Podchaser Logo
Home
Maurizio Isabella, "Southern Europe in the Age of Revolutions" (Princeton UP, 2023)

Maurizio Isabella, "Southern Europe in the Age of Revolutions" (Princeton UP, 2023)

Released Tuesday, 23rd May 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Maurizio Isabella, "Southern Europe in the Age of Revolutions" (Princeton UP, 2023)

Maurizio Isabella, "Southern Europe in the Age of Revolutions" (Princeton UP, 2023)

Maurizio Isabella, "Southern Europe in the Age of Revolutions" (Princeton UP, 2023)

Maurizio Isabella, "Southern Europe in the Age of Revolutions" (Princeton UP, 2023)

Tuesday, 23rd May 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

This episode is brought to you by State

0:02

Farm. What do your music playlists and

0:04

podcast feeds have in common? They're a reflection

0:07

of you. And that's how the State Farm Personal

0:09

Price Plan works, too. It gives you options

0:11

to personalize your coverage so you can protect

0:13

what you care about most at an affordable price

0:16

that's just for you. Like a good neighbor,

0:18

State Farm is there. Go to statefarm.com

0:20

today to create your State Farm Personal Price

0:22

Plan. Prices vary by state. Options

0:25

selected by customer. Availability and eligibility

0:27

may vary.

0:30

Good sleep leads to less

0:33

stress. And less stress leads

0:35

to better sleep. Natrel Melatonin

0:37

Gummies help you fall asleep faster

0:40

so you get a good night's sleep, which

0:42

is one of the best ways to help with occasional

0:44

stress. Put an end to the sleep

0:46

stress cycle. Shop now at natrel.com.

0:49

Natrel Melatonin helps with occasional sleeplessness.

0:52

These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. This

0:54

product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure,

0:56

or prevent diseases.

0:59

Diablo IV arrives on June 6th. As

1:02

the forces of Hell gather, only you can

1:04

stand in their way. Journey across the

1:06

expansive open world of Sanctuary. Choose

1:09

from five powerful classes to fit your

1:11

play style. Adventure with your friends in

1:13

four-player co-op with cross-play and cross-progression

1:16

on all platforms on June 6th. Hell

1:19

welcomes all. Pre-purchase now at

1:21

diablo4.blizzard.com. Rated

1:23

M for Mature. Tap the banner or visit this episode's

1:26

page to learn more.

1:29

Welcome to The New Books Network.

1:33

Hello and welcome to another episode on The

1:35

New Books Network. I'm one of your hosts, Dr. Miranda

1:37

Melcher, and I'm very pleased today

1:39

to be joined by Dr. Maurizio Isabella to

1:42

tell us all about his recently published book

1:44

from Princeton University Press titled

1:46

Southern Europe in the Age of Revolutions.

1:49

This is a fascinating book to understand

1:52

what was happening in the various countries

1:55

of Southern Europe

1:56

in the period after,

1:58

during the Napoleonic Wars.

1:59

the Congress of Vienna to figure

2:03

out kind of what is the monarchy

2:05

gonna look like, what is government gonna look like, what's the

2:07

role of the military, mainly

2:10

in Portugal, Spain, the Italian

2:12

peninsula, Sicily, and Greece. So you know, not a small

2:15

part of the world. And

2:17

Mertzio does a fabulous job of helping

2:19

us understand what happens in each of these

2:21

places in the 1820s, my

2:23

apologies, and also how they go together,

2:26

how we can understand these moments

2:28

and movements, and really

2:31

kind of reframe our broader historical

2:33

understanding of the time period and

2:35

the place. So Mertzio, I'm so pleased

2:38

that you're here on the podcast to tell us all about it.

2:39

Thank you very much, Miranda. It's entirely

2:42

my pleasure to

2:44

talk to you about my recently published

2:47

book, and maybe a

2:49

few words about myself.

2:50

Is that okay, Miranda? Yes,

2:53

I think we should probably start there. Before we dive

2:55

into all of these things in the book, could

2:57

you maybe introduce yourself a bit and explain

3:00

kind of why you decided to write this?

3:02

Yes, sure. I'm

3:05

a professor of modern history at Quinella

3:07

University of London, where I've been teaching for

3:09

the last 17 years. And

3:12

I'm an Italian national by origin.

3:14

And by origin, I was trained as a

3:16

historian of 19th

3:18

century Italy

3:21

and a spurn of ideas. And I've

3:23

always been interested in going beyond the national

3:26

as a historian. And

3:28

now, 10 years ago, I decided

3:32

to write a book about these revolutions

3:34

for, I guess, two different

3:37

set of reasons. The first was

3:39

mainly, I guess, political.

3:41

I decided to write this book

3:43

just in the aftermath of the financial

3:46

crisis, that the

3:49

crisis of the term affected

3:53

Spain, Portugal, Italy, and

3:55

Greece, they led to a rescue package. in 2011.

