Podchaser Logo
Home
Joe McCarthy - Part 2: When Power Corrupts

Joe McCarthy - Part 2: When Power Corrupts

Released Monday, 19th October 2020
Good episode? Give it some love!
Joe McCarthy - Part 2: When Power Corrupts

Joe McCarthy - Part 2: When Power Corrupts

Joe McCarthy - Part 2: When Power Corrupts

Joe McCarthy - Part 2: When Power Corrupts

Monday, 19th October 2020
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Personology is a production of I Heart

0:02

Radio. Welcome

0:11

back to part two of Joe McCarthy,

0:13

who has rapidly risen to the role

0:15

of U S. Senator of Wisconsin. Initially

0:18

seen as a moderate Republican, his

0:20

first few years as senator were not especially

0:23

remarkable. He was noted, however,

0:26

for being an excellent orator, but

0:28

his reputation would soon change. I'm

0:31

doctor Gale Salts, and this is Personology.

0:34

My guest again today is journalist and

0:36

author Larry Tye, a New York

0:38

Times bestselling author and author

0:41

of newly released Demagogue,

0:43

The Life and Long Shadow of Senator Joe

0:45

McCarthy.

0:49

We've sort of talked about the groundwork

0:52

as to why Joe McCarthy

0:55

might have been the right person

0:58

characteriologically to embark

1:01

on what he ultimately did. But

1:04

there was also, you have to say, somewhat

1:06

of a right person at the right time and

1:09

right place. Right. So it

1:11

so happened that in during

1:15

the Cold War Jitters rising

1:18

Uh, the House un American Activities

1:20

Committee becomes a permanent

1:23

House committee having nothing to do with Joe McCarthy

1:25

himself, so

1:28

that the idea of investigating

1:30

communist subterfuge becomes

1:34

a reality in the

1:36

Senate at that time, and

1:38

concerns about the Cold War means

1:40

that the American public is

1:43

very comfortable and ready to buy

1:45

into the concern that

1:48

Communism has to be ferreted out in

1:51

any way possible. So I

1:53

think it goes back to the word opportunists, and there

1:55

are two sides to that word. One is recognizing

1:58

the opportunity and the other is willingness

2:00

to exploit it. The opportunity was there,

2:02

and that we were I don't know what

2:05

kind of language I can use here, but we were scared

2:07

as heck in terms of what was going

2:09

on in the world. There was a real threat off in the Soviet

2:11

Union, and there was a

2:14

real sense in America that we

2:16

could go to nuclear war and kids

2:18

would very shortly be taught on how to

2:20

duck and cover under their desks. That was the

2:22

response if there was a nuclear attack and

2:25

the time was ripe for somebody to come

2:27

along. And John McCarthy brilliantly

2:30

understood that fear, and

2:32

like any good opportunist or

2:34

any good demagogue, knew

2:36

how to play for it, played to it, and he

2:39

played to it not with a realistic

2:41

and sensible and boring

2:44

response He played to it with

2:46

dynamism. He played to it with

2:49

dynamite. He played to it

2:51

by saying things that weren't true, but that

2:54

he knew his listeners would want to hear.

2:56

And he understood that

2:59

just saying that there were maybe

3:01

traders out there, Um,

3:04

if you did it in general terms, wasn't going

3:06

to mean anything. What you had to do was he had to name

3:08

the traders, and you had to count the traders.

3:10

And he knew how to,

3:13

in a wild West kind of

3:15

way, go in and really shake things

3:17

up. You know. He stoked

3:21

general paranoia, right, And of

3:23

course, as the saying goes, just because

3:25

your paranoid doesn't mean you don't have enemies. So

3:28

we did have enemies, and people

3:30

were fearful about that, which

3:33

does tend to ignite

3:36

more paranoia because

3:38

there's always a kernel of seeds

3:40

of truth there. And

3:43

the question, you know, so paranoid

3:46

is a term that went along with

3:48

Joe McCarthy for for many years,

3:51

uh following his death even and

3:54

the question is really whether

3:57

we don't see a lot of evidence of paranoia

4:00

before this time, right, we don't

4:02

see him walking around supposing

4:04

enemies all over the place and being

4:07

paranoid, which is interesting because

4:09

when someone has let's say, paranoid

4:11

personality disorder, you would expect

4:14

to see it much earlier than

4:16

this in their life. Uh, It's it's

4:18

true that a traumatic event can happen that

4:20

can change someone's trajectory and make them

4:22

more paranoid. And it's also

4:24

true, and I think this does become a question

4:27

that substance use and abuse can

4:30

also heighten a person's paranoia.

4:32

And so we do have to wonder whether

4:35

ultimately that comes to bear in

4:37

terms of the degree of paranoia that

4:40

he seems to exhibit. But it does

4:42

seem at this juncture that it's more likely

4:44

that, as you said, he sees an

4:46

opportunity, and he sees

4:48

that the general paranoia

4:51

that can be ignited and inflamed can

4:53

be an avenue for him playing

4:56

the role of rescuer protector

5:00

and therefore holding the power holding

5:02

being the gatekeeper and UM,

5:04

and that's just that is very interesting.

