Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
CBC Podcasts needs your
0:02
support. Some of our
0:05
best series from last year have
0:07
been nominated for Webby Awards, the
0:09
internet's highest honor. We'd love to
0:11
win, and you can help. If
0:14
you listen to The Africa's
0:16
vs. America, The Naked Emperor
0:18
Understood, or The No
0:20
Good, Terribly Kind, Wonderful Lives, and
0:22
Tragic Deaths of Barry and Honey
0:25
Sherman, you can vote now. webbyawards.com
0:29
to cast your vote. The
0:31
deadline is April 18th. This
0:37
is a CBC Podcast. Hey,
0:42
I'm Tom Power. Welcome to Q. So,
0:45
this is pretty cool. Not every day
0:47
you get to start
0:49
the show with a big old announcement. So,
0:51
in order to set up the
0:53
announcement, I need to tell you about something called the Massey
0:56
Electrons. If you're not as
0:59
familiar with the Massey Lectures, it's a really great Canadian
1:01
tradition that's been going on since the early 60s. Every
1:04
year, a great Canadian, or sometimes
1:06
international writer, or
1:08
thinker, or scholar, gives
1:11
a series of five public lectures
1:13
in cities across Canada, and they
1:15
get broadcast on the CBC. And
1:18
you listen to this thing, you go to the
1:21
theatre, you hear a great mind talk about the
1:23
subject of their choosing, and it's usually
1:25
something that Canada needs to hear, right?
1:27
Right now. In the past,
1:30
Massey Lectures have been folks like Margaret
1:32
Atwood, Noam Chomsky, Martin Luther
1:34
King Jr., Jane Jacobs, Tanya
1:36
Talaga. And
1:39
this year's 2024 Massey Lecture
1:42
is none other than the bestselling
1:44
author, Ian Williams. Ian
1:47
Williams is an award-winning writer, poet, and
1:49
professor at the University of Toronto.
1:52
His debut novel, Reproduction, won the 2019 Scotiabank-Gillar
1:55
Prize, which is Canada's richest
1:58
award for fiction. And
2:00
when Ian's talking,
2:02
you'd be hard-pressed to find someone who's
2:04
not hanging on his every word. But
2:06
as you're going to hear, when he came in to talk about his plans for
2:08
the lecture, he's not really
2:10
interested in talking by himself these days. He's
2:13
interested in conversations and
2:15
why these days it feels harder and
2:18
more complicated to have them. Here's
2:21
our conversation. Ian, welcome
2:23
to the show. Thanks for telling me. How
2:25
you doing? I'm doing well. Congratulations are
2:28
in order. Yeah. And to be
2:30
a part of that list, it's pretty impressive when
2:32
you read that list. Yeah. What
2:34
went through your mind when I was reading out those names? Yeah.
2:38
Yeah, trying to reconcile myself with these names.
2:41
Are these actual people or are these just kind of like
2:44
the abstractions of people? Like
2:46
at what point does Martin Luther King stop being
2:48
like a human person who needs oatmeal in the
2:50
morning and starts being like the champion of civil
2:52
rights? And so, yeah, maybe
2:55
we lose ourselves at some point. Yeah. I
2:57
think about that all the time. That is the reason
2:59
I do the show. I think about that all the
3:01
time. It's that these people like Charlie Chaplin or Martin
3:03
Luther King or Jane Jacobs, they
3:08
showered and they went
3:10
to a convenience store and bought cigarettes and
3:13
were also geniuses. Yeah.
3:16
What you do though is like you humanize people,
3:18
right? So if we have like Beyonce living up
3:20
on this level, Beyonce talking to you suddenly has
3:23
a wart or a pimple or something. I
3:26
bring the warts out in people even when I'm trying
3:28
to say. Suddenly you make them human, right? In a
3:30
way that we forget that these names that are circulating
3:32
all the time are people who do
3:34
have to buy toothpaste. The worry is for
3:37
me that if we make these people into
3:39
gods, then the average person thinks that they
3:41
can't do that stuff, that they have
3:43
to be like given some sort of gift from God. I
3:46
think life's richer when remarkable people are just
3:48
like you and me. Yeah. I
3:50
like that. That's actually kind of beautiful. That's all we
3:53
have time for. The end. My
3:55
thought. You know
3:57
what? I'll be doing the lecture next
3:59
year. Congratulations. What went through your head when you found out? Was
4:02
it a call you get? Did you do this thing?
4:04
I think it was a bit of a couple of
4:06
soft approaches, I think, at first. Might you be interested
4:09
in or are you thinking about
4:11
anything lately? I think there were a
4:13
few of those kinds of conversations I was having. I was like,
4:15
I'm not sure where this is going, but yeah, I'm thinking about
4:17
things. Writing
4:20
non-fiction next and so forth. Yeah,
4:22
I think they were feeling me
4:24
out and I was baffled and
4:27
just being honest. How did
4:29
you land on conversations as the topic of the lecture?
4:32
Yeah, that's tricky. I
4:35
did my PhD about tone
4:37
and voice. I was interested in how do
4:39
we know what people mean from just the
4:41
words they say. I
4:44
was also fascinated by how could
4:47
we detect who's speaking from a
4:49
page. A page is pretty neutral.
4:51
A doctorate was an English lit. How
4:53
do you know a black man is writing or
4:56
a lesbian woman or whatnot? What clues are there
4:58
in text? That's 20
5:01
years ago. I've written several books in the meantime. All
5:03
of that has been very useful in constructing
5:05
voices and whatnot. The
5:07
natural evolution for me is this idea of, okay,
5:09
we know about voice, we know about tone,
5:11
we put those things together and
5:14
what are our conversations like? That's
5:16
one part of it. That's a theoretical answer
5:19
for you. But also we're living
5:21
in a point now where we can barely talk to each other.