4:04

And in this context, sort of stereotypes

4:08

about Southern Italy being the problem

4:11

area of Europe,

4:13

along with kind of renewed ideals of

4:15

exceptionalism among scholars, not

4:18

resurfaced. And

4:20

so I was aware of

4:22

this context, which I wanted to

4:26

deal with historically

4:29

by going back to a moment in history

4:31

where actually Southern Europe

4:33

was at the forefront of the struggle for democracy,

4:36

although already sort of

4:39

weaker than Northern Europe. So

4:41

this is the political context that led me to

4:44

write this book. There was also an

4:46

intellectual reason. I had been, until

4:48

then, a stern of ideas interested in

4:50

the circulation of ideas, and I wanted to

4:53

retrain myself as a historian

4:55

to write about more countries

4:58

beyond Italy and also deal with other

5:00

types of history, not just intellectual history,

5:02

but also social history, political

5:05

history, history of culture

5:07

and history of practices, as well as global history.

5:10

That's a very interesting combination

5:12

of reasons, and I think comes through

5:14

a lot in the content of the book. And

5:17

so given that idea of kind of the sense of time

5:19

and identifying key moments, can

5:22

you tell us a bit about what period

5:24

you chose to cover in the book and sort of

5:26

how you made that decision of what time

5:29

to look at?

5:29

Yes, absolutely. The

5:32

1820s are the main objects

5:35

of the book because

5:37

it is in the 1820s there are a set

5:39

of simultaneous revolutions broke

5:41

out in just over a year

5:46

in Spain, Portugal, the

5:48

Kingdom of Piedmont, Sardinia, Naples,

5:51

Sicily, and Greece.

5:53

But I reassess this revolution

5:56

moment from the South in a longer

5:58

chronological span.

5:59

because I claim

6:02

that the origin of these upheavals has

6:06

to be found in the Napoleonic Wars,

6:08

in the Napoleonic expansion in these

6:12

European and extra European

6:15

territories, but also that these

6:18

revolutions had long-term

6:20

legacies and effects up to

6:23

roughly 1870,

6:25

which is maybe something we can talk about later

6:27

on. So the moment is a specific

6:30

moment when revolutions broke

6:32

out simultaneously, and

6:34

that's why I take it as the heart of

6:36

the book,

6:37

but I reframe it in a longer

6:40

chronological span. Very

6:42

helpful context. And I think probably

6:44

familiar to a lot of historians, the idea

6:46

that something might pop up in a way, but

6:48

there's a lot more before and after that's

6:50

relevant as well.

6:52

The idea of things happening in different

6:54

countries simultaneously

6:56

suggests that the answer to my next question might

6:59

be yes,

7:00

but of course, historians, the answer is

7:03

never yes or no. It's much more complicated

7:05

than that. So

7:06

to what extent, in what ways, were

7:09

these revolutionary moments connected

7:12

or related to the ones happening at the

7:14

same time in other places?

7:17

They certainly were. They were not just

7:19

simultaneous, but connected.

7:21

First of all, because there was

7:24

a kind of domino effect connecting

7:28

one to the other. The first

7:30

chronologically was the one that broke out

7:32

in Spain just

7:35

outside Paris on the 1st of January, 1820,

7:39

but very soon and very fast.

7:42

News about these events reached

7:45

the other countries across Southern

7:48

Europe, across the Mediterranean and beyond.

7:51

And though these news unleashed a sort

7:54

of set of events,

7:56

people in the squares of Lisbon

7:58

or in the squares of Naples, The Abones or

8:01

the cities of Messina

8:03

and Palermo in Sicily

8:05

were talking about these stylish events and

8:07

when revolutions broke out in these other

8:10

cities, they were actually shouting

8:12

in the squared scura to the revolution

8:15

of Spain. So first

8:17

connection is people being aware

8:20

of revolutions a bit

8:21

as it happened not so long

8:24

ago in with the Arab Spring.

8:26

What also connected these revolutions was a

8:28

circulation of information but also

8:31

printed material

8:33

that the constitutions that

8:35

were introduced as a result

8:37

of these revolutions circulated

8:40

across all of these countries. Other

8:42

public documents like the manifestos

8:44

that declared these revolutions were translated

8:47

and sent by

8:49

ship to other countries. Rumors

8:53

and fake news circulated

8:55

across space, across borders and

8:57

the sea,

8:58

but also individuals moved from one

9:01

country to the other country during

9:03

and after these revolutions. Volume

9:06

here, so freedom fighters, the best

9:08

known of them would be Lord Byron fighting

9:11

in Greece, by the way, hundreds of them

9:14

moving from Italy to Greece or

9:16

in other directions or to Spain

9:18

and Portugal

9:19

and also other types of displacement

9:22

connected these revolutions, for instance, refugees.

