Podchaser Logo
Home
Deborah Tuerkheimer: ...that a credibility complex shapes all of us

Deborah Tuerkheimer: ...that a credibility complex shapes all of us

Released Wednesday, 15th March 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Deborah Tuerkheimer: ...that a credibility complex shapes all of us

Deborah Tuerkheimer: ...that a credibility complex shapes all of us

Deborah Tuerkheimer: ...that a credibility complex shapes all of us

Deborah Tuerkheimer: ...that a credibility complex shapes all of us

Wednesday, 15th March 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Five seconds left, and he shoots,

0:03

he scores. I

0:05

can't believe

0:06

it. This is a moment for the three

0:08

books. Secure the w you've been

0:10

craving with big bold flavors from firehouse

0:13

subs, like our iconic hook and ladder

0:15

sub with smoked turkey breast, Virginia

0:17

honey

0:17

ham, and Monterrey Jack. Order now

0:19

and score two dollars off any sub purchase in

0:21

the firehouse subs app when you enter promo code

0:23

hoops. Limited time offer only on the

0:25

Firehouse Subs app. Tap the banner now

0:27

to download the Firehouse Subs app.

0:41

Welcome to nobody told me.

0:43

I'm Laura Owens, and I'm Jan Black.

0:45

The vast majority of sexual abuse

0:48

victims in this country are girls and women

0:51

statistics show that most abusers

0:53

are men and most sexual assault complaints

0:55

never result in an

0:57

arrest. Much less charges

0:59

a prosecution or a conviction. On

1:01

this episode, we'll take a look at the cultural

1:04

and legal forces that downgrade

1:06

the credibility of sexual abuse survivors.

1:09

Our guest is former special victims prosecutor

1:12

and legal scholar Deborah who's

1:14

a leading authority on sexual violence.

1:16

She's the author of the new book credible,

1:19

why we doubt abusers and

1:21

protect abusers. Deborah, thank

1:23

you so much for joining us. Thank

1:25

you so much for having me. And thank

1:27

you also for writing this book. It

1:29

is so

1:31

needed. Why did you decide

1:33

to write it? Well,

1:35

thank you. I also feel like it's

1:37

needed in this respect.

1:40

We are here in the Me Too era and

1:43

all sorts of stories of sexual

1:46

assault and sexual harassment are

1:48

coming to the fore. People are

1:51

feeling more willing to share

1:53

their experiences and share their

1:55

accounts. And that's all for

1:57

the good. And yet as

1:59

a society, as a culture, we

2:02

still have real problems with

2:04

responding to those stories. Certainly,

2:07

as a legal system, we still have

2:09

problems responding to these stories. And

2:11

so my hope in writing

2:14

this book is that readers

2:16

would be given a new understanding of

2:19

how in our own

2:21

individual lives, we can make

2:23

a difference and we can do better by

2:25

survivors. Are there any

2:27

standards right now for credibility?

2:30

Well, it's such an interesting question

2:33

because we judge credibility

2:36

all the time. We judge it when

2:38

we speak to our friends and family members.

2:41

And certain people have professional responsibilities

2:44

that require them to judge credibility.

2:46

If you're a police officer, if you're a

2:48

title nine officer, or

2:51

an HR worker. And

2:53

yet, we don't have

2:56

formal standards for judging credibility. We're

2:58

all sort of, you know, flying

3:01

little bit blind when it comes to this central

3:03

question of who

3:05

to believe and what to believe and

3:07

and even whether to care about

3:09

what we hear. What would you

3:11

like to see happen to change

3:14

that? Well, I think

3:16

the first step is is for

3:18

us to recognize that

3:21

there are these forces these

3:23

cultural and legal forces that

3:26

I call the credibility complex that

3:30

shapes all of our responses to

3:33

accusations of abuse.

3:36

And when we start to see these

3:38

forces and the biases and

3:40

the myths and the stereotypes

3:43

and the misunderstandings that

3:45

affect us, then we can

3:47

start to change. We can start to

3:49

rewire ourselves

3:51

and do better when it comes to

3:53

assessing credibility. One of

3:55

the toughest things for me when I

3:58

was going through the process of getting a

4:00

restraining order was when I first went to the

4:02

police and figured that I would

4:04

be trusted and they would think, okay.

4:06

Well, she's obviously the victim. She's a

4:08

full foot shorter than this guy.

