Podchaser Logo
Home
Biden Gives Israel An Ultimatum on Gaza

Biden Gives Israel An Ultimatum on Gaza

Released Wednesday, 10th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Biden Gives Israel An Ultimatum on Gaza

Biden Gives Israel An Ultimatum on Gaza

Biden Gives Israel An Ultimatum on Gaza

Biden Gives Israel An Ultimatum on Gaza

Wednesday, 10th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

You can live out your MasterChef dreams

0:03

when you find a professional on Angie to

0:05

tackle your dream kitchen remodel. Connect

0:08

with skilled professionals to get all your

0:10

home projects done well. Visit angie.com. You

0:13

can do this when you Angie that. Shopify

0:17

is the global commerce platform that

0:19

helps you sell at every stage

0:21

of your business. With the internet's

0:23

best converting checkout, 36% better on

0:25

average compared to other leading commerce

0:27

platforms, Shopify helps you turn browsers

0:29

into buyers. In fact, Shopify powers

0:32

10% of all e-commerce in the US. Sign

0:35

up for a $1 per month trial period

0:37

at shopify.com podcast.

0:39

Free all lowercase

0:41

shopify.com/podcast free shopify.com

0:44

slash podcast free Welcome

0:58

back to Pod Save the World. I'm Tommy Vitor.

1:00

I'm Ben Rhodes. Great to see you. Back, back

1:03

here. You're the world tour. You really were on

1:05

a world tour. Where'd we hit? Are we willing

1:07

to share at this point? I mean, I shared

1:09

where it was Hong Kong, Taipei, Sweden,

1:13

Copenhagen, Italy. So,

1:15

you know, I made the rounds. A

1:18

quick side tour into Burma where

1:20

you grabbed a rifle and fought with a resistance. I

1:23

thought about it. I thought about it, but, you know, that's the

1:25

next trip. They're doing well, by the way. It's an exciting story.

1:28

It's an insane story, actually. We should come back to it.

1:30

But yeah, like that's the thing that it's like one of

1:32

these things that in normal times, we get a lot more

1:34

attention that the junta is losing

1:36

the civil war. But

1:39

alas, we're not normal times. Alas, it is not

1:41

normal times. Ben, did you know that

1:43

while you were gone, we were nominated for a Webby Award? I

1:47

did. I saw that. That's

1:49

very exciting news. You know, I am a recipient

1:52

of a Webby Award. Nice Webby Award winner.

1:54

For Missing America. Oh, nice. I remember that,

1:56

of course. But this

1:58

is like, that's like a... Best Supporting

2:01

Actor category. This is

2:03

like the big kahuna here. Best

2:06

News in Politics Podcast. Look,

2:09

that's it guys. So if you

2:11

want to vote, right? I mean, this is... The

2:14

cynic in me, like, you know, doesn't

2:16

feel great asking for people to do this. But the

2:18

hardest thing in podcasting is to get people to find

2:20

your show because the discovery is just so bad. And

2:22

these awards really do help. They'll help us grow and

2:24

they'll help us do more and make it better. So

2:27

thanks to anyone who nominated us. I don't

2:29

know how that process works. Thank you. Thank

2:31

you. If you consider voting, go to vote.webbyawards.com.

2:34

Search for Crooked Media and you can vote

2:36

for Pate of the World and

2:38

for some fun social media stuff

2:41

that we did here as well.

2:43

But it's again, vote.webbyawards.com. We'd really

2:45

appreciate it. Yeah. And make it count. It's

2:47

easier than writing a review and giving us

2:49

five stars on Apple. Also do that. That

2:52

also helps people find the show. We

2:54

have a great show today. We're going to talk

2:56

about the latest from Gaza, President Biden's spicy

2:59

call, prickly call. Sounded

3:02

like it was an unfun call. Full and frank. Full

3:04

and frank. Yeah, what did this mean? President

3:06

Biden reportedly read Bibi Netanyahu the riot

3:08

acts and demanded a bunch of changes

3:11

for the way the war in Gaza is going.

3:14

We'll talk about that. We'll also talk about the

3:16

sea change in political opinion in the US on

3:18

this war. And we will talk

3:20

about this sort of anxious wait and

3:22

see to see if Iran retaliates militarily

3:25

to the Israeli military assassinating much of

3:27

its top generals in Syria last

3:29

week. We're also going to cover

3:31

a diplomatic crisis in Ecuador that is

3:33

spilling into all of Latin America. That is a crazy

3:35

story. I can't wait to talk about that one. I

3:37

read a lot about that. Yeah, me too. Trump's secret

3:40

plan for Ukraine. There was an

3:42

election in Slovakia. Japan has a state

3:44

visit in Washington this week on Wednesday.

3:46

There's also a fun update on our

3:49

favorite boondoggle in Saudi Arabia and some

3:51

more sad, embarrassing Tory party news Ben.

3:54

It's the best kind. Best kind of Tory party news. Then

3:57

you did our interview this week. What are folks going to hear? David

4:00

Miliband, former labor, a foreign

4:03

secretary for the UK, but talked to him

4:05

as the head of the International Rescue Committee,

4:07

the IRC. The IRC is one of the

4:09

eight organizations on the ground in Gaza. They-

4:12

Given the Lord's work. Yeah. And they'd previously actually

4:14

had one of

4:16

their guest houses that their personnel were sitting

4:18

at, you know, hit by an Israeli- Jesus.

4:21

So, they, you know, we talked about the

4:23

aftermath of the World Central Kitchen strike, obviously,

4:27

the need to get

4:29

more aid into Gaza. And Miliband was pretty

4:32

clear that they have not seen any change since

4:34

this call that Biden had. We can talk more

4:36

about that. We talked about the difficult

4:38

trade-off that they have to make about, you

4:40

know, wanting to perform their mission, but also wanting

4:43

to protect their people, because they have to make

4:45

those kinds of hard calls. What

4:47

kind of needs to happen in Gaza immediately,

4:49

but also kind of what is on the

4:51

horizon in dealing with this humanitarian crisis, you

4:55

know, in terms of if there is a ceasefire, what

4:57

still needs to happen. And then also they've

4:59

been very active in Sudan. So, we

5:01

talked about the one-year anniversary of the

5:03

civil war in Sudan. Miliband was recently

5:05

in South Sudan, and talked a little

5:07

bit about the UK and what changes

5:09

we might want to see if there

5:12

is a labor government. So, it was a good, you

5:14

know, full and frank conversation. I was going to say,

5:16

that's a great conversation. Positive one, but people should actually

5:18

listen because he gives kind of some real ground truth

5:21

in terms of like what it is like to be

5:23

a humanitarian organization in Gaza. What is

5:25

the risk of famine? What does that look like?

5:27

So, people should really stick around for the

5:29

interview. Yeah, and to your point, I mean, the risk

5:32

of famine doesn't go away the day that shelling stops.

5:34

That's what he said, actually. It was interesting, you know,

5:36

famine- It's precarious. It

5:38

emerges slowly, but then once it hits,

5:42

it's really hard to address both

5:44

the immediate life-saving needs, but then also the malnutrition

5:47

needs. So, we talk about that. Yeah, so it's

5:49

going to be a long-term effort. Okay,

5:51

well, let's turn to Gaza because, you know,

5:53

last week we talked about the Israeli drone

5:55

strike that killed those aid workers with World

5:57

Central Kitchen, which is that great relief

6:00

organization. funded by Jose Andres. So in the

6:02

wake of that airstrike, President Biden called

6:04

Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu. He reported to be

6:06

right in the riot acts with a list of

6:09

demands that included opening up more

6:11

crossings into Gaza to get into Gaza.

6:14

And he called on him to drastically increase

6:16

the amount of aid getting into the current

6:18

access points into Gaza. And so it sounds,

6:20

according to the reports about the call, Biden

6:23

also wanted those changes to be announced

6:26

immediately. And he told Bibi that if

6:28

they didn't happen, there would be consequences

6:30

that could include losing US support

6:32

for the war or maybe the US conditioning

6:34

aid to Israel. It's not entirely clear what

6:37

was said. So we do know that Netanyahu

6:39

quickly announced there would be new crossings for

6:41

aid to allow aid into Gaza. They seem

6:43

to have allowed more aid at the existing

6:46

crossings. So on Tuesday, April 9, Israel

6:48

says 468 aid trucks were

6:51

inspected and transferred into Gaza on Monday, 419,

6:54

on Sunday, 322. That is

6:56

way up from the February average of 98 trucks a day. In

7:00

other Gaza news, the CIA director Bill Burns

7:02

was in Cairo for the latest rounds of

7:04

talks about a ceasefire and hostage-released deal. There

7:06

have been reports that the

7:08

negotiators on the Israeli side were mad at

7:10

Netanyahu for not giving them enough flexibility to

7:12

make a deal. It sounds like that

7:14

has changed a bit at least. According

7:16

to Axios, Israel's latest proposal includes

7:19

releasing 900 Palestinian prisoners in

7:21

the deal. That's up from 700. Netanyahu,

7:24

though, is still promising to launch a ground

7:26

invasion into Rafa, the city in southern Gaza,

7:28

where over a million Palestinians are sheltering.

7:31

He says he has picked the date. Saved

7:33

the date, I guess. It's a weird thing to

7:35

do. The defense minister, by the way, says there

7:37

is no date. It's Marben Gevir. The right-wing national

7:39

security minister says he will withdraw support from the

7:42

governing coalition if a Rafa invasion doesn't happen. So

7:44

that's the politics. It's probably why I figured out

7:46

the thing about the date. Yeah, that's why there's

7:48

a fake date on the calendar. The

7:50

US still says this is a terrible idea. We

7:52

haven't seen a plan to protect civilians. So

7:54

hope it doesn't happen. So that's the big ticket

7:57

policy disputes, Ben. I do want to get into

7:59

the broader. changes in U.S. political opinion

8:01

on the war in a second. But I'm wondering

8:03

how much do you think these,

8:05

I don't know if it was quick action

8:07

or quick announcements from Netanyahu at this point,

8:09

stems from the fact that Biden finally laid

8:11

down the law on this call, or how

8:14

much of it is like six months of

8:16

public opinion turning against them, and just

8:19

knowing that this like airstrike on aid

8:21

workers is indefensible? I

8:24

think, and first of all, there's an interesting, you know, you

8:28

and I were talking before about Miliband's, you

8:32

know, what he's hearing from people on the ground, not

8:34

seeing changes versus some of these trucks getting in. But

8:36

part of that is that there are also supposed to

8:38

be these additional crossings, where

8:40

there may not be changes yet. I

8:42

do want to say though, and I

8:44

know you hit this on PSA, you

8:47

know, well, those were just

8:49

like you, I listened to

8:51

positive America on my drive in today.

8:53

But it bears emphasis

8:56

that the

8:58

strategy as articulated was always like you

9:00

got to hug BB, you got

9:03

to only disagree in private, we

9:05

can condition aid. We should recall

9:07

Tommy that you and I way back in the 2020 campaign, we're

9:10

trying to get every candidate on the record about would

9:12

you condition assistance, right? Shut up, Bernie, shut up. Bernie

9:14

was a peat peat. Well, remember, it was more narrow.

9:16

It was like, would you condition aid if it's used

9:19

to annex the West Bank? It was hard to get

9:21

people to agree to that. So

9:24

what we've learned is that strategy

9:26

is bullshit. It doesn't work. It's

9:28

so self evidently wrong to

9:30

say, we'll never say that there'll be

9:33

any conditions and expect you to change.

9:35

The first time that Joe Biden

9:37

reportedly directly said, if you don't

9:40

do X, we might consider Y.

9:42

So he didn't even, they weren't

9:44

even specific about we'll cut off

9:46

military assistance or offensive military assistance.

9:48

Just him saying that at least

9:50

led them to announce this change

9:52

in policy and to get some

9:54

trucks in. So we have learned

9:57

we now have a data set

9:59

what happens. when you say, we're

10:01

not going to condition anything, but we'll counsel you in

10:03

private. That didn't work for six months.

10:06

Then there's one phone call in which he

10:08

said that, and guess what? They changed. And

10:10

so the lesson that should be taken, not

10:13

just for the next few weeks and not

10:15

just until there's a ceasefire, but forever going

10:17

forward. Forever. Forever, is that if you have

10:19

leverage, you need to use it. And this

10:21

idea that we say that we'll use leverage

10:23

with every other country, but

10:25

not Israel, is an insane way of doing

10:28

policy. Not since the George H.W. Bush administration,

10:30

where they very clearly used leverage. As did

10:32

Ronald Reagan, by the way. There were threats.