5:07

Whether that ultimately later dovetails

5:10

with his increasing drinking

5:12

and as we'll get to later, the use of other

5:15

substances that may have heightened

5:17

his thoughts around this UM

5:19

is also something worth positing. But

5:22

let's move as you said to UM,

5:25

Really, his launch into McCarthy

5:29

is m like his launch into

5:31

this whole prosecutorial role.

5:34

Yes, so I want to just revisit

5:37

paranoia for one second and

5:39

we can come back to this later. UM.

5:42

I would say that while Um

5:44

he was often called a paranoid, especially

5:47

in the early days, UM he was anything,

5:49

but he was playing to other people's paranoia.

5:51

But he was seeing things clearly, and

5:54

he knew that he didn't believe in what he

5:56

was saying. I'd love to take your

5:58

listeners to a moment where I think McCarthy

6:01

is m was born, and that moment was in

6:03

February of nineteen fifty. There

6:06

is a tradition in Republican circles

6:08

in America that the one night that

6:10

is best to raise money is

6:13

when you are honoring the birthday

6:15

of the patron saint to the Republican Party, Abe

6:17

Lincoln, And they're famously

6:20

called Lincoln Day dinners. And if

6:22

you're a prominent U. S. Senator, you

6:24

get invited to places like New York and Boston

6:27

and San Francisco and Chicago. If

6:29

you're Joe McCarthy, the consummate backbencher

6:32

who looks like he's on his way to defeat. After

6:35

one term, you get invited to Wheeling,

6:37

West Virginia, which is where he gave the speech. That

6:39

night, he shows up with a briefcase

6:42

with two speeches. One

6:44

of them is a snoozer of a speech

6:47

on national housing policy that

6:49

he actually knew something about, and

6:51

had he picked that speech that night to deliver

6:54

you and I seventy years later, wouldn't

6:56

be paying attention to Joe McCarthy.

6:58

But instead he grabbed the other speech in his briefcase,

7:01

and that is a speech on a subject

7:04

that he knows arguably less about than

7:06

any other member of the U. S. Senate

7:09

in that year of nineteen fifty, and that's a speech

7:11

on the communist threat not

7:14

in the Soviet Union, but behind every

7:16

pillar in the U. S. State Department. So

7:19

he grabs a sheaf of

7:21

papers and he waves it

7:23

around like this in the air, saying,

7:26

I have in my hand the list of two

7:28

hundred and five subversives

7:30

in the State Department, and I

7:32

have the actual names, and I

7:34

know the jobs they have, and

7:37

I'm going to call on the government

7:39

to route these people out. And

7:42

it was a passionate speech, and it

7:44

was a brilliant speech, and it was, as

7:46

his fellow senators would later conclude,

7:49

a fraud in a hoax because a

7:51

he had I don't know what he had in

7:53

his hand. His friends have speculated

7:56

that it could have been that day's

7:58

racing sheet. But what it was

8:00

it wasn't a list of two hundred and five subversives

8:03

in the government. What it probably was

8:06

was a list, a recycled

8:09

list, based on the things that I saw

8:11

in his archives, a recycled

8:13

list of the House on American

8:16

Activities and other early first

8:18

generation Red hunters in

8:20

America. Many of the people

8:23

who we actually had names

8:25

of were people who no longer

8:27

worked for the State Department, or who

8:30

had had a sister or a

8:32

brother in law, or their

8:34

own association with

8:36

left wing activities twenty

8:38

years before. They were not Flaming

8:41

spies. Most of the twenty four Carrot

8:43

spies had been rooted out long

8:46

before Joe McCarthy joined the hunt, most

8:49

of the ones. When we got to see the Russian

8:51

archives, most of the spies who were

8:53

still there, Joe McCarthy wouldn't

8:55

have recognized if he had tripped over them

8:58

in the dark on the way to his speech in

9:00

Wheeling, West Virginia. But what happened

9:02

two days after his speech was he

9:05

was on page one of every

9:07

newspaper in America. He had

9:09

the Truman administration on the defensive,

9:11

and he never turned back. That

9:14

was the moment where he realized this was

9:16

the issue that was going to bring him the limelight.

9:19

And if there was a moment where McCarthy

9:21

ism was given birth, it was in

9:23

front of that audience of mine operators

9:26

and whoever else was there that night who

9:29

didn't recognize what was going on and didn't

9:32

recognize for sure that a

9:34

crusade like we had not seen in

9:37

a long time in America was being born. You

9:40

mentioned, who knows what those papers

9:43

were in his hand, Maybe they were race sheets.

9:45

I should mention that actually Joe

9:48

McCarthy was a gambler. He

9:50

he liked to bet, He bet in all kinds

9:52

of ways, and and that's

9:54

just important to keep in mind. Well clearly

9:57

that that night he bet on himself

10:00

and uh and one and the thrill

10:02

of the wind, whether we're talking about

10:04

horse races or

10:06

his individual political races

10:09

or you know, political moments, the

10:12

reward of that was

10:15

addictive. I'm gonna I'm gonna say addictive

10:18

for Joe McCarthy. He had

10:21

Um. You know, some people from

10:24

a neuro lot and from a neurological point

10:26

of view, are more susceptible to addiction

10:28

than others. There is something about

10:30

their dopamine, the neurotransmitter

10:32

dopamine of reward, that reward

10:35

system that is primed to

10:37

take off and super reward.

