Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
I'm an egg white! Adam Curry,
0:02
John C. Dvorak Sunday July 23rd, 2023 This
0:05
is your award winning accumulation media assassination
0:08
episode 1575 This
0:10
is no agenda Vending
0:13
bug eating for over a decade And
0:15
broadcasting live from the heart of the Texas Hill
0:17
Country Here in Finger Engine number 6 in the morning
0:19
everybody I'm Adam Curry And
0:22
from Northern Silicon Valley Where we're
0:25
all congratulating the new Sumo champ Finally
0:27
from July, I'm John C. Dvorak
0:30
It's Craig Lott and Buzzkill In the morning
0:59
Extra bonus stuff happening
1:02
Bonus? Yes, there is a lot
1:04
of material at the beginning of the show It's true, we
1:07
talked about the bonus clip which we both got And
1:09
you wanted to say something about the bonus clip Because
1:11
we both got the bonus clip
1:12
We got the both of us have
1:14
the bonus clip that we both got
1:17
Yes And we both positioned
1:19
it exactly the same spot in the show Yes,
1:22
which will be a donation segment
1:25
bonus clip Just saying
1:29
So everybody So there's reasons to listen
1:31
to the donation segment Besides
1:33
listening for your own donation There's fun
1:35
stuff in there I have a bonus
1:38
clip which I'd like to start with Okay
1:41
From the Anonymous Controller, you know the
1:43
air traffic controller Oh yes,
1:45
this is always good stuff Yes, he has
1:47
two boys, he and his wife have two boys, 9 and 11 year
1:49
old And the kids like to walk
1:52
around the house and pretend to do intros
1:54
to the show
1:55
Ha ha He says
1:58
it only gets awkward when they talk about D-D someone
2:00
in front of the other homeschooled kids whose
2:02
parents may actually still be douchebags.
2:05
But every Thursday and Sunday my wife or I will say
2:07
to them, Hey guys, guess what day it
2:09
is? Only for them to give us an intro
2:12
to the show. I
2:14
figured we should listen to today's intro
2:16
because these are podcasters
2:19
in spay. It's Sunday, July 23rd, 2023.
2:21
This is your award-winning Get More
2:23
Nation Media assassination episode 1575. This
2:27
is no agenda. Coming
2:29
to you live from the heart of the Texas Hill
2:32
country here in FEMA region number six in
2:34
the morning everybody. I'm Adam Curry. And
2:37
from Northern Silicon Valley where we
2:39
are all wondering where the heck is the
2:41
evidence of the Canadian wildfires. I'm
2:43
John St. Dvorak. It's
2:45
crackpot and buzzkill in
2:47
the morning.
2:52
Child abuse. This
2:54
show we have nothing to worry about. When
2:57
we're gone there are. Yeah, we'll just have those
2:59
two kids do the show. It'll be perfect. Yeah,
3:03
sounds good to get the timing down. It'll
3:05
be fantastic. I love them.
3:09
I figured I'd start
3:11
off with some deconstruction.
3:14
Some fun deconstruction because man,
3:17
the climate change stuff is just off
3:19
the hook. Tonight the dangerous heat
3:22
wave spreading across Europe as extreme
3:24
temperatures fuel wildfires in Greece. We're
3:26
just outside Athens where it's been hovering around 110
3:28
degrees. They
3:32
are still very much in this fight not only
3:34
from the air but also on the ground. This fire
3:37
popping up just a short time ago along this road leading
3:39
to villages here. We meet Maria
3:41
Valavani hurrying to make sure her grandmother
3:43
was okay.
3:44
You're obviously worried about them. You
3:46
were worried about them. I'm sorry. Maria
3:49
Valavani and friends here. Her
3:51
grandmother like so many others here lost her
3:53
home but is unhurt. Atmospheric
3:56
conditions trapping multiple heat domes across
3:58
the center of the earth. Hold up!
3:59
This is soaring here in southern Europe and
4:02
it's becoming a deadly trend. Scientists
4:04
estimate more than 61,000 deaths
4:06
on the continent last summer could have been heat
4:09
related. Highs now reaching 104 turning
4:11
spoons. In
4:13
Italy, Sicily hitting 115 degrees
4:16
in recent days. They're usually bustling streets
4:18
of Sardinia, mostly empty. So
4:21
this is your typical M5M
4:23
conflagration of a hot summer
4:26
and then all the fires could have been heat related.
4:29
These are, there are fires
4:31
in Greece right now. It happens. It's
4:34
very dry. There's fires in Texas. There's fires
4:36
everywhere. But oh no, it could be heat
4:39
related. That was ABC. Let's listen to what NBC
4:42
has to say. Tonight, the Greek countryside
4:44
is scorched earth. A distill- Scorched
4:46
earth! Will be envisioned of a future ravaged
4:49
by climate change. In this village west
4:51
of Athens, a sea of charred black
4:53
and a chemical factory burnt to a crisp. This
4:56
is all that's left of this home outside of
4:58
Athens after a fire is wrapped. This is
5:00
your dystopian future. Avedged this village
5:02
two days
5:03
ago. Residents here now picking
5:05
up the pieces of their lives. This
5:07
resident lost six dogs, several chickens
5:09
and a goat when the flames devoured
5:12
his family home. How quickly
5:14
did this house go up in flames? In 10
5:17
minutes. 10 minutes. Were
5:19
you scared for your life here? Yes.
5:22
It's not over. Authorities say 52
5:24
new fires erupted today. As
5:27
firefighters play whack-a-mole. Almost
5:29
as soon as the fires contained, the heat and
5:31
winds pick up and the old fires are reignited.
5:34
We have been watching for the last hour as
5:36
firefighting helicopters like this one
5:38
have been dumping water on this
5:40
hot spot here in the outskirts
5:43
of Athens. While Europe sizzles under
5:45
some of the hottest temperatures ever recorded, the
5:48
U.S. also grappling with triple digit
5:50
temps, a staggering 86 million
5:52
Americans across the south and west under
5:54
heat alerts tonight.
5:55
Dramatic video in Texas shows the moment a
5:57
father busted his windshield with a tire
6:00
iron after his baby was accidentally locked
6:02
in the vehicle. As the city of Miami-
6:05
What is that report? That has nothing
6:07
to do with climate change?
6:09
My baby's locked
6:11
in the car, well that's dangerous- You're
6:14
an idiot. Exactly. The South
6:16
and West under heat alerts tonight. Dramatic
6:18
video in Texas shows the moment a father busted
6:20
his windshield with a tire iron after his
6:22
baby was accidentally locked in the vehicle.
6:25
As the city of Miami bakes amid a 41 day
6:28
streak of a 100 plus degree heat
6:30
index. Tonight millions of Americans
6:33
flocking to Greece and Italy to escape the heat
6:35
only to find hot seas and air- Wait a
6:37
minute, who escapes to Italy?
6:39
Millions
6:43
of millions, mind you millions of Americans, going
6:46
to Italy to escape the heat?
6:48
Really? I didn't hear him say
6:51
that. Yeah, listen, listen, listen, listen, listen. The
6:53
city of Miami bakes amid a 41 day
6:55
streak of a 100 plus degree heat
6:57
index. Tonight millions of Americans
7:00
flocking to Greece and Italy to escape the heat.
7:02
What? This is complete bull
7:04
crap. Millions of Americans don't
7:06
escape to Greece and Italy to
7:09
escape the heat?
7:11
That's ridiculous. That's the dumbest
7:14
thing I've ever heard. Only to find
7:16
hot seas and air thick with smoke. An
7:19
unrelenting summer with no break
7:21
in sight. No break in
7:23
sight. Where was that report from? NBC.
7:28
Millions of Americans flocking
7:30
to Greece and Italy to beat the heat?
7:33
Yeah. Where
7:35
did that come from? Rogan's
7:37
there actually. To
7:39
beat the heat? Yes,
7:42
he's like, Adam, I gotta go to Greece to beat
7:44
the heat amongst the ruins.
7:48
So this other thing that's bothering
7:50
me is this heat. Didn't he
7:52
report back that it wasn't that bad? Of course,
7:55
he's having fun amongst the ruins. That's
7:57
literally what he said. I'm having a good time over here. No
8:01
heat dome. So the
8:03
heat index is another
8:05
thing that you just keep hearing about. Because
8:08
it's not the heat, it's the humidity. The
8:11
heat index, also known as the apparent
8:13
temperature, is what the temperature
8:16
feels like to the human body when
8:18
relative humidity is combined with
8:21
air pressure.
8:22
This has important considerations
8:24
for the human body's comfort.
8:27
Yes, it all feels like. Yes.
8:30
What it used to be just called feels like.
8:33
It's the opposite of the wind chill factor.
8:35
Same thing. Yeah. So
8:39
if that wasn't bad enough, now
8:41
we have this jamoke. Where's this guy
8:43
from? Let me see. This is from... This
8:45
is Paul Beckwith, PhD
8:49
candidate from the University of Ottawa.
8:51
The temperatures that we're reaching, the temperature
8:54
humidity combinations are
8:56
getting extremely detrimental
8:58
to human health. We know about the massive
9:01
Texas heat wave, northern Mexico
9:03
heat wave. Have you heard about
9:05
the massive Texas heat wave where people
9:07
are just dying left and right? Stop the
9:10
clip. Stop it. The clip is stopped.
9:13
I have on the line someone
9:16
who lives in the middle of Texas,
9:19
in the middle of the Texas heat wave. Yes,
9:21
hello John. I'm here. I'm on the line. What's up?
9:24
Hey, how's the temperature? How's the heat, Dom? Are you guys
9:27
okay? You're safe?
9:29
It's unbelievable here, John. The
9:31
heat index is just off the chart.
9:33
The apparent temperature is about 175 degrees. It's
9:38
just so dangerous. It's so dangerous
9:40
that I saw a dad the other day. He had
9:43
to break his windshield with a
9:45
tire iron because he'd locked his kid in there because
9:47
of climate change. John, it's really
9:50
bad here. Can I ask you a question?
9:52
Yes, briefly because I'm about to pass
9:55
out. Is this much different
9:57
than normal in Texas? Oh John,
9:59
this is the worst.
10:00
we in fact here we're talking about scorched
10:02
earth
10:04
good well be
10:06
safe back to the studio all right
10:09
well that's a report from our man on the scene
10:11
in fact I went out you know Eric
10:14
who mows the lawn you know
10:17
and he said he gave me half a mow today
10:19
because you know the grass was growing it's
10:21
not burned to a crisp
10:23
so he mowed the lawn and
10:26
didn't he on these and he said oh come on out and take a look
10:28
and I go out with my hoodie on cuz I'm inside
10:30
in this what do we have it's called air conditioning
10:33
and and I didn't
10:35
fall down dead I stood there
10:38
chatted with him for five or ten minutes with my
10:40
Salem College alma mater hoodie on
10:44
even even that so
10:47
I'm sorry this reporting is just lies
10:49
lies lies lies still
10:51
to human health we know about the massive
10:54
Texas heat wave
10:56
what do you know about the massive Texas
10:58
heat wave I mean it's this is we
11:01
know about yeah I moved here
11:03
in we know about Trump's crimes yeah
11:06
I moved here in 2010 when it
11:09
was 112 degrees
11:11
and I moved here no further
11:14
Mexico heat wave that was ongoing for
11:16
three four weeks we were each temperature
11:18
humidity combinations approaching the wet
11:20
bulb temperature the wet bulb
11:22
temperature now here's a new one what is the
11:24
wet bulb temperature are
11:26
you familiar with the wet bulb temperature
11:29
actually yes okay what is the wet bulb
11:31
temperature well there's these devices
11:33
that you used to the
11:36
wet draw it was called a wet this
11:38
one I was an air pollution inspector yeah of course it was
11:40
called a wet bulb dry bulb thermometer
11:43
uh-huh
11:44
and it was a methodology for
11:47
determining the relative humidity and
11:49
so you have this it's like a two
11:52
thermometers side by side one with it
11:54
with a cloth at the bottom of the you'd
11:57
wet right the bottom
11:59
of the tomorrow
11:59
bulb at the bulb. Hence
12:02
the wet bulb. And you take it and you spin
12:04
this thing. It was like a spinner.
12:07
Whoa, hold on. Wait a minute. It
12:09
was like a numb chuck is what it was like to be honest.
12:11
Just like a numb chuck. You spin, spin, spin,
12:14
spin, spin and then you'd get your. Hold on
12:16
so you can spin it John.
12:17
All right, spinning, we're spinning.
12:20
All right, we're spinning it around. Sounds pretty much
12:22
like it. So then you look at the
12:24
two bulb, the two thermometers
12:26
and one would be the dry
12:28
bulb would give you the ambient temperature
12:31
and then the wet bulb, because it was evaporating
12:34
from the bulb, it would give you
12:36
a lower temperature. So if
12:38
they're the closer they are together
12:41
then the more miserable
12:43
you're gonna be, I guess. Was that the Zephyr?
12:45
I don't even know why we're doing these measurements
12:47
to be honest about it. Did I hear the Zephyr
12:50
in the background?
12:52
No, it was just some local. Wet
12:54
bulb temperature is a temperature read by a thermometer
12:56
covered in water soaked cloth.
12:59
A wet bulb thermometer over which air is passed
13:01
at 100% relative humidity. The wet
13:04
bulb temperature is equal to the air temperature.
13:07
At lower humidity, wet bulb temperature is
13:09
lower than the dry bulb temperature because of evaporated
13:12
cooling. What's the point?
13:14
What's the point? I know what
13:16
the point is. It sounds cool.
13:19
Yeah, well. For this guy, this expert
13:21
to talk about wet bulb temperature. Wet bulb,
13:23
that's right. Yeah, I'll show you my wet
13:25
bulb. Approaching the wet bulb temperature. This
13:28
is a first, I believe, for the U.S.
13:31
We associate these sort of
13:33
high temperature, high humidity reaching
13:37
points where people can't work
13:39
outside. They can't do anything. They can't
13:41
even sit outside in the shade.
13:43
Their body overheats, they get heat
13:46
exhaustion, heat stroke and die.
13:48
Bro, they die! Listen,
13:51
listen, he literally said it. Their
13:54
body overheats, they get heat exhaustion,
13:56
heat stroke and die in a
13:59
matter of like eight to 10.
13:59
10 hours outside of the temperatures
14:02
higher than 35 with 100% humidity. You
14:06
can work out the corresponding wet bulb for
14:08
say 40 Celsius or 45 Celsius.
14:11
Oh, now he's going to throw some Celsius at us. We're
14:13
reaching 50 degrees Celsius
14:16
in regions and then... Why
14:18
did he switch from Fahrenheit
14:20
to Celsius? It's all very... Sounds cooler. It
14:22
does. It's 40 Celsius. Not even centigrade,
14:25
which is what everyone really says. Yeah, but
14:27
he's from Ottawa. Has to be Celsius. Scandinavian.
14:30
Say 40 Celsius or 45 Celsius. We're
14:33
reaching 50 degrees Celsius
14:35
in regions and then not only
14:38
do we have to
14:39
worry about the wet bulb conditions
14:41
being exceeded, but when we talk about
14:43
temperatures 50, 45, 50, we're
14:46
talking about
14:47
the breakdown of certain
14:49
chemicals that make up the body, like proteins,
14:52
for example. Oh! Think of what
14:54
happens when you... You've turned
14:57
into a pile of salt. No,
14:59
no. Better, better. Chemicals that make up
15:01
the body, like proteins, for example. Think
15:04
of what happens when you
15:07
crack an egg over... You expose
15:09
it to 50 degrees. You're an
15:11
egg. Temperatures, the clear part of the
15:13
egg turns white and this is basically
15:16
denaturation of the protein
15:19
molecules. They become broken and all
15:21
twisted and make the egg
15:23
clear. They're part of the egg go white and
15:26
this is actually happening. These chemical breakdowns
15:29
can actually start occurring
15:31
in the human body when we reach those
15:33
sort of temperatures, 50 degrees plus.
15:36
I'm an egg white!
15:37
Hold on a second. Where
15:40
would this guy... Where did you get this
15:42
one? This is from the University of
15:44
Ottawa podcast.
15:46
This is the PhD candidate. They should
15:48
be ashamed of themselves. He
15:51
calls himself a climate systems
15:53
scientist.
15:54
Huh? Which isn't... Huh? Huh?
15:57
Alright, so now a little bit of noagene.
16:00
history because we have been following
16:02
the climate change we're
16:04
in our 16th year it'll be 16 years
16:07
in October actually
16:08
we've been following climate
16:10
change so far back kids back
16:13
in the day what did they used to call
16:15
climate change global
16:18
warming and
16:21
we hadn't even heard of climate change it was
16:23
global warming you remember those days John
16:26
oh yeah global warming global
16:29
warming was what it was if
16:31
the Al Gore came out this
16:33
was in fact it was global warming before
16:35
no Al Gore changed it I think didn't well
16:38
it was global warming he
16:40
was a global warming then we're gonna forget the
16:42
global cooling part for a moment because then we have
16:44
to go further back we weren't doing this show for
16:47
that you need to go see Leonard Nimoy Dr. Spock
16:50
so global cooling by the way
16:52
because I have some I don't have any clips for today's
16:54
show but I have some historic clips
16:57
global cooling was it
16:59
you know we look back on it well as a short-term
17:02
phenomenon no it went into the Reagan
17:04
administration all right but let's say with global
17:06
warming
17:07
which now as you heard what is it today we
17:09
went from global warming to climate
17:11
change and now it's scorched earth
17:13
but
17:15
I just heard it one
17:17
of the main things
17:20
that is causing global
17:22
warming climate change scorched
17:24
earth is of course
17:27
beef
17:29
we know this to be true because
17:31
the science has told us the science
17:33
is in it's there is a science
17:36
floating around that's telling us stuff it's
17:39
telling it used to be the thing that would cause all
17:41
this of course was the Sun no no heat
17:45
no no no but this but it
17:47
has been
17:48
meat production and
17:51
consumption for for over a
17:53
decade and I
17:55
know it's been for over a decade because
17:57
I was so annoyed by something
18:00
I heard in NPR, which I will play in a moment,
18:03
that I went back to find the
18:06
first time we heard
18:09
the establishment telling us what
18:12
the solution is to eat not
18:15
to to meet, which is causing global
18:17
warming. And what was that solution? Go
18:21
vegan. Bugs. Bugs.
18:24
Yeah, that's right. Eat bugs. Eat bugs.
18:27
I think, not to correct
18:29
you here, but
18:31
I'm pretty sure they came up with
18:33
the cow flatulence of some of these other
18:35
things before they even suggested
18:37
eating bugs because these were all initiatives
18:40
of the vegans. Correct.
18:42
But
18:42
it was 13 years ago, episode 225 of Your No Agenda
18:45
Show, which was August 12th, 2010. When
18:57
we first saw the
19:01
powers that be, and you'll
19:04
be surprised who it was, of course, there will be a
19:06
term in here, which you'll remember, telling
19:09
us that we need to eat bugs
19:11
to stop global warming. And
19:14
I have that first moment when we first
19:17
were given the message that bugs,
19:19
eating bugs was the only way out.
19:22
We're
19:22
going back 13 years in
19:25
time.
19:26
The United Nations has come
19:28
out. They, of course, are the ones behind
19:31
the whole Codex Alimentarius push. And
19:34
they're basically saying that, you know, do we remember
19:36
the Codex Alimentarius? Yeah,
19:40
unfortunately we do. Of course,
19:42
are the ones behind the whole Codex Alimentarius
19:45
push. And they're basically
19:47
saying that, you know, we really can't go on
19:49
like this eating pigs and cows. We
19:51
need to eat insects. That
19:54
was oh yeah, you beat me to that story. That's a
19:56
great story.
19:56
Let them eat bugs.
20:00
Hot Pockets filled with bugs. That's
20:02
exactly what you need. The thing about this story which
20:04
gets to me is like,
20:08
this is all part of a vegan,
20:11
global warming agenda
20:13
to keep us from eating meat. By
20:15
the way, who says that Hot Pockets aren't already
20:18
filled with bugs? They could be. We
20:20
don't know. You could have to test for it. Yeah,
20:22
it's easy. It's brain dead easy. So
20:24
anyway, the... Yeah, it's about
20:27
it's against meat. That's correct. It's
20:30
all about meat, vegetarians
20:32
and the vegans and... Wait, wait, there's more
20:34
to it, John. There's
20:36
more to it. Let me just tell you
20:38
the exact
20:38
statement. It's
20:41
to cut levels of meat consumption worldwide
20:44
as part of the United Nations' commitment
20:46
to stamp out famine and
20:48
cut global warming.
20:50
The science is in. Let
20:53
them eat bugs.
20:54
Yeah, so they
20:56
come out... Can you imagine the meetings?
20:58
How are we going to introduce this to the
21:00
public? I don't think some people are going
21:02
to like the idea of eating bugs. Well,
21:06
I think if we just kind of slowly bring them
21:08
into it, they'll be eating bugs. We just have
21:10
to... And the funny thing was, now that you mentioned this, I realized
21:13
that I got a package about
21:16
six months ago. I don't know if I... I don't think I
21:18
mentioned it on the show. I didn't think about it. But
21:20
it was some green initiative sending
21:23
out chocolate
21:24
coated grasshoppers.
21:27
And so I got this package of chocolate coated
21:29
grasshoppers and my daughter
21:32
and her friend,
21:34
they both ate one and said
21:37
that they were delicious.
21:40
They said they were good. They were like eating a Kit
21:42
Kat bar. It's
21:44
got that crunch in it, you know, that crunchy... So
21:47
it's like a Kit Kat, only with a real
21:49
cat inside.
21:54
So
21:55
let's just establish here
21:57
that the United Nations, through
21:59
the Codex Outlaw, Elementarius sent out a
22:01
press release saying that we needed to eat
22:03
insects bugs to combat
22:06
global hunger and global warming
22:10
That's why I think that the correct phrase
22:12
was famine famine. Yes No
22:19
eating meat if there's a famine
22:21
yeah, don't eat Don't
22:25
eat meat Hey you famine
22:27
people go eat some bugs. They're all over
22:29
the place What
22:31
kind of help is this? Well, I think
22:33
what they're saying is if we eat the bugs then
22:35
there'll be some some meat left over for
22:38
the famine people
22:39
Maybe which would basically put us into
22:42
the famine people seat. I don't know
22:44
so let's just agree
22:47
Because and thank you sir Dean anonymous for
22:49
putting together being it dot IO What
22:52
a what a wonderful resource it took
22:54
me all of five minutes to figure this out And
22:57
find the right spot and and bring
22:59
this it took me three minutes to edit the
23:01
harpin.
23:02
So now
23:04
we fast forward to NPR
23:07
our national treasure and they
23:11
have a show called code switch
23:15
and code switch is It's
23:18
a it's clearly a DEI
23:20
in programming initiative and
23:23
These two hosts are going
23:25
to deconstruct
23:28
this huge conspiracy
23:30
theory Here's
23:32
the introduction. Hey,
23:34
what's good? Hey Jean So Jane Nahn
23:37
is one of our colleagues here at NPR and she
23:39
covers how information gets made how
23:41
it gets disseminated, right?
23:43
Yes, and as part of that I cover how
23:45
conspiracy theories travel and spread. Okay,
23:47
so Yes, yes.
23:50
So this is a show about gays no
23:54
No, this is this is an actual show
23:56
on NPR
23:58
these people are paid
24:00
by our national treasure.
24:02
Isn't code switch, isn't that a gay
24:04
term?
24:05
No, code switch is
24:07
when, that's like when Hillary starts
24:09
saying, I don't feel no
24:11
tired no more. When you start talking
24:14
code switch,
24:15
that's what code switch is. Oh,
24:17
but so why are they talking gay
24:20
then? Because they're probably gay, I don't know. It's not
24:22
the point. Okay, nevermind then. So as
24:23
part of that, I cover how conspiracy theories
24:26
travel and spread. You're
24:29
on the tinfoil hat beat, right? Yes,
24:31
but not just that. I covered
24:33
entire information. John,
24:36
save your oohs and ahhs for when it really
24:38
matters. I want you to listen because you
24:40
just won't believe what has happened. I don't
24:42
believe it already, but okay. 13 short years.
