Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Personology is a production of I Heart
0:02
Radio. Welcome
0:11
back to part two of Joe McCarthy,
0:13
who has rapidly risen to the role
0:15
of U S. Senator of Wisconsin. Initially
0:18
seen as a moderate Republican, his
0:20
first few years as senator were not especially
0:23
remarkable. He was noted, however,
0:26
for being an excellent orator, but
0:28
his reputation would soon change. I'm
0:31
doctor Gale Salts, and this is Personology.
0:34
My guest again today is journalist and
0:36
author Larry Tye, a New York
0:38
Times bestselling author and author
0:41
of newly released Demagogue,
0:43
The Life and Long Shadow of Senator Joe
0:45
McCarthy.
0:49
We've sort of talked about the groundwork
0:52
as to why Joe McCarthy
0:55
might have been the right person
0:58
characteriologically to embark
1:01
on what he ultimately did. But
1:04
there was also, you have to say, somewhat
1:06
of a right person at the right time and
1:09
right place. Right. So it
1:11
so happened that in during
1:15
the Cold War Jitters rising
1:18
Uh, the House un American Activities
1:20
Committee becomes a permanent
1:23
House committee having nothing to do with Joe McCarthy
1:25
himself, so
1:28
that the idea of investigating
1:30
communist subterfuge becomes
1:34
a reality in the
1:36
Senate at that time, and
1:38
concerns about the Cold War means
1:40
that the American public is
1:43
very comfortable and ready to buy
1:45
into the concern that
1:48
Communism has to be ferreted out in
1:51
any way possible. So I
1:53
think it goes back to the word opportunists, and there
1:55
are two sides to that word. One is recognizing
1:58
the opportunity and the other is willingness
2:00
to exploit it. The opportunity was there,
2:02
and that we were I don't know what
2:05
kind of language I can use here, but we were scared
2:07
as heck in terms of what was going
2:09
on in the world. There was a real threat off in the Soviet
2:11
Union, and there was a
2:14
real sense in America that we
2:16
could go to nuclear war and kids
2:18
would very shortly be taught on how to
2:20
duck and cover under their desks. That was the
2:22
response if there was a nuclear attack and
2:25
the time was ripe for somebody to come
2:27
along. And John McCarthy brilliantly
2:30
understood that fear, and
2:32
like any good opportunist or
2:34
any good demagogue, knew
2:36
how to play for it, played to it, and he
2:39
played to it not with a realistic
2:41
and sensible and boring
2:44
response He played to it with
2:46
dynamism. He played to it with
2:49
dynamite. He played to it
2:51
by saying things that weren't true, but that
2:54
he knew his listeners would want to hear.
2:56
And he understood that
2:59
just saying that there were maybe
3:01
traders out there, Um,
3:04
if you did it in general terms, wasn't going
3:06
to mean anything. What you had to do was he had to name
3:08
the traders, and you had to count the traders.
3:10
And he knew how to,
3:13
in a wild West kind of
3:15
way, go in and really shake things
3:17
up. You know. He stoked
3:21
general paranoia, right, And of
3:23
course, as the saying goes, just because
3:25
your paranoid doesn't mean you don't have enemies. So
3:28
we did have enemies, and people
3:30
were fearful about that, which
3:33
does tend to ignite
3:36
more paranoia because
3:38
there's always a kernel of seeds
3:40
of truth there. And
3:43
the question, you know, so paranoid
3:46
is a term that went along with
3:48
Joe McCarthy for for many years,
3:51
uh following his death even and
3:54
the question is really whether
3:57
we don't see a lot of evidence of paranoia
4:00
before this time, right, we don't
4:02
see him walking around supposing
4:04
enemies all over the place and being
4:07
paranoid, which is interesting because
4:09
when someone has let's say, paranoid
4:11
personality disorder, you would expect
4:14
to see it much earlier than
4:16
this in their life. Uh, It's it's
4:18
true that a traumatic event can happen that
4:20
can change someone's trajectory and make them
4:22
more paranoid. And it's also
4:24
true, and I think this does become a question
4:27
that substance use and abuse can
4:30
also heighten a person's paranoia.
4:32
And so we do have to wonder whether
4:35
ultimately that comes to bear in
4:37
terms of the degree of paranoia that
4:40
he seems to exhibit. But it does
4:42
seem at this juncture that it's more likely
4:44
that, as you said, he sees an
4:46
opportunity, and he sees
4:48
that the general paranoia
4:51
that can be ignited and inflamed can
4:53
be an avenue for him playing
4:56
the role of rescuer protector
5:00
and therefore holding the power holding
5:02
being the gatekeeper and UM,
5:04
and that's just that is very interesting.
5:07
Whether that ultimately later dovetails
5:10
with his increasing drinking
5:12
and as we'll get to later, the use of other
5:15
substances that may have heightened
5:17
his thoughts around this UM
5:19
is also something worth positing. But
5:22
let's move as you said to UM,
5:25
Really, his launch into McCarthy
5:29
is m like his launch into
5:31
this whole prosecutorial role.
5:34
Yes, so I want to just revisit
5:37
paranoia for one second and
5:39
we can come back to this later. UM.
