Podchaser Logo
Home
Texas abortion case stuns the nation

Texas abortion case stuns the nation

Released Sunday, 10th December 2023
 3 people rated this episode
Texas abortion case stuns the nation

Texas abortion case stuns the nation

Texas abortion case stuns the nation

Texas abortion case stuns the nation

Sunday, 10th December 2023
 3 people rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Have you heard you can listen

0:02

to your favorite news podcasts ad-free?

0:04

Good news. With Amazon Music,

0:07

you have access to the

0:09

largest catalog of ad-free top

0:11

podcasts included with your Prime

0:13

membership. To start listening, download

0:16

the Amazon Music app or

0:18

visit amazon.com/news ad free. That's

0:20

amazon.com/news ad free. And catch

0:22

up on the latest episodes

0:25

without the ads. Today

0:28

we're going to talk about a dangerous case playing out in Texas

0:30

that will 100% impact the 2024 election. And

0:34

I interview Governor Gavin Newsom about his recent

0:36

debate with Ron DeSantis, his thoughts on Sean

0:38

Hannity's obvious lack of impartiality, and how Fox

0:40

News viewers reacted to it. I'm Brian Tyler

0:43

Cohen and you're listening to No Lie. There's

0:48

something jaw-dropping happening in Texas that isn't getting

0:50

the coverage it deserves. There is a young

0:52

woman named Kate Cox, she's 31 years old,

0:55

whose 20-week-old fetus has trisomy 18, which

0:57

is a fatal genetic condition that'll mean

0:59

her child won't live more than a

1:01

few days outside of the womb. According

1:04

to the lawsuit, the pregnancy also puts

1:06

her at risk for severe complications threatening

1:08

her life and future fertility, including uterine

1:10

rupture and hysterectomy. So she's

1:12

seeking an exemption in court from the state's abortion

1:14

ban, which does have narrow exceptions,

1:16

only to save the life or prevent substantial

1:19

harm to the patient. But the

1:21

language is so vague and the threat of

1:23

prosecution so extreme that in the first nine

1:25

months of this year, Texas recorded all of

1:28

34 abortions across the

1:30

entire state. Back in 2020, before these

1:32

restrictions were in place, there were more than 50,000. And

1:36

so it might seem obvious that

1:38

Ms. Cox is a prime candidate for that

1:40

exception, and she was granted it by a

1:43

district court judge in Travis County who issued

1:45

a temporary restraining order to allow her doctor

1:47

to perform the abortion without facing civil or

1:49

criminal penalties. The judge said in her

1:52

ruling that, quote, be

2:00

a genuine miscarriage of justice and

2:02

so this is pretty cut and dry

2:04

right she's carrying a non-viable fetus continuing

2:06

to do so won't make it

2:08

more likely that you'll have a baby that will

2:10

survive but it will endanger her ability to have

2:13

a viable pregnancy in the future and it puts

2:15

her own health at risk but

2:17

Texas is far-right attorney general that's Ken

2:19

Paxton who only just recently survived an

2:22

impeachment effort from his own party that's

2:24

the same Ken Paxton by the way

2:26

who used his office to file a

2:28

lawsuit seeking to overturn the election results

2:30

in Wisconsin Pennsylvania Georgia and Michigan that

2:32

Ken Paxton he appealed the ruling

2:34

to the Texas Supreme Court which on

2:37

Friday halted the lower court's ruling so

2:39

it could have more time to issue a final

2:41

ruling Ken Paxton also warned both

2:43

miss Cox's husband that he could be

2:45

sued for helping his wife obtain an

2:47

abortion under Texas's bounty law and

2:49

he won the hospitals that they could

2:51

be sued for performing the abortion also

2:53

under Texas as bounty law Paxton

2:56

wrote in his appeal quote nothing can restore

2:58

the unborn child's life that would be lost

3:00

as a result and he wrote that

3:03

completely unwilling to acknowledge the

3:05

reality that the child's life will likely

3:07

already be lost because the fetus has

3:10

a fatal genetic condition and

3:12

so now we're in this limbo where this

3:14

poor woman who is carrying a non-viable fetus

3:16

is fighting for her life literally fighting for

3:18

her life and this partisan hack of an

3:20

attorney general has singled her out and threatened

3:22

prosecution if she dares have agency over her

3:24

own body and let's be clear this isn't

3:26

just about Kate Cox because there are tens

3:29

of thousands of other women across the state

3:31

who are seeing this play out and who

3:33

are watching these Republican officials throw the full

3:35

weight of their offices behind these threats and

3:37

so that will create a chilling effect where

3:39

women who don't have the means or

3:42

even the willingness to defend themselves in court or

3:44

you know to fly to a different state will

3:46

have to put themselves in danger to carry what

3:48

may very well be a dangerous pregnancy to term

3:50

or or just as valid to have a child

3:52

when they're not ready to have a child all

3:55

at the hands of a political party that has the

3:57

audacity to call itself the party of freedom And

4:00

so I know this is hard to hear.

4:02

This is one of those stories that legitimately

4:04

makes me sick. But it's important to hear,

4:07

because this is the manifestation of Republican rule.

4:09

It doesn't get much clearer than this. If

4:11

they have power, this is what will happen.