24:45
I'll back off. 13 years.
24:47
Yes, but not
24:49
just that. I covered entire information
24:51
environment, both online and offline. Take
24:54
social media, chat groups, television
24:56
schools, workplaces, churches.
24:58
So basically anywhere we get it. Oh, churches,
25:00
because that's where conspiracy theories are born. Churches.
25:03
Permission, got it. That is a very important
25:05
beat, especially right now. And part and beat. I mean, I
25:07
think so. You're gonna walk us through a phenomenon that lands
25:10
right at the intersection of R2
25:12
beats, right? My God. Race and conspiracies.
25:15
Okay, she's going to get into something
25:18
that is right at the intersection of
25:20
R2 beats, which is race and conspiracy
25:22
theories. At the intersection of
25:25
R2 beats, right? Race and
25:27
conspiracies.
25:28
Yes, cure antisemitism, white
25:30
anxiety, and a healthy dose of xenophobia.
25:33
Oh, okay. So it seems like there's
25:35
a lot of white problems here. The conspiracy
25:38
theory goes that global elites are
25:40
plotting to force ordinary people like
25:42
you and me to eat bugs. What?
25:45
That's a conspiracy theory
25:47
now. That the elites
25:50
have decided that they're going to force us
25:52
to eat bugs. Did we not just hear
25:54
that? 13 years ago. United
26:00
Nations, they're the elites. Yeah, of course
26:02
they're the elites, but that is now a conspiracy
26:05
theory. Why is it a theory? We
26:07
just play the reality. Well,
26:10
they clearly, I mean, her job is
26:12
to scour the internet, to find everything,
26:14
and she digs around and
26:16
she didn't find us. She found
26:19
something else that is NPR
26:21
broadcast worthy.
26:22
The conspiracy theory goes that global
26:24
elites are plotting to force ordinary
26:27
people like you and me to eat bugs.
26:28
Wait, what? To
26:31
eat bugs? Yeah, I know. I know.
26:33
Yeah, that's how we're starting. Okay. Global
26:36
elites, that's been kind of a wink toward
26:38
this old anti-Semitic idea that they're
26:40
like Jewish financiers who are secret block
26:42
of masters running the world from behind the scenes. Yeah,
26:45
exactly. So that's,
26:47
so when we say global elites,
26:50
of course that is the United Nations, without a
26:52
doubt they're elites.
26:53
That means that's a trope
26:56
which is anti-Semitic Jewish
26:58
financiers. No. Well,
27:01
I think that they bypass it. I
27:03
think that anytime
27:05
anything is brought up,
27:07
they just blame it on the, these
27:09
people are Jew haters. Okay,
27:11
so let's go to the next clip,
27:13
because it's not just Jews they hate.
27:16
Why are folks like Terry Balday in
27:18
the Netherlands and Tucker Carlson here
27:21
all up in arms about it? Well,
27:23
right now it may be because it
27:25
has become part of an even bigger
27:27
conspiracy theory. I did some
27:29
digging on the internet and this merging
27:31
seems to have begun with this anonymous blog post
27:34
in 2019. Okay,
27:36
so she did some digging on the internet, went
27:39
all the way back to 2019 and it sounds like
27:42
she has found the origin of the conspiracy
27:45
theory that the elites, mainly
27:48
Jewish financiers, want us to
27:50
eat bugs instead of the actual United
27:52
Nations, which told us that's what we need to do.
27:55
Which was in what, 2013?
27:57
2013, yes, correct. No,
27:59
no. get back that far she got to 2019 with
28:01
a blog 2010 2010 oh she got to 2010 no she got to 2019
28:08
we were talking about it in 2010 2010 okay so she
28:10
couldn't get back before 2019 and so she thinks
28:15
that's the origin so she's giving us her
28:17
version of the origin story which is totally
28:20
bogus correct
28:21
that's correct 19 all i could find out
28:24
about the person who wrote it is that they
28:26
call themselves a white identitarian
28:29
so
28:29
they're a white supremacist of some sort
28:31
yeah and you have to tweet to back it up um
28:34
and in the days after the north of them because digital
28:36
caught fire in paris
28:38
this blogger went on his rant saying
28:40
that the fire was on purpose okay
28:42
so now she's going to what she's
28:44
doing here is she's
28:46
giving credibility to this blog
28:48
post that she found which apparently they
28:50
have to tweets to back it up
28:52
from a white identitarianism
28:55
an identitarian but
28:57
i.e. white supremacists who also claimed
29:00
that the Notre Dame was set on
29:02
fire on purpose
29:05
which it probably was
29:07
oh there's a lot of evidence to suggest
29:10
it was set on fire on purpose not on npr
29:13
that it was not only an attack on christianity
29:15
on christendom but another sign
29:17
of global elites being sadist and
29:19
wanting to punish and enslave people
29:21
around the world and then the
29:23
blog post took a turn this person wrote
29:26
quote have you noticed there
29:28
is quite a lot of research going into turning
29:31
bugs into mass food projects then
29:33
the phrase i would not eat the bugs cross from
29:35
fortune over to twitter first by way
29:38
of again a white nationalist
29:40
so okay so this
29:42
person identifies that bug
29:45
ingredients are going into mass food products
29:48
cricket flower anybody i
29:51
mean yes this is absolutely happening
29:54
but there's it's it's part of another conspiracy
29:57
theory like after conspiracy theories
29:59
have been stuffing all sorts of stories under
30:01
the great recent name. Things like
30:04
governments are forcing you to stay at home
30:06
and wear a mask. Or like take the vaccine. Yes,
30:09
exactly. Don't. Hey,
30:12
hold on a second. This
30:15
is a, this show is a parody. This
30:18
is a joke. There was something comedic
30:20
about this show and
30:22
you're playing it. You've been suckered.
30:25
I don't think so, John. They are dead.
30:27
You've been suckered into thinking they're serious.
30:29
They are dead serious. These
30:31
people. Yes, yes, yes. Listen.
30:35
Things like. The great reset. They believe
30:37
that's a conspiracy theory instead
30:39
of the title of Klaus Schwab's book
30:42
and his main resom dactra. I have a conspiracy.
30:45
There is a book title.
30:46
Governments are forcing you to stay
30:48
at home and wear a mask. Or like take the vaccine.
30:51
Yes, exactly. It's been construed as a ploy
30:53
to control the population and take away your freedoms
30:56
for good.
30:57
No kidding. No kidding. No kidding.
31:00
For good. For good. But you can
31:02
hear the W.F. trying to address the concern here.
31:04
A great reset. So
31:07
now they're playing a piece
31:09
of the great reset from
31:12
the World Economic Forum where the
31:14
World Economic Forum pushed back.
31:16
They're playing this now as, well listen.
31:19
You can hear the W.F. trying to address
31:21
the concern here. A great reset. That
31:24
sounds more like Buzzword Bingo masking
31:27
some nefarious plans for world domination. Hands
31:30
up. This kind of slogan hasn't gone down
31:32
well. But all we really want to
31:34
say is that we all have an opportunity to build
31:36
a better world. They
31:38
sound mad defensive. Like if you're a conspiracy theorist,
31:41
that might make you even more suspicious of the people
31:43
at Davos and W.F., right? Yeah.
31:46
They're trying to
31:47
debunk or pre-bunk depending
31:50
on how you look at it. I like pre-bunk. That's
31:52
cool. Not very effective either way. The
31:55
actual great reset initiative that sprung out
31:57
of Davos is still vague and sprawling.
31:59
Kind of like the Great Reset Conspiracy Theory.
32:02
Oh, oh, oh, oh, okay, I see what they're saying. So
32:05
they're saying that, you know, just this little thing
32:07
that came out of the World Economic Forum, but they called
32:09
the Great Reset, that's not really like the
32:11
Great Reset Conspiracy Theory. Or
32:13
vague and sprawling. Kind of like the
32:15
Great Reset Conspiracy Theory that talk on
32:17
its name. The Conspiracy Theory goes that
32:20
there were shadowy puppeteers
32:21
behind governments.
32:23
Before it's called the Great Reset, it had
32:25
a different name, the New World Order.
32:30
You're gonna love how this winds up. It's like a hodgepodge
32:32
of old, old, anti-Semitic tropes. Yeah,
32:34
so you're saying that. Anti-Semitic tropes, no, it was
32:36
George Bush who said it. George
32:39
Bush Sr., not a Jew last time I checked. Yeah,
32:42
George H. Yeah, it was, it's
32:44
not a, these people have no
32:46
history,
32:47
have no education as far as I'm concerned.
32:50
And it sounds like they're two adults,
32:52
they're just like two kids, you know,
32:54
eighth graders just kind of making it up. No,
32:57
I believe they've been given a script.
33:00
I think they were- This is a very poorly written
33:02
script, let me tell you. Hello, chat GPT.
33:05
Before it's called the Great Reset, it had
33:07
a different name, the New World Order.
33:09
It's like a hodgepodge of old, often
33:11
anti-Semitic tropes. Yeah, so you're saying that the Great
33:13
Reset gave that old New
33:16
World Order a new branding. Yes,
33:18
and a new life as well. Like, think
33:21
about all this anxiety about the pandemic,
33:23
right? It's supercharged this conspiratorial thinking.
33:26
Conspiracy theory is one of the things that people
33:28
do to cope with uncertainty. And
33:30
the pandemic was a very uncertain time. So,
33:32
you know, the New World Order absorbed
33:35
eating bugs as one of the more salacious subplots
33:37
before the pandemic. And fast forward
33:39
to 2022, it is intertwined
33:42
again with the Great Reset.
33:43
I can't even follow this logic, but somehow
33:47
we couldn't deal with the pandemic because,
33:49
you know, we're obviously white supremacists
33:51
and Jew haters and we're
33:53
just tin-fall hat-wares. So before
33:56
the pandemic started, we started with
33:58
this bug eating thing. And then during the...
33:59
pandemic, it made us feel good to
34:02
wrap it up into what we used to call the new world
34:04
order. Okay, NPR sounds
34:06
good.
34:07
Now the idea of eating bugs,
34:10
um, what's the name of that? What's the
34:12
name of the show again? Code switch. So
34:17
why would we not want
34:19
to eat bugs? Now their
34:21
answer is even more stunning
34:24
than what we think it is. And that means the colonists
34:26
were not going to eat the bugs. Here's an
34:28
expert who researched it. There was, um, very
34:31
much an idea that you are
34:34
what you eat back then. And so the Europeans
34:36
felt they need European foods. Uh,
34:39
so there is a very much a worry that if you
34:41
ate the indigenous foods, you would become a savage.
34:43
Okay. Because we're worried that
34:46
if we eat bugs, we'll become savages
34:49
because we're colonialists.
34:51
She is Julie Lesnick, an anthropologist
34:53
at Wayne State University in Detroit. She
34:55
studies entomophagy or insect
34:58
eating. Lesnick wrote an article tracing this
35:00
colonial history of eating bugs or,
35:02
um, reluctance to eat bugs in the market. She says,
35:04
um, we don't have much information between then
35:07
and now, but that this repulsion probably
35:09
became a learned thing over time. I
35:12
think it just kind of gets recapitulated
35:14
every generation. Like it's the same thing and
35:16
it just becomes the same thing again. Cause
35:18
the seed was planted in the generation before.
35:21
The key here is that disgust
35:23
is socially reinforced. Babies
35:26
don't find bugs disgusting until they're a little older,
35:28
right? And this idea that...
35:29
Lady, do you have a child? Have
35:31
you fed your child bugs?
35:34
Do you know this for a fact that babies don't
35:36
find bugs disgusting until they're a little
35:38
older, right? Babies don't find
35:40
bugs disgusting. What age? Babies,
35:43
babies, she's given... No, no, I'm saying what age do they find
35:45
them disgusting? Because most kids I know, even
35:47
when they're babies, they repulse by bugs.
35:50
Course. Reinforced.
35:51
Babies don't find bugs disgusting until
35:53
they're a little older, right? And this idea that we
35:56
are thus civilized
35:58
and that we have...
35:59
the best and are the best. And
36:03
so insects are so easy
36:05
for people to other and- Othering
36:08
insects. Oh my God.
36:12
Cause the poor bugs, they're easy
36:14
to other cause they can't talk back.
36:17
Can I stop you for one second? Sure. Cause
36:19
you didn't mention the name of this show.
36:22
I did, I said it five times, code switch.
36:24
No, the name of the episode.
36:27
Oh, do you have the name
36:29
of the episode? Yes, I do. What's the episode?
36:32
It's the right wing conspiracy
36:35
theory about eating bugs is
36:37
as racist as you think.
36:40
Why are you giving away my punch line?
36:43
I thought we already had this figured out. No,
36:46
the punch line is this.
36:48
Thanks for stopping me. Well,
36:51
I'm sorry, but the name of the show is important.
36:54
I was, whose presentation is this?
36:57
All right, I'm sorry. I'm just trying to add
36:59
to the, I'm trying to add
37:01
dimensionality. Thanks. Thanks.
37:06
And so insects are
37:08
so easy for people to other
37:10
and associate with people that are not
37:13
the best and not civilized. It's
37:15
like the easiest punching
37:16
bag. So by- Wait.
37:20
Yeah. I think
37:22
he's stopping you because you keep bitching
37:24
about it. But what
37:26
does she say?
37:27
And so- We're uncivilized
37:30
because we don't eat bugs. No, no,
37:32
no. Bugs are easy
37:35
to other because- Yeah, I got that
37:37
part. Because, well, but so- Because we're uncivilized.
37:39
No, no, no. People who eat
37:42
bugs, like, you know, black people
37:44
who eat bugs, black people in Africa
37:47
or wherever they eat. American Indians used
37:49
to eat bugs. They're black.
37:51
We hate them too because we're white. We hate everybody.
37:54
Because they're so easy to other
37:56
than we are sophisticated
37:59
and those other-
37:59
Others who eat other things
38:02
like bugs, they are less
38:04
than us because we're racists.
38:06
You know, the best and are the
38:08
best. And so insects
38:11
are so easy for people to
38:13
other and associate with people that
38:15
are not the best and not civilized.
38:18
It's like the easiest punching
38:19
bag. Okay, so
38:21
let's finalize this with the last
38:24
clip, which will explain
38:26
even better than the title, will
38:28
explain exactly to
38:30
the T who they
38:33
are talking about. I mean, last
38:35
year, a poster who worked with Democratic candidates
38:37
asked respondents if they agreed with a statement
38:40
that the federal government is controlled by
38:43
a secret cabal. 53% of
38:45
Republicans agreed with that. And so did 41%
38:47
of independents and 37% of Democrats.
38:50
That's wow. Okay,
38:54
so that kind of makes sense. Like the idea that our government
38:57
works actively works to advance
38:59
the desires of a small number of very powerful,
39:01
very rich people. Like when you think about it like that,
39:04
like, I'm surprised the numbers of people answering
39:06
yes to that question are that
39:08
low, to be honest. The thing is
39:11
that Paul
39:11
was a way to get at people's QAnon beliefs.
39:14
Like that statement is a central statement of
39:16
the QAnon conspiracy theory. She's saying QAnon,
39:19
you see, it's the central statement of the QAnon
39:22
conspiracy. She said QAnon, I couldn't
39:24
understand her. She's saying QAnon. Well,
39:27
are you othering her?
39:29
I am. She can't speak
39:31
English. That's understandable. She's
39:33
a broadcaster. Or that
39:35
low, to be honest. The thing is
39:38
that Paul
39:39
was a way to get at people's QAnon beliefs.
39:42
So the Paul was a way to get at people's
39:44
QAnon beliefs. Paul was a way
39:46
to get at people's QAnon beliefs. Like that
39:48
statement is a central statement of the QAnon
39:50
conspiracy theory. There is no need formula
39:53
leading people to adopt these ideas. We
39:55
don't really know why people get caught up in them. What
39:58
we do know is that certain
39:59
categories of people have picked up this
40:02
ideas more. Okay, are you ready
40:04
for the categories of people who've picked up these
40:06
theories more? The true evil
40:09
a-holes who other bugs and
40:11
have come up with a QAnon related
40:13
conspiracy?
40:14
Unvaccinated, male,
40:17
conservative, Trump voting, Republican,
40:20
and also not college educated. Oh,
40:24
the boxes, baby! I tick them all!
40:29
This is truly atrocious
40:32
what these people are doing. Oh,
40:36
it's a kind of racism that is completely
40:38
disgusting. Yep.
40:41
And it's an NPR production, so it comes
40:43
right from National Public Radio. It's not like one of the offshoots
40:46
or an independent group. This is NPR
40:48
sanctioned. Yep.
40:51
I'm looking at their page.
40:53
And it's gross.
40:55
And it's so inaccurate about the
40:58
fact that we could play clips from 2010 and she can't get
41:01
past a blog post
41:03
in 2019 attributing all the bug eating
41:05
phenomenon to this one
41:08
blogger who happened to be a white guy. But
41:11
of course, we're all Jew haters.
41:14
It's just unbelievable. And this
41:17
is the problem. By the way, people
41:19
out there, everyone listening, if you give
41:22
any money to these people, think
41:24
about it and instead send it
41:26
to us. Exactly.
41:30
Exactly. And by these
41:32
people, I mean anyone who works
41:35
in and around NPR. Yes.
41:42
That is what's this is why podcasts
41:44
are winning. I
41:47
would hope I would hope no one listens. I hope it's
41:49
a good one though. Good catch.
41:52
I don't think that my revealing the title
41:54
of the show was hurt your point
41:56
at all.
41:59
Not a little bit. No. It would
42:01
have been a bigger reveal. I
42:03
don't think so. Okay. I
42:05
think it added to the suspense. Good
42:09
work, John. Sorry. I meant
42:11
to say good work. Thanks for adding
42:13
to the suspense. All right.
42:17
Distraction of the week time. If sharks
42:19
aren't terrifying enough to some of you, there's a new
42:21
threat in the waters off
42:23
of Florida.
42:24
How about sharks hopped up on cocaine?
42:27
Experts say sharks may be gobbling up bales
42:29
of drugs, which have been dumped off the Florida coast
42:32
by smugglers. Marine biologists went
42:34
to study the phenomenon. They conducted experiments
42:37
and spotted a hammerhead shark swimming into
42:39
dumped packages and biting into them. That
42:42
gave them what the scientists
42:44
call crazy brain.
42:46
Okay. So we've got sharks
42:48
hopped up on coke because
42:51
for some reason these coke
42:53
bales are in the water and don't
42:55
disintegrate. No, no, no. Not a problem.
42:58
We just know they're there in the water. They
43:00
don't. This is the latest thing. In fact, there
43:02
was a big bust of like a billion dollars
43:04
with the coke
43:05
where the big trawlers come
43:08
loaded with the coke and they throw it in the water on
43:10
purpose to get
43:12
picked up later. So it's pretty watertight
43:15
until the shark bites it. Then
43:17
it's all over. But somebody pointed out
43:19
that this is just kind of an interesting way to get
43:21
some news some attraction
43:24
to this a fake story based
43:26
on the fact that cocaine bear
43:29
was a big hit on the movie theaters.
43:31
It's even worse than that.
43:33
It is a native ad for something
43:35
we deal with every single year. Where
43:38
they behaved erratically. The phenomenon
43:40
is featured in a new documentary for the Discovery
43:43
Channel shark week,
43:44
which starts. Oh, shark.
43:47
It's every single day. Every year.
43:49
It's every single every year. Every
44:00
year. Every year. Well,
44:02
this was the best lead in so far. It's
44:04
definitely funny. Every
44:07
year. Some of the greatest, and
44:09
all these networks are showing B-roll
44:11
from like jaws with
44:14
the big white shark coming out of the water.
44:17
They're just biting at everything.
44:19
There's no wonder that people
44:21
are cutting the cord. They're not watching television
44:24
anymore. People,
44:26
you're over. You're so over.
44:29
And this strike, you're getting screwed.
44:33
This strike thing, I mean, I'm
44:36
so sorry. I'm so sorry.
44:41
I'm sorry for the actors
44:43
and the writers. And of course, it doesn't just affect
44:46
them. I mean, I at see all
44:48
the technicians, you know, everybody is affected
44:50
by this. But the actors and
44:53
the writers, I'd say, but the actors, they're
44:55
stupid. They are dumb. They
44:58
are lapping up this A.I. bull
45:01
crap
45:02
when they, I mean, your enemy
45:04
is big tech. Big tech owns
45:07
your outlets now. Literally,
45:09
Amazon owns studios. Yeah,
45:13
literally. They own MGM,
45:15
for example. They own studios
45:17
and they own the streaming.
45:19
And if you have not noticed,
45:22
if you're not noticed YouTube
45:25
and TikTok, the Silicon Valley model
45:28
is give us your creativity. We'll give
45:30
you nothing. That's what they
45:32
do. And then they throw algos
45:34
in there so that these poor influencers
45:37
have to post three videos
45:39
a day. Otherwise, they drop in the algo
45:42
and oh, I got to keep up. I got to post
45:44
more. I got to post more.
45:45
In order to
45:47
make any kind of money
45:50
with their influencer bull crap.
45:53
And at the drop of a hat, they can get cut
45:55
off. You know, you know, people like start to live
45:58
that way. And they got house pay.
45:59
payments and card payments and then they're
46:02
destroyed overnight. That
46:04
is what big tech does. And now you're surprised
46:07
that the streaming model does not
46:09
include residuals. You're surprised
46:12
that big tech has has decided
46:15
to cut seasons and anachronism
46:17
of epic proportion.
46:20
But seasons? No,
46:22
we just have six episodes of something and people
46:25
binge that. And they
46:27
watch it like one long movie. Have you not
46:29
noticed this? Actors and writers, have
46:31
you not seen what's going on? And now
46:34
you're buying into Silicon Valley's
46:36
ultimate hype
46:38
of AI. And
46:41
so now you're instead of fighting for
46:44
a different revenue model, which
46:47
I don't know, could be based on how many people
46:49
watch. There's a lot of different things you could actually
46:52
force if you were smart.
46:55
Instead of doing that, you're buying
46:57
into the dummy stuff. This is a
47:00
successful actor because, of course, the
47:02
successful actors, they're just on vacation.
47:05
This is James Vanderbake.
47:07
He's an actor from the successful show
47:09
Dawson's Creek. The Screen Actors Guild
47:12
is on strike. I'm joining the Writers Guild, which I'm also a member
47:14
of. We've been striking for the last three months. I
47:17
can't join them on the picket lines because I'm on vacation with my
47:19
family. So this is my contribution. Why
47:21
are we striking? What's at stake? There's
47:24
some big things in this one monumental thing. The
47:27
big things have to do with issues
47:29
that would allow writers and actors who are just starting
47:31
out to earn something that looks like a living wage. Things
47:34
like residuals, which have all been disappeared
47:36
in the streaming area.
47:37
These are nothing to
47:40
multi-billion dollar corporations, but everything
47:42
to people trying to pay the groceries and pay the rent. The
47:46
monumental thing is AI. And
47:49
this affects you as a viewer. Writers
47:52
need protection from studios generating
47:54
AI scripts. Actors, we need protection
47:57
over our likenesses and images and voices. If
48:00
we don't win these two, acting and writing
48:02
might cease to be a viable career in the future.
48:05
Now, I know this sounds dramatic,
48:07
but it is the
48:09
truth. Now, can AI be
48:11
a storytelling tool that we can use to tell
48:14
compelling stories of new views? Yes, totally,
48:16
in the right hands. In the hands
48:18
of the studios, it will be a cost-cutting tool.
48:21
And what they will cut out will be humans. If
48:25
you want a live human heart behind
48:28
the entertainment that you consume, we have
48:29
to win this. How can you support?
