Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hello, everyone, and welcome to another edition of Mormon
0:02
Stories podcast. I'm your host, John Delin. It's
0:05
February 13th, 2024,
0:07
the day before Valentine's Day, for those of you
0:09
who celebrate such things. And
0:12
we are here for part two of
0:14
the two-part series on this amazing book.
0:17
The book is Chosen Path, the memoir, I guess
0:20
originally authored by D. Michael Quinn, but
0:23
edited and annotated by the
0:25
Barbara... Only authored by D. Michael
0:28
Quinn. And we just
0:30
did a simple copy edit and then myself
0:33
and three other annotators annotated the
0:35
entire book. Yeah. So that's Barbara
0:37
Jones Brown, everybody. Barbara, welcome back to Mormon
0:39
Stories. Hi, thanks for having me back. If
0:42
y'all haven't watched the previous episode we
0:44
just released with Moshe Quinn, D.
0:46
Michael Quinn's son, and Barbara, I
0:49
really enjoyed it and the feedback
0:51
so far has been really good. So go check that out.
0:54
I thought it would be really fun to
0:57
bring Sandra Tanner back. The Sandra
0:59
Tanner. Hey, Sandra. Welcome
1:01
back. Okay. Y'all
1:03
know Sandra, she and her late
1:05
husband, Gerald Tanner, were the
1:08
founders of the Utah Lighthouse Ministry. Is that what
1:10
it was called? And for
1:12
decades and decades, they not only sold
1:15
books in Salt Lake
1:17
City, but they did lots of important
1:19
Mormon history and scholarship upon
1:21
whose shoulders we continue to stand. Is that
1:23
fair to say, Barbara? Absolutely.
1:27
Pioneers talking about Mormon
1:29
history, that's for sure. And Sandra
1:32
sold her bookstore and is retired, but
1:34
you know, I reached out to her
1:36
and said, Sandra, we still need you.
1:39
So the other day I
1:42
was just sitting here thinking we need more Sandra.
1:44
It's fine if she decides she needs to be
1:46
retired, but we,
1:48
uh, we still need her light and her wisdom.
1:51
So I reached out to her and said, Sandra, do you want
1:53
to come on Mormon stories? And she said, okay. And
1:58
so I gave her a readiest time. I said Sandra
2:01
your first reading assignment is chosen
2:03
path the memoir because it
2:05
talks a lot about you and Gerald and Barbara
2:08
you'd you want to tell your quick
2:10
story of you were doing a little
2:12
event right with Yeah,
2:15
so we were doing a book signing
2:17
for this book chosen path at the amazing
2:19
benchmark books here in Salt Lake City and
2:22
Sandra stood up and We
2:26
were doing Q&A and I just asked anyone who
2:28
knew Mike Quinn or who had read the book
2:30
to share Send up a share of
2:32
comment and Sandra stood up and of course in
2:34
life Gerald and Sandra and D Michael Quinn were
2:36
can I say? Our ten and me Sandra well
2:38
on the other side of the issues But
2:42
to hear Sandra stand up and say I've been reading
2:44
this memoir and I'm I'm actually starting to
2:46
like D Michael Quinn and discovering that we
2:48
actually had so much in common that I
2:50
never knew about and Learning things
2:52
about him. I didn't know and and starting to like
2:55
this person in spite of their differences
2:58
when he was alive Yeah, and
3:00
since Sanders forgotten more than we'll probably
3:02
ever know collectively we want to
3:05
We're gonna ring every bit of knowledge out of
3:07
her for as long as she's willing to share
3:10
So Sandra welcome back to Mormon
3:12
stories. Yeah And
3:15
and I want everyone to know this is a
3:19
550 page book that
3:22
I got assigned to read And
3:25
I've got all my little notes in
3:27
it of all the different interesting Pages,
3:30
which I won't remember what they all mean without
3:33
looking at them. But at least I get
3:35
it is my book
3:37
is Marked
3:41
so I have well you won't
3:43
be able to see that but there's red lines
3:45
all over everything. I It
3:48
was a It
3:52
was a very interesting read the
3:54
first part of it before he gets really into
3:56
his research Deals
3:59
a lot with his. The family stuff and
4:01
so it's not as applicable to.
4:04
My studies but it was
4:06
interesting getting to see more
4:09
of plan as. A.
4:12
Person in the context of his
4:14
whole life. So.
4:17
It. Was a challenge to
4:20
get through it sets
4:22
but it. It.
4:25
Was interesting to see how. He.
4:29
Was down and the glendale. California area.
4:32
And. I grew up in the San Fernando.
4:34
Valley Area which is just. A.
4:37
Few miles away. so.
4:40
It was cuddle I called home
4:42
weeks reading some of his early
4:44
experience. And Mormonism because I'm
4:46
just a few years older
4:49
than my maybe three years.
4:52
Sir. For few the and forty
4:54
four yards for a forty
4:56
one son three years old
4:58
are so similar kinds of
5:00
experiences growing up in Southern
5:02
California. In Mormonism, Or
5:04
which were good years for me. I. Enjoyed.
5:08
My early years in.
5:11
Southern. California as a born
5:13
and an awesome. His.
5:16
Mom and my family. All
5:18
from Plan Your Stock. So we
5:20
all grew up with a lot
5:22
of. Base knowledge
5:25
of Mormonism. Much
5:28
of words was the Pr version
5:30
or.the. P g the g version
5:32
and it wasn't until later. We
5:34
realized as and our
5:36
version of Mormonism separate.
5:41
So. To see my cursor. Just
5:47
a regular Mormon kid growing up. Was
5:50
instructor for me and and help into saw
5:52
him out as a person. And
5:54
I thought it was interesting reading
5:56
about his mission and then his
5:59
service. The and it was a
6:01
an Air Force or. Army
6:03
he was in Germany and I think
6:06
it was the army and that a
6:08
little rusty Cia is it here the
6:10
So city with intel in intelligence guy
6:12
in the intelligence community which I thought
6:15
was really interested because he tells about
6:17
how you want to go into the
6:19
Cia and the i guess be super
6:22
sleuth. Add those guys
6:24
talk. And was him about. What?
6:27
You have to do when you're at a joint and he
6:29
says. It all up dry. Be a time you're standing
6:31
with somebody face to face and you have to shoot
6:33
him. And for it's
6:36
like ah maybe I wanted to
6:38
for department so it's it's he
6:40
calls it a little different area.
6:42
The Tos is worth. Of
6:46
the struggle city has in
6:48
his. Marriage n though I
6:50
think most people. They
6:52
are that noisy about him or his
6:54
work. Know that he was gay and
6:57
how from a child he knows this
6:59
about himself. And
7:01
yet as a child, He
7:04
is given this promise by was that his
7:06
grandma his grandmother predicts that when it when
7:08
he's nine years of he's my point is
7:10
the kid that every past and testimony meeting
7:13
is getting up and during his testimony
7:15
and us the people in his words personal
7:17
using Crop to bring it be a church
7:19
leaders someday I'll bet and his grandmother when
7:22
he's nine tells them all that you grew
7:24
up to be an apostle and when take
7:26
that very seriously and he spends the rest
7:28
of his life believing he's going to be
7:31
an apostle some day. The
7:33
Army really serious hibs be a comments
7:35
through the books through his. Life of
7:37
that, he's A. He had this.
7:41
Read confirmation of this through different blessing
7:43
see what different people said. The M.
7:46
You know if someone just talks about all
7:48
yoga or you've got great things I had
7:51
a year the church and that all seed
7:53
sense of this believes he has that he's
7:55
been chosen to be an apostle. Some
7:57
day. So this drives him. Through
8:00
his commitment to Mormonism
8:03
to be the ultimate
8:05
Mormon. And. A
8:07
strides so hard to do everything
8:09
required of him. So that's it.
8:11
There's a certain tragedy and the
8:14
story of. His
8:16
desire is to be the ultimate.
8:18
Mormon to be worthy of being
8:20
an apostle. And yet
8:22
he. Has this inner struggle? Saw
8:26
that. To. Be An apostle. You
8:28
have to be married. He can't
8:30
be divorced and. Know
8:32
what the how high up can use of. Be.
8:34
In the church and have a divorce to
8:36
they looked bishops, get divorced, sewers and noom
8:39
yeah. That
8:41
that worse since the divorce was unmarried women on
8:43
and they said but I don't think you can.
8:46
Be a general thirty having been
8:48
divorced them Yeah, well. I've never.
8:50
Heard of any ones. In the
8:52
end, Higher tiers positions.
8:55
Ever Been a divorce person? I
8:57
mean you got widowers that end
8:59
up married again and and have
9:01
been searched polygamous like profit? Leader
9:03
of Mormonism. Today but but not
9:06
forced and so she knows
9:08
he has to keep his.
9:10
Marriage together to fulfill this
9:12
dream. And. Yet
9:14
as you read through a story of
9:16
so sad that is it that. One
9:19
point in the park he talks about.
9:22
He. Was so thrilled after years
9:24
of struggle. That they had
9:26
just had the best. Period.
9:29
Of their marriage ever.
9:32
And. Then his wife tells him. Know
9:35
it was that worst period of
9:38
the marriage as far as I'm
9:40
concerned. And they start
9:42
talking. Of divorce and assist. Quinn.
9:45
Struggles with this because he knows.
9:48
If he divorces it will be the end of
9:50
the dream. Of being an
9:52
apostle someday. But
9:54
he also has other dream
9:56
is to be the ultimate.
