Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:02
This is Masters in Business with
0:04
Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.
0:07
This week on the podcast, I have an extra
0:09
special guest. His name is Bruce van
0:11
so On. He is the chairman and CEO
0:13
of Citizens Financial Group. They
0:16
are a hundred and sixty five billion
0:18
dollar bank, the twelfth largest
0:20
in the United States. If you
0:22
are at all interested in banking,
0:25
financing, middle market, private
0:27
equity, just a whole run of
0:30
different um aspects
0:32
of the financial services world, you're
0:34
going to find this conversation to be
0:37
quite interesting. Uh. Bruce is
0:39
really a very knowledgeable
0:41
and articulate UM spokesman
0:43
on not only behalf of his
0:46
bank, but the banking industry in
0:48
general. He has a really good
0:50
insight as to what's going on in both
0:52
the industry and the economy.
0:55
So I I found this conversation to
0:57
be fascinating and I think you will
0:59
also. With no further ado,
1:01
my interview with Bruce van Soon. This
1:06
is Masters in Business with Barry
1:08
Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio. My
1:11
special guest this week is Bruce van
1:13
Soon. He is the chairman and chief
1:15
executive officer of Citizens Financial
1:18
Group. UH. They were spun out from
1:20
RBS back in where
1:24
Van so On led a successful
1:26
initial public offering. Previously, he
1:29
had been executive director on the
1:31
RBS board for the prior four
1:34
or five years. Before that, he was
1:36
vice chairman and CFO at the Bank
1:38
of New York Nellan. His
1:40
previous career stints include
1:43
Deutsche Bank, Washerstein, Perella,
1:45
and Kidder Peabody. Bruce
1:47
van Son, Welcome to Bloomberg.
1:49
Thanks my pleasure to be here, Barry. Let's
1:52
start at the Bank of New York and Bank
1:54
of New York Mellon. Where were you
1:56
during the financial crisis, which what
1:58
was the name at the time. Well, I had
2:01
left by then, so I joined Bank in New
2:03
York. In the
2:05
biggest crisis I experienced there
2:08
was when eleven hit and we were basically
2:11
out of business there for a few days, and we
2:13
had to scramble to get the bank back on its feet.
2:15
But how you downtown
2:20
One Wall Street was the headquarters building and
2:22
the Barclays was Street was the
2:24
operations center, and so
2:26
we were kind of straddling the World
2:28
Trade Center buildings, and when you couldn't
2:30
have access to downtown, we
2:33
had to work out of other offices
2:35
that we scrambled to secure, and then
2:37
we had to stand up a new data center with IBM's
2:39
help in Sterling Forest, So that
2:41
was an exciting period. How long did
2:44
it take for you guys to get
2:46
back up and running, Well, it
2:48
was it was a couple of days, uh, and
2:50
then we had a lot of pressure
2:53
to basically start moving money and move securities
2:55
and clear out the backlog that had piled up for a
2:58
couple of days. So you had
3:00
backup facilities you weren't just that
3:02
wasn't the sole location. It was relatively easy
3:04
to turn but we didn't have the same kind of resiliency
3:06
that banks have today. So after in the
3:09
wake of that, Bank in York went out and
3:11
built a brand new spanking data
3:13
center out in Tennessee, UM and
3:15
so we're constantly ready
3:17
to flip over, but we weren't at that level
3:20
of resiliency at that time. The cloud
3:22
has changed everything for banks
3:25
and financial instation. I think the cloud is part
3:27
of that. So part of it was just making
3:29
the investment and recognizing the need
3:31
for a higher level of resiliency. But
3:33
now moving things to
3:35
the cloud and running your infrastructure
3:37
in the cloud I think offers some great promise
3:40
to lower costs and also increased security
3:43
and you were at RBS then in
3:45
o eight oh nine is the yes, so so
3:48
uh the reason I missed the crisis we had
3:50
merged with Melon and
3:51
uh I stayed through the transition.
3:54
We had appointed a new CEO, so I wanted to
3:56
go do something else, and
3:59
I was out by July of oh eight. The crisis
4:01
was in the fall of oh eight, so it
4:03
was nice not to be in the hot seat during that. I
4:06
was working in private equity for about a year trying
4:08
to put deals together, and then RBS came a
4:10
calling. They had wanted to put a new
4:12
management team in place to help right
4:15
the ship after RBS took
4:17
a tumble in the crisis and needed a government bailout,
4:19
so I joined Stephen Hester. There I was the
4:22
CFO, and uh we had a lot
4:24
of surgery do in terms of shrinking the bank
4:26
and getting it back to safety. So you
4:28
mentioned private equity. Citizens Financial
4:31
is sort of a can I call them a middleware
4:34
sort of bank does a lot of work
4:36
with um not the giant
4:38
entities out there, but a lot of very other large entities
4:41
that I think are a little below the reader
4:43
of the public. Is that A yeah, So here's the
4:46
you know, the kind of Laya
4:48
the land in terms of our commercial business,
4:50
so h, we focus on middle
4:52
market companies, which are maybe twenty
4:54
five million to five million in revenues,
4:57
and then also the mid corporate segment, which
4:59
is five hundred million to about three billion
5:01
in revenues. Over time
5:04
since I've joined Citizens, we've taken
5:06
the middle market customer
5:08
a count from about two thousand up to about
5:10
three thousand, and mid corporates
5:13
we've taken from about five hundred up to
5:15
about a thousand. So uh,
5:17
we've grown faster at the bigger company
5:20
end. Uh. And what you need
5:22
there to be competitive is you need bankers
5:24
with industry expertise. So we had to go out
5:26
and recruit in some bankers for
5:28
technology or healthcare, energy, uh,
5:31
so they could really serve those customers well, and
5:33
they could bring previous relationships
5:36
from their last bank over to Citizens.
5:38
And so we've had some some really nice
5:40
growth. Uh. But we're
5:42
not focusing on the household
5:44
name. Fortune five companies were staying
5:46
a little bit below that radar, and we can compete
5:49
very effectively against the mega banks.
5:51
There's oftentimes we're leading deals and we'll
5:53
have jp more going to be of a on our right or we're
5:56
winning a swap transaction against the megabanks.
5:58
So we have really good cape abilities, but we
6:00
stay focused on an area that
6:02
that we know and we can compete effectively. So
6:05
I've noticed on Wall Street UM,
6:07
hedge funds and venture capital
6:09
seems to be going through a bit of a rough
6:11
batch. But private equity
6:14
just is a house of fire. It just
6:16
expands rapidly. How does
6:18
that? Well, private equity is is
6:20
a good customer segment for us in the commercial
6:22
bank, and we have focused
6:25
over time on say fifty
6:28
to sixty sponsors that we know well,
6:31
uh, that we think they're good operators. Uh.
6:33
They invest wisely, uh,
6:36
and they're good to their banks and when they
6:38
need to put equity back into a deal to right
6:41
the ship if something is a little stressed,
6:43
uh, they do that. So uh,
6:45
that's where we've stayed focused. We haven't
6:47
tried to move and compete for all
6:49
the business that's taking place there. And I think clients
6:52
selection has been really critical. So
6:55
those firms know us well, they
6:57
give us the swings at the bat, they let us lead
6:59
trans actions and then also provide more
7:01
services to their investee companies.
7:03
So that's been a really good strategy for
7:06
us, I would say, Uh, similarly
7:09
with commercial real estate, Uh, the developers
7:12
we focus on, we've known for a long
7:14
time. We think they're good operators, and so
7:16
again we build those strong relationships
7:19
and we get good swings at the bat when
7:21
they're doing things, and I like to include
7:23
us in the deals that they do, and then they give us a chance
7:26
to get more of their wallet because they
7:28
know we have the capabilities. That sounds quite
7:30
quite interesting. So let's
7:32
start with a really broad topic. Since
7:35
the crisis ended in O nine, there
7:37
have been just enormous changes
7:40
in banking and regulation even the
7:42
entire economy. How
7:44
has the role of a CEO
7:47
running a bank changed over
7:49
this period? How has banking changed over
7:51
the period. It's a very broad question, U.