4:11

And what she says, you can you can just tell

4:13

this guy would have a propensity to

4:15

try and do things that would overpower

4:18

a woman my size. So I

4:20

was absolutely shocked when they

4:22

initially seemed to be on

4:24

his side. However, the

4:26

cops who were taking the report were

4:29

his age and they

4:31

all seemed to just kind of be

4:33

in this club together that I

4:35

didn't know existed. So is

4:37

that true that if you're a

4:39

woman reporting a crime, you're typically

4:41

not like the officer who's taking the

4:43

complaint, so they're gonna maybe think

4:46

about, oh god, I had this ex girlfriend

4:48

who She was crazy. She was

4:50

crazy. And so I get it, man. Is

4:52

that true? Well,

4:55

I think that's a big part of the problem

4:57

and the experience that you're describing

5:00

is sadly

5:02

very familiar to me from my

5:05

time as domestic

5:07

violence prosecutor. And from

5:09

all of these years, I've spent since

5:11

speaking with victims and survivors

5:13

about their enounters with law enforcement

5:16

officers. And I should say other kinds

5:18

of officials as well. It's it's, of

5:20

course, not just the police. There

5:22

is tendency I think to

5:25

identify in many cases with

5:28

the accused man, particularly if

5:30

it's a man who share

5:33

certain characteristics with the person that

5:35

the victim is reporting to. And

5:38

at the same time, I I also wanna say that

5:40

this isn't just about men

5:42

disbelieving. I, you know, unfortunately,

5:46

we see that in many instances, you

5:48

know, women too

5:50

distrust accusers and

5:53

blame accusers and

5:55

and disregard their suffering. And

5:57

and I think the point that III

5:59

try to make in different ways in the book is

6:01

that this really is a cultural

6:04

problem. This is is not just

6:07

people who who don't wanna do

6:09

right. This is not a problem of bad apples,

6:12

but it's something that we all really have to

6:14

reckon with.

6:15

Isn't it also true that police

6:18

may be hesitant to

6:20

pursue cases like this? Because

6:22

it may end up coming down to he

6:24

said, she said, and for

6:26

prosecutors, that also may be very difficult

6:28

to prosecute. Yes.

6:31

And one of the things that is so

6:33

frustrating is the way that

6:36

he said she said is used

6:38

to stall investigations. And

6:41

what I mean by that is that at an early

6:43

stage, the research shows and

6:46

and experiences certainly show

6:49

that You

6:51

know, law enforcement officers often just

6:53

stop doing the work of investigating the

6:56

case so that it's

6:58

no longer a quote unquote he said,

7:00

she said. I mean, it's very

7:02

difficult to prove any case beyond

7:04

a reasonable doubt if it goes through

7:06

the criminal process and ends up a trial.

7:09

And I I don't wanna minimize the difficulty

7:11

that prosecutors have. And

7:13

yet, it's also the case that evidence

7:15

can often be gathered that

7:18

supports, that corroborates the

7:20

victim's account, and that's the kind of

7:22

evidence that law enforcement officers are

7:25

supposed to be looking for. But when

7:27

they decide early on to short

7:29

circuit the investigation, because

7:32

they just conclude that this is

7:34

inevitably he said, against

7:36

she

7:37

said, well, you know, that's the

7:39

dismissal of a case that might have been viable.

7:41

Yeah, and I think you're so right when you talk

7:43

about HOW IT'S REALLY HARD

7:45

FOR VICTIMS TO TALK ABOUT THEIR CASES

7:48

IN CORONOLOGICAL ORDER BECAUSE IT

7:50

JUST SEEMS SO OVERWHELMING BY THE TIME

7:52

YOU GO TO THE POLICE. Why

7:54

does that really put you at a disadvantage

7:57

with the cops even if you're coming off

7:59

hysterical and they can tell this seems

8:01

like somebody who is abused.

8:04

Yeah, you know, we there's all sorts

8:06

of really interesting and really

8:08

important neuroscience in this

8:10

area that helps to explain

8:13

the effects of trauma. And

8:15

it turns out scientists know

8:18

that putting together a

8:20

linear narrative of a traumatic

8:23

event is often difficult

8:25

to impossible for many survivors of

8:27

that event. And so, many

8:30

of us sort of expect that someone's going

8:32

to come in and be able to present a

8:35

clean and chronological account

8:37

that contains all of the details though

8:39

central details and the peripheral

8:42

details and everything in between. And

8:44

that's just not how how we work

8:46

as human beings. And And so,

8:48

you know, part of I think what

8:50

would help in this area is for

8:53

law enforcement officers and others those

8:56

who respond to allegations in

8:58

their jobs and in their lives to

9:01

become better versed in

9:03

this neuroscience and to be what's

9:06

known in the field as trauma informed

9:08

in the way they do their work.

