Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Kohler Smart Toilets introduce a
0:02
new standard of design and
0:04
cleanliness, sculptural forms, intuitive technology,
0:06
and total personalization with integrated
0:08
warm water cleansing, heated seats,
0:10
and warm air dryers. For
0:12
peace of mind and convenience,
0:15
there are touchless lids, seats,
0:17
flush, and a self-sanitizing bidet
0:19
wand. Now you can even
0:21
use voice commands with NuMe
0:23
2.0, featuring built-in Amazon Alexa.
0:25
Explore the complete lineup at
0:27
kohler.com/smarttoilets and discover what you've been
0:29
missing. Hi
0:40
Rabia. Hey Ellen, how you doing?
0:42
Good, how are you? Good, I like your lip
0:44
gloss. Oh thank you. My lip gloss
0:46
is popping and my milkshake brings all
0:49
of the boys to the yard. I
0:51
got zero compliments on my fucking lip
0:53
gloss by the way. Rebecca, we haven't
0:56
even introduced you. This is the problem
0:58
with having podcasters on is they're way
1:00
too comfortable in front of the mic.
1:03
When we have performers on, they're so
1:05
timid and then podcasters jump right in.
1:07
Welcome everyone to Rabia and Ellen solve
1:10
the case. I am Ellen and that
1:12
is Rabia across from me. Welcome to
1:14
our talk show. I'll be anybody Ellen
1:17
wants me to be. She just whips.
1:19
That's like a toxic relationship.
1:21
We're like sisters. Anyway,
1:23
I'm so excited about today because I have
1:30
two of my favorite people on. Two good
1:32
friends, two esteemed colleagues and they've brought us
1:34
a case that I know they know inside
1:36
and out. I actually wonder if this
1:38
is the case that like kind of propelled
1:41
them into true crime when they were
1:43
like in their developmental years. But anyhow,
1:46
let's with introducing our guests. Please welcome
1:48
the perfect haired,
1:50
annoyingly so, perfect
1:53
thickest head of hair in podcasting. And
1:55
I'm pretty sure that's pretty much what she's
1:57
known for. All of our other accolades. by
2:00
the wayside Rebecca
2:03
Lavoie Back
2:09
in Kevin welcome to Robbie and Ellen solve the
2:11
case. Oh, man. I can't believe I'm on the
2:13
show. I'm so excited I think I remember when
2:15
you guys launched the show and I was like
2:17
a good idea Fantastic idea.
2:19
I loved your video. That was a fun
2:22
video walking around New York Yeah, all
2:24
Ellen's idea because I don't have a creative cell in
2:26
my body That's why that's
2:28
why we work so well because I
2:30
interpret the law of how I'm feeling
2:32
that day You
2:36
should be on the Supreme Court Robby is says if
2:38
I was in charge every man would just be in
2:40
jail, you know what? I don't like your attitude jail
2:42
Bye not in this case in this case for the
2:44
one we're talking about today all the men are out
2:47
of jail So you do the opposite but
2:49
Robbie I go ahead and brag about them for
2:51
a little bit before we start Making
2:54
fun and we will not make fun of
2:56
you We know that you guys are here
2:58
and actually I have to tell you a
3:00
funny story because when Raffia said Rebecca
3:02
and Kevin were coming Best
3:10
conversationalists like in the industry you really
3:12
are I mean like anytime anybody needs a moderator
3:14
for anything. I'm like Rebecca Lavoie Have
3:17
a plan. Yeah Let
3:19
me tell you folks about Raka if you don't know
3:21
Rebecca and I can't imagine you would not but Rebecca
3:23
is not just Known for all
3:25
her podcast and you know the hosting but
3:28
she's also She's got a
3:30
day job at an HPR and she's the
3:32
director of podcast unit there She is a
3:34
creator and host of the hit podcast crime
3:36
writers on which is where I first discovered
3:39
her and her and her co-host
3:42
Kevin Flynn Toby ball and Laura
3:45
Bricker oh my lord. Why just blank
3:48
that and Laura Bricker they
3:50
reviewed to crime media journalism pop culture They're
3:52
also these two are also the co-hosts of
3:54
these are the stories a law and order
3:56
podcast and Rebecca is a host of
3:58
Netflix's you can't make it up Rebecca
4:00
has also been a guest host on
4:03
the undisclosed addendum of my former podcast.
4:05
She was also our editor for
4:07
what, seven years, I think. She
4:10
was on Slate's Mom and Dad Are Fighting. She's been
4:12
our guest on so many different podcasts. And also
4:14
she's a writer, published writer. She's
4:17
been published in so many different magazines,
4:19
but also co-written a bunch of
4:21
books which we're going to talk about in a second
4:23
with her incredible husband who is also here. Hi,
4:26
Kevin. Hello, Rabia. Hello, Ellen.
4:29
Most of us know Kevin as the co-host
4:31
and producer of Crime Writers On and Law
4:34
and Order. These are their stories. But
4:36
did you also know he is an award-winning
4:38
journalist? He is the Emmy award-winning television reporter
4:40
who first broke the story of the Sheila
4:43
LeBar murders and he is a
4:45
respected author slash co-author of five books. And
4:48
so... I know about respect. I respect
4:50
you. Yeah. That's
4:52
an adjective somebody threw in. I
4:55
like you a lot, but I don't
4:57
respect you. You're not mutually exclusive. Emmy
5:00
award-winning, you know, journalist. I
5:02
like myself, but I can't respect you. Oh, we should have brought
5:04
the Emmy down. That's so impressive to have it behind us.
5:07
Oh, you should always have that behind you. I
5:09
borrow it sometimes for Zoom, if I'm not going
5:12
to lie. Hang it around your neck, Kevin. I
5:14
would all the time. Yeah,
5:16
exactly. So,
5:19
Kevin, you wrote Wicked Intentions. That's
5:21
your book that you wrote on your own, but then you
5:23
too have co-authored four books, Our Little Secrets,
5:25
Legally Dead, Notes on a Killing, and most
5:27
recently, Dark Hearts. It's still a long
5:29
time ago, but yes. Most recently. Still
5:32
a long time ago. That was like 2016 for that one. It's
5:35
like talking about your youngest child and be
5:37
like, most recently. Most recently, Teddy LaFoy, 21 years
5:39
ago. You
5:41
guys were writing together before you
5:44
were married, weren't you? Is that how
5:46
it all began? Yep. Yeah.
5:49
We were. Before we were together together.
5:51
Yes. And you gave me editing
5:53
notes for Wicked Intentions, which
5:55
I took most of. Yeah. Because
5:57
then I had to like, just out of principle, reject some. I'm
6:00
like, this part sucks. Well,
6:02
were you flirting with him in those
6:04
notes? Yes. Really? Were
6:07
you? Just like the
6:09
real life serial killer, Sheila Lebar was flirting with
6:11
him when she was in prison writing
6:13
him letters. Oh, are you still in the news, Sheila? And
6:16
if you want to hear more about that, you
6:18
can listen to episode 10 of the show Criminal,
6:20
on which he tells that story from way back
6:22
when. Are you and Sheila still in contact, Kevin?
6:25
Aw. Is she your backup plan? No.
6:28
Imagine that. She's my backup
6:30
plan, absolutely. It's good to see. I like her
6:32
because I always know we're exactly where she is.
6:37
Don't have to worry about her, you know. No, but
6:39
you know. She can still get around in prison. So
6:41
thanks for coming on our show. You
6:43
guys are two crime, not just two crime,
6:45
you're two crime experts, I think, and especially
6:47
experts about crime in New Hampshire. I think
6:50
all your books were about New Hampshire crimes,
6:52
right? Yep, most of your writing's about that. Yep. And
6:54
today's case is about that, too. You want to tell us what case you
6:56
guys chose? Well, Rebecca and Kevin, we
6:58
have so much to talk about. I
7:01
think a lot of our listeners know who you are and
7:04
know all your accolades. Rabia, you didn't mention the
7:06
hair. I mean, I know I mentioned the
7:08
hair, but you didn't officially spec you with the good hair. I
7:11
just think about her hair all the time, now
7:13
that I'm pretty much bald. I love Rebecca's hair
7:16
so much. Well, before we dive
7:18
into the case, we play a
7:20
little game here called Three Quick Things,
7:22
where Rabia and I play a little game here called
7:25
Three Quick Things, where Rabia and I
7:27
each ask you a question, and then
7:29
we ask our guests the same question.
7:31
We're going to tweak it just a
7:33
little bit for you guys. Whoever is
7:35
really in their livelihood revolves
7:37
around true crime. We usually tweak it a little bit.
7:40
So go ahead, Rabia, and give Rebecca
7:42
and Kevin your first question. Oh,
7:44
you want me to go first? OK. I
7:47
am very excited to ask you this question,
7:49
actually. Oh. Yeah. And you
7:51
can both answer. Seven inches.
7:54
No, be kidding. We're back up.
7:58
I have wondered for years. every
8:00
time I see your brother. Listen,
8:05
more than that is just too much. You gotta
8:07
be something. Here's my question. Both
8:09
of you individually, what is your favorite
8:12
podcast ever? Oh, good question. You've
8:14
never given that question before. Besides the
8:17
ones that I've birthed, I would say one of
8:20
my favorites is... Yeah, as a consumer. Not you
8:22
can't pick your own. As a consumer, 60 songs
8:24
that explain that. Oh, where's a good one? It's
8:26
on Spotify, but I believe the way Spotify is
8:28
doing it, it's gonna put it out everywhere, but
8:31
it's... Rob Parvall is a music critic who
8:33
basically each week takes a
8:35
different song from the 90s and kind of... He
8:38
explains, you know, Green
8:40
Day's Basket Case or, you know, Fucking
8:42
Run by... Can I say that? Yeah.
8:46
That was fair. Okay. Have
8:48
you met Rabia Elizabeth Chaudry? I know. She's
8:50
got her mouth like a goddamn
8:52
priest. I don't know where that would go. He talks about it
8:54
for half an hour. He goes on all these crazy tangents that
8:56
are just really interesting and then interviews an expert. About that particular
8:58
song. I just find it really engaging.
9:01
He's very, very fun. Oh, okay. I
9:03
gotta check it out. I've never heard of it. It's not
9:05
the kind of show that would... If it's
9:07
not about murder, I generally don't check it out, but I'll
9:09
definitely check it out. Rebecca, you. Yeah,
9:12
I can't believe I'm gonna say this because I don't
9:14
think it's like the best podcast I've ever listened to, although
9:17
it's one of my favorites, but I've listened to it like four times. So
9:19
I think I should say it. It's Suspect, season one. I
9:24
love, love, love that show because the construction of
9:26
the show, like... Everything
9:28
you need to know, actually there's a clue to
9:30
it in the first episode, which
9:33
is why I've listened to it like four times because
9:35
it's just so brilliantly written and you don't...
9:37
What's that season about? The
9:39
season is actually about DNA. It's about
9:42
the fallibility of DNA and that's through
9:44
the lens of a wrongful conviction case.
9:46
And literally, we don't realize it while
9:48
you're hearing it, but you're getting every single clue.
9:50
That's brilliant. Episode one. It's like an agate... The
9:52
construction is sort of like an Agatha Christie situation,
9:54
but you don't realize it. It just feels like
9:56
straight journalism. And I just... I love
9:58
that show. I have a lot of affection for it.
10:00
Listen, I don't want to get off on a bad
10:02
foot, but I do just want to call out the
10:04
elephant in the room. Neither one of you mentioned any
10:06
podcast that Rambia and I do. It's
10:09
pandering. I'm putting it out there. I want to
10:11
be, I want, we're friends. I want to stay
10:13
friends, but like it has to be said. Well,
10:16
I really enjoyed the undisclosed
10:18
attendance season. I
10:22
just like, I've given you a lot of compliments and
10:24
there hasn't been a lot of compliments. So my question
10:26
is what's your favorite thing about me? I
10:29
said, okay. Actually,
10:31
I have one. No, no, no, no, no. No,
10:33
I do. I do. I don't like it. You
10:35
do the best podcast live show I have ever
10:38
seen. Period. Period,
10:40
period, period. Yeah. Yeah. I have
10:42
never seen anything like it and I
10:44
will never see anything like it again.
10:47
And her and Joey on stage together
10:49
are fire magic. You're very sweet. You
10:51
have changed the genre of what a
10:53
podcast live show can be and I
10:56
have never seen anything like it and I never will see
10:58
anything like it again unless you invite me to another one.
