Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
It's Friday , the 9th of February 2024
0:03
.
0:04
The last word in podcasting news
0:06
. This is the Pod News
0:08
Weekly Review with James Cridland
0:11
and Sam Sethi .
0:14
Sam Sethi is away this week , I'm James Cridland
0:16
, the editor of Pod News , and I'm Dave Jones
0:18
from the podcast index In the chapters . Today
0:21
, spotify almost makes money and
0:23
no more exclusives Podcast search
0:25
optimization . It's a thing
0:27
, and is all the money going into
0:29
AI these days Plus ?
0:32
hello . This is Darrell Pataglia from Triton
0:34
Digital . Later we will be talking
0:36
about the US podcast report
0:38
that was just released .
0:39
And I'm Claire Wake-Brown , and
0:42
later on I'll be talking about my
0:44
experience at PodFest .
0:46
They will . This podcast is sponsored
0:48
by Buzzsprout . Podcast hosting made easy with
0:50
easy and powerful tools , free
0:52
learning materials and remarkable customer
0:54
support .
0:55
And we're sponsored by a new show called why your
0:57
Podcast Isn't Growing , a show made
0:59
to help you get more new listeners
1:01
. They've just posted three ways to
1:04
increase the discoverability of your
1:06
podcast for faster growth probably
1:08
something that we'll talk about a little bit later . You
1:10
can find why your Podcast Isn't Growing
1:13
wherever you got this podcast . From
1:15
your daily newsletter , the Pod
1:17
News Weekly Review . Dave
1:20
, thank you so much for doing this . I really
1:22
appreciate it . What is the podcast
1:24
index for people who don't know ?
1:26
first of all , oh goodness , the podcast
1:28
index is primarily
1:30
a podcast directory , but I
1:33
guess the secondary function of it is to
1:35
give podcast apps a
1:38
back end when they don't have one . So back
1:41
ends for podcasting are expensive , got
1:43
to do a lot of aggregation , millions
1:45
of feeds , you know all that kind
1:47
of thing . And so we provide that for free
1:49
and we run on donations , value
1:51
for value model , and that's what we do .
1:53
Yeah , and you
1:55
, so you run that , and you also
1:58
I get the feeling
2:00
by accident Are
2:02
the head wrangler of podcasting
2:05
2.0 , which we'll talk
2:07
a little bit more about later
2:09
.
2:10
But it was a lot of things by accident ?
2:12
Yeah , was that a kind of a thing of
2:14
? I get the feeling that
2:16
the podcast index was a thing
2:18
that needed building and is a
2:20
great thing , and we use it for the
2:22
pod news , podcast pages and everything
2:25
else , but I get the feeling that you
2:27
weren't necessarily expecting to be also
2:29
looking after a brand new feature set
2:31
for new podcast apps .
2:33
No , I would say that's fair . Yeah , we
2:35
, we brought out the namespace because we
2:37
needed a couple of features
2:40
and then it just
2:42
became sort of a happy accident that
2:44
the namespace attracted all kinds of you
2:46
know once , once you have ideas for features , then
2:48
10 other people also have ideas because
2:51
things have been building up . So it
2:53
became just sort of a you know campfire
2:55
that everybody could gather around and throw their ideas
2:58
in the pot and before we know it we had
3:00
a burgeoning 2.0 namespace
3:02
and all kinds of things . And you
3:04
know , you , I don't , I don't simply
3:07
maintain it . You all , you're also a maintainer
3:09
on the , on the namespace , and you know
3:11
it's , it's a party .
3:12
Yeah , it is and , yes
3:14
, very much looking forward to . I don't know whether
3:16
or not I can announce it yet , but Daniel J
3:18
Lewis and I have been working on a thing , ideally
3:22
to help people like LTSK bar
3:24
understand a bit more about what podcasting
3:26
2.0 is all about , and
3:29
if I can announce it , then
3:31
I would be announcing that it's . There's
3:33
a website that you can now go and see . It's a podcast
3:35
toorg See what we did there
3:38
. Yeah , what
3:40
do you think of that ?
3:41
I like it . I also approve of this Todd
3:43
Cochran based shadiness
3:46
that you're using to hide whatever this is . Y'all
3:48
are building . This is . This is wonderful
3:50
.
3:51
Can't talk about it yet . Yes , so podcasting
3:54
2.0 . And it's a , it's
3:56
a , it's a website that
3:58
anybody can edit , which is nice on
4:01
the GitHub and yeah
4:03
, and it's been really good fun working on that
4:05
with Daniel . So , yes
4:07
, if it's not , if it's not announced by
4:09
now , then it , then this is me announcing it
4:11
.
4:12
I'm sure .
4:13
Daniel will be delighted about that .
4:14
I'm looking forward to it . He's got great design
4:16
chops . He's good , he does yeah he
4:18
does .
4:19
So I think I think you know we're still
4:21
working on it , but I think it should be a good thing . Shall
4:24
we get to the stories for this week . Why not start with the
4:26
heart of the podcast industrial
4:28
complex , dave ?
4:30
Let's do it . I want to call you
4:32
made a comment the other day that
4:34
said that our use , our use of the phrase
4:36
when I say our , I mean I'm
4:38
minding Adam's use of the phrase podcast industrial complex
4:40
is quote singularly
4:43
unhelpful . Yes , and I would . I
4:45
want to . I'm going to push back
4:47
on this and say we actually say lots of unhelpful things
4:49
.
4:51
This is not the only one , yeah
4:53
, yeah , well , fair enough yeah .
4:55
So , anyway , so it's all about Spotify . They
4:58
announced Joe Rogan has renewed
5:00
his agreement , but it's not exclusive anymore . Spotify
5:03
released their latest financial results . Yes , they did .
5:06
Total revenue growing at 16%
5:08
year on year to $3.9 billion . All
5:11
the company's figures met or exceeded expectations . So
5:14
, they said , the company
5:16
only lost $81 million in the
5:18
quarter , which apparently is rather better
5:20
than what was flagged in December . I don't know about you . I'm
5:23
not sure I could lose $81
5:25
million in a year alone
5:27
, in a quarter , but still , there we go . Daniel
5:31
Eck does , though , say that
5:33
the podcast business almost broke even in the quarter and
5:36
thinks it's good news for next year .
5:39
When we had our investor date last year , we outlined then podcasting was
5:42
a drag to the business but something
5:44
we were committed to turn around and
5:48
I'm pleased to say in Q4 , we were very close to break even
5:50
on that business , which gives
5:53
me a lot of confidence that as we get into 2024 , we will
5:55
achieve the full year profitability
5:58
target on podcasting . On
6:01
the top line side , we're still seeing healthy growth on engagement . That
6:05
engagement in terms means there'll
6:07
be more opportunities for us to monetize those engagement
6:10
hours . On
6:12
the bottom line , we have a double
6:14
down on the deals that worked and we've gotten out of a lot of the deals
6:17
that didn't work . And
6:19
that's the result you're now seeing with
6:21
the close to break even and that then will lead to a positive podcasting
6:24
business in 2024
6:26
.
6:28
I never really trust accountants .
6:29
Dave , close to break even , yeah I
6:31
mean there's so many ways to slice that yeah .
6:36
Whether it's that we're talking .
6:38
EBITDA , or we're talking profit , or operational
6:40
profit .
6:40
This is a
6:42
new term that I've , yeah , and I think it might be operational
6:44
profit , because I'll tell you what the amount of severance
6:49
payments that Spotify has been making recently can't have been
6:51
. I mean , that's
6:53
why they lost $81 million in the quarter , wasn't it ? It's
6:56
that they've actually got rid of an awful lot of people . I
6:59
learned yesterday , by the way , or I learned last week , that
7:01
the word redundancy is not understood
7:03
by Americans , so I have to use
7:05
the word layoff , or firing , or something like that .
7:08
It took me a while to figure out what you meant by redundancy
7:10
. It makes sense in retrospect
7:13
, but no , that is not an American term at all . Layoffs
7:17
, or you just got fired . Yeah , that's pretty
7:19
much it .
7:20
Yeah , that's pretty well it . Danny
7:22
Alec also went into detail about the new deals
7:24
that they've made with podcasters , why they
7:26
don't do exclusives anymore
7:29
not that they really did , anyway , he
7:31
reckons .
7:32
Generally speaking , we had multiple strategies in
7:34
podcasting . It wasn't just all about exclusivities
7:37
, even if that got most of the press
7:39
headlines , and what we've been able to see
7:41
here is , as we've been learning over these past
7:43
few years , is that while some of these
7:45
exclusivity deals worked , generally
7:48
it wasn't aligned with what the creator wanted . The
7:50
creator wants to have broader
7:52
audience and I feel like with
7:54
these new deals that we've
7:56
been making for most of 2023
7:58
, we are in a position where
8:00
we're actually better aligned with the creator . We
8:03
can both deliver the growth rate
8:05
and we are equally incentivized
8:07
to drive audience
8:09
growth and , of course , then
8:11
also drive revenue growth , because
8:13
we both share in that upside . Today , spotify
8:16
is , in many cases , the number
8:18
one podcasting player already , so exclusivity
8:21
makes sense when you're the smaller playing trying
8:23
to gain scale . When you're the bigger player
8:25
, the additional value
8:27
of the exclusivity is far smaller
8:30
than it is about being
8:32
aligned , and it feels also that
8:34
, from a values point of view , this is better aligned
8:36
with who we are at Spotify , too .
8:38
Now , if I had Adam Curry's little
8:40
bell , I think I'd
8:42
be ringing it a little bit in the middle of that , because
8:45
there's quite a lot . I think there that makes a
8:47
little bit of sense . Dave , I don't know
8:49
what you think , dave Curry , yeah , I think we're seeing
8:51
, as far as the exclusivity goes .
8:54
I don't think this is unique to podcasting , I
8:56
think this is across the board . I
8:59
think we're seeing a breakdown of exclusivity
9:02
as a business model
9:04
. I think when the
9:06
easy money dries up and
9:08
funds are harder to raise , I think you
9:10
do have to broaden
9:14
your scope , because they
9:17
just take video games , for instance and we were seeing Microsoft
9:19
just announcing that they're going to bring all of
9:22
their Bethesda games
9:25
to the PlayStation Network
9:27
, which is exactly opposite
9:29
of what they said when they bought the company and
9:32
I think just across the tech industry we're
9:34
seeing a breakdown of exclusivity
9:37
as a growth mechanic , because
9:39
growth is not the primary
9:42
factor anymore , now it's profitability , and
9:46
so if it's all about hunkering down and making
9:48
a profit , then exclusivity
9:51
reducing your total audience size
9:53
it's kind of hard to justify
9:55
that . It doesn't make a lot of sense , dave .
9:57
Curry . Yeah , I mean , I guess from his point
9:59
of view , he's basically saying you need exclusivity
10:01
if you're a small player in the market
10:03
, but you don't if you're the size
10:06
of Spotify . Now , now he's saying that
10:08
Spotify
10:10
is , in many cases , the number one podcasting
10:12
player already Posted by people , not by
10:14
downloads . That
10:16
much we can certainly say
10:18
. But I thought it was interesting that literally
10:21
as soon as Spotify released their figures
10:24
, you saw Anil
10:27
Dash posting a blog post in
10:30
praise of OpenRSS and saying
10:32
that OpenRSS is the best thing ever . Ani
10:35
Smith at TDM writing that there should
10:37
be something to be learned from RSS's
10:39
podcast success by the rest of the media
10:41
too . All of a sudden , everybody's going oh
10:44
RSS , it's a fantastic thing . Where's
10:47
this been for the last ?