9:59
church historian And he wants
10:01
to tell church history faithfully
10:04
for Mormonism, but to answer
10:06
the questions. And
10:10
that's the other theme
10:12
going through the book is the
10:14
struggle he has with
10:17
trying to be faithful on retelling
10:19
of church history and
10:21
not getting trouble with the brethren. Because
10:24
the brethren are always doing pushback
10:27
that you can't say that, you can't
10:29
tell that much, you can't tell that
10:31
part, you can't see that document. There's
10:34
just all these times through his life
10:36
that the leadership is interfering
10:39
or trying to squelch the
10:41
research he wants to do,
10:44
making him edit
10:47
some of the biography and
10:49
writings that he does because they're
10:51
too straightforward
10:53
on telling problem areas.
10:56
He does
10:59
an inside
11:01
look at church hierarchy and how
11:03
the brethren aren't all in agreement.
11:06
And it bursts this bubble of the
11:09
average Mormon that everything's
11:11
done just the
11:14
smoothest board meeting Jew could ever
11:16
have where everyone's in agreement. And
11:18
yet Quinn's writing out, no, they have
11:20
these big disagreements, they don't like each
11:22
other, different ones are saying by their
11:25
back, someone else, they don't like them,
11:27
they don't like their policies, they don't
11:29
like what they say publicly. And
11:32
you have this infighting which gets
11:34
him in trouble as he tries to
11:36
write his different book. You
11:39
have an observation on that part. I
11:42
think you're right on. And
11:44
as copy editor of the book,
11:46
it's interesting. I
11:50
know the themes that came out for me going through this
11:52
again and again and again, and then
11:55
hearing you pick up on the same
11:57
themes. I'm like, oh, great. coming
12:00
out to readers. The origins
12:02
and extensions of power, which are
12:04
both signature books, highly
12:06
recommended. Mormon hierarchy, yeah. It's
12:10
a three-part series. Right, because the financial
12:12
one came third, right? That's right, yeah.
12:15
The, those first two I
12:17
strongly recommend. They were a
12:19
really formative part of my faith journey.
12:22
They were written and published after
12:24
he was actually communicated, correct? Oh
12:27
gosh, they were published by signature books
12:29
before I started, so I don't remember the exact
12:31
years off the top of my head, but. I'm guessing
12:34
they came after. I think all
12:36
three of them came after his excommunication. And
12:39
he was excommunicated as one of the
12:41
September 6th and September of 1993. Yeah,
12:44
yeah. Yeah, those
12:46
are fascinating. And they talk about,
12:49
wasn't there the story of
12:52
Hubie Brown when David O'Mecay was
12:54
getting up there in years wanting
12:56
to rescind the priesthood ban in
12:58
the late 60s? Yeah,
13:01
they've been talking about it for years before it
13:03
finally actually happened, sure. And I think. The
13:06
power dynamics between those who wanted it and
13:08
those who didn't, yeah. And I think with
13:10
the right people out of town, he almost
13:13
got the vote necessary in
13:15
the late 60s to overturn it, but
13:17
then like Harold Lee or whoever came
13:19
back in town and scuttled the
13:21
deal, right? I mean, that's the type of stuff Quinn
13:24
was writing about. Right. To
13:27
be an example here of the early
13:30
on when he gets into
13:34
his studies.
13:37
So in 1966, he
13:40
has a section in his memoirs called
13:43
A Devout Freshman Shakes My
13:45
Confidence. And he tells
13:47
about how he had talked with LeGrand
13:49
Richards, who was an apostle. He
13:53
was back in 1961 and LeGrand
13:57
Richards had answered his questions about.
14:00
post-manifestal polygamy. And
14:03
Quinn felt that he
14:05
had adequately dealt
14:07
with post-manifestal polygamy as
14:09
not being a problem, not being an issue.
14:14
But then in 1966, a
14:17
student comes
14:19
up to him and talks to him about
14:21
the problem he has with
14:24
post-manifestal polygamy. Well,
14:26
Quinn thought he had that all solved, but
14:28
here comes this fellow, Stephen E. Robinson, who
14:31
goes on later to become a professor at
14:33
BYU. Yeah, and he wrote this very popular
14:35
book, Believing Christ. Yeah. Well,
14:38
this is back when Robinson's
14:40
a young
14:43
student, I believe. And he
14:45
comes up to Quinn and
14:48
he says, my
14:50
grandfather was a mission president who
14:52
married two plural wives in Salt Lake
14:55
City 10 years after
14:57
the manifesto. And my family
14:59
has a recommend from one
15:01
of the marriages signed by President
15:03
Joseph F. Smith. And
15:05
so this Robinson is struggling.
15:08
How do you put
15:10
this in the history of the
15:12
church when we were always taught
15:14
that the polygamy
15:18
stopped at 1890? And
15:21
so this gets Quinn interested in
15:23
this topic. Now post-manifestal
15:25
polygamy then goes on to become a major issue for
15:27
him. And he ends
15:30
up writing later a huge article in
15:32
dialogue on post-manifestal polygamy.
15:35
That's a classic. Didn't you
15:37
just list all the post-manifestal polygamy
15:39
marriages that you could find? And
15:42
on this story about Stephen, was
15:45
it Stephen E. Robinson or Elle? Okay, Stephen
15:48
E. Robinson. But he's upset
15:50
because he's in a religion class and
15:52
Mike Quinn is in the class with
15:54
him and the professor is teaching at
15:56
BYU. He says there were no polygamous
15:58
marriages After 18 years. Id and
16:00
if they were they were outside
16:02
mainstream Lds approval on you would
16:05
have been excommunicated after Eighty Nine,
16:07
All of them on. And so
16:09
the Stephen he robbed city success.
16:11
Just not true. My my ancestors
16:13
were mainstream after say soul Lds
16:15
and they were married and in
16:17
in nineteen hundreds of that's makes
16:19
my clean start thinking. Oh,
16:22
what what's going on with this
16:24
post manifest of polygamy was it
16:26
actually going on was sanctioned by
16:28
LD's church leaders as it. For
16:30
quite some time and dempsey he writes about
16:33
that and it's one of the subjects that
16:35
he. Printed. Says okay, we need
16:37
to start talking about this. Taboo subjects
16:40
yeah them for grin
16:42
rights. I was deeply
16:44
disturbed by was Steve told
16:46
me about his grandfather's both
16:48
manifesto polygamous marriages. This didn't
16:50
sit the explanation of Apostle
16:53
Richards and traditional historians by
16:55
Be A H. Roberts and
16:57
Joseph Fielding Smith that people
16:59
added posts manifest. Or polygamy
17:02
without authorization of the
17:04
first presidency. I
17:06
couldn't believe Steve story and
17:09
without indicating my skepticism I
17:11
ask for his grandfather's name
17:13
to. Look it up so that
17:15
he goes and looks up at
17:18
the static illogical library and signs
17:20
the genealogies, seats and verifies they
17:22
are. He took two wives after
17:24
the manifesto that all was true.
17:27
So then Quinn says this. B
17:30
Y U students set me on
17:32
a quest to understand post manifesto
17:34
polygamy and. Every other historical
17:36
claim about the Lds. Church
17:39
made by anti Mormon
17:41
loss. In
17:44
a process, I found
17:46
that traditional Mormon historians
17:48
were denying the existence
17:50
of things that anti
17:52
Mormons could demonstrate, even
17:54
from. mormon sources and i
17:57
felt that this was a
17:59
great vulnerability for the average Mormon,
18:02
I was determined to get to the
18:04
bottom of every historical
18:06
claim made by anti-Mormons and
18:08
do what traditional historians had
18:11
not been doing, acknowledging all
18:13
the evidence and still come
18:15
up with an explanation that was
18:19
both honest and reassuring
18:21
for believers. And
18:23
this was in 1960, I believe. Which
18:26
is right around the time you and Gerald were
18:28
starting up your stuff, right? We're doing all kinds
18:30
of stuff at that point. Yeah,
18:33
but the problem
18:35
for the historians through my whole
18:37
lifetime that the Mormon churches faced
18:39
is I don't see that
18:41
they have good answers
18:44
for the problems. They can give
18:46
you an answer, but I don't see them as
18:49
adequate. The problems are very
18:52
deep and very complicated. So
18:55
that all the way through, Quinn
18:57
and the different Mormon church historians
18:59
have spent these last 60 years
19:02
trying to write faith-promoting
19:05
history. And
19:08
they've done a lot of good
19:11
research along the way. Obviously,
19:14
though, for many people,
19:17
the answers still are not strong
19:19
enough because we see so
19:21
many people still leaving Mormonism
19:24
even after all of the research
19:27
has been done. And that's what the
19:29
brethren, why they have
19:31
such a pushback with Quinn on his
19:33
writing that, okay, Quinn, you
19:35
may think this is faith-promoting when you tell
19:37
all this, but most of the people read
19:40
this, don't end up thinking that's real faith-promoting.
19:43
I think what's fascinating, this tension
19:46
that comes out through the memoir
19:48
between Gerald and Sandra and
19:50
Michael Quinn is they were both doing the same
19:53
thing. They both Believed that
19:55
it's important to talk about
19:57
all of these difficult aspects.
20:00
The Mormon History Chef but with
20:02
different and goals and site. So
20:04
Michael Quinn believe it until he
20:06
died And twenty twenty one He
20:08
was a believer. He believed in
20:10
in Joseph Smith's as a Prophet
20:12
of God splitting the Book of
20:14
Mormon believes the truth claims of
20:16
Mormonism until his death. And
20:19
so for him he what he thought
20:21
was important cheryl these aspects of Mormon
20:23
history in order to help Latter Day
20:25
saints stay in the church you know
20:27
kind of inoculated them as he will
20:30
eat and sleep. Let's get roll out
20:32
there let everybody know it doesn't need
20:34
to be face on destroying and then
20:36
sandra correct me if I'm wrong but
20:38
you're in your insurance bowler miss since
20:40
we're sharing. All be things and in Mormon
20:42
history with the help people out of the
20:44
church. We are that's accurate
20:47
Mob rather they left or
20:49
not. We wanted them to
20:51
have informed decisions, right? and.