11:00
Now I want you to imagine the pressure of Rebecca when
11:02
I see her and Joey and she's like you, Raviya, you
11:04
and I are going to do live shows. I'm like, holy
11:06
shit. There's no way. There's no
11:09
way. I you know what I mean? Like the
11:11
I feel like dancing and everything. Yeah. Dance
11:13
and flip and improv. And I'm just I
11:15
can't do any of it. It is so
11:17
stressful. Raviya, I don't want to hear it.
11:19
I really don't want to hear it. I
11:22
don't need your cook shaming anymore. We get
11:24
it. You can cook. I can't. But
11:26
every time I cook a meal, I think
11:28
about you, Alan. I just think about how
11:30
you do it. The last time I had
11:32
friends over, I tricked them into thinking I
11:35
was an amazing cook with Factor Meals. And
11:37
that is a fact. Really? What
11:39
did you make with Factor Meals? You
11:41
have 35 options a week to choose
11:43
from and you can get keto and
11:46
calorie smart and vegan. Miss CrossFit over
11:48
there. Basically Factor is
11:50
ready to eat meals. And
11:52
I am telling you these
11:54
dishes for people. They have the
11:57
two minute meals. You can fuel up
11:59
faster. with, it's like restaurant
12:01
quality, Rabia. Well, it's chef
12:03
crafted and dietitian approved. They're delivered right to
12:06
your door. So I think that's a great
12:08
way to actually fool not just guests, but
12:11
also your own children and your
12:13
family. Factor is the perfect solution
12:15
if you're looking for fast, upscale
12:17
options done easily, or you happen
12:19
to be cooking challenged like myself.
12:22
Head to factormeals.com/solvethecase50 and
12:24
use code solvethecase50 to
12:26
get 50% off. That's
12:31
a big discount. Right? Yeah. That's
12:34
code solvethecase50 at factormeals.com/solvethecase50 and
12:36
get 50% off. All
12:39
right. Here's my question. You guys
12:42
work so well together. You guys have told
12:44
me that. So I want
12:46
you each to tell me your most
12:49
favorite thing about your podcast
12:51
partner slash life partner slash
12:53
bed partner slash you guys
12:55
do the horizontal boot
12:58
scoot boogie, and also your
13:00
biggest pet peeve about them. It doesn't have
13:02
to be something you hate, just something where
13:04
you're like, can you stop? Rebecca
13:07
had her hand up before I finished my
13:09
sentence. Go ahead. Yes. Kevin
13:11
makes me laugh like, like hilarious. Like, seriously,
13:13
he's the funniest person I've ever met in
13:16
my entire life. That is my favorite thing
13:18
about him. It is so hot. It really
13:20
is. My least favorite thing about
13:22
him is that he has an
13:24
Irish feelings box like you would not
13:26
believe. What is that? What does that
13:28
mean? He's fine, fine, fine, fine, fine,
13:30
fine, fine, fine, fine, until he is
13:32
not because he puts all of his
13:34
feelings that are not great in a
13:36
box and shoves them under the bed
13:38
until they explode and they all come
13:40
out at the same damn time. And I'm like,
13:43
where have all those been? And they've been in
13:45
the Irish feelings box. Is that often? Like, how
13:47
often does the box open? It's a box. Like,
13:50
I feel like my box. I
13:53
have a long fuse, but
13:56
it's a big and it's
13:58
unreasonable. It's unreasonable. Black
14:00
every four months racing yourself. You're like any
14:02
day now any day now. It's happening Yeah,
14:07
it's like it's like oh suspense Kevin
14:12
have you considered therapy? Well,
14:16
it's better help yeah use our promo
14:21
Don't use the other promo. You know how you know, I'm okay
14:23
though You know how you know like I'm safe. Yeah, because I
14:25
can talk about it in front of him like that's how you
14:27
know Don't write don't at
14:29
me. Don't tell me to leave everything. I do the thing
14:31
I go you cross your hand Not
14:38
that we're joking about that, of course we're not Kevin your turn oh
14:41
my turn about Rebecca forget it Which
14:45
you said about my feelings box is getting
14:47
opened right now this minute yeah, no, I would say
14:49
really like she just like makes me laugh and That's
14:53
a so it's the same thing fortunately we we
14:56
like the same thing about each other so That's
14:59
right. Thanks for being part of my thanks for not saying
15:01
boobs appreciate it. Well, it's gonna say
15:03
hair, but everybody said hair Everybody
15:07
loves your hair. Sure. I do. I love
15:09
your hair. Oh pulling on it No,
15:13
I actually doesn't have what
15:16
is it you can't stand about her? Oh Nothing.
15:19
Oh stop it grow
15:22
up Nice stand about
15:24
um She she can have opinions.
15:26
What would be the motive if you were charged with
15:28
her murder? Be
15:32
the motive like I
15:34
want an all-male jury Rebecca
15:47
is a super independent woman
15:51
and very confident and sometimes
15:54
she Goes off more
15:56
like she's the general and I'm the colonel instead of
15:58
work both on the same team So that's the
16:00
kind of thing that annoys me
16:02
and when I talk to her about it, my
16:04
feelings explode. Can confirm. So that's
16:07
a perfect start. I
16:13
do have to say that Rebecca is
16:16
very opinionated. She is independent and strong
16:18
and highly intelligent. And I have to
16:20
say that that speaks a lot about
16:22
you because a lot of men can't
16:24
handle that. And a lot of men
16:26
are not. Alan, he
16:29
can't. He's got a box. He's got a
16:31
feelings box. He actually can't handle it. Well,
16:33
no, because they also work together and
16:35
that's an added stress. And
16:38
women like Rebecca and Rabia
16:41
are very intimidating to
16:45
the men. Can you see me freezing up for
16:47
you? Okay.
16:49
And our third question is normally
16:52
to non-podcast
16:54
true crime people. How does true crime fit
16:56
into your life? So I'm
16:58
going to finish the question and I'm going
17:00
to say, what is one way
17:02
that you think that you guys have sort
17:04
of changed with the times how true crime
17:07
and how we consume it and how we
17:09
bring it to people, how you guys are
17:11
a part of sort of changing that narrative
17:13
in a positive way? Well, you start
17:15
by asking or mentioning that we were writers
17:17
first, which is where the crime
17:19
writers on comes from when we wrote true crime.
17:22
And we wrote it when true crime wasn't cool.
17:24
Yeah. We're way in the back of the… Yeah,
17:26
you guys are… Yeah, you're way in the back
17:29
of the bookstore. Our book had terrible titles. You
17:31
got to walk past all the romance. I love
17:33
their titles. We can talk
17:35
times about like how those titles get created.
17:38
I think that certainly, and this is because
17:40
of, you know, Nahn's
17:42
story primarily is that we see the
17:44
pendulum swing back from when we were
17:47
writing. It was about the bad guy
17:49
getting his comeuppance or her comeuppance, meaning
17:51
that the cops are really smart and
17:53
they're all Sherlock Holmes and there's an
17:55
interesting way that they solve the case.
17:59
And then in the end… It's
18:01
like, oh, everything's great. And the pendulum
18:03
has swung to stories where the system doesn't work.
18:06
And maybe not all the cops are really great
18:08
and what they're doing is super. And so that
18:10
has really changed. And there's still people that just
18:13
want to talk about like, they
18:15
have a favorite serial killer and
18:17
they can pull encyclopedia facts
18:20
about it. But I think that
18:22
that's sort of, that's the big thing we have seen change.
18:24
Yeah. We wrote way too much of our books
18:26
based on police reports and court transcripts. All just
18:28
sort of not there, except I've
18:30
never thought Scott Peterson did it. I'm just going to
18:33
say my most controversial truth crime
18:35
take for a very long time. Thank
18:37
you. I feel like a great company there.
18:39
I know. I know. I
18:41
know. Go
18:43
after Rebecca Lavoie, stop messaging me. Oh, I already
18:45
got it on Reddit last week. I'm a liar.
18:48
Who lies? I know. I
18:50
know. I want to take that question. this,
18:53
I'm bringing this up because of the case that
18:55
you guys decided to do today. The
18:57
Pam Smart case, this happened in New Hampshire, right?
19:00
In 1990 at a time when, were
19:02
you both in New Hampshire at the time? I was.
19:05
Yeah, I was in college. You were. Okay.
19:08
You were in college. So you must have been aware of that case. Oh,
19:10
sure. Yeah. As
19:12
it was ongoing. Or is
19:14
that like that kind of, oh, you did, you both
19:17
did? I did not, but I
19:19
had more of an interest in journalism. So
19:21
as far as this being like a big news story,
19:23
that was kind of like how I
19:25
was drawn to it, and maybe the fact that you
19:28
had sort of. I grew up on Long Island.
19:30
So I grew up in the era
19:32
of Joel Rifkin, serial killer. I
19:34
watched To Catch a Killer by John Wayne Gacy on
19:36
television when I was a kid. And
19:39
this case was almost contemporaneous with the Amy Fisher
19:41
case, which happened like right next door to where
19:43
I lived. I think that happened maybe like a
19:45
little bit later, because this was, I think I
19:47
was a senior in high school when this happened.
19:50
And that happened when I was in college. So
19:52
this is like, I grew up in a place
19:54
where true crime, like the DeFeo
19:56
murders, like it was very much a
19:58
part of the fabric. of where I lived,
20:01
like people, you know, talked about shit
20:03
that was happening on Long Island in New
20:05
York, like all the time. So I
20:07
was always kind of interested in it. Yeah, and a
20:09
lot was happening in that little place. So we're gonna
20:12
do the crash course outlining the case in
20:14
just a couple of details. Growing
20:19
up a chubby brown girl in small-town America
20:21
wasn't easy for me, you know. Forget fitting
20:23
in, there was no way I was ever
20:26
going to. But added to that was the
20:28
sense of jealousy I'd feel of the all-American
20:30
looking girls I went to school with.
20:32
You know the girls I mean. They
20:34
were lean, tan, had long legs and
20:36
little waist. They were always some shade of
20:38
blonde with big hair and teased bangs. They'd
20:41
have tiny upturned noses and blue eyes and
20:43
were almost always cheerleaders because of course they
20:45
were outgoing and fun and comfortable with their
20:47
perfect selves. Ugh, I
20:49
hated them and in equal measure wanted
20:51
to be them. I imagined
20:53
they must have amazing lives with all
20:56
the boys crushing over them. I
20:58
never harbored an ounce of sympathy for them,
21:00
never once stopped to think maybe their pretty
21:02
shiny veneers hit a sad reality. These
21:05
girls, the it girls, never got any
21:07
passes from me. And that's
21:09
the exact sense I had when I saw the
21:11
trial of a petite, beautiful young woman
21:13
named Pamela Smart who was charged with the
21:15
murder of her husband in 1990.
21:18
I wasn't alone in hating on her. I
21:20
was joined by most of the world and
21:22
goaded on by the media in convicting her
21:24
before the jury had ever reached a verdict.
21:26
You might think the OJ Simpson
21:29
or Menendez trials were the earliest
21:31
courthouse circuses America witnessed but no.
21:34
Pamela Smart's trial took place a few years
21:36
before those two and it
21:38
was the first ever live televised
21:40
trial in history that was covered
21:42
gavel to gavel. There could hardly
21:44
have been a more juicy story
21:46
for the media to cover or
21:48
a more fascinating figure than Pam
21:50
Smart. Black Widow, Ice Queen,
21:53
killer teacher, seductress,
21:56
vixen. These are just
21:58
some of the names the media dubbed Pamela with
22:00
once the story broke that a
22:03
22-year-old high school staff worker had
22:05
convinced her 16-year-old boyfriend to murder
22:07
her husband. The story was
22:10
as salacious as it gets, and
22:12
the newly launched 24-hour news networks
22:14
couldn't get enough. The local
22:16
TV station, in fact, canceled all
22:18
of its regular programming to air the
22:20
trial exclusively for the 14 days of
22:23
the trial. Media crews arrived
22:25
from around the world, making the
22:28
trial an international sensation, and turning
22:30
those involved into pseudo-celebrities themselves. It
22:33
was a small irony given the fact that Pamela
22:35
Smart had always hoped to become a media personality
22:37
and make it big on TV. Of
22:40
course, she never imagined that rather than
22:42
becoming famous, she would become
22:44
infamous. Pamela Smart was born in
22:46
1967 in Coral Gables, Florida, and grew up
22:48
in Miami before her family moved to New
22:50
Hampshire when she was in middle school. She
22:53
always missed Florida, however, so after graduating
22:55
high school, she returned to the Sun
22:57
Sign State, enrolling at Florida State University.