4:13

I mean, where they have power right now,

4:15

this is already happening. We're already here. This

4:17

is the dystopian future that all of us

4:20

Democrats warned about, while Republicans told us not

4:22

to be hysterical. It took, not

4:24

decades, but months before the worst case scenarios

4:26

in these states started playing out. Fucking bounty

4:28

laws to put $10,000 price tags on the

4:30

heads of those who help a woman get

4:32

an abortion. I mean, my God, in America,

4:34

in the year 2023. And

4:37

so mark my words, if this is

4:39

what they're willing to do in the lead up to

4:41

an election, just imagine what they'll

4:44

do after, when they're not accountable to

4:46

any voters. If this is what they're

4:48

willing to do after losing elections predicated

4:50

on abortion in Ohio, and

4:52

in Kansas, and in Virginia, and in Kentucky,

4:54

then clearly they are not concerned about the

4:56

will of the voters. Clearly, this is about

4:59

imposing their will on a population that doesn't

5:01

want it. This is about dominance. It's about

5:03

control. It's about power. And it is real

5:05

and it's happening in states across the country

5:08

where Republicans are in charge. The

5:10

fact is that we will have one shot to reverse

5:12

this tide. If Republicans are repudiated

5:14

in 2024, the Democrats can undo these

5:16

draconian laws and they can codify Roe

5:18

at the federal level. But

5:20

if Republicans win, they will take

5:23

that as permission to plow ahead, knowing that

5:25

there won't be any political penalty for stripping

5:27

women of their bodily autonomy. And then it's

5:29

off to the races. So I'm

5:31

covering this now because it is not normal, and

5:33

I'm not willing to accept it as normal, and

5:35

I'm certainly not willing to allow Republicans to normalize

5:38

it. But I also know that if we don't

5:40

talk about it, or if we lose hope, that

5:42

Republicans can ride that disillusionment to more power in

5:44

2024 and beyond. And

5:46

then what's happening to women like Kate Cox in

5:48

Texas will seem quaint compared to the stories that

5:50

we'll hear moving forward. So please, pay attention to

5:52

stories like this one and share stories like this

5:54

one, because if we don't do something about it

5:56

now, we might not have the chance to do

5:58

it in the future. Next

6:02

up is my interview with Gavin Newsom. I

7:00

do want to talk about your debate with

7:02

Ron DeSantis, but first, Sean Hannity gave this

7:16

whole monologue prior to the debate about how he would

7:18

be a fair and

7:20

impartial moderator. If

7:22

Hannity was any more in DeSantis' corner, he

7:24

would have asked Ron to like tag him

7:26

into the match. That's how obvious

7:28

it was. So what was your reaction to

7:30

Hannity's not so impartial

7:33

debate performance? I've been around

7:35

long enough. I shouldn't have been

7:37

surprised, but it is what it is. It

7:39

was what it was. I'm

7:42

still glad I did it. I think

7:44

it's important. Look, Fox

7:46

doesn't get alternative points of

7:48

view very often. It's a

7:50

doom loop. I thought it was important to

7:52

get in there however we could. I have 90

7:55

minutes interrupted. Can't say it

7:57

was uninterrupted. at

8:00

the end of the day, net positive regardless.

8:02

Now it's worth noting that DeSantis was like

8:04

one of those polishing dolls when it came

8:06

to repeating the line about how many more

8:09

Californians were moving to Florida, but you said

8:11

that per capita more Floridians moved to California

8:13

than Californians are moving to Florida and PolitiFact

8:15

rated that as true. So

8:17

what's your reaction to knowing that DeSantis'

8:19

most potent attack against you was actually

8:21

a lie? Well, I appreciate it. That

8:24

wasn't the only one. I mean, it just – it is

8:26

remarkable. And I think it is – it's the nature

8:28

of – it's interesting you bring

8:30

this – not just that issue that

8:33

per capita last couple years more Floridians

8:35

have moved to California than the other

8:37

way around, which is, again, completely contra

8:39

to his entire narrative and point.

8:42

But it was many other points that

8:44

he just simply said were a lie or

8:46

untrue or things that he asserted which were

8:48

lies or untruth that frankly

8:50

you get away with in politics nowadays because

8:52

how many people – I appreciate you bringing it up

8:55

– how many people read PolitiFact followed up after that?

8:57

They just move on to the next thing. And so

8:59

folks get away with this. I even saw a Republican

9:01

Party debate just the other night. Same

9:03

thing. People just asserting facts that

9:05

are not in evidence that don't exist that are

9:07

not true. Yet you get away with it in

9:09

that environment. So it's stubborn and it's hard. At

9:12

the same time, you don't want to necessarily be

9:14

in a debate where every single moment everybody pauses

9:16

and says, well, hold on. We're going

9:18

to fact check that and we'll be

9:20

back after this commercial break. So I don't know what

9:22

the right solution is to this, but it's

9:24

a big issue. When you

9:26

find yourself holding up a poop map,

9:29

as Ron DeSantis did, do you

9:31

think that generally comes from a place of strength?