20:54
We. Felt the evidence would lead them
20:56
out. but many of our friends
20:58
stayed. But I wanted them to
21:00
make an informed decision to stage,
21:02
not just because. They
21:05
the grandma told them the first fish
21:07
and story and of they were. You're
21:09
sure that was all true. And
21:11
they didn't really know. The problems
21:13
with that story of it. Isn't
21:16
that easy? And.
21:18
Are very first struggles.
21:22
With the historians was over the
21:24
first fisher and an. led
21:27
to other. Extensive
21:30
research that historical community over
21:32
that next sixty years after
21:34
we started in City Nine
21:37
riding on first session problems
21:39
and my Quinn later so.
21:43
Does his book Early Mormonism The. Magic
21:45
Worldview. Although the answer see
21:47
that think I thought in the park
21:50
and I don't remember which pays it
21:52
as but he tells that early on.
21:55
He goes to hear. elder it's
21:58
smith the church patriarch show
22:02
memorabilia from his, what
22:06
would it be, great-grandpa? Great- ancestor.
22:11
Well, his ancestor, yeah. I
22:14
guess he would have come from Hiram Smith,
22:16
Joseph's brother. But he had
22:18
inherited artifacts from the Smith
22:21
family, and he had these magic
22:24
papers that
22:28
were owned
22:31
by Hiram Smith, evidently. And
22:33
he would, this elder Smith would
22:36
show them at firesides and things. Mike
22:39
saw those at one of these firesides and just
22:41
tucked it away in the back of his mind,
22:43
oh, that's interesting, and didn't even think about it
22:45
for years. He also
22:47
was aware that Reed Durham, who
22:49
was the Institute Director at the
22:51
University of Utah back in the
22:54
early 70s, had given a famous
22:57
talk on Joseph
22:59
Smith's Jupiter's Talisman, but at the time
23:01
they thought it was a Masonic
23:04
artifact, but it turns out to
23:06
be a magic artifact.
23:09
And Quinn was aware of that. But he had not put
23:12
the pieces together that these
23:14
were part of a bigger picture
23:16
of the Smith family's involvement with
23:19
the occult. And so
23:21
it's not until you come up to
23:23
the time of the Mark Hoffman
23:25
documents, and
23:27
Mark Hoffman starts
23:30
his documents in
23:32
78, I think
23:34
is the earliest one I know. I think
23:36
his earliest one I think he brought to
23:38
me on the second
23:43
anointing, and supposedly a document
23:46
from the Salt Lake Temple, which
23:48
is complicated. So if you want
23:50
to read our biography on
23:52
Lighthouse, I guess it's in there. Mike
23:57
Quinn. start
24:00
seeing these different documents that
24:04
Mark Hoffman is we
24:06
now know inventing but
24:08
supposedly finding that show
24:10
connections to magic and This
24:13
gets my Quinn interested in
24:16
the whole magic question of the early
24:18
Smith family So he spent
24:20
several years and researching all of that
24:22
and eventually comes out with his book
24:26
Early Mormonism and the Magic Worldview
24:29
Which incidentally won the Mormon History
24:31
Association's best book award in 1988
24:35
and then you mentioned your biography
24:37
Sandra lighthouse It
24:40
won about you and Gerald and
24:42
it won the Mormon History Association's
24:44
best biography award last year So
24:46
incidentally both have won those awards
24:49
this episode brought to you by But
24:54
the Quinn's book early Mormonism
24:56
in the Magic Worldview was Just
24:59
a monumental study and
25:02
the brethren were not thankful that he
25:05
wrote it So
25:09
it just I'm sure cause them all kind of
25:11
grief But Quinn's philosophy
25:13
was if that's the way he lived
25:16
it then that's the way we tell
25:18
it And if the church
25:21
could get going and survive with that being
25:23
its story Then we ought to be able
25:25
to survive with it being our story now
25:28
so But he was
25:30
a little more accepting of some of that
25:32
than a lot of the average people But
25:36
Quinn's book, but that was a really
25:38
important study when he did the early
25:40
Mormonism in the Magic Worldview and and
25:43
it still remains the Starting
25:45
point I think anyone that's going to
25:47
try to deal
25:50
with that early period of Joseph
25:53
Smith's life It
25:55
would be required reading Okay,
25:59
I'm curious What did you so it came out in
26:01
1988 and That
26:04
was a decade after you and My
26:07
queen had had the conflict right
26:10
over the secret pamphlet But
26:13
what did you and Gerald think when early
26:15
Mormonism magic worldview came out in 88? Oh,
26:18
we just were fascinated by it now
26:22
It had its first edition came
26:24
out during the Mark Hoffman I
26:31
can't remember just how the dates go on that but
26:33
the first edition had some at
26:36
least one of Hoffman
26:38
stock forgeries forgeries and so there had
26:40
to be a new edition done a
26:44
bigger and better version and But
26:47
we were thrilled to see the research that
26:49
he had done on it now we were
26:51
troubled by his
26:56
Ability to marry Magic
27:01
with traditional Christianity
27:03
and So
27:07
other than that angle We
27:09
we were really impressed by the
27:11
research he did but that's the
27:14
problem for the Mormon historian in dealing
27:16
with Joseph's magic involvement
27:18
of how do you? put
27:21
that together with the Christian position
27:24
of traditionally
27:28
of rejecting magic involvement
27:30
and Whether
27:32
you make a white magic black magic,
27:34
I you know, they people make differences
27:36
anyways The
27:41
outer Christian community generally
27:43
outside of Mormonism would
27:46
would find that problematic
27:48
that someone was involved in soothsaying
27:52
magic rocks Digging
27:57
at night for very treasure binding
27:59
spirits that would guard the
28:01
treasure and doing
28:03
incantations to get the treasure
28:06
free from the spell and all.
28:09
And Mike was able in his mind to
28:12
meld it together and it didn't
28:14
bother him. One
28:19
of the problems though from looking at it
28:21
from the outside is, okay,
28:24
if you can say he could have
28:27
had some sort of power and whether you say
28:29
it's magic or God, the
28:31
problem though is that they never found a
28:34
treasure. And so
28:36
it isn't just that he's involved in
28:38
the occult,
28:41
but it's that he seems to
28:43
be deceptive in using
28:45
these things. And so how do we
28:48
deal with that part of it? So
28:51
I'm not sure how Quinn reconciled
28:53
all that in his mind, but
28:55
he did a great service in
28:57
pulling together all of the
28:59
references and sources on
29:02
that topic. So that, like I
29:04
say, I think it's classic. If you're going
29:06
to study the early years of the
29:08
Smith family, you have to read that. Whether
29:11
you agree with it or don't agree with
29:13
it, it is a primary text that
29:15
you just can't write on that early period
29:17
without reading them. And of
29:20
course, along that way is Dan
29:22
Vogel's books, another commercial
29:25
for his signature book. But
29:28
Dan Vogel's books, also dealing
29:30
with the early period of Mormonism
29:33
are just crucial. And
29:35
I think when you put together Dan
29:37
Vogel's works, Brent
29:39
Metcalf's works, Quinn's works,
29:43
these are all just paramount
29:46
for anyone going
29:48
through those, the early
29:51
years of Joseph Smith. Of course, Dan Vogel
29:54
goes on to do that whole series
29:56
of early Mormon documents.
29:59
That's right. And five volumes
30:01
of six volumes of that. I
30:04
don't I think it's yeah I should
30:06
know but it was a one-time ago. It's half a
30:08
bookshop Yeah, I think
30:10
it's I want to say four but It's
30:13
a lot of volumes. Yes a lot of
30:15
I'm curious You
30:17
know whenever You could
30:20
say critic or apostate or honest history
30:22
teller however you want to choose it.
30:25
It almost seems like whenever One
30:28
of that type of person emerges in the public
30:30
Mormon consciousness at some point
30:33
a faithful oftentimes
30:35
on the church's payroll person emerges to kind
30:37
of be the foil and So,
30:41
you know, it's interesting to me that you
30:43
and Michael you and Gerald and Michael are
30:46
are similar ages
30:49
And you're you're starting to study and
30:51
ask questions about Mormon history You
30:54
know within a two or three year period of each other Now,
30:59
I don't know exactly when Quinn
31:01
goes to grad undergrad in Yale
31:06
Exactly the years he would be
31:08
why you for his undergrad he goes to
31:10
the University of Utah for Masters
31:12
and then he goes to Yale for PhD and do
31:14
we know the other in that so he starts BYU
31:16
in the 60s Okay serves
31:18
a mission And then
31:20
yeah, so late 60s early 70s. Okay, he's that
31:22
he's at the U and then he goes to
31:25
yell in the 70s So I'm
31:27
wondering when Quinn for
31:29
you Sandra would have emerged as A
31:32
potential foil and it sounds like it's when
31:34
this dr. clandestine pamphlet
31:37
comes out and Gerald's just trying
31:39
to figure out Who
31:42
wrote it but he knew Gerald knew
31:44
enough to go to
31:46
quids Yale dissertation To
31:49
find the the tells in the
31:51
dissertation So I'm wondering
31:54
when Quinn came into
31:56
your and Gerald's mind your
31:58
consciousness as sort of
32:00
a church paid
32:03
foil to your criticisms
32:06
of the church? Was it before
32:08
the pamphlet? And if so,
32:11
when that started happening?
32:13
When you started realizing he
32:15
was trying to neutralize your work,
32:18
basically? Well, Gerald was aware of
32:20
Quinn's dissertation, but
32:22
I'm not sure just what brought
32:25
that to his attention. And
32:27
it may be through early issues of
32:29
BYU studies or dialogue or something.
32:35
I don't remember when
32:37
Quinn's earliest articles
32:39
would have started appearing. Do you know?
