Podchaser Logo
Home
No Such Thing As A Dice The Size Of The Universe

No Such Thing As A Dice The Size Of The Universe

Released Thursday, 21st March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
No Such Thing As A Dice The Size Of The Universe

No Such Thing As A Dice The Size Of The Universe

No Such Thing As A Dice The Size Of The Universe

No Such Thing As A Dice The Size Of The Universe

Thursday, 21st March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Hi everyone, welcome

0:02

to this week's episode of

0:04

No Such Thing as a

0:06

Fish when we were joined

0:08

by the incredible mathematician, youtuber,

0:11

science communicator, all round smart

0:13

guy Matt Parker. Now

0:15

a lot of you will know a lot of

0:17

Matt's work, he's written a lot of books, things

0:20

to make him do in the 4th dimensions, one

0:22

of his humble pie was an absolutely massive book

0:25

for him. He has

0:27

a new book out, it is

0:29

called Love Triangle, the life changing

0:31

magic of trigonometry. I

0:33

haven't read it yet but I

0:35

can tell you having read his

0:37

other books it is going to

0:39

be absolutely incredible and you can

0:41

pre-order it right now by going

0:43

to mathsgear.co.uk, that's

0:48

m-a-t-h-s-g-e-a-r.co.uk, don't

0:50

forget that S if you're in America. And

0:53

you can pre-order a signed copy with

0:55

a limited edition dust jacket, of course

0:58

it will be available in all of

1:00

the local bookshops and probably in those

1:02

big online book retailers as

1:04

well. A few other things about

1:06

Matt, he is in a podcast

1:08

called A Problem Squared with Beck

1:11

Hill who you might remember from

1:13

a few months ago, she came

1:15

on the podcast and talked about

1:17

Cabbage Patch Kids, Beck and Matt

1:19

have this incredible podcast, it's definitely

1:22

worth listening to and there is

1:24

also a podcast of unnecessary detail

1:26

that Matt does with two other

1:28

ex-fish alumni, Steve Mould and

1:31

Helen Arney from the Festival of

1:33

the Spoken Nerd. Anyway,

1:35

I'm sure you're going to love this week's show, don't forget

1:37

at the end of it go

1:39

to mathsgear.co.uk to pre-order Matt's new

1:41

book Love Triangle but for

1:44

now all that's left to say is on with

1:46

the podcast. Hello

2:05

and welcome to another episode of No

2:07

Such Thing as a Fish, a weekly

2:09

podcast coming to you from the QI

2:11

offices in Hobern. My name is Dan

2:13

Schreiber, I am sitting here with Anna

2:15

Tyshinsky, James Harkin and Matt Parker and

2:17

once again we have gathered around the

2:19

microphones with our four favorite facts from

2:21

the last seven days and in no

2:23

particular order here we go. Starting

2:26

with fact number one, that is Matt,

2:29

the first computer to ever discover

2:31

a shape starred in

2:33

the 1980s sitcom, well starred, was

2:36

in an episode of the 1980s sitcom Laverne

2:40

and Shirley. There

2:42

are a couple

2:44

of concepts in there I'm not familiar with. I like

2:46

to pack a lot of concepts into a centre. Yeah.

2:49

Okay so computer, shape, Laverne or

2:51

Shirley? Can we talk about

2:53

how you discover a shape? Great, yeah.

2:55

That feels like a big question, I

2:57

also don't know what Laverne or Shirley

2:59

you'd recommend. I'm unfamiliar

3:02

with their non-computer based episodes. I

3:05

used to watch it as a kid. Really? Yeah,

3:07

yeah. And it's good, yeah. I mean it was

3:09

a spin off from Happy Days. Yeah, it was

3:11

Gary Marshall who was the creator of it, he

3:14

was the Happy Days guy. Yeah, yeah. Apparently

3:16

it was a lot of, sorry we're in Laverne

3:18

and Shirley territory now, that was in the main

3:20

part of my, apparently they were like really kind

3:22

of like, you know they had a lot of

3:24

fights on set and Happy Days, the cast, they

3:26

used to put glass to the walls to hear

3:28

the arguments that were going on on the other

3:30

side, yeah, all that stuff. Unhappy Days. Yeah. But

3:34

it was early 80s I think Laverne and

3:37

Shirley, so that's quite early

3:39

for, no it's not that early for

3:41

computers is it? It was a 1980

3:43

episode and the same computer

3:45

had previously starred in The

3:48

Land of the Giants in 1969. Wow.

3:50

Oh god it didn't get worked for a while then.

3:53

No, it went out for a while. So

3:55

it was in 60s like sci-fi and

3:57

being in the 1986. was

4:00

actually like the final bit of its

4:02

Hollywood career. Yeah, it's pretty much,

4:04

you've as a result of this fact, and we

4:06

will get to the new shape, sorry Anna, for

4:09

knocking out of this, but this website that

4:12

you sent- Starring the computer. Starring

4:14

the computer is phenomenal. It's the IMDB

4:17

of computers and movies that they have

4:19

appeared in, and it's run by

4:21

this one guy who, he has this amazing

4:23

Twitter account where he just constantly puts up

4:25

photos from movies he's watching going, what's this?

4:27

Does anyone know, and people go

4:29

hunting to try and track down the exact

4:31

computer that's in the movie? What

4:34

was this computer? The Burroughs 220. Okay,

4:37

once you've seen it in Laverne and Shirley, do

4:39

you think people then go, well I

4:41

wanna watch The Land of the Giants now, and

4:43

I wanna watch- Watch it in higher back catalogs.

4:45

Yeah, yeah, like you might be with an actor.

4:47

Well what's good about this computer? The Burroughs 220

4:49

really looks like a computer. Like

4:51

if you're thinking 60s computers, like

4:53

with tapes spinning and lights flashing,

4:56

it's like your classic retro computer

4:58

look. Okay, I read

5:00

that a similar one, which was the

5:03

B205, Oh yes.

5:05

Was the Bat Computer in Batman. Yeah,

5:08

absolutely. Really? Cause I wondered

5:10

if there were ever computers that played other

5:12

computers, and I guess that's an example. Like a

5:15

Mac playing a Dell or something. Yeah, yeah.

5:18

I wanted to find out more about the

5:20

Bat Computer. Unfortunately, one of the most popular

5:22

internet firms in Lagos is called Bat Computers.

5:24

How many are there, and that's all you

5:26

get? I did find a few things about

5:28

the Bat Computer, and by the way, the

5:30

Burroughs 205 absolutely smashes the hell out of

5:32

the 220. It does, it had way

5:35

better casting. Yeah, it's in the top

5:37

10 most appeared in movies computers in

5:39

the world. Same family of computers for

5:41

the record. One big Burroughs family. So

5:43

here we go. The dynasty, you might

5:46

say. Exactly. What you get with the

5:48

Bat Computer, the Burroughs 205, is

5:50

you get the Bat Correction signal, which alerts Batman

5:52

when he has said something incorrect. You have the

5:54

Bat Computer input slot, which I remember. Wait a

5:57

minute, so they invented the QI Klaxon. You know,

5:59

like. Exactly, yeah. There's the input slot where

6:01

it's just it's kind of like where you it's

6:03

like a mail slot where you put your post

6:05

in But it's like here's an entire book and

6:08

you just shove the book in and it computes

6:10

the whole book really quickly Wow accelerated

6:12

concentration switch that's sort of giving it more

6:14

computing power in order to deal with a

6:17

problem and Special-escape arch

6:19

criminal bat locator Which

6:22

is a preset of the computer basically

6:24

but specifically for like the Joker and

6:26

Okay, that's clever. I find my phone

6:29

app, but like find my villain Exactly.

6:31

Yeah, and the bat keyboard. That's an

6:34

actual thing It is a keyboard which

6:36

only has I think five or six

6:38

or seven keys on it and

6:40

you can make any Letter by playing

6:42

a chord. Do you know these man like little

6:44

keyboards? So you don't need 26 keys

6:47

to play all the other Strog a fruit would

6:49

use I think so Yeah But it was useful

6:52

Like disabled people who you know only had one

6:54

hand or something like that and you could type

6:56

letters quickly by knowing that if you want To

6:58

do an a you might press the first one

7:00

the third one and the fourth one Oh,

7:02

yeah, because there's 30 well if you include

7:04

pressing nothing 32 options so that you've

7:06

got enough for the whole alphabet How

7:08

many five with five five five keys will give

7:10

you 32 options? Including

7:13

the null press which is not using

7:15

the keyboard 31

7:17

distinct presses and then if you include your nose now

7:20

you can do up around lower case Keyboard

7:23

I removed all the keys apart from the zero and the

7:26

one on the keyboard so I can

7:28

type in binary so I could included

7:30

the backspace I'm not a monster I Can't

7:34

enter so I could type out I tried doing

7:36

it on stage I'll type people's names in binary

7:38

then hit enter really it'll come up and take

7:41

Wow I was looking at that website

7:44

for all the examples of this b2o5

7:46

which is what the bats Computers.