9:34

I'll tell you, I honestly – I

9:37

looked – I'm not making this up. Literally

9:40

not making this up because

9:42

I had brought Ronald Reagan

9:44

up earlier in the debate. And

9:46

of course, I walk into his office, his

9:49

old gubernatorial office every day. I

9:51

looked at him. I said – I just said, this

9:53

is the guy that wants to be president of the United States. And

9:56

he looked like a guy running for city council. Yeah. I'm

9:59

kidding. District two in San Francisco

10:01

board of supervisors. I mean, that's an interesting

10:03

campaign. Sorry. It wasn't just the poop map

10:05

It was the porn map. Yeah,

10:08

you know, of course, we couldn't even bring in

10:10

our own pens and he broke

10:12

the poop map Oh, I'll spare you that the

10:14

nuances on that but or the particulars

10:16

on that but it was just it was it

10:18

was sad I thought I mean I get and

10:20

the whole premise of the debate. What's this guy

10:23

doing? Why I even said that I said I

10:25

know why I'm here. But Ron why are you here? You're

10:27

running for president States. I'm

10:29

not I'm a governor of the state of

10:31

California and you're spending 90 minutes talking

10:33

about things that pro-kill things Like

10:36

that and so I thought it was

10:38

a missed opportunity for him and he

10:40

just just reinforced why he's not qualified

10:42

to be president United States, you know

10:45

There was a moment where you explained

10:47

how Florida taxes low-income workers more than

10:49

California taxes millionaires and billionaires and the

10:51

Santa's response was to warn Americans about

10:53

Exporting the California model But one of

10:55

the most popular issues in America right

10:58

now is taxing the rich So how

11:00

I feel like it polls like an 80% So

11:03

what does that say about the Santa's is political

11:05

acumen that that's the issue on which he's gonna

11:07

attack you Or even the Republican

11:09

Party they talk about high-tax states look in the

11:11

mirror look at states like Texas I mean Texas

11:14

is really Texas even more than Florida for and

11:16

what you said is absolutely true They

11:19

tax these states these red

11:21

states overwhelming majority of the

11:23

red states Substantively Florida taxes

11:25

low-wage workers full-time workers more

11:27

than we tax millionaires and

11:29

billionaires And they call us a

11:32

high-tax state. How can you blame that? It's

11:34

who are you for and it's exposed in

11:36

this they talk about this populism and now

11:38

for the working folks in the middle class

11:40

They're not look at who they

11:43

tax look at their policies Look who they

11:45

benefit and I say Texas is a master

11:47

case class cases this because it's like 70

11:49

or 80 percent of Texans

11:52

pay more taxes and then a state like

11:54

California yet again when you read the Wall

11:56

