Podchaser Logo
Home
1651 - "WWX"

1651 - "WWX"

Released Sunday, 14th April 2024
 1 person rated this episode
1651 - "WWX"

1651 - "WWX"

1651 - "WWX"

1651 - "WWX"

Sunday, 14th April 2024
 1 person rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

He is blithering. Adam

0:02

Curry, John C. Dvorak. It's Sunday,

0:04

April 14, 2024. This

0:06

is your award-winning cable nation media assassination

0:08

episode 1651. This

0:11

is No Agenda. Breaking

0:13

unprecedented and broadcasting live from the

0:16

heart of the Texas Hill Country

0:18

here in FEMA Region Number 6.

0:20

In the morning everybody, I'm Adam

0:22

Curry. And from Northern Silicon Valley,

0:24

where the real question is, do you

0:27

have a leaky gut? I'm

0:29

John C. Dvorak. It's

0:31

Cragbot and Buzzkill. In the morning. I'm

0:34

glad you brought up something that the Elgos are

0:36

telling you to be worried about. Leaky

0:39

gut. Did

0:44

you see, were you watching TV? Was

0:47

that what happened? You were watching TV and you got

0:49

a leaky gut connection? No, I was watching a Rumble

0:51

channel. Oh, brother. I was

0:53

watching the World Rumble channel. I was

0:55

on the tin end of the World

0:57

channels. Where they go

1:00

on and on about what they're going to do to

1:02

you and then they go into this leaky gut ad.

1:06

I'm thinking I've seen one too many

1:08

of these leaky gut ads. I'm

1:10

sick of it. Okay. Remind

1:14

me to bring up the TikTok

1:16

advertising thing later. Why

1:19

later? Now you got my interest. Are

1:23

they pushing leaky gut? No.

1:26

And by the way, the stuff you take

1:28

for a leaky gut seems to be more

1:30

like some sort of plaster that seals the

1:32

gut. How's that work? Leaky

1:35

gut is, I hear from everybody, leaky

1:38

gut is really the genesis of all

1:40

your problems. Yeah, exactly

1:42

right. Leaky gut is the bottom line.

1:44

I don't feel good. Leaky gut must

1:46

be leaky gut. Nah

1:49

man, people have been sitting

1:51

around going, oh, oh,

1:54

oh, I need John and Adam

1:57

to help me understand what's happening. mean

2:00

the scamish bull crap that's been

2:02

going on and the scripted nonsense

2:04

about the old World War 3

2:06

with Iran? Breaking!

2:12

Good morning America, breaking overnight.

2:14

Breaking overnight! Finally

2:16

hundreds of frozen ballistic missiles and

2:19

drones at Israeli targets in an

2:21

unprecedented unprecedented show of force.

2:25

Explosions in the sky as the Iron

2:27

Dome fends off most of the attack. Explosions

2:30

in the sky! Air raid sirens wailing

2:33

across Israel, the country shutting down airspace

2:35

to international and domestic flights. This

2:38

is a severe and dangerous escalation.

2:40

Iran retaliating for a deadly attack

2:42

on its consulate in Syria. President

2:44

Biden cutting his weekend short and

2:47

monitoring the unfolding events from the

2:49

situation. The monitoring situation is

2:51

surrounded by top advisors. US military assets

2:53

in the region, ships and manpower

2:55

helping to fend off the attack.

2:58

Iran's first and

3:05

John Kirby joins us live. GMA

3:07

with full analysis of the

3:09

unfolding situation from Israel to the

3:12

White House to Wall Street amid

3:14

fears of a widening war. Widening

3:16

war! Good morning

3:18

America! Whoa! I'm

3:22

tired already. It's amazing. Everybody

3:26

was ready for this. Everybody was ready.

3:28

The news media, they had all their bits, they had

3:30

all their bites. Brian

3:32

of London who's in Tel Aviv, he

3:35

said, oh, we got the notice. He

3:37

said, you know, around I think it's one

3:39

o'clock our time. He said,

3:42

oh, they said between 11 and 11 o'clock,

3:44

here it comes. It'll last two to three

3:46

hours. We know it's

3:48

coming. He didn't even sleep in his bomb shelter

3:52

which he has in the house. He

3:55

said, oh, my clips I got from this thing and

3:57

there's too many of them because they Nobody

4:00

could talk about anything else. Although

4:02

now everything continues

4:04

to confirm the

4:06

idea that Israel killed that

4:09

guy in the embassy on

4:11

purpose and there was a

4:13

quid pro quo in place and this

4:15

is all stage theater. That's

4:18

the story for sure. And

4:21

I finally got the clip I needed which will

4:23

be the last clip I play which confirms the

4:25

thesis. Sorry, why don't you start

4:27

because I've got some feast eye of my own.

4:31

Let's start with this. This

4:33

was on Saturday by the

4:35

way just before the attack

4:38

began. This is PBS

4:41

News Hour Weekends on Saturday and

4:43

this is the kind of speculation

4:45

that you had before the attack,

4:48

before the quote unquote attack. Yeah

4:50

it was good. PBS Saturday on

4:52

Iran speculations one. Is Israel and

4:54

the US await a possible Iranian

4:57

response to the attack on its

4:59

consulate last week in Damascus, Syria?

5:02

That Israeli air strike killed one

5:04

of Iran's senior military leaders and

5:06

the Islamic Republic has vowed vengeance.

5:09

Following it all is Nick Schifrin who joins us

5:11

now. It's good to see you Nick. So how

5:13

great is the concern and what exactly are the

5:16

US and Israel bracing for? Senior

5:18

administration official tells me tonight that the

5:20

concern is quote very high. And

5:23

the US and Israel officials

5:25

are preparing for strikes by

5:27

Iran and Iran's proxies inside

5:29

Israel. And Iran has never

5:31

attacked Israel with kinetic weapons before.

5:33

One US official tells me the

5:35

attack is likely to be quote

5:37

bigger than usual. Another US

5:40

official tells me that the timing of the attack is

5:43

bigger than usual. They've

5:46

never attacked him before. But

5:48

it's bigger than usual. But

5:50

yet it's bigger than usual. But

5:53

yet it will be bigger than usual.

5:55

Now much bigger. How does that

5:57

work? They've never attacked him

5:59

before but it's... going to be bigger than usual. Okay,

6:02

well, you know, this is the way

6:04

the report thinks. It's real with kinetic

6:06

weapons before. One US official tells me

6:08

the attack is likely to be, quote,

6:10

bigger than usual. Another US

6:12

official tells me the timing of the attack could

6:14

be, quote, by the end of the weekend. But

6:17

I will say that another official from a different

6:19

branch of government is telling

6:21

me that the assessment is more that

6:24

Iranian proxies by themselves would attack Israel

6:26

or its assets in the region. And

6:29

so clearly, there are ongoing assessments. I just

6:31

want to remind everybody that

6:33

on Thursday, I was

6:35

already playing the Bomb, Bomb, Buran

6:38

end of show mixes because they

6:40

had already promised it was a

6:42

foregone conclusion. This

6:44

is a setup, of course, but

6:47

it was already a foregone conclusion on Thursday.

6:49

Oh, it's Iran. Oh, it's going to

6:51

be Iran. Oh, it's Iran. Iran's going to retaliate.

6:53

I'm going to retaliate. All right. Okay.

6:56

Okay. Let's hear some more

6:59

speculation from Saturday. But all the

7:01

officials agree that the most likely

7:03

scenario we're talking about is Iranian

7:06

missiles or Iranian made missiles and

7:08

drones attacking inside Israel and or

7:10

on Israel outside of Israel property.

7:13

And to show how seriously the US

7:15

is taking this, the US embassy in

7:18

Israel yesterday announced that

7:20

US government employees and their families

7:22

would be restricted from traveling outside

7:25

of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv or the

7:27

southern city of their Shiba. Those

7:29

are the places, by the way,

7:31

that Israeli iron dome and missile

7:33

defense are strongest. And today,

7:35

President Biden said an attack would be,

7:37

quote, sooner than later. What is your

7:39

practice to Iran in this moment? We

7:44

are devoted to the defense of Israel.

7:47

We will support Israel. We will help

7:49

defend Israel and Iran will

7:51

not succeed. Don't

7:54

don't hear the drone. There it

7:56

is. There it is. Hold on. There

7:59

it is. Don't. Just

8:01

don't. Iran will not succeed. What

8:03

does that even mean? Yeah but they... No

8:06

good. No good. Let's go to...

8:09

The funny thing is El Jazeera wasn't that much

8:11

better. They

8:20

spent hours and hours

8:22

and hours. They had nothing else to

8:24

do. So they just kept

8:27

bringing in one guy after

8:29

another to yak yak yak. So

8:31

let's listen to the series

8:34

that's the best is Iran

8:37

says it's already over because

8:39

that's what happened. In

8:41

the middle of the attack Iran sent out

8:43

a note. This is all covered in these

8:46

clips. So let's play Iran says it's already

8:48

over AJ. Well US President Joe Biden has

8:50

just released a statement on X. He said

8:52

I just met with my national security... Wait

8:54

a minute. Is

8:56

the White House now releasing statements on X?

9:00

Not only that but curiously so is

9:02

Iran. I

9:05

have that one too. Team for an

9:07

update on Iran's attacks against Israel. Our

9:09

commitment to Israel security against threats from

9:11

Iran and its proxies is iron clad.

9:14

Let's go to Gabe Lozondo now at the

9:16

United Nations headquarters in New York. Gabe will

9:18

come to President Biden's statement in a second

9:20

but the Iranian mission to the UN

9:23

issued a statement earlier. Just

9:25

remind us Gabe what they had to say. Yeah

9:28

that's right. This is the only statement that we've

9:30

gotten out of the Iranian mission but it's an

9:32

important one and it is worth

9:35

repeating in these very sensitive

9:37

times of course. The

9:40

Iranian mission to the United Nations

9:42

put out this statement saying that they conducted on

9:45

the strength of Article 51 of

9:48

the UN Charter pertaining to legitimate

9:50

defense. Iran's military action

9:52

was in response to in

9:54

their words the Zionist regime's

9:56

aggression against our diplomatic presence

9:59

in Damascus. The matter

10:01

can be deemed concluded. The

10:04

message on X went on to

10:06

say, however, should the Israeli regime

10:08

make another mistake, Iran's

10:10

response will be considerably more

10:12

severe. It is a

10:15

conflict between Iran and the rogue

10:17

Israeli regime from which the US

10:19

must stay away. So,

10:22

okay, hold on a second. So

10:24

first of all, I love that this is a war

10:26

on X or is it X wars? It's one of

10:28

the two. So we're now

10:30

tweeting, we're rage tweeting at each

10:32

other. I think

10:34

Jesus said that. Nation

10:36

will rise against nation, kingdom against kingdom and they

10:38

will battle it out on X. Second,

10:43

Article 51 reads as

10:46

such, nothing in the present Charter shall

10:48

impair the inherent right of individuals or

10:50

collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs

10:52

against a member of the United Nations

10:55

until the Security Council has taken measures

10:57

necessary to maintain international peace and security.

11:00

Okay, so they're operating within the law.

11:03

Good to know. There's law on X.

11:06

There's law. This is great.

11:08

Elon, I mean, Elon, this is good

11:10

for him. This is

11:12

good for him and it shows

11:16

how he's in on the game. Hey,

11:18

hey guys, listen, listen guys. Listen,

11:20

listen, listen. You

11:23

want some starling juice? Okay, could you please battle it

11:25

out on X for me? Come on, I need that.

11:27

Alrighty, now we'll do it. It's

11:30

in the contract. Yes.

11:34

We think alike on this. Yes, okay. Part

11:37

two? Yes. Clearly two

11:39

things out of that statement by the Iranian

11:42

mission that are pretty important. Number

11:44

one is they are saying, make

11:46

no mistake, they are saying it's in accordance

11:48

with Article 51 of

11:51

this, the UN Charter and in Article

11:53

51 it says, nothing in

11:55

the present Charter shall impair the inherent right

11:57

of individuals. I just read that. The inherent

11:59

right of individual or color. collective self-defense if

12:02

an armed attack occurs against

12:04

a member of the United

12:06

Nations." So clearly Iran positioning

12:09

itself here that this is a response

12:12

in line with international law, in

12:14

line with the UN Charter because

12:17

it was a response to Israel's

12:19

attack on Iran's diplomatic premises in

12:21

Damascus, of course. Oh, this

12:23

is great. Hey, man. Hey,

12:26

man, it's legal, okay? All

12:28

right. We're going to send the drones because

12:32

of Article 51. I'm

12:39

going to mention something before we play the last part

12:41

of this and then we get the thing,

12:43

we beat it up a little bit more. I

12:46

need to. But

12:48

the disconcerting part about all this, even though

12:51

I think this whole thing is just a

12:53

stage to its theater, is

12:58

the bombing of the consulate

13:01

and then what happened in Ecuador, which

13:03

is the raiding of the Mexican consulate. Yeah,

13:07

that's a very, very lightly covered

13:10

topic. This

13:13

is a bad thing to

13:15

start doing. These things are supposed to

13:17

be sovereign. You're

13:19

not supposed to be able to bomb them

13:22

or raid them or go in there or

13:24

do anything else. It's

13:27

closer to an act of war than

13:30

it is to some skirmish like the

13:32

way they're portraying it. This

13:34

is a bad thing that's going on and it's trending. So

13:37

I think it's

13:39

trending because you had the Ecuador thing

13:41

and it goes back to

13:43

the American embassy in Iran when

13:46

they had the revolution in 79.

13:49

But they didn't

13:52

go in there to grab the Americans

13:54

and if they did, there's

13:57

nothing to go in. You mean the one in Syria? in

14:00

Damascus? No, no, the one in Iran.

14:02

Oh, in Iran, yeah. No, they didn't go in. They didn't

14:04

go in. But now

14:06

they're going in and this means that anyone

14:08

who's going to be in the foreign service

14:11

and working anywhere, you're up for grabs. It's

14:13

this is the protection is over and nobody's

14:15

taught and that issue is not being discussed

14:17

at all. Well, I have

14:20

a clip but we'll play your... And we may

14:22

have been the one who triggered it when we,

14:24

if you recall, during the Clinton

14:26

administration... We may have the consulate

14:28

conversation after your third clip because I have two

14:30

clips. We blew up the Chinese consulate, I'm just

14:33

going to say. With a cruise missile. With a

14:35

cruise missile. With a cruise missile

14:37

accidentally. Whoops. Whoops. Let's

14:40

go with... Okay, clip three. But

14:42

then also the other important part of this

14:44

statement as well is the matter can be

14:46

deemed concluded. Clearly Iran they're

14:48

saying that this is it. This is the

14:51

response and as far as they're

14:53

concerned, at least from this statement and where we're

14:55

at right now at this

14:57

very hour, in their words, the

14:59

issue is concluded. So

15:01

those are pretty important statements

15:03

there from the Iranian mission

15:05

here at the UN. Yeah, Gabe, and just a final

15:08

thought to you. I mean, what about the response from

15:10

other UN members including the US that President Biden responded

15:12

there? Oh, stop it, Gabe. So

15:15

it's concluded and it turns out to

15:17

be concluded but no, we have to

15:19

keep yakking about it. And this will

15:21

be yakking about on the Sunday shows

15:23

and yakking and yakking and yakking. Wait

15:26

a minute, it can't be concluded. This is

15:28

too much airtime we can waste yakking

15:30

about it. So we're going to... This guy's

15:32

going to butt in and start yakking about it more. Just

15:36

a final thought to you. I mean, what

15:38

about the response from other UN members including

15:40

the US that President Biden responded there? How

15:42

worried are they about any further escalation? Well,

15:44

the US, of course, in Washington, they're of

15:46

course very worried about it. And you saw

15:48

it there from the statement. And

15:50

Joe Biden returning from Rehoboth Beach where

15:52

he spends a lot of his weekend

15:54

time late

15:58

on a Saturday to be back up. White

16:00

House, you knew when that happened that

16:02

they announced that he was coming back to White House.

16:05

That meant that something was probably going to be

16:07

happening, clearly. Beyond that, here

16:09

at UN headquarters in New York, it's a

16:11

little before 8 p.m. local time here. I

16:14

can tell you we have gotten no other reactions

16:16

so far from any countries

16:18

here, member states of the UN. I

16:21

can tell you that Malta holds

16:23

the presidency of the Security Council for

16:25

the month of April. So if there

16:28

were to be an emergency

16:30

Security Council meeting called because

16:32

of what's happening right

16:35

now, it would be Malta that would have

16:37

to plan that meeting

16:39

and or schedule that meeting, if

16:41

you will. And according

16:43

to our diplomatic sources, Malta has

16:46

not at this hour gotten any

16:48

requests yet for an emergency

16:50

Security Council meeting. Okay, John, I need

16:52

to ask you a very important question.

16:55

Where are you at this hour? Who

16:59

was the first to say at this

17:02

hour? Was it Bush? Was

17:05

that the... You know, that's a good

17:07

question. That's a

17:09

great question. It's

17:13

interesting that yes, I don't know,

17:15

but it's being used constantly. It's

17:18

part of the breaking, trending at

17:21

this hour. Breaking alert. At

17:23

this unprecedented, at this hour, at

17:26

this hour, I'm pooping. It's

17:29

just so everything is like, it's

17:32

all on a pivot point and

17:34

at this hour. At this hour. I mean... It's

17:37

just to keep people on edge. Yes. I

17:39

mean, this is the phoniest thing I've seen for 16

17:41

years. Let me dive in.

17:43

First of all, we'll go back to the phony because

17:46

this ex back and forth is

17:48

bugging me. In fact, it's like

17:50

World War X. The attack

17:52

marks the first time Iran has launched

17:54

a direct military assault on Israel, despite

17:57

decades of hostility between the two.

18:00

Iran had vowed revenge since in April

18:02

the first airstrike in Syria revenge killed

18:05

two Iranian generals inside a consulate building

18:07

in Damascus which they blamed

18:09

on Israel Shortly after the

18:11

strikes the office of the Iranian

18:13

ambassador to the UN posted on social media

18:16

warning against US involvement

18:19

The matter can be deemed concluded However,

18:21

should the Israeli regime make another mistake

18:24

Iran's response will be considerably more severe

18:26

It is a conflict

18:28

between Iran and the rogue Israeli regime

18:31

from which the US must stay away Alright, so

18:33

this World War X is interesting we

18:36

just need to leave that for what it is

18:39

because it says a lot about what's going on

18:41

this little play and one of

18:43

the actors made a mistake this morning and

18:46

I was really fortunate in this season of

18:48

reveal to come across this clip

18:50

from CBS this is some second stringer who

18:54

was doing the interview with a former CIA counterintelligence

18:57

official ok like

19:00

you can be a former CIA

19:02

counterintelligence official I don't

19:04

think so and he revealed something

19:07

interesting I want to bring in now CBS

19:09

News contributor and former chief

19:11

of operations in the CIA's

19:13

counter-terrorism mission center Andrew Boyd

19:16

Andrew! That's a little bit though about timing Andy

19:18

Boyd Never seen Andy in

19:20

my life before Never We don't

19:22

know Andy Andy He jumps up

19:24

on the scene He's a young guy He's

19:26

got because of course he's retired You

19:28

know you're retired when you're 35 over

19:31

there in the CIA Yeah, sure Counterintelligence

19:33

bureau Mission center Andrew Boyd Let's

19:35

talk a little bit though about timing Andrew

19:38

I was speaking with MTS about religious calendars

19:41

but this also comes in the context of

19:43

Israel getting

19:46

ready to slaughter the Red Heifer intending to

19:48

have a ground invasion in Rafa

19:50

being dissuaded by the United States

19:53

and other international actors trying

19:56

to minimize casualties in Gaza.

20:01

Do you think that in any way that this is

20:03

Iran trying to re-divert

20:06

attention away from

20:09

that potential military action by Israel? No,

20:12

I really don't. I mean, I think

20:15

this is solely tied to the attack

20:17

in Damascus against the facility adjacent

20:19

to the Iranian embassy in Damascus,

20:23

and the fact that a very

20:25

senior IRDC, Qudsworth, officer was killed

20:28

along with several other officers, this

20:31

is directly tied to that. And

20:35

a need in the minds of the Iranian

20:37

government that they needed to retaliate

20:39

against that alleged

20:42

Israeli attack. The Iranians

20:44

have really tried to stay out

20:46

of the conflict between Israel

20:48

and Hamas, and any

20:50

linkage between the two, I

20:52

think, would be a supposition that

20:55

just wouldn't fit with Iranian behavior.

20:57

Okay, so slip up there. And

21:01

everyone was on script, but then he said alleged

21:05

attack by Israel. What

21:07

would he say that? At

21:09

this hour, this is a foregone conclusion. You

21:13

even just said it yourself? Look, they attacked.

21:15

Now, I like your overall theory that... He

21:21

also said on the facility next

21:23

to the embassy. We're getting to get to that.

21:25

That's clip two. So

21:28

this alleged was a slip up, and

21:30

you'll hear him going a lot of

21:32

Hamana, because the newbie

21:35

over at CBS, clearly out

21:37

of J school, has not been

21:39

read in yet. She's like, hey, wait a minute.

21:41

What did you say to her? She

21:45

was not read in on this, but everyone

21:48

agrees at this hour that it

21:50

was Israel that attacked,

21:52

but apparently Israel has never

21:55

claimed this attack. I

21:57

like your overall thesis.

22:00

that this was

22:02

done let's just say by us US

22:06

and remember there's a lot CIA guys

22:08

have been all over this conflict yeah

22:11

we've got what's our chief

22:13

CIA guy these days? He's

22:16

the one going over to Qatar and you know trying

22:18

to go to

22:22

diplomat he's our go-to diplomat somehow he's

22:24

the head of the CIA and the

22:26

go-to diplomat because he was a diplomat

22:28

before but he was

22:31

always with the agents obviously because

22:33

this is an intelligence operation and

22:37

now now newbie over there CBS she's

22:39

going to throw out the script and

22:41

say hey hey hey I learned

22:43

in J school to follow up interesting

22:46

and you didn't say alleged

22:48

attack by Israel on that

22:50

embassy in Damascus Israel has

22:52

not claimed responsibility for it

22:54

obviously Iran wholly has

22:57

is holding Israel responsible you can

22:59

hear her IAB going off does

23:08

it matter obviously Iran has

23:12

is holding Israel responsible does

23:14

it matter in

23:16

any way that Israel has not claimed responsibility

23:19

yes you make a

23:21

very good point but in the history of Israel's

23:23

conflict with Syria

23:30

and then with with the Iranians

23:33

and the Iranian proxies in Syria

23:36

there there has there has always been a

23:39

denial or the Israelis just have never acknowledged

23:41

it so my point on the alleged

23:44

attack yes is my is that the

23:46

Israelis have never acknowledged that they did

23:48

attack that facility now there is

23:51

a number there's no one else who could

23:53

claim responsibility but the bigger

23:55

debate about that facility is what it

23:58

was and and and the Iranian I

24:00

mean it was a concept. I

24:03

lived in Damascus as a diplomat. Actually

24:06

I lived in that neighborhood and

24:08

the Iranians have used that. No,

24:10

this gets good. This

24:12

gets really good. This guy is great.

