Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hi, I'm Julia Louis-Dreyfus,
0:02
and guess what? I've got a podcast. It's
0:05
called Wiser Than Me, and each
0:07
week I get schooled on life by
0:09
women who are older and, yes, wiser
0:12
than me. Older women are this country's
0:14
biggest untapped natural resource,
0:16
and I want to hear from them. I
0:18
want to know what they've learned by living 70 or 80 or 85 years.
0:23
Jane Fonda, Darlene Love, Isabel
0:25
Allende, and many more. Subscribe
0:28
and get wise. Wiser than me.
0:30
Listen wherever you get your podcasts.
0:33
Are
0:35
you concerned about America's broken child
0:37
care system? Join veteran reporter
0:39
Gloria Riviera on No One Is Coming to
0:41
Save Us as she talks to local leaders, policy
0:44
makers, parents, providers, and more about
0:46
solutions to the child care crisis in their
0:48
communities. Season three of No One Is
0:51
Coming to Save Us from Lemonada Media and
0:53
Neighborhood Villages wherever
0:55
you get your podcasts.
1:00
Lemonada.
1:14
Hi everyone. I'm so happy to be here.
1:16
Welcome to this episode of No One Is
1:18
Coming to Save Us. Recently I've been saying,
1:21
actually someone's coming to save us because
1:23
we're talking to such amazing people
1:25
who are out there doing incredible work. This
1:28
show is created in partnership with Lemonada Media
1:30
and Neighborhood Villages. I have to say
1:32
thank you to Oakland Starting Smart and Strong.
1:35
Oakland Starting Smart and Strong is a citywide
1:38
collaborative that advances racial
1:40
justice, develops and amplifies
1:43
community-driven solutions, and
1:45
advocates for changes in early
1:47
childhood policy and resources. We
1:50
also want to thank the David and Lucille
1:52
Packard Foundation and KDOL-TV
1:55
for their partnership and sponsorship for
1:58
this event. We've been to a
1:59
a lot of cities, we've had a lot of people
2:02
to think, I can tell you this would not happen
2:04
without them. So we are
2:06
in a debt of gratitude to them. This
2:09
season we are doing something special. It's season
2:11
three and we have set
2:13
out across the country. We've been in a lot
2:16
of cities. We're talking about
2:18
the problems in childcare. We do a lot of that.
2:20
There are a lot of problems in a broken system.
2:24
But our goal is really to shine
2:26
a light on what's being done, the solutions.
2:28
And I
2:30
can say when I started this season, I
2:32
was not feeling great. And
2:35
then I meet people like you're looking
2:37
at up here on the stage
2:39
and I hear about what
2:41
they've been able to accomplish. And
2:43
I feel very
2:44
inspired. And I think that
2:46
change is afoot. Change is happening. You're
2:49
going to hear a lot about the challenges families here
2:51
are facing. Childcare costs remain
2:55
completely unaffordable for
2:57
too many families. And there are still
2:59
so many barriers.
3:01
We know a lot about the barriers,
3:03
but even in just our discussion backstage,
3:06
it's a long list. But the
3:09
advocates here are doing a lot to try to change
3:11
that. So first, let me introduce you to
3:13
Clarissa Douthard. She is the
3:16
executive director of Parent Voices
3:18
Oakland. Welcome Clarissa. Thank you.
3:20
So happy to be here. Also
3:24
joining us is LaWanda Wesley. She
3:27
is the director of government relations
3:29
of early learning at the Child Care Resource
3:31
Center. Welcome, LaWanda.
3:36
Last but not least, we have Maisha
3:38
Jones, who is a parent
3:41
to two beautiful children. And
3:44
she's also a preschool educator. Welcome,
3:47
LaWanda. Hello. And
3:51
welcome to all of you to No One Is Coming to
3:53
Save Us. So let's
3:56
get started. We were chatting backstage.
3:58
I always like to hear. as much as
4:00
I can about personal stories
4:02
that have stayed with us. And,
4:05
Clarissa, you had one
4:07
for the record books. Would you share it with us? Sure.
4:10
You know, I had a long saga
4:14
trying to get childcare,
4:16
get a childcare subsidy that I didn't even know I needed.
4:19
I thought I would just have a baby and somehow magically
4:21
there would be
4:22
support in the United States. I
4:25
quickly found out that I was pretty on my own.
4:28
So, after
4:32
really working hard to get childcare for
4:34
my son, and I needed to go back to
4:36
work at four months old when he
4:38
was four months old, and then getting
4:41
that childcare and then trying
4:43
to keep that childcare, going through all the steps
4:45
to keep it, I ended up losing
4:47
my childcare after I
4:50
asked to get a raise and
4:53
was told that I should
4:56
follow whatever the government said
4:58
in terms of eligibility guidelines. So,
5:01
I asked to make less money in
5:04
order to keep my childcare subsidy, and
5:06
my employer said I should comply
5:08
with what the eligibility was. And so, I
5:10
was kicked off of my subsidy and I actually lost
5:13
my job.
5:13
And so, this was when my son
5:15
was three years old. We didn't
5:18
have really any preschool
5:21
for him. And when he
5:23
got to kindergarten, I was like, oh my gosh, thank gosh, we
5:26
made it. He's five years old. We
5:28
get to kindergarten. And then
5:30
he was
5:33
assessed over the summer before kindergarten.
5:37
And we were told
5:37
that he was not on track
5:39
to be reading at
5:40
grade level by third grade.
5:42
That, you
5:45
know, I needed to give him, we
5:47
needed to get him some more supports. And
5:50
when he was, I think his
5:53
first week
5:53
of kindergarten, I got a call from the principal
5:56
saying, you know, he's just not ready for
5:58
kindergarten.
5:59
And I think it's better that
6:02
he wait another year to attend school.
6:06
And I've actually unenrolled him for
6:08
you. You can look for another place to
6:11
put him because it would be
6:13
devastating to his confidence
6:15
and his self-esteem if he stayed
6:16
in a kindergarten classroom.
6:19
It would do more harm at
6:21
this point. There's nothing we can really do for him. And
6:24
I want to say I know that this
6:27
was a couple of things. I told them that he hadn't had
6:29
preschool. And
6:32
he's a young black boy. He's a little
6:34
black boy. And he was pushed
6:36
out of kindergarten. We've
6:38
heard from a lot of people in the public school system
6:41
where there is support for whatever it is,
6:43
whether it's attention-related
6:46
issues or a long
6:48
list of things that your child might be
6:50
struggling with. And there is support.
6:53
But to unenroll a child because
6:56
that child is not reading at a certain level
6:59
without any, here's
7:01
what we suggest you do. You
7:03
were left alone. Yeah. They
7:07
said we should try to find a preschool.
7:09
So I would essentially be back to square one,
7:12
the original problem I had. I said, well, I didn't
7:14
have a preschool. I was waiting on kindergarten. And
7:19
it wasn't even...
7:21
You're not expected to read in kindergarten.
