Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
This. Episode is brought to you by
0:03
shopify. Whether you're selling a little are
0:05
a lot. Shopify. Shopify.
0:08
Helps you do your thing however you
0:10
teaching from the launch your online shop
0:12
stage all the way to their we
0:14
just hit a million orders States no
0:16
matter what state you're in, Shopify is
0:19
there to help you grow. Sign up
0:21
for a one dollar per month trial
0:23
period at shopify.com/special offer all lower case.
0:26
That's. shopify.com/
0:28
Special offer. Hello! Everybody! This is
0:30
Marshall Poem, the founder and editor. The
0:32
New Books Network of published several academic
0:34
books and one of the things I
0:36
found frustrating is my inability to get
0:38
them picked up in the press. The
0:41
really is no Pr service specifically oriented
0:43
toward academic books. Recently, however, I had
0:45
the opportunity to work with a Pr
0:47
firm in New York or L M
0:49
on a book that I recently published
0:51
and I have to say they did
0:54
a remarkable job at a very low
0:56
price And this got me thinking wonder
0:58
if the New. Books Network and R
1:00
O M could provide a service that
1:02
would promote academic books. So the folks
1:04
are eliminate or heads together and we
1:06
came up with a package. It is
1:08
specifically targeted toward people like you people
1:10
who write academic books. So if you're
1:12
interested you should go to the and
1:14
Be and website and click publicize your
1:16
book. In there you find some information
1:18
about the services that the and Be
1:20
an An R L M are offering.
1:23
What we really want to do is
1:25
provide you with value for money. As
1:27
far as we know, no such serves.
1:29
Exists. This is the first of its kind
1:31
and we really hope it is successful and
1:33
we hope that it helps you get the
1:36
word out about your academic book. Welcome
1:39
to the New Books Network! hello
1:43
and welcome to a new episode of
1:45
your favorite podcast new books and islamic
1:47
studies which operates online through the new
1:49
books network and murals cheer lead that
1:52
each for each do episode which was
1:54
an important new book in the broad
1:56
revealed of islamic studies and we chat
1:58
with it's odd it Anika
2:01
Schmading's new book Sufi
2:03
Civilities, Religious Authority and
2:06
Political Change in Afghanistan is
2:09
a deeply sensitive and rich study
2:12
of a variety of facets of
2:14
Sufism in contemporary Afghanistan. Focused
2:17
on the intersection and interaction
2:20
of Sufism and Afghan civil
2:22
society, this book simultaneously
2:24
offers a layered
2:26
and often moving account of
2:29
Sufism in Afghanistan while also
2:31
presenting an excellent critique of
2:34
Western NGO-driven understandings of civility
2:36
and civil society. The
2:39
book also engages a number of themes connected
2:41
to Sufism in Afghanistan including Sufism and the
2:43
state, gender in Sufism, Sufis
2:46
and the Olamah, and
2:48
Sufi religious authority through
2:50
the Aunirik imagination. This
2:53
wonderfully written book will also be a pleasure
2:55
to teach in the classroom. Here
2:57
now is my conversation with Professor Anika
3:01
Schmading. Hello
3:03
Anika, welcome to the New Books Network.
3:05
A real pleasure to have you on
3:08
our forecast. Absolutely,
3:11
and this was such a great pleasure reading this text. Both
3:15
for scholars and teachers of Sufism and South
3:18
Asia and Afghanistan and Islam, there is so
3:20
much there both in terms of research and
3:22
in terms of possible use in the classroom.
3:24
So really excited about talking to you about
3:27
this fantastic new book. We
3:29
have a tradition on the New Books Network,
3:31
Anika, that our first question is always biographical.
3:33
So I was wondering if briefly you could
3:36
share a bit with our listeners your journey
3:38
or story about how you became a
3:40
scholar. Sure, yeah. So
3:43
I think there's a very short answer and
3:45
there's a longer answer to that. I guess
3:47
the short answer would be curiosity and learning
3:49
from everyone. And The longer answer
3:51
is of course the combination of my own
3:53
studies and then spending time in the places
3:55
where I directly learned from people. So I
3:57
Studied cultural anthropology, political anthropology, and other things.
4:00
Fine and Comparative Literature in Berlin
4:02
and Am. I took a semester
4:04
off to hitchhike to Pakistan and
4:06
city their the university for one
4:08
semester in Islamabad and well I
4:10
was there. I realize that what
4:13
I was learning by being in
4:15
the place actually explain to me
4:17
so much more what and apology
4:19
was about what kind of questions
4:21
I one could ask and approach
4:23
and through anthropology And so I
4:25
decided that I wanted to just
4:28
spent more time actually in the
4:30
region to understand. Better.
4:32
Actually what I was studying at university
4:34
and so I decided to take a
4:36
year off and between might be a
4:38
and and May and I moved to
4:40
Afghanistan. To. That within twenty
4:42
eleven and I took on a
4:45
job as an intern in the
4:47
Afghan government. Ah and following that
4:49
I initially worked in and owes
4:51
Am but also for an Afghan
4:53
circus project And am I realized
4:55
that there was so much complexity
4:57
So much that am I wanted
5:00
to understand better So and back
5:02
to Europe to get a masters
5:04
in Middle East Area studies at
5:06
Leiden were also said it properly
5:08
learning Persian and pass to and
5:10
immersing myself in. History of Afghanistan
5:12
in the Region am I returned
5:14
for future research? In Twenty Thirteen
5:16
Fourteen and I decided I wanted
5:18
to pursue a Phd in anthropology
5:20
at Boston University which would give
5:23
me the time to properly understand
5:25
more facets of or what was
5:27
going on or I mean what
5:29
I was studying and it's only
5:31
see maybe such with not on
5:33
syfy communities and I actually be
5:35
searched initially on nine pneumatic commute
5:37
she's in Afghanistan. In
5:39
the during one of the research trips to. Enjoy
5:43
over which you with us are conducting
5:45
some research and for the European Union
5:48
and they got attacked and them during
5:50
a time when I was kind of.