10:48
20 years , dave Curry . Yeah , it's been right here .
10:51
Ani Smith , you know it's just I don't know . I
10:55
find it interesting that all of a sudden
10:57
we're seeing a bunch of people saying no
10:59
, rss is a good thing . Are
11:02
you seeing that too ?
11:04
Dave Curry . Oh , yeah , for sure . There's
11:06
this concurrent thing
11:08
that's happening that's beyond just podcasting
11:11
, which is so ? Return to
11:13
blogs . I'm sure you've noticed
11:15
this as well . I think you yourself
11:17
left medium right . You went back to your
11:19
own self-hosted blog . There's
11:22
Taylor Lawrence , the
11:25
journalist . She was
11:27
blasting out some stuff today about podcasting
11:30
and RSS being an open system
11:32
. There's this big . I think there's just a
11:34
general consensus
11:36
of it's time
11:38
to leave some of these platforms . It's
11:40
the platforms aren't the main
11:42
driver . They don't need to be Because
11:46
, again , you can exclude with exclusivity
11:48
. You have to fuel that a lot of times by debt
11:50
, because
11:53
you can't . The creator is the one
11:55
that is going to get hurt
11:57
with an exclusive deal because
11:59
you slash their audience in half , so you have
12:01
to make up for that by promising them
12:03
more money . If you can't get the money
12:05
, you can't do the deal . It's
12:08
one of those things where we've seen a lot
12:10
of creators tell horror stories
12:12
about going into an exclusive contract
12:14
with Spotify , losing most
12:16
of their audience , then being jettisoned about
12:18
. The contract gets killed . Now
12:20
all their subscribers are gone when they go back to open RSS
12:22
and they have to start from scratch . So
12:25
I think the whole thing is just very , very
12:28
dicey , and people feel more comfortable when they can
12:30
perhaps have a smaller listener
12:33
or reader base but have broader
12:35
reach .
12:38
There was talk and I tried to get the numbers
12:40
but I couldn't find the numbers but there was talk
12:42
that Brené Brown , when she moved
12:44
as an exclusive to Spotify
12:47
, all of a sudden loads of people stopped
12:49
buying her books because she wasn't getting the
12:51
influence that she used to get on
12:53
open podcasting , and
12:56
I think that there's definitely something there . And
12:59
X saying there that creators
13:01
want a broader audience , but
13:04
also sounding as if he's fixed the deals
13:06
so that unless
13:08
you grow the audience , unless you as
13:11
a podcaster deliver the revenue
13:13
, then you don't get your share of the
13:15
Spotify money either , and I think
13:17
that's an interesting thing to end up per seing . So
13:21
maybe they've rather redrawn
13:24
how their deals
13:26
work so that podcasters have
13:28
to work rather harder .
13:30
Well , you just reported today about
13:33
Rogan coming to Anchor , not Megaphone
13:35
. Yeah , I thought that was pretty interesting
13:37
.
13:38
I thought that was really interesting . Of course , it's called
13:40
Spotify for podcasters . Now , that's
13:42
right .
13:42
Yeah .
13:45
But I thought that was really interesting
13:47
. I
13:50
mean , I asked Spotify to comment
13:52
and they haven't . But I think from
13:55
my point of view I mean , megaphone
13:58
is the enterprise podcast host right
14:00
, they've got dynamic ad
14:02
insertion , they've got attribution , they've got demos
14:04
, they've got all of this kind of stuff . Spotify
14:06
for podcasting or Anchor has none
14:09
of that . None , you
14:11
know , I
14:13
mean , spotify for podcasters serves creators
14:15
of all sizes , but yeah
14:18
, Do you think Rogan had ?
14:19
do you think Joe had to download the Spotify for podcast
14:21
app and do the registration
14:24
process and all that stuff ?
14:26
I'm sure that he's done that . I wonder whether that's
14:28
because , do you think , that Megaphone
14:31
deals with Spotify video and
14:33
maybe Anchor doesn't deal
14:35
with Spotify video and no , the other
14:37
way around . So Anchor , I think is
14:39
the only one that deals with Spotify video and
14:42
Megaphone . Perhaps doesn't , I don't know .
14:44
I don't really think that's an interesting take . That's
14:47
an interesting take because , of course you know being running the
14:49
index . I looked at the feed
14:51
and I'm like , is this a special anchor feed
14:53
? Is this something ? I mean the biggest
14:55
, you know the big , not just the biggest podcasts
14:57
in the world , but the biggest you
14:59
know sort of media thing
15:02
in the world or one of them .
15:03
Yeah .
15:04
As far as listeners , I mean it's huge . Is
15:06
there some sort of special ? I know it's just a normal anchor
15:09
URL . It
15:12
looks like you know , like you might be sandwiched between
15:14
you know , a podcast of 30
15:16
second fart noises and
15:18
somebody reading their high school term paper . I mean it's just
15:20
like it's like he just got a random Spotify
15:23
for podcasters URL , so
15:25
it's just odd . And the other
15:27
thing it tells me is , like
15:30
first party data Is
15:33
that whole concept kind of dead ? Now Can
15:37
we just say that downloads
15:39
are good enough and
15:42
the whole idea of streaming
15:45
and first-party data as being just
15:47
the treasure
15:49
chest of advertising dollars
15:51
is probably just not that true .
15:54
Well , I suppose that they're still getting first-party
15:57
data from
15:59
Spotify for podcasters
16:01
, I guess Interestingly
16:05
so . There's two interesting things
16:07
, I think about the anchor thing . Firstly
16:09
, they are
16:11
so anchor hosts still on
16:14
Amazon CloudFront and
16:17
the URL of the enclosure
16:19
still includes
16:23
the actual
16:25
URL of the MP3 itself .
16:28
How big is that bill , by the way ?
16:30
Yeah , how big is that bill Exactly
16:32
? That must be a massive , great big thing
16:34
. So
16:36
that's one thing . But also , I
16:39
thought the anchor used to make everything
16:41
in
16:43
AAC rather than MP3
16:46
, but these files are most definitely in
16:48
MP3 now , so clearly there's been
16:50
a change there somewhere . But
16:53
yeah , now I find it really interesting
16:56
that they've gone to move to
16:58
anchor rather than to
17:00
megaphone . I'm
17:03
really curious as to why
17:05
that is .
17:07
You know , it also tells me , james , that
17:10
this whole move , the contract , everything
17:12
, I feel like it tells
17:14
me that they can't make
17:16
money in podcasting without him . If
17:21
it takes this deal to
17:23
get to break even
17:25
, then and he's clearly
17:27
driving a huge
17:29
portion of revenue of
17:32
ad buys across all of
17:34
Spotify that this tells
17:36
me that they could not let him
17:38
go , or else it would have been just a complete disaster
17:41
.
17:42
Well , and they did say something to
17:45
us the other day that the podcast
17:47
saw a 45% increase in revenue
17:49
last year . So
17:52
it's making money , but it's
17:54
making even more money now . So
17:56
, yeah , so
17:58
I find the whole thing fascinating
18:00
, so really interesting to see .
18:03
Well , moving on , Triton Digital
18:05
released their US
18:07
podcast report from 2023 with
18:09
lots of data about podcasting last
18:11
year .
18:12
Yes , and interestingly , given what we've just been
18:14
talking about , they say that
18:16
Apple podcasts gets 45%
18:18
of all episode downloads and Spotify just
18:20
gets 15% . I wonder
18:22
how many of those are auto downloads
18:25
, though Darrell Bataglia should know
18:27
a thing or two about what they found . He's SVP
18:30
of measurement products and strategy
18:32
for Triton Digital .
18:33
Triton Digital has been in the
18:36
digital audio and podcast space
18:38
for over 15 years
18:40
. We offer services
18:42
across streaming audio as well as podcasting
18:45
. In podcasting , we
18:47
have a hosting platform called On Me Studio
18:49
to help you manage and distribute your
18:51
content . We have a full
18:54
ad tech stack to help publishers
18:56
monetize their advertising
18:58
, and we have measurement and
19:00
analytic services to better understand
19:02
the audience for podcasts and that's
19:05
where I come in is leading our measurement
19:07
strategy in products .
19:08
So you released the US podcast
19:11
report for 2023 . That's
19:13
got data from On Me Studio in
19:15
it , from Triton Podcast Metrics
19:17
, from Demos , plus Some really good
19:19
data in there . What were the big findings
19:21
from your point of view ?
19:23
The biggest finding , I think always
19:25
, is podcast growing
19:27
and what we found is it's
19:29
grown each of the last two years . We
19:31
computed to a 12% growth
19:34
in monthly podcast listeners over
19:36
the last two years and
19:38
what we saw was that came across
19:41
all segments of the population
19:43
, different age groups , male , female
19:46
. We really saw a broadening of
19:48
the audience while podcasting
19:50
over indexes for a younger
19:52
audience , for a little
19:54
bit more male audience , we actually
19:57
saw more growth from the
19:59
over 55 group in
20:02
the United States and more
20:04
growth from females . So we're seeing a broadening
20:06
of the audience and we're really seeing that
20:08
podcasting appeals to everyone and
20:11
it , I think , really
20:14
is exciting for the future
20:16
that the podcast audience can continue to
20:18
grow and there's really no ceiling that it can
20:20
. Obviously there's all different types of podcasts
20:22
and it can appeal to all
20:25
different types of people .
20:26
Indeed , it's super exciting . I wonder whether
20:28
your report said anything
20:31
about YouTube . It's certainly
20:33
all of the talk of the podcast industry
20:36
over the last year .
20:37
It did . We did a
20:39
pretty in-depth comparison of
20:41
YouTube and Apple podcasts
20:44
and Spotify as well . What
20:47
we saw is that YouTube
20:49
is the number one
20:51
platform that people say
20:53
they use the most to consume podcasts
20:56
. 33.5%
20:58
of monthly podcast
21:00
listeners said they use YouTube
21:02
the most , and that
21:04
has been growing . 47%
21:07
of their listeners said they started consuming podcasts
21:10
in the last year , so a lot of the
21:12
new listeners are coming from
21:14
them . But we also saw a lot of differences
21:17
in the demographics of the
21:19
audience for YouTube as
21:21
compared to Apple podcasts
21:23
and Spotify .
21:24
Yeah , I was going to ask you about that because and
21:27
this is data from demos plus and
21:29
some really interesting data about the
21:31
demographics of the various platforms so
21:33
Spotify listeners being younger , Apple
21:35
listeners being richer , YouTube
21:38
listeners being more male and
21:40
a bit less money what should we
21:43
learn from that for podcasting
21:45
?
21:46
I think it helps with
21:48
distribution strategies
21:50
. I think it helps to understand
21:53
who your audience is and
21:56
help to inform your content strategies
21:59
and help to inform your advertising strategies
22:01
as well , to understand more about
22:03
not
22:05
only who your listeners are as a whole , which demos
22:08
plus helps to do , but to understand
22:10
some of the differences amongst platforms .
22:13
Yeah , and I guess it also shows
22:15
some of the benefits of Triton podcast metrics
22:17
in that the data that you get from Spotify is
22:19
only data of Spotify
22:22
listeners and similarly , the data that you
22:24
get from Apple is only from Apple listeners and they're
22:26
not necessarily the same
22:28
types of people , are they ?