10:40

Whether it's a gambling win, whether

10:42

it's with substance use and addiction

10:44

to alcohol or drugs,

10:47

or whether even it's something like a political

10:49

win. But the thing that gives

10:51

you that dopamine high is just

10:54

irresistible. And that seemed to

10:56

be a really important feature that we see

10:58

in many different ways, the ways

11:00

in which he was I'll almost say a

11:02

slave to his dopamine system,

11:05

um, and how that drove a lot of behaviors

11:07

for him. But upon this win

11:09

this night, as you said, there was

11:11

no turning back. And it's interesting because from

11:14

a concrete point of view, you

11:16

know, is there any

11:18

evidence that he wanted to be president, that

11:20

he wanted to and of the words move

11:22

into into that position of power

11:25

or what was the end goal? So

11:27

there was no end goal, and that to me is one of the fascinating

11:29

things and it is reminiscent of what we see

11:31

maybe going on today. That the goal was to

11:33

get power and hold on to power. It

11:35

was not what you would do with it, whether he ever

11:37

wanted to be president. Every time he

11:39

would deny it to one person, he

11:42

tells somebody else he did. I saw

11:44

a wonderful check that had never

11:46

been cashed to the McCarthy for President

11:48

committee in his um personal

11:51

papers. But I want to just say one

11:53

more thing about the addiction. You talked about it compellingly

11:56

from a mental health point of view. I want

11:58

to say that in later years,

12:01

when McCarthy went after not just communists,

12:03

but he went after gays

12:06

and lesbians in government, he

12:08

said that the reason he was doing that was because

12:11

they're being closeted where

12:14

their sexual orientation made

12:16

them vulnerable to blackmail

12:19

by Soviet operatives. I

12:21

think Joe McCarthy's addictions made

12:24

him vulnerable. His gambling

12:26

addiction is what he was doing with

12:28

his money, his alcohol consumption,

12:30

all of those are things that made

12:33

him more vulnerable than all the people he

12:35

was targeting for their alleged vulnerabilities.

12:38

And it is one more way

12:41

where we see hypocrisy defining

12:44

what he did. But that's another element

12:46

I think of opportunism, well, hypocrisy,

12:48

but what I would call projection,

12:51

right, these things within himself.

12:53

Um, I mean, he was the one

12:56

being the bad guy, He was

12:58

the one lying, He

13:00

was the one destroying other people's

13:02

lives, and he projected all

13:05

of this out and including as

13:07

you said, the addictions and the self

13:09

destructive and and stigmatized

13:12

behaviors that he was committing. All

13:15

of this was projected out. It's

13:18

I'm not the problem. Other people are the

13:20

problem, right. Other people are the spies,

13:22

the bad guys, the self destructive

13:24

guys, the stigmatized guys, and

13:27

and that was a huge part

13:30

of his m O. I guess I'll say that he that

13:32

he needed to project all these things outward and

13:35

he but at the same time, sadly,

13:37

for many other people in this country.

13:39

Again, his moral compass didn't

13:42

seem to make him sympathetic at

13:44

all or empathetic at all in

13:46

terms of destroying other people's

13:48

lives. He was sympathetic

13:51

and empathetic only when he was going out for the drink

13:53

after he had destroyed them during the day, and when he was

13:55

taking him out and being their buddy afterwards.

13:57

He was a bit empathetic. But in

14:00

terms of the randomness of this

14:02

whole um launch of McCarthy

14:04

is um, I want to just it is partly

14:07

fatuous, but I also think it partly

14:09

suggests how random the whole thing was. One of

14:11

the many ways his numbers

14:13

that first week kept changing between

14:16

especially two numbers two communists

14:19

or fifty seven, and the fifty

14:21

seven, it was suggested, could

14:23

have come he was a big Hamburger eater,

14:26

and it suggested that he might have gone

14:28

in and used Hines fifty seven sauce

14:30

and that number stuck in his mind. And

14:33

that wouldn't surprise me because the numbers

14:35

didn't mean much of anything, and it

14:37

could have come from anywhere. Let's

14:39

take a quick break here. We'll be back in

14:42

a moment, bed

14:54

bed bedding. It

14:56

is important for people to understand it

14:59

was not unusual will for him to have a multi

15:01

drink lunch, um to show

15:03

up on the floor after lunch appearing

15:06

drunk, to show up the next

15:08

day in the Senate appearing hungover,

15:11

and um somewhere in

15:13

this time period became

15:16

this really

15:19

unfathomable story that

15:22

it seemed he was probably at some point

15:24

started to use opiates. It may have started because

15:26

he he was prescribed them

15:28

for pain. He had a lot of accidents,

15:30

he broke a bone or or something

15:33

like that. Um it may have started

15:35

because he had terrible hangovers the next day

15:37

and was looking for some relief.

15:39

But UM, the story

15:43

of the secrecy of his

15:45

addiction, the discovery by

15:47

the head of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics

15:50

and his the

15:53

the Federal Bureau of Narcotics being convinced

15:55

that they basically

15:57

had to maintain his habit UH

16:00

to somehow protect the world

16:02

or protect his ongoing crusade

16:04

against communism,

16:07

provided him ongoing

16:10

morphine via a Washington, d c.