48:32
If you know an actor or writer who has a podcast,
48:34
if they're selling something, if they have a side gig, if they're on
48:36
Cameo, book them, patronize them, tell them
48:38
you love them.
48:40
Dummies. Dummies.
48:42
Your audience doesn't care if a computer
48:44
wrote the script. They're watching a movie
48:47
about a doll.
48:49
You're stupid.
48:52
Get your community together. According
48:55
to most of the reviews I've seen so far about
48:57
these two movies,
48:59
Oppenheimer's too long and it stinks.
49:02
And Barbie is just a one long
49:05
advertisement for Mattel. I have a clip. One
49:07
word seems to have captivated movie
49:10
audiences this weekend. Barbenheimer,
49:12
two films that couldn't be more different, released
49:15
on the same day, but they've managed to revive
49:17
something a lot of people thought was dead. The summer
49:19
movie spectacle, at a time when the industry
49:22
is in crisis. I
49:24
bought my tickets months ago. Americans
49:27
are back at the theaters, many dressed
49:29
in
49:29
pink, lining up to see two
49:32
films with no connection. Hi
49:34
Barbie. Hi Ken. The
49:37
bright pink comedy
49:37
Barbie. Hi Barbie. Didn't
49:41
need
49:41
a charge. And the dark historical
49:43
drama Oppenheimer. Moviegoers
49:46
are leaning into the wildly different tones.
49:49
Some 200,000 people bought
49:51
advance tickets to see both movies
49:54
on the same day, according to the National
49:56
Association of Theater Owners.
49:58
We saw Barbie at three. and
50:00
then we're doing Oppenheimer at six.
50:02
So it's like a full day thing. But the
50:05
industry is in dire
50:06
straits. Ticket sales haven't
50:08
fully recovered from the pandemic, down 20%
50:10
since 2019. And
50:13
summer sequels like Indiana Jones
50:15
and Mission Impossible are no longer attracting
50:18
audiences the way they used to. Both
50:20
fell short of expectations. And
50:23
complicating any recovery, Hollywood screenwriters
50:26
are on strike for a third month. Joined
50:28
on the picket line by the Screen Actors Guild
50:31
eight days ago. Tens of thousands
50:33
are out of work. Production on new films
50:36
halted.
50:36
Movies don't write themselves.
50:38
You have to have actors in front of the camera. So
50:41
this is gonna be very important
50:43
that this gets resolved the sooner, the better.
50:46
So while the Barbie and Oppenheimer
50:49
bump is keeping movie theaters alive, the big question
50:51
is what's next? With no big summer
50:53
blockbusters on the horizon and actors
50:56
potentially unable to promote upcoming films
50:58
if this strike stretches on. Well
51:01
now, wouldn't you
51:03
be surprised to find out
51:04
that there is something that's next? Next
51:07
up, Jamie Foxx. Over the weekend, the actor
51:09
was spotted in public for the first time since
51:11
being hospitalized back in April for what
51:13
a representative referred to as an unspecified
51:16
medical emergency. Well, in the brand
51:18
new video, this is obtained by TMZ. The Golden Globe
51:20
winner is seen here on a boat cruising
51:23
down the Chicago River, looking cheerful, smiling
51:25
and waving at the camera, even tossing up a peace
51:27
sign for the video. Since April,
51:29
few updates have been provided on Foxx's health. But
51:32
back in May, his daughter, Corinne, shared
51:34
on social media that her dad was back at home.
51:36
He's recuperating, he
51:37
plays pickleball. So we're happy to see Jamie
51:39
back in action. Of course, we wish him the best on
51:42
his recovery. And right on cue,
51:44
Netflix releases the summer blockbuster.
51:48
They clone Tyrone,
51:50
which looks fantastic.
51:53
It's now streaming on Netflix.
51:56
It's Jamie Foxx. It's
51:58
almost like a takeoff on. a black exploitation
52:01
movie from the 70s looks hilarious
52:04
with pimps and hoes
52:08
and then clones. It's fantastic.
52:11
And all of a sudden,
52:12
right in the middle of the strike when we got these
52:14
two dogs of movies out there that the M5M
52:17
is desperately trying to tell you that,
52:19
oh no, you don't just want to see one,
52:22
you want to get tickets to both of them. That's
52:26
what I want to do.
52:27
Jamie Foxx lives. I
52:29
want to begin to
52:31
tell you how far it
52:34
took me and how it brought me back. I
52:39
went through something that I thought
52:42
I would never ever go through. And
52:45
I know a lot of people were waiting or
52:47
wanting to hear updates, but to be honest with
52:50
you, I just didn't want
52:52
you to see me like that, man. I want you to see
52:54
me laughing, having a good time, partying, cracking
52:57
a joke, doing a movie, doing a television
52:59
show. I didn't want you to see
53:02
me with
53:06
tubes, running out of it and
53:08
trying to figure out if I was
53:13
going to make it through. And
53:16
to be honest with you, my sister
53:18
Dee Dee Ditch and my daughter Corinne Marie
53:21
saved my life. So
53:24
to them, to God, to
53:26
a lot of great medical people, I'm
53:29
able to leave you this
53:32
video. I cannot tell you how
53:34
great it feels to have your
53:36
family kicking in such a way. And y'all know
53:39
they kept it airtight. They didn't let nothing out. They
53:42
protected me. And that's what
53:44
I hoped that everyone could have in moments
53:46
like these. And
53:48
then by being quiet, sometimes
53:52
things get out of hand. People
53:54
say what I got. Some people said I was blind.
53:57
But as you can see,
53:57
they just kept it airtight.
53:59
You can see the eyes are working. Eyes are working
54:02
just fine. What? Since
54:05
when do we have to prove that I'm not
54:07
blind by moving his eyes back and forth?
54:10
This is weird. Well, I think
54:12
that had to do with he had, I think, Ray
54:14
and Barre from the X.
54:17
Yeah, something which paralyzes
54:19
your half of your body and does
54:21
weird things to your eyes. And they had it. There was
54:23
a clip floating around the Internet of him with his
54:25
eye. They showed his eyes. And
54:28
they were a wreck.
54:29
Yeah, I mean, it wasn't it was like beyond
54:32
anything anyone could actually do what
54:34
he was doing. Oh, goodness. And
54:36
so and because I had a friend who had this
54:38
ailment years ago and he he
54:41
he was had his eyes were shot
54:43
because when I wouldn't move
54:46
and it was really it was painful to move
54:48
the other one. And so the I
54:50
got a hold of an ophthalmologist
54:53
specialist from the University of California said
54:56
who told him to patch the good eye,
54:59
which is the key to getting out of that mess. And
55:02
it worked. He's fine. But yeah,
55:04
so that so he I think that was a reflection
55:07
of that. I don't know why they put that clip
55:09
on the net. It was disgusting with his eyes going
55:11
every which way. I just find the the
55:13
timing very coincidental.
55:16
Yeah, it's good timing. Somebody's
55:18
good at doing high fives. Someone's doing
55:21
a couple of things that I've noticed
55:23
in this.
55:25
Bull crap. First of all, when
55:27
I was a kid, there we go.
55:30
Double features were common, especially
55:32
on the weekends.
55:35
Yes, double features. So it is it
55:37
was a double feature. You go see one movie and it'd be another
55:39
one. But
55:40
the other thing is I noticed Margot
55:42
Robbie and the crew of Barbie,
55:44
they've been showing up on these talk shows that
55:46
they're not supposed to show up on. Really?
55:49
Yeah. And it goes like this. Oh,
55:51
we recorded this a couple of weeks
55:54
before the strike. And
55:58
I don't believe a word of it.
56:00
Well, it was one, I think it was Kelly
56:03
Clarkson or one of the people had
56:06
the whole crew on. They had Robbie
56:08
and all four of the main actresses
56:11
and
56:13
they didn't have Reynolds, but they had
56:15
the rest of them. And it was all this bull crap about how
56:17
it was recorded weeks ago.
56:21
I'm just not buying it. I think they desperately
56:24
had to get some publicity for this movie. Yeah.
56:26
Well, they do the junkets,
56:28
you know? I was listening to Fran Drescher
56:30
on a hate listen with
56:33
Kara Swisher. And oh
56:35
yeah. How did you get her any clips? No,
56:37
no. This is not. I'm listening up in that
56:39
hateful. Oh no, but I like Fran
56:42
Drescher. I kind of like
56:44
her. I mean, I know. I
56:46
admire her, especially as the head of the union. Do
56:48
you know that she created the nanny?
56:51
She wasn't just an actor. She created it. She
56:53
wrote it. She executive produced it. That
56:56
was all her deal. I didn't know that. No,
56:58
well, good for her. And so apparently they asked Rosie
57:00
O'Donnell to be the head of
57:03
the union. And
57:06
Rosie said, no, but you need Fran Drescher.
57:10
Anyway, so the
57:12
union, here's what they
57:14
did. So they, the
57:16
contract expired on June
57:19
30th, 31st, whatever.
57:21
No, 30th. And
57:24
they asked for an extension.
57:26
And so Fran thought, okay, well, and
57:28
the lawyers thought, okay, so they're, they're coming up
57:30
with something. They, they canceled a few meetings
57:33
during that extension. And then they basically
57:35
said, yeah, you know what? We got nothing for you. But
57:37
in that, in that interim period, they had
57:40
just enough time to promote these movies.
57:43
She got hoodwinked.
57:45
They hoodwinked her for an extra 12 days.
57:48
Oh, that was a good move. It was a great move.
57:51
So smart. I mean, a-holes,
57:54
but okay. Oh, that's what you do. Yeah. These
57:56
are tech companies too, people. So,
58:02
my goodness. And
58:04
I think that it's over. Late night talk TV
58:06
shows, people have already moved on. What are we
58:08
doing? Not we, but what are people doing at night when
58:10
they're in bed or when they're getting ready to go to bed? They're
58:13
watching TikTok.
58:14
They're not gonna go back to watching Jimmy Fallon.
58:16
That's over. By
58:18
the time the writers come back and the strikers are over,
58:21
no one's gonna care. They don't care about the celebrities
58:23
because no one watches award shows anymore.
58:26
They just don't care.
58:27
They have to have some, because
58:29
they gotta sit down and think about this.
58:31
Because it's when,
58:33
and I didn't believe these numbers when they came out. I
58:36
think you brought them up and I was, that bull crap. Sounds
58:39
about it. That Jimmy, that Greg
58:42
Gutfeld was getting bigger ratings
58:44
than the night shows on the networks. Correct,
58:47
much bigger.
58:48
Well, not much, but they were bigger. He
58:51
beat all those guys. And Gutfeld's
58:54
show is just kind of, it's a low
58:56
budget.
58:57
Show with pretty much
58:59
the same guess. It's not really, there's no anything
59:02
going on besides Gutfeld doing one-liners
59:04
and the guests trying to be funny.
59:06
And there's not much to it.
59:09
You don't have, even at dozen
59:11
movies. Very cheap production, no writing.
59:16
Our writers, I don't know if you wanna say that, but. Oh,
59:19
I'm sorry. I thought of no writing. There
59:22
are writers. Oh, it surprised me. Somebody writes a
59:25
Gutfeld, Gutfeld. He writes himself,
59:27
I think. But is he a member of the union?
59:29
I wonder. I don't know, probably not.
59:33
It's like a standup comic. No standup comics
59:35
are a member of that union. So we had
59:37
a dinner Friday
59:39
night here in the Hill
59:42
Country dinner with
59:45
some of the locals of
59:48
which one is the international arms dealer.
59:51
Oh yeah. And he, by
59:53
the way, he served some dynamite wine.
59:55
I asked him to send me all the details. I think
59:57
he's still drunk, so he didn't send
59:59
it.
59:59
to me, but I asked him to. He's
1:00:02
also, you're just still get the bottle. Remember what it said?
1:00:04
Dude, I was drunk. I don't remember.
1:00:07
It was, he had, so he had two different champagnes
1:00:10
to start with, including a JCB. Are you familiar
1:00:12
with the JCB?
1:00:13
Not offhand. And
1:00:16
I, I really, I don't want to embarrass myself, but
1:00:18
I will get the information for you. But some
1:00:21
really dynamite wines and it, yeah,
1:00:23
we had lobster rolls and
1:00:26
it was, it was, it was actually celebrated for Tina's
1:00:29
birthday. So they threw a little birthday party for her,
1:00:32
up on the Hill
1:00:33
at the international arms dealers house.
1:00:36
And so of course, you know, he's nice and sauced
1:00:38
up. I'm like, how's business? So
1:00:42
he does, you know, he's actually the lawyer for
1:00:44
the arms dealer. And, and
1:00:46
so I, I got a little lowdown on
1:00:48
how it works because he's, you know, he's, there's two more
1:00:50
aircraft, C 130s that have gone to Entebbe,
1:00:54
which is Uganda.
1:00:57
And, and so he tells me how
1:00:59
it works. The way it works
1:01:02
is his client is of
1:01:04
course the actual arms dealer. And
1:01:06
his client buys the aircraft
1:01:09
from the US government, while
1:01:11
simultaneously selling
1:01:14
it to a private dealer
1:01:17
in Uganda. So
1:01:20
he actually owns the aircraft for about five
1:01:22
minutes. And
1:01:24
then guess who buys it from that guy in
1:01:26
Uganda? Zelensky
1:01:30
the United Nations. Oh,
1:01:33
really? Yes, really. And
1:01:37
the United Nations is down there collecting
1:01:39
gear. And
1:01:42
now they're showing up in news reports because
1:01:44
we know that there's something going
1:01:46
on with the weapons from, from Ukraine
1:01:49
going down to Africa.
1:01:51
And here's a report from Turkish
1:01:53
radio television. Russia's assault
1:01:55
on Ukrainian Southern ports continues
1:01:58
at least 60,000.
1:01:59
1000 tons of grain have been lost.
1:02:02
Grain prices have risen and
1:02:04
fears that food prices and
1:02:07
food insecurity will follow. Wednesday
1:02:10
saw the largest single day increase. This
1:02:13
is a guy from the United Nations. In
1:02:15
wheat prices since the full scale invasion
1:02:18
commenced. Some will go hungry.
1:02:21
Some will starve. Many may die. Russia
1:02:24
claims it's targeting fuel facilities
1:02:27
tied to a Ukrainian attack on
1:02:29
a bridge in Russian
1:02:29
controlled Crimea days ago.
1:02:32
But Kiev says Moscow's
1:02:35
attacks on crucial grain distribution
1:02:37
for the rest of the world is tied
1:02:39
to Russia pulling out of the Black Sea
1:02:41
Grain Deal. On Friday Ukrainian
1:02:44
President Zelensky promised a response.
1:02:48
If someone in Russia hopes they can turn
1:02:50
the Black Sea into an area of arbitrary action and
1:02:53
terrorism, they will not succeed. We
1:02:55
know how to defend ourselves. Zelensky
1:02:58
spoke on Friday with Turkish President
1:02:59
Erdogan, who said he's willing
1:03:02
to talk directly with Vladimir Putin
1:03:04
again and possibly meet
1:03:06
with him next month in Turkey. We
1:03:10
believe the Russian Federation should be
1:03:13
brought to the table again. There
1:03:15
is a high probability that solutions
1:03:18
other than this would be coercion and will endanger
1:03:20
security. Moscow
1:03:23
says it will treat ships heading toward
1:03:25
Ukrainian ports now as hostile,
1:03:27
subject to search or attack. All
1:03:31
ships, all vessels proceeding to the Black
1:03:34
Sea waters and Ukrainian ports are
1:03:36
weighed by us as carriers of military
1:03:38
cargo. Moscow
1:03:40
says it is willing to rejoin the
1:03:42
Grain Deal only if it gets
1:03:45
economic concessions from the West. Zelensky
1:03:48
and Putin have both been trying to court
1:03:50
leaders in Africa who stand
1:03:52
to lose the most by the Grain Deal's
1:03:54
collapse. Putin has promised
1:03:57
to send them free grain, but
1:03:59
Zelensky said
1:03:59
Putin's latest aggression will cost
1:04:02
African lives. I am now
1:04:05
thinking in light of you
1:04:07
know this conspiracy theory
1:04:09
we have part of eating bugs that
1:04:12
that Russia may be and one of our
1:04:14
producers actually turned me on this idea Russia
1:04:17
may be stopping these grain
1:04:19
exports to Africa because Putin
1:04:21
knows this is weapons going
1:04:24
down there. What how else
1:04:26
are they how else do you ship the weapons from
1:04:28
Ukraine to Africa? That's
1:04:34
not a bad thought. I thought
1:04:36
it was a very good thought and by
1:04:39
the way we now know the UN is
1:04:41
down there buying stuff. What is it? They're not
1:04:43
driving them down that's for sure. Then why
1:04:45
are they buying stuff? Why are they buying
1:04:47
C-130s? What is the UN doing in
1:04:50
Uganda? What is the UN doing
1:04:52
in Africa? What is the UN doing? How about Sudan?
1:04:54
A food
1:04:57
crisis looms over war-torn
1:04:59
Sudan. Critical infrastructure
1:05:02
in the capital Khartoum and neighboring cities
1:05:04
of Khartoum north and Omdurman has
1:05:06
been damaged resulting in the closure
1:05:09
of more than 90 percent of the food
1:05:11
processing facilities and
1:05:13
there's little help in sight. Escalating
1:05:16
violence means humanitarian organizations
1:05:18
are unable to safely operate and
1:05:21
the war and parties have been
1:05:22
accused of theft and disrupting
1:05:24
the flow of aid. With the ongoing
1:05:27
conflict and the imperfect
1:05:29
ceasefire it makes it
1:05:32
more difficult for us humanitarian
1:05:34
actors to deliver. This is a UN guy.
1:05:36
Assistances and they are
1:05:39
life-saving. Assistances to
1:05:41
the ones that who are in need. Since
1:05:43
Sudan's armed forces and the paramilitary
1:05:45
rapid support forces began fighting
1:05:47
in April supply channels to the capital
1:05:50
Khartoum have been cut off causing
1:05:52
many regions to run out of food. The
1:05:54
basic necessities are extremely scarce
1:05:57
including flour, milk, bean broth, and other things.
1:05:59
products, edible oil and beverages. The
1:06:02
inventory is dwindling and the price
1:06:04
is constantly rising, now already
1:06:07
to an exaggerated degree and it's still
1:06:09
going, with no sign of stopping.
1:06:12
And the scarcity of resources means farmers
1:06:14
are unable to plant their crops in time. People
1:06:18
are struggling to get by. No one knows
1:06:20
what would come tomorrow. As the
1:06:22
violence continues and relief supplies remain
1:06:25
inaccessible in many areas, tens
1:06:28
of thousands of people are at risk
1:06:29
of starvation.
1:06:32
Yeah, I'm, first of all,
1:06:34
what is this war in Sudan? Play
1:06:37
my clip so we can at least catch up with that. This
1:06:39
is the update. Hold on a second. Thank
1:06:43
you. I'm glad you have this. In Sudan, the UN
1:06:45
reports 200, No, you could have warned me. thousand
1:06:48
people have been displaced just in the past
1:06:50
week as fighting rages between the army
1:06:52
and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces,
1:06:55
or RSF. In the four months
1:06:57
since the conflict erupted, some 2.6 million
1:07:00
people have been internally displaced and over 730,000
1:07:02
have fled Sudan. Survivors
1:07:06
of the 2003 genocide in Darfur
1:07:08
say the targeting of the Musselik people
1:07:11
in today's conflict resembles the ethnic
1:07:13
cleansing suffered in the region 20 years ago.
1:07:15
The International Criminal Court launched an investigation
1:07:17
last week into possible war
1:07:19
crimes and crimes against humanity in Darfur.
1:07:22
This is ICC prosecutor Karim
1:07:24
Khan.
1:07:24
We are, by any analysis,
1:07:27
not on the precipice of a human catastrophe,
1:07:30
but in the very mists of one. It
1:07:32
is occurring. And it's my analysis
1:07:35
and my prayer and advice that
1:07:37
we must act urgently, collectively to
1:07:39
protect the most vulnerable.
1:07:42
Okay, I don't understand. I know
1:07:44
the Dutch Hely Battalion because I was
1:07:47
with them in Iraq in 2003 for two weeks.
1:07:50
They all went to
1:07:52
either Afghanistan or Mali
1:07:55
or Darfur. And they all
1:07:57
pulled out in the last couple years. And
1:08:01
now all of a sudden it's a crap show over
1:08:03
there. This smells.
1:08:05
It really smells. And by
1:08:07
the way, What about this rapid force,
1:08:10
whatever it is, this group that's
1:08:13
causing all the trouble. We don't have any
1:08:15
explanation or any deconstruction
1:08:17
by the mainstream or anybody else about what
1:08:19
the hell is going on here. This
1:08:22
is some sort of a screwball thing
1:08:24
that
1:08:25
I just get the distinct impression
1:08:27
we're behind. Because Sudan is part
1:08:29
of the West Clark seven. It's
1:08:32
funny you say that. Maybe we should
1:08:34
just
1:08:35
play that for a second.
1:08:37
The West Clark seven always good to remember
1:08:40
seven countries in five
1:08:42
years. Starting with Iraq and
1:08:45
then Syria, Lebanon, Libya,
1:08:47
Somalia, Sudan and finishing off Iran.
1:08:50
Yeah. And if you hadn't,
1:08:52
in case you hadn't noticed, Iran's
1:08:55
cranking up again. The new military moves. The
1:08:57
US is making as tensions rise with Iran.
1:08:59
The Secretary of Defense sending Marines and
1:09:01
war warships to the Middle East after
1:09:04
Iran's attempt to seize two oil tankers
1:09:06
in international waters. ABC's Inez
1:09:08
De La Cretara has the latest now from London.
1:09:10
Good morning to you Inez.
1:09:12
From London. Let's get the
1:09:14
spooks on the line. Good morning, Janae. That's right.
1:09:16
The US deploying new assets to the Middle
1:09:18
East amid growing tensions with Iran. Who
1:09:21
gave the order
1:09:22
to deploy new assets? Where's
1:09:24
the president saying? I think we
1:09:26
should deploy some assets because this is what's going
1:09:28
on American people. No, no, no, no, no, no.
1:09:31
Let's just do it.
1:09:32
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin ordering additional
1:09:34
warships and forces. Does he get
1:09:36
to do that?
1:09:38
Lloyd Austin. Yeah,
1:09:40
I think I'll just order some warships over there to
1:09:43
the region and that's on top of the Navy
1:09:45
destroyer F-16 and F-35s also being deployed. US
1:09:49
Central Command saying this is all meant to deter
1:09:52
Iran's destabilizing activities in
1:09:54
the Strait of Hormuz with the US stopping
1:09:57
Iran from seizing two oil tankers traveling
1:09:59
through international.
1:09:59
waters earlier this month. CENTCOM
1:10:02
says that in the last two years, Iran has
1:10:04
attacked, seized or attempted to seize nearly 20
1:10:07
internationally flagged merchant vessels.
1:10:10
Now there are questions as to whether this could all be part
1:10:12
of a tit-for-tat because the U.S.
1:10:14
has also been seizing oil tankers,
1:10:16
an effort to crack down on shipments of Iranian
1:10:19
oil evading U.S. sanctions.
1:10:21
We have one of these
1:10:24
tankers that we grabbed. Yes.
1:10:26
Just off the coast of Texas.
1:10:29
Do you have a clue? They've
1:10:32
been trying to sell off the oil to the Texas
1:10:34
refiners and nobody will buy it. No one
1:10:36
touches it.
1:10:38
By the way, Victoria Newland has
1:10:40
announced she will soon be visiting South Africa.
1:10:43
And we grieve for you South
1:10:46
Africa because when she visits, you
1:10:48
know no good is going to come from that.
1:10:50
So there was a, I guess it was running
1:10:53
today, but it was online, it was
1:10:56
Margaret Brennan to face the nation
1:10:58
with Burns.