22:30
No , they're not . So , as you mentioned
22:32
YouTube , really all of those
22:34
platforms are younger
22:36
than the general population . However
22:39
, we saw that Spotify
22:41
was the youngest , whereas YouTube
22:44
was a little bit older . We
22:46
saw Apple podcasts was more female
22:49
, while YouTube was
22:51
more male . Differences
22:53
in income as well . Apple podcast
22:56
audience on average was
22:58
at a higher income
23:01
. So there are certainly differences amongst those
23:03
platforms which were interesting to
23:05
learn more about .
23:06
Yeah , so fascinating bits of
23:08
data . The other two bits that I
23:10
saw which I found interesting Firstly
23:12
, the top shows by purchase
23:14
intent . So , and
23:17
again I'm getting that this is from demos plus as
23:19
well . So if , for example
23:21
, you want to reach shows listened
23:25
to by people who are interested in switching
23:27
their wireless provider , which seems very niche
23:29
thing , then apparently
23:32
Wow in the world , or fantasy football
23:34
today are two big
23:36
shows for that
23:38
. This is really focused
23:41
information . Isn't it really useful for
23:43
for advertisers as well ?
23:45
Right . With our podcast metrics demos
23:47
plus solution , we're able to
23:50
understand the profile
23:52
of the audience across podcasts
23:54
of all sizes . So aging
23:56
gender , other demographic insights
23:59
, their purchase behaviors
24:01
and intent , their political affiliation
24:03
, their other
24:05
media usage , and so there's a wide
24:08
variety of purchase intent data and
24:10
different audience
24:14
segments are important for different advertisers
24:16
. So if you are a wireless
24:19
provider , you definitely want
24:21
to advertising shows that will do
24:23
a good job of reaching people who are in the market
24:25
to switch wireless providers . And
24:28
in the report , first
24:30
of all , we highlighted a few examples of
24:32
different genres at the genre level , but
24:35
within our our ranker
24:37
of the top 100 shows for the year , we
24:41
also highlighted for different audience
24:43
segments and different purchase intents and demographics
24:46
, what were the top three shows that
24:48
over index the most
24:50
for those segments or would reach that audience
24:52
most efficiently ?
24:53
Yeah , and I think particularly helpful for an
24:55
election year , which of course it is . I wonder
24:58
if anybody spotted this yet in the
25:00
US . Particularly
25:03
useful in terms of that , because being
25:05
able to focus on specific
25:07
age ranges
25:09
and also what , which
25:12
ways people are going to vote as well . Absolutely
25:14
.
25:15
It's not surprising , of course , that
25:18
different types of podcasts
25:21
that have political content are
25:23
going to be geared towards a
25:25
certain political affiliation
25:28
. That part's not surprising , but it
25:30
provides that insight for podcasts of
25:33
all genres and
25:35
definitely helps with political
25:38
candidates and their advertising campaigns and
25:40
determining what podcasts
25:42
could be a fit for them .
25:43
Yeah , and I particularly . You know it's
25:46
always nice seeing data where you
25:48
can go OK , that makes perfect
25:50
sense . For example , the
25:52
podcast listens to buy
25:55
people with the most amount of household
25:57
income . Podcasts like Planet
25:59
Money , or how I built this with Guy
26:01
Raz . I mean that that makes perfect sense , doesn't
26:03
it ? It's really nice seeing actually data
26:05
that you go . Yeah , that that's absolutely right
26:08
.
26:08
Right . I mean , even if they know that this
26:10
is the case because of the subject matter
26:12
of their podcast , have actual data
26:14
with actual numbers . That is
26:16
third party proof of
26:19
the case and helps quantify . It is
26:21
a big help for them as they try and find
26:24
advertisers or partners for their
26:26
shows .
26:26
So what do you think that the
26:29
US podcast report tells
26:31
the podcast industry ? What should we take
26:34
away from that ?
26:35
Better insight into who
26:37
the audience is and how
26:39
that differs across genres , across
26:41
shows , across platforms , with
26:44
download measurement . That data doesn't
26:46
you mentioned . Like sure , like Spotify can
26:48
provide it for their audience to
26:50
a certain extent maybe not to
26:52
the same level of depth , but so I think
26:54
that's been a
26:56
gap in the past , for the industry is really
26:58
understanding who the audience is and how
27:00
it differs across the whole , the whole landscape
27:03
, and so that's really a big part
27:05
of it is to shed insight into
27:07
that , share insights into that , and
27:09
a lot
27:12
of it is more at the aggregate
27:14
level , but we provide this
27:16
type of data to our clients at the individual
27:18
show level or for any aggregation of
27:20
shows as well .
27:21
So the report is free . Where can people get
27:24
hold of it ?
27:24
They can go to TraytonRankerscom
27:27
. On there you can see our
27:29
podcast rankers , which are monthly in every
27:31
country . But there's a link
27:33
below under the resource section to be able
27:36
to download the report . It's
27:38
about 30 plus pages of
27:40
all different insights that hopefully
27:43
people will find really useful , and
27:45
I know the team here has put a lot of work into it , so
27:47
we're excited to put it out there .
27:49
Yeah , super helpful stuff . It's really good to talk
27:51
to my friends at TraytonDarrell . Thank you
27:53
so much for your time today .
27:54
Thank you , james , appreciate it . That
27:57
was Darrell Bataglia from Trayton Digital
27:59
.
27:59
There's some really interesting data in there , and
28:01
interesting data
28:04
both from Omni Studio and
28:06
from their own enterprise podcasting
28:08
host , but also from the Trayton
28:11
Rankers as well around the
28:13
world as well . I always
28:15
find it really good when large
28:17
podcast companies do that kind of thing .
28:19
Dave , you know I read through some of the
28:21
report and there's
28:23
some just as usual , some
28:25
of this stuff . I find it hard
28:27
to reconcile some of the things in the
28:29
report because they say in
28:31
there that you've
28:34
got that huge
28:37
advantage
28:39
that Apple has over Spotify
28:41
, but then in
28:43
the other section where
28:45
they do the survey , it
28:47
says Apple's at 15% when
28:49
they say the question was which platform
28:52
do you use most often to listen to podcasts ? And
28:54
the respondent said that Apple's 15%
28:57
, Spotify 25 .
28:59
Yeah , and YouTube even more .
29:01
Yeah , I'm not sure I'm following . The
29:05
survey says one thing , the downloads , I guess
29:07
, or the trackers , say a different thing . I'm not sure how
29:09
to reconcile those two .
29:10
I have never understood that and it's really difficult to
29:13
report on it because you're there going
29:15
. I mean , I guess you can turn around and
29:17
say the podcast
29:21
app that people are most using
29:23
it doesn't necessarily mean
29:25
that that's the app which is delivering the most amount
29:27
of downloads . But
29:30
I also wonder whether or not it's a deal about
29:32
Apple's automated downloads as well
29:34
, and I wonder what
29:36
the story is there , and I would love
29:38
to dive more deeply into
29:41
what's actually automated
29:43
and what isn't , and maybe that's something that OP3
29:46
can actually help us with .
29:48
Yeah , and the other thing it talked about was the long
29:50
tail of podcasting . That is , 76%
29:53
of podcasts and
29:56
that's a number that people have
29:58
been just licking their chops to try to monetize
30:00
for so long , and
30:02
I'm just not sure it's doable . I'm
30:06
sure you can break off some of that with programmatic type
30:08
advertising , but when we
30:10
see the huge margins of error
30:13
, like when such a big drop when Apple
30:15
downloads change their Apple
30:17
podcast chains or download algorithm , it's
30:20
just when that kind of swing
30:22
can happen . If it happens on a million
30:24
downloads , on a show with a million downloads
30:27
, 20% is one thing , 20%
30:29
on a show with 10,000 downloads is something
30:31
completely different , and so
30:33
I'm not sure that those that
30:36
that long tail can can ever be , because
30:38
it's just not nobody . It
30:40
seems like nobody wants that .
30:42
Yeah .
30:42
Yeah , as far as the ad buyers .
30:45
No , I'm fascinated to . You
30:48
know , I'm really interested to find out how
30:50
many more of the Apple downloads
30:52
numbers are actually automated
30:54
and what that means for the industry . Because
30:57
I mean , you know , talking
31:00
with some people in the podcast
31:03
industrial complex about their
31:05
downloads and things you can
31:07
, you know , you can see that
31:09
there's some fear in their eyes when
31:11
, when they're saying you know how's it , how's
31:13
it impacted you , and they're going , oh , it's
31:15
fine . Really , you know
31:17
, yeah , right , right . They're
31:19
really kind of . You know , I mean I've seen some
31:21
, I've seen some of the numbers , and some of the numbers I
31:23
mean there are some large , large
31:26
podcast publishers which are down
31:28
30% , 40% and
31:32
they'll be having to pay , make goods for
31:34
that . They'll be having to , you know , go
31:36
back to their advertisers and saying , well
31:38
, yeah , but this isn't real numbers . And
31:40
then you've got Todd saying , yeah , there's been no change
31:43
at all . I'm not sure , I don't know it's
31:46
, it's just a weird , a weird one . But
31:48
then you see , you know numbers from
31:51
Buzzsprout as
31:53
an example , where Spotify has
31:55
been down significantly , but that
31:57
doesn't appear to be the case
31:59
on some other podcast platforms
32:01
. So I'm you know , it's just really hard
32:03
to report on , I think .
32:04
Yeah , the Spotify number being down , that
32:07
that has been a weird one , because you
32:09
know , I'm not , I'm not sure and you know we
32:12
, we saw and you published
32:14
the index of stats of of
32:17
podcasts that publish new episodes
32:19
and the count , the total count on that . You
32:22
know we saw that going down , down , down , down , down
32:24
through most of 2023 . And
32:26
then it sort of hit bottom around the early , around
32:28
early January , and now
32:30
it's just been on this slow march up
32:33
and so we've had this nice , you
32:35
know , every , it seems like every week it's one
32:37
and a half percent , two percent up and
32:39
these things are . Things
32:42
are improving and shows are producing
32:44
more episodes now
32:46
and we've seen this nice little gradual
32:48
recovery in the
32:51
total overall number of shows that are producing
32:53
new episodes . And I think
32:55
you're right , the it is hard
32:57
to make this , to
33:00
translate these kinds of things into money
33:02
, because I did . I did notice that that
33:05
in the Trident Report they listed the top 20
33:07
podcasts overall in
33:10
their in their rankings and NPR
33:12
has six of the shows in the top 20 , but they
33:15
laid off like almost the entire podcast
33:17
group so clearly these
33:19
things don't mate you know ?
33:22
No , no , exactly , and of course their
33:24
numbers are . You
33:26
know , depending on which numbers you look at , their
33:28
numbers are participating
33:30
publishers only , which is always
33:32
a always a thing , isn't it ? But
33:35
yeah , no , some really interesting numbers coming
33:38
out of that . And talking about really
33:40
interesting numbers , lots of very
33:42
large numbers to do with AI
33:45
and fundraising .
33:46
Yeah , Lots of AI companies are getting
33:48
fun . Everybody's getting money
33:50
. Podcastle got 13 and a half million
33:52
. Last week we heard from Wondercraft
33:55
who got three million . Dexa raised six
33:57
million . Audio stack
33:59
raised 3.2 million . I mean , everybody's
34:01
just getting a piece of the action .