10:34

There was public shaming. There was lots of

10:37

criticism of Israeli government policies at the time.

10:39

Yeah. And what I'd say

10:41

is, we in the Obama administration, I think could

10:43

have done more, particularly in the Palestinian issue, to

10:45

exert that leverage. I frankly would have liked it

10:47

at times. But on

10:49

the Iran deal, where Netanyahu came

10:52

and gave a speech to Congress opposing

10:54

it, well the leverage was, we just did. You

10:58

can also take actions that are contrary to what

11:00

Netanyahu wants. So that to me- And win those

11:02

fights. Yeah. That to me is

11:04

like the headline of this last week. And

11:07

again, we still haven't even seen a specification

11:09

of what the consequences would be. It

11:11

seems like it's offensive military aid, but

11:14

this is a sea change in the

11:16

Biden administration's approach if

11:18

they follow through on it. And if

11:20

Israel doesn't follow through on their commitments,

11:22

then we do really need to see

11:25

some conditionality, not just announced, but actually

11:27

imposed. Yeah. Ben, the other quick

11:29

point I wanted to make on this is, it

11:32

seems unclear whether these new aid

11:34

crossings have been opened yet or not.

11:36

But it does seem clear that, at

11:38

least by, according to the Israelis,

11:40

about 4x the number of trucks got in the

11:43

last couple of days this week, then got in

11:45

on average in February. I wanted

11:47

to read for you a tweet from a guy

11:49

named Ron Dermer. He's a top Netanyahu aid. Friend

11:51

of the pod. Yeah. And by,

11:53

on March 26, he tweeted the following, those

11:55

who suggest that Israel has a policy of denying

11:58

food or basic assistance to the people of God.

12:00

Gaza are simply spreading falsehoods.

12:02

It's a blood libel against Israel.

12:04

Well, it turns out that one

12:06

phone call from Joe Biden can quadruple the

12:08

amount of assistance allowed into Gaza through the

12:10

existing crossing. So I don't know that that

12:12

was a blood libel. It seems like it

12:14

was a policy choice. Yeah. Well,

12:17

it's a policy choice too that they announced in the first

12:19

days of the war. Right. Like the

12:21

defense minister was saying, no food, no water, right? I

12:23

mean, this is something that they went out and announced.

12:26

And look, this is not to excuse anything

12:28

about Hamas. The reality is

12:30

Hamas does not control those crossings.

12:32

Israel does. That's just basic

12:35

fact. I'm sorry. It's

12:37

the case that we can see with

12:39

our eyes that Israel controls everything

12:41

that gets in and out of Gaza. And

12:44

sure, there may be difficulty in getting aid to

12:46

some areas if Hamas is operating there. But if

12:48

you talk to Miliband, the other point he makes

12:50

that's really important is that this

12:52

isn't like charity. This is

12:54

international law. Israel is

12:57

internationally legally obligated to let this assistance

12:59

get in. That's common practice

13:01

in war zones. And so also

13:03

to say it's too hard because it's a war zone,

13:05

that's not how this works. And all

13:08

war zones, the warring parties have an

13:10

obligation to allow for assistance to get

13:12

to civilian populations here. And

13:14

so that's what needs to happen now. Yeah.

13:17

There isn't like a siege in the Middle Ages. This is a

13:19

modern warfare. Yeah. Before we move on to the

13:21

politics in the US, I did want to play a clip from Jose

13:23

Andres from ABC News over the weekend

13:25

talking about this devastating attack on his staff and

13:28

what it meant to him and the organization. Your

13:31

CEO said this was

13:33

unforgivable despite

13:37

what happens with the investigation, despite

13:40

however more is done. Is

13:43

this unforgivable? It

13:46

is unforgivable. I

13:48

will have to live with this

13:50

the rest of my life. We all will have to live with

13:53

this the rest of our lives. I

13:55

see firsthand what has been

13:57

happening in Ukraine. and

14:00

cities being wiped out by Russia and by

14:02

Putin. But Prime Minister

14:04

Netanyahu is doing exactly the same. We

14:07

both have been lucky enough to meet Jose, not just

14:09

in the context of his restaurants in D.C., but also

14:11

just through the humanitarian work he did. And you can

14:13

hear that the guy is just devastated

14:15

by this. Yeah, and I met

14:17

him a number of times, including he won

14:19

with us to Cuba. Actually had a very

14:21

memorable dinner in Cuba with

14:24

Jose Andres. That

14:26

was a special event. I

14:28

think he's emerged as an important moral voice

14:30

here. And

14:32

I think he would agree with the

14:35

fact that it is unforgivable that

14:37

these World Central Kitchen aid workers are

14:39

killed. It is also unforgivable that over

14:42

15,000 Palestinian children have

14:44

likely been killed. It's unforgivable that

14:47

food has been used as a weapon

14:49

of war. It's unforgivable, not just that

14:51

these Westerns were killed, but that

14:53

we've been seeing this... I

14:55

mean, again, as Miliband said to me, there's

14:58

not another time in recent history where a

15:00

population went from no risk of

15:02

famine to the doorstep

15:05

of famine this fast. This

15:07

is not normal. It's

15:10

just not something that we can sit

15:13

and watch and think that this is just

15:15

how things work. This is not

15:17

how things work. And I think he's a

15:20

good sign of... To

15:22

take a positive from this, Tommy, a

15:25

lot of people out there feel like world

15:27

events are going in this bad direction, politics is

15:29

going in this bad direction, there's nothing I can

15:31

do. This guy was a chef. Yeah,

15:33

he had a couple really great restaurants.

15:36

We were in DC, he had a

15:38

few good restaurants, OML, Haleo, whatever. And

15:40

he looked at the world and was like, I'm going to do

15:43

something. I'm going to try to help feed some people. And

15:45

over a course of years, that grew into this

15:48

massive, sprawling humanitarian institution. It is a

15:50

sign that people can step up and

15:52

do something. And so that's the example

15:54

I hope people take from Jose Andres.

15:57

Yeah, and look, Jose has changed the politics

15:59

on this war. Washington personally. More than any of

16:01

us. More than any of us, yeah. But also, it's

16:03

hard to overstate how much the politics were at large

16:05

have changed in the last couple of days or weeks.

16:08

According to Haaretz, a quarter of House Democrats

16:10

now back conditioning aid to Israel. Congressman

16:13

Gregory Meeks, the ranking member on

16:15

the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said

16:17

on CNN that he wants to

16:19

see Israeli assurances regarding civilian casualties

16:21

and how weapons are going to

16:23

be used before he's willing to

16:25

greenlight future weapons sales, including items

16:27

like F-15 fighter jets that wouldn't

16:29

be delivered for years. We've got Nancy

16:31

Pelosi signing onto a letter with 40

16:33

House Democrats asking Biden to

16:36

withhold additional arms transfers until there's

16:38

an investigation into the World Central

16:40

Kitchen airstrike. And Senator Elizabeth

16:42

Warren said that she believes

16:44

Israel's war will be considered

16:46

a genocide. So that's

16:49

incredibly, you know, she's leaning very far forward

16:51

on this. But in case you hear

16:53

that, listen, think like, oh, that's just a bunch of liberal Democrats.

16:56

Please listen to this medley

16:58

of comments by the former

17:00

Council of Foreign Relations chairman or

17:02

president Richard Haas, Joe Scarborough and

17:05

Democrat Chris Coons. These attacks are

17:07

continuing. And yet so

17:09

are U.S. arms transfers to Israel without

17:11

conditions. They have been going on for

17:13

six months. Why does Israel need 2,000-pound

17:16

bombs to be used in high-density populated

17:18

areas? Then 10 days ago, what does

17:20

Israel do? It expropriates 2,000 acres

17:23

of land in the West Bank for

17:25

settlement construction. Where is the White

17:27

House reaction to that? Let me ask you this.

17:30

Why did Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald

17:32

Trump know in 2018 the

17:35

sources of Hamas's illicit

17:37

funding and they

17:39

still did nothing? They

17:41

wanted that money to get the Hamas. I'd like

17:43

to know why, because we don't know in America.

17:46

Have there been any investigations in Israel at

17:48

this point? If Benjamin Netanyahu,

17:50

prime minister, were to order the IDF

17:53

into Rafa at scale, they were to

17:55

drop 1,000-pound bombs and send in a

17:57

battalion to go after the IDF. Hamas

18:00

and make no provision for civilians

18:03

or for humanitarian aid that I would vote

18:05

to condition aid to Israel. I've never said

18:07

that before. I've never been here before. So

18:10

Richard Haas worked in the Bush administration, both

18:12

of them actually. Joe Scarborough was a Republican

18:14

congressman. He was in that clip, was ripping

18:17

into the Israeli economy minister.

18:19

Chris Coons is a moderate Democrat. He's

18:21

very, very close to President Biden. So,

18:23

Ben, as you were saying a minute ago,

18:25

I'm very glad that the D.C.

18:27

foreign policy consensus is moving to a better

18:30

place. It is very gross that it took

18:32

the killing of a bunch of white Western

18:34

aid workers to get us there. I don't

18:36

know. Let's talk about that. What do you

18:39

think that tells us about U.S. foreign policy

18:41

or maybe lessons learned to kind of speed

18:43

up this evolution in the future? And for

18:45

people who are tearing their hair out saying

18:47

like, how did reports of thousands of kids

18:50

dying not move the

18:52

kind of D.C. blob faster? Yeah,

18:55

I have a lot of thoughts and feelings

18:57

about this, Tommy, because it is

19:00

important and I'm glad it's happening. But before

19:02

I get to that piece of it, this

19:04

was all obvious months ago. So I'm

19:07

glad, Richard Haas, I'm sure who eats at Jose Andres

19:09

restaurants. I'm really glad he's out

19:11

there saying what he's saying, but like,

19:13

you know, why was the 2,000 pound

19:16

bomb that was dropped on

19:18

a refugee camp early in the

19:20

war? That was in November. It was in November. We

19:22

talked about that at the time. We talked about the

19:24

time and we were talking about conditioning aid. And so

19:26

that's just to say, I wish

19:29

this happened earlier and I wish it didn't

19:31

take Jose Andres' people getting killed for it

19:34

to happen. And I think that

19:36

that's important to note because a lot of people now

19:38

are looking at where this is going and

19:40

they're trying to get on the right side of history.

19:42

They're trying to get on the right side of public

19:44

opinion this time. And again, that's good. And

19:47

actually part of what that shows is that the pressure that

19:49

young people in particular and that Arab and

19:52

Muslim communities have put from the bottom up

19:54

is now being manifested from the

19:56

top down because these are kind of the the

19:59

pinnacle of the kind of DC world expressing these

20:01

views. And that is very good. And to

20:03

speak to the people in Congress, Chris

20:05

Coons, not exactly, you know, someone, you know,

20:08

he's been very close to Israel over the

20:10

years, Greg Meeks. These

20:12

are not the squat, right? These are, this

20:14

is a sea change in kind of the

20:16

middle of Congress now being for conditioning assistance.

20:19

And that, that's a massive shift

20:21

that we're watching take place. I

20:24

think, again, the question is the same thing with the

20:27

Biden call. The question is,

20:30

does that continue as

20:33

the memory of this strike

20:35

on the world central cushion fade? If Israel

20:37

does make some announcements, but continues to

20:39

do what they're doing, does that pressure

20:41

stay up? Does the muscle memory of

20:43

like political fear of AIPAC. Yeah. Does

20:45

it return? Stick around. And also like,

20:48

cause another thing that's important to note

20:50

is that a lot

20:52

of this has become kind of personalized to

20:54

BB, which is understandable. Like we personalized a

20:56

lot of criticism to BB on this show.

20:59

But you know, if there's a Benny Gonson

21:01

there, we should have the same

21:03

concerns about settlements in the West Bank

21:06

and violence against Palestinians and obviously about

21:08

the situation in Gaza. So

21:10

I do think that this is, I've

21:12

never seen anything like this in my life as

21:14

it relates to the US relationship

21:17

with Israel. There seems

21:19

to be a tipping point

21:21

that was reached and that

21:23

has put even Joe Biden in this

21:25

position where he's shifting. When

21:27

Joe Biden is backgrounding, she wants the war

21:30

to end. Like something is changing. That

21:32

is an interesting piece of this. Folks haven't seen, there's some

21:34

reports that the first lady was pushing Biden the hardest behind

21:36

the scenes to change positions on the war. Yeah.