32:42
I think that Quinn, so when this
32:44
pamphlet came out challenging your work, More
32:47
Buddhism, Shadow of Reality, Quinn
32:50
was working for the Church History
32:52
Division for Leonard Errington. My
32:55
guess is, as Gerald probably was
32:57
looking at all the historians working there to
32:59
try and figure out who had written this anonymous
33:01
pamphlet and then started reading their works.
33:04
So it mentions this
33:06
in your biography, Lighthouse, how
33:08
Gerald sees these really weird Latin
33:11
phrases in that anonymous pamphlet. So
33:14
I think he probably started going through all the
33:16
historians working at the Church History Division, reading their
33:18
works. And then when he saw that really
33:20
weird Latin phrase, Hergo Proctor-Hock Post, whatever.
33:23
Something like that. Well, that was when
33:25
he figured it out. It
33:27
was Quinn. Okay. Well,
33:29
we know from both
33:32
Quinn's memoirs and from
33:34
our biography that
33:37
Ron Huggins wrote about us, The
33:40
Lighthouse, I think
33:42
Gerald was already aware of Quinn, and he
33:45
may have even already have read his dissertation.
33:50
But the guess
33:54
that it was Quinn came
33:56
the year before when... Gerald
34:01
was friends with Reed Durham, the Institute Director
34:03
that did the paper on the Jupiter
34:08
talisman. But
34:10
Gerald had got to be friends with
34:13
Reed Durham, and they had talked at
34:15
different times sharing about different
34:17
areas that they were researching.
34:24
I don't want to give the impression that Reed
34:27
was sympathetic to our point of
34:29
view, but
34:32
it's just like Gerald's friendship with Octon Kraut,
34:34
the polygamist. Gerald
34:36
was always interested in talking with anyone
34:39
who was doing factual history, no matter
34:41
what side they were coming from. They
34:44
all wanted to see the same documents,
34:47
even if they come to different conclusions. So
34:51
Reed had already mentioned to Gerald
34:53
that the Church historians office
34:55
was thinking of doing a rebuttal,
34:58
and the name of Michael Quinn had
35:00
come up at that time as a
35:02
possible person to do such a thing.
35:05
And Gerald had just made notes about
35:07
it and put them away in a
35:09
file and hadn't really thought
35:12
about it until the anonymous historian's
35:16
response to shadow reality came out. And
35:18
so that then drove
35:20
Gerald back to going through his files trying to find
35:22
that note he'd made. And when
35:25
he saw that the name Mike Quinn was on
35:27
his little notes, he thought, oh,
35:29
I better look into him because he may be the one
35:31
that did this. But at the
35:33
time of the rebuttal to us, I
35:36
think there were other people trying to figure out who
35:38
it was as well. And they
35:40
had some thought that it might have been, was
35:46
it Bush or Bushman? Bushman,
35:49
Richard Bushman? Bushman might have been
35:51
one of the authors. And
35:53
Arrington had been suspected. But
35:58
because Gerald had this clue. that maybe might
36:00
be involved, he went back and looked at
36:02
his thesis again and saw all
36:04
these Latin phrases in it. But
36:07
the one that stood out was the
36:10
post hoc ergo proctor hoc. We
36:13
got to remember that. Who writes that? I
36:15
will never remember that. Sorry. It's a logical
36:18
policy, I think. So
36:20
Gerald Reaves, we're the anonymous historian,
36:22
and we got post hoc ergo
36:24
proctor hoc. And so Gerald's like, ah,
36:27
okay, there's a clue. Yes. Even
36:29
reading his memoirs, he
36:32
doesn't put in the post hoc ergo
36:34
one, I don't think. But he
36:36
never figures out how Gerald figured it out that
36:39
he knew it was Mike. He's
36:41
just shocked that Gerald calls him. Yeah.
36:43
How does he know? But he does
36:45
use Latin phrases several times in his
36:47
memoirs. Oh, yeah. Not that particular one
36:50
again. But he does. He loves his
36:52
Latin. Yeah, you read along here every
36:54
once in a while, I'll get one, and I thought, oh,
36:56
that's a quinism. What
37:00
do you think about the confrontation as
37:02
related by D. Michael Quinn in
37:05
his book with Gerald? Did
37:08
it feel accurate? Did it feel embellished? Did
37:10
it feel one-sided to
37:12
you? Of what Quinn
37:15
writes about it? Yeah, Quinn recounting
37:17
his confrontations with Gerald. Well,
37:20
I think he sees Gerald as having more sinister
37:22
motives than I see
37:24
Gerald as having. But
37:29
when Gerald later prints
37:31
Quinn's talk
37:33
he gave at BYU on being a Mormon
37:35
historian that got Quinn in trouble, Quinn
37:39
comments that he thought
37:41
Gerald was just retaliating against
37:43
him for Quinn writing the rebuttal
37:45
against us. And I
37:47
don't think Gerald thought that way. I
37:51
think in Gerald's mind, it was two different instances. Quinn
37:54
had done the pamphlet, but then on this talk, Gerald
37:56
thought it was important. He
37:58
was afraid the talk would be squelched. and
38:00
people wouldn't see that
38:03
their own historians felt
38:06
there was a problem with the way the
38:08
church handled history, that their own
38:10
historians were calling for an open
38:12
history and the church was
38:14
pushing back. So his idea was that
38:16
this talk needs to go out to
38:18
a broader audience. And
38:20
I don't think in his mind it was really a
38:24
retaliation. Or
38:26
revenge. A revenge kind of
38:28
thing. Gerald didn't really think
38:31
that way. That's
38:34
why he could be friends with different
38:36
people that had different beliefs, believers, unbelievers.
38:39
I mean, we were friends through
38:41
the years with atheist historians, polygamous
38:45
historians,
38:47
the whole gamut. I mean, I was
38:50
kind of friends with T. Edgar Lyon,
38:52
who did the research on a
38:54
lot of the work on the
38:56
Nauvoo restoration stuff. And
38:59
he used to stop in the bookstore. Really?
39:02
Yeah. That's cool. My
39:04
dad, who was very devout, he
39:07
had three haunts when he came into Utah. He'd
39:09
visit the benchmark books, Ken
39:11
Sanders and Utah Lighthouse Ministry.
39:13
He loved to hang out with the Tanners. Right.
39:18
So, I mean, although
39:20
we're painted as these ogres, we
39:23
actually can sit down and have a
39:26
good discussion and talk with people from
39:28
different points of view. Gerald
39:30
was kind of like a kid
39:32
in a candy store talking to
39:34
different historians. These are my people.
39:37
These are people that know the documents I'm
39:39
looking at. It's someone to talk to that,
39:42
you know, most of our friends think we're crazy.
39:44
And I can't,
39:48
when you get deep into Mormon history,
39:50
it narrows the field of how many
39:53
people, how many nerds are interested in
39:55
it? How many nerds are
39:57
there? We Can talk about all the nitty
39:59
gritty. The new razor blade I
40:01
didn't know existed for Ss and my dad
40:03
used to say the same disease said these
40:05
are my people for the fifth. Grade
40:08
at L Owners Anderson said: you
40:10
remember once Gerald had would seal
40:13
discovered the Michael Quinn was the
40:15
author of Doctor for Hims don't
40:17
have the competition Oh and the
40:19
weights. Quinn lies to Gerald as
40:21
says he's not the guy. Digital
40:24
buyers to Gerald, not by dear
40:26
member or not. Gerald was surreal
40:28
a fly on when Arrington lies
40:30
to him as well and says
40:32
he doesn't know anything about it.
40:35
Gerald. Felt. They both were lying
40:37
to him, but the outdoor way to prove
40:39
otherwise. But now he wasn't. Persuaded.
40:43
By the either of their comments that
40:45
they had nothing do at that he
40:47
realized the game. was get all. These
40:50
guys jobs are probably on the line.
40:53
They have to lie and know. That's
40:55
always disappointed. And them. And
40:58
I think they were disappointed and
41:00
themselves. I think Arrington and Quinn
41:02
both were. Remorseful that.
41:05
That they had to lie to Gerald. Bigger.
41:07
there is a certain irony and
41:10
this whole thing. There was a
41:12
big wires. But now that I like
41:14
warm and how true for it had some
41:16
elena for were lying about true talent yeah
41:18
I mean and and when Manson sat in
41:20
his memoir he he talks about his regrets
41:23
in line about. It in his life hundred
41:25
basically yeah that's the start of my i
41:27
will get our news that turn about as
41:29
are many good as. Express or guess,
41:32
but especially Leonard Arrington End Laird
41:34
Leonard or intense add diary. Says
41:36
we've also published to He writes their
41:38
that he I regret having to lie
41:41
but he says something I had to
41:43
do. For. That serves at
41:45
the scene. he doesn't He's a term lines of the Lord
41:47
for yeah, he says he does a. Similar
41:50
to a similar turn down
41:52
an Absolutely so on. They
41:54
both said. I us address to
41:57
their apologize to you and offered
41:59
no. No, I never
42:01
gave us a soccer to say so.
42:03
Yeah, yeah, I'm. About
42:08
as it is gonna ironic
42:10
said that that situation him
42:12
about sorry for those with
42:14
i'm sorry for god yellow
42:16
like live on.elicited i know
42:18
was was so yards. And
42:21
since read routes that. Maybe read
42:23
that sense to see save excuses. As
42:26
advocates of the new Mormon history, we
42:28
were cause. In. The
42:30
the as me my
42:32
glasses we were cause
42:35
him the tangled web
42:37
of our best intentions
42:40
of faith. I feel
42:42
embarrassed empathy for Lds
42:44
headquarters and it's scenery
42:47
sins of compromising defenders
42:49
in his plan account
42:51
in his plane account
42:54
of Christian Perfection Methodist
42:56
founder John Wesley had
42:58
described such. Compromise as
43:00
the cool. I forgot, right?