1:11:00
Ah, did you get any clips? I
1:11:02
have one clip. I could have, I recorded
1:11:05
the whole thing and listened to it and it's
1:11:07
better for me to summarize what Burns
1:11:09
said
1:11:10
because Burns
1:11:12
is a master at really talking slow and
1:11:15
not really telling you anything you really want to
1:11:17
know.
1:11:19
And I'm talking about William Burns,
1:11:21
the head of the CIA.
1:11:23
And he does have,
1:11:26
and this was, and the other reason I
1:11:28
don't have more clips except this one is because
1:11:31
it was obviously scripted and I'll
1:11:33
tell you some of the things that were missing that any
1:11:35
journalist like Brennan or any, or Margaret
1:11:38
would have done. There's no question
1:11:41
about Ukraine and NATO.
1:11:44
There's no question about Ukraine
1:11:46
and the EU. There's nothing about
1:11:48
Putin's real motivation for doing
1:11:51
this, there's nothing about us setting him up or
1:11:53
goading him, there's nothing about
1:11:55
Iran that's meaningful.
1:11:57
There's no good questions. And
1:11:59
so I just.
1:11:59
So I have this one clip which brings me
1:12:02
to a question about the clip
1:12:04
because I think it's the only reasonable clip And
1:12:06
this is the very beginning of the show. This
1:12:08
is Brennan and Burns. You've got the whole world
1:12:10
to watch
1:12:10
right now So I know you're a busy man.
1:12:12
I want to start on Ukraine and Russia
1:12:15
with this anniversary On
1:12:17
the cusp of Russia's invasion you flew
1:12:20
to Kiev and you
1:12:22
told president Zelensky Tell me if this is
1:12:24
right the Russians are coming to
1:12:26
kill you Was that the very first thing
1:12:28
you said?
1:12:29
When the very first thing I said to president
1:12:31
Zelensky, but president Biden and asked me to
1:12:33
go to Kiev To lay out
1:12:35
for president Zelensky the most recent intelligence
1:12:38
we had which suggested That
1:12:40
what Vladimir Putin was planning was what he
1:12:42
thought would be a lightning strike from the Belarus
1:12:45
border To seize Kyiv in a matter
1:12:47
of a few days and also to seize
1:12:50
an airport just northwest of Kyiv called
1:12:52
gusto Which he wanted to use as a
1:12:54
platform to bring in air been airborne
1:12:56
troops as a way again of accelerating
1:12:59
That lightning conquest of Kyiv and
1:13:02
I think president Zelensky understood What
1:13:04
was at stake and what he was up against our
1:13:07
Ukrainian intelligence partners also had good
1:13:09
intelligence about what was coming as well
1:13:11
But I do think that the role of intelligence
1:13:13
in this instance What we're able to provide to
1:13:16
president Zelensky not just on that trip But
1:13:18
you know throughout the course of the war have
1:13:20
helped him to defend his country
1:13:23
with such courage and tenacity And I think that
1:13:25
made a contribution
1:13:28
Okay, so yeah the whole thing is like
1:13:30
this they're letting this they're hanging Zelensky
1:13:32
out to dry Well, whatever the case is
1:13:34
the point I get out of this particular
1:13:37
clip and the only one that was really worth
1:13:39
playing
1:13:40
Because as you can tell, you know, nothing
1:13:43
Nothing very yeah
1:13:46
So is hey if we knew
1:13:48
so much about this in advance months
1:13:50
in advance to that Extreme that he
1:13:53
says he has to fly he personally has
1:13:55
to fly to Kyiv to tell
1:13:58
Zelensky's gonna dead Putin was
1:13:59
to kill him,
1:14:02
why didn't we put a stop to it? No, because
1:14:04
what really happened is he went there and
1:14:06
said, hey, we, the CIA, are going
1:14:08
to kill you unless you send
1:14:11
these arms down to Africa
1:14:13
because, and I think this is what's going on.
1:14:15
According to the Economic Policy Journal, the
1:14:17
Chinese plan to put 300 million Chinese in
1:14:20
Africa and take over the continent.
1:14:22
I think that's what's going on. We just, hey, let's
1:14:24
start a whole bunch of wars down there. The
1:14:27
Chinese will stay away until we can figure it
1:14:29
out.
1:14:29
Send more guns.
1:14:32
If you remember during
1:14:34
the Libyan conflagration,
1:14:37
when we went after Qaddafi, out
1:14:39
of the blue for no good reason, the Chinese
1:14:42
had set up shop
1:14:44
and had built a huge complex
1:14:46
just in Tripoli somewhere. And
1:14:48
it's still there as a shell
1:14:51
because we bombed the crap out of it. The
1:14:53
Chinese scampered off never
1:14:55
to return.
1:14:57
So you might be right about the Chinese
1:15:00
and because the Chinese have been working in Africa
1:15:02
since way before we started this show
1:15:04
and we've documented it, both of us. And
1:15:07
they don't like conflict. The Chinese
1:15:10
are like millennials. They're
1:15:13
non-confrontational. The Chinese
1:15:15
millennials.
1:15:18
They don't cut in line.
1:15:22
They can't tell time. No,
1:15:25
that's interesting. From my experience is all
1:15:28
they do is cut in line, but that's 10 bills.
1:15:30
All right. So
1:15:31
let me wrap up Africa and then I think we
1:15:34
can, I can show you where Ukraine
1:15:36
is going. So the, what
1:15:40
is this? The
1:15:46
head of, I think it's the
1:15:48
Russian army, Igor
1:15:51
Kirilov. Who is
1:15:53
he? Anyway, he's a Russian official. He
1:15:56
now says that documents
1:15:58
were found in Ukraine. in
1:16:03
the labs that indicate
1:16:05
that the Pentagon plan to test medical
1:16:08
drugs on
1:16:10
the African population. They
1:16:16
indicate the Pentagon plan to use US Army
1:16:19
to test unregistered medical drugs
1:16:21
and then submit them for approval. And
1:16:25
of course this involved agencies
1:16:28
such as Metabiota because why wouldn't we
1:16:31
implicate Hunter Biden while we're at it? It's
1:16:33
beautiful.
1:16:34
And then Russia,
1:16:36
I think
1:16:38
this is, I'm going to wind up Ukraine here as
1:16:41
we, there's not much more we have in Africa right
1:16:43
now, but when it comes to Ukraine,
1:16:48
this is what Vladimir Putin thinks
1:16:50
is going to happen. Well, Germany says it will stand
1:16:52
by Poland in case of a potential
1:16:54
attack from Wagner fighters in
1:16:56
neighboring Belarus. Members of the Russian
1:16:59
mercenary group arrived at a base
1:17:01
near the Polish border earlier this week
1:17:04
and are due to hold joint military exercises
1:17:07
with Belarusian
1:17:07
forces. Poland calls
1:17:10
that a provocation and is deploying
1:17:12
more troops on its eastern side
1:17:15
in response. Russian President Vladimir
1:17:17
Putin alleged on Friday without any evidence
1:17:20
that Poland is plotting to seize parts
1:17:22
of Ukraine and Belarus.
1:17:24
Now, one of our producers sent me this
1:17:26
and I said, nah, that doesn't sound right. And then this clip
1:17:28
shows up like that could
1:17:30
be a very potential possibility.
1:17:33
Let's put Poland in there.
1:17:35
Let's get those guys going. Let's move the heat off
1:17:38
of us for a little bit,
1:17:39
because we now need to change
1:17:42
the focus of the military industrial
1:17:44
complex. We need to start sending weapons
1:17:46
directly to Africa. We now have
1:17:49
reasons for it because, you know, there's war.
1:17:51
We got crazy warlords in Sudan.
1:17:54
We've got, you know, we need to arm the United
1:17:56
Nations because people are hungry. We need
1:17:58
to go there with guns to feed the
1:17:59
people. By the way, why can't they eat bugs?
1:18:02
Seems like if you're hungry, there's plenty
1:18:04
of them, plenty of bugs there. So
1:18:07
we're going to ramp up something new.
1:18:10
Videos showing a series of explosions
1:18:13
across Russian occupied Crimea
1:18:15
have been posted to social media sites.
1:18:18
The Moscow-insolved authorities on the
1:18:20
peninsula say an ammunition depot
1:18:22
exploded and caught fire after
1:18:24
being struck by Ukrainian drones. The
1:18:27
incident occurred at Krasnovodiska in
1:18:29
central Crimea. They said there
1:18:31
were no casualties in the
1:18:33
blast and ordered an evacuation
1:18:35
of the area. Ukraine's military has
1:18:37
not commented on the explosions.
1:18:42
Let's welcome Marina Maran,
1:18:44
a military analyst at King's College
1:18:46
London. Marina, welcome. Which is a spook
1:18:49
college. Let's talk about
1:18:51
the drone attacks on Russian occupied
1:18:53
Crimea today. Just days after
1:18:56
that significant attack on the
1:18:58
Kerch bridge, which I'll remind our viewers,
1:19:01
connects Crimea to Russia. So
1:19:03
what we're seeing here, and we've been hearing it for a while
1:19:05
with the Kamikaze drones, with the Iranian
1:19:08
drones that sound like a moped, we are
1:19:10
into a new form of drone warfare.
1:19:12
The drone, again, literally.
1:19:16
And this is not your Reaper drones.
1:19:19
This is not your, you know,
1:19:21
your drones controlled by dudes
1:19:23
sitting in the Nevada desert. Way
1:19:26
too expensive. No, no, no.
1:19:27
We need to start sending some real
1:19:29
military stuff down to Africa. This
1:19:31
has to be above board. We've got to
1:19:33
get some real funding for it, but we need
1:19:35
to do something with Zelensky. We
1:19:38
need to throw the guy a bone.
1:19:40
And who
1:19:42
tells us what's going on, but
1:19:45
the anti-constitutionalist
1:19:47
elitist douchebag for Reed Zakaria
1:19:50
on CNN. And he
1:19:52
brings in Eric Schmidt,
1:19:56
the Google guy, the ex Google
1:19:58
guy who is now Everywhere
1:20:01
you don't want to see this guy show up, certainly
1:20:03
in defense. And to start off this little
1:20:06
interview, Fareed has to disclaim. I
1:20:08
should note I am a senior advisor at Schmidt
1:20:10
Futures, his philanthropic initiative.
1:20:13
So this is a native ad.
1:20:15
This is a native ad.
1:20:18
Now listen to what Eric Schmidt is
1:20:20
saying. We meaning the Ukrainians, the
1:20:23
US, the West, need a solution
1:20:25
to get them moving. So that
1:20:27
gets us to drones. They are already
1:20:30
using an extraordinary number of drones,
1:20:32
the Ukrainians. How many drones are they
1:20:35
using a week or a month? They're
1:20:38
on track to using a couple hundred thousand
1:20:40
drones in a year. Most
1:20:42
drones only survive one or two flights
1:20:44
before they fail or they're blocked. I
1:20:47
was shocked at how good the Russians
1:20:49
were at electronic warfare
1:20:50
and jamming. Basically, everything
1:20:53
you send into this battlefield, which is quite
1:20:55
narrow, by the way, the rest of the country
1:20:57
is fine. I suspect on both sides.
1:21:00
They jam everything. GPS is jammed,
1:21:02
but also communications is jammed. So
1:21:05
normal drones don't work. So the Ukrainians
1:21:07
have taken cheap drones and added
1:21:09
additional antennas. One
1:21:11
of the things that I learned was something called a Kamikaze
1:21:14
drone, which is a $400 Chinese drone
1:21:17
that carries a small payload. It moves
1:21:19
so fast you can't shoot it down. I
1:21:21
had thought that that was the innovation of
1:21:23
the war. Two generals yesterday
1:21:25
told me that I'm wrong and
1:21:28
that what they really need are cruise missile
1:21:30
drones, which can go really far and
1:21:33
carry with wings and can carry more payloads.
1:21:35
I don't think the Ukrainian drone strategy is
1:21:37
completely formed, but they're building a
1:21:39
completely new theory of war. Ah,
1:21:42
a completely new theory of war.
1:21:45
Yes, drone
1:21:47
warfare people. And
1:21:49
this is where we get to the solution. For you,
1:21:51
the only way the Ukrainians can break through
1:21:53
these lines is with massive
1:21:56
numbers of drones. Massive number of drones
1:21:58
or massive number of drones.
1:21:59
human casualties on both sides. The
1:22:02
beauty of the drone is it can take out the other
1:22:04
side's military target without collateral
1:22:06
damage. We are
1:22:08
very concerned about the propagation
1:22:11
of this war against other countries, but
1:22:13
I'm very concerned about it's effect on civilians, both
1:22:15
the Russian and the Ukrainians. The important
1:22:17
thing about a drone is it's a very, very targeted
1:22:20
solution. It's very inexpensive.
1:22:23
I think the goal that we should have for Ukraine
1:22:25
is to establish the principle that there
1:22:28
will never be another land war
1:22:29
where you can invade successfully.
1:22:32
That we're expecting the sovereignty
1:22:35
of the land is important. If
1:22:37
you're mad at them, that's fine. You can negotiate,
1:22:39
you can put pressure, but you can't send
1:22:41
artillery and flatten cities, which
1:22:44
is what the Russians have been doing. How
1:22:47
do you get to the solution of, I
1:22:50
mean, is there, can the Ukrainians produce
1:22:52
hundreds of thousands of drones? They have
1:22:54
the money and they have the talent.
1:22:57
They haven't figured out how to build all the factories
1:22:59
yet,
1:22:59
and they have to be built in Ukraine for many, many reasons.
1:23:02
So what I know is there are about 60 companies
1:23:05
that are building these types of drones. What's
1:23:07
interesting is it's just like startups in
1:23:09
the sense that they're not particularly well coordinated. They're
1:23:12
moving so quickly. Remember, this is all a year old.
1:23:14
Their operating systems and software aren't very integrated.
1:23:17
They can't speak to each other. All the problems
1:23:19
that you would imagine. Now, if it were peacetime,
1:23:21
you'd have an overall strategy, you'd get them organized,
1:23:24
and so forth. What's interesting to me
1:23:26
is that this is both a broadband war,
1:23:28
but it's also a technology war
1:23:29
in the sense that it's innovative, and
1:23:32
innovation occurs in small companies, not
1:23:34
in the MOD. There you go.
1:23:36
So Eric Schmidt is going to go in. He's
1:23:39
going to get all these companies
1:23:41
going, 60 companies, and get all the factories
1:23:44
going. It's going to be drone warfare of
1:23:46
little stupid drones over this
1:23:48
five-mile, what is it, this piece
1:23:50
of land, which would be the demilitarized drone
1:23:52
land filled with cluster munitions.
1:23:56
And as he just said, everything else is fine on the other
1:23:58
side. Nothing's wrong on the other side.
1:23:59
of that. It's just this little bit. And
1:24:02
so they brought him in, hey, Schmidt,
1:24:05
you do the drone stuff over there in Ukraine.
1:24:07
We're going to move to Africa with the real stuff.
1:24:14
Well, that was a depressing clip. Whenever
1:24:18
Schmidt shows up, you know, you're going to get depressed.
1:24:21
What are you going to, what can you say? Well,
1:24:23
for one thing, he's, he's
1:24:26
a,
1:24:27
he's a, at base of Silicon Valley guy
1:24:29
period. He's not a war guy. He's not a defense
1:24:31
department guy. He's not a
1:24:33
strategic guy. He's not an ex general.
1:24:36
He's not anything like that. He's just a
1:24:38
guy who does startups. And that's what he's talking
1:24:40
about. He wants to be in on the action.
1:24:44
When they, when this whole thing ends
1:24:47
and a body, God knows how, when it's
1:24:49
going to end, but it's going to end eventually.
1:24:51
And then when they do the rebuilding, he's
1:24:53
going to have a toehold in that part
1:24:55
of it, which is yes.
1:24:59
Well, they already have the money. He just said it.
1:25:02
They already have the money.
1:25:04
Good to go. And
1:25:07
I have no, I have not heard this
1:25:10
notion that a hundred thousand drones,
1:25:13
because
1:25:13
these drones are set off in the
1:25:16
Russian ones are set off in packs of five,
1:25:18
I think.
1:25:19
And they, you know, maybe there'd be 40 at a time,
1:25:22
but hundreds of thousands of these. No,
1:25:25
no, there's no, there's nobody's building
1:25:27
that many. If you're
1:25:29
the newsletter brought the drone thing
1:25:32
in a long essay, about three, four
1:25:34
newsletters ago, when the Iranian
1:25:37
structure for drone manufacturing was, it
1:25:39
was revealed with pictures and everything.
1:25:42
And there's no evidence
1:25:44
of these kinds of numbers. Anyway, to,
1:25:47
to wrap this all up, as you pointed
1:25:49
out, this whole grain problem
1:25:51
is because the UN, because the UN, you
1:25:54
know, tried to put this deal together. They promised
1:25:56
things. They said, all right, it will get your ammonia
1:25:58
pipeline back up.
1:25:59
connect one of your banks to Swift
1:26:02
and they didn't do it. And
1:26:04
then they didn't do it on purpose. Yeah.
1:26:07
And meanwhile, they're, they're down there
1:26:09
in Africa,
1:26:12
getting ready, ramping up,
1:26:15
which is really hard for us because you know, we
1:26:18
know a lot about stuff, but man, Africa,
1:26:20
that's a tough one. So
1:26:22
we're going to need a lot of help from producers. We're
1:26:25
not going to get it. We don't have to, we have so few
1:26:27
African listeners. Well,
1:26:31
should we just pack it in then? Is that what you're saying? Yeah,
1:26:33
we should show it over. We're going to
1:26:35
have to finalize it after the
1:26:38
next episode. And with that, I'd like to thank you
1:26:40
for your current say morning to you, the man who
1:26:42
put the sea in the Chinese millennials.
1:26:44
Ladies and
1:26:44
gentlemen, say hello to my friend on the other end, the
1:26:47
one and only Mr. John
1:26:48
C. In
1:26:54
the morning to Mr. Adam Curry, all his trips, sea boots, and
1:26:56
raffia near subs of the water, the dames, and
1:26:58
the night. Yes. In
1:27:01
the morning to the trolls. Hold on one
1:27:03
second. Trolls stand still.
1:27:09
Possible to count these trolls 2323
1:27:11
today. That's
1:27:16
pretty good. I think it's normal. Some part.
1:27:18
It's probably about 23. Well, we probably
1:27:20
lost a few people when we went off the air. Didn't
1:27:24
help. We had a little crash beforehand.
1:27:28
Just, a little crash. You know,
1:27:30
stuff does happen. The trolls
1:27:32
are listening live and they got a real
1:27:34
dose of it today because you know,
1:27:36
we started the show seven minutes into it. Things
1:27:39
crashed. And then they had to wait around and
1:27:41
wait for stuff to happen. And, they
1:27:43
were listening to Bemrose. I think it was Bemrose
1:27:45
and,
1:27:46
and who
1:27:48
else is on there? Our rock
1:27:51
and roll. Yeah. And we, and we got the
1:27:53
bluegrass show in the morning, even before then, before
1:27:55
that. Yes. Trolls,
1:27:58
if you want to join them. You can do that by
1:28:00
going to trollroom.io, noagendastream.com,
1:28:04
or get a modern podcast app at podcastapps.com.
1:28:08
That will give you all of your podcasts. This
1:28:11
is the same as where you can get all of your, you can import
1:28:13
from your legacy podcast app, but
1:28:15
you'll get new features, 25 new features,
1:28:17
in fact, including the great new lit systems
1:28:19
where you get a bat signal when
1:28:23
we go live and other shows go live. All of No Agenda
1:28:25
Stream is basically using these apps.
1:28:27
So you might want to be a part of that. And
1:28:29
you
1:28:29
get the troll room and you get the stream. And
1:28:32
of course you also get the podcast
1:28:35
there in regular fashion. So we
1:28:37
recommend that. Also, we recommend that you follow
1:28:40
us on our Mastodon site,
1:28:42
which is noagendasocial.com. Follow
1:28:44
Adam at noagendasocial.com, John C. Dvorak
1:28:47
at noagendasocial.com. And well,
1:28:49
so I saw the meme
1:28:52
that you posted in the newsletter. Yeah.
1:28:55
Exactly as this meme said,
1:28:57
I thought it was dumb.
1:29:00
Yeah. I don't get it. I do not understand.
1:29:05
99% of memes are just dumb. Now-
1:29:09
Which you just proved the point of the meme. I
1:29:12
know, but it's not funny. Shouldn't
1:29:14
the meme be funny? You know what, a meme
1:29:16
is basically diarrhea for
1:29:19
the illiterate. It's not a one-liner. It's not like, you know,
1:29:22
any young man material. Memes
1:29:24
are diarrhea for the illiterate.
1:29:27
That's what that is. There's people who can't write-
1:29:29
I think before you go on about any of this, I think we should
1:29:31
hear from Claire Daly while we still have some
1:29:33
listeners that might be amenable
1:29:36
to her pitch.
1:29:37
In the morning, if you truly
1:29:39
cared about media deconstruction
1:29:42
and about John and Adam, you'd be pushing
1:29:44
value for value. If everyone
1:29:47
listening would do a sustaining donation,
1:29:50
it'd be champagne all around. Thank
1:29:52
you for your courage.
1:29:53
Claire Daly,
1:29:55
everybody. Hey, even the socialists listen
1:29:58
to you.
1:29:59
to us now. You must be doing
1:30:02
something right. Value for value. Value
1:30:04
for value. If you cared. If you cared.
1:30:07
Thank you for your courage. Beautiful.
1:30:09
Thank you, Claire. We appreciate that. Yes,
1:30:11
that is the model that we follow where we
1:30:14
give you the show for free. You can
1:30:16
listen to it as much as you want. You can share
1:30:18
it with anybody. There's no restrictions, no paywalls,
1:30:21
no subscriptions, no Patreon, no things
1:30:23
to hop over, stoop under, don't
1:30:25
have to have ad blockers. There's no
1:30:28
ads at all. All we ask for is
1:30:30
that you return some value in time,
1:30:32
talent and treasure. Quick note I
1:30:34
wanted to share. There's some pitch pitch maniacs
1:30:37
on LinkedIn. They keep pitching me to
1:30:40
to
1:30:40
we should be using them as consultants.
1:30:43
Oh, so we can do premium
1:30:45
content. Premium content.
1:30:47
Well, we do premium content
1:30:50
twice a week.
1:30:51
There you go. And we do a
1:30:54
Netflix season's worth six hours,
1:30:56
more than six hours. That's
1:30:58
what we do. We go into them. We're throwing
1:31:01
money away. Well, that may that may
1:31:04
be the case. But that's
1:31:06
but we are doing what we want to do.
1:31:08
And the value for value allows us to do
1:31:10
that. Like Sir Ben Rose, you know, he runs
1:31:13
all of the stream. We got Boyd
1:31:15
Zero running all of the infrastructure. We got
1:31:17
Sir Daniel, our knight doing night stuff
1:31:20
over that. No agenda meetups
1:31:21
dot com. We've got our artists,
1:31:23
which I'll get to in a moment. I want to read a note
1:31:25
from Matt. He says, I want
1:31:28
to let you know how much I cherish the show. Ronk,
1:31:31
which was a couple episodes ago, was seriously off the
1:31:33
charts. Good. I've been too busy with my new
1:31:35
business to do art. So I'm switching
1:31:38
gears for a bit and doing a monthly donation
1:31:40
to share some of my recently mined treasure.
1:31:43
See,
1:31:43
this is what I'm talking about. Here's a guy who gets
1:31:46
it. Time, talent, treasure. I can't
1:31:48
deliver my talent right now. So
1:31:50
I'm going to give you some treasure instead.
1:31:53
What are you drinking?
1:31:55
It turns out I found another can of this
1:31:57
bubbly B-U-B-L-Y. The
1:32:00
Buble stuff? Yeah, the Buble stuff. Yeah, that's
1:32:02
been doctored. So
1:32:05
on that tip as value for value, we love
1:32:07
our artists who return value every single
1:32:10
show to us. They are listening live and
1:32:12
they are creating artwork that we can use right
1:32:14
after the show is done so we can upload
1:32:17
it for millions to download and
1:32:19
find it in their podcast app.