7:53
I'll break that down. So, you
7:56
know, after the crisis, it was
7:58
clear that there
8:00
needed to be some reforms first around,
8:03
i'd say the prudential regulation
8:05
about how banks, uh, did they
8:07
have enough capital, did they have the right funding
8:10
and liquidity structures and so um,
8:13
where they're managing risk the right way. So
8:15
we had a whole framework
8:17
that was put in place that was agreed globally
8:20
basically around capital, liquidity,
8:22
funding, running stress tests, uh
8:24
and I think that was really positive.
8:27
So we learned a lot from the crisis
8:29
and we put those lessons to use. Uh
8:32
So a big part of our efforts
8:34
early days was to make sure that we were
8:37
keeping up with those increasing demands
8:39
around the prudent regulation. The
8:41
second element of regulation was around
8:44
really conducting culture, and so
8:46
banks I think weren't always that transparent
8:49
with their fees, and sometimes they were working against
8:51
their customers that are working for their customers,
8:53
so they're needed to be changed there as well.
8:56
And so that whole agenda came in
8:58
in the second wave after the credential
9:00
agenda, and I think that's
9:02
also been very positive in
9:05
terms of creating the right mindset and
9:07
culture inside banks, in terms
9:09
of, you know, we have to be the trusted advisor. We
9:11
have to be working for the benefit of
9:13
our customers, giving them good advice, being
9:15
simple, being transparent on our fees. Have
9:18
we come full circles when we come a long
9:20
way, you know. The one kind of bump
9:22
in the road, unfortunately, was the
9:25
Wells Fargo selling scandal,
9:27
which kind of made folks think, well, maybe
9:29
there hasn't been any change here in banks, when in
9:31
fact, I think most of the banks had come through
9:33
and made the appropriate changes, so that yeah,
9:37
I think that was it. That was a black eye for the industry,
9:39
and they're paying the piper for that. They now
9:41
have a new CEO and they're working hard
9:43
on their regulatory equation and it's been a great bank
9:46
for deck generations and will continue
9:48
to be. I think they'll get back on track. But that was
9:50
that was unfortunate for the industry, I think.
9:53
Uh, so the regulatory agenda was
9:55
a big thing to keep up with. The
9:57
second thing that's changed a lot is uh.
10:00
You know, technology has moved
10:02
in warp speed to kind of dimensions
10:04
nobody thought possible. So moving
10:07
infrastructure to the cloud, UH,
10:09
new ways of development around
10:11
an agile framework which speeds
10:14
things up. UH. Going
10:16
to digital first business models, UH,
10:18
using data to personalize offers
10:22
to your customers so they don't waste their time.
10:24
Uh. You know, you see what's happening in other industries,
10:27
and customer expectations
10:29
for change and for a level of service
10:31
have really increased given
10:34
what they see elsewhere, and so banks have had
10:36
to make the investments and go
10:38
through significant change
10:40
in the business model to to to meet those
10:42
expectations. So it's really
10:45
kept it very interesting to to
10:47
keep up with all the change that we've had to over
10:49
over the last few years. You know, when the new
10:52
CEO of Vanguard came in the
10:54
his answer to a question I found
10:56
most fascinating, what
10:59
what keeps you up? In his answer was
11:01
security and hackers? How
11:03
big a deal is that? And is
11:05
technology helping us in this space or
11:07
or making it worse? Well, um,
11:10
to be in arms. I think it is a big
11:12
deal. And I think most CEOs of
11:16
financial institutions trusted with
11:18
keeping customers assets and data
11:20
safe have to have that as
11:23
the top issue on the priority
11:25
list, top risk that we face. Uh.
11:28
Fortunately, UM, there are advances
11:30
in technology and new tools
11:33
to actually help protect all
11:36
of those those assets and that data.
11:38
Uh. And you know, I think it also requires
11:42
hiring top talent. UM. We
11:44
feel really good at Citizens. We've hired a
11:47
leading expert in cybersecurity,
11:49
has had some big jobs elsewhere, who
11:52
um, I think, knows what good looks like and
11:54
has moved us into the future very
11:57
very quickly, has good followership,
11:59
has brought a aditional good people into the organization,
12:02
and then we've prioritized the tools
12:04
that she needs to really keep the banks
12:06
safe. So that kind of goes right to
12:08
the top of the capital expenditure list,
12:11
and I think that will continue to be the case because
12:13
there's a lot of bad guys out there. They
12:15
don't come into branches with a stocking
12:18
over their head and a water pistol and pass
12:20
a note to the teller anymore. That's less
12:22
and less the way that Yeah,
12:25
it's it's you know, much more sophisticated.
12:28
Now they're sitting in a you know, in a cafe,
12:30
hacking away, buying you know, data
12:32
off the black market, and trying to figure out
12:35
ways to to steal people's assets.
12:37
Unbelievable. So you lead the I p
12:39
O in what
12:41
was that process like going
12:43
public? And how happy are you that
12:46
you're not, you know, a tech unicorn
12:48
having to face what companies like Uber
12:50
and well, look, I think citizens
12:53
had that great foundation
12:56
serving a good part of the country. Because
12:58
of the troubles of the parents, there was a lot of work to
13:00
do. So the balance sheet
13:03
had shrunk dramatically and hadn't
13:05
kept pace in some ways investing
13:07
in technology and in our fee based businesses,
13:10
and so there was work to do when
13:12
we had the deadline in terms of taking
13:14
in public. The best I could do
13:17
really was assemble a strong team and board,
13:19
uh, put together a really good plan and
13:21
have a vision where we could take the company.
13:23
But it was you know, we had to do
13:26
it within a year, and so we were still operating
13:28
at relatively poor profitability
13:31
levels and we still had a lot of gaps, but we had a
13:33
good story to tell. So actually just
13:35
getting the deal done and getting investors
13:37
to kind of buy the promise. Uh,
13:40
and by our experience and our vision
13:42
felt really good. So that was that was important
13:45
to get that done and launch that.
13:48
UM. I would say, you know the experience of
13:50
going public really helped facilitate
13:52
our turnaround because uh,
13:55
usually UH divestitures
13:57
banks get sold, they don't get I p oed.
13:59
So this was opportunity for me to
14:01
assemble a management team and say, look, we're
14:03
in a unique situation where we get the keys
14:06
to the car and we have the steering wheel and we can take
14:08
this bank where we want to. So we can
14:10
build a great bank over time, and you're
14:12
gonna be a key player in doing that. So
14:15
that allowed us to I think attract
14:17
the levels of talent that had
14:20
citizens stayed a part of our BS we
14:22
would not have been able to do. And
14:24
ultimately, in any organization, you win
14:26
with great people when you win with talent. Uh
14:28
So that was that was really positive. I
14:30
think the other thing also is that it
14:33
kind of shook up the culture at
14:35
citizens that as a sub of a foreign
14:38
entity that has its own troubles, you could get
14:41
comfortable and a bit complacent. And so now
14:43
we had public shareholders who wanted
14:46
to hear about the long term vision, but they wanted
14:48
to see good execution in the
14:50
near term to towards that path. Uh
14:52
And so we had a higher level accountability
14:55
that we embedded into the culture. Uh
14:57
So we're accountable to shareholders and we're accountable
15:00
others to serve our customers better and
15:02
to run the bank better. So you sit
15:04
on the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
15:07
board representing other banks, what is
15:09
what is that experience? Like? Oh, that's great?
15:11
Uh So? Uh if you if
15:13
you flash back to the last two years,
15:16
I was on the Federal Advisory Council.
15:18
So I was representing the the
15:20
Boston Fed District in
15:22
meeting with the FED Board of Governors
15:24
and talking about issues and making
15:27
uh you know, giving color on economic
15:29
conditions and offering advice on certain
15:31
financial matters. So that was good.
15:33
And then I rolled onto the to the
15:35
Boston Fed and so we
15:38
talked about the economic conditions in the New
15:40
England region. Uh, we talk
15:42
about the macro economic dynamics
15:45
and where interest rates are
15:47
and where they where they should go because
15:50
uh, you know, the Boston Fed president
15:52
gets a vote in terms of what to do with
15:54
interest rates, so you're an influencer
15:57
of him, but not a voting member obviously,
15:59
yeah, obviously. Yeah. So quite
16:01
interesting. And you're on the board of Moodies
16:03
for a couple of years. This is post
16:06
crisis. Yeah, what is that experience?