21:40

Yeah. Which says a

21:42

lot again about where this

21:44

is. And it does, again,

21:46

it really matters because I

21:49

just don't think that these really

21:51

government could sustain what they're doing in

21:53

Gaza if the US were

21:55

to withdraw support and withdraw offensive weapons.

21:57

Not just practically that they want the

21:59

deliveries. of those weapons, but the degree of

22:01

isolation that they would find themselves in. Netanyahu's whole

22:03

case, as we've talked about, it's always been like,

22:06

I'm the guy that can basically speak smoothly

22:08

to the Americans and just do what the right wing

22:10

in this country wants to do. And

22:12

that is now no longer the case. Yeah. Trump

22:15

was on Hugh Hewitt's show, friend of the pod,

22:17

Hugh Hewitt. He was asked about Gaza again.

22:20

Trump, we talked a week or two

22:22

back about how Trump did this interview

22:24

with Sheldon Adelson's newspaper in Israel. He's

22:27

like, I think they're actual

22:29

settlers. They were super far right wingers conducting

22:31

the interview. Trump's answers freaked them

22:34

out. They interpreted it as him cutting off support

22:36

for Israel. So Hugh would ask him again, here's

22:38

a clip of Trump's response. Well, that's all the

22:40

advice you can give. I mean, that's the advice.

22:42

You got to get it over with and you

22:44

have to get back to normalcy. And

22:47

I'm not sure that I'm loving the

22:49

way they're doing it because you got

22:52

to have victory. You have to have a victory.

22:55

And it's taking a long time. And

22:57

the other thing is I hate they put out

23:00

tapes all the time. Every night they're releasing

23:02

tapes of a building falling down. They

23:04

shouldn't be releasing tapes like that. They're doing

23:06

that's why they're losing the PR war. They

23:08

Israel is absolutely losing the PR war. That's

23:11

how I read your interview. I read your

23:13

interview as saying they're losing the PR war.

23:15

They've got to stop releasing bad video and

23:17

win the war by going into Rafa. They're

23:21

releasing the most heinous, most

23:23

horrible types of buildings falling

23:25

down. And people

23:27

are imagining there's a lot of people in

23:29

those buildings or people in those buildings and

23:32

they don't like it. And I don't know why

23:34

they release, you know, wartime shots like

23:37

that. I guess it makes them look tough. But

23:40

to me, it doesn't make them look tough. They're

23:42

losing the PR war. They're losing it big, but

23:45

they've got to finish what they started and they

23:47

got to finish it fast. And

23:49

we have to get on with life. So

23:51

I think, I mean, every Trump interviews a

23:53

Rorschach test, you know, he says nothing. He's

23:57

like finish it, the war, but end

23:59

it. He's not complaining about the

24:01

death toll. He's complaining about the PR

24:03

around the death toll. Nevermind

24:06

that Israel is not actually allowing reporters into

24:08

the Gaza Strip to cover what's happening. So

24:11

I don't know. Maybe he's mad about

24:13

social media that's being released by the

24:15

IDF soldiers on the ground. I don't know what he's tough to

24:17

stop. I find it kind

24:20

of interesting, Tommy, because you heard

24:23

Hugh Hewitt, who once he's blood thirsty.

24:26

So Hugh Hewitt comes in, he's like, I hear you

24:28

saying that they should go to Rafa. And

24:30

Trump's like, no, they shouldn't

24:32

release tapes. Trump didn't ... What

24:35

I hear there, and I think Democrats should

24:37

hear this as a warning, right?

24:40

Donald Trump doesn't know much about this. He

24:43

probably doesn't know what Rafa is, right? But

24:45

he knows this is hurting Joe Biden. He knows

24:47

it's dividing Democrats. And he's trying to do the

24:49

same thing that he did on

24:51

abortion, right? In the

24:54

sense that he'd

24:56

be worse than Joe Biden on this issue. Like he wouldn't

24:58

be trying to get any aid in. He wouldn't give a

25:00

shit. But he knows politically

25:02

that this is bad for Joe Biden. So

25:05

he doesn't want to be out there. I

25:07

mean, he's actually been pretty restrained. He's not

25:09

saying go in there and kill them all

25:11

and stuff. He's trying to

25:13

step back and stay out of it and

25:16

let Biden just be in this political box

25:18

that he's in. I think

25:20

that's a big warning, right? That they

25:22

smell a problem for Biden and they

25:24

don't want to let Biden out of

25:26

that box by saying the

25:28

difference. He doesn't want to articulate

25:31

a difference from Biden on this thing.

25:33

And he doesn't want to get Bebe's back, I think

25:35

in part because of the politics he described. And he

25:38

knows that it's bad for Biden, but also he's still

25:40

pissed in it in Yahoo for not going, why would

25:42

he election? I remember right after October 7th, he was

25:44

like, oh, you know, Bebe's terrible.

25:47

He didn't go along with the Cosmo

25:49

Soleimani assassination. He said, husbandless

25:51

smarties are attacking the Israelis. Well, yeah. So

25:54

again, I want to be clear. I think Trump would be worse,

25:57

but I'm just saying this to me as a

25:59

political warning more than anything else

26:01

that when Donald Trump has not

26:03

taken the bait that he or

26:06

you is offering to try

26:08

to say, yeah, I would be tougher, I'd go on a Raffa. He's

26:12

trying to keep a step back on this thing.

26:15

Yeah. A couple more quick things on just Gaza.

26:17

By the way, what tapes is he... Anyway.

26:20

I'm not sure. I think there are

26:22

videos from the IDF of them hitting

26:24

targets and shit that's probably being released

26:26

to domestic Israeli media to show how

26:28

tough they're being in their response. Yeah.

26:31

But it's weird that that's what surfaced to

26:33

Trump. Out of all of them. Out of

26:35

all of the things. The PR. The PR.

26:37

We mentioned this at the top. We are

26:39

still waiting to see if Iran retaliates to

26:41

the Israeli airstrike over the last week that

26:43

killed a bunch of top Iranian generals in

26:46

Syria. There were a bunch of scary stories

26:48

over the weekend about an imminent attack. The

26:50

Israeli government was scrambling GPS service across

26:52

the country to try to protect

26:54

themselves. The AP reported that

26:57

Iran's foreign minister said that the US's failure

26:59

to condemn the attack on the IRGC generals,

27:01

quote, indicates that Washington had given the green

27:03

light to Israel to commit this crime, end

27:06

quote. The US denies having advanced knowledge of

27:08

the strike. Other news outlets have reported that

27:10

Iran has said to the US that if

27:12

we can broker a ceasefire in Gaza, they

27:14

won't respond militarily. So I guess we'll just

27:17

all wait and see here. HuffPo

27:19

had a fascinating interview with two top Hamas

27:21

leaders. It's worth reading in full, but

27:24

one important takeaway was that one

27:26

of the Hamas guys, Abu Marzouk

27:28

said Hamas would reject and fight any

27:30

force in Gaza, including an Arab-led

27:32

force, which complicates that path

27:34

as sort of an international Arab-led peacekeeping

27:36

force. And then finally, Ben, this

27:39

magazine, Plus 972 magazine, they published

27:42

this extensive investigation into the IDF's

27:45

intelligence collection and targeting in Gaza. It is

27:47

quite disturbing. It's this long piece, but some

27:49

takeaways are, one, that the IDF

27:51

was using artificial intelligence to select targets and

27:54

selecting enormous numbers of them, two,

27:56

that they were intentionally bombing the

27:58

homes of low-level ISIS. fighters and

28:00

killing their families because they knew it was easier

28:02

to find them in the home. Three,

28:05

that the acceptable number of civilian casualties

28:07

for a strike involving a low-level Hamas

28:18

operative was as high as 20. And

28:21

in one instance, the army authorized killing 300

28:24

civilians in a strike targeting a senior commander.

28:28

That's the total disregard for civilian casualties.

28:31

So look, I haven't seen anyone

28:33

else confirm the anecdotes in this

28:35

report, but pretty disturbing dystopian stuff here

28:38

that would help explain that staggering death toll. But look,

28:40

anything else jump out at you before we move on

28:42

from the Gaza section? Well, on

28:45

the... Well, the AI stuff is chilling

28:47

and at some point we should have a longer

28:49

conversation about the need to develop some norms around

28:51

the use of AI and war. This

28:54

degree of tolerance, war

28:57

does something to obviously, above all the civilians

28:59

who are impacted by it, but it

29:01

also does something to the countries that

29:03

are carrying it out. I

29:05

don't think it's been healthy for the United States to

29:07

be in the war on terror for two decades. And

29:10

yet, one of the

29:14

reasons we didn't take a strike at the bin Laden

29:16

compound but sent in a SEAL

29:19

team at risk was to

29:21

avoid the civilian casualties of bin

29:23

Laden's family. Their

29:26

tolerance is 20 for a low level person and

29:28

300. That's

29:30

just... That's not,

29:32

again, it's not normal. That's not rules of engagement

29:35

at all. It's not going to happen. There are

29:37

civilian casualties in the war. The US has caused

29:39

all men are civilian casualties in the war. I'm

29:41

not suggesting that Israel is the only country that...

29:45

This degree of tolerance, it's

29:48

not good for Israel to be

29:51

in a place where they think that's okay. On

29:53

the regional conflict, I think, look,

29:56

the Iranians, this

29:58

does feel like... We'll have to wait and

30:00

see what they do. There were

30:02

reports of them getting more involved in the West

30:04

Bank and trying to get more military

30:07

assistance in there. They clearly

30:09

intend to do something. The one point I'd make

30:11

while we wait for this is this

30:14

can get worse. It seems like

30:17

the war is somehow peaking and on the way

30:19

to a ceasefire. Rafa would

30:21

be a massive escalation in Gaza. If

30:23

Iran hits Israel proper, it's likely that

30:25

Israel would feel the need to hit

30:28

Iran proper in return. Then,

30:30

all of a sudden, you could have literally a

30:32

war between Iran and Israel. Or

30:34

Hezbollah could do it, and it's a war between Israel

30:36

and Hezbollah. This can

30:39

get worse. It's all the more reason to get this

30:41

to a ceasefire because the worst

30:43

case outcomes that we've already seen could

30:46

pale in comparison to the scale of

30:48

suffering in Gaza with Rafa going forward

30:50

or the scale of instability in

30:53

the region if the Iranian

30:55

response precipitates an

30:57

even wider war. Let's

31:00

take a quick break. When we come back, we're going

31:02

to talk about this crazy diplomatic crisis in Ecuador. Pod

31:10

Save the World is brought to you

31:12

by the UN Refugee Agency. The UN

31:15

Refugee Agency, or UNHCR, responds to emergencies

31:17

and provides long-term solutions for refugees. They

31:19

provide aid in over 130 countries,

31:22

including Ukraine, Syria, Afghanistan, and Sudan, where

31:24

people are forced to flee from war

31:26

and persecution at their greatest moment of

31:28

need. UNHCR helps and

31:30

protects refugees by providing food, shelter,

31:32

medical care, and other life-saving essentials.

31:35

The agency jump-starts relief in three key ways.

31:38

They transport core relief items stored in even

31:40

the most remote areas of the world. They

31:42

deploy expert emergency staff trained to help

31:45

in crisis situations. They transfer funds directly

31:47

to support the emergency. Because of generous

31:49

supporters and donors, UNHCR can scale up

31:52

its response within 72 hours

31:54

of a large-scale emergency. Your

31:56

support helps provide life-saving aid for refugees

31:58

whenever and wherever emergencies occur,

32:00

donate to USA

32:03

for UNHCR by

32:05

visiting unrefugees.org/donation. That's

32:08

unrefugees.org slash donation.

32:11

This show is sponsored by BetterHelp. How's

32:13

your social battery right now? Am I

32:15

all out of conversation juice, Lovett? The

32:18

famous Lovett line at a dinner where you just didn't

32:20

feel like talking anymore. I

32:22

was coming down, shall we say, and a very famous

32:25

person was talking to me and I just looked them

32:27

in the eyes and said, I'm out of conversation

32:29

juice. It

32:32

can be easy to ignore our social battery and

32:34

spread ourselves thin, especially when social gatherings picking up

32:36

after the winter. What's the right amount of socializing

32:39

for you and how do you recharge? Maybe you

32:41

thrive around people or maybe you need some more

32:43

alone time. Therapy can give you the self-awareness to

32:45

build a social life that doesn't drain your battery.