9:26

Interesting connections, especially that

9:28

idea of kind of in one square celebrating

9:31

it using the language of the other. And I

9:33

think

9:33

the allusion to the Arab Spring does help contemporary

9:36

audiences kind of understand this

9:39

idea of sort of zeitgeist, of hearing

9:41

the news and going, oh, well, what's that mean for us? And

9:45

thinking of that kind of contemporary audiences

9:47

understanding this, we,

9:51

this a lot of the history that you're talking about, a lot of

9:53

the arguments you're making who are maybe not as

9:55

present in the kind of current historiography

9:58

of our understanding of the world.

9:59

revolutionary history of the early 1800s.

10:03

How do you think that your book

10:05

and this focus on the history in Southern

10:08

Europe, the revolutionary elements there,

10:10

changes our wider understanding

10:12

about the period of revolution more broadly

10:15

across Europe? Well, I think

10:16

it changes our understanding of that period

10:20

at various levels. First of all, because it integrates

10:22

a part of Europe

10:24

that is generally ignored by generally

10:26

histories of the age of revolution or general

10:28

histories of Europe. And by

10:30

so doing, it offers

10:33

an alternative or more complex

10:35

sort of genealogy of the birth

10:38

of the struggle for representative government

10:40

in Europe. But

10:41

also it offers a revised chronology.

10:44

In what sense a revised

10:46

chronology? Because standard histories

10:48

of age of revolutions in Europe have

10:52

as a starting point 1789, the

10:54

French Revolution, 1815, the end of the Napoleon

10:56

wars, 1830, not another revolution in Paris, 1848, the European wide

11:04

revolutionary wave. And

11:07

very often the 1820s are hardly

11:10

mentioned. In his kind of

11:12

classic history of the age of revolution,

11:15

Eric Opson, talking about the dual revolution

11:17

of the industrial revolution, the French Revolution,

11:19

mentions, pleasingly

11:22

the 1820s, but dismisses them as

11:25

kind of minor events, but

11:27

elitist, weak, bereft

11:29

of any class action. I

11:31

turn this interpretation upside down.

11:34

I talk about these revolutions as mass

11:36

bases, as revolutions

11:39

supported by large

11:41

sectors of the populations. And that's why

11:44

I talk about a popular

11:46

constitution.

11:49

I think that's a great way now to kind of

11:51

dive into more of the specifics

11:54

of what's happening and what it means now that we have

11:56

all this useful context. So

11:59

thinking of this,

11:59

idea of

12:01

kind of when we start and end this,

12:04

when we understand what's leading up

12:06

to these simultaneous uprisings.

12:09

You argue in the book, quote, the 1820s

12:12

uprisings in Southern Europe demonstrate

12:14

the fragility, not the

12:16

solidity, of the post 1815

12:19

political order.

12:21

Can you tell us what you mean by this? Yes,

12:23

absolutely.

12:26

Again, so the received wisdom about

12:28

the restoration, the period between 1815 and 1848,

12:32

is that this is a

12:34

period of peace and stability

12:37

after the upheavals of the Napoleonic Wars,

12:40

and a period in which a new

12:43

system of international relations was

12:45

introduced and enforced

12:48

by the hegemonic powers of Europe,

12:50

via the principle of intervention

12:53

that was in fact experimented

12:56

first in Piedmont,

12:58

Naples, and in Spanish,

13:03

with the foreign armies, whether French

13:06

or Austrian, invading to crush revolutions.

13:09

And so within this framework, these are really

13:12

again minor blips that

13:14

didn't pose any threat to the

13:16

stability of the continent. While

13:18

for me, my interpretation is alternative

13:21

to this one,

13:23

in the sense that these

13:25

revolutions, the very fact that these revolutions

13:27

broke out, demonstrate that

13:29

large sectors of society were

13:33

not willing to accept the

13:36

settlement, the political and

13:38

institutional settlement agreed by

13:40

the Congress of the United 1815,

13:42

the reorganization of

13:44

the map of Europe, and the reorganization of

13:46

the states, as it had been

13:48

agreed, left

13:52

many social groups deeply

13:54

frustrated. And this is why

13:56

so easily, revolutions

14:01

broke out and so easily

14:04

they succeeded in basically

14:08

achieving their immediate goals without

14:11

much bloodshed. So

14:14

what then kind of take us through the

14:17

initial beginnings of this

14:19

unfolding? Because one of the things

14:21

that I found really interesting and really powerful

14:24

in your examination of what happened

14:26

in each place but then also how they're

14:28

connected is there seem to be

14:31

very much a script kind of this

14:33

is how these things start.

14:35

Can you tell us about sort of this process

14:38

and

14:38

comment on to what extent it was

14:40

the same in different places?

14:42

Yes absolutely.