5:42
I would say that while Um
5:44
he was often called a paranoid, especially
5:47
in the early days, UM he was anything,
5:49
but he was playing to other people's paranoia.
5:51
But he was seeing things clearly, and
5:54
he knew that he didn't believe in what he
5:56
was saying. I'd love to take your
5:58
listeners to a moment where I think McCarthy
6:01
is m was born, and that moment was in
6:03
February of nineteen fifty. There
6:06
is a tradition in Republican circles
6:08
in America that the one night that
6:10
is best to raise money is
6:13
when you are honoring the birthday
6:15
of the patron saint to the Republican Party, Abe
6:17
Lincoln, And they're famously
6:20
called Lincoln Day dinners. And if
6:22
you're a prominent U. S. Senator, you
6:24
get invited to places like New York and Boston
6:27
and San Francisco and Chicago. If
6:29
you're Joe McCarthy, the consummate backbencher
6:32
who looks like he's on his way to defeat. After
6:35
one term, you get invited to Wheeling,
6:37
West Virginia, which is where he gave the speech. That
6:39
night, he shows up with a briefcase
6:42
with two speeches. One
6:44
of them is a snoozer of a speech
6:47
on national housing policy that
6:49
he actually knew something about, and
6:51
had he picked that speech that night to deliver
6:54
you and I seventy years later, wouldn't
6:56
be paying attention to Joe McCarthy.
6:58
But instead he grabbed the other speech in his briefcase,
7:01
and that is a speech on a subject
7:04
that he knows arguably less about than
7:06
any other member of the U. S. Senate
7:09
in that year of nineteen fifty, and that's a speech
7:11
on the communist threat not
7:14
in the Soviet Union, but behind every
7:16
pillar in the U. S. State Department. So
7:19
he grabs a sheaf of
7:21
papers and he waves it
7:23
around like this in the air, saying,
7:26
I have in my hand the list of two
7:28
hundred and five subversives
7:30
in the State Department, and I
7:32
have the actual names, and I
7:34
know the jobs they have, and
7:37
I'm going to call on the government
7:39
to route these people out. And
7:42
it was a passionate speech, and it
7:44
was a brilliant speech, and it was, as
7:46
his fellow senators would later conclude,
7:49
a fraud in a hoax because a
7:51
he had I don't know what he had in
7:53
his hand. His friends have speculated
7:56
that it could have been that day's
7:58
racing sheet. But what it was
8:00
it wasn't a list of two hundred and five subversives
8:03
in the government. What it probably was
8:06
was a list, a recycled
8:09
list, based on the things that I saw
8:11
in his archives, a recycled
8:13
list of the House on American
8:16
Activities and other early first
8:18
generation Red hunters in
8:20
America. Many of the people
8:23
who we actually had names
8:25
of were people who no longer
8:27
worked for the State Department, or who
8:30
had had a sister or a
8:32
brother in law, or their
8:34
own association with
8:36
left wing activities twenty
8:38
years before. They were not Flaming
8:41
spies. Most of the twenty four Carrot
8:43
spies had been rooted out long
8:46
before Joe McCarthy joined the hunt, most
8:49
of the ones. When we got to see the Russian
8:51
archives, most of the spies who were
8:53
still there, Joe McCarthy wouldn't
8:55
have recognized if he had tripped over them
8:58
in the dark on the way to his speech in
9:00
Wheeling, West Virginia. But what happened
9:02
two days after his speech was he
9:05
was on page one of every
9:07
newspaper in America. He had
9:09
the Truman administration on the defensive,
9:11
and he never turned back. That
9:14
was the moment where he realized this was
9:16
the issue that was going to bring him the limelight.
9:19
And if there was a moment where McCarthy
9:21
ism was given birth, it was in
9:23
front of that audience of mine operators
9:26
and whoever else was there that night who
9:29
didn't recognize what was going on and didn't
9:32
recognize for sure that a
9:34
crusade like we had not seen in
9:37
a long time in America was being born. You
9:40
mentioned, who knows what those papers
9:43
were in his hand, Maybe they were race sheets.
9:45
I should mention that actually Joe
9:48
McCarthy was a gambler. He
9:50
he liked to bet, He bet in all kinds
9:52
of ways, and and that's
9:54
just important to keep in mind. Well clearly
9:57
that that night he bet on himself
10:00
and uh and one and the thrill
10:02
of the wind, whether we're talking about
10:04
horse races or
10:06
his individual political races
10:09
or you know, political moments, the
10:12
reward of that was
10:15
addictive. I'm gonna I'm gonna say addictive
10:18
for Joe McCarthy. He had
10:21
Um. You know, some people from
10:24
a neuro lot and from a neurological point
10:26
of view, are more susceptible to addiction
10:28
than others. There is something about
10:30
their dopamine, the neurotransmitter
10:32
dopamine of reward, that reward
10:35
system that is primed to
10:37
take off and super reward.
