Podchaser Logo
Home
Government By Private Eye

Government By Private Eye

Released Wednesday, 11th October 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Government By Private Eye

Government By Private Eye

Government By Private Eye

Government By Private Eye

Wednesday, 11th October 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Page 94, The Private Eye podcast.

0:03

Hello and welcome to another episode of Page 94. My

0:05

name is Andrew Hunter-Murray and I'm joined by

0:08

Ian Hislop, Richard Brooks and Helen Lewis.

0:10

We're in the Eye's office and we're

0:12

here to discuss the news developments

0:15

that have occurred since the magazine last went to print and

0:17

everything that might happen before it next

0:19

goes to print. So as we're in

0:21

the middle of conference season, it's worth covering

0:23

the Conservative Party conference which did make it into

0:26

the last issue and which I

0:28

think there hadn't been the final confirmation

0:30

when we went to press that HS2 was being scrapped

0:33

because that was saved for the big

0:35

speech, you know, the great announcement of what

0:38

we're not doing. Rishi Sinha could film his video

0:40

saying that they were going to scrap it but hadn't yet seen fit to

0:42

share that with the rest of the class.

0:44

You're absolutely right. And had he been Boris he would

0:46

have filmed two videos for

0:49

either result but he didn't. I just

0:51

felt, you know, thanks to Richard Brooks who is

0:53

here, I'm in a position where I

0:55

have to say, well, you know, Rishi, scrapping

0:58

it, you know, quite a good idea because Richard said

1:00

for a long time we should

1:02

probably scrap nearly all of it due

1:05

to the fantastic overrun. So I blame

1:07

you. That's very kind of him. Actually,

1:11

I think he was waiting to see what we

1:13

had to say before deciding

1:14

what was going to be in the

1:16

speech because we came out,

1:18

I think, the day or the day

1:20

before the speech where he announced

1:22

pretty much what was written in the eye, which

1:25

was cancel what's left of HS2 or,

1:28

you know, what you haven't already committed

1:30

too much to and do the Euston

1:33

bit. He sort of

1:35

said he was doing both of those, although he subsequently

1:37

said on the Euston bit someone else is going to have to

1:39

do it. And they're going

1:41

to do it a bit like Canary Wharf,

1:44

which I think only went bust twice.

1:47

Oh, right. So that's impressive. It's a

1:49

plan. It's a plan. So

1:52

do you think it will actually happen now? The

1:55

Euston bit? Yes. Or

1:57

even the Birmingham bit? Any of it? We don't

1:59

know.

1:59

anything will happen. Obviously

2:02

the Birmingham to Manchester bit's gone. The question,

2:05

the big question is whether the other promised bits

2:07

will happen. It's the network

2:09

north. Yeah the network north which

2:12

is a bit like the northern rail

2:14

power, northern powerhouse rail,

2:16

that's it. Itself

2:19

was already been cut in half back

2:22

in 2021 so some of that's been reinstated.

2:26

There are all kinds of promises, some of

2:28

which I think have already been rode

2:30

back on once, reintroduced once, rode

2:32

back on again. It's sort

2:35

of shunting around a bit this rail

2:37

plan. But some bits already finished

2:40

of what was announced, some bits were opened several years

2:42

ago. The Manchester Metro link I think

2:44

is done. So it's not put it in the

2:46

plan. Yeah I was wondering

2:49

if he was going to announce that the channel tunnel was going

2:51

to be done because at least that's finished.

2:53

But okay so pessimism there from Richard

2:56

but not a bad decision

2:58

then. No overall I think the key

3:00

point was that just

3:03

because you've got spades in the ground you don't have

3:05

to keep digging. The 40 billion

3:07

quid or so that's gone into phase one while that's

3:09

gone, that you know will provide this

3:11

shuttle service. But it didn't mean

3:14

that you then had to do the next bit. The

3:16

reality is that the funds

3:18

will be constrained. What I liked about your take

3:20

Richard was

3:21

the fact that everyone else it seemed in the entirety of the

3:23

media was kind of rending their garments about this. And

3:25

mostly it seemed formatory leaders who'd stayed a lot

3:27

of political credibility on it existing coming out

3:29

to go I really think it's a very good idea you know.

3:31

It was my good idea in some way. So

3:34

I don't think I felt like I'd really heard much

3:36

of the counterpoint. And the bit that kind of got me

3:38

was the fact that the bit through the Oxfordshire countryside

3:40

was

3:40

going to be so expensive because it all had to be tunnels

3:42

because it didn't get anyone's view basically.

3:44

It's a kind of great nimby pageant.

3:46

What an a nodding. I know so not only

3:49

is that part of the reason why it's so expensive

3:51

there also won't be nice views on

3:53

the short bit that is going to be. Just the whole

3:55

thing. I have to say I was surprised

3:58

when I read Richard's piece partly because

3:59

I like kinds and you know anything

4:03

that has to the number of trains in the country I think is basically

4:05

a good thing and then I thought I'd look at the

4:07

cost overrun of HS1 so down

4:09

to Kent Channel Tunnel and

4:12

that was 6.2 billion pounds so

4:15

and it was a bit over budget it was 18% over.

4:19

That's not over budget. Of

4:22

course well yeah

4:24

I mean that's and what HS2

4:26

is now coming in at least double

4:29

already. I think it started

4:31

off at 35, 37 something like that and

4:33

it's now well

4:36

over 80. Yeah and so it's

4:38

not even it's infinity now isn't it? Oh yeah

4:40

yeah. Undeliverable and

4:43

my maths is that at no

4:45

possible amount of money can it even be done.

4:47

I mean that was the report wasn't it? Yeah

4:50

yeah it just would keep going up.