5:53
Rethinking of the Weather and what
5:55
kind of research actually wanted to
5:57
do and had a very insightful
5:59
comments. And. How it
6:01
can happen friend of mine and and
6:03
it came from that experience actually that
6:06
I mentioned earlier from having spent time
6:08
in Turkey, Syria, Iran, Pakistan and which
6:10
are all countries with a sizable sushi
6:13
presence and also of course the to
6:15
chat bots of his men these countries
6:17
and and i was sitting overlap and
6:20
swiss my of can friend a ruler
6:22
who was at the timer director for
6:24
research institute death and ask him what
6:26
had actually happened to Soviets in Afghanistan
6:29
because of course. We
6:31
knew Afghanistan as a place which been
6:34
the cradle of mystic interpretation of islam
6:36
and of course also with the origin
6:38
of Milan majority in both the non
6:40
in the west as roomy. But.
6:43
It will. I'm wondering like okay
6:45
so what actually happened to these
6:47
communities in these last decades on
6:49
and I'm so He basically just
6:51
laughed at me and said like
6:53
well they also here and you
6:55
foreigners just don't ask about them
6:57
because all it's that he care
6:59
about is gender, counterinsurgency, and nation
7:01
building. And. So I
7:04
I just have that to
7:06
heart. And
7:08
decided. Such.
7:11
As basically a very delayed answer to
7:13
this discussion with my friends in which
7:15
I then I went on to on
7:17
the one hand for us to my
7:19
dissertation and also my post sucking which
7:22
Electron wrote. A book. That you have
7:24
no read and about and experiences
7:26
of city communities during attitude is
7:29
last twenty years am of minutes.
7:31
Of. Mention such occupation but also the
7:33
long history of kind of the
7:35
last four to five deck. it's
7:37
and of experiences that as if
7:40
he can meet his have had
7:42
enough. Of
7:44
a one hundred to sort of dive into the
7:46
book my be to talk about the title of
7:48
the book to do with disabilities and of you
7:50
know what a key aspect of this book. And
7:52
one aspect of the same in of
7:55
this book is this sub. What?
7:57
one might call the intersection but also it
7:59
also the into between Sufism
8:02
and Afghan civil society, and you
8:04
make it a point to use
8:06
this case study to critique sort of Western
8:08
NGO dominated notions of what is civil society.
8:11
So I was wondering maybe we can begin
8:13
with that. Could you speak a bit about
8:15
this underlying theme of the book in terms
8:17
of the relationship between civility and Sufism or
8:19
civil society and Sufism in Afghanistan? Could you
8:22
explain that a bit for our listeners? Yeah,
8:25
thank you for that question. So
8:28
my main argument is that by
8:30
using Sufism to look at Afghanistan,
8:32
kind of a crucial part of
8:34
Afghanistan's history in society, but also
8:36
civil space comes into view when
8:39
we apply this lens. And
8:42
this intersection of Sufism and civil society
8:45
actually came into view for me, not
8:47
from a literature lens at first, but
8:49
actually from an experiential lens. So it
8:51
came from an experience that I had at
8:54
a Sufi gathering in Kabul, where
8:57
one of the participants, and
8:59
this is also how I start the book, joked about this
9:02
to me and says, this is actually
9:04
the real Afghan civil society, what we're
9:06
experiencing here in this Sufi gathering. And
9:09
when she said that, it kind
9:11
of struck me for several reasons.
9:14
So at the time of my
9:16
research, of course, civil society have
9:18
become a special interest in
9:20
the kind of neoliberal development policy
9:23
that was driving the post 2001 state
9:25
building process in Afghanistan. And
9:29
interestingly, actually the woman who made that comment, she
9:31
was herself a part of that. So she was
9:34
a director of a large NGO. She
9:36
was interfacing with a lot of
9:38
international donors. But
9:42
she actually meant that what
9:44
is actually missing when we
9:46
see civil society as only
9:48
NGOs, we're actually missing
9:51
a really crucial part of what the
9:53
civil space is in Afghanistan. And
9:56
her critique actually is the critique
9:58
of seeing these
10:01
civil society, particularly as
10:05
NGOs that are actually English speaking, that
10:07
are mainly doing service delivery as well
10:09
in the development and reconstruction sector. And
10:13
of course, that's not uncommon in
10:15
the global development sector, where
10:17
of course the technically oriented NGOs
10:19
take over the job of aid delivery. But
10:23
what is, of course, furthermore happening or
10:25
what's happening in Afghanistan was
10:28
that these civil society
10:30
actors or organizations were also framed as
10:32
central to the post-2001 peace and state
10:34
building process as an attempt to also
10:36
humanize the war. So they
10:38
were actually seen by particular actors such
10:41
as military leads in the United States
10:43
as a kind of force multiplier or
10:45
as a part of the combat team.
10:48
So the kind of like linking up
10:50
of this kind of civil
10:52
society also with counterinsurgency. So
10:55
the joke of that woman who was attending that
10:58
Sufi poetry gathering was actually
11:00
targeted at this particular way of
11:02
understanding civil society, which is rather
11:04
limited because Afghanistan of course has
11:08
never been without its own civil
11:10
society sphere. So that's always in
11:12
the more informal sector, people
11:14
who are coming together on a
11:16
volunteer basis to improve infrastructure, to
11:18
support people in need or to
11:20
mediate disputes. So
11:23
once I started actually looking at these
11:25
Sufi communities in these ways, I
11:28
also found, of course, actual
11:30
evidence in, of course, the general
11:32
more history of Islam, right? When
11:34
we look at Amanda Savatore's work,
11:36
for example, who has argued that
11:39
Sufi logics historically have always been
11:41
important meeting points that
11:44
established social bonds between not only
11:46
the master and disciple, but also
11:48
between students. They
11:50
were always sanctuaries for long distance
11:52
travelers. Peers regularly
11:55
were recruited to mediate and resolve
11:57
problems. And Sufi authors,
12:00
in many ways connected a
12:02
wide variety of individuals, such
12:04
as social classes, and
12:06
also made connections between different
12:08
regions. So
12:10
my argument therefore builds on that, and
12:13
I use Sophism as a land to
12:16
which to better understand Afghanistan
12:18
society, and also built on
12:21
work by anthropologists who have
12:24
questioned this narrow usage of the
12:26
term civil society. And
12:28
I doubt it's therefore a
12:30
more expanded definition of what
12:32
they could term civility. So the
12:35
term itself, civility can be quite
12:38
misleading, of course, because I do
12:41
not mean to, with that kind
12:43
of morality or manners or civic
12:45
virtues. So I'm not trying to
12:48
measure the kind of civicness
12:52
of Sufi adherents or
12:54
how faithful they are, but
12:57
I'm using it to kind of analyze
12:59
the social networks of trust that are
13:01
created by these Sufi communities. And so
13:04
what I mean by that is that
13:06
they actually fulfill a lot of
13:09
important functions in society. So there's
13:11
of course aspects of socialization, public
13:15
communication of ideas, social
13:17
security, there's of course as well the
13:20
distribution of resources of food,
13:22
for example, at those Sufi lodges as
13:24
well. And as
13:26
already mentioned before, the kind of
13:28
mediation and conflict resolution. And
13:31
so if you look at
13:34
Sufi communities in this way, then
13:36
we can see these kinds of
13:39
changes and continuities in different areas
13:41
of society, such
13:43
as religious education, questions
13:46
of how national heritage is
13:48
negotiated, but also the
13:50
kind of space that
13:53
lets people voice divergent
13:55
opinions or tolerate coexistence.
