Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
Welcome
0:07
to Rates and Barrels. It is
0:09
Tuesday, March 26. Derek
0:11
Van Ryper, Eno Saris, we are
0:20
back in our respective home recording locations.
0:22
Feels good to have gotten out and
0:24
get those two live shows in. Thanks
0:26
again to our friends at Other Half
0:29
Brewing for being fantastic hosts. And thanks
0:31
to everybody who made it out live.
0:33
It was great to put some faces
0:35
to Twitter handles and
0:37
more specifically, Discord handles, right? I
0:39
got to meet Market8 dude, whose
0:41
name is not actually Mark. Yeah,
0:46
that was fun. Some of
0:49
our most ardent listeners and
0:51
people we interact with the most on Twitter
0:53
and Discord were there. So it was really
0:56
great to see everybody. It was really fun.
0:58
Other Half did such a great job.
1:00
It was a perfect little spot for
1:02
us. And Stacked Lineup is still
1:05
out there. So if you want to order it
1:07
at otherhalfbrewing.com, you can
1:10
still get that shipped to a bunch of different states. So
1:12
it was really great beer, really
1:14
great time, really great to see everybody. Yeah,
1:16
I kind of locked in on Stacked Lineup.
1:18
I didn't try enough of the other
1:20
beers at Other Half. That was a bit
1:22
of a mistake on my part, but we'll
1:25
be corrected in a future opportunity traveling to
1:27
New York. As I mentioned, the Discord, it
1:29
is popping. Get in there. If you haven't
1:32
already, we'll have a link to join that
1:34
in the show description. Since
1:37
we last recorded on Thursday, a ton
1:39
of news has broken. And one story
1:41
that was pretty fresh last Thursday has
1:43
developed a good bit. And I would
1:45
say it's still in the developing
1:48
category. That, of course, is Shohei
1:51
Otani and Ipe Mizuhara, his former
1:53
translator who has now been fired
1:55
by the Dodgers after being linked
1:58
to illegal gambling in California. Shouhei
2:01
met with the media on Monday
2:03
afternoon, you know, and he said
2:05
he was saddened and shocked by
2:07
the revelations that his former interpreter
2:09
had racked up a sizable gambling
2:11
debt. Reports have that as
2:13
about four and a half million dollars. That's still
2:15
the number that's floating around out there. And
2:19
Otani said he learned about this problem
2:23
for Mizuhara after the first game
2:25
the Dodgers played with the Padres
2:27
in Korea last week. So this
2:30
is really interesting. It's originally kind of
2:32
bubbled up from a Los Angeles Times
2:34
report that pointed out that Otani's name
2:36
had appeared on wire transfers to alleged
2:39
bookmaker Matthew Boyer. Boyer is under federal
2:41
investigation. And then Mizuhara
2:43
had claimed the transfers covered his
2:45
debts. Major League Baseball on Friday
2:48
after a few days announced they're
2:50
investigating. So we'll see what they
2:52
find beyond whatever the federal
2:54
investigation turns up. And
2:56
the biggest thing for me is that kind of like read
2:58
through some of the details that have been reported. It's
3:01
just that there were there were some inconsistencies
3:03
in the stories. Initially
3:05
there was a 90 minute interview that ESPN
3:07
had with Mizuhara and
3:10
that interview was attended by an Otani
3:12
spokesperson. Right. So that detailed
3:14
how Mizuhara met Boyer at a poker game in
3:16
San Diego back in 2021. Apparently
3:20
Boyer was invited to this game by an
3:22
acquaintance of David Fletcher's. The
3:24
details are like super clear in
3:26
that interview. And then
3:28
of course the details from that interview
3:31
were later recanted. And some of this
3:33
is being now kind of attributed to
3:36
throughout this last week. Prior
3:38
to being fired Mizuhara still being Otani's
3:40
translator and that creating a lot of
3:43
confusion about what Otani did and did
3:45
not know at various points. Yeah
3:48
the interaction between
3:50
a player and a translator
3:52
is just really intimate.
3:57
Actually I mean this person is. broadcasting
4:00
your views to the world for you, you know,
4:02
and translating the world
4:04
for you, you know, on the way back. And
4:07
then we know, we have established
4:10
that their interaction
4:12
was even more intimate maybe than normal translators,
4:14
like just in terms of like, you know,
4:17
they were friends, they were buds, they went
4:19
everywhere together, like, you know, they were seeing
4:21
everywhere together, like, you know, you
4:23
know, so, you know, does
4:26
he have access to his accounts? You
4:29
know, this translation thing is kind
4:31
of intriguing to the point
4:34
where yesterday, you know, I
4:36
have a friend who's more of a
4:38
native Japanese speaker or better Japanese speaker
4:40
than I am. And
4:42
he watched that same press
4:45
conference yesterday that Otani
4:47
gave in which he ostensibly
4:50
gave us more details. And
4:54
but it was a prepared statement. But
4:56
again, there's a translator there, the new translator.
5:00
And he's, he's, my
5:02
friend said he did a good job. But he said that
5:04
one specific thing, there was an interesting way
5:07
of translating. So my
5:10
friend said that sort of Otani
5:12
says specifically, he pay
5:15
access my account on his own and
5:17
transferred money out in Japanese. And
5:21
that was translated to if they stole my money
5:23
or stole money. So
5:27
that's that's it's that's just
5:30
part of the story with it like that,
5:32
like, now when did Otani know what he
5:34
knew? How much English does he
5:36
understand? How much does he how much do you
5:38
understand about this? Like
5:41
you could see a play away a story
5:43
of this guy who's just wants to be
5:45
about he's from the country in Japan, he
5:47
just wants to be about baseball, his mom,
5:50
you know, handled his finances and first until
5:52
just a couple years ago, you know, all
5:54
he wants to do is carry
5:56
out baseball, maybe like
5:59
who knows how much how good his
6:01
English is and how much he's understanding of
6:03
this and he's got this guy who's an
6:05
established liar or who is who's at least
6:07
admitted to lying on certain levels and has
6:10
a gambling problem who's his translator so He
6:13
could say anything that other people were
6:15
saying to Otani and then change whatever
6:17
his honey thing back, right? So oh,
6:20
yeah, Otani covered my debts. He
6:23
wasn't happy with it, but he did
6:25
it, you know Whereas Otani thinks he's
6:27
saying oh, yes, I paid for something
6:29
that That he had that
6:31
he bought in my house or whatever It was you know, I
6:33
mean like like maybe he knew
6:35
about the payments but didn't know exactly
6:37
what they're for I mean just because
6:39
that translating offers this like gray area.
6:41
We just don't know There's
6:44
another story where you know Otani's in the
6:46
veteran gambler and he's he cannot
6:48
lose He's one of these the players I think
6:50
the one thing that I know about players is
6:53
they hate losing one. They almost like winning and
6:56
you know, they are competitive
6:58
about tiddlywinks and Ask as well Walker
7:00
Bueller in ping-pong, you know what I
7:02
mean? Like it's it's it's They're
7:06
intensely competitive. So the other story is,
7:08
you know, here's a guy who's intensely
7:10
competitive and private
7:13
and has some time to
7:15
kill when he's not doing baseball things and
7:18
you know was gambling and you
7:21
know got into trouble and blamed on us
7:23
on his translator, so That
7:26
the thing is that this is all put against a
7:29
player who's probably the most inaccessible player
7:31
we've had in a long time and so,
7:35
you know, I feel badly for all
7:37
the reporters trying to chase this because It's
7:40
it's there's there's very
7:42
few in ways with the player himself
7:45
because of maybe the language again and
7:47
translating But also just the
7:49
way that he's insulated himself from the media and
7:51
then so you're trying to go to all these
7:53
people around him Who were saying I I
7:55
thought he was a good guy. I don't know so
8:00
It's a really difficult story for
8:02
everybody involved and we on
8:04
the outside here And it
8:06
like it inspires a lot of people to
8:11
Be very sure of their beliefs
8:13
in a lot of these instances Oh bookie
8:16
would never put out a 4.5 million dollar
8:19
credit line that seems like a lot But
8:21
it wasn't 4.5 million. It was 500,000
8:23
over and over again, or at least
8:25
that's how the payments came in, you know Would
8:28
he ever do that for someone who obviously
8:30
wasn't worth it? I don't know I mean you're
8:33
you're asking you're talking about an illegal bookie.
8:35
Well, and that's where the initial the
8:37
initial account from Mizuhara and explaining how
8:40
he met Boyer like kind of Oh,
8:42
okay Like you you got introduced to
8:44
each other because of who you each
8:47
know Yeah, these are probably a
8:49
mark for him right away that guy that
8:51
guy smelled you coming a lot of mile
8:53
away Right. So there
8:56
it's just one of these stories like there's there's the first
8:58
thing you think is like, what do you want
9:00
to believe? Well, we all probably many of us want
9:02
to believe that Shoyo Tani is
9:04
an amazing baseball player who loves baseball and would
9:06
never be involved in anything illegal like this That's
9:09
like the thing you kind of want to believe
9:11
that's like a fairy tale that you want to
9:13
tell yourself That's what you sort of hope comes
9:16
out in all of the investigation
9:18
in all of this that's the thing that you generally want
9:21
to see but You
9:23
also have probably lived long enough to
9:25
see and hear of enough famous people
9:27
being Involved in bad
9:29
things to think you know, maybe it's
9:31
not just e-pay like you your mind
9:33
wonders like isn't doesn't Michael Jordan just
9:35
like a Roll like
9:38
Charles Barkley didn't charge the box. I like
9:40
to lose millions of dollars, right? But also
9:42
there's aside from just the the legal ramifications
9:44
of well gambling is not legal in the
9:46
state of California Okay, like if that were
9:49
a thing that any player did I'm not
9:51
talking about Shohei specifically But let's just say
9:53
an athlete of any kind any sport wherever
9:56
they bet on sports in California and it's
9:58
a lot of money and It's
10:00
illegal. Okay, like am I crushed
10:03
by that as a fan? No, I
10:05
don't actually care if the
10:07
player Is not harming other
10:09
people, right? It's a little bit like smoking pot
10:11
smoking pot the leak is legal in some cities in
10:13
stem sites and not legal in others It's like
10:15
if somebody got busted in one of the states where
10:17
it wasn't legally be like, well, you know Maybe
10:20
thought he was in California. He woke up and whatever
10:23
it is I don't know doesn't it doesn't seem
10:25
like that big a deal with gambling. He's a
10:27
little bit a little bit different because What
10:30
about baseball? Right and that's
10:32
where that's where it would cross a line,
10:35
right? And again, like that's By
10:37
all accounts not what's happening here, but yeah
10:39
leverage over a player, you know
10:42
That owns owes five million dollars. Well, you better do this
10:44
or you got to do something for me on the field
10:46
that I can Bet on or whatever. Right?
