Podchaser Logo
Home
Shohei Ohtani Meets with the Media, Spring Job Battle Winners, Injury News & 'Our Guys' for 2024

Shohei Ohtani Meets with the Media, Spring Job Battle Winners, Injury News & 'Our Guys' for 2024

Released Tuesday, 26th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Shohei Ohtani Meets with the Media, Spring Job Battle Winners, Injury News & 'Our Guys' for 2024

Shohei Ohtani Meets with the Media, Spring Job Battle Winners, Injury News & 'Our Guys' for 2024

Shohei Ohtani Meets with the Media, Spring Job Battle Winners, Injury News & 'Our Guys' for 2024

Shohei Ohtani Meets with the Media, Spring Job Battle Winners, Injury News & 'Our Guys' for 2024

Tuesday, 26th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

Welcome

0:07

to Rates and Barrels. It is

0:09

Tuesday, March 26. Derek

0:11

Van Ryper, Eno Saris, we are

0:20

back in our respective home recording locations.

0:22

Feels good to have gotten out and

0:24

get those two live shows in. Thanks

0:26

again to our friends at Other Half

0:29

Brewing for being fantastic hosts. And thanks

0:31

to everybody who made it out live.

0:33

It was great to put some faces

0:35

to Twitter handles and

0:37

more specifically, Discord handles, right? I

0:39

got to meet Market8 dude, whose

0:41

name is not actually Mark. Yeah,

0:46

that was fun. Some of

0:49

our most ardent listeners and

0:51

people we interact with the most on Twitter

0:53

and Discord were there. So it was really

0:56

great to see everybody. It was really fun.

0:58

Other Half did such a great job.

1:00

It was a perfect little spot for

1:02

us. And Stacked Lineup is still

1:05

out there. So if you want to order it

1:07

at otherhalfbrewing.com, you can

1:10

still get that shipped to a bunch of different states. So

1:12

it was really great beer, really

1:14

great time, really great to see everybody. Yeah,

1:16

I kind of locked in on Stacked Lineup.

1:18

I didn't try enough of the other

1:20

beers at Other Half. That was a bit

1:22

of a mistake on my part, but we'll

1:25

be corrected in a future opportunity traveling to

1:27

New York. As I mentioned, the Discord, it

1:29

is popping. Get in there. If you haven't

1:32

already, we'll have a link to join that

1:34

in the show description. Since

1:37

we last recorded on Thursday, a ton

1:39

of news has broken. And one story

1:41

that was pretty fresh last Thursday has

1:43

developed a good bit. And I would

1:45

say it's still in the developing

1:48

category. That, of course, is Shohei

1:51

Otani and Ipe Mizuhara, his former

1:53

translator who has now been fired

1:55

by the Dodgers after being linked

1:58

to illegal gambling in California. Shouhei

2:01

met with the media on Monday

2:03

afternoon, you know, and he said

2:05

he was saddened and shocked by

2:07

the revelations that his former interpreter

2:09

had racked up a sizable gambling

2:11

debt. Reports have that as

2:13

about four and a half million dollars. That's still

2:15

the number that's floating around out there. And

2:19

Otani said he learned about this problem

2:23

for Mizuhara after the first game

2:25

the Dodgers played with the Padres

2:27

in Korea last week. So this

2:30

is really interesting. It's originally kind of

2:32

bubbled up from a Los Angeles Times

2:34

report that pointed out that Otani's name

2:36

had appeared on wire transfers to alleged

2:39

bookmaker Matthew Boyer. Boyer is under federal

2:41

investigation. And then Mizuhara

2:43

had claimed the transfers covered his

2:45

debts. Major League Baseball on Friday

2:48

after a few days announced they're

2:50

investigating. So we'll see what they

2:52

find beyond whatever the federal

2:54

investigation turns up. And

2:56

the biggest thing for me is that kind of like read

2:58

through some of the details that have been reported. It's

3:01

just that there were there were some inconsistencies

3:03

in the stories. Initially

3:05

there was a 90 minute interview that ESPN

3:07

had with Mizuhara and

3:10

that interview was attended by an Otani

3:12

spokesperson. Right. So that detailed

3:14

how Mizuhara met Boyer at a poker game in

3:16

San Diego back in 2021. Apparently

3:20

Boyer was invited to this game by an

3:22

acquaintance of David Fletcher's. The

3:24

details are like super clear in

3:26

that interview. And then

3:28

of course the details from that interview

3:31

were later recanted. And some of this

3:33

is being now kind of attributed to

3:36

throughout this last week. Prior

3:38

to being fired Mizuhara still being Otani's

3:40

translator and that creating a lot of

3:43

confusion about what Otani did and did

3:45

not know at various points. Yeah

3:48

the interaction between

3:50

a player and a translator

3:52

is just really intimate.