14:45

The armies are those who

14:47

initiate the revolutions across

14:50

southern Europe. Army

14:52

officers and their soldiers

14:55

because one of the consequences

14:59

of the end of the Napoleonic War is

15:02

that as it always happens after

15:04

great sort of

15:07

periods of military action is that

15:09

you have the problem of

15:10

the demobilization

15:12

of the armies and this demobilization is

15:15

not successful. You have across

15:17

southern Europe and highly politicized

15:21

armies

15:22

in which officers

15:24

who had fought

15:25

the Napoleonic Wars and had actually acquired

15:28

new political ideas lose

15:32

their salaries or are fired

15:35

or they are demoted because they

15:37

had be on the wrong side not

15:40

on the side of the absolute

15:42

monarchies. So the army

15:44

officers there is a surplus of unemployed,

15:47

meditate

15:49

officers and soldiers across

15:51

southern Europe highly politicized by

15:54

the Napoleonic upheavals and these are

15:56

the groups that lead the revolutions

15:59

that declare the revolution that declared

16:01

the constitutions and they do so

16:04

following a certain sort of pattern of

16:06

behavior practices. They

16:09

organize in secret, through secret

16:11

societies, these revolutions and

16:14

then they initiate them by declaring

16:16

revolution, by reading out in the public,

16:19

in front of civilians, declarations

16:23

that force the existing monarchs

16:26

to introduce a constitution.

16:29

In fact, in Spain, Portugal,

16:31

Piedmont and Naples, these are fairly

16:34

peaceful events. The army

16:36

forces the kings

16:39

to introduce a constitution without

16:41

bloodshed. The

16:43

case of the Greek revolution is different because in

16:46

the Ottoman Empire,

16:47

the declaration of the revolution by

16:49

its Atlantic coincides also with a war.

16:52

But it's not entirely different from the others because

16:54

here too,

16:56

the insurgents fundamentally, although

16:58

they're waging a war against the Ottomans, they're

17:00

also happy to negotiate with them to

17:02

obtain,

17:03

to meet their objectives. Can

17:06

you tell us a bit more about the goals

17:08

of these revolutions when they're standing up and making

17:11

the declarations? What do

17:13

they want?

17:14

To what extent does this end

17:16

up then being achieved?

17:17

They want to introduce constitutions

17:20

in the existing monarchies.

17:23

These revolutions are not Republican

17:26

revolutions. They're revolutions

17:28

to change the fabric,

17:31

the organization of the monarchies.

17:34

It is true that the revolution leads

17:36

temporarily to the establishment

17:38

of Republican government. But here too,

17:41

the insurgents are looking for a king

17:44

and they do so not only because it's a

17:47

system for diplomatic reasons

17:51

to make their revolution

17:54

more acceptable in the eyes of the

17:57

European powers, but because they also

17:59

generally... believe that the monarchical

18:01

government is superior. And

18:04

this is a belief that is shared by all the revolutions

18:06

who are whether claimed that after the Napoleonic

18:09

War,

18:10

during which the population Southern

18:12

Europe had shed their blood

18:15

to defend their monarchs, now

18:17

the kings have to pay a

18:19

debt of gratitude to them and

18:22

grant a degree of freedom to these populations

18:25

through the introduction of representative

18:28

government. And elections,

18:32

are they successful? What they are

18:34

in so far as constitutional are introduced.

18:37

The limitations to the success is

18:39

the fact that, of

18:41

course,

18:42

the production of constitutional government,

18:45

as much as it is very

18:48

popular, I mean, it's supported by large

18:50

sectors of the populations, it

18:52

also leads

18:54

to civil wars and

18:56

also produces resistance. So

18:58

it divides society for

19:00

a variety of reasons.

19:03

Constitutions are introduced, but

19:06

in Spain and Portugal, they also

19:08

produce a resistance from a royalist

19:12

movement, that is a mass movement hostile

19:15

to constitution, as a fortitude of absolutism.

19:19

And in other countries, civil wars break

19:21

out for other reasons, in the case of Sicily,

19:24

because Sicily wanted independence or time

19:26

from Naples.

19:27

In the case of the Greek revolution,

19:29

because some territories could not tolerate

19:32

the temporary leadership

19:35

of other territories over

19:37

them during revolution. So

19:40

the revolutions unleash another

19:43

wave of internal conflicts. These

19:45

revolutions ultimately collapse,

19:48

not because of internal weaknesses,

19:51

but

19:51

because of external pressures, because

19:53

of military intervention. Also

19:56

the Greek revolution, which is the only

19:58

revolution that succeeds. succeeds

20:01

thanks to the intervention of

20:04

foreign armies and foreign diplomats.

