Podchaser Logo
Home
Episode 021: Define: Title=”((((((Circular Reasoning)Voting)Religion)Nascar)” result: Syntax Error 121: Missing Parentheses; Reference Code: 81

Episode 021: Define: Title=”((((((Circular Reasoning)Voting)Religion)Nascar)” result: Syntax Error 121: Missing Parentheses; Reference Code: 81

Released Tuesday, 15th September 2015
Good episode? Give it some love!
Episode 021: Define: Title=”((((((Circular Reasoning)Voting)Religion)Nascar)” result: Syntax Error 121: Missing Parentheses; Reference Code: 81

Episode 021: Define: Title=”((((((Circular Reasoning)Voting)Religion)Nascar)” result: Syntax Error 121: Missing Parentheses; Reference Code: 81

Episode 021: Define: Title=”((((((Circular Reasoning)Voting)Religion)Nascar)” result: Syntax Error 121: Missing Parentheses; Reference Code: 81

Episode 021: Define: Title=”((((((Circular Reasoning)Voting)Religion)Nascar)” result: Syntax Error 121: Missing Parentheses; Reference Code: 81

Tuesday, 15th September 2015
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

We broke it. How do we know we broke it? Because our title says we broke it. Why does it say we broke it? Because we broke it. How do we know we broke it? Because the title says we broke it.

 

Who's on first, what's on second and I don't know is on third.

That's what I want to find out.

I told you already Who's on first, What's on second and I Don't Know is on third.

Well then, Who's on first?

Yes.

That's what I want to find out!

But I already told you Who's on first!

 

Who's on first?!

Who's on first?! The Video!

Ay yai yai. What's this episode even about you might be asking. Did we mess up this entire description? Maybe. Or maybe we're just trying to use circular reasoning to make ourselves sound smart, because we like sounding smart. Or maybe an error in our writing caused all this convoluted mess. Maybe everything is justified. Maybe it's not. Maybe you have to keep looking. Never stop looking.

Regardless of Who's on first, how long ago the defendant stopped begging the question, or when the Indy 500 finally ended back where it started, we've got another episode for your listening pleasure. So as long as we know why we broke it. How do we know we broke it? Because our title says we broke it. Why does it say we broke it? Because we broke it. How do we know we broke it? Because the title says we broke it.

Who's on first, what's on second and I don't know is on third.

That's what I want to find out.

I told you already Who's on first, What's on second and I Don't Know is on third.

Well then, Who's on first?

Yes.

That's what I want to find out!

But I already told you Who's on first!

 

Who's on first full text

Who's on first?! The Video!

Ay yai yai. What's this episode even about you might e asking. Did we mess up this entire description? Maybe. Or maybe we're just trying to use circular reasoning to make ourselves sound smart, because we like sounding smart. Or maybe an error in our writing caused all this convoluted mess. Maybe everything is justified. Maybe it's not. Maybe you have to keep looking. Never stop looking.

Regardless of Who's on first, how long ago the defendant stopped begging the question, or when the Indy 500 finally ended back where it started, we've got another episode for your listening pleasure. So as long as we know why we broke it. How do we know we broke it? Because our title says we broke it. Why does it say we broke it? Because we broke it. How do we know we broke it? Because the title says we broke it. 

Highlight here: Ahh. Annoying isn't it? Learn to spot what circular reasoning is and how to point it out when you hear it in this episode. Where Mat and Dusten get so convoluted in their own circular jokes that even they can't quite tell where the end is.

Show More

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features