7:23
We're talking about identifying letters
7:25
and numbers. And
7:28
this was the beginning of the school year. I
7:31
think there
7:33
were assumptions made about me and my family,
7:35
about my son and our capacity, racist
7:39
assumptions, classist assumptions. And
7:43
ultimately,
7:44
before he was even able to get into
7:47
the school system, it failed him. So
7:49
the childcare system failed him. The school
7:51
system failed him. And
7:54
there was a whole range of public
7:56
services that are
7:59
meant to provide. supports that didn't. It
8:01
failed him, it failed your family, it failed you,
8:03
it did not do anything
8:06
near what we're even told, right? We
8:08
have these babies and it's the message
8:10
is see you in kindergarten and that was
8:12
not the case for you. So,
8:15
LaWanda, I want to ask you because we're talking
8:17
about accessibility at kindergarten
8:20
but we know accessibility
8:22
is an issue, weightless or an issue,
8:24
as the mother of five who's
8:27
in early education, talk
8:29
us through what you encountered accessing
8:32
early education. Yeah, my
8:34
own story with accessing childcare
8:37
for five children was a long,
8:39
it was difficult even though myself, I
8:42
was a preschool teacher and so
8:44
when I found myself as a single mom
8:47
looking for childcare,
8:48
I was looking for childcare that
8:50
could fit the age group of my kids.
8:52
So, I had infants all the way to early elementary.
8:55
I finally found
8:57
that program, it took a while and then when
8:59
I found the program, I was in a great
9:01
job and I was working on my master's
9:04
at this time. I was like great, I'm working on my
9:06
master's, my kids are in childcare and I
9:09
have full-time work and at one point
9:11
my employer came to me and said,
9:13
we want to offer you a raise and
9:15
this is for one of the resource and referral agencies
9:18
that was in my community because you've done
9:20
such great work and I was supporting
9:23
actually a project that was called Child Care
9:25
Careers to get more of us into the child care
9:27
career field and it was during
9:29
the child care welfare
9:31
reform when we had something called TANF,
9:34
Temporary Assistance for Needed Families and we want to get more
9:36
of those folks in the field. So, I was running that program
9:38
for careers, they said we want to give you
9:40
a raise and give you more responsibility.
9:43
I said no, do not give me a raise
9:45
because if I go one more penny over
9:48
that amount, what's going to happen
9:50
is I will no longer be eligible
9:52
for the subsidy I'm getting for my
9:55
five children and in
9:57
the case you give me the raise anyway.
9:59
I'm going to end up paying $3,000 to $4,000. And
10:02
this is in the early 90s out of my pocket,
10:04
which was all the money I was making, right?
10:06
About $2,000 per pay period every
10:08
two weeks. There was no way, right? Essentially,
10:11
we would have been unhoused. We would have been, you know,
10:13
Clarissa, thinking about your story. So
10:17
my boss at the time said, we went to the board.
10:19
We've already, like, we already have done this
10:21
thing. I said, I can't take it. So
10:23
don't give me the promotion. I
10:25
will do the work. Don't give me the title. Give
10:28
me nothing, and I will still do the
10:29
work, because I believe in what I was
10:32
doing at the time in our community. And
10:34
so you think about your income is suppressed.
10:36
I had the opportunity to possibly
10:39
have a step forward in
10:41
economic mobility. But here, I was
10:44
not able to take a raise for years until
10:46
I waited until a few more of my kids were
10:50
actually in the elementary.
10:52
And then I was like, OK. But at that time,
10:54
that position had passed. Then I ended
10:57
up having to go into another sector of the
10:59
early education field and
11:02
do a job leap. So that's my
11:04
story, and that's not unusual, that
11:06
when you're taking subsidy, that you
11:09
cannot accept a
11:11
raise because you become ineligible
11:13
for all other public subsidies, including because
11:16
at the time, too, I was on, they
11:18
call at that time was food stamps. They call it CalFresh
11:21
now here in California. But
11:23
I was receiving those services. I was receiving
11:25
Medi-Cal. Everything just sort of keep us glued
11:28
and going into deep, deep poverty.
11:29
We were just coming. We were just starting to
11:32
touch, I say touch middle class,
11:34
but not quite. So I couldn't
11:37
get further into the middle class until
11:39
my kids really got into, honestly, high
11:42
school. And that's not so long ago if that
11:45
tells you anything. And I'm in my 50s. Yeah. There's
11:47
so much to your story that strikes me.
11:50
One is that we will educate you
11:52
to join early education. I
11:56
mean, you have a doctorate. Yeah.
11:58
It's expensive to get a doctorate. doctorate. But
12:02
it's this continual,
12:04
inescapable hamster wheel to
12:07
get where you should be. Because
12:10
of all the reasons that we talk about how we value
12:13
early educators and in COVID,
12:15
we saw that, right? We were pushed to the limit, we
12:17
saw it. And now we're in the hard work
12:20
of
12:21
taking what we saw and changing
12:24
it. I like the way you put it, all
12:26
of these social services to keep us glued
12:28
together. And I think the language is
12:30
so important because we've talked a lot
12:32
about the word subsidy and
12:35
how
12:36
shame is somehow integrated
12:39
into that word. And I am
12:41
changing the phrase food stamps to
12:43
CalFresh. I think there's a lot of work to
12:45
be done. Because when you compare it to
12:48
other countries,
12:49
those words are not used, right? Right.
12:53
I do think the welfare queen mentality still
12:56
exists, which we know was
12:58
a myth. And when World
13:00
War II was here, somehow
13:02
collectively, we were okay with universal
13:05
childcare. We've done it before. So
13:07
we were okay with that. All of us were working.
13:09
But I do think it is, there
13:12
is a layer of racism in there. Because as
13:14
soon as, you know, no offense, because my
13:16
family is very much diverse.
13:19
But as soon
13:19
as white women went back home
13:22
into the home and the rest of us women of color
13:24
were still on the line doing domestic work, that
13:27
included childcare, all of a sudden,
13:29
you don't get something for free, right?
13:32
You have to pay for it. So now you need to
13:34
have work requirements in order to
13:36
be worthy of it. And remember,
13:39
this is your situation. But when we were fighting
13:42
the war, and we were all in it together, universal
13:45
childcare was doable.
13:47
And then we have the pandemic. And
13:50
we saw doable again, because we're all
13:52
in it together. Oh, we're not in it
13:54
together anymore. Right. And
13:56
we're easing out of the pandemic. Memories are
13:58
short. Yes. And Here we are.
14:01
Maisha, I want to hear from you. Apologies
14:04
for it taking some time to get to you. But I
14:06
know that you are also in
14:08
early education and the mother of
14:10
two beautiful children. And you have a story
14:12
about waitlists. And there's some data
14:15
here about the waitlists in
14:17
this part of the country. What is your
14:19
story? So my daughter's 13 right
14:21
now.
14:22
And like he's
14:24
been said, I was like, oh, I can find childcare.
14:26
I'll just go out there and look for it. And then
14:29
they say, I went to the district. And they're like,
14:31
oh, go to this place. Go to this other site.
14:33
This is the wrong one. What's your neighborhood? I
14:36
go to another program where you get on the referral system.
14:39
And I put her on the list. And
14:41
I'm waiting for a phone call. But I've got to go
14:43
to work. So I go to work. And
14:45
she's at different places. There's
14:48
a family member that, week to week, somewhere
14:50
else, where whoever can take care of her. And
14:52
luckily, that worked out for me.
14:54
Because I didn't get a call for
14:57
her referral spot until she was in second grade.
15:00
And they were like, do you need services? I'm just checking
15:03
to see if you need your child to have a spot.
15:05
And I was like, what child? Oh,
15:08
she's in second grade. She's in class right now.
15:11
I want to say with my son, it wasn't
15:13
easier. I
15:16
did the scan the QR code. And
15:19
sometimes when it's online, you
15:21
fill out the wrong information.
15:22
I did that. It
15:25
says, what's the age? He turns
15:28
three in November. I thought the rule was 2.9. That's
15:32
what I'm understanding. And in the income
15:34
spot, I was like, oh, your yearly salary.
15:36
Put that in.
