Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hi everyone, welcome
0:02
to this week's episode of
0:04
No Such Thing as a
0:06
Fish when we were joined
0:08
by the incredible mathematician, youtuber,
0:11
science communicator, all round smart
0:13
guy Matt Parker. Now
0:15
a lot of you will know a lot of
0:17
Matt's work, he's written a lot of books, things
0:20
to make him do in the 4th dimensions, one
0:22
of his humble pie was an absolutely massive book
0:25
for him. He has
0:27
a new book out, it is
0:29
called Love Triangle, the life changing
0:31
magic of trigonometry. I
0:33
haven't read it yet but I
0:35
can tell you having read his
0:37
other books it is going to
0:39
be absolutely incredible and you can
0:41
pre-order it right now by going
0:43
to mathsgear.co.uk, that's
0:48
m-a-t-h-s-g-e-a-r.co.uk, don't
0:50
forget that S if you're in America. And
0:53
you can pre-order a signed copy with
0:55
a limited edition dust jacket, of course
0:58
it will be available in all of
1:00
the local bookshops and probably in those
1:02
big online book retailers as
1:04
well. A few other things about
1:06
Matt, he is in a podcast
1:08
called A Problem Squared with Beck
1:11
Hill who you might remember from
1:13
a few months ago, she came
1:15
on the podcast and talked about
1:17
Cabbage Patch Kids, Beck and Matt
1:19
have this incredible podcast, it's definitely
1:22
worth listening to and there is
1:24
also a podcast of unnecessary detail
1:26
that Matt does with two other
1:28
ex-fish alumni, Steve Mould and
1:31
Helen Arney from the Festival of
1:33
the Spoken Nerd. Anyway,
1:35
I'm sure you're going to love this week's show, don't forget
1:37
at the end of it go
1:39
to mathsgear.co.uk to pre-order Matt's new
1:41
book Love Triangle but for
1:44
now all that's left to say is on with
1:46
the podcast. Hello
2:05
and welcome to another episode of No
2:07
Such Thing as a Fish, a weekly
2:09
podcast coming to you from the QI
2:11
offices in Hobern. My name is Dan
2:13
Schreiber, I am sitting here with Anna
2:15
Tyshinsky, James Harkin and Matt Parker and
2:17
once again we have gathered around the
2:19
microphones with our four favorite facts from
2:21
the last seven days and in no
2:23
particular order here we go. Starting
2:26
with fact number one, that is Matt,
2:29
the first computer to ever discover
2:31
a shape starred in
2:33
the 1980s sitcom, well starred, was
2:36
in an episode of the 1980s sitcom Laverne
2:40
and Shirley. There
2:42
are a couple
2:44
of concepts in there I'm not familiar with. I like
2:46
to pack a lot of concepts into a centre. Yeah.
2:49
Okay so computer, shape, Laverne or
2:51
Shirley? Can we talk about
2:53
how you discover a shape? Great, yeah.
2:55
That feels like a big question, I
2:57
also don't know what Laverne or Shirley
2:59
you'd recommend. I'm unfamiliar
3:02
with their non-computer based episodes. I
3:05
used to watch it as a kid. Really? Yeah,
3:07
yeah. And it's good, yeah. I mean it was
3:09
a spin off from Happy Days. Yeah, it was
3:11
Gary Marshall who was the creator of it, he
3:14
was the Happy Days guy. Yeah, yeah. Apparently
3:16
it was a lot of, sorry we're in Laverne
3:18
and Shirley territory now, that was in the main
3:20
part of my, apparently they were like really kind
3:22
of like, you know they had a lot of
3:24
fights on set and Happy Days, the cast, they
3:26
used to put glass to the walls to hear
3:28
the arguments that were going on on the other
3:30
side, yeah, all that stuff. Unhappy Days. Yeah. But
3:34
it was early 80s I think Laverne and
3:37
Shirley, so that's quite early
3:39
for, no it's not that early for
3:41
computers is it? It was a 1980
3:43
episode and the same computer
3:45
had previously starred in The
3:48
Land of the Giants in 1969. Wow.
3:50
Oh god it didn't get worked for a while then.
3:53
No, it went out for a while. So
3:55
it was in 60s like sci-fi and
3:57
being in the 1986. was
4:00
actually like the final bit of its
4:02
Hollywood career. Yeah, it's pretty much,
4:04
you've as a result of this fact, and we
4:06
will get to the new shape, sorry Anna, for
4:09
knocking out of this, but this website that
4:12
you sent- Starring the computer. Starring
4:14
the computer is phenomenal. It's the IMDB
4:17
of computers and movies that they have
4:19
appeared in, and it's run by
4:21
this one guy who, he has this amazing
4:23
Twitter account where he just constantly puts up
4:25
photos from movies he's watching going, what's this?
4:27
Does anyone know, and people go
4:29
hunting to try and track down the exact
4:31
computer that's in the movie? What
4:34
was this computer? The Burroughs 220. Okay,
4:37
once you've seen it in Laverne and Shirley, do
4:39
you think people then go, well I
4:41
wanna watch The Land of the Giants now, and
4:43
I wanna watch- Watch it in higher back catalogs.
4:45
Yeah, yeah, like you might be with an actor.
4:47
Well what's good about this computer? The Burroughs 220
4:49
really looks like a computer. Like
4:51
if you're thinking 60s computers, like
4:53
with tapes spinning and lights flashing,
4:56
it's like your classic retro computer
4:58
look. Okay, I read
5:00
that a similar one, which was the
5:03
B205, Oh yes.
5:05
Was the Bat Computer in Batman. Yeah,
5:08
absolutely. Really? Cause I wondered
5:10
if there were ever computers that played other
5:12
computers, and I guess that's an example. Like a
5:15
Mac playing a Dell or something. Yeah, yeah.
5:18
I wanted to find out more about the
5:20
Bat Computer. Unfortunately, one of the most popular
5:22
internet firms in Lagos is called Bat Computers.
5:24
How many are there, and that's all you
5:26
get? I did find a few things about
5:28
the Bat Computer, and by the way, the
5:30
Burroughs 205 absolutely smashes the hell out of
5:32
the 220. It does, it had way
5:35
better casting. Yeah, it's in the top
5:37
10 most appeared in movies computers in
5:39
the world. Same family of computers for
5:41
the record. One big Burroughs family. So
5:43
here we go. The dynasty, you might
5:46
say. Exactly. What you get with the
5:48
Bat Computer, the Burroughs 205, is
5:50
you get the Bat Correction signal, which alerts Batman
5:52
when he has said something incorrect. You have the
5:54
Bat Computer input slot, which I remember. Wait a
5:57
minute, so they invented the QI Klaxon. You know,
5:59
like. Exactly, yeah. There's the input slot where
6:01
it's just it's kind of like where you it's
6:03
like a mail slot where you put your post
6:05
in But it's like here's an entire book and
6:08
you just shove the book in and it computes
6:10
the whole book really quickly Wow accelerated
6:12
concentration switch that's sort of giving it more
6:14
computing power in order to deal with a
6:17
problem and Special-escape arch
6:19
criminal bat locator Which
6:22
is a preset of the computer basically
6:24
but specifically for like the Joker and
6:26
Okay, that's clever. I find my phone
6:29
app, but like find my villain Exactly.
6:31
Yeah, and the bat keyboard. That's an
6:34
actual thing It is a keyboard which
6:36
only has I think five or six
6:38
or seven keys on it and
6:40
you can make any Letter by playing
6:42
a chord. Do you know these man like little
6:44
keyboards? So you don't need 26 keys
6:47
to play all the other Strog a fruit would
6:49
use I think so Yeah But it was useful
6:52
Like disabled people who you know only had one
6:54
hand or something like that and you could type
6:56
letters quickly by knowing that if you want To
6:58
do an a you might press the first one
7:00
the third one and the fourth one Oh,
7:02
yeah, because there's 30 well if you include
7:04
pressing nothing 32 options so that you've
7:06
got enough for the whole alphabet How
7:08
many five with five five five keys will give
7:10
you 32 options? Including
7:13
the null press which is not using
7:15
the keyboard 31
7:17
distinct presses and then if you include your nose now
7:20
you can do up around lower case Keyboard
7:23
I removed all the keys apart from the zero and the
7:26
one on the keyboard so I can
7:28
type in binary so I could included
7:30
the backspace I'm not a monster I Can't
7:34
enter so I could type out I tried doing
7:36
it on stage I'll type people's names in binary
7:38
then hit enter really it'll come up and take
7:41
Wow I was looking at that website
7:44
for all the examples of this b2o5
7:46
which is what the bats Computers.
7:48
Oh, yeah, and one just caught my
7:50
eye which was sex kittens go to
7:53
college The movie
7:55
why but this is an amazing movie because
7:58
it didn't just have this computer
8:00
in it, the B205. It also
8:02
had a robot called Electro in
8:04
it and Electro was an
8:06
exhibit of the 1939 World's Fair.
8:09
It was like a huge seven foot tall robot.
8:11
It could walk by voice command. So if
8:13
you told it to walk, it could walk. It could
8:15
speak 700 words using a record player.