16:12

Pharmacy and the impact

16:14

of that secret because

16:17

you have to understand that if you think drug

16:20

use and alcohol use or substance

16:23

abuse is stigmatized today, which

16:25

it is a deeply, deeply stigmatized

16:27

and not understood really as an illness, the

16:30

degree to which it was stigmatized in the nineteen

16:32

fifties is UH today

16:35

pales in comparison. So I want to

16:37

push back a little bit. So what you said

16:40

about the morphine addiction,

16:42

the opioid addiction UM was

16:44

reported in the newspapers,

16:46

and it was in an unnamed

16:48

way by the guy who

16:51

ran the drug agency,

16:53

and Slinger was his name. UM.

16:55

He indicated that there was an unnamed

16:58

senior politician who this happened to, when everybody

17:00

presumed and it may have been that he was referring to McCarthy.

17:03

The pushback on that as I want to be

17:05

fair to him. There's enough that we know

17:07

about what he did that

17:10

that would have shown up, I think

17:12

given the way his alcohol addiction did

17:15

in his exhaustive records,

17:17

thousands of pages of records UM

17:20

from Bethesda Naval Hospital. And I didn't

17:22

trust who am I a an old health

17:25

reporter to sit down and try to make

17:27

sense of that and whether there was really any sign of addiction

17:29

there. So I sat down with three doctors,

17:31

one of whom had just stepped down as dean

17:33

of Harvard Medical, A second was the

17:36

editor in chief emeritus of New England

17:38

Journal, and the third was an expert

17:40

on a lot of the areas that McCarthy

17:42

had suffered various medical

17:44

woes. And we actually there were four doctors

17:47

and we sat down and looked through every one of those pages,

17:49

and there was no evidence

17:52

in his medical records. That doesn't mean that he

17:54

wasn't addicted, but it was no evidence

17:56

of that addiction. There was a

18:01

jolting and upsetting set

18:04

of evidence of his alcohol

18:06

addiction, and it was

18:09

there at an early

18:11

stage from the moment that

18:13

he was condemned by his fellow senators.

18:16

That alcohol consumption was

18:18

quantified in the records. And

18:22

the only surprise to me is that he lived as

18:24

long as he did drinking that much

18:26

in the later years. But one of the interesting

18:29

things we now have access

18:31

to all of the nine thousand

18:33

pages of transcripts of McCarthy's closed

18:36

door hearings, two thirds of his

18:38

hearings were behind closed doors. He thought

18:41

that they would never become public, and

18:43

they showed Joe McCarthy unhinged

18:45

when he thought nobody was watching. And one

18:47

of the many interesting things to me in those hearings,

18:50

it wasn't just how he abused the

18:52

rights of witnesses and how

18:55

somebody who appeared before him in

18:57

a private closed

19:00

door session that was used as

19:02

a staging ground to see whether they wanted to bring

19:04

him before the public and if they were too

19:06

good a witness, meaning if they fought back effectively.

19:09

They never showed up in the public hearings. It

19:11

was only the ones that he knew that he could

19:13

get the better of. But another thing,

19:15

and it may be my looking for it, but

19:18

I don't think so. His demeanor

19:20

changed from the morning sessions, where I

19:22

think he was sober, to the afternoon

19:25

sessions, where his fuse became

19:27

shorter. He gave longer diet

19:30

tribes of speeches, and I

19:32

think it was for two reasons. I

19:34

think one, his standard

19:37

lunch was a burger,

19:39

a raw onion, and whiskey,

19:41

and I think he had had enough whiskey at lunch

19:44

that he lost his temper more

19:46

quickly in the afternoon. But the other

19:48

thing that I'm intrigued about from his

19:50

medical records is he had hemorrhoids.

19:52

And it may just have been if you sit

19:54

for two hours, the hemorrhoids are controllable.

19:57

You start looking nasty after four or

19:59

five, have a six hours Okay,

20:02

So that's interesting. Well, certainly

20:05

chronic pain of any sort could

20:07

definitely shorten your fuse, no question about

20:09

it. And we have to

20:11

wonder why he went

20:14

from really being I guess

20:16

we'd have to argue quite successful in

20:18

his pursuits right, in his

20:21

effect and in his acruement of power

20:23

in terms of inflicting

20:26

McCarthy ism on the on the nation

20:29

to to ultimately creating

20:31

his own downfall by going

20:34

for the military, for going going at

20:36

the army. And that seems like

20:38

such a clear,

20:42

uh self destructive maneuver, I

20:44

guess, I'll say, or a very very

20:47

poor decision that

20:49

we have to wonder what what was

20:51

instrumental in that decision for

20:53

him that ultimately brought his downfall.

20:56

So I think what happened to Joe McCarthy is he began

20:59

his crisis sight of McCarthy is um with

21:01

that accidental delivery

21:04

of a speech that he never knew was going to take

21:06

off in that way. And he knew

21:08

in those early days when he was raising

21:11

those charges that he was being an opportunist

21:13

and that he didn't have to believe in the things. I

21:16

think over time, something

21:18

strange happened that he started to believe

21:20

his own rhetoric in early nineteen

21:23

fifty four. By the time he

21:25

took on the military,

21:28

he had failed to see that he was overstepping

21:31

that you could bully people in the

21:33

State Department, you could get away with it at

21:35

the Voice of America, you could get away

21:37

with it in the government printing office because

21:40

nobody particularly knew who those people were

21:42

or cared much about them. But there

21:44

was an institution in America that was

21:46

too big to bully. That was the U.