24:14

He lived there as a diplomat. Quote

24:17

on quote. Quote on quote. So this

24:19

is basically saying to the American public

24:21

if you read between the lines that

24:24

all our diplomats are CIA guys.

24:27

Hello, this guy has to be

24:29

put back to the, sent back

24:31

to school to learn

24:34

how to talk to the media. This is the

24:36

JV team. He screwed it up, then she

24:38

screwed it up. And yeah, you're right.

24:40

This is a weekend team. This is one of the

24:42

reasons you do these things on the weekend. The Iranians

24:44

think, well let's do this over the weekend because we

24:46

get to see what happens. The

24:48

bigger debate about that facility is what it

24:50

was. And the Iranians

24:53

are claiming it was a consulate. I

24:56

lived in Damascus as a diplomat.

24:58

Actually I lived in that neighborhood.

25:02

And the Iranians have used

25:04

that facility and the embassy

25:06

for their activities, supporting Hezbollah,

25:08

supporting other Shia militia

25:10

groups around the region. So to

25:13

reference it as a consulate, a

25:15

consulate that issues visas as a

25:17

consulate, the United States consulates worldwide

25:19

would, is a bit of a

25:21

stretch. So that argument is a bit spurious

25:23

on the Iranians part. But the

25:26

fact of the matter remains that the Israelis

25:28

have not acknowledged that that was their attack

25:30

against that facility that I say encodes the

25:32

Iranians claims of the consulate. Yeah,

25:34

you're fired. All right. You're

25:37

fired. And by the way, they never denied

25:39

it either. Did they mention that in this

25:41

report? No. So, okay.

25:43

So this is something, and clearly

25:46

this guy

25:48

knows who blowed it up. And it doesn't seem

25:51

like it was the Israelis. But

25:53

in the grand scheme of the little play, let's

25:56

see how this plays out. And

25:59

your cup. bear a couple of things in mind, Faribah's,

26:02

my old boss Lex's

26:04

wife Faribah, she's

26:07

Iranian. In fact, I

26:09

think he's probably supposed to go visit Tehran

26:11

and then he's going to Kabul. He

26:13

was going to send back a report this

26:16

month. I don't know if he's already gone. She

26:19

always says, oh, in Iran,

26:21

we all know America and Iran,

26:24

the leaders of Iran, they're all playing

26:26

together. They're always working together, always working

26:29

together. Don't buy any of

26:31

it. They're always working together. We

26:35

know that this is the third term of Obama

26:37

who, how was it? Was

26:40

it $6 or $7 billion in cash

26:42

he shipped over? In

26:45

pallets. In pallets of money. With this

26:47

video, I mean, we haven't forgotten this.

26:49

Cash, cash money, money. Always

26:52

letting them do a little bit of spinning up

26:54

with that uranium and then there

26:56

was another, what was it, another $6 billion

26:58

that we said, you can have that with

27:00

interest, don't worry about it, which

27:02

was part of what the October 7th

27:04

attack was blamed on in the very

27:06

beginning, if you remember. Biden did it.

27:09

Biden, he let that money go just

27:11

so we're clear. The

27:13

American administration under Obama,

27:16

one, two and third term has

27:19

always been friendly and appeasing

27:22

to Iran. Now Sky

27:24

News had a professor on

27:26

and he made some things very clear. This

27:29

for me is when the light bulbs started

27:31

to go off. Well, I'm joined now by

27:33

Fauas Jerzyz, who's a professor of international relations

27:35

at the London School of Economics and Spoke

27:37

Medical Science. Very good

27:39

morning to you. Thanks so much for talking

27:41

to us here this morning. So President Biden

27:44

saying that he expects Iran to attack Israel

27:46

sooner rather than later. So

27:48

what do we expect to happen next?

27:51

Well, I mean, we don't believe we

27:53

are dependent on all of us on

27:55

American intelligence. American

27:57

intelligence. Thanks. an

28:00

attack on Israel is imminent. The

28:02

Iranians have not made a formal

28:05

decision, the top leadership. Yet, no

28:09

American targets are likely

28:11

to be in this particular attack. That

28:14

Iran will be using cruise missiles

28:16

and drones. The big

28:18

point here is the following. I

28:21

mean, think about it. You are

28:23

not in the United States. Everyone

28:25

is talking about this really unfolding

28:27

crisis. This is a man's

28:29

made crisis. This

28:32

is Benjamin Netanyahu's work

28:34

cabinet decision to provoke

28:36

Iran, to attack Iranian

28:38

sovereignty, the Iranian consulate

28:40

in Syria and field,

28:42

several top commanders. I

28:46

mean, I fully understand when President Biden

28:48

says we are devoted to

28:50

the defense of Israel. The question for

28:52

me, for him, is the following. Are

28:54

you devoted to the defense of

28:57

Israel? One Israeli leaders provoke

28:59

other nations and try to drag

29:01

the United States into another war in

29:03

the Middle East. That's what we are seeing

29:05

now. Thank you, professor. Now all of a

29:07

sudden it all comes into view. Remember,

29:10

just a few weeks ago, Chuck

29:12

Schumer, the biggest Jew in

29:14

Congress, oh, Netanyahu's got

29:16

to go. We got to get

29:18

him out. No good. Netanyahu bad.

29:21

Strong supporter of Israel, our friend

29:23

Chuck Schumer. So let's

29:26

just look at some history here. Long

29:29

before October 7th, Netanyahu

29:32

was under severe attack, quote

29:35

unquote, by protesters because

29:38

he wanted to change the Supreme Court

29:41

to bring more power to the Knesset,

29:43

more power to him. Now I'm

29:45

not making a judgment on that but we

29:48

had huge protests,

29:50

very, very woke movement. Israel

29:53

has become severely woke. We've

29:56

had 60 minutes,

29:58

did the entire pieces. is on

30:00

the LGBTQ movement within the

30:02

military. It's all about, oh,

30:05

we have to have, come on, this

30:07

is a very, very, we're very liberal

30:09

here in Israel. We love LGBTQ, we're

30:11

all Q, we're all Q, we love

30:13

it. And

30:16

the protests were very

30:18

similar to the BLM riots under Trump.

30:21

They were trying to get rid of him then.

30:24

The globalists put

30:27

in the middle who that is, but the

30:29

globalists want us all just in a big,

30:31

new world order, liberal,

30:34

democratic, world-based rules, whatever

30:37

they call it. Everyone

30:40

has to conform, and Netanyahu

30:42

is a nationalist, and he's

30:44

not conforming, they want him

30:46

out. So again,

30:49

we've sent billions in cash to

30:51

the Iranian leaders, we've appeased them.

30:53

October 7th itself,

30:55

let us recall, was highly

30:57

suspicious. All of

31:00

a sudden, we have the

31:02

militaries, AWOL, there's no one

31:04

guarding the big wall, the

31:06

fence, for hours, no

31:08

response. Let's not forget that. Who

31:11

did that? Why did that happen? That

31:14

was, at best, suspicious. Now

31:17

the timing of this attack. This

31:20

is the start of Passover week in Israel, and

31:24

the earlier one of your reports, oh, the schools

31:26

are closed, the schools are closed, it's Passover week,

31:30

and I heard from Sir Brian

31:32

of London, Israeli moms particularly are

31:34

very mad about this because they

31:36

typically send all their kids to

31:38

Passover camp. Get out, kid, go

31:40

away for a week. This is

31:42

vacation time, they're very annoyed. Now the

31:45

kids are home, people

31:47

are not happy about this. This

31:50

is an attack on Netanyahu

31:52

himself. They want him

31:54

out, and they'll do anything to

31:57

rile up Israel, and I think

31:59

Israel... And I think we'll be seeing a

32:02

lot of protests now,

32:05

protests have been ongoing. Then it was

32:07

for we need a

32:10

ceasefire because of the

32:12

hostages, Netanyahu, you're killing

32:14

hostages, everything is against

32:16

Netanyahu. That's what this

32:18

is about. And our people, our

32:20

intelligence agencies, they're doing this. Iran

32:23

probably said as you posited,

32:27

these guys in this so-called consulate, this

32:29

is these guys are, these are

32:31

A-holes, we can't control them. They're in this

32:33

little building over here. Go get rid of

32:35

them, they're annoying to us anyway. And we'll

32:37

blame it on Israel. And

32:40

that's exactly what is going on. Here

32:42

in the United States, Biden has a

32:45

huge problem. The left, the

32:48

BLM people who are all on Biden's

32:50

side are now mad. Oh,

32:53

genocide, genocide, genocide. The

32:55

right, the extreme far

32:57

right are equally mad

32:59

because Jews, Zionism, everybody

33:01

hates Biden so they have to

33:04

do something and the solution is

33:06

not a ceasefire. The solution is

33:08

we have to get rid of

33:11

Netanyahu. Now for my fellow Jesus

33:13

freaks, there's some biblical

33:15

references here. A

33:17

lot of people that I know are all spun up.

33:19

Oh, this is it. Ezekiel,

33:22

this is the prophecy at the end times. Oh,

33:26

Russia gets involved in Iran, that's it. Well,

33:30

no one knows of course when the end

33:32

times come but when

33:35

it was Saul's time to get out

33:37

ruling over Israel and to turn it

33:39

over to David, the men from

33:41

Issachar, men who understood the times and knew

33:43

what Israel should do, 200 chiefs

33:46

with all their relatives under their command

33:48

came in. That's what's going on right

33:50

here. That's what's

33:53

happening. Yeah, I'm glad you got

33:55

that off your chest. I

33:58

feel exactly the opposite. This

34:00

whole scheme was to keep

34:03

Netanyahu in office and to

34:05

save him. This

34:08

was a quid pro quo. The

34:10

Israelis and whoever killed those

34:12

guys who were troublemakers and

34:14

they killed him in that

34:16

embassy in Damascus. And

34:19

it was like, okay, here's what we're going to do.

34:21

You're going to do that. We're going to fake a

34:23

raid. We're going to send a bunch of missiles and

34:25

then call it over when it's over. And it's not

34:28

going to hit anything. It's going to look like maybe

34:30

it'll hurt somebody by accident, but we can live with

34:32

that. And

34:34

so what's in it for Netanyahu? I

34:36

want to play the concluding clip I

34:39

have, which is the Iran analysis. And

34:41

listen carefully. This is what it's really

34:43

all about. The superpowers

34:46

will have to take

34:48

a sense and be clear about

34:50

how do they stop the escalation.

34:53

And the Israeli response has

34:55

to do with

34:57

a lot, I'm afraid, with

35:00

Netanyahu's public relations. He

35:02

has got now the support of the

35:04

Israeli public, which he lost in

35:06

October 7th. Nobody is

35:09

talking now about the

35:11

abductees. Nobody is talking

35:14

about the famine in Gaza. It's

35:16

all about Iran. It depends on

35:19

how far the United States is

35:21

willing to go. What

35:24

is the American leverage

35:26

on Iran? I

35:28

love your analysis. I'm not

35:30

going to be rude like you were and say, I'm glad you

35:32

got that off you. Yes. Dush.

35:36

But let's put these conflicting opinions into

35:38

the red book. I think

35:40

Netanyahu is out within three months. Okay,

35:44

you can say that. You

35:46

don't have to be rude about it. I'm not being

35:48

rude. I say you can say that. I can say

35:50

that one too. It's all about the inflection. Okay,

35:53

you can say that. I didn't

35:55

have any inflection whatsoever. It was dead flat.

36:00

Okay. You're

36:02

hearing stuff that I'm not saying but

36:04

that's fine. Let's

36:06

just remember that there's always someone who benefits

36:09

from this. All of this could have a

36:11

major impact on the markets and oil prices.

36:13

ABC's Alexis Christopher is here tracking that part

36:15

of the story. Good morning Alexis. Good morning

36:17

Gio. Unrest in the Middle East has Wall Street

36:20

on high alert. Investors are bracing

36:22

for another spike in oil prices and a

36:24

possible stock sell off when the opening bell

36:26

sounds on Wall Street tomorrow. Stocks

36:29

were already in sell off mode last week

36:31

in anticipation of Iran's attack against

36:33

Israel. Stocks had their worst

36:35

week of the year while oil prices climbed

36:37

to a six month high topping $90

36:40

a barrel, a level not seen since

36:42

the early days of the Israel-Hamas war.

36:45

Analysts are now predicting oil prices above $100

36:48

a barrel as turmoil in the Middle

36:50

East threatens oil supply in the region

36:52

putting key shipping routes in jeopardy and

36:55

potentially sending gas prices and

36:57

inflation soaring. It was

36:59

just weeks ago stocks were rallying to

37:01

record highs on hopes the Fed would

37:03

deliver three interest rate cuts this year.

37:06

Those hopes were dashed after new reports

37:08

confirmed inflation is back on the rise

37:10

and now the risk of a wider

37:12

regional war in the Middle East

37:14

is pressuring global stock markets sending

37:16

investors running to the relative safety

37:18

of bonds, gold and the US

37:21

dollar. Yeah. Yeah. That's

37:23

a funny report from her since oil

37:26

is still stuck at 85 and gold

37:28

dropped 12 points since

37:30

she said that. All right. I

37:34

have a couple of clips. It'd be just because it's so

37:36

much fun. That's all they talked about. Oh,

37:38

by the way, there was one other thing that

37:40

happened. By the way, all

37:42

they talked about made it very difficult

37:45

to get any sort of clips that

37:47

were interesting not about this stupid situation.

37:49

No, that's correct. I mean, it's like

37:51

COVID, you know, but also is that

37:53

talk about COVID. This

37:56

is big. This is at this hour.

38:00

This is unprecedented. And I will mention by

38:02

the way, as far as I'm concerned, after

38:04

that list of that stock market report, this

38:07

was done over the weekend because of the

38:09

stock market. Of course. What do

38:11

you think? I think stocks are going to

38:13

rock it on Monday. It's going to be

38:15

great. If

38:17

you go either way, I would make that

38:20

bet. No, I'm not betting on it. And

38:22

so there was one other little thing that

38:24

happened and this was also unprecedented. Oh no,

38:26

it really wasn't. The Mediterranean shipping company has

38:28

confirmed reports that the MSC Ares vessel

38:30

was boarded by Iranian authorities via

38:33

helicopter as the ship passed the

38:35

Strait of Hormuz. Did you see

38:37

this footage? This

38:39

was nothing like we're used to from

38:41

the Houthis. This wasn't

38:43

like a cool... Different producers, different

38:46

directors. No producer. Different people on the

38:48

camera. No producer. It looked

38:50

like a Russian helicopter, which

38:52

would probably make sense. It looked like

38:54

a bullcough. And there's two guys

38:56

rappelling down. All right, we're taking this

38:58

ship. We're pirates. It wasn't like the

39:00

cool landing on the deck and all

39:02

the guys jumping out in their brand

39:04

new military garb like a video game.

39:07

There was none of that. It was just a

39:09

couple dudes rappelling down. Hey, we got

39:11

the script here. We're

39:14

now in charge, okay? Okay. Iran's

39:16

official news agency releasing video showing

39:18

someone rappelling from the helicopter to

39:21

board the ship, which Iran claims

39:23

is Portuguese flagged and connected to

39:25

Israel. In a statement to ABC

39:27

News, the shipping company says the

39:29

MSC Aries is owned by Zodiac

39:31

Maritime. Zodiac is partially owned by

39:33

an Israeli family. In a statement,

39:35

Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz claimed

39:37

it was a Portuguese civilian cargo

39:39

ship belonging to a European Union

39:42

member. Katz calling Iran's seizure of

39:44

the ship a pirate operation in

39:46

violation of international law, adding Iran's

39:48

Ayatollah regime is a criminal regime.

39:50

Israel is already on high alert

39:53

as rockets fired by the Iran-backed

39:55

terror group Hezbollah lit up the

39:57

sky. Those rockets intercepted by the

39:59

U.S. the Iron Dome over northern

40:01

Israel. Hey, I just thought it

40:03

was, yeah, you're right,

40:05

very different producer, very poorly

40:07

done, didn't look cool, didn't,

40:10

you know, I still think the other one

40:12

was video game footage but okay, they had

40:14

a GoPro underneath the helicopter, none of that.

40:17

Why not? Different

40:19

producer. Alright, Kirby is always

40:22

fun to listen to. The Kirby.

40:24

The Rear Admiral. And

40:26

so I got a couple of clips here

40:29

from Good Morning America because, you know, it's

40:31

Kirby, everybody. Kirby, spoke soul Kirby. And

40:33

John, we know that President Biden and

40:35

Prime Minister Netanyahu spoke over the phone

40:37

last night and there is a report

40:40

that Biden told Netanyahu that the US

40:42

will oppose any Israeli counterattack against Iran.

40:45

Can you confirm that's what was said

40:47

and what other context could you provide

40:49

for that conversation? Oh,

40:51

what? That's

40:54

not an accurate reading of

40:56

the conversation. The President

40:58

understands the Prime Minister runs

41:01

a government for a sovereign state of

41:03

Israel and that they'll decide whether

41:06

and how they're going to respond to what

41:08

Iran did last night. We respect

41:10

that. But again,

41:13

the President's message to the Prime

41:15

Minister was that he knows

41:17

that the United States stands with Israel.

41:20

That wasn't just the United States. Other countries also

41:22

helped Israel defend itself last night. That

41:25

Israel demonstrated a superior military

41:27

capability to what the Iranians threw

41:29

up against them. And

41:32

that, of course, as we've said many, many times,

41:34

we don't want to see the situation

41:36

escalate further. We're not looking for a war with

41:38

Iran. We're not

41:40

looking for a war with Iran. We're

41:42

not looking for it. But will Iran

41:44

attack? Can Iran warn the U.S. to

41:47

stay out of this conflict? And yet

41:49

we saw our assets taking down missiles

41:51

and drones in the skies. Is there

41:53

a concern now from the administration that

41:55

Iran could respond with an attack on

41:57

the U.S. or U.S. assets? That's

42:00

what we want the president also made clear in

42:02

that statement last night that he'll do whatever he

42:05

has to do to protect our troops And our

42:07

facilities are in the region in the region and

42:09

we will do that and we have sent a

42:11

very clear signal to arrive This region is so

42:14

big. I just love in the region privately and

42:16

publicly that any attack on our troops in our

42:18

facilities Will will have

42:20

consequences. We're very serious about that We

42:22

have not seen any threats specific threats

42:25

to our personnel or our facilities But

42:27

we're gonna stay vigilant to that. Absolutely

42:30

But when it comes to defending Israel again,

42:32

the president has been very very clear Israel

42:35

is a good friend and an ally and

42:37

our commitment to them is ironclad to commitment

42:39

to commitment to helping them defend themselves And

42:41

we showed that last night. Yeah, but but

42:43

but this is not good enough. We are

42:45

we are ABC We need to know are

42:48

we being pulled into war World War three

42:50

World War X, you know And our viewers

42:52

might be wondering now of the book this

42:54

this is reading my mind Exactly

42:56

what I'm wondering, you know and our viewers

42:58

might be wondering now What does this mean

43:01

for us and for our troops in the

43:03

region? And how likely is it that the

43:05

US now is getting pulled into this wider

43:07

scale war in the Middle East more troops

43:09

in the region? Well, it's important

43:11

to remember that our troops are in the region largely

43:14

to go after Isis Isis

43:16

in Iraq Isis in Syria. That's why they're

43:18

there. It's Isis. That's why

43:20

we're in the region And

43:22

now we had added additional forces to

43:24

the region since October 7th Help

43:27

with the defense of Israel and to help

43:29

the defense of commercial shipping in the Red

43:31

Sea So largely what we're doing with the

43:33

exception of the mission against Isis, which which

43:35

is a it's an active mission We're

43:38

largely in a defense role in

43:40

the Red Sea in the Gulf of Aden and in

43:42

the Eastern Mediterranean That

43:45

is what we're there for. We're gonna obviously be Vigilant

43:48

to any potential threat to our

43:50

forces in the region, but the president has been

43:52

clear We are not looking for a wider war.

43:54

We're not looking for a second front or a

43:56

third front We're not looking to see escalation and

43:58

we're certainly not looking for a war

44:01

with Iran. Iran responded in

44:03

an unprecedented way. Unprecedented.

44:06

Israel defended in a

44:08

truly unprecedented, remarkable way.

44:11

We don't want to see this situation

44:14

escalate further. Wow, man. It's like Chad

44:16

GPT is writing the scripts. Unprecedented, remarkable

44:18

at this hour in the region. Police.

44:22

It was so

44:24

bad that this happened this weekend.

44:27

Even though they could have been prepared, CNN

44:29

must be cutting budgets because they had Jake

44:31

Tapper doing an extended State of the Union

44:33

show which means don't let

44:35

any of those dopes like CBS get on the

44:37

air. No, no, no, no. But

44:40

they had nobody except John

44:42

Fetterman. Senator, what is your

44:45

reaction to Iran's attack on Israel and

44:47

how worried are you that this is

44:49

the beginning of an open war between

44:51

the two countries? Come on, John. Don't

44:53

screw it up. You can do this.

44:55

Well, a couple of things, actually. I

44:57

think it really demonstrates how it's astonishing

45:00

that we are not standing firmly with

45:02

Israel and there should never be any

45:04

kinds of conditions and all that when

45:06

a nation can launch hundreds of drones

45:09

towards Israel. And I'm not going to be

45:11

talking about conditions. Never. Never.

45:14

And second, I think that also was

45:16

Iran had to have some fireworks after

45:18

Israel smoked that Iranian

45:21

general. Moked. And

45:23

I am here for that. I'm

45:25

going to hear that again. They

45:28

smoked that

45:30

Iranian general and

45:32

I am here for that. And I

45:34

think it's just a matter of theater,

45:37

part of it as well, too. And

45:39

finally, it demonstrates how unstable things are

45:41

and why we need to lean in

45:43

and stand with Israel. Lean in. Well,

45:45

that's good. At least you and I both agree

45:47

that it's a theater. And John Fetterman, he's

45:51

the go-to guy on the weekend. He

45:53

agrees. Just to

45:55

add a little bit to my view

45:57

of it, this is just a

45:59

little echo. extra ditty that's a problem

46:01

for biden pro-palestinian activists want

46:03

president biden to know they

46:06

will be in the street

46:08

when the democratic national convention comes

46:10

to town groups from around

46:12

the country say they will march on

46:14

the dnc this august they met on

46:16

the near south or west side for

46:18

an organizing event planning demonstrations

46:21

for the three-day conference at the

46:23

united center leaders say they call

46:25

for justice in gaza and they'll

46:27

also protest what they say our

46:30

pride in administration failures on

46:33

police accountability abortion rights

46:36

and immigrant rights immigrant rights we

46:38

believe there will be tens of

46:40

thousands of people from across the

46:42

u.s. coming here to say stand

46:44

with palestine stop u.s. aid to

46:46

israel and biden you

46:49

have to stop being complicit in

46:52

the israeli genocide against palestinian people

46:54

in raza the god that

46:56

to me is all part of this

46:58

grand scheme to make sure absolutely that

47:01

trump gets in well i'm

47:03

yes i'm with i'm with you on that i

47:05

want to play this reports of attack and

47:08

i always thought this was good because

47:10

they they had to throw something in somebody

47:12

had to get injured by these uh... yes

47:14

i guess it was two hundred missiles and

47:17

drones no i think it'd be three hundred

47:19

and thirty three all we came

47:21

out of that yo this is

47:23

the president of the nation's well last time

47:25

i'd when they blast count i heard three

47:27

hundred and twenty but i think it'll be

47:30

three thirty thirty thirty three thirty three so

47:32

it this is your report a number of

47:34

ryanian missiles fairly inside

47:37

israeli territory called causing

47:39

minor damage to a military

47:41

base with no casualties only

47:44

one little girl has been

47:46

hurt and we hope she will be

47:48

well now we got one yes

47:51

that's the idea of that we got one the

47:54

one that hope she's okay well

47:57

we hope she's okay as i have the rest of

47:59

him this This is a clip called IDF

48:01

Dude. Let me see, IDF

48:04

Dude. CNN

48:06

is asking what type and how many

48:09

projectiles have been fired towards Israel tonight so

48:11

far and how many drones and missiles have

48:13

been intercepted and can you specify

48:15

by region? The

48:17

event is still occurring but

48:21

until now over 200 different

48:25

kinds have been fired to Israel.