7:48

Oh, yeah, and one just caught my

7:50

eye which was sex kittens go to

7:53

college The movie

7:55

why but this is an amazing movie because

7:58

it didn't just have this computer

8:00

in it, the B205. It also

8:02

had a robot called Electro in

8:04

it and Electro was an

8:06

exhibit of the 1939 World's Fair.

8:09

It was like a huge seven foot tall robot.

8:11

It could walk by voice command. So if

8:13

you told it to walk, it could walk. It could

8:15

speak 700 words using a record player.

8:18

It could smoke cigarettes, blow up balloons and

8:21

move its hands and arms. All

8:24

the parts of the shurington. Wow.

8:26

So this was like a really famous robot in the

8:28

World's Fair in 1939. And then by, you

8:32

know, the 1960s, it was in Sex Good and Go

8:34

to College. That's so good. What a career decline and

8:36

it was a bit depressing for that poor robot. I

8:38

just love it. I love all the movie. Like I

8:40

didn't read that movie. Like there are so many like

8:43

you get big ones like Austin Powers, The Spy Who

8:45

Shagged Me. It appears in that. But then you also

8:47

got Dr. Goldfoot and the bikini machine.

8:52

And the Burrows, by the way, it was

8:54

a company. Yeah. And it was started by

8:56

William Seaward Burrows, who was a grandfather of

8:58

William S Burrows. Really? The three generations. Yeah.

9:01

And he invented, at least this is, I'm

9:03

sure there are other claims to it, but

9:05

he invented and filed the patent for the

9:07

first calculator. You wouldn't imagine that spawning

9:09

William Burrows. Not really. Two

9:11

generations later, with like chain smoking,

9:13

romantic, wife shooting, wife shooting. He likes

9:15

to put that further down and see

9:18

if he can really talk about the

9:20

fact that he killed his wife. Yeah.

9:22

Well, apparently he said that he was

9:24

trying to do a William Tell thing.

9:26

Yeah. And shoot an apple off her

9:28

head and accidentally shot her. Yeah. I'm

9:30

not sure we all buy that. But

9:32

apparently that will get you off in

9:34

court because you didn't go to jail.

9:36

Yeah. Everything was fine. Yeah. I believe

9:38

an apple nearby at the scene of

9:40

the crime. Yeah. That's what I was

9:42

aiming for. Another cool pop culture computer

9:44

crossover I came across. Did

9:46

you guys know that Steve Jobs

9:49

is Homer Simpson's uncle? Oh,

9:53

yes. Yes. It's so

9:55

weird. The fact that

9:58

it's so bizarre. Steve Jobs'

10:00

dad is a guy called Abdul-Fattajan Dali.

10:02

Steve Jobs was put up for

10:04

adoption by this guy because his

10:06

partner's family disapproved of the marriage

10:09

because he was Syrian Muslim. So

10:11

Steve Jobs went up for adoption, never met his father

10:13

actually. This guy, Abdul-Fattajan Dali,

10:15

had another kid, also who

10:17

ended up estranged from him. She's

10:19

called Mona Simpson. And

10:21

she married a guy weirdly called Richard

10:23

Apple. So Steve Jobs' brother-in-law

10:25

is called Apple. She

10:29

married a guy called Richard Apple, who was a ricer

10:31

on The Simpsons, and he came up with

10:33

a character of Mona Simpson, Homer's mum, named

10:36

after his partner, Mona Simpson.

10:39

So Steve Jobs' sister is Mona

10:41

Simpson, Homer Simpson's mum. Okay.

10:43

Yeah. I followed that, but maybe because I knew

10:46

it beforehand, I'm not sure if that worked, because

10:48

we got too confused, like imagining a very

10:51

complicated family tree. Yeah, I'm thinking like the

10:53

Habsburgs, you know that family tree where they're

10:55

all kind of insurrections. Yeah, it is like

10:57

that. And also if that like branched onto fiction

10:59

for one bit of it, it's a little bit

11:02

like Icelandic sagas, where you're like, is this

11:04

true or is it not? So shapes, you

11:06

were... How does the computer invent

11:08

a shape? Well,

11:10

this is the problem. So everyone, and

11:12

this is a perfect example of

11:14

what happened in computing. Everyone loves

11:16

the B205, and

11:18

all these other fancy computers. The

11:21

B220 was like a vacuum tube

11:24

miscalculation, because they barely made any, no

11:26

one really bought them. Transistors had come

11:29

along and blown these old ones out

11:31

of the water. So they were pretty much a forgotten

11:33

computer until I was reading a old

11:36

maths paper from 1962. And

11:39

it was someone called Donald Grace, who

11:41

was trying to find the biggest shape. Now,

11:46

you're gonna need some constraints

11:48

on that. Otherwise,

11:50

the biggest shape is whatever shape the

11:53

universe is. But they

11:55

were trying to work out the biggest shape that you

11:58

could fit in like a unit sphere. Okay, so... Biggest

12:00

shape you can fit in a ball. And you

12:02

can imagine it the size of the universe if you

12:04

want. No one's stopping you. Or

12:06

you can imagine it at a nice

12:08

manageable basketball-esque size. And

12:10

to make it a bit more manageable again, they would

12:12

do it for the number of vertices, the number of

12:15

corners a shape has. And

12:17

Donald specifically was curious what's the biggest

12:19

shape with eight vertices on

12:21

it. Which some people might

12:23

think, we just work out how to put eight

12:26

points on a sphere as far apart as possible

12:28

and join them all up to make a cube.

12:31

And it doesn't work. Ah. That is the

12:33

best way to position your points on a sphere.

12:36

And that's actually quite difficult to do. That's a whole other...

12:38

No one has a good systematic way to

12:41

arrange dots on a sphere. That's

12:44

so interesting. What in that regular way that

12:46

makes a cube? Despite all the funding from Big

12:48

Golf. What

12:52

is the biggest golf? The five of

12:54

them. Yeah, there's no...

12:57

It's called the Thompson problem. There's no... Because it

12:59

came out of... Is it named after golf Alexei

13:01

Thompson? It's not. Oh, right, OK. It

13:05

came out of Thompson looking at

13:08

electrons in an atom to work out how they'd be

13:10

spaced. And they're like, oh, well, it's easy. They just

13:12

spaced such that they've got as close as

13:14

possible to the same distance between them. And they're like, we

13:16

just worked it. Oh, that's really hard to work out. And

13:19

it doesn't even solve this other problem. So we

13:22

were... Mathedge was a bit of a dead

13:24

end. And Donald Grace was studying at Stanford,

13:27

studying what would later be called computer science. And

13:29

they were like, you know what? I'll just see if

13:31

I can get a computer to solve this problem. Because

13:34

if I program a computer to start with eight

13:36

points on a sphere and

13:38

work out the shape that they define, and then jiggle them

13:40

all around a bit and see which

13:42

direction of jiggling increases the volume by

13:44

the most, and then just

13:46

do that more times than a human ever

13:48

could, you'll eventually evolve your way into the

13:51

biggest possible shape. Wow.

13:53

Yeah, OK. And so I read the paper

13:55

and I wasn't kind of aware of that at

13:57

the time. I was just looking in the color shapes. goes

14:00

read into the paper and there's a line

14:02

that said, oh we ran this on a

14:04

Burroughs 220 computer system. I was

14:06

like, that's weird, like that's commonplace in modern math

14:08

research. But I was looking at this going, that's

14:11

what, a computer already? And the paper

14:13

was submitted in August 1962. I'm

14:17

like, oh, they didn't have access to a computer. And

14:20

it turns out they did have a Burroughs 220 at

14:22

Stanford. They got it in 1960. So

14:25

Donald has since passed away, spoke

14:27

to his kids, and they're like, oh, we used to volunteer

14:29

and go in at night. He would

14:31

take the night shift from the computer lab. That meant

14:34

he could run his code on

14:36

the computer. Because otherwise, we're not going to waste

14:38

their computer time for someone finding the biggest shape.

14:40

Yeah, exactly. And he found it.

14:42

He found the biggest shape. And he published it. And he's like,

14:44

I found this thing. And do you have

14:46

any idea, can we explain what the shape is or is

14:49

it tough? It looks a

14:51

little bit like a dice from D&D.

14:55

It's made entirely out of triangles. It's

14:59

not like an acoustahedron, like a D20 or like a D8. That's

15:03

nice and neat because they're platonic solids. It's

15:05

somewhere in the middle. So there's still a

15:07

lot of triangles put together. And it looks

15:10

quite regular. But it's not exactly tidy because

15:12

that's an awkward number of vertices. So you

15:14

couldn't roll it as a physical die. It

15:16

would be slightly unfair. And

15:19

it's massive. I mean, it's going to be difficult, isn't it? Heavy. Well,

15:21

it's nice. Our universe. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

15:23

Yeah. Yeah. Can

15:26

we talk about golf? Yeah, sure.

15:28

Yeah. Oh, I made a

15:30

classic error there. Let

15:32

me know. No, you can't

15:34

say no. This is interesting. So I learned

15:36

this from researching for this. I looked at

15:38

my golf balls. And there's loads of dimples

15:40

on them. All the dimples

15:42

are hexagons. Or are

15:45

they all hexagons, Matt? Because it's a

15:47

copy. They can't be, right? And

15:49

so I found out that every golf ball

15:52

has 12 pentagons on it. It's

15:54

amazing. If you get one. That was Anna, by the way.