34:03
Yeah , it's just like so much money
34:05
. It seems that in order for
34:07
you to make a ton of cash
34:09
in terms of funding , all you have
34:11
to do is say AI . So
34:13
I'm wondering , obviously , when , when
34:16
podcast index is going to be doing some AI
34:19
? You already use AI , right ?
34:21
Sure , yeah , yeah Never .
34:23
And machine learning as well , which was last year's
34:25
catchphrase , wasn't it Right ?
34:27
Yeah , and blockchain the year before that
34:29
, oh , yeah , yeah , yeah , robotic
34:32
process automation , this it just keeps
34:34
going back and back and back . What
34:37
an so the odd narrative
34:40
of
34:42
AI being able to fix
34:44
podcast search
34:47
and discovery and that kind of that's
34:50
a new one on me . I don't see
34:52
how that's possible . But
34:54
people , now things have changed . It seems
34:56
like people have gone from
34:59
podcast , from
35:01
AI as podcast improvement
35:03
, to AI as
35:05
podcast search and discovery
35:07
, and I'm not sure how
35:09
that . I don't know how to
35:11
make that leap , but I guess we'll see what people
35:13
come up with .
35:14
Yeah , I think you know . I mean AI is being used
35:17
an awful lot . Our sponsor , buzzsprout , has
35:19
AI that will
35:22
generate , you know , entire titles
35:24
and episode show notes and everything else
35:26
. If I really wanted to , the
35:29
Dexa one is interesting . So Dexa
35:31
is essentially looking
35:35
at the entire contents of
35:37
your podcast back
35:39
catalog and
35:42
although they've just announced something
35:44
with with Huberman lab
35:47
I don't even know if that's how you
35:49
pronounce it Huberman , huberman , I
35:51
think so yeah , that's not right yeah . Well
35:56
, so they've just announced that , but they've
35:58
actually had one with Jordan Harbinger for
36:00
quite some time . If you want to
36:02
take a peek at that , it's Jordan Dexa
36:04
AI , and
36:07
you know that's a fascinating thing in that
36:09
you go into this thing . You can
36:11
ask Jordan Harbinger anything
36:14
you want , about anything that he might
36:16
have spoken about , and it comes back
36:18
with you know information on
36:21
you know some of his guests , information on
36:24
shows to go and have a listen to , but
36:26
also information on you know
36:28
on the advertisers you know you can go in and you
36:30
can ask for an athletic greens . You
36:33
know discount code .
36:35
That's the way you go . Now
36:39
, this , this kind of thing I can see . You know there's
36:41
there's a lot of AI , just
36:44
hype cycle trash that's out there , but
36:46
these that's that's actually a really cool
36:49
thing and I can see that within . If
36:52
you take a back catalog of a particular podcast
36:54
and say , okay , look , I've , I've done
36:56
900 episodes
36:59
of a podcast , I don't even remember
37:01
what I said in all of these
37:03
and I don't remember stories
37:05
that we've gone over and clips
37:07
that we've played and all these . If
37:09
you can pump all those transcripts and all that
37:11
data into a large language
37:13
model and get out something
37:16
that's easy to search and is pro
37:18
, even proactive , and telling you when
37:21
you're , as you're , prepping for the show , oh
37:23
you've , you know , oh , you tie , you just typed
37:25
this word into your show notes . Well
37:27
, here you've talked about this six shows ago
37:29
. I can see that now that's valuable
37:31
, that I could some of these , and that's the complicated
37:34
. I think that's the complex thing around AI in
37:36
general is that it's hard
37:38
right now because the hype cycle is
37:40
just so fire that
37:42
it's it's so difficult to figure out
37:44
which which of these things is
37:46
actually a useful product and which one
37:48
is just somebody trying to jump on the bandwagon
37:51
.
37:51
Yeah , it's just , it's just nonsense . Yeah
37:54
, yeah . So Audio Stack raising 3.2
37:56
million . They are the people who do automated
37:59
voices , and I think I used one
38:01
of the automated voices a couple of weeks ago with
38:05
and it was an , it was an Australian
38:08
ad and
38:11
you know , and the automated voice , to be honest , sounded
38:13
pretty good . You know , if you , if you want to
38:16
make automated ads that
38:18
essentially promote you
38:21
know that essentially promote , you
38:23
know , news headlines and stuff like that , then
38:25
that's quite a nice , that's quite a
38:27
nice idea , I think . But
38:30
you know , let me play , let
38:32
me play a little clip of one here . Many
38:34
Australian cities are bracing for their hottest
38:36
days in years , including Western Sydney
38:38
, as experts warn of dangerous conditions
38:41
in some areas . Now , that's a completely
38:43
automatic voice , but you wouldn't . I
38:46
don't think I would have guessed that that was an automatic voice
38:48
.
38:50
No , I wouldn't have picked that out , I
38:52
think , if I heard it long enough , if there
38:54
was enough , if it kept going probably
38:57
you'd start to get suspicious .
38:59
Yeah , but the ad is
39:01
only a 30 second thing and it's
39:03
basically that's the headline
39:05
. I mean , if that was a headline , go
39:08
and find out more at this website . So you
39:10
know , I can see that there's something there , but
39:13
still , but yes , whether or not
39:15
that'll help with podcast discovery
39:17
, who knows . But Oshah
39:20
, our French friends have
39:22
come up with something clever .
39:24
Yeah , they've , let's see
39:26
, they've launched a podcast search optimization
39:29
control panel . The tools aimed at ensuring
39:31
its podcasts reach the number one slot
39:33
in Apple podcasts and Spotify search results
39:36
.
39:36
Hmm , what do you think of that running a podcast
39:40
index yourself ?
39:43
I think search within podcasting
39:45
is incredibly difficult
39:48
for so many reasons
39:50
, and the number one reason with
39:52
search and audio it
39:55
doesn't matter if you have a transcript or not . Having
39:58
the text really doesn't help you that
40:01
much Really . So if we
40:03
, if we look at it will depends
40:05
on what you're trying to find . So sometimes
40:07
having the text of all the episodes
40:09
and everything can make makes the job even
40:11
worse Because the
40:14
the butte . So let's take search
40:16
, sort of the pinnacle of search that we all
40:18
think of , and that's Google . The
40:20
magic of Google is the backlink
40:23
, is measuring
40:25
the number of inbound links to
40:28
a page in order to rank the
40:30
results . Searching
40:32
doesn't have anything like that . You
40:35
can't . There's no linkage between
40:37
a podcast and
40:40
another podcast or a podcast
40:42
and some general
40:44
topic . There's just
40:46
not . There's no way to measure those
40:49
because without page rank , google
40:51
Google search is not what
40:54
it is . That's the secret sauce . It
40:56
says you don't have like anything that's sort of like
40:58
an analogous to that within podcasting
41:00
. You just have to go purely based
41:03
on just text , and there's
41:05
so much text out there that
41:07
it just pollutes everything down to nothing
41:10
. It's it's an odd
41:12
narrative to say that you could boost
41:15
, you know , boost search
41:17
results into the number one slot in
41:19
Apple and Spotify . That's
41:22
, and I'm wondering what . I
41:24
wonder what magic sauce they're using to make that
41:26
happen .
41:26
I mean , I think quite a lot of . It is just that most podcasts
41:29
are pretty bad at . They're
41:31
the metadata that goes with them , you know , and the
41:33
amount of I mean
41:35
Joe Rogan , for example . Joe Rogan's
41:38
entire Description
41:41
in the in
41:44
the the description field is
41:46
the official Joe Rogan podcast
41:48
. I think , I think that's
41:50
it . I mean , it used to be . It used
41:52
to be ramblings from a guy and minds , which
41:54
made even less sense .
41:55
But In
41:58
fairness . In fairness , I'm not sure how
42:00
you would explain this show like I got . It
42:02
interviews other people . Yes , it's
42:04
not a whole lot to say about it . It's pretty random
42:06
, yeah no , exactly , exactly .
42:08
So , you know , and I I wonder
42:10
whether , I wonder whether it's
42:13
it's an issue of ? Yeah
42:16
, I mean , you know , it's an issue of just
42:18
the , the metadata which is out
42:20
there , the official podcast of comedian
42:23
Joe Rogan , that's literally all
42:25
it's . So
42:28
yeah , so . You
42:30
know . So maybe you know , maybe
42:32
there's something that I'd not thought about back
42:34
links and things because of course , as
42:37
you so rightly say , there isn't . There
42:39
are no back links , because there's a back link
42:41
, maybe , to the Apple podcasts page . Now
42:43
there's a back link to the Spotify page
42:45
, but there's a back link to the website and
42:48
there's a back link to the other website , to his new
42:50
anchor website , which
42:52
looks , which looks , entertaining . So
42:54
, yeah , so I find
42:56
that's a really interesting
42:59
, interesting point . Hence why
43:01
you know , a discovery mechanism Like
43:04
pod role and things like that are really
43:06
interesting and useful and helpful . I was talking
43:08
with the folks from RSS and they promised
43:11
me pod role within the next couple of months
43:13
.
43:14
So yeah , I want to put it on our on
43:17
our homepage , on the index it's it's time
43:19
to move off the completely useless
43:21
, not helpful to anybody , random
43:23
, oh yeah .
43:24
The right which is usually , which is usually a
43:26
sermon isn't it ?
43:27
It's always , always sermon audiocom
43:30
. Yeah , so yeah
43:32
, yeah , so is it is . Osha is
43:34
. Are they ? Are they just fixing
43:36
show notes and description fields ? Is
43:38
that primarily what this is ?
43:41
I think it is Making
43:43
sure that you are using the right keywords
43:46
in the right Description
43:48
and show notes and everything else that
43:50
I think it really is is purely , it's
43:53
purely that my
43:55
my , you know , talking with Maxime , as
43:57
I did a while back , he he is
43:59
, you know , he's looked at Rankings
44:03
in Apple podcasts and in Spotify
44:05
. He's got a ton of data
44:07
behind him to show
44:09
how how this works and how this
44:11
works well . We should probably get him back on
44:14
to talk about this specifically . But
44:16
yeah , I mean it's , it's basically , it's SEO
44:18
, just the same way as you would use SEO . I
44:21
mean , there is a reason why the , the
44:23
pod news daily , that
44:26
show now has in the
44:28
description it mentions Joe
44:31
Rogan , it mentions
44:33
a few other , if you are the large shows
44:35
, just just to get it in Exactly
44:39
, you know . But yeah , that's really
44:41
interesting , really interesting , and I do think that the
44:44
pod role , particularly that
44:46
, that is , your backlinks , isn't it , but
44:49
it's your backlinks from , from
44:51
the industry or from the , from
44:53
the community . It's not necessarily backlinks from
44:55
audiences . So perhaps there's something else
44:58
that we need to build that right .
45:00
Which I think you know , honestly , is probably better
45:03
at this point in the game , or at least something that we
45:05
can work with , because once you introduce
45:07
Tens of millions of listeners
45:10
, then you just have chaos on your hands . If
45:12
it's , if it's just podcasters recommending
45:14
other podcasts , that seems like
45:16
a higher signal , you know , amongst
45:18
the noise . For now , yeah so did
45:21
you go to pod fest this this past
45:23
week , james ?
45:23
I did not go to pod fest for two reasons
45:26
firstly , because it's a long , long , long
45:28
, long , long way away and secondly , it's a bit
45:30
too Florida for me , although
45:33
I am going to Orlando in May
45:36
, so I'm going to speak
45:38
at a Christian radio conference there , so so
45:40
that should be fun . I have a , I
45:42
have a form which I was supposed to fill out two
45:45
days ago . I'm telling
45:47
them exactly what it , whatever he's , I'm going to be saying so
45:49
I should probably , I should probably get
45:52
to doing that . I guess you weren't a
45:54
pod fest either , is .