48:28

Killer drones, ballistic missiles

48:31

and cruise missiles. We

48:33

have already intercepted a vast majority

48:35

of the threats by Israeli systems

48:38

and with assistance from our partners. We

48:42

are still in the event, our plans

48:44

are still in the air, intercepting targets

48:46

and we are ready for any

48:49

threat that will come to Israel. We

48:51

will do everything we need, everything

48:53

to defend the state of Israel. As

48:57

an aside, obviously military industrial complex loves this

48:59

no matter what because you have more money.

49:01

It pays the bills. Well, more money is

49:04

being prepared already and it will be money

49:06

for Israel and money for and just throw

49:08

in some Ukraine money of course because we

49:11

need some credit man. So

49:13

we are throwing all that in. It is great. There

49:15

is more money for our

49:17

primary industry which is war.

49:20

War, war, war, war, war. I think

49:22

it was, I did not clip that. Macron

49:24

said we are now in a war economy.

49:27

Okay, good. It makes nothing but

49:29

sense. And now I

49:31

want to get to the immigrant

49:34

rights that you heard in that earlier

49:36

clip. Yes, I found that to be

49:38

interesting as an add-on. Well the

49:42

newcomers because we cannot say illegal

49:44

aliens, we cannot say, I guess

49:47

if you are on the alt-right media,

49:51

the controlled opportunist you can

49:53

say military-age men. But

49:57

no, we call them new people. newcomers,

50:00

you can also just call them immigrant

50:02

workers and we need to thank them.

50:05

Thank you. Thank you for entering the

50:07

United States. We need to thank them. Thank them and

50:09

thank them again. And a new

50:12

study shows immigrants have helped the US

50:14

economy prevent a recession. Recent

50:16

numbers show more than 3 million

50:18

foreigners entered the US last year

50:20

and that helped fill a labor

50:22

shortage that has left companies scrambling

50:25

for workers. It's a

50:27

low paying essential labor has

50:29

also eased pressure on companies to

50:31

sharply raise wages. The

50:34

combination has helped keep the economy

50:36

growing, even as officials struggle with

50:38

inflation. Thanks newcomers. That's

50:40

great. Exactly

50:42

what the former New York banker said,

50:45

exactly what our insider said. There's no

50:47

doubt about that. Exactly

50:49

what they want. Hey, we got inflation,

50:51

it's not transitory, we got to suppress

50:53

wages, that'll help everything. Open up the

50:55

floodgates, let them come on in. This

50:59

is the Joe Biden union, good paying

51:01

union jobs. And we need to assist

51:03

where? We need, well we'll start in

51:05

Chicago. Come on Mayor Brandon Johnson. Chicago's

51:08

mayor is joining local activists calling

51:10

on President Biden to allow work

51:12

permits for undocumented residents. Today

51:14

Mayor Brandon Johnson hosted this roundtable

51:16

discussion with business and community

51:19

leaders from across the city. The

51:21

group is pushing the federal government

51:23

to extend legal permits to undocumented

51:25

workers who have worked and paid

51:27

taxes for decades. Leaders

51:29

say work permits would ensure fair

51:31

wages and benefits and allow workers

51:33

the dignity they deserve. I

51:35

don't think people realize that people can't even get a

51:37

bank account, can't have a

51:39

savings account, a checking account because

51:42

they are undocumented. So

51:45

work permits for all is an opportunity

51:47

to right that wrong, to have

51:50

an equitable approach as we decide who

51:52

is worthy and who is not. Advocates

51:55

say Illinois is home to 480,000 long term undocumented workers.

52:00

Of course, the long-term undocumented

52:03

residents and the

52:05

newcomers will all get work permits. And

52:08

voting rights. Yeah. The

52:11

voting rights. I

52:14

know you're on the fence about that. I am. That

52:16

means it won't make a lot of difference in

52:18

the next election since it's obviously being rigged to

52:20

make sure Trump gets in. But

52:23

long-term. Long-term it's a problem.

52:25

Yeah. Long-term it's a problem. Although

52:28

I will say the last couple of

52:30

elections, I go to the taco place

52:32

around here and everybody working there is

52:34

voting for Trump. And it's like, oh

52:36

no, how's that work? The taco place.

52:38

Is it run by tacos? Yes.

52:41

A bunch of tacos run it. Yeah, I bet.

52:43

But they're all voting for Trump. And it's like, how do

52:45

these... You

52:49

have to remember that a lot of these

52:51

people are coming in from areas that are

52:53

strong Catholic countries and they're not for a

52:55

lot of these liberal progressive policies and they'll

52:57

vote Republican. Yeah. Actually,

52:59

I have a clip that may be relevant

53:03

to that. CNN is very worried

53:05

about this. I

53:07

mean, Christian nationalism, it's all

53:09

very, very worrying. And

53:12

so this report was six minutes and

53:14

they talked to some really low IQ

53:17

Trump voters to make everybody sound stupid.

53:19

They talked to some... Yeah, that's

53:22

what you do. Talk to some

53:24

pastors in Minneapolis who are clearly

53:26

have sparkle clergy. What

53:28

is that? Oh,

53:30

it's LGBTQ worshipers. Oh,

53:33

okay. Who

53:36

know that God is transgender. Yeah.

53:40

Oh. Oh.

53:42

Sparkle clergy. Sparkle clergy. Oh, show

53:44

title. Hold on a second. Sparkle

53:46

clergy. Keeping us up here with

53:48

the thing. With

53:52

the thing, yeah. So I cut all of

53:54

that out because there's one phrase that

53:57

is poorly understood and that

54:00

is the separation of church

54:02

and state. America's

54:05

founding fathers intentionally separated

54:07

church and state. But

54:10

Trump and some of his most vocal supporters

54:12

have tried to blur those lines. We are

54:14

gonna have one nation under God, which we

54:17

must. We have to

54:19

have one nation under God and

54:21

one religion under God. This vision

54:23

of America is known as Christian

54:25

nationalism. The belief that America is

54:27

a Christian nation that Christianity deserves

54:29

a privileged place in the American

54:31

government. What I'll hear at

54:34

events is the

54:36

founding fathers were Christian. America

54:39

was built off Christian values

54:41

widely in Jesus nor

54:43

Christianity, and it's an inter-constitution.

54:46

Trump has seized on Christian nationalism

54:48

and is feeding into it. From

54:50

speeches. We are a nation

54:52

that is hostile to liberty, freedom,

54:56

faith, and even God.

54:58

To hawking a $60 Bible. I'm

55:02

sorry? How's

55:04

that feeding into anything? Getting

55:06

into it. From speeches. We

55:09

are a nation that is hostile to liberty, freedom,

55:13

faith, and even God.

55:16

To hawking a $60 Bible. Do

55:19

you think laws in this country, government

55:21

should be based on Christianity or

55:23

is it just totally separate? Definitely.

55:25

We should put Christ back into the country where

55:27

he belongs, and the country would grow

55:29

a lot stronger. 44%

55:31

of Americans say the Bible should have at least some

55:34

influence on US law. Do you think,

55:36

is America a Christian country? Yes.

55:38

I believe that growing up I did. Yeah.

55:41

Found it as a Christian country. Yes, it

55:43

was found it as a Christian country. But

55:46

obviously in the Constitution there is that

55:48

separation of church and state. Okay,

55:50

so this is the one thing that just. Where did

55:52

you get this? CNN. With

55:55

an Irish guy talking, you know, he's like,

55:58

I got a lot of heart in this. I mean what

56:00

kind of reporting is this? I

56:03

don't know. They needed a guy to do it

56:05

and he was available. He was on the scene. But

56:08

I just need to explain for myself

56:10

even I had to look. Wait

56:13

a minute. This is a separation of church

56:15

and state. Where does this

56:17

really show up in the constitution? Because

56:19

when people use this and I probably will have

56:22

to get some from my hate listen from pivot.

56:24

Like these people, they

56:28

want God, they want God to guide them

56:30

to the laws but we have separation

56:32

of church and state in the constitution. This

56:36

is known as the Establishment Clause. It is

56:38

really just part of the First Amendment which

56:40

is not what they're making it out to be.

56:43

This is the same as well I have First

56:45

Amendment rights, I got rights, I got legal rights.

56:47

No. You have

56:49

free speech rights. The

56:53

First Amendment tells us what Congress

56:55

may not do to

56:57

thwart your already existing rights.

57:00

And the same goes for the so-called separation

57:02

of church and state. The only

57:05

thing in the constitution is under

57:07

the First Amendment and it states,

57:09

Congress shall make no law respecting

57:11

an establishment of religion. Which

57:14

means whatever religion

57:16

you want to have, pasta-farians, that's

57:19

fine. Congress can't forbid you. It's all

57:21

that it is. It doesn't mean

57:24

that Mike Johnson can't pray before

57:26

he brings a bill to the floor.

57:29

It doesn't mean that. People

57:32

forget these things and these types

57:34

of reports. No they don't. They

57:37

never knew these things. Well

57:40

there you go. That's even

57:42

worse. So it just needs to be

57:44

said from time to time. No. No.

57:48

It doesn't mean that you can't pray

57:50

before you do something. Kids in the

57:52

school are not taught anything about the

57:55

constitution. The whole idea is to

57:57

let the thing be quiet about

57:59

it. I don't even come up

58:01

with the idea about how it

58:04

works where the government stopped from doing

58:07

things. They want you to worship

58:09

the government because the government should

58:11

fix everything. It should be centralized.

58:13

That's what the Democrat Party has

58:15

been pushing. There's always been

58:17

the difference between the basic difference

58:20

between the Democrats and the Republicans is

58:22

the Democrats are for a big central

58:24

government that solves all our problems and

58:26

the Republicans are for states rights. And

58:29

it really doesn't be any more complicated

58:31

than that. Speaking

58:33

of Speaker Mike Johnson, under heavy

58:35

fire, he is under heavy fire, two quick

58:38

reports here first from Kristin Welker and Meet

58:40

the Press. Well, Congress has a role with

58:42

regard to federal elections. We want to make

58:44

absolutely certain that anybody votes is actually an

58:47

American citizen. In some states

58:49

it's too easy. You just check a box and

58:52

you can vote. So we need to make sure

58:54

that federal law is clear on that matter and

58:56

make sure that we actually have election integrity because

58:58

it's the biggest concern in the American people right

59:01

now. Now, to be clear, non-citizen

59:03

voting is already illegal and also

59:05

very rare. In fact, the conservative

59:07

heritage foundation has documented just 85

59:10

cases of alleged non-citizen voting

59:12

in the last 20 plus years

59:15

out of hundreds of millions of

59:17

votes cast. You

59:21

know, you can document 85 cases. It

59:24

doesn't mean there's only 85 cases. No,

59:27

it's documented in fact. It means it was

59:29

documented, but she makes it sound as if,

59:33

which is the way you present things if you're

59:35

a fake, a lousy

59:37

journalist with man hands,

59:39

I might add. Wow.

59:42

Okay. On the role,

59:45

man hands. Another one. Man,

59:47

we're just on a roll

59:49

here. Man hands. I really do

59:51

not like this woman. You don't like it?

59:54

No, I know. Of course, what it does

59:56

affect is any census because census doesn't say,

59:58

hey, are you American citizen? how

1:00:00

many people live in this house? Well

1:00:02

they try to prevent that but they...

1:00:04

Yeah, no, no, no, no, well we

1:00:06

can't have that. No, that's against their

1:00:08

human rights. Everybody that's out there, if

1:00:10

it's a bunch of hobo,

1:00:13

so what? It's against their human rights.

1:00:15

It's not... it's human dignity. So

1:00:18

of course Mike Johnson does what

1:00:20

everyone would do in this case.

1:00:23

He goes to Mar-a-Lago. Former President

1:00:25

Donald Trump and House Speaker Mike

1:00:27

Johnson, two men who fought to

1:00:29

overturn the 2020 election called a

1:00:31

press conference today to argue non-citizens

1:00:34

should not be able to vote,

1:00:36

despite the fact it's already illegal.

1:00:38

The House Republicans are introducing a

1:00:40

bill that will require proof

1:00:43

of citizenship to vote. It

1:00:45

seems like common sense. The Illegal Immigration

1:00:48

Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996

1:00:50

explicitly bans non-citizen

1:00:53

voting in federal elections. Yet

1:00:55

Trump and his allies have falsely

1:00:58

claimed non-citizens constantly vote in elections.

1:01:00

The nonpartisan Brennan Center, which tracks

1:01:02

voting issues, says examples of non-citizens

1:01:05

voting are extremely rare. For the

1:01:07

embattled speaker, today's pilgrimage to Mar-a-Lago

1:01:09

was a chance to get a

1:01:12

needed boost from the former president,

1:01:14

as some Trump allies say Johnson

1:01:16

is failing. I explained all the

1:01:18

reasons why he failed as our

1:01:20

speaker. In recent weeks, Johnson has

1:01:22

seen his grip on the gavel

1:01:24

loosened, as he has stumbled to

1:01:27

find votes on surveillance legislation and

1:01:29

funding for Ukraine. And his work

1:01:31

on some bipartisan measures has sparked

1:01:33

talk of a possible coup. I

1:01:36

think he's doing a very good job. He's doing about

1:01:39

as good as you're going to do. For

1:01:41

Trump, the visit underscored his immense influence

1:01:43

over the party, despite his legal

1:01:45

issues. Is it Ukraine or

1:01:48

my Ukraine? Because the way they say that

1:01:50

is Ukraine. When did

1:01:52

it become Ukraine? As

1:01:55

opposed to Ukraine? Yeah, Ukraine. Ukraine.

1:01:58

Who is this report from? CBS

1:02:01

Robert Costa. Oh,

1:02:03

Costa. Yes. So

1:02:06

Mike Johnson. Pilgrimage. I like that. That

1:02:09

was good. I was slipping it in there. Yeah, church and state.

1:02:13

So a note under all of this,

1:02:15

so much so that I didn't even get a single

1:02:17

clip, is the passage

1:02:19

of FISA, the reauthorization of

1:02:21

FISA. Yay! I have a

1:02:23

clip. Oh, you do? You

1:02:26

found a clip. Oh, good. Good. I

1:02:29

want it. The House lawmakers have

1:02:31

approved the reauthorization of the Foreign

1:02:33

Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, for

1:02:35

two years. Today's vote comes

1:02:38

after an earlier version of the bill that

1:02:40

called for a five-year extension, failed in the

1:02:42

House. But the measure won't head to the

1:02:45

Senate for approval just yet. Opponents

1:02:47

scheduled a reconsideration vote

1:02:49

for next week. The surveillance program is

1:02:51

scheduled to expire on April 19th. It's

1:02:53

a do-over. You got a do-over.

1:02:55

Ah, you did it wrong. So the

1:02:57

way it was positioned was it was 212 to 212, and

1:03:00

Mike Johnson cast the final

1:03:03

deciding vote. It's

1:03:05

not like the Senate where he doesn't get

1:03:07

to break the tie, does he? No.

1:03:11

No. But anyone could... So that's the way

1:03:13

he can position it if he sees... That's

1:03:15

how it was... He probably wasn't even the final vote. He's

1:03:17

probably... No. See, right after

1:03:19

Jay, it would be in the Jays with Mike Johnson, EA,

1:03:22

and then it goes on and they go one

1:03:24

by one. Yeah. That's a good way up.

1:03:28

That's a scam when anyone said that. So all the

1:03:30

reports, of course, I was positioning. There's a... Look,

1:03:33

man, we can't have the... They don't like Mike Johnson. No. No.

1:03:37

No. A lot of people don't like

1:03:39

him. Trump doesn't mind him. So why is anyone all bent

1:03:41

out of shape? Well, maybe that's why. Because he says he's

1:03:43

ordained by God to do this job. They

1:03:45

hated him from the minute he got in and said

1:03:47

that. Yeah, he shouldn't have

1:03:49

said that. Well, I mean,

1:03:52

he stands in his

1:03:54

truth. I don't

1:03:56

remember that. He may not even set it. This whole

1:03:58

thing could be a scam. No, he did.

1:04:00

He did. He did. Did he have a

1:04:02

clip? We played a clip. Oh.

1:04:06

I can find it for you if

1:04:08

you want. Let me see. Mike Johnson.

1:04:12

Let me try God. Oh, there we

1:04:14

go. Oh,

1:04:20

this is... Well,

1:04:22

here's Prof G just to show you

1:04:24

how mad some of the left were.

1:04:26

This guy is unqualified for this job,

1:04:28

and so far to the right of

1:04:30

most Americans, it's really quite astonishing that

1:04:32

they went with him. I

1:04:35

can't believe it, but Jim Jordan's less

1:04:38

problematic than this guy. I mean,

1:04:40

based on my initial read, he just

1:04:42

gave a duke without the baggage. You

1:04:44

know, if you read this guy, his

1:04:47

background, first off, his statement was really

1:04:49

troubling. He got it or gained it. Hey,

1:04:53

listen. You're talking over the exact

1:04:55

point we're looking for. His background,

1:04:57

first off, his statement was really

1:04:59

troubling. He said that God had

1:05:01

ordained this, and when

1:05:03

someone actually believes that God has

1:05:06

ordained this, it's just enormously disappointing if

1:05:08

you think more broadly. I believe on

1:05:10

social policy, we've become this... There you

1:05:12

go. No, no, and here's the other

1:05:14

one. I want to tell

1:05:16

all my colleagues here what I told the

1:05:18

Republicans in that room last night. I

1:05:21

don't believe there are any coincidences in a

1:05:23

matter like this. I believe that Scripture, the

1:05:26

Bible is very clear that

1:05:28

God is the one that raises up those in authority. He raised

1:05:31

up each of you, all of us. I think

1:05:33

it's pretty clear what he said. Yeah, it sounds like

1:05:35

he's beating around the bush. He said it

1:05:37

later. He's beating around the Bible. He's a

1:05:40

two-minute clip. I'm not going to play the whole thing. He

1:05:42

said it. He said it. But

1:05:44

beside that, and I

1:05:47

didn't get any clips of this, nor did you.

1:05:49

I can see, because he only had

1:05:52

one, but that was something, is

1:05:54

that he got an intelligence briefing,

1:05:56

an intelligence briefing, and after that, he said,

1:05:58

oh, I'm going to do this. Oh, yeah, we

1:06:01

really need warrantless surveillance of Americans

1:06:03

because I got an intelligence briefing

1:06:06

which consisted of a 45 pointed

1:06:08

against this temple or, hey,

1:06:11

how do you like your wife? Have

1:06:13

you seen this picture? How is she doing? Hey,

1:06:15

and your kids. Oh, we got some pictures of them

1:06:17

outside the school. Isn't that interesting? Or this picture of

1:06:19

you, Mike. What were you doing there? I mean, you

1:06:21

don't know. Well, that's probably more... You don't know. That's

1:06:23

probably the easiest way to do it. Yeah. I

1:06:26

mean, everybody... Yeah, what is her

1:06:28

name again? Julie, Julie, Jenny.

1:06:31

What is her name? I can't

1:06:33

remember. It's so obvious because

1:06:35

it goes against everything that we

1:06:37

stand for with liberty. You

1:06:40

can't have warrantless surveillance. Yeah,

1:06:43

but anyway, we get a do-over, so

1:06:45

it'll be interesting to see what happens. And I don't

1:06:47

know how does that work. I

1:06:49

kept hearing it's a very rare

1:06:51

procedure, rare procedure.

1:06:54

So they get a do-over vote. I've never

1:06:56

heard of this. I haven't. I

1:06:59

actually had... I don't think I have either,

1:07:01

but it sounds right the way they presented

1:07:03

it. So I guess

1:07:05

there's some system in place where they can

1:07:07

do this and then start to maybe switch

1:07:11

another vote someplace else so Mike can

1:07:13

stay with his yes vote and not

1:07:16

have his dirty laundry

1:07:19

put out into public. And

1:07:21

Reddy Kilowatt says what they really

1:07:23

said to him is either your signature or your brains

1:07:26

are going to be on this bill. I

1:07:30

think the softer way is probably...

1:07:32

You're probably right. It's the softer

1:07:34

thing where they caught him with

1:07:36

his pants down literally. Literally. Literally.

1:07:39

Yeah. I mean, everybody has something to

1:07:42

conceal. A photo can look bad no

1:07:44

matter what. It's like, well, I

1:07:46

don't want that. They

1:07:49

got everything in there. Oh, Mike Depp. Okay.

1:07:53

What do you want me to do? I don't

1:07:55

need that. Just stop. This is no good. I

1:07:57

don't want that. Yeah. It's sad. reconsideration

1:08:00

may be part of it. He may have been

1:08:02

the one that actually told them to do that

1:08:06

if he's a real good guy. He says,

1:08:08

hey you guys, can you hear? Let me

1:08:10

show you this process that a lot of

1:08:12

us are unfamiliar with. I'm going to explain

1:08:14

it to you. Yeah,

1:08:17

that's possible. All of

1:08:19

it is just... Get him off the hook. It's

1:08:21

sad. It's sad. It's just sad. No,

1:08:24

FISA shouldn't even be on the books.

1:08:26

It's a horrible situation. No. It

1:08:29

hasn't worked. All it

1:08:31

did was to work to spy on Trump's

1:08:33

campaign. There's no doubt about that. That's why

1:08:35

we need... I believe I heard

1:08:38

somewhere that even

1:08:40

if it expires, they still get to continue for

1:08:42

a year. Yeah, as long as

1:08:44

they can spy on Trump's campaign. Yeah, but

1:08:46

what's the big rush then? What's the big

1:08:48

problem? We can always go back and do

1:08:50

it again. They get to continue for a

1:08:52

year. Why? Because Trump. Well,

1:08:56

it's the faction that's trying not to... I'm

1:08:58

telling you, the factions are in play. Trump's

1:09:01

faction that wants him back, which

1:09:04

includes obviously spooks of various

1:09:06

sorts. Hey, Mike, we'd hate

1:09:08

for you to lose your head over this bill. I

1:09:11

think I'm going to win out on this

1:09:14

one because Biden is just a

1:09:16

flake. It's just terrible. All

1:09:20

right. A little bit

1:09:22

of big pharma news just to lighten things

1:09:24

up. I've got a

1:09:27

boots on the ground. Yeah, just lighten

1:09:29

things up with big pharma news and

1:09:31

basic corruption within the system that's causing

1:09:33

all these issues. Well, first

1:09:35

of all, 7-Eleven has announced the arrival of

1:09:37

the new Big Bite hot dog sparkling water.