10:40
Whether it's a gambling win, whether
10:42
it's with substance use and addiction
10:44
to alcohol or drugs,
10:47
or whether even it's something like a political
10:49
win. But the thing that gives
10:51
you that dopamine high is just
10:54
irresistible. And that seemed to
10:56
be a really important feature that we see
10:58
in many different ways, the ways
11:00
in which he was I'll almost say a
11:02
slave to his dopamine system,
11:05
um, and how that drove a lot of behaviors
11:07
for him. But upon this win
11:09
this night, as you said, there was
11:11
no turning back. And it's interesting because from
11:14
a concrete point of view, you
11:16
know, is there any
11:18
evidence that he wanted to be president, that
11:20
he wanted to and of the words move
11:22
into into that position of power
11:25
or what was the end goal? So
11:27
there was no end goal, and that to me is one of the fascinating
11:29
things and it is reminiscent of what we see
11:31
maybe going on today. That the goal was to
11:33
get power and hold on to power. It
11:35
was not what you would do with it, whether he ever
11:37
wanted to be president. Every time he
11:39
would deny it to one person, he
11:42
tells somebody else he did. I saw
11:44
a wonderful check that had never
11:46
been cashed to the McCarthy for President
11:48
committee in his um personal
11:51
papers. But I want to just say one
11:53
more thing about the addiction. You talked about it compellingly
11:56
from a mental health point of view. I want
11:58
to say that in later years,
12:01
when McCarthy went after not just communists,
12:03
but he went after gays
12:06
and lesbians in government, he
12:08
said that the reason he was doing that was because
12:11
they're being closeted where
12:14
their sexual orientation made
12:16
them vulnerable to blackmail
12:19
by Soviet operatives. I
12:21
think Joe McCarthy's addictions made
12:24
him vulnerable. His gambling
12:26
addiction is what he was doing with
12:28
his money, his alcohol consumption,
12:30
all of those are things that made
12:33
him more vulnerable than all the people he
12:35
was targeting for their alleged vulnerabilities.
12:38
And it is one more way
12:41
where we see hypocrisy defining
12:44
what he did. But that's another element
12:46
I think of opportunism, well, hypocrisy,
12:48
but what I would call projection,
12:51
right, these things within himself.
12:53
Um, I mean, he was the one
12:56
being the bad guy, He was
12:58
the one lying, He
13:00
was the one destroying other people's
13:02
lives, and he projected all
13:05
of this out and including as
13:07
you said, the addictions and the self
13:09
destructive and and stigmatized
13:12
behaviors that he was committing. All
13:15
of this was projected out. It's
13:18
I'm not the problem. Other people are the
13:20
problem, right. Other people are the spies,
13:22
the bad guys, the self destructive
13:24
guys, the stigmatized guys, and
13:27
and that was a huge part
13:30
of his m O. I guess I'll say that he that
13:32
he needed to project all these things outward and
13:35
he but at the same time, sadly,
13:37
for many other people in this country.
13:39
Again, his moral compass didn't
13:42
seem to make him sympathetic at
13:44
all or empathetic at all in
13:46
terms of destroying other people's
13:48
lives. He was sympathetic
13:51
and empathetic only when he was going out for the drink
13:53
after he had destroyed them during the day, and when he was
13:55
taking him out and being their buddy afterwards.
13:57
He was a bit empathetic. But in
14:00
terms of the randomness of this
14:02
whole um launch of McCarthy
14:04
is um, I want to just it is partly
14:07
fatuous, but I also think it partly
14:09
suggests how random the whole thing was. One of
14:11
the many ways his numbers
14:13
that first week kept changing between
14:16
especially two numbers two communists
14:19
or fifty seven, and the fifty
14:21
seven, it was suggested, could
14:23
have come he was a big Hamburger eater,
14:26
and it suggested that he might have gone
14:28
in and used Hines fifty seven sauce
14:30
and that number stuck in his mind. And
14:33
that wouldn't surprise me because the numbers
14:35
didn't mean much of anything, and it
14:37
could have come from anywhere. Let's
14:39
take a quick break here. We'll be back in
14:42
a moment, bed
14:54
bed bedding. It
14:56
is important for people to understand it
14:59
was not unusual will for him to have a multi
15:01
drink lunch, um to show
15:03
up on the floor after lunch appearing
15:06
drunk, to show up the next
15:08
day in the Senate appearing hungover,
15:11
and um somewhere in
15:13
this time period became
15:16
this really
15:19
unfathomable story that
15:22
it seemed he was probably at some point
15:24
started to use opiates. It may have started because
15:26
he he was prescribed them
15:28
for pain. He had a lot of accidents,
15:30
he broke a bone or or something
15:33
like that. Um it may have started
15:35
because he had terrible hangovers the next day
15:37
and was looking for some relief.
15:39
But UM, the story
15:43
of the secrecy of his
15:45
addiction, the discovery by
15:47
the head of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics
15:50
and his the
15:53
the Federal Bureau of Narcotics being convinced
15:55
that they basically
15:57
had to maintain his habit UH
16:00
to somehow protect the world
16:02
or protect his ongoing crusade
16:04
against communism,
16:07
provided him ongoing
16:10
morphine via a Washington, d c.
