
47:53
are sort of geared towards avoiding
47:56
people becoming extraordinarily so
47:58
extraordinarily wealthy that they stopped
48:00
being motivated. And yeah, it
48:02
is interpreted as a kind of informal cruelty
48:05
among some people. And that's why, um,
48:07
disgruntled former Amazon employees
48:10
are not a rare species, to say
48:12
the least. Let's talk a little bit
48:14
about some really fascinating things
48:17
with Bezos, including
48:20
one of my favorite memes circulating
48:22
Twitter is the photo of him in
48:26
sort of bookish looking with glasses.
48:29
And then there's a photo from I think it was sun
48:31
Valley where he's kind of
48:34
jacked in a you know, vest
48:37
and shirt, strolling confidently
48:40
towards the viewer, and it was Amazon, Amazon
48:43
Prime, and that was everywhere for a while. Tell
48:46
us about the transformation of
48:48
Bezos from a sort of you
48:51
know Wall Street geek into
48:54
uh an overlord. Right,
48:57
Well, the physical transformation,
49:00
so this is only the most obvious part
49:02
of it, right The guy has been working
49:04
out and getting in shape, and in the
49:06
first book I ascribed that from a
49:08
former friend to his interest in
49:11
in um in one day going
49:13
to space until he's trying to safe fit.
49:15
Now I think it's more. I suspect
49:18
it's more, you know, the billionaire fixation
49:20
with longevity and and and health.
49:23
But again that that's only part of it.
49:26
He his eyes have opened up to a
49:28
larger world beyond Amazon, and
49:31
and that's me a his ownership of The Washington
49:33
Post and participation in in Washington,
49:35
d C. Society, UM
49:39
Space Company, Hollywood right
49:41
throwing parties. He simply seems
49:43
to enjoy the lifestyle,
49:46
the extravagance that comes with his
49:48
position, much more than he ever did. And
49:50
and the greatest symbol of this, I never thought Jeff
49:52
Bezos circa even two thousand and ten
49:55
would be a yacht guy, you know, someone
49:57
who's spending time on big books.
49:59
And I was a report in the book. He's
50:01
building this massive three three
50:03
mass
50:05
math with a with its own
50:07
support yacht with it was
50:09
the right room for he and
50:12
I think part of that the the influence
50:15
of Laurence Sanchez, his partner, um,
50:17
and part of it is simply him enjoying
50:19
the world stage that is human
50:22
and the robot, the machine
50:24
that created Amazon. You know, is is
50:26
susceptible too. I guess some of these human
50:28
impulses. Yes, so so you
50:31
we we already talked. Mackenzie Scott,
50:33
his former wife, gave The Everything
50:36
Store a one star review. But
50:39
but her and and Bezos'
50:42
new girlfriend, Sanchez could not possibly
50:45
be more different. She's very
50:48
social and outgoing. Mackenzie Scott
50:51
is a little bit more of an introvert
50:53
and and a homebody. How
50:56
much of the divorce comes
50:59
from him wanting to step out a bit
51:02
and you know, literally the
51:05
wife wanting a quiet night at
51:07
home. What's the genesis of this?
51:09
Because there wasn't a whole lot about
51:11
the divorce um
51:13
other than to say it was already sort
51:16
of happening before Sanchez ever showed
51:18
up on the scene. I
51:20
mean, Barry, this the easiest
51:23
answers that we have no idea, right, I mean,
51:25
who really knows what happens in the private
51:27
confines of that marriage. Other than to observe
51:30
what what you've just said, which is Mackenzie
51:33
Scott is fiercely private.
51:35
I think I think she's done one interview
51:38
um around the publication of one of
51:40
her novels. Um. She she speaks
51:43
very carefully in the in the few medium
51:45
posts that she's written about her philanthropic
51:48
contributions. And she didn't seem
51:50
to enjoy as much going to
51:52
the awards shows or to the fashion
51:55
galas um as as Jeff
51:57
Bethos did. So yeah, they're they're
51:59
they're interest for public attention
52:01
were diverging. Um, that's
52:04
certainly true. And in Lauren Santis,
52:06
Bezos has found someone who's extremely
52:08
comfortable moving in those circles.