21:48

S. Army. That was also the

21:50

moment when he did that,

21:53

that not just the army eventually

21:55

developed a backbone and taking him on,

21:57

but our commander in chief, the one

22:00

person in America more popular than Joe McCarthy,

22:03

This former war hero Dwight

22:05

Eisenhower, finally understood

22:08

that the army was something he wasn't

22:10

going to let McCarthy get away with bullying.

22:13

He understood that McCarthy was overstepping,

22:16

and Joe McCarthy went

22:18

one step further. Had he not done

22:21

that, he could have gone on for years.

22:23

But I also think what happened. We look

22:26

at his poll numbers and

22:28

when he took on the Army, the

22:31

U. S. Senate, his old sub committee ended

22:33

up running what was the most famous set

22:35

of hearings ever run. They were called

22:37

the Army McCarthy Hearings. At the start

22:39

of those hearings, Joe McCarthy was at a full

22:42

fifty percent popularity. The

22:44

gallop Poles said one in every two Americans

22:47

thought he was doing a great job. By

22:49

the end of those hearings in the summer

22:51

of nineteen fifty four, his numbers

22:53

had gone from fifty down

22:56

to thirty. And

22:58

anybody who's old enough to member those

23:00

hearings remembers one magical

23:02

moment where a very smart, Harvard

23:05

trained lawyer from Boston named

23:07

Joe Welch stood up and said

23:09

when McCarthy went after Welch's

23:12

young associate and said that he had been affiliated

23:15

with a left wing legal group, Joe

23:17

Welch famously said, Senator,

23:20

have you no decency? Well,

23:22

the truth is that was not the magical

23:24

moment, and the truth is Joe Welch

23:26

had been waiting during the entire hearings.

23:29

He was a performer as well as a lawyer.

23:31

He had concocted that line and

23:33

he was waiting for a magical moment to deliver

23:35

it. He picked a great moment. But

23:38

the moment only worked because

23:40

I think Americans had been watching this guy,

23:43

who they thought was their hero, look

23:45

more like the schoolyard bully on

23:47

public television, and

23:50

they wanted to ask, Senator, have

23:52

you no decency? And so that

23:54

line crystallized the question

23:56

America had on its mind. It

23:59

showed the power of television to

24:01

take a guy who was a

24:03

schoolyard bully and make

24:06

him look that way to the American

24:08

public. And my book

24:10

begins with the line, this is a

24:12

book about America's love affair with bullies.

24:15

But I also think that American

24:17

knows when a bully is really

24:20

going too far and it will part

24:22

company. So I

24:25

wrote a book in part about one of the darkest

24:27

chapters in American history.

24:29

But I think there is ultimately a

24:32

very uplifting message of this book

24:34

and the book. The message

24:37

is in American history

24:40

with our uniquely American strain

24:42

of demagogues, from Huey

24:44

Long and the Jew

24:46

baiting radio preacher Father

24:49

Charles Coglin to Joe McCarthy

24:52

and Donald Trump. The

24:55

lesson is that give a demagogue

24:57

enough rope and they will hang themselves. And

24:59

is part of the hanging that the

25:02

overreach for power, the

25:04

displaying who you really are

25:06

inside, and people finally being able

25:08

to grasp that. What what is

25:10

the lesson that we

25:13

can we can learn today about

25:15

ultimately? You know,

25:18

is it the doer or the dewey that ultimately

25:20

catches on to the demagoguery.

25:23

Great question, It's both. I believe

25:25

two things about the American people. I believe

25:27

we are more naive and susceptible

25:30

to bullying into demagoguery

25:33

than we think about ourselves, because

25:35

we've shown it repeatedly, you know, George

25:38

Wallace, the lots of people who

25:41

we've bought into. But

25:43

I think in the end it

25:46

is partly demagogues doing themselves

25:48

in and it's partly America coming to its

25:50

senses. And I believe and I

25:52

pray that throughout

25:55

every phase of history, including

25:57

today, that in the Americans

26:01

recognize bullies. And

26:03

I think that we saw the

26:06

first effective pushback

26:09

against some of the bullying that Donald Trump

26:12

does come from the

26:14

US military. It came from

26:16

when he did over the last

26:19

month things staging

26:22

um, the photo opportunity outside

26:24

the White House, across the street from the park and

26:27

clearing people so we had a path to get

26:29

there. UM. The

26:31

commanders in chief of

26:34

the various arms services, I'm sorry, the heads

26:36

of the various armed services, UM,

26:38

Defense secretaries, UM,

26:41

the heads of joint chiefs of staff passed

26:43

in present. When the military

26:45

is bullied, they stand up and say that institution

26:48

you can't touch. And I

26:51

think that I think Donald Trump is a

26:53

very smart politician, and he probably

26:55

learned a lesson there. But I also

26:57

think that he has

27:00

almost to the letter, followed

27:02

the Joe McCarthy playbook in

27:04

the last three and a half years. And

27:07

it is not a playbook that I'm as

27:09

an author writing about Joe McCarthy, and I say,

27:11

jeez, he's using that playbook because I

27:13

want to sell books. Um,

27:16

nobody minds selling books. But it's also a

27:18

playbook that had a flesh and blood

27:20

through line in the name of

27:22

a smart, arrogant lawyer

27:25

named Roy Cone, who was Joe

27:27

McCarthy's protege and Donald Trump's tutor,

27:30

and he showed Trump

27:32

all the things that a politician

27:34

can learn from a guy like Joe McCarthy.