32:48

If you're thinking of starting therapy, give BetterHelp

32:50

a try. It's entirely online designed to be

32:52

convenient, flexible, and suited to your schedule. Just

32:55

fill out a brief questionnaire to get matched

32:57

with a licensed therapist and switch therapists at

32:59

any time for no additional charge. Find

33:02

your social sweet spot with BetterHelp.

33:04

Visit betterhelp.com/Crooked World. Go today to

33:07

get 10% off your first

33:09

month. That's betterhelp,

33:11

help.com/Crooked World.

33:16

You can host the best backyard You can host the

33:18

best backyard barbecue. You

33:22

can find a professional on Angie

33:24

to make your backyard the best

33:26

around. Connect

33:30

Connect with with skilled professionals to get all

33:33

your home projects done well. Inside

33:35

to outside. Repairs to

33:37

renovations. Get started on

33:40

the Angie app or visit angie.com today.

33:43

You can do this when you Angie that.

33:50

All right, so we have

33:52

this wild story out of Ecuador that has created a

33:55

diplomatic crisis all across Latin America. Here

33:58

is the backstory, Ben. So last week, Ecuadorian

34:00

police broke into the Mexican embassy in

34:02

Quito and arrested a guy named Jorge

34:04

Glass. He is Ecuador's former

34:06

vice president. Glass is a leftist.

34:08

He served with President Correa from 2007 to 2017.

34:12

Then he spent nearly five years in jail

34:15

for corruption charges and was about to be

34:17

arrested again when he entered the Mexican embassy

34:19

back in December. According

34:21

to Financial Times, Glass was finally

34:23

granted asylum on Friday and was

34:25

reportedly about to flee the country

34:28

with the Mexican ambassador when Ecuador

34:30

security forces finally raided the embassy. Now,

34:32

folks just know forcibly entering a foreign

34:34

embassy is a huge deal. It's a

34:37

violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic

34:39

Relations, which is the foundational

34:41

legal framework for all global diplomatic

34:43

relations. We discussed this a bit

34:45

last week in the context of Israel bombing

34:48

Iran's diplomatic ability. Yeah, sure we did. And

34:50

we said we were kind of concerned with the new norm. New

34:52

norm. Pretty big violation. As

34:55

we noted, embassy grounds are legally considered to be that country's

34:57

foreign soil, so you could consider it as an act

34:59

of war. No one can enter

35:01

an embassy without the ambassador's permission, so this

35:03

raid kicked up a shitstorm. Mexico

35:06

severed ties with Ecuador. They withdrew their diplomats.

35:08

The US condemned Ecuador's actions as did

35:10

a bunch of countries in Latin America

35:12

and Europe, the LIS, a lot of folks.

35:15

Daniel Naboa, Ecuador's president, is only 36 years old.

35:19

He took office in November of last year. He's

35:21

the son of this billionaire, you know, banana tycoon

35:23

guy. He was elected in a snap election to

35:25

serve out the rest of the last president's term,

35:27

so he's going to face elections again in 2025.

35:32

Much like Naive Bakkali in El Salvador,

35:34

Naboa has launched a war on

35:36

drugs and on crime. He's authoritarian, but that

35:38

has made him popular. So Ben, it

35:41

sounds so squishy and dorky to complain about

35:43

violations at the Vienna Convention. You know, it's

35:45

like Diplo speak, but it is hard to

35:48

convey how big of a deal this is.

35:50

And also, you know, so two questions for

35:52

you. One, take a swing at, you know,

35:54

explaining that. Two, I wonder how much

35:56

of this is also a

35:58

fracture along ideological lines. because

36:00

you have Glass, he's a leftist like Amlo,

36:03

who is the most outraged about not only

36:05

the breach of his diplomatic facility, but also

36:07

sort of a fellow traveler getting caught up

36:10

in raids, and even Neboa, who's conservative, and

36:12

you know, sort of an ideological opponent. But

36:14

what do you think? It's

36:17

just generally not a good thing to have this

36:19

norm. I know the word norm sounds

36:21

squishy. I know the Vienna Convention sounds squishy. This

36:24

just doesn't happen, though. This isn't like the

36:26

kind of thing that periodically happens. We

36:28

went to the Cold War, like the Soviets

36:31

didn't, you know, go into the US Embassy

36:33

in Moscow, same thing, vice versa. The

36:35

US didn't do that in our

36:38

country. We had a whole podcast on this feed

36:40

about a Chinese dissident who went into the

36:42

US Embassy in Beijing. Like

36:44

they didn't come get him out of there. The Ecuadorians,

36:47

ironically, hosted Julian

36:49

Assange. People will recall

36:52

in their embassy in London. And

36:54

when the Brits suggested they might try to go in to

36:56

get him, there was a huge

36:58

international uproar, and rightly, the Brits backed off,

37:00

right? So this kind

37:02

of allows for countries to

37:05

have embassies in hostile

37:08

or confrontational adversarial places. And

37:11

so if all of a sudden you can kick down the door

37:13

of the embassy, it becomes almost

37:15

impossible to have an embassy somewhere other than like

37:17

an allied nation, you know? And

37:20

then how can you conduct diplomacy? I

37:22

mean, diplomacy, the ability of countries to

37:24

sit down and negotiate things, or just

37:26

have an embassy that you can help

37:29

facilitate visas and services for your citizenry,

37:31

it depends on this norm being protected.

37:34

And I think that what is disturbing is

37:36

this Bukele model, right? You put your finger

37:38

on it, that this guy is probably, Naboo

37:40

is probably more popular for having done this.

37:44

I mean, it'd be interesting to watch that, what's the Ecuadorian

37:46

public reaction, but Bukele is kind of

37:48

like this new guy, young guy comes

37:50

along, and just breaking every rule makes

37:53

him seem like he's getting the shit done. And

37:55

I worry about a world in which the political

37:57

lesson is, oh, that works. So,

38:00

the way for me to be popular is to

38:02

come in, break rules, kick down embassy doors, arrest

38:05

my own parliament, just

38:08

do extrajudicial things to show that I'm the man

38:10

of action. That's

38:13

a slippery slope here, and not

38:15

one that I think is good

38:17

for Latin America or for ... And

38:19

I should say, Argentina's right-wing government,

38:22

they did condemn this. Yeah, how do you me

38:24

like condemn it? The anarchist. Yeah, the anarchist. It

38:27

does kind of show that there's

38:29

not ... It's not just the leftist in

38:31

Latin America who are upset about this. Yeah,

38:34

and we're obviously talking about this in a

38:36

diplomatic context, but imagine ... Ecuador has a

38:38

corruption problem. Glass got concurrent

38:40

sentences totaling eight years. He served

38:42

five. He allegedly had a

38:44

drug trafficker bribe a judge to get him

38:46

released early, and that's what he was about

38:48

to be re-arrested for. The former president, Daniel

38:51

Correa, was sentenced on corruption charges in absentia

38:53

and is currently chilling in Belgium, hiding out.

38:55

Clearly, there's a problem, and clearly, there's probably

38:58

some resentment among elites, but we're talking about

39:00

a diplomatic sort of problem.

39:03

Imagine if this kind of principle was applied

39:05

in the US. It would have been great for

39:07

Barack Obama to kick down a door on Wall Street

39:09

in 2009, grab a

39:11

fucking banker, throw him in jail for a

39:13

long time, just to show how tough we

39:15

were on corruption. A lot of us would

39:17

have loved to have done that. It might

39:20

have benefited the country, but you can't just

39:22

act extrajudicially whenever you want in service of

39:24

your politics. He's like, that's what's happening. You're

39:26

like, Bukele, when he stormed troops

39:29

into the parliament building. Yeah, if

39:31

Donald Trump wins, and

39:33

he starts kicking down doors and arresting people.

39:35

That might be super popular with his base,

39:38

but mid-cooking media, the

39:41

difficult workplace. He's in the new locker. We're

39:47

in such a dangerous, populist moment because people are

39:49

right to be pissed. I'm

39:51

sure this guy is corrupt, but that doesn't mean you

39:53

kick down the embassy door. The

39:56

question is, is this populism going to be a wave

39:59

that crashes? it's shocking to me

40:01

that these boundaries kind of held, by

40:03

and large, I mean, all across the board, through like

40:05

the Cold War, you know? But

40:07

in this kind of weird world where now, it's like,

40:10

no, all bets are off. Crazy

40:12

story. This guy's now sitting in like a super max

40:14

prison. Yeah, the pictures, I mean, the pictures of

40:17

this guy getting dragged away by like super armed dudes. It

40:22

looked like military, like special forces. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And they

40:24

roughed up the Mexican sand. I shouldn't laugh. I

40:27

know, it's crazy. I'm laughing just

40:29

because it's so crazy. I know, I know.

40:31

You bust in, you beat up some, oh

40:34

God, what a world. But again,

40:36

I think this is the Bukele model, you

40:39

know? This is what's happening. Mexico clearly like

40:41

the bigger fish in this fight too. Yeah,

40:43

yeah. Anyway, okay. Well, they got cartels. I

40:45

mean, there's a cartel problem. It says, you

40:48

know, the Mexican cartels are

40:50

very active in Ecuador, so. Yeah,

40:52

Ricardo explained that to us. Okay, a

40:54

lot of updates on Ukraine, which we haven't talked

40:56

about in a minute. So Ben, the first is

40:58

that the Washington Post got a hold or a

41:01

window of Trump's secret plan for Ukraine, such as

41:03

it is not really a plan. It is also

41:05

kind of exactly what we expected. Trump,

41:07

according to the Post, would force Ukraine to

41:10

cede control of Crimea and the Donbas region

41:12

in eastern Ukraine, limit NATO

41:14

expansion, and then there's some nonsense in

41:16

this story about quote, "'Enticing Putin to

41:18

loosen his growing reliance on China.'" So

41:20

that's part of the brand. The

41:23

big ramachand. Yeah, it is a big ramachand. Yeah,

41:25

so basically it's capitulation. It's freezing the lines where

41:27

they were. It's giving Russia another win on NATO,

41:29

and it's pretending Putin would agree to stop working

41:31

with China. No explanation for how

41:34

you actually do any of this, how

41:36

you actually force Ukraine or Europe to

41:38

stop fighting. Back here in reality, President

41:40

Zelensky signed a law that lowers the

41:42

military conscription age in Ukraine from 27

41:44

to 25 and gets rid of some

41:46

draft exemptions. The AP quoted an analyst

41:48

saying that the change would add about

41:50

50,000 troops to the Ukrainian military, which

41:52

is about a 10th of what Zelensky said he

41:55

needed, I think in December of last year. Also,

41:57

the Zaporizhia nuclear power plant was... damage

42:00

and a drone strike over the weekend. So

42:02

add nuclear meltdowns in Ukraine back to your list

42:04

of bedtime anxieties. I remember that

42:06

one early on. Finally, The

42:09

Washington Post reported on leaked internal

42:11

Russian documents that detail their PR

42:13

campaign to influence US lawmakers and

42:16

prevent the US from giving more support to Ukraine.

42:19

Here's a clip of Republican Congressman Mike

42:21

Turner, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee

42:24

on CNN, talking about it. We see

42:26

directly coming from Russia attempts

42:29

to mask communications that are

42:31

anti-Ukraine and pro-Russia messages, some of

42:33

which we even hear being uttered on the House

42:35

floor. I mean, there are members of Congress today

42:38

who still incorrectly say that this conflict between Russia

42:40

and Ukraine is over NATO, which of course it

42:42

is not. Vladimir

42:44

Putin having made it very clear both

42:46

publicly and to his own population that

42:48

his view is that

42:50

this is a conflict of a much

42:52

broader claim of Russia to Eastern Europe,

42:55

including claiming all of Ukraine territory as

42:57

Russia's. Now, to the extent

43:00

that this propaganda takes hold, it makes

43:02

it more difficult for us to really

43:04

see this as an authoritarian versus democracy

43:06

battle, which is what it is. So

43:09

Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, has reportedly

43:12

told donors that he wants to get Ukraine

43:14

funding passed, but the political reality

43:16

is that Marjorie Taylor Greene has

43:18

threatened to oust him as Speaker if he

43:20

moves forward with Ukraine funding. So she

43:23

could be the one who ultimately decides whether

43:25

the US supports or abandons these guys. What

43:28

a world. Yeah. And she's the

43:30

kind of person that repeats ... It's not just

43:32

the NATO point. I mean, there's been cases of

43:35

Republican members of Congress literally

43:38

retweeting Russian propaganda.

43:42

Yeah, you had David Cameron, the

43:45

foreign secretary and former prime minister of

43:47

the UK, flying to Mar-a-Lago to try

43:49

to unlock the supplemental.