8:18
It could smoke cigarettes, blow up balloons and
8:21
move its hands and arms. All
8:24
the parts of the shurington. Wow.
8:26
So this was like a really famous robot in the
8:28
World's Fair in 1939. And then by, you
8:32
know, the 1960s, it was in Sex Good and Go
8:34
to College. That's so good. What a career decline and
8:36
it was a bit depressing for that poor robot. I
8:38
just love it. I love all the movie. Like I
8:40
didn't read that movie. Like there are so many like
8:43
you get big ones like Austin Powers, The Spy Who
8:45
Shagged Me. It appears in that. But then you also
8:47
got Dr. Goldfoot and the bikini machine.
8:52
And the Burrows, by the way, it was
8:54
a company. Yeah. And it was started by
8:56
William Seaward Burrows, who was a grandfather of
8:58
William S Burrows. Really? The three generations. Yeah.
9:01
And he invented, at least this is, I'm
9:03
sure there are other claims to it, but
9:05
he invented and filed the patent for the
9:07
first calculator. You wouldn't imagine that spawning
9:09
William Burrows. Not really. Two
9:11
generations later, with like chain smoking,
9:13
romantic, wife shooting, wife shooting. He likes
9:15
to put that further down and see
9:18
if he can really talk about the
9:20
fact that he killed his wife. Yeah.
9:22
Well, apparently he said that he was
9:24
trying to do a William Tell thing.
9:26
Yeah. And shoot an apple off her
9:28
head and accidentally shot her. Yeah. I'm
9:30
not sure we all buy that. But
9:32
apparently that will get you off in
9:34
court because you didn't go to jail.
9:36
Yeah. Everything was fine. Yeah. I believe
9:38
an apple nearby at the scene of
9:40
the crime. Yeah. That's what I was
9:42
aiming for. Another cool pop culture computer
9:44
crossover I came across. Did
9:46
you guys know that Steve Jobs
9:49
is Homer Simpson's uncle? Oh,
9:53
yes. Yes. It's so
9:55
weird. The fact that
9:58
it's so bizarre. Steve Jobs'
10:00
dad is a guy called Abdul-Fattajan Dali.
10:02
Steve Jobs was put up for
10:04
adoption by this guy because his
10:06
partner's family disapproved of the marriage
10:09
because he was Syrian Muslim. So
10:11
Steve Jobs went up for adoption, never met his father
10:13
actually. This guy, Abdul-Fattajan Dali,
10:15
had another kid, also who
10:17
ended up estranged from him. She's
10:19
called Mona Simpson. And
10:21
she married a guy weirdly called Richard
10:23
Apple. So Steve Jobs' brother-in-law
10:25
is called Apple. She
10:29
married a guy called Richard Apple, who was a ricer
10:31
on The Simpsons, and he came up with
10:33
a character of Mona Simpson, Homer's mum, named
10:36
after his partner, Mona Simpson.
10:39
So Steve Jobs' sister is Mona
10:41
Simpson, Homer Simpson's mum. Okay.
10:43
Yeah. I followed that, but maybe because I knew
10:46
it beforehand, I'm not sure if that worked, because
10:48
we got too confused, like imagining a very
10:51
complicated family tree. Yeah, I'm thinking like the
10:53
Habsburgs, you know that family tree where they're
10:55
all kind of insurrections. Yeah, it is like
10:57
that. And also if that like branched onto fiction
10:59
for one bit of it, it's a little bit
11:02
like Icelandic sagas, where you're like, is this
11:04
true or is it not? So shapes, you
11:06
were... How does the computer invent
11:08
a shape? Well,
11:10
this is the problem. So everyone, and
11:12
this is a perfect example of
11:14
what happened in computing. Everyone loves
11:16
the B205, and
11:18
all these other fancy computers. The
11:21
B220 was like a vacuum tube
11:24
miscalculation, because they barely made any, no
11:26
one really bought them. Transistors had come
11:29
along and blown these old ones out
11:31
of the water. So they were pretty much a forgotten
11:33
computer until I was reading a old
11:36
maths paper from 1962. And
11:39
it was someone called Donald Grace, who
11:41
was trying to find the biggest shape. Now,
11:46
you're gonna need some constraints
11:48
on that. Otherwise,
11:50
the biggest shape is whatever shape the
11:53
universe is. But they
11:55
were trying to work out the biggest shape that you
11:58
could fit in like a unit sphere. Okay, so... Biggest
12:00
shape you can fit in a ball. And you
12:02
can imagine it the size of the universe if you
12:04
want. No one's stopping you. Or
12:06
you can imagine it at a nice
12:08
manageable basketball-esque size. And
12:10
to make it a bit more manageable again, they would
12:12
do it for the number of vertices, the number of
12:15
corners a shape has. And
12:17
Donald specifically was curious what's the biggest
12:19
shape with eight vertices on
12:21
it. Which some people might
12:23
think, we just work out how to put eight
12:26
points on a sphere as far apart as possible
12:28
and join them all up to make a cube.
12:31
And it doesn't work. Ah. That is the
12:33
best way to position your points on a sphere.
12:36
And that's actually quite difficult to do. That's a whole other...
12:38
No one has a good systematic way to
12:41
arrange dots on a sphere. That's
12:44
so interesting. What in that regular way that
12:46
makes a cube? Despite all the funding from Big
12:48
Golf. What
12:52
is the biggest golf? The five of
12:54
them. Yeah, there's no...
12:57
It's called the Thompson problem. There's no... Because it
12:59
came out of... Is it named after golf Alexei
13:01
Thompson? It's not. Oh, right, OK. It
13:05
came out of Thompson looking at
13:08
electrons in an atom to work out how they'd be
13:10
spaced. And they're like, oh, well, it's easy. They just
13:12
spaced such that they've got as close as
13:14
possible to the same distance between them. And they're like, we
13:16
just worked it. Oh, that's really hard to work out. And
13:19
it doesn't even solve this other problem. So we
13:22
were... Mathedge was a bit of a dead
13:24
end. And Donald Grace was studying at Stanford,
13:27
studying what would later be called computer science. And
13:29
they were like, you know what? I'll just see if
13:31
I can get a computer to solve this problem. Because
13:34
if I program a computer to start with eight
13:36
points on a sphere and
13:38
work out the shape that they define, and then jiggle them
13:40
all around a bit and see which
13:42
direction of jiggling increases the volume by
13:44
the most, and then just
13:46
do that more times than a human ever
13:48
could, you'll eventually evolve your way into the
13:51
biggest possible shape. Wow.
13:53
Yeah, OK. And so I read the paper
13:55
and I wasn't kind of aware of that at
13:57
the time. I was just looking in the color shapes. goes
14:00
read into the paper and there's a line
14:02
that said, oh we ran this on a
14:04
Burroughs 220 computer system. I was
14:06
like, that's weird, like that's commonplace in modern math
14:08
research. But I was looking at this going, that's
14:11
what, a computer already? And the paper
14:13
was submitted in August 1962. I'm
14:17
like, oh, they didn't have access to a computer. And
14:20
it turns out they did have a Burroughs 220 at
14:22
Stanford. They got it in 1960. So
14:25
Donald has since passed away, spoke
14:27
to his kids, and they're like, oh, we used to volunteer
14:29
and go in at night. He would
14:31
take the night shift from the computer lab. That meant
14:34
he could run his code on
14:36
the computer. Because otherwise, we're not going to waste
14:38
their computer time for someone finding the biggest shape.
14:40
Yeah, exactly. And he found it.
14:42
He found the biggest shape. And he published it. And he's like,
14:44
I found this thing. And do you have
14:46
any idea, can we explain what the shape is or is
14:49
it tough? It looks a
14:51
little bit like a dice from D&D.
14:55
It's made entirely out of triangles. It's
14:59
not like an acoustahedron, like a D20 or like a D8. That's
15:03
nice and neat because they're platonic solids. It's
15:05
somewhere in the middle. So there's still a
15:07
lot of triangles put together. And it looks
15:10
quite regular. But it's not exactly tidy because
15:12
that's an awkward number of vertices. So you
15:14
couldn't roll it as a physical die. It
15:16
would be slightly unfair. And
15:19
it's massive. I mean, it's going to be difficult, isn't it? Heavy. Well,
15:21
it's nice. Our universe. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
15:23
Yeah. Yeah. Can
15:26
we talk about golf? Yeah, sure.
15:28
Yeah. Oh, I made a
15:30
classic error there. Let
15:32
me know. No, you can't
15:34
say no. This is interesting. So I learned
15:36
this from researching for this. I looked at
15:38
my golf balls. And there's loads of dimples
15:40
on them. All the dimples
15:42
are hexagons. Or are
15:45
they all hexagons, Matt? Because it's a
15:47
copy. They can't be, right? And
15:49
so I found out that every golf ball
15:52
has 12 pentagons on it. It's
15:54
amazing. If you get one. That was Anna, by the way.
