Podchaser Logo
Home
Ian Williams on courageous conversations, cancel culture and taking risks + Magdalene Odundo on her life in clay

Ian Williams on courageous conversations, cancel culture and taking risks + Magdalene Odundo on her life in clay

Released Wednesday, 10th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Ian Williams on courageous conversations, cancel culture and taking risks + Magdalene Odundo on her life in clay

Ian Williams on courageous conversations, cancel culture and taking risks + Magdalene Odundo on her life in clay

Ian Williams on courageous conversations, cancel culture and taking risks + Magdalene Odundo on her life in clay

Ian Williams on courageous conversations, cancel culture and taking risks + Magdalene Odundo on her life in clay

Wednesday, 10th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

CBC Podcasts needs your

0:02

support. Some of our

0:05

best series from last year have

0:07

been nominated for Webby Awards, the

0:09

internet's highest honor. We'd love to

0:11

win, and you can help. If

0:14

you listen to The Africa's

0:16

vs. America, The Naked Emperor

0:18

Understood, or The No

0:20

Good, Terribly Kind, Wonderful Lives, and

0:22

Tragic Deaths of Barry and Honey

0:25

Sherman, you can vote now. webbyawards.com

0:29

to cast your vote. The

0:31

deadline is April 18th. This

0:37

is a CBC Podcast. Hey,

0:42

I'm Tom Power. Welcome to Q. So,

0:45

this is pretty cool. Not every day

0:47

you get to start

0:49

the show with a big old announcement. So,

0:51

in order to set up the

0:53

announcement, I need to tell you about something called the Massey

0:56

Electrons. If you're not as

0:59

familiar with the Massey Lectures, it's a really great Canadian

1:01

tradition that's been going on since the early 60s. Every

1:04

year, a great Canadian, or sometimes

1:06

international writer, or

1:08

thinker, or scholar, gives

1:11

a series of five public lectures

1:13

in cities across Canada, and they

1:15

get broadcast on the CBC. And

1:18

you listen to this thing, you go to the

1:21

theatre, you hear a great mind talk about the

1:23

subject of their choosing, and it's usually

1:25

something that Canada needs to hear, right?

1:27

Right now. In the past,

1:30

Massey Lectures have been folks like Margaret

1:32

Atwood, Noam Chomsky, Martin Luther

1:34

King Jr., Jane Jacobs, Tanya

1:36

Talaga. And

1:39

this year's 2024 Massey Lecture

1:42

is none other than the bestselling

1:44

author, Ian Williams. Ian

1:47

Williams is an award-winning writer, poet, and

1:49

professor at the University of Toronto.

1:52

His debut novel, Reproduction, won the 2019 Scotiabank-Gillar

1:55

Prize, which is Canada's richest

1:58

award for fiction. And

2:00

when Ian's talking,

2:02

you'd be hard-pressed to find someone who's

2:04

not hanging on his every word. But

2:06

as you're going to hear, when he came in to talk about his plans for

2:08

the lecture, he's not really

2:10

interested in talking by himself these days. He's

2:13

interested in conversations and

2:15

why these days it feels harder and

2:18

more complicated to have them. Here's

2:21

our conversation. Ian, welcome

2:23

to the show. Thanks for telling me. How

2:25

you doing? I'm doing well. Congratulations are

2:28

in order. Yeah. And to be

2:30

a part of that list, it's pretty impressive when

2:32

you read that list. Yeah. What

2:34

went through your mind when I was reading out those names? Yeah.

2:38

Yeah, trying to reconcile myself with these names.

2:41

Are these actual people or are these just kind of like

2:44

the abstractions of people? Like

2:46

at what point does Martin Luther King stop being

2:48

like a human person who needs oatmeal in the

2:50

morning and starts being like the champion of civil

2:52

rights? And so, yeah, maybe

2:55

we lose ourselves at some point. Yeah. I

2:57

think about that all the time. That is the reason

2:59

I do the show. I think about that all the

3:01

time. It's that these people like Charlie Chaplin or Martin

3:03

Luther King or Jane Jacobs, they

3:08

showered and they went

3:10

to a convenience store and bought cigarettes and

3:13

were also geniuses. Yeah.

3:16

What you do though is like you humanize people,

3:18

right? So if we have like Beyonce living up

3:20

on this level, Beyonce talking to you suddenly has

3:23

a wart or a pimple or something. I

3:26

bring the warts out in people even when I'm trying

3:28

to say. Suddenly you make them human, right? In a

3:30

way that we forget that these names that are circulating

3:32

all the time are people who do

3:34

have to buy toothpaste. The worry is for

3:37

me that if we make these people into

3:39

gods, then the average person thinks that they

3:41

can't do that stuff, that they have

3:43

to be like given some sort of gift from God. I

3:46

think life's richer when remarkable people are just

3:48

like you and me. Yeah. I

3:50

like that. That's actually kind of beautiful. That's all we

3:53

have time for. The end. My

3:55

thought. You know

3:57

what? I'll be doing the lecture next

3:59

year. Congratulations. What went through your head when you found out? Was

4:02

it a call you get? Did you do this thing?

4:04

I think it was a bit of a couple of

4:06

soft approaches, I think, at first. Might you be interested

4:09

in or are you thinking about

4:11

anything lately? I think there were a

4:13

few of those kinds of conversations I was having. I was like,

4:15

I'm not sure where this is going, but yeah, I'm thinking about

4:17

things. Writing

4:20

non-fiction next and so forth. Yeah,

4:22

I think they were feeling me

4:24

out and I was baffled and

4:27

just being honest. How did

4:29

you land on conversations as the topic of the lecture?

4:32

Yeah, that's tricky. I

4:35

did my PhD about tone

4:37

and voice. I was interested in how do

4:39

we know what people mean from just the

4:41

words they say. I

4:44

was also fascinated by how could

4:47

we detect who's speaking from a

4:49

page. A page is pretty neutral.