Street Journal editorial board when you

11:58

watch the doom loop at Fox and One

12:01

American News and Newsmax, you hear exactly

12:03

the opposite. Again, another reason

12:05

I thought it was so important to get in on

12:07

that platform and express some real

12:09

truth. And can you just building on

12:11

that, can you speak on the fact that these

12:14

states that kind of beat their chest about

12:16

not taxing people and not

12:18

being like high-tax states like California and

12:20

New York are actually the ones that

12:22

are the most reliant on federal subsidies

12:25

and tax dollars from the federal government?

12:27

I mean, you've driven home that

12:29

message a number of times. Can you just speak

12:31

on that? Yeah, seven of the top 10 most

12:33

dependent states, dare I say taker states, are

12:36

red states. I mean, you look

12:38

at infant mortality, you look at maternal mortality,

12:41

you look at life expectancy, you look at

12:43

the gun death rate, the murder rate, seven

12:45

of the top 10 murder rates

12:47

in the United States are in

12:49

red states. In every category, these

12:52

guys are on the back end, the

12:54

wrong side. You want to compare blue

12:56

versus red, 71% of the nation's economic

13:00

output, 71% of the GDP in

13:02

the United States of America come

13:04

from Biden County, come

13:07

from blue counties in the United States.

13:09

I mean, in every category, the red

13:11

versus blue, it's to me not that

13:14

complex. The problem is they have this

13:16

surround sound doom loop anger machine. And

13:19

that's our great challenge, I think, for Democrats is

13:21

that we have got to counter that. And

13:24

for me, my iteration with this, I don't know,

13:26

good or bad, people may

13:28

be different or indifferent about what I did, I just

13:30

think it's important to meet people where they are and

13:32

at least try to get in there and

13:35

to try to go toe to toe with these guys,

13:37

because otherwise, we continue to live

13:39

in these filter bubbles. And theirs is a

13:41

very dangerous one, because it's leading us down

13:43

a path of illiberalism. It's leading us down

13:46

a path where again, as I

13:48

said the other night, education is being used as a

13:50

sword for cultural purge,

13:53

attacking minorities, attacking vulnerable communities, attacking not

13:55

just the LGBTQ community, women, but also

13:57

the black community. And one thing that

13:59

I wish I could have discussed a

14:02

little bit more in the Hannity debate

14:04

and DeSantis debate is what – No, you had

14:07

to write on the Hannity debate part. Yeah,

14:09

no, it was the Hannity and DeSantis

14:12

debate. But I mean, you know, talk

14:14

about cultural purge. I mean, these guys

14:16

are rewriting history, censoring historical facts. They

14:19

banned AP African-American studies in Florida.