43:53

That's weird. Oh, he was lobbying for this. He

43:56

was lobbying Trump to

43:58

Tell Johnson that it's okay. The letters pass, you

44:01

know, interesting images show you where we're an

44:03

interesting night and how strange this is. And

44:05

in the thing about Trump, it. He.

44:07

Or this plan is is nonsensical, right?

44:09

as the the Ukrainians would never agree

44:11

to a sudden. America doesn't have

44:14

the capacity to like deliver Eastern Ukraine

44:16

and Crimea to prudence and the idea

44:18

that that Russia is gonna get any

44:20

less close to China, when in fact,

44:22

Rush has gotten much more. Dependent

44:24

on China throughout. this works for

44:26

all their technology and all their

44:28

economies. Enjoy it just shows like that

44:31

are living this other planets. I do

44:33

just wish like something has disappeared which

44:35

is some regard for the Ukrainian

44:37

people. I. Mean the people that are

44:39

living in Russian occupied territories particularly in in

44:42

the Donbass, the of their children being stolen

44:44

and sent into Russia the receive reports of

44:46

war crimes. So this isn't just like a

44:49

casual game of risk you know where sites

44:51

where I will move our piece off this

44:53

part of the board. I mean it's their

44:55

their real lives at stake here and I

44:58

do worry with the you saw these yolk

45:00

with as the front lines frozen you know

45:02

the nuclear plant as extreme case buds The

45:04

Russians are now trying to essentially. Decapitate.

45:08

Ukrainian energy that the Ukrainians hitting Russian

45:10

refineries and this war could continue to

45:12

kind of escalate in strange ways in

45:15

in the coming months. Here Jamie this

45:17

week was the two year anniversary of

45:19

the Russians finally pulling out of butcher

45:21

know that city near t of where

45:24

there were just horrible atrocities, committed war

45:26

crimes by Russian troops, indiscriminate massacring of

45:28

the opposite training civilians of that speaks

45:31

to why would be politically impossible for

45:33

as Lenski death to to say I

45:35

absolutely you could have the Donbass. And

45:38

also not your point about. like what

45:40

is to undecideds, the average soldier on

45:42

both sides is over forty. The Ukrainians

45:44

are worried about lowering the draft age

45:46

because basically say take too many young

45:48

people out of. Their. economy out

45:50

of the workforce the country just won't be

45:53

able to continue going they didn't want have

45:55

an economy anymore yes in russia me while

45:57

says sixteen thousand people signed up for them

46:00

in the wake of the Moscow concert

46:02

call attack. So they're not having these

46:05

problems of recruiting, or at least recruiting

46:08

in air quotes, conscripting soldiers

46:10

into their armed forces. Yeah.

46:13

But the Russians have their own problems. I mean, there was

46:15

a great report in the New York Times of the weekend

46:17

about all these convicts that they brought

46:20

into the Russian military in

46:22

the Wagner group offensive. Some

46:24

of them have now returned back to communities and

46:26

guess what they're doing. They're killing people. I mean,

46:28

these are people that are already killers or criminals

46:31

before, and God knows what kind of things

46:33

they saw on the front line.

46:35

You're going to have deeply traumatized

46:38

communities in both

46:41

countries, and obviously our sympathies are with

46:43

Ukraine because Russia is the aggressor, that

46:46

are going to reverberate for years

46:48

and decades to come. Yeah. Two more quick

46:50

things. So again, Marjorie Taylor Greene might be

46:52

the one who decides whether the US supports

46:54

Ukraine or not. On April 5th, the day

46:56

of the DC earthquake, she tweeted, God is

46:58

sending America strong signs to tell us to

47:00

repent. Earthquakes and eclipses and many more things

47:02

to come. I pray that our country listens.

47:04

So good to know this is in her

47:06

hands. Also, Ben, here's a clip from

47:09

the new Republican National Committee chairman,

47:11

Michael Watley, from some

47:13

TV show. Look, I think that we

47:15

are seeing right now that this election

47:18

truly, truly matters on national security, on

47:20

every one of these issues. When America

47:22

is weak, the world is a far

47:24

more dangerous place. And right now, Joe

47:26

Biden's specless leadership has shown China, has

47:29

shown Ukraine, has shown Iran that they

47:31

can feel free to be much more

47:33

aggressive on the world front to the

47:35

point where even they will try and

47:37

meddle with our elections here. So

47:40

maybe that was a Freudian slip, or maybe he

47:42

really thinks Ukraine is an aggressor that needs to

47:44

be confronted, not a country that was invaded. It's

47:46

what they, I mean, it's what they think. I

47:48

mean, they remember the

47:51

whataboutism on Russian interference, was it the

47:54

Ukrainians that actually interfered? Remember they had

47:56

the DNC server? I mean, there's like

47:58

a broken brain. on

48:01

the right about the Ukrainians that

48:03

that is totally bizarre. Yeah, and

48:05

they think they're anti-Christian. There's just

48:07

this... Yeah, there have been all

48:09

these conspiracy theories about Zelensky and,

48:11

you know, like he's persecuting Christians

48:13

and he's persecuting journalists. Like

48:17

there's a weird information stream. Whatever

48:19

their information sources, it's not this podcast. Yeah,

48:22

it does explain why Mike Turner, the Republican

48:24

chairman of the House Intelligence Committee went on

48:26

CNN to say some of his colleagues are

48:28

repeating Russian propaganda. I think we just heard

48:30

a couple of them there. Okay,

48:32

so Ben, we've also been watching how the war

48:34

in Ukraine impacts politics across Europe. And

48:37

there's some bad news out of Slovakia,

48:39

where a pro-Russia candidate named Peter Pellegrini

48:41

won the presidential election on Sunday with

48:43

nearly 54% of the vote.

48:45

The position of president doesn't have much

48:47

power in Slovakia, but he's an ally

48:49

of the pro-Russian prime minister, Robert Fico,

48:52

who halted Slovakia's arms shipments to Ukraine.

48:54

Pellegrini says Slovakia is going to stay

48:56

the course. They're going to be in

48:58

the EU. They're going to stay in

49:00

NATO, but it is an indication of

49:02

the strength of the argument, the nationalist,

49:05

isolationist message in parts of Europe. So

49:07

not great for the Ukrainian side. And again,

49:10

just like a data point we're watching as

49:12

we head into these European parliamentary elections in

49:14

June. Yeah, and I was in Bratislava, the

49:16

capital of Slovakia, a few months ago, right

49:18

after the prime minister was elected. And there

49:20

was a real sense of foreboding there. And

49:22

part of what happens is you have Bratislava

49:25

is a kind of more urban globalist, if you

49:27

will, capital of the country.

49:32

But then out in these rural areas, you have

49:35

right wing Russian-backed media. You've got

49:38

a lot of forces coming in

49:41

to support this. It's happening in part. Yes,

49:43

there's some fatigue or fear about supporting Ukraine,

49:45

but there's also a lot of effort being

49:47

put into kind of turning segments

49:50

of these populations to this kind

49:53

of urbanist worldview. And Slovakia, bordering

49:55

Hungary there, if they become kind

49:57

of part of a growing block of country, countries

50:01

that are in the kind of more pro-Russian

50:03

camp, more hustle to the EU,

50:06

that gets really complicated. And the reality

50:08

is too, the EU depends

50:10

on kind of consensus decision-making. As

50:13

does NATO, by the way, which we saw Erdogan

50:15

holding up the session of Sweden, if enough of

50:18

these countries start just kind of throwing sand in

50:20

the gears, it could also really mess up the

50:22

functioning of Europe. So this is not a,

50:24

it's not an unexpected development, but it's not a good

50:27

one. Yeah, I know if Orban can screw up the

50:29

EU for everybody. Imagine if there's a bunch of- A

50:31

bunch of Orban. A little mini Orban. Yeah. Not

50:34

great. Let's turn back to the US, Ben,

50:36

because President Biden is hosting Japanese Prime Minister

50:38

Fumio Kishida for a state visit on Wednesday.

50:40

He will also host a trilateral summit with

50:42

the US, Japan, and the Philippines on Thursday.

50:45

Japan is Biden's fifth state visit. The

50:48

US and Japan, they're going to talk about military

50:50

cooperation, space cooperation. Apparently, Japan wants to put an

50:52

astronaut on the moon, so- Do it. Let's

50:54

do it. Let's do it. Japanese

50:57

company is going to be allowed to take over

51:00

the US Steel Corporation. Let's see about that. The

51:03

trilateral meeting is going to- It's like, I

51:05

don't know. Do we care? In an election

51:07

year? Yeah, probably not. The trilateral meeting will

51:09

focus primarily on China. Ben, so the Biden

51:11

team has put a lot of time into

51:13

bolstering these alliances in Asia Pacific, the US,

51:15

India, Australia, Japan, they call it the Quad.

51:18

I remember there being another Quad, but whatever.

51:20

Yeah. They also did a

51:22

bunch of work trying to calm tensions between Japan

51:24

and South Korea. How are you

51:27

feeling about the Indo-Pacific these days? Bolstered, robust,

51:29

renewed? I feel like there's a

51:31

series- What's your flow words? I think there's

51:33

a series of robust partnerships that are creating

51:35

synergies and a network among our alliances in

51:37

the region that have never been stronger. This

51:39

is hard because it's really important, but it's

51:41

so boring. What's

51:44

interesting is two things. One is

51:47

they clearly want Japan,

51:49

and Japan wants to play this

51:51

more assertive role. You

51:53

saw the Japanese prime minister talking

51:55

about bolstering defense spending, and this is

51:58

a country with a fundamentally pacifist- constitution,

52:00

largely written with an

52:03

American looking over their shoulder after

52:05

World War II. And you feel

52:07

like Japan is now looking

52:09

at the threat from China and North Korea and

52:11

saying, hey, we're going to get more

52:13

on our front foot here in terms of defense spending

52:16

and being a defense partner, not just

52:18

to the United States, but the Philippines

52:20

meeting is interesting, right? Because the Philippines

52:22

has this maritime dispute, which

52:24

is essentially China claims all

52:27

of the South China Sea that includes, you

52:29

know, islands that are Philippines territory

52:32

under international law. And

52:35

so the fact that Japan is talking to the Philippines,

52:37

what the US is clearly trying to do is take

52:40

these different security partners and allies

52:42

we have, Japan, South Korea, the

52:44

Philippines, Australia, and get them working

52:46

more closely together with us, but

52:49

with each other as well. They'd

52:52

like to pull India into that. That's why the

52:55

United States seemed to have renamed the

52:57

Asia Pacific region, Indo-Pacific. Yeah, it's rebranding

52:59

things. But it is worth watching this

53:01

defense buildup in Japan and what that

53:03

does in the region. It shows you

53:05

that the concerns about China are not

53:07

limited to the United States, frankly. Right.

53:10

You know, some long-term risk to a military buildup

53:12

in Japan. Yeah, it's- You don't hear it considered

53:14

out- You've seen that. You've seen where that goes

53:16

in the South. Well, it could go wrong. Yeah,

53:18

nothing could go wrong. It's interesting that you swap

53:21

out President Duterte in the Philippines who would just

53:23

massacre people and call it a drug

53:25

war, just killing innocent people. Now we've

53:27

got Bong Bong Marcos, son of a

53:30

dictator. Yeah, just kind of more normalized.

53:32

Like, Marcos is just like extreme

53:35

corruption and authoritarianism without the kind

53:37

of extreme rhetoric and extrajudicial killing

53:39

of Duterte. It's interesting how much

53:41

they have kind of embraced Marcos.

53:45

That maybe embraces a strong word. They've

53:48

definitely saw- More palatable. More our

53:50

pallet in Washington. Yeah,

53:52

exactly. Yeah, yeah. Corruption classic.