3:57

Actually I mean this person is. broadcasting

4:00

your views to the world for you, you know,

4:02

and translating the world

4:04

for you, you know, on the way back. And

4:07

then we know, we have established

4:10

that their interaction

4:12

was even more intimate maybe than normal translators,

4:14

like just in terms of like, you know,

4:17

they were friends, they were buds, they went

4:19

everywhere together, like, you know, they were seeing

4:21

everywhere together, like, you know, you

4:23

know, so, you know, does

4:26

he have access to his accounts? You

4:29

know, this translation thing is kind

4:31

of intriguing to the point

4:34

where yesterday, you know, I

4:36

have a friend who's more of a

4:38

native Japanese speaker or better Japanese speaker

4:40

than I am. And

4:42

he watched that same press

4:45

conference yesterday that Otani

4:47

gave in which he ostensibly

4:50

gave us more details. And

4:54

but it was a prepared statement. But

4:56

again, there's a translator there, the new translator.

5:00

And he's, he's, my

5:02

friend said he did a good job. But he said that

5:04

one specific thing, there was an interesting way

5:07

of translating. So my

5:10

friend said that sort of Otani

5:12

says specifically, he pay

5:15

access my account on his own and

5:17

transferred money out in Japanese. And

5:21

that was translated to if they stole my money

5:23

or stole money. So

5:27

that's that's it's that's just

5:30

part of the story with it like that,

5:32

like, now when did Otani know what he

5:34

knew? How much English does he

5:36

understand? How much does he how much do you

5:38

understand about this? Like

5:41

you could see a play away a story

5:43

of this guy who's just wants to be

5:45

about he's from the country in Japan, he

5:47

just wants to be about baseball, his mom,

5:50

you know, handled his finances and first until

5:52

just a couple years ago, you know, all

5:54

he wants to do is carry

5:56

out baseball, maybe like

5:59

who knows how much how good his

6:01

English is and how much he's understanding of

6:03

this and he's got this guy who's an

6:05

established liar or who is who's at least

6:07

admitted to lying on certain levels and has

6:10

a gambling problem who's his translator so He

6:13

could say anything that other people were

6:15

saying to Otani and then change whatever

6:17

his honey thing back, right? So oh,

6:20

yeah, Otani covered my debts. He

6:23

wasn't happy with it, but he did

6:25

it, you know Whereas Otani thinks he's

6:27

saying oh, yes, I paid for something

6:29

that That he had that

6:31

he bought in my house or whatever It was you know, I

6:33

mean like like maybe he knew

6:35

about the payments but didn't know exactly

6:37

what they're for I mean just because

6:39

that translating offers this like gray area.

6:41

We just don't know There's

6:44

another story where you know Otani's in the

6:46

veteran gambler and he's he cannot

6:48

lose He's one of these the players I think

6:50

the one thing that I know about players is

6:53

they hate losing one. They almost like winning and

6:56

you know, they are competitive

6:58

about tiddlywinks and Ask as well Walker

7:00

Bueller in ping-pong, you know what I

7:02

mean? Like it's it's it's They're

7:06

intensely competitive. So the other story is,

7:08

you know, here's a guy who's intensely

7:10

competitive and private

7:13

and has some time to

7:15

kill when he's not doing baseball things and

7:18

you know was gambling and you

7:21

know got into trouble and blamed on us

7:23

on his translator, so That

7:26

the thing is that this is all put against a

7:29

player who's probably the most inaccessible player

7:31

we've had in a long time and so,

7:35

you know, I feel badly for all

7:37

the reporters trying to chase this because It's

7:40

it's there's there's very

7:42

few in ways with the player himself

7:45

because of maybe the language again and

7:47

translating But also just the

7:49

way that he's insulated himself from the media and

7:51

then so you're trying to go to all these

7:53

people around him Who were saying I I

7:55

thought he was a good guy. I don't know so

8:00

It's a really difficult story for

8:02

everybody involved and we on

8:04

the outside here And it

8:06

like it inspires a lot of people to

8:11

Be very sure of their beliefs

8:13

in a lot of these instances Oh bookie

8:16

would never put out a 4.5 million dollar

8:19

credit line that seems like a lot But

8:21

it wasn't 4.5 million. It was 500,000

8:23

over and over again, or at least

8:25

that's how the payments came in, you know Would

8:28

he ever do that for someone who obviously

8:30

wasn't worth it? I don't know I mean you're

8:33

you're asking you're talking about an illegal bookie.