15:38
And I'm waiting. I work for the district. I'm
15:40
waiting for the response. I'm waiting. We're
15:43
emailing nothing. Oh,
15:47
your income is too much. I'm like,
15:49
I have my teacher at the district. I
15:52
don't make too much. Then it
15:54
was like, oh, your income first. Then your child is
15:57
too young to get in program. And I was
15:59
like, it's not. not 2.9? Are
16:02
you sure? Because I had
16:04
a 2.9 kid in my classroom and
16:06
so his birthday was in December and I'm like, um,
16:09
so my child can't get in because of age and
16:12
my income. I feel that the wrong spot, the wrong
16:14
location, the check the wrong box.
16:17
And so even though I had
16:19
the inside, which thinks
16:21
she's like, Oh, I got the inside. I can definitely get
16:23
this done. We were
16:26
enrollment happens February
16:28
and August. I was still pushing because
16:30
school's about to start. I got to go to work on Monday
16:33
pushing to get my child
16:35
into the preschool program because I filled out
16:37
the wrong box.
16:39
I mean, it just, again, this is something we say a lot,
16:42
Illuminati, it doesn't have to be this way. What
16:44
is the average cost of childcare
16:47
in this part of the country?
16:50
It can be upwards of over $2,000,
16:52
$3,000, depending if
16:55
it's an infant taller, it just depends
16:58
the younger the child, the more expensive it is.
17:01
So you think about that.
17:03
And if you think about the average cost of rent in
17:06
this part of the county and
17:08
you know, I live in a different county now, but
17:11
it can be upwards the same amount. So
17:14
just think it can become a wash. Like do
17:16
I, do I pay for housing or do
17:18
I pay for childcare? But you need
17:21
childcare so that you can go to work so you
17:23
can access housing. So you
17:25
wonder why people are doubling up, tripling
17:28
up, right? You wonder why people are
17:30
housing insecure. You have to make some
17:32
tough choices. And I just remember
17:34
one time thinking about some of the families who are
17:36
going to work, but they were living in under the
17:38
bridge here in Oakland, and
17:40
the tents and we're delivering diapers because
17:43
some of them were in need, but they were making
17:45
choices. So I can put my
17:47
kid in childcare, you know, try to figure
17:49
that out. But then I may not necessarily
17:51
have secure housing. So
17:53
there's trade offs when we don't
17:56
figure out how to do this as a collective. So you're
17:59
saying some of the families live in Oakland.
17:59
living under the bridge were making choices to
18:03
access childcare, early childcare, in
18:06
the absence of housing. Sometimes that, or
18:08
sometimes I've heard stories where they were
18:10
even leaving them with other folks. I
18:14
mean, there are no words for what the landscape. Yeah,
18:16
you do desperate things, and that results in
18:18
a desperate landscape. This
18:21
episode is brought to
18:23
you by Post-it Brand.
18:29
Post-it
18:32
Brand helps people get ideas out of their
18:35
head and out into the world. They believe
18:37
there's power in writing it down, since
18:39
it's the spark of something bigger. It
18:41
can be so easy to lose track of all of
18:43
the little to-dos we set for ourselves throughout the
18:45
day, but that's where Post-it's super sticky
18:47
notes come in. They help you get it out of your head
18:50
and get it done. Post-it super sticky notes
18:52
feature two times the sticking power to ensure
18:54
your message stays put. For busy parents
18:57
or just anyone who has a ton to remember, Post-it
18:59
notes are there to help make it easier. 85% of
19:02
parents believe you're more likely to achieve a goal if
19:04
you write it down. Plus, check out the
19:06
latest Post-it 100% recycled paper super
19:09
sticky notes, with two times the sticking power.
19:12
Both the notes and the packaging are made from 100% recycled
19:14
paper. They come in eight different
19:16
colorways, so you can add a pop of color to your
19:18
daily routine. Life gets super busy,
19:21
but Post-it notes can help you organize your to-dos,
19:23
dreams, and goals in a bold way. Find
19:25
your favorite Post-it brand products at a local
19:27
retailer today.
19:30
If you're a full-time remote worker looking for
19:32
something new, check out Tulsa's thriving
19:34
community of more than 2,400 remote workers. Visit
19:38
TulsaRemote.com to learn more
19:41
about how you could receive $10,000 to
19:43
move to Tulsa and apply.
19:47
Thank you.
19:59
touched on it briefly, how
20:02
is child care a racial justice issue?
20:05
What are the things that come to mind for you? Well,
20:08
one of the things that comes to mind is
20:10
actually LaWanda mentioned the program
20:12
TANF, Temporary Assistance for Needy
20:14
Families, which was the program that
20:17
replaced AFDC. A
20:19
little bit of alphabet soup. You
20:21
know what I mean? We're with you. We're still
20:23
with you. All right. You know,
20:26
I understand the acronyms, but this is a very important moment
20:28
in history I think we're at another
20:30
precipice, another change
20:33
in the way that families
20:35
are viewed and exist in this country
20:37
economically, socially, and racially.
20:40
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families replaced
20:43
AFDC, which was aid to
20:45
families with dependent children or welfare.
20:48
Fun fact, the welfare queen is a
20:50
myth and also an actual person named
20:52
Linda Taylor. There is a podcast on Linda
20:55
Taylor's life. Very interesting character
20:57
in history. That
20:59
change to penalize black
21:02
women, immigrant women, for
21:06
making the very tough choice to either
21:08
stay at home with their babies, leave
21:10
their babies with someone else, enter
21:12
the workforce,
21:14
to have a safety net or not with
21:17
as few restrictions as possible. Because while
21:20
AFDC was not a perfect program,
21:23
it was a program that
21:25
allowed women who left
21:27
the job force either to have
21:30
a baby because
21:32
they were released for some reason.
21:35
There was a recession. That's a safety net
21:37
program. And the idea
21:39
that who was accessing safety
21:41
net programs or getting free
21:43
money was largely black and brown
21:45
women or women of color and immigrant
21:47
women is something that conservatives
21:49
have been able to attack. There's
21:51
overall safety nets around. What's
21:54
interesting is welfare
21:56
reform was not passed by conservatives.
21:58
It was passed by... Bill
22:00
Clinton and I'm a forever have a beef with
22:02
Bill Clinton because of that, you
22:04
know because it's single-handedly
22:06
that Sweeping legislation
22:08
put so many families into
22:10
poverty by tying Childcare
22:13
to work requirements
22:14
when actually child care is a human right
22:17
Access to child care becomes racialized
22:20
when we tie it to our labor to eligibility
22:23
requirements and when we require
22:26
that families prove they are worth
22:29
investing in and So it's
22:31
some families get the benefit of the doubt
22:34
some families are believed when they
22:36
say they need
22:36
help and others aren't There's
22:39
a history of underinvestment that
22:42
is racialized and I always
22:43
say if if
22:45
this country still didn't have to grapple with
22:48
the legacy of chattel slavery and We
22:51
were a homogeneous country that
22:53
didn't have black folks in it that would benefit
22:55
from social safety net programs We
22:57
would have them
22:59
we would have single-payer health care. We
23:01
would have free college. We
23:03
would have Childcare,
23:06
we would have food banks on every corner, but
23:08
because black folks Benefit
23:10
and we would in order them to for them to fully
23:13
benefit. We have to grapple with
23:15
that
23:15
Disturbing past and reconcile
23:18
as a country. We will continue
23:20
to spin our wheels at a legislative
23:22
level
23:23
It makes me think of what a
23:25
lot of talk is in Washington right now
23:27
and you can all speak to this. So
23:30
Initially people who have studied early education
23:33
Several of them say don't tie
23:35
child care to your job The danger
23:38
in that is that if you leave your place of
23:40
business where you work you lose your
23:42
child care However right now in
23:45
Washington the Secretary of
23:47
Commerce was instrumental in passing
23:49
the CHIP's program which is if you want to
23:51
borrow money from the government, there is a requirement
23:54
to provide childcare and
23:57
Part of the story is that there is an intention
23:59
to
23:59
to bring more women into the workforce.