4:51

A doctorate was an English lit. How

4:53

do you know a black man is writing or

4:56

a lesbian woman or whatnot? What clues are there

4:58

in text? That's 20

5:01

years ago. I've written several books in the meantime. All

5:03

of that has been very useful in constructing

5:05

voices and whatnot. The

5:07

natural evolution for me is this idea of, okay,

5:09

we know about voice, we know about tone,

5:11

we put those things together and

5:14

what are our conversations like? That's

5:16

one part of it. That's a theoretical answer

5:19

for you. But also we're living

5:21

in a point now where we can barely talk to each other.

5:24

It seems incredibly urgent these

5:27

days with increasing polarization,

5:29

online forms of talking. It

5:33

seems really timely that we step back and

5:35

say, why can't we talk to

5:38

each other? How can we talk to each other? What

5:40

do we need to talk about right now in 2024

5:42

and create an environment and space to make

5:44

that happen? I think it's

5:47

the fabric to make a number of

5:49

other kinds of important interventions possible. What

5:52

have you been learning about our inability to have conversations?

5:54

I think it's an interesting point because one of the

5:56

things I was going to bring up to you was

5:59

having a conversation about conversations right now is a

6:01

dangerous thing to do. You're

6:04

right, the fracturing of news media, we are not

6:06

consuming the same news media. When

6:08

we're DMing, are we really talking to one another?

6:10

When we're posting Instagram stories at one another, are

6:13

we really talking to one another? What have you

6:15

been cleaning? Right, right. It gets kind of meta,

6:17

right, after a point, but I'm trying to keep

6:19

this as sort of like real as

6:22

possible. Learning

6:24

about a lot of things, right? So for instance,

6:26

I think politeness constrains us and at the same

6:28

time, without that politeness, we see like what chaos

6:30

breaks loose on social media. So

6:33

what is the sort of appropriate amount

6:35

of like social

6:37

policing, right, that we need to be like decent

6:40

and similar to each other? I've

6:42

learned that the topics that we say we shouldn't talk about

6:44

are in fact topics that some segments

6:46

talk about all the time, right? So what do we

6:48

say like we shouldn't talk about race

6:52

or people's sexual lives or whatever, like

6:55

sexual minorities are talking about this all the

6:57

time, right? So there are friends, black folks,

7:00

Indian folks, we're talking about race constantly in

7:02

our circles. Only certain subjects are off limits

7:04

to some people, right? So

7:07

learning like just these little things that

7:09

we've taken for granted and sort of

7:11

assumed and then realize no, in

7:13

fact, this is not the case, right? Yeah.

7:17

It's an interesting thing you get to do here

7:19

to kind of talk to the country about this.

7:21

Yeah, yeah. And hopefully that we find

7:23

ways of talking to each other too about this and

7:26

like both nationally, right? How to have a

7:28

national conversation. Harder to do. Yeah,

7:30

about, I mean, lots of people involved, lots

7:32

of perspectives involved, but

7:35

also like more domestically too, right? So how

7:37

do we sit around a table at Christmas

7:39

time and talk

7:41

about gender neutral bathrooms, right?

7:44

So yeah, both like the

7:46

scale right from the personal and intimate all the way up

7:48

to the national. I

7:50

want to find out a little bit about why this might

7:53

be interesting to you, but I want to do that through

7:55

maybe talking a little bit more about you for people who

7:57

may not know you. The

8:00

last time we talked on the show, I've seen

8:03

social easy if the old Gillers every year and all that

8:05

kind of thing. It was when

8:07

you won the Giller Prize and we were doing a little bit of

8:09

research to get ready for this. Born

8:12

in Trinidad, moved to Canada. How old? That

8:15

was nine. Yeah. What do you remember? But

8:17

Trinidad, I mean, what do you remember about nine? It was

8:19

all it's all pretty clear, right? It's like I

8:22

feel at nine years old. I could have been pretty much an

8:24

adult. Yeah. Yeah, I could have found my way through. Remember

8:27

a lot about it. I remember sort of Yeah.

8:34

It's funny, like I remember the childish details. I remember

8:36

food and playing and my friends and my toys. I

8:38

remember my airplanes and all of that stuff. But

8:41

I also remember like just kind of like

8:43

atmosphere of something just beyond my grasp in

8:46

childhood. It's like when you come to an awareness that oh,

8:48

the world is really big. And

8:50

there are people living in North America

8:53

that I see on TV. But

8:55

they're actually like real people doing things that are

8:57

very different from what we're doing here. And

9:00

I'm in relation to that somehow. I'm

9:02

seeing them, but they're not seeing me. Like little things

9:04

like that that you start to sort of realize and

9:07

come to an awareness with your little child brain. Yeah,

9:10

those kinds of things. I remember sort of being

9:13

formed, right? And when you have a big move, a

9:15

big migration, sort of in

9:17

your childhood, you get split, right? You just

9:19

get divided. You move to where the TV

9:21

show was. You're moving to where

9:23

the you were looking out the window and you're

9:26

moving to the outside. That's right. What do you

9:28

mean by a split? Yeah, it's kind of this

9:30

way like you're in the audience for like a

9:32

sitcom being shot and then suddenly you're plucked and

9:34

sort of put on stage there. But

9:37

you're split in the sense that you know, you've got a private

9:39

life and sort of

9:41

like early history that's formed by one country in

9:43

one system. And then you come here

9:45

and you realize that oh, there's a totally other way

9:47

or a different way at least

9:49

of sort of living and being. And

9:52

I've got to do both of those things, right? Right?

9:54

Because my parents are committed to say this this form

9:57

a of living. But

9:59

if I'm good, I'm good. to live the rest of my life out

10:01

here. I better get used to Form B. What

10:05

do you remember in the practical

10:08

of coming to Canada for the first time?