52:11
Um. And yet who
52:13
you know, I don't think it's it's ever
52:16
possible to know, Um, you know what
52:18
what has really you know, what really happens in
52:21
a marriage? Huh? To say
52:23
the least, let's talk a little bit. You mentioned the Washington
52:25
Post Bezos really
52:28
helped to drive a huge turnaround at
52:30
the Post, and I was kind
52:32
of surprised to read that
52:35
the tagline democracy
52:37
dies in darkness? Was that really
52:40
a Bezos line? Well,
52:43
if you if you remember Barry, that was a
52:45
line in a speech um
52:48
that Bob Woodward had given crediting
52:51
of pre Watergate era judge,
52:54
and then Bezos had heard that, and
52:56
when he asked Marty Baron and
52:59
others is the Washington Post to go find
53:02
a slogan for the paper, he suggested
53:04
that it should do something like democracy
53:07
Dies in Darkness. And then they spent about
53:09
a year and probably you know, thousands
53:12
of hundreds of thousands of dollars, paying branding
53:14
firms and coming up with ideas and firing
53:16
them, and they basically got back
53:18
to Democracy Dies in Darkness, which
53:20
originally they had thought was kind of too dreary,
53:23
uh, and then ended up being perfect
53:26
for the age of Donald Trump. So yes,
53:28
it was sort of bezos inspiration but
53:31
a little a little bit of well hard
53:33
to call, you know, that era luck,
53:36
But it certainly was for the Post, right, because
53:38
even though Bezos did drive a remarkable
53:41
turner on there, they certainly did, they
53:43
were fortunate by the revival of interest
53:45
and political news had accompanied the Trump years.
53:48
So it's interesting because
53:50
as you read the book, it's as much
53:52
about Amazon the company
53:55
as it is about Bezos, like
53:58
a bio of him. Was the intention
54:00
or did it just become clear
54:03
you can't write about one without writing about
54:05
the other. I think
54:07
in both books I thought of them as
54:10
um as. Yes, as both
54:12
um. I you know, since I'm working with limited
54:15
access to Bezos. Um,
54:18
they're predominantly about the companies.
54:21
But just is the main character, right,
54:23
And you can't when you peel back the
54:25
layers of the onion on most major
54:28
inventions at Amazon and most big
54:30
strategic moves, you find
54:32
you get to Jeff Bezos and and a
54:34
decision that he made. And this
54:37
book Amazon Abound is about transformation.
54:39
It's it's the transformation of this company
54:42
into this monolith that is dominating
54:44
all of our life now and and our economic
54:47
reality. And then the accompanying transformation
54:49
of Bezos right into the richest man in the
54:51
world, into into this figure
54:53
on the public stage, the evolution
54:56
of a tech geek into kind of a business
54:58
superhero. And yeah, they're really
55:00
intertwined. I think. I think in some ways
55:03
they function as biographies for the company
55:05
and for the man. So there's a quote
55:07
of his in the book quote
55:10
you can invent your way out of any box
55:12
unquote, which kind of raises the
55:14
question, how does he see himself? Is
55:16
he an inventor, Is he a business
55:19
founder? Is he a CEO and a leader?
55:21
What? What is his self identified
55:24
role? Yeah, that
55:27
one's easy to answer because he keeps
55:29
insisting and he did so again in
55:31
his latest shareholder letter that he's an
55:33
inventor. That is how he wants
55:35
to be seen. And
55:38
it's funny because I have a colleague at
55:40
Bloomberg and we were talking about that and
55:43
she said, you know, this reminds me a little bit of Taylor
55:45
Swift, who wants to be seen as
55:47
a songwriter, but the world kind of sees
55:49
her, you know, more as a singer and as a performer.
55:52
I think that's true with Bezos too. He wants
55:54
to be seen as an inventor, but you
55:57
know, by his admire
56:00
as he will largely be seen I think as an operator
56:02
and an entrepreneur, a creator
56:04
of amazing business value,
56:07
and by his critics as a monopolist.
56:09
Right, and the verdict is still out on this, but as
56:12
a as an aggregator of extraordinarily
56:14
extraordinarily wealth and and not
56:17
yet really as a philanthropist whose
56:19
contribution back has been commensurate with
56:22
with his um you know, accomplishment.