13:58
So it's also a, a way
14:00
to look at how discourses
14:02
are shifting within society. Terrific.
14:07
The next question I want to ask before
14:09
we get more into some of the specifics
14:11
of the individual chapters is that,
14:15
of course, one ought not to over romanticize
14:20
or pigeonhole the specificity of any
14:22
context. But this
14:25
ethnographic project was conducted in rather
14:27
extraordinary times in Afghanistan.
14:32
And there are not many ethnographies,
14:34
especially in relation to Afghanistan's religious
14:37
present that we have in the Western Academy. So
14:40
I just wanted to ask you a bit about
14:42
the experience of conducting
14:44
an ethnographic project in a site
14:46
like Afghanistan, some
14:48
of the potentialities, but also some of the
14:50
challenges of ethnographic work in
14:53
a context that is so under explored in
14:55
the Western Academy. Let me very briefly talk
14:57
a bit about the experience of ethnography before
15:00
we get to some specific issues in
15:02
relation to the chapters of the book. Yeah,
15:06
so I think when thinking
15:08
about Afghanistan, a
15:11
lot of the literature that we
15:13
know, of course, comes more from
15:15
political science or IR. Can
15:18
we scrap that? Can I start again? Sure.
15:22
OK. Yeah,
15:24
so I approached Sufi
15:26
communities from an anthropological
15:29
perspective, which means
15:31
that I was looking at the networks
15:33
of Sufi teachers and students, their sociality,
15:35
but also their politics of interaction with
15:38
each other and with outsiders. And
15:40
I did that with
15:43
a number of different, very typical,
15:45
I would say, anthropological methodologies. I
15:48
did qualitative interviews. I
15:50
did participant observation. I
15:52
also looked at private archives of some of
15:54
these communities. But
15:57
what, of course, is maybe a bit more special. to
16:00
conflict settings, of course, is the question of
16:02
how to conduct the research safely
16:06
for both the
16:08
different people that I was
16:10
interfacing with and for their
16:13
wider community as well.
16:16
One of the responses for that for me was
16:18
to conduct the
16:21
research in multiple sites. So I
16:23
did multi-sided research in Herat and
16:25
in Kabul, so in two of
16:28
the major cities in
16:30
Afghanistan. So I
16:33
was spending some time in
16:35
the communities going to weekly
16:37
gatherings and teachings, attending annual
16:40
celebrations or attending
16:42
zikr sessions and videotaping and photographing speeches,
16:44
pretty much like the usual things
16:46
that I think any anthropologist
16:49
would do to conduct this kind
16:51
of research. But
16:54
of course one of the things that maybe
16:56
is special for most of conflict or post-conflict
17:00
environments is the
17:02
kind of dialogue with
17:04
many interlocutors about what
17:07
they consider a safe or safe way
17:09
of interacting with each other because there
17:12
is a constantly changing security situation,
17:14
of course, around us. And
17:16
so sometimes
17:20
that actually meant that I couldn't
17:22
spend very long time in one
17:24
place or it changed how long time I
17:26
could actually spend in communities. And
17:30
of course it's also a situation
17:32
where there is a very open
17:34
dialogue then with the communities that
17:36
I research about what is safe
17:38
for them to share with me
17:40
or what should I write about
17:42
and in which way. So I
17:44
did a lot what is often
17:46
termed dialogical writing, so I would
17:48
be writing already parts of
17:50
what I wanted to include later on in my
17:52
dissertation or for the book and I would
17:54
be showing it to some of my interlocutors and
17:56
getting their insights into whether
17:59
and writing about them actually
18:01
not only felt congruent with how
18:03
they were experiencing it, but also
18:05
whether that was actually safe to
18:07
name certain things or,
18:10
you know, to write about
18:12
in that sense also if it
18:14
became public in an environment that
18:16
also is quite polarized around some
18:18
of the issues there was writing
18:20
about. So I think in
18:23
that sense, a lot
18:25
of the difficulties of experiencing
18:27
research in Afghanistan are comparable
18:29
to other conflict laws. And
18:32
I believe that there has been always
18:35
actually a lot of room to actually
18:37
conduct underground research in Afghanistan, which
18:40
a lot of times is more
18:42
complicated also by institutions in
18:44
the Western Academy of actually
18:46
letting researchers go to those
18:49
places and doing that
18:51
responsibly. So I
18:53
think that there is actually a need for having a
18:56
broader discussion about this, how to conduct
18:58
this research to keep both the researcher
19:00
but also the research
19:03
community with whom we are doing this research
19:05
safe in the way that we're doing the
19:07
research. Okay, let's come to the
19:09
first chapter in which the
19:11
main theme is the relationship between Sufism
19:14
and the state and Sufi groups
19:16
and the state. And
19:18
here I think perhaps I thought the most
19:20
useful way to talk about this for our
19:23
listeners might be to talk
19:25
about these three main categories that
19:27
you talk about
19:29
in terms of conceptualizing this
19:32
relationship, what you call state
19:34
alignment resistance and strategic distance.
19:36
Could you explain a bit to our listeners
19:38
what you mean by these three categories and
19:41
how they shed light on some
19:43
of the ambivalence of this relationship
19:45
between Sufism and the state in
19:47
Afghanistan? Great question. Thank you for that.