16:08
Well, you know, you missed all the fun. Well
16:10
what's interesting is, uh, you know, most
16:13
ceo s can have one
16:15
outside board slot. Um and even
16:17
when I was a CFO for many years, I always had
16:19
an outside board slot. When I was in the UK, I
16:22
was on Lloyd's of London's board.
16:25
That's quite the entity. And I found
16:27
that, uh, you know, would complement
16:29
what I was doing as an executive because
16:31
their specialists and risk management, that's our
16:34
principal responsibilities to make sure we're
16:36
running a safe and sound institution. And
16:38
so when I came back from the UK and
16:40
came into the US. I was looking for a
16:43
job that would also be complementary
16:45
where I could continue to uh stay
16:47
in tune with the latest
16:50
developments in risk management and kind
16:52
of seeing the lay of the land about how Moodies
16:54
thought about global risks. And so that
16:57
was just a natural thing to for me to go from
16:59
Lloyd's of London go onto the board of Moodies.
17:01
So I've been a critic over the years
17:03
of the rating agencies, primarily
17:06
S and P. When you look at the fines post
17:09
crisis, I think Moody's paid
17:11
a million dollar fine. SMP paid
17:13
billions and billions in finals, and it wasn't
17:15
quite that much of a spread. I think SMP billion
17:19
settlement with the with the d J was about
17:21
a billion three and Moodies was about eight.
17:25
That they were ultimately but they
17:27
but they pretty much seemed to have gotten
17:30
much less blame in the popular press
17:32
than SMPA. I I don't know
17:34
why that is, but uh, you're you're this
17:37
predated you by yeah. I mean we had
17:39
that we that we settled while
17:41
I was there on the board, so we
17:43
got involved in looking at the facts and looking
17:46
at the allegations, but I do think Moody's
17:48
fact pattern generally was was in pretty
17:50
good shape. But still there was some
17:52
some culpability. Weren't going to escape without some
17:55
culpability. And I don't know you very
17:57
well, but I suspect from everything I've
17:59
learned about you preparing for this, I
18:01
suspect you're the sort of guy who comes in and says,
18:04
let's get this resolved, let's move on.
18:06
We have a business to run. This happened
18:08
before, it predates
18:10
my involvement. Let's write that check
18:12
and get on with all. Well, I'm just I'm just
18:15
one board member. But yeah, we had
18:17
those types of conversations. I can imagine
18:19
that the market is really focused on the future.
18:21
They don't like to have these overhangs on
18:24
the past, and so you just gotta put them
18:26
behind you. Let's talk a little bit
18:28
about Apple. You know, when
18:30
when I first started um
18:32
reading about citizens Financial,
18:34
my initial response was why is that name
18:37
so familiar? And I just punched
18:39
it into the search of my computer. It's like, oh,
18:41
they finance are our iPhones?
18:43
UM, tell us a little
18:45
bit about how did that come about? What?
18:48
How I know that's a relatively
18:51
minor UM thing in the overall
18:53
revenues of the bank. But it's kind of interesting
18:55
because it is a name brand,
18:57
and you guys are pretty much very public
18:59
with To be to be a partner for
19:02
the most iconic company on the planet, in
19:04
my view, really is a
19:06
lot of credibility for us. So we're
19:09
quite pleased that we hold that position. Uh.
19:11
You know, we had worked
19:14
with Apple early days when
19:16
we were building up our student
19:18
loan business, uh, potentially
19:21
with a notion that we could help them finance
19:24
the purchases of their equipment in student
19:26
book stores in college, and that
19:28
program didn't really fulfill
19:31
its potential. Um, But I
19:33
think we got to know them well and
19:36
they liked our focus on the customer
19:38
and really obsession around the customer
19:40
experience because that's really defines
19:42
Apple. So when they were thinking about
19:45
the upgrade program and how to sell
19:48
more phones through their stores, we
19:50
helped work with them on that program and
19:53
design the financing for that program.
19:56
Uh. And I think we built a very
19:58
effective platform
20:01
to process those transactions. So there's
20:03
a very small window of time that
20:05
as you know, since you've in it twelve
20:07
months, well, but you go into the
20:09
store, you pick your phone, and then you, we have
20:12
a little window to make a decision
20:14
do we want to finance you in
20:16
the program or not, and without getting
20:18
a lot of information. So we've built a very
20:20
good credit decision ing model and then a very
20:23
good processing capability
20:25
behind the scenes that leads
20:27
to a very good customer experience,
20:29
a very highly rated NPS
20:32
within the Apple store experience. So,
20:35
uh, anyways, pretty instantaneous. Yeah, it's
20:37
it's gone exceptionally well. On
20:39
on the days when they launch a new
20:42
uh phone. Uh, we get
20:44
massive volume that we have to process,
20:46
and we've always been able to flawlessly execute
20:49
all that volume. So so I think it's
20:51
been a good partnership. And Uh, the
20:53
nice thing is the technology platform
20:55
that we built for Apple, we can move
20:58
and offer it to other merchants and
21:00
adapted to to the needs of other merchants.
21:02
And so today we also have a d
21:04
T and vivin to smart alarm. Companies
21:07
are running similar programs,
21:09
and we have a number of other big
21:12
household names in the queue.
21:14
And so I kind of tease investors, I say,
21:16
stay tuned, watched this space, because
21:18
we're gonna announce a rollout to
21:21
some other very highly regarded
21:23
companies. So I'm curious
21:25
as to how this works because
21:28
when the first time we went to an Apple
21:30
store too, and I'm always complaining
21:33
I'm a power user phones and after a year
21:36
the battery life starts to die. The last
21:38
phone, I replaced the battery at month
21:40
fourteen, and I said, wait, twelve
21:42
months, new phone? What do I sign up for that?
21:45
It was a pretty surprisingly
21:47
quit. You punch a bunch of things in data
21:49
birth so, security, name, address, and
21:51
it's like eight seconds later you get approval.
21:54
I assume you're looking at things like
21:57
credit score, payment history, etcetera.
22:00
What what how many data points
22:02
go into that that it could be that's a number of data
22:04
points. We don't want to give away the full
22:06
secret, Sauceberry, but you
22:08
know, I think we feel quite confident
22:11
of our ability to make good
22:13
decisions. And I think we now have been
22:15
at the program now for a number of years, and
22:17
so we've seen the performance of all
22:19
the different vintages, uh, and
22:21
they've performed at or above
22:24
expectations. Do you tweak this on an
22:26
ongoing basis? It's always how do we make it a
22:28
little better and a little that's that's
22:30
that's kind of interesting. So I have
22:32
to think this new iPhone eleven the
22:34
week it comes out, what is that like?
22:36
Is this just a giant fire hose of data
22:39
or there's there's a big swell
22:41
of volume. Uh and uh.
22:43
It's great for Apple. I think they're pleased with
22:45
how the eleven is being received in the marketplace,
22:48
and it's gotten great reviews. And
22:50
despite the price, it's pretty expensive.
22:52
Well, they've had had a two tier price,
22:55
so I think, and you could get the eight for
22:58
a very cheap. They've
23:00
now covered the full spectrum of prices as
23:02
opposed to just being right. So I think they've
23:05
thought it through in terms of features and pricing
23:07
and alternatives. And it's meeting a
23:09
good reception, which is good for us. That means there's gonna
23:12
be good demand for the phone. People
23:14
continue to participate in the upgrade
23:16
program, and so we continue to grow the balances
23:19
onto the program. I'm an ideal client for you,
23:21
guys. We walk in, what's the biggest phone,
23:23
what's the top of line? Give me extra
23:25
storage? Wait it's fifty bucks
23:27
a month, Okay, great, we'll take two. It
23:30
really is a very simple
23:32
thing, and the only problem is you want
23:34
to upgrade after a year,
23:36
and sometimes you're waiting a couple of months for new
23:38
phone, so you end up holding onto it.