56:24
So yes, he wants to be seen as an inventor,
56:26
and that that might be uh, the
56:29
jury is out on that a little bit. So when
56:32
he looks at all of those accomplishments,
56:35
what does he see as his lasting
56:38
legacy? How does he want
56:40
to be remembered? With the caveat
56:42
that he's still a relatively young man, and is
56:45
what early fifties, Well, let's
56:47
see, it's probably it's probably mid
56:49
the late fifties, right, yeah, mid fifties
56:51
right now. I think he wants to be
56:53
seen as an inventor. I think that he
56:56
wants to be seen. The last investor
56:58
letter is really this interest thing, an impassioned
57:01
defense of Amazon as a contributor,
57:03
as a as a generator of
57:05
value, and he goes one by one talking
57:07
about the the
57:10
gross merchandise value generated
57:13
by third party sellers, the salaries
57:17
of the third party workers, how
57:19
much Amazon shareholders have benefited,
57:22
um. And he's really trying to reframe the
57:24
debate, I think, around his own wealth and
57:26
Amazon's own power, and to shed
57:29
lights on how much value Amazon is
57:31
creative. So I think he wants to be
57:33
seen and he wants Amazon's legacy to be
57:35
one that has contributed to the economy and positive
57:38
ways, and and and the reason why
57:40
he's arguing that so precipitously
57:43
is because the
57:45
prevailing sentiment right now at least
57:47
is that you know, billionaires are bad and
57:50
in some corners of society, of
57:52
course, um that they represent
57:54
something untoward in the distribution of
57:57
wealth in our society and the widening income
57:59
gap, and that big tech
58:01
companies have come to dominate the economy
58:04
and the snuff out opportunity for smaller
58:06
businesses. And look, I mean
58:08
I try to I try to get into that debate in
58:10
the book. I think that's a little bit of a harsh
58:13
view. Amazon has made some real positive
58:15
contributions and and basis
58:17
is I think only beginning to grapple with
58:20
the fact that his legacy right
58:22
now is very much contested and
58:25
he'll have to probably spend the next couple of years, you
58:27
know, turning turning that around and making significant
58:29
contributions and changing people's mind. You
58:32
have to say the least, I'm trying to remember where
58:35
which document of there's where they might
58:38
have been. In defense of something that Bernie sanders
58:41
Um had said, he points out, we
58:43
employ over a million people, with a second
58:46
biggest job creator in the country
58:49
which actually is as good a time as any to
58:51
talk about what he did
58:53
with the fifteen dollar an
58:56
hour um increase.
58:58
This this was just a brilliant jiu
59:01
jitsu in response to I
59:04
think Bernie Sanders haranguing uh
59:07
Bezos. He figured out pretty
59:09
quickly, Hey, this is paying more
59:11
money is a giant competitive advantage
59:14
to us. Tell us about how
59:16
he raised the minimum wage
59:18
at at Amazon to fifteen right,
59:23
and we should we should note I mean a lot
59:25
of a lot of these moves by
59:27
Amazon, as welcome as they are, our our
59:30
reaction reactions, and the
59:33
fight for fifteen dollars an hour, it's
59:35
something that starts ten years ago
59:38
among among big companies and fast
59:40
food chains. UM employee
59:42
strikes lots of pressure, and
59:45
Amazon is growing by leaps and bounds
59:47
over the past few years, becoming
59:50
a more and more prominent employer. The
59:52
lens of public scrutiny is on their relationship
59:55
with their employees, and at a certain
59:57
point, I think they realized that they're going
59:59
to have to get a head of it, and and they do have
1:00:01
the resources to get ahead of it in a way that
1:00:03
perhaps some of its competition UM
1:00:06
Walmart and the like do not, and
1:00:08
so they they raise their
1:00:10
their wage. And sorry, one other thing baries
1:00:13
that as they're hiring more and more people,
1:00:16
um, you know, hundreds of thousands of people in their for filming
1:00:18
centers at a time of economic
1:00:21
prosperity and tightness in the labor market,
1:00:23
I think they realized they need to sweeten the pot
1:00:25
for for workers to even just fill
1:00:28
those for filming centers, particularly during the holidays.
1:00:31
And so fifteen dollars an hour. It's a recruiting
1:00:33
mechanism. It's a strategic weapon
1:00:36
to to bludgeon their competitors
1:00:38
over the head who can't match the rate.