4:52

And the time for some people whose farm

4:55

had been purchased through a compulsory purchase order and

4:57

then actually gone through after Rishi said I

4:59

could film the video but not before he denounced it so

5:01

he kept spunking money

5:02

on it right up until the moment that

5:04

he stood up. Backing please. Sorry. Right up until the

5:06

moment he

5:08

stood up on the

5:09

podium. I think that's the other thing is and

5:11

I'm not going back to the jeweling of the A1 north

5:13

of Morpus which as you know I'm obsessed with but there

5:15

are similar situations where people know that their land

5:18

could be taken in a compulsory purchase order but

5:20

you don't get to find out when it is. Like so some of these

5:22

people have been living on this knife edge now on FHST

5:25

for years and that's what these projects mean

5:27

actually on the ground.

5:27

And some of them have sold massive

5:30

discounts to what they're worth because

5:32

they don't want to wait around. Yeah. And

5:34

now they're finding out they don't have to. I could still have had that else.

5:39

I mean some of the numbers are so big they're quite hard to get a handle

5:41

on. But so nice little instructive

5:43

difference here. Again HS1

5:46

cost per mile 51 million

5:48

quid per mile of that complete railway.

5:51

Which feels like a lot. And Helen you're looking. Well they're making

5:53

the rails out of gold. It's just

5:56

really expensive stuff. And not the fair is

5:58

it? Well. guarantee

6:00

Helen will seem like an absolute bargain whether you would anyone

6:02

like to guess the approximate cost of HS2

6:04

per mile?

6:07

Oh, three or four hundred. Yeah, 300

6:09

million pounds per

6:11

mile. That's the that's the kicker.

6:13

It is quite hilly up north isn't it?

6:15

Yeah.

6:16

Fades made of gold, diggers made of

6:18

gold, everything involved in this project must be made of gold.

6:20

It's impressive, yeah. No, I just

6:22

kept reading the reports thinking it

6:24

said spads on the graph. Yes,

6:27

I'm sure a lot of them have wasted a huge amount of

6:29

time. There's a lot of use. Yeah, I'm

6:31

in the kite. But this is

6:34

presumably Richard's pessimism extends

6:36

into another massive infrastructure

6:39

project which he's going to tell us is a waste of time.

6:44

Which one do you want? Richard made

6:46

a face that was like narrow it down. We're

6:49

heading northeast aren't we? We're heading a bit where

6:51

the HS2 wasn't going to go anyway. Well

6:54

this is a project that the Teesside

6:56

regeneration project at the center

6:59

of the flagship Freeport which

7:02

Rishi Sunak presents as the great future

7:04

for Britain outside Brexit. This

7:07

should go ahead just not the way

7:09

it is. Ah, right, okay. This

7:12

area really is ripe for regeneration. It's

7:15

got a long, at some stages, glorious

7:17

industrial history. It's got a steel industry,

7:20

chemical industry. It's in a great location.

7:22

It's got the Teess bit

7:50

takes the money out. You know they

7:53

often like to sort of present it as being

7:55

a bit like the PFI was the private

7:57

financial initiative that New Labor loved

7:59

so much. Why would you want the contract? Well,

8:01

compared to this, the PFI

8:04

is a sort of model of fiscal rectitude. Because

8:07

that at least involved the private sector

8:09

putting money in before it took money out.

8:12

I mean, it took too much out. And that was the scandal

8:15

there. But here, the private

8:17

operators aren't putting anything in. They're

8:19

just taking out. They have a lot

8:22

of contracts for things

8:24

like collecting scrap from the site,

8:26

scrapping a bit of a misnomer. It's very

8:29

valuable metal left over from the

8:31

steel industry that closed in 2015. They've

8:35

pocketed about 50 million quid from that

8:37

already. They have other

8:39

sort of commission agreements that we didn't

8:41

know about until

8:43

I went and looked at the books and asked some questions,

8:45

but which they won't explain, and

8:47

for which they don't seem to be doing anything at all. But

8:51

the main way they make their money is through

8:54

options to buy the land. There's

8:56

a sort of couple of thousand acres

8:58

worth of land there that needs

9:01

regenerating, which the

9:04

public sector, through the development corporation,

9:06

pays to regenerate, and

9:09

then allows the private

9:12

businessmen through a company

9:14

that they 90% own, called

9:17

Teesworx Limited, to buy the land

9:19

at one pound per acre. Plus

9:21

inflation from when they agreed that. Does

9:24

that seem very cheap to you? I'm just

9:26

guessing. I was just trying to look at how much of HFT you

9:28

could get for one pound. Well,

9:31

they also have to pay the costs of

9:34

remediating that bit of land to that point,

9:37

which work out that something like a typical 100

9:39

acre site

9:41

might have cost about 20 million

9:44

quid to get to the point where a business

9:46

can come in on it. But when it does

9:48

and

9:49

it has planning permission, it's

9:51

worth a lot more than that. Yeah. So

9:54

it's probably worth 100 million. But they

9:56

just have to pay the 20 million. Richard, you've been on

9:58

this show because of the terrier unbend.

9:59

Hooch and Stravaleg for this whole year. And

10:02

I have to ask you, what is it about it that sort of fascinates

10:04

you so much? On the surface

10:07

it's a story about kind of low-level

10:09

skull duggery, but there's

10:11

something about it obviously

10:12

that really has gripped hold of you.

10:15

Incidentally, Ben Houchin has got his own terrier

10:17

that he bought a few months ago,

10:20

a puppy and called it Boris. That's

10:22

weird. That's weird. Okay,

10:24

how on? That

10:27

is a big part of the story obviously.

10:29

And Boris then made him Lord Houchin. Not

10:32

the dog. I

10:35

think the dog just got a knighthood or something. Right,

10:38

it's on his leg. But

10:40

why I think it's important is

10:43

that almost all parts of the political

10:45

spectrum favour

10:48

regional devolution, devolution of economic

10:50

power, regeneration and

10:52

so on. And in principle that is a very

10:54

good thing. But this

10:57

illustrates a number of

10:59

problems, particularly in terms of accountability.

11:02

Because if you're going to hand that much

11:04

money over, and it's several hundreds of millions

11:07

of pounds now, over to a regional

11:09

authority which is

11:12

created with fewer checks

11:14

and balances than local

11:16

government traditionally has, then

11:19

there are real risks. No one's really

11:22

examining this in the way that other

11:25

centrally funded projects might be. For

11:28

example, the National Order Office doesn't have a remit

11:30

covering this. Nobody really does.