45:56
Movement in .
45:56
Dallas , the only big one that you've been
45:59
to or have you been to others .
46:01
Yeah , I've been to two part podcast
46:03
movements . I don't Because
46:05
of my day job Jane did
46:07
from roughly January to May
46:10
is is almost impossible to
46:12
do any travel , so I am always miss pod
46:14
fest and I miss podcast moving
46:16
evolutions . So I've only
46:18
been to the other podcast movement
46:20
.
46:21
Yeah , the big one the big one , yes
46:23
, yes , yes , because you know you . In
46:25
your day job You'll be
46:27
, you know , dealing with W9
46:29
forms . The amount of W9 forms
46:32
I've had to fill in and sends to people
46:34
I don't even know what they are .
46:37
That's give us , that's give us all your
46:39
per , all your highly personal numbers
46:41
and social security and all this stuff
46:43
, so that we can send you a 1099 . Yeah , exactly
46:46
Exactly , I guess you do get 1099
46:49
since you're an , since you're incorporated here
46:51
in the US .
46:53
I'm sure that the person that deals with my accounts
46:55
is , yes , absolutely , absolutely
46:58
doing that . Yes , I've got no idea
47:00
about any of this stuff . It used to be
47:02
. I . I worked for a Canadian radio
47:05
company about three or four years ago and
47:08
I ended up paying more Canadian tax
47:10
than I did , australian
47:12
tax , which was , which
47:14
was very strange , very strange . There
47:17
I was , you know , helping the good people of British
47:19
Columbia , what who
47:21
knows . But anyway , talking
47:23
about pod fest , which we were , and until
47:26
we went off on one , I spoke . I
47:28
spoke with Claire white Brown from the
47:30
creativity found podcast . She
47:32
did go to pod fest , so I asked
47:34
her what it was like and I was interested in
47:36
whether it was her first big event
47:39
it was .
47:40
So I've been to a number of events in
47:42
London and when
47:44
I saw this one in Orlando Orlando is a bit
47:46
easier for us Brits to
47:49
get to and a bit more affordable
47:51
, so , yeah
47:53
, I decided to bite the bullet
47:55
and go for it and go see what
47:58
podcast conferences are like in
48:00
the year US . I'm here , I hear
48:02
a lot about US podcasting
48:04
generally and I I have a number of US
48:06
guests and listeners , so I wanted
48:09
to go over and go to a big event
48:11
and did you pay for the tickets or
48:13
how did you get hold of those ? Well
48:15
, you see , luckily and I was I
48:17
was kind of a bit hopeful . So I
48:19
booked my flights and I booked my hotel
48:21
and I was hoping that
48:24
my lovely host , buzz sprout
48:26
because I'd heard them do this before
48:28
Would have some tickets to
48:30
give away . And yes , they did so . On the day
48:32
they announced that on buzzcast
48:34
, I was in the car and I rushed
48:36
back home . They're right .
48:38
I've got to get on to customer support .
48:40
Speak with Brian . And yes , so
48:42
my creator pass was Given
48:45
to me by buzz sprout , which , you know , considering
48:48
the costs going into a big trip like this
48:50
was , was really very helpful
48:52
and Much appreciated on my
48:54
part .
48:55
Well , they are our sponsor as well . So you
48:57
know , I can never say any bad
48:59
things about buzz sprout .
49:02
Not that you would want to know is never a bad thing
49:04
to say about no , indeed , and I
49:06
noticed that you .
49:07
You met Brian from customer support
49:09
while you were there . I
49:11
did Jordan and Albin . I
49:13
noticed not , not Kevin .
49:14
I didn't meet Kevin . No , I was hoping to meet
49:17
Kevin at the party , but it was just
49:19
too damn busy and he was just too damn
49:21
popular .
49:22
Yeah , well , you know , there you go . So
49:24
what did you think that pod fest would be like
49:26
?
49:26
first of all , Well , I didn't
49:28
really know , but I had had a little bit
49:30
of a clue from you actually , james , which was quite
49:33
nice because I wrote to you about it and
49:35
you said About you felt
49:37
it was grassroots , which is right up my
49:39
street , because I'm
49:41
an indie podcaster , you know . It was
49:43
an idea I had . The wonderfulness about
49:46
pod casting is you can just do it At
49:49
little expense . You don't need to do as you're
49:51
told . You can run the show how
49:53
you want to put it out , how you want
49:55
to it can have . It can be
49:57
hours and hours or it can be 10 minutes
49:59
, all of that kind of thing . But
50:01
I felt I do feel sometimes
50:04
going to some of the events in the UK a
50:07
bit lost in that area
50:09
, in that there's a lot of big business around
50:11
it . So I was quite happy to think that pod
50:14
fest may be more indie podcasters
50:16
like myself . I certainly know a lot of indie
50:18
podcasters here in the UK , but
50:21
not necessarily feel that
50:23
going to event I'm going to meet lots of them . But
50:26
then this was exactly what
50:28
happened at pod fest . It was so lovely . Obviously
50:30
I went completely on my own . I didn't know
50:32
anyone when I got there , apart from
50:34
Brian and Jordan , obviously Through
50:37
digital communication , but
50:40
it was a case of
50:42
being able to say someone so
50:44
what's your show ? And more often
50:46
than not , they did have a show and it
50:48
was their idea and they were doing this
50:50
show for this reason , or they were promoting
50:52
it for this reason . So it did feel very much
50:54
. I was very comfortable there . Oh
50:57
, it's so cheesy , but I was amongst my
50:59
people .
51:01
Yeah , well , that's a good thing I
51:04
found from pod fest and I went
51:06
a number of years ago , but I found
51:08
it very American and
51:11
certainly there was a thing called speed dating
51:13
.
51:13
Which terrified me Was
51:16
that , when you went , yes , yeah
51:20
, I've been calling it speed dating since
51:22
, but it's speed networking really
51:24
, and I know what you mean , james , because
51:26
I am very British . I did
51:29
find I didn't find
51:31
it very American at all . I didn't . There
51:33
was one thing I videoed
51:35
where a very lovely man
51:38
was doing some singing and I was like , oh
51:40
crikey , this is a bit , this is
51:42
a bit American , sent that home to my family . But
51:45
generally I didn't
51:47
and I really just found it
51:49
very friendly , very
51:52
ordinary , if you know what
51:54
I mean . It wasn't all whoop , whoop , you
51:57
know big American stuff . The people
51:59
, the individuals that I were meeting there was
52:02
so friendly . They were so keen
52:04
to explain things to me that I didn't know
52:06
is a Brit and vice versa , to
52:08
ask me about stuff that's different
52:10
in the UK and
52:13
the parties and things and talking to people . So I
52:16
would be one to notice if something
52:18
was a bit , as we would say , american
52:20
, and I didn't find it overly that
52:22
way at all .
52:24
Good Well , that's a good thing and lots of
52:26
informal meetups . So obviously you must
52:28
have been at the Buzzsprout party I'm imagining
52:30
with the balloons . From what
52:33
I understand , I was listening to Buzzcast and
52:35
listening all about that
52:37
, but there were lots of informal
52:39
meetups as well , I think .
52:41
Yeah , and that was lovely as well . So we had
52:43
the app and within the app
52:45
, obviously you've got your agenda on
52:47
there . You can try to fathom
52:49
out what you want to go to when , because there's such a
52:51
lot of talks going on . I
52:54
mean , obviously you can buy recordings of it , but it's
52:56
really good to be in the room with the speaker , but also
52:58
with other people in the room that
53:01
are interested in this topic and you can speak to them . But
53:04
, yeah , definitely there's a really lovely
53:06
, good sized space with round tables that was
53:09
just always open and just always
53:11
free from meeting up . There were people meeting in the
53:13
hallways . I mean , I went
53:15
to an organised one which was
53:18
arranged by Jen Hardy and it was aimed
53:20
at podcasters over the age of 50
53:22
. And that was really lovely
53:25
to actually speak individually
53:27
to some people there , find
53:29
out about their shows and vice versa . And then
53:31
during the rest of the conference , when you're wandering about
53:33
and you're in the halls , you've got
53:36
people that you've already met to
53:38
say hello to . And I know there were
53:40
lots of other groups like that . And
53:42
I'm going to be a bit American here , james , in
53:44
your niche or niche , as you say here , but
53:48
there were lots of informal
53:50
meetups that you could go to to meet other people
53:52
like yourself doing the same kind of show as
53:54
you or having the same interests
53:56
, which I thought was really lovely
53:58
as well .
54:01
Now you went to one of the talks that
54:03
you went to was all about podcasting
54:05
2.0 with Todd
54:08
and apparently he used one of Sam's
54:10
slides , which Sam will be delighted about
54:12
. He did , he did I'm delighted
54:15
about , and was
54:17
there lots of talk about podcasting 2.0
54:20
, or was it still a bit sort of ? We're
54:22
not quite sure what it is .
54:23
Yeah , it is still a bit more
54:26
. A bit we're not quite sure what it is . I
54:28
forgot to take a photo of Todd with Sam's
54:31
slide up , so I apologize for that , sam
54:33
, I was too busy listening . But
54:36
yeah , I think there
54:38
was more because
54:40
I'm you know I'm quite
54:43
very keen on all of this stuff
54:45
very interested in
54:47
it .
54:48
You do the value for value , don't you ?
54:50
Yes , yes , yes , yes , yes , I'm loving
54:52
that and I loved not blowing
54:55
smoke here , james , but I did love your description
54:57
of the fairground tokens , because I do
54:59
think people are a bit frightened of , like
55:01
, what's a sat ? Oh my God , do I have to ? You know
55:03
, put money over in my wallet
55:06
and blah , blah , blah . And you described it as
55:08
fairground tokens , which I think is perfect , because
55:10
in my wallet at the moment I
55:12
have , I think , a grand total of 16,000
55:15
sats , which I'm very pleased about , but
55:17
yeah , I haven't put any money into my wallet myself
55:20
. I've been able to boost and connect
55:22
with other podcasts
55:24
by using the sats that I've
55:27
earned just by listening . I
55:29
met a chap in the queue for the bar
55:31
you always meet the best people in queues for the
55:33
bar who gave me 10,000
55:35
sats because we were talking about podcasting
55:37
2.0 and value for value . But I felt
55:39
that more of the people I
55:41
was speaking to were aware of it
55:44
, knew the term and
55:47
the point that they're then at is then really
55:50
understanding what it means
55:52
and , to my mind , how easy
55:54
it is to take advantage of it , to use it
55:56
. But I know you and
55:58
Sam have been talking about it's
56:00
kind of down to the
56:02
apps to take on the mantle
56:05
and include some of those .
56:08
Yeah , I mean the hard sort of education and all of that
56:10
kind of stuff is always important
56:12
.
56:12
Yeah , and just make it acceptable and just
56:15
understandable and it's not scary .
56:17
So what was the most valuable thing
56:19
you learned ? I have a theory
56:21
about conferences and
56:23
events like podcast or evolutions
56:26
from podcast movement , which I'm going to . I
56:29
have a theory that actually you
56:31
go away , it's three days
56:33
of sort of fun and chatting to people , but you probably
56:36
go away with two big things
56:38
that you've learned , and
56:41
those big things are actually worth enough
56:44
, in my opinion , for
56:47
you to have actually gone there . Were
56:49
there some big things that you learned or was it just
56:51
meeting lots of people , making
56:53
lots of contacts and all that ?