24:03
There are several high paying entry level jobs.
24:06
I'm curious to know what you think in the absence
24:09
of an active solution right now of
24:12
more doors opening. Something
24:14
like the CHIPS program, which would
24:17
require businesses to provide early
24:19
education and childcare.
24:21
Is that a tenable solution? I
24:26
fundamentally believe that it is a mistake
24:29
for childcare to be treated like a commodity
24:32
on the private market. This
24:34
should be a public good that is
24:36
available to everyone. Incentivizing
24:39
corporations
24:40
to provide childcare is possibly
24:43
a step in the right direction. But tying
24:46
childcare and that labor and that workforce
24:51
to the profit margins of a
24:53
company that may or may not be treating
24:55
their employees well, when the quality
24:58
of life for a family is really hard,
25:01
depending on what income bracket you're in, I
25:04
don't see that as,
25:08
at best a band-aid,
25:09
at worst something that actually could
25:12
deepen income inequality. Because
25:14
one, we can't mandate what
25:17
these companies pay the providers
25:20
or how they manage or how safe
25:22
these environments are.
25:23
There's a reason why childcare
25:26
should be a public good and should have public
25:28
oversight. I think you make a complicated
25:31
relationship.
25:33
Right? And then how
25:35
do you reckon with that? You mean, to
25:37
your point, Clarissa, you may not be
25:40
faring well in that work, that
25:43
particular company, but because it's
25:45
tied to you having access to childcare. So
25:48
think about being sort of stuck. Because
25:50
you're like, I need this childcare, but it's
25:52
tied to this job. I really don't wanna
25:54
be at this job. I don't know. It feels messy.
25:57
Yeah, I was just thinking that same exact word. It
25:59
gets me.
25:59
messy, fast. It's one of those
26:02
programs that sounds good. It passed.
26:05
It was sort of what was, you
26:08
know, sort of salvaged from the end of Build
26:10
Back Better. But it's,
26:12
like you said, a bandaid and potentially,
26:14
you know, it's not going to heal the wound.
26:18
Speaking of
26:19
consistent issues California faces,
26:22
Maheshia, I'm curious if you can tell us about
26:24
the students whom you teach and
26:27
how housing instability shows
26:30
up in your classroom.
26:32
I'm in a space in the district where I'm on
26:34
executive board. So I sometimes
26:36
travel from site to site. And that
26:38
means I get to see parents coming,
26:40
see parents going, and then
26:43
hear from other teachers what
26:45
there are some problems that they're having to
26:48
trying to figure out how to support families. In
26:52
the summer I just noticed that there's families who
26:55
are
26:56
coming on the bus, getting there late. And
26:59
we hire teachers and don't explain
27:01
to them that these are homeless families.
27:04
And we can't say, hey, you're
27:07
late. I'm going to give you a warning.
27:09
If you're late again, you're going
27:12
to lose your spot. We
27:14
constantly say to families, you're
27:17
late dropping off. There's
27:20
a system where
27:21
I'm trying to figure out how to get housing. I'm
27:24
like, is this my job description to find housing? But
27:27
let me help you. I'll go online and look for it because
27:30
we don't have the space where
27:32
we have navigators at
27:34
our schools, but for
27:36
half a day, one day a week at
27:40
some sites.
27:41
And that does not support this
27:44
family's limit on food.
27:46
This family's got kicked out the shelter because
27:49
they didn't feel safe. And now where
27:51
can we go next? The shelters have lots
27:54
of rules.
27:57
And so here I am trying to figure out, well,
27:59
what can you do? you go? What can you do? Because in
28:01
the meantime, you're coming in saying,
28:03
Miss Maisha, this is going on. Or
28:06
I'm going to text from another teacher, this family
28:08
is going through this. What should they do? And I'm
28:10
like, I don't know. Call
28:13
the family navigator, call the enrollment
28:15
center, and ask them
28:17
to help.
28:18
Because as a teacher, I have
28:20
limited information. And I
28:23
there's no in our school sites, there's not
28:25
this scan the QR card, here's a paper
28:27
to hand to a family because they need information
28:30
right away. And you
28:33
got to know what program you can get into. We
28:35
can't say here's a list of programs,
28:38
but you might not qualify for this. Because there's
28:40
things you know about certain families. You're
28:42
coping, and how are you coping?
28:44
And if you're coping the way the program says you
28:46
should not be coping, although these things are
28:48
legal, you can't
28:51
sleep here. So now you're sleeping in
28:53
your car because they don't they're not working
28:55
with you to help you get through
28:57
your stress, your
28:59
anxiety, your depression.
29:02
And we're not giving tools to be like, hey we have
29:04
a group for you for
29:06
families who need because we're all online all
29:08
the time. And then the vicarious trauma
29:11
that educators go through in the class,
29:13
just I remember being in the school district, the stress
29:15
that you guys were going through. Bearing
29:18
witness to all of it.
29:20
Yeah there's a cost. There's a cost
29:23
and there's a one
29:25
bad day doesn't make for a good
29:28
day around the corner. Sometimes it does, sometimes
29:30
there are bright spots, but
29:33
it's
29:34
an unfathomable burden
29:37
to carry day in and day out.
29:40
I mean there's so much that we could talk about
29:42
going back to World War II. We know we can do
29:44
it. We know we can provide high quality
29:47
accessible
29:48
affordable care. Clorissa,
29:51
you were nodding your head pretty vigorously when Maisha
29:54
was speaking. What was on
29:56
your mind? A
29:58
few things. One of the...
30:00
campaigns that we ran. Shout
30:02
out to Bananas and shout out to
30:04
First Five, Alameda County. Shout out to so many
30:07
folks who are in the crowd right now who worked
30:09
with us. The late supervisor,
30:11
Wilma Chan, we organized.
30:15
We had a group of families who
30:19
after being in conversation and community,
30:21
right, this is about building trusting relationships
30:24
and Maisha really poignantly
30:26
illustrated the things
30:29
that organizers and teachers
30:31
do every day and being in conversation
30:34
with families who are impacted and
30:36
we learned that families were struggling
30:39
with housing and needed
30:42
emergency
30:42
child care, needed child care in order to find
30:44
housing, in order to get jobs
30:47
and we had no idea the number
30:50
of parent leaders at parent voices
30:52
who were actually living in shelters at
30:55
the time and I was floored
30:58
and I was also floored
31:01
at
31:02
the experiences families had in
31:04
shelters. So when Maisha was talking
31:06
about the different regulations
31:09
and not every agency
31:11
is a safe place for families with young children
31:15
and not every agency is equipped to
31:17
meet the needs of families who are
31:19
experiencing housing instability
31:21
and have really young children
31:24
and so we have, you know,
31:26
there were stories where babies
31:28
actually died, you
31:31
know, due to SIDS and
31:33
the conditions and
31:36
also we there is a very high black infant
31:38
mortality rate in Oakland, in
31:40
Alameda County and specifically Oakland. So
31:43
we were watching these conditions
31:45
and circumstances happen in real time
31:48
and so part of our organizing was
31:50
figuring out how we center those experiences,
31:53
build power and actually design services
31:56
that meet the needs
31:57
of families in crisis. deep
32:00
crisis. Yeah. Yeah. And
32:03
to your last point, I'm interested to hear from all
32:05
of you because, you know,
32:07
as you're all hearing, this can be a
32:09
difficult conversation to have because there are so many
32:12
persistent challenges.