11:34

We're the only ones really. Right,

11:35

and the local press has been hollowed out as

11:37

well. Yeah. Local papers don't have the resources

11:40

to put into covering these stories. That's a massive

11:42

part of it. government

11:45

loves outsourcing, which is that when it goes horribly wrong,

11:48

it's someone else and you can go, oh, Capita,

11:50

I've done very bad job here. I of

11:52

course had nothing to do with this. And I suppose the same

11:54

thing is true. It's pronounced Crapita. Hello. Sorry.

11:58

I don't know how, you're fairly new to me.

12:01

But I guess the same thing is that, oh, if, you know,

12:03

if actually the worst comes to the worst and the

12:05

drum beat against Ben Howtian

12:07

becomes so terrible, then oh, dear,

12:09

he has to step down. But everybody in Whitehall gets to

12:11

say how terrible we could never have known. But

12:14

they really ought to have known if they've read every issue of Private

12:16

Eye for about a year, during which,

12:18

of course, they've continued

12:21

to boost him at

12:23

the Tory conference. Again, he got the name

12:25

check in the Sunak speech. In the Sunak speech,

12:27

yeah. This is the future. Ben

12:30

Howtian is the future. Is that

12:32

because it's a free port and Sunak is hell

12:34

bent on free ports becoming a thing? Because

12:37

it's a free port, because it's red wall, because

12:39

they're very short of other ideas. And

12:42

because on other stuff, people can point

12:44

at it and go, ha ha, it's not as good as you say it

12:47

is. Whereas here, nobody can quite understand

12:49

it as hard as we try to explain it. No

12:52

one's really sort of grit

12:55

the fact that the team helps. Yeah,

12:59

complexity is part of it. I mean, all

13:01

financial scams work on complexity.

13:04

So you have to keep pointing out

13:06

what the how they work in principle. And

13:09

in this case, it is that

13:12

these businessmen are getting rights to acquire

13:14

stuff for nothing while

13:16

putting nothing in. And more

13:18

importantly, the the Development Corporation,

13:21

Ben Howtian, are really misrepresenting

13:24

the picture seriously misrepresented. Well, they I mean,

13:26

how it's been interviewed lots, hasn't he? Yeah, sworn

13:29

blind that that these businessmen

13:31

are putting lots of money into the project that that

13:33

it's that it's a loan that you know, that yeah,

13:36

on that they'll pay back. Yeah, exactly.

13:38

The biggest part of the project

13:41

is a new key being built on

13:43

the South Bank of the River Tees

13:46

for about 113 million pounds, which

13:48

has been paid for by the Development

13:50

Corporation using money borrowed from

13:52

the

13:53

UK Infrastructure Bank. So the taxpayers paid

13:55

for it. Ben Howtian said repeatedly,

13:58

notably in a big news night in

13:59

if you did that, the businessman

14:02

he brought in had to repay that loan.

14:04

I went up to

14:06

the east side two or three weeks ago and

14:09

asked for the, under legislation

14:11

that allows journalists to inspect accounts, when

14:14

the Cameron government scrapped the local audit

14:17

commission, that you brought in some rules as

14:19

a bit of a sop saying that for a limited period,

14:21

journalists and local electors can look at the

14:23

books. So I went up there to look at the books, asked

14:25

them, well, can I see the details

14:27

behind, the documents behind what

14:30

you say is this agreement for the businessman

14:32

to repay the loan, there's nothing. They're

14:34

also given a concession to operate the key

14:37

when it's built. The documents show that they

14:39

have to pay a fee for operating it, but

14:41

that fees related to how much business there is,

14:44

and they'll get income from that business. So it's

14:46

only when there's good profit that they pay anything.

14:50

And if that doesn't equal what

14:52

the

14:53

public authority needs to repay the loan,

14:55

well,

14:56

the public authority's stuck with the cost.

14:58

So there's literally no risk for the businessman

15:01

at all. That's correct, yeah. And

15:03

it gets serious because they account

15:05

for this. It gets serious. Yeah,

15:09

that's a really fluffy bit.

15:12

The accounts misrepresent

15:15

this. In the accounts, they say the businessmen

15:17

have a contractual obligation

15:19

to repay the loan. And

15:22

they

15:23

don't.

15:24

They say they got independent accountancy

15:26

advice, which should be disclosed under

15:29

this local audit legislation,

15:31

and they promised it to me and then

15:34

refused to supply it. Well, it

15:36

does not look good. One of the founding

15:39

principles of Freeport is you are free

15:41

from journalists. Yeah, I

15:43

think it's important for you to remember that.

15:47

There's a serious point there. You

15:49

know, they are, the history of them. It's

15:51

free from regulation. It's free from

15:55

prying eyes, yeah. So this

15:57

is where this is a key point that needs, you

15:59

know. something should be done but

16:02

you know that's my somebody should be picking

16:04

up on that you can't just file

16:06

false accounts yeah I put it to

16:08

you that you can yeah but

16:10

my question

16:10

is could this happen somewhere else is it

16:12

happening other places or is there something unique about tea

16:15

side and the coalition of things that happened

16:17

that meant it's happened there

16:19

it's happening there because so much money has gone

16:21

in the same public money hasn't

16:23

gone in to the other three

16:26

port areas you know the more you

16:28

look into to this area and

16:30

the history of it it's quite a small

16:34

business world in which everybody knows everybody

16:36

that some of the cronyism

16:39

the nepotism is

16:41

extreme I mean how should you these businessmen

16:44

before all this this wasn't they

16:46

didn't approach him with the idea that's all a bit

16:48

shrouded in mystery whether he personally knew

16:50

them but they were very influential figures

16:53

there okay and at the same time as they

16:55

stepped in to this project

16:58

they also got a very

17:00

similar deal on a new business

17:02

park at the airport which could be worth just as

17:04

much money to them so the whole everything

17:07

about redevelopment on tea side was

17:10

handed over to these people who are

17:13

extremely well connected and often

17:16

not with the you know the most savory

17:18

characters one of the two main partners

17:20

there chap called Chris Musgrave has

17:23

worked a lot with chap

17:25

who's familiar to the I Ray Mallon Robo

17:28

cop up in Middlesbrough who's a bit of a

17:30

local fixer so this is sort of network

17:33

that holds sway exactly the sort of

17:35

place where you really need scrutiny it goes back to

17:37

what you're saying Helen you know people

17:39

aren't looking at it local media aren't looking at it in

17:42

the detail there are a few exceptions aren't there I mean hasn't

17:45

the Yorkshire Post done a job the Yorkshire

17:47

Post has picked up on it and is

17:50

asking some tough questions yeah but

17:52

the the two the local Gazette

17:54

and the Northern Echo are just mouthpieces

17:57

yeah I mean it's not the Northern Echo it's a houching

18:00

whatever he says, front page.