43:02
Yes. And it was as
43:05
of I said the as I get it
43:07
out of a cording son. Leslie Yeah yeah
43:09
yeah. Us. And another
43:11
interesting thing on that Clint pamphlet.
43:15
When all this stuff comes out
43:17
then you have club in nineteen
43:20
seventy gate. He gets a
43:22
Quinn gets a death threat because
43:24
absence from one of our fans.
43:27
I guess. Six
43:31
When rights I became.
43:33
Terrified for myself and family
43:35
when a man found our
43:37
house. Tonight asking about the
43:39
anonymous. Response T threatened to
43:42
blooded told me for this
43:44
attack on that sad or
43:46
fuss. I quickly changed our
43:48
number kept it out of
43:50
the future. Found bucks at
43:52
Lusted. Unless said
43:55
at for one want him
43:57
for bases such he was.
44:00
he goes, he goes on, he says, uh, I,
44:03
I couldn't do anything about the
44:06
publicity and felt really
44:09
anxious about being murdered
44:11
by some anti Mormon crackpot.
44:15
Well, let's talk about the other side
44:17
of that. We were
44:19
always in the phone book. We
44:21
were all, uh, you could always find
44:23
our address or phone number. And
44:26
we were always worried about some Mormon
44:28
crackpot that might decide they're going to
44:30
help pod out by getting rid of
44:33
the opposition. When people have
44:35
come to me and said, John, aren't you afraid
44:37
to do Mormon stories that, you know, someone might
44:39
hurt you? I'm like, well, Michael Quinn and Jared,
44:41
you know, Sandra Tanner is still alive. So yeah,
44:43
what's, what's those
44:48
canaries in the coal mine drop? And I'll start
44:51
to get worried. Yeah. And I, and
44:53
I would just recommend. So we had just
44:55
published lighthouse, this biography of the Tanner's way
44:57
as I'm editing chosen path. And it was
44:59
so fun to like read what Mike is
45:01
writing his side of the story. And then
45:03
the Tanner side of the story says people
45:05
want to just really get into this conflict
45:08
of what's going on in the seventies and eighties
45:10
in Mormon history. We've those two books
45:12
together. It's, it's fascinating. So
45:15
Sandra, after, after Gerald
45:17
and, you know, confronted
45:20
D. Michael and D. Michael lied
45:22
and Gerald knew the D. Michael
45:24
had lied for
45:26
that point forward. Did you and Gerald think of him
45:28
as a foil to what you were trying to do?
45:30
Was he a nemesis? Did
45:33
he even rise to that level
45:35
of prominence and continue at that
45:38
sort of level of prominence in your minds or not?
45:42
Well, we
45:45
kind of viewed him as a little more
45:47
fair than, than the
45:50
true opposition. I
45:55
mean, the other side would have been
45:57
a apostle Packer. Hillary
46:01
Clinton's arch nemesis, Vader.
46:03
Yeah, Yeah, so that's.
46:05
All the way through the book to
46:07
his quinn struggle with. Ah,
46:10
Apostle Packer is always. On
46:12
a which chance to. Subvert
46:16
his research some way or a
46:18
stop his career or something else
46:20
as to have. Quite.
46:24
A different look of general authorities and
46:27
the average person would have of the
46:29
mill at the top and. And
46:32
Quinn saw him as someone different
46:34
than the rest of the men
46:37
he. He had fond memories and
46:39
associations with different church leaders, but.
46:41
Not Packer. He. He.
46:43
Had done real stars. Stats
46:45
Understating: It's and as. A.
46:49
Single clean them as as you mentioned at
46:51
the recently received really looked up to and
46:53
had a great relationship with of one of
46:56
them as. President. Spencer W. Kimball
46:58
very close with his son Thomas
47:00
as a father figure and then
47:02
also Marion D. Hanks who was
47:04
a General Authority and the Lds.
47:06
Church for forty years
47:08
for the seeded Woodbury
47:10
as Mr. President yet
47:13
been some. Say Yes! So
47:15
he was see Michael Plans mission
47:17
present in the British Missions ah
47:19
incidentally married he thinks was also
47:21
elders, a free or Hollins Mission
47:23
president, the young Jeffrey or Hollins
47:25
mister president and them quite know
47:27
clerk who both of those said
47:29
two men went on to become
47:31
Lds Apostles. They are today. And
47:34
Us but Clean was also in that
47:36
same miss and so smearing to Hanks
47:38
was hugely influential in their lives and
47:41
in in Queens less and and sympathies.
47:43
We are going to be publishing the biography
47:45
of Married to Hanks very soon. Nine The
47:47
Spring by seems are so much. I
47:50
thought of as interceded a book when
47:52
it talks about plan. And.
47:55
not quinn but arrington been demoted
47:57
and at them as sat down
47:59
to be BYU to
48:01
run history department things
48:03
down there. Mike
48:09
Quinn talks about how
48:11
Errington felt about
48:14
being taken out of the historians department and sent to
48:17
BYU. And Errington
48:19
makes some comment to the effects
48:21
that, well, now
48:24
we can just be concerned about
48:26
writing real history and we don't have
48:28
to worry about being
48:30
under the gun as the official
48:32
church answer on everything. That
48:35
when you're the church historian, everyone's
48:37
looking to you for the church
48:40
official answer. And I
48:42
think he felt a sense of relief
48:44
of not carrying that burden
48:47
because that implies it with it,
48:50
that you give more faith promoting slants
48:53
to things than he felt comfortable doing.
48:56
And by going to BYU to do
48:59
further history, I think he felt he
49:01
was more free to tell
49:03
it like
49:06
it is and to, although
49:08
he still was trying to be faithful
49:10
to Mormonism, but to be more frank
49:12
about the warts and wrinkles in Mormonism
49:14
and not blossom all over it so
49:16
everything was 100% beautiful. Quinn
49:22
also says about that incident, he
49:25
says Leonard's optimism
49:27
just broke my heart,
49:29
just made me want to cry. He ever the
49:31
optimist. And I'm friends with
49:33
Leonard's daughter, Susan, Errington Mattson, and
49:36
she told me actually her father
49:38
was just devastated by
49:40
that. But Leonard did tend
49:43
to be, I've read through much of
49:45
his diaries, he did tend to be
49:47
really optimistic always about things. Almost
49:50
boyish in his optimism. Yeah.
49:53
Sandra, did Michael Quinn ever come to
49:56
your store or did
49:58
y'all ever meet at MHA? days,
50:00
or did you have any direct
50:02
conversations after that phone call
50:04
with Gerald throughout your
50:06
life and his that you remember? Well,
50:09
there were some different times when
50:11
he'd give a paper at Sunstone
50:14
or Mormon History or something that
50:17
where I might have asked a question
50:20
and not questions to trip him
50:23
up, just questions about historical items.
50:26
And well,
50:29
for instance, and I don't
50:31
remember if this was Mormon History or
50:33
what, but he was talking on post-manifestal
50:35
polygamy at one of these symposiums
50:39
or conferences. And
50:41
I asked the question of him, and I'm
50:43
sure he knew who I was. Most
50:47
people recognize me when I'm around
50:50
at Mormon History. And
50:54
I asked him if he had carried his
50:56
research beyond that
50:58
first generation of people
51:01
that practice polygamy
51:04
after the manifesto. Did
51:06
you do any research on the next generation?
51:09
Did their children continue
51:11
with, did any of them continue
51:14
with polygamy? And he
51:16
said, no, he hadn't been
51:19
able to get into taking it
51:22
another generation down. And
51:24
I commented that the reason I brought it up
51:26
is that my
51:30
great-grandpa was—what was his
51:35
name? Walter Young. My
51:39
grandpa was Walter Young. He was the son
51:41
of Brigham Young Jr. And
51:45
although Brigham Young Jr. married
51:48
my grandma, great-grandma, before
51:50
the manifesto, it was in 1887. But
51:54
it was during the period when the church was—all
51:56
the leaders were in hiding for
52:00
living polygamy. It wasn't a time
52:02
when it
52:04
was okay with the government
52:06
to be taking more plural wives, but he
52:09
went ahead and took this
52:11
plural wife in 1887. But what we didn't know
52:15
until after my grandma died going
52:17
through her papers is
52:19
that he had married at least
52:21
one or two women post-manifestal
52:24
in polygamy. And
52:28
then my great
52:32
grandma evidently
52:34
was asked to go
52:36
into polygamy. And
52:42
my grandma was asked to go
52:44
into polygamy by Walter, who was
52:46
the son of this apostle who
52:48
was raised in a home that
52:50
was a product of post-manifestal
52:53
polygamy in the family. And
52:55
so my grandpa had asked
53:00
my grandma if he could take a plural wife.
53:04
And so she has this great story of
53:06
having a vision where God shows
53:08
her that they're not going to go into
53:10
polygamy. And so she tells
53:12
Walter this, and she thinks this puts an end
53:15
to it. Well, then when we go through my
53:17
grandma's papers after she died, we found
53:19
this postcard that addressed
53:23
to my beloved husband,
53:26
Walter and blah, blah, blah. And hope you
53:28
can see the kid, the boys want to
53:30
see you, blah, blah, blah. And then
53:32
it's got this name. It's not anybody we know.
53:34
This is a postcard for some
53:36
woman writing to Walter about hope
53:39
you can come see the boys.
53:42
And we
53:44
have no idea who this person is. It's
53:46
postmarked in the town we know they lived
53:49
in. It's a postmark where my uncle was
53:51
born in the same area and that. So
53:53
we know they lived there. So
53:56
who's this woman that says Walter, this
53:58
postcard? about
54:01
coming to see Du Bois. So
54:06
the assumption is that it was a post- manifesto polygamy.