1:32:24
I'm banning this... It's a big blast.
1:32:27
I'm banning this practice. Let's take
1:32:29
too long. We
1:32:32
thank Matadat.
1:32:38
Has Matadat had any
1:32:41
artwork chosen previously? I do not. No,
1:32:43
I don't think so. I think not. But Matadat
1:32:45
has been doing artwork
1:32:48
for a while. Yeah, and some
1:32:50
of it quite good. But just hasn't
1:32:52
had a win. Now
1:32:55
we argued quite a bit over
1:32:57
what to choose. This was a very hard
1:32:59
piece to pick. It was. This
1:33:02
was Spot the Spook and it showed a
1:33:05
whole bunch of stick figure
1:33:07
kind of, I'd say almost like Playmobil
1:33:09
type people. And one of them did not
1:33:11
have pants on.
1:33:13
And that of course was expertly
1:33:15
weaseled
1:33:17
in there based upon the conversation
1:33:19
we heard from the CIA Spook
1:33:22
podcast where they said that people
1:33:24
these days are so distracted by their phones
1:33:27
that we can change our pants, take our pants off
1:33:29
in public. That was great.
1:33:31
So we figured... This piece was
1:33:34
up against... You
1:33:36
had like something else better. Well
1:33:39
we had to excoriate because there was
1:33:41
some issues with... Oh yes, Paul
1:33:44
Couture as a matter of fact.
1:33:47
Yes. Paul Couture had... Where
1:33:49
was it? Well he had to not curry,
1:33:51
not to vorak. It was just...
1:33:54
It was... I... But he had... I
1:33:57
don't know what his... I don't know what his...
1:33:59
I didn't know.
1:33:59
He wasn't the one we're excorating with someone
1:34:02
else. No, well first of all, the one that we actually came
1:34:04
close to choosing because of its simplicity
1:34:06
and beauty and laugh factor
1:34:09
was Bobby the Op
1:34:11
from Dame Kenny Ben. Yes,
1:34:13
we almost picked that piece. I
1:34:15
still laugh when I see it.
1:34:17
It's a throwback piece to the old
1:34:20
piece years and years ago we had a piece that won
1:34:22
which was George,
1:34:23
and I'm sorry, Jebba Bush with these
1:34:26
glasses on and big giant eyeballs. Yes,
1:34:28
now the one that I wanted, which we
1:34:30
did not choose, was from correct to record.
1:34:33
It was CIA in Africa and
1:34:35
the reason we didn't choose it is
1:34:37
because the
1:34:39
name tag, the badge that
1:34:41
the spook is wearing there in Africa with the...
1:34:43
It's unreadable. It's unreadable with the incredibly racist
1:34:45
depiction of... That's the piece, that's the one we had to excoriate.
1:34:48
Of savages, because of course
1:34:50
in Africa there's only savages with spears
1:34:53
and... Spears, spears, yes, and
1:34:55
only spears. That wasn't a problem for us,
1:34:57
no. No, that's fine. The
1:35:01
problem was the spook's
1:35:04
name tag was too small. I
1:35:06
said not CIA. Now I
1:35:09
picked,
1:35:09
I wanted to bring this up. Darren O'Neill did
1:35:11
a piece of...
1:35:13
I used it for the newsletter because I thought it was
1:35:16
kind of a nice piece, but that reeks of
1:35:19
mid-journey. I
1:35:21
mean reeks of it. Oh,
1:35:23
Darren's piece, yeah. So I don't
1:35:25
understand what Darren is doing
1:35:28
by doing AI art,
1:35:30
which is what
1:35:31
this... Because we know Darren's
1:35:34
skill set and his limitations.
1:35:37
This is not it. This is nothing
1:35:39
like Darren could possibly do in a million
1:35:42
years. No. Even with clip
1:35:44
art. So... And he submitted a cheesecake
1:35:46
piece, which was typical Darren,
1:35:49
which was good. The cheesecake
1:35:51
was good, but it was just the fact was it
1:35:53
was AI. Yeah. Still
1:35:57
nice. How many
1:35:59
fingers does she have? have. Let me see. No,
1:36:01
a mid journey doesn't make that mistake.
1:36:03
Mid journey makes that mistake, too. No,
1:36:06
I've never seen a mid journey piece that has 10
1:36:08
fingers or anything. It's it's Dolly
1:36:11
and some of the other ones that really can't do
1:36:13
fingers. But it really just had no humor.
1:36:15
Just didn't. It was just it was just
1:36:17
a cheesecake. It's just a girl.
1:36:19
Just cheesecake. Kind of a
1:36:21
big, a lot of a lot of Barbies, a lot
1:36:23
of Barbie stuff. No, no, no.
1:36:26
They're getting enough publicity. Yeah,
1:36:29
the Bill Bill Gates
1:36:32
and Anthony Weiner was cute. But
1:36:34
no, no,
1:36:35
no, no.
1:36:37
Yeah, Barbie stuff. No, no.
1:36:39
The closest that came close was
1:36:41
the racist
1:36:44
depiction of the spook in Africa. We
1:36:46
couldn't read a sign. And Bobby, the op
1:36:48
was funny. It was simplistically some funny,
1:36:51
but it came very close. But we congratulate
1:36:54
Meta Dot Meta Dot for
1:36:57
being the selected art for episode 1574. If
1:37:00
you're using one of those modern podcast apps, you'll
1:37:02
see the artwork changing during
1:37:04
the
1:37:05
during the show. It's really cool if you're using that in the
1:37:07
car. The art will change if using
1:37:10
the Android auto
1:37:13
or car play. You'll see that on your dashboard
1:37:15
and it'll give you another chuckle. Just
1:37:18
an extra dimension. So many cool things.
1:37:20
And of course, you can always follow along at no agenda
1:37:22
art generator dot com. You can follow
1:37:24
along live and obviously
1:37:27
you can upload yourself and participate. Thank you
1:37:29
to all of our artists. We really appreciate
1:37:31
you. Thank you for delivering
1:37:33
us fantastic time and talent as
1:37:35
always. Now to the treasure.
1:37:38
We thank our first and top
1:37:40
executive producer for episode 1575. Coming
1:37:43
to us from Texas, from San Antone, Eric
1:37:46
Reinhart, one thousand dollars.
1:37:48
And he says, Adam and John,
1:37:51
this is my first time donating. So please do.
1:37:55
You've
1:37:55
been deduced. He
1:37:59
says.
1:37:59
Paul's bitching during the donation
1:38:02
segment in episode 1573 was
1:38:04
the kick in the butt I needed. Whoever
1:38:06
said complaining never gets you anything. I don't
1:38:08
think we were complaining. I think we're laying
1:38:10
out our case for value for value. I
1:38:13
mean, if you want, I mean, it's a little different
1:38:15
than complaining or... But we never complain.
1:38:17
No, we're just telling you like it is. We're transparent.
1:38:20
We give you everything.
1:38:22
We tell you that right here is like, we
1:38:25
tell you what comes in. You can count it yourself.
1:38:27
You'd be surprised. You'd be surprised when
1:38:29
we only have five or six executive
1:38:31
producers.
1:38:33
This is all we do. And
1:38:36
we're happy. We had one. We
1:38:38
had one. That's true. We had one.
1:38:41
Now, does he not become a knight today? Does he have
1:38:43
no request for knighting or anything
1:38:45
of the kind? Let
1:38:46
me see. We have... He even asked for... He said, yeah,
1:38:49
he got the deducing. So this means his first
1:38:51
donation. He didn't ask. We'll wait
1:38:53
for him to come back and tell us. Okay.
1:38:55
All right. He's not listed as
1:38:57
a knight. Along
1:39:00
with Michael Pierce in Aurora, Colorado.
1:39:03
A nice place. No note. So give him
1:39:05
his 80108. You've
1:39:08
got
1:39:11
karma. So I'm thinking 80108 is the
1:39:13
donation for a guy with big tits.
1:39:24
I do not. I despise that word. Boobs
1:39:26
is okay. Tits is just, it's so
1:39:28
crass.
1:39:29
It's the right name. That
1:39:32
is the doctor's name. That's what they
1:39:34
call them.
1:39:35
Doctors, they call them breasts.
1:39:37
You're kidding me. Anonymous
1:39:40
in Katy, Texas comes with... What
1:39:42
doctor do you go to? Really?
1:39:46
Okay.
1:39:46
It reminds
1:39:48
me of the joke. I
1:39:52
won't do that joke. The pope, the blind
1:39:54
pope joke. Everyone knows the punchline. Anonymous
1:39:57
in Katy, Texas, $600 says anonymous.
1:40:01
So give the double of karma
1:40:04
for them.
1:40:05
Okay, oops. The he or she. Yes, the
1:40:07
he or she. Here we go. You've
1:40:11
got
1:40:14
karma. All
1:40:18
right, then we go to the big blowout here. Sir 1%
1:40:22
of the GTFO, he's from Dixie,
1:40:24
Washington, and he comes in
1:40:26
with 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. We do like that.
1:40:29
And this change, it bumps him up to Barron
1:40:31
and he requests, screw your freedom, no, and
1:40:34
whoop him with the Constitution because it's simply
1:40:36
impossible for there to be too much goat.
1:40:39
Goat scream karma for all. In the morning gents, I
1:40:41
am back with more treasure with this donation of 4, 5, 6, 7, I've
1:40:46
become a Barron. Ain't that great? Now that
1:40:48
I've launched my rap career on
1:40:50
no agenda, but I'm thinking that I should
1:40:52
keep a day job. I request to be named
1:40:54
the Barron of the Free Republic of Liberland.
1:40:59
Contrary to the information put forth on air, my last producer
1:41:01
note became a train wreck. Liberland
1:41:03
has nothing to do with Washington state where I presently
1:41:05
live. It is nestled in between Serbia and Croatia
1:41:08
on the Danube River, on land
1:41:10
that is not claimed by either country.
1:41:13
How about that? I
1:41:15
didn't know this. I thought he was talking about lib.
1:41:18
Libs. Libs in
1:41:20
Washington state, which is loaded with them. Our
1:41:23
relations with our neighbors are becoming friendlier
1:41:25
all the time. Our passport is gaining recognition
1:41:27
internationally as a valid travel document
1:41:30
and permanent settlement of our land has recently
1:41:32
begun. Hold on a second.
1:41:34
Can we get passports to this country?
1:41:36
Get us some passports, dude.
1:41:39
Yeah. We'd love to become
1:41:41
citizens.
1:41:42
Our motto is live and let live.
1:41:45
Our government is constitutionally kept lean
1:41:47
and limited through a combination of strictly voluntary
1:41:50
taxes. That's my kind of taxes.
1:41:53
We may not take on debt and it's allowed
1:41:55
one job only, the protection of
1:41:57
the right to one's private property and whatever.
1:41:59
they might do with it of which
1:42:02
the most precious is an individual's own
1:42:04
life. You could say that we whoop
1:42:06
them with a constitution.
1:42:09
The one thing that we're building
1:42:11
is really starting to happen so encouraging
1:42:13
all freedom-loving Gitmo Nation inmates
1:42:16
to check us out, get involved, and even become
1:42:19
one of us.
1:42:21
Faithfully suppressing your exit strategy one
1:42:23
percent at a time. Well I'm interested.
1:42:25
I would like I would like some more information
1:42:28
about this and thank you for your courage.
1:42:30
Screw your freedom.
1:42:31
No no no no no no no no no no. Get
1:42:34
out there! Whoopee whoopee whoopee whoopee whoopee whoopee whoopee whoopee whoopee
1:42:36
whoopee whoopee whoopee whoopee whoopee. You've
1:42:38
got... Carmine.
1:42:42
I like it. Never like it that
1:42:45
Biden no no no. Yeah that's good right? Sir
1:42:47
Silverdude of the Silver Dolphins
1:42:50
in Aldersburg, Maryland comes in
1:42:52
with 450 bucks
1:42:54
and he says, ITM forgive me
1:42:56
for I have
1:42:57
forgive me for I have douched. Last
1:43:00
donation was in October.
1:43:02
I just heard episode 1573 with the lack of donors and realized
1:43:06
I can't let the show fall flat again.
1:43:09
Keep up the great work. Viscount Sir Silverdude
1:43:12
of the Silver Dolphins. Beautiful man.
1:43:14
Thank you. Brian Wolfe Dix Hills New York 333.33
1:43:17
Dear John and Adam I
1:43:19
apologize for the length of my last note from show 1574. Second
1:43:21
consecutive 333.33 donation
1:43:25
and one more coming on my way to knighthood.
1:43:27
Thank you for your courage. If I can get
1:43:30
a China is asshole and
1:43:32
a Huntsman
1:43:33
that would be awesome. Yes
1:43:35
I think I can do both of those for you.
1:43:38
China is asshole! There you go.
1:43:42
Kevin Willis in Arlington, Tennessee 33333.
1:43:45
Love
1:43:46
the show. I've been
1:43:49
listening off and on since the show numbers were in
1:43:51
the low 50s. I've never donated.
1:43:53
As
1:43:54
a dollar per hour of listening pleasure
1:43:56
I have to owe at least ten grand.
1:43:58
Good luck getting that.
1:43:59
out of me. So
1:44:02
here's three three three three three as a
1:44:04
token of my esteem. No jingles, but
1:44:06
I've been married for 30 years now so if I can
1:44:08
have some getting laid karma
1:44:11
I'll take it.
1:44:14
P.S. There's somebody
1:44:16
out there listening right now who has been
1:44:19
listening for 10 years maybe from the beginning
1:44:21
and like me has never donated.
1:44:24
I'm just letting that person know it's
1:44:27
time. You've got the cash.
1:44:29
You can be an executive producer maybe
1:44:32
for the next show. Do it.
1:44:34
P.P.S. I'm not asking for
1:44:36
a D douche in
1:44:38
as a given how much I've listened to how
1:44:40
much I've paid. I'm
1:44:41
really still a douchebag.
1:44:44
I've made my piece with it. You've
1:44:47
got karma. We
1:44:49
go to Swamp Scott
1:44:51
Massachusetts three three three dot thirty three
1:44:54
Julian Erickson Adam and John this donation is
1:44:56
an additional request for another big
1:44:58
deal karma.
1:45:00
Was that a special thing? For
1:45:02
him. I just
1:45:05
want to make sure I'm not missing something. We
1:45:07
got a new one by the way someone gave me a jingle
1:45:09
that I want to let people hear. Let
1:45:12
me give you this.
1:45:13
Big deal
1:45:16
karma.
1:45:17
Tomorrow okay
1:45:20
okay the last one did not quite get us over
1:45:22
the line to a final signature. Tomorrow
1:45:25
Monday my customer will be making a final
1:45:27
decision on a large software purchase.
1:45:30
So asking for your most substantial big
1:45:32
deal karma for a winning bid. Thank
1:45:34
you for all you do and for all the thoughts and prayers the
1:45:36
show has been excellent lately in the morning. Do
1:45:39
that again John would you please? Big
1:45:44
deal karma.
1:45:46
You've got karma.
1:45:50
Someone gave me a new karma jingle to share with
1:45:52
the group. You've
1:45:55
got a little bit of chicken tumour. Karma.
1:46:00
I don't know what that is.
1:46:29
I'm going to be in the NATO Summit by
1:46:31
a couple of weeks. But more importantly,
1:46:33
missing the upcoming Vilnius meetup by
1:46:35
a month. Wish I could have timed it
1:46:37
better. Shout out to my Lithuanian
1:46:40
neighbor, friend and fellow No Agenda
1:46:42
listener Luana, who
1:46:45
I hid in the mouth soon after
1:46:47
discovering No Agenda back in 2020. Her husband
1:46:50
William
1:46:51
has been instrumental in helping me track
1:46:53
down my real family name and the
1:46:55
village that my great-granddad came
1:46:57
from. I'm forever grateful. Since
1:47:00
episode 1500, Nighting had to be brief due to
1:47:02
the heavy volume of donations. I would
1:47:04
like to request Lithuanian cuisine
1:47:07
in order of my upcoming trip.
1:47:09
Salt
1:47:11
barcio, I don't know how to even pronounce
1:47:13
that. Salt barcio,
1:47:16
cappellini, and
1:47:19
canapine's beer at
1:47:22
the round table.
1:47:23
I'd love an L-sharp and respect
1:47:26
resistry much and a John C. Dvorak
1:47:28
scary donate. Thanks for all you do,
1:47:30
sir. BKF the PNW. So,
1:47:32
how am I... I mean, he's clearly
1:47:35
just doing that just to
1:47:37
trip us up.
1:47:39
What, salty barcio?
1:47:42
Salty barcio. No, not salty
1:47:44
barcio. Cepallini
1:47:47
and canapine's beer. All right.
1:47:50
All right. All right. Could be
1:47:52
some cuss words in Lithuanian we're unfamiliar
1:47:54
with. It's probably... But resist.
1:47:57
We must. It's exactly what's going on there. We must.
1:47:59
much about that
1:48:03
we commit.
1:48:23
And we move over to anonymous controller.
1:48:25
We just heard his kids at the beginning of the show.
1:48:29
Oh goodness, how did I miss this
1:48:31
pasta glock?
1:48:35
What is that called?
1:48:38
Locked and loaded? No, it's a noodle
1:48:41
boy thing. Noodle karma, that's what it is.
1:48:43
I'll read this. All we
1:48:45
want to hear is pasta glock and JCD's
1:48:47
hot pockets, which I don't think exist. We were listening
1:48:50
as a family throughout the week as
1:48:52
evidenced by our 9 and 11 year olds rendition
1:48:55
of the show's introduction. We played that earlier. Keep
1:48:58
up the good work we've written in a couple
1:49:00
of times, but I've always failed to mention that we
1:49:03
live 20 minutes north of JCD's
1:49:05
favorite town, Nobone,
1:49:08
Indiana. Thanks for all you do,
1:49:10
anonymous controller. I can't find
1:49:12
this thing. It's not called noodle boy karma.
1:49:17
It's called something else. I got my pasta
1:49:19
glock locked and loaded. That's the
1:49:21
one. Yeah. Is it noodle
1:49:24
gun maybe? Maybe it was noodle. Noodle gun,
1:49:26
that's got to be it. Noodle gun.
1:49:31
Oh, I'm so stuck on
1:49:33
this. This
1:49:35
is bad. Noodle. I,
1:49:38
oh, here we go.
1:49:39
Eh, I found it. I'm gonna
1:49:41
shoot you in the face with my noodle
1:49:44
gun. You racist piece
1:49:46
of shit. I
1:49:50
got my pasta glock locked and
1:49:52
loaded. Pew, pew. Hot
1:49:55
pockets. I found that one. All
1:49:58
right, Candace Mae. Nelson, BC,
1:50:01
Scandinavia. 333 hello
1:50:04
switcheroo I'd like to dedicate this donation to my
1:50:06
husband Craig Seedhouse. How
1:50:09
about that? That's a fun name. Okay I'm gonna
1:50:11
make that switch right now. I love the name
1:50:13
Seedhouse. Yes, if only we
1:50:15
all could be a Seedhouse.
1:50:17
Craig Seedhouse. He has been
1:50:19
a regular listener for years and while he already donates
1:50:22
monthly for his birthday Monday July 24th I wanted
1:50:24
to give him the gift
1:50:26
of being an executive producer to the best
1:50:28
podcast in the universe. Please
1:50:30
send him some good karma.
1:50:32
You bet we would never send bad karma.
1:50:34
Thanks to you both for your great show. Happy
1:50:36
birthday Craig from Candace May.
1:50:38
You've got karma.
1:50:42
Brett Samuel in Dubai,
1:50:45
Arab Emirates. Hi guys,
1:50:47
I mentioned to I managed to get my
1:50:49
donation through via PayPal. 333 is $333. I was a
1:50:54
man overboard for a while but recently
1:50:56
the shows have been outstanding.
1:50:58
I formerly deduched
1:51:01
both of you. You've
1:51:04
been deduced. I'm
1:51:06
back on the climb to Viscount. Birds
1:51:09
are fake. Brett
1:51:11
from the EUAE.
1:51:15
Thank you Brett sir. Gold plate is in
1:51:17
Columbus, Ohio. 333 no note
1:51:19
so I'll give
1:51:19
him a double up karma. You've got karma.
1:51:26
Diane Bannett comes in from Ashington,
1:51:28
UK. Dear Adam and John,
1:51:30
thank you for the best podcast in the universe. Like
1:51:33
many listeners I subscribed after hearing Adam
1:51:35
on Joe Rogan in the early days
1:51:37
of the COVID scandal.
1:51:40
Twice Weekly booster of media deconstruction
1:51:42
kept me protected from the pandemic.
1:51:45
Please accept my show donation
1:51:47
of 237.23 for Sunday's upcoming show kindly deduced.
1:51:54
You've been deduced. Candace
1:51:57
regards Diane north of the
1:51:59
wall. England, how way the
1:52:01
lads.
1:52:04
You know, I really love hearing
1:52:06
these things. This to me is I love
1:52:08
that. I love it. Thank you for subscribing.
1:52:11
Thank you for for for jumping
1:52:13
in because, you know, if you if you go back in
1:52:15
that Bing it.io, man, we have done
1:52:17
some amazing stuff, John.
1:52:20
I mean, seriously, there is no podcast
1:52:23
like it. That's why the Durham report. Record
1:52:25
setting. It is record setting. And the
1:52:27
Durham report said it's the best in the universe. You
1:52:29
can look it up.
1:52:31
But it's I mean, this there's so
1:52:33
much stuff that we have talked about.
1:52:36
Going back 10, 12, 13, 14, 15 years. And
1:52:40
it's, you know, and so it just coming
1:52:42
around again. Third time.
1:52:45
But our fourth bug bugs, bugs,
1:52:48
eating bugs, Mark. Oh, because of
1:52:50
a blog post. I
1:52:54
know. Mark Pechne is
1:52:57
in St. Louis, Missouri. Ed,
1:52:59
John, I might present you with my second baggie of
1:53:01
ducks. Please deduce me.
1:53:04
You've been deduced. As
1:53:07
I forgot to do that. I forgot
1:53:09
to do that with my first donation
1:53:11
several months ago. I heard of you from the Barnhart
1:53:14
podcast.
1:53:15
Barnhart donation. He
1:53:18
sent a jingle. He sent a jingle, which
1:53:21
is fine. I'm happy. Barnhart. Barnhart
1:53:23
donation. A year or two
1:53:25
ago, I've enjoyed your show ever since. I'm happy to be
1:53:27
a producer as a bonus for you both. My
1:53:30
daughter is a nun in traditional Latin
1:53:32
mass order. I've asked her to pray for you
1:53:34
both as I've written to her about your work to help
1:53:36
weed through the lies. Well, thank you. No
1:53:39
karma, but please, I'd like to wait.
1:53:41
If she's traditional Latin mass, it must be
1:53:43
the poor girl is a terrorist.
1:53:46
What are you talking about? Yeah, he knows
1:53:48
what I'm talking about. Really?
1:53:51
The government, our government are.
1:53:54
Oh, we kill our men of justice has determined
1:53:57
that anyone who is into the traditional.
1:53:59
Catholic, old fashioned mass, which
1:54:02
is the best product there is, by
1:54:04
the way, as a, as a lapsed Catholic,
1:54:06
I can say that. Outstanding product I hear.
1:54:08
It's an outstanding product.
1:54:10
But if you're into that and you're no
1:54:12
good, you're a, you're a terrorist.
1:54:15
It's, it's a, it's a,
1:54:17
that commentary by our justice
1:54:19
department is a crime against the humanity, to
1:54:22
be honest about it. They should be roused.
1:54:24
You should, when did, when did they pronounce the K
1:54:26
this?