8:35

Well, and that's where the initial the

8:37

initial account from Mizuhara and explaining how

8:40

he met Boyer like kind of Oh,

8:42

okay Like you you got introduced to

8:44

each other because of who you each

8:47

know Yeah, these are probably a

8:49

mark for him right away that guy that

8:51

guy smelled you coming a lot of mile

8:53

away Right. So there

8:56

it's just one of these stories like there's there's the first

8:58

thing you think is like, what do you want

9:00

to believe? Well, we all probably many of us want

9:02

to believe that Shoyo Tani is

9:04

an amazing baseball player who loves baseball and would

9:06

never be involved in anything illegal like this That's

9:09

like the thing you kind of want to believe

9:11

that's like a fairy tale that you want to

9:13

tell yourself That's what you sort of hope comes

9:16

out in all of the investigation

9:18

in all of this that's the thing that you generally want

9:21

to see but You

9:23

also have probably lived long enough to

9:25

see and hear of enough famous people

9:27

being Involved in bad

9:29

things to think you know, maybe it's

9:31

not just e-pay like you your mind

9:33

wonders like isn't doesn't Michael Jordan just

9:35

like a Roll like

9:38

Charles Barkley didn't charge the box. I like

9:40

to lose millions of dollars, right? But also

9:42

there's aside from just the the legal ramifications

9:44

of well gambling is not legal in the

9:46

state of California Okay, like if that were

9:49

a thing that any player did I'm not

9:51

talking about Shohei specifically But let's just say

9:53

an athlete of any kind any sport wherever

9:56

they bet on sports in California and it's

9:58

a lot of money and It's

10:00

illegal. Okay, like am I crushed

10:03

by that as a fan? No, I

10:05

don't actually care if the

10:07

player Is not harming other

10:09

people, right? It's a little bit like smoking pot

10:11

smoking pot the leak is legal in some cities in

10:13

stem sites and not legal in others It's like

10:15

if somebody got busted in one of the states where

10:17

it wasn't legally be like, well, you know Maybe

10:20

thought he was in California. He woke up and whatever

10:23

it is I don't know doesn't it doesn't seem

10:25

like that big a deal with gambling. He's a

10:27

little bit a little bit different because What

10:30

about baseball? Right and that's

10:32

where that's where it would cross a line,

10:35

right? And again, like that's By

10:37

all accounts not what's happening here, but yeah

10:39

leverage over a player, you know

10:42

That owns owes five million dollars. Well, you better do this

10:44

or you got to do something for me on the field

10:46

that I can Bet on or whatever. Right?

10:49

So there's infinite and we have something

10:51

like this another sport, right? Right. Meanwhile,

10:53

yeah Yeah in

10:55

the NBA John Tae Porter is

10:57

being investigated because of prop

10:59

bets and prop bets for the uninitiated or

11:02

just like I think this guy

11:04

will rebound have seven rebounds today and a

11:07

bunch of Regular bets were placed

11:09

on the under on his props when he

11:11

was in a game in which he removed

11:13

himself from the game

11:16

due to injury Which

11:19

is superficial and then I guess he has all

11:21

these alternate You

11:23

know Twitter accounts there's some reporting his alternate

11:26

Twitter accounts are related to crypto and gambling

11:29

and that he has publicly admitted

11:31

to gambling in those Twitter

11:33

accounts on NCAA basketball and

11:36

so, you know Like

11:38

there's a lot I think there's a there's

11:40

more smoke there and that's a

11:42

big deal because it's about the sport itself whereas

11:46

we can't necessarily trust he pay but he pays

11:48

always said no baseball and You

11:52

know, we also have this like this this

11:54

illegal bookie person the whole reason this came

11:57

out is because this illegal

11:59

bookie person And he's busted.

12:03

And so it reads to me like, oh well,

12:07

do you know Shohei Otani?