10:49
So there's infinite and we have something
10:51
like this another sport, right? Right. Meanwhile,
10:53
yeah Yeah in
10:55
the NBA John Tae Porter is
10:57
being investigated because of prop
10:59
bets and prop bets for the uninitiated or
11:02
just like I think this guy
11:04
will rebound have seven rebounds today and a
11:07
bunch of Regular bets were placed
11:09
on the under on his props when he
11:11
was in a game in which he removed
11:13
himself from the game
11:16
due to injury Which
11:19
is superficial and then I guess he has all
11:21
these alternate You
11:23
know Twitter accounts there's some reporting his alternate
11:26
Twitter accounts are related to crypto and gambling
11:29
and that he has publicly admitted
11:31
to gambling in those Twitter
11:33
accounts on NCAA basketball and
11:36
so, you know Like
11:38
there's a lot I think there's a there's
11:40
more smoke there and that's a
11:42
big deal because it's about the sport itself whereas
11:46
we can't necessarily trust he pay but he pays
11:48
always said no baseball and You
11:52
know, we also have this like this this
11:54
illegal bookie person the whole reason this came
11:57
out is because this illegal
11:59
bookie person And he's busted.
12:03
And so it reads to me like, oh well,
12:07
do you know Shohei Otani?
12:09
Is that a good name? Does that
12:12
give me a reduction in sentence
12:14
or anything? Does that give me anywhere? So
12:17
you don't like, it's really hard with all
12:20
these characters in there. And
12:22
again, we don't really know Shohei that well.
12:25
Right. But it's, again, still in the developing
12:27
category for me for sure. And I just try to
12:30
think through all these different details. And the thing I
12:32
put out there on Twitter was just like, how
12:34
do you even get four and a half
12:36
million dollars out of a bank account without
12:39
someone knowing about it? That would be challenging
12:41
because it would take several large transfers. Five
12:43
hundred thousand at a time. It's
12:45
something like that. But I just think about how
12:48
there's so many facets of life where there
12:50
are little checks on basic things we do.
12:52
And I realize that ultra
12:54
high net worth individuals live in a different
12:56
world than the rest of us and maybe
12:59
you can transfer hundreds of thousands of dollars
13:01
out of an account and not get a
13:03
notification or someone who has access to your
13:05
account can do that. I just think that's
13:07
really bizarre. That's all. I'm not really pointing
13:10
a finger or anything. I'm just like, man,
13:12
that's weird. And that's maybe... Yeah. Maybe
13:15
Otani is a classic example of someone that
13:17
trusted the wrong people. That's possible. I don't
13:19
know. I just think there's missing
13:21
information. I do know a fair amount
13:23
of people that have gotten rich not
13:26
by handling the money themselves. Who
13:30
inherited it or did
13:33
other things to acquire that wealth.
13:36
And I do know personally some people that just have
13:39
other people that dispersed the money from them.
13:43
They don't want to deal with it. That's
13:46
not why they have money and they
13:49
don't want to think about it. So that's
13:52
why I mentioned on Twitter the other day that
13:54
his mother handled his finances and maybe that's
13:57
not something he wants to think about. But
13:59
then other people are all over the place. Well, professional advisors and
14:01
people, yes, yes, but it's also possible
14:04
that someone that's as close as your translator
14:07
Can tell you that this is just a payment
14:09
for the thing you owe, you know, whatever it
14:11
is Just sign on this,
14:13
you know and
14:16
Don't worry about it. All right. So
14:18
for all of those reasons and many
14:20
that we haven't even uncovered yet This
14:23
is a complicated story to
14:25
completely unpack As far
14:27
as other news and notes the thing that you'd
14:29
thought we might be talking about right now as
14:31
it pertains to show Hey Otani is that he's
14:33
been cleared to start a throwing program as he
14:35
returns from elbow surgery in his bid to be
14:37
a two-way player Again, right like if you if
14:40
three weeks ago you said what do you think
14:42
we talked about with Otani in the days before?
14:44
State side opening day and say I don't
14:46
know rehab, you know, how his spring went
14:48
normal things like that So
14:50
good news there at least that Otani is
14:53
on that sort of progression You know, we'll
14:55
see if they actually Follow
14:57
through on their rumblings that they might
14:59
play him in the field by the end of the
15:01
season That would be a little bit of a surprise,
15:03
but it's an option to them eventually if he gets
15:05
to the rehab Unscathed but that's
15:07
the that's the baseball side of what's
15:09
happening with show Hey Otani right now
15:12
and it feels like a footnote given
15:14
how large the scope of everything else
15:16
is right now Ever
15:18
tried to break a bad habit
15:20
and felt like you're climbing Everest
15:22
and flip-flops. Yeah, we've been there,
15:24
too But here's a breath of
15:26
fresh air fume. It's not about
15:28
giving up It's about switching up
15:30
fume takes your habit and simply
15:32
makes it better Healthier and a
15:34
whole lot more enjoyable fume is
15:37
an innovative award-winning flavored air device
15:39
that does just that instead of
15:41
vapor Fume uses flavored air instead
15:43
of electronics fume is completely natural
15:45
and instead of harmful chemicals fume
15:47
uses delicious Flavors you get it
15:49
instead of bad fume is good It's
15:51
a habit you're free to enjoy and
15:53
makes replacing your bad habit easy your
15:55
fume comes with an adjustable airflow dial
15:57
It is designed with movable parts magnets
16:00
for fidgeting giving your fingers a lot
16:02
to do which is helpful for de-stressing
16:04
and anxiety while breaking your habit. For
16:07
me Fume's ability to also act as
16:09
a fidget device is incredible and helps
16:11
me get through the day stress free.
16:13
Plus Fumes just released a magnetic stand
16:15
for your Fume so there's no more
16:18
losing it around the house that's built
16:20
with fidgeting in mind. You can spin
16:22
your Fume around on it. Start the
16:24
year off right with the good habit
16:26
by going to trifume.com/barrels and getting the
16:29
journey packed today. Fume is giving listeners of
16:31
the show 10% off
16:33
when they use the code barrels to
16:35
help make starting the good habit that
16:37
much easier. Beyond
16:40
Otani we have an extension
16:42
for Ezekiel Tovar a
16:45
seven-year extension with the
16:47
Rockies 63 and a half
16:49
million plus an option for 2031. Yes
16:51
it's a real year at twenty and
16:53
a half million dollars. We've talked about
16:56
Tovar a few times
16:58
on this show as one of
17:00
the more aggressive hitters in terms
17:02
of approach in the league and
17:04
the overall results in his first full
17:07
season with the Rockies last year were
17:10
underwhelming at the play to 27% k-rate with a
17:12
4.1% walk rate. It was a 70 WRC plus
17:14
but we're talking about
17:18
a player who was a rookie and he
17:20
turned 22 in August so he was very
17:23
young to be there played great defense at
17:25
shortstop was a gold glove finalist at shortstop
17:27
so you can start to piece together like
17:30
a hey like what's the floor for Ezekiel
17:32
Tovar and say good defender
17:34
at short guy that might
17:36
actually you know over time strike
17:39
out a little bit less and be able
17:41
to take his hit tool and continue to
17:44
progress in a kind of gradual way at
17:46
the plate. My question for you is
17:48
as much as his approach would
17:50
scare us if it were for a 28,
17:54
29, 30 year old player like a Javier Baez
17:56
like at the end of the the
17:59
aging curve like Drops off really
18:01
sharply for players that have an approach
18:03
like Tovar's Do we ever
18:05
see positive outcomes in terms
18:07
of making significant adjustments? But we're talking
18:09
about someone who's so much younger for
18:12
the level than a lot of other
18:14
players that debut Yeah,
18:18
and you know, there are different
18:21
ways to sort
18:23
of Get out of
18:25
this law of not having great play discipline or
18:27
not having a great eye, right and This
18:30
is something I realized even with Josh Hamilton
18:32
at the time Who
18:34
has this same sort of sort of chasing? Mentality
18:39
very aggressive mentality is
18:41
that it you if you if
18:44
you? Like
18:46
contact rates are such that they're
18:48
almost always above 30%
18:51
right so
18:53
like You you
18:56
could just keep swinging you could you
18:58
basically make contact before you strike out?
19:02
and it seems like Tovar has
19:04
become even more aggressive this spring this
19:07
spring he has a 16%
19:09
a swing strike rate, which is again, just like
19:11
we've had before but somehow he only has a
19:13
22% Strike
19:15
I rate this spring and I think that's I think
19:17
he's just gonna try and be so aggressive early
19:20
in the counts and just not get to those
19:22
two strike counts and Just
19:24
try to use You
19:27
know hit tool we think of somebody that has a
19:29
16% switch swing strike rate is not having a great
19:31
hit tool But I don't know if
19:33
that's a hundred percent correct. That's swinging
19:36
miss it's
19:38
not necessarily that means he has a poor hit
19:40
tool and I think
19:44
the hit tool is the hardest thing to define so He
19:48
is definitely one of those guys that I
19:50
have very few shares of and Did
19:53
not want anywhere. I might
19:56
have one or two because you at some point you
19:58
have to just Take a guy
20:01
that might that project produce that's project value,
20:04
right? Now
20:06
I'm gonna be wrong on I think you
20:09
know, like he's that the park
20:11
is gonna be good for him and Yeah,
20:14
it's gonna be I think it's gonna be bias like and It's
20:17
gonna be really good for like four or five
20:19
years I could see that happening and then having
20:22
a sharp drop off after that So I don't
20:24
the extension thing they probably got him for
20:26
his best years. So it's it's okay But
20:30
you know his second contract is not one
20:32
I would hand out probably Right
20:34
like trying to project Where he
20:36
is today and where he'll be at the end
20:38
of this contract if you kind of put him
20:40
in the have your bias Plate discipline bucket and
20:43
say also there's less raw power and then when
20:45
you sign him if you're not
20:47
the Rockies You don't have the benefit of Coors
20:49
Field like all of those factors will be taken
20:51
into account I kind of
20:53
like Tovar where he goes in redraft though Just
20:56
because a lot of players in this
20:58
range kind of in that pick 200 overall range
21:01
are either part-time players or they have a realistic
21:04
chance of losing a share of playing time
21:06
Tovar is not gonna lose playing time
21:08
this extension just further cements that right?
21:11
So you're going to get good counting
21:13
stats because of the volume you have
21:15
power already even if you develop a lot
21:17
more 1518 home runs seen
21:19
within reach I'm just curious if he could
21:21
steal more bases some of that's getting on base more 287
21:23
OVP Doesn't exactly give
21:25
you a ton of opportunities next this spring.