10:10

Was it the snowing? I remember the

10:12

late night flight. It was in the

10:14

middle of the night. It was as late as we were allowed to stay

10:16

up. In

10:19

those days, I mean this is the late 80s, you

10:23

had to dress up to get on a plane. It

10:25

was actually like something. Yeah, there was no different kind

10:27

of dancing socks. No, no. No, you don't jump like

10:30

that, right? No. Wear like your

10:32

nice clothes on your flight, you know. They were

10:34

waving galleries and stuff to sort of say goodbye

10:36

to folks. And just the occasion of being

10:38

on a plane, there weren't discount airlines and all that. It was

10:41

an occasion, right? Yeah. You know, it was pretty big.

10:43

And so from a kid, like being on a plane

10:45

was a big thing, right? Yeah.

10:47

Toronto, did you land in Toronto? Yeah, landed

10:49

at Pearson. Yeah. And upon landing, you mean

10:51

like... Oh, I don't know. What was it?

10:53

I remember Snow for

10:56

the first time. I'm

10:58

shrugging. I guess you can't see that. Thank

11:01

you for the translation, though. I appreciate that. Yeah.

11:04

Not easily wowed, even as a kid,

11:07

right? One of these kinds of probably

11:09

little Sheldon kids. Were there

11:12

books and reading and

11:14

writing going on around you? Yeah, all the time. My

11:16

mom went back to university and I would read her

11:18

textbooks and stuff like that. What did she go to

11:20

university for? She went to York and she went back

11:22

for English. Yeah. And so

11:24

like good books in the house as a result of

11:26

that. And books with weird covers

11:30

things that you know you shouldn't quite be reading, but

11:32

you're kind of peeking into. Yeah. So the

11:34

path one would think is these books are around your

11:36

house going to university for English. You

11:39

would think, oh, well, he discovers these

11:41

books. He decides to commit his life

11:43

to writing. Not the case. Psychiatry

11:47

I was reading. You were on the

11:49

path of becoming a psychiatrist, psychologist? Right.

11:51

But I don't think these are super

11:53

unrelated things. That's the right you're

11:56

interested in sort of people and language. And I

11:59

mean, that's all. all I really

12:01

wanted, right? So you could go sort of the scientific way of

12:03

sort of getting to know people. Or

12:05

you could just make them up. I

12:08

chose the second, yeah. You are

12:10

aware now that you were interested in language and

12:12

how people spoke to one another? I knew this

12:14

like first year university, right? Like what's important in

12:17

life? People and

12:19

communication, right? How to get to know these people and

12:21

to talk to these people. And

12:23

so my first degree was like in psychology

12:26

and English, right? So all these

12:28

hypothetical people that you could sort of

12:30

figure out and then psychology as a

12:32

backdrop to that. Were you

12:34

having a hard time? The reason I

12:36

asked, and let me offer transference

12:39

so that you don't think I'm

12:41

accusing anything. Sometimes I wonder

12:43

if I do this job because it

12:45

is a controlled way to

12:48

talk to somebody. And

12:50

so I'll just offer that up.

12:53

I wonder why you were interested in

12:55

how we talk to one another and

12:57

converse with one another in early years

13:00

of university. Were you having a hard time with that? Yeah,

13:02

that's really insightful. Really insightful, Tom, for

13:04

your own life and for my degree. Oh, yeah.

13:07

They're going to put a wing in the therapist's

13:09

office for me. I'm not sure about that. They're

13:11

going to memorial wing in my name. I

13:15

guess, I mean, you can

13:17

superficially get along with anybody, right? But the

13:19

kinds of deep connections that you crave somewhere

13:21

in your teenage years require a bit more

13:23

than just kind of casual contact. And

13:27

I perhaps was a bit clinical about this. And

13:29

I was a lonely child, right? I was always

13:31

sort of on the

13:33

fringes of childhood, right? Always never

13:36

quite fitting into that time in life, right?

13:40

And so I wanted to understand why and how

13:42

and when will things get better and all of

13:44

that. Yeah. And so I think that's partly related,

13:47

right? Yeah. I

13:49

still can't see, but I hope you see my

13:51

nod of recognition. Were you on the fringes of

13:54

childhood? Oh, yeah, baby. And it doesn't mean you're

13:56

unpopular, right? No. It just means, like, you know,

13:58

why are we doing this? Can't we

14:00

just sort of move on to the next phase? It's

14:02

like everyone else seems to be, this seems to be

14:04

easy for everybody else. It seems a little bit harder

14:07

for me. Right, right, right. Like how much baseball can

14:09

you play? I'm good. You know, I love it. But,

14:11

you know, can we do something else now? You

14:17

end up not doing psychiatry anymore and you

14:19

end up becoming a writer. I

14:21

was reading you had a fire.

14:24

You had a house fire that

14:26

everything was gone.

14:29

Yeah. Except for the clothes on your back. That's a real

14:31

deep cut. Where'd you find that out? I mean, that's... Wait

14:36

till I read your credit score. By the way, you're

14:38

doing great. That's

14:44

really impressive. But yeah, so I worked in

14:46

the States for a long, for about seven

14:48

years, right after the doctorate. Our

14:51

doctorate in... In English. Yeah.

14:53

At University of Toronto. And

14:56

yeah, part way through my time there, I

14:58

was in my condo, there was a fire,

15:00

an electrical fire that spread across the building and

15:02

down and just kind of destroyed everything,

15:04

right? So I was home at the time. I managed

15:06

to get out, but never quite got

15:08

back in. I didn't

15:10

even have my glasses on me. I remember, but

15:12

yeah, I had my phone, my keys and

15:15

my cell phone. My phone,

15:17

my keys and my wallet I had. And I was

15:19

traveling and I need my passport. I remember that. And

15:23

so my question at that point in my life was, okay,

15:25

Ian, you've lost everything except the stuff in your

15:27

head. And so you need to

15:30

rebuild everything again. And

15:32

I had money in the bank, had a job. But

15:34

where do you want to rebuild? Do you want to stay

15:37

in Massachusetts and sort of rebuild your life as a potential

15:39

American? Or do you want to go back

15:42

to Canada? And so that was one of those

15:44

sort of hinge moments in a life, right?