12:09

Is that a good name? Does that

12:12

give me a reduction in sentence

12:14

or anything? Does that give me anywhere? So

12:17

you don't like, it's really hard with all

12:20

these characters in there. And

12:22

again, we don't really know Shohei that well.

12:25

Right. But it's, again, still in the developing

12:27

category for me for sure. And I just try to

12:30

think through all these different details. And the thing I

12:32

put out there on Twitter was just like, how

12:34

do you even get four and a half

12:36

million dollars out of a bank account without

12:39

someone knowing about it? That would be challenging

12:41

because it would take several large transfers. Five

12:43

hundred thousand at a time. It's

12:45

something like that. But I just think about how

12:48

there's so many facets of life where there

12:50

are little checks on basic things we do.

12:52

And I realize that ultra

12:54

high net worth individuals live in a different

12:56

world than the rest of us and maybe

12:59

you can transfer hundreds of thousands of dollars

13:01

out of an account and not get a

13:03

notification or someone who has access to your

13:05

account can do that. I just think that's

13:07

really bizarre. That's all. I'm not really pointing

13:10

a finger or anything. I'm just like, man,

13:12

that's weird. And that's maybe... Yeah. Maybe

13:15

Otani is a classic example of someone that

13:17

trusted the wrong people. That's possible. I don't

13:19

know. I just think there's missing

13:21

information. I do know a fair amount

13:23

of people that have gotten rich not

13:26

by handling the money themselves. Who

13:30

inherited it or did

13:33

other things to acquire that wealth.

13:36

And I do know personally some people that just have

13:39

other people that dispersed the money from them.

13:43

They don't want to deal with it. That's

13:46

not why they have money and they

13:49

don't want to think about it. So that's

13:52

why I mentioned on Twitter the other day that

13:54

his mother handled his finances and maybe that's

13:57

not something he wants to think about. But

13:59

then other people are all over the place. Well, professional advisors and

14:01

people, yes, yes, but it's also possible

14:04

that someone that's as close as your translator

14:07

Can tell you that this is just a payment

14:09

for the thing you owe, you know, whatever it

14:11

is Just sign on this,

14:13

you know and

14:16

Don't worry about it. All right. So

14:18

for all of those reasons and many

14:20

that we haven't even uncovered yet This

14:23

is a complicated story to

14:25

completely unpack As far

14:27

as other news and notes the thing that you'd

14:29

thought we might be talking about right now as

14:31

it pertains to show Hey Otani is that he's

14:33

been cleared to start a throwing program as he

14:35

returns from elbow surgery in his bid to be

14:37

a two-way player Again, right like if you if

14:40

three weeks ago you said what do you think

14:42

we talked about with Otani in the days before?

14:44

State side opening day and say I don't

14:46

know rehab, you know, how his spring went

14:48

normal things like that So

14:50

good news there at least that Otani is

14:53

on that sort of progression You know, we'll

14:55

see if they actually Follow

14:57

through on their rumblings that they might

14:59

play him in the field by the end of the

15:01

season That would be a little bit of a surprise,

15:03

but it's an option to them eventually if he gets

15:05

to the rehab Unscathed but that's

15:07

the that's the baseball side of what's

15:09

happening with show Hey Otani right now

15:12

and it feels like a footnote given

15:14

how large the scope of everything else

15:16

is right now Ever

15:18

tried to break a bad habit

15:20

and felt like you're climbing Everest

15:22

and flip-flops. Yeah, we've been there,

15:24

too But here's a breath of

15:26

fresh air fume. It's not about

15:28

giving up It's about switching up

15:30

fume takes your habit and simply

15:32

makes it better Healthier and a

15:34

whole lot more enjoyable fume is

15:37

an innovative award-winning flavored air device

15:39

that does just that instead of

15:41

vapor Fume uses flavored air instead

15:43

of electronics fume is completely natural

15:45

and instead of harmful chemicals fume

15:47

uses delicious Flavors you get it

15:49

instead of bad fume is good It's

15:51

a habit you're free to enjoy and

15:53

makes replacing your bad habit easy your

15:55

fume comes with an adjustable airflow dial

15:57

It is designed with movable parts magnets

16:00

for fidgeting giving your fingers a lot

16:02

to do which is helpful for de-stressing

16:04

and anxiety while breaking your habit. For

16:07

me Fume's ability to also act as

16:09

a fidget device is incredible and helps

16:11

me get through the day stress free.