21:27
Yeah, right So if you can nudge
21:29
up that OVP, maybe you can get the stolen bases to
21:32
tick up a little bit I mean, he's not a burner,
21:34
but he's not a bad runner either 69 percentile
21:36
and sprint speed So you'd think there's a
21:38
little more speed there if he's able to
21:40
create those opportunities Yeah,
21:43
and I wonder what the
21:47
Spring Leaders are like I
21:49
can't I can't get a team leader
21:51
board But I can look
21:53
at the Rockies in terms of how
21:55
many stolen bases and You
21:59
know Never before you release had
22:01
four Doyle has three Bouchard has two.
22:04
They don't seem like they're going to run crazy This
22:06
is not like the Nationals leaderboard Right
22:10
angels running a lot more this spring to
22:12
us a tweet from Scott to a pitcher
22:14
list pointing out they had become one of
22:16
the more aggressive teams this spring and oh
22:19
We look at that Jill Adele has
22:21
six Maris Nick five netto four Moniac
22:23
Hicks Soto three Yeah,
22:26
we talked about netto at some
22:28
point probably on the shortstop preview Maybe on the Angels
22:30
team preview a little bit as well. He's one of
22:32
those guys where the Projection
22:35
is just so modest, but you
22:37
could talk yourself into him being
22:39
a major exceed He kind
22:41
of goes in that same range as Tovar and I
22:43
feel similarly about netto and that's what I rather have
22:45
I mean, yeah, yeah, if I could have one of
22:47
the other I'll take the guy who whips less, you
22:50
know Has a better max
22:52
TV better Braille, right? You know, maybe
22:54
better legs so I
22:56
think it's like this little danger zone at
22:58
that position where Jeremy Pania
23:00
probably is the safest Ezekiel
23:02
Tovar might be the most Highly
23:06
most variable and then Zach Netto is sort
23:08
of like well if you want the younger
23:10
player that could get a lot better You
23:12
know who doesn't have pain is Multiple
23:15
years in the big leagues yet, but you
23:17
don't want the risk air quotes with Tovar
23:19
The netto kind of ticks both boxes and
23:21
splits the difference. No, yeah If you ranked
23:23
up on floor and ceiling, you know, you'd
23:26
have pain at the
23:28
top of floor and bottom of ceiling 100%
23:30
yeah But
23:33
I look at that entire group like I could do okay
23:35
with any one of those three guys as my middle infielder
23:38
a little peak ahead I have four
23:40
shares of Jeremy Pania and And
23:44
you know, we're gonna do some our guys
23:46
at the end here the
23:49
reasoning for me is a Lot
23:51
of those are in keeper leagues and it's
23:54
really kind of hard especially deeper keeper leagues
23:56
to acquire a Shortstop.
24:00
Like. A young shortstop. It's just like you
24:02
know, our shorts up before. During thing
24:04
in one leg was Jp Crawford. The
24:07
super this I was I'm trying
24:10
to figure it out of so
24:12
painter represented in attainable. Guy.
24:15
Arms and then I Also I think
24:17
especially the deeper and deeper you these
24:19
are Floor is underrated. You
24:21
know, To. The guy's gonna go out
24:23
there every day and place shortstop and hit
24:26
some homers and seals and bags you know,
24:28
doesn't really. Set. Hearts of
24:30
Slaughter and you know may not even
24:32
be relevant. And ten teamers and even
24:34
a by twelve team or. Ah,
24:37
where I have six shortstops. For some
24:39
reason. Ah, I've somehow kept on a
24:41
painting of Dame That my be where
24:44
I've been. I've made a mistake. It's
24:47
kinda like that old added to the gets
24:49
college football specimen a sale to get two
24:51
quarterbacks he might not have one right student
24:53
secure our whole I'm league. That
24:55
want to have audio crusoe? I I feel
24:57
I feel guy you have one. The problem
24:59
is you played deeper leagues and you've convinced
25:01
yourself at the other guys are all worth
25:04
holding onto because it everyday get right on
25:06
earth. I thought I'd twelve team bad said
25:08
I'm looking at the lights Do duties have
25:10
these guys here? Could he be happy? If
25:12
you have him and twenty team or a
25:14
as a tough toggle. Can
25:18
Tovar qualify as a load and player? Can I
25:20
start to like Tovar Because no one else really
25:22
does. I mean it to me. He's definitely though
25:24
there have there are people who like him. Now
25:27
I think he he qualifies for for raids
25:29
and barrels is loaded. Player is least proof
25:31
for you vs me he's out. you can
25:33
have tovar out. I don't care how terrible
25:35
toll vox with get suitable. The news and
25:38
notes: The Corey Seager and Josh Young expected
25:40
to be in the Rangers opening day lineups.
25:42
Pretty good news for the Rangers. I think
25:44
there was a nice discount on Corey Seager
25:46
for a little while during draft season. If
25:48
you haven't drafted yet, going to squeeze one
25:51
in here before opening day in some lexi
25:53
draft the weekend of opening day because they
25:55
play and. Longstanding. Leagues they
25:57
get together and he did get a few more themes
25:59
ending. Thing to think about like yeah, what about the
26:01
early drafts the early drafts all I got him I can't
26:04
take a horse here. He's hurt. He's hurt. How would I
26:06
drop a guy who's hurt right now? You know Well,
26:09
it seems like he is back from that sports hernia
26:11
and going having God, you know, it's like kind of
26:13
a similar deal Mm-hmm. Oh, did
26:15
I jump ahead on the run down? I'm on
26:17
the run down. No, he's there. There is
26:20
areas Shoulder could avoid IELTS
26:22
then I don't know what to learn
26:24
from it though because I you know It
26:26
is I kind of agree. You don't
26:28
really want to Buy injured
26:31
players. You don't want to buy
26:33
pictures with bad shoulders in March So
26:37
I wouldn't I wouldn't necessarily tell you
26:39
like oh You
26:41
know every time this is, you know something like
26:43
this you should you should buy I
26:47
would say That maybe
26:49
there's just a moment in every draft
26:51
where you say screw it. He's
26:54
fallen too far. I'm gonna take him That's
26:56
what I think it comes back to and there's
26:59
a few other players in this group I mean,
27:01
she's Yuri Perez Like we lived in some
27:03
uncertainty for what felt like at least a
27:05
week or so where he had the elbow
27:08
injury Everyone was so sad and seemed like
27:10
definitely Tommy John coming right and they diagnosed
27:12
them with elbow inflammation No
27:14
surgery needed at least not at this time
27:16
Which if you're buying that diagnosis
27:18
if you trust that that's all it really
27:20
is and he started playing catch over the
27:22
weekend then he's probably back
27:24
in a month or so like and that's sort
27:27
of in line for him to just be a
27:29
Regular starter the rest of the way without a
27:32
lot of restrictions. Obviously if he feels something in
27:34
his elbow He'll shut back death
27:36
again, but I'm kind of
27:38
cautiously Optimistic with Yuri at this
27:40
point just based on how things have progressed over
27:42
the last week or so Where
27:44
does that put Max Meyer? I've had a
27:47
lot of questions about Max Meyer, you know
27:49
Jared Jones made the opening day roster for
27:51
Pittsburgh And
27:54
you know, so there's a lot of people and
27:56
then Jordan Hicks had this 10 strikeout
27:58
game It
28:00
was against the A's. I do have to point out it
28:02
was the A's. Was it their A
28:04
lineup or their B lineup? It
28:06
doesn't matter. It doesn't matter.
28:10
And so I've had some questions, oh, I want to get
28:13
Jared Jones. Do I drop this? Oh, and
28:15
so those are kind of three of the
28:17
hottest names is Max Myers, Jared Jones, and
28:19
Jordan Hicks in the 12-team atmosphere. And
28:24
I would say, so I
28:26
ask you, Derek Van
28:28
Riper, what
28:32
happens when Braxton Garrett and Yuri Perez are healthy?
28:34
What happens to Max Meyer? Well,
28:36
Meyer's workload is going to be
28:39
managed pretty carefully anyway. But
28:42
if we assume that everybody else
28:45
in that rotation is healthy. Did
28:48
Edward Cabrera have a similar situation to Yuri
28:50
Perez where it's like, it sounded bad at
28:52
first, it is shoulder versus elbow. Which
28:55
isn't that bad. An impingement. Who
29:00
had the impingement? Same
29:02
to Klana Han had the impingement. But
29:07
you could have the impingement and come back in
29:09
a month or six weeks and then tear your
29:11
elbow completely unrelated to the impingement. It was the
29:14
next year, I think he'd tear the elbow. Yeah,
29:16
that's sort of, that's what it seemed like in
29:18
the Klana Han example. It's
29:20
just the always having that risk of being a
29:22
pitcher. What do I think is going
29:24
to happen? Well, Luzardo obviously is in as long as
29:26
he's healthy. Yuri in the rotation as long as he's
29:29
healthy. Maybe they'd be careful with
29:31
Puck too. Like would
29:33
they give Puck a temporary break from starting?
29:36
Like I just think they're probably using
29:39
a six-man rotation once they get
29:41
everybody available. So it's
29:43
Luzardo, it's Perez, it's Garrett, those
29:45
are your first three. If you
29:47
keep Puck in, that's four. Cabrera,
29:49
Rogers, you'd bump Meyer as the odd man
29:51
out. I just assume one of those six
29:53
that I named before Meyer is probably going
29:55
to be banged up at any given time.
29:58
Like the odds of all of them being healthy. the head
30:00
of them seem pretty low and then in the
30:02
unlikely event that it happens you just bump one
30:04
guy in the long relief for a little while
30:06
because you got to manage their innings then they're
30:08
stretched out enough to quickly bump back into the
30:10
rotation without much difficulty and
30:12
they may just play help
30:15
permitting a schedule based game with
30:17
that group and give everybody a little bit of a
30:19
run in the bullpen to take a
30:21
few innings off. My answer to
30:24
that question was that Meyer
30:26
has better command and
30:29
Jones and Hicks have better stuff but
30:32
to be a starting pitcher I
30:34
do think command is important
30:36
even if we can't necessarily lock
30:38
this down. We talked about this
30:40
a little bit in New York.
30:45
When we're talking about starting pitching it's not
30:47
just success. It's success as a starting pitcher.
30:50
We know that Jared Jones, Jordan Hicks and
30:52
Max Meyer could all be closers. We
30:56
know that. I think we could say that.