16:12
Pharmacy and the impact
16:14
of that secret because
16:17
you have to understand that if you think drug
16:20
use and alcohol use or substance
16:23
abuse is stigmatized today, which
16:25
it is a deeply, deeply stigmatized
16:27
and not understood really as an illness, the
16:30
degree to which it was stigmatized in the nineteen
16:32
fifties is UH today
16:35
pales in comparison. So I want to
16:37
push back a little bit. So what you said
16:40
about the morphine addiction,
16:42
the opioid addiction UM was
16:44
reported in the newspapers,
16:46
and it was in an unnamed
16:48
way by the guy who
16:51
ran the drug agency,
16:53
and Slinger was his name. UM.
16:55
He indicated that there was an unnamed
16:58
senior politician who this happened to, when everybody
17:00
presumed and it may have been that he was referring to McCarthy.
17:03
The pushback on that as I want to be
17:05
fair to him. There's enough that we know
17:07
about what he did that
17:10
that would have shown up, I think
17:12
given the way his alcohol addiction did
17:15
in his exhaustive records,
17:17
thousands of pages of records UM
17:20
from Bethesda Naval Hospital. And I didn't
17:22
trust who am I a an old health
17:25
reporter to sit down and try to make
17:27
sense of that and whether there was really any sign of addiction
17:29
there. So I sat down with three doctors,
17:31
one of whom had just stepped down as dean
17:33
of Harvard Medical, A second was the
17:36
editor in chief emeritus of New England
17:38
Journal, and the third was an expert
17:40
on a lot of the areas that McCarthy
17:42
had suffered various medical
17:44
woes. And we actually there were four doctors
17:47
and we sat down and looked through every one of those pages,
17:49
and there was no evidence
17:52
in his medical records. That doesn't mean that he
17:54
wasn't addicted, but it was no evidence
17:56
of that addiction. There was a
18:01
jolting and upsetting set
18:04
of evidence of his alcohol
18:06
addiction, and it was
18:09
there at an early
18:11
stage from the moment that
18:13
he was condemned by his fellow senators.
18:16
That alcohol consumption was
18:18
quantified in the records. And
18:22
the only surprise to me is that he lived as
18:24
long as he did drinking that much
18:26
in the later years. But one of the interesting
18:29
things we now have access
18:31
to all of the nine thousand
18:33
pages of transcripts of McCarthy's closed
18:36
door hearings, two thirds of his
18:38
hearings were behind closed doors. He thought
18:41
that they would never become public, and
18:43
they showed Joe McCarthy unhinged
18:45
when he thought nobody was watching. And one
18:47
of the many interesting things to me in those hearings,
18:50
it wasn't just how he abused the
18:52
rights of witnesses and how
18:55
somebody who appeared before him in
18:57
a private closed
19:00
door session that was used as
19:02
a staging ground to see whether they wanted to bring
19:04
him before the public and if they were too
19:06
good a witness, meaning if they fought back effectively.
19:09
They never showed up in the public hearings. It
19:11
was only the ones that he knew that he could
19:13
get the better of. But another thing,
19:15
and it may be my looking for it, but
19:18
I don't think so. His demeanor
19:20
changed from the morning sessions, where I
19:22
think he was sober, to the afternoon
19:25
sessions, where his fuse became
19:27
shorter. He gave longer diet
19:30
tribes of speeches, and I
19:32
think it was for two reasons. I
19:34
think one, his standard
19:37
lunch was a burger,
19:39
a raw onion, and whiskey,
19:41
and I think he had had enough whiskey at lunch
19:44
that he lost his temper more
19:46
quickly in the afternoon. But the other
19:48
thing that I'm intrigued about from his
19:50
medical records is he had hemorrhoids.
19:52
And it may just have been if you sit
19:54
for two hours, the hemorrhoids are controllable.
19:57
You start looking nasty after four or
19:59
five, have a six hours Okay,
20:02
So that's interesting. Well, certainly
20:05
chronic pain of any sort could
20:07
definitely shorten your fuse, no question about
20:09
it. And we have to
20:11
wonder why he went
20:14
from really being I guess
20:16
we'd have to argue quite successful in
20:18
his pursuits right, in his
20:21
effect and in his acruement of power
20:23
in terms of inflicting
20:26
McCarthy ism on the on the nation
20:29
to to ultimately creating
20:31
his own downfall by going
20:34
for the military, for going going at
20:36
the army. And that seems like
20:38
such a clear,
20:42
uh self destructive maneuver, I
20:44
guess, I'll say, or a very very
20:47
poor decision that
20:49
we have to wonder what what was
20:51
instrumental in that decision for
20:53
him that ultimately brought his downfall.
20:56
So I think what happened to Joe McCarthy is he began
20:59
his crisis sight of McCarthy is um with
21:01
that accidental delivery
21:04
of a speech that he never knew was going to take
21:06
off in that way. And he knew
21:08
in those early days when he was raising
21:11
those charges that he was being an opportunist
21:13
and that he didn't have to believe in the things. I
21:16
think over time, something
21:18
strange happened that he started to believe
21:20
his own rhetoric in early nineteen
21:23
fifty four. By the time he
21:25
took on the military,
21:28
he had failed to see that he was overstepping
21:31
that you could bully people in the
21:33
State Department, you could get away with it at
21:35
the Voice of America, you could get away
21:37
with it in the government printing office because
21:40
nobody particularly knew who those people were
21:42
or cared much about them. But there
21:44
was an institution in America that was
21:46
too big to bully. That was the U.
