Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:02
Lucky Land Slots. You can get lucky just
0:04
about anywhere. Dearly beloved, we are gathered
0:06
here today to... anyone Has anyone seen
0:08
the bride and groom? Sorry,
0:10
sorry, we're here. we were getting We were getting lucky in
0:12
the limo and we lost track of time. No,
0:15
Lucky Land Casino. With cash prizes that add up
0:17
quicker than a guest registry. In that case, I pronounce you
0:20
Lucky. In that case, I pronounce you lucky. Play
0:22
for free at luckylandslots.com. Daily bonuses are
0:24
waiting. No No purchase necessary. Void where
0:27
prohibited by law. 18 plus. Terms and
0:29
conditions apply. Hello, it
0:31
is Ryan and I was on a flight the
0:33
other day playing one of my favorite social spin
0:35
slot games on Chumba casino.com I looked over the
0:37
person sitting next to me and you know what
0:40
they were doing? They were also playing Chumba Casino.
0:42
Coincidence? I think not. Everybody's loving having fun with
0:44
it. Chumba Casino is home to hundreds of casino
0:46
style games that you can play for free
0:48
anytime, anywhere, even at 30,000 feet. So
0:51
sign up now at chumbacasino.com to claim
0:54
your free welcome bonus. That's chumbacasino.com and
0:56
live the Chumba life. No purchase necessary. VTW.
0:58
Avoid or prohibited by law. See terms and
1:00
conditions. Hello,
1:29
I'm Martin Wolisher, host, and
1:31
welcome to the show, Podcast
1:34
UFO and Weekly Show. I
1:36
have a lot of great fans from over the
1:38
years, and I want to thank
1:41
you all for watching the show. And I
1:43
want to thank the people that support the
1:45
show. And whether you're supporting me
1:47
or not, I do thank you. And
1:49
our blog this week is... There is
1:52
no blog. Charles is in
1:54
a play opening this week, so he wasn't
1:56
able to put out a blog. So
1:58
there's still plenty to be done. read over at
2:00
podcast UFO calm where we have new
2:02
blogs generally every single week and They
2:06
turn into an audio blog and
2:08
audio podcast that comes out roughly
2:11
once a week or so we'll get those out
2:13
and Crossfire
2:15
this week you AP
2:17
crossfire. It has been canceled this I've
2:19
been moving From one
2:22
place to another and there's a lot going
2:24
on with everyone So we can't run the
2:26
show this week, but we'll be back next
2:28
week and soon we will have I
2:31
believe hopefully Danny Sheehan on with
2:35
also with Kevin Wright On
2:38
the advocacy ad that's
2:40
can't remember his the name of his
2:42
group But
2:44
it's you you AP transparency.
2:46
It's basically the subtitle of
2:48
it they'll both be
2:50
on crossfire coming up soon, so Keep
2:54
in mind that's every Thursday night generally speaking
2:56
except for this week so our guest tonight
2:58
Jim low He has done a lot of
3:01
research into what
3:03
it would be like to have a UFO briefing
3:05
book a guide for Congress
3:07
or someone if they were
3:09
looking into this topic in a serious way and
3:12
he had some UFO encounters when he was young
3:14
and I'm going to bring him in
3:16
now and Welcome to the
3:18
show Jim Thank you
3:21
very much Martin And
3:23
as a the watcher of
3:25
YouTube can see you're in sunny weather out
3:27
in, California Which
3:30
is a nice area to be? Not
3:32
only you didn't get caught up in the
3:34
flood you were saying that's that's great. Oh,
3:36
no, I was I'm
3:38
in an area in the mountains that normally gets
3:41
the flooding, but the coast got it this time.
3:43
Oh All right, that's
3:45
good. So So
3:48
thank you for You actually reached
3:50
out to me you had written this book. I think
3:52
it's an interesting book and What
3:56
I guess I want to ask you what inspired you
4:00
to write this in the beginning? Well,
4:05
I'm a retired attorney and for 25 years
4:07
I was going to retire
4:11
and write an election law book. And
4:14
then on my 65th birthday, December 17th, December
4:20
16th, 2017, the Politico and the New York Times came
4:23
out with the three videos. Wow,
4:31
that was like your birthday? Yeah, 65th birthday.
4:35
Now I'll always remember your birthday because I remember
4:37
that date. Me
4:41
and Beethoven. But
4:45
it made me think about what I was doing. Having
4:49
practiced government law for close
4:52
to 40 years, I
4:55
kept my experiences pretty much
4:57
to myself because representing politicians,
5:00
it's not the best thing to do to talk
5:02
about UFO encounters.
5:07
It could be used against you in the courtroom. So
5:10
having practiced election
5:12
law and represented
5:14
local and regional governments, I'd
5:17
always lean that way. But my
5:20
interest has always been something
5:22
I've been kept
5:24
to myself. And then
5:26
when that came out, I
5:28
saw that as a trigger, which
5:31
it certainly did trigger
5:33
things into
5:36
the possibility of disclosure. And
5:39
having worked with hundreds of elected
5:42
officials over the years, I know
5:46
what they go through and what
5:48
they perceive of the world
5:50
around them. And jumping
5:53
off into an issue
5:56
like UFOs, it happened
5:59
at Dennis Kossi. image, you
6:01
know, back in 1992, and I remember that political career.
6:07
Yeah. And, yep. And so I
6:10
saw this as a way to sort
6:13
of educate elected
6:16
officials, primarily. And so I wrote
6:18
the UFO briefing book, a
6:21
congressional guide to the UAP
6:23
phenomenon. Back
6:25
in 2021, six
6:28
months, I got it published
6:32
four months before the director
6:39
of national intelligence issued their
6:41
first preliminary assessment. And
6:43
what I wanted to do is predict what
6:46
they were going to say, and then explain
6:50
members of Congress, what
6:52
would happen if they
6:54
followed certain rules, or
6:56
procedures that would help them sort
6:59
of peel back the onion, so to speak.
