Podchaser Logo
Home
Michigan Business Beat | Anthony M. Dalimonte, Foster Swift: FTC Bans Non-Compete Agreements

Michigan Business Beat | Anthony M. Dalimonte, Foster Swift: FTC Bans Non-Compete Agreements

Released Friday, 17th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Michigan Business Beat | Anthony M. Dalimonte, Foster Swift: FTC Bans Non-Compete Agreements

Michigan Business Beat | Anthony M. Dalimonte, Foster Swift: FTC Bans Non-Compete Agreements

Michigan Business Beat | Anthony M. Dalimonte, Foster Swift: FTC Bans Non-Compete Agreements

Michigan Business Beat | Anthony M. Dalimonte, Foster Swift: FTC Bans Non-Compete Agreements

Friday, 17th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Chris Holman welcomes back Anthony M. Dalimonte, Attorney, Southfield, MI Foster Swift, serving a half dozen offices statewide.

There were several things Chris was looking to find out from Anthony in this conversation: Tell us about the new FTC rule banning non-competes?

· FTC voted April 23, 2024 3-2 to publish its final rule banning all non-compete agreements.

· The rule states that non-compete agreements violate Section 5 of the FTC Act. All non-compete agreements signed after the effective date will be illegal and violate federal law.

· FTC defines “non-compete clause” as a term or condition of employment that either “prohibits” a worker from, “penalizes” a worker for, or “functions to prevent” a worker from (A) seeking or accepting work in the United States with a different person where such work would begin after the conclusion of the employment that includes the term or condition; or (B) operating a business in the United States after the conclusion of the employment that includes the term or condition.

· Effective date is 120 days after the rule is published in the federal register, which has not happened yet so sometime in September.

· All non-compete agreements signed BEFORE the effective date are also unenforceable EXCEPT for non-competes that were signed by “Senior Executives”.

What led to the FTC to vote to approve the final rule 3-2?

· The FTC commissioners voted along party lines, so we knew this was going to be passed. The dissenting republican commissioners sort of previewed the basis for the challenge – that the FTC does not have the authority to make sweeping law changes.

Does the FTC tell us who a senior executive is?

· Senior executive is someone who makes over $151,164 and are in a “policy-making” position.

· FTC says that less than 1% of employees fall into this category. Theory, according to the FTC, is that non-competes are typically less coercive with “senior executives” because more likely to be negotiated and often with the assistance of a lawyer.

If an employee signed a non-compete and they aren’t a senior executive, what happens?

· Non-compete is unenforceable AND employers have to give notice to employees that states they will not enforce any non-compete clause against you.

· FTC provided model language that basically says you may seek to accept a job with any company or person, even if they compete with the company. You may run your own

business, even if it competes with X company. And you may compete with X company following your employment with that employer.

Are there any exceptions?

· This rule does not apply where a person enters into a bona fide sale of a business entity.

· This is a change from the proposed rule that came out last year where the FTC said you have to be selling at least 25% of business.

Is this limited to only non-compete clauses?

· In general, yes.

· BUT the FTC says that if other overly broad clauses that prohibit or penalize a worker or “functions to prevent” a worker from working with someone else or starting their own business after they leave their job could be considered a “non-compete” clause.

· So the FTC says Non-disclosure agreements, confidentiality agreements, non-solicitation agreements are still enforceable. Unless they are so broad and onerous that it acts as a “functional non-compete”. The FTC basically says this is a case by case basis.

Is this going to be challenged?

· Yes, it was challenged almost immediately in the Eastern District of Texas by one business group.. The US Chamber of Commerce also filed a lawsuit, and the Court is likely to join these two lawsuits together. So we will be watching this closely.

» Visit MBN website: www.michiganbusinessnetwork.com/» Watch MBN’s YouTube: www.youtube.com/@MichiganbusinessnetworkMBN» Like MBN: www.facebook.com/mibiznetwork» Follow MBN: twitter.com/MIBizNetwork/» MBN Instagram: www.instagram.com/mibiznetwork/

Show More
Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features