5:24
It seems incredibly urgent these
5:27
days with increasing polarization,
5:29
online forms of talking. It
5:33
seems really timely that we step back and
5:35
say, why can't we talk to
5:38
each other? How can we talk to each other? What
5:40
do we need to talk about right now in 2024
5:42
and create an environment and space to make
5:44
that happen? I think it's
5:47
the fabric to make a number of
5:49
other kinds of important interventions possible. What
5:52
have you been learning about our inability to have conversations?
5:54
I think it's an interesting point because one of the
5:56
things I was going to bring up to you was
5:59
having a conversation about conversations right now is a
6:01
dangerous thing to do. You're
6:04
right, the fracturing of news media, we are not
6:06
consuming the same news media. When
6:08
we're DMing, are we really talking to one another?
6:10
When we're posting Instagram stories at one another, are
6:13
we really talking to one another? What have you
6:15
been cleaning? Right, right. It gets kind of meta,
6:17
right, after a point, but I'm trying to keep
6:19
this as sort of like real as
6:22
possible. Learning
6:24
about a lot of things, right? So for instance,
6:26
I think politeness constrains us and at the same
6:28
time, without that politeness, we see like what chaos
6:30
breaks loose on social media. So
6:33
what is the sort of appropriate amount
6:35
of like social
6:37
policing, right, that we need to be like decent
6:40
and similar to each other? I've
6:42
learned that the topics that we say we shouldn't talk about
6:44
are in fact topics that some segments
6:46
talk about all the time, right? So what do we
6:48
say like we shouldn't talk about race
6:52
or people's sexual lives or whatever, like
6:55
sexual minorities are talking about this all the
6:57
time, right? So there are friends, black folks,
7:00
Indian folks, we're talking about race constantly in
7:02
our circles. Only certain subjects are off limits
7:04
to some people, right? So
7:07
learning like just these little things that
7:09
we've taken for granted and sort of
7:11
assumed and then realize no, in
7:13
fact, this is not the case, right? Yeah.
7:17
It's an interesting thing you get to do here
7:19
to kind of talk to the country about this.
7:21
Yeah, yeah. And hopefully that we find
7:23
ways of talking to each other too about this and
7:26
like both nationally, right? How to have a
7:28
national conversation. Harder to do. Yeah,
7:30
about, I mean, lots of people involved, lots
7:32
of perspectives involved, but
7:35
also like more domestically too, right? So how
7:37
do we sit around a table at Christmas
7:39
time and talk
7:41
about gender neutral bathrooms, right?
7:44
So yeah, both like the
7:46
scale right from the personal and intimate all the way up
7:48
to the national. I
7:50
want to find out a little bit about why this might
7:53
be interesting to you, but I want to do that through
7:55
maybe talking a little bit more about you for people who
7:57
may not know you. The
8:00
last time we talked on the show, I've seen
8:03
social easy if the old Gillers every year and all that
8:05
kind of thing. It was when
8:07
you won the Giller Prize and we were doing a little bit of
8:09
research to get ready for this. Born
8:12
in Trinidad, moved to Canada. How old? That
8:15
was nine. Yeah. What do you remember? But
8:17
Trinidad, I mean, what do you remember about nine? It was
8:19
all it's all pretty clear, right? It's like I
8:22
feel at nine years old. I could have been pretty much an
8:24
adult. Yeah. Yeah, I could have found my way through. Remember
8:27
a lot about it. I remember sort of Yeah.
8:34
It's funny, like I remember the childish details. I remember
8:36
food and playing and my friends and my toys. I
8:38
remember my airplanes and all of that stuff. But
8:41
I also remember like just kind of like
8:43
atmosphere of something just beyond my grasp in
8:46
childhood. It's like when you come to an awareness that oh,
8:48
the world is really big. And
8:50
there are people living in North America
8:53
that I see on TV. But
8:55
they're actually like real people doing things that are
8:57
very different from what we're doing here. And
9:00
I'm in relation to that somehow. I'm
9:02
seeing them, but they're not seeing me. Like little things
9:04
like that that you start to sort of realize and
9:07
come to an awareness with your little child brain. Yeah,
9:10
those kinds of things. I remember sort of being
9:13
formed, right? And when you have a big move, a
9:15
big migration, sort of in
9:17
your childhood, you get split, right? You just
9:19
get divided. You move to where the TV
9:21
show was. You're moving to where
9:23
the you were looking out the window and you're
9:26
moving to the outside. That's right. What do you
9:28
mean by a split? Yeah, it's kind of this
9:30
way like you're in the audience for like a
9:32
sitcom being shot and then suddenly you're plucked and
9:34
sort of put on stage there. But
9:37
you're split in the sense that you know, you've got a private
9:39
life and sort of
9:41
like early history that's formed by one country in
9:43
one system. And then you come here
9:45
and you realize that oh, there's a totally other way
9:47
or a different way at least
9:49
of sort of living and being. And
9:52
I've got to do both of those things, right? Right?
9:54
Because my parents are committed to say this this form
9:57
a of living. But
9:59
if I'm good, I'm good. to live the rest of my life out
10:01
here. I better get used to Form B. What
10:05
do you remember in the practical
10:08
of coming to Canada for the first time?
10:10
Was it the snowing? I remember the
10:12
late night flight. It was in the
10:14
middle of the night. It was as late as we were allowed to stay
10:16
up. In
10:19
those days, I mean this is the late 80s, you
10:23
had to dress up to get on a plane. It
10:25
was actually like something. Yeah, there was no different kind
10:27
of dancing socks. No, no. No, you don't jump like
10:30
that, right? No. Wear like your
10:32
nice clothes on your flight, you know. They were
10:34
waving galleries and stuff to sort of say goodbye
10:36
to folks. And just the occasion of being
10:38
on a plane, there weren't discount airlines and all that. It was
10:41
an occasion, right? Yeah. You know, it was pretty big.