30:58
We know that. Do we
31:00
know who's going to be a starter, who's going to be
31:02
a successful starter? I think Max
31:04
Meyer's command puts them a little bit
31:06
ahead in terms of that
31:08
likelihood. The
31:11
innings are a big question but maybe in a 12-teamer
31:13
you don't care about innings over the whole season. You're
31:15
just like, who's the better one right
31:17
now? I
31:19
don't know. I can drop these guys and
31:21
get somebody off the waiver later if they get managed.
31:25
I kind of put Hicks and
31:28
Jones together as wildish guys with
31:30
great stuff. All
31:32
three of these guys are likely
31:35
to get 90 to 100 innings this year. The
31:37
shape of the innings could be a little bit tricky with
31:40
all of them but they're all getting the chance right now.
31:42
I think you do have to play present
31:44
over future when you get to that point when
31:46
the season starts and you can run waivers. It
31:49
does feel like you're the meme. You're holding
31:51
hands with one person and checking out someone
31:53
else. That's
31:56
what the bottom of your roster is
31:58
every single year. Oh, I'm holding
32:01
hands. Oh, we just finished
32:03
off Jared Owens. Oh, Luis Hughes. Right.
32:05
You can't have all of these pictures
32:07
on your roster. I had a few
32:09
leagues that ran fab on Sunday night
32:11
and I barely bid because I happened
32:14
to guess right on a whole bunch of
32:16
different roster like job battles and different things
32:18
where I looked and I said, is there
32:20
a clear upgrade? Even though a
32:23
bunch of stuff has happened, some of these leagues drafted a month
32:25
ago. Most of mine were just swapping
32:27
out injured guys. Yeah, it was just, has anyone hurt?
32:30
Who can I pick up and then do I want to spend 10% of
32:33
my budget on something I don't need? I just made a
32:35
bunch of low bids and scooped up
32:37
a whole bunch of shares of
32:39
Brock Stewart and Trevor McGill. Yeah,
32:42
the hardest decision for me was I had
32:44
James MacArthur and was staring at Brock Stewart
32:46
and McGill. And so what I ended up
32:48
doing is just low bids on
32:50
Stewart and McGill because I knew that worst
32:53
case scenario, I still have MacArthur. In
32:56
the places I was most at first steals, for saves,
32:58
I tried to get Stewart and McGill on
33:04
alongside MacArthur. But
33:06
again, I bid like 12 bucks
33:08
each on those guys and just
33:10
tried to get lucky on a cheap
33:13
one. But yeah,
33:15
Luis Hill, I'm going to put
33:17
him behind Jones and Hicks in
33:19
this weird grouping of players
33:21
that I've put together just from
33:24
DMs and discord questions and stuff.
33:28
But they're hot names. The reason I want
33:30
to put Hill just behind Jones is that
33:33
I think they're mostly fastball slider guys. Heel's
33:35
change up is better than Jones' third pitch.
33:38
However, Jones' milieu
33:42
is way better. His park
33:44
is way better. His opponents are
33:46
going to be worse. I
33:48
think Jones is just more set up for success
33:51
right away. We could watch one start
33:53
of Hill and I'll feel like an idiot. Maybe
33:55
he'll just dominate. But yeah,
33:58
it's a tough park and it's a tough
34:00
division. He's going up against the Red Sox
34:02
offense, the Blue Jays offense, the Orioles offense,
34:04
you know. I don't think
34:06
that, you know, Jared Jones has the same problems.
34:09
I think there's a lot about
34:11
Heels profile that reminds me of
34:13
Hicks mostly when you see big-time
34:15
K-rates next to problematic
34:17
walk rates and
34:20
you say, okay, well there have been some
34:22
health issues. There's been a more consistent you're
34:25
a starter in the eyes of the
34:27
organization role where, you know, Heels appearances
34:29
outside of, geez, I
34:31
don't, has he had any relief appearances? I
34:33
think he had a couple spring appearances that
34:35
weren't starts but that's just because that's how
34:37
your innings show up over the course of
34:39
the year. There's only been a handful of
34:42
times the Yankees have used him as
34:44
a non-starter across all of his
34:46
time in their organization so they
34:48
at least see him as someone that is
34:50
worth trying to stretch out. The
34:53
K's should be there, the floor looks nice, I
34:55
do think the park makes things difficult but
34:57
yeah. You also take a look at a small
35:00
sample of a lower walk rate than he's ever
35:02
posted from what he did this spring
35:04
and you start to get a little bit optimistic.
35:06
So if I can learn Jones's walk rate went the
35:08
other direction and went back, back up. Yeah,
35:10
I think if I have Hicks
35:13
on my roster and I've got him a
35:15
couple places already and I'm looking at Jones
35:17
and Heel and Meyer, is there a clear
35:19
upgrade there? Probably not. Would I consider doing
35:21
the thing where I bid very low on
35:24
all three of the other more exciting options?
35:27
I probably would because I think
35:30
Max Meyer is the guy I actually want of the
35:32
group. I'm not worried about the
35:34
other Marlon starters all getting healthy. I think if
35:36
Meyer pitches well he could make
35:39
his case and keep a spot anyway, they
35:41
could trade pitching that's always an option for
35:43
them too. Whereas Heel has you know Will
35:45
Warren potentially looking over his shoulder. Eventually
35:48
Garrett Cole should be back in the fold and by
35:50
the way I had a draft last night, 260 budget,
35:53
15 team league, Garrett
35:55
Cole went for seven bucks. Is
35:58
that a risk worth taking at this point? Yes,
36:00
good cuz I got him I Didn't
36:06
have any plan of going in and adding Garrett
36:08
Cole on that team I'm like seven bucks for
36:11
four months of Garrett Cole. Yeah, I could figure
36:13
that out But
36:16
I think I'm Meyer Like
36:19
a Meyer Jones heel
36:21
in terms of long-term value
36:23
short-term value Good
36:26
luck I mean there's just so little that separates them
36:28
For me in the short term that I would have
36:31
very similar bids on all of them if I was
36:33
trying to replace someone that Was just
36:35
similar but not quite as exciting and Hicks is
36:37
pretty darn exciting even throwing out what he did
36:39
on Monday night We
36:42
have some we have some spring stuff
36:44
just to bring that into the mix
36:46
Max Myers slider 133
36:48
stuff plus great Max Myers forcing
36:50
fast all 83 stuff plus Change
36:54
up 71 so he's definitely one of these guys
36:56
who's gonna be pitching off of the slider However,
36:59
there's plenty of people who
37:01
have taken this package and run with it I
37:04
mean, it's a British is a guy who comes
37:06
to mind plus you've got the nice
37:08
really nice home park That
37:11
you can fall back on Luis
37:14
heel forcing fast all 149 stuff plus Slider
37:18
115 change of 108. This is the thing I saw 87
37:20
location plus on that change up And
37:25
so he tries to use
37:27
it as a freeze pitch because he's
37:29
very north-south With his rest
37:31
of his stuff and the change of his a power
37:33
sideways And so I think batters
37:35
mostly say I'm not gonna swing at this He
37:38
almost hit Trey Turner in the face with a 90 mile an
37:40
hour change up So he does not have
37:42
good command of that But when when
37:44
he does if he can just throw it in his
37:46
own, he'll get called strikes that line I
37:49
just a seven location plus meets my eye
37:51
test. I was like he cannot command that
37:53
pitch So then he becomes this
37:55
two pitch pitcher Why does he have high walk rates
37:57
and a lot of games start in the minor leagues?
38:00
because he's probably working on that change up. I
38:03
think he can man the other two pitches. Who
38:06
else do we have here? Hicks, I don't know
38:08
that I need to break this out. Yeah, Hicks,
38:10
we have an established situation where it's great
38:12
stuff numbers on all its pitches, even the splitter and
38:16
in poor location numbers. And then
38:18
Jared Jones, Jared Jones and Heel
38:21
actually were tied in stuff plus and
38:23
like at third and fourth among track
38:25
pitchers in the major leagues in spring
38:27
training. Jared Jones 148 stuff
38:30
plus on the fourth team, 123 on the cutter, 121 on the slider,
38:35
and 98 on the curve ball. If
38:37
he really does have four distinct pitches like that,
38:40
then I think long
38:42
terms, I want Jones. I
38:44
think there's arguments to be made for
38:47
anybody in that group because they're all
38:49
interesting for slightly different reasons. The
38:52
other guy that's not part of that conversation now,
38:54
but could be part of a conversation like this
38:56
in the future is Paul Skeens, because he's gonna
38:58
start the season at Triple A. Bailey
39:00
Falter, I believe, has a spot in the rotation
39:03
for the Pirates right now. That
39:05
would be the, who
39:07
could cough up a spot for Paul
39:09
Skeens? I think Bailey Falter would be
39:12
my first choice of like most likely to be shifted into
39:15
more of a long relief rule. Because Contreras
39:18
and Luis Ortiz,
39:20
interestingly, guys who have popped in stuff
39:22
plus in the past, but Contreras
39:24
couldn't keep his fastball shape. Ortiz
39:27
couldn't command it, look
39:29
like they're in the bullpen. Ortiz could
39:31
come back out of it, I think easier than Contreras.
39:35
But they've also got Quinn Priester, and
39:38
they even signed Domingo-Hermont. So there's other
39:41
options that Bailey Falter hold on
39:44
that position seems like
39:46
it could falter quickly. Yeah, nice
39:49
first start of the season too for Jared
39:51
Jones. I think he gets the Marlins during
39:53
the opening weekend. So probably has some streaming
39:55
appeal even in some of those more shadow
39:57
leagues out there that have first-hand, first-hand, first-hand.