20:07

This

20:30

episode is brought to you by Travelodge

20:32

by Windham. There's so much to discover

20:34

and

20:38

Travelodge

20:45

is your base camp for adventure. Whether

20:47

you're exploring a national park, escaping

20:50

to the beach, or discovering a new city,

20:53

Travelodge helps you get up and explore

20:55

with free Wi-Fi, free coffee, and

20:57

a great night's rest so you can be

20:59

ready for anything. Like being

21:02

ready to enjoy the scenic wilderness of Yellowstone,

21:05

the awe-inspiring Crater Lake, or

21:07

the marshes of the Everglades. Adventure

21:10

isn't far away when you stay with Travelodge,

21:12

one of 24 trusted brands by Windham.

21:15

Stay close to adventure at Travelodge

21:18

by Windham. Get the lowest price at

21:20

Travelodge.com. Windham

21:22

rewards membership may be required. Restrictions

21:24

apply.

21:28

Given the sort of internal

21:31

problems being created by this, the force is

21:33

unleashed.

21:34

Can you tell us a bit more about why these

21:37

revolutions collapsed and the role of the external

21:40

actors?

21:41

Yes, they collapsed because

21:43

of the intervention of much more

21:45

powerful and larger foreign

21:48

armies, in

21:51

front of which the local populations

21:53

did not rise up in arms, although

21:55

they were called to a kind of thoughts on

21:58

war against the foreign armies.

21:59

sensibly so because there

22:02

was no realistic chance

22:05

of success. This is certainly

22:07

the case of Spain, and Piedmont,

22:10

and Naples. So as much as

22:12

local populations were hostile to

22:14

absolute government, they

22:17

were also clear that

22:19

they could not lead a war against

22:22

more powerful

22:24

armies, not least because their

22:27

monarchs

22:28

supported foreign intervention and

22:30

were hostile to the Constitution.

22:33

And authority,

22:35

a form of government, without

22:37

the support of the monarch, was

22:41

not conceivable, not realistic

22:45

at the time, given the diplomatic

22:48

complex, but also not conceivable

22:51

because of the

22:53

political culture of the populations

22:56

of the time. Monarch power

22:58

could not be dismantled.

23:01

It's what Napoleon had done,

23:04

but not what the local population in Southern

23:06

Europe wanted for themselves.

23:10

So speaking of this idea of

23:13

what kind of the local population wanted,

23:15

what they were willing to try in terms of

23:17

new ideas versus not, you

23:20

talk about these countries during the time period

23:23

having, quote, a blend of new ideas

23:26

of citizenship endowed with individual

23:28

rights alongside older

23:31

communitarian concepts of rights

23:33

as privileges, a really interesting blending

23:35

of kind of old ideas and new ideas.

23:38

Can you tell us about kind of what this looked

23:41

like and maybe some of the tensions it caused?

23:43

Yes, absolutely. This

23:45

constitutional text introduced

23:48

a number of individual rights,

23:51

and that's supported by the notion that the sovereign

23:54

is the sovereign nation as

23:57

a kind of... in

24:00

some of the free

24:02

citizens and who have

24:04

individual rights that are protected like the right

24:07

of property and also the right for

24:09

May citizens or the overwhelming majority

24:12

of them to vote, although

24:15

indirectly for a parliament

24:17

they introduce freedom of expression,

24:20

freedom of the press, although

24:23

freedom of expression is limited by

24:26

a lack of religious polarization.

24:28

And this is the first communitarian dimensional

24:31

of the culture of the time that

24:33

even a sovereign nation of

24:35

free citizens is still a religiously

24:39

homogeneous one, culturally

24:42

homogeneous one of Catholic of Orthodox

24:45

nations. So that's the first communitarian

24:47

element

24:48

that if you like limits not the

24:51

individual freedoms of the citizens

24:54

at the time. But there are other types

24:56

of freedom that

24:59

the supports of the revolution advocate

25:03

or want to defend and reexist.

25:06

The archisens for instance

25:09

support universal suffrage

25:12

for men, but they also want to

25:14

defend their corporate privileges

25:17

against the free market. And even

25:19

the political, the governance of their corporations

25:22

as part of the broader governance

25:24

of the state, for instance, in Sicily.

25:28

Vinegars and community of peasants

25:30

beneath the freedom of the commune

25:34

and the protection of common land against

25:36

privatization is a freedom

25:40

that the constitutions need to

25:42

defend against the encroachment

25:45

of land laws

25:46

willing to buy their land. So

25:48

freedom as the privilege of

25:51

a community as an entity

25:54

blended with the freedom of an individual

25:57

who as an individual has the right

25:59

to vote represent a

26:02

feature of these revolutions. And also

26:04

freedom of peripheries, freedom

26:06

of municipal

26:08

authorities or given

26:11

regions with their own legislative

26:13

privileges are something that local

26:17

populations in Sicily

26:20

or the Basque countries or

26:23

in the islands of the Aegean want

26:25

to defend along with supporting

26:28

the prostitution and representative

26:30

governments. We may see these types

26:32

of freedoms as incompatible

26:34

today but they were not in the mind of

26:37

the actors of these revolutions at the time.