15:58
True. I can be. Thank you. Bye-bye. I was
16:00
a weird Star Wars creature that's just suddenly
16:02
came off that. We went to Epcot, Disney
16:04
World, and I made everyone I was with
16:06
stop so we could look at the massive
16:08
Epcot sphere, which is a giant golf ball,
16:10
I guess. I'm like, in there somewhere I
16:13
said are 12 Pentagon's. Oh my God. And
16:15
I'm going to try and find something. But
16:17
the interesting thing is, this is the least
16:19
interesting part of it, now I think
16:21
this has improved my golf game because what I
16:23
do is when I put the ball on the
16:26
tee, I line up one of the Pentagon's to
16:28
where I want to hit and it helps me
16:30
concentrate that that's the part of the ball that I
16:32
want to hit. Oh, that's great. Yeah.
16:35
That's like with bowling, I use the triangle in the middle.
16:37
Well, you're supposed to. That's what they're there for. I don't
16:39
think anyone does though, but I do. I do and it
16:41
works. So yeah, I mean, that's what that's there
16:43
for. That's quite
16:46
annoying for the golfer behind you who has to wait for
16:48
you to just constantly hang on. I know
16:50
they're alone here. Finally, it's Pentagon. Well, that's amazing,
16:52
isn't it? Yeah, that's amazing. Yeah,
16:54
that's incredible. Yeah, that's because you
16:56
can't put hexagons on a sphere.
16:59
You can't. And I've gotten very
17:01
upset because the UK street signs for
17:03
a football stadium, the picture of a football and
17:06
they've forgotten the Pentagon's. It's
17:08
all hexagons, which is mathematically
17:10
impossible. So why it can't be
17:12
if they made the sign work. Well, they just
17:14
drawn a hexagon kind of slightly distorted grid and
17:16
then cut out a circle of it and put
17:18
on the sign. And we never see the other
17:20
side. Yeah, of course. Yeah. So
17:23
I had I ran a big petition. Right.
17:25
I got 20,000 signatures on a parliamentary
17:27
petition. Yeah. So the government has to
17:30
write to you at that point to say what they're going to
17:32
do about this important issue you've raised. Yeah. And
17:34
they wrote to me to say they're not going to change
17:36
the street signs to be correct. They're like, no, they
17:39
said that the correct geometry would be so similar
17:41
to the current signs. There's no point
17:43
changing it. And they also said the correct geometry would
17:45
be so distracting. It might
17:47
increase the likelihood of accidents. Really?
17:51
Absolutely bullshit. Like a lane. We've
17:54
got an election coming up. Thank you. I
17:56
Think if any party decides to go for that,
17:58
we're going to chase it. Say pro football's
18:00
on roadsides the I got my eye to
18:03
huge majority of the an athlete now I
18:05
agree although I did some now talks. Owner
18:07
makes custom. For. Balls or yeah
18:09
symbols and gotten to make me a
18:11
bowl were from one specific angle. It
18:13
looks like secret the street side nice
18:16
so I'm so true I someone who
18:18
runs a company called twelve Pentagon's and
18:20
is jumping all designed this ball were
18:22
from the front and the back looks
18:24
like a street sign but like the
18:27
a Quasar around the bit is a
18:29
nightmare of. Weird shapes, prohibitive. Patch the
18:31
John a Governor together to make it work.
18:33
In general rallies suffer and you have. I
18:35
got off. I took it up to Liverpool
18:38
Football Club now as yeah I got their
18:40
sports analytics seem to have get around with
18:42
it out are not allowed to play. They
18:44
like to eat. Youth has to come on
18:46
a day where we can guarantee they will
18:48
be no players and right in the cellar.
18:50
Played with that all sorts of his entire.
18:54
Play with these are the bulls enclosure. This is
18:56
a woman's I'm not to be. great to see
18:58
a lower league team like the in the Afoul.
19:00
Of training with that bold yeah, knowing the
19:02
game with Apple than playing a premier league
19:04
team and just seeing they are testing media
19:06
with a bomb as the guys at some
19:09
math might seem, a listening device gulf isn't
19:11
how Be much less a must have Any
19:13
this an infinite ssssss. A
19:20
podcast Sup the podcast everyone. This
19:22
week's episode of Fish is sponsored
19:25
by Square Space. Absolutely, Square Space
19:27
is that place to go If
19:29
you want to set up your
19:32
own website, stand you and I
19:34
have to be talking off might
19:36
about How Dahlia the world's premier
19:38
Loch Ness Monster Trucks. Are
19:43
the website saw the all those very sensible
19:45
Melville people he believes a lot this month
19:48
that could come and see or evidence. Will
19:50
Square Space is the place to go to
19:52
do that. That's right if you use where
19:54
it's base. not only can you set up
19:56
an amazing website where you can use all
19:58
very different templates and customize. it to yourself
20:01
but you can sell custom merch like
20:03
the Dan Nessie mug or the Dan
20:05
Nessie plushy toy. You can
20:07
also have an online store that will sell
20:09
it all and ship it out to you
20:12
so all my merch can make it right
20:14
to your front door. There's an asset library
20:16
where you can upload any of the photos
20:18
that you want to use to Photoshop to
20:20
make it look as if you have created
20:22
your own Nessie. But
20:25
no matter what the reason is for your
20:27
website, Squarespace is definitely the place to go
20:30
and if this speaks to you
20:32
then go now to squarespace.com for
20:34
a free trial and when you're
20:37
ready to launch if you go
20:39
to squarespace.com/fish you will save 10%
20:41
off your first purchase of
20:43
a website or domain. That's
20:46
right so head to squarespace.com/fish save 10%
20:48
off your first purchase of a website
20:50
or domain by simply using the code
20:53
FISH. Do it now. Okay
20:55
on with the podcast. On with
20:58
the show. Okay
21:04
it is time for fact number two that
21:06
is James. Okay my fact this week is
21:08
that the woman who invented the trolley problem
21:10
was the daughter of a man who made
21:12
railway tracks for a living. Amazing.
21:15
And the trolley problem is the issue where you're
21:17
in a supermarket and one of the wheels gets
21:19
stuck and you can't push in a straight line.
21:22
No it's when your coin won't fit into the
21:24
slot to release it from the big bunch of
21:26
trolleys and yeah I feel like I have to
21:28
give a little bit more information about the trolley
21:30
problem. So it's like a philosophical idea that
21:32
you've got a trolley or like a trolley
21:34
car in America I guess it is and
21:36
it's going down some tracks and
21:39
it's gonna kill five people who are working on the
21:41
tracks or who are tied to the tracks depending on
21:43
the version. But you have a lever
21:45
and you can pull the lever and the trolley can
21:47
go in the other direction and it will kill only
21:49
one person. Do you pull the lever
21:52
to kill that one person or do
21:54
you just do nothing and let the five
21:56
people die and not everyone agrees with what's
21:58
the correct answer. It's always interesting. Yeah,
22:00
and that was so that was originally called
22:02
the tram problem, which was created by Philip
22:04
of but she married a guy
22:06
called foot Which feels quite rebellious if your dad
22:09
makes railroad tracks That's
22:11
true. And she is known as the grand
22:13
dam of philosophy Yeah, and her
22:15
mother was Esther Cleveland who was the
22:18
first president's child to be born in
22:20
the White House The
22:22
daughter of Grover Cleveland and her
22:24
father was William Sidney Bents boss
22:26
and Kwe who managed
22:28
skinning Grove steel works in Yorkshire
22:31
and He made a
22:33
lot of the tracks for the train tracks in
22:35
the north of England And I'm not sure
22:37
it had any bearing on her philosophical works. I
22:40
just like the idea I think it's
22:42
good that she had parents who worked on railroads
22:44
because imagine if her parents were like an accountant
22:46
and a librarian Yeah, like it'd be a very
22:48
different You
22:51
know five people are want to borrow the
22:53
same book. Yeah, one other person needs it
22:55
for their Shelf
22:58
is gonna fall on it's gonna go one
23:00
of two ways There's five people on one side
23:02
you can shove it the other way and
23:04
get one person. I'm thinking yeah I don't think it would
23:06
have caught on as the you know philosophical meme it is
23:08
today But
23:10
Philip a foot was amazing. She's incredible and it's
23:13
amazing that all the connections, you know
23:15
granddaughter of Grover Cleveland came up with this massive
23:18
Philosophical dilemma flat made of Iris Murdoch,
23:20
you know, she's like got so many
23:22
interesting little cultural touch points that I
23:24
just surprised I've never heard of yeah
23:27
I guess they all there seemed to be a coterie of
23:29
very interesting female philosophers round about that time
23:31
Which I suppose is a 30s and
23:33
40s 40s. She got her degree in 42. Got
23:35
it Yeah, so around the 40s
23:38
and yeah, I was Murdoch who I never really
23:40
thought of as a philosopher and that's just my
23:42
ignorance I read just read a couple of our
23:44
off my ducks years ago and It
23:47
makes me feel much more highbrow now having read
23:49
them because really Iris Murdoch books have you guys
23:51
ever read her? No, they're basically about loads of
23:53
people having affairs Well the two that I read
23:55
and I think all the rest of them, but
23:57
once you notice the moral philosopher, there's a huge
24:00
moral undercurrent that you're supposed to think
24:02
about. Um, so the, the trolley problem.