54:08
That's what I had to have been after 1900. And
54:10
so I'd ask Quinn
54:13
about did you do the next generation
54:15
down and he said no but my
54:17
reason for asking was it'll look like
54:20
my family where
54:22
you have a General Authority son had
54:24
continued polygamy after the manifesto
54:26
after 1900 to continue
54:29
it down. Which I think is
54:31
still an interesting thing. I don't know how
54:34
well anyone could research it but I would
54:36
be curious how many of
54:38
the people's next
54:41
generation felt they had to live
54:43
polygamy after the
54:46
second manifesto even.
54:48
Yeah so as you mentioned
54:50
Mike did this dialogue article on
54:52
that and he also his magnum
54:54
opus was supposed to be two
54:56
books on post-manifesto polygamy. And if
54:58
you'll recall that was the first thing as a
55:00
teen and then as a
55:02
student at BYU he's that makes
55:05
him start questioning things like in in
55:07
church history that aren't talked about. But
55:09
anyway so his magnum opus was going
55:11
to be these two volumes on post-manifesto
55:13
polygamy. He writes about it in his
55:16
memoir and I will just share that
55:18
his children found what he had done
55:20
on those two volumes and
55:23
I've been in talks with them
55:25
about taking those editing them and publishing
55:27
them. So we may have one
55:29
more or two more books from D.
55:31
Michael Quinn on his work on post-manifesto
55:33
polygamy. That's fun. Yeah
55:37
and I ask that question because it just
55:39
seems like y'all would have been natural collaborators.
55:42
Not collaborators. Yeah because you
55:44
had different end goals. Yeah right.
55:46
Well I think you both wanted
55:48
to discern the truth about the
55:51
history. Right but with different ends
55:53
in mind. Mike to keep people
55:55
in the church center and Gerald to say
55:57
well maybe help you out. But
56:01
I guess I'm saying, Sandra just got through
56:03
telling us 30 minutes ago that she and
56:05
Gerald didn't care. She would have friends of
56:08
believers, nonbelievers, atheists, Christians,
56:10
non-Christians, just because at
56:12
least for Sandra and Gerald, it didn't
56:15
matter what the
56:17
faith politics were. But I guess we're saying maybe
56:19
for Michael that it would have been... Well, it
56:21
would have been a little more awkward because
56:23
it had been such a
56:26
personal issue between
56:29
Gerald and Mike. Maybe
56:31
Mike was embarrassed? No,
56:34
I think Gerald would have felt uncomfortable with...
56:40
Hanging around Mike? With being
56:44
able to view him that neutrally,
56:46
like he did with Ogden Kraut, the polygamist,
56:50
or talking with Reed Durham, because they
56:52
had not taken any
56:55
written stand to denounce us
56:57
or call us out. And
56:59
throughout Quinn's memoir, he says throughout the
57:01
memoir, he does not like the tanners.
57:04
Yeah. Yeah, he does not
57:06
like the tanners and that never changes. Yeah,
57:08
so I think it would have been too
57:10
awkward. But I think that he
57:12
and Gerald, had
57:14
there not been the pamphlet, would
57:19
have had a lot of common ground
57:21
in their research. Like
57:24
you said, the early Mormonism, the magic
57:26
worldview, and the origins and extensions of
57:28
power, y'all were cheering him on, I'm
57:31
sure, right? Well,
57:33
we carried his books in the
57:35
bookstore, which got us in trouble
57:37
with the faithful Mormons. Lou
57:40
Midgeley came
57:43
in and... Wasn't it Lou Midgeley that came in
57:45
and castigated me one day
57:47
for carrying Quinn's books?
57:51
Lou Midgeley was an LDS apologist and
57:53
Quinn couldn't stand him either. No,
57:56
it's a classic from Lou Midgeley. Oh really? Yeah,
57:58
so I knew him. Yeah. Yeah, he's all
58:00
through the book. Oh, he's here. He came in
58:02
one day and really
58:06
carried on with How
58:08
could I handle those books by that gay
58:11
man? And and it was
58:13
much more vulgar than that or I shouldn't
58:15
say vulgar necessarily, but but more caustic and
58:19
I just said look I Don't
58:22
know the family situation of
58:24
most of the authors of the books in
58:27
my store That's not
58:29
my issue of what their family dynamics
58:31
is I go
58:34
by the research and he's got a lot of
58:36
good research So that's what I'm looking at even
58:39
though we don't have the same conclusions But
58:41
that was true of many of the Mormon
58:43
historians that we sold in our bookstore that
58:46
I could Deal
58:49
with the fact that they came to
58:51
their different conclusion at the end because
58:53
they had valid historical research
58:55
in the book so We
59:01
in a sense were champions
59:03
of Quinn's after
59:05
the his
59:07
little pamphlet against us in
59:10
that we sold his
59:12
books and recommended his books to people
59:14
if they asked me about Like
59:16
Mormon hierarchy stuff and held a lot. Here's
59:19
the books you need Mormon hierarchy origins extensions
59:21
of power, you know, and so
59:26
It was a awkward friendship,
59:28
but we didn't know each other
59:30
personally So
59:33
makes sense What
59:35
a weird thing for Mitchell II did I
59:38
mean the fact that you were well known apostates
59:40
that he would come in your bookstore and tell
59:42
you not to tell you what Publish
59:45
it's like it was it he came
59:47
in with a deliberate Motive
59:50
of trying to get me angry.
59:53
He wanted a confrontation that he
59:55
could go boast about
59:57
how belligerent and mean that
1:00:00
Tanner's are. He went
1:00:02
around to different, um,
1:00:05
critical sources
1:00:09
and would, I mean, he was famous for this
1:00:11
of trying to get a rise out of people.
1:00:14
And so he was just being
1:00:16
very rude to me and very,
1:00:18
um, dismissive and
1:00:21
just snide. But
1:00:23
this was when Gerald was going into his Alzheimer's
1:00:25
and I think this is in our lighthouse
1:00:28
book. Um, dear
1:00:30
sweet, Charles, he was in the
1:00:32
back and heard midgetly ragging
1:00:34
on me and body was being, uh,
1:00:37
rude to me. And so he comes
1:00:39
in to save the day and
1:00:42
opens the door to the bookstore and
1:00:44
tells him, uh, I think
1:00:46
we've heard enough. I think it's time for you
1:00:48
to go home. And he opens the door for
1:00:50
Lou to leave. And so he
1:00:52
later writes this up on the internet spot
1:00:54
is still up on the internet. I'm sure,
1:00:57
uh, the day that Gerald Tanner threw
1:00:59
him out of the bookstore. And
1:01:02
uh, it just was so funny when
1:01:04
I read that, uh, you know, here's
1:01:06
milk post Gerald opening the door and
1:01:09
saying, we're done. You're leaving. That's
1:01:12
so interesting your relationship with Midgley cause yeah,
1:01:14
it's Quinn whites in the memoir about how
1:01:16
he could not stand Lou Midgley. Yeah.
1:01:18
Interesting. Well, he, he
1:01:21
was the, so I
1:01:25
think he saw himself as the
1:01:27
champion of the true cause and
1:01:29
anyone that was a fraction
1:01:31
off from what he perceived
1:01:34
to be the truth was his enemy.
1:01:36
And he would just set out to
1:01:39
deride or dismiss or, uh,
1:01:42
start talk about the
1:01:44
person to diminish them in other
1:01:47
people's eyes. But he had quite a
1:01:50
bad reputation in that regard. Yeah.
1:01:53
I was like, you know, believe then
1:01:55
Midgley, then Daniel Peterson, like there's a
1:01:57
long, that'd be a fun book is
1:01:59
the, history of Mormon apologists, kind
1:02:01
of prominent, sharp elbow,
1:02:04
Mormon apologists. That'd be, you want to write it,
1:02:06
John? Maybe.
1:02:11
Okay. So, um, well
1:02:14
that's classy that y'all were willing to
1:02:16
recognize his value as a
1:02:18
scholar and help them sell books, even though he had
1:02:20
done y'all a dirty. That's
1:02:24
nice. So, um, any,
1:02:27
uh, other, other important reflections
1:02:30
like, so, Arrington and you know,
1:02:32
the, the church history department gets kind of
1:02:34
shut down. Quinn goes to BYU. There's
1:02:37
the Hoffman stuff. Goes to BYU, not Quinn.
1:02:40
Didn't they both? No,
1:02:42
Quinn. Um, well, Quinn went to BYU,
1:02:44
but not at the time that Arrington went
1:02:46
down there. Yeah, he didn't go with Arrington's. Yeah,
1:02:48
I think he was at Yale. He,
1:02:52
Quinn later becomes a professor of
1:02:54
history at BYU. He's hired. Yeah. Yeah. No,
1:02:56
it's okay. But he ends up being a professor
1:02:58
there later. Okay.
1:03:02
Yeah. Professor of history. Got
1:03:04
it. Okay. And
1:03:06
Arrington didn't become a professor of
1:03:08
history when he went to BYU. No, he, no, he
1:03:11
did as well, but it was like the, the whole,
1:03:13
um, what was called Camelot, but
1:03:15
the church history division at the time is shut
1:03:17
down and it's in 1981, which
1:03:20
incidentally is when signature books was
1:03:22
started and that was intentional by
1:03:25
the owner. But, um, and they're sent
1:03:27
down to BYU, kind of demoted, if you
1:03:29
will. And there was, I think it's called the
1:03:31
Joseph Fielding Smith Institute or the Joseph
1:03:34
F. Smith history. I always prefer that, which else?
1:03:37
Um, I think it's Fielding. But yeah, it's just
1:03:39
the Fielding Smith Institute. And I think
1:03:42
Quinn is either at Yale
1:03:44
or anyways, when Quinn finishes his PhD at
1:03:46
Yale, then he starts applying for professorships
1:03:48
and he's hired by BYU to be
1:03:50
a professor of history. So it's not
1:03:52
with like, gap
1:03:55
between him leaving the
1:03:57
church history department and him joining BYU. Okay,
1:04:00
well, did you notice that and
1:04:02
I think we talked about this
1:04:04
with Moshe Barbara that Quinn
1:04:08
Sort of attributes the whole
1:04:10
dr. Clandestine Fiasco
1:04:13
as the final undoing of
1:04:16
the Errington administration Yeah, Quinn
1:04:18
says he believes that in
1:04:21
his memoir so I looked at Errington's
1:04:23
diary for the same time and Errington's
1:04:26
writing about being sent to be white.
