Podchaser Logo
Home
Copping out? Biden skips UN climate conference

Copping out? Biden skips UN climate conference

Released Saturday, 2nd December 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Copping out? Biden skips UN climate conference

Copping out? Biden skips UN climate conference

Copping out? Biden skips UN climate conference

Copping out? Biden skips UN climate conference

Saturday, 2nd December 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

This is The Guardian. Hey,

0:10

it's Ryan Reynolds, owner and user of Mint

0:12

Mobile, with a special holiday message. If you

0:14

sign up now for three months, you get

0:16

three months free on every one of our

0:19

plans, even unlimited. Now, I realize this is

0:21

more of a holiday offer than it is

0:23

a holiday message, but if you read between

0:25

the lines, you can see a message in

0:27

there. It says we love you. Visit mintmobile.com/switch

0:29

for the offer. Limited time new customer

0:31

offer. Activate within 45 days. Additional taxes, fees,

0:33

and restrictions apply. Unlimited customers using more than

0:35

40 gigabytes per month will experience lower speeds.

0:38

Video streams at 480p. See mintmobile.com for details.

0:43

Most of you aren't just listening right

0:46

now. You're driving, cleaning, and even exercising.

0:49

But what if you could be saving money by switching to

0:51

Progressive? Drivers who save

0:53

by switching save nearly $750 on average, and auto customers

0:55

qualify for

0:58

an average of seven discounts. Multitask

1:00

right now. Quote today

1:02

at progressive.com. Progressive

1:04

Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. National average 12-month savings

1:06

of $744 by new customers surveyed who saved with

1:09

Progressive between June 2022 and May 2023. Potential

1:12

savings will vary. Discounts not available in all states and situations.

1:21

This week, the United Nations Conference of

1:24

the Parties on Climate, or as it's

1:26

better known COP28, kicked

1:29

off in Dubai. I pray

1:31

with all my heart that

1:33

COP28 will be another

1:36

critical turning point towards

1:39

genuine transformational action

1:42

at a time when already,

1:45

as scientists have been warning for so

1:47

long, we are

1:49

seeing alarming tipping points being reached. Over

1:52

the next week or so, leaders from

1:54

around the world, senior ministers, and officials

1:56

from 198 countries will come together. to

2:00

hash out deals and compromises

2:02

with the intended goal of

2:05

tackling the climate emergency. But

2:07

there will be one big

2:09

name missing from the attendees

2:11

list. President Joe Biden. Vice

2:14

President Kamala Harris will lead the

2:16

American delegation, including US climate envoy

2:18

John Kerry. Earlier this week, the

2:20

White House announced President Biden is skipping the

2:22

event. Biden pledged

2:24

to make the fight against climate breakdown

2:26

one of his top priorities. And so

2:28

folks, we've got to listen to the

2:30

scientists and the economists and

2:33

the national security experts. They

2:35

all tell us this is code red.

2:37

But the news of his absence from

2:40

this year's conference has frustrated activists. So

2:43

what message does it send to Americans

2:45

and to people around the world that

2:47

the president of the United States is

2:49

not going to cop? With US oil

2:52

and gas production set to

2:54

reach record highs this year, has

2:56

Joe Biden done enough to tackle

2:58

the climate emergency? And for

3:00

the second time in as many months,

3:02

has Biden angered enough younger voters that

3:04

many will abandon him? I'm

3:07

Jonathan Friedland, columnist at The Guardian,

3:09

and this is Politics Weekly America.