18:03

But there is work happening there at

18:05

the moment. I mean, they are doing this scrapping and remediating

18:07

right now. The key is under construction, right? Yep,

18:10

and it's nearly finished. Well, has

18:12

anyone proposed handing HS2 over to these guys?

18:14

They're making things happen. They're

18:18

actually very cheap. They can handle large sums

18:20

of money, public money. And

18:23

you're talking hundreds of millions. We're not interested.

18:25

We're on billions now. The story's

18:27

over, Richard. Could you do that? Yeah, make a houch

18:29

and transport secretary. Yeah, could

18:31

be done. We've been in lots now. They

18:33

literally get to know his empowerment. You certainly

18:36

heard it here first. Just quickly,

18:38

while we're on large projects that

18:40

soak up a great deal of money and don't

18:43

benefit normal people, Richard, you wrote

18:45

something for the latest issue about the post

18:47

office. Yeah,

18:50

things don't get much larger or more corrupt

18:53

than this, really, in the way that the post

18:55

office has dealt with this scandal

18:58

over more than 20 years

19:00

now. And for any listeners who didn't

19:02

hear, you and Nick Wallace, wasn't

19:04

it, on the last special episode

19:06

we did? This is past masters having their lives ruined

19:08

due to faulty IT. Yeah, yeah. And

19:11

some of them going to prison, some of them taking their own lives,

19:13

all due to dodgy IT, which accused

19:16

them of theft, basically, from the build of the

19:18

public. Yeah, several thousands and hundreds with

19:21

convictions on faulty evidence

19:24

on the basis that the computer system was flawless

19:27

when it wasn't. That's at the heart

19:29

of it, but there's any

19:29

number of scandals

19:32

coming off it as well. And the latest

19:34

really emerging is how the post

19:37

office approached this issue

19:39

internally, going back 20 years,

19:42

when they were made aware that

19:45

this computer system wasn't actually

19:47

perfect. There was an audit report

19:49

that said that we can

19:51

see examples of one

19:54

out not being matched by a corresponding in, that

19:56

kind of thing. So there were clearly bugs in

19:58

it. But. senior

20:01

post office lawyers who were prosecuting

20:04

individuals or involved

20:06

in civil action against them said look let's

20:09

keep that quiet because it threatens

20:11

our whole approach and it you know we've

20:13

got to pretend that this horizon system

20:16

this horizon IT system is

20:18

flawless when it absolutely

20:20

wasn't genuinely shocking even

20:23

now we've got an inquiry and

20:25

usually you know we have inquiries into

20:27

things when the heat's gone out of it no one cares

20:29

anymore this inquiry is still

20:31

going on it still turns up

20:33

stuff that makes you gasp yes

20:36

it does in the last couple

20:38

of weeks after the summer break the the

20:41

inquiry started hearing from people

20:43

within the post office senior lawyers and

20:45

both internal and and their external

20:48

lawyers and they were saying things

20:50

like you know when confronted with evidence

20:53

that the computer system didn't really work one of the

20:55

senior post office lawyers says there's a bigger picture

20:57

you know this is bigger than nailing someone

21:00

falsely there is a bigger picture either

21:02

the post office wishes to be seen to be taking

21:05

this claim very seriously to defend

21:07

the horizon system and to discourage

21:09

other sub postmasters from

21:11

pursuing similar claims this is when

21:14

someone had said well it's not me it's the computer

21:16

system yeah the bigger the

21:18

law is to defend the lie yeah

21:22

and the same lawyer said the safest way to manage

21:24

this which is was a similar case from someone

21:26

else it's to throw money at it and get

21:28

a confidentiality agreement signed

21:30

let's throw public money at it and

21:33

cover it up that was the approach what's

21:36

the story that they told themselves because this is I'm always

21:38

interested in when you look at people who are

21:40

villains in a story right most people have a cycle

21:42

they don't think ha ha ha ha look out I'm gonna

21:45

ruin the lives of some sub postmasters and mistresses

21:47

yeah they have a story that they're telling themselves

21:50

it's usually flattering to themselves what

21:52

do you think they they thought they were doing they

21:55

thought that these people were really and I think

21:57

I really wonder whether some of them still do I

22:00

think that these people, yeah, the computer system

22:02

might not have worked, but they were still guilty. They

22:04

were still at it. There

22:06

was a really vindictive culture

22:09

in the post office. It almost

22:11

goes back centuries. You know,

22:13

this was a very powerful institution.

22:16

When you go back to the, you know, the king's mail

22:19

being transported across the country, they had incredible

22:21

powers. You could execute

22:23

people for stealing a letter or something. Well,

22:25

so they got their own prosecutions, don't they? And

22:27

they conduct their own prosecutions. That was it. It became

22:30

even when most of the

22:32

rest of the government

22:35

or public bodies had to

22:37

have their prosecutions conducted by the Crown

22:39

Prosecution Service to give a bit of independence.

22:42

The post office retained the ability to prosecute.