1:09:41

Literally sparkling water that tastes like a

1:09:43

hot dog. So they've

1:09:45

taken the dirty water from the hot

1:09:47

dog cooker and put

1:09:49

it through one of those spritzing

1:09:51

things. Spritzed it up and here

1:09:54

you go, people. Dirty

1:09:56

water hot dog sparkling. has

1:10:00

sparkles in it. Now that

1:10:02

Ozempic, it just takes care of everything. Who

1:10:04

cares? Go for it. Drink your

1:10:06

hot dog water. You

1:10:09

got a boots on the ground from

1:10:11

Sir Mattie of Central Oregon in the

1:10:13

morning, Adam John. Right. And

1:10:15

just tell you about my experience at my quarterly medical

1:10:18

check doctor's appointment. The last two

1:10:20

times I've been in my doctor, in lots of

1:10:22

times I've been in, my doctor had recommended Ozempic

1:10:24

for me even though my A1C was 6.3

1:10:26

and 6.5 and below is the target range

1:10:31

for type 2 diabetics. She

1:10:34

thought it might help with weight loss and I said,

1:10:36

no, I don't want to take that. This time when

1:10:39

she recommended it and I declined, she

1:10:41

closed her laptop and confronted me. She

1:10:44

said, tell me your reasons why you don't want to take it. I

1:10:47

felt put on the spot. No kidding. But

1:10:50

managed to say that it makes you lose

1:10:52

lean muscle mass, not fat and many people

1:10:54

have terrible side effects. I also told her

1:10:56

that if I could go back, I would

1:10:58

not even take the COVID vaccine because that

1:11:00

was foisted upon me by her predecessor. She

1:11:03

then launched into a five minute

1:11:05

lecture on GLP drugs and lauded

1:11:07

their benefits. Again

1:11:09

I declined and noted my A1C results and

1:11:11

the fact that I recently had started walking

1:11:14

again on a daily basis. Adam, I do

1:11:16

believe that the doctors are getting paid handsomely

1:11:18

for every Ozempic prescription they write. Yeah,

1:11:21

I think you're right sir, Matt. Spiffs. Spiffs?

1:11:25

That was an old term using the stereo. Remember

1:11:27

in the old days, there's all these stereo operations

1:11:29

all over the place. You buy your stereo here

1:11:31

and get your speakers and you can do this

1:11:33

and you do that. You go in there and

1:11:36

they push it towards some speaker company that

1:11:38

you never heard of or some gear you

1:11:40

never heard of and you're, okay, sounds good

1:11:42

to me. You buy it and they get

1:11:44

a payback from the manufacturer and those were

1:11:46

called spiffs. Spiffs? I

1:11:49

don't remember this term. Yeah, I'm

1:11:51

surprised you don't know that term. Spiffs. Being

1:11:53

in the business and all. Crazy Eddie would have had

1:11:55

some spiffs going on. Totally. Alright,

1:11:58

now we have a potty. The

1:12:00

Scientific American Podcast. I would say Scientific

1:12:03

American is seen as an authority when it comes

1:12:05

to all things science. Not

1:12:07

since the mid-80s when they were woke.

1:12:12

Well this is so good because

1:12:15

this is a script. It's completely scripted

1:12:17

and it shows. We've got the two

1:12:19

hosts of the Scientific American Podcast and

1:12:22

the reason why I clip this is

1:12:24

just the title alone. Title of

1:12:26

this podcast episode, Measles

1:12:29

is Scary. Just

1:12:31

a week ago, the US reported its 113th case

1:12:33

of measles for 2024. Now

1:12:37

please take note, when it's only 85 illegal

1:12:40

immigrants voting, it's no big

1:12:42

deal but when it's

1:12:44

100 measles cases, stop

1:12:46

the presses. It's more cases than we

1:12:48

had in all of 2023 when we had 58 during the

1:12:50

whole year and we've

1:12:53

still got three quarters of this year to go. And

1:12:56

an increase in measles means

1:12:58

an increase in danger. It's

1:13:00

actually the most contagious. Stop

1:13:02

this for a second. Do

1:13:04

these people, these scientists, have

1:13:06

any concept of statistics

1:13:09

or anything

1:13:12

that would indicate that this is not a

1:13:14

number that we can because it's almost an

1:13:16

error, kind of the

1:13:19

range, it's a range. In

1:13:22

fact, I'm surprised that it's so low. I

1:13:25

thought it must have been thousands at least. And

1:13:29

remember, it actually is considered one of

1:13:31

the most although there's nobody dying from

1:13:33

it so much but it's

1:13:36

considered one of the most

1:13:38

virulent things. I mean it really can't

1:13:40

go as fast. All these

1:13:42

statistics are coming. There's great statistics on the

1:13:44

way but these people are shills obviously for

1:13:47

pharma but it's

1:13:52

just interesting to hear the script. And

1:13:54

an increase in measles means an increase

1:13:56

in danger. Danger! It's actually

1:13:58

the most contagious. infectious disease

1:14:01

we know on Earth, approximately

1:14:04

one infected person can transmit it

1:14:06

to about 12 to 18 other

1:14:09

people. Now just to check here,

1:14:11

John, did you have measles as a kid? I

1:14:14

believe so, yes. And I had measles as a kid,

1:14:17

I remember. Did you live? I

1:14:19

had to stay inside because it's a... Yeah.

1:14:22

Yeah. Did you live?

1:14:24

Yeah, I'm here. I'm here. Hello.

1:14:27

And any issues? Any long-term issues?

1:14:29

We are so lucky. It's a

1:14:31

devastating disease. That's Caitlin

1:14:33

Jettilina, a public health scientist. A

1:14:36

lot of people have forgotten how dangerous

1:14:38

measles is because of the vaccines, right?

1:14:40

We've largely wiped it out. But we

1:14:43

do not want to mess with measles.

1:14:45

One in five of those who get

1:14:47

infected that are not vaccinated will be

1:14:50

hospitalized. One in five will

1:14:52

be hospitalized. One in

1:14:54

20 will develop pneumonia. One

1:14:56

in 20 will get pneumonia. One

1:14:59

in 1,000 will develop encephalitis which is

1:15:01

inflammation of the brain. One

1:15:04

in 1,000 will get a brain swell. One

1:15:07

in 1,000 will get encephalitis. Can

1:15:09

cause permanent brain damage. And

1:15:12

one to three in 1,000 will die. One

1:15:15

to 300,000 will die on the roads of America today. I

1:15:21

mean, whoa. There's also this strange

1:15:24

problem that measles can bring on

1:15:26

called immunonegia. This is what I

1:15:28

was looking for. Immune amnesia. Do

1:15:32

you have an immune amnesia? Do you have this?

1:15:35

Because this is the problem. No, I forgot. Did

1:15:38

I? I forgot. No,

1:15:40

it's not that kind of amnesia. I've heard of that. It's

1:15:42

a weird thing. It's a weird thing. I've heard of

1:15:44

that. I'm a doctor. Yeah, it's

1:15:46

not completely understood. Oh. But the

1:15:48

measles virus seems to wipe out B

1:15:50

cells, the immune cells that remember viruses

1:15:52

you've previously encountered and help fight them off.

1:15:54

Oh, so if you get measles, then

1:15:57

your body forgets to fight off COVID.

1:16:00

and that leaves you

1:16:02

vulnerable to those illnesses again. What

1:16:04

we're seeing after measles infection is

1:16:06

that if you survive that measles

1:16:08

infection, that's great news

1:16:10

but you're not necessarily in the clear

1:16:13

because there is mortality that happens after

1:16:15

the fact from other viruses. Okay,

1:16:17

so the idea is if you

1:16:19

get through measles, we should pay

1:16:22

attention you and I because we're

1:16:24

unvaccinated measles, potential measles, we're pre-measles

1:16:27

because if we get it again, which is not

1:16:30

going to happen, but we could get another virus

1:16:33

and because we had measles, we're

1:16:36

not going to our bodies that go like, I don't

1:16:38

know what to do. I

1:16:41

don't know. My immune system don't want to do. I know

1:16:43

what to do. Both.

1:16:46

Problems of course, vaccines. So

1:16:49

measles is definitely a bad disease. But

1:16:51

Caitlin said that a lot of people have forgotten

1:16:53

how bad it is because vaccines are so

1:16:55

successful. Yeah, before the vaccines, we

1:16:57

were getting about 600,000 cases a

1:16:59

year. Now

1:17:02

we typically top out at 40 to

1:17:04

50 cases each year. We've had the

1:17:07

measles vaccine for about 70 years and

1:17:09

now most kids get it as a

1:17:11

combination, measles, mumps, rubella or

1:17:13

MMR. Now I'm sure that

1:17:15

there's a lot of skeptics out there. This

1:17:18

MMR can't be any good. We got to

1:17:20

thwart that. Let's drag some old

1:17:22

cows out of the canal, shall we? You

1:17:24

get one shot when you're about a year

1:17:26

old and the second shot at four to

1:17:28

six years old before kids start school. And

1:17:31

it works incredibly well. It does. Two

1:17:33

shots are 97% effective at preventing measles.

1:17:35

Plus these shots are safe. The most

1:17:37

common side effect in about one in

1:17:40

3000 kids is a short fever

1:17:42

that resolves on its own. Now

1:17:44

years ago, there was this

1:17:46

BS idea that measles shots

1:17:48

somehow triggered autism. A BS

1:17:50

man, this BS idea. RFK

1:17:53

Jr. is full of BS. It's BS

1:17:55

man. Yeah, and let's be clear. There's

1:17:57

absolutely no link between the MMR vaccine.

1:18:00

vaccines and autism. Zero links, in fact.

1:18:02

How about Wakefield? Bring out Wakefield. A

1:18:04

single fraudulent study claimed that there was,

1:18:06

but it was debunked years ago. Many

1:18:09

other studies have searched for a connection

1:18:11

and failed to find one. And despite

1:18:13

that, every year, the number of kids

1:18:15

in kindergarten with measles shots is going

1:18:17

down. And that's

1:18:19

because more parents are asking for

1:18:22

vaccine exemptions. A lot of

1:18:24

them don't trust the shots. No! And

1:18:26

they went on to tell you why. They're just

1:18:29

reading, it sounds like they're reading from a book

1:18:31

or a script or something provided. This

1:18:33

is the most, I would

1:18:35

say, soulless presentation I've heard for

1:18:37

a long time from any podcast.

1:18:41

It's propaganda. It's not a podcast. It's

1:18:43

propaganda. A propcast. Propcast.

1:18:46

Propcast. Meanwhile, the...

1:18:48

Thank you. Pod-a-ganda. Pod-a-ganda. No, don't

1:18:50

even know... Pod-a-ganda. No, I'm not...

1:18:52

I revolt against that. No, I

1:18:55

revolt against pod-a-ganda. It's not a

1:18:57

good thing. You don't like anything

1:18:59

where the word pod is separated

1:19:02

from cast. We know this is

1:19:04

what it is. Horrible. Horrible. Get

1:19:07

back in your pod. Hey, man. How

1:19:09

was the pod today? Like, hey, man, I hear you're on the pod. I'm

1:19:11

talking about sucker punch you. Meanwhile, food is doing great. Food

1:19:13

is just doing great. We're auditing. We're doing

1:19:15

great. We're doing great. We're doing great.

1:19:18

We're doing great. We're doing great. We're doing

1:19:20

great. We're doing great. We're doing great. Food

1:19:23

is just doing great. We're automating

1:19:25

food everywhere. Yes. The

1:19:28

burger said this Los Angeles

1:19:30

fast food restaurants are classic,

1:19:32

but the workers may be

1:19:34

the future. Cali-Quest helps itself

1:19:37

as the world's first fully

1:19:39

autonomous restaurant. Major chains are

1:19:41

already starting to bite into AI

1:19:43

in automation. Wendy's experimenting

1:19:45

with AI-powered drive-throughs. Welcome

1:19:48

to Wendy's. What would you like? The

1:19:50

chain Sweetgreen has salads rotating

1:19:53

through automation. Chipotle even

1:19:55

has robots building its burrito

1:19:57

bowls. I think there's a kind

1:19:59

of. significant smoke and mirror strict happening here

1:20:01

where you get claims of full automation. Because

1:20:04

even at what they call the world's first

1:20:06

fully autonomous restaurant, there's Hano

1:20:08

Veva. The robot helps me out

1:20:11

a lot and then I help the robot in turn.

1:20:15

The robot helps a lot and then blah

1:20:17

blah blah blah. Let's see

1:20:19

because we need to move towards some

1:20:21

fake food here. So let's look at

1:20:23

some fake food. The popular long time

1:20:25

lunch staple being called out by Consumer

1:20:27

Reports for what it says were high

1:20:29

levels of sodium, lead and other heavy

1:20:31

metals found in store bought versions. The

1:20:33

group even asking the federal government to

1:20:36

take them out of the menus of

1:20:38

millions of kids through the federal

1:20:40

school lunch program. How high were the

1:20:42

levels of lead and cadmium that you saw? It ranged

1:20:44

from as low as 7% to as high as over

1:20:46

70. But

1:20:50

it's important to note that the question is

1:20:52

that this is lunchables. This is a

1:20:54

fake cheese. 70% what? Lead.

1:20:57

Heavy metals, were they giving us a sheet of

1:20:59

lead? What are you talking about? It

1:21:02

ranged from as low as 7% to as high as

1:21:04

over 70. But

1:21:07

it's important to note that the versions that are

1:21:10

made available for the school lunch program were

1:21:12

in the 70% range. Consumer

1:21:15

Reports said one package tested at

1:21:17

74% of the

1:21:19

maximum lead allowed per day in

1:21:21

California under what it calls the

1:21:23

most protective state law. There's

1:21:26

no safe level for lead for

1:21:28

kids. How

1:21:30

about zero? Am I crazy? Should

1:21:33

just the level for

1:21:36

lead for kids be zero? Just

1:21:38

like no lead? Or is that impossible? Is

1:21:40

lead everywhere? Lead's

1:21:42

not everywhere. I don't understand. No, no, you're not

1:21:45

crazy in the least. I

1:21:47

think- Except for your Netanyahu prediction. But

1:21:49

except for that, there's no crazy in the least. Oh,

1:21:51

are you going to keep- okay, okay, okay. No,

1:21:55

no, it's okay. The predictions in the book,

1:21:57

it's there to stay. No, you're

1:21:59

not. You're not crazy. Why do it? Is

1:22:01

there any lead at all is the question

1:22:04

you're really asking. Yeah. How does it get

1:22:06

in there? Well, maybe we'll find out. Pigeops.

1:22:09

And so when you're exposing this much to

1:22:11

them at such an early age, it can

1:22:13

really increase the risk later on in life.

1:22:16

We need a vaccine. In a

1:22:18

statement Kraft-Hind, the manufacturer of Lunchables

1:22:20

products, said lead and cadmium occurred

1:22:22

naturally in the environment and called

1:22:24

the Consumer Reports study misleading,

1:22:27

causing undue concern over the safety

1:22:29

of our products, something we take

1:22:31

seriously. All our products

1:22:33

tested well below the acceptable limits.

1:22:35

Dietitian Arlene Stein. What do you

1:22:37

recommend parents do? One

1:22:39

option would be that you balance, try and balance out

1:22:42

the rest of the day with

1:22:44

healthier things like not having juice with it,

1:22:46

drinking water. Developing healthy habits that will last

1:22:48

for years to come. Less lead. Less lead.

1:22:50

Hey parents, it's okay. You can give your

1:22:53

kids Lunchables but then go easy on the

1:22:55

lead later in the day. This is not

1:22:57

so much lead. What I have to assume

1:22:59

is that the number for the lead permissible

1:23:02

lead amount in the Lunchable is

1:23:05

actually quite low but

1:23:07

because you can approach it with just some

1:23:10

parts per billion, you can make

1:23:12

it sound as though all hell is breaking loose. Stuff

1:23:15

is terrible. That's

1:23:17

the only thing because they don't give you any solid

1:23:19

numbers. They just say 75%. 75%

1:23:23

of what? Yeah, no. That

1:23:25

one part per billion we don't know. This

1:23:27

is a misleading report you gave us there. I'm

1:23:29

not giving it to you. I'm laughing along with

1:23:31

you. But who is this report? Where

1:23:34

does this come from? This report is

1:23:36

from... Hold

1:23:41

on, where was it? Big Pharma. This

1:23:43

report is... No. I'm

1:23:45

sorry. I can't seem... I just

1:23:48

had it. Lunchables.

1:23:53

I think it's CBS. Yeah,

1:23:56

CBS. Yeah, CBS. But

1:23:59

here's what's happening. As

1:24:01

you know, the price of beef is through the roofs,

1:24:03

all the farmers are selling all their stock like get

1:24:05

it out, get it out. It's

1:24:08

controlled by Brazil by the way, JBS,

1:24:10

the big meat processors, Brazilian company. We're

1:24:12

not really good friends with Brazil so

1:24:14

that sounds like a good idea but

1:24:16

those guys control our beef. All

1:24:19

of this is going away and we're going to get

1:24:23

fake food but really and this is what Texas Slim

1:24:25

taught me was he came by the house two weeks

1:24:27

ago. They're going

1:24:29

to redefine what protein is and

1:24:31

we've seen this with cricket powder,

1:24:34

cricket flower. They'll say, well it's

1:24:36

protein and that's protein. But

1:24:38

it's horrible. Yeah,

1:24:41

but protein. Microphagias of viruses and

1:24:43

crazy things are in these insects

1:24:45

that we're being forced to eat.

1:24:48

But it's not just going to be that. There's

1:24:52

a new way of creating protein and

1:24:54

it's good. It's protein. I

1:24:56

mean protein is just a term. It's

1:24:59

not animal fat, not animal protein.

1:25:02

Oh, this has protein. And

1:25:04

the latest from Korea is

1:25:06

rice beef. Rice beef. Rice beef.

1:25:09

South Korean researchers have succeeded in

1:25:11

growing beef cells in rice grains

1:25:13

which they say could become a

1:25:16

sustainable alternative source of protein

1:25:18

that can replace farming cattle

1:25:20

for meat. Professor Jin Ki Hong

1:25:22

of Yonsei University in Seoul says

1:25:25

that beef rice is the first

1:25:27

of its kind using grain particles

1:25:29

as the base for cultivating animal

1:25:31

muscle and fat cells. Here's

1:25:34

how it works. Rice grains are

1:25:36

first treated with enzymes to create

1:25:38

an optimal environment for cell growth.

1:25:41

For cancer cells to grow. Hey,

1:25:43

put some enzymes in there, heat

1:25:46

it up. Then they are infused

1:25:48

with cultivated bovine cells. No, it's

1:25:50

rice goo with bovine cells.

1:25:52

Then they are infused with

1:25:54

cultivated bovine cells. The

1:25:57

result is a pinkish hybrid beef rice

1:25:59

that contains... He's approximately 8%

1:26:01

more protein, and 7% less

1:26:04

fat than conventional rice. And

1:26:07

the taste is also different. The Yongse

1:26:09

team is not the first to try

1:26:11

and bring lab-grown meat products to the

1:26:14

table. Companies around the world have launched

1:26:16

cultivated meat. But

1:26:18

Hong's team says rice represents a

1:26:21

unique eat-safe base to cultivate animal

1:26:23

cells relative to soy or nuts

1:26:25

because of a far lower incidence

1:26:27

of allergy. Price at roughly

1:26:30

$2 per kilogram. And with

1:26:32

a far smaller carbon footprint,

1:26:34

Hong says cultured beef rice

1:26:36

can potentially compete with traditional

1:26:38

beef products. But

1:26:41

he says challenges remain not only

1:26:43

from a technical standpoint, but also

1:26:45

in winning over customers with the

1:26:47

right flavor and texture. Ah,

1:26:50

there it is. Flavor and texture. Taste

1:26:52

and texture. This is what Royal DSM

1:26:54

in the Netherlands does. Used to

1:26:56

be a chemical company. I mean, it still is a

1:26:58

chemical company. They now do €8

1:27:00

billion a year in revenue

1:27:04

for taste and texture products. If you just

1:27:06

take some rice beef, some

1:27:08

goo with cells, some

1:27:10

slurry, slurry? Is that the term? Slurry, that's the term.

1:27:13

Slurry. And then you add

1:27:16

some texture chemicals to it and then form it into

1:27:18

something that looks like meat. And

1:27:20

then you make it taste good. And

1:27:23

that's what people will try. People will eat it because

1:27:26

they'll read on the packaging, right?

1:27:28

It'll say, tastes great. It'll

1:27:31

say, yes, it

1:27:33

says on the package, tastes great.

1:27:36

And it's got electrolytes. I mean,

1:27:39

everybody will love it. Everybody will

1:27:41

love it. It's going to be

1:27:43

dynamite. And I'm glad I have a

1:27:45

rancher. That's all I have. I'm telling you, your

1:27:47

rancher is a depressive person. My

1:27:50

rancher is... It brings us these stories. This

1:27:52

is depressing. This is a depressing story. You

1:27:54

have yet to bring anything uplifting. Well, that's

1:27:56

because the ranchers are sounding the alarm. This

1:27:58

is red alert, red alert. They're

1:28:00

saying, hey, I'm

1:28:02

going to be fine. Texas

1:28:04

Slim and Cole, the KNC cattle, we're going to be

1:28:07

fine because I'll just, you know, I can

1:28:09

go get my beef from them. Even

1:28:12

if they won't let me buy it, I can still go

1:28:14

get it from him. And you can do it but

1:28:16

you're barter. Actually he

1:28:18

accepts Bitcoin. So

1:28:22

when my credit card doesn't work, I can

1:28:24

still buy it with Bitcoin. That's happening any

1:28:26

minute. Let's see. Well, let me

1:28:28

stick with climate change because there's some

1:28:30

developments that we need to talk about. Boris

1:28:33

Johnson's dad, did you know that he

1:28:35

was a thing? Stanley

1:28:38

Johnson. I understood that he had a father. Stanley

1:28:40

Johnson? I'd never seen his dad. No, I didn't

1:28:43

know he was a thing though. Stanley

1:28:45

Johnson is a commentator. He

1:28:47

was a guest on GB News

1:28:50

which is supposed to be like

1:28:52

not stupid news. Isn't

1:28:56

that what GB News? Isn't that kind of

1:28:58

like a more like a Murdoch type Fox

1:29:00

News type? What am I saying? It's

1:29:02

just the stupid. Of course it

1:29:04

is. So he comes on and

1:29:07

there's this report about our global

1:29:09

carbon budget. Did you

1:29:11

know that we have a global carbon budget? I

1:29:14

do now. Now, of course, I'm

1:29:17

not sure what that means because it's

1:29:19

always been about carbon dioxide but

1:29:22

we've just kind of chopped off the dioxide

1:29:24

part. We just talk about carbon. There's

1:29:27

too much carbon in the air. Oh, look, there's some

1:29:29

carbon. It might have lead in it. Now

1:29:31

listen to what this globalist shill says.