23:00
There, Pam finished a four-year communications
23:02
degree in three years and
23:04
did so while working and hosting a
23:06
college radio show. This drive and level
23:09
of achievement was typical of Pam. She
23:11
had always been hyper-focused, ambitious, super-organized, and
23:14
methodical. Partying and wasting time
23:16
on college kid pursuits was not her
23:18
thing. She wanted to be
23:20
a television broadcaster and had the
23:22
outgoing, and some would say attention-seeking,
23:24
personality for it. She kept so busy,
23:26
in fact, that she said she didn't even have time for
23:29
a boyfriend. Her first real relationship
23:31
in college came about because of a chance
23:33
meeting during Christmas break in
23:35
1986. She was back in New Hampshire
23:37
visiting family for the holidays when she
23:39
met Greg Smart. Greg was tall,
23:41
handsome, had shaggy long hair and
23:43
deep dimples that she loved and he
23:45
was into heavy metal music just like her.
23:48
Greg was two years older than her and
23:50
was dating other women, but the two eventually
23:52
became a monogamous couple. Greg briefly moved to
23:54
Florida to be close to Pamela but missed
23:56
New Hampshire and his family and friends too
23:59
much. Pam agreed to move back
24:01
to New Hampshire to be with him, even turning down
24:03
a broadcasting job in Florida, and the couple was
24:05
married in a fairy tale wedding on May 7th,
24:07
1989. By
24:09
the time they got married, though, Greg wasn't the
24:11
same Greg that Pam had initially fallen in love
24:14
with. Unlike Pam, Greg had
24:16
never attended college, instead working
24:18
in a factory and then in landscaping, but
24:20
it finally hit him that if he wanted
24:22
to give his wife the kind of comfortable
24:24
life his father had provided, he had to
24:26
get a real career. So he
24:28
cut off his long, rocker hair, started
24:30
wearing suits, and got a job as
24:32
an insurance salesman just like his father.
24:34
At the time, Pam still had media
24:37
ambitions, and while she wasn't able to
24:39
find a broadcasting position in New Hampshire,
24:41
she landed a job as a media
24:43
services director at a local high school.
24:45
There, she met and befriended a number
24:48
of students through Project Self-Esteem, a
24:50
project she volunteered in. She was
24:52
vivacious, energetic, and 22 years old, so
24:55
the kids loved her. She looked young enough
24:57
to be one of them and acted it as well.
25:00
If anything, it's pretty fair to
25:02
say that Pam had some boundary-setting
25:05
issues. She essentially became best friends
25:07
with her student intern, 15-year-old Cecilia
25:09
Pierce. The two hung out together
25:11
in their free time, both inside and outside
25:13
of school, gossiped, shared personal
25:16
details of their lives, and giggled
25:18
over the crush that another student,
25:20
16-year-old Billy Flynn, had on Pam.
25:23
Billy was tall and lanky with dark
25:25
hair, played the guitar, loved heavy metal,
25:27
and was smitten with the 22-year-old staff
25:29
member at the school. The first
25:32
time he saw her, he leaned over to his
25:34
friend and said, I'm in love. Imagine
25:36
his surprise when his crush turned out to
25:38
have a crush on him, too. Pam
25:41
and Greg had not even been married a
25:43
year yet, but the union was already on
25:45
the rocks. They had steadily grown apart since
25:47
the wedding, with Greg spending time outside of
25:49
work with friends, and Pam spending time with
25:51
the students she had turned into close confidants.
25:53
The real turning point came in December of
25:56
1989, just seven
25:58
months into their marriage, when Greg confessed
26:00
to Pam that he had cheated on her. He
26:02
had been having an affair. This is
26:04
when Pam began telling her young friends of her
26:06
marital woes, and when, it seems,
26:09
she began having reciprocal feelings for the
26:11
student who worshiped her, Billy Flynn. Not
26:13
long after Greg confessed his incidelity, Pam
26:16
told Billy that she thought about him
26:18
a lot. In February of
26:20
1990, Pam took Billy and Cecilia to pick
26:22
out videos to watch back at her condo,
26:24
and after the group watched the steamy film Nine
26:27
and a Half Weeks Together, Pam
26:29
took Billy to her room, changed into
26:31
lingerie, and if we are to be
26:33
legally correct here, raped him. After
26:35
all, he was a minor. It was the beginning
26:37
of their sexual involvement, and not long after,
26:40
she began confiding in Billy that Greg was
26:42
abusive to her, and that if Greg
26:44
was around, they wouldn't be able to be together. Billy
26:47
asked her the natural question, why not
26:49
divorce Greg? She said she couldn't. She
26:51
would lose everything, the condo, the beautiful
26:53
furniture, and, of course, their beloved dog,
26:55
Halen. The only way she could stay with
26:57
Billy, she said, was if Greg
27:00
died. In other words, Billy had to kill him. Just
27:02
a few months later, on May 1st, 1990, a
27:05
week shy of their first wedding
27:07
anniversary, Greg was murdered in cold
27:09
blood by Billy Flynn and his
27:12
friend, Pete Randall, while two other
27:14
teens, Vance Jr., Latome, and Raymond
27:16
Fowler, waited in the getaway car.
27:18
According to the testimony of the boys, Pam
27:20
had planned the entire thing. She had left
27:22
a door open for them to get into
27:24
the condo that evening, arranged an alibi for
27:26
herself by being at a school meeting 35
27:29
miles away, had
27:31
instructed them to wear dark clothing and make the
27:33
place look like it had been burgled, told them
27:35
to put the dog in a safe place so
27:37
it wouldn't witness the murder, and even told them
27:39
to use a gun instead of a knife because
27:41
it would be less bloody and not
27:43
mess up her furniture. That night,
27:46
24-year-old Greg Smart entered his darkened
27:48
condo for the last time. His wife
27:50
was still out, and when he stepped
27:52
into the foyer and flicked on the
27:54
lights, he was ambushed by two figures
27:56
that had been lying in wait. Pete
27:58
Randall demanded Greg's wedding. But
28:00
he refused to take it off, saying his wife would
28:02
kill him if he did, and instead offered up
28:05
his wallet. The boys forced Greg on
28:07
his knees and Pete held a knife to
28:09
Greg's throat as he begged for his life.
28:11
But tonight, there was no mercy. Twice
28:14
before Billy had tried to work up the
28:16
courage to kill Greg, but had failed. Tonight
28:18
was the last chance, according to Pam. If he
28:20
didn't do the deed tonight, she'd leave him. And
28:23
so Billy removed the .38 revolver he
28:25
had tucked in his waistband, pointed it
28:27
at Greg's head and said, God forgive
28:30
me, and pulled the trigger. Greg
28:32
was murdered execution style with a single bullet
28:34
to the head. When Pam arrived home a
28:36
little while later, she found her husband's body
28:38
in the foyer of their home and ran
28:41
to neighboring condos pounding on the doors
28:43
and asking for help. First responders
28:45
arrived quickly, but of course, nothing could
28:47
be done for Greg. Pam
28:49
was eager to speak to the police so they
28:51
could help catch the perp that killed her husband
28:53
and she was sure, she told the authorities, that
28:55
he was murdered in the course of a botched
28:57
burglary. The investigators in the case weren't so sure,
28:59
however. There was no sign of forced entry. Burglars
29:02
generally didn't carry guns and usually
29:04
take off with a fight if the homeowner shows
29:07
up. And most importantly, whoever had done this had
29:09
left behind things that they could have taken like
29:11
Greg's wallet, which was laying in plain
29:13
sight between his legs. No, this did
29:15
not smell like a burglary to them and
29:18
something about Pam seemed really off as well.
29:20
She wasn't acting like a grieving widow. In fact, they
29:22
hadn't seen her shed a tear at all. When
29:25
they returned to the crime scene with her so
29:27
she could collect some personal items, she walked right
29:29
on top of the blood-stained part of the carpet and
29:31
when her mother put a towel down over the
29:33
blood stain, she walked on top of that as
29:35
well. Callous. That was
29:37
the observation. She seemed callous
29:40
about the entire thing and
29:42
entirely too invested in convincing them that
29:44
Greg had been murdered because he interrupted
29:46
a burglary. A couple of weeks into
29:48
the investigation, two big breaks came their
29:50
way. A phone tip told them a
29:52
teenager named Cecilia Pierce had information about the
29:54
case and a man came into the station
29:56
with a wrapped-up gun and told him he thought
29:59
it might be involved. in the murder. The
30:01
man was the father of Vance Latamy Jr.,
30:03
one of Billy's best friends, who had stolen
30:05
it from his father's collection for the purpose
30:07
of killing Greg. It didn't take long for
30:09
the police to piece together the entire conspiracy.
30:12
On August 1st, 1990, Detective
30:15
Daniel Pelletier approached Pamela in her school's
30:17
parking lot. Smart knew him, having been
30:19
interviewed by him numerous times since the
30:21
murder. She casually asked, what's up? Well,
30:24
Pam, Pelletier responded, I have some good news
30:26
and I have some bad news. The good
30:28
news is that we've solved the murder of
30:30
your husband. The bad news is you're
30:32
under arrest. From the moment
30:34
of her arrest to all these years later,
30:36
Pamela Smart has maintained her innocence. When the
30:39
story broke by a young pre-teacher who made
30:41
her 16-year-old lover murder her husband, she
30:43
became the media star she never
30:46
anticipated. She was reviled, hotly and
30:48
instantly, and not unlike Scott Peterson
30:50
was convicted in the eyes of the
30:52
public before she ever stood
30:54
trial. During opening arguments, the prosecutor
30:56
referred to the teenagers involved in
30:58
the murder as victims of, quote,
31:00
an evil woman bent on murder.
31:03
The jury agreed. Pamela Smart was found
31:05
guilty and convicted of being an accomplice
31:07
to first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder,
31:10
and witness tampering. She was sentenced to
31:12
life without the possibility of parole, a
31:14
sentence which she is still serving. As
31:16
to the boys who murdered Greg, after
31:18
having served various sentences, they all received
31:20
plea deals in exchange for testifying against
31:23
Smart. And they are all out on
31:25
parole today. For the past 33 years,
31:27
Pamela Smart has held to the same
31:29
story. Yes, she was guilty of
31:31
having a sexual relationship with a minor, but no,
31:34
she had nothing to do with the murder of
31:36
her husband. She says she did not ask Billy
31:38
to murder Greg and she had no idea he
31:40
was planning on doing it, and she alleges she
31:43
did not receive a fair trial. She
31:45
has repeatedly appealed the conviction and applied
31:47
for parole and been denied
31:49
each time. So, is she guilty as
31:51
charged? Did she get a fair trial?
31:53
And what about a fair sentence? Let's
31:56
talk about it. Rabia, I know
31:58
you have no worries, but... Imagine
32:00
lying awake at night worrying about all
32:02
the worries that you don't worry about,
32:04
and then your next day is just
32:07
awful. I can be the worst sleeper
32:09
sometime, but we got Magnesium Breakthrough. Yeah,
32:11
Magnesium Breakthrough is unlike any other magnesium
32:13
supplement because most of them give you
32:15
one or two forms of magnesium, but
32:18
Magnesium Breakthrough contains all seven forms of
32:20
magnesium, which by the way, I did
32:22
not know there were seven forms of
32:24
magnesium, and it's designed to help calm
32:26
your mind, help you fall asleep, stay
32:29
asleep, and wake up refreshed. Now we
32:31
know we're all different and unique. That's
32:33
why you need Magnesium Breakthrough, the ultimate
32:35
way to give your body all seven
32:38
forms in one supplement. And it's more
32:40
than just sleep. Magnesium Breakthrough also helps
32:42
improve digestion. It supports muscle recovery, which
32:45
is really important for folks like me
32:47
who work out, and it supports healthy
32:49
bone density. So nurture your mind and
32:51
body with this all-natural, full-spectrum magnesium supplement.
32:54
Simply go to buyoptimizers.com and
32:56
use promo code RABIANNELLEN during checkout to
32:59
save 10%. In addition
33:01
to the discount you get by using
33:03
the promo code RABIANNELLEN, you can get
33:05
gifts with purchase up to two travel
33:08
bottles of Magnesium Breakthrough. Act fast. It's
33:10
a limited-time offer. Go now to buyoptimizers.com
33:19
and use promo code RABIANNELLEN during checkout.
33:22
There's a lot to talk about here. And I know I
33:25
sent you guys kind of our creative outline, and
33:27
I started off with some bullet points. I was like,
33:29
oh, stuff we can all agree on and right out
33:31
the gate. I think that was not true. Sorry.
33:34
No, no. It wasn't just you. Even Ellen had a
33:36
question about a couple of these points. So let's start
33:38
with the stuff we can definitely agree on, right? There's
33:41
no question about any of this. We know Pam admits,
33:43
Pam was smart, admits that she was having an
33:46
affair. I'm using bunny quotes, molesting
33:48
a child. At the time,
33:50
it was always framed as she was in
33:52
a relationship with a minor, in a relationship with a
33:54
16-year-old. Framed by her, or you mean framed
33:56
by the media? Both. They didn't call it that.