7:02
And so I, I
7:04
was writing one book on
7:07
UFOs at the time, and
7:09
I dropped it and picked up this book and wrote
7:11
it in six months and, and
7:13
put it out. Wow. Most
7:15
of the copies that I
7:18
didn't, I didn't market it. I
7:20
went on two podcasts and figured this is
7:22
a waste of time. And
7:25
because at the time, it wasn't, it
7:28
wasn't as big an issue. You know, the
7:30
UFO community was well aware what was going
7:33
on, but the general public
7:35
didn't. And so I what
7:38
I did was I put something
7:40
together, it would be more aimed
7:42
at elected officials and, and
7:44
what they can do within their role.
7:46
And I distributed over 200 copies to
7:50
members of the National Security Committees
7:52
in Congress. And from
7:55
the feedback I've gotten, it
7:57
was well received. And
8:00
And Harry Reid sent
8:02
me a personal note. He was retired at the
8:04
time, saying that
8:07
it was done well and that he was
8:09
happy for my interest in this vital subject.
8:13
And so while I
8:15
was writing, I was sending the books, I
8:17
wasn't getting a response. And I don't live
8:19
in Washington or play along
8:22
Washington. You've
8:27
had people on the deal in
8:29
Washington, but I was looking at
8:31
it as an outsider from the
8:33
political perspective, how they
8:35
would go about this. And
8:38
so I predicted that
8:41
the intelligence and the military would
8:43
slow walk anything. They would be
8:45
like pulling teeth and
8:49
that they'd
8:51
have to boost the protections
8:53
for whistleblowers, put
8:56
together legislation
9:00
to allow the release of
9:04
NDAs, non-disclosure agreements.
9:09
I have a friend,
9:11
Robert Salihas, who
9:15
was forced to sign one of those agreements and
9:17
never seen a copy of it. So
9:22
I started down that road and
9:24
made some recommendations. And so far,
9:27
most of the recommendations I've put
9:29
together have been put into law.
9:32
Now whether that's coincidence or not, I
9:34
don't know, but I know I
9:36
was along that path. So I have
9:38
a new book out now, Threat to
9:40
the Body Politic from Foo Fighters
9:44
to UAP. And
9:46
that's also available at bookstores
9:48
in Amazon. In
9:52
that book, I try to go back
9:54
to the beginnings of what the,
9:56
not the UFO policy is, whether
9:59
they're real. or not, because lots of
10:01
people have done that. And
10:03
I went back and looked at how
10:06
the process began that
10:11
led to the stigma that we
10:13
all feel about the subject. And centered
10:16
on the Robertson panel in 1953. Yeah,
10:20
and there's been a
10:22
lot written on the Robertson panel,
10:25
but mostly saying that they
10:27
got the UFO issue wrong. And
10:30
I ignored that part of it pretty much,
10:32
and looked at what they did
10:35
that sort of start the debunking
10:37
process. And so I traced
10:40
through declassified records and
10:43
stories mostly from government
10:45
officials, either state,
10:47
local or federal, how
10:50
they were cast
10:54
and treated very unfairly.
10:57
Now your typical person who saw UFO
10:59
back then was
11:02
usually just lights in the sky. But
11:05
when you had someone like Rex
11:07
Heflin in 1965, who
11:10
saw a structured craft, very
11:13
close, took three Polaroids at a
11:16
time when trying to fake a
11:18
Polaroid was near impossible for
11:20
a traffic engineer, let
11:24
alone someone in Hollywood, that
11:27
you know, the way he was
11:30
approached, the way they stole his
11:32
photographs, I
11:34
found a pattern of these kinds of things in
11:37
the records. Many of the
11:39
records were like
11:41
I found civil
11:43
rights violations in the FBI records
11:45
committed by the Air Force, but
11:48
the FBI didn't have records about
11:50
their violations. Those I
11:52
found in CIA records. And so
11:55
a lot of cross-checking of records,
11:57
I was able to come up with a- a- a
12:01
series of they couldn't be coincidences.
12:03
They were just so many times
12:06
where they people would
12:08
approach the government say I've got
12:10
the Theirs is the famous
12:12
picture. I've been on that street looking
12:15
that direction. There's a big shopping mall
12:17
there now But
12:19
uh, I don't doubt it. Yeah. Yeah,
12:21
it's like everything else in California. It's a
12:24
mall Yeah This
12:26
is the one right outside of his pickup truck
12:28
window Yeah, first first
12:31
Polaroid I believe and the
12:33
last one I don't the last one I
12:35
don't see it. It shows like a streak
12:37
of smoke if I remember right? Yep a
12:39
smoke ring that he never showed up Yeah,
12:41
yeah, yeah a smoke ring and is in
12:44
his co-workers laughed at it. So he
12:46
never showed it around So when the
12:48
quote unquote nor read Officers
12:52
show up and he gave
12:54
his photographs to them They
12:57
disappeared for 22 years and they returned them
13:00
to him when he was dying
13:02
of cancer in retirement And
13:05
so someone had to hold on to those photographs
13:08
for 22 year 27 years almost
13:12
actually and So
13:15
I found a pattern of these kinds of
13:17
things where your typical person
13:20
was who took a picture of a
13:22
UFO They
13:24
showed a structured craft not lights in the sky,
13:27
but You know
13:29
the type of pictures that would not
13:31
be considered swamp gas, you know There
13:34
there wouldn't be an explanation for that.
13:36
They would take these pictures and Most
13:39
them they had no interest in the
13:41
UFO subject before they took the pictures
13:44
Each one of them approached the government to
13:47
say I've got these do you
13:49
want them and? I want
13:51
them back and they take them and steal
13:53
them never give them back Anything
13:56
Rex heffernan's case they claimed he
13:58
was a hoaxer How
14:01
many hope there's turnover their originals to
14:03
the government? Yeah, that's right.
14:06
This is a smoke. That's it So
14:08
yes, and they're in this They
14:13
for years they were in the safe. I'm trying
14:15
to members of female Ufologists
14:18
are really well known in California. I can't
14:20
remember her name. I spoke with her
14:22
daughter. Her daughter was on my show Anyway,
14:25
they were in there in their safe. They're
14:27
in the safe in their house. Oh, really?
14:29
Okay Yes, yes. Yeah. Yeah.