9:10

We thank you for being part of our.

9:12

Nobody told me family of listeners.

9:14

You know, we always try to tell you about

9:17

things that will help improve your

9:19

life. And our sponsor, Zocdoc

9:21

is one of those things. Zocdoc is

9:23

the only free app that lets you

9:25

find and book doctor who are patient

9:28

reviewed, take your insurance, and are available

9:30

when you need

9:31

them. They treat almost every condition

9:33

under the sun. You know, it's frustrating to

9:35

go to a doctor's appointment, expecting to

9:37

be able to fully explain your symptoms,

9:39

condition, and

9:40

worries, only to find that the

9:42

doctor wants to hurry you out of their

9:44

office. Instead of listening to you intently,

9:47

the doctor is checking the clock, but on

9:49

Zocdoc, you'll find quality doctors who

9:51

focus on you, listen to you, and prioritize

9:53

your care. I've used doc doc several

9:55

times to find doctors, and I have never

9:58

been

9:58

appointed. I love how soft dock lets you

10:00

check a doctor's availability and book an appointment

10:03

as soon as the same day if there's an opening.

10:05

Thousands of doctors and medical professionals

10:08

on Zocdoc are there to help

10:10

you. Zocdoc helps

10:12

you find the ones that specialize in the

10:14

care you need and deliver the type of experience

10:17

you

10:17

want. When you're not feeling your best

10:19

and just trying to hold it together, finding

10:21

great care shouldn't take up your energy, and

10:23

that's where Doc Doc comes in. Using their

10:25

free app that millions of users rely on,

10:28

you can find the right doctor that meets your needs

10:30

and fits your schedule. Book an appointment

10:32

with a few taps in their app and

10:34

start feeling better faster with zocdoc.

10:37

Go to zocdoc dot com

10:39

slash NTM and download the zocdoc

10:41

app for

10:41

free, then find and book a top rated

10:44

doctor today. Many are available within

10:46

twenty four hours. That's Z0CD0C

10:51

dot com slash NTM

10:54

zuck dot dot com slash

10:57

NTM.

10:57

If you have a symptom that you'd really like to

10:59

get checked out, don't put it off anymore.

11:02

Just go to zocdoc dot com

11:04

slash NTM and download

11:06

the zocdoc app for free.

11:08

One thing that I wanted to say

11:10

to domestic violence survivors

11:13

who are currently in a relationship and don't

11:15

necessarily know how they can get

11:17

out. They don't know how they can describe these events

11:20

is I went to the courthouse to

11:22

try and file a report and

11:24

I found I just god, there was just

11:26

so much that was coming out, no. It wasn't

11:28

coming out in order. And I was so lucky

11:31

that a women's group backed offered

11:33

free legal help for me and they

11:36

prepared everything for

11:38

me in chronological order and they they

11:40

took their time to do it. And so I know

11:42

that there are resources like that available

11:44

to other women. So I think that

11:46

they should take the time to maybe research that

11:49

that can help their credibility, tremendous

11:51

amount.

11:52

Yes. And that makes a lot of sense to

11:54

me. It's really unfortunate

11:57

that the onus, the burden is put

11:59

on victims to to do

12:01

that kind of, you know, difficult work upfront.

12:05

As you say, very helpful to have

12:07

an advocate to to assist

12:09

with that. It would be

12:11

much better if the person on the receiving

12:14

end, you know, was asking

12:16

the kinds of questions designed to elicit

12:18

the best possible narrative, but that doesn't

12:20

always happen. And so you're absolutely right

12:22

that, you know, going into these kinds

12:24

of interviews having prepared

12:26

some for the kinds of questions that are gonna

12:29

gonna come your way can can be really

12:31

useful and and can enhance that credibility.

12:34

Well, what should you be prepared for

12:37

if you want to pursue charges

12:39

against your attacker? And and especially

12:41

if your attacker was someone you may have been in

12:43

a relation ship with?

12:45

Well, the criminal justice system, the

12:47

legal system generally, but the criminal justice

12:49

system, in particular, has

12:52

been very

12:55

unreceptive to these kinds of claims,

12:58

particularly when they

13:00

involve people who are known to

13:02

one another, which is the vast majority of

13:05

sexual assault cases. We

13:07

still have this idea that rape

13:10

involves a stranger. We

13:12

think of an alley or a weapon. And

13:14

of course, that's really not the not

13:17

how most of these cases play

13:20

themselves out. And so

13:22

we have a criminal justice system with a

13:24

with a miss misunderstanding

13:27

of what sexual assault looks like.