33:58
Both. And
34:01
in court as well. I mean like that's how it was referred
34:03
to her relationship. It was referred to as
34:05
a relationship. Because you know boys are very
34:07
lucky when they have sex with adult women. That's
34:09
how it's always framed back then. Yeah. You're
34:12
an adult, right? We know for sure that
34:14
Billy Flynn and Pete Randall were the guys, the
34:16
boys who were in the house and
34:19
they are for the murder of Greg between the
34:21
two of them. Like you can, you
34:23
might disagree on who did what but they
34:25
both say that Billy was the one who
34:27
pulled the trigger and Pete
34:29
held a knife to Greg's throat. We
34:33
know for sure that Vance and I was going
34:35
to ask you guys is it Lattamy or
34:38
Lutt Team? Lattamy, yeah. That's what I
34:40
thought. Yeah. Okay, that Vance Lattamy also
34:42
known as Junior that he procured his grandmother's
34:44
car and his father's gun for the
34:46
commission of the crime. Junior
34:48
and Ray Fowler apparently were waiting in the getaway car.
34:50
So these are all kind of like facts that everybody
34:52
can stipulate to. We all know
34:55
that Pam had definite boundary issues given
34:57
her relationships with not just Billy but
34:59
also with Cecilia, I would say, right?
35:01
Yep. And then going to
35:03
Cecilia, now here's where I think we start
35:05
kind of departing. I said that we all
35:07
can agree that Cecilia Pierce had knowledge beforehand
35:09
about the murder. And Rebecca
35:11
says no. Let's just start there. Hard
35:14
disagree. Hard disagree. She told
35:16
police she had knowledge of the
35:18
murder beforehand. She said that she
35:20
told an adult she had knowledge of murder
35:22
beforehand. I don't believe that she did.
35:24
And if you look at the transcript
35:26
of the phone call, which is suspect
35:28
that the wiretap stuff, which I know
35:30
we'll get into, the transcripts of them
35:32
are incredibly suspect because of the quality
35:34
of the tapes. She talks about you
35:36
knew beforehand, but she's talking to Pam.
35:38
She's not talking about herself. And
35:41
she changed her story multiple times
35:43
with the cops. So
35:46
she claims she knew beforehand only
35:48
after saying she didn't know. And
35:50
I think that all of these
35:52
kids were so susceptible and so
35:54
suggestible by law enforcement once law
35:56
enforcement had come up with their narrative of the
35:58
case. I just I don't think she
36:00
knew or I don't I mean in it
36:03
if she knew I don't think she knew in the way that
36:05
she says she knew. Well, I guess here's my question to that
36:08
if we're to believe that she didn't know anything, you
36:10
know, she was Cecilia was why agreed to wear a wire
36:12
now apparently it was that with parental consent. She was 16
36:14
years old. You could talk about the legalities of that. It
36:16
may have been an illegal wiretap too, because it was not
36:19
signed off on by a judge. It was signed off on
36:21
by the AG, which is the
36:23
prosecutor. Is that still legal to
36:25
wiretap a minor? That feels highly
36:27
illegal. Well, they're not wiretapping the
36:29
minor. They are listening. I mean
36:31
they're really wiretapping Pamela Smart here,
36:33
but the minor agreed to wear the
36:36
wire, right? That's what I mean.
36:38
I'm sorry. She – because Cecilia
36:40
was 16. That feels illegal. Well, parental
36:42
consent is probably required. I think usually
36:44
the big legal issue, right, is about –
36:46
not about the age of the person being
36:48
recorded, but about the permission. Yeah. And whether
36:50
you're in a state that's one party or
36:53
two party. Yeah. She was an agent of
36:55
the law enforcement at the time, yeah. Right.
36:57
And so – yeah, so I think that's
36:59
why New Hampshire is what's called two party
37:01
state. So in theory, both parties
37:03
need to know they're being recorded. Unless a
37:05
judge says not. Unless a judge says Pam
37:07
doesn't need to know she's being recorded because.
37:10
At the beginning of one of the recordings, at least,
37:12
you hear – and I didn't listen
37:14
to all the – I can't find all the
37:16
recordings, frankly, online. Yeah. You know why? Because they're
37:18
not. Right. They're not exactly. But at the beginning
37:20
of one recording, I did hear the police officer
37:22
say that we are going to begin this wiretap,
37:24
and it is a one-party consent state. And
37:26
so I don't know if the law has
37:28
changed. It could be that the law has
37:30
changed in New Hampshire since the officer actually
37:32
said this on the call. But here's what
37:35
I want to say about it. But that's
37:37
kind of a non-issue because Pam says she
37:39
– quote – knew she was being recorded.
37:41
So she takes that off the table. Pam
37:43
says that. But that's Pam covering for why
37:45
she said the thing she said. Totally. Now,
37:47
what's interesting to me about this is, like,
37:49
if you're saying that Cecilia didn't know, Pam's
37:51
entire narrative about these conversations was that I'm
37:53
calling Cecilia because Cecilia knew something. So Cecilia
37:55
knew something. Even Pam is admitting that
37:57
Cecilia knew something. So what – could
38:00
that something be? Pam has said her phone
38:03
call conversations is that I call Cecilia because
38:06
Cecilia knew stuff about the murder and I
38:08
wanted to find out what she knew. That's her
38:10
entire defense. So even Pam is saying, yeah Cecilia
38:12
knew about the murder. But it's the act of
38:14
the murder. Cecilia is like, I knew the murder.
38:16
No, no, no, but don't. That's not what she's
38:18
saying. She's saying that she knew something even about
38:21
like before, the planning and all of that. Cecilia
38:23
already had information about this. Meaning what she's trying
38:25
to say is that Cecilia was in a conspiracy
38:27
with Billy and others but Pam wasn't part of
38:29
that. Okay. So Cecilia is saying I
38:32
had some knowledge beforehand. Pam seems
38:34
to know that Cecilia knows something. How?
38:36
I don't know. I don't know how
38:38
Cecilia or how Pam knows Cecilia knows.
38:40
And so I'm like I tend to
38:42
believe that Cecilia did know because nobody
38:44
in the mix seems to say she
38:46
doesn't, right? I think we're talking about an
38:48
incredibly suggestible girl who slept overnight
38:50
at Pam's house a bunch of times when
38:53
she was 15 years old and will go
38:55
along with what everybody says. But given the
38:57
fact that Pam we know had really poor
38:59
boundaries obviously she's like partying with these kids.
39:01
They're going to be together, they're going to clubs, they're
39:04
drinking together. I mean who wouldn't? It seems
39:07
like Cecilia was like her bestie at the time.
39:09
It doesn't sound like Pam had any other friends
39:11
at that point. Except for the one
39:13
she was fucking. I mean yeah.
39:16
There's that. That's right, Kevin. So.
39:18
Sex with a 15 year old
39:20
boy must be super bad. Great.
39:24
The technique must be like super
39:26
refined. I mean he was a
39:28
virgin. These kids by the way
39:30
we should clarify people
39:32
who don't know they were from Seabrook,
39:34
New Hampshire. They were from like an
39:36
impoverished like not great place.
39:39
They all came from really poor
39:41
families and they had
39:43
like learning issues. Like these were like
39:46
very vulnerable young people and
39:49
Pam Smart even today admits
39:51
that what she did was
39:53
super fucked up with these
39:55
kids and yeah they
39:57
were really really vulnerable
39:59
kids. Well, let me ask you this. All
40:01
three of you, I might pose this question to you. What do you
40:04
think about Pam's vulnerability herself at that time?
40:07
She's 22. She's in a new
40:10
relationship. She's a little disappointed with her professional
40:12
life and then like her private life. And
40:14
so, yeah, I mean, I think the idea
40:16
that she would be looking for friendship
40:19
from, you know, regardless of the
40:21
age, from students, like her, is
40:23
it like she's an educator or
40:26
a paraprofessional or whatever? But the
40:28
fact that she, you know, that
40:30
she would entertain having those kinds
40:32
of relationships, I just show, like
40:34
you said, that she has boundary issues. And
40:37
I think there's probably, you know, some sadness
40:39
in her life, but also a lot of immaturity.
40:41
Yeah. She was emotionally very, very stunted. There was
40:44
something going on with her for sure in her
40:46
personal life. And there are allegations that she was
40:48
in an abusive relationship. That's where that would come
40:50
in. If it came in, to me,
40:52
that's where it would come in because she
40:55
clearly couldn't connect with anybody as a peer.
40:57
So why was she seeking validation in this
40:59
way? I mean, she clearly couldn't get it
41:02
elsewhere. I mean, if I was in
41:04
a really toxic, awful situation, there's
41:09
a million people I could go have a drink with and talk
41:11
to you about it, like you. Right. But when
41:15
you're 22 and if there was
41:17
abuse, you know, and I
41:19
know Rabia was saying, does it matter if
41:21
she was abused? But then you kind
41:23
of have to think about somebody that
41:25
young whose frontal cortex isn't
41:28
done developing, being rather stunted. Right.
41:31
So if she was stunted at sort of like a
41:33
16 or 17-year-old, the
41:35
idea of being friends or,
41:37
you know, befriending teenagers
41:39
of that age doesn't seem that
41:41
out of the question. Right. And
41:44
also, I'm trying to think of 22 years
41:46
old graduating college, but she was, like, married
41:48
and, you know, the rumors of— But she
41:50
graduated early too, right? Right. She
41:53
was super ambitious, real hardworking. And
41:55
there were those two incidents that
41:58
had witnesses that had tested it. that
42:00
Greg was abusive so yeah.
42:03
Did you guys like in your high school you
42:05
did you not also have like that one
42:07
girl who had a boyfriend who was
42:10
in college or yeah right you know
42:12
and it's so you know they
42:14
call it the Romeo and we all had
42:18
the teachers who you know fed off of
42:20
the adoration of students. Yeah like thing.
42:24
Stop it.
42:26
There's a part of me that feels really
42:28
sympathetic for her in this situation. She's needy.
42:32
Her husband she found out like seven months
42:34
into her marriage you know has cheated
42:36
on her. She's less the life that she
42:38
wanted in Florida. I moved back to New Hampshire to be with
42:41
him and she's at a high school
42:43
versus being in a broadcast. I mean like you
42:45
know she's all these things going on. She's generally
42:47
a super high achiever but it just seems like
42:49
her life is not going as she planned and
42:51
she was a planner too. Yeah I do feel
42:53
sympathetic for her but then my sympathy just kind
42:56
of stops at the murder
42:58
scheme and I think that
43:00
might also be where like some of us depart ways
43:02
to in our opinions about this. So I want to
43:04
talk about Pam's culpability but before
43:06
that Ellen you brought up the abuse and
43:09
the two times that they seemed like there
43:11
might have been abuse was there was an
43:13
incident where Pam was out with Greg her
43:15
husband at a bar and they
43:17
were out for drinks with friends and they got into a fight
43:20
and he spit his drink on her
43:22
and anger. People witnessed that and then
43:24
one time she showed up. Any like
43:26
spit take like around Joe Marx? No
43:28
like spit it spit it at her
43:30
and anger like deliberately. Which is assault and
43:32
imagine what he would do behind closed doors if you do
43:35
that in front of people. And then there's also a time
43:37
she showed up at her parents house in her in
43:40
her pajamas saying that he kicked me out. She
43:42
had told Billy that one time he had kicked
43:44
her out while she was in her just on the
43:46
Braun undies and locked her out of the house. And
43:48
we don't know if that's true or not other than
43:51
the fact that she told Billy that and Billy related.
43:53
So let's talk about smart culpability and in terms
43:56
of the murder of her husband
43:58
I mean where do you guys land on that? I'm
44:00
gonna be completely honest with you. I don't think
44:02
it's knowable, but there's one thing
44:04
about it that is really fascinating
44:06
to me. Pam Smart
44:09
admits that she, you know,
44:11
she calls it an affair still, which really
44:13
is fucked up. But she did, she admits
44:15
the relationship with Flynn. She
44:17
admits her role in being
44:20
the instrument that kicked off the murder
44:23
of her husband. She admits all of
44:25
it. She knew the
44:27
only way she could potentially get parole
44:29
was to admit her culpability in the
44:31
murder. And she wouldn't and she
44:34
knew that if she didn't she would be in
44:36
prison for the rest of her life. And
44:39
she wouldn't do it. And
44:41
that's and that has, I can't
44:43
get over that. The other thing that I can't
44:45
get over is that there
44:47
was a narrative set
44:49
for her that everything
44:52
played toward. The media played toward
44:54
it and she got the
44:56
one of the worst trials I have like ever,
44:58
I mean you can see all of it because
45:00
it's all on video. It
45:03
is one of the most tainted trials. It's
45:05
like unbelievably tainted. Like when we talk about
45:07
it, it's like crazy. And
45:10
you know you were talking about the frontal cortex thing. We
45:13
have no problem applying research about that and
45:15
talking about that when we talk about like
45:17
young male defendants or whatever. She
45:20
got, we talk about the benefit of the doubt.