21:48
S. Army. That was also the
21:50
moment when he did that,
21:53
that not just the army eventually
21:55
developed a backbone and taking him on,
21:57
but our commander in chief, the one
22:00
person in America more popular than Joe McCarthy,
22:03
This former war hero Dwight
22:05
Eisenhower, finally understood
22:08
that the army was something he wasn't
22:10
going to let McCarthy get away with bullying.
22:13
He understood that McCarthy was overstepping,
22:16
and Joe McCarthy went
22:18
one step further. Had he not done
22:21
that, he could have gone on for years.
22:23
But I also think what happened. We look
22:26
at his poll numbers and
22:28
when he took on the Army, the
22:31
U. S. Senate, his old sub committee ended
22:33
up running what was the most famous set
22:35
of hearings ever run. They were called
22:37
the Army McCarthy Hearings. At the start
22:39
of those hearings, Joe McCarthy was at a full
22:42
fifty percent popularity. The
22:44
gallop Poles said one in every two Americans
22:47
thought he was doing a great job. By
22:49
the end of those hearings in the summer
22:51
of nineteen fifty four, his numbers
22:53
had gone from fifty down
22:56
to thirty. And
22:58
anybody who's old enough to member those
23:00
hearings remembers one magical
23:02
moment where a very smart, Harvard
23:05
trained lawyer from Boston named
23:07
Joe Welch stood up and said
23:09
when McCarthy went after Welch's
23:12
young associate and said that he had been affiliated
23:15
with a left wing legal group, Joe
23:17
Welch famously said, Senator,
23:20
have you no decency? Well,
23:22
the truth is that was not the magical
23:24
moment, and the truth is Joe Welch
23:26
had been waiting during the entire hearings.
23:29
He was a performer as well as a lawyer.
23:31
He had concocted that line and
23:33
he was waiting for a magical moment to deliver
23:35
it. He picked a great moment. But
23:38
the moment only worked because
23:40
I think Americans had been watching this guy,
23:43
who they thought was their hero, look
23:45
more like the schoolyard bully on
23:47
public television, and
23:50
they wanted to ask, Senator, have
23:52
you no decency? And so that
23:54
line crystallized the question
23:56
America had on its mind. It
23:59
showed the power of television to
24:01
take a guy who was a
24:03
schoolyard bully and make
24:06
him look that way to the American
24:08
public. And my book
24:10
begins with the line, this is a
24:12
book about America's love affair with bullies.
24:15
But I also think that American
24:17
knows when a bully is really
24:20
going too far and it will part
24:22
company. So I
24:25
wrote a book in part about one of the darkest
24:27
chapters in American history.
24:29
But I think there is ultimately a
24:32
very uplifting message of this book
24:34
and the book. The message
24:37
is in American history
24:40
with our uniquely American strain
24:42
of demagogues, from Huey
24:44
Long and the Jew
24:46
baiting radio preacher Father
24:49
Charles Coglin to Joe McCarthy
24:52
and Donald Trump. The
24:55
lesson is that give a demagogue
24:57
enough rope and they will hang themselves. And
24:59
is part of the hanging that the
25:02
overreach for power, the
25:04
displaying who you really are
25:06
inside, and people finally being able
25:08
to grasp that. What what is
25:10
the lesson that we
25:13
can we can learn today about
25:15
ultimately? You know,
25:18
is it the doer or the dewey that ultimately
25:20
catches on to the demagoguery.
25:23
Great question, It's both. I believe
25:25
two things about the American people. I believe
25:27
we are more naive and susceptible
25:30
to bullying into demagoguery
25:33
than we think about ourselves, because
25:35
we've shown it repeatedly, you know, George
25:38
Wallace, the lots of people who
25:41
we've bought into. But
25:43
I think in the end it
25:46
is partly demagogues doing themselves
25:48
in and it's partly America coming to its
25:50
senses. And I believe and I
25:52
pray that throughout
25:55
every phase of history, including
25:57
today, that in the Americans
26:01
recognize bullies. And
26:03
I think that we saw the
26:06
first effective pushback
26:09
against some of the bullying that Donald Trump
26:12
does come from the
26:14
US military. It came from
26:16
when he did over the last
26:19
month things staging
26:22
um, the photo opportunity outside
26:24
the White House, across the street from the park and
26:27
clearing people so we had a path to get
26:29
there. UM. The
26:31
commanders in chief of
26:34
the various arms services, I'm sorry, the heads
26:36
of the various armed services, UM,
26:38
Defense secretaries, UM,
26:41
the heads of joint chiefs of staff passed
26:43
in present. When the military
26:45
is bullied, they stand up and say that institution
26:48
you can't touch. And I
26:51
think that I think Donald Trump is a
26:53
very smart politician, and he probably
26:55
learned a lesson there. But I also
26:57
think that he has
27:00
almost to the letter, followed
27:02
the Joe McCarthy playbook in
27:04
the last three and a half years. And
27:07
it is not a playbook that I'm as
27:09
an author writing about Joe McCarthy, and I say,
27:11
jeez, he's using that playbook because I
27:13
want to sell books. Um,
27:16
nobody minds selling books. But it's also a
27:18
playbook that had a flesh and blood
27:20
through line in the name of
27:22
a smart, arrogant lawyer
27:25
named Roy Cone, who was Joe
27:27
McCarthy's protege and Donald Trump's tutor,
27:30
and he showed Trump
27:32
all the things that a politician
27:34
can learn from a guy like Joe McCarthy.