3:15

The climate crisis feels like someone's writing your future for you

3:17

and that you don't have an option and don't have the

3:19

ability to breathe clean air in

3:22

a sense because this is Jerome Foster, climate

3:24

activist who a couple of years ago became

3:26

the youngest ever White House adviser. I was

3:29

looking at like a landscape painting and a

3:31

lot of older people were thinking about it

3:33

and thinking about nature as a refuge in

3:35

a place for escape and where time feels

3:38

endless. But for young people, the environment doesn't

3:40

feel that way anymore. And as a young

3:42

person, I felt that very deeply and understanding

3:44

that nature felt like something that was a

3:46

ticking time bomb. And for like every moment

3:48

I had to grab onto because maybe it

3:50

won't be here next year. And that

3:53

is a very scary feeling growing up. And I think that

3:55

is what sparked my generation

3:57

to say that we can't live like this

3:59

anymore. Jerome's journey to the

4:01

White House started unusually with him

4:03

standing outside the building with a

4:05

placard following in the footsteps of

4:07

the likes of Greta Thunberg. On

4:10

my first Friday it was pouring down raining

4:12

like it was flooding up to my ankles

4:14

and then right after I ended my strike

4:18

the sun came right out. At the time there

4:20

was only 10 to 20 young people that were climate striking and

4:23

after a few weeks I realised that this was something

4:25

much bigger than I realised and that it wasn't just

4:27

me that was feeling these emotions but it was a

4:30

large percentage of my generation. With

4:33

the fact that we were skipping

4:35

school we're saying our education is

4:37

on the line and that we

4:39

will forego our future and our

4:41

careers for making a statement

4:43

like this it allowed us to be able

4:45

to as a generation show the

4:47

world that we that the world has to do

4:49

something about this and has to do something with urgency and

4:51

decisiveness. So after striking

4:53

for over a year what

4:56

happened exactly in 2021 that brought you

4:59

inside the White House. During

5:02

the climate strikes during the the time in

5:04

which Greta Thunberg came to Washington DC to

5:06

join I had launched an

5:08

organisation called One Million of Us in which

5:10

we worked on the goal of mobilising one

5:12

million young people to register and to vote

5:14

by the 2020 elections and

5:17

we had an entire coalition with other

5:19

organisations in which we stopped at every

5:21

presidential stop on every presidential candidate's way

5:24

through the country and said you need

5:26

to prioritize climate justice and from that

5:28

we were able to mobilize over 1.8 million

5:31

young people across the country to turn

5:34

out and to really show that we

5:36

will put our votes where

5:38

our words are and not

5:40

even two months later I got a call from the White House

5:43

that they wanted me to be a part of the

5:45

Environmental Justice Advisory Council and I was 18

5:48

years old and I was just leaving

5:50

a class from college and they said

5:52

we would actually be working to provide

5:54

recommendations to the whole of government of

5:56

all federal agencies and working on what

5:58

we could do to to advance environmental justice

6:01

in a way that isn't just about renewable

6:03

energy, but it's also about looking and restoring

6:05

the past damage that the climate crisis has

6:08

already wrecked. And it was

6:10

something we've been fighting for since 2016. I

6:13

feel like for young people to actually be taken seriously

6:15

in political spaces. And for us to not just be

6:18

something that they mention in a speech, but something that they

6:21

have accountability to within an

6:24

advisory council like this. And it

6:26

was a moment of joy and also a moment of

6:29

hope in a sense that we could do a

6:31

lot more. What a phone

6:33

call to get. And in that moment, you

6:35

became the youngest ever advisor at the

6:37

White House. As you've said, you were just 18 when that

6:40

call came. Just briefly explain to us

6:42

what that entails, what work you

6:44

do on the White

6:46

House Environmental Justice Advisory Council.

6:48

And we should obviously stress here that you're

6:50

not speaking to us today as a spokesperson

6:52

for the US government. These are just your

6:55

own views. But what does it mean to

6:57

be on that council? What work do you do? Yes,

7:00

I cannot speak on behalf of the White House

7:02

itself, but I am a private

7:04

citizen advisor. And what that means is the

7:06

first month that I joined in, I think,

7:09

March of 2021, we

7:11

were working on the Justice40 initiative,

7:14

which means that 40% of investment benefits go

7:16

to frontline communities and disadvantaged communities that are

7:18

being impacted by the climate crisis. So

7:21

what that meant is that we had to

7:23

do a lot of structural work to make

7:25

sure those 40% investments. When those

7:27

communities were, you

7:29

could actually identify what a disadvantaged community

7:31

is on a very concrete level. And

7:35

we had very short timelines of sometimes two

7:37

to four weeks where we had to write

7:39

a 40-page recommendation sheet. And it turned into

7:41

100 pages in referencing and then talking to

7:43

friends who were in the environmental movement about

7:45

what recommendations we should send and

7:47

how they should send that money to communities so that it

7:49

actually reaches them. And

7:52

it was sometimes nine hours

7:54

of meetings that we'd

7:56

go to. My professor was very mad at

7:58

me for not going to... class, but it

8:00

was something that I thought was very important to

8:03

do. And basically every

8:05

month from that March of 2021, we've

8:07

been sending in recommendations on

8:09

what they should do with regard to funding

8:11

communities, making sure that they aren't investing in

8:13

and continuing to perpetuate the climate crisis. And

8:16

people will have an image of being a White House

8:19

advisor. I'm sure you get this from friends a lot,

8:21

where they just assume you stroll into the Oval Office,

8:23

have a quick word with the president. Do

8:26

you ever speak to President Biden directly? I

8:28

think your laugh is telling me that no,

8:30

you don't. I've never had a

8:32

conversation with President Biden. A lot of our work

8:34

is just the paper. Like a lot of our conditions manifest

8:37

their ways into paperwork

8:39

and what the president will see and review. And

8:41

we'll be on the kind of first paragraph that

8:43

he'll read about what actions we recommend he should

8:46

take. Through that work that you're

8:48

describing though, that things do get down.