45:22
She got the whatever the opposite of it is.
45:25
She's still getting that to this day.
45:27
The prosecutor in the case Paul Magiato
45:30
testified at Billy Flynn, the shooter's
45:32
parole hearing to help him get
45:34
out. And he is still calling
45:37
Pam Smart an unrepentant
45:40
cold-blooded killer to this day. Billy
45:42
Flynn is the one who pulled
45:44
the fucking trigger in this case. So
45:46
there is a narrative about her that
45:48
to me is like it is unknowable
45:51
what actually happens. So it is
45:53
not, in my opinion, it is not what the state
45:55
says it is. It is not. There's a reason why
45:58
she will refuse. If it's not what the state says, states
46:00
as it is, you're saying that she
46:02
did not coach, groom,
46:05
encourage Billy, force even according
46:07
to Billy because Billy's like she reamed me out because I tried
46:09
a couple of times I just couldn't go through with it and
46:11
I messed it up and she reamed me out and forced me
46:13
and said it's over between us if you
46:16
don't do this. But you don't believe any of that.
46:18
You think Billy, Billy Flynn did this on its own.
46:20
I think it could be somewhere in between that being
46:22
said, I have heard enough police
46:24
interrogation tape of New Hampshire cops with
46:27
young men through the lens of the
46:29
Jason Carroll case to know that you
46:32
could get a young man to say
46:34
anything if you've already got your narrative set. I
46:37
know that. I know that for a fact. And I
46:39
know that all these kids were like housed together,
46:41
were able to talk to each other. I
46:44
know that there is just like so many
46:46
forces at work here and there was a
46:48
narrative and if the police tell the kids
46:51
a narrative, the kids are going to
46:53
tell them that narrative back. And that's
46:55
why I just think it's unknowable and I think that
46:57
the story we have been told and the one that
46:59
is the legend of Pam Smart, I do
47:01
not believe that that legend is true.
47:04
I do. All right,
47:06
yeah, Kevin has his hands out. All right,
47:08
Kevin. Yeah, I'm down. First of
47:10
all, no one has asked whether Kevin
47:12
Flynn is related to Billy Flynn. Yes.
47:15
No brothers. We're brothers. And
47:17
not one person has broken out
47:19
into giving the old razzle dazzle,
47:21
which I think is amazing. Oh,
47:23
yeah. It's a real, real shame. I
47:26
am using a lot of restraint right now. Well,
47:30
it's all that jazz and whatever. Yes,
47:33
well, I am, I mean, call me
47:35
a sheep, but I don't know
47:38
if all the details are right, but
47:41
I do believe that she instigated
47:43
the killing with Billy Flynn, who
47:45
she was, you know, carting around
47:48
by, we'll just say his nose.
47:53
You know, I just, I think that if you're
47:55
going to say Rebecca, or if
47:57
one, I won't say it on point to Rebecca,
47:59
if one were to say. that perhaps they all
48:01
kind of worked their
48:04
story in a different way. I would
48:07
think by now someone would say that.
48:09
Do you think someone would come out now that they're all out
48:11
and say, oh, no, you don't think that? No.
48:15
Why would there be no upside to that? The story is sad. This is
48:17
what it's going to be forever. Right. They
48:19
also serve their sentences and it's too late to come back now
48:21
and say that. Well, I would say this. For
48:23
somebody like Cecilia, we have seen
48:25
– and Kevin, sorry, Rebecca, you've seen these cases when
48:27
we've done undisclosed. The word 20 years later, the witness
48:29
who was forced to lie about making a false identification
48:32
is like, I just can't live with this shit anymore.
48:34
For the guys who are enrolled and who are actually
48:36
charged, it's different. But for Cecilia, who
48:38
was never charged with anything, she certainly could come
48:40
forward after all these years. And we've seen this. It's
48:42
been 33 years. And I don't think it would be
48:44
any loss to her to come forward and
48:46
say, you know what? It's all bullshit.
48:49
I mean all that ought. Both things could be
48:51
true. Sam Smart could have been abused
48:53
by the system and maybe you
48:56
can argue whether she got a fair
48:58
trial. You can argue with whether all
49:00
the things that happened, you know,
49:02
what happened to a man or happened to a
49:05
different kind of defendant if there were no TV
49:07
and if a teacher
49:09
sleeping with students wasn't a hot thing in
49:11
the media. But it
49:13
can also be true that she got Billy
49:15
Flynn to kill her husband. And
49:18
just because you might want to come
49:20
to her defense with, you
49:22
know, either a
49:24
wrongful conviction or I wouldn't say
49:27
wrongful conviction but maybe a misguided
49:29
prosecution or from a feminist lens,
49:31
I still feel like that
49:34
doesn't change the fact that she,
49:36
you know, set motion. Kevin's getting canceled
49:38
after this one. No, no. But
49:41
you used very important words there. You feel
49:43
like. This is a great example to
49:46
me of a feels like
49:48
case. I feel like I do
49:50
not feel like what you're asserting.
49:52
Well, true. That's absolutely true. That
49:54
being said, I but this
49:58
is what I believe. This is what I absolutely. believe
50:01
even if the story is 100% true
50:04
that she goaded Billy Flynn to shoot her
50:06
husband, she should 100% get a new trial. I
50:11
cannot believe that anybody could look
50:13
at that trial and say, and
50:15
what really bothers me
50:22
is when people are like, well, she's guilty, so
50:24
it doesn't matter. It matters
50:27
because tainted trials are used by
50:29
the system to point to other
50:32
trials and say, see, we treat
50:34
everybody the same. And it's
50:36
like, that's not okay. It's not okay what
50:38
happened in this trial. And this trial became
50:40
like the model for the way other defendants
50:43
were treated around media stuff. And
50:45
like a lot of people got screwed over because of
50:47
this trial, not just Pam Smart. We disagree about the
50:49
case itself, but I also disagree
50:51
with the outcome even if she
50:53
is super guilty, which I also
50:55
think is probably somewhere in between.
50:57
Ellen, what do you think? It's
50:59
so interesting because I find so
51:01
many pieces of other cases. I
51:03
find this like a combination, like
51:05
a mixture of true crime cases.
51:08
Like when I never really understood the
51:11
full scope of
51:13
a coerced confession until, you know,
51:15
Brandon Dassey and then hearing, if
51:17
you've listened to Jesse, Ms. Kelly's
51:20
coerced confession where he literally was parroting
51:23
what the police officer was saying, because
51:25
thinking in your right mind, you think
51:27
that's not a thing. You don't say
51:30
you do something when you don't do
51:32
it. That's what we think. I
51:34
feel like it has aspects of
51:36
this. And then my utter disdain
51:39
for Mary Kayla Torino, like having
51:41
the disdain and especially being a
51:43
mom and thinking like, how can
51:45
you touch a little boy
51:47
bot? The narrative that I
51:49
have in my mind, and maybe I'm
51:51
a little theatrical, I've heard that once
51:54
or twice, I feel
51:56
like it was this stunted
51:59
kind of thing. of woman having this
52:01
affair with a young man, unfortunately it
52:03
does happen. And I feel
52:06
like it was like, oh I wish we could
52:08
be together. Yeah but
52:11
we'd have to like throw my
52:13
husband off a bridge or something.
52:16
It was that and like the
52:19
seed could have been planted. So
52:21
I don't think she was some
52:24
goomba, jabroni godfather being like, hey
52:26
you didn't kill him the way
52:28
I told you to. Like I
52:30
don't think she was a mastermind
52:32
like that. I think maybe
52:34
it was talked about and he was
52:36
like a 15 year old kid
52:38
being like, yeah I can run off in the sunset
52:40
with this hot 22 year old. All
52:42
we have to do is offer old man. I think
52:45
it is way more simple than
52:49
everything that it has blown
52:51
up to. And of course
52:54
it's all wrong. The fact that she got
52:56
murder on the first and they got murder
52:58
on the second is my brain
53:00
just like it doesn't compute.
53:02
And also I have to
53:04
be honest I watched recent
53:07
interviews of her and maybe
53:09
I'm hook, line and sinker. I don't
53:12
know she was so adamant in what
53:14
she was saying. It does
53:17
it all kind of makes sense to
53:19
the story of it really
53:21
not being that big of a plan
53:23
and kids being stupid and awful. I'm
53:25
taking a man's life. You know what
53:27
the problem is? Is that the person
53:29
she actually is is so
53:32
widely different than the portrayal of
53:34
the person that we know her
53:37
as. Like, iconicly right? We know
53:40
the woman with the perm and
53:42
the giant bow that is a
53:44
whore. Right? That's the one we know. And
53:47
the person she actually is and we
53:49
know the bikini photo because that was
53:51
shown on TV 10 million fucking times.
53:54
She did not give that bikini photo to
53:56
Billy Flynn. You know who gave that bikini
53:58
photo to the cops? Photoshop
54:01
manager who developed and had a copy
54:03
of that right and the cops released
54:05
it to the media and that became
54:07
the Sensational photo and the story became
54:09
this is Pam smart posing in a
54:11
bikini and look how look at this
54:13
whore Who had this photo and
54:15
gave it to a child? And we
54:18
all thought that like we all thought
54:20
it and now you're but
54:22
your brain isn't computing the real person
54:24
that you're seeing And like
54:26
that's because the root the perp am smart that
54:28
we all knew is a fake ass Person
54:31
that the cops and the prosecutors
54:33
wanted us to know and the
54:36
media fucking loved that heaven You're
54:38
gonna say something when Ellen was
54:40
speaking. I was curious about What
54:43
do we remember what happened with the state
54:45
of the relationship between? Pam
54:48
and Billy right after Greg was
54:50
killed Did she ghost
54:52
him after that or were they still
54:54
having? Romance or
54:56
did the shooting somehow for some
54:58
reason resolve the rest of the
55:01
relationship I didn't see anything of any information
55:03
about that in the she broke up with him before
55:05
the shooting did she really I believe so Yeah, was
55:07
that what Billy testified to know? I believe they actually
55:09
were not together for like a couple weeks before this
55:12
but apparently but she saw him the day of the
55:14
Shooting right she visited him at the like she met
55:16
him up He met up with him at his Walker
55:18
or something during the afternoon. She told him that According
55:22
to the boy sesame. She told him
55:24
that I'm leaving the basement door unlocked,
55:26
right? I haven't seen anything
55:28
about like they're the state of there But I'm
55:30
guessing that the police are all over
55:33
her immediately pretty much that she's like trying
55:35
to keep it I kept a distance from
55:37
Billy She's not gonna be the time to be
55:39
hanging out or also to be like you've done what
55:41
I needed you to do and thank you You
55:43
can take that 15 year old schlong and you
55:45
can go Find Mary Jane Rotten
55:47
crotch at Seabrook High School and you can
55:49
take her to the prom Here's what
55:51
I think though I think that if the police
55:53
had taken her seriously Which
55:55
they didn't because she's like this is a burglary got
55:58
gone wrong. She did media interviews And she's like, I
56:00
think this is burglar. Police were like, we don't think
56:02
it is, because there's no signs of forced entry. Burglars,
56:05
usually if a homeowner interrupts a burglary, they
56:07
just take off. They don't carry guns. They
56:10
don't slash the cushions on a sofa. Like,
56:13
it seems very staged to them. It was staged.
56:15
The whole thing was staged. And Greg's
56:18
wallet was lying between, if you
56:20
see the crime scene, he was lying between his legs. They
56:22
didn't even take that. What are they burglaring
56:24
if they're not even going to take his wallet? They left
56:26
that behind. So they didn't believe that. And I
56:28
think if they had believed that, but I
56:31
think they were so immediately focused on this
56:33
is a murder. Like, this is a personal
56:35
murder versus a burglary gone wrong. If the
56:37
whole thing had just been like, botch burglary,
56:40
we've got to figure out who did this,
56:42
maybe she would have continued to see her
56:44
lover. I don't know. So what was the
56:46
motive? The motive was not money. And that
56:49
has been because the whole insurance thing is
56:51
bullshit. She could not have known how
56:53
much insurance policy was worth. That is correct. She did
56:55
not know. She knew there was a life insurance. She
56:57
didn't know how much it was worth. But here's the
56:59
thing. I want to give my opinion on where I
57:02
land because I haven't done that yet. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
57:04
I'm actually with Kevin on this one. And I'm the
57:06
person who I'm like, everybody's innocent. But
57:08
I think everybody's innocent. That's where I start.