14:21

This is a guy who literally

14:23

doubled down that somehow slavery

14:26

was some workforce development program. It's

14:28

a not extraordinary, extraordinary thing. And

14:31

they defend it and they assert it as a point of

14:33

pride. Right. And also you had

14:35

called him out on banning Toni Morrison books and he

14:37

pretended that that wasn't the case. It absolutely was the

14:39

case that was proven true again after the fact. But

14:42

again, there won't be any fact checks during the debate. And

14:45

if there is a fact check, it won't

14:47

pierce the hermetically sealed bubble that is right-wing

14:50

media. But to that point,

14:52

what has the response been like for you? Have

14:54

you heard from any Fox viewers, for example, in

14:56

the aftermath of that debate? Well, yeah, I heard

14:58

from my father-in-law. He got

15:01

a chance to watch me. Look,

15:05

it was interesting. Someone

15:08

told me it was an aside. I

15:10

don't know if it's true, but I was literally, I woke

15:13

up this morning and looked at my email

15:15

and someone said, hey, that debate you did

15:17

with Hannah got more views than even the

15:19

Republican primary debate the

15:21

other night. And they have obviously different networks. But the

15:24

point is a lot of folks tune in, including a

15:26

lot of Democrats, not just traditional Fox news

15:28

viewers. And I think what we saw was a long tail.

15:31

And I appreciate you highlighting some of the some

15:33

of the points of the debate. It was the

15:35

social media side of it. And it was the

15:38

clips that were like 10 X, 100 X of

15:40

the actual viewing audience. So, look, I think it

15:42

did break through. A lot of it was in

15:44

the silos and the lanes that were already in.

15:48

And, you know, the punditry was, as you predict,

15:50

sort of through the prism of red versus

15:52

blue. But look, I think

15:54

it's important for Democrats to show up. I think

15:56

it's important for Democrats to go on the offense.

15:58

I think it's important. Democrats to try

16:01

to shape the debate as opposed to

16:03

being shaped by the debate. DEI, ESG,

16:06

CRT, anything with three letters, IRS, FBI.

16:08

We're constantly on this defense. Even though

16:10

we have the goods, we have the

16:12

facts, we have the vast majority of

16:15

American people on the side of our

16:17

policies, our principles, our values, the things

16:19

we believe in, but we just have

16:22

to be able to promote them across

16:24

platforms and not just in our silos.

16:28

DeSantis believes that his strength is derived

16:30

from punching down on large swaths of

16:32

Americans that don't agree with his political

16:35

ideology. What does it say that you

16:37

have a guy who only knows how

16:39

to attack broad swaths of the electorate

16:41

who is also running to represent those

16:44

people as president of the United States?

16:47

Well, that was the thing about just the California

16:49

bastion. I mean, this is a tenfold American

16:51

economy. 27% of

16:53

all American jobs, 27% last

16:56

month came from the state of California.

16:58

We'll do the math on the 199,000

17:00

that came out today. Again, another argument

17:03

in favor of Bidenomics, 14.1 now

17:06

million new jobs, almost 14.2 million

17:08

jobs. It's 10 times, now 10 times more than

17:10

the last three Republican presidents combined. You

17:12

look at, by the way, just on the job

17:15

score, I think it's so important

17:17

for Democrats out there to understand this. Since

17:19

the end of the Cold War, since Reagan

17:21

left office, there have been 50 million American

17:23

jobs created, 48 million of them.