16:13

Plus Fumes just released a magnetic stand

16:15

for your Fume so there's no more

16:18

losing it around the house that's built

16:20

with fidgeting in mind. You can spin

16:22

your Fume around on it. Start the

16:24

year off right with the good habit

16:26

by going to trifume.com/barrels and getting the

16:29

journey packed today. Fume is giving listeners of

16:31

the show 10% off

16:33

when they use the code barrels to

16:35

help make starting the good habit that

16:37

much easier. Beyond

16:40

Otani we have an extension

16:42

for Ezekiel Tovar a

16:45

seven-year extension with the

16:47

Rockies 63 and a half

16:49

million plus an option for 2031. Yes

16:51

it's a real year at twenty and

16:53

a half million dollars. We've talked about

16:56

Tovar a few times

16:58

on this show as one of

17:00

the more aggressive hitters in terms

17:02

of approach in the league and

17:04

the overall results in his first full

17:07

season with the Rockies last year were

17:10

underwhelming at the play to 27% k-rate with a

17:12

4.1% walk rate. It was a 70 WRC plus

17:14

but we're talking about

17:18

a player who was a rookie and he

17:20

turned 22 in August so he was very

17:23

young to be there played great defense at

17:25

shortstop was a gold glove finalist at shortstop

17:27

so you can start to piece together like

17:30

a hey like what's the floor for Ezekiel

17:32

Tovar and say good defender

17:34

at short guy that might

17:36

actually you know over time strike

17:39

out a little bit less and be able

17:41

to take his hit tool and continue to

17:44

progress in a kind of gradual way at

17:46

the plate. My question for you is

17:48

as much as his approach would

17:50

scare us if it were for a 28,

17:54

29, 30 year old player like a Javier Baez

17:56

like at the end of the the

17:59

aging curve like Drops off really

18:01

sharply for players that have an approach

18:03

like Tovar's Do we ever

18:05

see positive outcomes in terms

18:07

of making significant adjustments? But we're talking

18:09

about someone who's so much younger for

18:12

the level than a lot of other

18:14

players that debut Yeah,

18:18

and you know, there are different

18:21

ways to sort

18:23

of Get out of

18:25

this law of not having great play discipline or

18:27

not having a great eye, right and This

18:30

is something I realized even with Josh Hamilton

18:32

at the time Who

18:34

has this same sort of sort of chasing? Mentality

18:39

very aggressive mentality is

18:41

that it you if you if

18:44

you? Like

18:46

contact rates are such that they're

18:48

almost always above 30%

18:51

right so

18:53

like You you

18:56

could just keep swinging you could you

18:58

basically make contact before you strike out?

19:02

and it seems like Tovar has

19:04

become even more aggressive this spring this

19:07

spring he has a 16%

19:09

a swing strike rate, which is again, just like

19:11

we've had before but somehow he only has a

19:13

22% Strike

19:15

I rate this spring and I think that's I think

19:17

he's just gonna try and be so aggressive early

19:20

in the counts and just not get to those

19:22

two strike counts and Just

19:24

try to use You

19:27

know hit tool we think of somebody that has a

19:29

16% switch swing strike rate is not having a great

19:31

hit tool But I don't know if

19:33

that's a hundred percent correct. That's swinging

19:36

miss it's

19:38

not necessarily that means he has a poor hit

19:40

tool and I think

19:44

the hit tool is the hardest thing to define so He

19:48

is definitely one of those guys that I

19:50

have very few shares of and Did

19:53

not want anywhere. I might

19:56

have one or two because you at some point you

19:58

have to just Take a guy

20:01

that might that project produce that's project value,

20:04

right? Now

20:06

I'm gonna be wrong on I think you

20:09

know, like he's that the park

20:11

is gonna be good for him and Yeah,

20:14

it's gonna be I think it's gonna be bias like and It's

20:17

gonna be really good for like four or five

20:19

years I could see that happening and then having

20:22

a sharp drop off after that So I don't

20:24

the extension thing they probably got him for

20:26

his best years. So it's it's okay But

20:30

you know his second contract is not one

20:32

I would hand out probably Right

20:34

like trying to project Where he

20:36

is today and where he'll be at the end

20:38

of this contract if you kind of put him

20:40

in the have your bias Plate discipline bucket and

20:43

say also there's less raw power and then when

20:45

you sign him if you're not

20:47

the Rockies You don't have the benefit of Coors

20:49

Field like all of those factors will be taken

20:51

into account I kind of

20:53

like Tovar where he goes in redraft though Just

20:56

because a lot of players in this

20:58

range kind of in that pick 200 overall range

21:01

are either part-time players or they have a realistic

21:04

chance of losing a share of playing time

21:06

Tovar is not gonna lose playing time

21:08

this extension just further cements that right?