1:29:33

This report which you've just referred to

1:29:35

now is extremely important because

1:29:37

the idea of just getting a crop

1:29:39

is that there's a global carbon budget

1:29:42

out there. You know, it's 40 billion

1:29:44

tons, gigatons a year and

1:29:47

if we don't… 40 billion gigatons. 40

1:29:49

billion gigatons. We have to divide that up

1:29:51

amongst all nations, you see. 40

1:29:55

billion gigatons. Yes, yes. That's the budget.

1:29:57

That's the budget. We've got a budget.

1:30:00

go over the budget. No, and he's going to explain

1:30:02

how we do that. Giga tons a year, and

1:30:04

if we don't keep to that, actually we've got

1:30:06

to shave that down year after year. We run

1:30:09

out of steam by 2030. So

1:30:11

it's absolutely vital. But this is all kind

1:30:13

of based on modelling. So we do these

1:30:15

modelling stuff. Don't we have to be careful

1:30:17

that our modelling is actually correct? Because a

1:30:19

lot of the modelling, so for example the

1:30:21

modelling during the pandemic, we got that completely

1:30:24

wrong. It was so way off

1:30:26

the mark. Don't we have to be careful that our

1:30:28

modelling is the outcome that we're predicting using

1:30:30

our current modelling? Well, you've got 100 top

1:30:33

scientists out there behind this report.

1:30:35

One thing is not modelling, it's

1:30:37

actually modelling. Can that woman

1:30:40

say modelling more? Modelling. We've got modelling. Well,

1:30:42

she's trying to be the voice of reason.

1:30:45

But then he throws right back in her

1:30:47

face. Well, because... And this is Johnson at

1:30:49

the start of this thing?

1:30:51

Yes. And Johnson is saying, well, we

1:30:54

have 100 top scientists. What's wrong with

1:30:56

you, lady? 100 top scientists out there

1:30:58

behind this report. And one thing is

1:31:00

not modelling, it's actually measuring the increase

1:31:03

in the presence of carbon dioxide in

1:31:05

the atmosphere. That is an absolute fact.

1:31:07

I think we're on about 418. PPM,

1:31:11

the pre-industrial level, was half that. So that

1:31:13

is a fact. It's the

1:31:15

implications of that, which of course does require

1:31:17

modelling. And I think they've pretty

1:31:19

much got it right. You see it. I've travelled around the world the whole

1:31:21

time. And you can just see the effects of it.

1:31:23

The floods. I bomb a well-traveled puzzle. I travel around

1:31:26

the world all the time. I'm looking at the playing

1:31:28

window of my private jet. I can see the

1:31:30

floods. And I think they've pretty much got it

1:31:32

right. You see it. I travelled around the world

1:31:35

the whole time. And you can just see the

1:31:37

effects of it. The floods. The drought. The

1:31:39

drought. Pick one. Pick one. Pick one.

1:31:41

Pick up your mind. Is it a

1:31:43

flood or a drought? Pick one. See

1:31:45

the effect for it. The floods. The

1:31:50

drought. The melting of

1:31:52

the glaciers. It actually means that countries

1:31:54

need to listen. Hold on a second. Stop. The melting of the

1:31:57

glaciers. People listen

1:31:59

to this. They have to. understand especially they haven't been

1:32:18

to develop this carbon budget between them and

1:32:20

then they need to develop the sectors and

1:32:23

then they need to have the measures which

1:32:25

deals sector by sector with getting the and

1:32:27

it's not means actually. Okay, okay now this

1:32:29

is the big kicker, you

1:32:31

got to listen carefully because our 40

1:32:33

gigaton carbon budget

1:32:36

needs to be divided up amongst

1:32:38

the nations then in those nations

1:32:41

it has to be divided up amongst the sectors

1:32:44

which will include travel and

1:32:46

too bad for you slave. And then they

1:32:48

need to develop the sectors and then they

1:32:50

need to have the measures which deals sector

1:32:52

by sector with getting the and it's not

1:32:54

means actually some of us are told well

1:32:56

you can't go on a plane that's fine

1:32:58

that's part of the national plan. It's part

1:33:00

of the plan. I'm

1:33:04

sorry if some of us are told obviously not

1:33:06

me because I'm Stanley Johnson if some of us

1:33:08

are told you can't fly in the plane then

1:33:10

that's fine because that's just what

1:33:13

it is. Shut up. Shut

1:33:15

up. Your credit card will not

1:33:17

work to buy tickets

1:33:19

because your

1:33:21

carbon budget has already been spent. It's that

1:33:24

simple. The glaciers

1:33:27

and of course Al Gore's out there.

1:33:29

I'm sticking with the climate change thing

1:33:31

because it's the biggest problem

1:33:34

we have. Everything stems from it all

1:33:36

your fake food, all your rice beef

1:33:38

and he's out on NBC on the

1:33:40

Today Show talking some some smack. Well

1:33:42

it's important to keep hope alive as

1:33:44

Reverend Jackson always does. And the truth

1:33:46

is the crisis

1:33:50

is still getting worse faster than we

1:33:52

are deploying the solutions. A lot of

1:33:54

the scientists who are almost always cool

1:33:57

heads they're really beginning to get

1:33:59

super agitated. about how serious this

1:34:01

is. Oh yeah, you don't want to piss

1:34:03

off some scientists because you

1:34:05

know they'll come and they'll hit you with a slide

1:34:07

rule. So we still have time and

1:34:10

the question is whether we have the

1:34:12

political will but political will is itself

1:34:14

a renewable resource. We

1:34:17

need to stop making the

1:34:19

problem. Political will, that

1:34:22

was a good quote, political will

1:34:24

itself is a critical resource, is

1:34:26

that what he said? Or did

1:34:28

he say renewable? The question is

1:34:30

whether we have the political will

1:34:32

but political will is itself a

1:34:34

renewable resource. It's renewable. Renewable. It's

1:34:36

renewable. What is he

1:34:38

talking about? Why

1:34:43

was political will a renewable

1:34:46

resource? Because you can kick

1:34:48

people out of office and

1:34:50

vote other people in. Yeah,

1:34:52

it's a misuse of the word renewable.

1:34:54

The question is whether we have

1:34:57

the political will but political will is itself

1:34:59

a renewable resource. We

1:35:01

need to stop making the problem worse. We

1:35:04

need to obey the first law of holes.

1:35:06

When you're in one, stop digging. First law

1:35:08

of holes. The

1:35:10

first law of holes. Holy

1:35:14

mackerel, this guy's on a roll. I've

1:35:17

never heard of the first law of holes but

1:35:21

he's one for sure. The problem worse. We need

1:35:23

to obey the first law of holes. When you're

1:35:25

in one, stop digging. We've

1:35:28

got to stop using the sky as

1:35:30

an open sewer for trapping all this

1:35:32

extra heat. This is good. It's important

1:35:35

to make the changes. We were talking

1:35:37

earlier about composting and all of these

1:35:39

different, getting the heat pump and changing

1:35:41

the light bulbs. But as important as

1:35:43

it is to change the light bulbs,

1:35:45

way more important to change the laws

1:35:48

and the policies because that's really the

1:35:50

solution. Yeah, we need carbon budget.

1:35:52

Unfortunately, the largest polluters are

1:35:55

way better at capturing politicians than

1:35:57

capturing emissions. Even those who

1:35:59

in the past would not even want

1:36:01

to use the word climate or the

1:36:03

phrase global warming are now saying, Oh

1:36:05

man, I got to look at my

1:36:07

old guards here. You know, this thing

1:36:09

is really getting bad and everybody sees

1:36:11

it in their own lives now. So

1:36:13

we've got to get over this political

1:36:15

barrier that the big polluters are reinforcing

1:36:17

like revetments every single day. And they've

1:36:20

got massive advertising campaigns to try to

1:36:22

convince people it's not that serious and

1:36:24

we shouldn't go so fast to try

1:36:26

to solve it. We need to

1:36:28

go fast. Hold on. Stop. What

1:36:31

ad have you ever seen in your

1:36:33

entire life where they come out and

1:36:35

say, Hey, we're going

1:36:37

too fast on this climate change. This

1:36:39

is an advertisement presented by Exxon. Bull

1:36:42

crap. I'm

1:36:46

still stuck at first law of holes. Well,

1:36:48

the first law of holes, you would have that.

1:36:51

Don't be an A. By the way,

1:36:53

the first law of holes, if you're in one, stop

1:36:56

digging. What if you want to dig? What if you're

1:36:58

digging down because you're trying to get to the sewer

1:37:00

line or something, you might want to be in the

1:37:02

hole digging deeper. I have

1:37:04

the first law of holes. It's

1:37:08

just a great term. It

1:37:10

is. It's the greatest. So

1:37:12

I've been, I am in

1:37:14

fact advertising against the climate change

1:37:16

scam and I've spurred

1:37:18

people on to go to YouTube because

1:37:20

it was released on YouTube climate change,

1:37:23

the movie, and I'm going

1:37:25

to play a short clip from it. These are

1:37:27

all Harvard, MIT, Nobel

1:37:29

prize winners who are all

1:37:31

saying this is bull crap.

1:37:33

It's a hoax. In fact,

1:37:35

quite the opposite is true

1:37:37

of this global warming. This

1:37:40

is not at all unprecedented.

1:37:44

The last 500 million years, temperatures

1:37:46

have varied greatly, but

1:37:49

for almost all that time, the earth was

1:37:51

much, much warmer than today compared

1:37:54

to the last half billion years. The

1:37:56

earth like about is exceptionally cold. very

1:38:00

few times when it's been this cold. We're

1:38:03

relatively cold, maybe not quite

1:38:05

the coldest it's been in

1:38:08

500 million years, but pretty close to

1:38:10

it. We are in a remarkably cool

1:38:13

period if we look over the last

1:38:15

550 million years. In fact,

1:38:18

only one other time period in that

1:38:20

last 550 million years was the temperature

1:38:22

as cool as it is now. The

1:38:24

mammals who now inhabit the Earth began

1:38:26

to evolve around 60 million years ago,

1:38:28

when the world was much warmer than

1:38:30

today. We just look at

1:38:33

the last 65 million years. So this is

1:38:35

after the dinosaurs go extinct, mammals

1:38:37

really start to take over and

1:38:39

our evolutionary ancestors start to live

1:38:41

on the land. Any time

1:38:43

period within the last 65

1:38:46

million years was warmer than it

1:38:48

is essentially today. The Earth's mammals,

1:38:50

humans included, appear to thrive when

1:38:52

it's warm, warmer than it is

1:38:54

now. There's no doubt that

1:38:56

warm is better than cold in geological history.

1:38:59

We are a tropical species.

1:39:02

A human being in the shade naked

1:39:04

dies at 20C from

1:39:07

hypothermia. We evolved

1:39:09

on the equator in Africa and

1:39:12

the only reason we were able to get out of

1:39:14

there eventually was fire, shelter

1:39:16

and clothing. We

1:39:19

do not want to get colder. This

1:39:21

is bad for us. But that

1:39:25

is the idea. First, we'll go

1:39:27

another ice age to kill all

1:39:29

humans. Well, they're well

1:39:31

on their way and we're going to use

1:39:34

all kinds of propaganda and

1:39:37

a new term or not a new term

1:39:39

but a term that is being cemented in

1:39:41

our psyche and I came across this ah,

1:39:43

ah. What are you drinking?

1:39:45

I waited the whole last show.

1:39:47

You didn't crack anything. Yes,

1:39:52

yes, yes. Actually I did but I turned

1:39:54

off the sound. This is

1:39:56

of all things signature

1:39:58

brand seltzer. Water Original. Oh,

1:40:01

it's a signature brand. Oh,

1:40:03

wow. It's

1:40:06

Seltzer Water. Because

1:40:08

of the war in the Middle East, I'm

1:40:10

drinking Seltzer Water. You're

1:40:13

helping the children in the Middle East. So

1:40:16

the European Union

1:40:18

has a landfill directive

1:40:23

which means stop putting, stop throwing out your

1:40:25

trash. I'm shortening

1:40:27

it here. Stop

1:40:29

throwing out your trash, people. We can't have you

1:40:31

throwing out your trash. This is

1:40:34

no good. We need sustainable waste

1:40:36

management. And

1:40:39

how do you convince people to do

1:40:42

this? Well, you inject it into

1:40:45

culture. What better way

1:40:47

than to do this into fashion? The

1:40:50

most recent Paris Fashion Week had

1:40:54

all the biggies from Estella

1:40:56

McCartney, everybody. And

1:40:58

they all are using a new type

1:41:00

of material. Estella is a child blazer.

1:41:04

And she is a woman that dances to the beat

1:41:06

of her own drums. And

1:41:08

I love her creativity. But more than

1:41:10

anything, I love the way that she's championing

1:41:13

sustainability in fashion. Because I think

1:41:15

that's an incredibly important message. And

1:41:18

there are some very big names supporting

1:41:20

her. Hadad, Paul McCartney and his wife

1:41:22

Nancy Chevelle. But also Ringo Starr and

1:41:24

his wife Barbara Bath. Luxury

1:41:27

groups have long jostled for a piece of

1:41:29

Estella pie. Oh, it's a huge platform. I'm

1:41:31

a big believer in infiltrating from within. I

1:41:33

mean, I'm with the biggest puppies

1:41:35

in the world. And I'm hiding inside.

1:41:39

And they're very open-hearted to it. I'm

1:41:41

very encouraged. So I feel really positive, actually,

1:41:43

about the changes that we're making. And

1:41:45

I have their full support. I think it

1:41:48

gives a really, really loud message to the

1:41:50

industry that Miss Chiano is invested in this

1:41:52

business. Fired up by that same desire to

1:41:55

change the world. French designer Marine Certosa showcased

1:41:57

her 2024 winter ready to work. and

1:42:00

ground control, an alternative food

1:42:02

hole located in an old Parisian railway

1:42:05

depot. With an each

1:42:07

look, a celebration of the

1:42:09

power of recycling. Yeah, there

1:42:11

were lots of upcycling, so

1:42:13

you had the upcycling scarves,

1:42:15

you had the upcycling t-shirts,

1:42:17

upcycling hoodies, a

1:42:20

lot of recycled fibres, also for example the

1:42:22

new top and the neat old adage and

1:42:25

the hydrogenite fibre, even if they are

1:42:27

not upcycled, not to be confused. So

1:42:29

yeah, this is still part of the idea

1:42:31

of the brand, but of course I'm there

1:42:33

today also to make a dream and to

1:42:36

make you a joy and I'm really also

1:42:38

happy to be

1:42:41

able to understand in the difficult

1:42:43

world today to have the chance

1:42:45

to speak and I thought

1:42:47

what was the most important thing for

1:42:50

me and enjoy and love to people.

1:42:52

So upcycling is the term where we

1:42:54

take waste, some of it

1:42:57

from the food hole, at

1:43:00

pizza boxes and

1:43:03

we turn this, we upcycle this

1:43:05

into material and then

1:43:07

you're supposed to wear it. It's

1:43:11

literally trash fashion. Yeah,

1:43:16

because heaven forbid that cotton, you know, you

1:43:18

have a million acres of

1:43:20

cotton being grown and just throwing these fibres

1:43:22

out. Hoodies,

1:43:26

you need hoodies. Hoodies,

1:43:28

it's hoodies, it wasn't hoodies,

1:43:31

it's hoodies. Meanwhile, the

1:43:33

Guardian says that temperatures of minus

1:43:36

three Celsius are forecast next

1:43:38

week in Scotland. So

1:43:43

it's going from 21.8 degrees

1:43:45

to minus three. Did

1:43:48

they replace the sun? Did they replace

1:43:50

the sun with a fake sun? What did they do?

1:43:53

That's weird. That's weird.

1:43:57

That's weird. I'm sure

1:43:59

that will also be blamed on the carbon,

1:44:01

our carbon budget. Oh,

1:44:03

extreme weather events. It's

1:44:06

a scam people, they're coming for everything with

1:44:08

that, everything, everything

1:44:11

you can imagine, all

1:44:13

of it. Well,

1:44:18

the change topics. Okay. Let's

1:44:20

talk about Russia. Yeah,

1:44:22

yeah, we should do that. But this is

1:44:24

a different story about Russia. You know those

1:44:26

bastards are always trying to meddle. Oh no.

1:44:29

Is the EU, Belgian, finger pointing

1:44:31

at Russia? Oh, Belgian.

1:44:33

Officials in Belgium are looking into

1:44:36

whether Russia is meddling in upcoming

1:44:38

European Parliament election. Authorities

1:44:40

say that Russian agents in Brussels

1:44:42

are promoting pro-Moscow candidates to try

1:44:44

to undermine the EU's support for

1:44:47

Ukraine. They've allegedly even tried to

1:44:49

bribe some lawmakers. Belgium's

1:44:51

prime minister announced the probe today. Belgian

1:44:54

intelligence services have confirmed the existence

1:44:56

of pro-Russian interference

1:44:58

networks with activities in

1:45:01

several European countries and

1:45:03

also here in Belgium. The goal

1:45:05

is very clear. A

1:45:08

weakened European support for Ukraine

1:45:11

serves Russia on the battlefield.

1:45:14

Russian authorities deny the accusations. The

1:45:16

Europe wide elections are slated for

1:45:18

June. Yeah, they're

1:45:20

pretty worried because the far right

1:45:23

is taking over. They

1:45:25

don't like it. For good reason. France,

1:45:27

by the way, according to Politico, headline,

1:45:32

France talks tough on Ukraine while

1:45:35

gobbling up more Russian gas. 600

1:45:39

million euros this year for liquefied

1:45:41

natural gas. What? Yeah,

1:45:44

I know. I see everyone's all over the place

1:45:46

about this. Well, you know, Macron's shaking his fist

1:45:48

at Russia. We're going to send troops and meanwhile

1:45:50

they're buying all this gas. And

1:45:53

I mean, it's

1:45:55

hilarious to see some of these TikTok

1:45:57

videos of young people. kids

1:46:00

across the EU, the British are the best. Well,

1:46:02

you think I'm off by Russia? No, I'm not

1:46:04

going to do that. I've got TikTok videos to

1:46:06

make. Mate, I'm not doing that. No,

1:46:10

it's not bad. And Germany, Germany,

1:46:13

with a conscription code

1:46:15

for draft. German Defense Minister

1:46:18

Boris Pistorius, meeting soldiers deploying

1:46:20

to Lithuania this week. The

1:46:23

countries have agreed to station 4,800 troops there in

1:46:25

three years' time in what's being

1:46:29

called an historic agreement. But

1:46:32

these deployments highlight a wider issue

1:46:34

for Germany, a lack of military

1:46:37

resources. The issues

1:46:39

reignited the debate around conscription. Oh no!

1:46:42

Pistorius has even said the phasing

1:46:44

out of compulsory military service in

1:46:46

2011 was a mistake.

1:46:49

Andreas Rincke is in Berlin. How

1:46:52

controversial is conscription as an issue?

1:46:54

It's very controversial. I think the

1:46:57

population is half split, I would

1:46:59

say, regarding the polls. What

1:47:01

type of system is being suggested? It's

1:47:04

important to understand that conscription is

1:47:06

not abolished in Germany, but it's

1:47:08

suspended. So it's easier to

1:47:11

go back to the old system if you

1:47:13

want to do it. But there

1:47:15

are different proposals. One

1:47:18

is to go back to the

1:47:20

normal compulsory service model, but that

1:47:22

could include this time women and

1:47:24

men. You could have Swedish models,

1:47:26

that means mastering a soldier. They

1:47:29

can have Swedish models in the

1:47:31

army, that's cool. Yeah, well they

1:47:33

get a lot of people to

1:47:35

join. Yeah, definitely. Women

1:47:37

and men, you could have

1:47:39

Swedish models, that means mastering

1:47:42

a soldier, and then

1:47:44

take roughly one third of the people

1:47:46

which have been mustered, and

1:47:48

then select volunteers. Mustered,

1:47:50

you can be made into mustard. Well,

1:47:53

an NPR has a

1:47:55

quick report here on the future

1:47:57

for all of these conscripted EUs.

1:48:00

young people are the

1:48:02

latest voices of America.

1:48:05

This is NPS or

1:48:08

PBS. Can't be good for a country trying to

1:48:10

win a war that they would need more troops

1:48:12

as soon as possible. And Ukrainian leaders think that

1:48:14

this new conscription law will help turn that around.

1:48:16

How would it do that? So,

1:48:19

A, the law lays the groundwork

1:48:21

to draft more military-age men. They

1:48:23

would be required at all times

1:48:25

to carry draft registration documents, so

1:48:27

conscripts would be easier to find. If they

1:48:29

don't, they could lose privileges like they

1:48:32

would be banned from driving. And lawmakers

1:48:34

are also considering imposing fines for draft

1:48:36

dodgers in a separate bill. All right, so

1:48:38

those are the stakes. Any carrots here? Yeah,

1:48:41

the law also offers incentives to men

1:48:43

who volunteer for service. For example, they

1:48:46

can get certificates to buy a car

1:48:48

or put down mortgage payments on a

1:48:50

house. And in one controversial move, the

1:48:53

bill also would allow convicts to serve

1:48:55

in return for a suspended sentence. Previously,

1:48:57

convicts were banned from military service. And

1:48:59

quickly, the draft age in Ukraine is 25.

1:49:02

Why are younger men Ukraine exempted? Ukraine

1:49:05

doesn't have many of them. Ukraine has

1:49:07

a very low birth rate, a drastic

1:49:09

declines in birth rates since the USSR's

1:49:11

collapse. And if Ukraine recruits a lot

1:49:13

of young men, it risks decimating an

1:49:15

entire generation. There

1:49:17

you go. If

1:49:19

we don't get you with climate change, we'll

1:49:21

kill you on the battlefield. Stop

1:49:23

this, you insane people. There's got to be some

1:49:25

way of killing more people. Insane. These people, I'm

1:49:28

glad we're all really worried about the region

1:49:30

at this hour because

1:49:33

there's almost no more men.

1:49:35

There's no more sperm left

1:49:37

in Ukraine. Another way to get rid of

1:49:39

a country. Well, kind

1:49:41

of a roundabout way

1:49:44

of doing it. Inexpensive.

1:49:46

It doesn't fix any potholes. I

1:49:49

mean, no. But

1:49:51

it does fill the coffers

1:49:54

of the military industrial base. The

1:49:58

Prime Minister of Japan was... Was

1:50:00

it rare, rare, rare speech before Congress? Did

1:50:03

you catch any of the speech? I

1:50:05

didn't catch it. I know about it. I saw

1:50:07

the summaries that you have and no.

1:50:13

Whatever you have is going to be,

1:50:15

I'm sure, better than anything that was

1:50:17

presented on the mainstream media. Well, this

1:50:19

is from Reuters. So fat chance. Russian

1:50:21

missiles and drones destroyed a large electricity

1:50:24

plant near Kiev and hit power facilities

1:50:26

in several regions of Ukraine on Thursday.