32:14
So I'm curious if
32:16
when you look at the landscape, what are
32:18
the things that make you think, okay,
32:20
that's working?
32:22
Is it seeing a family who gets the help that
32:24
they need? Is it seeing somebody, a child,
32:27
be able to stay in the same school,
32:30
in the same district,
32:32
having overcome a housing
32:34
issue, having overcome, you know, all the
32:36
things that come as they cope, right? When
32:39
you look at the landscape,
32:40
what makes you think, okay, this is working
32:42
for families that face all the challenges we've
32:44
been talking about? Yeah.
32:48
I think one of the first things, so
32:50
AC Cares was the campaign that we
32:52
won, which is emergency
32:53
childcare vouchers for families experiencing
32:56
homelessness. Those families were
32:58
not being counted in the point in time count.
33:00
They were being passed over by systems.
33:03
One of the things I see working is when
33:06
we organize and build programs that start
33:08
from families who are the most marginalized,
33:11
the most
33:11
in crisis, and really listening
33:14
to those – not just listening to those stories because the
33:16
stories are important, but
33:18
the solutions, the ideas,
33:21
the brilliant, beautiful
33:23
imagination that human beings
33:25
have, the capacity to
33:28
influence and change
33:29
and bring power to their own
33:31
conditions when given the space and resources
33:33
to do so. I think that's
33:36
what lands us, these really
33:38
deep,
33:39
positive outcomes, right? So
33:42
AC Cares, of course, is an example
33:45
of that. I mean, that was the imagination
33:47
of families that were going through it. My
33:49
life is an example of that. I
33:53
had to start
33:53
organizing for childcare so I could get childcare
33:56
because parent voices was the only place
33:58
I could take my son. And,
34:01
you know, so I think community organizing is working,
34:04
right? It is working in partnership
34:07
with systems, in partnership
34:09
with champions in our elected
34:12
officials. Because we're talking
34:14
about, right, federal programs, Head Start.
34:17
And they're not always perfect, but
34:20
in some places they're more problematic than others,
34:23
and you had direct experience with that. What
34:25
was your experience with Head Start here? My
34:27
experience was we'd already built
34:30
a coalition of labor
34:33
unionized
34:34
childcare providers. That's
34:37
also a solution, organized
34:39
labor, and
34:42
building power with them. So it was our organization,
34:44
unions. And
34:47
then we also had a
34:48
progressive women of color majority
34:50
on city council, right? Elections
34:54
matter. Who's in power matters.
34:57
And also most of these women had experience
35:00
with childcare, experience
35:02
with either lack of childcare. One of
35:04
them
35:04
was a childcare provider herself. She was
35:06
a family childcare provider herself. And
35:09
so, you know, there were
35:12
these conditions that really supported
35:14
us intervening in stopping
35:16
three sites from being closed and 52 jobs
35:19
from being lost. Those jobs were women
35:22
of color. Many of them had been working
35:24
in the city's Head Start program for
35:26
many years. And
35:28
so there were multiple things
35:31
that led to that win. I will
35:33
say that that win was building
35:35
off of other wins, right? That
35:38
win was building off of
35:40
being part of one,
35:43
two ballot initiatives, right?
35:46
It was part of organizing with families,
35:48
again, who are experiencing houselessness
35:51
to win emergency vouchers and family
35:53
navigation. So
35:56
it's not that simple. And it's this
35:58
long term
35:59
process. So
36:01
we ran a very quick campaign to keep
36:03
those sites open. Those sites happen to be in
36:06
East Oakland, which is one
36:08
of the most impacted parts of our city
36:10
in every way, environmentally,
36:13
economically, politically. So
36:15
we were successful for a number
36:17
of reasons, but I will say we were successful. And the thing
36:20
I'm most proud of is
36:22
childcare providers and parents
36:24
working in such deep solidarity with each
36:26
other. I hear across the country, because
36:30
in doing this work, I hear across the country where childcare
36:32
providers and parents are pit against each other
36:34
and have a hard time figuring
36:37
out where they align on
36:38
issues. The truth is, for
36:40
us, our experience has been that family
36:42
childcare providers and the parents really came together.
36:45
And also, family childcare providers
36:48
came out
36:49
in support of the Head Start workers in
36:51
solidarity. And it was one of the most, I
36:54
would say, one of the most beautiful moments in my career
36:56
to see that, you know, even
36:58
as they were fighting their own battles,
37:01
OUSD teachers came out and
37:03
they said, oh, my gosh, they're doing this to the Head Start
37:05
teachers? You know, they're like, why are they struggling enough?
37:08
Why are they doing this to the...oh, no, we can't
37:10
have this. And they
37:12
came out and built a mural with us and organized.
37:15
And that's what is actually,
37:17
for me, going to be a huge part
37:20
of
37:21
how we pass the next big federal
37:23
legislation. It is from
37:25
the grassroots up. You cannot tell me
37:27
different at all. It
37:29
is these largely women of color
37:32
who have figured out how to resource
37:34
themselves to support each other, how to resource
37:37
themselves to support each other. And that's
37:39
what you're talking about when you're saying somebody says, wait, they're doing
37:41
this to Head Start. I'm going to come out and support. Oh,
37:44
my gosh. They're like, where would I need to call? I
37:46
would call my council person. I mean, it was beautiful.
37:49
Yeah, beautiful. That is beautiful. LaWanda,
37:52
you were now shaking your head. Yeah.
37:54
OK. Today was historic.
37:56
OK, tell us about what happened. There was over 3000. maybe
38:00
upwards 4,000 marchers
38:03
that included parents, parent voices,
38:06
statewide parent voices, but collectively across
38:08
the state and childcare providers. We
38:10
marched to a place where we called the swing space where
38:12
Governor Newsom is, and we
38:14
shouted, and we marched, and we
38:17
yelled, pay us now, give
38:20
us our contract. We are
38:22
women, we are women of color, and I will say
38:24
specifically for black women, we're earning 78 cents
38:27
less an hour as compared to our white
38:29
peers,
38:29
but I already imagine the
38:32
wage is suppressed. So the racial wage
38:34
gap is real, but the wage gap in general
38:36
for work that's done by primarily women
38:39
and women of color, it's unacceptable. There's
38:41
no other industry that you would, as
38:44
a government, say we care about children. Every politician
38:47
runs on this notion that education
38:50
is good for children and young children we should
38:52
invest, and as soon as you get an office,
38:55
you start acting brand new. Yeah,
38:59
and you're sitting across with them, with the data,
39:02
with all the knowledge, with the parents, we're bringing babies
39:04
to the capital, we're making dolls,
39:07
we're sending emails, we're doing all the
39:09
templates, we have advocacy committee groups, up
39:11
and down the state, in the city, and all of
39:13
a sudden, when we're sitting before you as
39:16
constituents, you can't
39:18
find the money.
39:20
And all the time, we have
39:22
women leaving the workforce, we have
39:24
the women who are doing the work leaving the workforce, and we
39:26
can go work for In-N-Out
39:28
and make $30 an hour. $30 an
39:30
hour. And get education assistance. I
39:33
can't make this up, go look at a Taco Bell. I
39:35
know, I know. Like with
39:38
education assistance and some level
39:40
of benefits, and here we are in
39:42
the classroom,
39:43
right, Maisha? Doing the work, and
39:46
we can't get what we need, and
39:48
so we are relying, at least 50% or more, rely
39:52
on some form of public subsidy.