56:55
Yeah , I wouldn't say
56:57
so . I came away
56:59
and I'm going to be a
57:01
really annoying guest and I'm not going to
57:03
put it into two things that I've learned , because that's
57:06
just I haven't got the brain space
57:08
yet to actually hone that
57:10
in , but I came away with
57:12
notes , not loads and loads of notes . Another
57:14
thing I like about these kind of events is sometimes
57:16
they can help reiterate
57:18
to yourself that you're on the right
57:21
track , that you know
57:23
things and you are doing things in a good
57:25
way , that you want to do . So that I
57:27
find very valuable . As you've already
57:29
said , meeting people is very valuable
57:32
. I've been . I think this is the first
57:34
conference I've been to . I've actually come
57:36
back with contact details and got back
57:38
in touch with those people , whether
57:40
for friendly chat , whether to actually
57:42
talk about guest swaps and
57:45
just sharing information Certainly not
57:47
a lot of sharing information
57:50
. For example , there was some you know , the
57:52
inevitable chat about AI
57:54
, and some of us have been chatting amongst
57:56
ourselves and sharing our experiences of
57:59
what we're trying within AI
58:01
, for example , show notes etc . So
58:04
, yeah , the connecting with people . But I did come
58:06
back with some notes and
58:08
the plan in my head
58:10
, which is good for me , because
58:13
everything can be a bit fuddled up in there with
58:15
all the information you've taken on , but
58:18
a plan in my head to actually look
58:20
at what I've taken from
58:23
it , find the most important things that
58:25
I want to actually implement . And there are a couple
58:27
of things I want to implement , but
58:29
to schedule those in a long , slow
58:32
process . So I'm going to say
58:34
, like , for this month I'm going
58:37
to do this small thing and next
58:39
month I'm going to do this small thing , so that
58:41
I can actually do them all
58:43
and they don't all get rushed together
58:45
and then probably , you know , by
58:48
the wayside or what have you . So
58:50
a little bit of just slowing down , looking
58:52
at it all and taking on the ones that I really want
58:55
to do , giving myself the time to actually
58:57
do them .
58:57
So what's your advice for people going to these types
59:00
of events ?
59:00
Well . So the other thing I wanted to say , actually
59:03
, is that I am a
59:05
very good networker . I
59:08
am absolutely happy to go
59:10
to events like these completely on my own
59:12
and go and talk to people . I
59:14
have no problem with that whatsoever . Not everybody
59:16
does . Also , I think people
59:19
often think that they're going to go to these events
59:21
and it's going to be cringey , or there's
59:23
going to be oh , we haven't talked about the
59:25
speed dating oh yeah , which
59:27
wasn't cringey , but you know
59:29
it's going to be really difficult
59:32
for them . At this particular event , there
59:34
was a table and it had some
59:36
extra things you could stick onto your
59:38
lanyard . For example
59:41
, my pronouns are or
59:43
I'm an introvert or I'm an extrovert
59:46
, which I think possibly yeah
59:48
is . I didn't use any of those . But if
59:50
you felt you needed a bit
59:52
of help when you're going
59:54
to be talking to strangers , it's a bit American , isn't it
59:56
? I was going to say that , and then I wasn't going to say
59:58
that , yeah , yeah
1:00:01
, I did think that , even
1:00:03
if you don't feel that you're very confident
1:00:06
in going to things on your own , we're
1:00:08
often told
1:00:11
we need to be selling ourselves and selling
1:00:13
our products and blah , blah , blah , selling
1:00:15
our show . Don't feel it has to
1:00:17
be like that Just be human
1:00:19
. Majority of people at these events
1:00:21
are human , but you know what I mean . You
1:00:24
know they're just ordinary humans , beings , and
1:00:26
it is can
1:00:29
be easier to just talk to people
1:00:31
than you think
1:00:33
, and I personally
1:00:35
make better connections when
1:00:37
I speak to a person in real life . Yeah
1:00:39
, yeah .
1:00:42
Well , everybody is in the same boat as well
1:00:44
, aren't they which ? is important , yeah
1:00:46
. So another thing that I would add to that is plan
1:00:48
, plan ahead , plan the different things
1:00:51
that you're going to go and see . If
1:00:53
you're coming to Evolutions or Podcast Movement , make
1:00:55
sure you go and see Amy Poehler and the
1:00:57
ridiculous English
1:01:00
guy that will talk for
1:01:02
10 minutes prior to Amy Poehler
1:01:04
. He's very good , you
1:01:07
should go and see him . So , yeah
1:01:09
, you know , planning is a good thing because
1:01:11
otherwise , actually , you're not going to get
1:01:13
the best out of some
1:01:15
of the speakers that you end up seeing there . I
1:01:18
think I don't know if you agree with that .
1:01:20
Yeah , I think it's going to save on your stress while
1:01:22
you're there as well . I definitely went through the
1:01:24
app , went through the agenda , ticked
1:01:26
off the ones on the agenda I wanted to go
1:01:29
to Didn't necessarily always go to
1:01:31
that ones , you know , sometimes I change my mind
1:01:33
but have a good understanding of
1:01:35
what's there and then you're not going to be stressed
1:01:38
rushing between rooms and
1:01:40
you're not going to be stressed about changing
1:01:42
your mind because you've got a good idea of what's going
1:01:44
on . I think that's a very good , very good idea
1:01:47
, james . Yeah , good point .
1:01:49
Yes , yes , especially the English guy
1:01:51
before Amy Poehler . And
1:01:55
the final question is what is the name of your podcast
1:01:58
and why should we listen ?
1:01:59
Oh , thank you so much . Yeah , so my podcast
1:02:01
is called Creativity Found
1:02:03
and it's born
1:02:05
out of my own experience , although I
1:02:07
didn't realise that until I'd been making
1:02:10
the show for quite a few episodes . But
1:02:12
basically I speak with people who have found
1:02:14
or re-found their creativity
1:02:17
later in life . So we talk
1:02:19
a lot about the hiatus period
1:02:21
, when , insensible , every
1:02:23
day , normal all of those in
1:02:25
bunny ears life , you know creativity
1:02:27
is put to the bottom of a pile and
1:02:29
how people have found their way back and how they
1:02:32
benefit from that in
1:02:35
their life now . So there's a lot
1:02:37
of personal journal , there's a
1:02:39
lot of wellbeing , there's a
1:02:41
lot of good advice on trying things and
1:02:43
not worrying if you're not perfect
1:02:45
at them , and it's from
1:02:48
all sorts of creative disciplines
1:02:50
. So my guests are from all over the world
1:02:52
, all sorts of creative disciplines , and
1:02:54
have so many different stories
1:02:56
.
1:02:57
Well , thank you , buzz Brown , for the tickets and thank you
1:02:59
, claire , for your time today .
1:03:01
Thank you so much . It's been fabulous .
1:03:03
Claire Waite-Brown from the Creativity Found
1:03:06
podcast .
1:03:06
Yeah , it was nice to hear that she
1:03:08
was given 10,000 sats
1:03:10
by a man in the queue for the bar
1:03:13
. This is how things work , isn't
1:03:15
it ?
1:03:15
I think when you get into the
1:03:17
weird underbelly of
1:03:19
Bitcoin stuff , you never know who's going to just
1:03:22
give you sats . It may be some random guy at a bar
1:03:24
.
1:03:25
You know that's how that works .
1:03:26
Show me your app and I'll show you mine , and you'll get 10,000
1:03:29
sats .
1:03:31
Say can I have a look at your QR code ? That's
1:03:34
right . Yeah
1:03:37
, no , but it was good to hear that . You
1:03:40
know she went to Todd . She
1:03:42
went to hear Todd talking about
1:03:45
that and value for value was something that Claire
1:03:47
has been doing for a while on her show
1:03:50
and everything else , and she liked Fairground
1:03:52
Tokens , which I was very , very pleased about .
1:03:54
Yes , congratulations .
1:03:55
I don't know quite what you think about Fairground
1:03:57
Tokens . I'm sure that Adam disapproves
1:04:00
, as he disapproves of most things that I say
1:04:02
.
1:04:04
I think all analogies are
1:04:07
fair game . They all fall down in some
1:04:09
way or another . It's
1:04:11
very hard to make analogies to any of this stuff
1:04:13
. I
1:04:15
like how she throws in blah blah blah
1:04:18
, because that's basically when
1:04:20
you start talking about Bitcoin and podcasting and
1:04:22
sats . There's always going to be a little
1:04:24
bit of blah blah blah in there .
1:04:25
Yeah , put money over into my wallet and blah , blah
1:04:28
, blah . Let's
1:04:30
look at some other events . Podcasting is coming
1:04:32
to South by Southwest , which is
1:04:34
in . What I was going to say is in your neck of the
1:04:36
woods , it's in Adam's neck of the woods , isn't it ? Austin
1:04:39
, kind of yes , early
1:04:41
March . And then , of course , there's Evolutions
1:04:44
, which I'm going to , sam's going to . There's
1:04:47
PodFrance as well , which they're doing
1:04:49
to put together podcasting's top
1:04:51
publishers with brands , agencies and buyers
1:04:54
. I'm not going to that bit , but I'm
1:04:56
sure it's going to be very good . The New Zealand
1:04:58
Podcasting Summit 2024 has been announced
1:05:01
on May the 11th in Auckland and the podcast
1:05:03
show in London , which I am going to
1:05:05
, as is Sam the 22nd
1:05:07
and 23rd of May , looking forward to that . Such
1:05:10
a good event and it should be very
1:05:12
excellent . This year . There's a creators section
1:05:15
, which they've not done before , so
1:05:18
hopefully we'll find
1:05:20
out more about that . And there are more events
1:05:22
, both paid for and free , at PodNews
1:05:24
virtual events or events in a
1:05:26
place with people , and if you're organising
1:05:28
something you can tell the world about , it's free to be listed
1:05:31
. Podnewsnet slash events . The
1:05:33
tech stuff on the Pod
1:05:35
News Weekly Review . Yes
1:05:38
, it's the stuff you'll find every Monday in the Pod News
1:05:40
newsletter . Here's where we do all of the tech
1:05:42
talk , and I'm delighted that you're here , dave
1:05:44
, because normally I am basically taking
1:05:47
the posts that you have posted on MasterDom
1:05:49
and then
1:05:51
rewriting those , and then Sam and I talk about them
1:05:53
. So
1:05:57
cut out the middleman .
1:05:59
Yeah , well , I basically did the same thing . I went and looked at my
1:06:01
email and looked at the namespace and like , hey , here we
1:06:03
go , what's going on ? And
1:06:05
the first thing that popped out was Eric
1:06:08
Pee-Pee . So
1:06:11
Helipad , that's the thing we all many
1:06:14
of us use to see our booster grams
1:06:16
and get those
1:06:18
messages and that kind of thing . I've
1:06:20
pretty much turned over the
1:06:22
source code of Hellypad over to Eric Peepee . He's
1:06:24
kind of running with that full , full steam
1:06:26
. Now I just got so much going on that it
1:06:29
was great to see him pick that up . And he's
1:06:31
got a new release . He's got this
1:06:33
lets you reply . So if somebody sends you
1:06:35
a booster , you can reply back and send Sats
1:06:37
back and a message . There's
1:06:40
a . Scent tab to let you
1:06:42
see all your Scent boost when you're replying
1:06:44
. He's got password protection in there
1:06:46
. You can see your automated boosts and
1:06:49
if you run an Umbrella or Start9 , you can
1:06:51
run it on there or you can run it on any machine
1:06:54
. He's got new app icons
1:06:56
for podcast guru and true fans
1:06:58
and LN beats Lots of great
1:07:00
stuff .