1:54:27
Oh, this has been going, what? So many in the chat
1:54:29
room knows this has got to be about two or three
1:54:31
months ago. Is this, is this
1:54:33
like a small batch deal these, these nuns
1:54:35
are doing? What is this? No, it's a large
1:54:38
movement in the church. They're sick of this English
1:54:41
mass. It's not
1:54:42
even, by the way, void zero is
1:54:45
a traditionalist like that. Yes, he is. Yes, he is. By
1:54:47
the way, coincidentally also a terrorist.
1:54:50
I mean, so there you go. Yeah, boy, is it? Yeah,
1:54:53
that could be true in his
1:54:55
own way. Um, well, thank you very much.
1:54:57
We appreciate the prayers. No karma, please. But I'd
1:54:59
like one of the Reverend Al Litany's. Thank you. God
1:55:01
bless you both. Mark of the deep South County.
1:55:04
Little rebel for you with a misspelling.
1:55:08
Oh, ESPICT.
1:55:12
Noah Asaria in Lancaster,
1:55:15
Pennsylvania. Yeah. Home, home
1:55:17
of the, of the Amish.
1:55:20
Two, 10, 12.
1:55:22
None of who, not one Amish got COVID.
1:55:26
Uh, after the only sparking lot,
1:55:28
sparking, the only parking lot,
1:55:31
the only parking spot.
1:55:34
After, let me start over John and Adam after
1:55:36
the only parking spot at the train station
1:55:39
was spot 33. I
1:55:42
knew it. It was time to donate. Please
1:55:45
D douche me and play a sharp tin
1:55:47
of your choice. Noah.
1:55:50
You've been D douched. Oh man,
1:55:53
this is good. Jamie
1:55:57
Palacios, Clifton, Virginia. Two, 10.
1:56:00
Listened for almost three years, now
1:56:02
no longer a douche bag! I
1:56:05
presume he wants to be douching? I would say so. It
1:56:08
makes sense. You've
1:56:10
been de-douched. Thank you
1:56:12
for this amazing show! May
1:56:14
I ask for jobs, Karmas? I'm looking for my next
1:56:16
opportunity. Thank you, but of course
1:56:19
you can ask for that. Hold on a second.
1:56:21
You know what, I wanna do one of those mega, mega job, Karmas.
1:56:23
I haven't done those in
1:56:25
a while. Jobs! Jobs!
1:56:30
You've got Karma. And
1:56:32
here we have Linda Lupatkin in Lakewood,
1:56:35
Colorado.
1:56:36
May I please ask for, I'm sorry,
1:56:39
may I please ask, I
1:56:41
keep reading the line above and I can't stop. Jobs,
1:56:43
Karma for all! For a complete
1:56:46
edge, go to
1:56:47
ImageMakers.com
1:56:49
for all your executive needs! Hold on
1:56:52
a second.
1:56:52
Uh, Dvorak, this is every single
1:56:54
week you're doing this wrong, it's ImageMakers, Inc.
1:56:56
with a K.com. Please get it right. ImageMakers,
1:57:01
Inc. dot com for
1:57:03
all of your executive resume and job
1:57:05
search deeds. That's ImageMakers,
1:57:07
Inc. with a K.com. Or
1:57:09
look for Linda Lupatkin under the show's
1:57:12
producer list.
1:57:13
Jobs! Jobs! Jobs! Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!
1:57:16
Jobs! You've got Karma.
1:57:19
This really must be working
1:57:21
for Linda. It must be,
1:57:23
I mean, she's running a streak here. This is
1:57:25
like, uh... Tenth time or something. Ever
1:57:28
since the time that she tried to slip one through
1:57:31
with a $55 donation, she's
1:57:33
back on track. That's right.
1:57:36
And then, uh, Matthew
1:57:39
Gill in Raleigh, North Carolina, Don't
1:57:42
forget Sir C. C. Sharp. Oh, I'm sorry,
1:57:44
Sir C. Sharp of .Net. Oh, Austin,
1:57:46
Texas. How could I miss that? I
1:57:48
went completely in the wrong direction. Our final associate
1:57:51
executive producer. To all the dudettes
1:57:53
named... Dude slash dudettes
1:57:55
named Ben slash Bernadette. My
1:57:57
keeper got laid off. If you
1:57:59
know of any... Group, principal, senior product manager
1:58:02
jobs, please connect with her on LinkedIn,
1:58:04
linkedin.com slash in slash
1:58:07
Amani dash Kodichini.
1:58:10
Oh boy, A-M-A-N-I dash
1:58:12
C-O-D-I-C-H-I-N-I. I
1:58:14
will link that to your donation,
1:58:17
sircsharp of .net and get
1:58:20
her on No Agenda Social. That's where people
1:58:22
connect, man. Get her to a meetup. That's
1:58:24
where people really connect. Yeah,
1:58:26
the Austin meetups. And there's a bunch of stuff going
1:58:28
on in Austin. They're opening up a bunch of chip plants.
1:58:31
There's all kinds of stuff going on in Austin. Get
1:58:33
to a meetup. Sir Scott, Baron Scott, I think
1:58:35
has one planned. A float meetup.
1:58:37
It'll be, I believe, on August 13th. We'll find
1:58:39
out in the
1:58:40
meetup segment. And of course, we've got
1:58:42
some Jobs Karma for her. Jobs, jobs,
1:58:45
jobs, and jobs.
1:58:47
Let's vote for jobs. Yeah!
1:58:50
You've got karma. Or you can get
1:58:52
a hold of Linda Lou Patkin. Linda
1:58:54
Lou Patkin might be able to help, exactly.
1:58:57
And get on No Agenda Social, people. Or
1:58:59
at least post something to Adam at noagendasocial.com
1:59:02
or John C. Dvorak at noagendasocial.com. We
1:59:04
will boost it.
1:59:06
You don't have to be on No Agenda Social to post.
1:59:08
That's the beauty
1:59:10
of the decentralized mastodon
1:59:13
fetivers. And
1:59:15
thank you all very much for supporting the best podcast
1:59:18
in the universe. These are executive and
1:59:20
associate executive producers. These are credits that
1:59:22
are real and they are valid
1:59:24
anywhere credits
1:59:26
are accepted. You could put it on your
1:59:28
LinkedIn, just a thought there. You could put it on your
1:59:30
IMDB. You can open and start an IMDB
1:59:33
with these credits. And if you'd like to learn more about
1:59:35
it, go to Dvorak.org
1:59:37
slash N-A. And thank you once again
1:59:40
to all of our executive and associate executive
1:59:42
producers of 1575. Our formula
1:59:44
is this. We go out, we
1:59:47
hit people in the mouth.
2:00:02
Sorry, meant to goat
2:00:03
that, meant to goat it. There we go. Goat,
2:00:05
I've goated it. So I ran into
2:00:07
a, I rarely
2:00:10
see MSNBC, but I did run into a
2:00:12
Nicole Wallace piece. Oh
2:00:15
man, I try to run away from that.
2:00:17
She is so bad. She's
2:00:20
not only bad, she's looking bad.
2:00:22
I mean- She's starting to look haggard.
2:00:24
She's, yeah. Which is something women do not
2:00:27
like. By the way, we're only saying
2:00:29
that as television producers. We have experience,
2:00:31
we've been in the business. We know what works,
2:00:33
we know what doesn't work. We've never made
2:00:35
women twirl around for us, but we do know.
2:00:38
Yet. She needs to fix
2:00:40
her teeth. It's time now.
2:00:42
And I can speak to this. She needs to fix her
2:00:44
teeth. And the hairdo has got
2:00:47
to change. I'm thinking of Bob.
2:00:50
Thinking of bald cut, personally. Well,
2:00:53
that'll be after everything happens
2:00:55
when we shave her head. So there's a bunch
2:00:58
of errors and she's not using the right words. I'll
2:01:03
give some of it away as we go. But she's also
2:01:06
very bigoted in the way she presents everything.
2:01:08
So let's listen to- Hold on, hold on. Let's
2:01:10
just straight up tell people that she
2:01:12
used to be
2:01:14
communications director or spokes
2:01:16
hold for the Republican party
2:01:18
under Bush. I
2:01:21
believe so. I believe under Bush. Well,
2:01:23
you can look it up. I could.
2:01:26
She is now a diehard Democrat,
2:01:29
MSNBC- A hater.
2:01:31
A hater. She's a hater. And here's some
2:01:34
hate right at the beginning. She's going to have Eric Holder
2:01:36
on who knows nothing about anything,
2:01:38
but she's bringing him on anyway
2:01:40
to hate together. Hate together. And
2:01:43
here's her intro. Listen to this.
2:01:45
I want to ask you what
2:01:47
it is like for the
2:01:49
men and women working at the department
2:01:51
to see one of their leaders,
2:01:54
Jack Smith, targeted and threatened
2:01:57
by Donald Trump and his allies. And
2:01:59
I'm sure you and I have
2:01:59
both been attacked over Twitter
2:02:02
by the twice indicted twice
2:02:04
impeached ex-president. And we should also mention
2:02:06
that Eric Holder was attorney general,
2:02:09
famously corrupt attorney general under
2:02:12
President Obama.
2:02:15
Yeah, and he was part of Fast and Furious
2:02:17
and the gun running and the whole thing. And lying.
2:02:20
And lying. And he's a liar. He's a
2:02:23
liar. Well, the thing about this though
2:02:25
is she has to put in twice indicted, twice impeached. Yeah, that's what
2:02:27
you do. Lab lab, lab, okay. That's
2:02:29
like you saying to me, you're twice divorced.
2:02:33
I've never said that. No, of course not. You
2:02:35
would never say that because you're not a hater like Nicole Wallace.
2:02:38
Good phrase
2:02:40
though. Now, here
2:02:43
we go. Now listen to this clip and I have
2:02:45
a sub clip highlighting it. She
2:02:48
uses the wrong word.
2:02:50
She's trying to say condemn,
2:02:52
but she says condone.
2:02:55
Which one do you want me to play? The sub clip? I'll
2:02:57
play two. The big one, the sub clip is the short
2:02:59
one. That just highlights it. The other
2:03:02
one is in context.
2:03:03
I think there's something that people don't understand
2:03:05
that your family worries
2:03:07
and there is a destabilizing nature
2:03:09
to being targeted by the leader
2:03:11
of that movement, leader of the right, a party
2:03:14
that doesn't quickly condone violence,
2:03:16
that doesn't quickly condone anti-Semitism, that
2:03:19
doesn't quickly condone racism. There is something,
2:03:22
again, this is where the right is
2:03:24
onto a set of tools that more
2:03:26
closely approximate an autocrats tool.
2:03:29
She's a bonehead.
2:03:30
She's
2:03:33
a bonehead, yes. She won't
2:03:35
say Republican Party because she knows
2:03:37
that she's bigoted as it is. Now
2:03:40
here's the sub clip so everyone can remember what she
2:03:42
said. Listen to the stupidity of these comments.
2:03:45
Leader of the right, a party that doesn't quickly
2:03:47
condone violence, that doesn't quickly
2:03:49
condone anti-Semitism, that doesn't quickly condone
2:03:52
racism.
2:03:52
Now at any point did you hear- Nicole,
2:03:55
that's condemned. That's condemned. Could
2:03:57
you correct yourself please? Because she's
2:03:59
being said.
2:03:59
She's being sabotaged. If they didn't correct
2:04:03
her on that from the control room,
2:04:05
that's sabotage. I think they're asleep in the control
2:04:07
room. That's sabotage. But
2:04:09
yes, they wouldn't quickly condone
2:04:12
racism like the Democrats
2:04:14
would. Exactly. Well,
2:04:17
as we say, what the heart is full of, the mouth overflows
2:04:20
with.
2:04:22
And there's a Dutch phrase for that? Yeah.
2:04:25
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
2:04:28
Nicole
2:04:34
Wallace with Holder clip
2:04:36
three. Here we go with a WTF
2:04:38
clip. What is available to them or how
2:04:40
they are at this moment, this unprecedented
2:04:43
moment where they've been, they've charged an ex-president
2:04:45
and they seem to be on the precipice of charging him
2:04:47
again.
2:04:48
Yeah. I mean, this is something that,
2:04:50
you know, has to have an impact on people within
2:04:52
the department. These are strong folks
2:04:54
and, you know, they're used to being
2:04:57
criticized, but the level of criticism
2:04:59
that you see here, the unfounded levels
2:05:01
of criticism that you see here are really
2:05:04
kind of unprecedented. And
2:05:06
so that's why, as I said earlier, I hope
2:05:08
that those people who are right minded will
2:05:11
come to the defense of the people in the bureau,
2:05:14
the defense of people at the Justice
2:05:16
Department and understand that
2:05:18
these personal attacks on Jack
2:05:20
Smith and other people, you know, I remember
2:05:23
when, after the court
2:05:25
authorized search of the Mar-a-Lago residents,
2:05:28
the names and the addresses
2:05:31
of the who actually conducted
2:05:33
that search were publicized.
2:05:35
And shortly thereafter, a, you
2:05:38
know, a person decided to attack the
2:05:40
FBI office in Cincinnati.
2:05:44
Wait. What? So
2:05:48
a bunch of Florida FBI guys supposedly
2:05:50
got outed. Which
2:05:53
I didn't hear about. Did you hear about? I didn't hear
2:05:55
about this. I didn't know. I know about the
2:05:57
Cincinnati office, but I never heard about a public.
2:06:00
reveal of these guys' home addresses,
2:06:02
and what's that got to do with the office of Cincinnati?
2:06:05
And why doesn't he mention Brett Kavanaugh,
2:06:08
whose house, his personal residence
2:06:10
was actually attacked by a bunch of left-wing
2:06:12
lunatics? What about isn't, John? That's a
2:06:14
false equivalency.
2:06:17
Never mentions that, does he? Of
2:06:19
course not. But why would he?
2:06:23
So here we go with the final clip on this group.
2:06:26
So there are real world consequences for
2:06:29
this. And you put people's
2:06:31
lives at risk for no good
2:06:34
reason. Now, people who sign
2:06:36
up to work for the FBI understand that
2:06:38
they're putting their lives at risk, and they
2:06:40
can face all kinds of life
2:06:43
and death situations, but not these kinds
2:06:45
of life and death situations that are perpetrated
2:06:48
by people who are former government officials generally,
2:06:51
and formulated by people,
2:06:53
or by a person who was the former president of the
2:06:56
United States. This
2:06:58
is something, again, unprecedented,
2:07:01
something that we should not accept, and
2:07:03
something that we have to push back against.
2:07:07
What about Kavanaugh?
2:07:10
Unprecedented. Unprecedented
2:07:13
for FBI, perhaps.
2:07:16
I liked your newsletter
2:07:19
analysis of Bobby the Op and
2:07:22
what went down with this censorship
2:07:26
hearing
2:07:28
in the House of Representatives. Yeah. You
2:07:31
wanna reiterate that for a moment? Well,
2:07:34
there was a, in fact,
2:07:36
I think I have a clip. It's not a
2:07:40
Kennedy clip, but it's a clip about the hearings.
2:07:43
Just you can find it. Yeah, talking to the mic
2:07:45
though, because you're kind of dropping out a little bit.
2:07:47
Oh, I'm sorry. Again, the mic has
2:07:49
moved. You didn't
2:07:52
notice it. I'm gonna move it back. No, don't freak
2:07:54
out. That mic is moving. It's a moving
2:07:56
mic.
2:07:58
Let's see, does that sound better?
2:07:59
Yeah, yeah now we can at least hear you
2:08:02
now you're here welcome Where
2:08:04
is this thing? I have some clips
2:08:06
on if you can't find it
2:08:09
I can't find it but let me I'll
2:08:12
tell you what what the deal is
2:08:13
So there was this hearing out of the blue
2:08:15
with Kennedy coming in to talk about censorship
2:08:18
and they of course tried to censor the hearing
2:08:20
hilarious with
2:08:22
what the clips about and
2:08:25
It I believe the whole thing was
2:08:27
scripted
2:08:28
and I believe Debbie Debbie Wasserman
2:08:31
Schultz was had the script
2:08:33
couldn't she barely read it and He
2:08:36
got him outraged and the whole thing was designed
2:08:39
to get him attention and I'm
2:08:42
I'm gonna agree with you on this because
2:08:44
they also Put the heat-seeking
2:08:46
missile the Dumbo nobody cares about
2:08:48
because she doesn't have a vote the
2:08:52
the representatives from the Virgin Islands Yeah,
2:08:55
what's she doing there? Well, she's great. Well, first
2:08:57
of all, she's black So that that the Stacey
2:08:59
Plaskett is who we're talking about. So that's you
2:09:02
know, you can't she
2:09:04
got special privilege
2:09:05
Oh here I got my clips. I found him. Okay
2:09:07
This is Jeffrey Tucker
2:09:10
discussing and Jeffrey Tucker is one of the
2:09:13
Talking heads that the NTD brings on is
2:09:15
ahead of some some think tank
2:09:17
and it's pretty good. This is good Jeffrey
2:09:20
Tucker Good to see you again. That's a pleasure to
2:09:22
be here. Thank you so much Jeffrey some Democrats
2:09:24
signed a letter calling for RFK
2:09:26
juniors testimony to be canceled. Yeah,
2:09:29
tell us about that Well, it was it was
2:09:31
actually just an epic moment and and
2:09:34
in history to see him there And
2:09:37
I knew this is coming. I guess, you know two weeks
2:09:39
ago when I've been a little bit mum about it Because
2:09:43
what
2:09:43
was that? It's
2:09:46
a silliest laugh so he says I've been
2:09:48
a little bit mum about it Haha,
2:09:51
that's yeah, he's keeping a secret
2:09:54
This is
2:09:57
in TD and
2:09:59
I knew this is coming I guess two weeks
2:10:01
ago when I've been a little bit mum about it. Haha.
2:10:04
Dude, I have to question this guy right
2:10:07
away. Because I
2:10:09
had a feeling it was going to be like this, but sure
2:10:12
enough, so Democrats sign a letter
2:10:14
denouncing him as- Wait a minute.
2:10:17
So we need to know where this guy is from, because
2:10:19
if he knew it, that means he must
2:10:21
have informed people that it was coming. He
2:10:24
must have informed, that's what it
2:10:27
sounds like, and not
2:10:28
the news. No, he was informed that
2:10:30
was coming, or he knew something was up.
2:10:33
But if he knew it was coming, then he might have informed some
2:10:35
political people. I don't know, it's interesting. Because
2:10:38
I had a feeling it was going to be like
2:10:40
this, but sure enough, so Democrats sign
2:10:42
a letter denouncing him as an anti-mite,
2:10:45
which is the most absurd charge, and
2:10:47
sure enough, right out of the bat, because immediately
2:10:50
the Democrats passed, or
2:10:52
tried to rally around a move to go to executive
2:10:55
session, which is to say, they
2:10:58
wanted to go to a secret session
2:11:00
not available to the public, so the public couldn't see it.
2:11:03
So in other words, they're trying to censor the
2:11:06
hearing on censorship. I have
2:11:08
to say, if people wanted to watch, they should
2:11:10
go to epoch and watch the whole thing. People
2:11:12
need to see it, because it's odd.
2:11:15
I had forgotten that it
2:11:17
was possible to make
2:11:18
good points and good sense and rash arguments
2:11:21
and science within the halls of Congress.
2:11:23
We think we've gotten
2:11:25
used to what a clown show it is. He
2:11:28
showed them up.
2:11:31
Interesting. Interesting.
2:11:34
So then you go to clip
2:11:35
two. He explained that the First Amendment is really
2:11:37
the foundation of all the rest of our liberties. He
2:11:40
described it as the fertilizer, the water,
2:11:42
and the sun, to democracy.
2:11:46
But he said without that sort of openness
2:11:49
that all of our rights become in danger.
2:11:53
And he said at least to dystopia and
2:11:55
totalitarianism. Here's the thing that
2:11:57
I started realizing as I was
2:12:00
listening to this hearing. The censorship
2:12:02
have been so extreme and so tight. A lot
2:12:04
of us who were dissenters on
2:12:06
all the COVID crackdowns and
2:12:09
even on the Biden laptop and everything else, we
2:12:11
might have been in the overwhelming
2:12:13
majority the entire time, but
2:12:16
because of the censorship, we were made to feel
2:12:18
isolated and strange and
2:12:21
like a persecuted group of
2:12:23
dissenters, not even a group. A lot of us just felt
2:12:26
alienated and isolated. Now we realize looking
2:12:28
back, that was all intentional. That was
2:12:29
the goal, was to drive
2:12:32
us out of the public debate in
2:12:34
a quasi-martial law style censorship.
2:12:37
I like that analysis. Yes, and
2:12:40
it goes well with what you
2:12:42
said,
2:12:45
that this hearing was scripted
2:12:48
to a degree that that
2:12:51
censorship thing would come up, but also
2:12:53
as an actual, perhaps
2:12:55
even a stress test from the real
2:12:57
movers and shakers in the Democratic Party to
2:13:00
see if Kennedy can really stand
2:13:02
up to it.
2:13:04
Yeah, there's definitely elements. The
2:13:07
stress test is on.
2:13:09
We only have, I mean it's
2:13:11
a year away the election, but the
2:13:13
real thing, it all begins pretty
2:13:15
much the beginning of next year with these
2:13:18
primaries and Kennedy's got to have
2:13:21
turned around. I mean I had the dinner
2:13:23
table conversation with the kids and
2:13:26
they all think Kennedy's a
2:13:28
conspiracy theorist.
2:13:30
So that image of
2:13:32
him has been put
2:13:34
in play and it's working
2:13:37
well so far. Well
2:13:39
of course it's always helped
2:13:41
by the
2:13:42
Kennedy family themselves. Tonight
2:13:45
one of America's most famous families engaged
2:13:48
in a very public feud. Hi, I'm
2:13:50
Jack Schlossberg and I have something to say.
2:13:53
Jack Schlossberg, the grandson of President
2:13:55
John F Kennedy and the son of Caroline
2:13:57
Kennedy taking to Instagram to speak
2:13:59
up.
2:13:59
against his relative, Robert F. Kennedy
2:14:02
Jr. Let's not be distracted again
2:14:04
by somebody's vanity project. He's
2:14:07
training in on Camelot, celebrity,
2:14:10
conspiracy theories, and conflict for personal
2:14:12
gain and fame. He's not alone.
2:14:15
RFK Jr.'s sister, Kerry Kennedy, and
2:14:17
nephew former Congressman Joe Kennedy have
2:14:19
condemned the remarks. And now Republicans
2:14:22
are using his rhetoric as a tool to attack
2:14:24
the Biden administration on Capitol Hill. You
2:14:27
are slandering me incorrectly. The
2:14:29
time belongs
2:14:29
to saying he's dishonest. RFK
2:14:32
Jr. rejects the idea that
2:14:34
his views are racist or anti-Semitic,
2:14:37
but members of his family are backing away
2:14:39
and putting their support behind Biden's reelection.
2:14:42
The Kennedy family has a deep relationship with
2:14:44
the Bidens. Joe Biden served with Ted Kennedy
2:14:46
and the Senate for decades and appointed several
2:14:49
Kennedys to administration posts.
2:14:52
You know, this is a 19-year-old. Is
2:14:55
he 19? I think he's 19.
2:14:58
When was he born? 93. Now he's 30.
2:15:03
But when he was 19, this is a Vatjeserbeinzelf
2:15:06
mich jekopto de häll. This kid's projecting. Really?
2:15:08
Who's... Which kid? This Schlossberg kid.
2:15:11
Oh, the Schlossberg kid is... Again,
2:15:15
I suspect the script involved.
2:15:19
No projecting at all. In October 2015,
2:15:22
after graduating from Yale, which, gee,
2:15:24
if you're maybe related to the Kennedys, you get
2:15:26
in there,
2:15:27
he started working at a Japanese internet
2:15:29
e-commerce company in Tokyo. Of course,
2:15:32
why not? In 2016, he worked
2:15:34
as a staff assistant at the Bureau of Oceans and International
2:15:37
Environmental and Scientific Affairs, part of the U.S.
2:15:39
Department of State.