10:43
And so from a kid, like being on a plane
10:45
was a big thing, right? Yeah.
10:47
Toronto, did you land in Toronto? Yeah, landed
10:49
at Pearson. Yeah. And upon landing, you mean
10:51
like... Oh, I don't know. What was it?
10:53
I remember Snow for
10:56
the first time. I'm
10:58
shrugging. I guess you can't see that. Thank
11:01
you for the translation, though. I appreciate that. Yeah.
11:04
Not easily wowed, even as a kid,
11:07
right? One of these kinds of probably
11:09
little Sheldon kids. Were there
11:12
books and reading and
11:14
writing going on around you? Yeah, all the time. My
11:16
mom went back to university and I would read her
11:18
textbooks and stuff like that. What did she go to
11:20
university for? She went to York and she went back
11:22
for English. Yeah. And so
11:24
like good books in the house as a result of
11:26
that. And books with weird covers
11:30
things that you know you shouldn't quite be reading, but
11:32
you're kind of peeking into. Yeah. So the
11:34
path one would think is these books are around your
11:36
house going to university for English. You
11:39
would think, oh, well, he discovers these
11:41
books. He decides to commit his life
11:43
to writing. Not the case. Psychiatry
11:47
I was reading. You were on the
11:49
path of becoming a psychiatrist, psychologist? Right.
11:51
But I don't think these are super
11:53
unrelated things. That's the right you're
11:56
interested in sort of people and language. And I
11:59
mean, that's all. all I really
12:01
wanted, right? So you could go sort of the scientific way of
12:03
sort of getting to know people. Or
12:05
you could just make them up. I
12:08
chose the second, yeah. You are
12:10
aware now that you were interested in language and
12:12
how people spoke to one another? I knew this
12:14
like first year university, right? Like what's important in
12:17
life? People and
12:19
communication, right? How to get to know these people and
12:21
to talk to these people. And
12:23
so my first degree was like in psychology
12:26
and English, right? So all these
12:28
hypothetical people that you could sort of
12:30
figure out and then psychology as a
12:32
backdrop to that. Were you
12:34
having a hard time? The reason I
12:36
asked, and let me offer transference
12:39
so that you don't think I'm
12:41
accusing anything. Sometimes I wonder
12:43
if I do this job because it
12:45
is a controlled way to
12:48
talk to somebody. And
12:50
so I'll just offer that up.
12:53
I wonder why you were interested in
12:55
how we talk to one another and
12:57
converse with one another in early years
13:00
of university. Were you having a hard time with that? Yeah,
13:02
that's really insightful. Really insightful, Tom, for
13:04
your own life and for my degree. Oh, yeah.
13:07
They're going to put a wing in the therapist's
13:09
office for me. I'm not sure about that. They're
13:11
going to memorial wing in my name. I
13:15
guess, I mean, you can
13:17
superficially get along with anybody, right? But the
13:19
kinds of deep connections that you crave somewhere
13:21
in your teenage years require a bit more
13:23
than just kind of casual contact. And
13:27
I perhaps was a bit clinical about this. And
13:29
I was a lonely child, right? I was always
13:31
sort of on the
13:33
fringes of childhood, right? Always never
13:36
quite fitting into that time in life, right?
13:40
And so I wanted to understand why and how
13:42
and when will things get better and all of
13:44
that. Yeah. And so I think that's partly related,
13:47
right? Yeah. I
13:49
still can't see, but I hope you see my
13:51
nod of recognition. Were you on the fringes of
13:54
childhood? Oh, yeah, baby. And it doesn't mean you're
13:56
unpopular, right? No. It just means, like, you know,
13:58
why are we doing this? Can't we
14:00
just sort of move on to the next phase? It's
14:02
like everyone else seems to be, this seems to be
14:04
easy for everybody else. It seems a little bit harder
14:07
for me. Right, right, right. Like how much baseball can
14:09
you play? I'm good. You know, I love it. But,
14:11
you know, can we do something else now? You
14:17
end up not doing psychiatry anymore and you
14:19
end up becoming a writer. I
14:21
was reading you had a fire.
14:24
You had a house fire that
14:26
everything was gone.
14:29
Yeah. Except for the clothes on your back. That's a real
14:31
deep cut. Where'd you find that out? I mean, that's... Wait
14:36
till I read your credit score. By the way, you're
14:38
doing great. That's
14:44
really impressive. But yeah, so I worked in
14:46
the States for a long, for about seven
14:48
years, right after the doctorate. Our
14:51
doctorate in... In English. Yeah.
14:53
At University of Toronto. And
14:56
yeah, part way through my time there, I
14:58
was in my condo, there was a fire,
15:00
an electrical fire that spread across the building and
15:02
down and just kind of destroyed everything,
15:04
right? So I was home at the time. I managed
15:06
to get out, but never quite got
15:08
back in. I didn't
15:10
even have my glasses on me. I remember, but
15:12
yeah, I had my phone, my keys and
15:15
my cell phone. My phone,
15:17
my keys and my wallet I had. And I was
15:19
traveling and I need my passport. I remember that. And
15:23
so my question at that point in my life was, okay,
15:25
Ian, you've lost everything except the stuff in your
15:27
head. And so you need to
15:30
rebuild everything again. And
15:32
I had money in the bank, had a job. But
15:34
where do you want to rebuild? Do you want to stay
15:37
in Massachusetts and sort of rebuild your life as a potential
15:39
American? Or do you want to go back
15:42
to Canada? And so that was one of those
15:44
sort of hinge moments in a life, right?
15:46
Where you decide, okay, if I've been reset,
15:49
where do I want to be? And so move back to
15:51
Canada, rebuild. Yeah, the where wasn't what I was thinking about.
15:53
I was thinking that like you had a job. I mean,
15:55
you're still a professor, but like you had, you had a
15:58
job and you were sort of living in that academic world.