1:50:29

Russia is scaling up its airstrikes

1:50:31

as Kiev runs low on air

1:50:33

defenses. President

1:50:38

Vladimir Zelensky has been repeating a plea

1:50:40

for promised aid to come through, citing

1:50:42

the desperate lack of defenses. In

1:50:45

the halls of the U.S. Congress, a

1:50:48

similar call rang out this week. The

1:50:51

world needs the United States

1:50:53

to continue playing this pivotal

1:50:57

role in the affairs

1:50:59

of nations. Whatever. Japanese Prime

1:51:01

Minister Hinyou-Kashida giving lawmakers something

1:51:03

of a pep talk on

1:51:05

what America's role is

1:51:08

or should be in the

1:51:10

world. And yet, as

1:51:14

we meet here today,

1:51:16

I detect and

1:51:19

under current self-doubt behind him, Republican

1:51:21

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson,

1:51:23

who has refused to bring up

1:51:26

for a vote a foreign military

1:51:28

aid package that includes $60 billion

1:51:31

for Ukraine. We

1:51:33

tell to U.S. support how

1:51:36

long before hopes

1:51:38

of Ukraine would collapse

1:51:41

under the onslaught from

1:51:44

Moscow. Yes.

1:51:47

So brave. Did he go? Since you were

1:51:50

playing this, at what point did he mention

1:51:52

negotiations as a possible solution to this issue?

1:51:54

Like maybe sitting down at the table and

1:51:56

saying, hey, we got to stop this. This

1:51:59

is causing trouble. too much money. Where

1:52:02

was that in the speech? Did you not catch that?

1:52:05

I must have missed it. It's odd.

1:52:08

I'm sure he said it. Well,

1:52:11

he must have because that seems like

1:52:13

the normal thing you'd say. But I haven't

1:52:16

heard it. Have you been

1:52:18

following this Lisa Cook over

1:52:23

at the Fed? No.

1:52:26

What? Lisa, you got me here.

1:52:28

Yeah. So this is part of Moe's theory that

1:52:32

we're just going to blame everything on black women. Yeah.

1:52:36

Trouble. I know the theory is

1:52:38

simple. And as time

1:52:40

goes on, it looks like there's a

1:52:43

lot of black women up to get blamed. Let's

1:52:45

review. Let's review. We have Fonny Willis.

1:52:49

They're going to be blamed for Trump's getting out

1:52:51

of the- She's also corrupt. It's obvious that he

1:52:53

said the more they dig into her, the worse

1:52:55

it looks. I'm sure she's not the only corrupt

1:52:58

one, but she's the one getting pushed forward. Who

1:53:01

else do we have? We have

1:53:03

several examples. We have Lori Lightfoot investigating

1:53:06

a black mayor in a nearby

1:53:08

town who's a black woman.

1:53:10

That's my favorite one, by

1:53:13

the way. When does she

1:53:15

become an investigator? Mayor Adams,

1:53:17

another black woman in New

1:53:19

York, who was getting her- The mayor?

1:53:25

Yeah. And now, trouble at the

1:53:27

Fed. Investigation into

1:53:29

Lisa Cook's academic record

1:53:31

raises questions. Lisa

1:53:34

D. Cook is one of the world's

1:53:36

most powerful economists. She taught

1:53:38

economics at Harvard University of Michigan

1:53:41

State and served on the Obama

1:53:43

Administration's Council of Economic Advisors before

1:53:45

being appointed in 2022 to the

1:53:47

Federal Reserve Board of Governors, which

1:53:50

controls the interest rates and

1:53:53

money supply of the United States.

1:53:55

Now- Can I guess? Yeah.

1:53:58

Go for it. So

1:54:01

they've discovered that all

1:54:03

these years no one's ever actually looked

1:54:05

into her academic background and just took

1:54:07

her at her word instead of actually

1:54:09

checking. Turns out that she doesn't

1:54:12

have any half the degree she says. She's kind

1:54:14

of like Biden who once said he had three

1:54:16

or four degrees he never did. Biden's a liar.

1:54:19

Is something like that? The quality

1:54:21

of her scholarship has received criticism.

1:54:26

In her pedigree questions have long persisted

1:54:28

about her academic record. Her

1:54:30

publication history is remarkably thin for

1:54:33

a tenured professor and her published

1:54:35

work largely focuses on race activism

1:54:37

rather than on rigorous quantitative economics.

1:54:41

Her nomination to the Fed required

1:54:43

Vice President Kamala Harris to cast

1:54:45

a tie-breaking vote. By

1:54:48

contrast her predecessor in the seat

1:54:50

Janet Yellen, now Treasure Secretary, was

1:54:52

confirmed unanimously. Cook also

1:54:54

seems to have consistently inflated her own credentials.

1:54:57

Oh no! In 2022 investigative

1:54:59

journalist Christopher Brunette pointed out that

1:55:01

despite billing herself as a macro

1:55:03

economist Cook had never published a

1:55:05

peer-reviewed macroeconomics article and had misrepresented

1:55:07

her publication history in her CV

1:55:09

claiming that she had published an

1:55:11

article in the Journal of American

1:55:13

Economic Review. In truth the article

1:55:15

was published in American Economic Review

1:55:18

papers and proceedings, a

1:55:20

less prestigious non-peer reviewed magazine.

1:55:23

So it goes

1:55:26

on and on and on and on and on. So

1:55:29

I think that Ms. Lisa D. Cook is

1:55:31

going to be blamed. It

1:55:33

was Lisa who said, transitory, don't

1:55:35

you remember? I remember that. It was

1:55:37

Lisa. Don't you remember that John? Oh yeah,

1:55:40

I was heard. Definitely.

1:55:42

It was Lisa. And

1:55:45

I don't know who made it. I think Lisa

1:55:47

did this. Well

1:55:49

it's Lisa. There is an incredible scandal unfolding

1:55:52

at the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

1:55:55

Before your eyes glaze over it

1:55:57

has to do with non-public secret information.

1:56:00

information being related to a group of what

1:56:02

they described as super users who of course

1:56:04

are all on Wall Street in a position

1:56:06

to make millions of dollars based on this

1:56:08

non-public information. This is per the New York

1:56:10

Times a lot of other outlets reporting on

1:56:13

this as well They say new questions on

1:56:15

how a key agency shared inflation data I

1:56:17

think that's to put it pretty mildly a

1:56:20

government economist had regular contact with quote

1:56:22

Superusers in finance record show at

1:56:25

a time when such information keenly

1:56:27

interest investors I can't wait

1:56:29

to find out who did it what

1:56:31

economist I'm gonna

1:56:34

say blame Lisa Even if she

1:56:36

didn't do it So they

1:56:38

were just leaking the inflation data early.

1:56:40

Did you guys talk about I haven't I haven't heard DH

1:56:42

unplugged You guys talk about that at all what

1:56:45

leaking the inflation inflation data early.

1:56:47

No, yeah This

1:56:50

is quite outrageous I would

1:56:53

say No, it's outrageous

1:56:55

because it allows for people to do

1:56:58

trading that could benefit. Yes. Yeah, it's

1:57:00

it's Illegal to

1:57:02

do that. Well a government

1:57:04

economist we shall see I'm

1:57:07

saying Lisa You

1:57:10

had that Four-parter on

1:57:12

EI. Yes, you had that

1:57:15

four-parter on a transgender Medical

1:57:19

Necessary medical transgender treatment.

1:57:22

Yeah, the cast report. Yeah, sure. Well

1:57:26

The final report now is out

1:57:28

of the cast report the the cast review is

1:57:30

what it's called And

1:57:33

and they have some conclusions and

1:57:35

correct that it says in there.

1:57:37

Hey, there's no real evidence. This

1:57:39

works It's

1:57:41

no good kind of we're not sure But

1:57:44

the final report has two points and I think

1:57:47

that this is this is where it all goes

1:57:49

askew quoting from the

1:57:51

final report For most

1:57:53

young people a medical pathway will not

1:57:55

be the best way to manage their

1:57:57

gender related distress This

1:58:00

is good. For those

1:58:02

young people for whom a medical

1:58:05

pathway is clinically indicated, it is

1:58:08

not enough to provide this without also

1:58:10

addressing wider mental

1:58:12

health and or psychosocially

1:58:16

challenging problems. Innovation

1:58:19

is important if medicine is to move

1:58:22

forward but there must

1:58:24

be a proportionate level of

1:58:26

monitoring oversight and regulation that

1:58:28

does not stifle progress while

1:58:30

preventing creep of unproven approaches

1:58:32

into clinical practice. Innovation

1:58:35

must draw from and contribute to

1:58:38

the evidence base. So

1:58:41

I think they're going to flip this around and

1:58:44

they're just going to start using

1:58:47

this on for

1:58:49

better medical, for big pharma to come

1:58:51

in and do more and

1:58:54

have scientists that know

1:58:56

how much carbon budget you have. It's

1:59:01

sad that this good evidence-based

1:59:04

report is now basically being turned

1:59:06

into, well, as long as

1:59:08

we shore this up, we'll be okay. Yeah,

1:59:11

of course. This is where the money is. It's

1:59:14

easy money. What was the number? $72,000

1:59:17

a year for everyone who gets transitioned

1:59:20

or get on these crazy drugs and put

1:59:22

them on? It's like $12

1:59:24

million over the lifetime of each patient.

1:59:26

Yeah, it's something like ridiculous amounts of

1:59:28

profit. And so all

1:59:30

these HMOs and all the rest

1:59:33

of them that are profit motivated

1:59:35

included Kaiser who has signage

1:59:37

that we've, I think, has been in the newsletter.

1:59:39

You're going to see the signage. We're this way

1:59:41

and we're that way. Come

1:59:43

here and we'll do the operation for

1:59:45

you. Yeah, it's corrupt.

1:59:48

This whole system is bad. You

1:59:51

read the note earlier about the

1:59:54

doctor who excoriated someone for trying

1:59:56

to make him take Gozepic for

1:59:58

the rest of his life. Yeah and part

2:00:01

of this is the testing industrial complex which is

2:00:03

also high on my list of things to

2:00:05

be looking at. We were

2:00:07

taught during, bless you, we were

2:00:10

taught during COVID to

2:00:12

trust the test. Oh, I'm just going to

2:00:14

test it. It'll be okay. Even though we

2:00:16

know that the original test, what's

2:00:19

the name of that test? PVR,

2:00:21

PCR, PVR. PCR, I can't remember. Pacific Coast

2:00:23

Highway. Yeah, the PCH. PCR test. PCR

2:00:26

test. PCR test. PCR test. That

2:00:28

is bogus. There's

2:00:30

never intended to be a test and then all

2:00:32

of a sudden we got antigen tests. We got

2:00:35

some home kits. They could have been given them

2:00:37

away. Given them away, I tell you. They

2:00:39

were. I have boxes of them. All

2:00:42

of this testing is bogus.

2:00:45

The PSA test for.

2:00:49

Public service announcements. A lot

2:00:51

of people don't have them. They get tested. PSA

2:00:54

blood test for colon cancer is

2:00:56

killing more people than it's

2:00:58

saving. I would

2:01:00

wager to say that all

2:01:02

the pap smears, probably the

2:01:04

breast cancer. All of it,

2:01:08

testing. If you go to your doctor, let's test

2:01:10

some stuff. No, I'm good, man. I'm good. We

2:01:13

have a lab rat, boots on the ground

2:01:15

who was just to remain anonymous and this

2:01:17

is regarding PFAS because PFAS is in the

2:01:19

band-aids now. It's going to kill your kid.

2:01:21

Don't use a band-aid. Just stitch them up.

2:01:26

PFAS everywhere. This is another part of this

2:01:28

testing industrial complex.

2:01:31

Boots on the ground report. I've worked for

2:01:33

a commercial environmental lab for over 10 years.

2:01:35

I agree with the show's assessment that there

2:01:37

is an over-hype money grab going on right

2:01:39

now with PFAS. I'm

2:01:41

seeing a lot of headlines noting that PFAS

2:01:43

is detected in name, water supply here. I'm

2:01:46

thinking that when the

2:01:49

M5M is using the detected headline, they

2:01:51

are scaring the public by not mentioning

2:01:53

at what levels the chemicals are present.

2:01:55

This is exactly like your lead test,

2:01:57

John. We are talking about detection

2:01:59

limits of our... Ground Zero Point:

2:02:01

One to fifty parts per

2:02:04

trillion. Dollar. Surplus.

2:02:07

The test is also easily contaminated of

2:02:09

incest this that that level the test

2:02:11

is also easily contaminated. While sampling and

2:02:14

samples need to be process in the

2:02:16

clean room and outfield, sample collection occurs

2:02:18

in a clean room and five them

2:02:21

are using the term detection but not

2:02:23

mentioning concentration. The reporting which is like

2:02:25

seat likely causing in flames and endless

2:02:28

truths onto the money wraps. Right now

2:02:30

there was probably only couple of mods

2:02:32

commercial lab companies that. Might

2:02:35

face P a C working with the

2:02:37

P A to develop a method and

2:02:39

would be set up and have certification

2:02:41

since limits have not been established by

2:02:43

the Apia. in the testing isn't widely

2:02:45

available that leaves a huge new markets

2:02:47

only available to be companies with the

2:02:49

foot in the door so to speak.

2:02:51

The Be A also just released maximum

2:02:53

contaminant levels and see else for p

2:02:55

Fast and drinking water with a compliance

2:02:58

timeline. Off to the races. So

2:03:00

big money and the testing. Big

2:03:02

money in the testing. The.

2:03:05

It interesting for everything. testing for

2:03:07

lead testing for for cancer cancer's

2:03:10

the best one. The best one.

2:03:13

To I'm I'm very happy. Dance on

2:03:15

your doorstep, your crap in it and

2:03:17

say back now and you can set

2:03:20

of the earth's surface and hats and

2:03:22

they say right in the commercial could

2:03:24

be false positives to be false positives

2:03:27

comes from to become see cause I

2:03:29

know anything can be possible. Anything's possible

2:03:31

these days. How's

2:03:33

the? I'm very skeptical

2:03:35

but tests. Is

2:03:38

very skeptical about just.

2:03:42

Than we ever pick Seeger. Pixie.

2:03:45

Girl on the Hill. Picks

2:03:48

marriage Yes, Herridge on the Hill. Justifiably

2:03:50

up for a woman miffed at well,

2:03:53

Sure, As

2:03:56

best as now, every single

2:03:58

reporter in the main stream

2:04:00

has such as to. Why

2:04:04

he will he will go with

2:04:06

oil was big So mana Higley

2:04:08

sister every single reporter. News

2:04:10

model spokes whole. They

2:04:12

talk about sources. A

2:04:14

sources say. A sources said.

2:04:17

Sources: Say. They

2:04:20

never reveal their sources. Ever.

2:04:23

Somehow. Catherine Herridge

2:04:25

has to reveal her sources. So

2:04:28

I'm not sure if if if to

2:04:30

exactly what's going on with this a.

2:04:33

With. Her issue, but she doesn't wanna

2:04:35

give up her sources. To

2:04:38

so someone must have slipped her information.

2:04:41

That was not supposed to get out. And

2:04:43

even though every single report ever

2:04:45

since we've been doing the show

2:04:48

never mentioned to just sources say

2:04:50

sources familiar with the man Sources

2:04:52

who know how the President's think

2:04:54

source is My sources: Good sources

2:04:56

Military sources Intelligence sources. They.

2:04:58

Never mention to note Catherine

2:05:01

Herridge gets. Drawn

2:05:03

to the to ask. Me as the

2:05:05

As and thought investigated for find Catherine Herridge

2:05:07

with honor hell this week leading her case

2:05:09

and thera her way behind the press act

2:05:11

that is up for path is. Much

2:05:13

less than the person I am

2:05:16

the last journalists who has to

2:05:18

spend two years in the Federal

2:05:20

courts fighting to protect my confidential

2:05:22

sources. She is currently embroiled

2:05:24

in a First Amendment legal case that

2:05:26

is seeking to reveal the confidential I

2:05:28

Daddy A source. She has years and

2:05:31

reporting for Fox News Reports about a

2:05:33

Chinese scientists who was investigated by the

2:05:35

Sci. Fi. Is also known for her

2:05:37

reporting on Hunter. By the last before

2:05:39

congress she told her side as the

2:05:41

story. When

2:05:44

you go through major life events

2:05:46

as I has in recent weeks:

2:05:48

losing your job, losing your company

2:05:50

health insurance, having your reporting files

2:05:53

seized by your. Former employers in

2:05:55

being held in contempt of. Court

2:05:57

gives you clear it is the

2:05:59

for. First Amendment, the protection of

2:06:02

confidential sources, and a free

2:06:04

press are my guiding principles.

2:06:07

They are my North Star. When

2:06:09

I was laid off in February, an incident

2:06:11

reinforced in my mind the

2:06:14

importance of protecting confidential sources.

2:06:17

CBS News locked me out of

2:06:19

the building and seized hundreds of

2:06:21

pages of my reporting files, including

2:06:24

confidential source information. Multiple

2:06:27

sources said they were concerned that by

2:06:29

working with me to expose government corruption

2:06:31

and CBS

2:06:34

News locked me out of the building

2:06:36

and seized hundreds of pages of my

2:06:38

reporting files, including

2:06:45

confidential source information. Multiple

2:06:47

sources said they were concerned that

2:06:50

by working with me to expose

2:06:52

government corruption and misconduct, they would

2:06:54

be identified and exposed. I

2:06:57

pushed back and with the public

2:06:59

support of my union SAG-AFTRA, the

2:07:01

records were returned. CBS

2:07:03

News' decision. I

2:07:06

was waiting for you to catch that. Wow.

2:07:10

Well, to be

2:07:12

fair, it's American Federation of

2:07:14

Radio and Television Artists, AFTRA,

2:07:18

and SAG Screen Actors Guild. They got

2:07:20

together, but yes, her boss is the

2:07:22

nanny. The

2:07:25

nanny planned Russia. And with

2:07:27

the public support of my union

2:07:29

SAG-AFTRA, the records were returned. CBS

2:07:33

News' decision to

2:07:35

receive my reporting records crossed

2:07:37

a red line that I believe

2:07:39

should never be crossed again by

2:07:41

any media organization in the future.

2:07:43

Is there no union for journalists?

2:07:47

Yeah, there's the

2:07:49

guilds, various newspaper guilds. There's tons of

2:07:51

them. Oh, yeah. Every newspaper

2:07:54

has one, and that's what you think she'd be part of. I

2:07:56

didn't think SAG-AFTRA would

2:07:59

be what you'd do. union you're in

2:08:01

if you're a reporter, that's a doctor's

2:08:03

union. So she's

2:08:05

testifying during the hearing

2:08:09

regarding this is already past the house. Yeah, I'm

2:08:11

going to stop you for a second. I'm glad

2:08:13

you got these clips because I was not thinking

2:08:15

that this is anything other than just who gives

2:08:17

a shit but you're

2:08:19

probably right. This is something phony

2:08:21

baloney about this whole thing to

2:08:23

an extreme. Please

2:08:26

continue. The Protect

2:08:28

Reporters from Exploitative State Spying

2:08:30

Act or press app. It's

2:08:33

already past the house. This bill

2:08:36

prohibits the federal government from

2:08:38

compelling journalists and providers of

2:08:40

telecommunication services, example

2:08:42

phone and internet companies to

2:08:45

disclose certain protected information

2:08:47

except in limited circumstances

2:08:50

such as to prevent

2:08:52

terrorism or imminent

2:08:54

violence. January

2:08:56

6th, specifically the

2:08:58

bill protects from disclosure any

2:09:01

information identifying a

2:09:05

source as well as

2:09:07

any records, contents of a communication documents

2:09:09

or information obtained or created by journalists

2:09:11

in the course of their work which

2:09:14

is called doing journalism. Further,

2:09:16

the bill protects specified

2:09:18

third parties such as

2:09:20

telecommunications carriers or

2:09:23

social media companies from

2:09:25

being compelled to provide testimony or

2:09:28

any document consisting of a record

2:09:30

information or other communications that is

2:09:33

stored by the third party on

2:09:35

behalf of a journalist. Isn't

2:09:37

that interesting in light

2:09:40

of section 203? Very

2:09:42

interesting. Here's part two

2:09:44

of her testimony. Congressman Jim Jordan came

2:09:46

to her defense on Thursday. It seems

2:09:49

to me there's a pattern developing here.

2:09:51

The critical of the government Ms. Atkinson's

2:09:53

situation and Shazam, they start doing

2:09:56

all kinds of strange things to your phone line,

2:09:58

to your computer, your critical. of the government

2:10:00

at a major news organization, and your award-winning journalists have

2:10:02

been there five years, you get fired. But it's not

2:10:05

just that you got fired. In

2:10:07

fact, maybe there's nothing to that,

2:10:09

but what we do know is they seize your documents. That's

2:10:12

scary as well. And

2:10:14

you talk about a chilling effect on the First

2:10:16

Amendment. I don't know how it could be more

2:10:18

chilling. Now, thank goodness this lady said, and besides

2:10:20

you, they stepped in, right? Because they're stepping in

2:10:22

and helping. Them stepping in helps you

2:10:25

get your, because you got your files back finally, didn't

2:10:27

you? I did get the files back

2:10:29

if I didn't have the support

2:10:31

of Syg-Astra really publicly

2:10:33

standing up for journalism. I don't believe.

2:10:35

Maybe it's just scripts. Like, hey, man,

2:10:37

give me my sides back. How

2:10:40

can I do my work without my sides?

2:10:42

Your file's back finally, didn't you? I

2:10:44

did get the files back if I

2:10:47

didn't have the support of Syg-Astra really

2:10:49

publicly standing up for journalism. So she's

2:10:51

going crediting, and she could have just

2:10:54

said yes. She's not

2:10:56

like a NASCAR where she has to plug

2:10:58

every little patch that's on her jacket. Well,

2:11:02

hey, those documents include- Why don't you just

2:11:04

say, yes, I got them back. Now, I

2:11:06

want to thank Syg-Astra, and I want to

2:11:08

thank my mom. I

2:11:11

think she's pissed because one of her scripts

2:11:13

was signed by John Brennan. I mean, these

2:11:15

are things that you want to keep for

2:11:17

prosperity space. I did get the files back

2:11:19

if I didn't have the support of Syg-Astra

2:11:21

really publicly standing up for journalism. I

2:11:24

don't believe that I would have received

2:11:26

the files and they would have been returned.

2:11:28

And I just want to be clear, Congressman,

2:11:32

wherever you work, if this happened to

2:11:34

you, it's an attack on

2:11:36

free press, it's an attack on

2:11:38

the First Amendment. It makes it

2:11:40

more challenging for reporters to work in the

2:11:42

future. That just- Of course it does.

2:11:44

The free flow of information to

2:11:47

the public. They call it

2:11:49

a journalism, a profession for a reason,

2:11:52

because it's about an informed electorate

2:11:54

and it's a cornerstone of

2:11:56

our democracy. Isn't Trump

2:11:59

a member of- after? He must be.