40:00
First served moves some
40:02
other injuries to get to how about Paul Seawall
40:04
the grade two oblique strain So we're right back
40:06
to where we were You know this time last
40:08
year looking at this Arizona bullpen and trying to
40:11
figure out who actually is the
40:13
likely Candidate for most
40:15
saves names include Kevin
40:17
ginkle Ryan Thompson Scott
40:19
McGuff Maybe there's other
40:22
sleepers in there. I think it's gotta be a
40:24
ginkle Thompson you've got
40:26
that that The very
40:28
few closers have had that arm
40:30
slot Yeah, you know real
40:32
low and if it leads
40:34
to platoon splits It's it's not a power
40:36
pitcher people want a power pitcher. Kevin ginkle
40:38
was a power pitcher I mean
40:40
Justin Martinez, I think he got sent
40:42
down Yeah,
40:45
really good stuff but look very very low
40:47
grades on the command right now Yeah, they
40:50
they optioned him they option him on the
40:52
10th of March. So he wasn't even hanging
40:55
around for long so
40:58
It's ginkle for me Maybe Martinez comes
41:00
up for the roster slot and becomes part
41:02
of that bullpen But I you know that
41:05
I guess they can't depend on his command
41:07
in the night That's
41:09
getting cool for me. Are you ready to
41:11
throw? 1520 plus
41:13
percent here budget at Kevin ginkle like doesn't that
41:16
that drive you a little bit nuts when it comes
41:18
to fantasy baseball Where you have this
41:20
player that you outside of like NL only leagues
41:22
or draft and hold you you wouldn't have stashed
41:24
away Because Paul see you all the pretty solid
41:26
closer See you all gets hurt and
41:28
all of a sudden. Nope. There goes 20% of
41:31
my fab budget if I need saves like that's I don't
41:33
know. It's something about that's frustrating. I've just never
41:35
I've never I won't do it even
41:38
10% I Like
41:41
I said, I I put you
41:43
know $15 out of a thousand on
41:46
Brock Stewart What I
41:48
want to do is get that guy a week
41:50
early. Yeah, you know So
41:54
I tend to have I tend to
41:56
just dedicate one dense slot to prospecting
42:00
on saves so that I can spend $15 rather
42:02
than $200. I
42:04
don't ever want to spend $200. You could spend $200 on
42:06
Ginkle, get four saves, and
42:09
then Seawall's back. I mean,
42:11
with a grade two oblique strain, the window's a
42:13
little bit longer, but it's still a situation where
42:15
Seawall should be the guy once he gets back.
42:18
That hopefully will temper the biz a little bit
42:20
on Ginkle. But I'm with you. I think Ginkle
42:22
is the clear cut next option up for
42:25
the Dbacks. Jordan Romano is likely
42:27
to begin the season on the IEL with
42:29
what they're calling elbow inflammation. So similar to
42:31
the Yuri Perez diagnosis in that, it doesn't
42:33
seem like there's a structural problem in play
42:35
here. And given that he's
42:37
a veteran reliever as opposed to a very
42:40
young future ace, maybe
42:43
there's a quicker return for
42:45
Romano. The other problem for the Jays
42:47
in the short term, though, is Eric
42:49
Swanson, who might be the next option
42:51
up ordinarily, is down with a forearm
42:53
injury right now. So is it Yemi
42:55
Garcia, Chad Green, or somebody else that
42:57
you're looking at as a short term
42:59
replacement for Romano in Toronto? I
43:02
was talking to a Blue Jays coach,
43:04
and I think it's Yemi,
43:08
really. Yes.
43:12
Don't trust me. I'll
43:15
call him Garcia for now. Garcia
43:19
has had a good spring. Stuff-wise,
43:21
I really like Chad Green, and
43:24
I think he could do the job. I
43:27
think that we are all humans,
43:29
though, and you're
43:31
going to look at that 7-8 ERA for Chad
43:33
Green and
43:36
be influenced by it, even if you think his stuff is
43:38
good. So I'm
43:40
thinking Green is the setup guy, and
43:43
Garcia is the closer. I think there's even been
43:45
some comments to that effect. Yeah, it
43:47
does seem like Garcia has the inside track. On
43:51
a personal note, I think Igariega is
43:53
the most ridiculous letter in the alphabet
43:55
in Spanish. It's just the letter Y,
43:57
but it doesn't appear in a
43:59
lot of words. You know stand
44:01
alone. It means and like there's just there's a
44:03
lot going on there So I
44:05
need to go take another Spanish class and
44:07
wasn't there even some discussion with Jordan Alvarez
44:10
is actually Jordan Alvarez I remember that beginning
44:12
his career and everyone's still calling him your
44:14
Don. So I don't know Take
44:17
a lot of Spanish. No one ever told me to pronounce
44:19
wise like J's Yeah, but
44:21
it was like regional differences. There's right Rico.
44:24
There's Cuba Again,
44:26
maybe didn't take enough years of Spanish needs
44:28
maybe more So they
44:30
didn't have a poor degree. I don't know
44:33
now. I've got it. We got to dig in even further
44:36
Some other news Brian Wu will begin
44:39
the year on the aisle with elbow
44:41
inflammation news came down Like
44:44
I was clicking Brian I
44:46
clicked Brian Wu to pick him and then some of the
44:48
chat goes you didn't see the news And
44:50
I click over to see the news and I was
44:52
like that news came in like a minute
44:55
ago you Like
44:58
you saw this news so you have like Big
45:01
trade forces something open watch draft man I
45:04
should have but I was trying to draft
45:06
from a little league baseball game. So sorry
45:08
I know I didn't see the news dang
45:10
it limited screen resources drafting from a game
45:13
like that Came right
45:15
after I took verlander where I was like, he's
45:17
an injury stash. We got unlimited. I know it's
45:19
perfect Yeah injury
45:21
guy injury guy nice Later
45:24
I took the Grom just to just to throw it
45:26
all in there Might as well if
45:28
you got the spots to stash them away With
45:31
Wu the good news here is they did
45:33
have him go through an MRI it came
45:35
back clean They're hoping seven to ten days
45:37
of rest. He'll start throwing again. So Emerson
45:39
Hancock steps in for now, but it may
45:41
be April or even
45:43
just part of April before Wu was back
45:45
in the equation for Seattle Yeah,
45:48
I'm hoping you know when I was doing
45:50
my main event draft Which
45:53
I just completed we kind
45:55
of had pitchers in two buckets one was
45:57
missus a month Where
45:59
it's just a little bit harder to like hold
46:01
them and think about them and maybe it's gonna
46:03
get worse you know and misses a couple weeks
46:06
and we we had a little bit of distinction
46:08
there I I think we was
46:10
on that side closer to the couple of weeks
46:12
than the full month yeah based on we know
46:14
right now I would agree with
46:16
that assessment circling back to
46:18
the Diamondbacks Eduardo Rodriguez has a lat
46:20
injury so he was placed on the
46:23
aisle that opened up a spot for
46:25
both Ryan Nelson and Tommy Henry to
46:27
begin the season the more I look
46:29
at that bullpen or that rotation the
46:32
more I think Ryan Nelson's probably the
46:34
permanent fifth starter once erod comes back
46:37
because it was sort of announced that Henry
46:39
was in because of the Eduardo Rodriguez right
46:41
which sort of assumes that Nelson's in already
46:45
and the lat strains are this is
46:47
a this is difficult for a lot of reasons
46:49
one is that it
46:51
sounds like back but it's really kind
46:54
of part of the shoulder apparatus like
46:57
it's really it's all tied together it's you know
46:59
it's it's hard to be like oh this is
47:01
a very distinct injury but
47:04
also and whatnot yeah exactly but also
47:06
it's an actual injury was we just
47:08
talked with that who and
47:10
Cabrera impingement is close
47:14
but you know some of these inflammations are
47:17
are less likely to be an
47:19
actual injury they may turn into an injury or they may
47:21
be hiding an injury sometimes you do a scan if you
47:23
have the information we heard learn this a little bit we
47:26
were talking about this whichever may which is like if
47:28
you have swelling if you have inflammation sometimes you don't catch
47:31
the actual injury so it could turn
47:33
out that some of these inflammations or
47:35
injuries but I will take inflammation over
47:38
an actual strain so if
47:40
I had Eduardo Rodriguez and there were options
47:42
out there on the wire and it wasn't
47:44
a Kiever League I've
47:46
already been the low man but I would just
47:48
drop Eduardo Rodriguez that's
47:50
the easy way to go in
47:52
shallow leagues deeper leagues a little
47:54
tougher again a 15-teamer he's is
47:57
he good enough to hold on to like he's right on
47:59
that borderline for me. I wouldn't,
48:01
I think I have a great 60th,
48:04
so I feel like he's pretty close to the
48:06
streaming line anyway. Yeah, if he's that close to
48:08
the streaming line for you when healthy, then I
48:10
think it's an easier drop for you. I think
48:12
I'm a little higher on E-Rod, but tough
48:15
call to make for sure. A
48:17
few more news and notes here. Jackson Holiday
48:19
falls short of the Orioles opening day roster.
48:21
It seems like he was heating up as
48:23
the camp went along as well, but the
48:25
question for most people is, how long do
48:28
you think we're going to have to stash
48:30
Jackson Holiday in redraft leagues before he breaks
48:32
through with the Orioles? I
48:35
believe that the kind of
48:38
Super 2 area,
48:41
like the extra year of team
48:43
control, whatever, is May
48:45
25th for
48:48
players who don't have any time. So
48:52
he could be magically ready in late May.
48:56
There was a 30% strikeout rate this spring
48:58
that was pretty surprising to everybody because it
49:00
came with a 19% whiff rate where he
49:03
had 8s and 9s before. So
49:06
I'm sure that was part of the
49:08
sort of surprising underlying numbers that they
49:12
just wanted to see him go back to AA
49:14
or go back to AAA and mash again. There's
49:19
also the question of who's
49:22
he replacing? So if
49:24
Westburg's playing fine, then
49:27
what's the deal? What do you need to pick him up
49:29
for? I guess you're
49:31
playing Ureas at third. Yeah.
49:35
It's just not that high of a bar. I think
49:37
if he goes to AAA, mashes for
49:39
a couple of weeks, gets the K rate down,
49:41
they could say, let's just go for
49:43
the rookie of the year award. Let's go for
49:46
that draft pick compensation and play it that way.
49:48
Oh, I had somebody point out this. This is
49:50
interesting. On holiday, I
49:52
don't know that you're going to platoon him, but he
49:54
is a lefty batter and there's a weird twist of
49:56
the schedule. I think the ores start
49:59
with like four. lefties in the first five or
50:01
six games. So,
50:03
uh, it's possible that you just
50:05
would want this guy to hit the ground
50:08
running and not, you know, Hey,
50:10
opening day, you've got five lefties in a
50:12
row. That's fair.
50:14
Yeah. And I think with where he was
50:16
going in read draft, I think you, you
50:18
knew this was a possible outcome and you
50:20
probably had a fixed number of lineup periods
50:22
that you hoped you'd be able
50:24
to stash him for, I would guess
50:26
the month for most people, if it's not up
50:28
by the end of April and you don't have enough
50:30
bench. You're not going to wait all the way to May 25th.
50:33
I don't think so. I mean, most likely your roster is
50:35
not going to hold out. They
50:38
take time to hold shape that long. Worked
50:40
that way. Um, they did put Colton couser
50:42
on the opening day roster. He had a
50:44
huge spring. The playing time questions in
50:47
the outfield or are just as interesting as what we've
50:49
seen in the outfield and with couser, he's a lefty
50:51
in an outfield that has a few
50:53
different options between, you know, Mullins being the center
50:55
fielder. Sontagner being a switch hitter
50:58
and Austin Hayes being a
51:00
righty, like that looks like the best
51:02
path is wrestling playing time away from
51:04
Hayes. And then of course, you know,
51:06
pushing someone else into the DH mix
51:08
along with Ryan Mountcastle, but between
51:10
O'Hern and Mountcastle at first base in DH.