1:04:28
He doesn't say anything about the pamphlet He
1:04:30
writes about the pamphlet he writes about being
1:04:32
figured out and discovered by Gerald and how
1:04:35
he's embarrassed that he lies about it and so forth
1:04:37
but Errington doesn't say that that
1:04:39
incident is the reason why he's Demoted
1:04:41
and if you look in Errington's diaries
1:04:43
and also in this memoir There's all
1:04:46
kinds of conflicts going on between
1:04:48
Leonard Errington and G Homer Durham
1:04:50
who was the general authority Advisor over
1:04:52
the church history division. So I think there
1:04:54
were a lot of things but in Quinn's
1:04:56
mind. Yeah, it's him He's the reason why
1:04:58
letters demoted. What do you think about did
1:05:00
you did that strike you as interesting Sandra?
1:05:03
I Yeah, I noticed
1:05:05
that but I Was
1:05:09
Quinn all along in
1:05:11
reading his story there's
1:05:13
so much other stuff going on
1:05:15
around him that There
1:05:18
is a Bigger
1:05:22
story To
1:05:24
view the Camelot years and
1:05:27
what's going on through Errington's
1:05:29
period covers a
1:05:32
lot more events than just what Quinn's
1:05:34
life covers and So
1:05:36
if you wanted to get a real view of
1:05:38
that time period there's several
1:05:40
books you'd have to read to
1:05:43
to flush that out Errington's Diary
1:05:48
biography whatever would be One
1:05:51
of the things you would have to add to Quinn But
1:05:54
I think you also would need
1:05:56
something like our lighthouse to give
1:05:58
you the some
1:06:01
of the conflicts
1:06:03
that they don't talk about. So
1:06:05
there were a lot of conflicts going
1:06:07
on. I mean, we had our lawsuit
1:06:09
with Andrew Ehad over the Clayton
1:06:12
diary thing, and then the church
1:06:14
suit us in 1999-2000 time period over the church handbook
1:06:17
stuff. And
1:06:23
then, you have the September
1:06:25
6th fiasco, which
1:06:29
Quinn touches on, but very briefly
1:06:31
I felt in his memoirs,
1:06:36
that's a more complicated story than just
1:06:38
what he dealt with of
1:06:41
all the different people that were involved. Well, he gives
1:06:43
a little bit of a run-through
1:06:45
of the different people. But
1:06:47
there was so much going
1:06:51
on in that time period on
1:06:53
so many fronts. The church must
1:06:55
have just been tearing their hair off of
1:06:58
these little fires that
1:07:01
are popping up all the time all over
1:07:03
the place on different aspects of
1:07:05
church history, different aspects
1:07:07
of theology, on feminism,
1:07:11
gay rights. It isn't
1:07:13
just history. There's the
1:07:16
black issue, the priesthood issue,
1:07:21
the just
1:07:23
general different scholarship on their
1:07:26
scriptures, challenges
1:07:29
to the Book of Mormon, challenges to the
1:07:31
Book of Abraham, challenges
1:07:34
to the Joseph Smith
1:07:36
translation of the Bible. There were
1:07:38
just so many different areas that
1:07:40
were being challenged. It
1:07:43
was like you could just put all the
1:07:45
topics of Mormonism on a dartboard, put
1:07:47
on a blindfold and throw the
1:07:49
dart, and you would hit something
1:07:52
that was being written about or
1:07:54
people were worked up about or
1:07:56
people were getting fired over through
1:07:58
that whole time period. I
1:08:00
think Quinn has a little
1:08:02
bit of tunnel vision on seeing
1:08:08
his participation as a heavier
1:08:12
weight. He
1:08:16
was a factor, but there were
1:08:18
many other factors. Like
1:08:20
the September 6th thing, each
1:08:23
of those people had
1:08:25
their own struggles with
1:08:28
the brethren and the church and
1:08:30
was research and history and all. So
1:08:33
that Quinn
1:08:36
might have felt that his
1:08:38
dealings with us were the final
1:08:40
blow, but I
1:08:43
would say it's one of them. There
1:08:46
was a whole
1:08:48
ream of papers you
1:08:50
could have written on other
1:08:54
problem areas that were facing the church
1:08:56
at that time that brought things to
1:08:58
the conclusion. If we have to shut
1:09:00
down the church historians department. I
1:09:02
think that comes out throughout the
1:09:04
memoir Quinn sees. Of course, it's
1:09:06
him telling his own story. Each
1:09:09
one of us, if we were to write a memoir,
1:09:12
an autobiography, we would be the center of
1:09:14
that story. But
1:09:16
he does tend to see himself as
1:09:18
the center of everything that's going on.
1:09:22
What was it like Sandra
1:09:24
to have been on the
1:09:26
receiving end of Michael Quinn's
1:09:28
apologetics, you being a target,
1:09:31
you seeing him as a faithful historian
1:09:34
that you were cheering on only 20 years
1:09:37
later to see him on
1:09:40
the receiving end of an extra communication. What
1:09:43
was that like for you to witness the guy who
1:09:45
had been attacking you as a believer to
1:09:47
see him get excommunicated? Well
1:09:49
I felt sorry for Quinn. I
1:09:53
didn't feel to rejoice over
1:09:55
that. It
1:09:59
was just part of it. of that whole sad
1:10:01
story of how everyone, it seemed
1:10:04
like that the faithful
1:10:07
historians for
1:10:09
the last 30 years had
1:10:11
been systematically
1:10:14
cut off some
1:10:16
way because
1:10:20
they were too frank. And
1:10:25
we felt it was a great
1:10:27
disservice to the community to
1:10:30
stop all these people's research. So
1:10:32
we didn't rejoice over his excommunication.
1:10:36
We felt for him that his own
1:10:38
people had turned on him. And
1:10:41
reading through the book, when I got through, I thought this
1:10:43
poor guy, he wanted to be
1:10:45
the greatest Mormon historian and
1:10:48
the greatest defender of faith. And
1:10:51
that very effort is the
1:10:55
one thing he was
1:10:57
cut off from really fulfilling. He
1:11:01
did his best to tell history the
1:11:03
way he thought. And
1:11:05
even though I disagree with some of his conclusions,
1:11:08
he was being true to himself on trying
1:11:11
to write up the church history. And I
1:11:13
can respect that in him. And
1:11:15
I felt for him that his
1:11:18
own church didn't value
1:11:20
him more as
1:11:23
someone who wanted so much to
1:11:25
be accepted by that community and have
1:11:28
them not see his value. So
1:11:31
I thought it's a very sad ending
1:11:33
to his life. I
1:11:37
felt bad for his whole family that it
1:11:40
just... He
1:11:42
accomplished so much, and
1:11:44
yet to end up alone in his
1:11:48
apartment at the end, it was just to
1:11:50
me very sad. Yeah.
1:11:54
And I would just add, talking to
1:11:56
his children, and I agree
1:11:58
with all of the things you said, The
1:12:00
only thing I might disagree with is
1:12:02
his children said, no, dad wasn't alone.
1:12:04
Yeah, he lived in California, but we
1:12:06
were in constant contact and
1:12:08
we saw him at holidays. So
1:12:11
they've never thought of their dad as
1:12:13
being alone. That was comforting for me
1:12:15
to hear too because, yeah, just to
1:12:17
know that he did have very
1:12:21
much the love and the contact
1:12:23
with his family. And he
1:12:25
was communicating with the historical
1:12:27
community too. He was mentoring
1:12:29
people, you know, Sarah Patterson, who wrote
1:12:31
the September 6th and the struggle for the
1:12:33
soul of Mormonism. She talked about being a
1:12:35
graduate student at Claremont Graduate University and D.
1:12:37
Michael Quinn coming and lecturing to them and
1:12:40
how kind he was to her and encouraging
1:12:42
who was to her. So I
1:12:44
do think we can, as a community, take comfort
1:12:46
in. He actually
1:12:48
didn't necessarily see himself as
1:12:51
alone. So that's comforting.
1:12:53
Yeah, the way he was rejected
1:12:55
by the church and
1:12:57
excommunicated by the church that he loved
1:12:59
so dearly and he wanted to help
1:13:02
by telling the truth about his
1:13:04
history. That part is very tragic
1:13:06
and it comes out throughout the memoir. Yeah.
1:13:09
Did you ever find yourself puzzled, Sandra,
1:13:12
by his continued belief after all he
1:13:14
learned? And if so, how did you make
1:13:16
sense of that? Well,
1:13:20
I guess people look at me the same
1:13:22
way, but the
1:13:26
spiritual side of him was a very big
1:13:31
part of his life and
1:13:34
he put great confidence
1:13:36
in his spiritual
1:13:38
experiences and prayer
1:13:41
times when he felt confirmation of
1:13:44
his goals and direction
1:13:46
for his life. So
1:13:49
I puzzled
1:13:53
how he could write what
1:13:56
he did and come out
1:13:58
the other side. and
1:14:00
say, Joseph's
1:14:02
the prophet of God. I mean, I go
1:14:05
through early Mormonism in the
1:14:07
magic worldview and I don't end up
1:14:10
with someone that's a prophet of God. I
1:14:14
go through Mormon hierarchy, origins
1:14:17
of power and extensions of
1:14:19
power. I didn't read volume three, so
1:14:21
I can't comment on that one. But
1:14:25
I get through those and it doesn't raise
1:14:27
confidence for me and- In
1:14:31
the leadership. In the leadership. Yeah. So,
1:14:36
I don't know how do you explain faith?