1:00:40
And then it's a little bit of a of a defense
1:00:44
um to the for the activists and the politicians
1:00:46
like Bernie Sanders who are criticizing Amazon's
1:00:49
relationship with their employees. Yeah,
1:00:51
he went away for a little while. Eventually he
1:00:53
started coming back at Bezos,
1:00:55
but for a while he was pretty
1:00:58
satisfied. Let's let's talk about on another
1:01:01
jiu jitsu that was so brilliantly played.
1:01:04
Um. Laurence Sanchez's brother
1:01:07
got access to a variety of
1:01:09
texts and then went
1:01:12
about selling them to the National Enquirer.
1:01:15
He claimed that he
1:01:17
had a nude selfie
1:01:19
of quote unquote below the belt selfie
1:01:22
that turned out not to be so true,
1:01:25
and Bezos just completely
1:01:29
up ended what looked like being
1:01:32
trapped in a box. Tell us a little bit about
1:01:35
that incredible escaping
1:01:38
act. Yeah, right, this is
1:01:40
this is one of those episodes that I couldn't quite
1:01:43
believe I was I was going to be writing about.
1:01:45
Um, Bezos has tangled with the National
1:01:47
Enquirer. You mentioned Laurence
1:01:50
Snchez, his brother delivering um,
1:01:52
delivering those text messages
1:01:54
to the paper. Um. He you know,
1:01:57
he thought he was trying well,
1:01:59
the cup was sort of conducting their relationship
1:02:02
out in the open, and you know, for
1:02:04
whatever reason, he decided that he wanted
1:02:06
to try to get ahead of it. He was
1:02:09
also he was also paid quite well
1:02:11
by the Inquirer for the information. And
1:02:14
UM, it's it's almost
1:02:17
impossible to believe Bezos.
1:02:20
Um. Well, it's a really complicated
1:02:22
saga. UM. I don't know how far you want me to
1:02:24
go back. But the the Inquirer was very susceptible
1:02:27
to accusations that they had
1:02:29
political motives, and Bezos
1:02:31
and his representatives had had been floating the possibility
1:02:34
that they were doing the work for the Trump administration
1:02:36
to embarrass Bezos as an owner of the
1:02:38
Washington Post, and in the negotiations,
1:02:42
um, the Inquirer essentially
1:02:45
was threatening Bezos
1:02:48
with the release of all of this, these these
1:02:50
embarrassing photos, saying you have to
1:02:52
stop accusing us of having political motives.
1:02:54
It wasn't politically motivated at all, simply
1:02:56
a good story. And then Bezos turns
1:02:59
around and publishes told his emails um
1:03:01
and suggest that there were political motives and suggests
1:03:04
that studies were involved, and
1:03:06
then sympathies swing to his side. It was this
1:03:08
brilliant move. If people remember that
1:03:10
episode at all, they probably think Bezos
1:03:13
did the right thing. And as I untangled
1:03:15
it, I sort of at least I concluded
1:03:18
that there weren't political motivations, so the
1:03:20
Staudies weren't involved. They
1:03:22
may have hacked Beazos' phone. We kind of don't
1:03:24
know, but it was. It was simply a sort of brilliant
1:03:27
pr master master
1:03:29
stroke, and they edited
1:03:31
the Inquirer ended up getting fired. Um,
1:03:35
you know, and I think we we That was
1:03:37
my excerpt in Bloomberg Business Week,
1:03:40
and the cover line was Bezos wins again. And
1:03:42
of course because he did right and this
1:03:44
is one where by all measures, he should
1:03:46
have been embarrassed, and he kind of came out on top
1:03:49
the New York Post with another memorable
1:03:52
headline, Bezos exposes
1:03:54
Pecker, referring to David
1:03:57
Pecker was the editor of the UM
1:04:00
Inquirer and had already
1:04:04
been under pressure
1:04:06
because of the catching killed deals
1:04:08
they had done to protect Donald Trump
1:04:11
UM and were some I don't
1:04:14
remember what the problem was. I guess that's a violation
1:04:16
of campaign finance laws. And he was
1:04:20
sort of in limbo with the Southern District.