21:11

So you're going to get good counting

21:13

stats because of the volume you have

21:15

power already even if you develop a lot

21:17

more 1518 home runs seen

21:19

within reach I'm just curious if he could

21:21

steal more bases some of that's getting on base more 287

21:23

OVP Doesn't exactly give

21:25

you a ton of opportunities next this spring.

21:27

Yeah, right So if you can nudge

21:29

up that OVP, maybe you can get the stolen bases to

21:32

tick up a little bit I mean, he's not a burner,

21:34

but he's not a bad runner either 69 percentile

21:36

and sprint speed So you'd think there's a

21:38

little more speed there if he's able to

21:40

create those opportunities Yeah,

21:43

and I wonder what the

21:47

Spring Leaders are like I

21:49

can't I can't get a team leader

21:51

board But I can look

21:53

at the Rockies in terms of how

21:55

many stolen bases and You

21:59

know Never before you release had

22:01

four Doyle has three Bouchard has two.

22:04

They don't seem like they're going to run crazy This

22:06

is not like the Nationals leaderboard Right

22:10

angels running a lot more this spring to

22:12

us a tweet from Scott to a pitcher

22:14

list pointing out they had become one of

22:16

the more aggressive teams this spring and oh

22:19

We look at that Jill Adele has

22:21

six Maris Nick five netto four Moniac

22:23

Hicks Soto three Yeah,

22:26

we talked about netto at some

22:28

point probably on the shortstop preview Maybe on the Angels

22:30

team preview a little bit as well. He's one of

22:32

those guys where the Projection

22:35

is just so modest, but you

22:37

could talk yourself into him being

22:39

a major exceed He kind

22:41

of goes in that same range as Tovar and I

22:43

feel similarly about netto and that's what I rather have

22:45

I mean, yeah, yeah, if I could have one of

22:47

the other I'll take the guy who whips less, you

22:50

know Has a better max

22:52

TV better Braille, right? You know, maybe

22:54

better legs so I

22:56

think it's like this little danger zone at

22:58

that position where Jeremy Pania

23:00

probably is the safest Ezekiel

23:02

Tovar might be the most Highly

23:06

most variable and then Zach Netto is sort

23:08

of like well if you want the younger

23:10

player that could get a lot better You

23:12

know who doesn't have pain is Multiple

23:15

years in the big leagues yet, but you

23:17

don't want the risk air quotes with Tovar

23:19

The netto kind of ticks both boxes and

23:21

splits the difference. No, yeah If you ranked

23:23

up on floor and ceiling, you know, you'd

23:26

have pain at the

23:28

top of floor and bottom of ceiling 100%

23:30

yeah But

23:33

I look at that entire group like I could do okay

23:35

with any one of those three guys as my middle infielder

23:38

a little peak ahead I have four

23:40

shares of Jeremy Pania and And

23:44

you know, we're gonna do some our guys

23:46

at the end here the

23:49

reasoning for me is a Lot

23:51

of those are in keeper leagues and it's

23:54

really kind of hard especially deeper keeper leagues

23:56

to acquire a Shortstop.

24:00

Like. A young shortstop. It's just like you

24:02

know, our shorts up before. During thing

24:04

in one leg was Jp Crawford. The

24:07

super this I was I'm trying

24:10

to figure it out of so

24:12

painter represented in attainable. Guy.