24:04
So started as a tram problem with Philip's foot.
24:07
Actually, let's go around the table. Sorry to interrupt
24:09
that. Yeah, yeah. Let's go around the table. Pull
24:11
on that pole. Great game.
24:14
Would you pull on that pole? Pull. Pull,
24:16
yeah. But what depends on the freight, the whole
24:18
point is you change insignificant
24:20
details. Yeah. Flips what people will say.
24:23
Okay. And that seems to be what happened. So this
24:25
one seems to be relatively straightforward, although
24:27
there's some disagreement, but almost everyone says they
24:29
would pull. But then when you add lots
24:31
of other bits of the scenario, and that
24:33
seems to be done by this other woman
24:35
called Judith Jarvis Thompson, who was the person
24:38
who made the trolley problem famous, came up
24:40
with the term the trolley problem. That's trolleyology
24:42
is this whole kind of area of study
24:45
that's because of her. And yeah, she expanded
24:47
on it with loads of possible examples. I
24:49
think the most famous is probably the bystander
24:51
case where rather than being the driver of
24:54
the trolley, you're now just on a bridge.
24:56
And you see the driver between faint and
24:59
then as a bystander, do you step in and
25:01
then that's like, are you're intervening now? Well,
25:03
it's slightly different. The bridge one slightly different. There's two
25:06
options that Judith came up with. One is that you're
25:08
on the side watching the trolley come and there's a
25:10
lever that you're able to pull. So you now need
25:12
to make the decision. The five people are one people.
25:14
Yeah. The bridge decision is you're standing on the bridge.
25:17
You've suddenly done an interesting calculation where
25:20
you realize that if you chucked what
25:22
they call the fat man, someone big
25:24
enough, someone big enough, not yourself,
25:26
you've like, no, you're too important. But
25:29
there's someone who's big and weighty next to
25:31
you and you somehow have the skill to
25:34
throw them off the bridge and stop it.
25:36
Would you then do that? Yeah, that's that's
25:38
the biggest dilemma because that's taking an innocent
25:40
bystander and well, then there is
25:42
another version where the bystander is not just
25:44
big enough to stop the train, but he's
25:46
also the person who put the five people
25:48
on the track in the first place. So
25:51
he's the villain. So is it
25:53
better to push him if you know he's a bad
25:55
guy? He's the one who set this whole terrible scheme
25:57
up. Did he do it deliberately? Yeah, so much backstory.
26:00
now. Okay, well what are the five people done to him? Oh,
26:02
well, that's a good question. That's why if they're
26:04
workers versus tied to the track, yeah, can change
26:06
it sometimes. Because are they foolish
26:08
workers who didn't follow health and safety? Or are they
26:11
there of no fault of their own? You're
26:13
right, they had it coming, mate. You don't follow health and
26:15
safety. This feels like a game of pool whenever I
26:17
go to a pub and you have to work out
26:19
what rules you're playing before you make the... Two shot
26:22
carry, two shots in the black. What is it? But
26:24
I like the bridge one because a lot of people
26:26
would, in the standard issue version
26:28
of this, pull the lever and
26:30
sacrifice one person to save five. But then
26:33
there's the hospital waiting room problem, which
26:35
is where a perfectly healthy person walks in
26:37
and sits down the hospital waiting room and
26:39
they realize there are five people who all
26:41
desperately need an organ transplant. Yeah. And if they
26:43
got the organ, they'd all live. So if
26:45
we take this one healthy person, we
26:48
can take their organs and five
26:50
people, which in the abstract is equivalent to
26:52
the same problem. But now it's universally no,
26:54
as opposed to almost
26:57
universally yes. Yeah. And I think
26:59
this is what befuddled old Judith Jarvis Thompson
27:01
and she changed her mind on
27:03
her solution. She said you shouldn't push the bystander off.
27:05
And this was years later. So it was in the
27:07
70s that she came up with her... It was a
27:10
bit late by then because she's already killed 500
27:12
people in experiments. She
27:14
suddenly was like, I feel terrible about this.
27:16
It's wrong. But she said, it's
27:18
kind of what you were saying, Matt. She said, actually,
27:20
if you're on the bridge and you've got the option
27:22
to push someone off the bridge to save the five
27:25
people, but sacrificing them, would you
27:27
sacrifice yourself? And if the
27:29
answer is no, then you've got no right to
27:31
sacrifice the other person. And if the answer
27:33
is even yes, you've still got no right
27:35
because their answer might be no. Yeah. Yeah.
27:37
So it kind of makes sense. But is
27:39
it absolutely right, Danny? Well, my
27:41
answer to the trolley problem, if I'm on the trolley,
27:43
I would immediately look out, see if someone's standing near
27:45
a lever, go pull the lever for Christ's sake, if
27:48
you want, or
27:50
yell up to the bridge. Are there anyone who's just having
27:52
a bad time of it? You just kind of want to
27:54
be a hero? You need to be over 16 stones. Judith
28:00
Thompson was really important in the abortion
28:02
debate and around Roe vs. Wade, she wrote probably the
28:04
most famous or maybe the most
28:06
seminal paper about it with another thought experiment
28:09
that she came up with. Which,
28:11
and I guess what's quite fun about thought
28:13
experiments is they're kind of a bit
28:15
funny. Abortion often not a funny subject, but in...
28:17
But Judith made it rather than a way.
28:20
She found the comedy and she
28:23
said in defense of
28:25
abortion, she wrote, imagine this, you wake up
28:27
one morning and you find yourself back to
28:29
back in bed with a famous unconscious
28:32
violinist. Nigel Kennedy,
28:34
say. Not say Nigel Kennedy yet.
28:36
In fact, because he's probably the only
28:38
famous violinist you can name. I'll check Benny.
28:41
All right, you can have Jack Benny. Jack Benny? This is
28:44
a game I was not equipped to play. Vanessa May? Very
28:49
good. All right, it can be any famous unconscious
28:51
violinist. It's not really important which specific violinist it
28:53
is. Go on, Dad. We're playing the famous violinist
28:55
tennis. No, no,
28:57
no. Please. I'll
29:00
go on. I can't think of one. So
29:03
the famous violinist has a fatal kidney. Sorry,
29:05
that's just the smallest violin playing for me
29:08
in my sadness of losing. So
29:11
the violinist has a fatal kidney
29:14
ailment and the Society of Music
29:16
Lovers have therefore kidnapped you and
29:19
rigged up your circulatory system to
29:21
the violinist, and this will save
29:23
the violinist, him or her. And
29:26
you go to the hospital and you're like, someone's
29:28
rigged up my circulatory system with this fucking violinist,
29:30
and I don't want it there. And
29:32
the hostel's like, look, we're super sorry. Wouldn't let
29:34
it happen if we'd known about
29:37
it, but now it's happened. It's kind of letting him die
29:39
if we unplug you. She says, should you
29:41
have to agree to be plugged into him?
29:44
And her argument is no, you shouldn't have to agree.
29:46
And the doctor also says in nine months it will
29:48
all be fine and you'll be unplugged anyway, right? The
29:50
doctor says in nine months it'll be fine. Yes.
29:52
Although she sort of expands on it a bit
29:54
because if you have a child often it's
29:56
not straight up. So in nine months it'll
29:58
be fine. But. He's going to
30:01
have to look after the chromatic envelope. He's going to
30:03
have to look after the man! He's going to change
30:05
the nappy! I think
30:07
Philippa Futt's original one was also about
30:09
abortion, the one with the trolley problem.
30:12
Because it had the trolley problem in
30:14
it, but it also had another quandary,
30:16
which was a magistrate who executes one
30:18
man in order to quell a riot
30:20
in which five innocent men will die.
30:23
And so she asked people, should you
30:25
be able to execute one person to
30:27
save five people in the riot? And
30:29
almost everyone said no. And then you said,
30:31
but should you pull this lever so that the
30:33
trolley kills this one person? And almost everyone said
30:36
yes. And she's like, this is a weird dichotomy
30:38
of ideas. And I think maybe
30:40
that's where argument came in of one
30:42
of the judges actively killing someone versus
30:44
just not saving people, wasn't it? So
30:46
she was like, that's quite slightly different.
30:49
Very confusing. And then Daniel Battles of
30:51
Columbia University says this is all bullshit
30:53
because these dilemmas are really engaging situations
30:56
that people enjoy thinking about, but in
30:58
real life you wouldn't enjoy it at
31:00
all. If you had to
31:02
make that decision, you probably would be a
31:05
bit stressed. On
31:07
Mastodon, the new Twitter, there's
31:10
a user called Sidereal who came up
31:12
with a solution where the trolley is
31:14
going down and you've got a lever.
31:16
And what you do is you pull
31:18
the lever just when the front wheels
31:20
of the trolley have passed, but before the back
31:22
wheels of the trolley have passed. And
31:24
that will make the trolley car stop. I'll
31:27
kill everyone. No,
31:31
you kill no one. And apparently this
31:33
is how railroad workers stop runaway trains
31:36
and how railroad robberies used to take place in
31:38
the Wild West is you would make the tracks
31:41
change just as the train's going over you. Right.