1:04:22
Is that what took place there? Yeah,
1:04:25
they had a non prosecution agreement
1:04:27
with the Southern District of New York that required
1:04:30
am I, the company that operated
1:04:32
the National Inquirer, to to to
1:04:35
be a good citizen, to not break the law,
1:04:37
to play by the rules. And so when
1:04:39
the Washington Post and Gavin de Becker
1:04:42
Bezoss representative started
1:04:44
insinuating that the Inquirer was
1:04:46
doing the work of the Trump administration to embarrass
1:04:49
Jeff Bezos, UM, you
1:04:51
know that was that was sensitive
1:04:53
for for am I, and Pecker wanted
1:04:56
wanted the Dylan Howard, the under the Inquiry
1:04:58
to kind of settle settle settled the matter.
1:05:02
That's just an incredible story. And I
1:05:04
guess the the lesson is, if
1:05:06
you're in the business of challenging wealthiest
1:05:09
people in the world with lots of resources,
1:05:12
you probably don't want to do it while you're
1:05:14
on double secret probation is
1:05:16
probably a bit. There's a line from
1:05:18
the Wire that I love in this in this context,
1:05:21
if you come at the King, you better not
1:05:23
miss And they
1:05:25
came at the King and they missed.
1:05:28
Before we get to our favorite questions, I
1:05:30
have to ask you some recent news that
1:05:33
came out after the book
1:05:36
was published. What do you make of this eight
1:05:38
point four billion dollar purchase
1:05:41
of MGM. Is this about
1:05:44
Amazon Prime or is this about
1:05:47
Bezos getting to hang with Hollywood
1:05:50
Royalty. Well,
1:05:52
you can hang with Hollywood Royalty without MGM.
1:05:55
It's about intellectual property. It's about
1:05:57
the vault of franchisees, the deep.
1:06:00
The MGM has James Bond,
1:06:02
the Rocky Series, Legally Blonde, et
1:06:05
cetera, RoboCop um. Amazon
1:06:07
is facing the likes of Disney
1:06:10
Plus and an Apple. Um
1:06:12
you know, not just Netflix, Paramount,
1:06:15
Peacock Network and and franchises
1:06:18
are are going to be a big differentiator.
1:06:21
UM In addition, we talked about
1:06:23
the advertising business and with MGM,
1:06:25
Amazon gets this vault of this catalog
1:06:28
of archival programming.
1:06:30
They can funnel all that into Prime video
1:06:33
and into another streaming service I m DBTV,
1:06:36
which is it's free to use and it's
1:06:38
supported by advertising, and and
1:06:40
this is like, this is these are table
1:06:42
stakes now in the new streaming wards being
1:06:45
able to mint franchises and have
1:06:47
very deep catalogs of libraries of archival
1:06:50
programming. Really interesting. All
1:06:52
right, for our last regular question, I'm just
1:06:54
gonna throw a curveball at you and
1:06:57
say congratulations on
1:07:00
winning the Amazon Whole Food sweep
1:07:02
steaks. Okay,
1:07:05
I love this story. Yeah, thank you Berry.
1:07:08
Um, I is
1:07:10
that correct? Yes, I'm
1:07:13
working on this book and I got a call telling
1:07:15
me that I won a Whole Food
1:07:17
sweep stakes and I had never entered any but
1:07:20
apparently if you use your Amazon credit
1:07:22
cards and a Whole Foods, who got entered in?
1:07:24
And what are the chances I won? And
1:07:27
I thought it was a fraud. It sounds
1:07:29
like a telemarketing scam totally.
1:07:32
And I and I think, Okay, I'm gonna I'm gonna
1:07:34
look into this because somebody's abusing you
1:07:36
know, the Amazon name, and I find
1:07:39
out that it's real, and of
1:07:41
course I didn't, I didn't accept it. But it
1:07:44
was just so peculiar. I mean, what what are
1:07:46
the what are the chances I could be eating you
1:07:49
know, free and whole foods now, But sadly
1:07:51
my journalistic obligations prevented
1:07:54
me from accepting it. That's
1:07:56
pretty hilarious. All right, Let's jump to our favorite
1:07:59
questions that we ask all
1:08:01
of our guests. And let's start
1:08:03
with and I asked this to everybody, not just
1:08:06
to you. What are you streaming these days?
1:08:08
Give us your favorite Netflix and Amazon
1:08:10
Prime shows? Interesting?