26:40

Very interesting to unpick how

26:43

these different ideas sort of practically

26:45

went together, made sense in people's heads and

26:48

sort of in the same vein. I wonder if you

26:51

can tell us a bit about how these

26:53

revolutionary moments, all of these

26:56

changes happening politically, impacted

26:59

relations between the

27:01

revolutionary governments, the

27:03

monarchies, and of course the other huge

27:05

institution, the church. Yes,

27:07

absolutely. This is a

27:10

crucial aspect if you want to

27:12

understand these revolutions.

27:14

First of all, that everywhere governments wanted

27:18

to have the churches

27:20

on their side and according

27:23

to the Napoleonic model,

27:25

they want to use the churches, they want to

27:27

use the bishops

27:29

as a sort of

27:31

longer manners of their new political

27:33

power to get their support and

27:36

their endorsement for constitutional

27:39

government

27:40

and the production of constitutions. Do

27:42

they achieve in their goal? Well, partly

27:45

so because what is fascinating, what's

27:47

studying the relationship between church

27:49

and revolutionary government is

27:51

that the revolutions

27:53

sort of trigger a revolution also within

27:56

the church hierarchies. To talk about church

27:58

as a single

27:59

institutional,

28:01

misses the point. Catholic

28:04

and Orthodox churches were

28:06

very complex institutions that

28:08

imputed highly

28:10

educated people from

28:13

the upper classes, but also semi-literate

28:16

priests

28:19

or monks whose

28:22

political views and whose

28:24

aspirations were closer to

28:27

those of their own community of peasants

28:29

than to those of their hierarchy they had to

28:31

take orders from. This is crucial

28:33

to understand how the individual members

28:36

of the churches responded. So

28:39

some bishops had to send out

28:41

public documents to be read in

28:44

churches in support of the Constitution.

28:46

Some refused to do so,

28:47

for instance the Archbishop of Lisbon, the

28:50

Prime Minister of Portugal, and so he was expelled

28:53

from the country, and other bishops

28:55

also refused to support the

28:57

government. And at the level

28:59

of the local parishes, some priests supported

29:03

the Constitution and reached in favor of

29:05

the Constitution in front of their parishioners,

29:09

arguing

29:11

in favor of the compatibility

29:13

between constitutional government and

29:15

the Holy Scriptures. And others

29:17

in fact led the revolution, fought against

29:20

the revolution. The same can

29:22

be said about monks

29:26

in monastic communities, they were also

29:28

divided. So you find priests

29:31

fighting in armies, leading

29:34

soldiers in the battlefield,

29:36

as they did in Greece where all

29:38

the church members

29:40

supported, without

29:42

exception, the

29:44

revolution. You find them in parliaments

29:47

elected as members of the parliament,

29:49

you find them in patriotic societies,

29:52

talking about politics,

29:55

not priests and monks are everywhere

29:57

in the public sphere. Huh, I'm glad

29:59

you've

29:59

raised the idea that the church was not

30:02

one monolithic institution

30:04

and detailed kind of the different ways

30:07

that priests were involved in

30:09

the public sphere because I think that that

30:12

helps explain kind of the mixing

30:15

that was happening, the sort of the fact that

30:17

there's variation in different places

30:19

and understanding the roles of

30:21

the different actors. And to further

30:24

complicate the story, there's another

30:26

group of people I kind of would

30:28

love to ask you to bring into this conversation

30:31

of how they're being impacted

30:33

by change, how they're impacting change.

30:36

And that's the role of journalism,

30:39

the fact that there's so much literacy, that

30:41

there's so much improved communication. You

30:43

already mentioned at the beginning of the interview the idea that

30:46

a lot of people were simply able to be aware

30:48

of what was happening in other places and this had

30:50

an impact. Can you tell us more

30:53

about kind of this news

30:55

and information side of things

30:57

and how that played into the revolutions

31:00

and the

31:01

work against them?

31:03

Yes, absolutely. So before

31:05

the revolutions, there was hardly

31:08

any journalism in these countries. There were

31:10

just a few official gazettes.

31:12

There was not even

31:15

printed press in the Okoman Empire basically

31:17

did not exist. There was maybe one in

31:20

Constantinople. So what

31:22

these revolutions threw was

31:25

to sort of legalize free

31:27

journalism, political journalism. So there

31:29

is a sudden explosion

31:31

of the number, for the quantity,

31:35

and of

31:39

newspapers and political periodicals,

31:42

especially in Spain and Portugal

31:45

and Naples and to a lesser extent

31:47

in the conflicts of the Greek revolution.