14:32
Yeah. I'm drawing a blank on her
14:34
name too, but yeah She's really well
14:36
known she passed away. I think
14:38
maybe five or six years ago very well
14:40
known She wrote
14:43
the book firestorm about
14:45
all right. I'm gonna look her up just because
14:47
I want to pay good tribute to her But
14:52
anyway, so let's talk
14:54
about you you had You
14:59
had a you some UFO sightings Yourself,
15:03
right? Oh, yes. I'm
15:06
what is generically called an
15:09
experiencer and
15:11
so I've had experiences pretty
15:14
much my whole life and First
15:17
when I remember I was five and a half
15:19
years old It was
15:21
the weekend before kindergarten
15:24
started and I was
15:26
out in the country with my dad and my
15:29
aunt and uncle and their family camping
15:32
and and I was I Was
15:36
five and a half and the next Youngest
15:39
person was about 13. So
15:42
there was a big gap between everyone and
15:45
I was very hyperactive and so they
15:47
they told me You
15:49
know, why don't you just look
15:51
up at the sky and look for Sputnik, you
15:54
know to keep me busy And
15:56
while they were sitting over in campfire drinking
15:59
and telling stories or and
16:04
I looked off to a cow pasture that was
16:06
about 500 to 1000 feet away from us and I saw this
16:11
object that was probably the size of
16:14
a full moon and
16:16
it was dripping metal off of it. It
16:18
looked like it was and it was shooting
16:21
off sparks. In fact I
16:23
talked to Colonel Halt
16:26
about it because it looked remarkably
16:28
like the one at Rambleton Forest.
16:31
Right, he said it looked like an eyeball and it
16:33
was dripping magna. Exactly.
16:36
And this was late summer
16:38
and the cow pasture was
16:40
dry and so whatever it
16:42
was it didn't
16:45
you know it didn't catch fire. So
16:47
I remember looking looking
16:50
at it and then looking back at
16:52
my family and
16:55
they were all just staring with
16:57
their mouths open dumbfounded. Later
16:59
on I sort of compared it to
17:02
a Steven Spielberg movie where they always
17:04
had normal people just looking perplexed
17:08
and it reminded me
17:10
of a few scenes of Close Encounters. But
17:13
I'm looking at them and that's the
17:15
last thing I remember. And
17:18
I remember waking up the next morning and
17:22
coming out outside
17:25
from the ref cabin that the
17:28
family was working on. And
17:31
everyone was sitting around the campfire having
17:34
breakfast drinking coffee and talking about
17:37
the comet they saw. So
17:40
being a five and a half year old I
17:42
thought comets just flew over cow pastures and you
17:45
know and so
17:48
you know I go wow and
17:50
now I've seen a comet. So
17:53
the next morning is Monday and
17:55
I'm going off to kindergarten. I
17:57
think that's one of the reasons I remember this so well
17:59
because it's It was right at that
18:01
time in my life, whenever you started,
18:05
you remember long
18:07
bits of time. And
18:10
I asked my dad what he thought, wasn't
18:12
that neat seeing the comet? And my
18:14
dad said, I don't know what you're talking about. And
18:18
so I just sort of dropped it, went
18:21
off to kindergarten. So
18:24
later on, I'm in
18:27
high school and then going into
18:29
college, and I still have this
18:31
impression that comets are really big
18:33
things that stop and everything else. And
18:36
I knew from science books that that didn't make
18:38
sense. And then I
18:40
actually saw my first comet when
18:42
I was in my teens or
18:45
early 20s. And I
18:47
remember how disappointed I was. I go,
18:49
that's not big. It didn't have
18:51
metal dripping off of it. It's
18:54
funny how I kept that,
18:57
not only that memory, but that understanding
18:59
despite the fact that I learned in
19:01
science. Well, before you
19:03
move on to anything else, I'd like to
19:06
tell you about an encounter that
19:09
was told to me by someone not
19:11
really into the UFO world or whatever,
19:13
just someone I know in the outside
19:15
world. She's actually an
19:18
author of antique books and things like
19:20
that. And she was a
19:22
Girl Scout. And they
19:24
were on an island on
19:27
a lake. And they were camping out.
19:29
They had the campfire going. And they saw
19:31
this thing come over them. She
19:34
said it kind of looked like the size of the moon
19:36
type of thing. It came over them and then it appeared
19:38
to be right over them. And
19:40
she said the next thing she remembers, she woke
19:42
up in the morning in her
19:44
tent and was
19:47
asking the different
19:50
people, hey, what about what we saw
19:52
last night? And they said they didn't
19:54
remember or they didn't know anything. And
19:56
then to the leader, the Girl Scout
19:58
leader, she said, that don't you even
20:01
think about talking about it. That's
20:03
what she said to her. So
20:05
that was her impression. I mean, there
20:07
is some similarities there. That's why I
20:10
thought I'd bring it up. That was-
20:12
No, it's good. Exactly. You know, about
20:15
2012, 2013, I
20:19
decided I was just gonna sort
20:21
of open up my mind and talk to
20:24
people about this. And so I started going
20:26
to conferences. And what I found is listening
20:30
to the speakers was nice, but
20:32
talking to other experiences over
20:34
there, ones that have had
20:37
these experiences, I joined Yvonne
20:39
Smith's- Oh, yeah. CERO
20:42
group, the Close Encounters
20:44
Resource Organization. And
20:47
I've learned more from other
20:49
experiences than I've learned from
20:52
all the books and all the podcasts,
20:54
no offense. But in fact, probably
20:56
a lot of your listeners fit
20:58
in the same category as me. And
21:04
you learn so much and
21:07
you stop being surprised about
21:09
similarities like that. Right.