24:15

Arms and then I Also I think

24:17

especially the deeper and deeper you these

24:19

are Floor is underrated. You

24:21

know, To. The guy's gonna go out

24:23

there every day and place shortstop and hit

24:26

some homers and seals and bags you know,

24:28

doesn't really. Set. Hearts of

24:30

Slaughter and you know may not even

24:32

be relevant. And ten teamers and even

24:34

a by twelve team or. Ah,

24:37

where I have six shortstops. For some

24:39

reason. Ah, I've somehow kept on a

24:41

painting of Dame That my be where

24:44

I've been. I've made a mistake. It's

24:47

kinda like that old added to the gets

24:49

college football specimen a sale to get two

24:51

quarterbacks he might not have one right student

24:53

secure our whole I'm league. That

24:55

want to have audio crusoe? I I feel

24:57

I feel guy you have one. The problem

24:59

is you played deeper leagues and you've convinced

25:01

yourself at the other guys are all worth

25:04

holding onto because it everyday get right on

25:06

earth. I thought I'd twelve team bad said

25:08

I'm looking at the lights Do duties have

25:10

these guys here? Could he be happy? If

25:12

you have him and twenty team or a

25:14

as a tough toggle. Can

25:18

Tovar qualify as a load and player? Can I

25:20

start to like Tovar Because no one else really

25:22

does. I mean it to me. He's definitely though

25:24

there have there are people who like him. Now

25:27

I think he he qualifies for for raids

25:29

and barrels is loaded. Player is least proof

25:31

for you vs me he's out. you can

25:33

have tovar out. I don't care how terrible

25:35

toll vox with get suitable. The news and

25:38

notes: The Corey Seager and Josh Young expected

25:40

to be in the Rangers opening day lineups.

25:42

Pretty good news for the Rangers. I think

25:44

there was a nice discount on Corey Seager

25:46

for a little while during draft season. If

25:48

you haven't drafted yet, going to squeeze one

25:51

in here before opening day in some lexi

25:53

draft the weekend of opening day because they

25:55

play and. Longstanding. Leagues they

25:57

get together and he did get a few more themes

25:59

ending. Thing to think about like yeah, what about the

26:01

early drafts the early drafts all I got him I can't

26:04

take a horse here. He's hurt. He's hurt. How would I

26:06

drop a guy who's hurt right now? You know Well,

26:09

it seems like he is back from that sports hernia

26:11

and going having God, you know, it's like kind of

26:13

a similar deal Mm-hmm. Oh, did

26:15

I jump ahead on the run down? I'm on

26:17

the run down. No, he's there. There is

26:20

areas Shoulder could avoid IELTS

26:22

then I don't know what to learn

26:24

from it though because I you know It

26:26

is I kind of agree. You don't

26:28

really want to Buy injured

26:31

players. You don't want to buy

26:33

pictures with bad shoulders in March So

26:37

I wouldn't I wouldn't necessarily tell you

26:39

like oh You

26:41

know every time this is, you know something like

26:43

this you should you should buy I

26:47

would say That maybe

26:49

there's just a moment in every draft

26:51

where you say screw it. He's

26:54

fallen too far. I'm gonna take him That's

26:56

what I think it comes back to and there's

26:59

a few other players in this group I mean,

27:01

she's Yuri Perez Like we lived in some

27:03

uncertainty for what felt like at least a

27:05

week or so where he had the elbow

27:08

injury Everyone was so sad and seemed like

27:10

definitely Tommy John coming right and they diagnosed

27:12

them with elbow inflammation No

27:14

surgery needed at least not at this time

27:16

Which if you're buying that diagnosis

27:18

if you trust that that's all it really

27:20

is and he started playing catch over the

27:22

weekend then he's probably back

27:24

in a month or so like and that's sort

27:27

of in line for him to just be a

27:29

Regular starter the rest of the way without a

27:32

lot of restrictions. Obviously if he feels something in

27:34

his elbow He'll shut back death

27:36

again, but I'm kind of

27:38

cautiously Optimistic with Yuri at this

27:40

point just based on how things have progressed over

27:42

the last week or so Where

27:44

does that put Max Meyer? I've had a

27:47

lot of questions about Max Meyer, you know

27:49

Jared Jones made the opening day roster for

27:51

Pittsburgh And

27:54

you know, so there's a lot of people and

27:56

then Jordan Hicks had this 10 strikeout

27:58

game It

28:00

was against the A's. I do have to point out it

28:02

was the A's. Was it their A

28:04

lineup or their B lineup? It

28:06

doesn't matter. It doesn't matter.

28:10

And so I've had some questions, oh, I want to get

28:13

Jared Jones. Do I drop this? Oh, and

28:15

so those are kind of three of the

28:17

hottest names is Max Myers, Jared Jones, and

28:19

Jordan Hicks in the 12-team atmosphere. And

28:24

I would say, so I

28:26

ask you, Derek Van

28:28

Riper, what

28:32

happens when Braxton Garrett and Yuri Perez are healthy?