23:40
But then but you're never really obsoletely, you're
23:42
always getting the latest and greatest, which after
23:45
the very appealing. Well, some people
23:47
don't care, other people want whatever.
23:50
The most buzzworthy thing is I
23:52
am an early adopter, even though it can
23:54
occasionally be painful when you
23:56
buy things before they're really ready for prime
23:58
time. UM, thankfully
24:00
I passed on the Google Glass. But any
24:03
time I have an opportunity to upgrade the phone, I'm I'm,
24:06
I'm there right away. Good. I have
24:08
to think that where you sit
24:10
in the economy, looking
24:12
at consumers, looking at
24:14
other um businesses and entrepreneurs,
24:18
you have to get a really early read
24:21
on any changes in the economy.
24:24
Is that a fair statement or am I overstating it? Yeah?
24:26
No, Look, we're kind
24:28
of cover three regions of the country.
24:31
So we have New England, mid Atlantic and
24:33
Upper Midwest within our footprint,
24:36
three very different economies economies,
24:39
and we cover, as I
24:41
said earlier, the mid mid corporate middle
24:43
market all the way down to small business, and
24:45
then we have a very big consumer business. So the
24:48
balance of our businesses is roughly fifty
24:50
fifty between uh corporate
24:52
and and also uh the consumer.
24:54
Uh so we get it. We got quite a good read
24:57
on uh, you know, both data
25:00
in terms of, you know how how
25:02
are borrowing patterns, how our charge
25:04
card usage, etcetera. Uh,
25:06
and then also anecdotes just what are
25:09
we hearing from customers? What's
25:11
the businessman doing? Are they buying
25:13
that next piece of capital equipment? Are
25:15
they holding back because of the trade
25:17
tension? Uh? So, I think
25:19
we get a well informed view of what's
25:22
likely to come up in the economy. If
25:24
there's a recession somewhere out on the
25:26
horizon, where would you see it first?
25:28
Is it in spending patterns? Is it in payment
25:31
patterns? Where? Where does the what
25:34
line of business is most sensitive? Yeah?
25:36
So, I you know, I think the thing that
25:38
you really want to keep your eye on is
25:41
credit deterioration. So in
25:45
the consumer side, are you seeing migrations
25:48
into delinquency buckets that people
25:50
are starting to stretch and have difficulty
25:52
keeping up with obligations. Same
25:54
thing on the corporate side of their particular segments
25:58
of the economy that are starting to dress
26:00
a little bit. And so to me, that's a key
26:02
early warning sign. Are you seeing any of that
26:04
today, We're not. So.
26:07
There was a Wall Street Journal article about
26:09
middle class consumers moving
26:12
towards a seven year versus the old
26:15
five year UH loan
26:17
for automobiles, and that could be a sign of
26:19
of something I don't. I think
26:21
people maybe you're holding their cars longer.
26:23
That's a little more affordable to stretch the payment out
26:26
over a longer time. So and these cars now
26:28
less pretty much, they do, they do, so
26:31
you're not seeing a lot of people have been nervous
26:33
about I s M and I've been
26:35
nervous about residential sales. And
26:39
you know, the recession easts have been forecasting
26:41
a recession next year for the past five
26:43
years. They you know, eventually they'll be
26:46
right. But it doesn't mean we don't.
26:48
We don't see it. Uh, you know, I I'd
26:50
say, uh, there's some recent
26:52
data that UH manufacturing
26:54
sector is a little soft. But you have to remember
26:56
in the context of the US economy, economy's
26:59
power s by consumers,
27:01
and consumers are in great times.
27:03
Unemployments low, people can find jobs,
27:06
real wage growth, So you've got UH
27:08
wages growing at three point two, inflations
27:10
down at one and a half. So people are having expanding
27:13
uh net pay over inflation,
27:15
which is great. So that I think
27:17
the consumer is watching some of
27:19
the current events. They're watching the trade
27:22
and they're watching the impeachment
27:24
proceedings, but I think they're almost inured
27:26
to to that. It's been around for a long time and
27:29
it hasn't really caused anything, and so people
27:32
are aware of it, but it's not holding folks
27:34
back. Where it is holding people
27:36
back a little bit is the
27:38
kind of middle market companies sitting
27:41
there saying, how is the trade
27:43
tension and the tariffs going to impact me?
27:45
And it's going to impect impact different
27:48
sectors differently. Again, the service economy
27:51
is not that impacted by it, but the manufacturing
27:54
sector is. And fortunately
27:56
for us, the service sector
27:59
dominates our to me so, but you guys
28:01
have have offices in the Midwest. You're
28:03
seeing stresses starting to perform
28:05
on at least on a small basis. I think. I think a
28:07
lot of companies are thinking about their supply
28:10
chains and how to adjust
28:13
their supply chains to try to
28:15
minimize the impact from the tariffs.
28:17
And you know what it forces everybody
28:19
to do, including the banks, is how do you get more
28:22
efficient if you're going to have these
28:24
costs that come in from external
28:26
from uh some of the administration
28:28
policies. Then how do we protect
28:31
our growth and our earnings, etcetera. And
28:33
so deploying artificial intelligence,
28:36
deploying robotics, finding ways to keep
28:38
streamlining how business gets done
28:41
becomes an imperative. When we think
28:43
of traditional banks, we tend to think
28:45
of the yield curve as
28:48
being a determiner of their profitability.
28:50
When the yield curve is steep, hey, there's a
28:52
lot of spread to be captured, and they make money.
28:54
When it's flat or as we've seen the past
28:57
quarter, inverted, very challenging
28:59
for those banks. How does that
29:01
affect a middle market bank like yourselves.
29:03
Yeah, well, it's uh, certainly
29:06
move something that's been a tailwind for the last
29:08
two years. Its rates were going up. Most banks
29:11
are what's referred to as assets sensitive,
29:13
so their loans are repricing faster than deposits
29:16
and spreads are widening. When you
29:18
have the flip and rates start to move down,
29:21
then your loans are repricing downward
29:23
faster than you can reprice your deposits. So
29:26
it puts a little pressure on your net interest
29:28
margin. Uh. Certainly, you try
29:30
to hedge that to
29:32
some extent, but you are going
29:34
to have an impact, uh, and NIM
29:37
will be contracting somewhat.
29:40
How do you combat that? I mentioned earlier
29:42
the expenses focused on expenses,
29:44
we had launched a very big transformational
29:47
cost program. We kind of saw
29:49
the the tea leaves about
29:52
the FED going to either pause or
29:54
maybe start to cut rates, and so we got
29:56
on this back in December and we launched
29:58
a big program in July. We're
30:00
also over the time, we've been investing
30:02
in our fee based businesses and we've done a couple
30:05
of very smart fee
30:07
based acquisitions. What are those fee
30:09
based businesses? Well, in the commercial side,
30:11
we we've purchased two M and
30:13
A boutiques to broaden out what we can do
30:15
for our customers, and there's still been
30:17
a good flow of M and A opportunities occurring
30:20
in the middle market. We bought
30:22
a mortgage business, which
30:25
timing was great on that because
30:28
as rates go down, as the FEDS cutting rates,
30:30
it maybe crimps your NIM a little bit. But
30:32
NIM standing for that interest margin, the
30:35
spread that you're making on your balance sheet. But
30:38
there's a refi boom like we haven't
30:40
seen in years, taking places
30:42
have you re financial mortgage. I literally
30:45
was there Friday doing the paperwork
30:47
and the numbers are just insane.
30:50
So so to eight on a
30:52
ten one mortgage and I'll have my mortgage
30:54
paid off in ten years. I
30:58
don't ever have I know, I can't recall having
31:00
heard of rates that low.
31:02
I I want to say, a thirty year fixed was three
31:05
five or three three and a half. Yeah, these
31:08
are just these are These are great
31:10
opportunities for consumers to
31:12
put more money in their pocket and lock in lower
31:15
carrying costs on their debt, and so
31:17
we make fees when that happens.