15:46

Where you decide, okay, if I've been reset,

15:49

where do I want to be? And so move back to

15:51

Canada, rebuild. Yeah, the where wasn't what I was thinking about.

15:53

I was thinking that like you had a job. I mean,

15:55

you're still a professor, but like you had, you had a

15:58

job and you were sort of living in that academic world.

16:00

Yeah, yeah, and you hadn't written a novel

16:02

yet. No and I was wondering whether you

16:04

had your book But you published poetry by

16:06

that point. I had I'd published. Yeah a

16:08

short story collection and some poetry Yeah, I

16:10

wondered whether after the fire because this happened

16:12

to a friend of mine who was an

16:14

actor Yeah, her house burned down and

16:17

she went well, I'm gonna just

16:19

become an actor I just lost everything

16:21

what was she doing before it was her job,

16:23

you know, she was working She was part-timey acting

16:26

but you know kind of doing everything else and

16:28

not fully committing yourself I wondered whether after that

16:30

happened you were like I'm gonna kind of commit

16:32

myself more to being a writer in a yeah

16:34

I can see that story. I like that story.

16:36

But yeah, it's um, you can have it. No,

16:38

I Before

16:41

I was committed before but you sort of double down

16:43

in a different kind of way like you realize Not

16:49

whether I can do this or not right but to

16:51

do it again, it's like getting that second chance to

16:53

do it again What would I do differently? And

16:56

so is the sort of American

16:58

market more important than sort of like

17:00

rediscovering myself as a Canadian and sort

17:02

of returning And entrenching

17:04

myself here like those kinds of questions become

17:06

important. Yeah. Well, I was that I mean

17:09

as a writer You would think

17:11

hey come on staying in the state. Yeah, it's

17:13

a different world though And I think aesthetically I

17:15

think we we think differently right as between like

17:17

Canada and the US and so there's a real

17:19

kind of palpable Like artistic difference

17:21

I think between the two countries and you

17:23

could do it See there's a lot of

17:25

crossover that's possible and whatnot. It's it's not a

17:27

bad thing. I'm not saying I'm not

17:29

discouraging it And your book sold in the US.

17:31

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, so it's not not an issue

17:35

But where are you at home? I think is the question

17:37

right and so It's here

17:39

in Canada. The first of the first

17:41

time we talked was for your first novel Reproduction

17:44

for people who don't know is a sort of beautiful winding

17:47

love story about family and class and relationships and

17:49

also sort of one of my favorite things about

17:51

it was that it sort of Plays with the

17:53

form of the of the novel.

17:55

What do you remember? What

17:58

was on your mind when you were writing that? mid

18:02

30s. Mid 30s, unmarried had no kids

18:04

and so thinking about all of those

18:06

things and the possibility

18:08

of never doing any of those things too. And so

18:10

if I could do it sort of artistically, I don't

18:12

actually need to do it in person. And this kind

18:15

of mystifies my friends about sort of like the pattern

18:17

of my life. Like don't you actually

18:19

want to do this kind of thing

18:21

or do X or Y? I'm like,

18:23

you know, if I can think about it and if

18:25

I can sort of explore it and figure it out,

18:27

then I'm good. I don't really need to have that

18:29

sort of real life experience. So reproduction kind of felt

18:31

like that for me, right? Do

18:34

you still feel that way? About

18:36

the present novel that I'm working on, yeah. About

18:38

some of the other things. I feel like you

18:40

can lay some things to bed without

18:44

necessarily having the actual lived in the

18:46

world experience, right? Right, yeah. You can

18:48

kind of settle some things. Settle some

18:50

things, yeah. I feel unsettled. Just work

18:52

it out. I understand. I think I've

18:54

read this book about these things. Right.

18:58

And I think peace with the whole issue of

19:00

like, you know, what I should be doing at

19:03

Yeah. I mean, what's

19:06

interesting is that that book ends up giving you another

19:08

path through its success. I mean, I remember

19:10

I was actually looking a little bit right

19:12

after you won and I sort

19:14

of tried to ask this doe-eyed,

19:16

you know, like I just won the Giller Prize

19:19

person, like, hey, what does this mean to you?

19:21

And you're kind of like, being very polite. But

19:24

you're also kind of going, I don't know. I don't know. It

19:26

just happened. It just happened like six hours ago. I don't know.

19:29

I really enjoyed that interview, Tom. I remember it,

19:31

yeah. I enjoyed it as well. How

19:34

did winning the Giller change things for you?

19:36

Your life, your career, whatever. Yeah.

19:38

It's incredibly like liberating, right? Like

19:41

to know that you've

19:43

achieved something that you don't need to achieve again or you

19:45

don't need to prove X or Y. And I'm rolling my

19:49

eyes at this comparison I'm about to make, right? But

19:51

do you need, like, does Beyoncé

19:54

need to sort of win a Grammy

19:56

again, right? You know, I feel like

19:59

there comes a point where, okay, you

20:02

have been sort of granted permission to do whatever you

20:05

want to do with your mind and your life. And

20:08

that is the greatest gift. I mean, to

20:10

symbolize it in the form of an award

20:12

or something, that's one thing. But I wish

20:14

we could like bestow this on people without

20:16

the actual like material award or checks or

20:18

whatever to say like, hey, you

20:21

are free to live your life and to do whatever

20:23

you want with your life. That's sort of

20:25

big, big gift of the giller for me. Help

20:28

me understand that better. If I think you are saying what

20:30

I think you are saying, it's really interesting. So

20:35

what the giller gave

20:37

you, especially for a debut novelist,

20:39

is sort of permission that like, hey, you

20:41

got some value here. You

20:43

should write. You should do this. And

20:45

you are saying, wouldn't it be nice if we all

20:48

had that without it? All had that. Right. Yeah.