2:15:41
Gee, you think that he's trading off
2:15:43
of the Kennedy name?
2:15:45
I think it's a spook. He attended the Medal
2:15:47
of Freedom Award dinner to commemorate the 50th
2:15:49
anniversary of his grandfather's death.
2:15:53
Come on, kid. K.
2:15:57
So, Anderson Pooper
2:15:59
had a... had the
2:16:02
main actor on his show, Stacy
2:16:06
Plaskett, the representative from
2:16:08
the Virgin Islands, who was just, I
2:16:10
mean, the thing she was saying was, I
2:16:13
mean, she could go work for NPR.
2:16:16
She's so bigoted. And
2:16:19
so actually Anderson Cooper
2:16:21
did a pretty good job. He gives us some
2:16:23
of the clips from the hearing and he's got her
2:16:26
on and so this is a nice little series.
2:16:28
Democrat Stacy Plaskett is the ranking member
2:16:30
of the Subcommittee on Weaponization of the Federal Government,
2:16:33
which held the hearing today. She pushed back on the
2:16:35
comments you heard Kennedy make prior to the
2:16:37
hearing that COVID was ethnically targeted.
2:16:40
These are individuals who would
2:16:42
bring a witness who's promoted
2:16:45
a video that compared the COVID
2:16:47
vaccine to the Tuskegee
2:16:49
trials. The Tuskegee trials
2:16:52
were a very difficult time in black America
2:16:55
where individuals who were already
2:16:57
sick
2:16:59
with a disease were
2:17:01
then reviewed, experimented
2:17:04
on, who already had a disease to
2:17:07
see how far that disease went. And
2:17:10
making the comparison that
2:17:13
manipulates and praise on
2:17:15
black people's feelings about the atrocities
2:17:17
of the past in order to prevent
2:17:20
them from seeking life-saving vaccines
2:17:22
in the present.
2:17:22
I mean, this is a conflagration
2:17:25
of epic proportions.
2:17:28
It's really unbelievable and
2:17:30
part of the problem is because that clip, we
2:17:32
haven't been able to clean that clip up so you can actually
2:17:35
hear what he said.
2:17:36
But he talked about studies that suggest
2:17:39
and
2:17:42
medical and America's history
2:17:44
with, Bill Clinton had to apologize
2:17:46
for the Tuskegee
2:17:48
experiments. But
2:17:50
okay, let's go to the next clip.
2:17:52
What was wrong with Robert F Kennedy Jr. being
2:17:55
there today? I mean,
2:17:57
why did it so anger you?
2:18:01
Or, Paul, you. I think that what's,
2:18:03
well, I think what's so upsetting about
2:18:06
my Republican colleagues is
2:18:08
that they are giving a platform to
2:18:11
an individual who is spewing
2:18:14
conspiracy theories that are based
2:18:16
on quasi-science, on false
2:18:19
information, who is trying
2:18:21
to get individuals pitted
2:18:24
against one another, who is trying
2:18:26
to deny people life-saving
2:18:29
information. We know that his
2:18:31
group, his children's defense
2:18:33
group, were the ones who spread
2:18:35
information in Minnesota, which
2:18:38
led to a rash of measles
2:18:40
outbreak among the Somali community
2:18:43
because they believed that those vaccines
2:18:45
were in fact harmful to them. These
2:18:48
are the kinds of things that Robert F. Kennedy
2:18:50
Jr. is doing, and he's using
2:18:52
his family's name as a
2:18:54
shield to be able to
2:18:57
reach him and let individuals know
2:18:59
that this is not who his father was, this
2:19:02
is not who his uncles were, and
2:19:04
we need to stop giving him the credibility that
2:19:06
they had because this guy
2:19:08
is not safe
2:19:13
for the American
2:19:13
people. The things that he says is
2:19:16
going to get us all in trouble. He's not
2:19:18
safe. He's not brand
2:19:20
safe for the American people. Now,
2:19:23
taking into account, we believe that Bobby the
2:19:25
K is an op, Bobby the Op, by
2:19:27
the CIA.
2:19:29
What better place to have Miss
2:19:31
Plaskett on than former CIA
2:19:34
employee Anderson Cooper to keep
2:19:37
running the test, the stress test?
2:19:40
Will Bobby the Op be able to stand
2:19:42
up to it? What happens with the stress test is you
2:19:44
get new information, comes to light.
2:19:47
New shit comes to light. Now they have to deal
2:19:49
with the Somalia measles
2:19:52
outbreak. So let's put that on the list of
2:19:54
things to fix.
2:19:59
colleagues for inviting him.
2:20:04
They intentionally chose to elevate this rhetoric
2:20:06
to give these harmful dangerous views a platform
2:20:09
in the halls of the United States Congress. I
2:20:11
mean she is obviously reading. Let's
2:20:13
just let's just call it what it is. This
2:20:16
is not an outraged person who has something
2:20:18
to say. She's an actor.
2:20:21
That's endorsing that speech.
2:20:24
That's not just supporting
2:20:26
free speech. They have cosigned
2:20:29
on idiotic bigoted
2:20:32
messaging. He's
2:20:34
also obviously running for president.
2:20:37
How much of that plays into why you think he was
2:20:39
invited there today?
2:20:42
Well, we know that Chairman
2:20:44
Jordan, my colleague who I sit next
2:20:46
to, the chairman, gets his marching
2:20:48
orders from Mark Meadows, from
2:20:51
Donald Trump, potentially
2:20:53
from Speaker McCarthy. I don't think he has much
2:20:55
say in what happens in his conference. But
2:20:58
those are the individuals who are determining
2:21:01
that this committee should be used
2:21:03
to test run every conspiracy
2:21:05
theory that's going to be used in the 2024.
2:21:07
Notice how she uses
2:21:09
the term test run.
2:21:12
Isn't that interesting? Who's really
2:21:14
test running what, Miss Plaskett? This committee
2:21:17
should be used to- Yes?
2:21:19
I was gonna say that
2:21:21
he was brought to the committee because this is
2:21:23
a committee on censorship and he was deplatformed,
2:21:27
as famous as he is, from
2:21:28
YouTube- And Insta?
2:21:31
And Insta during the period of time
2:21:33
where his messaging was important.
2:21:37
Yes. That's the reason he was there. He wasn't
2:21:39
there to test conspiracy theories.
2:21:42
But I think she's saying something
2:21:44
here that she- it's on her mind
2:21:47
because, you know, we're doing a test here. We're doing a
2:21:49
stress test. Oh, no, she's got the- she's got the-
2:21:51
yeah, you can't get that out of her
2:21:53
head. That's why she said it. Yes.
2:21:59
be used to test run every
2:22:02
conspiracy theory that's going to be used in
2:22:04
the 2024 presidential race.
2:22:07
So having an individual who they believe is
2:22:09
going to hurt President Biden is
2:22:11
something that they're going to amplify and elevate.
2:22:14
We gave information that this individual,
2:22:17
there's a super PAC associated with
2:22:19
him that is the same super PAC
2:22:22
organizers who have been the super
2:22:24
PAC for Marjorie Taylor Greene
2:22:26
towards Santos and the failed
2:22:28
campaign of social welfare. So
2:22:30
he is pushing issues that
2:22:33
are going to support the Republican Party. And
2:22:35
what's even more frightening is their whole
2:22:38
notion that social media
2:22:40
companies, which are private companies, private
2:22:42
platforms that are open to
2:22:44
public use, should
2:22:47
not be checked, should not be
2:22:49
looked at, should not be information,
2:22:52
should not be looked at them. And it has a chilling
2:22:54
effect on these
2:22:55
social media companies. I love what she's trying
2:22:57
to say is we should control the social
2:22:59
media companies. Instead, she says they
2:23:01
should not be looked at, looked
2:23:04
at,
2:23:05
that are open to public use,
2:23:09
should not be checked, should not be
2:23:12
looked at, should not be- Controlled!
2:23:15
Information should not be-
2:23:16
Controlled by the government. That's
2:23:18
exactly what she's trying to say. Or trying
2:23:20
not to say. She knows she can't say that because
2:23:22
that's the wrong thing to say. So
2:23:26
she's actually flopping around, she's
2:23:28
dog paddling, she doesn't know what to do. She's
2:23:30
been to public use, should
2:23:33
not be checked, should not be
2:23:35
looked at, should not be- information
2:23:38
should not be looked at them. And it has a chilling
2:23:40
effect on these social media companies. And
2:23:42
we know that in the run-up to
2:23:44
20- It has a chilling effect on these social
2:23:46
media companies. She's lying. She
2:23:49
can't say the word censored.
2:23:51
They should be censored. By
2:23:54
the government. By the government, by her,
2:23:56
by her and her compadres.
2:23:59
should not
2:24:02
be- Free speech. Check, should
2:24:04
not be looked at, should not
2:24:06
be information should not be looked at them. And
2:24:09
it has a chilling effect on the social media companies.
2:24:12
And we know that in the run up to 2024 elections,
2:24:16
that Russian trolls, the Chinese,
2:24:18
the Iranians are going to be trying
2:24:21
to push voter
2:24:23
disinformation, trying to suppress
2:24:25
the American people from
2:24:26
voting. So she's saying that Bobby
2:24:29
the K is being controlled by Russian trolls,
2:24:31
Iranians, by the Chinese.
2:24:34
What is she really saying here?
2:24:37
She's this woman.
2:24:39
I have no idea what she's saying. And
2:24:41
this little ditty got no play, but I need
2:24:44
to share it with the group. This is representative
2:24:46
Kat Kamik, never even heard of her. I
2:24:49
don't know where she's from,
2:24:50
but she went freewheeling. I have to bring
2:24:52
this up. And since the door
2:24:54
was opened, I'm
2:24:58
deeply concerned about the fact
2:25:00
that there were FEC
2:25:02
reports brought up. Mr. Kennedy,
2:25:04
you acknowledge that you don't know where
2:25:06
those came from. You
2:25:10
said that you have no affiliation
2:25:12
with those. That PAC,
2:25:14
that super PAC, I believe, the
2:25:17
ranking member said she was deeply concerned
2:25:19
about the affiliation. And we seem
2:25:21
to have a guilty by association theme going
2:25:24
on here. And so I just have to state
2:25:26
for the record that I myself am deeply
2:25:28
concerned about the affiliation
2:25:30
of the convicted sex trafficker,
2:25:32
Jeffrey Epstein, of which the ranking member took
2:25:35
campaign donation money from. So I think
2:25:37
that's the beauty of the First Amendment is that
2:25:39
we have a right to say what we want to
2:25:42
say, but we also have the right to be offended.
2:25:44
By the
2:25:45
way, I've given up my right to be
2:25:47
offended. I don't know why she
2:25:49
said that. That was very weird, very
2:25:52
weird. So then
2:25:54
just to show you that CNN is all over this
2:25:57
stress test, we have Dana Bash.
2:26:00
Who's looking better than she used to? She
2:26:03
had some work done. Yeah, she
2:26:05
had to have some work done because she used to be
2:26:07
kind of a bug-eyed alien looking woman.
2:26:10
Yes, maybe it was an eye job, but I think she had
2:26:12
an eye job.
2:26:13
Something happened. Something
2:26:15
changed. And she is going to... It's fantastic
2:26:17
because they even put a little flash
2:26:20
in there. She is going to show a
2:26:22
piece of the incriminating
2:26:24
video that we can't actually play
2:26:27
a clean copy of because it's
2:26:30
so hard to hear amplified
2:26:32
and compressed and everything. You kind of have to watch
2:26:34
it yourself with subtitles. She's
2:26:36
going to show a deceptively
2:26:39
edited piece
2:26:40
to make her point. Here
2:26:43
we go. Antisemitism.
2:26:48
Racism. These
2:26:51
are the most appalling, disgusting
2:26:54
pejoratives and they're applied to
2:26:56
me to silence me. In
2:26:58
my entire life,
2:27:00
I have never uttered
2:27:02
a phrase that was either racist
2:27:05
or anti-Semitic. They're misrepresentation.
2:27:07
I'm going to ding
2:27:09
the bell whenever there's a video edit. Representation.
2:27:12
I didn't say those things.
2:27:14
So you just heard it. Defamation, distortions,
2:27:17
misrepresentations, reading between the lines,
2:27:19
a siding motive, guilt by association.
2:27:22
That is how RFK Jr. offers an
2:27:24
answer for every accusation. But believing
2:27:26
him that he's just a contrarian, that
2:27:29
he never spread hate requires
2:27:31
ignoring his own words.
2:27:34
COVID-19, there's an argument
2:27:36
that it is ethnically targeted.
2:27:39
COVID-19 is targeted to
2:27:42
attack Caucasians and
2:27:44
black people. The
2:27:48
people who are most immune are Askinology
2:27:50
Jews and Chinese.
2:27:53
So they took out the piece where he talks about
2:27:56
the study that he
2:27:57
read. Just edited that right
2:27:59
out. He is quoting from a study. Took it
2:28:02
right out. That's the piece they took out.
2:28:05
This is CNN. She
2:28:07
continues, there's more. And
2:28:10
Chinese.
2:28:12
That kind of denial and deflection showing
2:28:14
up over and over in this hearing. Listen
2:28:17
to Mr. Kennedy say something
2:28:19
that
2:28:20
he never said. Mr.
2:28:23
Kennedy, do you think it was easy for Jewish people
2:28:25
to escape systematic slaughter of Nazis? Yes
2:28:27
or no? Absolutely not. Do
2:28:30
you think it was just as hard to wear a mask
2:28:32
during COVID as it was to hide
2:28:34
under floorboards or false walls so
2:28:36
you weren't murdered or dragged to a concentration camp?
2:28:38
Of course not. That's ridiculous. That's
2:28:40
a comparison that you made. I did not
2:28:42
make that comparison.
2:28:46
Except he did. Even
2:28:49
in Hitler, Germany, you could you could
2:28:51
cross the Alps into Switzerland. You can hide
2:28:54
in an attic like Anne Frank did. Today,
2:28:57
the mechanisms are being put in place. I
2:29:00
will make it so none of us can run and
2:29:02
none of us can hide.
2:29:05
So they take a speech from
2:29:07
COVID.
2:29:09
This was a setup. This was a setup by
2:29:11
Debbie Wasserman Schultz in CNN. So
2:29:14
that's why she was firing off those questions.
2:29:17
Because they knew. Oh, that was a coordinated
2:29:20
effort. Coordinated
2:29:23
effort. We've got the video of him saying this.
2:29:26
That was actually quite good.
2:29:27
I just want to hear that again. And
2:29:30
then a bash like, look at my eyes.
2:29:33
I got a nice eye job. Don't you think it's pretty
2:29:35
good? The people who are most
2:29:37
men are askinology Jews and
2:29:40
Chinese.
2:29:42
That kind of denial and deflection showing
2:29:44
up over and over in this hearing. Listen
2:29:47
to Mr. Kennedy say
2:29:49
something that
2:29:50
he never said. Mr.
2:29:53
Kennedy, do you think it was easy for Jewish people
2:29:55
to escape systematic slaughter of Nazis?
2:29:58
Yes or no? Absolutely.
2:29:59
not do you think it was just as hard to
2:30:02
wear a mask during COVID as it
2:30:04
was to hide under floorboards or false
2:30:06
walls. So you weren't murdered or dragged to
2:30:08
a concentration camp. Of course not. That's ridiculous.
2:30:11
That's a comparison that you made. I did
2:30:13
not make that comparison.
2:30:15
Okay, so is this a false equivalency?
2:30:17
I want to so what what what is she Debbie
2:30:19
Wasserman Schultz. This
2:30:23
woman is amazing. She's
2:30:26
saying is it just as hard to wear a mask
2:30:28
as it is to hide as a Jewish person
2:30:30
to the Second World War. And
2:30:33
so she's and he walked
2:30:35
into this, of course, walk straight into
2:30:37
it. He could have figured this one out. Now let's listen
2:30:39
to the equivalency is being drawn with this this
2:30:42
testimony. This speech. He
2:30:44
did. He did. Except he did. By the
2:30:46
way, by the way, it
2:30:48
should be noted that first
2:30:50
Dana
2:30:52
Bash's form of of sarcasm
2:30:57
is not it doesn't work. Just
2:31:00
people sarcasm is doesn't
2:31:02
work in present news presentations.
2:31:05
No, it doesn't. No, it's very it's very
2:31:07
bad form. And it's something I don't like about
2:31:09
Tucker Carlson when he does it.
2:31:11
Tucker Carlson does it. Yes,
2:31:13
he does it way too much. Okay, let's go again to
2:31:16
the speech. Even
2:31:18
in Hitler Germany, you could you could
2:31:20
cross the Alps into Switzerland. You can hide
2:31:23
in an attic like Anne Frank did today.
2:31:26
The mechanisms are being put in place. I
2:31:29
will make it so none of us can run and
2:31:31
none of us can hide.
2:31:33
It's not quite the same thing. What's
2:31:35
it got to do with masking?
2:31:38
Well, because it was about COVID.
2:31:41
So what it wasn't about
2:31:43
it. In fact, what did he even mention COVID in
2:31:46
that clip? I
2:31:48
bet you if we go and look at the full clip
2:31:51
that
2:31:53
that it didn't quite work. So that's why they couldn't
2:31:55
play it. It's unbelievable. That
2:31:57
was very poorly done. Very poorly
2:31:59
done. It was a setup. It was weak, it
2:32:01
was weak, and I think this is part of
2:32:03
it.
2:32:04
It was a setup. This is weak, and it shows you the CNN's
2:32:07
stupid.
2:32:07
Yeah. That was a weak comparison.
2:32:10
Yeah,
2:32:11
but CNN does what they're told to do.
2:32:14
But I liked it. Which really
2:32:17
surprises me, considering that John Malone
2:32:19
is a piece of that. Well,
2:32:22
hence the stress test. I'm still
2:32:24
liking that whole idea. Is something up? I agree with you. I
2:32:27
like the stress test idea, I really do.
2:32:30
I think it makes sense.
2:32:35
You're gonna have to reverse it at some point.
2:32:37
Before the end of the year. Yeah. Before
2:32:40
Christmas. And we've just got six
2:32:42
months. So it's a six month thing. We're gonna be talking
2:32:44
about this for six months because of this bull
2:32:46
crap. Yeah, I know. They're gonna have to
2:32:49
do a reversal and say, well, we were wrong.
2:32:52
Yeah. And golly gee whiz, you know, this guy
2:32:54
was really making a lot of sense, and
2:32:56
all he really wants to do in my two points
2:32:59
is that what he has to do or
2:33:01
wants to do or what the CIA wants him to do or
2:33:03
somebody wants him to do, is get
2:33:05
those TV advertisements of
2:33:08
drug companies, go back to making
2:33:10
them illegal. And then I think
2:33:12
the second thing is going after Nixon's
2:33:14
edict. Nixon's the one who screwed up our healthcare
2:33:17
system by allowing these
2:33:19
health management companies
2:33:24
to make profits. There was illegal to make a profit.
2:33:26
You had to be a non-profit. You had to break even.
2:33:29
But ever since they made them profitable and
2:33:31
it became a thing, they've taken over the place.
2:33:33
I mean, I can't even find an independent doctor
2:33:36
around here and I'm in California. Speaking
2:33:38
of SSRIs, this really does
2:33:40
seem to be at least the base
2:33:43
of some of the transmaoism going
2:33:45
on, as I have a boots on the ground,
2:33:47
Anonymous, who's noticed
2:33:50
a pattern in his circle of M2F friends.
2:33:55
That's male to female transition.
2:33:59
started down this rabbit hole.
2:34:02
As of course they went to the rapists,
2:34:05
a therapist,
2:34:06
the ones who are the
2:34:08
ones who are captured. This not all
2:34:11
of them because we certainly have therapists who are
2:34:13
taking cash and don't even consult
2:34:15
with kids. But these are young men in this case.
2:34:19
And they were prescribed SSRIs.
2:34:21
So these are antidepressants and all kinds of
2:34:24
stuff, which we really don't know how they work or
2:34:26
what they do. But everybody's on them. They're
2:34:28
believed to work like this. Even
2:34:31
in the ads, they say they think it works. Like,
2:34:33
they don't know. So of course, as
2:34:35
we have seen often, if you're on them for
2:34:37
long length lengths of time, long periods of
2:34:40
time, anxiety, depression, suicidal
2:34:42
thoughts start to occur, the very
2:34:44
thing that's supposed to stop from a
2:34:46
generation that in general feels a bit abandoned.
2:34:49
It gets perverse, our boots on the ground
2:34:51
says.
2:34:52
When a side effect of these common drugs
2:34:55
is the this is well known.
2:34:57
This is one thing we know that the SSRIs
2:34:59
do. They make it very difficult
2:35:01
for people on them to achieve orgasm
2:35:05
through regular sexual
2:35:07
means. Regular through in
2:35:10
general libido is down. Or
2:35:12
achieving orgasm is difficult. There's a known
2:35:15
side effect of these drugs.
2:35:17
Funny they never say that on the television
2:35:19
ads, do they?
2:35:22
They never have as a side effect.
2:35:24
I think they should. It should. Because
2:35:27
of this difficulty in achieving orgasm.
2:35:30
These young men tend to
2:35:33
go on a perverted porn journey
2:35:35
leading I'm reading this, leading
2:35:37
them to this whole hypnosis stick,
2:35:40
the sissy hypnosis stick.
2:35:43
And the way they are then told by the
2:35:46
by the sissy groomers
2:35:49
is, oh, no, you can achieve an orgasm
2:35:51
by
2:35:51
prostate stimulation.
2:35:54
So enter
2:35:59
enter literally enter anal
2:36:01
sex. And this now
2:36:03
leads down the rabbit
2:36:05
hole of sissy, hypno
2:36:08
porn,
2:36:09
and forced feminization, etc.
2:36:12
And I actually have a video
2:36:16
here from one of these, I would call them
2:36:20
not really a groomer. She's, she's clearly
2:36:22
from Europe, I think a foreign
2:36:24
country. She's
2:36:27
on Instagram, and she
2:36:30
would be someone who confirms young
2:36:33
men that they are in fact sissies. Here
2:36:36
she is. Hi guys, my name is Bella. Welcome
2:36:38
back to my channel. And in this video, we're
2:36:40
going to talk about the five main signs
2:36:44
that somebody is a sissy and these signs
2:36:46
are kind of subtle. I'm not gonna be talking about things
2:36:48
like oh, he has 50 G strings
2:36:50
in the closet, right? Because that's kind of obvious.
2:36:53
So these are gonna be like really subtle signs.
2:36:56
Maybe if you are suspecting yourself to
2:36:58
be a sissy, this video is definitely going to help
2:37:00
you. Or if you already
2:37:02
know that you are sissy, and
2:37:05
you just want to reinforce yourself,
2:37:06
this is also going to be a video for
2:37:08
you. Or maybe if you're suspecting somebody
2:37:11
else in your surroundings
2:37:14
to be a sissy
2:37:14
that you understand what's going on here, you
2:37:17
can you can understand it clearly enough.
2:37:20
Okay, good enough. Yeah, yeah. So she's saying if
2:37:22
you if you suspect you're a sissy, and I'm
2:37:24
only gonna do I'm going to do two or three. I would have run that
2:37:26
one through the
2:37:28
Adobe. She's got too much echo.
2:37:30
Yeah, I'm sorry. Well, we'll just have
2:37:32
to deal with it at this point.
2:37:34
Well, actually, I could run it through the Adobe
2:37:36
and come back to it. But it kind of fits in
2:37:38
the in the whole flow of things. I don't want
2:37:41
to do that. Why am I so run it through the Adobe. So
2:37:43
we'll come back to the sissy and how she
2:37:46
is basically helping confirm
2:37:48
a confirmed
2:37:50
young man that hey, you know, you really are a sissy.