13:29

And if you're someone who who comes

13:31

forward and decides to pursue criminal

13:33

charges, you may be met

13:36

with hostility and

13:38

you may be met with skepticism

13:41

and you may be met with blame

13:43

shifting and and disregard and

13:45

and and a lot of things that, you know, I think people

13:47

who've gone through the system are are

13:49

often familiar with. And at

13:51

the same time, I wanna say that not all

13:54

law enforcement officers, prosecutors, judges,

13:57

jurors, are this way.

13:59

And so for some victims

14:02

who go through the criminal process, it can be

14:04

very empowering, and it can be validating.

14:06

And And so there's just a range of

14:08

experiences, and yet we can say

14:10

for the most part, the criminal justice system

14:13

really does need to do

14:14

better. I've heard that in so many

14:16

cases, men will say that

14:19

sexual acts were actually

14:22

Yes. Exactly, strangulation. Oh, she

14:24

wanted that. How does

14:26

the court see

14:27

that? Do they say, oh, well, the guy

14:29

must be right. Because how can you disprove that?

14:32

Mhmm. Yeah. A lot of these cases

14:35

become consent defenses.

14:38

It's not a question of identity, it's

14:40

not a question of who did it, but

14:43

a question of whether the

14:45

person who comes forward and says she was

14:47

assaulted, actually consented to

14:49

those sex acts. And this is exactly

14:51

why credibility is so critical

14:55

in these cases. This is why

14:57

people tend to think of them as he

14:59

said, she said because she's got one account

15:01

and he's got another and it falls

15:03

to the trier effect,

15:06

often a jury, sometimes a

15:08

judge, to sort through that. And that's

15:10

where that corroborating evidence

15:12

becomes really important. But also,

15:14

and this, again, the point of book is to say,

15:17

we need to do better at at

15:19

judging credibility, and we need to not

15:21

start from a position of of

15:24

of doubting.

15:25

The woman often usually

15:28

who says, this happened to me and I

15:30

did not consent. So

15:33

would that be a good enough argument

15:35

for that? Or what should women

15:37

say if they're told your boyfriend

15:39

said that it was a consensual act Do

15:41

they wanna get ahead of it in some way and

15:43

say, oh, I know he'll say that? Well,

15:46

I think, you know, the the question is

15:48

who is the victim

15:50

talking to. Right? If she's talking to a police

15:52

officer, you know,

15:54

it can be helpful to say Here

15:57

are some thoughts about where

16:00

you might look for corroborating evidence.

16:02

There was a person who

16:04

saw me immediately afterwards and

16:06

I was crying and I was distraught and

16:08

I told her what happened or, you

16:11

know, he was text staying with a friend of his

16:13

afterwards, and it may be that those

16:15

texts contain incriminating information. And

16:17

so at the investigative stage,

16:20

it can be helpful to sort

16:22

of assist with the law enforcement

16:24

effort, particularly if you've got officers

16:26

who don't seem especially inclined to

16:29

to move in that direction. And then

16:31

if the case moves forward to

16:33

trial, which I want to emphasize is

16:35

exceedingly rare in these

16:38

cases, most sexual assault

16:40

never gets reported. Of

16:43

those complaints that do go

16:45

to the police, most do

16:47

not result in an arrest. And those that

16:49

do result in arrest may not result in

16:51

a prosecution. Okay? And and those

16:53

that do result in prosecution may never make

16:55

their way to a jury. So this is what's

16:57

known as case attrition. Case

17:00

is dropping out. Of the system.

17:02

And, you know, your your listeners should understand

17:05

that when someone decides to

17:07

go forward, that doesn't necessarily mean

17:09

that the case is going to end up in

17:12

a trial and with a jury sorting through

17:14

credibility. But if it does end

17:16

there, then the question that you

17:18

asked about, you know, how does this get resolved?

17:21

Well, that becomes a jury question. And

17:23

the the the jurors have to figure out

17:25

what to believe and whether they're persuaded beyond

17:28

a reasonable doubt that the person accused

17:30

actually did the the crime of which he's

17:32

accused. I was absolutely

17:35

shocked to learn from your book that more

17:37

than one hundred thousand rape

17:39

kits sit untested

17:42

around the country. Why is

17:44

that the case? I mean, that that's

17:46

mind boggling.