8:50

So let's dive into that a bit.

8:52

Some of the policies that the Biden

8:54

administration has implemented.

8:57

Can you just give us two or three

8:59

examples of actual policy changes you and your

9:01

colleagues on the council have actually implemented made

9:03

happen, thanks to being there? One

9:06

thing I can really point to is the climate

9:09

and economic justice screening tool, in which I talked

9:11

about the Justice for the Initiative, in which we're

9:13

making 40% of investments go to frontline communities. We

9:15

have to first identify what is a

9:18

disadvantaged community so that federal agencies can't

9:20

distort that. So it continues to go to

9:22

wealthier and wider communities that have historically received

9:25

funding for the climate crisis to

9:27

be able to be insulated from it.

9:29

Really what it's supposed to be is that

9:32

if you log onto a website, you can

9:34

see in your zip code where the funding

9:36

is going. There's more examples of that within

9:38

how we've asked the federal government to

9:40

cap old oil wells that have been in indigenous and

9:43

in black communities that have been sitting there for sometimes

9:45

50 to 70 years. We're

9:47

also been working with communities on

9:50

making sure they have cleanup projects

9:52

within military industrial sites, which have

9:54

had chemical spills in communities at

9:57

highest risk of cancer because of

9:59

the government. lack of care for

10:01

their cleanup and caring for the

10:03

environment. And

10:11

what's fascinating here is that in what you're

10:14

explaining there that is environment is as you're

10:16

defining it in the there in the White

10:18

House is not just a matter of bringing

10:20

down carbon emissions it touches on all these

10:23

other kind of justice issues including poverty including

10:25

as you said discrimination with you know minority

10:27

areas that have been less well-served but a

10:29

lot of attention has gone on big policies

10:32

like for example the Bill that Better

10:35

Act and famously the Inflation Reduction Act.

10:37

The Inflation Reduction Act is also the

10:39

most significant investment ever in

10:41

climate change ever. Lower

10:47

utility bill, taking an American

10:49

job, leading the world to a

10:52

clean energy future. These are the

10:54

big flagship pieces of legislation of

10:57

the Biden administration and several of

10:59

them have incorporated elements

11:01

to address the climate crisis.

11:04

And Joe Biden himself talks about them a lot

11:07

in that context. Can you give us just a

11:09

couple of examples of how those big set piece

11:11

pieces of legislation particularly the Inflation

11:13

Reduction Act have helped in terms

11:15

of climate and environment? Thinking

11:18

about the climate crisis in three main ways of the

11:20

past, present and future is something that's very crucial in

11:23

the work that we do. And understanding that when we look at

11:25

the future a lot of what the

11:27

legislation like the Inflation Reduction Act and the

11:30

other big legislations like that do is oftentimes

11:33

in tackling ways in which

11:35

we can decarbonize our

11:38

existing infrastructure and

11:40

giving subsidies for people to be able to

11:42

transition to electric vehicles and speed up that

11:44

transition to reach a very

11:46

equitable timeline in which it

11:48

is realistic for us to be able to reach that 1.5

11:51

degree target that we must reach. And

11:53

that's the future aspect of it. But

11:55

within the climate crisis and understanding solutions to

11:58

it we have to think about the past

12:00

and the present. And that for

12:03

us to have gotten here as a society,

12:05

we had to have certain mechanisms in our

12:07

economy that allowed us to be able to

12:09

prioritize the

12:11

exploitation for profit over

12:14

the existence of nature. And

12:16

we've come from a society

12:18

in which slavery was the beginning

12:21

mechanism in which we thought about

12:23

exploitation, where we could think we

12:25

could exploit people and cultures limitlessly

12:27

with no cost. But now we're

12:29

explaining nature limitlessly and thinking there's

12:31

no cost and thinking that the

12:34

forest is only valuable for the wood that

12:36

it produces, but not for the oxygen that

12:38

it gives us. And thinking

12:40

about that the world has something greater

12:42

than an economic value, but a social

12:45

and health and wellbeing value that we

12:47

don't take into account often at all.