31:51

Now here there is a kind of paradox

31:53

that we need to unpick because in fact

31:55

these are societies with

31:58

extremely high interest. illiteracy

32:01

rates, the majority, the overwhelming

32:03

majority of citizens in these countries

32:06

cannot read. So

32:10

how are these people

32:12

politicized and exposed

32:15

to information, to definition

32:17

of what a constitution is, to

32:20

the novelty of their rights? They are exposed

32:22

to it in very many different ways

32:26

and via a different

32:28

set of means. Political

32:31

communication becomes

32:33

faster and intensified thanks

32:36

to public debate and public reading.

32:38

And newspapers and

32:40

manifestos and decorations were read

32:43

in squares, in

32:46

churches, at sermons,

32:50

by priests were a form of political

32:52

communication. They were

32:54

read in public, in patriotic societies

32:57

and clubs and listened

32:59

to by people who could not

33:01

read. They were read and discussed

33:04

among the ranks of the members

33:07

of secret societies that become

33:10

public institutions. During

33:12

revolutions, the carboneria, the comoneros

33:14

or the filipid, are secret

33:17

societies that organize

33:19

the revolutions, but they are also

33:21

societies that

33:25

contribute to the expansion of the public

33:27

sphere during revolutions, whose

33:30

members discuss politics,

33:34

interfere in

33:37

the canvassing and the electoral

33:39

campaign for the elections,

33:42

discuss

33:44

parliamentary debates, and

33:46

of course there is also the uncontrolled circulation

33:49

of rumors

33:51

that fuels the expansion

33:53

of the public sphere

33:55

beyond the printed material. Can

33:58

you tell us a bit about the rumors? Yes. Rumors

34:00

are a fascinating feature

34:04

of these revolutions.

34:06

And in fact, rumors tended

34:09

to be condemned by revolutionists

34:12

as a kind of form of irrational communication

34:16

fueled by the enemies of the revolutions

34:19

and taken on by callable,

34:22

uneducated people. So

34:26

they undermined the revolution. In

34:29

reality, there

34:32

is a little distinction between

34:34

pretty communication and verbal communication

34:37

between,

34:38

and the distinction

34:41

we have in mind today, and they had

34:43

in mind, between irrational

34:45

printed political journalism

34:48

and an irrational sort of circulation

34:53

of rumors based on conspiracy

34:55

theory, is one

34:58

that does not exist. Even the newspapers

35:02

contributed to the circulation of rumors.

35:05

Rumors were fueled. What

35:07

was the content of rumors? A

35:10

lot was, rumors were about invasion.

35:12

This is a moment in which the

35:14

Austrian army invades Dieuenmont

35:17

or invades Naples. So there were fear

35:19

of other invasions in Spain, Portugal.

35:23

Sometimes fake news were

35:25

fabricated by revolutionaries as

35:28

a tool of political

35:30

battles. For instance, you'd spread the news

35:33

in Naples that the Russian

35:35

army

35:36

and the Greek army would come soon

35:39

to rescue the revolution and reinstate

35:41

the constitution after the collapse of

35:43

the revolution.

35:44

And the same happened in Spain where

35:46

counter-revolutionaries spread

35:48

fake news about the imminent arrival

35:51

of the Russian army that crushed

35:53

the constitution.

35:54

So rumors were used constantly

35:58

as a tool of the... political

36:00

battles going on during the revolutions also.

36:03

They were not just the product of uncontrolled

36:06

irrational fears

36:09

spread by the uneducated. I

36:12

think that that will sound quite familiar

36:15

to many people thinking about politics today.

36:17

Yes, exactly. So thank you for telling

36:19

us about rumors and

36:21

the many uses of them. Thinking

36:24

then, sort of towards the longer term

36:26

period of the book, obviously, you've detailed

36:29

a lot of changes, a lot of reactions,

36:31

a lot of counter reactions.

36:33

What were the long term consequences

36:36

of the revolutions, both the one that

36:38

succeeded and the others that failed? Well,

36:41

the main long

36:41

term consequence was a sort of legacy

36:44

of instability because although

36:46

these revolutions were crushed and

36:48

Greek was turned into

36:51

a semi independent state, where

36:53

there was no constitutional freedom, it

36:56

became an absolute monarchy.

36:59

The quest, the aspiration for constitutional

37:02

government represented in institutions

37:04

remain there could only be temporarily

37:07

suppressed. And also the quest

37:09

for local autonomy is in the defend of

37:11

privileges. In

37:14

a complex in which the monarchs remained

37:17

hostile to it. And

37:20

so this fostered a kind of

37:23

long term instability with

37:25

various attempts to

37:28

find

37:29

a sort of compromise between revolution

37:32

and restoration with the introduction

37:34

of costipletials between the 1830s and 50s that

37:36

say it rescued the

37:39

idea of representative government, but that

37:42

introduced it on the basis of very limited

37:44

suffrage.

37:45

So in delight of

37:48

these attempts to find

37:51

compromises, the costipletials

37:53

of the 1820s were ditched as

37:57

no longer useful.