31:44
So that's a way to trick it. Brilliant. Did you
31:46
read the really recent story about a runaway train? No.
31:49
No, no. Like two weeks ago,
31:51
it was mad. In Japan, it was
31:53
a freight train. It had 50 carriages
31:55
and it went for 80 kilometres
31:58
on its own. Totally drive-lur. 100
32:01
km per hour. So the driver disembarked
32:03
for like a driver stop at a station in a
32:06
place called Jammu and
32:08
it just started rolling and it kept going and
32:10
they had to close all the road crossings ahead
32:12
of it. They were like, oh my god, we
32:14
can't stop this train like quickly. Make sure pedestrians
32:16
aren't crossing the tracks. Went for 80 km and
32:19
eventually I think someone came and put like
32:21
blocks on the track to stop it. So
32:23
I'm randomly on the track. And there
32:25
was no people on it to drive Rick Gannon? No people, just shed
32:27
loads of bricks I think. That's
32:30
a worst case scenario. Not
32:32
pillows, marshmallows. I
32:36
think you guys know
32:39
Vsauce, the YouTuber. Oh,
32:41
your buddies are them. You're our Michael friends. Are
32:43
you? I really want to know your opinion on the
32:45
fact that he actually tried the trolley problem for real,
32:48
which has never been done before and is so
32:50
weird to watch. I mean I think he did
32:52
it. He's claiming to have done it. Yeah, it's
32:54
really hard to work out if people are acting
32:56
or not because you really kill five people. Yeah,
32:59
next video comes from
33:01
jail. Maybe it's us, Michael
33:03
in jail here. Yeah,
33:07
it wasn't quite that extreme, but basically he took
33:10
volunteers from the street and told them they were
33:12
in an experiment about high speed rail and were
33:14
like, we're testing this train,
33:16
this automated train, took them into a switching station
33:19
and he said, why don't you have a look
33:21
at how this switching station works while you're here?
33:23
And there's a guy who's there saying, hey, this
33:25
is the button I press to put the train
33:27
on a different track. And then he gets a
33:29
phone call and has to leave. So the volunteers
33:31
just alone in the switching station and they suddenly
33:33
see a train coming and they're watching workers on
33:36
the track with headphones on so they can't know
33:38
what's happening. And they think that the only way
33:41
to save these workers is to click that switch
33:43
they've just been shown and to kill one person
33:45
but save the other five. And it's incredible to
33:47
watch. And it's mad to me that it was
33:50
allowed to happen. But he took it through this like
33:52
ethics board and seven people did it. Do you want
33:57
to guess how many? Because obviously the other thing about it is that it's a very The
34:00
problem is people always say they'd switch and
34:02
in real life. Would you actually yeah? Yeah Seven
34:06
people how many people do you think click the switch? I'm
34:08
gonna go one. Yeah, I think just like
34:10
if you're in That's someone else's office. You
34:12
just don't want to touch anything. No matter
34:15
what all the other so like you like
34:17
Oh, yeah, people dying, but the social awkwardness
34:24
That's how good human beings are
34:27
you're actually right two people
34:30
They were like well, it's not really my I don't know
34:32
maybe it's pretty good under control It
34:36
is part of the dilemma that you sort of think the act
34:38
of pulling the lever Makes you
34:40
complicit to a murder versus yeah, I hadn't
34:43
thought of that really like that being part
34:45
of the emotion I'm deciding you die. Oh,
34:47
yeah, where is that just like if it's
34:49
your job? Then you could
34:51
be negligent for not pressing it right right you've let
34:53
five people die and it's your job And you should
34:56
have made that decision, but if you've just be left
35:01
If you've misunderstood this the situation you make it
35:03
worse Okay,
35:15
it is time for fact number three and that
35:17
is Anna My fact
35:19
this week is that on the first ever road
35:21
trip across America? Multiple bridges
35:24
collapsed under the weight of the cars and had to
35:26
be rebuilt along the way Wow
35:29
Presumably crumbled behind you often
35:32
crumbled with the vehicles on it, and they would
35:34
plunge into a river all right I
35:37
was thinking like that Maybe it's like you know
35:39
when you're walking in the countryside, and you have
35:41
to close all the gates behind you like consider
35:43
it driving in America bridge back Cow's
35:47
camcros This
35:49
is a very specific road trip and involved a
35:51
lot of cars so it was 1919 and it was 79 vehicles Specifically
35:57
it was the army motor
35:59
transport and they were
36:01
driving across America to check out the state
36:03
of the road. So it was ordered by
36:06
the War Department, this road trip, and
36:08
no one had ever traveled from East Coast
36:10
to West Coast in America because the roads just weren't equipped
36:13
for that. There wasn't an interstate road
36:15
system and so this trip
36:17
was commissioned to see if the roads were
36:19
passable and it turned out not really. And
36:22
there were just constant diversions because
36:24
roads like cars would sink in
36:26
the mud or they
36:28
often had to disassemble covered bridges because the
36:30
trucks were too tall so they'd have to take a bridge
36:32
apart and then put it back together when the trucks had
36:35
gone through. And then if you look up
36:37
news reports about it, it was a huge media
36:39
deal. Every new state they went into, this caravan
36:41
of cars, everyone was like, hey! So it was
36:43
always reported in the news and the news was
36:46
always saying, you know, 12 bridges
36:48
repaired today, 8 bridges collapsed today, you
36:50
know, none other 12 bridges. This truck fell and
36:52
had to be pulled out of a gully. So
36:55
really, if you were a small town, you'd want
36:57
to divert the road to your worst bridges so
36:59
that you're getting free repair. What
37:02
was the date again? Sorry Anna, I know you said. 1919.
37:04
1919. And how many cars were on it? 79 vehicles. And
37:06
it took a surice
37:10
a long time because the roads were so bad
37:12
so it took all together, they traveled 3,242 miles
37:15
and it took 62 days which ended up being an
37:17
average of about five
37:23
miles an hour. A bit over five miles
37:25
an hour. Wow. They took 20 days longer
37:28
to do this than the records were running across
37:30
America today. Right. Oh wow. So
37:32
then this caused this report to be written by
37:35
loads of people, one of whom was a chap
37:37
called Eisenhower in 1919 who went on along
37:39
for the road trip, wrote a report saying
37:41
we've got to fix these roads, became president
37:44
more than 30 years later, was like, they
37:46
haven't fixed these bloody roads yet. And so
37:48
he was the one who fixed the roads.
37:50
I find it amazing that the
37:52
in-state system in America is basically
37:55
an army thing, it's a defense thing isn't it? That's
37:58
why they built it. Is that why they did it in Italy? It's
38:00
actually officially known as the Dwight D.
38:03
Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense
38:05
Highways. So yeah, but then after
38:07
it had been going for 40 years, they claimed that
38:09
it had saved the lives of 187,000 people. Is
38:14
that because it's so safe? It is because
38:16
motorways and highways are just super safe
38:18
compared to normal roads because everyone's going
38:20
in the same direction. Yeah, yeah. And
38:22
it's so regimented how it works. So
38:24
I didn't really know anything about the
38:27
interstate highway system. But
38:29
all the rules are exactly the same across the
38:31
board. So America didn't have a unified road system
38:33
by the 1950s. You still
38:35
couldn't really cross efficiently from one state to
38:37
another because it's just not in a state's
38:39
interest to make the crossing between states good.
38:42
So the federal government took over. And
38:44
yeah, it's super safe, but like everything down
38:46
to the last detail is the same across
38:49
the board. So tunnels and bridges are exactly
38:51
the same height everywhere. There's
38:53
the same gradient of slope at the edge
38:55
of the road for water runoff. Everything's the
38:57
same. That's cool. Universally across
39:00
America, still to this day. Just in
39:02
the interstate highway system. Yeah.
39:04
Yeah. Yeah. And sweetly, Alaska
39:06
and Hawaii both have interstate
39:08
highway roads, even though they've
39:11
got no states to go to. I'm the one in
39:13
Alaska and it's not like... It doesn't seem the same
39:15
as the ones in New York. Oh, did it not?
39:18
Really? No, no. Yeah, they maybe have played it a
39:20
bit faster than these, so the rules are there. The
39:22
ones in Hawaii are the ones in Honolulu. They're exactly
39:24
like anywhere in America, for sure. The
39:27
average age of bridges in the US is
39:29
a year younger than me. Wow.
39:34
Are we talking like 54, 54? Oh, slam
39:36
dunk. Ouch. Will
39:39
that always be true? They age with you? No,
39:42
they'll chase them and repair them and get new
39:44
ones. They're not going to get older than you,
39:46
though, sadly, are they? Yeah. Who has the best
39:49
truth? How
39:51
often do you remove a bridge, though? Like how many bridges
39:53
are we losing? Well, a third of them are classified as
39:55
structurally deficient. in
40:00
the US. So they are having to replace
40:03
them, but they've kind of kicked
40:05
the can down the road for years and years
40:07
and years and now. Who has a longer life
40:09
expectancy? You or the bridge? Average
40:13
bridge or you? I reckon the bridges probably
40:15
don't drink as much as me, but I get a
40:17
bit more exercise. Who would you save in the trolley
40:19
problem? There's a trolley, it's going to kill a bridge.