21:12
Yeah. Yeah. I
21:15
do think it's funny. You hear a
21:17
lot of people say either they
21:19
don't talk about it the next day or
21:23
people don't remember, which is really, I
21:26
mean, it's such a dramatic
21:28
situation. I
21:31
recently listened to the Allagash. The
21:35
Allagash incident, the two, it
21:38
was Jim Weiner and Charlie
21:41
Foltz that were talking about it. And I got to
21:43
meet them at that conference they were at, but I
21:45
was listening to it again. And it's
21:48
basically the same thing. It
21:50
happened to them and they just like move
21:52
on and boy, that's strange. The fire had
21:55
burned down. And if anyone wants to check
21:57
out that case, it's a fascinating case and
21:59
eyes on. Cinema on
22:01
YouTube has posted the conference that I
22:03
was at where they spoke. It's very
22:05
interesting Their whole
22:08
whole life all for them their
22:10
lives changed and they never really
22:12
realized they were abducted until you
22:14
know Ten years after but their
22:17
whole life's changed in their artwork. They were
22:19
all artists their artwork all changed dramatically and
22:22
Since that encounter which is
22:25
another fascinating thing when
22:27
people's lives change Ivan
22:30
Smith has written a book
22:32
called Coronado. Oh, yeah a
22:35
joint abduction and the
22:37
day after they all the group Left
22:41
the conference and drove
22:43
back to Los Angeles in different cars.
22:46
They were meeting at a restaurant up
22:49
the coast towards LA and And
22:53
They were most Mostly irritated with each other
22:55
and didn't want to talk about it and
22:57
a lot of them never talked to each
23:00
other again They were friends before and
23:02
so something drove them apart How
23:05
about that? Yeah, I remember her
23:07
talking about that. I had her on the show years ago When
23:11
I think actually before she wrote the book
23:13
or maybe about that same time But
23:16
I know the hotel I used to go there
23:18
when I lived in the sandy in San Diego
23:20
area Years ago beautiful
23:22
beautiful place. That was a strange
23:24
encounter. That's another one to look
23:26
up This
23:28
is a question we have dr. Richardson
23:31
about every show. Thank you for the
23:33
questions I do have any theories
23:35
about what the visitors are up to I Think
23:41
my thinking is they're not here to
23:43
take us over because I
23:50
Don't I don't believe this is the
23:52
case, but let's assume they got here in World War
23:54
two the Foodfighters
23:56
started showing up You
23:59
Know. If gonna attack
24:01
somebody. You. Don't wait eighty
24:03
years till they get. Better.
24:05
Able to defend themselves in
24:07
the Us? I don't I
24:09
don't think they're ousted overtly
24:11
do that, but I think
24:13
it's a mixed bag. My
24:16
guess is a mixed bag
24:18
of different ethnicities. And
24:20
from different locations? Perhaps not
24:22
all from this dimension. And
24:25
dungeons I think that some
24:27
of mean well and others
24:29
are probably just ah in
24:32
mop in my a book.
24:34
Threat. To the body politic and the last
24:36
chapter I talk about. The
24:39
are probably for to ever get. Excuse
24:43
me. They're. Probably for
24:45
different categories. There's a because I'm
24:47
right. that book I wrote. To.
24:51
Inform Congress and they have
24:53
the knowledge of your listener
24:55
base. You. Know they're learning
24:57
this from scratch. My An
24:59
so the first possibilities hostility
25:02
and I don't To the
25:04
reason I said, I don't
25:06
think they're hostile in that
25:08
regard. The next is transactional.
25:11
That they're here for resources
25:13
just like. You. Know
25:15
Chevron goes to I
25:18
Nigeria. You know to
25:20
drill for oil. You. Know they're
25:22
doing that kind of thing,
25:24
as that's one possibility. Someone
25:26
could just be here for
25:29
purely transactional purposes. In possibly
25:31
the abduction program is that.
25:33
Ah, In that the hybrid
25:35
Isation program. I'm then
25:38
there could be it could
25:40
be entering a third down.
25:42
Agree. That. They're.
25:44
Just years you observe because
25:47
we've got nuclear weapons. And
25:49
we're trying to launch into space.
25:52
and so you know what you
25:54
want to keep an eye on
25:56
the local i'm civilization like that
25:59
isn't and is that
26:01
they're positive and
26:04
a fourth is that they're
26:06
positive. And if
26:10
they were, are they
26:12
really going to just show up and say, hey we're
26:14
here, hi, you know,
26:16
no they're not. There are
26:19
probably protocols in place to keep societies
26:22
like ours from not
26:25
going through the right steps. And
26:29
you know, just you don't hand,
26:33
you don't hand people, you know, in the
26:35
Middle Ages nuclear weapons. Yeah,
26:37
you know, you don't give them machine guns. You
26:41
know, you don't, you know, if we were to
26:43
go back in time. So they
26:46
would, you know, I'm
26:48
not just taking this from Star Trek, I really
26:50
think there has to be some sort of ground
26:53
rules that civilizations have
26:56
when they approach a society
26:58
like ours. Because you
27:01
want them to develop naturally, where they're
27:03
not just going to be
27:05
given something ahead of time and jump
27:07
into space and start trying to take
27:09
over other planets. And, you
27:13
know, once you achieve that nuclear
27:15
stage, see, notice
27:18
that all, you know, the biggest portion
27:20
of our understanding
27:22
of UFOs comes from the
27:25
1940s on. And
27:27
so what were we doing
27:29
then? We're putting together a nuclear weapon. And
27:32
so even if they're supportive
27:34
of us, I would think
27:37
that they would sit back and wait. And
27:39
that's what they've been doing. Curt
27:43
Jaimungal Yeah, yeah, this there hasn't, there
27:45
hasn't been a lot of interference.
27:47
You know, that is
27:50
a question a lot of people
27:52
ask, you know, like, what, why don't they
27:54
show themselves, you know, show themselves on
27:57
the White House lawn, blah, blah, blah, you hear
27:59
that a lot of times. all the time, things like that. And,
28:03
you know, I think there's definitely fears
28:06
involved here, like what do they want?
28:09
You know, why are they even here to begin with,
28:11
you know, that type of thing, whatever
28:14
they are. And I think
28:16
you're right, too. I don't think
28:19
it's just one type of
28:21
situation, one type of entity,
28:23
whatever that is showing
28:25
up here. I think it could
28:27
be a lot
28:30
of different things. And, you know, there's
28:32
always the argument from skeptics that they
28:34
could never get here. It's too
28:37
far to travel and all
28:39
that. But obviously, whatever
28:41
is getting here has figured out how to get
28:43
here, wherever they're from.
