Podchaser Logo
Home
Oral Argument

Joe Miller and Christian Turner

Oral Argument

A weekly Society, Culture and Philosophy podcast
Good podcast? Give it some love!
Oral Argument

Joe Miller and Christian Turner

Oral Argument

Episodes
Oral Argument

Joe Miller and Christian Turner

Oral Argument

A weekly Society, Culture and Philosophy podcast
Good podcast? Give it some love!
Rate Podcast

Episodes of Oral Argument

Mark All
Search Episodes...
We discuss the morality of concurring and dissenting. And the usual nonsense.
Joe and Christian talk about the pandemic and, then, some nonsense.
We discuss the march on the Capitol and... all this.
In this holiday spectacular, we talk about small claims. In particular, would a court for small copyright claims be a good or bad thing? You can probably guess what we each say. In exploring this, we consider the nature of dogs, hunters, and ch
Joe lowers the boom, and we start talking. In the 213th episode of this very serious podcast, we discuss: scams, flight simulators, flight, K2, Joe's blue cheese odyssey, olives, the nature of expertise, nihilism, and the adversary system. And
We discuss the Supreme Court's (I know, I know) decision in Roman Catholic Diocese v. Cuomo (https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a87_4g15.pdf).
Is this thing on? What did we miss?
Just Joe and Christian on the pandemic, new articles, and spring break.Achieving A Fair and Effective COVID-19 Response: An Open Letter to Vice-President Mike Pence, and Other Federal, State, and Local Leaders from Public Health and Legal Expe
We are joined by our student, Justin Van Orsdol, who has co-authored a paper with Christian about a new approach to the gun violence crisis.Justin Van Orsdol's writing (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=3096029)Christia
We discuss a proposal by Sen. Hawley to abolish, more or less, the Federal Trade Commission, the agency that administers consumer protection and antitrust laws, and place its responsibilities in the Justice Department. Antitrust, the unitary ex
Sometimes in law, as in other areas of life, we think we know something, but the more we think about, the more we realize we don't know it at all. Legal scholars have focused on puzzles like this before, like why blackmail should be illegal. De
Joe and Christian discuss Christian's latest paper, on the way we define and separate markets, including European football, campaign finance, surrogate motherhood, and water bottles in disaster zones.Christian Turner, The Segregation of Market
Christian calls Joe out of the blue to celebrate our sixth anniversary and to talk about heroes.
We discuss new calls to integrate church and state. The conversation ranges over liberalism, religion, religious zeal, and, obviously, some nonsense.Micah Schwartzman and Jocelyn Wilson, The Unreasonableness of Catholic Integralism (https://pa
On immaturity, defensiveness, art, the intellect, models, and the self. And mailbag on scholarship and practice, Title VII, and Star Trek. It's Joe's birthday.
We discuss dictionaries, up and down on maps, and excellence in seminar conversation.Joseph Miller, Suggestions for Law School Seminars (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3425608)Seminar Skills – Learning Collaboratively (ht
Just Joe and Christian, lumbering into season 2, talking about tipping and fraud in the gig economy, bar exam fiascos, legal scholarship, and fireworks.Andy Newman, DoorDash Changes Tipping Model After Uproar From Customers (https://www.nytime
We kick off Season 2 with assorted nonsense before diving into our second SCOTUS round-up, which consists entirely of the Supreme Court's decision on the census citizenship question.Dep't of Commerce v. New York (https://www.supremecourt.gov/o
We discuss items from the mailbag and go ahead and conduct our annual, absurd Supreme Court round-up (fifty minutes in).James Macleod, Ordinary Causation: A Study in Experimental Statutory Interpretation (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf
How would you feel if you found out you were unwittingly the subject of an experiment testing two alternatives? You got A, and another group got B. Many people object to this. But what if neither A nor B was at all objectionable and in fact eac
We talk about LARPing, emotions, meaning, exam writing, grading, happiness, and other things.Lawrence S. Krieger and Kennon M. Sheldon, What Makes Lawyers Happy? A Data-Driven Prescription to Redefine Professional Success (https://ir.law.fsu.e
Is the common law efficient? Richard Posner, among many others, has argued that it is, perhaps even without judges ever themselves focusing on that goal. Daniel Sokol joins us to discuss how understanding law as a platform, like modular and ope
We dip back into the mailbag to discuss verdicts, unpublished opinions, "based off," canons and anti-canons, and more.
With Zahr Said and Jessica Silbey, we discuss new narrative forms, their setting, and their influence on law and legal education. How do the natures of podcasts, twitter, fake news, and deep fakes affect the way we experience culture together a
Fast on the heels of her last appearance, Carissa Hessick joins us to talk about corpus linguistics, which means... well, we debate this, but, generally, the use of computer-based methods to draw inferences from large databases of texts. What i
Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features