2:12:02

Oh, he asked to be. Well, they should give his files

2:12:04

back to them. Well,

2:12:07

he's the one who took the files. Kudos

2:12:10

to Jim Jordan for resurrecting

2:12:12

Shazam! Kudos

2:12:16

to Jim Jordan. Good work,

2:12:18

Jim. Shazam! He said Shazam!

2:12:20

Okay, well, let's give us a bit.

2:12:22

I want to hear your theory on

2:12:24

this. There's got to be something that

2:12:26

happened to the Chinese guy. She outed

2:12:28

or she did something she should have

2:12:31

told not to do, if she did it anyway,

2:12:33

or she didn't do something she was told to

2:12:35

do. It has to be warring

2:12:40

factions. I would say CIA,

2:12:42

FBI, and she

2:12:44

overstepped her boundaries somewhere. Somewhere

2:12:46

she, I mean the

2:12:49

CIA, certainly at CBS, they

2:12:51

just give you the talking points. Hey, you got to keep

2:12:55

me, this is off the record,

2:12:57

background only. But here's what's

2:12:59

going on with that situation. And

2:13:01

of course, it's exactly what they want

2:13:03

to see on the news. And

2:13:05

someone went rogue, this has nothing to do with

2:13:08

her. They want to know who went

2:13:10

rogue, who gave her

2:13:12

some information. I don't know what it is.

2:13:14

But then all of a sudden, we have

2:13:17

this weird bill and this is what it's

2:13:19

about, about

2:13:21

if you're a journalist and

2:13:23

you have, I guess, DMs on

2:13:26

social media, which sounds

2:13:28

kind of like where this is coming from because

2:13:30

they mentioned specifically that

2:13:32

the intelligence community

2:13:35

can't demand that. I

2:13:39

think everybody has something to hide in this one. Well, I

2:13:41

think it's just the opposite. I

2:13:44

think the intelligence community is planting these things

2:13:46

and they don't want to be outed and

2:13:48

they want to have some sort of protection.

2:13:50

Well, there you go. I love

2:13:52

that. That makes sense.

2:13:55

This is the Intelligence Community Protection Act.

2:14:01

We can say whatever we want, no one's gonna

2:14:03

say, hey, wait a minute, this came right out

2:14:05

of your offices. Yeah, well,

2:14:07

there we go, solve. Poor

2:14:10

Catherine then. I thought that she'd be in

2:14:12

place. Maybe she's

2:14:14

in the position, the

2:14:17

whole thing's a setup. She did

2:14:19

nothing wrong. This is all right and

2:14:21

she's being, because she's

2:14:23

a good spokesperson, she's the guy that the

2:14:26

guy, the gal that needs to go in front

2:14:28

of Congress and give her sad story and do

2:14:31

it well because she's good, she's

2:14:33

not a slouch, she's an actress,

2:14:35

she's in SAG-AFTRA. She goes

2:14:38

up there and everybody says yes, yes, yes to

2:14:40

this and then they pass that idiotic thing. It's

2:14:42

got nothing to do with the press. It has to do with protecting

2:14:45

intelligence sources. There you go.

2:14:50

Who do you think her agent is? CAA? Let's

2:14:53

see. William Morris, who knows? Well,

2:14:56

no, you definitely have somebody good. They

2:14:59

all have agents. Usually, I know they do. Usually,

2:15:02

it's ITA. I

2:15:04

wonder, let me see. It wouldn't be hard to

2:15:06

find out. You can look, IMDB, if you have

2:15:08

the pro account, you can look up their agents.

2:15:10

I don't have a pro account. She'd be in

2:15:12

there. I have no pro account. Oh.

2:15:15

I have a pro account. You

2:15:18

can book her though for speeches. Sure.

2:15:21

But the booking, that's less defined.

2:15:23

Just like once you give a

2:15:26

young speaking circuit, everybody books you.

2:15:28

Speakers, speaking. Oh, speaking fee. Let's find

2:15:30

out. How much do you think you can get her for? I

2:15:33

think she's 12 grand. Read

2:15:36

more. Let me see. They

2:15:39

don't... Ah,

2:15:41

fake news. AAE. Do

2:15:43

we know this outfit? Oh, $30,000 to $50,000 for a live event. Holy

2:15:49

crap. What? That's ridiculous.

2:15:51

That's great. Yeah, for her.

2:15:53

If you want a virtual event, please contact. What?

2:16:01

She makes money off a Zoom call. Categories.

2:16:04

Yeah, this is... Okay,

2:16:07

back into the beginning of what you're

2:16:09

doing here. This stinks to high heaven.

2:16:12

Yeah, it does. Yeah.

2:16:16

Yeah, she did nothing. No,

2:16:21

she did nothing wrong. But

2:16:24

yeah, I'm with you on that. It's like,

2:16:26

hey, hey, hey, hey, hey,

2:16:29

she's actually, you know, she's protecting

2:16:31

her sources. She's doing the right

2:16:33

thing. She knows how it works.

2:16:35

She's got an agent. She does

2:16:37

live events. She is... Oh,

2:16:40

she's with this little bit that she just pulled

2:16:42

off, this speaking

2:16:46

in front of Congress and getting her ass

2:16:48

in a sling, supposedly. Yeah, just off her

2:16:50

feet. That's where you get the high rates.

2:16:52

She doesn't have to go back to work

2:16:54

for CBS. She'll make her $50,000, do about

2:16:56

10 speeches, make a half a million dollars

2:16:58

this next year. And

2:17:01

do a podcast. And do a

2:17:03

podcast. Yeah, she'll be doing

2:17:05

a podcast. That's true. I bet

2:17:08

she is. I bet that's... That's

2:17:10

her next step. I thought she was going to

2:17:13

show up at another network or in government. No,

2:17:15

it's something completely different. She's got it made.

2:17:18

She's the next Megyn Kelly. Yep,

2:17:23

she'll be pushing gold. No,

2:17:28

no, Megyn pushed... Oh,

2:17:31

that's... Stomach gut leakage. No,

2:17:33

no, no, no. Do you have an effort to gut

2:17:35

leakage? No, no, she's always talking about her legacy box.

2:17:38

Legacy box. Legacy box,

2:17:41

okay. That's a good sponsor.

2:17:43

Yeah, it's a great sponsor.

2:17:45

That and mattresses. Now, the

2:17:48

mattresses, even Squarespace, that's all

2:17:51

over. It's legacy box. It's

2:17:53

the wellness company, really. The

2:17:55

wellness company, very sketchy outfit.

2:17:58

They are paying for it. for a lot of these

2:18:01

podcasts. Well,

2:18:03

good for them. I'm glad the podcasters are making

2:18:06

money. Yeah. Because we're sure not.

2:18:08

Yeah. Say

2:18:10

in the morning to you, the man who just put the

2:18:12

sea in intelligence community, ladies and gentlemen, say hello to my

2:18:14

friend on the other end, the one we missed, John C.

2:18:17

The world. In

2:18:20

the morning, I'm a certain kind of citizen, sea breeder,

2:18:22

graphene is there, subzer, water and dames in the

2:18:24

night out there. In the morning. Oh,

2:18:26

hold on. Hold on. Troll

2:18:29

room. Can I count you trolls for

2:18:31

a second? Troll count? A previous Sunday, our troll count

2:18:33

was 1760 1760. Today's

2:18:41

count, 2008. Trolls

2:18:45

are up. The war. They're

2:18:47

multiple. The war. You're right.

2:18:50

World War X. There's no doubt

2:18:52

about it. Everybody's here. Everybody's ready to go. Good to hear

2:18:54

what we had to say. What we had to say about

2:18:56

this whole scheme. Scheme, I'd say. Scheme

2:18:58

is what I call it. And they stuck

2:19:00

all the way through the Catherine Herridge actress

2:19:02

bit. That's pretty cool. The

2:19:05

trolls are here live. That's our

2:19:07

live studio audience because

2:19:10

no agenda is filmed before a live studio

2:19:12

audience. And you can be a

2:19:14

member of the studio audience. You don't have to stand in line.

2:19:16

You don't have to send off for tickets. You

2:19:19

don't have to bribe anybody. Know somebody on the inside.

2:19:21

Just go to trollroom.io. And

2:19:24

you can listen to the live stream there which is 24-7,

2:19:26

the no agenda stream which is filled with

2:19:28

all kinds of podcasts live

2:19:30

and pre-recorded. And

2:19:32

there's also login for the chat and that's the trollroom. That's

2:19:34

how simple it is. Or go

2:19:37

over to podcastapps.com. Get yourself a

2:19:39

modern podcast app which

2:19:41

are doing more and more every day,

2:19:43

more joining. Now we have Pocket Cast.

2:19:46

That's automatic. They

2:19:48

bought that Pocket Cast. They're starting to add features.

2:19:54

You can see a Podcasts app.com. You see all the

2:19:56

cool features there. But the one that I like is

2:19:58

where you get automatically notified when we... go live or

2:20:00

any of your favorite podcasts go

2:20:02

live and you can tap

2:20:05

on it boom oh I'm listening live right in

2:20:07

my app the same app that notifies you within

2:20:09

90 seconds of us posting the show if you

2:20:11

can't listen live and it

2:20:13

includes chapters. I think Dreb Scott will

2:20:15

now be using the so we have

2:20:17

some cool new chapter features which is

2:20:19

animated gifs. So

2:20:21

now the show. Oh no. Oh

2:20:23

yeah. There's gonna be a cat running back and

2:20:25

forth across the screen. Yes. Right

2:20:28

when you said this actually is gonna be happening. Yes.

2:20:31

I'm sure Dreb will be all over that. Where

2:20:36

was I? Oh yes. The podcast.

2:20:39

Yes. Right. We're

2:20:41

not making Catherine Heritage money. That's what we were talking about. No way.

2:20:44

And she'll be doing a podcast. She'll be

2:20:46

selling Legacy Box and doing all kinds of good

2:20:48

things but we think that compromises our integrity.

2:20:50

It does. And we don't want

2:20:52

to be deplatformed. We take a beating. We

2:20:55

take a beating but we keep on treating.

2:20:57

No. And

2:20:59

we've decided to do it all value for value which means we

2:21:01

can do whatever we want. We don't have to stop for ad

2:21:03

breaks. We don't have

2:21:05

to be careful about mentioning competing

2:21:08

product which by definition of self-censorship.

2:21:10

Now we just do whatever we want. If

2:21:13

we like a product that one of our

2:21:15

producers uses, we'll talk about it without getting

2:21:17

compensated. We love it. Many such products in

2:21:19

the past. I mentioned Sir

2:21:22

Cal of lavenderblossom.org. We

2:21:24

both use these products, many products. Of

2:21:27

course, we have all kinds of

2:21:29

side things that take place but

2:21:31

we also, we don't do t-shirts.

2:21:34

Yeah, we just know agendashop.com but

2:21:36

that's just one of our producers

2:21:38

who's returning value by running that for

2:21:40

us. We don't

2:21:42

get any cut off of any sales. He works

2:21:44

with the artist and then figures

2:21:47

something out and I don't think

2:21:49

he's making a lot of money actually because

2:21:51

those prices are pretty reasonable and

2:21:53

there's fantastic merch. And

2:21:56

from time to time, he makes a donation. It's

2:21:58

called the Value for Value. model. If you want to

2:22:00

read more about it and

2:22:21

they are returning value by creating people

2:22:30

pay attention to it and the

2:22:34

last episode which is titled algo juice the

2:22:36

artwork for that was no exception for the

2:22:38

amount of attention it received Dame

2:22:40

Kenny Ben brought it to us We

2:22:43

got emails over this one What's

2:22:49

with the beads Well, those

2:22:51

are pop beads obviously and it but

2:22:53

the idea was that the Sun had

2:22:55

these be this moment There's these beads

2:22:57

show up when you're looking at an

2:22:59

eclipse and she just exaggerated it Yeah,

2:23:02

it was the only piece that was

2:23:04

there that was that was artistic Interesting

2:23:08

how Dana Burnett he's not buying that story. Well,

2:23:10

I don't know. I mean something's that guy I

2:23:12

have a dirty mind man. He's like he does

2:23:14

a dirty mind a lot of people do I

2:23:16

mean, we just saw pop be doing Hollywood too

2:23:19

long. Yeah, I've been trying to break away Yeah,

2:23:21

it was just clean living guy, but he can't

2:23:23

do no Hey remember he's the

2:23:25

50 shades of gray guy. So oh, yeah,

2:23:27

that's it. Uh-huh. Uh-huh. You can't forget that

2:23:30

Nope, you can take the you can take

2:23:32

the guy out of sex Three

2:23:36

of those films That

2:23:38

he walked away with a half a billion

2:23:40

dollars. I think she had a piece of

2:23:42

the action and he's only an associate executive

2:23:44

producer Well, no, he's become

2:23:46

the executive producer. What's why I hate to

2:23:48

throw that at him. Okay, I'm sorry. That's

2:23:51

mean Oh

2:23:56

there let me see we were looking

2:23:58

at cuz there was a lot of eclipse stuff in this was

2:24:00

obviously eclipse related and people were talking

2:24:02

about the beads. So

2:24:05

it was fun to choose some beads art. We

2:24:09

had I mean really

2:24:12

wasn't anything. It was another we're having this

2:24:15

is a moment we're going through which

2:24:18

is a dry city of the posity

2:24:20

of donation of the

2:24:23

posity of art. People

2:24:25

relying on AI too

2:24:28

much. You like the piece

2:24:30

by Nethworks eclipse confusion with

2:24:32

the castle

2:24:35

ish. No, I said

2:24:37

what do you

2:24:39

think about? The one you wanted was the rapture.

2:24:41

You wanted all the people floating up. I did.

2:24:43

I thought that was funny. You had all the

2:24:46

people floating up into the sky from drop-co.

2:24:48

I'm like no. I thought

2:24:51

that was a good piece. That was

2:24:53

weird. But since you're closer to the

2:24:56

rapture being in Texas, you

2:25:00

thought it was inaccurate. Yes,

2:25:02

it's incorrect. Thank

2:25:06

you very much, Dame Kenny Ben, for

2:25:09

providing us. There

2:25:12

were some other ones. Let me see. I saw

2:25:14

you used Sir Shug aka

2:25:17

Fodidly's art for the newsletter

2:25:20

which we discussed briefly. I like that

2:25:22

one. That was definitely cool. It

2:25:25

was artistic. It was artistic.

2:25:30

Band-aids. I thought there was an

2:25:32

orange juice spill. Maybe I'm wrong.

2:25:34

No, there's an orange juice spill with

2:25:36

the show number. Yeah, that wasn't it.

2:25:38

Which came in late. Well,

2:25:42

artists, we love you. We love what you do.

2:25:44

We love the value that you provide. It gives

2:25:46

us something to do after the show because we're

2:25:49

not like, okay, that's a wrap everybody. Let's do

2:25:51

it. Done. See you next week. We

2:25:54

immediately get back

2:25:57

to work. We have to find a show title. We

2:25:59

have to find some artwork, we have to do

2:26:01

the credits which we spend a lot of time

2:26:03

on, we double check our work to make sure

2:26:05

we don't miss anybody's credit, try

2:26:07

hard. So thank you

2:26:09

all very much for participating in our bi-weekly

2:26:12

contest. Is it bi-weekly

2:26:14

or twice weekly? What is it? Twice

2:26:17

weekly. Twice weekly contest.

2:26:20

And again, thank you very much, Dame Kenny Ben, providing

2:26:23

some value back to the show. Time, talent,

2:26:25

treasure. Then on the role. Yes, she has

2:26:27

been on the role. She won the competitions

2:26:29

last year. Oh, for

2:26:31

most chosen artists? Most wins. It's

2:26:34

amazing. It's amazing. Now

2:26:37

this being a tax weekend

2:26:39

here in America. Oh yes, tax time

2:26:41

on tomorrow. Yes, I did

2:26:43

my taxes yesterday. It was a lot

2:26:46

of fun. A

2:26:48

lot of fun. All bet. Oodles

2:26:51

and oodles are fun. I

2:26:56

can't wait. I can't wait. How many more years

2:26:58

are we doing this thing, John? Four.

2:27:02

Four more years! There you

2:27:04

go. I'm glad I had

2:27:06

the right answer. Tina

2:27:10

is like, hey man, hey, what are

2:27:12

you going to do after four more

2:27:15

years? I said, I don't

2:27:17

know. We'll figure something

2:27:19

out. That's what Mimi says too.

2:27:21

Oh really? You guys

2:27:23

shouldn't be putting a

2:27:25

hard date out. Notice how the

2:27:27

women in our life aren't very

2:27:30

confused about this. Actually,

2:27:33

that's the wrong Mimi voice anyway. You

2:27:35

want to do over? You want to do over? Yeah,

2:27:37

I'm supposed to do this way. And

2:27:41

now you want to stop after

2:27:43

four years? What am I going

2:27:45

to do? Four more years! That

2:27:48

would be the new device she wants

2:27:50

me to use. So it's a very

2:27:52

short list today, understandably so. However,

2:27:57

I love this. Baron

2:27:59

et large. that's

2:28:02

his name, Baron at Large, has been sending us

2:28:04

this email for a couple of weeks and

2:28:07

he says, you need to

2:28:09

do a Rubble-lizer donation. Did

2:28:11

you see this email? Oh yeah.

2:28:13

And did you respond to it? You

2:28:18

know, I probably did one of his earlier ones

2:28:20

and then I didn't and then I said you

2:28:23

and I went back and forth on this. So here's

2:28:25

his idea. His idea is you

2:28:27

need to do a Rubble-lizer donation. If

2:28:29

someone donates $3,333.33, that's a Rubble-lizer donation.

2:28:36

And we're like, okay, yeah,

2:28:39

global warming is real. So

2:28:43

what does he do? He

2:28:46

donates $3,333.33. Yes.

2:28:51

A Rubble-lizer donation. I'm sick of you

2:28:53

guys not answering my letters. I'm

2:28:56

going to do it myself, which is of course

2:28:58

the way they know it. That's the new agenda

2:29:00

way, which is you do it yourself. You do

2:29:02

it yourself. You make it happen. And here's his

2:29:04

note. He's from Bridgewater, New Jersey, by the

2:29:06

way. This is a new donation called the Rubble-lizer.

2:29:10

Producers donating the same Rubble-izers if

2:29:12

you're okay with it. Yeah, we're

2:29:15

okay. If 20 others become Rubble-izers

2:29:18

in the next two years, I'll

2:29:21

make challenge coins for them. Wow.

2:29:25

I mean, he's

2:29:27

tripling down on this. That

2:29:30

is, yes, tripling down. $3,333

2:29:32

is donation. $3,333,333,

2:29:34

which is a lot of threes. Yes.

2:29:41

And he wants 20 other people to

2:29:43

join him in this club that he's

2:29:45

created. It's his own club. And once

2:29:47

he gets to 20, boom, the coins

2:29:49

come out. I think we should call

2:29:51

it the Baronet Large Rubble-lizer Club. Fine

2:29:54

with me. And so he says,

2:29:57

please play the Rubble-lizer clip. I

2:30:01

felt like we had to do a

2:30:03

little bit more than that. Ladies and

2:30:05

gentlemen, it is time

2:30:07

to Rubble-like. India, hang

2:30:09

out Mike. Stand

2:30:12

by. 33,

2:30:14

33, 33. The

2:30:17

Rubble-izer out. Rubble on the double.

2:30:19

There we go. That's

2:30:21

your new sequence of clips for the Rubble-izer. And by

2:30:23

the way, the way he goes with 33, 33, 33

2:30:26

is the donation. Coincidentally.

2:30:30

Yes, yes. 33,

2:30:33

33, 33. Thank

2:30:36

you, Baron-at-Lodge. You saved our butts. Big

2:30:39

time. Big time. Yes.

2:30:42

I will say this to people out there who think that donating

2:30:44

doesn't help. We had a total

2:30:46

of 29 donations over $50. And

2:30:49

this is through a newsletter of 30,000 people

2:30:51

and an audience of a million. Well, they

2:30:53

all pay taxes. They all pay

2:30:55

taxes. And that's a miserable

2:30:58

29 donations. And

2:31:00

if it wasn't for Baron-at-Lodge, the number

2:31:02

would be terrible. But let's

2:31:04

continue on with our executive and associate

2:31:07

executive producers. Thank you, Baron-at-Lodge. Thank you.

2:31:10

Yeah. Lifesaver. Mr. Black comes

2:31:12

in with from

2:31:14

Rysvick. Rysvick. Rysvick.

2:31:18

Rysvick. Netherlands at 350.

2:31:20

And he says, in the morning, John and Adam,

2:31:22

a 333. A

2:31:25

333 donation. Also have a

2:31:27

birthday call to my son, Karsten, who

2:31:30

turns eight on April 14th. My

2:31:35

light in life together with my

2:31:37

daughter. I love always health karma

2:31:39

for everybody, Mr. Black. You've

2:31:43

got karma. On

2:31:47

words to, we're already at associate

2:31:49

executive producers. Chad Finkenbiner, Highland Heights,

2:31:51

Ohio, 233.99. Thank

2:31:55

you for providing the best podcast on the

2:31:57

known area of our level top... topographical

2:32:00

plane flatter

2:32:02

hi mom he says jingles

2:32:05

jcd spooky donate and tpp

2:32:07

jobs karma job

2:32:11

job job job job

2:32:14

day you've

2:32:23

got karma I

2:32:26

like that one onward

2:32:29

with caliplegius colon

2:32:31

colon colon colon

2:32:33

calaipigius colon dub

2:32:35

spring north carolina 222 and a note was attached

2:32:40

call it do you have a

2:32:43

calaipigius note there John

2:32:45

and Adam made this short row of ducks

2:32:47

remind you of simpler times when

2:32:49

birds were real my

2:32:54

wife and I are not dildos we

2:32:56

have a two-year-old boy or two two

2:32:58

well we have twin two-year-olds unfortunately

2:33:01

one of them was already oh

2:33:03

one of them died that's terrible and

2:33:05

we're currently working on baby number three

2:33:08

and this is my first donation so

2:33:10

please de doo she as well as

2:33:12

one as well as provide baby

2:33:15

making time karma

2:33:25

I'll skip over this one and go straight

2:33:27

to Dame Zelda of the wandering jews she's

2:33:29

in San Jose California $200 associate executive producer

2:33:32

ship and she and thank you very much

2:33:34

Dame Zelda and the last one and then

2:33:36

there's what for the same amount

2:33:38

of money is Linda Lou Patkin in

2:33:41

Lakewood Colorado yes indeed Linda Lou Patkin

2:33:43

the Duchess of jobs and writer of

2:33:46

resumes and she

2:33:48

wants jobs karma and for

2:33:50

and wants to tell you that for

2:33:52

a resume that gets results go to

2:33:54

image makers inc.com for all your executive

2:33:56

resume and job but job search needs

2:34:00

Mr. Maker's Inc. with a K or find Linda on

2:34:02

the producer's list. And

2:34:11

that wraps up the executive and

2:34:14

associate executive producers for episode 1651 on this tax

2:34:17

weekend. We appreciate it. You

2:34:19

can always remember us when you get your refund. We hope you

2:34:22

get a refund. We'd love it if you got a refund. But

2:34:25

of course, we appreciate everyone who returns

2:34:27

time, talent and treasure to the best

2:34:29

podcast in the universe. We thank everybody

2:34:32

who came in under $50, always for

2:34:34

reasons of anonymity. But also, we have

2:34:36

people on the sustaining donations, which is

2:34:38

incredibly helpful. Certainly when we

2:34:41

have less numbers above the fold, you

2:34:43

can make them up yourself. You can

2:34:45

go to noagendadonations.com or for the old

2:34:47

schoolers. And John's going to take us

2:34:49

through and mention all of the donors,

2:34:51

$50 and above. Yeah,

2:35:17

the 20 of them. Gabriel

2:35:20

Shelton starts us off in Fulton, New York from

2:35:22

8195. And

2:35:25

he saw a gas station receipt with a

2:35:27

bunch of threes on it and decided to donate.