12:49

It's about rebuilding the communities that have

12:51

been impacted by natural disasters. And the

12:54

federal government has done nothing to rebuild

12:56

them in a meaningful way. And

12:59

indeed people talk about the fact

13:01

that the Inflation Reduction Act invested

13:03

or invests around $340

13:06

billion in investment and tax

13:08

breaks, which could meant

13:10

to make the USA world leader

13:13

in making the stuff that leads

13:15

to renewable energy and

13:17

clean energy. And so that's, you

13:19

know, many people say that's a

13:21

game changer in the business of

13:23

getting the whole world into cleaner

13:25

technology. Now, what about those decisions

13:27

that the Biden administration has made that

13:30

maybe you don't agree with? I'm thinking here

13:32

about, for example, the Willow

13:34

Project and just explain to our listeners what that is

13:37

and why that was something you wished had

13:39

not been passed. Yes, so the

13:41

Willow Project is a project that President

13:44

Biden approved earlier this year that would

13:46

be equivalent to increasing the

13:48

US's emissions by 4%. And

13:51

with the US committing to getting to

13:53

net zero within the next few decades,

13:56

it is completely counterintuitive to their

13:59

actions. And the oil product has

14:01

been the largest oil and gas leasing on

14:03

US federal land. My strong inclination

14:05

was to disapprove of it across the board.

14:09

But the advice I got from council

14:11

was that if that were the case, I

14:13

may very well lose in court and

14:17

lose that case in court to

14:19

the oil company and then

14:21

not be able to do what I

14:23

really want to do beyond that. There was

14:25

a massive backlash. If young people using social

14:28

media to basically state why

14:30

they are mad about president Biden continuing

14:32

to be on the side of fossil fuels

14:35

and only really paying lip service and

14:37

giving cheap talk to what he promises

14:39

to do. There's a massive

14:41

groundswell of people on TikTok who showed their concern.

14:43

And then in the council, we said, why don't

14:46

we use that power and send the letters to

14:48

the president? This isn't what we should be doing.

14:50

We should be changing our actions and we should

14:52

be changing that status quo, not continuing in ramping

14:54

up, going into that with the fossil industry that

14:57

has led to a decrease

14:59

in the size of the Willow project,

15:02

but we don't want that. We want to complete

15:04

an utter reversal of their action to permit this

15:07

oil and gas project, because it's so insidious

15:09

in thinking that you can have it both

15:12

ways in which you can go into the

15:14

fossil industry and then go and make a

15:16

speech about how the climate crisis is distorting

15:18

entire communities. You have to be on what side? And

15:21

the question to Joe Biden is what side are you

15:23

on? And what do you make of this decision

15:25

by Joe Biden not to attend COP28

15:28

in Dubai? Of

15:30

course, other U.S. officials will be there.