22:45

And that's starting to come out that

22:48

there simply weren't the checks and balances. There

22:50

are lots of these cases when we looked at them some

22:53

time ago. It was clear that had an independent

22:55

prosecutor looked at it. They'd have said,

22:58

no, that evidence doesn't really stack up. So

23:01

it was an arrogance in the institution. Yeah,

23:03

an arrogance. And the way they treated

23:05

people during investigations was

23:09

quite abusive, really. They

23:11

would occasionally interview

23:13

them without representation, coerce

23:16

them into confessing certain

23:18

crimes in return for not pursuing more

23:21

serious ones, you know, getting

23:23

people to plead guilty in court so they would avoid

23:25

a present sentence. In one case, I think we reported,

23:28

I remember, they told

23:30

someone, well, plead guilty to this lesser

23:33

offense and you won't go to prison. The person did go to

23:35

prison. Yeah. And

23:38

I believe in the infallibility of the computer system,

23:40

right? In the same way that, you know, I think

23:43

there's

23:43

a real problem in court cases with forensic evidence,

23:45

which is often somewhat interpretable

23:47

and has problems with it. But it is seen as

23:49

a kind of deus machina, like it's spoken. The

23:51

computer system, well, that couldn't be wrong. Because

23:54

computer systems are never wrong, unlike people

23:57

who are wrong. Yeah, I mean, they

23:59

knew it was wrong.

23:59

as we're now starting to discover. Yeah,

24:02

they knew it was wrong. But you're right, and there

24:04

was this legal doctrine that

24:07

what a computer says is correct. It

24:09

was backed up by experts from

24:12

Fujitsu, the IT company that ran

24:14

this system, going into court and

24:17

saying, there's nothing wrong with it, even when they knew full

24:19

well that there was something wrong

24:21

there. The Met Police have

24:23

been

24:24

investigating people for perjury

24:27

now for two or three years, but nothing's

24:30

come of it yet.

24:31

Oh, right. And I guess also the idea

24:33

that if you... It's such a huge thing psychologically

24:36

to take on, isn't it? That these aren't ISAID examples

24:38

of something fundamentally rotten about the computer

24:40

system. I suppose that also, presumably, psychologically

24:43

people try to say, OK, in one or two

24:45

cases it might have been wrong, we don't need to look at the whole

24:48

thing. Because

24:48

once you've accepted that, it's kind of like staring

24:50

into a huge yawning chasm, isn't

24:52

it? Yeah, yeah. Nothing is certain anymore.

24:55

No, and finding that

24:57

out, admitting it would come with huge

25:00

costs. The backdrop commercially

25:02

was that the post office was on

25:05

a headlong drive to become self-sustaining

25:09

to not have to rely on government subsidies.

25:12

So the board were heavily incentivised

25:15

to make profit. All

25:18

their incentives were financial,

25:19

human. Yeah, but

25:21

in that way it reminds me of a medical scandal in some ways,

25:23

right? Which is like a drug company finding out their new wonder

25:26

drug that's making them billions suddenly, and

25:28

it's making people's legs fall off. And there's

25:30

obviously a few isolated examples, and

25:32

they're kind of arrogant about the fact that, oh, patients,

25:34

you know what they're like, they never tell the truth anyway.

25:36

So some of those, yeah, I think that's really interesting

25:38

to me that this is a dry financial scandal

25:41

in some ways, but there's a lot of human drama

25:43

in it too, of people making terrible mistakes

25:45

and lying to themselves, lying to other

25:47

people. Yeah, and

25:49

I don't think the post office have faced up

25:51

to the fact that they need to

25:54

address that side of it. We've looked

25:56

at a lot of the victims of this and

25:59

their stories.

26:00

Not all of them have come out, but lots have and

26:02

we can see what was happening there. But

26:05

I don't think we've really seen inside properly

26:07

yet

26:08

what was driving those people, as

26:10

you say. Do you think we will in the

26:12

course of this inquiry? I think it's starting to come out

26:15

with talking to lawyers, but they're so defensive.

26:17

I watched some of the sessions live

26:20

and there's a lot

26:22

of selective memory on

26:24

our current move. You know, even when confronted

26:26

with reports of what they'd said,

26:28

there's a lot of, I can't imagine

26:30

I would have said that. But the mindset

26:33

in the post office clearly hasn't changed

26:35

at all, because I mean, you pointed this out, but

26:38

they decided that they deserved a bonus

26:41

for looking into a previous miscarriage

26:44

as part of their job. They wanted more money, more

26:46

money. Yeah, that's the sort of perverse

26:49

world they operate in. They

26:51

would have answered that criticism,

26:53

that obvious sort of outrage

26:57

by saying, well, actually, that shows we're taking the inquiry

26:59

seriously, because our

27:01

bonus structure has to reflect our priorities.

27:04

So if we build in dealing

27:06

with the inquiry properly into our bonus system,

27:09

then actually that means we're

27:11

going to do it properly. As if, you know, if

27:13

you don't pay us a bonus, then we won't. Then

27:15

why not would any normal human being do anything?

27:18

But maybe they just plugged it into the computer system and the

27:20

computer said, oh, that's right, you wrote several hundred thousand pounds

27:22

of bonus. Now,

27:25

just to bring us up to date and to throw

27:27

in a bit of balance, we should cover the fact that

27:30

as we are recording this, the Labour Party conference

27:32

is currently in full swing up in Liverpool. I

27:34

guess the thing that I mean, I don't

27:37

want to predict a cover. And actually, the

27:39

next night is going to come out a week after the Labour conference

27:41

has ended. But I don't know whether Ian,

27:43

you feel a duty of balance to put the Labour

27:45

conference on as we've had a Conservative Party

27:47

conference on. Yeah, I'm slightly worried because

27:50

I read a piece saying that they are

27:52

deliberately trying to make this conference boring,

27:55

which may be just to cover up for the fact that

27:57

it is boring and they've tried really

27:59

hard. to make it interesting. I don't know, but yes,

28:02

clearly I feel a duty

28:04

of balance. And Helen, you've been doing

28:06

lots of this. Yeah, I'm sort of obsessed

28:08

with Keir Starmer because

28:10

I think he's got one of the most interesting stories

28:12

in British politics and like Ian's saying, he's camouflaged

28:14

it very carefully under sort of a tedium shield 30

28:17

miles thick. But he has changed,

28:19

he basically ditched all of his pledges that he

28:22

made to become Labour leader. So, you

28:24

know, he was going to end the cruel

28:26

sanctions regime and now they're keeping the two child

28:28

benefit caps. I mean, it's caused a lot of dissent within

28:30

Labour, defending migrant rights,

28:32

you know, whereas now he accepts the end of free

28:35

movement.