53:55

Okay, two more things. So the

53:57

regular listeners to the show have heard us talk

53:59

about- Saudi prince Mohammed bin Salman, his

54:02

massive development plans for Saudi Arabia in

54:04

particular. We covered some of this

54:06

on the latest episode of The World Corrupt, by the way, which

54:08

is available on the PADSE of the

54:10

World Feed. Please listen. But some of MBS's

54:12

ideas are smart. They do need to diversify

54:15

the country's economy away

54:17

from fossil fuels. Others are

54:19

ridiculous boondoggles. My favorite such boondoggle

54:22

is a project called The Line,

54:24

which is conceived of being one day

54:27

a 105-mile-long linear city. So

54:31

imagine a building longer

54:33

than the distance between New York and Philly

54:35

that is taller than the Empire

54:37

State Building. So Ben, you'll be shocked to

54:39

learn that this project

54:42

is behind schedule. The

54:44

government wanted to have 1.5 million people

54:46

living in The Line city building

54:48

by They've scaled

54:50

back that ambition to less than 300,000. And

54:53

now only 2.4 of the planned 170 kilometers will be done by 2030. So

54:59

very sad news for consultants everywhere

55:01

who want to get paid for

55:04

this thing. This is just

55:06

the, it continues to be the craziest story out

55:08

there in a lot of ways. Because

55:10

it is just clearly like Mohammed bin Salman, you know,

55:13

like he's a Roman emperor who wants to just like

55:15

leave some physical manifestation of

55:17

his greatness behind. I

55:19

don't know what on earth he saw, what

55:22

sci-fi movie or- PowerPoint presentation.

55:24

Yeah, PowerPoint presentation. This

55:27

is a $1.5 trillion project, I think,

55:30

when you add up the whole cost.

55:32

At budget, yeah. At budget. At budget.

55:35

Like there'd be no overruns to actually build this

55:37

vision. And to what purpose does this

55:39

serve? Like, you know, there are air

55:41

conditioning questions that come to my mind.

55:44

But I want to know, Tommy, is like, what

55:46

do you think the meeting was like where they

55:49

had to go in and tell him- Oh my God.

55:51

That, hey, this isn't going to be ready in 2030.

55:54

And we got to downsize. Like who gets

55:56

nominated in the pre-meeting to be the one

55:58

who has to go to the- hotel,

56:00

MBS, hey, that cool

56:02

model we showed you is actually

56:04

going to be one third

56:07

the size of that.

56:09

You pick the guy with the Kevlar vest

56:11

on, go from there. Yeah, I wouldn't

56:13

want to deliver that news. You're right

56:15

though, it is pyramid-like. It's crazy.

56:19

We interviewed Ben Hubbard about this,

56:21

New York Times writer, Istanbul bureau chief,

56:24

wrote one of the best books I've read on MBS.

56:26

It's like, yeah, well, you know, cities like Jeddah or,

56:28

you know, they just like don't have

56:30

good sewer systems. I mean, you could

56:32

improve the quality of life of citizens

56:34

so easily just by refurbishing the things

56:37

you have instead of this NEOM project,

56:39

which also includes a plan to create

56:41

man-made snow on mountains in

56:43

Saudi Arabia so that you can ski

56:45

three months a year. Yeah, so MBS

56:47

and, you know, rural family types can

56:49

go ski. It's

56:51

just, yeah,

56:53

you could spend a trillion dollars making people's lives

56:55

a lot better, you know, and they have a

56:57

large young population in Saudi Arabia, but, or you

57:01

could build NEOM or whatever it's called. He's

57:03

also like, MBS seems like a smart enough

57:05

guy. Actually, I think he is a smart

57:07

guy. How do you not know this is

57:09

a bullshit idea? He had it

57:11

pretty, like, you know, he, there's

57:13

just a pyramid aspect to it. There's this, like,

57:15

I'm going to leave something behind. It's

57:18

got to be- Are there autocrats who tried this,

57:20

right? Like in Burma, they built an entirely new

57:22

city because some astrologer told them it was unsafe

57:24

to live in the current capital. And that city's

57:27

like, might be the weirdest place

57:29

I've ever been. And completely vacant, then. Yeah. I

57:31

remember coming in from the airport and

57:34

it's like miles and miles of road because

57:36

nobody actually, but nobody lives there, right, to

57:39

the government buildings from the airport. And we were driving

57:41

like a hundred miles an hour or something because it's

57:43

like a, it's like a 20 lane

57:46

highway. I can't tell you why this thing is. With no

57:48

cars on it, you know? Not

57:51

the best- in a country where people are

57:53

starving, you know? I got a

57:55

feeling there'll be like a one kilometer of

57:57

line building that will live in the desert

57:59

forever. I mean Emirati's like like they

58:01

when they're not kind of financing the RSF

58:03

in Sudan like they're building Dubai and Abu

58:05

Dhabi I mean, I guess they don't have

58:08

a lot of land to use but I

58:11

mean build up riyad or Jeddah I mean, I don't know

58:13

I don't get it man And then

58:15

finally been a British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's

58:17

Tory party is once again being ridiculed Thanks

58:20

to a truly stupid now deleted Tory

58:22

party tweet So this was there

58:24

was a subtext in an image the image they

58:26

put out looked like Kind of

58:28

like a garage sale poster you might have made

58:30

in high school with like clipart on your you

58:32

know home computer It

58:35

said quote Britain is the second most

58:37

powerful country in the world. It

58:39

included photos of Rishi

58:42

Sunak King Charles wearing his crown with

58:44

his like sausage fingers up in the air England

58:47

soccer team some fighter jets and

58:49

Aston Martin a director

58:51

whose name is escaping me. So People

58:54

on social media pointed out that one of

58:56

the fighter planes featured was an f-35, which

58:58

is made by the US That

59:01

the poster was supposed to be about the United Kingdom

59:04

But it only includes the English soccer team and

59:07

the photo they used of the team was from

59:09

a game They just lost to Brazil. So I

59:11

guess in fairness that does fit well at the

59:13

number two narrative There's no women

59:15

featured Despite the fact that the

59:17

UK has some of the most powerful and famous

59:19

women leaders in history You have Margaret Thatcher in

59:22

there the queen on there, right? It

59:24

included an image of a container ship that

59:26

some reports say was built in South Korea

59:28

Others say is owned by the Swiss I

59:30

don't know why it was there and then

59:32

the text that accompanied the image said don't

59:34

let the doomsters and naysayers Trick

59:36

you into talking down our country, but that

59:39

too was deleted then I Did

59:42

so many thoughts and questions here

59:44

for the second most powerful? I guess are

59:46

we number one is that the

59:48

kind of soft power? Justin first of all

59:52

Nothing in this picture like

59:54

not a thing in this picture even the American

59:56

plane to me projects

1:00:00

Power in any way like Rishi

1:00:02

Sunak like like giving like what

1:00:04

was that looking? shit,

1:00:07

oh steel yes Like

1:00:12

Throwing a little blue steel with a skinny tie a

1:00:15

Containership that could literally be anywhere any fucking port

1:00:17

in the world like that could be anywhere like

1:00:19

and it looks like a child Cut them all

1:00:22

out and then pace of them on like a

1:00:24

poster board and like I'm just be say right

1:00:26

here I actually love the UK. I love Britain.

1:00:28

I love England But I'm just

1:00:30

gonna compile on here a little bit the English soccer

1:00:32

team which gets bounced every World Cup Earlier

1:00:34

than there's a little right then one in

1:00:36

a while some guy looking through a

1:00:39

camera that looks like he's making a movie in like 1952

1:00:42

or something I forget with it's a famous British

1:00:44

direct. I'm sure he's a great director, but it

1:00:47

doesn't like exude You know I mean

1:00:50

and like King Charles Nolan, it's cuz we're no oh,

1:00:52

you know what I take that back Okay,

1:00:54

I did my second. I give him one I'll

1:00:57

give them Nolan because I did my rewatch of

1:00:59

Oppenheimer on the flight home. I gotta watch that

1:01:01

movie fucking bang And

1:01:05

honestly it bangs on the rewatch cuz you

1:01:07

see what this genius You know let's just

1:01:09

take Christopher Nolan out of it and like

1:01:12

like cuz I full respect to that guy

1:01:15

Someone said the Aston Martin is actually owned by

1:01:17

a Canadian I wasn't sure what they meant tweet

1:01:19

at me if you'd also like it's not that

1:01:21

cool anymore the Aston Martin I'm sorry that in

1:01:23

fact if I wanted to make the case for

1:01:25

Britain I'd have an entirely

1:01:27

different keep Christopher Nolan and

1:01:30

then every other thing I'd have on this would

1:01:32

be different You know you and you could have

1:01:34

a bunch of you do a lip it could

1:01:36

be on there right like we know What

1:01:38

else could we get here Tommy like? You

1:01:41

know I guess it's Harry Potter. It's Harry

1:01:43

Potter cancelled if we're doing the UK like I think so

1:01:45

You could have Harry Potter on there. Yes, you have some

1:01:48

corgis on there What

1:01:50

else is what is that like what else is

1:01:52

popping these days cricket? Listen

1:01:57

all I said we need

1:01:59

to brainstorm this So today yeah, yeah benefit

1:02:01

from a brainstorm better for a brainstorm Also,

1:02:03

did you see that the British in the

1:02:05

French did like a freaky Friday style palace

1:02:08

guard switch? They had a bunch

1:02:10

of French soldiers do the changing of the guard

1:02:12

of Buckingham Palace and the the Brits did it

1:02:14

the Elisee Palace it was ostensibly to celebrate the

1:02:16

120 year anniversary of some agreement

1:02:20

or thing that you've never heard of but

1:02:22

I think it was just kind of like a We're

1:02:24

still friends after Brexit kind of sad thing

1:02:26

again. I'm not bringing this up to knock

1:02:29

friends in UK This is a Tory party tweet like

1:02:31

yeah, I'm really not actually cuz I I give him

1:02:33

a bit of an angle file I'm

1:02:36

just this is not this is not the you

1:02:38

can do better thing. I put forward here. Yeah,

1:02:40

do better Yeah, good. Yeah, come on

1:02:42

if the if the labor gets in there like

1:02:45

let's see a different let's see It's just a

1:02:47

different thing. Nolan will keep him Let's

1:02:50

the rest, you know the rest grab it much, you

1:02:52

know speaking of I'd rather see one of those big

1:02:54

red buses in the f-35 I like that like that.