15:58

True. I can be. Thank you. Bye-bye. I was

16:00

a weird Star Wars creature that's just suddenly

16:02

came off that. We went to Epcot, Disney

16:04

World, and I made everyone I was with

16:06

stop so we could look at the massive

16:08

Epcot sphere, which is a giant golf ball,

16:10

I guess. I'm like, in there somewhere I

16:13

said are 12 Pentagon's. Oh my God. And

16:15

I'm going to try and find something. But

16:17

the interesting thing is, this is the least

16:19

interesting part of it, now I think

16:21

this has improved my golf game because what I

16:23

do is when I put the ball on the

16:26

tee, I line up one of the Pentagon's to

16:28

where I want to hit and it helps me

16:30

concentrate that that's the part of the ball that I

16:32

want to hit. Oh, that's great. Yeah.

16:35

That's like with bowling, I use the triangle in the middle.

16:37

Well, you're supposed to. That's what they're there for. I don't

16:39

think anyone does though, but I do. I do and it

16:41

works. So yeah, I mean, that's what that's there

16:43

for. That's quite

16:46

annoying for the golfer behind you who has to wait for

16:48

you to just constantly hang on. I know

16:50

they're alone here. Finally, it's Pentagon. Well, that's amazing,

16:52

isn't it? Yeah, that's amazing. Yeah,

16:54

that's incredible. Yeah, that's because you

16:56

can't put hexagons on a sphere.

16:59

You can't. And I've gotten very

17:01

upset because the UK street signs for

17:03

a football stadium, the picture of a football and

17:06

they've forgotten the Pentagon's. It's

17:08

all hexagons, which is mathematically

17:10

impossible. So why it can't be

17:12

if they made the sign work. Well, they just

17:14

drawn a hexagon kind of slightly distorted grid and

17:16

then cut out a circle of it and put

17:18

on the sign. And we never see the other

17:20

side. Yeah, of course. Yeah. So

17:23

I had I ran a big petition. Right.

17:25

I got 20,000 signatures on a parliamentary

17:27

petition. Yeah. So the government has to

17:30

write to you at that point to say what they're going to

17:32

do about this important issue you've raised. Yeah. And

17:34

they wrote to me to say they're not going to change

17:36

the street signs to be correct. They're like, no, they

17:39

said that the correct geometry would be so similar

17:41

to the current signs. There's no point

17:43

changing it. And they also said the correct geometry would

17:45

be so distracting. It might

17:47

increase the likelihood of accidents. Really?

17:51

Absolutely bullshit. Like a lane. We've

17:54

got an election coming up. Thank you. I

17:56

Think if any party decides to go for that,

17:58

we're going to chase it. Say pro football's

18:00

on roadsides the I got my eye to

18:03

huge majority of the an athlete now I

18:05

agree although I did some now talks. Owner

18:07

makes custom. For. Balls or yeah

18:09

symbols and gotten to make me a

18:11

bowl were from one specific angle. It

18:13

looks like secret the street side nice

18:16

so I'm so true I someone who

18:18

runs a company called twelve Pentagon's and

18:20

is jumping all designed this ball were

18:22

from the front and the back looks

18:24

like a street sign but like the

18:27

a Quasar around the bit is a

18:29

nightmare of. Weird shapes, prohibitive. Patch the

18:31

John a Governor together to make it work.

18:33

In general rallies suffer and you have. I

18:35

got off. I took it up to Liverpool

18:38

Football Club now as yeah I got their

18:40

sports analytics seem to have get around with

18:42

it out are not allowed to play. They

18:44

like to eat. Youth has to come on

18:46

a day where we can guarantee they will

18:48

be no players and right in the cellar.

18:50

Played with that all sorts of his entire.

18:54

Play with these are the bulls enclosure. This is

18:56

a woman's I'm not to be. great to see

18:58

a lower league team like the in the Afoul.

19:00

Of training with that bold yeah, knowing the

19:02

game with Apple than playing a premier league

19:04

team and just seeing they are testing media

19:06

with a bomb as the guys at some

19:09

math might seem, a listening device gulf isn't

19:11

how Be much less a must have Any

19:13

this an infinite ssssss. A

19:20

podcast Sup the podcast everyone. This

19:22

week's episode of Fish is sponsored

19:25

by Square Space. Absolutely, Square Space

19:27

is that place to go If

19:29

you want to set up your

19:32

own website, stand you and I

19:34

have to be talking off might

19:36

about How Dahlia the world's premier

19:38

Loch Ness Monster Trucks. Are

19:43

the website saw the all those very sensible

19:45

Melville people he believes a lot this month

19:48

that could come and see or evidence. Will

19:50

Square Space is the place to go to

19:52

do that. That's right if you use where

19:54

it's base. not only can you set up

19:56

an amazing website where you can use all

19:58

very different templates and customize. it to yourself

20:01

but you can sell custom merch like

20:03

the Dan Nessie mug or the Dan

20:05

Nessie plushy toy. You can

20:07

also have an online store that will sell

20:09

it all and ship it out to you

20:12

so all my merch can make it right

20:14

to your front door. There's an asset library

20:16

where you can upload any of the photos

20:18

that you want to use to Photoshop to

20:20

make it look as if you have created

20:22

your own Nessie. But

20:25

no matter what the reason is for your

20:27

website, Squarespace is definitely the place to go

20:30

and if this speaks to you

20:32

then go now to squarespace.com for

20:34

a free trial and when you're

20:37

ready to launch if you go

20:39

to squarespace.com/fish you will save 10%

20:41

off your first purchase of

20:43

a website or domain. That's

20:46

right so head to squarespace.com/fish save 10%

20:48

off your first purchase of a website

20:50

or domain by simply using the code

20:53

FISH. Do it now. Okay

20:55

on with the podcast. On with

20:58

the show. Okay

21:04

it is time for fact number two that

21:06

is James. Okay my fact this week is

21:08

that the woman who invented the trolley problem

21:10

was the daughter of a man who made

21:12

railway tracks for a living. Amazing.

21:15

And the trolley problem is the issue where you're

21:17

in a supermarket and one of the wheels gets

21:19

stuck and you can't push in a straight line.

21:22

No it's when your coin won't fit into the

21:24

slot to release it from the big bunch of

21:26

trolleys and yeah I feel like I have to

21:28

give a little bit more information about the trolley

21:30

problem. So it's like a philosophical idea that

21:32

you've got a trolley or like a trolley

21:34

car in America I guess it is and

21:36

it's going down some tracks and

21:39

it's gonna kill five people who are working on the

21:41

tracks or who are tied to the tracks depending on

21:43

the version. But you have a lever

21:45

and you can pull the lever and the trolley can

21:47

go in the other direction and it will kill only

21:49

one person. Do you pull the lever

21:52

to kill that one person or do

21:54

you just do nothing and let the five

21:56

people die and not everyone agrees with what's

21:58

the correct answer. It's always interesting. Yeah,

22:00

and that was so that was originally called

22:02

the tram problem, which was created by Philip

22:04

of but she married a guy

22:06

called foot Which feels quite rebellious if your dad

22:09

makes railroad tracks That's

22:11

true. And she is known as the grand

22:13

dam of philosophy Yeah, and her

22:15

mother was Esther Cleveland who was the

22:18

first president's child to be born in

22:20

the White House The

22:22

daughter of Grover Cleveland and her

22:24

father was William Sidney Bents boss

22:26

and Kwe who managed

22:28

skinning Grove steel works in Yorkshire

22:31

and He made a

22:33

lot of the tracks for the train tracks in

22:35

the north of England And I'm not sure

22:37

it had any bearing on her philosophical works. I

22:40

just like the idea I think it's

22:42

good that she had parents who worked on railroads

22:44

because imagine if her parents were like an accountant

22:46

and a librarian Yeah, like it'd be a very

22:48

different You

22:51

know five people are want to borrow the

22:53

same book. Yeah, one other person needs it

22:55

for their Shelf

22:58

is gonna fall on it's gonna go one

23:00

of two ways There's five people on one side

23:02

you can shove it the other way and

23:04

get one person. I'm thinking yeah I don't think it would

23:06

have caught on as the you know philosophical meme it is

23:08

today But

23:10

Philip a foot was amazing. She's incredible and it's

23:13

amazing that all the connections, you know

23:15

granddaughter of Grover Cleveland came up with this massive

23:18

Philosophical dilemma flat made of Iris Murdoch,

23:20

you know, she's like got so many

23:22

interesting little cultural touch points that I

23:24

just surprised I've never heard of yeah

23:27

I guess they all there seemed to be a coterie of

23:29

very interesting female philosophers round about that time

23:31

Which I suppose is a 30s and

23:33

40s 40s. She got her degree in 42. Got

23:35

it Yeah, so around the 40s

23:38

and yeah, I was Murdoch who I never really

23:40

thought of as a philosopher and that's just my

23:42

ignorance I read just read a couple of our

23:44

off my ducks years ago and It

23:47

makes me feel much more highbrow now having read

23:49

them because really Iris Murdoch books have you guys

23:51

ever read her? No, they're basically about loads of

23:53

people having affairs Well the two that I read

23:55

and I think all the rest of them, but

23:57

once you notice the moral philosopher, there's a huge

24:00

moral undercurrent that you're supposed to think

24:02

about. Um, so the, the trolley problem.