27:37

And Trump was a very able student. Let's

27:39

take a quick break here. We'll be back in

27:41

a moment. Be

27:52

beddy, beddy, beddy.

27:56

It certainly was Joe McCarthy's

27:58

end, so to speak. Senate did

28:01

go on to censure him. Um,

28:03

he did lose his power. He became

28:06

sort of a nonentity at that point.

28:09

He did marry. He married actually this she

28:12

was his assistant essentially, and

28:15

uh and his teammate and very

28:17

involved in supporting

28:20

his work, um, supporting

28:22

his ideology, and as

28:24

you point out, kept his letters

28:27

and all the records and everything was

28:31

part of keeping those private following

28:34

his death to protect I

28:36

suspect his reputation. She

28:38

was highly invested, but

28:41

it wasn't. It was only I guess a couple

28:43

of years after the incident

28:47

that you described where he

28:50

is, and then he has censured that he

28:53

he becomes increasingly ill, he's

28:55

hospitalized more often. It seems

28:57

like a little of this and a little of that. No one's

28:59

ever clear on a exactly what it is, but

29:02

um, he is all. He dies in

29:06

at the age of forty eight, really

29:08

quite young. But um,

29:11

the doctors say it's hepatitis, a non

29:14

infectious hepatitis of undetermined

29:16

ideology. And that's

29:18

fascinating because of course it

29:21

seems very clear from all the medical records

29:23

that it is alcoholic hepatitis. And

29:27

it's fascinating that even at that time,

29:30

given the stigma, there's this effort to hide

29:33

what he dies from. So

29:35

appatitis was part of what was induced

29:37

by his alcoholism, but that's not the

29:40

part of the alcoholism that killed him, and

29:42

the doctors had to have been it

29:45

was only Um. It wasn't that

29:47

long ago. It was the nineteen fifties, and they

29:49

understood alcoholism and the effects,

29:52

and they understood what was happening to him. And

29:54

I think there were two reasons

29:56

that they told a fib about

29:59

what he died of. That the coroner listed acute

30:02

hepatitis rather than alcoholism

30:04

is the cause of death, and that the

30:06

press repeated that, and that that's what's gone down

30:08

in history. And I think one reason

30:11

was because they were trying to protect

30:14

Um, the family, But I think that

30:16

UM and alcoholism they thought

30:18

as being an embarrassment. I

30:21

think the other reason was what you said that

30:24

Um, it was the ultimate

30:26

stigma then and maybe now,

30:28

to die of an addiction, to die of something that

30:31

it looks like people could

30:33

turn and say, geez, he did that to himself,

30:35

rather than he had a real disease, and alcoholism

30:38

was a legitimate disease as

30:40

we know today. But I'm not sure

30:43

that if a politician died of

30:46

what Joe McCarthy did today that would

30:48

be any more candid. And it,

30:51

to me was one of the many tragedies

30:54

of his life that this guy who,

30:56

in Bobby Kennedy's words, had been taken

30:58

at a toboggan to the top the hill, was

31:02

going blind down the hill, and he was

31:04

so excited by the ride that the fact he

31:06

was going to crash and hurt himself at the

31:08

bottom, I think never occurred to him. From

31:11

the day that he was censured by the Senate, his

31:14

political life was over, and I would

31:16

argue that his life generally was over. The only

31:18

good things he had in his life really

31:20

from that time on were an incredibly

31:23

smart and loyal wife, Jane,

31:26

and an infant daughter that they adopted

31:28

at the very end. And it

31:31

was too late, and it was too late to pull him out

31:33

of what I think may have been a

31:35

depression. Um. I think if he

31:38

had any condition, any diagnosable

31:40

condition, and I'm no psychiatrists,

31:42

um it may have been a bipolar

31:45

disease or what they call then manic depression,

31:47

because he had such Mannock highs

31:49

and he had such extraordinary lows,

31:52

and it looked a bit classic

31:54

like that, But there were very few

31:57

highs after his censure

31:59

by this in it at the end of nineteen four

32:02

and it was really

32:05

sad what happened to him, and we had it documented

32:08

in a way that I'm not sure, anybody, even

32:10

public figures like McCarthy, had

32:13

the last two days of his life documented.

32:15

There was a medical orderly sitting with him,

32:18

taking down every rant and rave

32:20

that McCarthy uttered, taking down

32:23

every word. His nurse or doctor said,

32:25

so when we come along all

32:28

this time later, And there were all these conspiracy

32:30

theories that Joe McCarthy was murdered, that he

32:33

died of some fantastic cause. Well,

32:36

unless that orderly was lying about

32:38

everything that happened in those last two days, he

32:41

didn't die of any conspiracy. He

32:43

died of something hugely tragic,

32:45

which was the d T S and

32:48

alcohol poisoning and a fever

32:50

that spiked too. I think it was a hundred and seven.