1:02:57

I like that. Yeah, Mike is well, it's all soft

1:02:59

power. You don't need a fucking fighter jet on Yeah,

1:03:01

not blowing people up. It's soft power. Yeah, speaking of

1:03:03

Brits Ben We're gonna get to your interview with David

1:03:05

Miliband in a second But quick reminder positive America is

1:03:08

going on tour later this year going to Brooklyn Boston

1:03:10

Madison Phoenix Philly in Ann Arbor We're also gonna be

1:03:12

at LA Times the LA Times book festival in LA

1:03:14

on April 21st Come see us

1:03:16

live to get tickets go to crooked comm slash

1:03:19

events We're gonna take a quick break

1:03:21

we come back you're in here Ben's conversation with David

1:03:23

Milban You

1:03:31

can host a best backyard barbecue You

1:03:36

find a professional on Angie to

1:03:38

make your bank yard the factory

1:03:40

And that's

1:03:45

a skill professional to get all your

1:03:47

home projects done well inside

1:03:49

to outside repairs to renovations

1:03:53

Get started on the Angie app or

1:03:55

visit Angie comm today You

1:03:57

can do this when you Angie that. Shopify

1:04:02

is the global commerce platform that

1:04:04

helps you sell at every stage

1:04:06

of your business with the internet

1:04:08

stuff converting. Check out Thirty six

1:04:11

percent better on average compared to

1:04:13

other leading commerce platform. Shopify helps

1:04:15

you turn browsers, inspires in fact,

1:04:18

Shopify power Ten percent of all

1:04:20

ecommerce in the Us. Sign up

1:04:22

for a one dollar per month

1:04:25

trial period at shopify.com/podcast Free All

1:04:27

lowercase shopify.com/podcast Free Shopify dot Com

1:04:29

slash Podcast Free. To

1:04:35

the political news cycle make you want to

1:04:37

scream crime, maybe throw up Pods America is

1:04:39

going on Tor to help you make sense

1:04:41

of what's going on and points when we

1:04:43

for no matter where you have the Democracy

1:04:45

or Else tour will be heading all the

1:04:47

country to City Good Brooklyn, Boston, Madison, Phoenix,

1:04:50

Pseudo Feel, Ann Arbor and more. And for

1:04:52

long term screen bar protection get the Vip

1:04:54

ticket bundle that includes a signed copy of

1:04:56

our new book Democracy or else How To

1:04:58

Save America and an Easy Steps He can

1:05:00

take us with you. wherever you go the

1:05:02

other toward a can get your tickets no

1:05:04

equity. Coms Louis events before they

1:05:06

say is. I'm

1:05:15

very pleased to welcome back to the

1:05:17

podcast: David Miliband, the head of the

1:05:19

International Rescue Committee, former Foreign Secretary of

1:05:21

the Uk, and of a leading voice

1:05:24

on all manner of international issues. Or

1:05:26

David. Thanks so much for joining us

1:05:28

of course been playing Spencer Meal. So

1:05:31

want to start with the ciders

1:05:33

in Gaza Ayers He's obviously been

1:05:35

active eyes when reading, he, mentoring

1:05:37

or decisions in the world Before

1:05:39

we get into some of the

1:05:41

specific issues that have obviously been

1:05:44

fun center. Just what is your

1:05:46

sense of the current state of

1:05:48

the humanitarian crisis in Gaza? and

1:05:50

how is the I or See

1:05:52

on the ground trying to address

1:05:54

some of these needs? of

1:05:56

sadly it's very simple to describe it's

1:05:58

a catastrophe the sky worse. And

1:06:03

what we know is that there's

1:06:05

no precedent for a country

1:06:07

that had no famine to

1:06:09

turn into a situation where half the population

1:06:11

are facing literally famine in the space of

1:06:14

six months. But that's happened in

1:06:16

the Gaza example, you'll have seen two or three

1:06:18

weeks ago, the international phase classification,

1:06:20

which is a very conservative, small c

1:06:22

conservative, technical technocratic institution

1:06:25

that has assessed half of the

1:06:27

population are at international phase classification

1:06:29

level five, which is catastrophic levels

1:06:31

of hunger. And

1:06:33

the rest of the population are at levels

1:06:35

three and four, which are a crisis and

1:06:37

emergency. And the situation is getting worse,

1:06:40

because famines

1:06:42

happen slowly. But

1:06:45

they then are very hard

1:06:47

to turn around. And it's

1:06:49

beyond awful,

1:06:52

that there were announcements on Friday that

1:06:54

there would be a new crossing opened

1:06:56

in a res, that

1:06:58

there'd be a new access from the

1:07:00

port of ash dog, but

1:07:02

there's been no benefit. I checked with our teams

1:07:04

overnight, there's no benefit of that. And

1:07:07

so what you're seeing is

1:07:09

famine, death on

1:07:11

a very large scale, 33,000 people

1:07:14

directly from the fighting, desperation.

1:07:18

And then of course, all of the

1:07:20

illness that goes with those kinds

1:07:22

of conditions, because it's a public health emergency.

1:07:24

And those factors produce

1:07:26

massive disorder as well. And so I

1:07:29

listened to or I think it was

1:07:31

in The Economist this week, some

1:07:33

that there was a quote of someone who's just gone

1:07:35

back to their house in carn units, a Palestinian civilian.

1:07:38

And he said, we are, it's life as if we

1:07:41

were dead.

1:07:45

And I think that brings home a fight. What a

1:07:48

humanitarian catastrophe this is. Your teams

1:07:50

have not seen any change in

1:07:53

delivery since the announcement after the

1:07:55

Netanyahu Biden call. That's exactly

1:07:58

right. Yeah. And we saw that. The

1:08:00

president had an impact on the words

1:08:03

coming out of the Israeli Prime Minister's office, but

1:08:05

the deeds on the ground have not yet changed. Before

1:08:08

we get into the policy too, just in terms of

1:08:11

the IRC, give us a

1:08:13

sense of what the IRC has been doing

1:08:15

in Gaza, but also like how

1:08:17

do you make judgments as the leader of

1:08:20

this organization? We saw what happened to

1:08:22

the World Central Kitchen with their people

1:08:25

getting killed. I know you guys

1:08:27

have had some of the Israeli military operation come your way.

1:08:30

How do you make decisions about, obviously, the

1:08:32

whole purpose of your organization? You want to

1:08:34

help people, but you also have responsibility to

1:08:36

not put your people at risk. What

1:08:39

are you doing in that? How do you think through those tradeoffs?

1:08:41

Yeah, that's a great question. Obviously,

1:08:44

we think about a lot and fear a lot. And

1:08:47

there's no world where we work where

1:08:49

there isn't heightened risk. And the question is,

1:08:51

do you have the systems to manage the risk? We

1:08:54

are now into our fifth emergency medical team,

1:08:56

which we run with medical aid for the

1:08:58

Palestinians who are a UK-based charity. We

1:09:01

have between eight and 15 doctors

1:09:03

who go and work at various

1:09:05

hospitals in Gaza. We

1:09:08

also partner with a range of

1:09:10

local NGOs who are trying

1:09:12

to distribute

1:09:14

non-food items, who are

1:09:17

trying to do child protection and women's protection work

1:09:19

around the Gaza Strip. We

1:09:23

did have an Israeli missile hit our guest

1:09:25

house on the 18th

1:09:27

of January. And we said at the time

1:09:29

that this showed that the so-called deconfliction system,

1:09:32

the system by which NGOs tell

1:09:35

competence, tell the Israeli authorities in this case

1:09:38

where they are and what their movements are going to be,

1:09:40

we said it's not working. And it's a threat to life

1:09:43

and limb at the time. I think the death

1:09:45

toll among aid workers was around 150. As

1:09:48

you'll know, the death toll is now over 200. And

1:09:50

the deconfliction system simply doesn't work. So

1:09:54

we've had to, more and more, our medical team has been working on this.

1:10:00

team to take that as an example, that they

1:10:02

find a place to sleep in the hospital. They

1:10:04

don't leave the hospital. So even

1:10:06

guest houses that have been deconflicted, which

1:10:08

I was turned out not to be

1:10:10

safe. And all

1:10:12

to say that the most basic

1:10:14

legal rights of an aid worker

1:10:16

to stay alive and a civilian

1:10:19

caught up in war to receive

1:10:21

aid are not being honored in

1:10:23

this conflict. And so it couldn't

1:10:25

be more serious. That informs our

1:10:27

call for a ceasefire

1:10:29

on humanitarian grounds, a sustained and

1:10:32

immediate, but also sustained ceasefire to

1:10:34

allow us to do humanitarian work.

1:10:36

But it also informs the calls that

1:10:39

we're making in the

1:10:41

absence of a ceasefire without any way diminishing our

1:10:43

call for a ceasefire for aid to

1:10:45

flow in massively greater

1:10:47

quantities, because it's human decisions,

1:10:50

sometimes bureaucratic, sometimes political that are preventing

1:10:53

the flow of aid, but also more

1:10:55

protection for aid workers. And

1:10:59

you just spoke to a piece of

1:11:01

this that I think is important to highlight,

1:11:03

which is, you know,

1:11:05

I remember when I was in government, you

1:11:08

have deconfliction set up to facilitate the delivery

1:11:10

of aid in conflict zones. There

1:11:13

are legal requirements, international legal requirements

1:11:15

that go along with that, right? I mean, what

1:11:17

is the interaction between the

1:11:20

obligation to facilitate aid and

1:11:23

to pursue deconfliction measures with

1:11:25

international law? Well, there

1:11:27

are, I mean, international law, as you know, has four

1:11:29

elements to do with military necessity,

1:11:31

to do with proportionality,

1:11:34

to do with distinction

1:11:36

between civilians and competence,

1:11:39

and to do with humanity.

1:11:43

And that is a well-developed case

1:11:45

law. What I would say is that we

1:11:48

need an absolute paradigm shift, 180 degrees

1:11:50

shift, in the way we understand

1:11:53

the rights of civilians and aid

1:11:55

workers and their rights to receive

1:11:57

aid, which is that their participation is

1:11:59

not a good thing. Protection from

1:12:01

danger and damage and

1:12:03

their right to receive

1:12:06

aid is not a gift of

1:12:09

conflict parties. We've got

1:12:11

ourselves into a mindset where we should be grateful

1:12:13

that aid is allowed to get through. No,

1:12:16

no, no, no. It's the opposite. There

1:12:18

is a responsibility on conflict parties

1:12:21

to enable aid to go through. And

1:12:23

a long time ago, we said that the conduct

1:12:25

of all parties to this conflict was

1:12:28

not honoring those most fundamental

1:12:30

commitments. And it's

1:12:33

very, very important that they are,

1:12:35

because we know it's not just in

1:12:37

Gaza that impunity is reigning. It's much

1:12:39

more widely spread. And this idea that

1:12:42

somehow the protection of civilians or

1:12:45

the distribution of aid is something that is a

1:12:47

gift, a generous gift, is just wrong. Yeah.

1:12:51

And one more piece of this is, obviously,

1:12:53

you've called for a ceasefire. You've

1:12:56

talked about these different prongs, the need for

1:12:59

a ceasefire, the need to get aid in, obviously,

1:13:01

the need to comply with international law. It's

1:13:03

not, though, like even if you got to a ceasefire,

1:13:05

that the needs would immediately go away. Have

1:13:08

you been able to think through it all, the

1:13:10

medium and longer term challenges in Gaza

1:13:12

that might be confronting the IRC in

1:13:14

the international community if we

1:13:16

do get to a ceasefire? I mean, I

1:13:19

think that the short answer is obviously no,

1:13:21

because there are so many imponderables. I mean,

1:13:23

the scale of destruction is absolutely massive. The

1:13:28

psychological damage matches the physical damage.

1:13:30

We don't know what security arrangements

1:13:32

will be in place. You're seeing

1:13:34

in the north how difficult that

1:13:36

is. And

1:13:38

obviously, we're still in a situation where we don't

1:13:41

know if this Rafa offensive is

1:13:43

going to go ahead. And so all

1:13:45

of those factors make it very, very hard.

1:13:48

What we know is that if

1:13:50

you think about it for those two million people, what

1:13:54

they face is the biggest reconstruction job that

1:13:57

has existed for generations. It's

1:13:59

not necessarily largest number of people who

1:14:01

are affected by conflict. I mean the

1:14:03

conflict in Sudan has 25 million people

1:14:06

in humanitarian need, but it's

1:14:08

an absolutely massive challenge. What we know is

1:14:10

something that's important which we're trying to spread

1:14:13

at the World Bank Spring meetings and elsewhere. Effective

1:14:16

humanitarian aid is the first step on the

1:14:18

road to development. Stopping people dying is the

1:14:20

first step on the road to development. Basic

1:14:23

early childhood interventions to

1:14:25

help tackle the trauma that's

1:14:27

being faced by young people is step

1:14:29

one. The tackling of malnutrition. This

1:14:31

is why I started this interview by talking

1:14:33

about the famine and malnutrition. That's the apex

1:14:35

of the pyramid if you like. We know

1:14:37

that in humanitarian emergencies where there's

1:14:39

famine or malnutrition, everything else is going

1:14:41

wrong as well. Obviously, Gaza

1:14:44

is very unusual in that no one can

1:14:46

get out and it's actually impossible to get

1:14:48

aid in, but

1:14:50

we know that these conditions

1:14:52

have long-term consequences. Yeah,

1:14:56

I mean one other thing that comes out

1:14:58

of your question. You mentioned Rafa. I mean

1:15:02

it's almost hard to imagine. People

1:15:04

keep not being able to envision how this could

1:15:06

get worse, but I kind of can't get

1:15:09

my mind around what the situation might look

1:15:11

like in the Gaza Strip if that Rafa

1:15:13

operation goes forward. I mean it

1:15:15

would exponentially complicate everything from aid

1:15:17

delivery to immediate needs to

1:15:19

freedom of movement for organizations like

1:15:22

your own, right? From a humanitarian

1:15:24

point of view, it's clear that there's a

1:15:26

million plus people who have all

1:15:30

been moved already once, twice, three times.

1:15:33

The scale of loss already is very, very

1:15:35

high. There was a story today that 40,000

1:15:37

tents have been procured, but there's a million

1:15:39

plus people in Rafa.

1:15:42

So that's why there's

1:15:45

such grave, grave trepidation,

1:15:48

fear about what's next. Well,

1:15:53

pulling back the lens, obviously the rest

1:15:55

of the world doesn't stop suffering from

1:15:57

conflict and humanitarian crises in the midst

1:15:59

of... what's happening in Gaza. I

1:16:01

know IRC has been quite active in Sudan, a

1:16:04

situation that I think in more normal

1:16:06

times would be getting a lot of attention. How

1:16:09

would you describe for people what the needs

1:16:11

are there? What have you seen and heard

1:16:13

about what's happening in the civil war in

1:16:16

Sudan, and how that's kind of spilling over

1:16:18

into places like South Sudan? Yeah, there's a

1:16:20

couple of things to say, actually, which speak

1:16:22

to the wider global sense of, I

1:16:25

call it a flammable world, in the world on fire

1:16:27

in various places, and it's very flammable. And

1:16:29

we produce an annual emergency watch list.