51:12
That's the other spot you could look at
51:15
and say something could give with one of
51:17
those guys, you shift everybody around a little
51:19
bit and suddenly Colton couser ends up with
51:21
a spot to call his own. So another
51:23
kind of fluid aspect of what the Orioles
51:25
have right now. Yeah.
51:28
Uh, jumping ahead again to
51:30
my player shares, Cedric Mullins,
51:32
I have five shares and
51:35
I've, I've got, uh, an
51:37
ongoing conversation, uh, with
51:39
somebody in my, in my DMS about,
51:42
uh, we've got a beer riding on
51:44
it now. I
51:47
use the reason, my reasoning for taking him
51:49
is he's, uh, usually available after pick one
51:52
50. Um, so
51:54
I usually get him in the 10th, 11th,
51:56
12th rounds. And he represents to me, a
51:58
guy, uh, who should hit. at least 15
52:00
homers and steal 30 bags. So,
52:02
you know, I pick 150 makes a lot of sense.
52:06
His line of reasoning is they're playing
52:08
Kouser in center. He's not
52:10
a platoon fit with Mullens cause they're both
52:12
lefties and his defense is not
52:14
as good as Mullens. So I think
52:17
the Kouser in center was just, can we play
52:20
him there sometimes? And
52:22
maybe they play him against lefties over
52:25
Mullens cause he's just a
52:27
little bit better against lefties than Mullens. I
52:31
still think Mullens is at least getting two thirds
52:33
and I think center field is a place you'd
52:35
rather just stick someone all the time. So
52:38
I'm also looking at this roster and saying,
52:40
you know, who is the guy, is there
52:42
somebody here that they're trying to sneak into
52:44
the organization? This is something that like Farhan
52:46
does where somebody makes the opening
52:49
day roster and then gets cut like two
52:51
weeks into the season because it's easier to
52:53
sneak someone through waivers once
52:55
the rosters are set and all the
52:57
other teams are like, no, I've got my roster. Do
53:00
I really want Nevan? I might've liked Nevan two
53:02
weeks ago but I made a decision
53:05
from this guy. So to me, it's maybe Tyler Nevan
53:08
cause I was looking, did Nick Mayton make this roster? No.
53:11
And who is the bottom
53:13
guy on this roster that made it? And
53:15
it's Tyler Nevan for me. Yeah, I think
53:18
it's Nevan and then Matteo. But
53:22
Rios and Matteo have like real
53:24
solid use cases. Yeah,
53:27
I think Rios' use case is better
53:29
for this roster. But
53:32
Matteo is infield-outfield. Right.
53:36
Which is really useful. So Tyler
53:38
Nevan is just a backup first baseman, Thursday's
53:40
an outfielder. That's
53:42
the Jackson holiday spot because you can play
53:44
Jackson at second where he was
53:46
playing all spring and play Westburg and Uris at third.
53:50
It's gonna work itself out. I'm pretty confident we're
53:52
still gonna see the guys that we wanna see
53:54
in Baltimore for most of the season even though
53:56
we're gonna wait just a little bit longer for
53:58
Jackson holiday to get that opportunity. We
54:00
may have a late shift in St. Louis as a
54:02
result of the collision in the outfield. I happen to
54:04
be watching this game on Monday afternoon. Jordan
54:07
Walker and Dylan Carlson conversed on the ball
54:09
in the gap. And kind of at the
54:11
last minute Walker tried to dive out of
54:13
the way and kind of went low on
54:15
Dylan Carlson. Carlson hurt his shoulder. I haven't
54:17
seen any follow ups yet as far as
54:20
whether or not there's structural damage. But if
54:22
Carlson were to miss time, they may have to
54:24
turn to Victor Scott earlier than they anticipated in
54:26
St. Louis. Yeah, I
54:28
saw some early bids, speculating on that. Victor Scott
54:30
is a burner, 105 steals across all the levels
54:32
last year or something like that.
54:37
He's a son of
54:39
sprinters. He was
54:41
telling me a cool thing about how his
54:43
dad used to hold an iron pole out
54:45
15 yards away
54:47
from him and tell him to sprint. And
54:52
he held it out so that he had to go under it. Because
54:55
it's good to stay low at first when you sprint
54:57
and then come up high and not just like come
54:59
up high right away. So he had
55:01
this like whole dad with the iron
55:03
pole that I thought was interesting. But
55:06
yeah, no, I think he's really
55:09
interesting. I think he has non-zero
55:11
power. So I think he's 10 to 15 homers, 50, 60
55:15
steals if you gave him a full year. Obviously
55:19
for me, the best defensive center fielder
55:21
that they have as an option. Yeah,
55:24
it'd be a tough break for Carlson if he
55:27
loses this job while he's hurt. But
55:29
at least it's a possibility because Scott
55:32
really looks like the future in center field
55:34
for the Cardinals. Matt
55:36
McLean dealing with a shoulder injury, still not
55:38
sure what the result of his examination on
55:41
Monday will reveal, but just another
55:43
problem. It's so bad because the
55:45
bad words were uttered, surgery
55:48
is on the table. Yeah. So
55:50
this one, he's been dropping to a bench
55:52
pick where people are like, well, I'll drop
55:54
him if he has surgery. Yeah,
55:56
it kind of feels like that's the direction. That
55:58
story is headed. Garrett Mitchell
56:00
injury could actually open up more
56:02
time gonna lead off. Yeah,
56:05
it's gonna make the team So
56:08
Brewer's Twitter is still kind of in
56:10
me how good is Garrett Mitchell phase
56:12
Which is fair because it's
56:14
been a limited sample. He's been productive with
56:17
a really high k-rate That doesn't quite seem
56:19
like who he is the player Now
56:22
with Mitchell having a fractured left hand that's
56:24
gonna be a For
56:26
the six-week injury you're
56:28
probably gonna see Sal Freelik go back from the
56:30
dirt To center field and then
56:33
you see more Joey or T's at third
56:35
base That would be my my guess as
56:37
to like what the most common adjustment would
56:39
be roster Mitchell injury wemer comes back up
56:42
Yeah, wemer would be the extra outfielder
56:45
if they need another center fielder on
56:47
the roster. Yeah, but we were
56:49
wouldn't play much in that
56:51
configuration because of handedness
56:54
Right. Yeah, it'd be like mostly small side platoon.
56:56
I don't even know how much they're gonna sit Freelik against
56:58
lefties I think they're gonna let free look play against lefties,
57:01
but they were trying to get him in the lineup Yeah,
57:04
and I think with Freelik I think he makes a
57:06
lot more sense to me as a table setter in
57:08
the one spot than he did in the heart of
57:10
the Order last year where they were hitting him after
57:12
they brought him up. Oh, yeah
57:14
I mean, he's the contact guy
57:16
without much power high OBP speed
57:18
occasional power fits really well I
57:20
think at the top of
57:22
that lineup that appears to be the fallout of
57:24
the Garrett Mitchell injury We didn't get a chance
57:26
to talk about this yet either J.D. Martinez has
57:29
joined the Mets on a one-year deal and that
57:31
looks like it was the reason why Mark Vientos
57:33
has been optioned back to triple-a to start the
57:35
season it's awesome tweet that was like There
57:39
was like it showed a picture of the
57:41
Antos and J.D. Martinez talking to cage and
57:43
then underneath it said You
57:45
know J.D. Martinez Sorry for taking
57:48
your job kid and then the Antos
57:50
saying back. Well, you know, they
57:52
you know, it hasn't been determined You know,
57:54
you know, we'll see what happens and then
57:56
Jason Martinez says sorry for taking your job
58:02
Let me be a bummer to have a spot
58:05
that you think is going to be yours all
58:07
spring in the last 10 days, last week a
58:09
veteran comes in and you just know crap that
58:11
is. It's a lot of playing time that just
58:14
got chewed up by a signing where JD is
58:16
probably going to hit cleanup in this lineup. So
58:18
if there was a late draft season drop in
58:20
terms of where he was going, that
58:23
probably gets corrected over the last week. He's also not expected
58:25
to be ready for opening day. It's going to take a
58:27
little more time to get ready, but not
58:30
long after opening day, JD Martinez probably
58:32
hitting behind Pita Lanzo for the Mets.
58:35
And JD Martinez took the job, the
58:37
offer from the Mets over the
58:40
Giants. Both
58:42
of them have pitching friendly parks and
58:46
somebody was pointing out that the
58:49
different park factors and such and such.
58:51
But the one thing about park factors that
58:53
doesn't quite capture it all, and this is
58:55
something that players have actually literally asked me
58:57
to model for them, which isn't quite out
59:00
in the space. So if you want an
59:02
idea that isn't quite out there, is
59:05
more granular park factors. I
59:07
think I've seen some stuff about like sort of
59:09
center right or whatever, but like
59:12
doing a better job of like mapping expected
59:15
home runs and expected
59:18
output specifically with their
59:20
swings and their sort
59:22
of heat maps in
59:25
general, because he said specifically in the thing, particularly
59:28
those that go to right center. And
59:30
I have to say right handers that go
59:33
to right center do not fare that well
59:35
in San Francisco. That's called
59:37
triple's out. It's not
59:39
called home run now. No, and
59:41
JD Martinez isn't going to turn the double.
59:46
No, that's the downside. I mean, at this stage of his
59:49
career. If
59:51
you kind of look at his spray chart
59:53
from 2023, 11 homers were to dead center
59:55
and to right center. He had four that
59:57
were completely oppo to right. It
1:00:00
should be a little better for him at City Field than
1:00:02
it would have been in San Francisco.
1:00:04
I also think it would be a little weird
1:00:06
to have J.B. and Jorge Soler on
1:00:08
the same roster. Like, you don't want to play Jorge
1:00:10
Soler in the outfield a lot. Maybe that
1:00:12
offer is on the table for Soler. Yeah, it
1:00:15
might have been back then, but I
1:00:17
don't know. I'm okay with J.B. Martinez. He's
1:00:19
36 now. I think he's got that. Could
1:00:22
slip pretty quickly, even though the quality of
1:00:24
contact is so good. Injuries
1:00:26
have kind of been an on-again-off-again problem for him
1:00:29
too, so I'm not saying he's
1:00:31
a must-grab sort of player, but I'm
1:00:33
a little worried, especially with the K-rate jumping last
1:00:35
year. 31% K-rate's
1:00:37
a big, big leap for J.D. Martinez.