57:10
That's what they say on Reddit, Rabia. Well,
57:12
that's where I start because people do deserve
57:14
the presumption of innocence. That's our constitutional right,
57:17
is the presumption of innocence at the beginning
57:19
of being charged. But for me, it's not
57:21
so much feelings-based because I really did have
57:23
to parse and I talk about in the
57:25
crash course how my initial reaction
57:27
to it was like, oh, this really good-looking,
57:30
oh, you know what I mean?
57:32
Like manipulated the sky. I mean, that was my initial
57:35
reaction all those years ago and
57:37
continued to be for many years. So
57:39
I had to divorce that. But even her
57:41
own lawyer, Mark Sisty, has said, other than
57:44
her totally screwing up
57:46
on cross-examination when it came to being
57:48
asked about the recorded conversations, the fact that he's
57:50
like in the tape. Literally, Mark Sisty said this
57:52
quote. He's like in the tape, she says, if
57:55
you tell the truth, we're all fucking going to
57:57
jail. She says this is Cecilia. Mark Sisty is
57:59
acknowledging death. Those are the actual lines and he
58:01
said there's an mark sissy said there's no question It
58:03
was Pam's voice the jury could recognize
58:05
the voice and a sentence But there are parts
58:07
of the tape that were not you could not
58:09
hear there parts of the tape that are clear
58:11
and those are the Parts that Pam was trying
58:13
to explain away during her cross examination because they
58:15
make her sound really bad My opinion
58:18
is not based on a feeling when you're when
58:20
I hear that if she's telling Cecilia if you
58:22
tell the truth We're all fucking going to jail.
58:24
That means the truth is gonna convict
58:27
him and That means
58:29
she had something to do with it. I mean, it's
58:31
as simple as that I don't know how much simpler
58:33
it can get if she's your house
58:35
mark sissy says he thinks she didn't do
58:37
it Oh the defense the journey
58:40
Say that about all of his clients and you
58:43
know him because we have written books where he
58:45
was the fucking defense journey And he did not
58:47
say that all the other markets mark sissy
58:49
never said I think my client did it But of
58:51
course their clients did do I don't understand
58:53
how anybody could hear him say
58:56
that line and
58:58
believe that She
59:00
didn't do it. That's hard to explain away
59:03
agree unless you're buying her explanation that I
59:05
was just that was me My
59:07
way of drawing out stuff. No that
59:09
line has nothing to do with drawing
59:11
out information from Cecilia That line is
59:14
is an admission of guilt. She didn't
59:16
say if the truth comes out all of you
59:18
are going Yeah, well, what do you think the motive was
59:20
for her to kill Greg if it was if she did
59:22
in fact on purpose in
59:24
advance Have a plan to
59:27
as the state says Lore this
59:29
boy in with sex and then use him
59:31
to murder her husband. Well, here's the thing
59:34
I actually don't think that the whole thing
59:36
started with a murder plot I think she
59:38
felt I think she asked it to stay
59:40
think so maybe but I think because of
59:42
where she was down in the Dumps, that's
59:44
you know feeling rejected feeling humiliated in her
59:46
marriage feeling lonely and vulnerable to me That
59:49
explains her weird relationship with a 16 year
59:51
old girl as well I think
59:53
she did kind of fall for Billy
59:55
and then she's like, oh this guy
59:58
this kid who by the way is from the wrong
1:00:00
side of the tracks, has anger
1:00:02
management issues, is also really vulnerable.
1:00:04
Maybe I could get him to off-preg. I
1:00:06
don't think she's sort of sleeping with him
1:00:09
for the purpose of that, but I think
1:00:11
she realized the opportunity in it. So why kill
1:00:13
him? Why do so many people kill their
1:00:15
spouses instead of divorce? It happens all the
1:00:18
time. No, I'm just, I'm, you wanted to be
1:00:20
the first to ever do it. No, I'm just
1:00:22
curious. I'm curious about, because it's such, it's so
1:00:24
impr- it's so impractical. That's the only reason why
1:00:26
I'm asking. Listen, I have plenty of friends that I
1:00:28
have said this myself. I'm like, I just wish
1:00:30
this person I'm, you know, who I'm trying to get away
1:00:32
from, I just wish a truck would hit them. They'd
1:00:35
be dead rather than divorced. Anybody who's been
1:00:37
through a divorce, myself included, has had the
1:00:39
fantasy of it would just be easier if
1:00:41
they died. Yeah, maybe they'll get COVID really
1:00:43
bad. But they weren't getting divorced. The whole
1:00:45
point was they weren't getting divorced. And I'm
1:00:47
just, and I'm curious, and I
1:00:50
agree that that one line in the
1:00:52
tape sounds really bad. But I also
1:00:54
know that the whole rest of the
1:00:56
tape was not, like, hearable.
1:00:58
So much so that Greg's dad in court, like,
1:01:00
threw the headphones off and said, I can't hear
1:01:02
this damn thing. And the jurors had to listen
1:01:04
to it. And they also had a transcript of
1:01:06
what it said in front of them so that
1:01:08
they were listening to words that were already had
1:01:10
already been decided what was said by somebody else.
1:01:13
And so there's just a lot of problems with
1:01:15
the audio tape for me already. And like, I'm
1:01:17
not saying I agree, it's the
1:01:19
worst looking piece of evidence.
1:01:22
I'm not disagreeing with that in any way.
1:01:24
But I also, I just still think that
1:01:26
the truth is somewhere, not where the state
1:01:28
says it is. I really, really do. Ellen,
1:01:30
did you know that I am super sensitive
1:01:33
to smells? Like I've got a nose like
1:01:35
a hound dog. Is that why the last
1:01:37
time we went on a plane together, you
1:01:40
switch seats? Let's not get into that. Nobody
1:01:42
would be switching any seats if everybody used
1:01:44
Lumi. Lumi is sort of a game changer.
1:01:46
That whole body deodorant they have, I don't
1:01:49
know what's in it, but I do know
1:01:51
it was designed by an OBGYN to work
1:01:53
not only in your pits, but your feet,
1:01:55
your privates, and everywhere else you get odor.
1:01:58
So no matter where you use it, Lumi. clinically
1:02:00
proven to block odor all day long
1:02:02
thanks to its one-of-a-kind pH optimized formula
1:02:05
and they've got over 275,000 five-star reviews to show for it.
1:02:09
What's your favorite scent? I
1:02:11
like the coconut one. The thing that
1:02:13
I started with was the Lumi starter
1:02:15
pack. It's perfect for new customers. It
1:02:17
comes with a solid stick deodorant, the
1:02:19
cream tube deodorant, two products of your
1:02:21
choice. I of course like the mini
1:02:23
body wash and I love the deodorant
1:02:25
wipes and you get free
1:02:27
shipping. As a special offer for our
1:02:30
listeners, new customers get five dollars off
1:02:32
a Lumi starter pack with code solve
1:02:34
the case at lumi deodorant.com. That
1:02:36
equates to over 40% off your
1:02:39
starter pack when you visit lumi
1:02:41
deodorant.com and use code solve the
1:02:43
case. Kevin and Rabia,
1:02:45
let me ask you, so if
1:02:48
you think that she was the
1:02:50
mastermind behind it all, do you
1:02:52
think that the way that the
1:02:54
charges landed was equitable? Do you
1:02:57
think that all the charges the
1:02:59
way they were were fair? My
1:03:02
opinion on this has evolved over time and
1:03:05
I think now that the boys
1:03:07
who are now in their late 40s are
1:03:09
out and you can kind of see
1:03:11
you know a
1:03:13
more sophisticated view of what
1:03:16
time in prison is supposed to
1:03:18
be, about rehabilitation, about grace. What's
1:03:21
the largest percentage of people who
1:03:23
go into jail who are gonna eventually join
1:03:26
us in society? It's like you know 98% or
1:03:29
whatever. So if
1:03:31
that can be afforded to the boys, it
1:03:34
seemed like life without parole was
1:03:36
pretty harsh. Murder
1:03:39
for hire was not one
1:03:41
of the charges right? They didn't, I
1:03:43
mean it was a kind of theory of
1:03:46
the case. Murder for hire is
1:03:48
a capital offense in New Hampshire. No one's
1:03:50
been put to death in New Hampshire since
1:03:52
1932 and we currently have one person on
1:03:54
death row. We
1:03:56
don't have an electric chair they're talking
1:03:59
about maybe someday we'll be there. build the gallows. But
1:04:01
they decided not to go that way. This
1:04:03
was like the harshest thing that they could
1:04:05
they could give her. It's
1:04:07
a long way of saying I starting
1:04:09
to think that maybe she should have gotten
1:04:12
something you know even if
1:04:14
you wanted to give her 40 years. You mean like Eric
1:04:16
Winhurst did 15 to 35 and he
1:04:18
got out after 15? Well also substitute
1:04:21
Gypsy Rose. Yeah. I mean
1:04:24
Gypsy Rose Blanchard would be
1:04:26
the Pam Smart and
1:04:29
she served seven and a half years
1:04:31
and that dude is
1:04:33
in jail. But so it's actually literally
1:04:36
the opposite. So how can anyone
1:04:38
advocate for her and have none
1:04:42
none of that like theme
1:04:45
for Pam Smart? I think that's where
1:04:47
the sexism comes in in this case. Yeah. Yeah.
1:04:49
We have we have an analogous case in
1:04:51
New Hampshire that we wrote about where the guy
1:04:54
named Eric Winhurst while he was in high school
1:04:57
actually shot and killed a man for his friend
1:04:59
who he who she said that her dad was
1:05:01
molesting her and it was threatening her life. He
1:05:04
shot and killed him, lied about it
1:05:06
for 20 years, was eventually caught. He was sentenced
1:05:08
to 15 to 35 years. He took
1:05:10
a plea. He was sentenced to 15 to 35 years.
1:05:12
No no no no it was seven and a half to 15. No
1:05:15
it was 15 to 35. Okay. All right. And and and the girl who was now a
1:05:17
woman at the time got
1:05:23
two years because
1:05:25
you know she was she originally took a
1:05:27
plea wasn't gonna get any time but then
1:05:30
she got two years. She was quote the
1:05:32
mastermind but like he had all these character
1:05:34
witnesses, had all these people, great guy
1:05:36
blah blah blah blah. He fucking pulled
1:05:38
the trigger. Bill Flynn pulled
1:05:40
the trigger. I think Bill Flynn's sentence was
1:05:42
appropriate. He was a child. Right?
1:05:44
Pam Smart did not pull the trigger
1:05:47
and it's like the evidence is kind
1:05:49
of tenuous and the trial
1:05:51
was tainted. Like we cannot. Like
1:05:53
can we talk about all the
1:05:55
stuff that went wrong in this
1:05:57
trial? What didn't? While I-
1:06:00
I'm not a she was a mastermind behind
1:06:02
that. I do agree with you that she
1:06:04
deserves. I think she deserves a fair trial,
1:06:06
a new trial I don't know that bid
1:06:08
for an outcome. Frankly, if none of this
1:06:10
has happened in this trouble but you got
1:06:12
you guys want to talk? I refuse have
1:06:14
a little bit of about like how this
1:06:16
went haywire. Sure, basically the jury is Ers
1:06:19
were not sequestered and this was the first
1:06:21
ever televised gavel to gavel trial and history
1:06:23
of the United States. When the first ever
1:06:25
televised trial with first ever televised gavel to
1:06:27
gavel trial. There. Is no doubt
1:06:29
even Paul Maggi out of the prosecutor
1:06:31
says it's not true. There is no
1:06:33
doubt the jurors are watching the coverage
1:06:35
of it at night because later the
1:06:37
jurors talked about how they knew the
1:06:40
world was watching, right? And. That
1:06:42
there were so much pressure because the world
1:06:44
was watching and we knew we had to
1:06:46
just sit there. And we also had a
1:06:48
juror who was making ah audio recordings of
1:06:50
herself every night, recording her thoughts and feelings
1:06:53
about it and talking about how they talked
1:06:55
about it. In the jury room, we also
1:06:57
had a breathless reporter. Have. Always that
1:06:59
reporters name Phil Spencer and what was he
1:07:01
doing? Random still spends of those manson and
1:07:04
feel like you sure that your next little.
1:07:06
All right there. Yeah, I know those
1:07:08
before my time, but does he owe
1:07:10
less day a long shadow on the.
1:07:13
Broadcast. Journalism in New Hampshire well
1:07:15
I remember Bill he was of also
1:07:17
of working as a. Bartender.