17:49

It is mind boggling. It's one

17:51

of those statistics that I

17:53

I think if you sort of sit with it for a while,

17:55

you just can become more and more angry

17:57

and upset. This goes

18:00

to the earlier conversation that

18:02

we were having about short

18:04

circiting investigations and law enforcement

18:07

officers just deciding from

18:09

the get go that the the case is not gonna

18:11

be pursued. There's been some

18:13

really good research done on these

18:15

shelved rate kits by Rebecca

18:18

Campbell. And she's a

18:20

psychologist, and she's talk to

18:22

some of the officers about why these rate

18:24

kits didn't get tested. And

18:26

and it turns out they didn't get tested

18:28

because the officers had really already

18:31

dismissed the case as as being a case that

18:33

wasn't gonna go anywhere.

18:34

Oh, wow. Another thing that I abusers

18:38

can do to get ahead of their victim is

18:40

to file a protective order against

18:43

the

18:43

victim. How should the

18:45

victim then handle that? Howard Bauchner:

18:47

Oh, this is this is

18:49

so common and it's it's awful. Right?

18:51

To it's often refer

18:54

to as Darvo deny

18:56

attack, reverse victim and offender.

18:58

This is how psychologists and experts in

19:00

the field will often kind of characterize

19:03

these efforts to, you know, to

19:05

shift the focus. This

19:08

is another place where I think having a really

19:10

good epic get, ideally legal advocate

19:14

is is key. It's interesting

19:17

to realize that in so many

19:19

of these cases that are very highly

19:21

publicized of sexual assault,

19:23

something of Bill Cosby or Larry NASA

19:26

or Jeffrey Epstein. It's

19:28

taken dozens and

19:30

dozens of people to come through.

19:33

In order for these cases to be prosecuted,

19:36

Why is it that it takes so many

19:38

that just one or two or even five

19:40

or ten don't get it? One

19:42

or two really should be enough. Right. But but

19:45

you look at a case of like Bill Cosby. It

19:47

was sixty. In the case of Larry Nasser,

19:49

it's over two hundred and fifty. All

19:51

of these these you know, highly publicized

19:53

cases seem to have dozens of

19:56

victims.

19:57

They do, and that's because as

20:00

a culture, we do this thing

20:03

that I call credibility discounting,

20:06

which is that when one accuser

20:09

comes forward, her word is unlikely

20:11

to be enough to persuade someone. And

20:13

so credibility comes in

20:15

numbers and it's,

20:18

you know, terrible to say, but what we

20:20

see is that you need a mass

20:22

of victims

20:23

before people believe

20:26

and before they care. We

20:28

thank you for being part of our, and nobody

20:30

told me family of listeners. And in

20:32

just a

20:32

minute, we'll tell you about a special offer for

20:35

our listeners from our sponsor, ritual.

20:37

Ritual makes a great product called

20:39

symbiotic plus. We love it and

20:42

we think that you might too. You may have

20:44

heard us talk about it before. It's our daily

20:46

three in one clinically studied prebiotic,

20:49

probiotic, and postbiotic designed

20:51

to help support a balanced gut microbiome.

20:54

If your gut's telling you it needs a

20:56

little support, ritual has your

20:58

back. With ritual symbiotic plus,

21:01

you get two of the world's most clinically

21:03

studied probiotic strains to

21:05

support the relief of mild and occasional

21:08

digest of

21:08

discomfort, like bloating, gas,

21:11

and diarrhea. Why include a post

21:13

biotic? Well, it provides fuel to

21:15

the cells that make up the gut mining and supports

21:17

a healthy gut barrier, symbiotic

21:19

plus comes in a delayed release capsule

21:21

that's designed to help survive the harsh

21:24

conditions of the upper GI tract

21:26

for delivery to the

21:27

colon, an ideal place for probiotics to

21:29

grow and thrive. Synbiotic plus

21:32

and ritual are here to celebrate, not

21:34

hide your insides,

21:36

It's time to listen to your gut.

21:38

Ritual is offering our nobody told me listeners

21:40

ten percent off during your first

21:42

three months. Visit ritual dot com

21:44

slash NTM to start ritual

21:46

or add symbiotic plus to your subscription

21:49

today. All you have to do is

21:51

visit ritual dot com

21:53

slash NTM to

21:55

start ritual or add

21:57

symbiotic plus to your subscription

22:00

today. These statements have not been evaluated

22:02

by the Food and Drug Administration. This

22:04

product is not intended to diagnose, treat,

22:06

cure, or prevent any disease. Visit

22:09

ritual dot com slash NTM

22:12

to start ritual or add symbiotic

22:15

plus to your subscription

22:16

today. Do you think

22:19

that criminal defense attorneys who

22:21

are representing an abuser really

22:24

care if they committed that

22:25

act? And do you think they they trust them.