39:55
As a professional, who's skilled,
39:57
who has AA degrees, certification, BH.
40:00
degrees. A doctorate. A doctorate. It
40:02
doesn't matter. Yeah. Family
40:04
child care providers who are amazingly
40:07
worthy, skilled, bright. Some of them,
40:09
average women in the city I know who provide care
40:12
are in their 60s.
40:13
And we're losing that. We're losing those folks because
40:16
it's time. It's time for them to rest. But
40:18
we can't retain. We can't
40:20
attract. And high school counselors
40:22
won't even refer their high
40:24
school students and you as a student go and sit with
40:26
your high school counselor. What profession
40:29
should I go into? When
40:31
they look at child care worker, they go,
40:34
oh, no. We're not going to pipeline you into
40:37
poverty. Oh my gosh. The
40:39
idea that a high school student would not
40:41
be counseled into early education breaks
40:44
my heart because the
40:46
reason that you do it is because you're passionate
40:48
about it. And it can be an
40:50
incredibly fulfilling
40:52
career.
41:04
It's time for fair finance for all
41:06
with today's financial tech services, apps
41:09
and products, individuals and small businesses
41:11
have the opportunity to achieve better
41:14
financial health and wellbeing. And
41:16
that's the goal for Flourish Ventures. This
41:19
global financial tech venture capital firm
41:21
invests in early stage mission
41:23
driven entrepreneurs and industry influencers
41:26
who share a common vision to build
41:29
a fairer, more inclusive financial
41:31
system for all.
41:33
Hi everyone. It's Jen Psaki.
41:36
I'm excited to tell you that my weekly show on MSNBC
41:38
Inside with Jen Psaki is also available
41:41
as a podcast. I know from the years I spent
41:43
on campaign buses and foreign capitals and
41:45
in the Oval Office that there's always more to
41:47
a story under the surface. On my show,
41:49
we try to bring you inside all of it, breaking
41:52
down the things that matter and visiting with some of the
41:54
most fascinating people in the news today. Search
41:56
for Inside with Jen Psaki wherever you're listening
41:59
and follow. I'm going to start with
42:04
you.
42:14
We've talked a lot, the bubble
42:17
above my head, I'm thinking, I always hear
42:19
having covered politics from DC
42:21
for a long time, oh, the teacher's unions. Every
42:24
candidate goes to talk to the teacher's unions.
42:26
And when they're running, they're nervous,
42:29
they need that support. It's a powerful
42:31
organization.
42:33
Is there something similar for
42:36
early educators? Why does the
42:38
teacher's union hold so much power over
42:40
politicians when they're running? Is
42:43
it
42:43
misaligned with early educators? Where
42:46
is that cohesive, powerful
42:48
group? So
42:51
I also do other things like advocacy stuff like
42:54
early age. I'm an advisory group where
42:56
we meet across online with
42:59
people across from San Diego to
43:01
LA to Modesto. And
43:04
what the challenge has always been is that how
43:06
do we bring it right together? Even when
43:09
OUSD went on our own strike,
43:11
we struggled to
43:13
be like, well, in the
43:15
past,
43:17
we were not represented. And
43:19
over year, year after year, ECE
43:21
teachers did not get a raise because our funding's
43:23
different. Well, we still
43:26
have to negotiate what that looks like
43:28
for us. So
43:31
how do you come together
43:32
when at the end of the day, I looked at those
43:35
signs like, oh, I should go
43:37
work at the In-N-Out
43:39
Burger down the street because I'm like, yeah, I
43:41
don't have to deal with all the other stuff. So
43:45
when you have me thinking like that, it's
43:47
a whole other step to be like, come together.
43:49
How do you do that? And
43:51
we are just now coming to stand.
43:53
We are the same. Even
43:56
the family child care writers, we are the same. Head start,
43:58
we are the same. We are.
43:59
all one community
44:02
and because it's been so broken and we're
44:04
not the same community in someone's head
44:06
yes yes we go someone
44:09
said you're not we're not the same that's different because that's
44:11
different money that's different because their family child care they
44:14
don't have the same curriculum at that program
44:16
so
44:16
your child
44:19
won't get the best yes if
44:21
your public private family
44:23
child care which my great-aunt had
44:26
ran the child care and for many years and
44:30
you still get that sometimes that
44:32
love and compassion we don't recognize that in the
44:34
family child care setting you get more that because there's
44:36
not that top heavy what do you need to do
44:39
in this position so when we don't
44:41
recognize it and we're all been we've all been
44:43
divided
44:44
it's hard to set it's
44:46
like you got a sale togetherness yeah
44:49
we're together with the same walk arms yeah yeah
44:52
and for me as a parent first because
44:54
I'll say that all the time I'm a parent first an
44:56
advocate second and in the teacher and then that's
44:58
how I roll every day
45:00
and if you don't understand that you
45:02
have to be the the if your provider
45:04
is the is your teacher or your advocate
45:06
who are you who is it who is your teacher
45:09
who is your parent can the parents be advocates
45:11
they don't know some people don't know how are
45:13
they afraid to do it because they might get in
45:16
trouble or their their family might
45:18
be something might happen I'm not
45:20
documented
45:21
so these all these pieces that
45:24
stop families from coming together
45:26
with the teachers and stop the teachers from saying that's
45:29
that child care center that's been there that's come to us
45:31
that's been there for 30 years
45:33
and I've seen them bring kids to our program
45:36
we need to connect with them we won't step up our
45:38
comfort zone
45:40
and if we can't stop our comfort zone we
45:43
can't move forward as a team I
45:47
feel like that deserves a round of applause
45:50
we got big smiles from everybody here
45:52
well speaking
45:55
of coming together and the hard work that
45:57
can be successful when that does happen
45:59
I want to bring back Latoya Gale
46:02
from our co-producer, Neighborhood Villages.
46:06
Hopefully, some of you have some questions. If
46:08
something's percolating, please
46:11
get it to us. Ask your questions.
46:13
Hopefully, you know by now that Neighborhood Villages
46:16
does incredible work. They
46:19
are really working to make sure all families have access
46:22
to the kind of care that we're talking about.
46:24
So Latoya, you've
46:26
spent your career at Neighborhood Villages
46:29
in this work.
46:30
It's amazing to watch
46:32
Latoya listen in every city that we've
46:34
been in and hone in
46:36
on what stands out to someone who's really
46:38
an expert in the kind of work that gets
46:41
results. And I am in awe of
46:43
you and your work. So welcome back.
46:46
Hi. Thank you. Hi.
46:51
So I was thinking, when
46:53
we talk about what's happening in Oakland, what
46:55
resonates with you from this conversation? Something
46:58
that really resonates with me is
47:01
something I think we don't speak about a lot,
47:04
that all three of these beautiful black
47:06
women have brought up
47:08
how race is impacting
47:10
this crisis. We
47:12
know the history that this country has
47:14
with race. We know how that impacts
47:17
policies and who gets what in
47:20
this country and how hard our legislators are willing
47:23
to work for something. And so I want to say thank
47:26
you for speaking so candidly
47:28
and openly and honestly about that. Because if we
47:30
don't talk about it, we're
47:33
not going to do nothing about
47:34
it. Welcome to Oakland. Welcome
47:36
to Oakland, home of the Black
47:38
Panthers. Race like black
47:40
Panthers.
47:41
Yes, steeped in organizing
47:44
history and muscle. And it shows
47:46
here. The fact
47:48
that you guys had a, I
47:49
don't even know what you
47:51
got, not a strike, but a march. You
47:53
had a march to rally at your
47:55
state capital with 3,000 to 4,000 fans.