1:07:01
Ah , and as I talk , I
1:07:03
thought I'll go into Umbrella and I'll just check
1:07:05
whether the update is available and it is
1:07:07
. Oh really , yeah , there
1:07:11
it is Added . Missing user agent header when
1:07:13
calling the podcast index API . You'll be pleased
1:07:15
about that . That will be , and
1:07:17
various other entertaining things . Excellent , let's hit
1:07:20
the update button on that then . What could
1:07:22
possibly go wrong ?
1:07:23
I'm not going to do that because I'm podcasting from
1:07:25
my Umbrella , so I'm not going to risk this
1:07:27
at all . So I'm like terrible
1:07:29
decision .
1:07:31
Nobody wants that . Nobody wants that . So
1:07:34
that is a very cool thing and it's nice to see
1:07:36
Eric doing a ton of work
1:07:38
with that , which is nice . Phase
1:07:41
seven of the namespace . So the namespace
1:07:43
is lots of additional functions and additional
1:07:46
tools
1:07:48
and things for podcasting in
1:07:50
general . You have set
1:07:52
a closing date , haven't you ? Which is sometime
1:07:54
in the future .
1:07:55
It is , it is , it's . Why is that
1:07:57
? June 1st we sort
1:08:00
of intentionally slowed
1:08:02
down things . We were going when the
1:08:04
first first year and a half , two
1:08:06
years of the namespace development , we
1:08:08
were just going at a lightning speed and
1:08:11
that's just not great for anybody to keep
1:08:13
up a pace like that . And
1:08:15
I think it was good to slow down the
1:08:18
introduction of new tags and that kind of thing so
1:08:21
that hosts could catch up , apps
1:08:23
could catch up , and because these development
1:08:25
cycles , I mean it takes a long time . So
1:08:28
we intentionally kind of slowed everything
1:08:30
down and just stopped the frantic pace and
1:08:32
I feel like now , going forward
1:08:35
, it probably makes sense to have
1:08:37
roughly a six month cadence on bringing
1:08:40
out new phases . So
1:08:42
a phase is we
1:08:45
sort of have an idea for a bunch of features and
1:08:47
tags that we want , that
1:08:50
the community has said , hey , I want
1:08:52
this . And then
1:08:55
we sort of try to hash
1:08:57
them out and we discuss them
1:08:59
, debate them , try to find problems with them all the normal things
1:09:01
you do as you're developing new
1:09:03
things and
1:09:06
then at the end of the period
1:09:08
when that phase closes , we just do a red , you know , say okay
1:09:10
, where are we at ? Is this tag good enough
1:09:12
. Does it need more work ? If it
1:09:14
does , we'll just kick it to the next phase . If
1:09:18
this other tag or this other feature
1:09:21
enhancement maybe it's ready not
1:09:23
on June 1st , maybe
1:09:26
it's ready April 1st We'll go ahead and do it . It
1:09:28
doesn't mean we have to wait , but it does mean
1:09:30
that it's not a good time to do it . It
1:09:33
does mean that it's nice to have sort of a , I
1:09:35
think a six month expectation
1:09:39
that we're going to have a
1:09:41
new set of features to target
1:09:43
for a specific date , and that , I
1:09:45
think , helps everybody have sort
1:09:48
of a goal in mind for what dates and
1:09:50
they want to hit , so that we don't
1:09:53
just sit around and not so
1:09:55
we're not going too fast and we're also not going too
1:09:57
slow .
1:09:58
What's your favorite new feature
1:10:00
in this next
1:10:02
phase ? That's a nasty question
1:10:04
to ask , isn't it ?
1:10:06
I don't know if I have a favorite . I
1:10:09
would say that probably publisher feeds and
1:10:11
the publisher medium make a lot of
1:10:13
sense to me . But then I think
1:10:16
, do you want to explain what those are how
1:10:19
those work . Yeah , sure , so this is sort
1:10:22
of again like a backlink type of
1:10:24
situation or a pod roll , but
1:10:26
it takes a little bit of a different approach . So
1:10:28
if I'm a podcast
1:10:30
network or even a podcaster
1:10:32
that has four different
1:10:35
podcasts , well then maybe
1:10:37
I want to group my
1:10:39
podcast together in
1:10:41
a way where it's easier to discover
1:10:44
all the shows that belong
1:10:46
to me . You could think of this sort of like
1:10:48
as an open version of
1:10:50
Apple's channels feature
1:10:52
in the Apple podcast . So
1:10:55
you can say all right , I have
1:10:57
four podcasts and
1:10:59
I'm going to have a feed , and
1:11:01
the feed is going to have a medium of publisher
1:11:04
, and so the only four
1:11:06
things in that feed are going to be links to
1:11:08
the other feeds , and
1:11:12
you can go in reverse as well . So each
1:11:14
podcast feed has
1:11:17
a link back up to the publisher feed . So it's
1:11:19
sort of a two-way street . I can start
1:11:21
at the publisher feed and find all
1:11:23
the shows that that publisher creates , or
1:11:25
I can find one of their feeds , go
1:11:28
back up the chain to the publisher
1:11:30
feed and then discover all the other ones . So
1:11:32
it's sort of a two-way street and you get some
1:11:34
verification there too . I'm
1:11:37
not just saying that I'm part of this publisher
1:11:40
. The publisher's feed also
1:11:42
says yes , this is part of this publisher
1:11:44
.
1:11:44
Right , yeah , so one links to one and
1:11:46
the other links to the other , and that sort
1:11:49
of helps you , and that's different from
1:11:51
Podroll , because Podroll you can link to anything
1:11:53
you like . So this show links
1:11:56
to the BuzzCast show
1:11:59
because of our sponsor
1:12:01
and also because we like it , and
1:12:04
so that's all fine , but
1:12:07
that's very different from this , which
1:12:09
is very much more focused on . Here
1:12:11
are all of the shows that this publisher
1:12:13
has produced .
1:12:14
Yes , that's right . And
1:12:16
on the medium front , we've also got a proposal
1:12:18
for adding a new medium
1:12:21
of course . So that would be
1:12:23
like some
1:12:25
kind of teaching course or an
1:12:28
educational type course .
1:12:31
Right . So we've got mediums of audiobooks
1:12:33
.
1:12:33
I think We've got mediums
1:12:36
of music , obviously
1:12:38
podcasts and now
1:12:41
courses , yeah , and I think these make
1:12:43
sense to distinguish
1:12:45
between , because we're about obviously
1:12:47
, we've done tons of stuff with music over the last
1:12:49
year , year and a half but
1:12:52
I think audiobooks make
1:12:54
a ton of sense . We're
1:12:56
already talking I talked
1:12:59
in an email today with somebody who's doing
1:13:01
some audiobook work and they're
1:13:03
looking to publish those in a podcast
1:13:06
feed , and so , as we distinguish
1:13:08
between these different medium types , I
1:13:10
think it makes sense to go slow and pick , choose
1:13:13
wisely and course . Course
1:13:15
makes a lot of sense to me . I mean that it
1:13:18
just seems sort of intuitive that that would be
1:13:20
a thing that you would want to look for at a high level
1:13:22
, yeah .
1:13:23
No , I think that that makes a bunch of sense . There's
1:13:25
more details , of course , on that
1:13:27
if you go in through now . How
1:13:30
could people find more details on
1:13:32
these new features , I wonder
1:13:34
?
1:13:36
It's super easy , Jay . You just Google
1:13:38
for podcast namespace , click on the GitHub
1:13:41
repo and then go to the discussions tab and
1:13:43
then click on the phases tab .
1:13:44
It could not be simpler , so it's
1:13:46
super easy to me . I have a
1:13:48
feeling that podcasting2.org
1:13:51
should have a link somewhere , yeah
1:13:55
. I think , so too . Boostergram .
1:13:57
Corner , corner .
1:13:58
Corner On the Pod
1:14:00
News Weekly Review . Yes , our favorite time of
1:14:03
the week .
1:14:04
It's Boostergram Corner and , yes
1:14:07
, lots of boosts . As ever
1:14:09
. We get boosts for the Pod News Daily , as well
1:14:11
as boosts for this very show . And
1:14:14
yeah , and do
1:14:16
you want to read the first one ? The first one out is
1:14:18
a bit weird isn't it ?
1:14:19
Yeah , it's 1,024 sets
1:14:21
and it just says great show , great show .
1:14:24
Excellent . Well , thank you , Thanks . Thank you , random
1:14:27
, anonymous person . The good news is now
1:14:29
that with the new helipad I can
1:14:31
hit reply on that one and
1:14:33
I can , yeah , so I
1:14:36
will do that and ask them who they are for the next time .
1:14:38
Who are ?
1:14:38
you , who are you ? Thanks
1:14:40
, random person for your 1k boost
1:14:42
, but yes
1:14:45
, but who are you ? 10,000
1:14:47
sets from Adam Curry , who
1:14:50
is very grumpy at me again this
1:14:53
time because I linked to
1:14:55
a video of your
1:14:58
board meeting from last week and
1:15:02
how it shows on the new Apple Podcasts
1:15:05
app and forgot
1:15:07
, of course , that I'd left a variable
1:15:10
speed on , so it was at 1.25%
1:15:13
and he was there
1:15:15
. He called it atrocious
1:15:17
and triggering . Speed
1:15:20
listening is not healthy people . Sorry
1:15:22
, adam .
1:15:23
Well , at least he paid you 10,000 sets for the privilege .
1:15:25
Yeah , at least he paid me 10,000 sets for that . And
1:15:28
I have to say I
1:15:31
didn't realize , because I've not been using an iPhone
1:15:33
. I didn't realize that Apple iPhones
1:15:36
don't have Skip Silence on
1:15:38
them . Yeah
1:15:40
, so all of the podcast apps that I've
1:15:42
ever used has had Skip Silence and all
1:15:44
of a sudden I discover that Apple Podcast is missing
1:15:47
this obvious basic feature . And
1:15:50
I'm there going . I really , really
1:15:52
miss that , but still , there we are .
1:15:55
That turned on . I used to have all of it . I
1:15:57
used to have the increase , speed , the gap
1:15:59
, skipper , all of that . I
1:16:02
turned it all off a couple of years ago . It
1:16:06
was baking my brain .
1:16:07
I couldn't handle it . Well
1:16:09
, there is some podcast that I can only
1:16:11
listen to if I turn all of the Skip .
1:16:13
Silence off .
1:16:16
Including ours , evidently . I mean Pocketcast
1:16:18
lets you choose them by
1:16:21
show , so you can have a specific setting
1:16:23
for I don't know the new media show
1:16:26
and a specific setting for the
1:16:28
podcasting 2.0 show , and
1:16:31
those are different in Pocketcasts
1:16:33
, but I'm being a good boy and I'm just using the Apple Podcast
1:16:35
app for now , who do you listen to
1:16:38
at a faster speed ?
1:16:39
us or new media show ?