27:37
And Trump was a very able student. Let's
27:39
take a quick break here. We'll be back in
27:41
a moment. Be
27:52
beddy, beddy, beddy.
27:56
It certainly was Joe McCarthy's
27:58
end, so to speak. Senate did
28:01
go on to censure him. Um,
28:03
he did lose his power. He became
28:06
sort of a nonentity at that point.
28:09
He did marry. He married actually this she
28:12
was his assistant essentially, and
28:15
uh and his teammate and very
28:17
involved in supporting
28:20
his work, um, supporting
28:22
his ideology, and as
28:24
you point out, kept his letters
28:27
and all the records and everything was
28:31
part of keeping those private following
28:34
his death to protect I
28:36
suspect his reputation. She
28:38
was highly invested, but
28:41
it wasn't. It was only I guess a couple
28:43
of years after the incident
28:47
that you described where he
28:50
is, and then he has censured that he
28:53
he becomes increasingly ill, he's
28:55
hospitalized more often. It seems
28:57
like a little of this and a little of that. No one's
28:59
ever clear on a exactly what it is, but
29:02
um, he is all. He dies in
29:06
at the age of forty eight, really
29:08
quite young. But um,
29:11
the doctors say it's hepatitis, a non
29:14
infectious hepatitis of undetermined
29:16
ideology. And that's
29:18
fascinating because of course it
29:21
seems very clear from all the medical records
29:23
that it is alcoholic hepatitis. And
29:27
it's fascinating that even at that time,
29:30
given the stigma, there's this effort to hide
29:33
what he dies from. So
29:35
appatitis was part of what was induced
29:37
by his alcoholism, but that's not the
29:40
part of the alcoholism that killed him, and
29:42
the doctors had to have been it
29:45
was only Um. It wasn't that
29:47
long ago. It was the nineteen fifties, and they
29:49
understood alcoholism and the effects,
29:52
and they understood what was happening to him. And
29:54
I think there were two reasons
29:56
that they told a fib about
29:59
what he died of. That the coroner listed acute
30:02
hepatitis rather than alcoholism
30:04
is the cause of death, and that the
30:06
press repeated that, and that that's what's gone down
30:08
in history. And I think one reason
30:11
was because they were trying to protect
30:14
Um, the family, But I think that
30:16
UM and alcoholism they thought
30:18
as being an embarrassment. I
30:21
think the other reason was what you said that
30:24
Um, it was the ultimate
30:26
stigma then and maybe now,
30:28
to die of an addiction, to die of something that
30:31
it looks like people could
30:33
turn and say, geez, he did that to himself,
30:35
rather than he had a real disease, and alcoholism
30:38
was a legitimate disease as
30:40
we know today. But I'm not sure
30:43
that if a politician died of
30:46
what Joe McCarthy did today that would
30:48
be any more candid. And it,
30:51
to me was one of the many tragedies
30:54
of his life that this guy who,
30:56
in Bobby Kennedy's words, had been taken
30:58
at a toboggan to the top the hill, was
31:02
going blind down the hill, and he was
31:04
so excited by the ride that the fact he
31:06
was going to crash and hurt himself at the
31:08
bottom, I think never occurred to him. From
31:11
the day that he was censured by the Senate, his
31:14
political life was over, and I would
31:16
argue that his life generally was over. The only
31:18
good things he had in his life really
31:20
from that time on were an incredibly
31:23
smart and loyal wife, Jane,
31:26
and an infant daughter that they adopted
31:28
at the very end. And it
31:31
was too late, and it was too late to pull him out
31:33
of what I think may have been a
31:35
depression. Um. I think if he
31:38
had any condition, any diagnosable
31:40
condition, and I'm no psychiatrists,
31:42
um it may have been a bipolar
31:45
disease or what they call then manic depression,
31:47
because he had such Mannock highs
31:49
and he had such extraordinary lows,
31:52
and it looked a bit classic
31:54
like that, But there were very few
31:57
highs after his censure
31:59
by this in it at the end of nineteen four
32:02
and it was really
32:05
sad what happened to him, and we had it documented
32:08
in a way that I'm not sure, anybody, even
32:10
public figures like McCarthy, had
32:13
the last two days of his life documented.
32:15
There was a medical orderly sitting with him,
32:18
taking down every rant and rave
32:20
that McCarthy uttered, taking down
32:23
every word. His nurse or doctor said,
32:25
so when we come along all
32:28
this time later, And there were all these conspiracy
32:30
theories that Joe McCarthy was murdered, that he
32:33
died of some fantastic cause. Well,
32:36
unless that orderly was lying about
32:38
everything that happened in those last two days, he
32:41
didn't die of any conspiracy. He
32:43
died of something hugely tragic,
32:45
which was the d T S and
32:48
alcohol poisoning and a fever
32:50
that spiked too. I think it was a hundred and seven.
