Podchaser Logo
Home
“Unwritten Law” didn’t cover murder of in-laws

“Unwritten Law” didn’t cover murder of in-laws

Released Friday, 29th May 2020
Good episode? Give it some love!
“Unwritten Law” didn’t cover murder of in-laws

“Unwritten Law” didn’t cover murder of in-laws

“Unwritten Law” didn’t cover murder of in-laws

“Unwritten Law” didn’t cover murder of in-laws

Friday, 29th May 2020
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode
Alfred Lester Belding may have intended to try to claim the protection of the “Unwritten Law” when he made his plans for revenge. But, reviewing the historical record, it seems more likely he didn’t give a single thought to anything beyond the four murders he had planned.It would have been a long shot anyway. The “Unwritten Law” was a social convention that “allowed” a man to murder another man if he sincerely believed the victim had been intimate with his wife, or had adulterously “ruined” a close female relative. It didn’t have much to say about murdering mothers-in-law, fathers-in-law, and/or the wife herself. (Portland, Multnomah County; 1902) (For text and pictures, see http://offbeatoregon.com/1804e.UL-alfred-belding-murderer-493.html)
Show More

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features