16:00
Yeah, yeah, and you hadn't written a novel
16:02
yet. No and I was wondering whether you
16:04
had your book But you published poetry by
16:06
that point. I had I'd published. Yeah a
16:08
short story collection and some poetry Yeah, I
16:10
wondered whether after the fire because this happened
16:12
to a friend of mine who was an
16:14
actor Yeah, her house burned down and
16:17
she went well, I'm gonna just
16:19
become an actor I just lost everything
16:21
what was she doing before it was her job,
16:23
you know, she was working She was part-timey acting
16:26
but you know kind of doing everything else and
16:28
not fully committing yourself I wondered whether after that
16:30
happened you were like I'm gonna kind of commit
16:32
myself more to being a writer in a yeah
16:34
I can see that story. I like that story.
16:36
But yeah, it's um, you can have it. No,
16:38
I Before
16:41
I was committed before but you sort of double down
16:43
in a different kind of way like you realize Not
16:49
whether I can do this or not right but to
16:51
do it again, it's like getting that second chance to
16:53
do it again What would I do differently? And
16:56
so is the sort of American
16:58
market more important than sort of like
17:00
rediscovering myself as a Canadian and sort
17:02
of returning And entrenching
17:04
myself here like those kinds of questions become
17:06
important. Yeah. Well, I was that I mean
17:09
as a writer You would think
17:11
hey come on staying in the state. Yeah, it's
17:13
a different world though And I think aesthetically I
17:15
think we we think differently right as between like
17:17
Canada and the US and so there's a real
17:19
kind of palpable Like artistic difference
17:21
I think between the two countries and you
17:23
could do it See there's a lot of
17:25
crossover that's possible and whatnot. It's it's not a
17:27
bad thing. I'm not saying I'm not
17:29
discouraging it And your book sold in the US.
17:31
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, so it's not not an issue
17:35
But where are you at home? I think is the question
17:37
right and so It's here
17:39
in Canada. The first of the first
17:41
time we talked was for your first novel Reproduction
17:44
for people who don't know is a sort of beautiful winding
17:47
love story about family and class and relationships and
17:49
also sort of one of my favorite things about
17:51
it was that it sort of Plays with the
17:53
form of the of the novel.
17:55
What do you remember? What
17:58
was on your mind when you were writing that? mid
18:02
30s. Mid 30s, unmarried had no kids
18:04
and so thinking about all of those
18:06
things and the possibility
18:08
of never doing any of those things too. And so
18:10
if I could do it sort of artistically, I don't
18:12
actually need to do it in person. And this kind
18:15
of mystifies my friends about sort of like the pattern
18:17
of my life. Like don't you actually
18:19
want to do this kind of thing
18:21
or do X or Y? I'm like,
18:23
you know, if I can think about it and if
18:25
I can sort of explore it and figure it out,
18:27
then I'm good. I don't really need to have that
18:29
sort of real life experience. So reproduction kind of felt
18:31
like that for me, right? Do
18:34
you still feel that way? About
18:36
the present novel that I'm working on, yeah. About
18:38
some of the other things. I feel like you
18:40
can lay some things to bed without
18:44
necessarily having the actual lived in the
18:46
world experience, right? Right, yeah. You can
18:48
kind of settle some things. Settle some
18:50
things, yeah. I feel unsettled. Just work
18:52
it out. I understand. I think I've
18:54
read this book about these things. Right.
18:58
And I think peace with the whole issue of
19:00
like, you know, what I should be doing at
19:03
Yeah. I mean, what's
19:06
interesting is that that book ends up giving you another
19:08
path through its success. I mean, I remember
19:10
I was actually looking a little bit right
19:12
after you won and I sort
19:14
of tried to ask this doe-eyed,
19:16
you know, like I just won the Giller Prize
19:19
person, like, hey, what does this mean to you?
19:21
And you're kind of like, being very polite. But
19:24
you're also kind of going, I don't know. I don't know. It
19:26
just happened. It just happened like six hours ago. I don't know.
19:29
I really enjoyed that interview, Tom. I remember it,
19:31
yeah. I enjoyed it as well. How
19:34
did winning the Giller change things for you?
19:36
Your life, your career, whatever. Yeah.
19:38
It's incredibly like liberating, right? Like
19:41
to know that you've
19:43
achieved something that you don't need to achieve again or you
19:45
don't need to prove X or Y. And I'm rolling my
19:49
eyes at this comparison I'm about to make, right? But
19:51
do you need, like, does Beyoncé
19:54
need to sort of win a Grammy
19:56
again, right? You know, I feel like
19:59
there comes a point where, okay, you
20:02
have been sort of granted permission to do whatever you
20:05
want to do with your mind and your life. And
20:08
that is the greatest gift. I mean, to
20:10
symbolize it in the form of an award
20:12
or something, that's one thing. But I wish
20:14
we could like bestow this on people without
20:16
the actual like material award or checks or
20:18
whatever to say like, hey, you
20:21
are free to live your life and to do whatever
20:23
you want with your life. That's sort of
20:25
big, big gift of the giller for me. Help
20:28
me understand that better. If I think you are saying what
20:30
I think you are saying, it's really interesting. So
20:35
what the giller gave
20:37
you, especially for a debut novelist,
20:39
is sort of permission that like, hey, you
20:41
got some value here. You
20:43
should write. You should do this. And
20:45
you are saying, wouldn't it be nice if we all
20:48
had that without it? All had that. Right. Yeah.
20:53
right? To be more deeply myself rather than
20:55
to try
20:58
to please or try to do the right thing
21:00
or all of those other things. I really limit
21:03
our behavior. And it
21:05
would be great if we everybody had permission to
21:07
actually be themselves, like
21:09
truly and fully, right, as if they had
21:11
already won at their lives, right, instead of
21:13
trying to sort of prove that it. Yeah.