31:19
So fortunately this quarter
31:22
we're going to have a really strong third quarter
31:25
UH on the feet side, which
31:27
will offset any of the leakage
31:29
that we see on the balance sheet income
31:31
side. UM. And then the last
31:34
acquisition that we did was we bought a high
31:36
end wealth advisor because
31:38
what we found is in the corporate
31:41
side, the business owner the fourth
31:43
generation UH family that
31:46
is very wealthy and occasionally
31:48
takes out large dividends from their company
31:51
and puts that back on the company. We
31:53
weren't getting the swings at the bat to manage
31:55
those assets or to do the estate planning
31:57
for the company, So the folks out
32:00
of US as their bank, but they would take that
32:02
business elsewhere, and so we said, look,
32:04
we should be doing that for those customers.
32:07
We went out and bought a company called Clarfeld
32:09
Asset Management, which is a highly respected
32:11
wealth advisor and based in Terrytown,
32:14
New York. And so we're now able
32:16
to offer those services. So, uh,
32:18
really not trying to do anything too
32:21
big, but just hitting the sweet spots
32:23
with kind of rifle shot acquisition program
32:25
which has really been positive. So it sounds
32:28
like your business lines are pretty diversified,
32:30
yes, so that that that's a
32:33
good thing, is um? So
32:35
you you mentioned the FED pausing
32:37
and starting to reverse itself.
32:40
Obviously mortgages rates make it
32:42
a big difference. How
32:44
how did Quewie affect the rest of your
32:46
business and and how does all the
32:48
noise which seems to
32:50
have faded along with the summer
32:53
about the President and the FED doing
32:55
battle, how does that impact what
32:58
you guys do? Well? Um,
33:00
Obviously the actions the
33:02
Fed takes has a direct influence on the
33:04
economy and on the money supply and
33:06
the cost of funding, and so it's
33:09
going to impact banks in a material way.
33:11
Uh. Quantitative easing I
33:14
think was a stimulative
33:16
measure which basically the FED
33:18
was building up their balance sheets, so taking on
33:20
securities and buying
33:23
those with cash and putting cash back into the
33:25
system. So it helped promote liquidity
33:27
and deposit growth and promote
33:29
lending. Rates came down as they were
33:31
buying those, uh, the long end securities.
33:34
UH. So you know, we just have to be in tune
33:37
for where the FED is going. Uh. And
33:39
when we do our forecasting, we do our business
33:41
planning, we run a bunch
33:43
of different scenarios. Is that you know what
33:45
happens. If this is happening in
33:47
the economy, then what is the FED likely to do?
33:50
Uh? But uh, in any case, we
33:52
we just need to be flexible and adapt to
33:55
the circumstances that we see. So
33:57
I mentioned diversification, and you
33:59
mentioned are in the southeast, Northeast, and midwest,
34:02
so Boston, Philly, Pittsburgh,
34:04
Providence, Detroit. Um
34:06
any thoughts about expanding elsewhere
34:09
are you eventually gonna Well, there's a couple of things.
34:11
So on the on the corporate side, Uh,
34:14
as we moved to the mid corporate space,
34:16
which are slightly bigger companies five undred
34:19
three billion, we need to be national
34:21
in those industry verticals, and so we've
34:23
planted a flag down in Atlanta, so
34:26
we have about twenty five folks down there at
34:28
this point. Brought a guy out of sun Trust
34:30
and he's built a nice team down there. We've
34:33
expanded now into Texas, which is another
34:35
big state economy. We always had an energy
34:37
practice in Houston, but we put some more commercial
34:39
bankers in Dallas and in Houston. We
34:41
just hired a fellow to UH pull
34:44
together our team out in California,
34:46
So he's going to be based in l A. And so
34:49
UH, you know, we'll be on from
34:51
a corporate bank standpoint more of a
34:53
national player. And I think you're seeing that as a
34:55
trend for all of the super regional banks.
34:59
On the conser sumer side, we've
35:01
attacked that our consumer
35:03
lending operations are national, but
35:06
UH in really direct interaction
35:08
with consumers around deposits. We
35:11
were the first super regional bank last year
35:13
to launch a national
35:15
digital bank called Citizens Access
35:19
Online online only focused
35:21
on savings products. After
35:24
a year, we now have five and a half billion
35:26
of deposits UH and so it's been highly
35:29
successful. And so what we're thinking
35:31
about now is we've gotten good
35:33
at that. If you say that's a deposit mining
35:35
operation, we're abul tract deposits.
35:37
But what else can we do for those customers? And
35:39
what else can we do for many of the
35:42
customers we've now assembled through our lending
35:44
products who might be thin relationship
35:46
customers. They may know us like you may know us
35:48
because your Apple loan is with us. But
35:51
could I come to you very digitally
35:53
and offer some things in a bundle to
35:55
say, hey, that mortgage refinancing do
35:58
it with us? Or uh, other
36:00
needs that you might have, how to how to
36:02
manage your your wealth portfolio.
36:05
We have digital tools that would allow you to do
36:07
that and be pretty true to how you do it.
36:09
So uh, that's kind of the next phase
36:12
for us is we probably don't want
36:14
to have branches outside of our traditional
36:16
footprint, but we can I
36:18
think attack the national market digitally.
36:21
What you're seeing that's very interesting. There's a lot of experimentation
36:24
going on. So the megabanks like
36:26
JP, Morgan and ba A are saying we're going into
36:28
all these new cities. They're actually not
36:31
increasing their branch count, their thinning branches
36:33
where they're thick and they're putting them
36:36
if Chase has a big customer base
36:38
around their Sapphire card in a city. Okay,
36:40
we should have branches there too, so we can do more
36:42
with those customers. You've seen some super
36:45
regional competitors like PNC. They now
36:47
have a digital bank up and running, and they're putting
36:49
thin offices. They've got three in Kansas
36:51
City, they're putting ten or twelve in Dallas, and
36:54
so everybody's attacking this a little
36:56
differently. We want to get our brand
36:58
out there. We want to be more national in
37:00
scope. Do we need the branches or do we
37:02
not need the branches. That's one of the key questions
37:05
that will kind of in the peatree dish right
37:07
now, we'll see how it plays out. You mentioned
37:09
super regionals. We seem to
37:11
go through these cycles where suddenly
37:14
the majors are acquiring super regionals
37:17
left and right, and then we enter a lull
37:19
for a couple of years. What do you
37:21
see? I know, I obviously can ask you about
37:23
your bank, but in
37:26
general, looking at the industry, what do you see
37:28
for the m and a um landscape
37:31
for the mega banks and the superregionals.
37:33
Are we done with rolling up for now
37:35
or how does that change? I think I think
37:38
the mega banks, most of them are at the deposit
37:40
cap, the national deposit cap, so they're really
37:42
not players that can't play. You
37:44
did see in the superregional space murder
37:47
of equal between bb and T and
37:49
sun Trust, which I think was fairly
37:51
unique. It created a Southeast champion
37:54
uh and I don't think the other
37:56
superregionals feel compelled to
37:59
act in the wake of that. I think right now there's
38:01
so much change taking place in kind
38:03
of moving your technology ecosystem
38:05
to the future, that a merger could
38:07
be a distraction. So if we can be flexible
38:10
and nimble and good and make the right decisions,
38:12
I think we can still compete effectively at
38:14
our size. So I'm not sure you'll see
38:16
much more in the super regional space this year.
38:19
But I think the smaller banks, who
38:22
really have to contend with all of the
38:24
cost of that new technology and some of
38:26
the costs of regulation, even though the regulators are
38:29
trying to give them cut them a little slack. I
38:31
think there's an impetus to see the smaller
38:33
end of the market continue to consolidate.
38:36
We had an issue post crisis,
38:39
or at least compared to pre crisis, a
38:42
lot more mega banks a
38:44
lot less competition, more
38:46
of the national assets held by
38:48
fewer banks. Is that an attempt
38:50
to sort of resolve that issue?
38:52
Or or am I reaching too
38:54
much here? Yeah? I think you're reaching a bit. I think
38:57
if you just look at the trend. Twenty years
38:59
ago, there were fourteen hous and depository institutions
39:01
in the US. Five years ago it was seven.
39:03
Today it's like five, and so
39:06
you're just seeing that inevitable
39:08
consolidation because we still have, I
39:11
think, much more fractured banking
39:14
landscape than any other country. We
39:16
have been speaking with Bruce van Son.