28:45
Here's It is Ryan here and
28:48
I have a question for you. What do
28:50
you do when you win? Like are
28:52
you a fist pumper, a woohooer, a hand
28:54
clapper, a high fiver? I kinda like to
28:57
high five, but if you wanna hone in
28:59
on those winning moves, check out Chumba Casino.
29:01
At chumbacasino.com, choose from hundreds of social casino
29:03
style games for your chance to redeem serious
29:06
cash prizes. There are new game releases weekly,
29:08
plus free daily bonuses. So don't wait, start
29:10
having the most fun ever at chumbacasino.com. No
29:13
purchase necessary. VGW, void or prohibited by law.
29:15
See terms and conditions. off?
29:18
Tired of wasting time and money on starvation
29:21
diets that lead to more frustration and stress?
29:23
If there was a weight loss solution that
29:25
could actually work for you, would you try
29:27
it? Then head to golo.com. I'm Steve.
29:29
I lost 138 I'm
29:33
Amber, I've lost 128 pounds with Golo. pounds with
29:35
GoLo. If you're ready to take back
29:37
control If you're ready to take back control of your life, head to
29:40
golo.com now and see how Golo can work
29:42
for you. That's golo.com. My
29:44
sleep is way better. My inflammation
29:47
has gone way. surgery
30:06
found a better way to
30:09
lose weight with Golo. Your
30:11
healthier and happier life begins
30:13
at golo.com. That's golo.com. Again,
30:15
G-O-L-O dot com. You know there's
30:18
just too many things that
30:21
have been witnessed to say otherwise
30:24
you know at this point. So
30:27
how do you think the
30:29
government's been handling the situation?
30:33
That's a schizophrenic answer. I'm
30:40
expectedly disappointed
30:42
in the defense and intelligence
30:45
communities. But
30:47
I'm very happy with how
30:49
Congress has handled this. Until
30:53
this last year, you
30:55
haven't had a
30:58
lot of pushback and the
31:01
recent pushback, I don't want to go down that
31:03
rabbit hole, but when
31:05
was the last time you ever
31:08
heard Congress passing laws three years
31:10
in a row on the same
31:12
subject? They usually get it done
31:16
in one year and I've
31:19
worked on legislation for years. What
31:22
you do is you put together a package to
31:25
address whatever the issue is.
31:27
It takes compromises. You
31:29
finally put it together.
31:32
Everyone's happy. You pass it. You cut
31:34
the ribbon. You
31:37
have your congratulations, then you
31:39
move on to the next topic. Here,
31:42
occasionally you'll bring back
31:44
what curative legislation it's called where
31:47
you made a mistake. But both
31:49
in the Trump administration
31:52
and the Biden administration,
31:54
you did not have
31:57
overt pushback of the Congress. on
32:01
these issues. The pushback
32:03
came from below. And
32:06
so look at it this way. I think,
32:09
you know, right now, you know,
32:11
the Trump administration, the actual presidential
32:13
admin, the office of the president,
32:17
didn't really push back to this. And
32:21
then when Biden came in, you
32:23
don't have the same kind of pushbacks. He signed all
32:26
the bills. In
32:28
the first bill, he
32:31
issued a signing statement that
32:33
said that the National Defense
32:35
Authorization Act of 2022 adopted
32:37
in 2021, they always do
32:39
it a year ahead of
32:41
the fiscal year. That
32:44
particular signing statement
32:48
pointed to the Defense Act, which
32:50
is a massive bill, and
32:52
said, we're going to
32:54
comply with request for information from
32:56
Congress, as long as it
32:59
doesn't reveal battle plans, or
33:01
the names of confidential
33:03
sources, or that kind of thing.
33:07
But he never applied it to UFOs.
33:10
In fact, none of the examples they
33:12
listed, they were all about
33:14
the Afghanistan war and the Iraq war. And
33:18
also Central Command and their
33:20
battle plans for some reason.
33:23
But nothing about UFOs. And so, you
33:25
know, you've got Joe Biden, who's
33:28
the Senate guy. I
33:30
mean, that's his, that's
33:33
his foundation is the Senate. And
33:36
you've got pretty much the leading
33:38
group on this has been the select
33:41
committee on intelligence in
33:43
the Senate. And they've
33:46
been passing out this
33:48
legislation on 17 to
33:50
zero votes. I
33:52
mean, they can't agree that the sun
33:55
is coming up tomorrow. Yeah, I
33:57
know. You know, And
34:00
so we're talking
34:02
about a unique window here
34:05
where as long as
34:07
it stays bipartisan, we
34:10
could make tremendous progress. I
34:12
mean, we've made, they've made
34:14
more progress than the last five years than
34:16
they've made in the last 80. And
34:20
so, you know, you've got
34:22
a core of people. And the interesting thing
34:25
is, if it was just the
34:28
national security people, you're
34:31
going to have senators or senators or congressmen,
34:34
they're going to vote no on the bill,
34:37
because or try to take out
34:39
the UFO stuff, because they think it's crazy.
34:42
Nobody did that. Until,
34:44
you know, this recent thing here, you
34:47
don't have that. So, you know,
34:49
when you're talking about, you
34:51
know, especially a defense
34:53
and intelligence committees, they're
34:58
bipartisan, you know, they have
35:00
people from both parties. And so, you
35:02
know, if you're a rank and file congressman,
35:05
and you're trying to figure out what about this UFO
35:07
bill in
35:10
the National Defense Authorization Act? And
35:13
so they're going to ask one of their
35:15
colleagues, it's, you know, from their party that
35:17
agrees with them, you know, if you're a
35:19
Republican, you're going to ask Mike Gallagher, why
35:23
do you have this crazy stuff in here? He'd
35:26
say, leave it alone. I
35:28
know what I'm talking about. Yeah, you
35:31
know, they're gonna, they
35:33
know so much more than they're telling us
35:35
right now, while they're still because they're still
35:37
trying to figure it out. They
35:40
can't tell us at every stage. But
35:42
there comes a point they're going to have to tell us. And
35:46
you probably what my
35:48
suggestion is
35:51
that they do
35:53
internal briefings on each step.