47:59
families and educators coming together.
48:02
Amazing! That
48:05
is amazing and the fact that they're coming together. Maisha,
48:08
what you just said about
48:10
convincing
48:12
people to lock arms. The
48:14
truth of the matter is, you know, sometimes
48:17
it's hard to convince people that you're on the same
48:19
team, right? Especially
48:22
when you have big, powerful teachers'
48:24
unions who might see themselves different than
48:27
early educators, right? We all
48:29
know education starts
48:29
before you get to kindergarten, right? And
48:32
so how are we, go ahead clap for
48:34
that. Yes, yes. How
48:38
are we coming together to
48:41
do that? And so, Luanda, when you
48:42
were talking about your march today, that's really
48:44
inspiring to hear. And
48:48
the other thing that stands out is that, you
48:50
know, Luanda can tell a story that happened 25, 30 years
48:52
ago.
48:53
And Clarissa
48:55
can tell a story that happened, what, 10? 15 years
48:58
ago. And you can tell a story that happened 10 years
49:01
ago and it's still the same story,
49:03
right? And so it really highlights
49:05
the importance of really
49:08
coming together and sticking this out because change
49:10
hasn't happened yet, right? We still
49:12
have changes to make. And this
49:14
room is filled, people on air cannot
49:17
see it. But this room is filled
49:19
with childcare, supporters and advocates.
49:21
And I am just inspired
49:23
in all to be in all of you guys' presence.
49:25
But yeah,
49:27
you guys are doing amazing work and
49:30
you're organizing. I think Clarissa, when you talk
49:32
about organizing, it has
49:34
to start from the ground up, right? Trickle
49:36
down, that didn't work. We all learned that, right?
49:38
Bush taught us that didn't work. But
49:41
we need to really be organizing from the ground
49:44
up. And I think about who's supporting
49:46
that organizing, right? Whether
49:48
it's unions, are unions gonna, when
49:51
I say support, I mean give money to, okay? Because
49:53
it takes money to do it. Is it gonna
49:55
be our philanthropy? Who is it gonna be, right?
49:58
So we can really move toward that. ultimate
50:00
goal of childcare being a public
50:02
good that's not means tested.
50:05
Like, you spoke about it so beautifully, Clarissa,
50:08
that it's something that you just
50:10
get. It's something for everyone. And
50:13
you don't have to quantify
50:14
or qualify yourself
50:16
or your children for it. And it's not about an
50:18
economy. When we think about, like I said, the history of this country,
50:21
it's not about let's put black and brown women to
50:23
work so everybody else can go to work. It's
50:27
about
50:28
our children and investing in our children
50:30
because
50:30
our children are our future and they're
50:32
the foundation of this country. And so I
50:35
just want to thank you for everything
50:37
that all of you guys do and for speaking about it.
50:40
Yeah, we've asked a lot of people, where
50:42
is the money? My
50:45
Isha's face is like, I don't know. I haven't
50:48
seen any. But we have been
50:50
in places where the percentage
50:52
of a sales tax has gone to fund some
50:54
incredible early education. Is that
50:56
something to build on or what's the reaction
50:59
from people when you talk about that?
51:01
You know, we ran one of our first tax
51:03
initiatives. And I will say what
51:06
we forgot to do when we did that one, our
51:08
first run was educate the
51:10
educators who were going to benefit from it. I
51:13
know we had many forums where
51:15
we brought folks together to really understand and
51:17
unpack it. What does it mean for
51:19
our bottom line? And I've always said things like this, you
51:21
can pay now or you could pay later. So do
51:23
you want to pay, and I'm just making up a number,
51:26
you know, $20,000 per child, per
51:29
year, and give them all these rich
51:31
experiences that Clarissa and Myesha talked
51:33
about? Or would you rather pay
51:35
upwards $90,000 a year to incarcerate someone? Because
51:40
we didn't pour in all the love, all the support,
51:42
all the resources. You're going to pay. So
51:44
do you want to pay now and put your down
51:47
payment and make those investments? Or
51:49
do you want to pay later and it looks like
51:51
incarceration? And I think I
51:53
just want to say there's multiple reasons why
51:55
incarceration happens in our communities.
51:58
Because I think we have a tendency to... to look for a silver
52:00
bullet. Like if we all have preschool, you know,
52:03
we will stay out of incarceration. And
52:06
I know you know
52:06
that. Yes, I do. But I
52:08
also want to say that systemic readiness,
52:11
systems being ready and actually
52:13
being coordinated, communicating
52:15
with each other is also really important. So we can dump
52:18
a bunch of money into a system.
52:20
You said a system that's broken. I
52:23
think the system is not broken. I think
52:25
it's designed for failure and it's working
52:27
exactly the way it should. Exactly. So
52:29
we can keep pumping a bunch of money. And I
52:32
do it.
52:32
I'm responsible for pumping a bunch
52:34
of money and to figure out
52:36
something for families. But if we
52:38
continue to not look
52:41
at how public systems function
52:44
for the public good, how agencies
52:47
are set up to deliver
52:49
services in the most equitable way, and
52:52
how administrators are people
52:55
who are actually community centered. And
52:58
we have infrastructure to really hold
53:01
systems. You know, I think that's also a really
53:03
big part of it. So we could have a billion dollars today and
53:05
we'd all take it. And that would be great. But
53:08
I think we would be doing ourselves
53:10
a disservice to not look at how systems operate.
53:12
Yeah, no, I love that. Thank you. And I love learning
53:15
from people like you that we do say
53:17
the system is broken. That narrative is out there.
53:19
That has been in many a headline. And
53:22
your point is the system
53:24
was designed
53:24
in a very flawed
53:27
way. Right? OK, anybody
53:29
have a story or a question that they would
53:31
like to ask? And it can be very
53:33
Oakland centered. It can be a big question.
53:36
Jennifer Cowang. I am with
53:38
the city of Oakland. I am a systems person,
53:41
but also a community-centered person, as
53:44
our friends know. And I am the
53:46
Children's Initiative Accountability Officer,
53:48
so a local tax measure that's supporting early
53:50
care and education and college access supports.
53:54
One of my questions is the ordinance
53:56
requires community engagement.
53:59
We know how difficult. it is to get that community
54:01
engagement in the different communities and
54:03
everybody wants a piece of the pie and we want
54:05
to do the good work. And so
54:07
I'm always looking for different ways to
54:09
engage community. There is the, you know, pay
54:12
people for their time and their money, but like, what
54:14
are other ways that you think, particularly
54:17
with this initiative in the city of Oakland,
54:19
that we engage folks and keep the
54:22
initiative can evolve over
54:24
five years. And so getting that community
54:26
input, so we're meeting community needs, not
54:29
just from advocates,
54:29
but from actual community is
54:32
important. So thoughts and ideas.
54:34
I would say it's about being present.
54:38
So for me as a parent, I
54:41
don't want to go to any more Zoom meetings
54:43
ever again. And if it's, if
54:45
it's a like, here's something, a resource, tell
54:48
your child this, I'm skipping the text message
54:50
because I don't, I don't care anymore. If
54:52
it's not in person, not, I want to do
54:54
it.
54:55
It's about being present every day. Like how
54:57
can we be present? I
55:01
know that we, I send messages on, on parents square two families
55:03
and they don't see him. Where is the paper? Can
55:06
we print it on some paper? Oh my gosh, parent square. Don't
55:10
laugh at parent square. It's
55:12
okay sometimes. But
55:14
I feel like for me, like even when
55:16
a daughter, like don't send me any more messages. Let's
55:18
be in person.