1:08:13
Let's see, Um, we
1:08:16
just started Halston
1:08:18
this is the you and McGregor fashion
1:08:21
thing on Netflix. We're only one episode
1:08:23
in my I'll reserve judgments
1:08:26
on that. Um. The Michael
1:08:29
Douglas series Comisky
1:08:32
Method, so they just did season three. I've
1:08:35
loved that show. The opening of
1:08:37
the first episode at the funeral is
1:08:40
just totally hilarious. Um,
1:08:44
and I haven't been watching a lot of
1:08:46
TV. So those are the two right now.
1:08:50
UM. I tried, I have I have young
1:08:52
daughters, teenage daughters. I
1:08:54
tried to introduce one to a classic film,
1:08:57
rain Man over the weekend the
1:09:00
great Dustin Hoffman films, and she wanted
1:09:02
to watching halfway halfway through.
1:09:06
UM, so I don't know, maybe maybe you
1:09:09
know, it's not it's not as moving
1:09:12
for for the younger generation. My
1:09:14
experience is that the younger
1:09:16
generation can't enjoy
1:09:19
the pacing which is so much slower.
1:09:22
I mean, unless you go to something like the front page
1:09:24
or bringing up baby. The pacing
1:09:27
of movies from the fifties,
1:09:29
sixties, seventies, eighties are just so much
1:09:32
slower than you know, how
1:09:34
how rapid the jokes come and
1:09:36
how fast explosions come. Today it's
1:09:39
a different era and and they
1:09:41
don't have the tolerance for that. I
1:09:45
think that might be true, and in the exactly the
1:09:47
same way as I rejected the
1:09:50
movies of my parents generation. I'm
1:09:53
now and there's receiving rooms. Yeah,
1:09:55
no, it's it's everything is accelerating. Let's
1:09:57
let's talk a little bit about your career and
1:09:59
ment yours who helped guide and
1:10:02
shape your career? Well?
1:10:04
Um, I think probably the most influential
1:10:07
with Stephen Levy, um, technology
1:10:09
writer at at Newsweek Magazine.
1:10:12
UM. He has written great books
1:10:14
about Apple and Facebook and Google. And
1:10:16
seeing him work and the way he writes was
1:10:18
always very inspirational to me. Um
1:10:22
George Hackett was an editor of
1:10:24
mine at Newsweek magazine. He was he
1:10:26
was quite influential and just a great, great
1:10:29
editor. And then um at Josh
1:10:31
Turangle, the former editor of Business Week who
1:10:33
brought me over from from the New York Times,
1:10:35
and the way he managed people
1:10:37
and his story sensibility, the way he
1:10:40
really refreshed business Week. When Bloomberg
1:10:42
bought it was was wonderful to watch.
1:10:46
What are some of your favorite books and and what
1:10:48
are you reading right now? Let's
1:10:51
see, I'm reading Cast, the
1:10:55
wonderful book by Isabel
1:10:58
Wilkerson just about um,
1:11:00
you know, how we view racial
1:11:03
and income divisions in the in the United
1:11:05
States. That's that's been really eye opening.
1:11:08
I feel like my reading has been eclipsed by
1:11:10
self promotion and book promotion over
1:11:13
the past a few weeks. So I
1:11:15
feel like I'm really looking forward to this summer
1:11:18
when I get to maybe read some of the other
1:11:20
excellent books that have that have come out this year.
1:11:22
I read the novel Clara and the Sun
1:11:25
by A. Kazoo Is Shiguru, which
1:11:28
um you know who wrote Remains
1:11:30
of the Day is just such a wonderful
1:11:32
author. And this book is about
1:11:35
it's a sort of science fiction future where people
1:11:37
can take home home robots, and it
1:11:40
is it is such a moving novel. I actually
1:11:42
read it and then immediately reread it, And
1:11:45
so that is a book I heartily recommend.