1:07:19
On the see. Was really like he was like
1:07:22
fall when. Of a he was like
1:07:24
really trying to get the the lead on
1:07:26
aura inside scoop so he would try to
1:07:28
be stocking some as a different friends. Witnesses
1:07:31
users like falling them to bars
1:07:33
isn't repair. Hence the reporters were
1:07:35
so loud in the court room
1:07:37
that the jury could hear them
1:07:39
talking about the reporting they were
1:07:41
doing in the courtroom. It was.
1:07:44
Wildly inappropriate. like while the judge
1:07:46
also refuse to change as hinges
1:07:48
I knew was I thought was
1:07:50
practicing should have been reversible error
1:07:52
It even though the. That defense
1:07:54
did ask the jury is sequestered was used to
1:07:56
do it until the very last day of deliberations.
1:07:58
Like the file they do. There was a
1:08:00
question like it matters at that point, but you know
1:08:03
these are issues that came up on appeal. Were.
1:08:05
Denied but in a direct appeal as shit. Anyways
1:08:07
of know you can win anything. In
1:08:09
New Hampshire especially the ah the Subsides, it
1:08:11
seems like was very open to all this
1:08:13
media attention and he joked about how he
1:08:16
helped Clint Eastwood would play him in the
1:08:18
movie and later was like I was really
1:08:20
be. As. Liberty. But given the fact
1:08:22
that they seem to the upswing, no. Control
1:08:24
over the media it seemed.
1:08:26
Like he was perfectly fine with it And. I would
1:08:28
like to refute that misled. Wait a second for
1:08:30
guys that as you thought robin come back to
1:08:33
meekly school. When I was gonna say as out
1:08:35
the proof that this was a media circus and
1:08:37
probably had a real. Serious. Impact on
1:08:39
the outcome. The case is the fact that
1:08:41
they've been made changes to the rules around
1:08:43
the stuff later on and those changes would
1:08:45
have come about unless. All. These people
1:08:47
who were witnessing with of s is happening right now and
1:08:49
you wouldn't have I needed those rules Be in. Place. And
1:08:51
now there's a lotta rules bus. When. And
1:08:53
if media can cover something and how many
1:08:56
cameras all this stuff right there. but none
1:08:58
of that and how long it sure has
1:09:00
to wait before talking about a case afterwards.
1:09:02
That rule was implemented because a juror was
1:09:04
literally writing a column for the Boston Globe
1:09:06
about why he convicted him smart very next
1:09:09
day, the very next and. It's
1:09:11
a came out a couple days afterwards which
1:09:13
many had to have been writing it while
1:09:15
he was deliberating while like why I can
1:09:17
be contained in contact with with with the
1:09:19
Boston Globe which they pay him fifteen thousand
1:09:21
dollars for that story heavily uss. Was
1:09:23
considered sort of the long lasting legend,
1:09:25
especially in New Hampshire. With this happened
1:09:27
was that. This. Was a media
1:09:30
circus and that the media presence
1:09:32
in the court room was delayed.
1:09:34
Serious to this proceedings and on
1:09:36
what actually happened. What are you
1:09:38
looking at? L you reach a.
1:09:41
Deal at Syria as on harmful come as
1:09:43
a bit. The great would have learned he
1:09:45
likes these. That's the way I read or
1:09:47
write it down there head guy you want
1:09:49
to sound law is. That's what you need to, you
1:09:51
have to a couple of words like. That pull. Us. So.
1:09:54
That oh no, I'm the kind of attorney. I just
1:09:56
stick my son this out and such. Perfect. Two
1:09:58
people think it's like would they would see. like
1:10:00
a courtroom hubbub on TV or a movie
1:10:03
where there's hundreds of cameras in the back
1:10:05
and there's all sorts of flash bulbs going
1:10:07
off and murmuring and things like that. It
1:10:09
was what's called pool coverage because
1:10:11
they worked this out ahead of time
1:10:13
meaning there'd be one camera in the
1:10:16
courtroom and that camera would feed out
1:10:18
to the rest of the media outside
1:10:20
of the courtroom. What was
1:10:22
in the courtroom was which is very
1:10:24
common today especially is that
1:10:27
you'd have one camera and one
1:10:29
person locked in one place very
1:10:31
much like OJ and then one pool
1:10:33
photographer, still photographer who's authorized to take
1:10:35
still photographs but not 50 or 30.
1:10:38
The reason why people believe that
1:10:41
is because there was always these
1:10:43
scenes of the media scrum, people
1:10:45
yelling questions. Outside, yes. Now
1:10:47
that was always happening in the hallway. But there were
1:10:50
kind of reporters in the courtroom. No. Yes,
1:10:52
there were. But I'm talking to... Rebecca,
1:10:55
do you feel like you have not had enough time to
1:10:57
talk about this case? All right. Let
1:10:59
me tell you what I know because I talked
1:11:02
to reporters who were there and I worked with
1:11:04
them and this is what happened. All
1:11:06
this stuff that we saw
1:11:08
as far as the lasting
1:11:11
image of the media frenzy
1:11:13
was happening in the hallway
1:11:15
because when there'd be a break, she'd get
1:11:17
up and she'd walk to wherever, clickity click
1:11:19
click, then she'd come back, clickity click click.
1:11:22
And those were the big images
1:11:24
that we remember inside the courtroom.
1:11:27
Now, you can always talk about what is
1:11:29
the effect of cameras in the courtroom. It's
1:11:31
a great thing to discuss and whatever it
1:11:34
is, probably an effect here. But as far
1:11:36
as like that this was crazy media stuff,
1:11:38
that was not the case. And
1:11:41
it actually... But Kevin, the difference between how I'm
1:11:43
looking at this in terms of media coverage and
1:11:45
you're looking at it, I don't give a shit
1:11:47
about any of that. I'm talking about when the
1:11:49
jury or others or even the jury pool in
1:11:52
general, what they're being subjected to, like
1:11:55
when they're consuming the coverage, the
1:11:57
headlines, Black Widow, Ice Princess. seductress,
1:12:00
whore, whatever. I mean,
1:12:02
it's all inquirer, tabloidy,
1:12:05
and she hasn't even gone
1:12:07
national, even international, hasn't
1:12:09
gone to trial yet. I'm talking about
1:12:11
the perception that they are being fed
1:12:14
by the media coverage, that
1:12:16
we all were fed by the media coverage. And I wonder,
1:12:18
Rebecca, I mean, how much awareness do you have? I was
1:12:20
in high school as well when this was going on, but
1:12:22
I remember looking at that, and as a kid in high
1:12:24
school thinking, ew, she's so gross, that
1:12:27
is so disgusting. She did it. She did it.
1:12:29
She a hoe, she a hoe, she a hoe. We
1:12:32
all kind of just believed that, and the facts kind
1:12:34
of didn't matter, although when I get to the facts,
1:12:36
I still think she's... I
1:12:38
mean, that's the whole thing, is it's like that's why
1:12:41
I know the state's story isn't true. Like, I know
1:12:43
it. I know it with my... every
1:12:45
fiber of my being, because the
1:12:47
story was written... Wow. The story
1:12:49
was written before she was arrested.
1:12:52
The story was written by the cops, just
1:12:55
like Roland Lamy wrote the Jason Carroll
1:12:57
story before they even talked to him.
1:12:59
You're trying to tug on my innocence
1:13:01
lawyer heartstrings, but it ain't working this
1:13:03
time. No. The story
1:13:06
about her was written before
1:13:08
evidence was gathered. The
1:13:11
story was written about her. The many stories
1:13:13
written about her afterwards, I think, have harmed
1:13:15
her, you know, all the Nicole Kidman portrayal
1:13:17
and to die for, the book. That's the
1:13:19
way she's saying it. Which is fiction, which
1:13:21
is scripted and fiction, and people, when they
1:13:23
remember this case, they actually are thinking
1:13:25
about the movie, not the real case.
1:13:28
That is so true. I actually was
1:13:30
thinking that when I was thinking about...
1:13:32
because it's Joaquin Phoenix, right? Yeah. And
1:13:34
the author of the book that it was based on,
1:13:36
Joyce Mader, many years later, wrote in
1:13:39
support of, you know,
1:13:41
her effort to get either reduced sentence or
1:13:43
parole by saying, if my
1:13:46
fictional portrayal of this story has
1:13:48
any impact on your perception
1:13:50
of her, that didn't exist. Like, you know, that's
1:13:52
not what I meant. None of it was supposed
1:13:54
to be based on her as a real character.
1:13:57
But That's what it kind of like lingers in
1:13:59
the... In our imaginations, all this
1:14:01
not gone girl for Scott Peterson's wasn't
1:14:03
Joyce. Maynard, your father's neighbor. Guess
1:14:06
is our neighbor to. And
1:14:08
she was. She was like. says he
1:14:10
sounds are sixteen year old girlfriend us.
1:14:13
And then when she grows dropped out of
1:14:15
Princeton to I'd have even six pm and
1:14:17
seed. In she can I just
1:14:19
ask a question about the new evidence?
1:14:21
How much information do we have about
1:14:24
that that new witness that overheard and
1:14:26
does that hold any water? So five
1:14:28
years ago, a defense investigator who was
1:14:30
doing pro bono work for I'm Pamela.
1:14:33
It. It's held his interview. With.
1:14:36
Say. Meghan I'm Kelly Seven calories and gifts
1:14:38
and in the interview he said well we
1:14:40
the and you know much you know as
1:14:42
much as the named Paul My God and
1:14:45
guess all ago and he's like everywhere So
1:14:47
he was also part of the shows on
1:14:49
the panel. Any. Have the defense
1:14:51
investigator was like Tom Nichols his name
1:14:53
he's like I. We have a new
1:14:55
witness that I have recently discovered This
1:14:57
witnesses they were at a party would
1:14:59
believe the night before the murder and Billie
1:15:01
said i'm gonna kill the sky and.
1:15:04
This. Person was liable to spam, know anything
1:15:06
about what you're gonna do and he said
1:15:08
no doubt this is information is shared. On.
1:15:11
A Tv show, but I don't think it's ever
1:15:13
been raised in a court of law like. That's
1:15:15
the kind of thing you'd use the basis for.
1:15:17
Like a new trial, Write a post
1:15:19
conviction hearing For a new trial. Nobody
1:15:21
to raise it. My guess is that they could
1:15:23
not get that witness. Said. Actually
1:15:26
testify to it or give an affidavit.
1:15:28
Or verify it. It's been five years
1:15:30
since he said that on Tv. I have a feeling
1:15:32
that that's not good evidence. She's. Out
1:15:34
of Options. This is coming out of options now is
1:15:36
A. I think the fact that she is, she's out
1:15:38
of appeals to see how the one in was it.
1:15:40
Ninety One I think that's. Not. Seals
1:15:43
had one a couple your mother as she has
1:15:45
had a case in front of a New Hampshire
1:15:47
Supreme court south as the Governor for clemency. And
1:15:50
he said oh yeah, I read that letter.
1:15:52
That's rough. We have a question. I just
1:15:54
won a pulitzer. The red very lightly to
1:15:56
some light little tad. sure. i don't
1:15:58
know what happened i never know happen, I can
1:16:00
be swayed, I can wake up in
1:16:04
a situation where I'm not in any
1:16:06
position of power. Do
1:16:13
you think that's what it is that we're
1:16:16
just taking her side because we're painting the
1:16:18
picture of an innocent woman? I just want
1:16:20
to be clear, that is not what I
1:16:22
think. You
1:16:25
said it and it was passing and I just want to go back
1:16:27
to it for a minute. I think that maybe
1:16:29
we will all agree on this
1:16:31
point that a lot of the
1:16:33
antipathy towards Pam Smart is based
1:16:35
in misogyny and anti-feminism
1:16:38
and the femme fatale and
1:16:40
all that. Who
1:16:42
doesn't love an evil woman and somebody can blame it on.
1:16:45
And so I feel like
1:16:48
in some cases it does feel
1:16:50
like maybe the defense against her
1:16:53
is that because she was mistreated,
1:16:55
because she was a woman, that
1:16:57
she needs to be exonerated because
1:17:00
she was a woman as opposed to
1:17:02
exonerate her because she did
1:17:04
do it and I think that she did. Or
1:17:07
not even exonerate her because even if she was
1:17:09
a part of it, I am
1:17:11
mostly fall in the camp of I don't think the
1:17:13
punishment fit the crime no matter what. Even
1:17:16
if tomorrow we woke up and she actually was
1:17:18
like, I think I'm with you on that. By the way,
1:17:21
this isn't the hill I want to die on. No, no,
1:17:23
no. You said it and I
1:17:25
was like, because I am always very careful
1:17:27
about that. I am a feminist, but I
1:17:29
definitely never, I always try and
1:17:32
pull my feminist brain out of it
1:17:34
and not just like always take a
1:17:36
woman's side. Yeah. Which I think
1:17:38
I proved in the Never Heard in Johnny Deaf episode.