32:53
And we know that you
32:55
bring up bipolar disorder, and
32:57
of course all these things were saying,
33:00
you know, it's impossible, even though I am a
33:02
psychiatrist at a psychoanalyst, for me to diagnose
33:04
someone I've never met and based
33:07
only on retrospective information. But
33:09
one would expect that if you
33:12
did have bipolar disorder, first
33:14
of all, the hypomania
33:17
romania might put you in a position
33:19
to be exactly the kind of expansive
33:22
thinker and grandiose character
33:25
and highly creative and verbal
33:28
verbally able person that Joe
33:30
McCarthy by all accounts appeared. But
33:33
we don't have documented
33:35
periods of inability
33:38
to function at least until the
33:40
very end there, you know, after he was censured,
33:43
but earlier in his life. There
33:45
there are no reported periods of a
33:48
deep depression such that one's functionality
33:50
is impaired and one basically can't
33:52
get out of bed and you know, really performed
33:55
that he seems to be much
33:57
more on the side of driven uh
33:59
and and and doing that
34:02
being said, um, there
34:04
there are people who have bipolar
34:07
disorder who have very little in the way of depression,
34:09
much more in the in the vein of hypomania
34:12
and mania. Um. But I would
34:14
have to tell you that if you
34:16
saw someone like this today in your office,
34:19
it would be impossible to really make
34:21
an accurate diagnosis until you had
34:23
treated their substance abuse, because unfortunately,
34:26
the substance abuse can make people appear
34:29
all of those hypomanic things
34:31
you know, grandiose, aid able and um
34:35
and also depressed, because the reality
34:37
is alcohol is a depressant and
34:40
it actually makes many people
34:42
feel both disinhibited in
34:44
terms of their verbal capacities and so on,
34:47
but also feel at times
34:49
in terms of their mood, very depressed or
34:51
fluctuating in mood. And so it's
34:54
it's very hard to separate those things. And yet
34:56
there's tremendous what we call comorbidity.
34:58
Right, people who experience one
35:01
are very likely to experience the other. If
35:03
you are bipolar, you're probably more
35:05
likely to unfortunately suffer
35:08
from substance addiction, UM
35:11
or any other mood disorder or
35:13
I guess we could also argue in the case of Joe
35:15
McCarthy, you know how much
35:17
of this was a potential personality
35:20
disorder in other words, that characterologically
35:22
all along there were patterns of behavior
35:25
that were that worked for him
35:27
in certain ways but really didn't
35:29
in others, and particularly anti
35:32
social characteristics. A
35:35
man who enjoyed breaking
35:37
the rules, I mean, he liked
35:39
taking risks, he liked breaking
35:41
the rules. He seemed to be devoid
35:43
of empathy for others, truly if
35:46
they making them suffer was not something
35:48
that pained him. UM and
35:51
these sort of You know, if he didn't
35:53
happen to have gone into government where
35:56
he could be spared the
35:58
punishments. He is somebody
36:00
who if he'd gone into different directions, might
36:02
have found himself really on the wrong side of
36:04
the law and often punished.
36:08
The only place I would take exception to what you
36:10
said is he did find himself from the
36:12
wrong side of the law, but he was protected because
36:14
he was in the Senate, and he did.
36:17
I think that he liabeled
36:20
lots of people. He did all kinds of things. There
36:22
was a hint in the medical
36:25
records from his time in the
36:27
military that when
36:29
he went into the medical
36:31
facilities in the South Pacific,
36:34
that doctors wrote different
36:37
things. And I don't know whether they were being coy
36:40
in not being more explicit, or they didn't
36:42
know or what it was, but
36:44
they suggested maybe he's
36:47
um suffering from some sort
36:50
of serious depression or fatigue,
36:52
or maybe he's just lazy and doesn't want
36:54
to go back out. But there was a hint
36:57
that something was going on. But
36:59
I think that probably if there was anything
37:01
they would have kept out of the medical records,
37:04
it was um a
37:06
stigmatized yes depression
37:08
or any mental illness. And I wish
37:10
that I could have interviewed his doctors
37:13
from back in the nineteen fifties, because I think
37:15
they knew more than they were letting on. They
37:17
were extraordinarily explicit about
37:20
everything, um in terms of his
37:22
physical symptoms and the
37:26
just hinting at things in terms of mental
37:28
issues. I think some of the clear sense
37:31
I had of what motivated him
37:33
was an unpublished memoir that
37:35
his wife Jean wrote, called The Joe
37:38
McCarthy. I knew she
37:40
never published it for understandable reasons
37:42
why she left it behind in his papers.