1:16:32

Gaza was number two, Gaza was number

1:16:34

two, Sudan was number one. As I

1:16:37

said earlier, 25 million people in humanitarian

1:16:39

need. It's the one-year anniversary of the

1:16:42

start of this civil war. And

1:16:45

I was in South Sudan in

1:16:47

February, and I met a couple who I

1:16:49

went to the border or near the border,

1:16:51

and a couple of fled 700

1:16:54

miles from Khartoum, 700 kilometers from Khartoum. She

1:16:57

was a hairdresser, he was a shoemaker,

1:16:59

the kids were meant to be going to

1:17:01

university. And now they're wondering whether they'll ever

1:17:03

go back to their country. I

1:17:07

think there's a couple of aspects of it that are

1:17:09

very striking. One, this is not just a

1:17:11

Sudan crisis. It's a Sudan, South Sudan,

1:17:13

Chad, it's the whole of Northeast Africa

1:17:16

crisis. And

1:17:20

the second is that those who are much

1:17:22

more expert than I, in what happened in

1:17:24

Darfur 20 years ago, will tell you that

1:17:27

there are very, very dark and chilling echoes

1:17:29

in what's happening now, of

1:17:31

what happened then. So you've

1:17:33

got number one, it's affecting the

1:17:35

neighbors massively, Sudan, South

1:17:37

Sudan. Secondly, the Darfur element

1:17:40

of this. Thirdly, every humanitarian emergency

1:17:42

is a political emergency. And

1:17:44

the political emergency in this case, is

1:17:47

that you have different regional powers,

1:17:50

supporting different sides. You

1:17:52

have the situation where authority for

1:17:54

peacemaking has been devolved from the

1:17:57

UN Security Council to the African

1:17:59

Union. So

1:18:01

you've got a different set of plays

1:18:04

there, which is

1:18:06

very involved with different strands of African

1:18:08

politics, tying into Middle Eastern

1:18:10

politics because of Saudi Arabia and United Arab

1:18:12

Emirates, both very involved, Egypt. And

1:18:15

so this political emergency is creating this sense of

1:18:18

vacuum where people are really asking whether the country

1:18:20

is going to exist after this.

1:18:23

And I mean, you've written and talked

1:18:25

a lot about a kind of culture of impunity

1:18:27

here. And oftentimes we

1:18:30

end up focusing on the worst

1:18:32

actors, right? The people, the militias

1:18:35

or the warlords or the warring parties in

1:18:37

the civil war. But

1:18:40

as you mentioned, there's also these regional

1:18:42

powers that are arming different sides, backing

1:18:45

different sides. And

1:18:47

some of those are actors like the Emirates, the

1:18:49

UAE that are very

1:18:51

plugged into global politics. I mean,

1:18:53

how do we try

1:18:56

to align some sense

1:18:58

of accountability or some sense of pressure or

1:19:00

some sense of incentive for these

1:19:02

kind of regional parties in a conflict like Sudan

1:19:05

to take more responsibility for their own

1:19:08

choices here? I mean, to turn off the spigot

1:19:10

of weapons and get to the table of

1:19:13

negotiation rather than to just kind of let

1:19:15

these fires burn. Yeah. Well,

1:19:17

I think the starting point is actually getting our own

1:19:19

house in order. Now in this one can actually

1:19:22

point to something that the Biden administration done

1:19:24

that's very significant and very positive, which is

1:19:26

their own new Department of Defense guidance on

1:19:29

civilian protection and military operations does actually set

1:19:31

a very high standard for what should be

1:19:33

expected, not just of the US, but of

1:19:35

all its security partners. And

1:19:38

that's, I think, really important. Secondly,

1:19:40

to get active on the diplomatic

1:19:42

front. Now there is now a

1:19:44

new special envoy, Tom Pierrillo is

1:19:46

the special envoy for the

1:19:48

crisis. It's good because it needs

1:19:51

the weight of the US if there's going

1:19:53

to be any diplomatic progress at all. Thirdly,

1:19:55

it's back to our old friend leverage.

1:19:59

And it's about... prioritization and leverage and the

1:20:01

extent to which that is used, the

1:20:03

US has a number of allies who

1:20:06

are engaged in this conflict.

1:20:08

The internationalization of this civil war

1:20:10

is symptomatic of something that's happening

1:20:12

right around the world with civil

1:20:14

wars that are burning longer with

1:20:16

more ferocity because

1:20:18

of external sponsorship. And

1:20:21

so the US needs to use its leverage. I

1:20:23

would argue the West needs to use its leverage more generally.

1:20:26

Well, and I wanted to ask you, you have

1:20:28

a piece out in The Guardian recently that people

1:20:31

should check out about the role of UK. And

1:20:34

this is an interesting point for the UK.

1:20:36

We're out of Brexit a couple of years or a

1:20:39

few years now. You also

1:20:41

have an election coming up there. David

1:20:43

Cameron's flying off to Mar-a-Lago. It's just me

1:20:45

with Donald Trump that's a little peculiar. He

1:20:47

survived. I think he survived. He said there'd

1:20:50

been sightings of- He

1:20:52

said, okay, he's out. The

1:20:56

UK is not part of the EU

1:20:58

anymore, obviously. It's

1:21:00

kind of floating in this new

1:21:03

space. I

1:21:05

mean, break down for people kind

1:21:07

of the role that you see that the

1:21:09

UK should be playing in this world of

1:21:12

increasing disorder, of increasing risk in

1:21:14

a post-Brexit foreign policy and maybe post-Tory

1:21:17

foreign policy. Well, fingers crossed.

1:21:21

There are many of us who warned that

1:21:23

Brexit would be an act of unilateral

1:21:25

political disarmament. And I'm

1:21:28

very, very sad that in all sorts of ways that's

1:21:30

proved to be true. However, Brexit

1:21:32

is much worse than

1:21:34

even I predicted on the foreign policy

1:21:36

front. It's actually very

1:21:38

bad on the economic front as

1:21:40

well. And I think

1:21:43

the UK now finds itself in a

1:21:45

position where it has

1:21:47

effectively no relations on the foreign policy and

1:21:49

defense front with the European Union. And

1:21:52

it's got all of its chips in

1:21:54

the NATO basket. Now on Ukraine, the UK has actually

1:21:56

played a good and positive role, but

1:21:58

it's doubly- stupid to have

1:22:00

no relations on foreign defense and climate

1:22:03

policy with the EU, given

1:22:05

that EU NATO divisions have been

1:22:07

so bridged by the Ukraine

1:22:09

crisis. The EU, despite having islands in

1:22:11

neutral, but it hasn't stopped weapons being

1:22:13

shipped, there are six million Ukrainian refugees

1:22:15

in Europe that have

1:22:17

rights to residents and to work. The

1:22:20

EU is a global trade and climate

1:22:22

actor. And so I think the

1:22:24

first order of business is a structured,

1:22:27

serious relationship between

1:22:29

the UK and its closest allies,

1:22:32

geographically, who are in the European Union, 27

1:22:34

of them. Obviously

1:22:37

there's a second aspect to this, which is that traditionally

1:22:39

the UK has leveraged

1:22:41

its relationships in the

1:22:44

US for its European

1:22:46

engagement as well and vice versa. Those

1:22:50

remain very important relationships. But as you know

1:22:52

better than I, every country

1:22:54

in the world is hedging both on the

1:22:56

outcome of your election. And

1:23:00

even if the Biden administration is reelected

1:23:02

on whether or not your

1:23:04

divided government is going to be able to deliver the

1:23:06

kind of patient, strategic,

1:23:09

informed, deliberative, international

1:23:11

leadership that's necessary. And

1:23:13

so the UK is going to have

1:23:15

to adapt what I call, or not

1:23:17

my phrase, but the phrase of Shashi Thoreau,

1:23:19

the multi-aligned world. And

1:23:22

it's a much more transactional, much more

1:23:24

fluid set of arrangements, where

1:23:26

I think the North Star, just to finish the

1:23:28

third point and go back to something you

1:23:30

said earlier, the North Star for our international engagement

1:23:32

as the UK, I think, has to be to uphold

1:23:34

the rule of law and to fight impunity. Because

1:23:37

that is the great danger, both to our interests and to

1:23:39

our values. Yeah. Well,

1:23:42

we'll hope that we get to see

1:23:44

a new government in the UK

1:23:46

committed to that. I want to just end, I mean,

1:23:48

I know that the

1:23:50

IRC is, you have local partners, you

1:23:53

have staff around the world. What would

1:23:55

you want people to know about what

1:23:57

your teams are doing in places like Gaza

1:23:59

and Sudan? like, what give us a window

1:24:01

into kind of who the

1:24:03

people are that are on the front lines of

1:24:05

these conflicts? Yeah, I'd love

1:24:07

people to listen to the testimony of

1:24:10

people like our head of

1:24:12

our emergency health unit, Sima

1:24:14

Jilani. She did an excruciating

1:24:16

interview in the New

1:24:18

Yorker about her experience as a doctor

1:24:20

in Gaza, which I really recommend that

1:24:23

people read look the face of the

1:24:25

IRC is now 25,000

1:24:27

plus employees in 330 field sites in 45 countries

1:24:29

around the world, and 3000 staff in

1:24:36

30 US offices because we're working

1:24:38

to support refugees and asylum seekers here

1:24:40

in the US. We're an organization that's

1:24:43

unusual because we have this focus not on poverty

1:24:45

per se, but on people whose lives are shattered

1:24:47

by conflict and disaster and are left in poverty

1:24:50

and desperation. And

1:24:52

our effort in the

1:24:54

humanitarian sector is to be the solutions NGO.

1:24:57

And if you're interested in malnutrition, we've got a

1:24:59

different way of tackling malnutrition. If you're interested in

1:25:01

early childhood development, with Sesame Workshop, we've got a

1:25:03

different way of tackling that. If you're interested

1:25:06

in how can the tech sector

1:25:08

help provide information to

1:25:10

refugees and asylum seekers about where's safe,

1:25:12

signpost is our solution

1:25:15

for how that's taken forward. If you

1:25:17

care about sexual violence against women and

1:25:19

violence against kids, we've got very interesting

1:25:21

program about how to tackle co-occurrence. And

1:25:23

at a time when people

1:25:26

get accused of being a globalist, rather than thanks

1:25:28

for being a globalist, it's

1:25:30

I think really important to

1:25:33

assert these vital This

1:25:35

vital work needs support. I'd love people

1:25:37

to visit our website, rescue.org, to learn

1:25:39

more about what we're doing. Great.

1:25:43

Well, David, thanks so much for joining us

1:25:45

and taking us through a lot of issues there. Thanks

1:25:47

a lot, Ben. Thank you. Thanks

1:25:52

again to David Miliband for joining the show. Welcome

1:25:55

back. Thanks to

1:25:57

Christopher Nolan. Holding it down

1:25:59

on that poster. I

1:26:01

like the Rishi put himself in the center. Well,

1:26:03

nobody thinks that about Rishi. Nobody

1:26:06

thinks that this guy powers

1:26:08

above Britain and it's soft

1:26:10

power. Also, you're not supposed to put the

1:26:12

king on political things. What

1:26:14

do you think Rishi's name idea is outside of

1:26:16

the UK? Like

1:26:19

0.0? That's

1:26:22

pretty soft power. That's soft. And

1:26:26

we're done. Talk

1:26:28

to you guys next week. See

1:26:30

ya. If you

1:26:32

want to get ad-free episodes, exclusive content

1:26:35

and more, consider joining our Friends of

1:26:37

the Pods subscription community at crooked.com/friends. Don't

1:26:40

forget to follow Crooked Media on Instagram, TikTok

1:26:42

and Twitter for more original content, host takeovers

1:26:44

and other community events, plus find Pod Save

1:26:46

the World on YouTube for access to full

1:26:48

episodes, bonus content and more. And if you're

1:26:50

as opinionated as us, consider dropping a review.

1:26:53

Pod Save the World is a Crooked Media production. Our

1:26:56

executive producers are me, Tommy Vitor, Ben

1:26:58

Rhodes and Reed Turlin. Our producer is

1:27:01

Alona Minkowski and associate producer is Ashley

1:27:03

Mizzuo. It's mixed and edited by Andrew

1:27:05

Chadwick, audio support by Kyle Seglen and

1:27:07

Charlotte Landis. Our studio technician

1:27:09

is David Tolz. Thanks to our

1:27:12

digital team, Elijah Cohn and Phoebe Bradford,

1:27:14

who upload our episodes and videos to

1:27:16

youtube.com/Pod Save the World.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features