38:00

because they had introduced quasi-universally

38:03

direct suffrage for men, and

38:06

this was not acceptable

38:08

for part of the elites and the monarchs.

38:10

So in that sense, those constitutional

38:13

documents were abandoned. At

38:15

the same time, the memory

38:18

of these vents of the 18th Memphis

38:20

Revolutions had

38:22

an enduring effect

38:25

and were absorbed into a sort

38:28

of an idea

38:29

of a genealogy among liberals.

38:33

By

38:35

the time the

38:37

representative government

38:39

became a permanent

38:41

reality in Southern Europe,

38:43

the memory of these events was rescued

38:47

in the sense that they came to be seen

38:50

also by the establishment and by the elites

38:53

as the founding moment of

38:56

constitutional freedom in all of these countries.

38:59

And emancipation.

39:01

A very interesting combination

39:03

of sort of short-term suppression, but

39:06

with longer-term implications.

39:09

So thank you for taking us through that.

39:11

And of course, it would be remiss

39:13

of me not to point out that of all of

39:15

the aspects that you've been discussing,

39:18

obviously the book has all the

39:20

fabulous details behind it. So

39:22

for anyone who's intrigued by

39:24

what you've been telling us, obviously I'd point

39:26

them to read the book in its full

39:29

self to learn about

39:31

what's happening in each of the places in

39:33

detail for the topics we've discussed.

39:36

And

39:36

award the potential.

39:40

Well, there's a lot of detail,

39:42

right? And there's a lot of pieces. How can

39:45

you possibly cover these different

39:47

places in Southern Europe and all

39:49

the aspects in terms of the relations with the church,

39:51

the relations with the military, the relations with literacy?

39:55

I don't think anyone could do that in just one or two paragraphs.

39:58

So of course it's a long book. This

40:01

feels perhaps my final question maybe

40:04

a little bit unfair. We obviously

40:06

are the new books network, so usually

40:08

when I ask this the books are have been

40:10

out maybe for a little bit. But in fact,

40:12

as we're speaking, the book is not quite released yet

40:14

by the time that you're listening to it, it will

40:17

be. But this is obviously a

40:19

very kind of big milestone about to happen.

40:22

That said, you have finished the book.

40:25

It will soon, if not now, be available

40:27

to the listeners.

40:29

Do you have anything you might be thinking

40:31

of working on now that this project

40:33

is done, whether or not it's on the

40:36

same topic, whether or not it's a big book, maybe

40:38

you need to sleep for a bit first?

40:41

Yes, aside apart from resting

40:43

a bit, which

40:44

I do need as we all do when we finish a

40:46

big project. I'm

40:48

thinking about

40:50

writing a history of the age of revolutions

40:52

as a history of counter revolutions because

40:55

studying these revolutions made me aware

40:58

that popular

41:00

royalism and popular supports

41:03

of absolutism

41:04

was an equally important and

41:07

also historically novel phenomenon. That

41:10

needs to be studied in its own right

41:13

as a semi permanent feature

41:16

of the history

41:17

of Europe, especially

41:19

as we take

41:21

the South as our

41:25

sort of space of analysis. So

41:27

I'm thinking about

41:28

looking at the question of popular mobilization,

41:31

sort of politicization of the masses

41:34

from the point of view of those

41:36

people who

41:37

hated democracy, who did

41:39

not want constitutional government, who

41:42

intervened in the public sphere

41:44

in defense of the pins, but

41:46

could also question

41:48

monarchical power and act

41:51

independently, even if they did so

41:53

in the name of the restoration of the

41:55

public. Thank you.

42:00

So this is a thing that is also full

42:02

of a part and so a pirate contradiction

42:06

And

42:06

which does not meet all our

42:09

expectations and I want to explore it

42:11

as my next step

42:13

Huh?

42:15

Well that sounds fascinating, but it does also

42:17

sound like a large project So

42:19

best of luck investigating that and

42:22

while you do of course listeners can read the

42:25

book We've been discussing titled southern

42:27

europe in the age of revolutions just

42:29

out from princeton university press Murat's

42:31

you thank you so much for sharing your time

42:34

and expertise with us on the podcast

42:36

Well, thank you very much. Miranda. It's been a pleasure

42:38

to talk to you

42:39

Thank you

42:41

So

42:52

Weddings are the celebration of all the details

42:54

that make a couple perfect for each other and you can

42:56

find your perfect fit too At indochino choose

42:59

every detail of a custom tailored suit from

43:01

lapels to linings and more starting

43:03

at just 4.99 My

43:06

bash, sorry

43:08

Find the suit that's perfect

43:10

for you go to indochino.com and use

43:12

code podcast for 10 off any purchase of 399 or more That's 10

43:16

off 399 or more at indochino.com

43:21

Code podcast

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features