28:35

You know, there have just been this series of U-turns

28:37

and he's dragged Labour back into

28:39

this much more centrist, blary

28:42

position, all with, you know, a reasonable

28:44

grumbling, but not actually the civil

28:46

war that you perhaps would have predicted that would

28:49

follow that in 2020. So I

28:51

think, I think you're right. I think they'd love nothing more

28:53

than this to be an extremely boring conference where no

28:55

one says anything that makes any news and

28:57

they just quietly wait for the Tories to

28:59

tear each other apart and do weird things

29:02

like invite Nigel Farage to their conference and then

29:04

dance with him. That was very strange. But

29:06

is this not the time where they do announce the

29:09

positive vision for change that Britain

29:11

needs? I thought this would be as the last party

29:13

conference, probably before an election, the one in which they enact

29:15

phase three of the master plan.

29:17

There is a part of the, it was detox the party

29:20

and then phase

29:20

three, I can't remember, under pants names, but

29:22

phase two, point out Tories rubbish

29:25

and then phase three, you know, who's not rubbish us. Yeah.

29:27

Right.

29:27

And, you know, to some extent that's working. They had an

29:29

enormous by-election win in Scotland and that

29:32

seat that was vacated by Margaret Ferrier who break

29:34

the Covid rules with a 24% swing.

29:37

So I think they feel relatively confident about the fact

29:39

that they don't need to come out there and say, you know, free

29:41

bus passes for, you know, whoever

29:43

or whatever it might be. I think the trouble is

29:45

that journalists always demand that party leaders have

29:48

vision because it gives you something to write about in a column. And

29:51

I'm not sure that it necessarily, I think

29:53

actually people go, well, you're not going to get into parliament

29:55

just by not being the Tories. And

29:57

I think

29:57

it's just about possible that they

29:59

more.

29:59

quite actually. But

30:02

having a vision that is, my vision

30:04

of Britain is that it's not as bad

30:06

as it is now. Yeah. I

30:08

think that is alright. I think that

30:11

might work. My

30:11

cabinet is less weird than the current

30:13

cabinet. Yeah. And I'm quite boring

30:16

rather than being either crazy or a crook.

30:18

It's sort of a fairly powerful message I would

30:20

say. And is it working?

30:23

Well. And behind the scenes?

30:24

Is there anything I think is fascinating?

30:26

So Patrick McGuire of The Times did a very good profile

30:28

of Morgan McSweeney who is sort of the

30:31

dominant comings of this operation except

30:33

the exact opposite of dominant comings in that he hates

30:35

publicity and doesn't write 30,000 word

30:37

blogs. Which is the correct thing to do if

30:39

you're going to be the kind of, not the brains

30:41

exactly, but the kind of iron fist of

30:43

the operation because everyone will hate you and they can't

30:46

say that they hate the leader so they all say they hate you. But

30:48

he's a really interesting guy. He's from Cork

30:51

in Ireland. He lives in rural Anaksha.

30:53

His wife is standing actually for

30:55

the next door seat to the one that they won just

30:57

recently. And so you've ended up with, yeah,

31:00

this kind of Irish guy lives in Scotland really in

31:02

masterminding the English revival

31:04

as well as the Scottish revival of the Labour

31:06

Party, which is kind of a cute and interesting

31:08

thing. Someone described him in that piece

31:10

I think is dominant comings but not

31:12

crackers. Which is hard to consider what's

31:15

left.

31:17

But in the same sense that he is the one who has

31:19

kind of said, this is where the

31:22

country is and this is therefore where we have to be

31:24

on a whole range, like from welfare to

31:26

immigration. And they have been very ruthless

31:28

about selection, which we've covered several times

31:30

in HP source. And also about the fact

31:32

that, you know, conference, last year they were all buoyant.

31:35

It was extraordinary, very weird to see the Labour Party

31:37

happy. I didn't like it at all. But

31:39

this time what's really nice is that the businesses

31:41

have come flooding back. So Jim

31:44

Murphy's lobbying firm is there, you

31:46

know, they have got Labour Together has got, which is

31:48

the kind of starmore, I think tank, has

31:50

had a huge amount of money applied into it. Big

31:53

donors want to give the Labour Party money again,

31:55

which was not the case during the Corbyn years, although the

31:58

membership was, you know, a grand

31:59

streets membership was very healthy. And what happened

32:02

to this vast movement that

32:04

disapproved of care and centrism and Blairism

32:07

and Blair dad-ism and all

32:09

the other movements that

32:11

they didn't like?

32:12

There are some people who are really unhappy and

32:15

keep

32:15

writing you know about the broken promises

32:17

but weirdly not that many I feel like I'm sort of

32:19

more obsessed with

32:20

the broken promises than quite a lot of people

32:22

on the labour left. I think the thing that's really

32:24

obvious is that quite a lot of people who supported

32:26

Corbyn really bought the hope.

32:28

They really liked the fact that he was properly opposing

32:30

the Tories after the Miliband

32:33

era where you know it felt like a real near miss

32:35

in 2015 and in a different way, Stalmer

32:37

is doing that. It looks like he is 20 points

32:39

ahead and uncaused to form a Labour government.

32:42

So I think some people say okay so it might

32:44

not be the Labour Party that I would in my dreams have

32:47

but it's better than a Tory party and I'm surprised

32:49

by how many people have basically taken

32:51

that bargain.