35:56
Yes, they're real. Yes, they're
35:58
from someplace else know they're not
36:00
from Russia. No, they're not from China.
36:03
They're from someplace else. And
36:05
then next step do another set
36:08
of reasons. They've been doing that since
36:10
1947 though, you know, with the twining
36:13
memo and you know, oh, I agree, this
36:16
is not fictitious. This is real. It's
36:18
not visionary. You know, I
36:20
mean, it keeps in
36:23
and again in 53,
36:26
50 right after the 52 UFO flap,
36:29
you know, they came out again and basically saying it's
36:31
real, you
36:33
know, but they got it. I guess
36:35
they have to reinforce that. So I'm
36:38
sorry, continue on. I just want to make
36:40
that point. Oh, no, no, no, no. That's
36:42
an excellent point. In 1955,
36:44
Senator Richard Russell with the Russell
36:49
office building is named after was
36:52
on a train going from
36:54
Russia to
36:56
Czechoslovakia on a
36:59
mission, you know, for the
37:02
Senate, you know, an investigation tour.
37:05
And a classic
37:07
Billy Meyer UFO flew
37:10
by the plane and a Russian official came in
37:12
and shut all the curtains. So
37:17
there were press in the car in the
37:19
train car. And so
37:22
later they, you know, it got out what
37:24
happened. And so a lot
37:26
of people were asked questions. And so one of a
37:29
reporter asked Richard Russell,
37:31
Senator Russell about it. And
37:34
he said, I've been
37:36
advised by the, you
37:39
know, parts of the government
37:41
that are working on this, and it is
37:43
best not for me to talk about it
37:45
now. Okay, that was 1955.
37:47
The Senate until 2017 18. It
37:49
wasn't talking about
37:54
it at all. And so you this
37:56
to me, that's the difference between now
37:58
and back then. Sure is you
38:00
have you have Congress that is interested in
38:03
it. Yeah, and You
38:05
know if you're a whistleblower Are
38:08
you gonna blow the whistle if
38:10
there's no one they're gonna back you up? Now
38:13
we've got someone that's backing them up. And
38:15
so I know Robert Salus is is already
38:19
Spoken to arrow about his
38:21
incident. Yeah, I'll strum
38:23
UFO incident. Yep, and
38:25
it galls me because Sean
38:28
Kirkpatrick Comes out
38:30
after it retires and says there's no
38:32
evidence No
38:34
first-hand witnesses Yeah,
38:36
and he and Sean Kirkpatrick talked
38:39
to Bob Salus I
38:41
know he did and same as I I brought
38:43
this up many times in the show that also
38:45
Some of this been on the show. I'm a
38:47
friend with his Mario Woods who has Talked
38:50
four hours to them, you know,
38:52
yeah or ours to be exact four
38:54
hours in 19 minutes. He always puts that in But
38:57
yeah, you know first-hand witness again
39:00
Yeah, so no first-hand witness is no evidence
39:03
Yeah, so I think arrow was just
39:05
is just window dressing, you know, we'll
39:07
either Maybe
39:09
the under new leadership. It'll be different, but
39:12
I don't have any real hopes for it
39:15
well, we'll find out in June
39:17
of 2024 when they
39:20
release and they will they won't release it
39:22
on time because they haven't released anything on
39:24
time Yeah, since arrow
39:26
took over but uh,
39:28
whenever they release the history of
39:30
UFO Information
39:34
then we'll know whether they're
39:36
they're Serious
39:42
actors or not, but see you
39:44
can come forward now and You
39:47
know Dave Gresham there are many others
39:49
besides him that have come forward that
39:51
we don't know yet and
39:55
So they they have to
39:57
educate themselves because if they to
40:00
do this if the Republicans tried to
40:02
do this alone or the Democrats, the
40:04
other sides are going to go, you're crazy. They've
40:08
got to do it together. And
40:11
considering that political environment are in,
40:13
it's difficult to do things together.
40:17
And so they've got to figure out a
40:19
way. And so my goal has been, well,
40:22
I haven't worked in Congress myself.
40:24
I've worked with elected officials. And
40:29
for decades, and sit
40:32
down with them, and how do
40:34
you want to do this? Well, if you do
40:36
it that way, it's
40:39
all going to fall apart. But if
40:41
you try this, maybe it'll work. And I'm
40:44
not always right, but I
40:47
see a process that needs to unfold.
40:49
And so besides my book, I started
40:51
a series of blog about
40:56
how they should release,
40:58
how they should start the disclosure
41:00
process. And
41:03
I'll, like the
41:05
book, I'll package it up and, and
41:07
send it to Congress. And, you
41:10
know, if I'm wrong, and there's better way to
41:12
do it, then that's what
41:14
they have staff for. And they
41:17
have, they have good staff
41:19
on this. They have a few staff
41:21
members that are handling this, and they
41:24
will go into some. And they,
41:26
you know, without them know, you
41:29
know, Marco Rubio and Mark Warner,
41:31
the two heads of the
41:33
Senate Intel Committee would not be stepping
41:36
forward. One
41:38
of the things I've thought
41:40
about this, and I don't know, I'm just
41:42
trying to get your opinion on it, is
41:44
that I think they don't
41:46
know the whole picture. And because
41:48
they don't know the whole picture, then
41:51
they can't say that they can protect us
41:53
from it. Right, whatever it
41:55
is. And so that's why I think disclosure is
41:57
going to be very difficult for
41:59
our government to actually come all
42:01
out and say, look, we are being
42:03
visited and we
42:05
don't know exactly what it is. So
42:10
I don't know, you know, I don't know
42:12
if if if we'll
42:14
ever get to that point, because, you
42:17
know, it's only my opinion, but I don't really think
42:19
they know the whole picture. Oh,
42:21
I agree with you on that.
42:24
They're learning the picture and they're
42:26
learning the picture. But what
42:29
we don't know is how much
42:31
they've learned of the puzzle. Like
42:33
I said at the beginning, it's
42:35
an onion. And my guess
42:37
is there are layer layer five of 40. And
42:42
I'm hoping we can keep this going till they
42:44
get to layer 40. So they can do it
42:46
all. You know, but I agree with you.