40:22
There's a bridge on top of a fat man. I
40:27
would love to see a website where it's
40:29
you and listed all the other bridges of
40:31
America and let's see who wins. Let's see who
40:33
makes it to the end. This is my list
40:36
of the letters. This is
40:38
a terrible memento mori, which
40:40
I wasn't expecting. It would
40:42
be a great update that James has outlived
40:45
another bridge. Bridges
40:48
are not surprised collapsed with cars. Engineering
40:51
and designing a bridge is complicated. Yeah.
40:54
And more engineering is kind of experimental.
40:56
I mean, less so now we've got
40:59
computers. Now we're in the post-Burrows 220
41:01
era. But
41:03
back in the day, you build
41:05
a bridge, you're over-engineered a bunch and
41:07
hope it stays up. But
41:10
it's only really as good as the load
41:12
cases that have been over it so far.
41:14
Right. So when they wheeled out cars, I'm not
41:17
surprised this is a whole new load case. Yeah.
41:19
Bridges failed. Yeah. They built a bridge in
41:21
the north of England in 1846. It
41:25
was a railway bridge and it was
41:27
fine. It was like longer than they'd ever built before.
41:29
So they tensioned it up to make it extra stiff
41:32
and trains were going fine over it. And then
41:34
they added a bit more rock and aggregate to
41:36
the top of it to kind of protect the
41:38
sleepers. And that additional mass
41:41
opened up a new mode of movement for the
41:43
bridge that they'd never seen before. And the next
41:46
train that went over the middle of the bridge
41:48
was long enough that the middle bit could twist.
41:51
And they just they just never seen that happen before because no
41:53
bridge had been big enough or had that low foot on it.
41:55
And that now Alton Towers. What
41:58
happened? a
42:01
lot of injuries, five people died.
42:03
The first train that
42:05
went over after they'd added this
42:07
extra rock caused it to
42:09
twist in a new mode in the middle of the bridge
42:11
that hadn't been seen before. And
42:13
it'll happen every now and then. We'll
42:15
build something bigger or different to before.
42:18
And until you test it, we have
42:20
no... I mean, now, obviously with computers,
42:22
we can do a lot more modeling
42:24
and testing in advance, but particularly historically,
42:27
it was a build it and survive
42:29
a bio. Yeah, whenever I'm on Instagram
42:31
and I'm just scrolling through videos, there
42:33
often is an advert that comes up for
42:35
a game where you have to build a bridge
42:37
and you have to put the positions of the
42:40
steel underneath it. And I just watch
42:42
this ad for minutes on end because
42:44
every conceivable way I think a bridge
42:46
should be built, it collapses and flips
42:48
and crashes. Well, thank God you're not
42:50
a civil engineer. I'm not the first
42:52
one that thought that. So
42:55
yeah, that's right. It's more
42:57
complicated than we realized. Yeah, like it was kind
42:59
of a big deal at the time, although I have to
43:01
say I've forgotten about it
43:03
and still reminded researching this, but like the
43:05
Millennium Bridge was a big case, wasn't it?
43:07
And exactly as you say, it's sort of
43:09
untested with a huge deal. So
43:13
for our listeners, it was a quite beautiful bridge across
43:15
the Thames in London that was opened
43:17
in the year 2000 in the summer. And
43:20
I think it closed after two days because it
43:22
was wobbling, wasn't it? It was moving
43:24
about seven and a half centimetres backwards
43:26
and forwards. And people felt it.
43:28
It didn't sound like a lot, but if you're
43:31
standing on this bridge, That's earthquake level. Yeah, it's
43:33
noticeable. And it's because it was able to move
43:35
from side to side. And what I really like
43:37
about it is London is called the Wobbly Bridge.
43:39
They didn't call it the Bouncy Bridge because
43:42
it wasn't going up and down. It
43:44
was very specifically going side to side.
43:46
It had this lateral back and forth.
43:48
They accidentally, when they built it, tuned
43:50
it. They tuned. It
43:52
wasn't deliberate. It ended up being tuned
43:55
to be able to resonate at about
43:57
one Hertz. And when a
43:59
human walks, take about two steps a
44:01
second so we're basically at mass going backwards
44:03
and forwards at the rate of one Hertz
44:06
and people walking across the bridge are naturally
44:09
walking at a Hertz where their
44:11
bodies moving backwards and forwards once a second and
44:13
it would cause the bridge to move a little
44:15
bit but then you had the synchronizing effect where
44:18
because the bridge is moving slightly people are
44:20
more likely to step in rhythm
44:22
with it. Yeah, we're all natural
44:24
dancers. So
44:27
yeah then it makes it worse and worse. I
44:29
feel like is it the same as on a
44:31
trampoline you know when someone's bouncing and you automatically
44:33
bounce in sync with them to make it more
44:35
comfortable. Yeah. So it's quite cool to imagine everyone
44:37
on Millennium Bridge was walking exactly in step
44:41
and then all vomiting. Yeah, you've got seasickness
44:43
going over a bridge. Is it the case
44:45
that they had to fix it? Was it
44:47
dangerous because you could break the bridge? It
44:49
could have got worse and worse so at
44:51
the levels it was happening it wasn't dangerous
44:53
but no one wants to be on a
44:55
bridge wobbling backwards and forwards. It genuinely made
44:57
people feel sick. This is my new entry
44:59
for how I'd solve the trolley problem. I
45:02
would be on the bridge I would see
45:04
the trolley coming and I'd say everyone let's
45:06
walk in sync and let's down the bridge.
45:08
Shake the bridge. Shake the bridge. It
45:11
cost an extra five million pounds to fix.
45:13
It was like on an original budget of
45:15
17 or 18 million to build it. It
45:17
took them two years and five million pounds.
45:20
They had to add extra damping to take
45:22
out those frequencies. Yeah, yeah. By doing that
45:24
they increased the damping below
45:26
one and a half Hertz by about
45:28
15-20% and that was enough to stop
45:30
that runaway feedback group. How interesting. So
45:33
if you got a load of
45:35
shorter people with shorter legs walking
45:37
along might it happen
45:39
again? If you were able to
45:42
walk at a frequency that
45:44
would it be faster or slightly like
45:47
race walkers? The way it's been designed
45:49
now you'd have to be running. Okay. You'd have
45:52
a higher frequency to cause a problem
45:54
but you'd have to have a lot of people running at
45:56
once to fall in sync. I guess
45:58
the London Marathon changes. is
46:02
like people who work on designing
46:05
football stadiums have to make sure
46:07
the stadium is not accidentally tuned
46:09
to any of the frequencies where a concert that's
46:11
put in the stadium might match
46:13
to. Yeah. And so what
46:15
do you mean? Because then the actual structure
46:17
could be the whole structure, the video of
46:19
people dancing in a stadium, although it
46:22
was a football chat that people were doing. And
46:24
you can see the whole structure itself figure out
46:26
and down because they've hit that resonant. That's
46:28
extraordinary. For even though it was just a year of five.
46:30
So every engineer on the stadium has to go, the referee's
46:32
a wanker. Okay, let's do it
46:35
to that one. The
46:37
famous one up near where I
46:39
live is the Broughton suspension bridge
46:42
between Manchester and Bolton, which collapsed
46:44
in 1831 and was supposedly
46:46
because people were marching across it
46:48
and that resonance caused the bridge
46:50
to collapse. I think that's the
46:52
first, in my research, that's the
46:54
first bridge that collapsed. Yeah,
46:57
resonance. Really? And
46:59
the military from then on were always told to
47:01
break step when they cross over a bridge. It
47:04
is sensible to not walk exactly at the same
47:06
pace if you're going over a bridge, I think.
47:09
Yeah, actually, for the British army,
47:11
at certain points, you have to stop playing the music.
47:14
So the trumpeters have to
47:17
shut up as you go over a bridge so you
47:19
can all walk really carefully, not
47:21
coordinating with anyone else's walk. They
47:23
won't walk totally randomly. It's
47:25
different to everyone else walking randomly. You
47:27
could just put some music that's really
47:30
difficult to dance to. Yeah, something like
47:32
some Shostakovich, some really sort of... Get
47:34
all three of the best known violinists.
47:46
Stop the podcast! Stop the podcast!
47:48
Hi everyone, we'd like to let
47:50
you know that this week we're
47:52
sponsored by Hello Fresh! That's
47:55
right, guys, do you want to make your life
47:57
easy? Just make it easy as hell, getting to the
47:59
end of... every evening knowing that there's a
48:01
big meal to cook for yourself and maybe
48:03
for a family. Do you want to just
48:05
have it so that you have a recipe
48:07
ready to go with the times printed out
48:09
for you with all the proportions there? Well
48:11
that's what HelloFresh is. It's a box that
48:13
arrives at your door and allows you to
48:15
make delicious, brilliant meals for everyone in the
48:17
family, efficiently. Let me give
48:19
you some of those meals Dan.