22:28

Well,

22:30

criminal defense attorneys have a really important

22:32

role to play in our system. And I and

22:34

I really respect the work they do. I don't

22:36

think that you know, when they stay within

22:39

the ethical bounds, everyone

22:41

deserves a defense. And think

22:43

the problem is less with the defense

22:45

attorneys and the and the attorneys

22:48

doing their job, then

22:51

it is the kinds of

22:53

arguments that often win the day. Because

22:56

if it didn't work to shift blame,

22:58

if it didn't talk, if it didn't work to talk

23:00

about what the victim was

23:02

wearing, then

23:04

defense attorneys wouldn't bother to make those

23:07

arguments. It's the fact that they're

23:09

often successful that ought to trouble

23:11

us.

23:12

How is it that these powerful

23:14

men are able to

23:16

get away with abuse for a

23:18

long time?

23:20

Our culture is oriented

23:23

to the pain of the powerful. And

23:25

so we're loathed to impose

23:28

consequences on people for their

23:30

abuse were reluctant to

23:33

hold them to account. And instead, we

23:35

want to look at what the victim

23:38

did to deserve this or why she

23:40

ought not to be trusted or

23:42

why her pain doesn't

23:45

matter. And, you know, that

23:47

that is a

23:49

deeply seated tendency,

23:52

and it's going to take a

23:54

lot of work for us to

23:56

get

23:56

better. The body cam footage

23:58

of the Gabby Potato Case has

24:01

angered me so so much

24:04

knowing that the people who reported

24:06

what was going on between her and

24:08

Brian Lawndry, actually saw

24:11

him hitting her. I mean, what are your

24:13

thoughts on all of

24:14

this? I'm sure you followed the case. Yeah.

24:16

I mean, this is, you know, This

24:18

is the enabling. This is the kind

24:20

of cultural tolerance for

24:22

a level of violence against women

24:25

in particular. That I I think

24:27

we see in so many cases

24:30

now and, you know, we're looking

24:32

right now at the r kelly trial

24:35

and the jury is

24:37

about to be charged

24:39

and deliberate in the case. Well, that

24:42

was decades of allegations,

24:44

decades against the singer that

24:48

that circulated and and there

24:50

were people around him who

24:54

the evidence suggests facilitated this

24:56

abuse, and it and it didn't matter

24:58

these young women continued

25:00

to be hurt by

25:01

him. It's also interesting though

25:04

to me to see in a case of

25:06

well known figures. It's like the

25:08

public really doesn't want to believe

25:11

that they could be evil or monsters

25:13

or something other than

25:15

what we have created

25:17

in our minds about them. Like in the case, like

25:19

I say, of a Bill Cosby or

25:21

a Jeffrey Epstein who, you know, who's

25:23

out on the town at society events

25:25

and Bill Cosby is America's dad and

25:27

and that sort of stuff. Isn't that

25:29

part of the problem too that we just don't

25:32

want to believe that these people

25:34

we've built up as heroes can be anything

25:36

but that?

25:38

Yeah, very much. So I think that

25:40

there are powerful defense mechanisms

25:42

that come into play when particularly our

25:44

revered cultural elites

25:47

are are accused of this kind

25:49

of abuse or

25:51

there are rumors circulating or

25:53

people see things with their own eyes

25:55

that that should set off alarms.

25:58

Right? We would we would rather continue

26:01

to to put these men on a pedestal, continue

26:04

to allow them to influence our

26:06

culture and to, you

26:08

know, to maintain their authority.

26:11

And that's frankly can

26:13

be easier. It's certainly less

26:16

destabilizing than the alternative.

26:18

And, you

26:19

know, it's hard

26:21

when things get unsettled.

26:25

Right. Do you think that abuse

26:27

is becoming more rampant in this

26:29

day and age? Or do you think that it's

26:31

been going on for a long time and people

26:33

have been just afraid to report it like

26:35

in these famous cases you and my mom were

26:37

talking about.

26:38

Yeah. Very very much the the

26:40

the second alternative. I think that

26:43

abuse has been going on forever.

26:45

And what we're

26:48

seeing now is more willingness

26:50

on the part of victims to come

26:52

forward. And

26:55

and to put the stories out there and

26:57

and to report formally

26:59

or informally to, you know, to tell

27:01

their family members, their friends, or maybe

27:03

even to talk to the press or to

27:05

go to the police or to, you know, to go

27:08

to HR, think that the the big

27:10

shift in the past few

27:12

years, particularly since this hashtag

27:14

me too, went viral, is that

27:16

these stories are now in

27:18

circulation, but the abuse was happening

27:20

all along. What would you

27:22

like to see done? You said that one of the reasons

27:24

that you wrote the book was

27:26

to generate conversation so

27:29

that we as individuals could

27:32

realize maybe how we can

27:34

make

27:34

changes. Howard Bauchner: Exactly right.