21:17
Yeah. Yeah. I
21:19
mean, how lovely would that be? I feel like we all. Some
21:21
people snatch it, right? Some people just take it. They
21:24
refuse. They don't wait for it to be sort of awarded
21:26
on them. And that kind of courage
21:28
I really admire. But
21:30
I guess if nobody's giving it to you, you take it. In
21:32
the latest book of Essie's Disorientation, you opened the book with
21:35
a quote. I wanted to read that live because I thought
21:37
it might have something to do with the theme
21:40
you chose for your
21:42
Massey lecture. It's by Audre
21:44
Lorde. Do you want me to read it?
21:46
Yeah. All right. I
21:48
have come to believe over and over again that what
21:50
is the most important to me must be spoken, made
21:52
verbal and shared, even at
21:54
the risk of having it bruised and misunderstood. Opening
21:58
the book with that, it also feels... like
22:00
your lecture? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
22:02
Oh, great, great isolation there. Good,
22:04
good point. Hey, I've never
22:06
felt myself a scene had you never been higher
22:08
in an interview in my entire life. Whatever the
22:11
producers are behind the scenes. Right out there, Caitlin
22:13
Swan out there, by the way. Yeah, you think
22:15
I wrote that down? I'm an AI and I've
22:17
been trying
22:19
to tell you that from the very beginning. It's
22:21
really excellent. Yeah,
22:24
so Orchard Lord, what she's suggesting here is that
22:26
even if people misunderstand you, even if you're going
22:28
to get cancelled, even if you are saying the
22:30
wrong thing, it's worth taking the
22:32
risk to say it. And
22:35
for me, that's important. That book is about
22:37
sort of race, right in the world. And
22:41
I hadn't really written directly about it. And it's
22:43
a subject that most people sort of avoid. And
22:45
I want to sort of get all of my
22:47
thoughts in one place about race. And
22:49
when people kept asking me, this was during, you
22:51
know, Black Lives Matter and George Floyd, all this
22:53
people kept asking me for thoughts and comments
22:55
and opinion on race. And
22:58
they were all inside, right? Just not
23:00
really organized. Your thoughts were
23:02
inside. Yeah. What else would they be? But
23:05
not really organized. I was with the people. I
23:07
was like, we were all inside also because it
23:09
was a pandemic. We couldn't go outside anyway. But
23:11
not systemically organized and all of that. And
23:15
I decided to take the risk to write
23:17
about race, right? Even if I
23:20
was going to offend people,
23:23
even if I was going to say the wrong thing,
23:25
but my commitment was to be as honest to myself
23:28
at that particular point, right? Who knows? Like my
23:30
thinking on some of those points has actually evolved
23:32
right in the last few years. But
23:35
at that moment, that was true. Yeah.
23:37
And it was a risk. And I
23:39
took it. First
23:44
part of my conversation with the brilliant Ian
23:46
Williams, who is the author of Reproduction, which
23:48
won the Giller Prize in 2019. We just
23:50
announced he'll be the mass electricist this year,
23:53
meaning he'll be traveling across the country, giving
23:55
a talk. His talk will
23:57
be about conversations. He'll be in
23:59
Sydney, Nova. Scotia, Halleweet in
24:01
Nunavut, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Victoria,
24:04
BC, and Toronto, Ontario. More
24:06
of my conversation with Ian coming up. We're
24:08
going to talk about courage, which we often
24:10
think of as saying what no one
24:12
else is going to talk about. I'm
24:14
just going to say, everyone else is thinking, I'm
24:16
going to say that's courageous. Ian will talk about
24:18
how courage can often be listening. Plus,
24:20
Dame Magdalene O'Dundo will talk about why
24:23
she spends more time on the inside
24:25
of her sculptures
24:28
than the outside, even though we can't see
24:30
it. This is cute. Think
24:49
of your favorite one-hit wonder. Or that overpriced
24:51
toy your parents would never let you have.
24:53
Or that TV show that no one else
24:55
remembers because it was canceled way too soon.
24:58
Now what if we could fix it? I'm
25:00
Francesca Ramsey. And I'm Delon Grant. And
25:03
after 20 years of friendship, we are
25:05
now hosting a new nostalgia podcast called
25:07
Let Me Fix It. Each
25:09
episode we have taken our favorite celebrities, shows, and
25:11
brands of yesteryear and then imagine what it would
25:13
take to repackage them for relevance today. Think
25:15
of our show as an intervention, but
25:17
with way less stakes. So subscribe to
25:20
Let Me Fix It wherever you get your favorite podcasts.
25:32
I'm Tom Power. Welcome back to Q. You're
25:34
in the middle of my conversation with one
25:36
of the great minds in Canada, the author,
25:38
poet, and professor Ian Williams. Ian was the
25:40
winner of the Giller Prize, Canada's richest literary
25:42
prize in 2019. And
25:45
we just announced, and this is pretty cool, that
25:47
Ian is this year's Massey Lecturist, which is a
25:49
role in Canada that's been around since the early
25:51
60s. I love it.
25:54
It's like a great thinker travels
25:56
all across Canada to
25:59
speak in... theaters on
26:01
a topic of their choosing. Ian
26:03
will be going to Sydney, Kailuit,
26:05
Saskatoon, Victoria, and Toronto. And
26:08
for Ian's lecture, he's landed on the topic
26:10
of conversation, which
26:12
is broad. But
26:15
here's how Ian talks about it. He's
26:17
going to get up there and talk about how to
26:20
have hard conversations that we need
26:22
to have with one another. How
26:24
we actually don't talk to each
26:26
other anymore. Is digital communication, texting
26:28
and DMing and all that, is
26:30
that really conversation, the
26:32
ability to disagree? And
26:35
what is courage really? It's fascinating to
26:37
hear his thoughts on it, in particular
26:39
around courage in conversations. And I think
26:41
oftentimes we think about courage, or courage
26:43
gets talked about in sort of the
26:45
modern discourse in conversations as, I'm going
26:47
to say the thing that everyone's thinking.