39:18
He is CEO of Citizens Financial
39:20
Group. If you enjoyed this conversation,
39:23
we'll be sure and come back for the podcast extras,
39:25
where we keep the tape rolling and continue
39:28
discussing all things banking related.
39:31
You can find that wherever your
39:33
finer podcasts are sold iTunes,
39:35
Google, Stitcher, Spotify. We
39:38
love your comments, feedback in suggestions
39:40
right to us at m IB podcast
39:43
at Bloomberg dot net. Give us a review
39:45
on Apple iTunes. Be sure to
39:47
check out my weekly column on Bloomberg
39:49
dot com. Sign up for my daily reads
39:51
at Ridholts dot com. I'm
39:54
Barry Ridholts you're listening to Masters
39:56
in Business on Bloomberg Radio. Welcome
40:00
to the podcast. Bruce, Thank you so much
40:02
for doing this. I um, it's always
40:04
funny when I see different names.
40:07
I have this pet theory that there are thousands
40:10
and thousands and thousands of people working
40:13
who have a giant impact on everybody's
40:16
day to day life, and nobody knows who
40:19
they are. Everybody knows who Steve Jobs was
40:22
not, everybody knows who Bruce van so On is.
40:24
And yet you're impacting what
40:26
what people do. So I was
40:29
I was looking forward to this. There were a
40:31
couple of questions I did
40:33
not get to that. I'm
40:35
going to try and run through now and then we'll we'll do
40:38
our favorite questions and we'll get you
40:40
over to TV on time. UM.
40:42
Oh, so you guys went public in I've,
40:47
I've. We have all heard lots of
40:49
folks complain about the I P O
40:51
process and how difficult it is being
40:54
a public company. How
40:56
does that square up with your experiences running
40:58
a private company and then taking
41:01
it public. Yeah, so you know, I
41:03
actually, um,
41:05
I think it's been very positive for
41:07
citizens. Part of it is where
41:10
we came from. Uh, we had to turn around
41:12
the bank and so having
41:14
UH an interested investor
41:16
community and twenty two
41:18
cell side analysts focused
41:21
on us and prodding on our long term
41:23
strategy and putting estimates as to how
41:25
fast we could turn around the bank. UH. It's
41:28
certainly raised the level of accountability
41:30
and I think our ability to execute
41:33
improved. UM. You know, when
41:36
I when I think about the trade
41:38
offs, people say, well, private
41:40
companies can can quote unquote
41:42
go long they can think long term and make
41:44
the investments for the long term, and they're not kind
41:47
of hemmed in by the need to deliver
41:49
quarterly results. UM.
41:51
I actually think that if you communicate
41:54
effectively what you're trying to
41:56
do for the long term, and you
41:58
say I'm gonna need to invest some money
42:01
in this and this is why I'm doing it, and this
42:03
is how fast I think I'll get the payback, there
42:05
are long term investors out there
42:07
who who appreciate that, who
42:10
want to invest with a growth story with
42:12
the management team that's trying to grow the franchise
42:15
and not just really focus on
42:17
cost cut and the delivering for
42:19
the next quarter and buying back shares.
42:22
And so we've tried to balance that. We've tried to
42:24
make sure that we're executing well and putting
42:27
points on the board and showing a good trajectory
42:29
in the short term. But we're also doing
42:31
significant reinvesting UH
42:34
and trying to grow the bank so that we make it
42:36
stronger five years from now and ten years
42:38
from now. So all
42:40
the complaints about how um
42:43
onerous being a public company is
42:45
and the threats from activist
42:47
investors, is that all overstated?
42:50
Or what do you think? Look if you if you run
42:52
the company well and you actually
42:55
think through an activist agenda,
42:58
Like what am I missing in terms of my
43:00
own plans? Are there? If an
43:02
activist was involved in this company,
43:05
what would they do? Would they take capital away
43:07
from these lending portfolios and move
43:09
it to this lending portfolio? Actually, you
43:11
can proactively anticipate
43:14
where they would where they would make suggestions,
43:17
and just get ahead of it. And and you know,
43:19
it's helpful to to kind of keep that mindset.
43:22
It insulates you from
43:24
attack if you're beating them to the punch.
43:27
Yeah. Interesting, I mentioned
43:30
you're on the Federal Reserve Bank of
43:32
Boston as well as the
43:35
board of directors at Moody's. There were two
43:37
other things I want to mention because I
43:39
think they're both interesting. You're a
43:41
board member for the Bank Policy Institute.
43:44
What does the bank policies to do? What
43:46
are you? What is your involvement? Uh, tell
43:48
us a little bit about that institution. So the
43:51
Bank Policy Institute is a
43:53
relatively new creation
43:55
with a long history and legacy
43:58
organization before it, which was
44:00
originally the Banker's Round Table, which became
44:02
the Financial Services Round Table. I
44:05
think, Uh, what's the correlation
44:07
between this and the fincial. So
44:09
now bp I has
44:11
effectively succeeded the
44:14
Financial Services Round Table, And
44:16
I think there was a desire at
44:18
one point to put different
44:20
industry groups in financial institutions
44:23
under one roof. So when it was the Banker's Roundtable,
44:25
it was just bankers. Then it was financial
44:27
services and so asset managers and insurers
44:30
all got together and we would have meetings and
44:32
interact, you know, on policy
44:34
and talk to folks down on the hill. A lot
44:36
of the meetings would be in Washington. But
44:39
you know, over time, I think the agendas
44:42
of the different subsectors were different.
44:44
So under Brian moynihan's
44:46
leadership, who runs b of A, was determined
44:49
that the banks should split off and
44:51
keep a kind of larger bank profile
44:54
minimums asset size twenty five billion
44:56
would throw into this Bank Policy
44:58
Institute H and effectively
45:01
work on policy matters and things that
45:03
impact the economy and have an ability
45:05
to you know, effectively operate like
45:07
a think tank, put out papers and
45:09
monitor what the FETE is doing, and respond to
45:12
request for proposals from the regulatory
45:15
agencies, and have an ongoing dialogue
45:17
with members of Congress. So they were informed on
45:19
financial issues that impact the real economy.
45:22
Quite interesting. And then you are
45:25
also a board member of the Partnership
45:27
for Rhode Island and Jobs from Massachusetts.
45:29
What are these two groups do well? Those are
45:32
efforts to stimulate the
45:34
local economy and get
45:36
business people to work together to
45:39
help the governors of those
45:42
uh states. UH, you know drive
45:44
pro business and and pro growth
45:46
and pro jobs agendas. UH.
45:48
And so the one that uh
45:51
uh we've had some really good traction,
45:54
in particular with Partnership for Rhode Island,
45:56
where we've focused on education
46:00
UH and and uh also
46:02
business attraction and transportation,
46:05
which are important to improving
46:08
the Rhode Island economy. UH. One
46:10
thing we did recently is we funded the
46:12
Johns Hopkins Review of the Providence
46:15
school system, which I don't know if you've
46:17
seen that. It caught a lot of national press, but
46:19
basically was pretty damning of
46:22
the state of the school system. And uh,
46:24
now can you say that in pretty much any
46:26
school system, but some are
46:29
better. This was this was really
46:31
kind of pretty low down the totem
46:34
pole and there needs to be changed. And so the
46:36
state's going to take over the administration of
46:38
that school district and I think make
46:40
the changes that will make sure those
46:43
kids in that community really have a chance
46:45
to prosper when they come of age
46:47
and are entering the job market. So,
46:50
uh, those things feel good. Um,
46:52
you know, working in collaboration with governors
46:54
and with the government to to you know,
46:56
bring business, uh influence
46:58
and money behind things that are going to improve
47:01
local economies. One of the
47:03
things I've noticed
47:05
with some of the business development groups
47:08
has been a sort of and
47:11
we saw a little bit of this with the Amazon headquarter
47:14
bake off, but we've seen this
47:16
sort of tendency
47:18
to give the store away in
47:20
order to attract specific companies
47:23
as opposed to just creating an environment
47:26
that is helpful
47:28
and easy to operate in for businesses.