27:36

And the book has ideas

27:39

for law reform. I am a law

27:41

professor, and I certainly think that our

27:43

laws that bake in the credibility

27:45

discount need to be changed. But

27:48

the, you know, the the audience is

27:50

people who can make change in their

27:52

daily lives. And I think I

27:55

try to sketch out some, you know, some very

27:57

practical and realistic ways that

27:59

people can improve their

28:01

own decision making around credibility

28:04

and resist the lore of

28:06

blame shifting and

28:09

shrink what I call the care gap, which

28:11

is our our tendency to care

28:15

deeply about powerful people

28:17

and much less so about those

28:19

who are vulnerable and marginalized in our

28:21

society.

28:22

Right. Well, what advice would

28:24

you have for women

28:27

or men who are in an abusive relationship

28:29

right now and who are afraid to

28:31

come forward given how our society

28:34

might view them.

28:36

I understand that fear. I

28:38

I am certainly in no position to tell

28:40

anyone that the right thing to do is to come

28:42

forward. I think that you know,

28:44

people know themselves, know their lives,

28:47

and they know what they're up against. And so,

28:49

you know, if anything, it's less advice

28:51

than validation. I I would say that

28:54

the credibility complex

28:56

is real. It's powerful. It's daunting

28:59

and it's one of the main

29:01

reasons for the the silence that we see

29:03

in our society. I hope

29:06

this changes. I wrote

29:08

the book. In an effort to help bring

29:10

about that change, but I don't judge

29:13

anyone who chooses to

29:15

to to keep silent about the

29:17

abuse. You spent

29:19

five years as an assistant district

29:21

attorney in New York specializing in

29:23

domestic violence and child abuse prosecution.

29:26

And I'm wondering What percentage

29:29

of cases that should be prosecuted

29:32

go unprosecuted?

29:36

It's hard to say from my experience because

29:39

by the time I got the case,

29:41

that case was already somewhat statistically unusual.

29:44

I think that part of my

29:47

answer goes to the to the earlier

29:49

question about reporting

29:51

and silence. I think that what

29:54

needs to happen is that

29:56

people are

29:59

given reason to believe they'll be fairly

30:01

judged when they come forward. And that's what's gonna

30:03

bring more cases into the system.

30:05

Of course, this is, you know, a virtuous

30:08

cycle. Once we see the system

30:10

responding more nearly to

30:12

these kinds of allegations, we can expect

30:15

that more victims will be

30:17

willing to tell their stories.

30:19

What does more fairly look like

30:22

to you? How can law enforcement win

30:24

back the trust

30:25

of the people who don't trust them? Part

30:27

of it is not starting from AAA

30:30

position of disbelief, of doubt,

30:33

not shifting blame

30:35

from the perpetrator to the victim and

30:38

and having concern for

30:40

victims of, you know, of all identities

30:43

from all populations, and

30:47

being open to reexamining

30:50

some of our fundamental biases around

30:52

abuse and some of the misconceptions

30:55

that continue to fuel

30:58

inaccurate judgments about credibility.

31:01

What would you say to

31:03

someone who perhaps was the victim

31:05

of a sexual assault

31:08

a while GO AND THEY'VE DELAYED

31:10

REPORTING IT AND YET IT'S STILL IMPACTING

31:12

THEIR LIFE. SHOULD THEY COME FORWARD

31:15

AND HOW LONG? WHAT'S A

31:17

TIME frame in which to

31:19

do that. Limitations. Well, the scientific

31:21

limitations. Yeah. That's true. But I'm I'm seeing

31:23

if you're within the statute of

31:24

limitations, but maybe it's it's still

31:26

been a while. Yeah, I

31:28

mean, statues of limitations vary

31:31

from state to state.

31:33

They differ depending upon whether

31:36

you're talking about a civil case where someone

31:38

is going to sue an

31:40

individual as compared to a criminal

31:42

case where the state is

31:44

bringing charges or

31:46

a federal prosecution where the government

31:49

is. And, you know, there are all sorts

31:51

of ways to disclose. You can

31:53

you can walk into a police

31:55

precinct and make a complaint, you

31:58

can, you know, you could tell someone

32:00

in your family or a friend or a therapist. And

32:03

I think that, you know,

32:05

each each survivor obviously

32:07

has her his own

32:10

story an own set of concerns about

32:13

about coming forward. I will say because

32:15

I mentioned earlier that I I think there are really

32:17

good reasons to stay silent because it's

32:20

so devastating. It can be so

32:22

devastating to be dismissed, but I also

32:24

want to say that many, many of the survivors

32:27

I've spoken with over the years have

32:30

have experienced real

32:32

validation and real

32:34

catharsis, solidarity, from

32:36

coming forward. And so I, you know,

32:38

I I do think that for

32:41

for many people who

32:43

decide to tell their stories. That is a

32:45

decision that that that feels right.

