This year, GCSE exams were cancelled for the first time since their introduction in 1988. As a result, the whole system has come under scrutiny. Defenders of GCSEs say that they introduce students to a range of subjects, and that universities and employers can easily understand and compare GCSE grades. But opponents argue that they focus too on cramming facts and learning how to sit exams.

What should students be taught in school? Are exams good or bad? What are the alternatives to the current system? Take a listen to hear Kian, Angelina, Liza and Tanya discussing these questions and more, when debating the motion, “This house believes that GCSEs are not fit for purpose”.