1:00:41
Could this team win a wildcard? Yes,
1:00:43
it could. All right, last
1:00:46
topic for today. Your most
1:00:48
heavily-rostered players for this season.
1:00:51
Who is important to several
1:00:53
of your teams? And before
1:00:55
we started recording, you
1:00:57
gave me a crack at the number one name on the list. I
1:01:00
think I narrowly missed, but number one is
1:01:02
not a surprise. If you listen to the
1:01:04
show, if you had three
1:01:06
guesses, I would say most of our listeners would
1:01:08
pretty confidently land it. Put a
1:01:10
name in your head now. Think for a minute. Who
1:01:13
do you think Eno's most-rostered player is so far in
1:01:15
2024? As
1:01:17
a run-up to this, I
1:01:19
just want to say that most-rostered players are interesting because
1:01:21
they are not going to be the players that you
1:01:24
necessarily think are the best. Because
1:01:27
the best players you
1:01:29
require, maybe it's a keeper league
1:01:32
situation, and Acuna's kept. I
1:01:34
obviously think Acuna is the best player in the big
1:01:36
leagues this year in terms of position players. Definitely easiest,
1:01:38
the best player. But how many times do I get
1:01:40
the first pick? That
1:01:42
actually happens to be a big deal in
1:01:44
the first 20 to 30 picks. If
1:01:48
I pick one, there's going to be picks
1:01:50
that I'm not accessible, like I can't get after
1:01:53
that. What ends up
1:01:55
happening is these lists end up telling you who
1:01:58
do you like late in a draft. That's
1:02:01
what you're doing because it's late in the
1:02:03
draft. You can jump a guy a round
1:02:05
or two off of ADP because it doesn't
1:02:07
matter as much. You know, like you're in
1:02:09
the draft taking the YOLO part of the
1:02:11
draft. So this is my
1:02:13
YOLO list and my number one is the
1:02:15
most boring player ever. It's not a YOLO
1:02:18
at all. It's Seth Lugo. Of
1:02:20
course it's Seth Lugo. And the reason
1:02:22
that he has shown up on so
1:02:24
many set places is that I
1:02:27
do take risk in my pitching staff. And
1:02:30
I see Lugo as one of the last
1:02:32
guys that is not that risky. I don't
1:02:34
think he's got great upside, but I think
1:02:37
I will start him 75% of the time
1:02:39
when I own it. I
1:02:41
think I'll start him for almost every start in Kansas
1:02:44
City and I'll start him half the time on the
1:02:46
road. And
1:02:48
a 75% starter where
1:02:50
he goes, he goes among the streamers, the 50%ers,
1:02:52
the guys that may not
1:02:55
even make the opening day roster. He
1:02:58
goes against the guys that you may drop two starts
1:03:00
in. So that's, I
1:03:02
take, okay,
1:03:04
so a couple spots down. Actually
1:03:07
next because there's a tie. So
1:03:09
I have seven shares of Seth Lugo. I
1:03:12
have five shares of Edward Cabrera. Now that
1:03:15
makes a lot more sense to
1:03:17
people being like, oh yeah, YOLO. But
1:03:21
Lugo and Cabrera are a package
1:03:23
deal. You know what I mean?
1:03:25
Lugo is the one that's going to make the
1:03:27
starts. Edward Cabrera is the one that I may
1:03:29
actually have to drop now. But
1:03:32
you know what I mean? Like it's the,
1:03:34
that's the pairing. And so Matt
1:03:36
Manning, I have five shares. That
1:03:38
one didn't work out. We'll see how long I hold on to
1:03:40
him. A lot of, and then a lot of these shares are
1:03:42
in different types of leagues. So I have Matt Manning and keeper
1:03:45
leagues where I just, I just hold on to him until he
1:03:47
comes back up. And he was,
1:03:49
he was, didn't cost anything. I'm Matt Manning and draft and
1:03:51
holds. Fine. I'm going
1:03:53
to do some innings at some point in the season. You know,
1:03:55
I'm not that worried to get sent down, but
1:03:59
Tanner Halk. He pairs with
1:04:01
Seth Lugo really well. You take a
1:04:03
Seth Lugo, you take a Tanner Hulk. You're hoping Tanner
1:04:05
Hulk is really really good
1:04:07
and you're hoping Seth Lugo just
1:04:10
stays healthy. That's the different, it's
1:04:12
like you know having different approaches.
1:04:14
So that's those are my, and then you
1:04:17
know I have what I have
1:04:20
four shares each of a
1:04:22
couple closers and it's funny
1:04:24
they're not what I think of the best closers but
1:04:26
I've been doing this thing where I take a top
1:04:28
closer and then I take a cheap closer
1:04:31
right and I take a real cheap closer. So
1:04:33
my most roaster roaster closers are
1:04:35
not the ones I think of the best
1:04:38
again but they are Robert Suarez, Hunter Harvey
1:04:40
and Carlos Estebes. Why? Because I look
1:04:42
up in the you know 20th round and
1:04:44
say which closers are left and
1:04:48
these are the ones that I actually I like them a little
1:04:50
bit. So if you want a late
1:04:52
closer Suarez Harvey and Estebes are
1:04:54
fine for me. Interesting
1:04:57
yeah I mean it makes sense like we've talked
1:04:59
about this a few different draft seasons now and
1:05:01
you end up with these later players that are
1:05:03
generally easier to get on your roster as your
1:05:05
most rostered players when you play a lot. Lugo
1:05:08
is just one that I'm happy you have them
1:05:10
as many places as you do because I know
1:05:12
sometimes you're in a room people know who you
1:05:14
like. He actually got tonight from me a couple
1:05:17
times. I could have had 10 chairs. I've got
1:05:19
like jeez four different sites I'm playing
1:05:25
on right now and I've got fewer
1:05:27
NFBC teams than usual but I got
1:05:31
four on the NFBC platform so far.
1:05:33
Luis Severino is on three and
1:05:37
I've got Severino in labor. I
1:05:39
got Severino in that auction from last night
1:05:41
like there's just he
1:05:44
is my most rostered player. I am
1:05:46
convinced and we talked about it throughout the
1:05:48
draft season that the struggles last year with
1:05:50
the Yankees were the function of tipping pitches
1:05:53
they were not the function of having really
1:05:55
lost stuff or lossy with the command
1:05:57
things and the floor
1:05:59
to me Is so much safer for
1:06:01
him at city field than it was
1:06:03
at Yankee State if you stay to Yankee I
1:06:06
would still have him in a couple places I would
1:06:08
not have him in this many places because it can
1:06:10
go so sideways when it's not
1:06:13
going well in a park like that Yeah,
1:06:16
no, I think that that's a great one. Do
1:06:18
I have a Luis Severino type picture
1:06:21
here? Oh, I have a Luis
1:06:23
Severino type. His name is Tyler O'Neill
1:06:27
Yeah, I'm kind of a similar hit her side. Yeah guy
1:06:29
that's like you own it before I mean Going
1:06:32
to a better park for his skills, you know
1:06:36
But I also I have
1:06:39
five shares of Reese Hoskins which
1:06:42
just sort of snuck up on me and I
1:06:45
think it's just because I
1:06:48
like that the projections say he's gonna be fine
1:06:51
and I'm just not that worried about that kind
1:06:53
of an injury for first baseman You know Yeah,
1:06:57
I think he's gonna roll out of bed and
1:06:59
mash again. I think it's you know another 30
1:07:02
type homers and a 250 average and I've
1:07:05
done a lot of builds where I can afford to take
1:07:07
a little hit on the batting average there and He
1:07:11
also represents a weird spot in
1:07:13
the first base rankings where he's the last one
1:07:17
that You know sort
1:07:19
of upper tier or like he's sort
1:07:21
of a tear break You know, and so
1:07:23
I end up being like well, I don't
1:07:26
really want Jamer Candelario is my
1:07:28
starting first baseman You
1:07:31
know, so I'm gonna go with Hoskins here
1:07:34
Yeah, I think that makes sense That's the
1:07:36
the last chance of a tier last chance
1:07:38
of a player type that definitely seems like
1:07:41
something good end up with a lot Cuz
1:07:43
it even if you use similar builds some
1:07:45
of those players fit multiple Foundations to the
1:07:48
do everything type players O'Neill's a little bit of
1:07:50
a do everything type So he makes sense of
1:07:52
someone you could always say this this helps me
1:07:54
rather than maybe batting average This is gonna help
1:07:56
me in all the other categories doesn't really matter
1:07:58
what I did at the start I'm
1:08:00
gonna go ahead and throw him on my roster here. I've
1:08:03
got a lot of Richie Palacios I missed out on
1:08:05
him last night because of Jason Colette not a surprise
1:08:07
Tried to sneak him through early for a dollar that
1:08:09
didn't work Had money trouble
1:08:11
as I often do in auctions spending too much
1:08:13
early I think about for the first
1:08:16
seven players for like a hundred and forty
1:08:18
bucks Yours
1:08:20
yeah That's
1:08:23
a Derek Van Riper build right
1:08:25
there. Yeah, it was the draft started at
1:08:27
bedtime build So if I get pulled away at it,
1:08:29
so I don't want there to be consequences for stepping
1:08:31
away If I got the foundation I like
1:08:33
you get all her guys on the wire Yeah,
1:08:36
I could miss five or six players, and I
1:08:38
probably wasn't gonna be on those players anyway I
1:08:41
do like playing that way and I did get
1:08:43
players I liked at prices I like it just
1:08:45
it was one of those things were like well
1:08:47
I'm aggressive here this won't be the worst time
1:08:49
to be aggressive given life factors I
1:08:51
ended up with a little bit of Starley Marte because of you
1:08:53
that's your Your four
1:08:56
four for me. Yeah, I'm more like two I
1:08:58
think two or three Across
1:09:00
all the rosters it would really help if I could like Multiple
1:09:03
I can make a spreadsheet I know how
1:09:05
but it'd be great if I could
1:09:07
just click a button and it would just be done for
1:09:10
me So I don't have to do it manually. Yeah, I
1:09:12
actually comb through all my different teams to add to my
1:09:14
it was it was not the most Scientifically
1:09:17
rigorous so I may have may
1:09:19
have lost some guys But I just sort of did
1:09:21
it by I started my days interesting to me just
1:09:23
because last year he was hurt
1:09:27
He was terrible. He's 35 and he stole 24 backs Hmm
1:09:33
in 344 played events, so it's like that's
1:09:35
a that's just a steel play for me
1:09:37
I'm just like hey, that's that's
1:09:39
the worst case scenario. I just get 25
1:09:41
bags in half a season. Yeah, man I'll
1:09:44
take it 25 bags 25 bags.