17:25

I'll repeat that. 48

17:27

out of 50 million American jobs

17:30

have been created under Democratic

17:32

administrations, not Republican administrations. The

17:34

last three Republican presidents have

17:37

one thing in common, recessions,

17:39

the last three. I

17:41

can't believe we've been debating the issue of jobs

17:43

in the economy and comparing the

17:46

contrasts of Republican parties. Look,

17:48

again, all of this expresses

17:51

itself in terms of the work we have

17:53

to do to lift up the work that

17:55

Biden and Harris and the Democratic

17:57

Party have broadly done. Then obviously,

18:00

Get things ready for the contrast and the compare

18:02

contrast is where we're gonna excel and that's why

18:04

I have great confidence going into 2024

18:07

not just on the basis of 2023 and 2022 2020 2018

18:12

where we've outperformed Democrats consistently

18:15

But also on the basis of our ability

18:17

to compare contrast with the likely Republican nominee

18:19

and I'm sorry Rhonda Santas That's not you.

18:22

That's Donald Trump You know You

18:24

brought up the idea that that Republicans how they

18:26

present themselves as the party of Job, job, jobs

18:28

and yet in the last 30 some

18:30

odd years They've created 4% of

18:33

the jobs while while the Democrats have created 96% of

18:35

them Can

18:37

you explain like did that inform your reason?

18:40

For going on this debate stage and debating

18:42

Rhonda Santas and because there are there are

18:44

those who say well Why isn't Biden the

18:46

one to go out there? So what kind

18:48

of what led you to be the one

18:50

to kind of take this mantle a little

18:52

frustration? I mean now I'm getting trouble

18:54

but I mean we

18:56

got to show up for this guy He's

18:58

shown up for us last three years the

19:01

American people the most significant economic plan. I

19:03

said it in the stage I'll say it

19:05

again to you since FDR the chips and

19:08

science acts the infrastructure bill the most significant

19:10

investments in infrastructure since Eisenhower 1.2

19:13

trillion dollars 550 billion new investment. So

19:15

I mean I'm we're seeing the benefits of

19:17

that California We just announced this morning the

19:19

six billion dollars coming into my state the

19:21

tens of thousands jobs May created just on

19:23

our first in the nation

19:25

high-speed rail program because of that infrastructure

19:27

investment I mean, he's doing things Republicans

19:29

dreamt of I mean Donald

19:32

Trump every week the punchline you

19:34

talked about it ad nauseam We

19:36

all have that punchline that was

19:38

infrastructure week the lowest black unemployment

19:40

in American history the lowest Unemployment

19:42

for women in 70 years the

19:44

lowest Hispanic unemployment in American history

19:46

the lowest poverty rates for African

19:48

Americans in American history the

19:50

highest Insured rates I mean across the

19:52

board if any one of those things remember you

19:54

heard Trump all the time So I'm the lowest

19:56

black unemployment and under me. He lost by the

19:58

way 2.9 That was

20:01

Trump's and close to $9 trillion

20:03

of debt. I mean,

20:05

and the fact that they're selling that as somehow

20:08

as a renaissance and prosperity in

20:10

the United States, Biden's actually delivered,

20:12

but we need to deliver that

20:14

message. And if it's

20:16

not someone else, then I just said, okay, if I'm

20:18

not gonna see other people do this, I

20:21

appreciate, Pete's been doing great. A lot of people

20:23

are doing amazing job. Like they're out

20:25

there for this guy, for our team

20:27

Biden, but I think we need to get

20:29

more of us. We need reinforcement with pride.

20:33

We're not pulling teeth here. We've got the

20:35

record. I mean, they don't, they

20:37

have rhetoric. They say, well, we're gonna lower interest

20:39

rates. Really? How are you gonna do that? We're

20:41

gonna, inflation's out of control. Well, what are you

20:43

gonna do about it? They got nothing. They

20:45

have, I mean, literally nothing. I read Ron DeSantis' plan. I

20:47

wanted to get into it in the debate. We

20:49

didn't have enough time. He didn't wanna talk about his

20:52

plan. He doesn't have a plan. I

20:54

was like, I'm at the debate stage

20:56

tonight. We're gonna repeal and replace Obamacare.