48:21
Teriyaki salmon, pokey style bowl. Crispy
48:25
sea bass and lime coriander rice. Don't they
48:27
just make your mouth water? They sound incredible
48:29
and honestly HelloFresh if you've not tried it
48:31
out I do highly recommend you giving it
48:33
a go. Not only is it tasty and
48:35
it's wholesome and it really is the sort
48:37
of home cooked meal that you dream of
48:40
but again super quick recipes and you've got
48:42
vegan options, you've got vegetarian options, you get
48:44
healthy snacks. It's so much more than just
48:46
the main meal you can see through a
48:48
whole big menu of stuff to
48:50
order from. Absolutely and right now
48:53
you can discover the delicious possibilities
48:55
with HelloFresh by visiting HelloFresh that's
48:57
HELLOFRESH.co dot u-k/new fish and when
49:00
you do that you will unlock
49:02
more in your kitchen and you'll
49:05
get 60% off your first order
49:07
and 25% off the next two
49:09
months. Use
49:12
that link and get 60% off your
49:15
first order and 25% off the next
49:17
two months. Do it now. Okay
49:19
on with the podcast. On with
49:22
the show. Okay
49:28
it is time for our final fact
49:30
of the show and that is my
49:32
fact. My fact this week is that
49:35
in the board game Rising Sun players
49:37
are able to collect monsters that are
49:39
inspired by both Japanese mythology and by
49:41
complete accident a New Zealand farmer. This
49:44
is the board game which they put on
49:46
Kickstarter they needed 300,000 in order to get the game going but
49:49
they ended up getting over 4 million dollars and
49:51
so they had all this additional money. That
49:56
was a stretch goal. One
49:58
guy from New Zealand. He gets to
50:00
pick a monster. So what
50:03
they did was they said, okay well as we've
50:05
got all this extra money what we're going to
50:07
do is we're going to produce more characters. So
50:09
it's like a bonus pack that you get. So
50:11
one of these monsters is called the katahi and
50:14
basically it's described as a manawa bradford, a spirit
50:16
monkey that is very hairy and gets engulfed in
50:18
rage. Are you the New Zealand farmer, Dan? I've
50:22
never seen you consumed with rage.
50:24
No, but you have seen me
50:26
naked. Which made him pretty angry at
50:29
it. But
50:32
yes, so then what happens is the game comes out,
50:34
all these characters are out there and then there's this
50:36
guy who's online who says, hey I'm
50:39
actually from Japan and I've never heard of this
50:41
character. Does anyone know anything more about it? So
50:44
it sparks off a big hunt online for people to
50:46
try and get to the bottom of it. Someone
50:49
eventually discovers that there's a Wikipedia page,
50:51
Legendary Japanese Monsters, that has all the
50:53
characters on it and in there is
50:55
an entry for this katahi and a
50:58
guy in New Zealand, 19 year old
51:00
and his buddy Dickin' About Online, went
51:02
to this page and they named it
51:04
after him and it just sat
51:06
there for over a year and the makers of
51:08
this game went on to Wikipedia, cut and paste
51:11
all of the characters on there, didn't
51:13
do any additional research and ended up
51:15
using him and so he's immortalised in
51:17
this game as a Japanese mythological character.
51:20
Awesome. I encourage more people to
51:22
edit Wikipedia and they're desperate hope they'll make
51:24
it to a board game. Yeah, that's true.
51:26
And there's this great line which says, someone
51:29
was describing it saying, this is the most
51:31
exciting thing to happen in Danoverque, which is
51:33
the rural town where he's from in New
51:36
Zealand, since someone tried to open a brothel
51:38
there in 2008 and it lasted
51:40
precisely three weeks. I think,
51:43
I mean people got really moralistic about it. One
51:45
woman said she'd sit outside the brothel every day
51:47
knitting to shame anyone who came in and she
51:49
also said, I can't see any of our men
51:51
paying $100 a bonk, which I can see a
51:54
lot of her men reading that and going, can't you love?
51:57
A bonk. She's
52:00
from the 50s. One of the
52:02
district council chiefs said that brothels were
52:04
a legal business and the only thing
52:07
that they could do was impose environmental
52:09
conditions on it. And his name was
52:11
Roger Twenty-Man, which sounds like coming on
52:14
the menu. No, brothel. Have
52:17
we ever mentioned the Ant and Dec
52:20
Saturday Night Takeaway board game? I don't
52:22
think so. You say that
52:24
and we must have mentioned it. No, it's the
52:26
game we play all the time. Yeah, we've noticed
52:28
it in pretty much every episode. I don't know what you're on
52:30
about. We came out in 2017. It was
52:32
an Ant and Dec board game called Saturday Night
52:35
Takeaway based on their TV show and it was
52:37
basically a quiz. So you would play the board
52:39
game and get lots of trivia questions. That sounds
52:41
good. It was in theory
52:43
good, except it was just riddled with
52:45
mistakes. One question asked
52:47
where is Stonehenge located? It
52:49
said Somerset. They said that Albert Einstein
52:52
died in 1949 instead of 55, which
52:54
is I guess, you know, you're not going to automatically know if
52:56
that's right or wrong. How about this one? True or false? This
52:59
is not the question. I'm really rephrasing the question here. True or false?
53:02
The moon is the same distance from London to
53:04
Australia. That is
53:06
incorrect. Incorrect.
53:09
Yeah, and it's incorrect that they said that.
53:12
By a factor of 10. Yeah, they said it
53:14
was the same distance as London to Blackpool. So
53:17
in answer to how far away is the moon, they put
53:19
225 miles as the correct answer. It
53:23
posted 238,000. Wow. The
53:27
short lived TV game show Color
53:29
of Money. I
53:32
only know it from the game and pub. Oh yeah.
53:36
You could choose from. They
53:38
hired a mathematician to analyze the game for them.
53:41
And the mathematician ran the numbers
53:43
and came back and said, this is a terrible game. No one's ever
53:45
going to win. And they're like,
53:47
oh no, but I tested it when I was
53:49
home with the family and my grandma won and
53:51
everyone had a great time. And so they put the game into
53:54
production. And basically no one
53:56
won. And that was it for the game.
54:00
I think that would be a good thing for the production company
54:02
though, right? Or if it doesn't make good people. No, no,
54:04
no one wants to watch it. You know, you know. Did
54:06
they ever think of putting that grammar on the
54:09
show? They should have. Lucky grammar. That's where you're
54:11
going wrong. Sweep up.
54:14
Take it all home. It's like the fruit
54:16
machines, pokey's. You
54:18
can tune the payout rate. Like it's not
54:20
doing, you're pulling the lever but it's just
54:22
hitting a switch that's spinning the
54:24
things. And the
54:26
payout rate is programmed
54:29
in to be once every kind of so
54:31
often. It's not even doing
54:33
something particularly randomly. It's evening out the payout
54:35
rate. Right. So you just have to
54:37
watch and once it's been long enough then
54:39
you go on. When I used
54:41
to work in a bar we would watch it and if no
54:43
one won all night and people were playing it all night then
54:46
once everyone else had gone home we'd put a lot of tips
54:48
in and lose all our tips. But
54:51
then we were just terrible at those.
54:53
For instance there was a QI quiz
54:55
machine game. Oh yeah. Have
54:58
we said this on here? I don't think so. I don't think so. So
55:01
there's a QI quiz machine game and before it
55:03
went out they sent me all of the questions
55:05
so that I could check through them to make
55:07
sure there wasn't any mistakes and make sure that
55:09
it was kind of QI as it should be.
55:11
And there was probably, I think it was 20,000, it might
55:14
have been more. Anyway I had
55:16
a database of all the questions and they put
55:18
one in the pub next to where we were.
55:21
Yeah. I was like, I'm really in love with this
55:23
pub down the road. We'll get a clean
55:25
up here and so we went and played and
55:27
we just lost all our money. We
55:29
couldn't win. We just hit every plaque
55:31
so it was ridiculous. Oh
55:34
my God. On Japanese games in the 1980s, I think
55:36
it was 1985 or 1986, did you know that almost half
55:41
of Japanese people owned a
55:43
computer domestically when in the US
55:45
for instance that was about In
55:48
what year? I think it was 1985 or 6. I
55:50
just read it this week. But that's because
55:52
they all owned Famicon which
55:55
was a family computer which
55:57
was the Nintendo console thing.
56:00
And they were all playing Nintendo. In
56:02
1990, I only knew one
56:04
person who had a computer in Bolton. Yeah,
56:06
there you go. And it was called, interestingly,
56:09
everyone called it FamilyCom, and they still do,
56:11
and it's still always called FamilyCom, but the
56:13
name is Family Computer because
56:15
they weren't allowed to trademark it as FamilyCom
56:17
because there was an oven released
56:19
a couple of years earlier, which
56:21
was a family convection oven,
56:23
which was FamilyCon. And
56:26
so, just on board games,
56:28
cool new weird board games, which are always fun,
56:30
people always coming up with them these days. Have
56:33
you guys heard of Consentical? No
56:37
one I already regret half hearing about. Go
56:40
on, guess what it is? You
56:43
can touch my board. So
56:47
it's a cooperative card game for two
56:49
players, and it's about
56:52
a consensual, crucially sexual encounter
56:54
between a curious human and
56:56
a tentacled alien. Oh,
56:58
wow. Consentical. And
57:00
the way it works... I see, like tentacle.