19:50
So my take
19:53
on the relationship between Sufi leaders
19:55
and their community vis-a-vis the state
19:57
comes from this question how Sufi
19:59
can help. communities have dealt historically,
20:01
but also more contemporaneously, with
20:05
this ever-changing political circumstances that they
20:08
found themselves in. So I
20:10
believe most listeners would know maybe most
20:12
about, you know, the last 20 years,
20:16
with international intervention slash occupation and
20:18
counterinsurgency operation and terror attacks. But
20:20
of course, there's a
20:22
much longer history already of
20:25
revolutions and coups and rapidly
20:28
changing socioeconomic conditions, the Soviet
20:30
invasion, of course, before that
20:33
in the late 1970s, 1979. So
20:41
there are a lot of drastic changes
20:43
that Sufi communities have lived through. And
20:46
so I looked into how can
20:49
we actually understand the
20:51
relationship then from
20:53
like Sufi leaders and their communities
20:55
vis-a-vis the state. Historians,
20:58
of course, have cautioned that there's not
21:00
one particular Sufi approach to politics, per
21:02
se. But
21:04
what I found when I looked into
21:07
the historiography and my own oral history
21:09
interviews, was that Sufi communities
21:11
have shown a remarkable
21:13
dexterity in their ability to
21:15
adapt. And in fact, I
21:18
would actually say that their dexterity itself is
21:20
the framework. So the way to adapt in
21:22
these multiple ways towards
21:24
these changing political circumstances. And I
21:27
propose these three relational types that
21:30
you just mentioned, the state alignment,
21:32
resistant and assert, which are termed
21:34
strategic distance. And so
21:37
these three approaches, of course, do
21:39
not map neatly onto particular actors
21:42
or groups, but they're adopted circumstantially
21:44
as the environment shifts and changes.
21:47
So the first one, state
21:49
alignment, is maybe one
21:51
that a lot of historians would be very
21:54
familiar with. Because
21:56
over the centuries, many rulers in various parts
21:58
of the world have attacked. themselves to
22:00
Sufi peers or follow their guidance.
22:03
Of course, in the early
22:26
20th century, they were welcomed to Afghanistan
22:28
by the then ruler, Amia Habibullah, who
22:51
gave them land, for example, and a monthly
22:53
allowance to settle. For
22:56
the Mujahideedi, they established much
22:59
earlier, actually, already their
23:01
Sufi lodge in Kabul, and
23:03
it became very influential religious
23:05
family in Afghanistan that also
23:08
was asked, for example, to
23:10
perform coronation ceremony for the
23:13
Durrani ruler, Zaman Shah. Of
23:16
course, this is a very well-known
23:18
history that's also detailed by
23:20
historians such as Walid Ziyad.
23:23
They showed that actually in
23:25
the study of these next
23:27
Mujahidee alliances, rulers,
23:31
for instance, of newly established
23:33
states often lacked historical legitimacy,
23:36
and they required the backing of
23:38
spiritual institutions or of a spiritual
23:40
institutional base, and
23:43
they could draw on that as social capital.
23:45
So, that was kind of like a kind
23:47
of, yes, ambiosis, as one might
23:49
want to say. And this actually
23:52
carried on in the
23:54
last decades, where of course, particular
23:57
members of the Sufi families became ministers
23:59
or intermarried. with the royal family. And
24:02
they were important in the political establishment
24:04
in Afghanistan. And I think a lot
24:06
of history has often
24:09
focused on these families
24:11
and the more politically
24:13
visible Sufi groups.
24:16
But then kind of like there's
24:18
of course the second stance vis-a-vis
24:20
the state, which is resistance. So
24:23
Sufi communities have not only served
24:25
as allies of the state, but
24:28
also as key figures
24:30
of resistance. And in many
24:33
parts of the Islamic world Sufis
24:35
were known as critics of
24:37
power. We know that of course from
24:39
times of colonial expansion when Sufi peers
24:42
and brotherhoods were often
24:44
one of the authoritative
24:46
structures that were giving
24:48
resistance actually to
24:52
colonial powers. And
24:55
this actually didn't end in
24:57
the colonial period, but we also see this later
25:00
on with critics of
25:02
the Afghan state, such
25:04
as in Afghanistan, Pierre-Ella Mafayzani, who was active
25:07
in Afghanistan's political scene in 1950s to 70s.
25:09
But also in 1980s with the resistance
25:14
against the Soviet-backed Afghan government, there
25:16
were two of the resistant parties
25:18
that were also led by Sufi
25:20
peers. And I
25:23
believe that the third kind of
25:26
stance that Sufi
25:28
leaders and communities could take towards the
25:30
state and what I call strategic distance
25:33
is a bit more difficult to
25:35
trace because it doesn't directly come
25:37
out of a direct alliance as
25:40
being part of the state or
25:42
a direct political stance. So Sufi
25:45
communities have usually primarily
25:47
existed as localized social groups
25:50
and they were usually affiliated to
25:53
a particular Sufi teacher, a peer,
25:55
or a high-ranking student in Khalifa.
25:57
But they
26:00
did not have necessarily
26:02
an overt political affiliation
26:04
to central government structures.
26:08
So this is
26:10
basically just a normal fact of these
26:12
local groups life of how they just
26:14
lead their life. But in
26:17
moments when actually drastic political
26:19
changes took place, this
26:22
remoteness from power could also become
26:24
a shielding mechanism, a way to
26:26
stay apolitical to be power avoidant.
26:29
So there's different examples of that that mainly
26:32
actually came out of a lot of my
26:34
interviews of the
26:36
different communities. So it could mean avoiding
26:39
interaction with government representatives or
26:41
with insurgents. It could mean
26:44
migration either of individuals or
26:46
of a wholesale community and
26:49
then re-establishing of particular teaching
26:51
circles or of libraries in
26:53
neighboring countries. It could also
26:56
mean a discursive distancing.
26:58
So a community could
27:01
either self-censor or they could stay
27:03
away from voicing political opinions or
27:05
they could give depro of
27:24
these three rough typologies surfacing
27:27
in the history of Afghanistan.
27:30
And of course, there would be much more to
27:32
say about that. But maybe these examples already give
27:35
a taste of the
27:37
repertoire of these adaptations and these
27:39
groups were engaged in. Wonderful. The
27:43
next question I want to ask you again is
27:45
one of the key themes of
27:47
this book, which
27:50
is trying to question the
27:52
supposed and oftentimes supposed binary
27:55
of Sufis and the Olamah or
27:57
between Sufism and the stomach. legal
28:00
tradition in the study of Central Asia and Afghanistan.