47:30
What do you think of those It's
47:33
almost like a race to the bottom. Ester a
47:36
big proponent of that. And uh,
47:38
you know, we had an opportunity.
47:42
Um. A couple of years ago, we
47:44
had a fork in the road. We had a very large least
47:46
facility in the Greater
47:48
Providence area and
47:51
a couple other smaller leases. That meant
47:54
people were uh
47:56
you know, kind of going to roll off their current
47:58
occupancy and we can either renew or
48:01
do something different. We
48:03
decided to break ground and build our
48:05
own campus in a town called Johnston, Rhode
48:07
Island, which is a little west of Providence. We've
48:10
got people there, four square
48:13
feet uh beautiful
48:15
campus with sports fields that we
48:17
share with the local community, walking trails
48:19
through the woods. Uh. And we didn't
48:21
take any funding. We didn't try
48:23
to hold up Rhode Island and say I want
48:25
you to compete against Massachusetts. We just
48:27
said, this is where we want to be, this
48:30
is where our history has had us,
48:32
and we have a great uh colleague base
48:34
here. Uh. And so you know
48:36
that I think the government was helpful
48:39
in getting things we needed, like an exit
48:42
ramp off of the highway into our
48:44
campus, for example. So the work isn't that
48:46
what the state or the local city is supposed
48:48
to be doing as opposed to tax give away right,
48:51
so that we we split the cost with
48:53
the state, so we paid half and they paid half
48:55
for that exit ramp for example. And you
48:57
know some of the some of the locals
48:59
are alreadis put sewer lines in and on an expedited
49:02
basis so we could get the campus up and running.
49:04
So uh yeah, I think it was it
49:06
was the right thing to do, and we didn't have our hand
49:09
out. I have some NFL
49:11
team owners I'd like to introduce you to.
49:13
Maybe you convince them to stop
49:15
being socialists and actually embrace capitalism.
49:18
You own a football team, build your own
49:20
damn stadium. I know that doesn't win me any
49:22
friends, but it just seems
49:24
like a reasonable thing to do.
49:27
Um. I just was reading, uh
49:29
the Cleveland Cavaliers. Their stadium
49:31
needs an upgrade, and they're
49:34
asking the taxpayers to pay a couple hundred
49:36
million dollars. You're a billionaire,
49:38
fix your own stadium. Leave us out of it it.
49:41
Uh. I can't. Obviously,
49:43
I'm not going to talk about anything in Boston sports
49:45
as a New Yorker. I I just don't even
49:48
want to go there. Um.
49:50
Let's see if there's any other questions I missed
49:53
that I wanted to get to. We talked about that.
49:55
We talked about that, all
49:58
right, So let's jump to our favorite
50:00
questions that we ask our
50:03
guests. These are the ten questions that are supposed
50:06
to be revealing of who you are and
50:08
how you got that way. Tell us the first
50:10
car you ever own, year making model uh
50:14
Ford Mustang to four.
50:19
I was still a year away from
50:21
my license, but I had worked summer
50:24
jobs and my dad said, I'll pay
50:26
two thousand dollars to any car. You've got
50:28
to come up with a difference. We paid
50:31
for that car, and so when I got my license,
50:33
I was driving a brand new car. So wait, you
50:35
bought that car before you actually
50:38
had it was the model year was letting
50:40
out or something, so my father thought he could get
50:42
a deal on it. So but I pick it up at
50:44
the end of the year, had from working
50:46
summer jobs, so I put up my share that
50:48
that's great. Um,
50:51
what's the most important thing people don't
50:53
know about? Bruce Van so on? Um,
50:58
I you know, one of my early
51:00
jobs was as a landscaper,
51:03
summer jobs to make that money for the car.
51:06
Uh and I still love to garden to
51:08
this day. So I take
51:11
great pride in designing
51:13
a nice landscape and then maintaining it. Uh.
51:16
Tell us about your early mentors who helped
51:18
guide your career well?
51:21
Um, I I always mentioned my
51:23
parents because I think they gave me a great foundation
51:25
and moral compass. But
51:28
uh, you know, as you as you
51:30
grow up, it's your teachers and favorite
51:33
sports coaches and so that all goes into
51:35
making you who you are. Uh. And
51:37
then I had some great people that I worked for. UM.
51:40
I had a fellow at General Mills,
51:42
my first job out of college, who was
51:45
tall, lanky, athletic guy like me,
51:47
but really smart. Had worked at General Motors,
51:50
learned a lot from him. He was very decisive,
51:53
worked for Bruce Wasserstein, one of the smartest shows
51:55
on the planet. Uh. He
51:57
had There were a lot of Bruce is ms that I picked
51:59
up in a out of wisdom. And so I always
52:02
found that if you want to you
52:05
know, move ahead in a career that your
52:07
you should look for great people to work for that
52:09
you can learn from. So when they're interviewing you,
52:11
you should also be interviewing them to make sure
52:13
that these are people that really are going to have
52:16
an impact on you what about bankers
52:18
that influence the way you look
52:21
at the business of banking? Who who affected
52:24
your uh to bankers
52:27
that I would call out? Tom Rennie
52:29
was my boss at the bank in New
52:31
York for many years, and I think
52:34
Tom had a had a just
52:36
great stoicism to to hand
52:39
be inflappable under all kinds
52:41
of scenarios. Um and uh
52:43
kind of it's never it's always
52:46
darkest just before the dawn, that kind of mentality,
52:48
it's not as good as you think it is when it's when it's
52:50
going really well, and just kind of keep that even
52:53
keel. And then the second
52:55
one was Stephen Hester when I worked over at RBS
52:58
UM who was under a mense
53:00
pressure to get RBS
53:03
righted, but uh just was
53:05
so unflappable under all that pressure.
53:08
Um and again keeping that even keel,
53:11
um and uh just super super
53:13
smart, really good thoughts about
53:15
how to go about that turnaround, which some
53:17
of those things I've I've applied to citizens on
53:19
a smaller scale obviously than URBS. What
53:22
about books? Tell us about your favorite books.
53:24
What do you enjoy to read? I read a
53:27
wide uh range of books,
53:29
read a lot of business books. Uh, I read
53:32
uh you know, Tom Clancy, Harlan Coben,
53:34
those kind of books. Probably the
53:37
the book that's had the biggest impact me my
53:39
whole life was The Power Positive Thinking by Norman
53:41
Vincent Peale. Uh So, I was
53:43
a giant that really positive attitude,
53:46
which I read probably when I was in my early twenties.
53:48
Uh So. I totally enjoy
53:51
reading. Unfortunately, I have I
53:53
have so much reading to do for work in such
53:55
an extensive seven have
53:58
work agenda that I don't read as much
54:00
as I could. But I've still probably read a dozen
54:02
books a year. I would say, give give us another
54:04
title, one other that you really enjoyed. I
54:06
would, you know, I just I just read
54:09
a very interesting book. Um,
54:12
I can't I don't remember the title, but it was about
54:15
an elephant trainer
54:18
who basically lead these elephants
54:21
in World War two and the kind of
54:23
Burmese jungle, which to me was
54:25
really fascinating. Let's see if I can find
54:28
how Burmese elephants helped defeat Japanese
54:30
in World War two. Elephant Company
54:32
there is let
54:35
me get let me see if I can read the exact
54:38
name. That's
54:41
wild by Vicky Croake. Elephant
54:43
Company the inspiring story of an unlikely
54:46
hero in the animals who helped save him
54:48
lives in World War two. Wow, that's
54:50
quite quite fascinating. Tell us about
54:52
a time you failed and what you learned
54:54
from the experience. But
54:57
by the way, a thousand
54:59
nine views, five stars,
55:01
that's pretty that's pretty impressive. That was a good
55:03
book. So you might want to put that one on your
55:05
list. Yeah, I definitely will um tell us about
55:07
a time you failed and what you learned
55:09
from the experience. Uh, you know, I
55:12
I'd say getting cut from a sports
55:14
team was kind of a big moment
55:16
for me. I was a tall sport. Did you play basketball?