24:04

So started as a tram problem with Philip's foot.

24:07

Actually, let's go around the table. Sorry to interrupt

24:09

that. Yeah, yeah. Let's go around the table. Pull

24:11

on that pole. Great game.

24:14

Would you pull on that pole? Pull. Pull,

24:16

yeah. But what depends on the freight, the whole

24:18

point is you change insignificant

24:20

details. Yeah. Flips what people will say.

24:23

Okay. And that seems to be what happened. So this

24:25

one seems to be relatively straightforward, although

24:27

there's some disagreement, but almost everyone says they

24:29

would pull. But then when you add lots

24:31

of other bits of the scenario, and that

24:33

seems to be done by this other woman

24:35

called Judith Jarvis Thompson, who was the person

24:38

who made the trolley problem famous, came up

24:40

with the term the trolley problem. That's trolleyology

24:42

is this whole kind of area of study

24:45

that's because of her. And yeah, she expanded

24:47

on it with loads of possible examples. I

24:49

think the most famous is probably the bystander

24:51

case where rather than being the driver of

24:54

the trolley, you're now just on a bridge.

24:56

And you see the driver between faint and

24:59

then as a bystander, do you step in and

25:01

then that's like, are you're intervening now? Well,

25:03

it's slightly different. The bridge one slightly different. There's two

25:06

options that Judith came up with. One is that you're

25:08

on the side watching the trolley come and there's a

25:10

lever that you're able to pull. So you now need

25:12

to make the decision. The five people are one people.

25:14

Yeah. The bridge decision is you're standing on the bridge.

25:17

You've suddenly done an interesting calculation where

25:20

you realize that if you chucked what

25:22

they call the fat man, someone big

25:24

enough, someone big enough, not yourself,

25:26

you've like, no, you're too important. But

25:29

there's someone who's big and weighty next to

25:31

you and you somehow have the skill to

25:34

throw them off the bridge and stop it.

25:36

Would you then do that? Yeah, that's that's

25:38

the biggest dilemma because that's taking an innocent

25:40

bystander and well, then there is

25:42

another version where the bystander is not just

25:44

big enough to stop the train, but he's

25:46

also the person who put the five people

25:48

on the track in the first place. So

25:51

he's the villain. So is it

25:53

better to push him if you know he's a bad

25:55

guy? He's the one who set this whole terrible scheme

25:57

up. Did he do it deliberately? Yeah, so much backstory.

26:00

now. Okay, well what are the five people done to him? Oh,

26:02

well, that's a good question. That's why if they're

26:04

workers versus tied to the track, yeah, can change

26:06

it sometimes. Because are they foolish

26:08

workers who didn't follow health and safety? Or are they

26:11

there of no fault of their own? You're

26:13

right, they had it coming, mate. You don't follow health and

26:15

safety. This feels like a game of pool whenever I

26:17

go to a pub and you have to work out

26:19

what rules you're playing before you make the... Two shot

26:22

carry, two shots in the black. What is it? But

26:24

I like the bridge one because a lot of people

26:26

would, in the standard issue version

26:28

of this, pull the lever and

26:30

sacrifice one person to save five. But then

26:33

there's the hospital waiting room problem, which

26:35

is where a perfectly healthy person walks in

26:37

and sits down the hospital waiting room and

26:39

they realize there are five people who all

26:41

desperately need an organ transplant. Yeah. And if they

26:43

got the organ, they'd all live. So if

26:45

we take this one healthy person, we

26:48

can take their organs and five

26:50

people, which in the abstract is equivalent to

26:52

the same problem. But now it's universally no,

26:54

as opposed to almost

26:57

universally yes. Yeah. And I think

26:59

this is what befuddled old Judith Jarvis Thompson

27:01

and she changed her mind on

27:03

her solution. She said you shouldn't push the bystander off.

27:05

And this was years later. So it was in the

27:07

70s that she came up with her... It was a

27:10

bit late by then because she's already killed 500

27:12

people in experiments. She

27:14

suddenly was like, I feel terrible about this.

27:16

It's wrong. But she said, it's

27:18

kind of what you were saying, Matt. She said, actually,

27:20

if you're on the bridge and you've got the option

27:22

to push someone off the bridge to save the five

27:25

people, but sacrificing them, would you

27:27

sacrifice yourself? And if the

27:29

answer is no, then you've got no right to

27:31

sacrifice the other person. And if the answer

27:33

is even yes, you've still got no right

27:35

because their answer might be no. Yeah. Yeah.

27:37

So it kind of makes sense. But is

27:39

it absolutely right, Danny? Well, my

27:41

answer to the trolley problem, if I'm on the trolley,

27:43

I would immediately look out, see if someone's standing near

27:45

a lever, go pull the lever for Christ's sake, if

27:48

you want, or

27:50

yell up to the bridge. Are there anyone who's just having

27:52

a bad time of it? You just kind of want to

27:54

be a hero? You need to be over 16 stones. Judith

28:00

Thompson was really important in the abortion

28:02

debate and around Roe vs. Wade, she wrote probably the

28:04

most famous or maybe the most

28:06

seminal paper about it with another thought experiment

28:09

that she came up with. Which,

28:11

and I guess what's quite fun about thought

28:13

experiments is they're kind of a bit

28:15

funny. Abortion often not a funny subject, but in...

28:17

But Judith made it rather than a way.

28:20

She found the comedy and she

28:23

said in defense of

28:25

abortion, she wrote, imagine this, you wake up

28:27

one morning and you find yourself back to

28:29

back in bed with a famous unconscious

28:32

violinist. Nigel Kennedy,

28:34

say. Not say Nigel Kennedy yet.

28:36

In fact, because he's probably the only

28:38

famous violinist you can name. I'll check Benny.

28:41

All right, you can have Jack Benny. Jack Benny? This is

28:44

a game I was not equipped to play. Vanessa May? Very

28:49

good. All right, it can be any famous unconscious

28:51

violinist. It's not really important which specific violinist it

28:53

is. Go on, Dad. We're playing the famous violinist

28:55

tennis. No, no,

28:57

no. Please. I'll

29:00

go on. I can't think of one. So

29:03

the famous violinist has a fatal kidney. Sorry,

29:05

that's just the smallest violin playing for me

29:08

in my sadness of losing. So

29:11

the violinist has a fatal kidney

29:14

ailment and the Society of Music

29:16

Lovers have therefore kidnapped you and

29:19

rigged up your circulatory system to

29:21

the violinist, and this will save

29:23

the violinist, him or her. And

29:26

you go to the hospital and you're like, someone's

29:28

rigged up my circulatory system with this fucking violinist,

29:30

and I don't want it there. And

29:32

the hostel's like, look, we're super sorry. Wouldn't let

29:34

it happen if we'd known about

29:37

it, but now it's happened. It's kind of letting him die

29:39

if we unplug you. She says, should you

29:41

have to agree to be plugged into him?

29:44

And her argument is no, you shouldn't have to agree.

29:46

And the doctor also says in nine months it will

29:48

all be fine and you'll be unplugged anyway, right? The

29:50

doctor says in nine months it'll be fine. Yes.

29:52

Although she sort of expands on it a bit

29:54

because if you have a child often it's

29:56

not straight up. So in nine months it'll

29:58

be fine. But. He's going to

30:01

have to look after the chromatic envelope. He's going to

30:03

have to look after the man! He's going to change

30:05

the nappy! I think

30:07

Philippa Futt's original one was also about

30:09

abortion, the one with the trolley problem.

30:12

Because it had the trolley problem in

30:14

it, but it also had another quandary,

30:16

which was a magistrate who executes one

30:18

man in order to quell a riot

30:20

in which five innocent men will die.

30:23

And so she asked people, should you

30:25

be able to execute one person to

30:27

save five people in the riot? And

30:29

almost everyone said no. And then you said,

30:31

but should you pull this lever so that the

30:33

trolley kills this one person? And almost everyone said

30:36

yes. And she's like, this is a weird dichotomy

30:38

of ideas. And I think maybe

30:40

that's where argument came in of one

30:42

of the judges actively killing someone versus

30:44

just not saving people, wasn't it? So

30:46

she was like, that's quite slightly different.

30:49

Very confusing. And then Daniel Battles of

30:51

Columbia University says this is all bullshit

30:53

because these dilemmas are really engaging situations

30:56

that people enjoy thinking about, but in

30:58

real life you wouldn't enjoy it at

31:00

all. If you had to

31:02

make that decision, you probably would be a

31:05

bit stressed. On

31:07

Mastodon, the new Twitter, there's

31:10

a user called Sidereal who came up

31:12

with a solution where the trolley is

31:14

going down and you've got a lever.