15:33

We know that there'll be attending meetings,

15:35

there'll be giving talks, but not the

15:37

president himself. And we've yet to see

15:40

an official explanation as

15:42

to why he's not going. There have been some

15:44

rumors that it's because he needs to focus on

15:46

the ongoing conflict in the Middle East. But

15:49

then there's another adviser saying that wasn't the case. Whatever

15:51

the reason to you, Jerome,

15:54

how does it look that Joe Biden is not going

15:56

to be there? It's very disappointing

15:58

for the- US president

16:00

who has is representing a country that

16:02

has historic responsibility for decarbonizing because they

16:05

have been the largest emitter for so

16:07

many years, even though the second largest

16:09

emitter, they have been the first for

16:11

so long. And I

16:14

feel like it's a moment of understanding

16:16

that he has a responsibility

16:18

at COP 28. Would it ever

16:20

lead you this decision would ever lead you to

16:23

say it's best for you to resign your place

16:25

on the White House Council? No,

16:28

the White House Environmental Council

16:30

is very nationally focused. And

16:32

I think the US has good intention

16:34

within the individuals that work within

16:37

the country. And I think actions

16:39

like the Willow Project and him not attending COP

16:41

28 and him continuing to lease oil

16:43

and gas, that is something

16:45

that we have to continue to fight against. And if

16:48

we're not in these rooms, then we're back at the

16:50

position which we're quite striking in front of the White

16:52

House and begging for them to listen to us. But

16:55

now we have real kind of leverage to be

16:57

able to demand change. That is

16:59

something we haven't had before. I think

17:01

that is why I have to continue

17:03

pushing, continue to be loud and aggressive

17:05

within our ask for them to really

17:07

be the climate president like he said he will

17:10

be. It's shaping up that he isn't being that

17:12

if he continues down this path. Our

17:19

focus on this podcast is all in the politics

17:21

of these things. And there is

17:23

real politics here because a crucial

17:25

constituency in Joe Biden getting elected

17:28

in 2020 was young

17:31

voters. Young voters may in some ways

17:33

made the difference. And yet

17:35

there's research now from the Pew Research Center

17:37

polling of Americans. Taken

17:39

earlier this summer before the blow, as it

17:41

may be seen of this decision not to

17:44

go to COP 28, where a

17:46

majority of Democrats age between 18 to 29,

17:48

that's right, the group that you fall into, saying

17:51

that the Biden administration could be doing

17:53

a whole lot more on climate change

17:56

as an issue. One

17:58

suspect they will now say that in even bigger

18:00

numbers now that he's staying away. In terms

18:03

of the political price that the

18:05

president will pay for some of

18:07

these decisions, like choosing to

18:09

stay away, Jerome, what do you think? Do you

18:11

think this decision of

18:13

the president will ultimately hurt him? And

18:16

I mean it particularly in terms of

18:18

your age group. This

18:20

will hurt his political ambitions

18:22

because young people are

18:25

very keen to understanding that it's

18:27

not just about giving a

18:29

speech, it's about the actions that he makes. And

18:32

it feels very hurtful

18:34

for our generation. It feels like it's a deep cut because

18:37

we put our trust and we put our vote into him.

18:39

A lot of us went into the first time like myself

18:41

in a president that said he would do something. And

18:44

this is a heavy political toll

18:47

because he should be doing a lot

18:49

more. All their calls to actions have gone

18:51

ignored and they continue to go

18:54

ignored even though he had

18:56

countless years to do something. I think

18:59

over this next year we'll really see what

19:01

happens and we'll see that he must fulfill

19:03

in his promises. I think that's the one

19:05

thing that any president must do is fulfill

19:07

their promises and give the people

19:09

a sense of assurance that he has

19:11

their back. And young people don't feel like

19:13

that at the moment. I think that is what has to radically

19:15

change is him showing

19:18

some authenticity within his actions. We

19:20

mentioned on the podcast a couple of weeks back

19:22

that he was paying a price with younger voters

19:24

for his position on the current

19:26

Middle East conflict. You've now told us why

19:29

there is a price to pay for not

19:31

seeming to do enough on

19:34

the climate. Is it your sense that

19:36

there will be enough younger voters disenchanted

19:38

by all this that

19:40

they will even consider, well

19:42

you tell me, but voting

19:44

Republican backing potentially Donald Trump

19:47

or someone like Jill Stein who ran in the past

19:49

for the Green Party. There are other third-party

19:52

independent candidates, Cornel West. Do

19:55

you see younger voters not just perhaps staying

19:57

at home and that could cost Biden dearly.

22:00

Next by the producer is Daniel Stevens,

22:02

the executive producer this week, Max

22:04

Sanderson. I'm Jonathan Friedland. Thanks

22:07

as always for listening. This

22:14

is The Guardian. This

22:24

episode is brought to you by Progressive.

22:27

Most of you aren't just listening right

22:29

now. You're driving, cleaning, and even exercising.

22:32

But what if you could be saving money by switching to

22:34

Progressive? Drivers who save by

22:37

switching save nearly $750 on average, and auto customers qualify

22:41

for an average of seven discounts. Multitask

22:44

right now. Quote today at

22:46

progressive.com. Progressive Casualty

22:48

Insurance Company and affiliates national average 12-month savings

22:51

of $744 by new customers surveyed who saved with Progressive

22:53

between June 2022 and May Potential

22:56

savings will vary. Discounts not available

22:58

in all states and situations. We

23:00

all deserve to look and feel

23:02

our best. To prevent the appearance

23:04

of hair thinning with Kilgauer MD,

23:06

using cutting-edge science and natural ingredients,

23:08

the Treatment Scalp Serum by Kilgauer

23:11

MD maximizes the appearance of remaining

23:13

hair once thinning has begun. Developed

23:15

by Stanford Dermatologist, studies prove it

23:17

can stimulate hair follicle growth by

23:19

200%. Join

23:22

the revolution in preventative scalp care

23:24

with the Treatment Scalp Serum by

23:26

Kilgauer MD. Buy today

23:28

at scalp.health. That's

23:30

scalp.health.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features