55:19
I played baseball, basketball, and a little bit of football
55:21
for a couple of years. But I got cut
55:23
from the varsity team as a sophomore
55:25
in high school. Uh, and I
55:28
really I was angry. You went through
55:30
all the emotions that go with that. But
55:32
I picked myself up and we went A bunch
55:34
of us went and joined a travel basketball team
55:37
and we played. You
55:39
know, we had so much fun. And then we got
55:41
to play the high school team in a kind
55:43
of just a braggadocio
55:46
game. I'll bet you were better than you and we beat the high
55:48
school team when we got that's great
55:50
revenge. That's a little bit of Michael Jordan's
55:53
didn't make He was a freshman, he got
55:55
cut h and he used it as motivation
55:57
as well. What do you do for fun? What are
56:00
you still playing hoops or no more? Nah,
56:02
It's it's a little risky at this stage.
56:04
But you know I still enjoy sports, so
56:06
golf, tennis, swimming. Uh. Like
56:09
to go to the beach. Uh. You
56:11
mentioned your sail Yeah. I was
56:13
a commodore at our at our sailing club, so
56:16
I love the water. Um.
56:19
And you know, like good dining,
56:21
going out, having a good time
56:23
with the family and friends. Um,
56:26
well you got plenty of choices for restaurants
56:28
restaurants here. Yeah. So in
56:31
the banking industry today,
56:33
what are you most optimistic about and
56:35
what are you most pessimistic about? Well,
56:38
I'd say, um, you
56:41
know, when I look at at this country,
56:43
the US, that that we serve, that
56:45
citizens serves, I think it's the
56:47
greatest country on the planet. Um.
56:49
And uh, you know, we have our troubles,
56:52
we have our challenges, were not perfect, but
56:55
over time we've continued just to I
56:57
think get it right. Uh. And we're
57:00
we have an innovative society. We've got the big
57:02
tech companies. We're trying to improve people's
57:04
lives, and so I just think about how
57:06
the quality of life in the country
57:08
is so much better than it was in nineteen
57:11
fifty nine thousand. Just
57:13
think where it's going to be going forward.
57:15
So I'm optimistic about that. Um,
57:18
I'd say the things that I'm disappointed
57:20
in are pessimistic about, is that
57:22
people don't feel good about it. So the
57:25
flip side of that is, we have so much to be thankful
57:27
for and so much to to count our blessings
57:30
for, but everybody seems to be grumpy
57:32
and angry and not step back and say, gosh,
57:34
look look what we have. Uh
57:36
So, anyway, I think we've lost our soul
57:39
a little bit. We've lost our spirituality, which
57:41
I'd love to see that rejuvenate at some
57:43
point. It does seem that people are
57:45
a little more divided,
57:48
a little more angry. It's it's some
57:50
of its social media, but some of it is just
57:53
you know, this the post crisis state
57:55
of affairs. People never really
57:57
fully recovered their optimism after
58:00
that. It took a long time after the Great Depression
58:02
before that and A and a world war
58:04
before people seem to resurrect
58:06
that can do American spirit. Um
58:10
So a millennial or I'm gonna say that again
58:13
because I have to drop millennial because they're too
58:15
old now. Ah
58:17
So, a recent college grad comes to
58:19
you and says they're interested in banking.
58:22
What sort of career advice would you give that. I
58:24
tell them it's a great career, and uh,
58:26
you know what I love about
58:29
it? I think it's a noble profession. So I
58:31
tell people, Look, you get to positively
58:34
impact people, individuals,
58:38
uh, communities, local
58:40
economies by what you do in
58:42
your day job working as a banker. But
58:45
then we also have a platform
58:47
that you can volunteer off
58:49
that platform and further that impact
58:52
on local communities. And so for
58:54
example, Citizens Bank, when I joined
58:57
six years ago, we were volunteering about
58:59
fifty ours. We
59:01
really had to focus on upping that and today
59:03
this year we're gonna hit about a hundred and fifty
59:06
thou volunteer hours. We
59:08
have seven people serving on local
59:10
boards around our footprint. And
59:13
so, uh, if you want to
59:15
have a career where you can learn
59:18
be challenged constantly evolving
59:20
landscape that you have to contend with, but Importantly,
59:24
you can positively benefit the
59:28
people that you live with and the
59:30
local communities and economies that you
59:32
live in. Banking is a great career.
59:35
So normally I don't ask
59:37
follow up questions in this segment, but
59:39
you just made me think of something. Not
59:42
too long ago, the Business Round Table
59:45
change their perspective on UM.
59:49
The end goal of the corporation is maximizing
59:52
shareholder profits. They now look
59:54
at it as there are many different
59:56
constituencs UM
59:58
and that that' seems to have been a pretty
1:00:01
large sea change. What did you
1:00:03
think of what? It sounds like you've already adopted
1:00:05
that. What did you think of this? Well, if
1:00:08
we we, I think it's been a little controversial
1:00:10
because ultimately you're working
1:00:12
for your shareholders. You know, management
1:00:15
is an agent for the shareholders of the bank.
1:00:17
I think all those uh different
1:00:20
stakeholders work together, UM.
1:00:22
And so you're trying to deliver for
1:00:24
customers, for communities, uh,
1:00:27
for your colleagues, the three c's. If
1:00:29
you're regulated, you gotta run a business
1:00:31
the right way for the regulators. You've got to deliver
1:00:34
for the shareholders. You want to get that
1:00:36
flywheel working. But to me, it comes
1:00:38
back to the shareholder. If you're running the bank well,
1:00:41
you'll have the resources to keep investing
1:00:43
in all the deliverables
1:00:45
for those other stakeholders. So
1:00:48
I'm you know, I like the concept
1:00:50
of broadening it out and making sure that
1:00:52
people are thinking it's not all about the bottom
1:00:54
line. But still I think the shareholder
1:00:56
is the one that you have to please first
1:00:59
and foremost. They're the ones with the acts.
1:01:01
If if you're not pleasing, you
1:01:03
can't go pursue your own agenda and
1:01:05
make the other stuff more important and then see
1:01:08
the stock not performed well, in the bottom line not
1:01:10
performed well. It should
1:01:12
work together. And our final question,
1:01:15
what is it that you know about the world of banking
1:01:17
today that you wish you might have known
1:01:19
thirty years ago? Um
1:01:26
I. I think it's just a cumulative
1:01:28
process where you go through life
1:01:30
and you learn things. UM
1:01:32
I don't. I don't have any ah ha moments.
1:01:34
I just have gained a lot
1:01:37
of wisdom by working in different companies.
1:01:39
And I think you know just
1:01:42
that that that banks have
1:01:44
a big role to play in the economy. They have
1:01:47
to be run well in a safe
1:01:49
and sound fashion. They have to be focused
1:01:51
on delivering for customers. Um
1:01:54
and you know. I think you've you've come to
1:01:56
that knowledge over time. I don't. I don't
1:01:59
know if there's an aha thing that I said, God,
1:02:01
I would have run my career differently
1:02:03
if I knew it back then. I think I've just,
1:02:05
you know, evolved with the changes
1:02:07
in the industry, and I think I have a pretty good
1:02:10
concept of what banking is all about at this point.
1:02:13
Fair enough, Bruce, thank you so much for
1:02:15
being so generous with your time. We have been
1:02:17
speaking with Bruce van so On.
1:02:20
He is the chairman and CEO
1:02:22
of Citizens Financial Group. If you
1:02:24
enjoyed this conversation, well look up
1:02:26
an intri down an inch on Apple iTunes
1:02:28
and you could see any of the previous
1:02:31
two hundred and seventy five or so such
1:02:33
conversations that we've had over the past five
1:02:35
and a half years. We love
1:02:37
your comments, feedback and suggestions
1:02:40
right to us at m IB podcast
1:02:43
at Bloomberg dot net. Be sure and give
1:02:45
us a lovely review on Apple iTunes.
1:02:48
I would be remiss if I did not mention the crack
1:02:50
staff that helps put together these conversations
1:02:53
each week. Karen O'Brien is
1:02:55
my audio engineer. Michael
1:02:58
Boyle is my produce your slash
1:03:00
booker. Michael Batnick is my head of research.
1:03:03
I'm Barry Retolts. You've been listening
1:03:05
to Masters in Business on Bloomberg
1:03:07
Radio. H
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More