1:09:46
I need those it'll be nice Yeah,
1:09:48
you're done Alvarez on four teams. That's kind
1:09:51
of unusual That's
1:09:53
pretty high up. I think my highest up guide
1:09:55
is like that is Ellie do I cruise I
1:09:57
ended up with four shares I will say
1:09:59
two of them are keeper leagues. So
1:10:02
that means I picked them up as a prospect or
1:10:04
you know I once had a
1:10:06
birdie a whisper in my ear, and so I
1:10:08
went and picked him up as well. I think I
1:10:14
even said that on this pod at some point a
1:10:16
long time ago. So if anybody's
1:10:19
been listening for a while they know
1:10:21
that I've loved Ellie since that moment
1:10:23
because hitting the ball hard is I want
1:10:26
you to do two things. I want you to make
1:10:28
contact and I want to hit the ball hard. That's why I tell my kid. I
1:10:31
want you to do two things. I want you to make contact and
1:10:33
hit the ball hard. Play
1:10:35
split is good but you can
1:10:37
learn it over time. So Ellie's
1:10:39
my foreshare. Yordon, I would rather
1:10:41
have foreshares of Yordon, but
1:10:45
the cookie didn't crumble that way. Yeah,
1:10:47
I had a lot of late draft positions
1:10:49
over the course of draft season so far.
1:10:51
It just reminds me of 2022. That was
1:10:53
the year I had a bunch of Aaron
1:10:55
judge that year. Just I don't
1:10:57
know, like how do you not like a guy
1:10:59
that hits for average nearly 40 home runs of the
1:11:01
year before, steals a few bases, plays
1:11:04
in a great hitter friendly park, like ticked all the
1:11:06
boxes. I didn't expect the 16 steals or the 62
1:11:08
home runs, but it just
1:11:10
felt like a super safe player
1:11:13
could have one of those years where he pops. That's sort
1:11:15
of the mindset I think that
1:11:17
pushed me towards Yordon in so many of those
1:11:19
leagues. There's a statistical argument for
1:11:21
it too, which is just that home
1:11:25
runs are co-related. Co-related.
1:11:28
There's a co-correlation between home runs, runs batted
1:11:30
in, and runs. And
1:11:40
batting average really. I mean it's still a hit. So
1:11:44
there's more co-correlations with the
1:11:47
traditional five by five stats for a home
1:11:49
run than there is for a stolen base.
1:11:52
Stolen base is lightly correlated to runs, but
1:11:54
it doesn't mean you get a run right
1:11:56
away. So it's not even that. And you
1:11:59
can get runs. from guys that don't
1:12:01
steal bases, you know? It's,
1:12:03
so, you know, that's the
1:12:05
argument for punting stolen bases is that you
1:12:07
don't accidentally punt three
1:12:10
categories just by punting stolen bases. If
1:12:12
you punt homers, you're
1:12:15
punting like two or three categories. Like, it's
1:12:17
never a good idea to punt homers, I'm
1:12:19
pretty sure. If you're in a five by
1:12:21
five league and you punt homers, you are
1:12:23
probably not going to win that league. That's
1:12:25
what I think. It's very hard to find
1:12:27
a combination of players that does well in
1:12:29
everything else but is bottom of the pack
1:12:31
in power. And
1:12:33
the league also just doesn't reward
1:12:35
those players anymore. Maybe
1:12:38
in the 70s you could have had like
1:12:40
the all speedster, you know, shortstop guys, you
1:12:42
know, who hit 15 homers, 10 homers, but
1:12:45
the league doesn't play those guys anymore. You
1:12:48
know, my kid was asked about Brian Turing
1:12:50
last night, and he goes, don't
1:12:53
you think he could just keep playing because he's great at defense?
1:12:55
And I'm like, yeah, as a backup, like
1:12:58
I just, like that type of player doesn't usually
1:13:00
get a starting job anymore. There's very few
1:13:02
players like that. Even Victor Scott, the
1:13:04
reason I like him is because I keep saying he
1:13:07
has non-zero power. If he had zero power, it'd be
1:13:09
hard for him. What are we seeing with
1:13:11
Istori Ruiz? He's going to be platooned this year. It
1:13:14
has already begun. The
1:13:16
key difference for me with Ruiz and
1:13:18
even Tarang is that Tarang is a
1:13:20
premium defender and Ruiz is not. Ruiz
1:13:22
is not. And I think your only
1:13:24
path out of a part-time role with
1:13:27
that sort of profile as a hitter is to
1:13:29
be a phenomenal defender up the middle. And it
1:13:31
has to be its center or short or catcher.
1:13:34
Right. And Tarang, I think, got away with
1:13:36
it at second in part because the Brewers
1:13:38
had an everyday shortstop, and it
1:13:40
could reach a point where Tarang is a shortstop for
1:13:42
somebody because his defense is that good. I think they're
1:13:45
even holding him around in case he's the shortstop after
1:13:47
it down. I
1:13:49
think having Joey Ortiz there now
1:13:52
takes a lot of pressure away
1:13:54
from Tarang. It makes it quite
1:13:56
a bit less likely that Tarang's that guy now. Or
1:13:59
that Tarang. even plays. Yeah,
1:14:02
it's a legit concern. Other pitchers that have a
1:14:04
lot of places, Shane Bos by the way, like
1:14:07
four leagues now because I just have a fair amount of
1:14:09
I think a three or four shares. The timetable
1:14:12
is gonna be as long as everyone expects
1:14:14
it to be. I
1:14:17
think it's just massaging his innings. Well
1:14:19
yeah, you're backloading them because you wanted to be in
1:14:21
your rotation in the playoffs. Yeah,
1:14:23
I have other ones that won't surprise them. I have four
1:14:25
shares of Dean Kramer. Four
1:14:28
shares of JP France. JP France
1:14:30
is a little bit like Kramer where I'm like, hey,
1:14:32
do you know that he led the league in strikeouts
1:14:34
the year before he came up and struck nobody out?
1:14:37
I think, you know, and what he did in the
1:14:39
minors for France is he used the breaking balls a
1:14:41
lot and then he got to the big leagues and
1:14:43
I don't know maybe gave him a homer off a
1:14:45
breaking ball or something and just went to the changeup
1:14:47
a ton. I think he still has those breaking balls.
1:14:49
I still believe in France. I've
1:14:52
got four shares of Trevor Rodgers. Three
1:14:55
of Grayson Rodriguez. Three
1:14:58
of Joe Boyle has walked everybody
1:15:00
this spring. Yay, super excited for
1:15:02
those three shares. In the defense
1:15:04
of Joe Boyle, at least he
1:15:06
kind of showed you that
1:15:09
flaw before nine. Yeah, I
1:15:11
knew that. You knew going
1:15:13
in. And I didn't spend big picks on
1:15:15
them. Those are some real late picks. Some
1:15:17
higher ones that might surprise you. I have
1:15:19
three of Kirby. When
1:15:22
I could get him, I got him.
1:15:24
And then three of
1:15:27
Verlander where I
1:15:29
just think he's good and I know
1:15:31
he's a little behind but I put him a little bit
1:15:33
more towards the two weeks than
1:15:36
the four weeks. There
1:15:38
was never really an injury announced. It
1:15:40
was just that he's behind. So I like
1:15:44
Verlander there. And here's one that may really
1:15:46
surprise people. I haven't talked about him a
1:15:48
lot. I have three shares
1:15:50
of Michael Soroka. Yeah. We've
1:15:54
talked about him a little bit but I think
1:15:57
he's changed his pitch mix. I don't
1:15:59
have... spring training stuff numbers really, but
1:16:02
the strikeout rate is way up this spring,
1:16:05
and he's got all the road he can handle,
1:16:07
and I'm gonna give him some
1:16:10
of it. He's still only
1:16:12
26 years old, after
1:16:14
all the injuries and all the miss time, and
1:16:17
did it with different stuff and got great results, but this
1:16:19
might be a path for him to also
1:16:21
miss more bats, and we've talked about it. The
1:16:23
White Sox need him to take the ball as
1:16:26
often as he's physically able to, so
1:16:28
no pressure if things aren't going well for
1:16:30
a stretch. They'll keep letting him start, I
1:16:33
think, so long as he's healthy. So yeah, good kind
1:16:36
of late riser, I think, in draft
1:16:38
season, as someone who became a bit more interesting
1:16:40
in March than he might have been throughout most
1:16:42
of the winter. We'll
1:16:44
get to a few more players, I'm sure,
1:16:46
at some point. Maybe the players we regret
1:16:48
not having once the season officially starts. One
1:16:50
last thing is just, I have three hitters
1:16:52
here that do some things well, and I'm
1:16:54
just like, what have you added the next
1:16:56
thing? That's Ty France,
1:16:58
MJ Melendez, and Parker Meadows. I
1:17:01
have three shares each of those. It's like, you do
1:17:03
some good stuff. What if you hit the
1:17:05
ball a little bit harder? What if you struck out a little
1:17:07
less? What if you did this? So
1:17:09
I like taking guys
1:17:12
with medium ceiling, too. That's the kind of thing
1:17:14
I do, is these guys have medium floor, medium
1:17:16
ceiling. I don't expect any of them to be
1:17:18
stars, but their
1:17:20
prices are pretty low, and they do stuff. They
1:17:25
probably play, too. Yeah,
1:17:27
I think those are all pretty intriguing options
1:17:30
where they go mostly after pick 200, and
1:17:32
I think Melendez is gonna play
1:17:34
a lot. He doesn't have that catcher eligibility in
1:17:36
most leagues anymore, but I still like what he
1:17:39
brings to the table, hits the ball very hard,
1:17:41
could unlock a little more power this year
1:17:44
as part of that. Improving Kansas City lineup.
1:17:46
We are gonna go on our way out the door. A
1:17:48
reminder, get a subscription to The Athletic for
1:17:50
$2 a month for the first year. theathletic.com/rates
1:17:53
and barrels. Join the Discord, the link is
1:17:55
in the show description. Be
1:17:57
sure to like this video if you watched us on YouTube. Subscribe to the
1:17:59
YouTube channel. channel if you haven't done so already.
1:18:01
Schedule for the rest of the week. We're
1:18:04
on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. Friday live with
1:18:06
Trevor May at 1 o'clock Eastern. We got
1:18:08
that back on the calendar pretty much every
1:18:10
week all season barring some unforeseen schedule related
1:18:12
stuff that comes up and I don't have
1:18:15
any stuff on the schedule. It's pretty pretty
1:18:17
consistent around here these days so that's gonna
1:18:19
do it for this episode of rates and
1:18:21
barrels. We're back with you on Wednesday. Thanks
1:18:24
for listening.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More