1:14:38
How do you explain spiritual commitment? I
1:14:43
find it very puzzling, but then I know a lot
1:14:45
of people say that about me. I don't know how you could be
1:14:47
a Christian and
1:14:51
be researching and doing history. How can you
1:14:53
still end up believing? So, I guess
1:14:57
Mike and I both end up with the
1:14:59
same question to a
1:15:01
lot of people, why? With
1:15:04
both of you, with your faith in Christ. Because
1:15:06
we both still maintain our faith in God.
1:15:09
And in Christ, and that's a fun parallel between
1:15:12
you and D. Michael. As
1:15:14
you both will have maintained your
1:15:16
faith in Christ until the very end.
1:15:19
I keep thinking of this empty chair right
1:15:21
here and wishing that
1:15:23
Mike was still alive and that
1:15:25
this conversation was going on within
1:15:27
here. Fortunately, all we have is
1:15:29
his book to refer to. But I
1:15:32
think it would be fascinating if Mike was with
1:15:34
us and could have this conversation with
1:15:36
Sandra now. Yeah, but that's the
1:15:38
way history goes. You can read the
1:15:40
same documents and come up with different
1:15:42
answers. Well,
1:15:45
any other, you wrote down some stuff
1:15:47
in that. No, that's good. Yeah?
1:15:51
So, if you had to
1:15:53
give a summary take on the
1:15:55
book and a
1:15:57
recommendation, anything else you wanna share? about
1:16:01
D. Michael, what would your closing thoughts or
1:16:03
comments be, Sandra? Well,
1:16:05
I think if you're interested in the
1:16:11
history of Mormonism, the
1:16:14
last 60 years have been
1:16:16
an important period of Mormonism,
1:16:19
and maybe you could say that about
1:16:21
every period, I don't know. But the
1:16:24
awakening of church
1:16:26
history and
1:16:28
the formation of professional
1:16:31
historians dealing with
1:16:33
Mormonism has been
1:16:35
that story of the last 60 years, the same
1:16:39
60 years I went through, deconverting,
1:16:41
they went through trying
1:16:44
to resolve all those problems so people
1:16:46
wouldn't walk away like we
1:16:48
did. And I think
1:16:53
that Quinn's book is
1:16:55
part of the
1:16:57
story of that, the
1:17:00
struggle of the church
1:17:02
historians to tell
1:17:05
the story the way they saw it, the way
1:17:07
the documents led them, in
1:17:10
spite of tremendous pressure from their own
1:17:13
church leadership, to
1:17:16
squelch that very
1:17:19
detailed history and give a
1:17:21
smooth view
1:17:24
that makes it seem that everyone
1:17:27
always agreed with everyone. And
1:17:29
one thing you find in Quinn's book is
1:17:31
how much of the different church leaders
1:17:34
disagreed with each other.
1:17:37
And I thought that was quite interesting. So
1:17:40
I think if you're interested in
1:17:44
how Quinn wrote
1:17:47
all those fantastic research books that he
1:17:49
did, if you've got his books, you'll
1:17:52
want to read his story. I think
1:17:54
it fills out the picture
1:17:57
of my Quinn story.
1:18:00
that you don't get from just
1:18:02
reading his research books. So
1:18:04
I thought it was fascinating. It helped
1:18:06
me have a fuller
1:18:09
appreciation of Mike and a greater
1:18:11
understanding of him and his
1:18:14
efforts at writing, even though we don't end
1:18:16
up at the same spot at the end.
1:18:19
I thought it was— In all the
1:18:21
same spots, but you end up in
1:18:23
some of the same spots. We all
1:18:25
end up still believing in Christ and
1:18:29
wanting people to join
1:18:31
us in serving God. So
1:18:33
in that— And loving history. And loving
1:18:35
history. And fighting history. Interesting. Right.
1:18:39
Yeah. But the details end
1:18:41
up a little different. Yeah. You
1:18:43
know, there's two themes that come out in
1:18:46
this memoir. One is
1:18:48
Quinn's life as
1:18:50
a devout and
1:18:52
for much of his life,
1:18:54
closeted, gay, Latter-day
1:18:57
Saint man. What
1:18:59
it was like to be that
1:19:02
person in the second half of the 20th
1:19:04
century. And I
1:19:06
love that yesterday—you just released yesterday
1:19:08
the interview with Moshe Quinn,
1:19:11
Mike's son, in which we delved into that
1:19:13
aspect of Mike's life and that part of
1:19:16
this memoir. And then I love that today,
1:19:18
Sandra's here, and we're talking about the
1:19:21
other major theme in this book, which
1:19:23
is Mike as a
1:19:25
historian who's a pioneering scholar
1:19:29
of Mormon history in the
1:19:31
latter part of the 20th century and into
1:19:33
the 21st century. He's
1:19:35
a pioneer in both these areas. And so
1:19:37
today's episode, of course, focused on that historical
1:19:39
side. And then anyone who wants to
1:19:41
look at his life as a
1:19:44
devout, gay, Latter-day Saint man can listen
1:19:46
to the interview with Moshe Quinn.
1:19:48
So we covered both aspects, those
1:19:50
two huge parts of Mike's life.
1:19:53
So viewers and listeners, here's your homework. Pull
1:19:56
up Amazon right now and fill
1:19:58
up your card with the following. Early
1:20:01
Mormonism in the Magic Worldview. Mormon hierarchy.
1:20:06
Mormon hierarchy origins of power and Mormon
1:20:08
hierarchy extensions of power. And
1:20:10
then round that out with Chosen Path
1:20:13
the Memoir, D. Michael Quinn and Lighthouse.
1:20:18
Help me out. Lighthouse.
1:20:21
Gerald and Sandra Tanner despised
1:20:24
beloved critics of Mormonism. The
1:20:27
biography of the Tanners is fantastic. And
1:20:29
if you want to throw something else in,
1:20:31
throw in the Leonard Errington biography. Leonard Errington
1:20:34
Diaries is the best one, which
1:20:36
is his annotated diaries by Gary
1:20:38
Bregera. That'd be a good read. Oh,
1:20:41
if you want to dig deep. Fascinating.
1:20:45
And then hold out for the
1:20:47
Post Manifesto Polygony book,
1:20:49
Yet to Come. Yet to Come
1:20:52
by Quinn. Alright,
1:20:55
well Barbara, thanks for all you and your
1:20:57
team are doing from George Smith
1:20:59
on Down at Signature Books
1:21:03
because we wouldn't be
1:21:05
able to be having all these conversations without the
1:21:07
great work of you and
1:21:09
Signature Books. And our
1:21:11
great authors and great subjects in these books.
1:21:13
And Sandra, it's so fun to get you out
1:21:15
of retirement. How does it feel to be out
1:21:18
of retirement? You have a homework assignment.
1:21:21
Yes, right. Yeah,
1:21:24
it's good. So what's it like being
1:21:26
retired? Have you enjoyed it? Is it
1:21:29
met your expectations? Oh, I love
1:21:31
it. Yeah. Do you want me to leave
1:21:33
you alone? Would you like me to leave you alone? No, I
1:21:35
don't mind popping in once in a while.
1:21:37
It's just nice not to be
1:21:39
required to pop in all the
1:21:41
time. I get to choose. So
1:21:45
are you ready for your next assignment or not yet?
1:21:49
Well, it depends on how big the book is. Okay.
1:21:52
Hi Barbara. We'll put our heads together and we'll come
1:21:54
up with Sandra's
1:21:56
next assignment. Fantastic. It's full
1:21:58
of informed consent. You
1:22:00
said you can either accept or reject yourself.
1:22:02
Okay. All right. All right. Well, it's lovely
1:22:05
to have you Sandra. Thank you so much
1:22:07
Okay, you're welcome back anytime in
1:22:09
our studio. We love you. All right. Thank
1:22:11
you and Barbara same for you This is
1:22:13
like fourth or fifth time like we got
1:22:16
time. Yeah, I'm meeting like stop Too
1:22:20
many good books to talk about. Yeah.
1:22:22
Well, let's have you back as soon
1:22:24
as we have another book Sure. All
1:22:26
right, and thanks for ever for
1:22:28
joining us today on more my stories podcast. This was fun.
1:22:30
Hope you liked it Please comment.
1:22:32
Please subscribe. Please like please
1:22:34
share if you want to become a donor Please
1:22:37
go to more my stories org become
1:22:39
a monthly donor. We appreciate it thanks
1:22:42
to Julia and Maven and Gerardo and
1:22:45
Brooklyn and our board for keeping all the
1:22:47
wheels on the wagon and please
1:22:50
check out benchmark books and and
1:22:54
All the other great bookstores around
1:22:56
town Support Mormon
1:22:58
scholarship support Mormon bookstores. What's the
1:23:01
one in Provo Brad Kramer? so
1:23:04
written vision and pioneer book in
1:23:07
Provo, I know that pioneer book
1:23:09
has signed copies of
1:23:11
chosen paths right now signed by
1:23:13
Moshe myself and annotators And
1:23:16
then also Ken Sanders is another great local bookstore
1:23:18
in Salt Lake City Benchmark,
1:23:20
I know has signed copies. So please support
1:23:23
local bookstores when you can. All right
1:23:26
Thanks everyone. Be good to each other be kind to each
1:23:28
other We'll see you all again soon on
1:23:30
another episode of Mormon Stories podcast. Take care
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More