20:53

right? To be more deeply myself rather than

20:55

to try

20:58

to please or try to do the right thing

21:00

or all of those other things. I really limit

21:03

our behavior. And it

21:05

would be great if we everybody had permission to

21:07

actually be themselves, like

21:09

truly and fully, right, as if they had

21:11

already won at their lives, right, instead of

21:13

trying to sort of prove that it. Yeah.

21:17

Yeah. Yeah. I

21:19

mean, how lovely would that be? I feel like we all. Some

21:21

people snatch it, right? Some people just take it. They

21:24

refuse. They don't wait for it to be sort of awarded

21:26

on them. And that kind of courage

21:28

I really admire. But

21:30

I guess if nobody's giving it to you, you take it. In

21:32

the latest book of Essie's Disorientation, you opened the book with

21:35

a quote. I wanted to read that live because I thought

21:37

it might have something to do with the theme

21:40

you chose for your

21:42

Massey lecture. It's by Audre

21:44

Lorde. Do you want me to read it?

21:46

Yeah. All right. I

21:48

have come to believe over and over again that what

21:50

is the most important to me must be spoken, made

21:52

verbal and shared, even at

21:54

the risk of having it bruised and misunderstood. Opening

21:58

the book with that, it also feels... like

22:00

your lecture? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

22:02

Oh, great, great isolation there. Good,

22:04

good point. Hey, I've never

22:06

felt myself a scene had you never been higher

22:08

in an interview in my entire life. Whatever the

22:11

producers are behind the scenes. Right out there, Caitlin

22:13

Swan out there, by the way. Yeah, you think

22:15

I wrote that down? I'm an AI and I've

22:17

been trying

22:19

to tell you that from the very beginning. It's

22:21

really excellent. Yeah,

22:24

so Orchard Lord, what she's suggesting here is that

22:26

even if people misunderstand you, even if you're going

22:28

to get cancelled, even if you are saying the

22:30

wrong thing, it's worth taking the

22:32

risk to say it. And

22:35

for me, that's important. That book is about

22:37

sort of race, right in the world. And

22:41

I hadn't really written directly about it. And it's

22:43

a subject that most people sort of avoid. And

22:45

I want to sort of get all of my

22:47

thoughts in one place about race. And

22:49

when people kept asking me, this was during, you

22:51

know, Black Lives Matter and George Floyd, all this

22:53

people kept asking me for thoughts and comments

22:55

and opinion on race. And

22:58

they were all inside, right? Just not

23:00

really organized. Your thoughts were

23:02

inside. Yeah. What else would they be? But

23:05

not really organized. I was with the people. I

23:07

was like, we were all inside also because it

23:09

was a pandemic. We couldn't go outside anyway. But

23:11

not systemically organized and all of that. And

23:15

I decided to take the risk to write

23:17

about race, right? Even if I

23:20

was going to offend people,

23:23

even if I was going to say the wrong thing,

23:25

but my commitment was to be as honest to myself

23:28

at that particular point, right? Who knows? Like my

23:30

thinking on some of those points has actually evolved

23:32

right in the last few years. But

23:35

at that moment, that was true. Yeah.

23:37

And it was a risk. And I

23:39

took it. First

23:44

part of my conversation with the brilliant Ian

23:46

Williams, who is the author of Reproduction, which

23:48

won the Giller Prize in 2019. We just

23:50

announced he'll be the mass electricist this year,

23:53

meaning he'll be traveling across the country, giving

23:55

a talk. His talk will

23:57

be about conversations. He'll be in

23:59

Sydney, Nova. Scotia, Halleweet in

24:01

Nunavut, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Victoria,

24:04

BC, and Toronto, Ontario. More

24:06

of my conversation with Ian coming up. We're

24:08

going to talk about courage, which we often

24:10

think of as saying what no one

24:12

else is going to talk about. I'm

24:14

just going to say, everyone else is thinking, I'm

24:16

going to say that's courageous. Ian will talk about

24:18

how courage can often be listening. Plus,

24:20

Dame Magdalene O'Dundo will talk about why

24:23

she spends more time on the inside

24:25

of her sculptures

24:28

than the outside, even though we can't see

24:30

it. This is cute. Think

24:49

of your favorite one-hit wonder. Or that overpriced

24:51

toy your parents would never let you have.

24:53

Or that TV show that no one else

24:55

remembers because it was canceled way too soon.

24:58

Now what if we could fix it? I'm

25:00

Francesca Ramsey. And I'm Delon Grant. And

25:03

after 20 years of friendship, we are

25:05

now hosting a new nostalgia podcast called

25:07

Let Me Fix It. Each

25:09

episode we have taken our favorite celebrities, shows, and

25:11

brands of yesteryear and then imagine what it would

25:13

take to repackage them for relevance today. Think

25:15

of our show as an intervention, but

25:17

with way less stakes. So subscribe to

25:20

Let Me Fix It wherever you get your favorite podcasts.

25:32

I'm Tom Power. Welcome back to Q. You're

25:34

in the middle of my conversation with one

25:36

of the great minds in Canada, the author,

25:38

poet, and professor Ian Williams. Ian was the

25:40

winner of the Giller Prize, Canada's richest literary

25:42

prize in 2019. And

25:45

we just announced, and this is pretty cool, that

25:47

Ian is this year's Massey Lecturist, which is a

25:49

role in Canada that's been around since the early

25:51

60s. I love it.

25:54

It's like a great thinker travels

25:56

all across Canada to

25:59

speak in... theaters on

26:01

a topic of their choosing. Ian

26:03

will be going to Sydney, Kailuit,

26:05

Saskatoon, Victoria, and Toronto. And

26:08

for Ian's lecture, he's landed on the topic

26:10

of conversation, which

26:12

is broad. But

26:15

here's how Ian talks about it. He's

26:17

going to get up there and talk about how to

26:20

have hard conversations that we need

26:22

to have with one another. How

26:24

we actually don't talk to each

26:26

other anymore. Is digital communication, texting

26:28

and DMing and all that, is

26:30

that really conversation, the

26:32

ability to disagree? And

26:35

what is courage really? It's fascinating to

26:37

hear his thoughts on it, in particular

26:39

around courage in conversations. And I think

26:41

oftentimes we think about courage, or courage

26:43

gets talked about in sort of the

26:45

modern discourse in conversations as, I'm going

26:47

to say the thing that everyone's thinking.