26:50
I'm going to say the thing that everyone's thinking. I got the courage to
26:52
do it. What about the courage
26:54
to be silent? What
26:56
about the courage to actually listen? That's
26:59
where our conversation picks up. Typically
27:01
we think about courage as the act to
27:03
sort of say something, especially if that's something
27:06
unpopular and to power. But
27:10
I think, in fact, a number of the
27:12
positions that we hold right now are not
27:14
courageous positions. They're sort of popular liberal positions.
27:19
And we have a whole army of supporters
27:21
ready to sort of at our back. They're
27:23
positions that we can just step into without
27:25
forming. We can just occupy them without sort
27:27
of developing them. And I wish
27:29
that more of us would actually come to a point
27:32
where we develop our opinions instead of just kind of
27:34
like receive and then sort of parrot them. So
27:37
courage normally is for the thing that's
27:39
sort of spoken. But
27:42
I think there's something to courageous
27:44
listening and courageous silence. And
27:47
I think we ought to realize that one half of
27:49
our conversations is in fact listening. You do this all
27:51
the time. You spend a lot of your time listening.
27:54
And to sort of flip the script
27:56
from the person in power or
27:58
the most important person in a conversation. conversation is
28:00
not the person speaking, but sometimes
28:03
the person listening. Some
28:05
groups have been listening for hundreds of years, right?
28:07
Now they're speaking and people are getting antsy because
28:09
they're not used to listening. So
28:13
I mean there's a kind of paradigm shift that we need
28:15
to sort of think about what the balance
28:17
is in a conversation. Is
28:20
it courageous to speak
28:22
or is it courageous to sort of hold your peace
28:24
until someone else has said something contradictory to
28:26
you and like not rush in to sort
28:29
of like contradict them and to sort of
28:31
prove your point, but to just
28:33
kind of like listen graciously to let it settle, to
28:35
offer no comment or whatever and just let it be.
28:39
It's a hard thing to learn. Yeah. I
28:41
found it hard. Yeah, it's fairly. It's, yeah,
28:43
but it's possible. And when you can
28:45
get there, it's... It's
28:48
revolutionary. Yeah. It's revolutionary
28:50
in a conversation because all the defenses, all the armor
28:52
sort of comes down and we're just kind
28:55
of like in this free flowing exploratory space. Have
28:57
you seen that movie? That
28:59
trilogy of like Ethan Hawke walking around
29:01
Paris with Julie Delpy? Awaking the... Yeah,
29:04
Before Sunrise. Before Sunrise. All of that
29:06
stuff. I haven't seen it. Go
29:09
see. I mean it's old. Every 10 years
29:11
they redo it, right? But that kind of conversation we could have
29:13
more of, right? Conversations without agenda, conversations
29:15
without like the intent to persuade
29:18
and to convert just conversations for
29:20
the sake of just relating one human
29:23
being to another. Yeah. Conversations
29:25
where, and I don't know if you struggle
29:27
with this the way I do, conversations while
29:29
the other person's talking, I'm not thinking about
29:31
the thing I'm going to say. Yeah. Yeah.
29:34
Yeah. Are
29:36
you listening to me or are you just waiting for your turn to speak? Yeah.
29:39
And too often is that it's the second one,
29:41
right? I'm excited to hear you have these Massey
29:43
Luckdell. Well, thank you, Tom. I'm looking forward to
29:46
it. You're going all across
29:48
the country. Sydney? Yeah.
29:51
Staring in hell. Sydney? Keep
29:53
reading. Yeah. In Halloween?
29:56
Yeah. Have you been before? Never
29:58
been. Beautiful. I
30:00
mean just the kindest most wonderful people and we had a grand
30:02
old time. What time of year were you there? So
30:05
geez Louise April and May
30:08
yeah, it was still dark. It was still
30:10
dark all year all day And
30:12
I mean I got a real kick out of that. When
30:15
are you going? October.
30:18
October? It'll be late. That's okay.
30:20
Saskatoon? Yeah. That's
30:22
the one province I've not been to actually
30:24
yeah, so flown over Saskatchewan
30:26
looking forward to that Caitlin looks one out
30:29
there from Jesus, Saskatchewan Great
30:32
Victoria Victoria. I guess that's the only
30:34
major Canadian city. I've never been to
30:36
why not. I mean You
30:41
asked me as if you asked me as if I made
30:43
the call as if I was like I'm never going out
30:45
there obvious place to be you've been to the island though
30:47
No, never been to the island. Oh, I
30:49
never had a never had a occasion to go out there. I would have
30:51
you know, I Should
30:54
That's your summer plan. I would love to tell you
30:56
what I want to go out to the like the islands
30:59
I want to go to like Salt Spring. Oh, yeah,
31:01
you don't know you that yeah Yeah, I used to live
31:03
in in BC, right? So did a lot of traveling
31:05
around there, but I am curious about like the minutia
31:07
of going on the road in Canada Oh,
31:09
whether you have like a famous favorite restaurant, you know, I know
31:11
that's kind of neat, right? Sort
31:14
of make a whole thing out of it. Oh,
31:16
I don't know man. I asked Caitlin. She said
31:18
the Broadway cafe in Saskatoon What
31:21
for like diner diner kind of stuff? I
31:23
love diners. Yeah diner you Seem
31:25
like a good time. Are you yeah enough and spread
31:27
it and you just kind of like yeah Just eat
31:30
away right a white china cup of coffee, but you
31:32
need the right person to be in a diner with
31:34
yeah I need good company In
31:36
lovely to talk to you as always I
31:43
love those diners by myself Ian Williams is
31:45
I don't know what that says about me.