42:48
They're not, you know, if if if
42:52
they don't know if they're
42:54
worried about hostility, they're not going to bring
42:56
it out. Yeah, especially.
43:00
Yep, this just put up a
43:02
couple of questions here. Has the
43:04
disclosure act been watered down? Yes.
43:07
Yeah, quite a bit, actually. Yeah,
43:10
quite a bit. Yeah, yeah. You
43:12
know, Tim Berchette's done an
43:14
awful lot for UFO
43:18
disclosure. But when
43:21
you compared his bill in
43:23
the house to the
43:25
Mike rounds, Chuck Schumer bill
43:27
in the Senate, I
43:30
Mean, That
44:00
their yeah. They both said
44:02
that they're going to press
44:05
forward and try this year
44:07
to. I reconsidered adopted in
44:10
the difference between the two
44:12
Bill says that's ah, under
44:14
the house version. The
44:17
i'm a lot of the
44:19
power for this is left
44:21
with the agency's themselves old
44:23
the records when you have
44:25
an independent commission. That
44:28
is I badgered and
44:31
I had chosen by.
44:34
The entire senate. You're
44:37
gonna have a better chance. With.
44:39
This independent group. Considering
44:42
now this out. You.
44:45
Can you can yell at me and
44:47
I'll stop? but I'll talk a little
44:49
bit about the legal stuff. The standard
44:52
in the bill is that. Ah,
44:55
an independent group. Must.
44:58
Be convinced by clear and
45:00
convincing evidence that the raptors
45:03
his say secret. Clear
45:05
and convincing evidence is the highest
45:07
civil standard there is. It's not
45:10
beyond a reasonable doubt, the criminals
45:12
setting, but it takes a hell
45:14
of a lot of evidence. Ah,
45:17
you know to be able to say
45:19
that south. You know if there are.
45:22
You. Know breakthroughs on. You.
45:24
Know propulsion nurse? You know you
45:26
don't. We don't also turn over
45:28
nuclear weapons. Animate Thors? Yeah, So.
45:31
Those should stay in all
45:33
his you know is classified
45:35
as possible. But you
45:38
know the fact it's you know, pictures
45:40
like the one you showed of Rex
45:42
Heflin took. Yeah, you know, Those
45:45
need to be released from. India
45:50
Is he a fee he bought? Salah
45:52
says I'll wave my privacy rights and
45:54
you can release. The End The A.
45:58
Then. it's released You
46:00
know, you don't give the military the
46:02
chance to to say no first and
46:05
this commission would have done that and
46:08
uh Just
46:10
by the fact that it was
46:12
a bill by my grounds You
46:15
know, uh a quality senator,
46:17
you know high up in the ranks
46:19
of the Republican side And
46:22
chuck schumer. I cannot remember
46:24
the last time The majority
46:27
leader or minority leader in either
46:29
house Actually sponsored
46:31
a bill. You don't see
46:33
nancy plosie's name on bills And
46:36
chuck schumer did this himself That
46:39
is That doesn't get
46:41
that means That biden didn't
46:43
have a problem with it because
46:46
the The
46:48
democratic leader of the senate would not put
46:51
a bill out that makes the president look
46:53
bad Of his own party.
46:55
I never ever thought of that. Yeah Yeah,
46:59
and and so and the
47:02
combination chuck schumer Uh,
47:04
mitch mcconnell when he started having some
47:06
of his episodes Uh,
47:08
you know where he couldn't talk for a while uh,
47:11
he started delegating work and
47:16
Uh, my grounds ended up with
47:18
the uap portfolio on this
47:21
at least this is my outside reading and
47:23
chuck schumer and my grounds are also Are
47:27
going to be the two point people for
47:29
both parties in the senate
47:31
on ai So
47:34
look at that you've got ufos
47:37
and ai I
47:39
mean, can you think of two future things
47:42
bigger than those two and the same two
47:44
guys on both sides of the aisle are
47:46
working together Yeah Now
47:49
they'll still argue about abortion and
47:52
gun control and You
47:54
know the border and all that and
47:56
and we can't wish everyone to
47:58
be queued by ah But But on this
48:00
issue, you know, if you step out
48:02
and you ain't gonna stay, they're jumping
48:05
off a bridge that they don't know where
48:07
the bottom is. It's
48:09
better to do it together. Yeah,
48:12
then separately. Yeah, that's
48:14
right. I was actually at the hearing
48:17
this last July and it was really
48:20
very I was so second to last
48:22
person in the door with my producer
48:24
and Chris Lito. So
48:28
we were all in there watching and
48:30
it was really amazing to
48:33
see what
48:35
is it AOC on
48:38
one side and Mac Gates on the other
48:40
side and them all just getting along and
48:42
discussing, you know, the topic and
48:44
having, you know, it was a
48:48
clear bipartisan, you
48:50
know, issue that they were
48:53
really looking and taking seriously and
48:55
working together. So that was
48:57
yeah, that was really very I
49:00
felt it was very historic. It
49:02
was and there
49:04
wouldn't be another subject rather than happen. I
49:08
don't think so. And you know,
49:10
there was like, I've said this before in the show, there was over
49:12
1000 people that showed up for those 30 seats.
49:15
And I wasn't there at 540am. I
49:18
would have never gotten in, you know, you thought
49:20
at 540 and you're the last two people in.
49:23
Yeah, but there were people that cut in front of us quite a few.
49:26
Oh, yeah. Yeah. Certain people,
49:28
George Knapp, Jeremy Corbell, you know, people like that. Yeah.
49:32
Yeah. Well,
49:35
George is a true journalist, but
49:37
yeah, they should they should wait
49:39
their turn. Yeah. But
49:43
except for Virginia Fox, a
49:45
Congresswoman from North Carolina, she
49:48
bashed, spent her five
49:50
minutes bashing the Biden administration over
49:52
the Chinese balloon incident. Besides
49:55
that, I
49:57
mean, it was amazingly bipartisan. Mm-hmm.