26:50

I'm going to say the thing that everyone's thinking. I got the courage to

26:52

do it. What about the courage

26:54

to be silent? What

26:56

about the courage to actually listen? That's

26:59

where our conversation picks up. Typically

27:01

we think about courage as the act to

27:03

sort of say something, especially if that's something

27:06

unpopular and to power. But

27:10

I think, in fact, a number of the

27:12

positions that we hold right now are not

27:14

courageous positions. They're sort of popular liberal positions.

27:19

And we have a whole army of supporters

27:21

ready to sort of at our back. They're

27:23

positions that we can just step into without

27:25

forming. We can just occupy them without sort

27:27

of developing them. And I wish

27:29

that more of us would actually come to a point

27:32

where we develop our opinions instead of just kind of

27:34

like receive and then sort of parrot them. So

27:37

courage normally is for the thing that's

27:39

sort of spoken. But

27:42

I think there's something to courageous

27:44

listening and courageous silence. And

27:47

I think we ought to realize that one half of

27:49

our conversations is in fact listening. You do this all

27:51

the time. You spend a lot of your time listening.

27:54

And to sort of flip the script

27:56

from the person in power or

27:58

the most important person in a conversation. conversation is

28:00

not the person speaking, but sometimes

28:03

the person listening. Some

28:05

groups have been listening for hundreds of years, right?

28:07

Now they're speaking and people are getting antsy because

28:09

they're not used to listening. So

28:13

I mean there's a kind of paradigm shift that we need

28:15

to sort of think about what the balance

28:17

is in a conversation. Is

28:20

it courageous to speak

28:22

or is it courageous to sort of hold your peace

28:24

until someone else has said something contradictory to

28:26

you and like not rush in to sort

28:29

of like contradict them and to sort of

28:31

prove your point, but to just

28:33

kind of like listen graciously to let it settle, to

28:35

offer no comment or whatever and just let it be.

28:39

It's a hard thing to learn. Yeah. I

28:41

found it hard. Yeah, it's fairly. It's, yeah,

28:43

but it's possible. And when you can

28:45

get there, it's... It's

28:48

revolutionary. Yeah. It's revolutionary

28:50

in a conversation because all the defenses, all the armor

28:52

sort of comes down and we're just kind

28:55

of like in this free flowing exploratory space. Have

28:57

you seen that movie? That

28:59

trilogy of like Ethan Hawke walking around

29:01

Paris with Julie Delpy? Awaking the... Yeah,

29:04

Before Sunrise. Before Sunrise. All of that

29:06

stuff. I haven't seen it. Go

29:09

see. I mean it's old. Every 10 years

29:11

they redo it, right? But that kind of conversation we could have

29:13

more of, right? Conversations without agenda, conversations

29:15

without like the intent to persuade

29:18

and to convert just conversations for

29:20

the sake of just relating one human

29:23

being to another. Yeah. Conversations

29:25

where, and I don't know if you struggle

29:27

with this the way I do, conversations while

29:29

the other person's talking, I'm not thinking about

29:31

the thing I'm going to say. Yeah. Yeah.

29:34

Yeah. Are

29:36

you listening to me or are you just waiting for your turn to speak? Yeah.

29:39

And too often is that it's the second one,

29:41

right? I'm excited to hear you have these Massey

29:43

Luckdell. Well, thank you, Tom. I'm looking forward to

29:46

it. You're going all across

29:48

the country. Sydney? Yeah.

29:51

Staring in hell. Sydney? Keep

29:53

reading. Yeah. In Halloween?

29:56

Yeah. Have you been before? Never

29:58

been. Beautiful. I

30:00

mean just the kindest most wonderful people and we had a grand

30:02

old time. What time of year were you there? So

30:05

geez Louise April and May

30:08

yeah, it was still dark. It was still

30:10

dark all year all day And

30:12

I mean I got a real kick out of that. When

30:15

are you going? October.

30:18

October? It'll be late. That's okay.

30:20

Saskatoon? Yeah. That's

30:22

the one province I've not been to actually

30:24

yeah, so flown over Saskatchewan

30:26

looking forward to that Caitlin looks one out

30:29

there from Jesus, Saskatchewan Great

30:32

Victoria Victoria. I guess that's the only

30:34

major Canadian city. I've never been to

30:36

why not. I mean You

30:41

asked me as if you asked me as if I made

30:43

the call as if I was like I'm never going out

30:45

there obvious place to be you've been to the island though

30:47

No, never been to the island. Oh, I

30:49

never had a never had a occasion to go out there. I would have

30:51

you know, I Should

30:54

That's your summer plan. I would love to tell you

30:56

what I want to go out to the like the islands

30:59

I want to go to like Salt Spring. Oh, yeah,

31:01

you don't know you that yeah Yeah, I used to live

31:03

in in BC, right? So did a lot of traveling

31:05

around there, but I am curious about like the minutia

31:07

of going on the road in Canada Oh,

31:09

whether you have like a famous favorite restaurant, you know, I know

31:11

that's kind of neat, right? Sort

31:14

of make a whole thing out of it. Oh,

31:16

I don't know man. I asked Caitlin. She said

31:18

the Broadway cafe in Saskatoon What

31:21

for like diner diner kind of stuff? I

31:23

love diners. Yeah diner you Seem

31:25

like a good time. Are you yeah enough and spread

31:27

it and you just kind of like yeah Just eat

31:30

away right a white china cup of coffee, but you

31:32

need the right person to be in a diner with

31:34

yeah I need good company In

31:36

lovely to talk to you as always I

31:43

love those diners by myself Ian Williams is

31:45

I don't know what that says about me.