57:03
Yeah. Tentacle. Not
57:05
testicle. That's down below. I see consent
57:08
tackle. Consenticle is a testicle
57:10
one. I think Consenticle is the one where it's
57:12
you and Mr. Tickle have that. There
57:14
are lots of variations, it's like the trolley problem.
57:16
It builds on a lot. Anyway,
57:19
it sounds super fun. So you've got
57:21
these cards, which are things
57:24
like things that you
57:26
might want to do to this alien
57:28
that you fancy with tentacles. So like
57:30
wink, gaze, envelop, bite, lick, penetrate is
57:32
one of the cards. And
57:34
you convey which card you want to mutually
57:37
put down with faces and gestures. So you
57:39
make a certain face. I'm looking at that
57:41
and it's like very awesome. It's so
57:43
wonderful. Not me, I'm looking
57:46
at that plant over there. I'm showing a lot of
57:48
copies of those QI books over there. That
57:51
looks and penetrate at that plant. By
57:55
Hockeside there's a famous painting of a
57:57
woman having sex with a... Yeah,
58:00
with an octopus. Yeah. And
58:02
a load of octopus scientists looked at it
58:04
and said it didn't look like the octopus
58:06
was enjoying itself. Really? Because
58:09
apparently, octopuses have ways of changing their
58:11
body whenever they're mating and stuff like
58:13
that. I think there was an exhibition
58:15
at the British Museum that had a
58:17
bunch of these, effectively a monster erotica
58:19
paintings. And in the year that they
58:21
were there, if you go to the
58:23
website and you looked at the data,
58:25
there were more searches for that exhibition
58:27
than there were for the opening hours
58:29
of the British Museum. It was very popular.
58:32
Well, maybe I'll try this game, you
58:34
know. It's like, stop having this non-consensual sex
58:37
with octopuses. So what happens, sorry, you put the cards
58:39
down and... I would need to convey through a series
58:41
of looks and gestures what kind of sex move we
58:43
should make with each other. And then, we would... Should
58:45
look at the table. The plants over there, if you need it. And
58:54
then you would play a card, and I would play a card,
58:56
and we would hope that our cards mutually match each other
58:58
and build trust between us, rather
59:00
than being non-consensual. It's
59:02
snap. Yeah. It's a sexy
59:04
snap. Sexy snap. It's snap.
59:07
Oh, snap. It's a really random
59:09
thing that is a board game
59:11
I'd love to get my hands
59:13
on. It's a game which
59:15
you can get in Sierra Leone,
59:17
which is essential to be played
59:19
by anyone who's trying to obtain
59:21
a driver's license. It's
59:24
not funny, but it's just the only piece of the
59:26
car. I
59:29
think you go around the board and whatever you land
59:32
on it, ask your question about the highway code. Right.
59:34
And you have to play it for two to
59:36
three months, and then you do
59:38
the test and the game supposedly gets you ready
59:40
for the test. Oh, right. It's so good. I
59:43
could do with that. I'm learning to drive at the
59:45
moment, and I'm dreading the theory test because it's a
59:47
big old book to read, the highway code. So a
59:50
board game would be amazing. There you
59:52
go. If you're listening, please God, make the
59:54
board game. Otherwise, that would be as difficult
59:56
as possible. So a lot of fun. Did
1:00:01
you guys ever play the game Guess Who? Yes, yes,
1:00:03
still play it. Good on you mate, it's not going
1:00:05
to help you party, Tash. Yes, okay. LAUGHTER That
1:00:09
was invented by this couple called
1:00:12
Aura and Theo Koster, who created
1:00:14
a company called Theora. It
1:00:17
was invented in the, I think it was the 60s. Theo
1:00:20
was actually a classmate of Anne Frank, went to
1:00:22
school with her. No! Yeah, interestingly.
1:00:25
His original name was Morris, but
1:00:27
he was brought up in the Netherlands when it was
1:00:29
under German occupation, so changed his name and
1:00:32
hid his Jewish identity. And yeah,
1:00:34
they married and they became amazing game designers. They
1:00:36
designed loads of extremely popular games, one of
1:00:38
which was Guess Who, and they died, one
1:00:40
of them died in 2019, one in 2021, I think, both aged 90. Wow.
1:00:45
And their gravestones are the Guess
1:00:47
Who pop-ups. You're kidding. You can
1:00:49
flip their gravestones down. You can't flip
1:00:51
them, sadly. That would be
1:00:53
so cool. But no, you
1:00:55
can't. What is it? What do they have? They
1:00:57
just have the same design as the Guess Who
1:00:59
pop-ups, which are quite similar to an actual gravestone.
1:01:02
Optimal Guess Who. You
1:01:05
want to be able to split
1:01:07
the remaining possible people as
1:01:10
evenly in half as possible. Yes. Because you want
1:01:12
to basically do a binary search. You
1:01:14
want to split it in half each time. Yeah. And
1:01:16
that's the fastest way to get to the final answer. And
1:01:20
the way you need to do that is
1:01:22
by stacking your conditions at once, which a
1:01:24
lot of other people will claim as cheating
1:01:27
or making the game not fun
1:01:29
anymore. But you can say, like,
1:01:31
if it's a man, do they have
1:01:33
glasses? Or if it's a
1:01:35
woman, have they got a hat? And
1:01:38
there's still a yes or no response.
1:01:42
But now you've used the categories to better split
1:01:44
the options in half. That is so much better
1:01:46
than the way we play it. Yeah, that's brilliant.
1:01:48
We always say, does your guy like peas? And
1:01:51
you have to make a judgment. Deep into their
1:01:53
eyes, would you trust them with
1:01:56
the trolley problem? So roughly, how quickly do you
1:01:58
destroy the seven-year-olds you're playing? I
1:02:01
wonder how mathematicians had a go
1:02:03
at the other game invented by
1:02:05
Aura and Theo Costa, which
1:02:07
is the, and they made it in the 1970s,
1:02:10
the popping out rubber spheres
1:02:12
game that's come really popular recently. I've
1:02:14
only seen it because suddenly I'm surrounded
1:02:16
by young children. Yeah, we've got a few at
1:02:18
home. Yeah. Yeah. Do you guys know what I
1:02:20
mean? The big toy thing. Yeah. Yeah. And people
1:02:23
are into it. I thought babies were into it,
1:02:25
but apparently it's popular. I thought they were invented
1:02:27
by someone who's inspired by a field of breasts.
1:02:29
Theo absolutely right. And that is Aura
1:02:32
Costa. Wow. Yeah. She was actually sweetly
1:02:34
and darkly inspired by her sister who
1:02:36
very sadly got breast cancer. And she
1:02:38
had a dream around that time of
1:02:40
a huge field of her sister's breasts
1:02:42
and woke up and went to the
1:02:44
game designer and was like, make me
1:02:47
a field of boobs. Wow. Oh my
1:02:49
God. I had a dream last night where there
1:02:51
was this referee in a football match and he
1:02:53
tried to send one off, but he pulled out
1:02:55
a rice cake instead. Oh yeah. Can we turn
1:02:57
that into a game? Not all dreams are going
1:03:00
to be money for them. That should have been
1:03:02
her tombstone, a giant rubber gravestone that you could
1:03:04
push down into the ground. But
1:03:06
then what if she pops it back up?
1:03:08
That is scary. Okay.
1:03:18
That's it. That is all of our facts. Thank
1:03:20
you so much for listening. If you'd like to
1:03:22
get in contact with any of us about the
1:03:24
things that we've said over the course of this
1:03:26
podcast, we can be found on our various social
1:03:28
media accounts. I'm on Instagram on Shriverland. James.
1:03:31
My Instagram is no such thing as
1:03:33
James Harkin. Matt. I'm stand up maths
1:03:36
pretty much everywhere. Yep. And Anna. You
1:03:38
can find us on Twitter on at no such
1:03:40
thing or on Instagram. No such thing as a
1:03:42
fish or you can email podcast.com. Yep. Or you
1:03:44
can just head straight to our website, which
1:03:46
is no such thing as a fish.com. You'll
1:03:48
find all of our previous episodes out there.
1:03:50
You'll find a link to club fish, our
1:03:53
secret members club where we have lots of
1:03:55
bonus episodes. But most important of
1:03:57
all, you should find yourself to a pre-order
1:03:59
link. for Matt's new book which is
1:04:01
coming out this June, you were saying? June
1:04:03
in the UK, August in the US. And where's
1:04:06
the best place for them to go? If you
1:04:08
go to mathgear.co.uk, you can get the signed pre-ordered
1:04:10
copies by me, but you can
1:04:12
support your local independent book shop or anywhere else
1:04:14
online to pre-order it. Remind us what it's called?
1:04:16
It's called Love Triangle. Okay, that's it. We'll be
1:04:18
back again next week with another episode and we'll
1:04:20
see you then. Goodbye.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More