50:00
Amazingly. And you know,
50:03
you have to remember that's the commit the hunter
50:05
Biden committee. I mean, yep.
50:09
You know, that's what Biden crime family
50:11
committee yet Chuck Schumer, when he put
50:13
his bill together, uh, with
50:16
Mike rounds, the overseer
50:19
of that, the committee
50:22
that would review the documents to
50:24
see whether they should be released
50:26
the oversight by the house was
50:29
the over house oversight committee. So
50:32
the most contentious committee on
50:35
the other side was written into
50:37
the bill in UFOs, having
50:40
oversight authority. Cause if
50:42
Matt Gaetz complained that they didn't have
50:45
access to secrets, you
50:47
know, at that hearing, and,
50:49
uh, the reason they didn't
50:51
is because when they adopted the
50:53
original bill in 2021, uh, they
50:57
listed who the appropriate committees
50:59
were to receive classified information
51:02
and they're up to 12, but oversight isn't
51:04
on the 12th. So
51:06
there are already almost 200 members
51:10
of Congress out of the 535 that are
51:12
on these
51:15
committees. So you've got a core, you
51:17
got about 40% of Congress already.
51:20
That are, are they
51:23
made all show up for all the hearings
51:25
on this or the, the classified briefings, but
51:28
you're talking about a big group of people.
51:31
So it's not a question of, you
51:34
know, educating everyone. It'll take a year
51:36
and a half. They can, they
51:38
can spread out pretty quick and educate them.
51:42
Uh, and when you start
51:44
seeing briefings like that, you
51:46
notice closures coming. Right.
51:48
Um, yeah, I hope so. I know that,
51:51
uh, Lou Lou Elizondo
51:53
had said 2024 Is
51:56
the big year, whatever that means, Will
51:58
I, I've been communicating. With him,
52:00
but directly by with his wife. And.
52:02
I know that tough as soon as his
52:05
new book comes out he'll be are coming
52:07
on podcast skin and our job Good like
52:09
it. like to hear more what he asked
52:11
to say. I'm. So. I'm
52:14
gonna shift gears a little bit and just,
52:16
well, maybe or maybe not. Have you ever
52:18
had. Any other you know advance
52:20
any other you fo sightings in your life or
52:22
was that the was that the one and only
52:24
one. I've I've
52:27
had dozens and dozens.
52:29
Yes, Ah,
52:32
Unexplained. I'm
52:34
pretty much all I I've
52:36
done regressions with of on
52:38
Smith yeah and of only
52:41
pulls out limited information very
52:43
little. ah she teases me
52:45
that I'm a lawyer and
52:47
I don't follow direction very
52:49
well as and so that's
52:51
probably yeah. my block as
52:53
murder do I think with
52:55
them and done aspects. I've.
53:00
I've had. My
53:02
Us, you know the actual
53:05
sightings I've had a few
53:07
best frankly some of the
53:09
other paranormal behavior. You. Know
53:11
stands out to be more. Like.
53:13
Guy. Ah in the
53:16
last. Fifteen. Years?
53:18
Yeah, actually yeah, that
53:20
is. Twelve.
53:23
Or thirteen years I'd say. I
53:25
vibe is. I started getting into
53:28
this more. Ah,
53:30
I've had. A
53:32
couple of instances of missing
53:35
time where. Things.
53:37
On. I've
53:40
ended up in in
53:42
my hotel room in
53:44
various times. Twice is
53:46
for. To. Significant times
53:48
where something has appeared in
53:51
the room. That.
53:54
Sort. Of started between a i'm laying in
53:57
bed and is between me and the. The.
53:59
Air. where the TV is, not
54:01
from the TV, but where
54:04
like a bubble sort of would form.
54:08
And then I'd see visions. And
54:11
I had one when
54:14
I was at the International UFO Conference
54:16
in Arizona, where
54:19
all of a sudden I wake up at
54:22
about three o'clock and
54:27
this greenish light is starting to
54:29
form like thousands
54:32
of tiny lights that merge into
54:34
one and form
54:36
sort of an oblong
54:38
three-dimensional area that
54:40
was sort of like a plasma or something. And
54:43
then from that, I
54:46
actually saw images. First,
54:51
the one that stood out, I could have reached
54:53
out and touched it as I was
54:55
sitting up. I
55:00
saw this like three
55:02
foot silver metallic domino sort
55:04
of looking thing. And on the
55:06
top, in the base
55:09
relief, it had a classic UFO with a
55:12
line going down like a beam
55:15
or something. And the second
55:17
half of the domino had
55:19
a DNA strand in it.
55:23
But the DNA strand had hundreds of
55:27
DNA strands in it.
55:29
And out of
55:31
those strands popped like a
55:33
symbol. And I just
55:35
kept staring at that simple symbol. I've
55:40
got to remember this. I kept telling myself,
55:42
I got to remember this, got to remember
55:44
this. And then all of a sudden, the
55:47
symbol disappeared. And it went right out
55:49
of my head. I just
55:53
lost all knowledge. And so I'm
55:55
totally disturbed. And then the whole
55:57
thing tricks down to nothing and
55:59
leaves. Well, you
56:01
hear that a lot that something shrinks down to
56:03
nothing. Yeah. And disappears. Listen,
56:06
we're just about out of time here. So
56:09
and that was quite a
56:11
fantastic story to end
56:13
the show on. So where can people
56:15
find you and get ahold of
56:18
your or at least get your books? Well,
56:21
my books are available on Amazon for
56:23
sure. And starting to
56:25
be available in other places had
56:27
had a few problems in production.
56:31
But I have
56:33
a website JPL
56:36
UFO dot com. And
56:39
that's right. A lot of time.
56:41
I'm sorry to say we're out of time. I
56:43
will link your website in the
56:46
show notes and in the text below. Thank you
56:48
so much. It's been a real pleasure. Yeah,
56:50
I enjoyed it, Martin. All right. Take
56:52
care. All right, everyone. We'll
56:54
be back next week with Gio Turner.
56:57
She's in the UK and should be an interesting
56:59
show. Thank you. And remember to keep your eyes
57:01
to the sky. Bye.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More