32:53

And we know that you

32:55

bring up bipolar disorder, and

32:57

of course all these things were saying,

33:00

you know, it's impossible, even though I am a

33:02

psychiatrist at a psychoanalyst, for me to diagnose

33:04

someone I've never met and based

33:07

only on retrospective information. But

33:09

one would expect that if you

33:12

did have bipolar disorder, first

33:14

of all, the hypomania

33:17

romania might put you in a position

33:19

to be exactly the kind of expansive

33:22

thinker and grandiose character

33:25

and highly creative and verbal

33:28

verbally able person that Joe

33:30

McCarthy by all accounts appeared. But

33:33

we don't have documented

33:35

periods of inability

33:38

to function at least until the

33:40

very end there, you know, after he was censured,

33:43

but earlier in his life. There

33:45

there are no reported periods of a

33:48

deep depression such that one's functionality

33:50

is impaired and one basically can't

33:52

get out of bed and you know, really performed

33:55

that he seems to be much

33:57

more on the side of driven uh

33:59

and and and doing that

34:02

being said, um, there

34:04

there are people who have bipolar

34:07

disorder who have very little in the way of depression,

34:09

much more in the in the vein of hypomania

34:12

and mania. Um. But I would

34:14

have to tell you that if you

34:16

saw someone like this today in your office,

34:19

it would be impossible to really make

34:21

an accurate diagnosis until you had

34:23

treated their substance abuse, because unfortunately,

34:26

the substance abuse can make people appear

34:29

all of those hypomanic things

34:31

you know, grandiose, aid able and um

34:35

and also depressed, because the reality

34:37

is alcohol is a depressant and

34:40

it actually makes many people

34:42

feel both disinhibited in

34:44

terms of their verbal capacities and so on,

34:47

but also feel at times

34:49

in terms of their mood, very depressed or

34:51

fluctuating in mood. And so it's

34:54

it's very hard to separate those things. And yet

34:56

there's tremendous what we call comorbidity.

34:58

Right, people who experience one

35:01

are very likely to experience the other. If

35:03

you are bipolar, you're probably more

35:05

likely to unfortunately suffer

35:08

from substance addiction, UM

35:11

or any other mood disorder or

35:13

I guess we could also argue in the case of Joe

35:15

McCarthy, you know how much

35:17

of this was a potential personality

35:20

disorder in other words, that characterologically

35:22

all along there were patterns of behavior

35:25

that were that worked for him

35:27

in certain ways but really didn't

35:29

in others, and particularly anti

35:32

social characteristics. A

35:35

man who enjoyed breaking

35:37

the rules, I mean, he liked

35:39

taking risks, he liked breaking

35:41

the rules. He seemed to be devoid

35:43

of empathy for others, truly if

35:46

they making them suffer was not something

35:48

that pained him. UM and

35:51

these sort of You know, if he didn't

35:53

happen to have gone into government where

35:56

he could be spared the

35:58

punishments. He is somebody

36:00

who if he'd gone into different directions, might

36:02

have found himself really on the wrong side of

36:04

the law and often punished.

36:08

The only place I would take exception to what you

36:10

said is he did find himself from the

36:12

wrong side of the law, but he was protected because

36:14

he was in the Senate, and he did.

36:17

I think that he liabeled

36:20

lots of people. He did all kinds of things. There

36:22

was a hint in the medical

36:25

records from his time in the

36:27

military that when

36:29

he went into the medical

36:31

facilities in the South Pacific,

36:34

that doctors wrote different

36:37

things. And I don't know whether they were being coy

36:40

in not being more explicit, or they didn't

36:42

know or what it was, but

36:44

they suggested maybe he's

36:47

um suffering from some sort

36:50

of serious depression or fatigue,

36:52

or maybe he's just lazy and doesn't want

36:54

to go back out. But there was a hint

36:57

that something was going on. But

36:59

I think that probably if there was anything

37:01

they would have kept out of the medical records,

37:04

it was um a

37:06

stigmatized yes depression

37:08

or any mental illness. And I wish

37:10

that I could have interviewed his doctors

37:13

from back in the nineteen fifties, because I think

37:15

they knew more than they were letting on. They

37:17

were extraordinarily explicit about

37:20

everything, um in terms of his

37:22

physical symptoms and the

37:26

just hinting at things in terms of mental

37:28

issues. I think some of the clear sense

37:31

I had of what motivated him

37:33

was an unpublished memoir that

37:35

his wife Jean wrote, called The Joe

37:38

McCarthy. I knew she

37:40

never published it for understandable reasons

37:42

why she left it behind in his papers.