20:58

I mean, can't make it up. Did

21:00

you hear DeSantis' answer? It was literally

21:02

laughable. And what was more laughable is

21:05

that the moderators didn't even

21:07

follow up saying, was that

21:09

an answer or was that a joke? Yeah. I

21:12

mean, this is serious. Hundreds of millions of people's

21:14

lives can be disrupted if these

21:16

guys get their way. I mean,

21:18

DeSantis tried to pull that up 14 times he

21:21

voted against Obamacare. You got Trump now campaigning

21:23

on. I mean, this is

21:25

serious stuff. And so for me, yeah, I'm gonna

21:27

keep showing up until a lot of folks tell

21:29

me to stop or no one

21:31

wants to hear me anymore, which I get. But

21:34

I don't wanna be the only one. And we're

21:36

not. I mean, we got some great governors out

21:38

there, great mayors, great leaders out there in Congress

21:40

doing good work, but we need more. We just

21:42

do. We need surround

21:44

sound because this is Democrats

21:47

in legislatures matter, democratic governors

21:49

matter, democratic local leaders matter

21:52

and our president matters. And

21:55

I'll tell you, if we can't have the

21:57

back of the guy who's done more in three years than any

21:59

president in my lifetime. Democrats, I don't know what

22:01

we deserve. This guy's, he really,

22:03

this is a man of character,

22:05

decency, honesty, integrity,

22:08

and he's produced some extraordinary results. We have

22:10

a lot of work to do, get inflation

22:12

down further. I understand people's stress. I understand

22:15

what interest rates mean and don't mean, but

22:17

we're gonna see interest rates start coming down

22:19

next year. We're moving in the right

22:21

direction, and we have no peers. America

22:23

has no peers globally, which only reinforces

22:26

Biden's leadership. Yeah, I think that was

22:28

perfectly put. You know, this isn't gonna

22:30

be Ron DeSantis' last time on a

22:33

debate stage, so, and it

22:35

looks like he's gonna be going, he's gonna

22:37

be going at Nikki Haley, who is, for

22:39

all intents and purposes, eclipsed him, because this

22:41

race was his to lose, and he did

22:43

exactly that. So, do you have any advice

22:45

for Nikki Haley as she will prepare to

22:47

take the debate stage against Ron DeSantis? What

22:49

is his biggest weakness on the debate stage

22:52

as he moves forward? I think

22:54

you saw it on display, and it was

22:56

interesting. I saw some clips of the debate.

22:58

I'm assuming you're not talking about his effort

23:00

in trying to smile. I

23:03

wanna be fair. That's for

23:05

me, not from you. Some have

23:07

suggested there's an inauthenticity that...

23:12

Look, here's the interesting thing, and I don't mean

23:14

this as a personal slide. I meant when I

23:16

said at the end, he seems like a wonderful

23:19

husband, I mean, and a great father. He really

23:21

does, and I admire his service and is willing

23:23

to sacrifice in terms of his public service by

23:25

getting in the ring. None of that's

23:27

easy, and you see that on his face. This has been hard.

23:29

This has been hard. It's been humiliating. He's belly-plugged.

23:32

I mean, this guy, he was here, and now

23:35

he's down, as I said, 41%

23:38

in his own home state against

23:41

a guy who has

23:43

91-plus counts against him and is likely

23:45

to be convicted once, twice, three or

23:48

four times. That's hard, and

23:50

Nikki Haley, accordingly, is now moving past

23:52

him. So I was

23:55

hoping, and here's the long-winded point, I was hoping

23:57

between those takes, before the debate...

26:00

and things that young people in particular care about

26:03

deeply. But, you know,

26:05

we'll save that for another time, another opportunity.