31:16

And what you do is you pull

31:18

the lever just when the front wheels

31:20

of the trolley have passed, but before the back

31:22

wheels of the trolley have passed. And

31:24

that will make the trolley car stop. I'll

31:27

kill everyone. No,

31:31

you kill no one. And apparently this

31:33

is how railroad workers stop runaway trains

31:36

and how railroad robberies used to take place in

31:38

the Wild West is you would make the tracks

31:41

change just as the train's going over you. Right.

31:44

So that's a way to trick it. Brilliant. Did you

31:46

read the really recent story about a runaway train? No.

31:49

No, no. Like two weeks ago,

31:51

it was mad. In Japan, it was

31:53

a freight train. It had 50 carriages

31:55

and it went for 80 kilometres

31:58

on its own. Totally drive-lur. 100

32:01

km per hour. So the driver disembarked

32:03

for like a driver stop at a station in a

32:06

place called Jammu and

32:08

it just started rolling and it kept going and

32:10

they had to close all the road crossings ahead

32:12

of it. They were like, oh my god, we

32:14

can't stop this train like quickly. Make sure pedestrians

32:16

aren't crossing the tracks. Went for 80 km and

32:19

eventually I think someone came and put like

32:21

blocks on the track to stop it. So

32:23

I'm randomly on the track. And there

32:25

was no people on it to drive Rick Gannon? No people, just shed

32:27

loads of bricks I think. That's

32:30

a worst case scenario. Not

32:32

pillows, marshmallows. I

32:36

think you guys know

32:39

Vsauce, the YouTuber. Oh,

32:41

your buddies are them. You're our Michael friends. Are

32:43

you? I really want to know your opinion on the

32:45

fact that he actually tried the trolley problem for real,

32:48

which has never been done before and is so

32:50

weird to watch. I mean I think he did

32:52

it. He's claiming to have done it. Yeah, it's

32:54

really hard to work out if people are acting

32:56

or not because you really kill five people. Yeah,

32:59

next video comes from

33:01

jail. Maybe it's us, Michael

33:03

in jail here. Yeah,

33:07

it wasn't quite that extreme, but basically he took

33:10

volunteers from the street and told them they were

33:12

in an experiment about high speed rail and were

33:14

like, we're testing this train,

33:16

this automated train, took them into a switching station

33:19

and he said, why don't you have a look

33:21

at how this switching station works while you're here?

33:23

And there's a guy who's there saying, hey, this

33:25

is the button I press to put the train

33:27

on a different track. And then he gets a

33:29

phone call and has to leave. So the volunteers

33:31

just alone in the switching station and they suddenly

33:33

see a train coming and they're watching workers on

33:36

the track with headphones on so they can't know

33:38

what's happening. And they think that the only way

33:41

to save these workers is to click that switch

33:43

they've just been shown and to kill one person

33:45

but save the other five. And it's incredible to

33:47

watch. And it's mad to me that it was

33:50

allowed to happen. But he took it through this like

33:52

ethics board and seven people did it. Do you want

33:57

to guess how many? Because obviously the other thing about it is that it's a very The

34:00

problem is people always say they'd switch and

34:02

in real life. Would you actually yeah? Yeah Seven

34:06

people how many people do you think click the switch? I'm

34:08

gonna go one. Yeah, I think just like

34:10

if you're in That's someone else's office. You

34:12

just don't want to touch anything. No matter

34:15

what all the other so like you like

34:17

Oh, yeah, people dying, but the social awkwardness

34:24

That's how good human beings are

34:27

you're actually right two people

34:30

They were like well, it's not really my I don't know

34:32

maybe it's pretty good under control It

34:36

is part of the dilemma that you sort of think the act

34:38

of pulling the lever Makes you

34:40

complicit to a murder versus yeah, I hadn't

34:43

thought of that really like that being part

34:45

of the emotion I'm deciding you die. Oh,

34:47

yeah, where is that just like if it's

34:49

your job? Then you could

34:51

be negligent for not pressing it right right you've let

34:53

five people die and it's your job And you should

34:56

have made that decision, but if you've just be left

35:01

If you've misunderstood this the situation you make it

35:03

worse Okay,

35:15

it is time for fact number three and that

35:17

is Anna My fact

35:19

this week is that on the first ever road

35:21

trip across America? Multiple bridges

35:24

collapsed under the weight of the cars and had to

35:26

be rebuilt along the way Wow

35:29

Presumably crumbled behind you often

35:32

crumbled with the vehicles on it, and they would

35:34

plunge into a river all right I

35:37

was thinking like that Maybe it's like you know

35:39

when you're walking in the countryside, and you have

35:41

to close all the gates behind you like consider

35:43

it driving in America bridge back Cow's

35:47

camcros This

35:49

is a very specific road trip and involved a

35:51

lot of cars so it was 1919 and it was 79 vehicles Specifically

35:57

it was the army motor

35:59

transport and they were

36:01

driving across America to check out the state

36:03

of the road. So it was ordered by

36:06

the War Department, this road trip, and

36:08

no one had ever traveled from East Coast

36:10

to West Coast in America because the roads just weren't equipped

36:13

for that. There wasn't an interstate road

36:15

system and so this trip

36:17

was commissioned to see if the roads were

36:19

passable and it turned out not really. And

36:22

there were just constant diversions because

36:24

roads like cars would sink in

36:26

the mud or they

36:28

often had to disassemble covered bridges because the

36:30

trucks were too tall so they'd have to take a bridge

36:32

apart and then put it back together when the trucks had

36:35

gone through. And then if you look up

36:37

news reports about it, it was a huge media

36:39

deal. Every new state they went into, this caravan

36:41

of cars, everyone was like, hey! So it was

36:43

always reported in the news and the news was

36:46

always saying, you know, 12 bridges

36:48

repaired today, 8 bridges collapsed today, you

36:50

know, none other 12 bridges. This truck fell and

36:52

had to be pulled out of a gully. So

36:55

really, if you were a small town, you'd want

36:57

to divert the road to your worst bridges so

36:59

that you're getting free repair. What

37:02

was the date again? Sorry Anna, I know you said. 1919.

37:04

1919. And how many cars were on it? 79 vehicles. And

37:06

it took a surice

37:10

a long time because the roads were so bad

37:12

so it took all together, they traveled 3,242 miles

37:15

and it took 62 days which ended up being an

37:17

average of about five

37:23

miles an hour. A bit over five miles

37:25

an hour. Wow. They took 20 days longer

37:28

to do this than the records were running across

37:30

America today. Right. Oh wow. So

37:32

then this caused this report to be written by

37:35

loads of people, one of whom was a chap

37:37

called Eisenhower in 1919 who went on along

37:39

for the road trip, wrote a report saying

37:41

we've got to fix these roads, became president

37:44

more than 30 years later, was like, they

37:46

haven't fixed these bloody roads yet. And so

37:48

he was the one who fixed the roads.

37:50

I find it amazing that the

37:52

in-state system in America is basically

37:55

an army thing, it's a defense thing isn't it? That's

37:58

why they built it. Is that why they did it in Italy? It's

38:00

actually officially known as the Dwight D.

38:03

Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense

38:05

Highways. So yeah, but then after

38:07

it had been going for 40 years, they claimed that

38:09

it had saved the lives of 187,000 people. Is

38:14

that because it's so safe? It is because

38:16

motorways and highways are just super safe

38:18

compared to normal roads because everyone's going

38:20

in the same direction. Yeah, yeah. And

38:22

it's so regimented how it works. So

38:24

I didn't really know anything about the

38:27

interstate highway system. But

38:29

all the rules are exactly the same across the

38:31

board. So America didn't have a unified road system

38:33

by the 1950s. You still

38:35

couldn't really cross efficiently from one state to

38:37

another because it's just not in a state's

38:39

interest to make the crossing between states good.

38:42

So the federal government took over. And

38:44

yeah, it's super safe, but like everything down

38:46

to the last detail is the same across

38:49

the board. So tunnels and bridges are exactly

38:51

the same height everywhere. There's

38:53

the same gradient of slope at the edge

38:55

of the road for water runoff. Everything's the

38:57

same. That's cool. Universally across

39:00

America, still to this day. Just in

39:02

the interstate highway system. Yeah.

39:04

Yeah. Yeah. And sweetly, Alaska

39:06

and Hawaii both have interstate

39:08

highway roads, even though they've

39:11

got no states to go to. I'm the one in

39:13

Alaska and it's not like... It doesn't seem the same

39:15

as the ones in New York. Oh, did it not?

39:18

Really? No, no. Yeah, they maybe have played it a

39:20

bit faster than these, so the rules are there. The

39:22

ones in Hawaii are the ones in Honolulu. They're exactly

39:24

like anywhere in America, for sure. The

39:27

average age of bridges in the US is

39:29

a year younger than me. Wow.

39:34

Are we talking like 54, 54? Oh, slam

39:36

dunk. Ouch. Will

39:39

that always be true? They age with you? No,

39:42

they'll chase them and repair them and get new

39:44

ones. They're not going to get older than you,

39:46

though, sadly, are they? Yeah. Who has the best

39:49

truth? How

39:51

often do you remove a bridge, though? Like how many bridges

39:53

are we losing? Well, a third of them are classified as

39:55

structurally deficient. in

40:00

the US. So they are having to replace

40:03

them, but they've kind of kicked

40:05

the can down the road for years and years

40:07

and years and now. Who has a longer life

40:09

expectancy? You or the bridge? Average

40:13

bridge or you? I reckon the bridges probably

40:15

don't drink as much as me, but I get a

40:17

bit more exercise. Who would you save in the trolley

40:19

problem? There's a trolley, it's going to kill a bridge.

