Podchaser Logo
Home
Episode 30: 4 Ways the Concept of Trauma Bonding Works Against Survivors

Episode 30: 4 Ways the Concept of Trauma Bonding Works Against Survivors

Released Saturday, 5th December 2020
Good episode? Give it some love!
Episode 30: 4 Ways the Concept of Trauma Bonding Works Against Survivors

Episode 30: 4 Ways the Concept of Trauma Bonding Works Against Survivors

Episode 30: 4 Ways the Concept of Trauma Bonding Works Against Survivors

Episode 30: 4 Ways the Concept of Trauma Bonding Works Against Survivors

Saturday, 5th December 2020
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

The term "trauma bonding" was originally coined by Patrick Carnes,  who was a proponent of the concept of sex addiction.  He originally developed the term to describe "the misuse of fear, excitement, sexual feelings, and sexual physiology to entangle another person." A simpler and more encompassing definition is that traumatic bonding is: "a strong emotional attachment between an abused person and his or her abuser, formed as a result of the cycle of violence."

 Problematically, the term is often misapplied to survivors rather than focusing on perpetrators and their choices and tactics. In this episode Ruth and David discuss 4 ways the concept works against survivors: 

  • Problem #1: It deemphasizes or ignores  perpetrators' behaviors that keep survivors trapped in an abusive situation.
  • Problem #2:  It blames victims for  the  failure of friends, family, professionals, and faith leaders failure to hold  perpetrators accountable for their actions.
  • Problem 3: It focuses professionals on the survivor, not the perpetrator.
  • Problem 4: It lets systems  and professionals off the hook for how they are not responding well to survivors and perpetrators

David and Ruth also explore the connections between the concept of trauma bonding and Stockholm Syndrome, co-dependency and learned helplessness.  They also examine the differential impact of this term on  poor and indigenous women, women of color, and trans survivors.

Toward the end of the show David and Ruth talk about how the Safe & Together Institute's approach offers professionals alternative approaches to working with survivors including: 

  • Making sure that any discussion of trauma is contextualize to the perpetrator's pattern

  • Actively seeking to understand behaviors of resistance and protection for self and others 

  • Working to ensure that the response that a survivor gets for disclosure is a positive experience (validation, partnership and consequences for the perpetrator) 

  • Respecting survivors unique needs

  • Using tools like the Ally Guide to communicate to professional and kin

  • Training professionals to recognize  a) the patterns of manipulation by perpetrators, b) and b) their vulnerabilities to manipulation 

Listen to other related episodes:

Episode 2: Victim blaming
Episode 3: Language and professional terms which cover up realities of abuse

Check out related ecourses on our Virtual Academy


Now available! Mapping the Perpetrator’s Pattern: A Practitioner’s Tool for Improving Assessment, Intervention, and Outcomes The web-based Perpetrator Pattern Mapping Tool is a virtual practice tool for improving assessment, intervention, and outcomes through a perpetrator pattern-based approach. The tool allows practitioners to apply the Model’s critical concepts and principles to their current case load in real

Check out David Mandel's new book "Stop Blaming Mothers and Ignoring Fathers: How to transform the way we keep children safe from domestic violence."

Show More
Rate

From The Podcast

Partnered with a Survivor: David Mandel and Ruth Reymundo Mandel

These podcasts are a reflection of Ruth & David’s ongoing conversations, which are both intimate and professional and touch on complex topics like how systems fail victims and children, how victims experience those systems, and how children are impacted by those failures. Their discussions delve into how society views masculinity and violence and how intersectionalities such as cultural beliefs, religious beliefs and unique vulnerabilities impact how we respond to abuse and violence. These far-ranging discussions offer an insider look into how we navigate the world as professionals, as parents and as partners. During these podcasts, David & Ruth challenge the notions that keep all of us from moving forward collectively as systems, as cultures and as families into safety, nurturance and healing. Note: Some of the topics discussed in the episodes are deeply personal and sensitive, which may be difficult for some people. We occasionally use mature language. We often use gender pronouns like “he” when discussing perpetrators and “she” for victims. While both men and women can be abusive and controlling, and domestic abuse happens in straight and same-sex relationships, the most common situation when it comes to coercive control is a male perpetrator and a female victim. Men's abuse toward women is more closely associated with physical injury, fear and control. Similarly, very different expectations of men and women as parents and the focus of Safe & Together on children in the context of domestic abuse make it impossible to make generic references to gender when it comes to parenting. The Model, through its behavioral focus on patterns of behavior, is useful in identifying and responding to abuse in all situations, including same-sex couples and women's use of violence. We think our listeners are sophisticated enough to understand these distinctions. Have an idea for a podcast? Tell about it here: https://share.hsforms.com/1l329DGB1TH6AFndCFfB7aA3a1w1 

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features