28:03
Could you talk a little bit about how
28:05
you question this often presumed antagonism between
28:08
Dholama and Sufi masters with the help,
28:10
perhaps, of a case study
28:12
that you talk about extensively in Japras,
28:14
right? Yeah. I
28:16
think one of the difficulties when
28:19
trying to look at actually the different
28:21
Sufi groups is
28:24
this idea of having
28:26
these two different antagonistic
28:28
groups, that being,
28:31
on the one hand, the Dholama with
28:33
Imams and with, for example, the Dholama
28:36
Council, and on the other hand, different
28:38
Sufi groups. And this
28:40
has been amply
28:42
critiqued historically, of course, as they
28:45
used to be overlapping.
28:47
So Dholama used to
28:49
also be Sufi peers
28:51
and used to both
28:53
actually give legal advice
28:56
as much as they were also engaged
28:58
actually in activities that we
29:00
would usually ascribe more into,
29:04
you know, for Sufi communities and for
29:07
Sufi teachers. But
29:10
it's interesting that kind of in the
29:13
last decades, of course, there
29:15
is a kind of
29:17
more like heightened bifurcation
29:21
that we can see between these
29:24
two different positions and how they're
29:26
being stereotyped or how they're being
29:28
cast. And in some
29:30
cases, actually, that has led to
29:33
Sufi communities themselves, very subconsciously
29:36
actually working with that. And
29:39
one example for me is, which
29:41
I've described in the chapter that
29:43
you mentioned, is
29:47
the Hanaka Palavan,
29:49
which is one of the
29:52
oldest Sufi lodges in
29:54
Ashikanwa Arefan, which is an old
29:56
part of Kabul. And
29:58
this particular chapter, Sufi
30:00
Lodge had been led
30:03
by one family over
30:06
the course of nearly 200 years and given
30:08
further from one
30:11
teacher to another but always kind of
30:13
remaining actually within the same family. And
30:17
during a period of time in
30:20
which fighting intensified
30:23
particularly in Kabul,
30:25
so this was kind
30:27
of at the end of the Soviet
30:30
government of the PDPA
30:32
in the end of the 1980s and then beginning
30:35
1990s when different
30:38
Mujahideen factions that had fought against the
30:40
central government were starting to fight against
30:42
each other period. That also is then
30:44
known as kind of the civil war
30:46
period in Afghanistan or often described as
30:48
such. During
30:50
this time there was also
30:52
a lot of fighting
30:55
that happened in the vicinity of
30:57
this particular Sufi Lodge and not
30:59
only had some of the teachers
31:02
before been threatened and imprisoned and
31:04
targeted but also then
31:06
it just became too
31:08
much for that family that had
31:10
had this particular Sufi Lodge. And
31:13
so they decided to leave
31:16
Afghanistan like at that time
31:18
many Afghans who went
31:20
to Pakistan or further
31:23
as well to the west at the time. So
31:26
the family left the Sufi
31:29
Lodge but what they decided
31:31
is to give
31:34
the leadership of
31:36
the Sufi Lodge to an Imam
31:39
who had led his own mosque
31:42
in a different part of town. His name
31:44
was Hajiz Dakhal and he
31:47
had known actually that particular
31:50
Sufi Lodge for many
31:52
years since he was a little boy. So
31:54
his father actually used to come to that
31:56
Sufi Lodge and he was
31:58
known by by
32:00
the community who
32:02
frequented this Sufi lodge as
32:05
somebody who was trustworthy and
32:08
somebody who would also maybe
32:10
be better positioned to well positioned to
32:12
take over this position
32:14
at this particular point in time. Because
32:18
what was happening of course, all
32:21
over Afghanistan also in Pakistan was also
32:23
a shift in general
32:25
discourse about religious authority and
32:27
who could be seen as
32:29
a legitimate religious
32:32
authority. And so him actually
32:34
being an Imam with
32:36
his own mask and madrasa had
32:39
a particular standing and was recognizable in
32:43
his particular role as an Imam.
32:45
So he actually took on also
32:47
as the peer of that community
32:49
and he did both. And what he
32:52
did actually then during the next decade
32:55
and two was that he
32:57
really shielded that community through
32:59
his way of interacting with
33:01
different power brokers who came
33:03
and went. In Afghanistan, so
33:05
on the one hand, he
33:09
interacted with different Wudaydi
33:12
sections who were there. On
33:14
the other hand, she also interacted then later with the
33:16
Taliban when they were in power in the 1990s. And
33:20
the Taliban at the time didn't
33:22
have a particular national
33:27
rule towards Sufi groups.
33:31
But from time to time, they would
33:33
maybe make moves to close the Sufi
33:35
lodge. So what he would do actually
33:37
was that he would talk
33:40
with his students in his madrasa and
33:42
figure out who would be
33:45
closely connected to particular
33:47
ministries of the Taliban
33:49
to talk with them to keep the Sufi
33:51
lodge open. So he very much
33:55
embodied this kind of, this
33:57
double sense of on the one hand,
34:00
being part of the general
34:02
ulema, but also actually being
34:05
the peer of the Sufi lodge. And I
34:08
found that
34:11
this was a way as well for
34:13
me in my book, then, to talk
34:16
a bit and to problematize this idea
34:18
that these are two absolute
34:21
separate realms that are
34:23
also antagonistic to each other. Because
34:27
in many instances where
34:29
I went to different khanakas to different
34:31
Sufi lodges as well, I
34:34
found that they were also
34:36
led by imams who also
34:38
had their own mask, who actually were leading
34:40
both at the same time. So these
34:43
are actually not mutually exclusive
34:47
roles to be had. And then I
34:49
think it would serve
34:51
generally well to reevaluate this
34:53
idea of Sufism
34:56
as being absolutely separate from
34:58
otherwise Islam
35:00
and from these other roles of the
35:02
ulema, for example. One other key
35:04
theme that comes up in this book, especially
35:07
in one of the chapters is Sufi poetry.