40:22

There's a bridge on top of a fat man. I

40:27

would love to see a website where it's

40:29

you and listed all the other bridges of

40:31

America and let's see who wins. Let's see who

40:33

makes it to the end. This is my list

40:36

of the letters. This is

40:38

a terrible memento mori, which

40:40

I wasn't expecting. It would

40:42

be a great update that James has outlived

40:45

another bridge. Bridges

40:48

are not surprised collapsed with cars. Engineering

40:51

and designing a bridge is complicated. Yeah.

40:54

And more engineering is kind of experimental.

40:56

I mean, less so now we've got

40:59

computers. Now we're in the post-Burrows 220

41:01

era. But

41:03

back in the day, you build

41:05

a bridge, you're over-engineered a bunch and

41:07

hope it stays up. But

41:10

it's only really as good as the load

41:12

cases that have been over it so far.

41:14

Right. So when they wheeled out cars, I'm not

41:17

surprised this is a whole new load case. Yeah.

41:19

Bridges failed. Yeah. They built a bridge in

41:21

the north of England in 1846. It

41:25

was a railway bridge and it was

41:27

fine. It was like longer than they'd ever built before.

41:29

So they tensioned it up to make it extra stiff

41:32

and trains were going fine over it. And then

41:34

they added a bit more rock and aggregate to

41:36

the top of it to kind of protect the

41:38

sleepers. And that additional mass

41:41

opened up a new mode of movement for the

41:43

bridge that they'd never seen before. And the next

41:46

train that went over the middle of the bridge

41:48

was long enough that the middle bit could twist.

41:51

And they just they just never seen that happen before because no

41:53

bridge had been big enough or had that low foot on it.

41:55

And that now Alton Towers. What

41:58

happened? a

42:01

lot of injuries, five people died.

42:03

The first train that

42:05

went over after they'd added this

42:07

extra rock caused it to

42:09

twist in a new mode in the middle of the bridge

42:11

that hadn't been seen before. And

42:13

it'll happen every now and then. We'll

42:15

build something bigger or different to before.

42:18

And until you test it, we have

42:20

no... I mean, now, obviously with computers,

42:22

we can do a lot more modeling

42:24

and testing in advance, but particularly historically,

42:27

it was a build it and survive

42:29

a bio. Yeah, whenever I'm on Instagram

42:31

and I'm just scrolling through videos, there

42:33

often is an advert that comes up for

42:35

a game where you have to build a bridge

42:37

and you have to put the positions of the

42:40

steel underneath it. And I just watch

42:42

this ad for minutes on end because

42:44

every conceivable way I think a bridge

42:46

should be built, it collapses and flips

42:48

and crashes. Well, thank God you're not

42:50

a civil engineer. I'm not the first

42:52

one that thought that. So

42:55

yeah, that's right. It's more

42:57

complicated than we realized. Yeah, like it was kind

42:59

of a big deal at the time, although I have to

43:01

say I've forgotten about it

43:03

and still reminded researching this, but like the

43:05

Millennium Bridge was a big case, wasn't it?

43:07

And exactly as you say, it's sort of

43:09

untested with a huge deal. So

43:13

for our listeners, it was a quite beautiful bridge across

43:15

the Thames in London that was opened

43:17

in the year 2000 in the summer. And

43:20

I think it closed after two days because it

43:22

was wobbling, wasn't it? It was moving

43:24

about seven and a half centimetres backwards

43:26

and forwards. And people felt it.

43:28

It didn't sound like a lot, but if you're

43:31

standing on this bridge, That's earthquake level. Yeah, it's

43:33

noticeable. And it's because it was able to move

43:35

from side to side. And what I really like

43:37

about it is London is called the Wobbly Bridge.

43:39

They didn't call it the Bouncy Bridge because

43:42

it wasn't going up and down. It

43:44

was very specifically going side to side.

43:46

It had this lateral back and forth.

43:48

They accidentally, when they built it, tuned

43:50

it. They tuned. It

43:52

wasn't deliberate. It ended up being tuned

43:55

to be able to resonate at about

43:57

one Hertz. And when a

43:59

human walks, take about two steps a

44:01

second so we're basically at mass going backwards

44:03

and forwards at the rate of one Hertz

44:06

and people walking across the bridge are naturally

44:09

walking at a Hertz where their

44:11

bodies moving backwards and forwards once a second and

44:13

it would cause the bridge to move a little

44:15

bit but then you had the synchronizing effect where

44:18

because the bridge is moving slightly people are

44:20

more likely to step in rhythm

44:22

with it. Yeah, we're all natural

44:24

dancers. So

44:27

yeah then it makes it worse and worse. I

44:29

feel like is it the same as on a

44:31

trampoline you know when someone's bouncing and you automatically

44:33

bounce in sync with them to make it more

44:35

comfortable. Yeah. So it's quite cool to imagine everyone

44:37

on Millennium Bridge was walking exactly in step

44:41

and then all vomiting. Yeah, you've got seasickness

44:43

going over a bridge. Is it the case

44:45

that they had to fix it? Was it

44:47

dangerous because you could break the bridge? It

44:49

could have got worse and worse so at

44:51

the levels it was happening it wasn't dangerous

44:53

but no one wants to be on a

44:55

bridge wobbling backwards and forwards. It genuinely made

44:57

people feel sick. This is my new entry

44:59

for how I'd solve the trolley problem. I

45:02

would be on the bridge I would see

45:04

the trolley coming and I'd say everyone let's

45:06

walk in sync and let's down the bridge.

45:08

Shake the bridge. Shake the bridge. It

45:11

cost an extra five million pounds to fix.

45:13

It was like on an original budget of

45:15

17 or 18 million to build it. It

45:17

took them two years and five million pounds.

45:20

They had to add extra damping to take

45:22

out those frequencies. Yeah, yeah. By doing that

45:24

they increased the damping below

45:26

one and a half Hertz by about

45:28

15-20% and that was enough to stop

45:30

that runaway feedback group. How interesting. So

45:33

if you got a load of

45:35

shorter people with shorter legs walking

45:37

along might it happen

45:39

again? If you were able to

45:42

walk at a frequency that

45:44

would it be faster or slightly like

45:47

race walkers? The way it's been designed

45:49

now you'd have to be running. Okay. You'd have

45:52

a higher frequency to cause a problem

45:54

but you'd have to have a lot of people running at

45:56

once to fall in sync. I guess

45:58

the London Marathon changes. is

46:02

like people who work on designing

46:05

football stadiums have to make sure

46:07

the stadium is not accidentally tuned

46:09

to any of the frequencies where a concert that's

46:11

put in the stadium might match

46:13

to. Yeah. And so what

46:15

do you mean? Because then the actual structure

46:17

could be the whole structure, the video of

46:19

people dancing in a stadium, although it

46:22

was a football chat that people were doing. And

46:24

you can see the whole structure itself figure out

46:26

and down because they've hit that resonant. That's

46:28

extraordinary. For even though it was just a year of five.

46:30

So every engineer on the stadium has to go, the referee's

46:32

a wanker. Okay, let's do it

46:35

to that one. The

46:37

famous one up near where I

46:39

live is the Broughton suspension bridge

46:42

between Manchester and Bolton, which collapsed

46:44

in 1831 and was supposedly

46:46

because people were marching across it

46:48

and that resonance caused the bridge

46:50

to collapse. I think that's the

46:52

first, in my research, that's the

46:54

first bridge that collapsed. Yeah,

46:57

resonance. Really? And

46:59

the military from then on were always told to

47:01

break step when they cross over a bridge. It

47:04

is sensible to not walk exactly at the same

47:06

pace if you're going over a bridge, I think.

47:09

Yeah, actually, for the British army,

47:11

at certain points, you have to stop playing the music.

47:14

So the trumpeters have to

47:17

shut up as you go over a bridge so you

47:19

can all walk really carefully, not

47:21

coordinating with anyone else's walk. They

47:23

won't walk totally randomly. It's

47:25

different to everyone else walking randomly. You

47:27

could just put some music that's really

47:30

difficult to dance to. Yeah, something like

47:32

some Shostakovich, some really sort of... Get

47:34

all three of the best known violinists.

47:46

Stop the podcast! Stop the podcast!

47:48

Hi everyone, we'd like to let

47:50

you know that this week we're

47:52

sponsored by Hello Fresh! That's

47:55

right, guys, do you want to make your life

47:57

easy? Just make it easy as hell, getting to the

47:59

end of... every evening knowing that there's a

48:01

big meal to cook for yourself and maybe

48:03

for a family. Do you want to just

48:05

have it so that you have a recipe

48:07

ready to go with the times printed out

48:09

for you with all the proportions there? Well

48:11

that's what HelloFresh is. It's a box that

48:13

arrives at your door and allows you to

48:15

make delicious, brilliant meals for everyone in the

48:17

family, efficiently. Let me give

48:19

you some of those meals Dan.