1:17:41
I mean in New Hampshire, Pam Smart
1:17:43
is our Confederate flag. It's like it makes
1:17:46
no fucking sense, but this is the thing
1:17:48
where, oh no, it's absolutely, she absolutely did
1:17:50
it. Whatever. She's been
1:17:52
there forever and I feel like
1:17:55
probably she deserves some
1:17:57
kind of, I don't want to say clemency. It
1:18:00
would be called Clementine. Time-sucker. If any
1:18:02
kind of relief would be called Clementine. I mean, like, she
1:18:04
went in when she's 20-something and, you know, she's
1:18:06
going to spend, what, 60 years behind bars. I
1:18:08
mean, I know that's why she's in prison. Until
1:18:10
she's dead. Until she's dead, yeah. The bills were denied in 1991
1:18:12
and 97. She had a
1:18:14
federal habeas denied in 2002. It was
1:18:16
upheld in 2004. In
1:18:18
2019 and 22, commutation petitions were
1:18:21
denied. In
1:18:23
2022, the commutation petition, apparently the governor
1:18:25
and the executive board were making these
1:18:27
decisions in less than three minutes in
1:18:29
consideration of her application. So just a
1:18:32
year ago, in February 2023, Mark
1:18:34
Sisti, who is still defense counsel, appeared before
1:18:36
the New Hampshire Supreme Court, asking them to
1:18:38
compel the executive counsel to reconsider a full
1:18:41
hearing because it only took three minutes. But
1:18:44
a few months later, the Supreme Court denied
1:18:46
that as well. And you
1:18:48
are right, Rebecca. She is shit out of luck
1:18:50
right now. Do you know why?
1:18:52
It's political. It would be unpopular
1:18:54
politically to say anything other than- It's
1:18:56
our Confederate flag. I
1:18:59
mean, I guess that's a weird way of putting it, but sure.
1:19:01
By the way, I don't know if you just made the podcast
1:19:03
or if this is what we were talking about earlier, but Paul
1:19:05
Maggiato, Rebecca's defense attorney. Yeah,
1:19:07
I wrote divorce attorney. He held
1:19:09
me in a post divorce matter and it was
1:19:11
so weird. Yeah, and get to go up
1:19:13
and say, is this your email? It just
1:19:15
was like, oh wow. I'll tell you something.
1:19:18
He represented me in a matter in court,
1:19:20
like a minor matter, and
1:19:23
I would not want him to prosecute me,
1:19:25
but he was a great lawyer for me.
1:19:28
No, he comes across like a shark. The man comes
1:19:30
across like a shark. Everything, this giant
1:19:32
calculator and put it out and started making
1:19:34
the guy like you. He made
1:19:37
somebody understand, do calculations about their
1:19:39
income and stuff on a giant,
1:19:41
one of those old people calculators
1:19:43
with giant buttons. No pressure. It
1:19:47
was so illustrative. Let me just put it that way. I was
1:19:49
like, I would not want him to prosecute me. He's good at
1:19:51
his job. Mark Sisti's also good at his job, although I will
1:19:54
say that one juror who was hoping to sell
1:19:58
her tapes for $25,000. she's recording
1:20:00
herself every night at the end of like the trial.
1:20:02
In one of her recordings, and you actually can hear
1:20:05
the audio of this, she says that if I had
1:20:07
known that the sentence was going to be that, I
1:20:09
probably would have hung the jury. She was the
1:20:12
one who wasn't quite sure and quite
1:20:14
bought the story, but she also said that
1:20:16
the defense rested today, but there was really
1:20:18
no defense. The jury didn't know what the
1:20:22
consequences would be. They didn't know what the
1:20:24
possibilities of the sentence were. Well, no jury
1:20:26
does. Did that woman ever turn those recordings
1:20:28
into a podcast? Well, they were in the
1:20:30
documentary captivated,
1:20:34
which was on HBO about 10 years
1:20:36
ago. Yeah, it's just waiting to be
1:20:39
a podcast. Well, here is the good
1:20:41
news. Rebecca and Kevin, we do a
1:20:43
little thing called A Couple More
1:20:45
Things on our Patreon. After
1:20:47
the episode, you know whenever you record an episode
1:20:49
and you say, I should have said that, I
1:20:52
should have said this. So the good
1:20:54
news is we can come back, talk for
1:20:56
another half an hour, and see
1:20:58
where we land after we hear the
1:21:00
podcast. We throw that on our Patreon
1:21:02
because there is so, it is.
1:21:05
It's kind of an emotional case. I know we're
1:21:07
not supposed to think of it like that, but
1:21:10
it really is. I mean, unless
1:21:12
one of these guys comes and says, you know
1:21:14
what, we were lying all those years. We took
1:21:16
the plea. We changed our story, but until
1:21:19
then, do you have any parting
1:21:21
words for us? I'm
1:21:24
pretty clear where you landed, but
1:21:26
give us a definitive answer of where
1:21:29
you think this all lands because I'm
1:21:31
a little flip-floppy. Kevin, you can go,
1:21:33
you know, you have some flip-floppy ideas.
1:21:36
I will say that I believe
1:21:38
that Pam Smart could manipulate
1:21:41
Billy Flynn who, you know, got his
1:21:43
friends to help him out. To do
1:21:45
this crime, I think that that's accurate.
1:21:47
I don't think all the
1:21:49
media coverage, the legend of what it
1:21:51
came down to is actually What
1:21:54
Happened. But I Also believe that maybe, and I
1:21:56
believe it today, but I didn't believe it at
1:21:58
the time, that. Tensions
1:22:00
was excessive that you probably shouldn't
1:22:02
spend her whole life in jail.
1:22:05
For. This crime on middle a
1:22:07
very stiff sentences you know. When.
1:22:09
He forty years some play that and she
1:22:12
serve that and. You know is that. What?
1:22:15
Is the possibility that he will have
1:22:17
her next lover killed? You know it's
1:22:19
probably pretty low. so ah my it,
1:22:22
she probably will not be a danger
1:22:24
to society. That two master's degrees now?
1:22:26
Yeah, she's gotten out of the minutes. I
1:22:28
then. I think that
1:22:30
either. She. Didn't orchestrate
1:22:32
her husband's murder or it's
1:22:35
a nice dahmer. More simpler
1:22:37
narrative then the incredibly complicated
1:22:39
ah one that to stay
1:22:42
put forth were talking about.
1:22:45
I'm not at the time
1:22:47
very bright or sophisticated or
1:22:49
mature or or interesting people.
1:22:51
Than. A stay at A Picture
1:22:54
of genius. Bright, mature, interesting,
1:22:56
sophisticated people who plotted together
1:22:58
and came up with this
1:23:00
mastermind plan. Ah well, we're
1:23:02
talking about at narrative that
1:23:05
included her wanting a condo
1:23:07
and furniture that is couple
1:23:09
didn't even own right. So
1:23:11
this is not complicated is
1:23:13
a much simpler story no
1:23:15
matter what happened and I
1:23:18
will really like die on
1:23:20
the hill of how vulnerable.
1:23:22
These young people were and how
1:23:24
good and I mean it. You.
1:23:27
Have to say police are good at their job,
1:23:29
They are good at their job and they are
1:23:31
not like. Like. Evil lead the
1:23:33
police and other places but there are a
1:23:35
couple of them that are very very good
1:23:38
at getting what they want when they go
1:23:40
in and question people and are some of
1:23:42
them are working at that time especially and
1:23:44
those kids were vulnerable. Said there was already
1:23:46
a story written they knew how to get
1:23:49
from those kids. Yeah. As
1:23:51
a sort of alluded to before, if
1:23:53
you listen to some interrogation tapes, they
1:23:55
are good and they get in people's
1:23:57
mind. We've seen it so many times.
1:24:00
Amanda Knox, she was questioned, she
1:24:02
was exhausted, they were speaking in
1:24:05
and out of English and Italian, we've seen
1:24:07
it so many times. So if you ever
1:24:09
think that you just like, you can't just
1:24:11
make up something, I really encourage you to
1:24:14
watch some of those intense interrogations on YouTube,
1:24:16
because you will, like Rebecca said, you will
1:24:18
definitely see, it is absolutely
1:24:20
possible. You guys are
1:24:23
the best, you are so smart, I love
1:24:25
the way you can respectfully
1:24:28
disagree and talk through
1:24:30
ideas and yeah, yeah.
1:24:33
It's not funny. Yeah, someone will
1:24:35
call the cops. Please give our
1:24:37
loyal and lovely listeners all the information on where
1:24:40
they can find you, how they can connect and
1:24:42
how they can support you guys. Please, please, please
1:24:44
listen to Crime Writers On, we actually review true
1:24:46
crime media, we talk about whether it's ethical, whether
1:24:48
it's good, whether you should listen to it and
1:24:50
watch it, we give a thumbs up or thumbs
1:24:52
down. And we also have
1:24:55
an awesome Patreon where we make tons
1:24:57
of extra stuff, we have an advice
1:24:59
show called Mary With Podcast that Kevin
1:25:01
and I do, we've got book club,
1:25:03
we've got tons of stuff, that's patreon.com/partners
1:25:05
in crime media. And. And I
1:25:07
have a podcast called, These are Their Stories,
1:25:09
The Law and Order Podcast, where we take
1:25:12
an episode of either Criminal Intent, SVU or
1:25:14
Original Recipe, we shit on the episode for
1:25:16
about 35 minutes and
1:25:18
then we talk about the real life case that inspired the
1:25:20
show. It's very funny. We have great guests and I'm looking
1:25:22
at you Ellen, you're gonna have to pay this forward. It's
1:25:25
hilarious, it's totally hilarious. I hope so. Well,
1:25:27
you two are certainly two of our favorite
1:25:29
people and we would love to have you
1:25:31
back for a couple more things because I
1:25:33
have a couple more things I wanna say,
1:25:35
but I fear the four of us could
1:25:37
talk for a very long
1:25:39
time. Well, that is all for today.
1:25:42
Thank you all so much for joining
1:25:44
us. Many thanks to our dear friends,
1:25:46
Rebecca Lavoie and Kevin Flynn for being
1:25:48
just the epitome of a perfect podcast
1:25:50
guest. And thank you to all of
1:25:52
you. Thank you to all of our
1:25:55
patron supporters, especially our star
1:25:57
witnesses who are here with us in the chat
1:25:59
every episode. If you'd like to
1:26:01
be a member of our Patreon, we
1:26:04
sure would love your support. You can
1:26:06
head over to patreon.com/rabiaanellen. There you'll find
1:26:08
lots of bonus content, including About Damn
1:26:11
Crime, our SpeakPipe episodes, a couple more
1:26:13
things, as well as our watch party.
1:26:15
We sit, we watch, we chat,
1:26:17
and we have a grand old
1:26:19
time. Please also take some
1:26:21
time to give us a five-star review
1:26:24
on iTunes or Spotify or wherever you
1:26:26
get your podcasts. Tell your friends
1:26:28
why you love us, spreading the word really does
1:26:30
help us out, and we are always
1:26:32
so grateful for any kind of support
1:26:34
you give, whether it be being a
1:26:36
patron or supporting us on social media.
1:26:38
We can't thank you enough. Thank
1:26:40
you so much. Until then, thanks, Ravia. Love you
1:26:43
guys. Love you Ellen. Bye everyone. Sometime
1:26:53
in the early 80s, REO
1:26:55
Speedwagon's airplane made an unannounced middle-of-the-night landing. This
1:26:57
is my friend Kyle McLaughlin, the star of
1:27:00
Twin Peaks, and he's telling me about how
1:27:02
he discovered a real-life Twin Peaks
1:27:04
in rural North Carolina, not far from where he filmed
1:27:07
Blue Velvet. What was on the plane was
1:27:09
copious amounts of drugs coming in from South
1:27:11
America. Supposedly
1:27:14
Pablo Escobar went looking for other spots, quiet, out-of-the-way
1:27:16
places to bring in his cocaine. My
1:27:20
name is
1:27:23
Joshua Davis, and I'm an investigative reporter. Kyle
1:27:27
and I talk all the time about the strange
1:27:30
things we come across, but nothing was quite as
1:27:32
strange as what we found in Varnam Town, North
1:27:34
Carolina. There's crooked cops,
1:27:36
brother against brother. Everyone's got a story
1:27:38
to tell, but does the truth even
1:27:41
exist? Welcome to
1:27:43
Varnam Town. Varnam
1:27:45
Town is available.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More