35:10
And what I really loved about this chapter is that you
35:12
showed not only
35:14
the religious significance and history of Sufi
35:17
poetry in Afghanistan, but also the
35:19
sorts of changes and transformations
35:21
that tradition has undergone over time,
35:24
especially in the modern and
35:26
contemporary period. So that's a very big question
35:28
I'm asking, but perhaps you could speak a
35:30
little about the significance of Sufi poetry to
35:33
Afghanistan. And what are some of the major
35:35
changes that this tradition and continuities for that
35:37
matter that this tradition has undergone in
35:40
the modern and contemporary periods? Yeah,
35:43
it's a huge question. I think
35:45
actually one where we need
35:47
even more research on and
35:49
writing on in the future. So of
35:52
course, on the one hand, the importance
35:54
of Sufi poetry in the religious and
35:56
social history of Afghanistan can not be
35:58
stated enough Sufi poetry. have
36:00
played an important part in Afghanistan's cultural
36:03
and religious history. It's
36:05
been a source of religious education and
36:08
also a particular point of pride, as well
36:10
as sometimes struggle in terms of cultural heritage.
36:13
It might not become maybe directly
36:15
a pairing for a Western
36:17
audience when reading Persians of the poetry
36:19
in its English translation, but many
36:22
of the phrases, of course, within the
36:24
poetry come directly from the Quran or
36:26
the echo, its spirit. So a
36:28
telling example of the different readings
36:30
and understanding of what to be poetry is
36:33
made of course be and that has been
36:35
written about a lot already. The
36:37
writing, one of its most prominent
36:40
exemplars of Jalaluddin
36:42
Ba'arci or Wumi, as he
36:44
is also known in the
36:47
West. And
36:49
he has of
36:52
course produced some of the most
36:55
important and beautiful poetry.
36:59
In Afghanistan, his work is actually called
37:01
the Quran in Persian. And
37:04
this is the case because Malana drew on
37:06
something that Purnuya called the
37:08
coronization of memory. So Quranic vocabulary
37:11
not only colored these poetic expression
37:13
and influenced the poetry, but
37:16
also Sufis were able to understand
37:18
everything in light of
37:20
different Quranic sentences and could draw on
37:22
it. And of course, Malana,
37:25
Wumi, he was a scholar
37:27
himself. And so a lot
37:30
of historically Muslims in the Persian
37:33
world learned about Islam, not only
37:35
through the Quran
37:37
and the Hadith, but also
37:39
through poetry of Wumi, Sadi
37:41
and Hafiz. So it
37:43
was a regular component in
37:45
Maratha education to,
37:47
for example, read poetry collections such
37:50
as Panch Ganj, like the Five
37:52
Treasures or Koliata Jahar Kitab, the
37:55
complete four books. And these were
37:57
these poetry collections that were also
37:59
thought in Madrasas. So
38:03
the anthropologist, Nilouf Hairy, who works on
38:05
poetry in Iran, of course, suggests that
38:07
poetry is, on the
38:10
one hand, religious ethical scaffolding for
38:12
people's lives, but also
38:14
an Islamic educational tool. And
38:17
that was also the fact
38:19
in Afghanistan where classical poetry
38:21
that's also overwhelmingly steeped in
38:23
Islamic mysticism provided this
38:25
important educational tool. Of
38:29
course, some of that has been changing, as
38:31
some of the poetry also has been learned
38:33
from that particular point of
38:36
the education. But
38:38
it used to be a big part of
38:40
how people learned about
38:43
Islam. And it
38:45
became such a huge part, of
38:47
course, of orality and making ethical
38:50
judgments for people to actually
38:52
see their lives through this
38:54
poetry. And not
38:57
only did a lot of
38:59
people learn about this in
39:01
schools, but
39:04
also Afghanistan had
39:06
particular poetry
39:08
hulks or poetry circles and
39:10
meeting places where Sufi
39:13
poetry teachers would
39:16
teach on Sufi poetry. One
39:19
example, of course, is with the title
39:21
Wudjadi about whom I talk a lot
39:24
in that chapter that you mentioned, who
39:26
was also a public intellectual who stayed
39:30
for over five decades in
39:32
Kabul's public library and had a weekly
39:35
teaching circle, for example. It's
39:39
also teachers like him who, of
39:42
course, were wooed by
39:44
different governments who tried to
39:46
persuade him to maybe
39:48
take an official government job or
39:50
write in favor of the government.
39:52
So different governments in
39:55
Afghanistan were always very aware
39:57
of how important actually Sophie
40:01
poetry was and how much
40:03
it actually mattered. And
40:06
maybe one example that
40:09
is maybe also interesting in
40:11
terms of the dissemination and
40:13
also the differences over
40:17
various decades than in
40:19
how poetry was disseminated
40:21
and received is,
40:24
of course, some
40:26
of the collaborations that I
40:28
described in the book. So,
40:33
one example is the family
40:35
of the next one year, Sophie teacher, Kandy
40:38
Ara and his family, who
40:40
have been teaching and writing about mainly
40:42
Biddle de Hilarie, who
40:45
is a famous Sufi poet
40:47
as well, not regarded by everybody as a Sufi
40:49
poet but who is also
40:52
taught as a Sufi poet in
40:54
Afghanistan, and they collaborated
40:56
with Muhammad with Sarah
40:59
Hung, who is an
41:02
important and beloved musician
41:04
in Afghanistan, he was classically trained in
41:06
India, and he
41:08
was among the first and only
41:10
artists permitted to perform live on air when
41:13
radio Afghanistan was
41:16
established, and he then became
41:18
famous for using Biddle poetry.