37:45
I think what happens to people when
37:47
they leave hundreds or
37:49
thousands of boxes of papers is nobody
37:52
has the energy to go through and see what's there and what's
37:54
not, and they throw it all there and say we're
37:56
putting it into an archives and nobody's going to see
37:58
it for a very long time. And
38:01
I think some of the greatest insights into who
38:03
Joe McCarthy was were not his
38:05
insights, because I don't think he was the kind of guy who
38:07
would ever sit down and offer any really candid
38:10
sense of himself. But
38:12
she just in observing who he was, even
38:15
though she adored him. Um, she was
38:17
smarter than he was, as smart as I
38:19
think he was. Um, she was his
38:21
biggest booster. She was
38:24
a true, true believer in
38:26
the cause of McCarthy ism um,
38:29
which they would have defined as patriotism
38:31
and all Americanism. Joe McCarthy
38:34
never objected to the term McCarthy ism, He
38:36
just offered his own definition for it. But
38:39
in the end, um, we are
38:41
grateful to them because they left behind
38:43
such a record of who he was
38:46
and what he did and why he mattered
38:49
and he mattered. There was a reason my
38:51
book had a one word title of demagogue,
38:54
and that is because while this is a biography
38:57
of Joe McCarthy, it is also a
38:59
biography of this strain
39:01
of bullying that didn't end
39:04
with him and didn't begin with him, But we
39:06
can use his life as a way of understanding
39:09
and battling back against it.
39:12
And I would add to that, there's
39:14
a concept in my field called
39:16
folliado, the delusion of two,
39:19
and sometimes we see that literally in
39:22
individuals. Two people come together and
39:24
they're in this delusional world that no
39:26
one else can understand because it's not real,
39:28
it's psychotic, and but they both believe
39:31
it and they share this delusion. In Joe
39:33
McCarthy's time, he created
39:36
this belief system right between
39:38
himself and the public at large,
39:41
and they both had to buy into
39:43
it for him to continue
39:46
the delusion, if you
39:48
will, or the belief system that he had
39:50
going his own McCarthy ism. When
39:53
one person breaks out of that, it
39:55
ends the folia due essentially, And
39:58
so can we learn from
40:00
that historically that that
40:02
can occur, that that a that a person
40:05
can propagate a belief system that a
40:07
whole community can buy into,
40:11
even if it's not accurate, even
40:13
if it's not correct. And I
40:15
hope that we all can learn that
40:18
somebody who can gain that kind of charismatic
40:21
power of a
40:23
cult leader of sorts uh, can
40:26
can propagate some really
40:28
delusional thoughts that we can all
40:30
buy into. So I love
40:32
that idea that they propagate the thoughts,
40:34
but that becomes scarier
40:37
still when there are two of them doing it and
40:39
they're reinforcing one another. And there was a very
40:42
smart physicist from
40:44
Harvard named Ramsey who McCarthy
40:47
invited to his house. Ramsey had
40:50
been on meet the Press, I think it was,
40:52
and it had been trying to take
40:55
on um some of the things that McCarthy
40:57
had said in one of his hearings and was being try
41:00
by the press, and McCarthy felt badly enough
41:02
for him that he and his wife invited Ramsey
41:04
to come to a dinner party that night at his house.
41:06
And Ramsey was a smart guy who would go on to
41:09
win a Nobel Prize in physics. And
41:11
Ramsey said, at the end of that night, Joe
41:13
McCarthy alone didn't scare me.
41:15
He was not dangerous. But when you added Jean McCarthy,
41:18
this incredibly smart, incredibly
41:21
reinforcing person, sort of taking
41:23
all of his worst instincts and feeding it
41:25
back, that really scared me. And
41:27
that could have become a dictatorship. And I
41:29
would suggest that there was another duo
41:33
in the McCarthy era that did
41:35
the same thing before Jean, or
41:38
during the time the gene was there doing it at home,
41:41
there was a guy, Roy Cone, who we talked about, who
41:43
was doing it at work. And Roy Kone was exceedingly
41:46
smart, exceedingly arrogant, a
41:48
moral and he also
41:51
encouraged all the worst instincts
41:53
in Joe McCarthy. And I want to just say
41:55
one last thing about that, which is, if
41:58
roy Cone hadn't gotten the job as
42:00
chief council, which really meant chief
42:02
of staff, the second in line
42:05
for that job was a guy named Bobby
42:07
Kennedy. And what would Joe McCarthy
42:09
have been like? And we can only imagine
42:12
if it had been Bobby Kennedy there instead
42:14
of Roy Cohne helping set
42:17
the path on where Joe McCarthy was going. Well,
42:19
sadly we will we will never know, but it
42:22
is important for us to think about today. Who
42:25
are the duos? Who do we give
42:27
our power to? Right? Who do we give
42:29
over to and and thereby
42:32
join their their system, join their belief
42:35
system. Well,
42:43
that wraps things up for this episode. Thanks
42:45
for joining me today. If you're interested
42:48
in more information about Joe McCarthy, check
42:50
out Larry Tis book Demagogue, or
42:52
for more on the concepts of personology,
42:55
you can also check out my book The Power
42:57
of Different The Link between Disorder and Genie
43:00
Us. Also make
43:02
sure to follow me on Twitter at doctor Gayl
43:04
Saltz or at Personalogy m
43:06
D Until next time. Personology
43:11
is a production of I Heart Radio. The executive
43:13
producers are Doctor Gayl Saltz and Tyler
43:16
Clang. The supervising producer is Dylan
43:18
Fagan. The Associate producer is Lowell
43:21
Berlanti. Editing music and mixing
43:23
by Lowell Berlante. For more podcasts
43:25
from My Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio
43:27
app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you
43:30
get your podcasts.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More