37:45

I think what happens to people when

37:47

they leave hundreds or

37:49

thousands of boxes of papers is nobody

37:52

has the energy to go through and see what's there and what's

37:54

not, and they throw it all there and say we're

37:56

putting it into an archives and nobody's going to see

37:58

it for a very long time. And

38:01

I think some of the greatest insights into who

38:03

Joe McCarthy was were not his

38:05

insights, because I don't think he was the kind of guy who

38:07

would ever sit down and offer any really candid

38:10

sense of himself. But

38:12

she just in observing who he was, even

38:15

though she adored him. Um, she was

38:17

smarter than he was, as smart as I

38:19

think he was. Um, she was his

38:21

biggest booster. She was

38:24

a true, true believer in

38:26

the cause of McCarthy ism um,

38:29

which they would have defined as patriotism

38:31

and all Americanism. Joe McCarthy

38:34

never objected to the term McCarthy ism, He

38:36

just offered his own definition for it. But

38:39

in the end, um, we are

38:41

grateful to them because they left behind

38:43

such a record of who he was

38:46

and what he did and why he mattered

38:49

and he mattered. There was a reason my

38:51

book had a one word title of demagogue,

38:54

and that is because while this is a biography

38:57

of Joe McCarthy, it is also a

38:59

biography of this strain

39:01

of bullying that didn't end

39:04

with him and didn't begin with him, But we

39:06

can use his life as a way of understanding

39:09

and battling back against it.

39:12

And I would add to that, there's

39:14

a concept in my field called

39:16

folliado, the delusion of two,

39:19

and sometimes we see that literally in

39:22

individuals. Two people come together and

39:24

they're in this delusional world that no

39:26

one else can understand because it's not real,

39:28

it's psychotic, and but they both believe

39:31

it and they share this delusion. In Joe

39:33

McCarthy's time, he created

39:36

this belief system right between

39:38

himself and the public at large,

39:41

and they both had to buy into

39:43

it for him to continue

39:46

the delusion, if you

39:48

will, or the belief system that he had

39:50

going his own McCarthy ism. When

39:53

one person breaks out of that, it

39:55

ends the folia due essentially, And

39:58

so can we learn from

40:00

that historically that that

40:02

can occur, that that a that a person

40:05

can propagate a belief system that a

40:07

whole community can buy into,

40:11

even if it's not accurate, even

40:13

if it's not correct. And I

40:15

hope that we all can learn that

40:18

somebody who can gain that kind of charismatic

40:21

power of a

40:23

cult leader of sorts uh, can

40:26

can propagate some really

40:28

delusional thoughts that we can all

40:30

buy into. So I love

40:32

that idea that they propagate the thoughts,

40:34

but that becomes scarier

40:37

still when there are two of them doing it and

40:39

they're reinforcing one another. And there was a very

40:42

smart physicist from

40:44

Harvard named Ramsey who McCarthy

40:47

invited to his house. Ramsey had

40:50

been on meet the Press, I think it was,

40:52

and it had been trying to take

40:55

on um some of the things that McCarthy

40:57

had said in one of his hearings and was being try

41:00

by the press, and McCarthy felt badly enough

41:02

for him that he and his wife invited Ramsey

41:04

to come to a dinner party that night at his house.

41:06

And Ramsey was a smart guy who would go on to

41:09

win a Nobel Prize in physics. And

41:11

Ramsey said, at the end of that night, Joe

41:13

McCarthy alone didn't scare me.

41:15

He was not dangerous. But when you added Jean McCarthy,

41:18

this incredibly smart, incredibly

41:21

reinforcing person, sort of taking

41:23

all of his worst instincts and feeding it

41:25

back, that really scared me. And

41:27

that could have become a dictatorship. And I

41:29

would suggest that there was another duo

41:33

in the McCarthy era that did

41:35

the same thing before Jean, or

41:38

during the time the gene was there doing it at home,

41:41

there was a guy, Roy Cone, who we talked about, who

41:43

was doing it at work. And Roy Kone was exceedingly

41:46

smart, exceedingly arrogant, a

41:48

moral and he also

41:51

encouraged all the worst instincts

41:53

in Joe McCarthy. And I want to just say

41:55

one last thing about that, which is, if

41:58

roy Cone hadn't gotten the job as

42:00

chief council, which really meant chief

42:02

of staff, the second in line

42:05

for that job was a guy named Bobby

42:07

Kennedy. And what would Joe McCarthy

42:09

have been like? And we can only imagine

42:12

if it had been Bobby Kennedy there instead

42:14

of Roy Cohne helping set

42:17

the path on where Joe McCarthy was going. Well,

42:19

sadly we will we will never know, but it

42:22

is important for us to think about today. Who

42:25

are the duos? Who do we give

42:27

our power to? Right? Who do we give

42:29

over to and and thereby

42:32

join their their system, join their belief

42:35

system. Well,

42:43

that wraps things up for this episode. Thanks

42:45

for joining me today. If you're interested

42:48

in more information about Joe McCarthy, check

42:50

out Larry Tis book Demagogue, or

42:52

for more on the concepts of personology,

42:55

you can also check out my book The Power

42:57

of Different The Link between Disorder and Genie

43:00

Us. Also make

43:02

sure to follow me on Twitter at doctor Gayl

43:04

Saltz or at Personalogy m

43:06

D Until next time. Personology

43:11

is a production of I Heart Radio. The executive

43:13

producers are Doctor Gayl Saltz and Tyler

43:16

Clang. The supervising producer is Dylan

43:18

Fagan. The Associate producer is Lowell

43:21

Berlanti. Editing music and mixing

43:23

by Lowell Berlante. For more podcasts

43:25

from My Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio

43:27

app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

43:30

get your podcasts.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features