41:22
And in turn also of course Biddle
41:24
poetry and Sufi poetry became widely known
41:26
through him. So, the dissemination to radio
41:28
through music through song, and then
41:31
as of people listening to it
41:33
and singing
41:35
it and receiving it in that way, we have
41:38
another aspect into thinking of
41:41
like how Sufi
41:43
poetry is a part of
41:45
everyday life as well in Afghanistan. So,
41:48
another theme that comes up
41:50
in the next chapter, which is the question
41:52
of female participation
41:54
and I guess gendered
41:56
participation in Sufi orders is to
41:58
be a part of the future of the world. especially the one that
42:00
you focus on in this chapter, the Kargariya. So
42:03
I was wondering if you could speak a
42:05
bit about, again, some of the ambivalence. I
42:07
mean, that is the fantastic thing about this
42:09
book, that each chapter basically presents to the
42:11
reader a set of both potentialities, but also
42:13
ambivalences, in relation to the theme that is
42:15
discussed. So here again, I was wondering if
42:18
you could speak a bit about some
42:20
of the discursive and institutional
42:22
means through which female
42:24
participation in Sufi orders is
42:27
legitimized, is authorized, and
42:29
again, what kinds of ambiguities and ambivalences
42:31
do we see in relation to that
42:34
question? Yeah,
42:36
this is a very good
42:38
question. So of course,
42:40
when I was researching, when I started
42:42
to research, I realized that a
42:45
lot of the Sufi orders were predominantly
42:47
male, as was
42:49
also the general public Sufi
42:52
sociosphere. And
42:54
there were, of course, women in informal
42:56
settings. Women were, of course, at shrines,
43:00
also in the sphere of the household. So there
43:02
was individual learning that was happening for women. But
43:05
I was wondering whether women
43:07
also were part of,
43:09
you know, particular Sufi orders, or
43:11
could even teach or elite thicker
43:14
circles as well. I
43:16
think most of the different
43:18
Sufi, larger than Sufi orders
43:20
where I went, there was
43:23
a general approach where the
43:26
teachers or members said like, oh, well,
43:28
women can come. And if they come,
43:31
they will be given the
43:33
appropriate space, we'll make space for them.
43:35
But it was not that I actually
43:37
found women as actively teaching. And
43:40
this was until I actually started
43:43
researching with this particular Kaidiriya Sufi
43:45
order with the Faizanis, where
43:48
women actually not only learned and studied,
43:51
but they also led thicker circles
43:53
and they recited the Quran, and
43:55
they were teaching Sufi insights also
43:57
to other female students. And
44:01
I got curious about how
44:05
it came about, that in
44:07
this particular Sufi order, one
44:11
would have women
44:13
teaching and what actually
44:15
supported that. And
44:18
the Sufi order on the
44:20
one hand had particular,
44:24
I would say contemporary community
44:26
practices that supported it, but
44:29
also a particular discourse about
44:32
gender or about women that
44:34
supported the inclusion of women
44:37
in teaching. And so
44:41
this actually anchors in
44:43
the founder's life, Alama
44:45
Saizani, who actively supported
44:48
the inclusion of women,
44:51
not only in learning but also actually in teaching. He
44:54
was very active in the 1950s and
44:56
1960s, and
44:59
he himself is often
45:01
regarded as a
45:04
kind of moral exemplar. So he
45:10
lived actually in Afghanistan at a
45:12
time when he was also very
45:14
politically active. He himself
45:17
got at some point imprisoned for his political
45:20
activities. I can't get into that right now
45:22
here, but read in the book. But
45:25
he was a very interesting scholar
45:27
and peer. He taught individual
45:29
lessons on Tafseer and Sufism
45:32
and also regular Thursday evening
45:34
classes on the Masnavi, on
45:37
Malana Rumi's work.
45:41
And he actually
45:43
also first included his wife.
45:46
He taught his wife to read and to
45:48
write, and then she actually began to give
45:50
literacy classes to other women, whom
45:53
she then also led in zikr circles. And
45:55
there are many stories and memories that are
45:57
connected to Alama Saizani that I've seen. are
46:00
shared concerning his conduct
46:02
with other scholars, his encounter later on
46:04
with prison inmates, whom he shared a
46:06
cell with, but also his conduct with
46:09
male and female Murids with students on
46:13
the Sufi path, who were part of the
46:15
community. And Al-Amagh
46:18
has championed a particular discourse
46:20
in his writing about the
46:22
spiritual path, which then
46:24
took root within the community as a
46:26
particular approach to understanding spirituality.
46:30
And one Murid summarized it
46:32
at some point to me in saying
46:34
that it's not about either being a
46:36
man or a woman on this path.
46:39
It's about being human. It's not
46:41
about the outer physical form that
46:45
determines our own spiritual path,
46:47
but it's about the rule, the soul
46:49
or spirit, the act, also
46:51
the wisdom or reason, and the heart
46:54
that needs to be trained. And
46:58
that actually wouldn't matter whether the
47:00
heart resides in a male or
47:02
a female body. And
47:04
this is, of course,
47:06
a departure from some approaches that
47:09
either sketch women as spiritually
47:12
inferior, or in contrast,
47:14
as being exceptionally singled out as
47:16
spiritual guides because of their gender
47:18
and experiences, for example, as mothers,
47:20
as we see in some other
47:22
Sufi orders. And
47:25
in contrast, here in this
47:28
community, actually, there is
47:30
a particular discourse that
47:32
spirituality transcends gender and should be
47:34
understand as a non-gendered human endeavor.
47:37
And so the own discourse of
47:40
gender equality in the spiritual realm
47:42
and also actually to some kind
47:44
of unimportance of gender as a
47:46
category on the spiritual path then
47:49
also justifies women participating, also
47:51
leading zikr, Quranic recitation, or
47:54
Islamic learning. And
47:56
in this way, the
47:58
whole discourse really focuses focuses on the
48:01
heart that is seen as
48:03
the training ground to adopt
48:05
particular postures and to train
48:09
to be actually a good Sufi, to
48:11
be a good believer as well. And
48:14
this has been also supported structurally
48:17
by what I would call male
48:19
allyship, so male teachers, male students
48:22
who also supported women on their
48:24
path and also accepted them as
48:26
spiritual equals as well. So
48:30
it's not only that there
48:32
is a generalized discourse but
48:34
also other community practices around
48:36
that then support this particular
48:38
approach. Finally,
48:40
I want to talk to you about the
48:42
sort of last substantive chapter which moves to
48:44
the context of Herat, which is another key
48:46
context in addition to Kabul for
48:49
this book. And you talk about a
48:51
certain succession debate among the Sufi community
48:53
and I was especially captivated
48:57
by ways in which this whole debate
48:59
about succession drew on and
49:02
involved dreams and onyric imagination.
49:05
Could you speak a bit about this debate
49:07
and the role of dreams and how this
49:09
debate unfolded? Yeah,
49:11
it's a complex debate actually.