32:52

Do you think that if

32:54

this business is breaking promises people actually

32:56

quite like it? They think that makes him look like

32:59

a Prime Minister for his continuity. Did

33:03

you have a few illicit parties in affairs? Yeah,

33:05

that's in phase two. I

33:08

do think the really weird thing about U-turns is that political

33:11

journalists are obsessed with them but you should always do

33:13

them

33:13

because people don't pay that much attention

33:15

to politics and it's much better to end

33:17

up with the right policy in the end than

33:19

to be you know you'll be mocked

33:20

at Prime Minister's questions for two weeks

33:23

but after that you're at you're essentially in the

33:25

correct policy space. Just always do it.

33:27

I wonder if they're in a way

33:29

triangulating themselves into a bit of a corner

33:32

when it comes to economically

33:35

what they can do they promise to improve all

33:37

sorts of things.

33:38

Everything's going to get better, education,

33:40

health service is going to have all

33:42

these problems solved and so on.

33:44

At the same time Rachel Reeves is

33:47

being extremely conservative

33:49

and promising that she's not going to raise any

33:51

taxes. So where does that lead?

33:53

That leaves them in a sort of Gordon Brown type

33:56

position in about 97 doesn't it? Needing

33:59

to look for other people.

33:59

sources of money which is how we got to the private

34:02

finance need which would be great

34:04

for us.

34:05

You're right, where it leaves them

34:08

is absolutely stuffed. They have essentially done

34:10

the same thing that Blair did in 1997 which was

34:12

say we'll stick to the Tory spending envelope. The

34:14

difference being that he was coming on the back of a, you know,

34:16

John Major left him a pretty decent economy

34:19

by that point and they were on a big boom.

34:21

Now it does not look like that

34:23

and so the line constantly from Keir Starmer and Rachel

34:26

Reeves is we won't put your taxes up. He came in with

34:28

a pledge to put up taxes on the top 5% of earners.

34:30

You know, even that is kind

34:32

of off the table now. So you're

34:34

right, there will be sneaky raids. I mean things

34:36

like pensions I would look at very carefully because

34:39

they want to do stuff like cut NHS waiting

34:41

lists by paying doctors overtime. Well, you

34:44

know, with what cash? And

34:46

there is, I think the next election is basically

34:47

going to be fought on a sort of giant lie that Britain

34:49

is a lot richer than it is and we've got a lot

34:52

more money to throw around and you won't have to pay higher taxes

34:54

or accept worse public services.

34:57

There's going to be a lot of work being done

34:59

by things like efficiency savings. That's

35:01

always where you turn for when you've really

35:03

run out of money. I was amazed

35:06

to see Starmer saying someone saying,

35:08

well, where's this money coming from? And

35:10

he's saying, growth. And I thought,

35:12

oh, God, he's turning into Liz and Ross.

35:15

You know, be careful. Yeah,

35:17

well, that was you're right. Exactly. The Gordon Brown thing was

35:19

we share the proceeds of growth. And then the next

35:21

question has to be now in 2023, 24, what growth? And

35:23

we're servicing

35:25

this very big debt at very

35:27

high levels of interest. Again, a different situation

35:30

to where we were even 10 years ago. And

35:33

but you're right, but it's not in the Tories interest

35:35

to bring this up because they don't have

35:36

an answer to that question. Apart

35:38

from going, you're right, actually, you've looked at it now it

35:40

does all God, well, this terrible

35:42

that is the Chancellor's position. Particularly if you

35:44

catch him slightly

35:47

off guard, he's just looking at God,

35:50

he's saying these figures. Right, he always

35:52

looks like he's just remembered. Yeah.

35:55

But but he's been so quiet and

35:57

the effort to make Sunak

35:59

presidents has been very concerted,

36:01

but he, I don't think, mentioned the cost

36:03

of living in his speech at

36:06

the Conservative conference, did he? Maybe briefly

36:08

in passing? Well, his big thing on

36:10

that is inflation, isn't it? That's one of his five.

36:13

Oh, that's a tax. He's going to bring

36:15

down inflation and that's a tax cut. Yeah.

36:18

So that's your cost of living dealt with. We're

36:20

going to have inflation of 5%, not 10%. And

36:23

the Chancellor got fine. 10, 15 minutes

36:27

at the conference. Right. He was quite a short

36:29

speech. The better, I'm the Prime Minister's wife, God. But

36:33

that is a kind of classic culture war play

36:35

in the sense of you've kind of given up the ghost economically, you

36:37

don't have anything to say, then you just retreat to

36:39

your comfort zone. Like, I felt looking at that Tory

36:41

Party conference a bit like I felt looking at Labour in 2015, where

36:44

they went, oh, it's all terrible. Why

36:46

don't we just have what we really want? Let's forget

36:48

about compromising the electorate. Can't I just have,

36:50

like, a government that's just David Frost

36:53

hugging Nigel Farage next to

36:55

Priti Patel and then Suella

36:56

Braveman shouting at people. That's just what I want

36:58

in my heart. And, you know, rather

37:01

than saying, what is a Tory Party that

37:03

could win a majority in Britain? What does that look like? What do

37:05

we have to do? And I think that they're going to

37:07

have to go through this sort of, if they lose the next election, which they're

37:09

uncoursed to, go through the kind of spin cycle

37:11

of just having freak

37:13

hour before they get back to

37:15

a position where they, sorry to be true. I'm

37:18

kind of talking about Ian Duncan's death, the last

37:20

freak hour. No, there was at a moment, I thought,

37:22

beginning to end up where GB News has more

37:25

members of Parliament than the Conservative.

37:28

The official opposition. There

37:30

was one Labour pledge I wanted to ask you about, Richard,

37:32

which is from Rachel Rees's speech. Oh,

37:35

yeah. We're recording this just

37:37

after that happened, and it's about cutting the use of

37:39

management consultants in government. Cutting

37:41

it by half,

37:42

I think?

37:43

She really has been reading the eye.

37:48

And because the rest of it through a kind of cost benefit analysis

37:50

to make sure it's going to be valued for money. Right.

37:54

Well, that would be a departure.

37:57

Yet again, this is your fault. We're going to be

37:59

saying politicians. was a right. Yeah.

38:02

This is exactly what David Cameron said

38:04

in 2010. Do you remember he came in and said,

38:07

we're going to end government by management consultant.