32:47

And even if it is difficult and

32:50

it is always difficult, for

32:55

so many people, that is exactly

32:57

what is needed to

33:00

pursue this journey toward

33:02

healing. That's such good advice, and

33:04

the book is filled with such good

33:05

advice. I'm gonna

33:07

ask you to narrow it down a bit. What

33:09

is your nobody told me lesson.

33:11

So what is it that nobody told

33:13

you about why we doubt

33:16

accusers and protect abusers that

33:18

you wish you'd known long

33:20

ago because it would have saved

33:22

you some time and energy.

33:25

I would say this. Nobody

33:27

told me that there's a credibility

33:30

complex and

33:32

that it shapes all of us. Wow.

33:35

And in what ways are we

33:37

all shaped by it? Because don't you think that

33:39

a lot of us feel like I'm not that

33:41

way. I can determine whether a

33:43

story is true or not and whether a victim is

33:46

credible or

33:46

not. Howard Bauchner: I do think that

33:49

many of us feel that way and

33:51

I I guess I would point to some

33:55

of my conversations with survivors where

33:57

that credibility discount that

33:59

I mentioned earlier is internalized. And

34:02

where survivors doubt themselves

34:05

or blame themselves or

34:08

wonder whether they matter enough

34:11

to justify coming forward and

34:15

what often feels or what's often characterized

34:19

as quote unquote, ruining his life.

34:21

Right? It's those kinds of internalized

34:24

sentiments that I think

34:27

for me, serve

34:29

as really powerful confirmation

34:32

that none of us can sort of escape

34:35

the cultural influences on our

34:37

thinking in this

34:38

area. Yes, absolutely. I agree

34:40

with that. And how can people learn

34:42

more about the book? And how can I connect with

34:44

you

34:45

online? The book is

34:47

is called Credible. Why we

34:49

doubt accusers and protect abusers.

34:51

As you've mentioned earlier, And I

34:53

have a website, which

34:55

is WWW dot debra

34:59

dot

34:59

com, the spelling of my name, and I have

35:01

a contact form on that website.

35:03

And the spelling of your name for everyone

35:06

who wants to jot it down and and check it out?

35:08

Absolutely. My first name is Deborah,

35:11

DEB0RAH,

35:11

and

35:15

is spelled TUERKHEIMER.

35:19

The website is debra terkimer is

35:21

all one word.

35:23

Perfect. Deborah, thank you so much for

35:25

joining us. I really hope that we've encouraged

35:27

some people who are Vic symptoms to

35:29

maybe see their situation in a little bit different

35:31

light. Well, thank you so much for

35:34

having me for drawing

35:36

attention to this, you know, to this

35:38

hugely important issue in advancing

35:41

this conversation. I really appreciate it.

35:43

Oh, yeah. No. We really appreciate you. I

35:45

mean, AS VICTIM MYSELF MEANS

35:47

EVERYTHING THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO THIS AND

35:50

TRYING TO MAKE WOMEN FEEL LIKE THEY'RE CREDIBLE

35:52

AND INSTANCES WHEN THEY DON'T feel that

35:54

way. It really is a helpful and needed

35:56

book. Thanks to Deborah Again,

35:59

her new book is called Credible. Why

36:01

we doubt accusers and protect

36:04

abusers. And her website again

36:06

is debra dot com.

36:08

I'm Jan Black, and I'm Laura

36:10

Owens. You're listening to nobody told me.

36:12

Thank you so much for joining us.

36:34

At Kroger, we want our fresh produce

36:36

to meet your expectations, which is why

36:38

we're dedicated to doing up to a twenty seven

36:40

point inspection on our fruits and veggies. Checking

36:43

for things like scarring. In fact, only

36:45

the best produce like zesty oranges and

36:47

crisp carrots reach our

36:48

shelves. Because when it comes to fresh, our

36:50

higher standards mean fresher produce.

36:52

Kroger, fresh for everyone. And

36:54

right now, stock up on your favorites during

36:56

the ten for ten sale. Mix and match participating

36:59

items and get ten for just ten dollars with

37:01

your card. Kroger, fresh for everyone.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features