1:16:40
Oh , the new media show has all of the
1:16:42
silent skipping 2X
1:16:46
, 2X and everything else and
1:16:50
it's yeah , I have to be
1:16:53
. I love that show when
1:16:55
it's a normal show and I would completely
1:16:58
agree , by the way , with what Adam
1:17:00
was saying . It's just not the same without
1:17:02
Todd . Just not the same . Don't
1:17:05
leave me Todd , co-creators . Just
1:17:07
not the same without Todd . So I'm
1:17:09
hoping that Todd comes back on that show
1:17:11
relatively soon , but
1:17:14
yeah , no , it's good . A thousand
1:17:16
cents from Andrew . Now , he did
1:17:18
tell me how to pronounce his surname
1:17:21
and I've completely forgotten . Do
1:17:23
you want to have a go ? Yeah , andrew Grummit .
1:17:25
Andrew Grummit there you go . Yeah
1:17:28
, one of Adam's employees at PodShow
1:17:30
.
1:17:31
Oh wow , there you go .
1:17:34
One of the first , I think . I think he was
1:17:36
a very perhaps one of the foundational
1:17:39
employees at Meavio .
1:17:41
I had no idea . I had no idea
1:17:43
. Are you these newcomers in the industry ?
1:17:47
Whippersnappers , no idea . 2222
1:17:50
Sats from Gene Bean . He says welcome to the world
1:17:52
of Apple phone users , James .
1:17:54
Yes , it's been an entertainment . There's
1:17:56
another blog on the way , I'm sure 2222
1:17:59
Sats from Mea Mortals , from
1:18:01
Kyren . He says here's some
1:18:03
fresh goss . You might not know the swankiest
1:18:05
, and then he uses a phrase that I have no
1:18:07
idea bougiest , bougiest , bougie
1:18:10
, bougiest , like bourgeois . Oh
1:18:12
, okay , the swankiest
1:18:14
, bougiest gym I've ever checked
1:18:16
out is Total Fusion Newstead . Kyren
1:18:19
has no Kyren
1:18:21
and I . He talks about gyms and
1:18:24
I'm no , no
1:18:26
interest in gyms . But anyway , the reason , the
1:18:28
reason why he says it is they have a podcast Studio
1:18:33
on their ground floor . So that's nice
1:18:35
. Sam is here next week
1:18:37
and I have just booked a
1:18:40
. I've just booked a proper podcast studio
1:18:42
for next week .
1:18:43
Oh , you sprung for the big boy yeah .
1:18:46
So I will not be . I
1:18:48
will not be , I'll be in the
1:18:50
pod in West End and
1:18:53
I will not be in this slightly echoy room . So
1:18:56
that's so . That's good news . So Sam
1:18:58
is back next week .
1:18:59
Sam is here in Brisbane next
1:19:01
week In honor of Sam . I
1:19:04
didn't mention it , but I'm doing the . I'm doing
1:19:06
the show from the bubble
1:19:08
bath with my red wine in
1:19:10
. In honor of Sam , I'm holding
1:19:12
down the Fort . Sam .
1:19:13
Yeah , cause that's that's what he always
1:19:16
does . Yeah , and
1:19:18
then 500 sats , inexplicable
1:19:20
500 sats from now . Is
1:19:22
this Joe Rowey or Joe Rowey , but
1:19:24
anyway , 500 sats from him through fountain
1:19:26
. I like pickleball .
1:19:29
Oh good . Oh that's , that's okay
1:19:31
, great .
1:19:33
You get some interest this is .
1:19:35
This is an interesting set of booster grams you get on this show
1:19:37
.
1:19:38
Yeah , thank you for those boosts . And
1:19:40
just to remind you , sam and
1:19:42
I share these boosts . What
1:19:44
we should have done is we should have had a split
1:19:46
for you , dave . We
1:19:48
don't have the technology to do that . I'm afraid
1:19:51
we will have a look at splitting that . So
1:19:56
so the pod , the pod news weekly review . What do
1:19:58
I normally say here ? The pod news weekly review is separate
1:20:00
from pod news , sam , and I share everything . So
1:20:03
please give us a boost in your new podcast
1:20:05
apps . That would be lovely . Modern podcast appscom
1:20:07
is , I believe , the place where you should be going these
1:20:10
days , or you can
1:20:12
slip us some fiat
1:20:14
at weeklypodnewsnet
1:20:16
. So what's happened for you
1:20:18
this week then , dave ?
1:20:20
I'm going to be working on on trying
1:20:22
to get back in the namespace and sort of getting
1:20:24
that thing tidied up . I started out
1:20:26
a little bit today . I think
1:20:29
is I've been
1:20:31
really focused on the activity , pub bridge
1:20:33
and and I've got
1:20:36
. I've got a little bit
1:20:38
more to do on that , but I'm really trying to
1:20:40
resist the urge to code that . And
1:20:42
because what it's missing is search
1:20:45
, you're doing it because it's fun . I
1:20:47
am , I have , and
1:20:49
you know this as a as a as a programmer
1:20:52
, you know that when you get into something
1:20:54
that's really fun and challenging it's , it's
1:20:56
hard to break away from it and do the thing that you
1:20:58
know you should the drudgery . So
1:21:00
I'm I'm I'm resisting the urge
1:21:02
to code more on that and I'm going
1:21:05
to stay in the namespace for the most part . And
1:21:07
also I got a little bit of a cleanup
1:21:09
to do on on the index . We've
1:21:12
we have some sweepers that go through and check
1:21:14
for old feeds that
1:21:17
are for a forward and we give them grace
1:21:19
periods . And then we have some things that
1:21:21
look for iTunes IDs or Apple
1:21:23
podcast IDs that have changed and just
1:21:25
a bunch of cleanup scripts . And there's
1:21:28
been some bugs in those that have been squashing this
1:21:30
week , so just stuff like that .
1:21:32
Well , I enjoyed your your talking in
1:21:34
the the podcasting 2.0 podcast
1:21:37
last week about avoiding burnout
1:21:39
and stuff like that , and I was . I was taking
1:21:42
notes all the way through there .
1:21:45
It's a hard thing in the in , yeah , hard thing
1:21:47
in open source , very , very common
1:21:49
in open source , yeah . So what happened for you
1:21:51
this week ?
1:21:51
James , I have been cursing
1:21:54
visual studio code , which
1:21:56
is the , the , the
1:21:58
, the , the programming editor that I use
1:22:00
. I've been cursing that because
1:22:02
they made a change . I
1:22:04
foolishly pressed the oh yeah , update
1:22:06
button for the latest
1:22:09
version of visual studio code and
1:22:11
then discovered that the
1:22:14
, the SSH tool
1:22:16
that it used basically , was
1:22:19
no longer going to support
1:22:21
older Linux
1:22:24
distros or something . So
1:22:27
I'm using Amazon Linux 2 . I
1:22:29
think on one of on on the main pod
1:22:32
news box , or was using that , and
1:22:34
all of a sudden it wouldn't connect to it anymore , and
1:22:36
so I couldn't edit any code
1:22:38
. But , more to the point , I couldn't do some
1:22:41
of the editorial work that I do , which is
1:22:43
still actually , you know , going
1:22:45
in and editing .
1:22:46
What kind of connection is this ? Is this
1:22:48
does ? Does VS code ? Does it SSH
1:22:51
over to the box ? Yeah
1:22:54
, it is . It's so to speak .
1:22:56
Yeah , it SSH is over to the box , but then
1:22:58
it installs some software on that box
1:23:01
and uses that as a channel
1:23:03
back and forth
1:23:05
. Okay yeah , and
1:23:07
all of a sudden it stopped working . Why
1:23:10
Do you know ? Why Do ?
1:23:11
you know why .
1:23:12
Yeah , it was just
1:23:14
hidden away in the release notes . It was oh
1:23:16
, we're no longer supporting this version of , I don't
1:23:18
know , G-Lib C or something equally dull
1:23:20
.
1:23:23
Oh , and I and .
1:23:24
I , and so I ended up having to
1:23:26
move
1:23:29
the pod news box yesterday
1:23:31
, which I didn't want to do , and that's
1:23:33
now running Amazon Linux 2023
1:23:35
. That's nice . And PHP eight
1:23:37
, which means that , of course , that quite
1:23:39
a lot of my dodgy PHP isn't working
1:23:41
at the moment . I'm literally as , as we
1:23:43
speak , I'm looking at the terminal window and
1:23:46
I'm looking at the errors coming
1:23:48
up and seeing another fatal error and
1:23:50
that's oh dear . That's something else that I need to go and fix
1:23:52
this kind of stuff
1:23:55
. Oh , so anyway . So it's
1:23:57
been a it's been a great week of , you
1:23:59
know , fiddling around with that sort of thing . And , of course
1:24:02
, google and Yahoo
1:24:04
both made a big change about bulk
1:24:07
email , which means that you have to
1:24:09
do certain things if you want your email to actually
1:24:11
get to people .
1:24:12
Yes , this is the long awaited changes
1:24:14
that , yeah , have been hearing about
1:24:16
this . What , what exactly did
1:24:19
they change ?
1:24:20
Yeah . So there's , you know , you have to have de-kim
1:24:22
and you have to have , you know , signing for mail
1:24:26
and all this kind of stuff , and it's just so
1:24:28
. I mean , yes , they're doing the
1:24:30
right thing , it's a bit like Apple podcasts yes
1:24:32
, they're doing the right thing , but it's so annoying .
1:24:34
Yeah , yeah , I feel
1:24:36
yeah , dmark , and all that yeah .
1:24:39
Yeah , yeah , dmark , and then , and then there's , and
1:24:41
then there's some headers that you also need to
1:24:43
include as well , and the person
1:24:45
that runs the , the
1:24:48
not quite open source but nearly piece
1:24:50
of mailing list software that I use , has
1:24:53
misread what they've said
1:24:55
. And oh , it's just yeah
1:24:57
, so that's been a bundle of fun , but still
1:24:59
. But there we are , but apart from that , it's been lovely
1:25:01
.
1:25:02
You will survive .
1:25:03
You will survive . Yeah , and
1:25:05
looking forward to Sam being
1:25:07
here in Brisbane
1:25:10
for the first time next week , so that
1:25:12
should be good . We're all going
1:25:14
out for a beer on Thursday night . If
1:25:16
anybody else wants to join , then find the
1:25:18
Brisbane podcasters list on Facebook
1:25:21
and you can come along
1:25:23
as well , or just send me an email Then
1:25:25
. That's cool and that's it for this week . Thank
1:25:28
you to both of our guests , darrell and
1:25:30
to Claire . You can also listen to the pod
1:25:32
news daily and subscribe to the pod news newsletter
1:25:35
for more of these stories and other
1:25:37
things too .
1:25:38
You can give feedback to James and Sam by sending
1:25:40
this show a boostergram . If your podcast app
1:25:42
doesn't support boost , then grab a new app from
1:25:44
pod newsnet slash new podcast
1:25:46
apps .
1:25:47
Our music is from studio dragonfly . Our
1:25:49
voiceover is Sheila D . We
1:25:51
use clean feed from main audio and we're sponsored
1:25:53
by why your podcast isn't growing
1:25:55
? A new podcast for podcasters and
1:25:58
hosted and sponsored by Buzzsprout podcast
1:26:00
hosting . Made easy , Get updated
1:26:03
every day . Subscribe
1:26:05
to our newsletter at podnewsnet .
1:26:08
Tell your friends and grow the show and support
1:26:10
us , and support us .
1:26:12
The pod news weekly review will return
1:26:14
next week . Keep listening .
1:26:17
And by popular demand .
1:26:25
That's horrible .
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More