1:11:48
What sort of advice would you give to a
1:11:50
recent college grad who was thinking
1:11:52
about a career in either investment
1:11:55
finance or or journalism or
1:11:57
both? Right, well, I would
1:11:59
have absolutely no advice on the investment
1:12:02
finance side of things, very
1:12:04
that that might be more your per view than
1:12:07
mine. Um on journalism,
1:12:09
after maybe waving my hands, uh,
1:12:12
you know, at them to get them to reconsider
1:12:16
if they were really determined, I
1:12:19
would um, I would. I would encourage
1:12:21
young journalists to kind of find their lean, you
1:12:24
know, find something that they're passionate about and
1:12:26
interested in, to go deep
1:12:28
on um and to sort of
1:12:30
master the expertise in and
1:12:33
then to just be persistent. This
1:12:35
business is all about persistence and
1:12:38
being there after everyone else has left,
1:12:40
and going a little deeper and asking that last
1:12:43
question and digging into another box
1:12:45
of files when you feel like you're exhausted
1:12:48
and want to drop. And that's that's
1:12:50
the key to this business. Right, it's not rocket science.
1:12:53
We don't we don't need PhDs to do it. But
1:12:55
often it's just sheer curiosity
1:12:58
and persistence and absorption
1:13:01
and obsession, right. I mean I
1:13:04
have become over the past decade sort
1:13:06
of obsessed with understanding how
1:13:08
Amazon works and what drives
1:13:11
Jeff Bezos, um, you
1:13:13
know, and what's good about it, what's bad about
1:13:15
it? And I think you need that kind of absorption,
1:13:17
of an obsession of curiosity to succeed
1:13:20
as a journalist today. And our final
1:13:22
question, what do you know about
1:13:24
the world of journalism today? You
1:13:26
wish you knew when you were first getting started
1:13:30
twenty plus years ago, years
1:13:32
ago. I
1:13:34
mean, it's just just such a different environment.
1:13:37
I guess I wish I had known how rapidly
1:13:39
things would change. You
1:13:42
know. I spent the first ten years in my
1:13:44
career as I as I said earlier in the conversation
1:13:46
that Newsweek, magazine and
1:13:50
Newsweek does exist, and magazines of course
1:13:52
exists, but that kind of media
1:13:55
organization no longer does. Um.
1:13:57
There there was a whole class of journal
1:14:00
who labored in the salt mine, so to
1:14:02
speak, um, not really
1:14:04
reporting and writing, but researching
1:14:07
and and and performing support
1:14:09
functions. Um, and then every week
1:14:12
would be a desperate competitive scramble
1:14:14
to get your articles in the magazine.
1:14:17
And I actually think I learned a lot from
1:14:19
that. But um, there's
1:14:22
no replacement for writing and
1:14:24
publishing and repeating and reporting
1:14:26
and getting out into the world. And
1:14:28
and those are the kinds of skills that are rewarded
1:14:30
in today's journalistic environment.
1:14:33
And so I think I might wish that if
1:14:36
I was able to foresee the way in which the media
1:14:38
climate would change that I had been,
1:14:40
that I would have been a little bit more productive
1:14:42
in my earlier, earlier years,
1:14:45
where where like success at
1:14:47
a big magazine, just being at a big magazine
1:14:49
like like news Week, seemed like a career accomplishment
1:14:52
on its own. But of course, you know that
1:14:54
world no longer exists. We have
1:14:56
been speaking with Brad Stone. He is
1:14:59
the author of Amazon Unbound,
1:15:01
Jeff Bezos and The Invention of a Global Empire.
1:15:04
Thanks Brad for being so generous with your time.
1:15:07
If you enjoyed this conversation, well
1:15:09
be sure and check out any of our previous
1:15:12
almost four hundred interviews we've done over
1:15:14
the past seven years. You
1:15:17
can find those at iTunes, Spotify,
1:15:19
wherever you get your podcasts.
1:15:22
We love your comments, feedback in suggestions
1:15:24
right to us at m IB podcast
1:15:27
at Bloomberg dot net. You can
1:15:29
sign up for my daily reads at
1:15:31
rit Halts dot com. Check out my
1:15:34
weekly column on Bloomberg dot com
1:15:36
slash Opinion. Follow me on Twitter
1:15:38
at rit Halts. I would be
1:15:41
remiss if I did not thank our crack
1:15:43
staff that helps put these conversations
1:15:45
together each week. Rolie
1:15:48
Volmer is my audio engineer.
1:15:50
Atico val Bron is our project manager.
1:15:53
Michael Boyle is my producers
1:15:57
slash booker. Michael Batnick is
1:15:59
my head of research. I'm Barry
1:16:01
Rihults. You've been listening to Masters
1:16:03
in Business on Bloomberg Radio
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More