31:47

Ian Williams is an author and

31:50

professor at the University of Toronto He

31:52

has been chosen as this year's

31:54

Massey Lecturist which means he'll be

31:57

traveling across Canada speaking about how

31:59

to have conversations with one

32:01

another. He'll be in Sydney, Nova

32:04

Scotia, Ekaluit, Nunavut, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Victoria,

32:06

B.C., Toronto, Ontario. These

32:08

lectures will be broadcast as

32:11

part of CBC's ideas.

32:25

So when you walk into a museum, and

32:28

it could be any kind of museum, modern

32:30

art, historic art, natural history, the

32:32

one thing you see, and I

32:34

only realized that in this interview in all of

32:36

these different types of museums, is ceramics or pottery.

32:39

Think about it. When was the last time you

32:41

went to a museum and you didn't see ceramics

32:43

or pottery in some way? And

32:45

it makes sense because since the beginning of civilization, they've been

32:47

a big part of our lives, whether eating

32:49

out of them, storing food in them, or making

32:51

part out of them. And that last part, making

32:53

art out of them, well,

32:56

ceramics has not necessarily always been taken

32:58

seriously as an art form. And that's

33:00

been changing thanks to the works of

33:02

artists like Dame Magdalene O'Dundo, who has

33:04

been called one of the greatest living

33:06

ceramicists and her work's been shown in

33:08

some of the biggest collections in

33:10

the world. Now listen, it's hard to describe

33:12

Dame Magdalene's pottery and do justice on the

33:14

radio. So we put some of the photos

33:16

up of her pottery at CBC Q on

33:18

Instagram. If you want to follow along

33:21

and have a look at them while you're listening

33:23

to this conversation. But yeah, we talk a little

33:25

bit about pottery. We talk a little bit

33:27

about why the insides of her pieces, even

33:29

though you can't see them, are maybe more

33:31

important than the outside. But I

33:33

wanted to start with when she fell in love with

33:35

clay. Hi, how are you? Welcome to the show.

33:38

Thank you very much. I want to start

33:40

by talking a little bit about

33:42

clay. You say that the first

33:45

time you encountered clay,

33:47

you fell in love with it. What

33:50

happened? Where were you? What did

33:52

you fall in love with? Gosh,

33:57

that's 45, 45. years

34:00

off? Not

34:02

yesterday, what you're saying. Not

34:04

yesterday, a good question. I

34:07

think the sensation

34:10

of the material just moving into

34:12

one's hand and just the

34:18

recognition of being able to

34:21

manipulate the clay was really

34:23

a life changer

34:25

really because up to

34:27

then I had never worked in a

34:30

plastic material. I had only

34:32

worked as a graphic

34:35

designer and worked in advertising.

34:38

And I just think I probably had

34:40

started in the wrong business.

34:42

And so when I

34:46

touched clay, I think there

34:50

was a feeling of finding

34:52

myself. How do you end

34:54

up doing it in the first place?

34:56

Like if you were studying more graphic things,

35:00

how do you end up putting your hands in a bunch of clay to

35:02

begin with? I just ended up, I

35:05

worked and trained

35:07

in commercial art and

35:09

advertising in Nairobi in

35:12

Kenya. And

35:14

then I had this opportunity to come to

35:16

England and to go on and

35:18

do a foundation course. And

35:21

I happened to go into the

35:23

ceramics department and

35:26

met this wonderful woman who

35:28

was quietly

35:31

sat in a corner and

35:33

showing students

35:35

how to build work

35:38

using coils and also

35:41

throwing on the wheel.

35:43

And I just

35:45

thought I stared

35:48

at her and all the other

35:50

students who are much

35:52

more competent in the work. And

35:54

I just thought how magical to

35:56

be able to form

35:59

a piece of work. from the beginning to

36:01

the end. And,

36:03

and it did have it kind of,

36:06

you know, sort of had this natural

36:11

human quality to it.

36:15

And I remember

36:17

the sensation, the feeling of

36:20

elation, and

36:22

the joy that I

36:25

kind of received the material. But

36:28

I'm not really sure, I can't

36:30

describe the

36:34

physical experience of remembering,

36:38

as it were. Help me understand

36:41

this better too. There's a couple of times so

36:44

far in our conversation, and

36:46

in the reading I

36:49

did, I get ready for

36:51

this conversation, where you talked a little

36:53

bit about the connections between clay,

36:57

ceramics, and humans,

36:59

like the human form.

37:02

Can you help me understand that? Like, what do you

37:04

mean by that? What are the parallels there? Otters

37:08

have, you know, hopeful

37:11

centuries referred to what

37:13

they made in

37:16

terms of the

37:18

human body. Because a

37:22

vessel, to a

37:24

potter, a vessel or a

37:27

figurine, has a body,

37:29

has feet, has

37:32

a waist, has a neck, a

37:35

lid, which can act as

37:37

the head. And

37:39

quite often you'll hear potters refer

37:41

to a lip, because

37:46

they're forming a jug. And

37:49

the terminology used

37:52

by potters reference

37:56

the body. Now, you know, I'm

38:01

not sure philosophically whether I can

38:03

actually explain that, but you

38:07

know, whether those terminology

38:11

are as long as man

38:13

has lived or whether they're biblical

38:15

and you know, sort of the

38:17

terms I used in a lot of

38:19

literature as well. But

38:21

it is just a natural thing to

38:24

say you are throwing a mug,

38:27

for argument's sake, and

38:29

the mug has a body because

38:32

it is a vessel and a human

38:34

being is a vessel that

38:36

contains what

38:39

it is we make as human. And

38:42

a mug will contain liquid that

38:45

nourishes and you need that nourishment

38:47

to nourish your body. And

38:50

therefore you have a handle that

38:53

you handle the mug with and

38:56

you have a lip, you have to pay attention to

38:58

the lip on the mug because

39:00

it's going to come into contact with

39:03

your lips. So I think

39:06

the terminologies have

39:08

always referenced the

39:10

body. Now I am

39:12

not as a philosopher, I wouldn't

39:14

be able to tell you why. But

39:17

every, every, everything I've read,

39:20

whether it's been in, in

39:22

beliefs, religious beliefs, or

39:25

philosophical thinking has always

39:28

ended up with associating, say,

39:31

with the body. And the body

39:34

is the

39:37

greatest muse for a

39:39

potter anywhere. How

39:41

about you? Is

39:43

the body the muse for you

39:45

in your work? Yes.