31:47
Ian Williams is an author and
31:50
professor at the University of Toronto He
31:52
has been chosen as this year's
31:54
Massey Lecturist which means he'll be
31:57
traveling across Canada speaking about how
31:59
to have conversations with one
32:01
another. He'll be in Sydney, Nova
32:04
Scotia, Ekaluit, Nunavut, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Victoria,
32:06
B.C., Toronto, Ontario. These
32:08
lectures will be broadcast as
32:11
part of CBC's ideas.
32:25
So when you walk into a museum, and
32:28
it could be any kind of museum, modern
32:30
art, historic art, natural history, the
32:32
one thing you see, and I
32:34
only realized that in this interview in all of
32:36
these different types of museums, is ceramics or pottery.
32:39
Think about it. When was the last time you
32:41
went to a museum and you didn't see ceramics
32:43
or pottery in some way? And
32:45
it makes sense because since the beginning of civilization, they've been
32:47
a big part of our lives, whether eating
32:49
out of them, storing food in them, or making
32:51
part out of them. And that last part, making
32:53
art out of them, well,
32:56
ceramics has not necessarily always been taken
32:58
seriously as an art form. And that's
33:00
been changing thanks to the works of
33:02
artists like Dame Magdalene O'Dundo, who has
33:04
been called one of the greatest living
33:06
ceramicists and her work's been shown in
33:08
some of the biggest collections in
33:10
the world. Now listen, it's hard to describe
33:12
Dame Magdalene's pottery and do justice on the
33:14
radio. So we put some of the photos
33:16
up of her pottery at CBC Q on
33:18
Instagram. If you want to follow along
33:21
and have a look at them while you're listening
33:23
to this conversation. But yeah, we talk a little
33:25
bit about pottery. We talk a little bit
33:27
about why the insides of her pieces, even
33:29
though you can't see them, are maybe more
33:31
important than the outside. But I
33:33
wanted to start with when she fell in love with
33:35
clay. Hi, how are you? Welcome to the show.
33:38
Thank you very much. I want to start
33:40
by talking a little bit about
33:42
clay. You say that the first
33:45
time you encountered clay,
33:47
you fell in love with it. What
33:50
happened? Where were you? What did
33:52
you fall in love with? Gosh,
33:57
that's 45, 45. years
34:00
off? Not
34:02
yesterday, what you're saying. Not
34:04
yesterday, a good question. I
34:07
think the sensation
34:10
of the material just moving into
34:12
one's hand and just the
34:18
recognition of being able to
34:21
manipulate the clay was really
34:23
a life changer
34:25
really because up to
34:27
then I had never worked in a
34:30
plastic material. I had only
34:32
worked as a graphic
34:35
designer and worked in advertising.
34:38
And I just think I probably had
34:40
started in the wrong business.
34:42
And so when I
34:46
touched clay, I think there
34:50
was a feeling of finding
34:52
myself. How do you end
34:54
up doing it in the first place?
34:56
Like if you were studying more graphic things,
35:00
how do you end up putting your hands in a bunch of clay to
35:02
begin with? I just ended up, I
35:05
worked and trained
35:07
in commercial art and
35:09
advertising in Nairobi in
35:12
Kenya. And
35:14
then I had this opportunity to come to
35:16
England and to go on and
35:18
do a foundation course. And
35:21
I happened to go into the
35:23
ceramics department and
35:26
met this wonderful woman who
35:28
was quietly
35:31
sat in a corner and
35:33
showing students
35:35
how to build work
35:38
using coils and also
35:41
throwing on the wheel.
35:43
And I just
35:45
thought I stared
35:48
at her and all the other
35:50
students who are much
35:52
more competent in the work. And
35:54
I just thought how magical to
35:56
be able to form
35:59
a piece of work. from the beginning to
36:01
the end. And,
36:03
and it did have it kind of,
36:06
you know, sort of had this natural
36:11
human quality to it.
36:15
And I remember
36:17
the sensation, the feeling of
36:20
elation, and
36:22
the joy that I
36:25
kind of received the material. But
36:28
I'm not really sure, I can't
36:30
describe the
36:34
physical experience of remembering,
36:38
as it were. Help me understand
36:41
this better too. There's a couple of times so
36:44
far in our conversation, and
36:46
in the reading I
36:49
did, I get ready for
36:51
this conversation, where you talked a little
36:53
bit about the connections between clay,
36:57
ceramics, and humans,
36:59
like the human form.
37:02
Can you help me understand that? Like, what do you
37:04
mean by that? What are the parallels there? Otters
37:08
have, you know, hopeful
37:11
centuries referred to what
37:13
they made in
37:16
terms of the
37:18
human body. Because a
37:22
vessel, to a
37:24
potter, a vessel or a
37:27
figurine, has a body,
37:29
has feet, has
37:32
a waist, has a neck, a
37:35
lid, which can act as
37:37
the head. And
37:39
quite often you'll hear potters refer
37:41
to a lip, because
37:46
they're forming a jug. And
37:49
the terminology used
37:52
by potters reference
37:56
the body. Now, you know, I'm
38:01
not sure philosophically whether I can
38:03
actually explain that, but you
38:07
know, whether those terminology
38:11
are as long as man
38:13
has lived or whether they're biblical
38:15
and you know, sort of the
38:17
terms I used in a lot of
38:19
literature as well. But
38:21
it is just a natural thing to
38:24
say you are throwing a mug,
38:27
for argument's sake, and
38:29
the mug has a body because
38:32
it is a vessel and a human
38:34
being is a vessel that
38:36
contains what
38:39
it is we make as human. And
38:42
a mug will contain liquid that
38:45
nourishes and you need that nourishment
38:47
to nourish your body. And
38:50
therefore you have a handle that
38:53
you handle the mug with and
38:56
you have a lip, you have to pay attention to
38:58
the lip on the mug because
39:00
it's going to come into contact with
39:03
your lips. So I think
39:06
the terminologies have
39:08
always referenced the
39:10
body. Now I am
39:12
not as a philosopher, I wouldn't
39:14
be able to tell you why. But
39:17
every, every, everything I've read,
39:20
whether it's been in, in
39:22
beliefs, religious beliefs, or
39:25
philosophical thinking has always
39:28
ended up with associating, say,
39:31
with the body. And the body
39:34
is the
39:37
greatest muse for a
39:39
potter anywhere. How
39:41
about you? Is
39:43
the body the muse for you
39:45
in your work? Yes.