48:21

Teriyaki salmon, pokey style bowl. Crispy

48:25

sea bass and lime coriander rice. Don't they

48:27

just make your mouth water? They sound incredible

48:29

and honestly HelloFresh if you've not tried it

48:31

out I do highly recommend you giving it

48:33

a go. Not only is it tasty and

48:35

it's wholesome and it really is the sort

48:37

of home cooked meal that you dream of

48:40

but again super quick recipes and you've got

48:42

vegan options, you've got vegetarian options, you get

48:44

healthy snacks. It's so much more than just

48:46

the main meal you can see through a

48:48

whole big menu of stuff to

48:50

order from. Absolutely and right now

48:53

you can discover the delicious possibilities

48:55

with HelloFresh by visiting HelloFresh that's

48:57

HELLOFRESH.co dot u-k/new fish and when

49:00

you do that you will unlock

49:02

more in your kitchen and you'll

49:05

get 60% off your first order

49:07

and 25% off the next two

49:09

months. Use

49:12

that link and get 60% off your

49:15

first order and 25% off the next

49:17

two months. Do it now. Okay

49:19

on with the podcast. On with

49:22

the show. Okay

49:28

it is time for our final fact

49:30

of the show and that is my

49:32

fact. My fact this week is that

49:35

in the board game Rising Sun players

49:37

are able to collect monsters that are

49:39

inspired by both Japanese mythology and by

49:41

complete accident a New Zealand farmer. This

49:44

is the board game which they put on

49:46

Kickstarter they needed 300,000 in order to get the game going but

49:49

they ended up getting over 4 million dollars and

49:51

so they had all this additional money. That

49:56

was a stretch goal. One

49:58

guy from New Zealand. He gets to

50:00

pick a monster. So what

50:03

they did was they said, okay well as we've

50:05

got all this extra money what we're going to

50:07

do is we're going to produce more characters. So

50:09

it's like a bonus pack that you get. So

50:11

one of these monsters is called the katahi and

50:14

basically it's described as a manawa bradford, a spirit

50:16

monkey that is very hairy and gets engulfed in

50:18

rage. Are you the New Zealand farmer, Dan? I've

50:22

never seen you consumed with rage.

50:24

No, but you have seen me

50:26

naked. Which made him pretty angry at

50:29

it. But

50:32

yes, so then what happens is the game comes out,

50:34

all these characters are out there and then there's this

50:36

guy who's online who says, hey I'm

50:39

actually from Japan and I've never heard of this

50:41

character. Does anyone know anything more about it? So

50:44

it sparks off a big hunt online for people to

50:46

try and get to the bottom of it. Someone

50:49

eventually discovers that there's a Wikipedia page,

50:51

Legendary Japanese Monsters, that has all the

50:53

characters on it and in there is

50:55

an entry for this katahi and a

50:58

guy in New Zealand, 19 year old

51:00

and his buddy Dickin' About Online, went

51:02

to this page and they named it

51:04

after him and it just sat

51:06

there for over a year and the makers of

51:08

this game went on to Wikipedia, cut and paste

51:11

all of the characters on there, didn't

51:13

do any additional research and ended up

51:15

using him and so he's immortalised in

51:17

this game as a Japanese mythological character.

51:20

Awesome. I encourage more people to

51:22

edit Wikipedia and they're desperate hope they'll make

51:24

it to a board game. Yeah, that's true.

51:26

And there's this great line which says, someone

51:29

was describing it saying, this is the most

51:31

exciting thing to happen in Danoverque, which is

51:33

the rural town where he's from in New

51:36

Zealand, since someone tried to open a brothel

51:38

there in 2008 and it lasted

51:40

precisely three weeks. I think,

51:43

I mean people got really moralistic about it. One

51:45

woman said she'd sit outside the brothel every day

51:47

knitting to shame anyone who came in and she

51:49

also said, I can't see any of our men

51:51

paying $100 a bonk, which I can see a

51:54

lot of her men reading that and going, can't you love?

51:57

A bonk. She's

52:00

from the 50s. One of the

52:02

district council chiefs said that brothels were

52:04

a legal business and the only thing

52:07

that they could do was impose environmental

52:09

conditions on it. And his name was

52:11

Roger Twenty-Man, which sounds like coming on

52:14

the menu. No, brothel. Have

52:17

we ever mentioned the Ant and Dec

52:20

Saturday Night Takeaway board game? I don't

52:22

think so. You say that

52:24

and we must have mentioned it. No, it's the

52:26

game we play all the time. Yeah, we've noticed

52:28

it in pretty much every episode. I don't know what you're on

52:30

about. We came out in 2017. It was

52:32

an Ant and Dec board game called Saturday Night

52:35

Takeaway based on their TV show and it was

52:37

basically a quiz. So you would play the board

52:39

game and get lots of trivia questions. That sounds

52:41

good. It was in theory

52:43

good, except it was just riddled with

52:45

mistakes. One question asked

52:47

where is Stonehenge located? It

52:49

said Somerset. They said that Albert Einstein

52:52

died in 1949 instead of 55, which

52:54

is I guess, you know, you're not going to automatically know if

52:56

that's right or wrong. How about this one? True or false? This

52:59

is not the question. I'm really rephrasing the question here. True or false?

53:02

The moon is the same distance from London to

53:04

Australia. That is

53:06

incorrect. Incorrect.

53:09

Yeah, and it's incorrect that they said that.

53:12

By a factor of 10. Yeah, they said it

53:14

was the same distance as London to Blackpool. So

53:17

in answer to how far away is the moon, they put

53:19

225 miles as the correct answer. It

53:23

posted 238,000. Wow. The

53:27

short lived TV game show Color

53:29

of Money. I

53:32

only know it from the game and pub. Oh yeah.

53:36

You could choose from. They

53:38

hired a mathematician to analyze the game for them.

53:41

And the mathematician ran the numbers

53:43

and came back and said, this is a terrible game. No one's ever

53:45

going to win. And they're like,

53:47

oh no, but I tested it when I was

53:49

home with the family and my grandma won and

53:51

everyone had a great time. And so they put the game into

53:54

production. And basically no one

53:56

won. And that was it for the game.

54:00

I think that would be a good thing for the production company

54:02

though, right? Or if it doesn't make good people. No, no,

54:04

no one wants to watch it. You know, you know. Did

54:06

they ever think of putting that grammar on the

54:09

show? They should have. Lucky grammar. That's where you're

54:11

going wrong. Sweep up.

54:14

Take it all home. It's like the fruit

54:16

machines, pokey's. You

54:18

can tune the payout rate. Like it's not

54:20

doing, you're pulling the lever but it's just

54:22

hitting a switch that's spinning the

54:24

things. And the

54:26

payout rate is programmed

54:29

in to be once every kind of so

54:31

often. It's not even doing

54:33

something particularly randomly. It's evening out the payout

54:35

rate. Right. So you just have to

54:37

watch and once it's been long enough then

54:39

you go on. When I used

54:41

to work in a bar we would watch it and if no

54:43

one won all night and people were playing it all night then

54:46

once everyone else had gone home we'd put a lot of tips

54:48

in and lose all our tips. But

54:51

then we were just terrible at those.

54:53

For instance there was a QI quiz

54:55

machine game. Oh yeah. Have

54:58

we said this on here? I don't think so. I don't think so. So

55:01

there's a QI quiz machine game and before it

55:03

went out they sent me all of the questions

55:05

so that I could check through them to make

55:07

sure there wasn't any mistakes and make sure that

55:09

it was kind of QI as it should be.

55:11

And there was probably, I think it was 20,000, it might

55:14

have been more. Anyway I had

55:16

a database of all the questions and they put

55:18

one in the pub next to where we were.

55:21

Yeah. I was like, I'm really in love with this

55:23

pub down the road. We'll get a clean

55:25

up here and so we went and played and

55:27

we just lost all our money. We

55:29

couldn't win. We just hit every plaque

55:31

so it was ridiculous. Oh

55:34

my God. On Japanese games in the 1980s, I think

55:36

it was 1985 or 1986, did you know that almost half

55:41

of Japanese people owned a

55:43

computer domestically when in the US

55:45

for instance that was about In

55:48

what year? I think it was 1985 or 6. I

55:50

just read it this week. But that's because

55:52

they all owned Famicon which

55:55

was a family computer which

55:57

was the Nintendo console thing.

56:00

And they were all playing Nintendo. In

56:02

1990, I only knew one

56:04

person who had a computer in Bolton. Yeah,

56:06

there you go. And it was called, interestingly,

56:09

everyone called it FamilyCom, and they still do,

56:11

and it's still always called FamilyCom, but the

56:13

name is Family Computer because

56:15

they weren't allowed to trademark it as FamilyCom

56:17

because there was an oven released

56:19

a couple of years earlier, which

56:21

was a family convection oven,

56:23

which was FamilyCon. And

56:26

so, just on board games,

56:28

cool new weird board games, which are always fun,

56:30

people always coming up with them these days. Have

56:33

you guys heard of Consentical? No

56:37

one I already regret half hearing about. Go

56:40

on, guess what it is? You

56:43

can touch my board. So

56:47

it's a cooperative card game for two

56:49

players, and it's about

56:52

a consensual, crucially sexual encounter

56:54

between a curious human and

56:56

a tentacled alien. Oh,

56:58

wow. Consentical. And

57:00

the way it works... I see, like tentacle.