55:19
Let's find a, be at a park, make it an event
55:22
where people are excited to come. And
55:24
then every community, like my
55:27
school is the Royal. How
55:29
many times have I seen like, it's the bad
55:32
neighborhood. I'm like, and I'm like, I go to, I work
55:34
here. It's not that bad. What
55:36
are you talking about? These are people. My
55:38
kids walk through here every day.
55:40
And it's that part where we don't step
55:42
into spaces where we don't feel, where people
55:45
feel uncomfortable. We need
55:47
to get back to
55:48
real time, real
55:50
people, real connections. And
55:53
that's not happening when we're online. Right. We
55:56
can't lock arms if we're not together. But also
55:58
community engagement
55:59
for what? Right? I'm
56:02
not even trying to be funny. I mean community engagement, I mean,
56:04
and I'm not, it's not even totally
56:06
directed to you, but it's to the field.
56:09
Parent community engagement to what
56:11
end, right? Community
56:14
engagement for decision making that's
56:16
going to directly impact their lives and the people can
56:19
see the result of. You
56:22
know, folks are working two, three jobs and really
56:24
busy and we want
56:25
to make sure that they're, you know, it's
56:27
worth it for folks to show up even if in person.
56:30
So when decisions are made for people,
56:33
you know, but we just want their input, but they're
56:35
ultimately not, we want to make sure that there's
56:38
real stake for people to show up. I think
56:40
you'll start seeing a lot of people show up
56:42
when there's real power that they can bring
56:44
to the situation.
56:46
I just wanted to say if you're having in-person
56:48
things, they should absolutely be accessible for everyone
56:50
to come, whether that's transportation,
56:53
whether that's different abilities, because it's very
56:55
hard. Having things be online currently
56:57
has been very good for certain communities
57:00
and individuals and families because that
57:02
is a way that they can contribute and participate because they
57:04
weren't able to be there in person. So
57:07
just being mindful of like, if we're going
57:09
to go to in-person, let's make sure
57:11
that we can include everyone that's there, that
57:13
the spaces are accessible for
57:16
every type
57:16
of ability and that people actually have
57:18
means of transportation to get there because it's
57:21
hard. I was thinking about
57:23
that question too, and I was thinking co-constructing.
57:26
I've seen where the engagement is the highest
57:29
is when from the inception that the
57:31
communities engage in the co-designing of it,
57:33
and that's where I've seen the highest, which is
57:35
hard, but once you can get even
57:38
just two or three sometime, it has
57:40
the ripple effect, but it's the co-constructing
57:44
from the start and they are, and the other
57:46
part that's being successful is when they have a leadership
57:49
role in it, that they're activating
57:51
around something and they
57:52
have like, you're charged to go do
57:54
this, and then they go, and
57:56
we come back and we meet, and that's when I've seen...
57:59
here in Oakland where it's been the most
58:02
powerful and the strongest, but
58:04
you also need to go to your brokers, your community
58:06
brokers, to help you get
58:08
to them, to the other folks in the community.
58:11
And I've had to learn that the hard way.
58:13
I'm amazed at the
58:16
shift that I've had from feeling
58:19
not great about what's happening. And then I come speak
58:22
to people like you who are
58:24
so engaged that I end up thinking there's
58:27
no way this won't change. This will change. I
58:29
feel like it's the fight of one
58:31
of the fights of
58:33
my generation, the generation before me,
58:36
my mother's generation, the generations after me,
58:38
this is our, it can't be this
58:40
way. It's not sustainable. It's not sustainable.
58:42
You know, Gloria, before we end, I want to say at least here
58:44
in California historically, just
58:47
even yesterday and today, both the Senate
58:50
and the Assembly, both houses agreed
58:52
on $1.2 billion for childcare. And
59:00
it's because of folks in this room.
59:02
It's because of folks like Clarissa and
59:05
Myisha going to the Capitol,
59:07
doing the work
59:08
here in our own backyard in Oakland, who
59:11
made the difference. You know, we're just waiting for the
59:13
governor to sign on. We're also trying to make sure
59:15
that $1.2 billion is ongoing
59:17
money. So that's still another battle
59:19
that they want to give stipends. I was like, honey, no
59:22
one can budget with a stipend. If you
59:24
give us a, you know, it's not that we're not happy
59:26
when we get a $15,000 stipend or
59:29
however it comes out, but it's so
59:31
temporary, you can't do anything. So now we're trying to get
59:33
Governor Newsom, you know, our
59:36
governor of California, you know, we other
59:38
governors are
59:38
banning books. We
59:40
want children to be able to read. And we are the adults who
59:42
support that and facilitate as parents
59:45
and as caregivers and as early educators.
59:48
So we just need him to sign it
59:50
by tomorrow. Don't call out
59:52
DeSantis and not fund childcare.
59:55
All right. That's hard. That
59:59
is real money. That is real
1:00:01
money. I want to say a big thank you to LaToya
1:00:03
and our partners at Neighborhood Villages. I
1:00:06
want to say a big thank you to Oakland Starting
1:00:08
Smart and Strong. I also want to thank
1:00:10
the David and Lucille Packard Foundation
1:00:13
and KDOL TV for
1:00:15
their incredible partnership and support of
1:00:17
this event. Of course, a big thank
1:00:19
you to our panelists, Clarissa Douthard. She
1:00:22
is the Executive Director of Parent Voices Oakland.
1:00:25
Also a big thank you to LaWanda Wesley,
1:00:27
the Director of Government Relations of Early Learning
1:00:29
at the Child Care Resource Center, and
1:00:32
also Maisha Jones. She
1:00:34
is a preschool educator as well as
1:00:36
the parent of two beautiful children. Thank
1:00:39
you all for joining us.
1:00:43
Applause
1:00:56
Our
1:01:12
executive producers are Stephanie Whittles-Wax
1:01:15
and Jessica Cordova-Cramer, along
1:01:17
with me, Gloria Riviera. If
1:01:20
you like the show and you believe what we are doing
1:01:22
is important, please help others find
1:01:24
us by leaving us
1:01:26
a rating and writing us a review, and most
1:01:28
importantly, by telling your friends.
1:01:31
Follow No One Is Coming To Save Us wherever
1:01:33
you get your podcasts or listen ad-free
1:01:35
on Amazon Music with your Prime membership.
1:01:38
Thanks for listening, and we'll be back next
1:01:40
week. Until then, hang in there.
1:01:43
You can do this.
1:01:49
capitals
1:02:00
and in the Oval Office, that there's always more
1:02:02
to a story under the surface. On my show,
1:02:05
we try to bring you inside all of it, breaking
1:02:07
down the things that matter and visiting with some of the
1:02:09
most fascinating people in the news today. Search
1:02:12
for Inside with Jen Psaki wherever you're listening
1:02:14
and follow.
1:02:15
Does
1:02:17
keeping up with the news cycle feel like a daunting task?
1:02:20
Join me, V-Spear, on V-Interesting
1:02:22
from Lemonade Media, with fascinating
1:02:25
guests like Mercury Stardust, Taylor
1:02:27
Lorenz, and Hank Green. We'll break
1:02:30
down what you need to know to be the most
1:02:32
interesting person in any room. We'll
1:02:34
find the stories that give us a reason for optimism
1:02:37
among all the doom-scrolling headlines.
1:02:40
I want us to be smart together.
1:02:42
V-Interesting has new episodes out every
1:02:45
Friday on Amazon Music, Apple,
1:02:47
Spotify, or wherever you get your
1:02:49
podcasts.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More