39:48
And for me, I think one
39:50
of the, you know,
39:53
having talked about the beginning of my
39:56
falling in love with clay, I think
39:59
my main... greatest
40:01
moment of realizing how
40:04
important the
40:06
body, the human body was
40:09
to my making
40:12
my whole future
40:15
of being a ceramicist
40:17
was just standing
40:20
around watching people moving up
40:22
and down a staircase at
40:25
a railway station. I was waiting
40:27
for my train. And just
40:29
looking at the
40:32
interaction between human
40:35
beings, the spaces that
40:38
are left in between that create
40:41
the body, the
40:43
solid bodies around
40:46
us are just fascinating and
40:48
movement. Everybody has
40:51
a movement that says something that
40:54
leads them to somewhere that
40:57
spells out what they are feeling,
40:59
the emotions they are feeling. It's
41:02
very, very interesting. And I just
41:04
remember watching this amazing
41:08
young woman, about
41:10
five foot six or something like that,
41:12
walking up. She'd
41:15
just come off a train walking up
41:17
the staircase. She was very pregnant, carrying
41:20
the stuff that she was going
41:22
to need, perhaps, you know, 24
41:26
hours later. And
41:29
in the highest high heel
41:31
shoes I'd ever seen, with
41:33
her hair tied at the back, you
41:35
know, in a ponytail. And I just
41:37
thought, how beautiful. She was a vessel,
41:39
she was carrying some life
41:43
within that body. She
41:46
was already caring for
41:48
it, because she was already shopping
41:50
for this creature.
41:54
But everything that was
41:58
about her was about containment
42:02
and happiness and
42:05
everything that is the
42:08
best of us as human beings.
42:12
We have other sides as well which I'm not
42:14
going to... No, but I understand what
42:16
you mean now. I mean, that's beautiful. I
42:20
want to close off by playing something for you
42:22
from this video you made for the exhibition in
42:24
Canada. And you said something in it
42:26
that struck us here and I wanted to ask you about
42:28
it. So let me just play it for you right now so
42:31
people can hear it. My
42:33
thinking process, my being and who
42:36
I am is defined by the
42:38
inside of those pieces. The
42:41
outside is the show that
42:43
I present to the public
42:45
and to the owner of the world. So
42:49
talk to me a little bit about that. What
42:52
do you mean by that? Did I really say
42:54
that? What
42:57
I mean by that is, you
43:00
know, when you're making something or when you're
43:03
painting or doing whatever it is, you're
43:05
manifesting a lot of thoughts within
43:09
yourself into this piece of work.
43:13
The thing with my pieces with,
43:16
as opposed to say a painting or
43:19
a ceramic that has a
43:21
lot of glazing and narrative
43:23
on it, is
43:26
that you can't really see what is
43:28
important in my
43:31
work, which is the interior side,
43:34
the inside of the work. The
43:37
literal inside of the work is
43:39
important. The literal inside of the
43:41
work. Which I can't really
43:44
see. I mean, I tried to peer in, but I can't really
43:46
see. No, and you're
43:48
not allowed to in the museum, unfortunately. Try
43:52
and stop me. That's
43:55
the meaningful part to you, the inside of this work? I
43:58
think the inside of the work is very important. And
44:00
the inside of me and you as a
44:02
person is really what
44:05
is important, isn't it? Yeah,
44:07
what you what, what kind of
44:09
fashion you dress up
44:12
in that outer
44:14
bit of yours is just show. It's
44:18
what we carry. That's why that,
44:20
that a
44:22
young pregnant woman for me remains
44:25
by muse
44:27
forever, because what
44:30
was contained in
44:33
that wonderful body was
44:36
going to kind of be let out
44:38
and be let loose, but it was
44:40
really precious. And the inside
44:42
of the pieces, for me, have to be
44:44
as carefully and
44:47
tenderly made as the
44:50
outside. And I
44:52
think without the inside, the
44:55
outside has no
44:57
meaning. The beauty of
44:59
clay is that it has this
45:01
capacity to to breathe,
45:03
especially because I don't fire
45:06
my work very high. So
45:08
they still breathe in
45:11
and out. There's
45:13
a process of osmosis going
45:15
in and they
45:17
both are important to each
45:20
other. But it is important that
45:22
the inside informs the
45:24
outside. Dame
45:29
Magdalene O'Dundo, the renowned ceramicist, you
45:32
can see your exhibition, A Dialogue
45:34
with Objects at Toronto's Gardiner Museum,
45:37
until April 21st. If you want to
45:39
see the images of Magdalene's pottery that she
45:41
was just talking about, go to our Instagram
45:43
page at CBC. If
46:01
the only thing Mike Post did was compose
46:04
this, the Rock-R-Files theme, legacy
46:06
cemented, right? But
46:08
instead, he played guitar on
46:10
I Got You, Babe by
46:13
Cher. He produced classical gas.
46:15
He discovered Kenny Rogers, and
46:17
he composed the Dun-Dun for Law &
46:19
Order, a conversation with one of the
46:21
most important figures in music history that
46:23
you may have never heard of. Mike
46:26
Post, tomorrow on the show. And
46:30
that is it for us today. Edna Burek, to
46:32
all those celebrating the end of Ramadan. We'll see
46:34
you tomorrow on the show. Later on. For
46:40
more CBC podcasts,
46:42
go to cbc.ca/podcasts.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More