57:03

Yeah. Tentacle. Not

57:05

testicle. That's down below. I see consent

57:08

tackle. Consenticle is a testicle

57:10

one. I think Consenticle is the one where it's

57:12

you and Mr. Tickle have that. There

57:14

are lots of variations, it's like the trolley problem.

57:16

It builds on a lot. Anyway,

57:19

it sounds super fun. So you've got

57:21

these cards, which are things

57:24

like things that you

57:26

might want to do to this alien

57:28

that you fancy with tentacles. So like

57:30

wink, gaze, envelop, bite, lick, penetrate is

57:32

one of the cards. And

57:34

you convey which card you want to mutually

57:37

put down with faces and gestures. So you

57:39

make a certain face. I'm looking at that

57:41

and it's like very awesome. It's so

57:43

wonderful. Not me, I'm looking

57:46

at that plant over there. I'm showing a lot of

57:48

copies of those QI books over there. That

57:51

looks and penetrate at that plant. By

57:55

Hockeside there's a famous painting of a

57:57

woman having sex with a... Yeah,

58:00

with an octopus. Yeah. And

58:02

a load of octopus scientists looked at it

58:04

and said it didn't look like the octopus

58:06

was enjoying itself. Really? Because

58:09

apparently, octopuses have ways of changing their

58:11

body whenever they're mating and stuff like

58:13

that. I think there was an exhibition

58:15

at the British Museum that had a

58:17

bunch of these, effectively a monster erotica

58:19

paintings. And in the year that they

58:21

were there, if you go to the

58:23

website and you looked at the data,

58:25

there were more searches for that exhibition

58:27

than there were for the opening hours

58:29

of the British Museum. It was very popular.

58:32

Well, maybe I'll try this game, you

58:34

know. It's like, stop having this non-consensual sex

58:37

with octopuses. So what happens, sorry, you put the cards

58:39

down and... I would need to convey through a series

58:41

of looks and gestures what kind of sex move we

58:43

should make with each other. And then, we would... Should

58:45

look at the table. The plants over there, if you need it. And

58:54

then you would play a card, and I would play a card,

58:56

and we would hope that our cards mutually match each other

58:58

and build trust between us, rather

59:00

than being non-consensual. It's

59:02

snap. Yeah. It's a sexy

59:04

snap. Sexy snap. It's snap.

59:07

Oh, snap. It's a really random

59:09

thing that is a board game

59:11

I'd love to get my hands

59:13

on. It's a game which

59:15

you can get in Sierra Leone,

59:17

which is essential to be played

59:19

by anyone who's trying to obtain

59:21

a driver's license. It's

59:24

not funny, but it's just the only piece of the

59:26

car. I

59:29

think you go around the board and whatever you land

59:32

on it, ask your question about the highway code. Right.

59:34

And you have to play it for two to

59:36

three months, and then you do

59:38

the test and the game supposedly gets you ready

59:40

for the test. Oh, right. It's so good. I

59:43

could do with that. I'm learning to drive at the

59:45

moment, and I'm dreading the theory test because it's a

59:47

big old book to read, the highway code. So a

59:50

board game would be amazing. There you

59:52

go. If you're listening, please God, make the

59:54

board game. Otherwise, that would be as difficult

59:56

as possible. So a lot of fun. Did

1:00:01

you guys ever play the game Guess Who? Yes, yes,

1:00:03

still play it. Good on you mate, it's not going

1:00:05

to help you party, Tash. Yes, okay. LAUGHTER That

1:00:09

was invented by this couple called

1:00:12

Aura and Theo Koster, who created

1:00:14

a company called Theora. It

1:00:17

was invented in the, I think it was the 60s. Theo

1:00:20

was actually a classmate of Anne Frank, went to

1:00:22

school with her. No! Yeah, interestingly.

1:00:25

His original name was Morris, but

1:00:27

he was brought up in the Netherlands when it was

1:00:29

under German occupation, so changed his name and

1:00:32

hid his Jewish identity. And yeah,

1:00:34

they married and they became amazing game designers. They

1:00:36

designed loads of extremely popular games, one of

1:00:38

which was Guess Who, and they died, one

1:00:40

of them died in 2019, one in 2021, I think, both aged 90. Wow.

1:00:45

And their gravestones are the Guess

1:00:47

Who pop-ups. You're kidding. You can

1:00:49

flip their gravestones down. You can't flip

1:00:51

them, sadly. That would be

1:00:53

so cool. But no, you

1:00:55

can't. What is it? What do they have? They

1:00:57

just have the same design as the Guess Who

1:00:59

pop-ups, which are quite similar to an actual gravestone.

1:01:02

Optimal Guess Who. You

1:01:05

want to be able to split

1:01:07

the remaining possible people as

1:01:10

evenly in half as possible. Yes. Because you want

1:01:12

to basically do a binary search. You

1:01:14

want to split it in half each time. Yeah. And

1:01:16

that's the fastest way to get to the final answer. And

1:01:20

the way you need to do that is

1:01:22

by stacking your conditions at once, which a

1:01:24

lot of other people will claim as cheating

1:01:27

or making the game not fun

1:01:29

anymore. But you can say, like,

1:01:31

if it's a man, do they have

1:01:33

glasses? Or if it's a

1:01:35

woman, have they got a hat? And

1:01:38

there's still a yes or no response.

1:01:42

But now you've used the categories to better split

1:01:44

the options in half. That is so much better

1:01:46

than the way we play it. Yeah, that's brilliant.

1:01:48

We always say, does your guy like peas? And

1:01:51

you have to make a judgment. Deep into their

1:01:53

eyes, would you trust them with

1:01:56

the trolley problem? So roughly, how quickly do you

1:01:58

destroy the seven-year-olds you're playing? I

1:02:01

wonder how mathematicians had a go

1:02:03

at the other game invented by

1:02:05

Aura and Theo Costa, which

1:02:07

is the, and they made it in the 1970s,

1:02:10

the popping out rubber spheres

1:02:12

game that's come really popular recently. I've

1:02:14

only seen it because suddenly I'm surrounded

1:02:16

by young children. Yeah, we've got a few at

1:02:18

home. Yeah. Yeah. Do you guys know what I

1:02:20

mean? The big toy thing. Yeah. Yeah. And people

1:02:23

are into it. I thought babies were into it,

1:02:25

but apparently it's popular. I thought they were invented

1:02:27

by someone who's inspired by a field of breasts.

1:02:29

Theo absolutely right. And that is Aura

1:02:32

Costa. Wow. Yeah. She was actually sweetly

1:02:34

and darkly inspired by her sister who

1:02:36

very sadly got breast cancer. And she

1:02:38

had a dream around that time of

1:02:40

a huge field of her sister's breasts

1:02:42

and woke up and went to the

1:02:44

game designer and was like, make me

1:02:47

a field of boobs. Wow. Oh my

1:02:49

God. I had a dream last night where there

1:02:51

was this referee in a football match and he

1:02:53

tried to send one off, but he pulled out

1:02:55

a rice cake instead. Oh yeah. Can we turn

1:02:57

that into a game? Not all dreams are going

1:03:00

to be money for them. That should have been

1:03:02

her tombstone, a giant rubber gravestone that you could

1:03:04

push down into the ground. But

1:03:06

then what if she pops it back up?

1:03:08

That is scary. Okay.

1:03:18

That's it. That is all of our facts. Thank

1:03:20

you so much for listening. If you'd like to

1:03:22

get in contact with any of us about the

1:03:24

things that we've said over the course of this

1:03:26

podcast, we can be found on our various social

1:03:28

media accounts. I'm on Instagram on Shriverland. James.

1:03:31

My Instagram is no such thing as

1:03:33

James Harkin. Matt. I'm stand up maths

1:03:36

pretty much everywhere. Yep. And Anna. You

1:03:38

can find us on Twitter on at no such

1:03:40

thing or on Instagram. No such thing as a

1:03:42

fish or you can email podcast.com. Yep. Or you

1:03:44

can just head straight to our website, which

1:03:46

is no such thing as a fish.com. You'll

1:03:48

find all of our previous episodes out there.

1:03:50

You'll find a link to club fish, our

1:03:53

secret members club where we have lots of

1:03:55

bonus episodes. But most important of

1:03:57

all, you should find yourself to a pre-order

1:03:59

link. for Matt's new book which is

1:04:01

coming out this June, you were saying? June

1:04:03

in the UK, August in the US. And where's

1:04:06

the best place for them to go? If you

1:04:08

go to mathgear.co.uk, you can get the signed pre-ordered

1:04:10

copies by me, but you can

1:04:12

support your local independent book shop or anywhere else

1:04:14

online to pre-order it. Remind us what it's called?

1:04:16

It's called Love Triangle. Okay, that's it. We'll be

1:04:18

back again next week with another episode and we'll

1:04:20

see you then. Goodbye.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features