26:07

And you Republicans reach out to you about

26:09

debating you in the aftermath of that desantis

26:12

debate? Well, not

26:14

surprisingly. I mentioned some of my family members,

26:16

Republicans, and I have a lot of Republican

26:18

friends. And I don't, you know, my goal

26:21

is, I have to represent

26:23

everyone. I represent the largest state size

26:25

of 21 state populations combined. It's

26:27

the fifth largest economy on planet Earth, soon

26:30

to be fourth, likely, very likely. And

26:33

I represent everybody. You don't have to

26:35

like me, try to recall me, disagree

26:37

with me, have deep respect. Because we

26:39

all, at the end of the day, we all want to be

26:41

loved. We all need to be loved. I talked at the end

26:43

of the debate about everybody wants to

26:45

be protected, respected, connected to something bigger than

26:47

themselves. And so, yeah, I had a lot

26:50

of Republican friends call, and if nothing else,

26:52

they said, good for you. Yeah, but

26:55

any politicians reach out about about getting

26:57

getting in the ring with you? Well,

26:59

I know I didn't get anybody said,

27:01

hey, next. But so, look, I don't

27:03

know if I did that. That's a

27:06

compliment or not. Right. But look, I,

27:08

hey, I'm ready. I enjoyed that. And

27:10

I said at the end, let's keep

27:12

going. That was fun. And as

27:14

I said, we got a lot more in the

27:16

tank. So I'm looking forward to getting back on

27:19

the stage for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, getting

27:21

back on the stage for Team Blue, getting back

27:23

on the stage. Getting back on the stage for

27:25

our values, which I think are universal that are

27:27

shared by the vast majority of Americans and get

27:29

on the stage for the next generation that deserves

27:31

better than the Republican Party. And just

27:34

I know we're getting close to the end. I

27:36

cannot impress upon you more how consequential this moment

27:38

is. I began that

27:40

debate by talking about these guys putting

27:42

America in reverse. That's not exaggerated.

27:45

They do want to bring us

27:47

back to pre-1960s world. They're very

27:49

intentional about it. Voting rights, civil

27:51

rights, LGBTQ rights. It's

27:53

not just, as I said, access to reproductive

27:56

care. I mean, it's also access to simple

27:59

things like contraception. that these guys are coming

28:01

after. It's a very, very

28:04

meaningful moment. And I know we may

28:06

have some different points of

28:08

view on a lot of complex issues. Democrats,

28:10

I love that about our party. We express

28:12

ourselves in different shades of blue,

28:14

but I hope at the end of the

28:16

day, we all get on board and we

28:18

recognize our responsibility

28:21

to meet this moment in this campaign head on

28:23

and go to bat for this

28:26

guy and our president and this administration. Well,

28:28

I appreciate you bringing the fight to their

28:30

home turf and reaching those voters where they

28:32

are. Governor Newsom, thanks for taking the

28:34

time. It's great to be with you as always. Thanks

28:37

again to Governor Newsom. That's it for this episode. Talk

28:39

to you next week. You've

28:42

been listening to No Lie with Brian

28:44

Tyler Cohen, produced by Sam Graber, music

28:47

by Wellesley, interviews captured and edited for

28:49

YouTube and Facebook by Nicholas Nicotera, and

28:51

recorded in Los Angeles, California. If

28:53

you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe on your

28:55

preferred podcast app. Feel free to leave a

28:58

five-star rating and a review and check out

29:00

briantylercohen.com for links to all of my other

29:02

channels. The

29:09

number one selling product of its kind

29:11

with over 20 years of research and

29:13

innovation, Botox Cosmetic, out of botulinum toxin

29:15

A, is a prescription medicine used

29:17

to temporarily make moderate to severe frown

29:19

lines, crow's feet, and forehead lines

29:22

look better in adults. Effects

29:24

of Botox Cosmetic may spread hours to weeks

29:26

after injection causing serious symptoms. Alert your doctor

29:28

right away if difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye

29:30

problems, or muscle weakness may be a sign

29:33

of a life-threatening condition. Patients with these

29:35

conditions before injection are at highest risk. Don't

29:37

receive Botox.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features