39:48

And for me, I think one

39:50

of the, you know,

39:53

having talked about the beginning of my

39:56

falling in love with clay, I think

39:59

my main... greatest

40:01

moment of realizing how

40:04

important the

40:06

body, the human body was

40:09

to my making

40:12

my whole future

40:15

of being a ceramicist

40:17

was just standing

40:20

around watching people moving up

40:22

and down a staircase at

40:25

a railway station. I was waiting

40:27

for my train. And just

40:29

looking at the

40:32

interaction between human

40:35

beings, the spaces that

40:38

are left in between that create

40:41

the body, the

40:43

solid bodies around

40:46

us are just fascinating and

40:48

movement. Everybody has

40:51

a movement that says something that

40:54

leads them to somewhere that

40:57

spells out what they are feeling,

40:59

the emotions they are feeling. It's

41:02

very, very interesting. And I just

41:04

remember watching this amazing

41:08

young woman, about

41:10

five foot six or something like that,

41:12

walking up. She'd

41:15

just come off a train walking up

41:17

the staircase. She was very pregnant, carrying

41:20

the stuff that she was going

41:22

to need, perhaps, you know, 24

41:26

hours later. And

41:29

in the highest high heel

41:31

shoes I'd ever seen, with

41:33

her hair tied at the back, you

41:35

know, in a ponytail. And I just

41:37

thought, how beautiful. She was a vessel,

41:39

she was carrying some life

41:43

within that body. She

41:46

was already caring for

41:48

it, because she was already shopping

41:50

for this creature.

41:54

But everything that was

41:58

about her was about containment

42:02

and happiness and

42:05

everything that is the

42:08

best of us as human beings.

42:12

We have other sides as well which I'm not

42:14

going to... No, but I understand what

42:16

you mean now. I mean, that's beautiful. I

42:20

want to close off by playing something for you

42:22

from this video you made for the exhibition in

42:24

Canada. And you said something in it

42:26

that struck us here and I wanted to ask you about

42:28

it. So let me just play it for you right now so

42:31

people can hear it. My

42:33

thinking process, my being and who

42:36

I am is defined by the

42:38

inside of those pieces. The

42:41

outside is the show that

42:43

I present to the public

42:45

and to the owner of the world. So

42:49

talk to me a little bit about that. What

42:52

do you mean by that? Did I really say

42:54

that? What

42:57

I mean by that is, you

43:00

know, when you're making something or when you're

43:03

painting or doing whatever it is, you're

43:05

manifesting a lot of thoughts within

43:09

yourself into this piece of work.

43:13

The thing with my pieces with,

43:16

as opposed to say a painting or

43:19

a ceramic that has a

43:21

lot of glazing and narrative

43:23

on it, is

43:26

that you can't really see what is

43:28

important in my

43:31

work, which is the interior side,

43:34

the inside of the work. The

43:37

literal inside of the work is

43:39

important. The literal inside of the

43:41

work. Which I can't really

43:44

see. I mean, I tried to peer in, but I can't really

43:46

see. No, and you're

43:48

not allowed to in the museum, unfortunately. Try

43:52

and stop me. That's

43:55

the meaningful part to you, the inside of this work? I

43:58

think the inside of the work is very important. And

44:00

the inside of me and you as a

44:02

person is really what

44:05

is important, isn't it? Yeah,

44:07

what you what, what kind of

44:09

fashion you dress up

44:12

in that outer

44:14

bit of yours is just show. It's

44:18

what we carry. That's why that,

44:20

that a

44:22

young pregnant woman for me remains

44:25

by muse

44:27

forever, because what

44:30

was contained in

44:33

that wonderful body was

44:36

going to kind of be let out

44:38

and be let loose, but it was

44:40

really precious. And the inside

44:42

of the pieces, for me, have to be

44:44

as carefully and

44:47

tenderly made as the

44:50

outside. And I

44:52

think without the inside, the

44:55

outside has no

44:57

meaning. The beauty of

44:59

clay is that it has this

45:01

capacity to to breathe,

45:03

especially because I don't fire

45:06

my work very high. So

45:08

they still breathe in

45:11

and out. There's

45:13

a process of osmosis going

45:15

in and they

45:17

both are important to each

45:20

other. But it is important that

45:22

the inside informs the

45:24

outside. Dame

45:29

Magdalene O'Dundo, the renowned ceramicist, you

45:32

can see your exhibition, A Dialogue

45:34

with Objects at Toronto's Gardiner Museum,

45:37

until April 21st. If you want to

45:39

see the images of Magdalene's pottery that she

45:41

was just talking about, go to our Instagram

45:43

page at CBC. If

46:01

the only thing Mike Post did was compose

46:04

this, the Rock-R-Files theme, legacy

46:06

cemented, right? But

46:08

instead, he played guitar on

46:10

I Got You, Babe by

46:13

Cher. He produced classical gas.

46:15

He discovered Kenny Rogers, and

46:17

he composed the Dun-Dun for Law &

46:19

Order, a conversation with one of the

46:21

most important figures in music history that

46:23

you may have never heard of. Mike

46:26

Post, tomorrow on the show. And

46:30

that is it for us today. Edna Burek, to

46:32

all those celebrating the end of Ramadan. We'll see

46:34

you tomorrow on the show. Later on. For

46:40

more CBC podcasts,

46:42

go to cbc.ca/podcasts.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features