2:35:30

Kevin McLaughlin's back as usual. He

2:35:32

hasn't missed the show for years.

2:35:34

He conquered North Carolina with the

2:35:37

8008, the boob donation. Christian

2:35:40

Grulish in Lake Linda,

2:35:42

Ohio 8008, another one.

2:35:45

Eric Adler in Punta Gorda,

2:35:47

Florida. And

2:35:50

he gives 8008 and calls it sad

2:35:52

puppy boobs. Because of the sad puppy

2:35:54

that was in the newsletter that did

2:35:56

this very little. Gary

2:35:58

Blatt in Wayne, Pennsylvania. Robyn

2:36:01

Tolbert and Topeka, Kansas, $75.88.

2:36:06

I came for Adam and stayed for John, whatever

2:36:10

that means. Barry Boniface

2:36:12

in Elkton, Florida, $57.27.

2:36:19

Christopher Dector, it's $56.78. Freddie

2:36:23

Vera in San Antonio, a

2:36:25

birthday donation, $56.73. Happy

2:36:29

33rd, another 33rd to Samantha. Gary

2:36:33

Mao in Woodland Hills, California, $50.

2:36:36

Oh, we're already at the $50, so I'm

2:36:38

just going to name them and give the

2:36:40

location and that will be that. Gary

2:36:43

Mao, Steven Ng in Box

2:36:45

Elder, South Dakota, and Douglas

2:36:47

Mook in Cochranton, PA. Mr.

2:36:52

Luke in London, UK. Real

2:36:55

deals now in San Antonio,

2:36:57

Texas. Kristia

2:37:00

Branden, Savoie in Port Orchard, Florida,

2:37:02

Dainte Patricia Worthington in Miami, thank

2:37:05

you. Jared Jha in Nashville,

2:37:08

Tennessee, Christian Freeman in San

2:37:10

Marcos, Texas, Kevin Dills in

2:37:14

Huntersville, North Carolina. I wonder where

2:37:16

he went. Dylan

2:37:19

Schwannabek in

2:37:22

Johnsburg, Illinois. Brian

2:37:25

P. Belton in Ashbury, New

2:37:27

Jersey. Owen

2:37:29

Story in Farmers Branch, Texas. And

2:37:32

last on our short list of

2:37:34

29 total, Sir

2:37:37

Greg, the momma- what do

2:37:39

you think this says? The

2:37:42

mommaked night in Newport, North Carolina. I

2:37:44

want to thank everybody for helping us

2:37:46

out here. We did get the show

2:37:49

off the ground. The

2:37:51

mommaked night, yes. Well, thank you

2:37:53

all very much. We appreciate it. Thank you again

2:37:55

to our executive associate executive producers. I should have

2:37:57

mentioned that you can use these credits anywhere credits

2:38:00

are available. recognized, you will be on imdb.com

2:38:03

with Catherine Herridge. You

2:38:07

can have her credit in the same place and I

2:38:09

don't even know if she has an executive producer credit.

2:38:11

She'll just be listed as actor, actress,

2:38:15

performer, live speaker.

2:38:17

But you, my friend, associate executive

2:38:20

or executive producer of episode 1651

2:38:22

of the best podcast

2:38:24

in the universe, if anyone

2:38:26

questions you on this, you can put in your

2:38:28

LinkedIn profile, your social media or in that if

2:38:30

you don't have one, even open up an IMDb

2:38:32

account, most people don't. If

2:38:35

anyone questions you, you let us know. We will

2:38:37

vouch for you. No pro-blame-o at all. It's

2:38:39

value for value. We put the

2:38:41

show out, no restrictions, no hoops,

2:38:43

no jumping through anything, no commercials,

2:38:46

no creepy money, just value.

2:38:49

I mean no creepy corporate money is what I should say.

2:38:51

All money is creepy. But the creepy corporate money is the

2:38:53

worst. We just put it out and then

2:38:55

whatever value it is to you and there's 980,000 of you according to

2:39:01

OP3.dev that listen on a

2:39:03

monthly basis, so if you

2:39:05

like it, do something back

2:39:07

for us. You can build

2:39:09

a website, you can hit somebody in

2:39:11

the mouth, you can also support us

2:39:13

with sustaining donations or from time to

2:39:15

time do an executive producer donation. And

2:39:18

if it totals $1,000 or more, then you become a

2:39:20

night ordain with a no agenda roundtable. No one to

2:39:22

reward with that today, but I'm going

2:39:24

to give everybody an extra service to vote Karma

2:39:26

just in case you need it. You've got Karma.

2:39:29

Karma. Well, just

2:39:35

as a donation, same goes

2:39:37

for the birthday list. Mr.

2:39:43

Black wishes his son, Carson, a

2:39:45

happy birthday. And he

2:39:47

turned eight years old today

2:39:49

and Freddie and JCV with

2:39:51

Samantha Maria. Happy birthday. She

2:39:54

is turning 33. The magic number. A lot

2:39:56

of people are doing it. All the kids are doing it. podcast

2:40:00

in the universe. No

2:40:03

nights, no dames, no title changes. This

2:40:07

is a Viera. Oh, Viera? Viera. I'm sorry.

2:40:09

Samantha Viera. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I did

2:40:11

not mean to misgender you. Samantha

2:40:14

Viera. So no nights,

2:40:17

no dames, no title changes.

2:40:19

So we go straight to

2:40:21

the meetups. No one

2:40:23

should have beat

2:40:29

up. A couple

2:40:31

of meetup reports. By the way, if you've never

2:40:34

been to a No Agenda meetup, consider putting this

2:40:36

on your list of things to do. What? I

2:40:39

said go. Oh, go. Yeah, go to one. Yes.

2:40:41

For example, the report

2:40:44

from the

2:40:46

Eclipse Day meetup, the

2:40:48

long shadows of Trash Mountain in Dayton,

2:40:50

Ohio. Perfect, cloudless day for the Eclipse.

2:40:53

After the chemtrails that showed up in attendance,

2:40:55

we had Brett and Robert at

2:40:58

third with the one

2:41:01

on Mastodon, Sir Little John, Jenna, and their

2:41:03

sweet baby all the way from Pennsylvania. Sir

2:41:06

Nick of the Columbus meetups, my buddy Silky

2:41:08

Smooth, my sister and her husband, the

2:41:10

liberal socialists. Hey,

2:41:13

this is what I mean. Everybody can

2:41:15

come to a meetup, even the liberal

2:41:18

socialists. And my sweet human resources, Big

2:41:20

Sweetie and Little Islam and Smoke, what's

2:41:23

your kid's name, Little Islam? And

2:41:25

Smoke and Hot Wife, PJ Golden. Oh,

2:41:28

a me, Sir Egghead and a handful

2:41:30

of dogs. We had almost more strangers

2:41:32

than familiars. Good times were had, good

2:41:34

contacts made. Everybody got along beautifully despite

2:41:37

far right socialists, liberals, hippies and babies

2:41:39

in the crowd. It's like a party.

2:41:41

Go to a meetup. Rest

2:41:43

in peace, Tijun does that. Yes,

2:41:45

very sad. We lost Tijun's dad.

2:41:48

That's exactly what a no agenda meetup can

2:41:50

be. They're not all like that, but they

2:41:52

all are always a party and everyone always

2:41:55

does not. He never hear like, we had

2:41:57

a fight. Someone was mad. Someone rained quick.

2:42:00

No, no, it's always a good time. Here's

2:42:02

the quick report from... A

2:42:04

bar brawl. A bar brawl. Here's a

2:42:06

quick report from the Atlanta meet up.

2:42:08

We're in Atlanta on April the 13th.

2:42:11

This is Baron Spud the Mighty with

2:42:13

two more people. This

2:42:15

is Sir R here in Chinatown. I guess

2:42:17

I'm part of the MSS. Dr.

2:42:21

Sir, Mike Roch, here enjoying all the

2:42:24

China cuisine in the

2:42:27

morning. Yes, China

2:42:29

cuisine is exactly what

2:42:31

it's called. Then

2:42:33

we go to our Viscount. Let

2:42:36

me see. I had a note from him

2:42:38

as well. Yes,

2:42:43

our Viscount in New Jersey.

2:42:46

In the morning, this is Sir R

2:42:49

Daniels coming at you from 3BR Distillery

2:42:51

in Keyport, New Jersey at

2:42:53

the Central Jersey meet up. We do drink and

2:42:55

we do know things. John

2:42:58

and Adam, this is Karaoke from 3BR.

2:43:00

We had a great meet up today

2:43:02

and I know it was a great

2:43:04

up great meet up because I know

2:43:06

what Mrs. Lewis is. Hey guys, this is

2:43:09

my first meet up. This is Magda

2:43:13

here in Keyport. Hey

2:43:17

guys, Sir, nobody has the 3D printer.

2:43:20

Just wanted to say the fewer, the greater, the cheer.

2:43:24

In the morning. Yes, I

2:43:26

got a note from Sir

2:43:28

Viscount R

2:43:31

Daniels. You remember that he for a

2:43:34

little moment there was the Executive Director

2:43:36

of Project Veritas as it

2:43:38

was going through its issues. We

2:43:41

played a couple of clips from

2:43:43

Sound Investigations on

2:43:47

the last show. Remember? Member?

2:43:49

Do you remember? I remember,

2:43:51

right? You talked, you played a

2:43:53

couple of clips from them. Yes.

2:43:55

He says, I want to give

2:43:57

you some detail around the sound.

2:44:00

investigations group that did the Pornhub and

2:44:02

CIA stories. It's kind of like the

2:44:04

same story. These are

2:44:06

all former Project Veritas journalists. Aha!

2:44:10

Eric Cochran, the narrator for the CIA story,

2:44:13

started the group. So they

2:44:15

also brought their bad sound with them. Yes

2:44:17

they did! Adobe

2:44:20

people! Arden Young joined

2:44:22

Eric part-time while she was working

2:44:24

for Project Veritas during the time

2:44:26

I was still there as executive

2:44:28

director before the organization's rapid unscheduled

2:44:30

disassembly. Nice

2:44:34

space extern. She helped to

2:44:36

blow open the amazing Pornhub story. She's

2:44:38

great. I can't say enough good things

2:44:40

about her. The undercover journalist on the

2:44:42

gay CIA date is some guy codenamed

2:44:44

Jasper. He's kind of a wacko. He

2:44:47

says, not a bad guy but his head is planted

2:44:49

firmly up O'Keefe's butt. I don't

2:44:52

know if he wants me to read everything. Anyway,

2:44:54

so they're not a spook outfit that we know

2:44:56

of. They seem to

2:44:58

be legit and they definitely need help with

2:45:00

their audio. Thank you. I like

2:45:03

that we know of comment. Well

2:45:06

of course. That's how

2:45:08

it always goes. Which means you're

2:45:10

doing a good job. They're doing a good job.

2:45:14

There's a meetup today at 3 o'clock

2:45:16

which has been underway for about 5-0

2:45:19

minutes. The Indian A tribal April

2:45:21

showers green up meetup at the

2:45:23

Blind Owl Brewery in Indianapolis. Marka

2:45:25

Maria, Dame and Knight

2:45:27

of the Greenwood hosting that. On

2:45:30

Thursday, shards thirsty third Thursday monthly

2:45:32

meetup 7 o'clock Ed's Tavern Charlotte

2:45:34

North Carolina. We have

2:45:37

also on Thursday, oh this is

2:45:39

the sold slaves resist we much

2:45:41

beer tasting mystery meetup 8 o'clock

2:45:45

KST at Kraft

2:45:47

Hans Seoul Republic

2:45:49

of Korea and

2:45:53

excuse me Yap Yap is organized and that

2:45:55

sounds like a fine Dutchman. I hope they

2:45:57

have people there because Korea is guy great.

2:46:00

bars and everyone's a great

2:46:02

place. Not just that,

2:46:04

I hope that they send

2:46:07

a meetup report, an

2:46:09

audio one. We love it. Even if it's just

2:46:12

an iPhone, I'll chop it up for you. It's what I

2:46:14

do for most of these reports actually. On

2:46:17

the way in April, Fort Worth,

2:46:19

Texas, Richmond, Virginia, Kennersville, North Carolina,

2:46:21

Cincinnati, Ohio, Garden City, Idaho, Aurora,

2:46:24

Illinois, San Diego, California, North Georgia,

2:46:26

Castroville, Texas, Fort Wayne, Indiana, Houston,

2:46:29

Texas, Columbus, Ohio, in May, Torrance,

2:46:31

California, Blaine, Washington, Landon, the Netherlands,

2:46:33

Richmond, Virginia, Fargo, North Dakota, and

2:46:36

that's in June along with Mosley,

2:46:38

Virginia and Amsterdam on June 15th.

2:46:42

That's a tentative I think. That

2:46:45

may be the one that we're trying to figure

2:46:47

out that maybe it's a cheap old at the

2:46:49

airport. One of our producers has an

2:46:52

office there. No Agenda Meetups. Go to No Agenda

2:46:54

meetups.com. This is where you can find all of

2:46:56

these scheduled meetups. This is where

2:46:58

you can add one yourself. If you can't

2:47:00

find one near you. They are always a

2:47:02

party. noagendameetups.com. Go to one.

2:47:04

You will be delighted. Sometimes

2:47:07

you want to go shake them

2:47:09

with all the nights and days.

2:47:18

You want to be where you want me.

2:47:26

You want to be where everybody feels the same. It's like a party.

2:47:28

Oh man. So because of all

2:47:30

the theater going on, I just have

2:47:33

one ISO which I think is probably

2:47:35

useless. It may be useful

2:47:37

in the future maybe just when you're talking

2:47:39

but I'll play it anyway so you can

2:47:41

do anything with it. I don't carry

2:47:43

a phone. That's

2:47:46

all. Hey, got a laugh audio.

2:47:48

Okay. I had this. What

2:47:50

else? What do you got? I got three

2:47:52

and I think at least two of them are usable. Okay. Let's

2:47:55

start with ISO drain. Drain

2:47:59

the swab. Okay.

2:48:02

Again, there's always this

2:48:04

one, dynamite. DYNOMITE! Is

2:48:07

that JJ? Yeah. And

2:48:10

then, hello Poland. Hello Poland!

2:48:15

That's dumb. I think

2:48:18

dynamite. DYNOMITE! This is

2:48:20

kind of classic. I

2:48:22

can go for the classic. Alright

2:48:24

everybody, lots of good stuff happening.

2:48:26

Wow! I never thought I would

2:48:28

actually play something generated by artificial

2:48:31

intelligence. Turns out it's great for

2:48:33

jingle. The world that

2:48:35

you love, new daddy says, The

2:48:38

time you come, new dad won't make you

2:48:40

sad. Long before I

2:48:42

can be high and low,

2:48:44

Old somebody do say, When

2:48:47

you know a jenny, It's time

2:48:49

for good and you stay in the morning. I'm

2:48:52

going for you. If

2:48:56

I could play the music right,

2:49:00

I'd know I'd end up

2:49:02

dying. What do you think? Wow!

2:49:05

I know. It sucks for songs

2:49:07

but for jingles, it turns out

2:49:10

it's really usable. I'm

2:49:12

surprised. That's a very good jingle. Yeah.

2:49:14

I have all kinds of stuff. Wow.

2:49:18

Frightening. Okay.

2:49:21

Well, this is the interesting story

2:49:23

because they misheadlined it. I think

2:49:25

it was ABC News because

2:49:27

there was a story, another story about a

2:49:29

10-year-old who crawled out of his house

2:49:32

window and then got stuck in a chimney. Oh

2:49:34

no! In a chimney? Yeah, because

2:49:36

he decided that he's going to go down to

2:49:39

the chimney as an idiot, this kid. And they

2:49:41

rescued him. And it turns out now some teenage

2:49:43

girl tried the same stunt Oh no. Because

2:49:46

she was locked out of her house and

2:49:48

now this looks like this is a trend. Turn

2:49:50

now to a rescue of someone who was trying

2:49:52

to get down the chimney. No,

2:49:54

not the big guy. It was actually a

2:49:56

teenager who was locked out of her house

2:49:59

so she decided to shimmy down the

2:50:01

chimney to get back in. Aerial rest shift

2:50:03

is here. Look, if Santa can get down

2:50:05

a chimney, surely a teenager can. I thought

2:50:07

this was sound logic. Yeah, I know. And

2:50:09

it's hard to believe that this time of

2:50:11

year we're reporting on this kind of story,

2:50:13

but that girl somehow managed TJ to call

2:50:15

for help from inside her family's chimney, her

2:50:17

Santa Claus style plan to get back into

2:50:19

her house undetected, going up in smoke, the

2:50:22

rescue operation, caught on camera. This

2:50:25

morning, an Arizona teen narrowly escaping

2:50:27

danger, her rescue put on camera.

2:50:30

Watch as Phoenix firefighters pulled a

2:50:32

17 year old girl out

2:50:34

of her family's chimney, covered in soot

2:50:36

from head to toe, but in good

2:50:39

spirit, showing a huge smile after being

2:50:41

stuck for more than an hour. According

2:50:43

to a friend, she was attempting to

2:50:45

get back into the house after they

2:50:47

were locked out late at night. I

2:50:49

don't know her thinking. But she learns

2:50:51

quickly. It's not as easy as Santa

2:50:53

Claus makes it look panicky. I

2:50:55

don't know what to do. Call 911.

2:50:58

The teenage girl apparently climbing to the

2:51:00

roof, hoping the chimney would connect directly

2:51:02

to the inside of her home and

2:51:05

she could make her way in. But

2:51:07

no such luck. Firefighters eventually using a

2:51:09

tripod to hoist her to safety. We

2:51:12

don't see it very often. Not in

2:51:14

a chimney. This is definitely something that

2:51:16

we don't do every day. Now,

2:51:19

thankfully, firefighters say the girl was not injured.

2:51:21

But guys, this time of year, Santa should

2:51:23

issue some kind of disclaimer that says, do

2:51:25

not kids try this at home. That was

2:51:27

pretty good. Yeah, what an idiot. Sounds

2:51:29

like a TikTok trend to me. By

2:51:31

the way, I'm

2:51:40

going to move my TikTok advertising

2:51:42

story to Thursday. Stay tuned for

2:51:44

that. Let's do one more really

2:51:46

bad artificial intelligence jingle. It's

2:52:02

something that Darren would plan to pre-show.

2:52:08

Yeah, yeah,

2:52:10

yeah, definitely.

2:52:17

A.I. is not taking over

2:52:19

the jingle business anytime soon, but I appreciate

2:52:21

the effort from our producer there.

2:52:23

They just get better. Yeah,

2:52:26

they just get better. And

2:52:29

the show mix is coming up from,

2:52:31

let's see, Professor Jay Jones. We've got

2:52:33

to go to Jitsukoi Nelson. We've

2:52:36

got lots of Iran bombing stuff.

2:52:39

Why not? I mean, it's

2:52:41

perfect after a good news segment, isn't it? And

2:52:45

speaking of coming up after, we have

2:52:47

live on the new agenda stream. If

2:52:50

you're still in the troll room or you're

2:52:52

not on podcast stop, just keep listening. No

2:52:54

problem. Oh, after balls of Spencer and Dame

2:52:56

DeLorean, John Fletcher. He's

2:53:00

the guy from Four More Years and many

2:53:02

other no agenda streamers. And

2:53:04

I'm coming to you from the heart of the Texas

2:53:06

Hill Country here in FEMA Region Number 6.

2:53:09

It's Fredericksburg, Texas. In

2:53:12

the morning, everybody, I'm Adam Curry. And

2:53:14

from Northern Silicon Valley, where I'm

2:53:16

concerned about Jeff Ellis and

2:53:18

John C. DeBois. We return

2:53:21

on Thursday. Please join us. Happy Tax

2:53:23

Day, everybody. Until then,

2:53:25

remember us at knowaginthedonations.com.

2:53:28

Till Thursday, adios, mofos, ahoo-wee-hoo-wee.

2:53:30

And such. Vam,

2:53:33

vam, vam, vam, my red.

2:53:35

Vam, vam, vam, my red.

2:53:48

We've been stealing now. It's time for

2:53:50

stealing, vam, my red. Hey,

2:53:57

so it's a very weird moment for a woman of the

2:53:59

group. Individuals.

2:54:15

Why not have a dangerous thing about

2:54:17

trump? Will

2:54:20

not had many red flags against.

2:54:23

Their see how sincere precedent for

2:54:25

malaria. The Federal

2:54:27

Jennifer's mentally disturbed individuals.

2:54:32

Many red flags because similar. With

2:54:39

flag last. Thing

2:54:43

is in danger. Signs were drawn from

2:54:45

from Northern Syria one last. Summer

2:54:50

and course. He will take

2:54:52

us. Why not? I'm an extremely

2:54:55

stable genius of Us citizens in

2:54:57

a one that. Says

2:55:01

units is is severely mentally. Promo

2:55:04

videos a great danger in. Miami

2:55:15

part. Of.

2:55:19

The. Hour.

2:55:35

Mark How. Common.

2:55:39

Are. Very,

2:55:44

very worried. This

2:55:49

grown was as soon as you're

2:55:51

waters Really remember. A

2:56:00

law will about didn't. Know that

2:56:02

even a minor. I

2:56:06

have. A

2:56:09

whoever message to do a. Lot

2:56:12

only when he. Has

2:56:14

Asia as a mission. Japanese

2:56:16

prime minister delivering a message

2:56:19

on the American Have Club.

2:56:21

With him with. The.

2:56:24

Horse.

2:56:29

Or no, No. No.

2:56:33

And Us surveillance drone flying

2:56:36

above. The current the will move over. In

2:56:38

international waters shot at a time I know.

2:56:40

when you know focus on the Mughal emperors

2:56:42

other. Oh move

2:56:44

up a lot. About

2:56:48

them as women are more

2:56:50

who one with Iran Mobile

2:56:52

Home Park Moo moo. Moo.

2:57:00

Hyun I usually do you want another

2:57:02

soon as he has been some I.

2:57:05

Use. Her

2:57:07

wizardry and for example says Americans want

2:57:09

to be ready to fight and die

2:57:11

for Shipping lanes on had a sudden

2:57:14

was in your hands leftwing warmonger by

2:57:16

seen it is also com on america's

2:57:18

and think he rainy leaving any land

2:57:20

or. When. You may not have

2:57:22

an hour that it out and setting

2:57:24

Andre directly. From.

2:57:48

Me:

2:58:06

How A Boy red.org

2:58:09

slice and.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features