2:37:52
This is this is really who you are. And or
2:37:54
if you know somebody who's a sissy, then
2:37:57
then or you would suspect
2:37:59
you suspect you're
2:37:59
You should tell them, hey, you know, you're a sissy. This
2:38:02
is, and by the way, it's completely normal. As you can hear,
2:38:04
she's speaking just normal tones. And
2:38:06
if you think someone's a sissy,
2:38:07
then you should let them know.
2:38:09
So Helen Joyce, we've
2:38:11
played clips from her before. She literally wrote
2:38:13
the book on this transgenderism
2:38:17
and how damaging it is. She
2:38:20
did another interview, which was, oh, wait, I
2:38:22
have the, hey, Adobe was fast.
2:38:25
Hold on a second. Let me get Adobe
2:38:27
here. Let me, let's do this.
2:38:29
How cool is that? I can't believe it went so fast.
2:38:32
Okay,
2:38:33
so here we go. Let's see
2:38:36
if this, if this helps. Hi guys,
2:38:38
my name is Bill Iowo. Oh my God, you
2:38:40
were right. You hear the difference? Oh
2:38:42
yeah. I mean that, hey, Adobe. Massive.
2:38:45
Adobe rocks, man. All right, here we go. Come back
2:38:47
to my channel. And in this video, we're going to talk
2:38:49
about the five main signs
2:38:52
that somebody is a sissy. And these signs
2:38:54
are kind of subtle. And like I'm talking about things like,
2:38:56
oh, he has 50 G strings in
2:38:59
the closet, right? Because that's kind
2:39:01
of obvious. So these are going to be like really subtle
2:39:03
signs. Maybe if you are suspecting
2:39:05
yourself to be a sissy, this video is definitely
2:39:08
to help you. Or if you already
2:39:11
know that you are sissy.
2:39:12
You know what else this does
2:39:14
besides take the echo out?
2:39:16
It brings out the full-throated arrogance
2:39:19
of this creep. Yeah.
2:39:21
Yeah.
2:39:21
Yeah, it really does. And you just
2:39:24
want to reinforce yourself. This is also
2:39:26
going to be a video for you. Or maybe
2:39:28
if you are suspecting somebody else in your
2:39:32
surroundings to be a sissy, then yeah.
2:39:34
You're going to know after
2:39:36
this video. So let's get
2:39:38
started. Oh man, you know who she reminds me of?
2:39:41
That's true. She reminds me of those ladies
2:39:43
for some odd reason. Anyway. Sissy
2:39:45
then. Yeah, you're going
2:39:47
to know after this video. So
2:39:50
let's get started. First sign that
2:39:52
somebody is a sissy is that they
2:39:54
have no male friends.
2:39:57
They have never been part of this like big.
2:39:59
men group, you
2:40:02
know, this kind of like groups in high
2:40:04
school, there's like a lot of guys and
2:40:06
the guys stuff together. Systems
2:40:09
are usually not going to be part of that.
2:40:11
So if I'm sitting at home in my basement
2:40:13
vaping, playing video games, I'm
2:40:15
probably like, Hey, that's me.
2:40:17
I got no male friends, no big muscly
2:40:20
male friends around. Or
2:40:22
even like big muscly male friends.
2:40:24
Yeah, yeah. They don't get it off. They
2:40:27
don't get it off. They don't get it off. You're right.
2:40:29
This is really horrible what they're doing here.
2:40:31
Or even like if you don't just
2:40:33
go to school anywhere, they usually
2:40:36
don't have a healthy masculine
2:40:38
group around them. They usually
2:40:41
have no friends at all,
2:40:43
or they prefer to just spend
2:40:46
time with their families or
2:40:48
with female company.
2:40:51
Oh boy. If you hang out with girls, you're
2:40:53
probably a sissy. So that was the first
2:40:55
sign. Okay. So what you
2:40:57
can find is that they feel attracted
2:40:59
to female lingerie and
2:41:01
it's not just them buying it.
2:41:04
It's them like talking about it like, Oh, this is, this
2:41:06
looks so pretty, you know, maybe like scrolling
2:41:08
some Victoria secret or something.
2:41:11
They just feel attracted and compelled to
2:41:13
the female clothing. Even when they're outside
2:41:15
shopping, they always have to take a look,
2:41:18
you know?
2:41:19
And so as we've discussed and
2:41:21
we've heard from experts, this
2:41:23
is, this is truly the way in
2:41:26
this is for male transitions. It
2:41:29
eventually becomes a fetish. The fetish
2:41:31
is so they become so obsessed through
2:41:33
the porn they're watching that they eventually want to
2:41:36
wear the female clothing and basically
2:41:38
have sex with the woman that they feel is the woman
2:41:40
of their dreams by becoming the woman
2:41:42
of the dreams. It is in fact a mental
2:41:44
condition.
2:41:45
Yeah. They just want to explore
2:41:47
more of it and just
2:41:50
feel weird attraction to all female
2:41:53
clothing. So
2:41:56
next sign, the third sign is that they
2:41:59
put a.
2:41:59
bit too much effort into their looks.
2:42:02
And I'm not just talking about clothes because
2:42:05
it doesn't necessarily have to be clothes, but
2:42:07
I'm talking about like products, for example,
2:42:09
and they use a lot of products on their skin.
2:42:12
They care about all these like email
2:42:15
stuff, you know, like when girls use
2:42:17
like a lot of peeling and
2:42:20
like mask or whatever, they just want to try
2:42:22
it out too, right? Like they feel really compelled
2:42:25
to that.
2:42:25
So if you'd use moisturizer,
2:42:27
you might be a sissy. And not looking
2:42:30
wrong, it's definitely not wrong that you try
2:42:32
to take care of yourself, but it's not something that
2:42:34
she would usually see that is like a really
2:42:36
masculine man, right?
2:42:38
Right, okay. Yeah. I'm
2:42:42
stopping it there. Now we go to Helen Joyce
2:42:44
and she's going to explain how this unhealthy
2:42:46
obsession, well, I mean, it
2:42:48
becomes a fetish
2:42:49
for men. They start watching
2:42:53
this category of porn
2:42:55
and she is going to take us through
2:42:59
what really, why we're now
2:43:01
going after kids. I mean, it's fascinating
2:43:04
to listen to. So no, there aren't trans kids.
2:43:06
We know that. And yet
2:43:09
there must be. But they're being encouraged to believe
2:43:11
they are. Yes. And so you're getting a sort of
2:43:13
in a way, another form of gay
2:43:15
conversion therapy, aren't you? I
2:43:17
think it's the most straightforward form of gay conversion therapy.
2:43:19
It's a conversion therapy on the body. You
2:43:22
turn a, you know, perfectly normal healthy gay
2:43:24
person into a sterile because,
2:43:26
you know, this treatment pathway sends you on the way to
2:43:28
sterility. A sterile
2:43:30
pretends straight person of the opposite sex. I
2:43:33
mentioned the elephant in the room. I mean, there's absolutely
2:43:35
an erotic drive for some men in particular
2:43:38
to present as women. That's their, their erotic
2:43:40
fixation in fact. And they're
2:43:42
in love with the woman they wish to be. And
2:43:46
if, if you don't want to say
2:43:48
that, like one of the specialists
2:43:51
that I interviewed for the book, he said, he said it very
2:43:53
frankly, he said, you know, suppose
2:43:55
you've been erotically cross dressing since your teens
2:43:59
and you're now in your 15.
2:43:59
And this woman is more real to you than anything
2:44:02
else and it's time to be her. And
2:44:04
you walk into work and you say, I've been masturbating
2:44:07
and
2:44:07
my wife snickers since I got
2:44:09
married. It's time to wear them all the time. That's
2:44:12
not going to go down well. But if you
2:44:14
go in and you say, I have always been a woman inside
2:44:17
and now it's time. I can't hide that fact about me
2:44:19
anymore. That fits much better
2:44:21
into this long run history
2:44:23
of, you
2:44:25
know, black liberation, women's
2:44:28
liberation, gay liberation. Yeah, I
2:44:30
see that kind of jumping on this much more respectable.
2:44:33
But also a strong feeling of progress,
2:44:35
the sort of arc of progress, then
2:44:37
slowly, but you know, that sort of thing. It feels
2:44:39
like part of that, even though it's a very different thing. So
2:44:42
then what do you have to say and do
2:44:44
to make that plausible that actually there's
2:44:46
a woman inside and that's
2:44:47
the real person that you are? Because
2:44:49
it's a very bizarre claim. Well,
2:44:52
you have to have always been that way. And
2:44:54
if you've always been that way, then there are children
2:44:56
who are trans.
2:44:58
Boom.
2:45:00
So in order to live with your fetish,
2:45:03
you can go
2:45:05
into work now and say, well, I've always been a woman. Oh,
2:45:08
how wonderful, Bob. Love
2:45:12
your dress, love your nails. And
2:45:15
then the logical conclusion, she wrote the book
2:45:17
on this is a very interesting woman. And she, and this
2:45:19
is not her opinion. She interviewed a
2:45:22
lot of doctors, went through a lot of effort
2:45:24
to put this together.
2:45:25
And if that is true, if
2:45:28
you've always been a woman, then
2:45:30
there must be kids that are born
2:45:33
that way.
2:45:33
And if you look back at sort
2:45:36
of the 70 or 80 years that doctors have been seeing people
2:45:38
who come in and say, I was meant to be a woman
2:45:41
or I was meant to be a man or whatever. If
2:45:43
they're children, they tend to grow out of it like 80
2:45:46
to 90 percent grow out. And
2:45:49
it happens around puberty. And it happens
2:45:51
mostly because they say, oh, I'm gay. Because
2:45:54
there's a strong link between being quite
2:45:56
nonconforming for your sex in
2:45:59
early
2:45:59
childhood and growing up to be gay. We've
2:46:02
known that for a long time. Every homophobe
2:46:04
knows it. Every dad who wants to beat
2:46:07
the sissiness out of his sissy little boy
2:46:09
because he wants him to grow up straight
2:46:10
knows it. And yet it's become a kind of an
2:46:12
unmentionable thing. I
2:46:14
don't quite know why, because it's really
2:46:16
very obvious once you look if you know children.
2:46:19
But those kids now think of themselves as
2:46:22
trans. And they often before would too.
2:46:24
They'd wonder, why am I like this? Especially
2:46:26
if they've got a very traditional rigid family
2:46:28
that's trying to push them into traditional
2:46:31
sex roles. See the little
2:46:33
boy who wants a Barbie and doesn't like, you know, cries about
2:46:35
the idea of playing rugby and so on. And if he's told
2:46:38
he's a sissy, take away the doll, no,
2:46:40
you're not allowed to wear a skirt. At some point the
2:46:43
idea occurs to that poor child. Why
2:46:46
am I like this? I wish I was a girl. Maybe
2:46:48
I was meant to
2:46:49
be a girl. So those kids- That's now
2:46:51
being encouraged effectively by mermaids. Yes,
2:46:53
exactly. So those kids, they popped up.
2:46:55
They always popped up. And as soon as a gender
2:46:58
clinics saw kids, there's very few of them,
2:47:00
but they used to see them. And they just tracked
2:47:02
them. And what happened was those boys and their teens
2:47:04
went, oh, now I know why I'm different.
2:47:05
I'm gay. That was the overwhelming
2:47:08
thing that happened. So no, there aren't trans
2:47:10
kids. We know that. And
2:47:13
yet there must
2:47:13
be. But they're being encouraged to believe
2:47:15
they are. Yes. And so you're getting a sort
2:47:17
of in a way, another form of gay
2:47:19
conversion therapy, aren't you? I
2:47:22
think it's the most straightforward form of gay conversion therapy.
2:47:23
It's a conversion therapy on the body. You
2:47:26
turn a perfectly normal healthy gay
2:47:28
person into a sterile because
2:47:31
this treatment pathway sends you on the way to sterility.
2:47:34
A
2:47:34
sterile pretends straight person of the opposite sex.
2:47:36
And this is what Levine is doing,
2:47:39
Rachel Levine. This is the prisker woman,
2:47:42
man, woman thing. This
2:47:45
is really a problem. Well,
2:47:50
it's definitely a problem for the Democrat party.
2:47:55
Because the party will be out of people within a generation.
2:47:58
Because they're sterilizing their own.
2:47:59
Yeah,
2:48:01
yeah, that's the short-sightedness of it
2:48:03
But it's just wow man, but they don't like to
2:48:05
you know The funny thing is you bring this up at the table
2:48:07
with anybody who's not following it
2:48:10
Is that nobody sees this as a mass
2:48:12
sterilization project?
2:48:14
No, no, they're not even suggested
2:48:17
let alone thought of but that's what it is.
2:48:19
This is mass Sterilization
2:48:22
of children and where are the gays
2:48:24
and lesbians because even what well, they're
2:48:27
befuddled by the whole thing there
2:48:29
They're the can't keep up either and
2:48:31
they're aside many of them since many
2:48:33
of them not all of them obviously are or
2:48:36
or liberals because
2:48:38
they think it has something to do with their being gay and
2:48:41
They are just
2:48:43
flummoxed and they're
2:48:45
buying into it. They're making a biggest
2:48:47
mistake Yeah Yeah,
2:48:52
we need a trans Maoism jingle. Why
2:48:54
is that not happened? Well,
2:48:56
how are you gonna do it? I don't know someone needs it's gonna
2:48:58
be sick So we're gonna accept the fact it's
2:49:01
gonna be sick Just
2:49:03
a few trans Maoism moment
2:49:07
Have a couple of clips
2:49:10
I do have a real news clip
2:49:12
that I thought you did break things up a little
2:49:14
bit As
2:49:18
we haven't done this forever Mm-hmm
2:49:21
Meggining Harry these
2:49:23
are challenging times for the youth and Duchess of Sussex
2:49:26
Harry and Megan's marriage is in trouble.
2:49:29
There's such a mess going on around
2:49:31
them The new Harry and Megan
2:49:33
headlines trouble in paradise rumors
2:49:36
of divorce and they're taking
2:49:38
time apart Things haven't
2:49:40
been so marvelous over in Montecito
2:49:43
the tabloid seemed to be in attack mode Why
2:49:46
well speculation is there's pressure
2:49:48
on the pair after some recent bad press?
2:49:51
They are Destroying us
2:49:53
seven days ago their Netflix docu-series
2:49:55
failed to get an Emmy nod just weeks
2:49:58
earlier Harry and Megan parted
2:49:59
ways with Spotify after making an
2:50:02
estimated $25 million deal
2:50:04
and then a company exec trashed
2:50:06
them.
2:50:07
I wish I had been involved in the Megan and Harry
2:50:09
leave Spotify negotiation. The
2:50:11
f***ing grifters. That's the podcast we
2:50:13
should have launched with them. This also comes
2:50:16
amid
2:50:16
major backlash in the UK.
2:50:18
You know this plays right into my boomerang
2:50:21
theory and
2:50:24
I will repeat it. If
2:50:26
you abuse the press for
2:50:28
your own benefit, the media
2:50:30
in general, that boomerang
2:50:33
comes back in equal and opposite
2:50:35
force. This is what you
2:50:37
get.
2:50:38
Yeah, that's exactly right. This has been your
2:50:40
thesis forever. Yes. And
2:50:43
this is a perfect example of it because we
2:50:45
had both of us knew that this was going to happen.
2:50:47
Yeah, we should have mentioned it. They built them up and built
2:50:49
them up and then there's been a little chit
2:50:52
chat about them ripping off everybody
2:50:54
because they're grifters. From
2:50:56
the executives at Spotify no less. Wow,
2:51:00
there's a lawsuit waiting to happen. But
2:51:04
then again, it's expensive. So I
2:51:06
have one off beat clip I want to play.
2:51:08
It's a minute and eight seconds. And
2:51:11
it needs to be discussed because this is going on
2:51:13
all over the place and nobody understands it.
2:51:16
It's called NPC, non-playing character,
2:51:18
whatever that NPC stands for. Non-playing
2:51:20
character, correct.
2:51:22
And there's a bunch of these tik tokers and
2:51:24
YouTubers. Hold on,
2:51:25
hold on, hold on. Tock,
2:51:28
tik tok. We have
2:51:30
a jingle for that.
2:51:35
There's a bunch of these tik tokers that go off
2:51:38
and they're doing something called NPC
2:51:41
and they're just
2:51:43
talking and babbling and doing.
2:51:45
Remember that whisper trend there was for
2:51:47
a while? They were whispering and whispering. The
2:51:49
whisper trend. I don't remember the whisper
2:51:52
trend. Yeah, there was a whispering thing. It was like
2:51:54
a whole thing. It came and went.
2:51:55
This, I think, has more legs and I'm going to play
2:51:58
a clip of one of the women.
2:51:59
is one of the best at it, of just
2:52:02
yakking away saying nothing, repeating
2:52:04
herself over and over and over again. This
2:52:06
is a black woman, people have
2:52:09
seen her, she's got a fake blonde
2:52:11
wig on, I'm sure it's a wig. And
2:52:16
I'm listening to this because NPC
2:52:18
also has a second meaning
2:52:21
and it has to do with spying and spookery.
2:52:23
And I think,
2:52:27
and I'm going to say it in advance, I
2:52:29
believe that this is, non-playing
2:52:31
character bit, is this is
2:52:34
a
2:52:34
number station.
2:52:40
Okay, of all
2:52:42
things, I did not expect this. Let
2:52:45
us give a, how about an example
2:52:49
of a number station. This
2:52:52
is it. This is the NPC black girl.
2:52:54
You want to hear an actual, play the number station
2:52:56
first. This is our number, this is the no agenda number
2:52:58
station. You can hear these on shortwave.
2:53:00
Okay, so that's an example
2:53:04
of a number
2:53:06
station and now we're
2:53:09
going
2:53:14
to listen to this NPC.
2:53:37
Yes,
2:53:46
popcorn, yes, popcorn. Yes,
2:53:48
popcorn, yes, popcorn. That
2:53:51
was good, cooking up, that
2:53:53
was good, cooking up, cake, cake, cake,
2:53:55
cake, cake, cake, cake. Oh, thank you baby, this is so cute, gangga,
2:53:58
gangga, gangga.
2:53:59
I seen so good. Yes.
2:54:02
Yes. Yes. Now. Now. Now. Fire.
2:54:04
Fire. Fire. Oh, special. Oh,
2:54:06
special. Oh, special. Oh,
2:54:08
yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Oh,
2:54:10
amazing. Yes. Yes. Yes.
2:54:13
Fire. Fire. I
2:54:19
see so good. That's
2:54:23
me. So good.
2:54:26
Okay. First of all, goes
2:54:28
on for 10 minutes. I do this in the shower, so
2:54:30
I'm not quite sure, but I'm not a number station. I
2:54:33
think it's something else.
2:54:35
There's a donation aspect to this.
2:54:38
Yeah. And I think that's part of it.
2:54:40
I think those numbers that keep flying on the screen
2:54:42
showing certain donations is part of the number
2:54:44
station. This is a high end
2:54:46
encrypted
2:54:48
product. Stop.
2:54:53
It's a high end
2:54:55
encryption
2:54:56
product. So this is actually a public
2:54:58
key that she's giving
2:55:01
us. Well, it's obviously
2:55:03
I have no idea what she's... Yeah, that's
2:55:05
my thinking because that's exactly what it reminded
2:55:07
me of. I had this clip and
2:55:10
I was thinking, Adam is not going to
2:55:12
let me play this clip because it's stupid.
2:55:14
But... Well, young
2:55:17
boys are jacking off to this girl.
2:55:19
They're sending her money and it's
2:55:22
all... I know
2:55:24
exactly who's going to... Ancilla is going to set
2:55:26
us straight on this because I've seen this trend.
2:55:29
This lick lick, mint mint.
2:55:33
This is basically value for value. Direct
2:55:38
to value for value. Do you want me
2:55:40
to go lick lick lick and then they
2:55:42
send you money? This is
2:55:46
the end of civilization is
2:55:48
what this is.
2:55:49
One of the reasons I'm going to stick with my
2:55:52
theory is because I've watched different
2:55:54
versions of this. Yeah. And not
2:55:56
everybody is good at it
2:55:59
and can be...
2:55:59
and can I don't know what kind of a
2:56:02
script is involved here what she's doing.
2:56:04
This particular girl is definitely
2:56:06
a number station some of the other ones are just lousy.
2:56:12
I love your thesis man. I'm
2:56:14
going
2:56:16
to show my school by
2:56:18
don't know to know agenda imagine all
2:56:20
the people who could do with us oh yeah that'd be
2:56:22
fab. Yeah
2:56:25
I know agenda in
2:56:27
the morning.
2:56:32
So we have Matthew Gill at the top of
2:56:34
our list.
2:56:37
He actually sent a note in.
2:56:39
I don't normally read these notes and we don't read
2:56:41
notes under 200 but I hear some. Once
2:56:44
in a while we'll do that just because. Handwritten
2:56:47
note. Okay. He's
2:56:50
a deducian. He's right at the top. Oh
2:56:52
man I am out of control today.
2:56:55
Yeah. What is going on with me? You've
2:56:59
been deduced. Something's wrong. I'm off.
2:57:02
I'm off.
2:57:03
He is originally from Raleigh
2:57:06
North Carolina and he has noticed
2:57:08
sweet I'll send you a copy of it
2:57:10
telling us we have a great show. Oh
2:57:12
thank you very much. Thank you very much. Summarize.
2:57:15
Helene Jansen Jansen
2:57:18
in Rotterdam in the Netherlands.
2:57:21
This is Yomson. She says. Yomson.
2:57:24
She can't seem to get her donation
2:57:26
through but she did it's $150 along with John Keihana in
2:57:31
Parkville Maryland. Can I just say something? Helena
2:57:34
Helena. I appeared on
2:57:36
a big a big Dutch podcast
2:57:39
the Robert Jansen podcast
2:57:42
two days in a row so he did it into
2:57:44
a two-parter and a lot of people. Oh a two-parter
2:57:46
with you. Yes a Robert Jansen donation.
2:58:00
Visali in Fairfield, California,
2:58:03
which is up the road from here to me.
2:58:05
He is in for 130.
2:58:09
Jason Bible in Austin, Texas, 120.12. Ryan
2:58:12
the stable boy, Edmonds Washington, is asking
2:58:14
for some F cancer. Carmo put that
2:58:16
at the end for him. James
2:58:19
Regnier in Burlington,
2:58:21
Wisconsin, 100.
2:58:24
Part of his morning
2:58:27
routine. Amy Stubblefield in Soddy
2:58:29
Daisy, Tennessee, $100. Ian
2:58:32
Field in Parts Unknown, 100.
2:58:35
David Allen, Joplin, Missouri, 100.
2:58:37
Sam Loy in Alton, Illinois,
2:58:40
another Rogan donation, $100. Rogan
2:58:43
donation.
2:58:46
He says we host a great show. Matthew
2:58:50
Saladino in Katie, Texas, 100. I
2:58:55
like these $100 donations.
2:58:57
John McKeown, McKeown, McKeown,
2:59:00
McKeown, I don't know. M-C-K-O-E-N,
2:59:04
I should know how to pronounce that. He's in Glastonbury,
2:59:07
Connecticut, $97. Brian
2:59:09
Lillard in Prosper, Texas, 8888.
2:59:12
Owens, Edward
2:59:14
Owens in Alameda, California. He
2:59:16
needs a deducing. He's got a boot.
2:59:20
You've been deduced. He's
2:59:22
in for 8.008 along with Ryan
2:59:24
and Tony Odey
2:59:27
in Pembroke, Massachusetts, 8008. Jason
2:59:31
Marr. He also needs a deducing.
2:59:33
Oh, I see that. First donation from Massachusetts.
2:59:37
You've been deduced. Jason
2:59:40
Marr in Vancouver, Washington, 8008. And
2:59:43
Kevin McLaughlin in Concord, North Carolina, 8008.
2:59:46
But this time he says
2:59:48
honeydew melons. He just wrote that in
2:59:50
there for some reason.
2:59:53
Michael Gon-Zall, Gon-Solvit,
2:59:55
Gon-Solvist, I believe his husband
2:59:57
is. Gon-Caldus.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More