49:15
So when I
49:17
came to Herat and started
49:20
researching and interviewing Murids,
49:22
so students in this
49:24
particular Sufi order, I
49:27
directly came into a
49:30
moment in
49:32
which there was a succession debate. So it
49:34
was already happening when I
49:36
met the different Sufi teachers and
49:39
students in that community. So
49:41
two years before I came to
49:44
Herat, the community had lost their
49:46
teacher and leader, P.R. Osman Maud
49:48
Udditishti. And initially
49:51
actually because His son was
49:53
still alive. most on the outside of
49:55
the group actually believed that he would
49:57
inherit the father's position. A
50:02
practicing of predatory am transmission
50:04
of and of positions as
50:06
both an but when I
50:08
talked with the members of
50:10
the group they actually did
50:12
neither see him as an
50:14
automatic successor to his father.
50:16
but actually they said that
50:18
it's pretty open of would
50:20
actually become the next sufi
50:22
at the next leader of
50:24
the community. And.
50:27
I'm so I ask them how
50:29
will it be decided? who will
50:31
be the next Am a teacher,
50:33
the next and leader in the
50:35
community and they said it would
50:37
be decided am through receiving a
50:39
dream of the Prophet Mohammad. And.
50:43
This. Was. Quite. Striking
50:46
to me. I mean, of
50:48
course I knew about the
50:50
general importance of dream. Within
50:52
Islam within you know most
50:54
excludes religious traditions and but
50:56
I have not actually heard
50:58
about this particular configuration of
51:00
using dream So beams of
51:02
course used to make many
51:04
decisions to their practices such
51:07
as it's too hot i
51:09
am did I used and
51:11
to induce stream so there's
51:13
a and session of in
51:15
Iraq and cleansing and preparing
51:17
and setting and attention to
51:19
then receive guidance to a
51:21
dream and which. Is practice
51:23
quite widely not only in Afghanistan
51:25
but also in the wider region
51:28
and and of course there is
51:30
also in a many a historic
51:32
presidents were and political leaders am
51:34
such as. after my found
51:37
in nineteenth century up until actually that
51:39
taliban leader mullah mine and ninety nine
51:41
it's justified then legitimacy as head of
51:44
the construction declaring divine dreamed had had
51:46
predicted death success but a lot of
51:48
that actually am has been a lot
51:51
of that has been kind of after
51:53
the fact so it's these are a
51:55
lot of times and diary said we
51:58
have or recordings or after
52:02
actually somebody has already taken up
52:04
leadership. So this kind of reversal
52:07
of having dreams as a
52:09
part of this practice of
52:12
figuring out who should be the next leader
52:15
was quite striking to me. And so how
52:18
this actually played out on
52:21
the one hand, it draws on particular
52:24
underlying cosmology
52:27
that dreams have this ability
52:29
to open up and in
52:31
between space, a
52:33
kind of bazaar. And in this
52:36
in between realm of consciousness, our
52:38
dreamers are more open to the
52:40
divine spirit, to also believe in
52:43
existence of the power of prophetic
52:45
dreams. So there's kind of
52:47
this openness for meetings. And
52:51
what happened in the community then is
52:53
that two of the
52:56
community teachers or two
52:58
of the community students were also at the
53:00
same time teaching in the community. They
53:03
published a book about their own
53:06
community, kind of like a history of
53:09
their own community. And
53:11
in the book, they detailed actually a
53:14
lot of instances in
53:16
which the dream had
53:18
established certain decisions and
53:22
had actually impacted the constitution
53:24
of the community itself, their
53:27
practices and many different ways
53:29
how they were
53:31
deciding on
53:35
particular decision making matters.
53:37
And when they published
53:39
this community history, so this
53:42
was self published and then
53:44
also distributed in
53:47
Herat, for example, to the Ulama
53:49
council or to also what was
53:51
established at the time in Herat,
53:53
which was so-called Sufi council, which
53:55
was a council of different Sufi
53:57
groups in this civic civil society
53:59
space. It
54:01
kind of started a conversation
54:03
about whether to decide
54:07
on a leader through dreams or
54:10
how leadership should be
54:12
decided on in the first place. It
54:17
started this conversation about that. And in
54:20
actually then seeing how that unfolded,
54:22
it was very interesting in seeing
54:24
these processes. On the one hand,
54:26
between the authors of this particular
54:28
book and other people within
54:31
the community who also saw
54:33
the book itself as a kind
54:35
of litmus test for
54:39
potentially the authors as
54:41
a kind of candidacy for leadership. But
54:44
also then within the wider community. And
54:47
what was interesting there was the
54:49
wider Sufi community. So outside of
54:52
the Sufi order. And here,
54:55
for example, the Sufi council and
54:57
the different other Sufi community, Sufi
54:59
orders, Sufi gathering places also
55:02
discussed the book and also had
55:05
discussions about whether
55:08
this was actually a right way to decide
55:10
on a leader. And
55:12
there was also criticism leveled
55:15
against the community. But
55:17
interestingly, not against the
55:20
mechanism, not against using
55:22
dreams to decide for
55:24
leadership, but only
55:26
about the fact that at that point
55:28
in time, no leader had
55:30
been decided yet. Because
55:33
basically a lot of the other
55:36
Sufi teachers saw it as
55:39
being wrongful for a Sufi
55:41
order to be without leadership.
55:44
So what was interesting in this whole navigation
55:48
of this moment in which there
55:50
was no leadership was
55:52
actually that dreams with
55:54
a particular place within Islamic Orthodoxy
55:56
and within the cultural history of
55:59
Afghanistan had a very firm
56:01
place, even in such
56:03
a really insecure and difficult
56:05
moment for this community. So
56:09
it was actually a mechanism, a method that
56:12
the community could draw upon for
56:15
decision making, even though there was
56:17
this contestation about what it then
56:19
would mean in terms of who
56:21
would become the next leader.
56:24
Sufi's civility, religious authority and
56:26
political change in Afghanistan by
56:28
Professor Anika Schmidding, published
56:31
by Stanford University Press in 2024. Thank
56:33
you so much
56:35
Anika for this outstanding book and for
56:37
your time in talking about it with
56:40
such insight and clarity. I
56:42
really appreciate you being on the New Books Network. Thank
56:45
you so much for having me. So this was
56:48
my conversation with Professor Anika Schmidding
56:50
on her wonderful new book, Sufi's
56:52
Civilities. I hope you enjoyed
56:54
this episode of New Books in Islamic
56:56
Studies, which operates online through the New
56:58
Books Network. This
57:01
is your host, Sheer Al-Etareen, signing off.
57:03
Take care, stay well and keep listening
57:06
to NBIS New
57:08
Books in Islamic Studies. Bye.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More