38:10

And he did cut it for a year or so, but

38:13

then it crept right back up. Right.

38:15

And we're back there. So they may

38:17

well, you know, really feel the heat for 12 months

38:20

or so. Frederic

38:22

has been chatting to George Osborne, which

38:24

is only a fact I learned from the Osborne

38:26

Balls podcast. Oh,

38:29

it's the listener. I've

38:33

written every single one of those lukewarm reviews

38:35

for us on iTunes. Yeah. But he just casually

38:37

dropped into the conversation. Well, in my conversations with

38:39

Rachel Reeves, I've made clear about how normal.

38:42

Yeah, but he was chanced for quite a long time. You might

38:45

not think he did a very good job, but he at least understands

38:47

what the job is. Right. And has tried to have

38:49

a go at it. I don't, I wouldn't have a go at over

38:51

that. I know I said kiss on was boring.

38:53

Yeah. I'm going to attract that because you know what he did that I

38:55

think is enormously banterous.

38:58

He made Boris Johnson's ex-wife his

39:00

advisor on social harassment in the workplace.

39:02

Yes. A genuinely good joke.

39:07

So yeah, I retract that he is,

39:09

he is a master troll and I

39:11

stam. I was thinking

39:14

Lord Byron's widow set

39:16

up a home for fallen girls in

39:19

honor of her husband. I thought that's about

39:21

the same level of joke. She

39:24

also announced an anti-covid

39:26

corruption commissioner. Have you seen

39:29

that? Yes. Excellent. That's

39:31

just government by private. I know. Your

39:35

Dominic coming for my name in terms of that Richard.

39:37

I mean, it's slightly sort

39:39

of anti horse bolting, uh, right. Commissioner,

39:42

um, several years after the event,

39:44

what we probably need is someone

39:46

with that kind of role in government, looking at all

39:49

the other scams going on. Some of which we just talked

39:51

about, uh, some of the more current ones. Give

39:53

them a few years. We

39:55

should mention the interest of balance that the

39:57

Lib Dems and the Greens also had a conference. SMP.

40:00

Yes. Although the SMP one is just them crying. No,

40:03

you're right,

40:05

we should mention that. And now we have. I've

40:08

read a couple of people saying that the

40:10

other thing about Kirstom is he's very lucky and

40:13

Corbin wasn't lucky and whatever else

40:15

you think about him and the SMP

40:17

deciding to entirely implode

40:20

is not necessarily to his enormous

40:23

political credit. Yes,

40:25

I don't think Kirstom has secretly sent Nicola Sturgeon

40:27

that campervern perspective saying, oh these

40:30

look nice,

40:30

when you like to spend some SMP money on these? And

40:32

actually he benefits from that enormously because if

40:35

you remember the 2015 election the idea of Ed

40:37

Miliband in the pocket of sermon and

40:39

Sturgeon, that was a very powerful Tory

40:41

message was if you vote for a Labour government

40:44

what you're actually gonna get is loads more money is gonna go

40:46

to Scotland and English voters didn't like

40:48

that. They were like what about my hospital? And

40:50

if Labour can make the case that it can win UK-wide,

40:53

I mean not excluding Northern Ireland, but if it

40:55

can make the case that it wins the rest of the nations

40:57

then that becomes that sort of nullified. And Kirstom

41:00

has from the start said I won't do any kind of deal,

41:02

I will not do a coalition with the SMP because he knows

41:04

how incredibly potent that attack line was. But

41:07

you're right, he has been handed the gift of at

41:09

the right time, the SMP

41:11

has sort of detonated itself. But

41:14

you know, Anna Sawa, the Labour leader in Scotland

41:16

is a genuinely I think good politician, he's

41:18

a smart guy, he's an improvement on the

41:20

run of you know, maybe rude, no

41:23

hopers, I don't know if he's slightly rude, but people

41:25

who really struggled to escape the orbit of the SMP

41:27

and the gravity, you know, the gravity of Scottish politics revolving

41:29

around the SMP for so long. So

41:31

I think you know, there's a smart alliance

41:33

he's made Stalmer and Sawa have

41:36

a kind of decent working relationship and that really

41:38

helps. But you're right, he has

41:40

been the beneficiary of timing,

41:43

he's also been the beneficiary of timing, let's be honest about the fact

41:45

that the Tories are just clapped out. You

41:47

know, I think it's a lot harder to win you know, for

41:50

people to be in opposition for one term and come back.

41:52

Whereas what we've done now is we've cycled through various iterations

41:55

of a Tory party and now as I say,

41:57

I think they've sort of just even they fail

41:59

themselves.

41:59

they've given up. You know if you look at the number

42:02

of Tory MPs who are retiring at the next election a lot

42:04

of them have gone 50 I think. Yeah 50 out of about 350. And

42:06

Chris Grayling for health reasons

42:09

has become the latest of those but there are a lot of people have

42:12

looked and gone I'll leave it.

42:15

Someone else can sort. I was personally

42:18

very excited to see the Prime

42:20

Minister doing a joke about

42:22

Nicholas Sturgeon which is straightforward contempt of

42:24

court as an active police investigation and

42:27

he's not being investigated so I'm just putting

42:29

it on record. The next time I am done

42:31

for contempt of court I will plead

42:34

what we call the Sunac defence is that

42:36

it doesn't matter. And it was the only joke

42:38

as well. The only joke is potentially

42:41

a breach of the law. He did one good joke

42:43

at the private Westminster correspondence thing where he talked about

42:45

what they're going to do at Karaoke and he said he was

42:47

going to do Tiny Dancer. Well that's just like

42:49

him reserving his best joke for the private sector. That's

42:52

it for this episode

42:55

of page 94. We'll be back again in a

42:57

fortnight with another one. Between now and then if

42:59

you find yourself wanting to read more of these

43:01

stories in print form subscriptions to Private

43:04

Eye are available. All you have to do is go to private-eye.co.uk.

43:08

There is a big red button there which says get a subscription

43:10

now. We warmly recommend you do that. Thanks

43:13

for listening and

43:13

see you next time.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features