28:34

What happens to Max Meyer? Well,

28:36

Meyer's workload is going to be

28:39

managed pretty carefully anyway. But

28:42

if we assume that everybody else

28:45

in that rotation is healthy. Did

28:48

Edward Cabrera have a similar situation to Yuri

28:50

Perez where it's like, it sounded bad at

28:52

first, it is shoulder versus elbow. Which

28:55

isn't that bad. An impingement. Who

29:00

had the impingement? Same

29:02

to Klana Han had the impingement. But

29:07

you could have the impingement and come back in

29:09

a month or six weeks and then tear your

29:11

elbow completely unrelated to the impingement. It was the

29:14

next year, I think he'd tear the elbow. Yeah,

29:16

that's sort of, that's what it seemed like in

29:18

the Klana Han example. It's

29:20

just the always having that risk of being a

29:22

pitcher. What do I think is going

29:24

to happen? Well, Luzardo obviously is in as long as

29:26

he's healthy. Yuri in the rotation as long as he's

29:29

healthy. Maybe they'd be careful with

29:31

Puck too. Like would

29:33

they give Puck a temporary break from starting?

29:36

Like I just think they're probably using

29:39

a six-man rotation once they get

29:41

everybody available. So it's

29:43

Luzardo, it's Perez, it's Garrett, those

29:45

are your first three. If you

29:47

keep Puck in, that's four. Cabrera,

29:49

Rogers, you'd bump Meyer as the odd man

29:51

out. I just assume one of those six

29:53

that I named before Meyer is probably going

29:55

to be banged up at any given time.

29:58

Like the odds of all of them being healthy. the head

30:00

of them seem pretty low and then in the

30:02

unlikely event that it happens you just bump one

30:04

guy in the long relief for a little while

30:06

because you got to manage their innings then they're

30:08

stretched out enough to quickly bump back into the

30:10

rotation without much difficulty and

30:12

they may just play help

30:15

permitting a schedule based game with

30:17

that group and give everybody a little bit of a

30:19

run in the bullpen to take a

30:21

few innings off. My answer to

30:24

that question was that Meyer

30:26

has better command and

30:29

Jones and Hicks have better stuff but

30:32

to be a starting pitcher I

30:34

do think command is important

30:36

even if we can't necessarily lock

30:38

this down. We talked about this

30:40

a little bit in New York.

30:45

When we're talking about starting pitching it's not

30:47

just success. It's success as a starting pitcher.

30:50

We know that Jared Jones, Jordan Hicks and

30:52

Max Meyer could all be closers. We

30:56

know that. I think we could say that.

30:58

We know that. Do we

31:00

know who's going to be a starter, who's going to be

31:02

a successful starter? I think Max

31:04

Meyer's command puts them a little bit

31:06

ahead in terms of that

31:08

likelihood. The

31:11

innings are a big question but maybe in a 12-teamer

31:13

you don't care about innings over the whole season. You're

31:15

just like, who's the better one right

31:17

now? I

31:19

don't know. I can drop these guys and

31:21

get somebody off the waiver later if they get managed.

31:25

I kind of put Hicks and

31:28

Jones together as wildish guys with

31:30

great stuff. All

31:32

three of these guys are likely

31:35

to get 90 to 100 innings this year. The

31:37

shape of the innings could be a little bit tricky with

31:40

all of them but they're all getting the chance right now.

31:42

I think you do have to play present

31:44

over future when you get to that point when

31:46

the season starts and you can run waivers. It

31:49

does feel like you're the meme. You're holding

31:51

hands with one person and checking out someone

31:53

else. That's

31:56

what the bottom of your roster is

31:58

every single year. Oh, I'm holding

32:01

hands. Oh, we just finished

32:03

off Jared Owens. Oh, Luis Hughes. Right.

32:05

You can't have all of these pictures

32:07

on your roster. I had a few

32:09

leagues that ran fab on Sunday night

32:11

and I barely bid because I happened

32:14

to guess right on a whole bunch of

32:16

different roster like job battles and different things

32:18

where I looked and I said, is there

32:20

a clear upgrade? Even though a

32:23

bunch of stuff has happened, some of these leagues drafted a month

32:25

ago. Most of mine were just swapping

32:27

out injured guys. Yeah, it was just, has anyone hurt?

32:30

Who can I pick up and then do I want to spend 10% of

32:33

my budget on something I don't need? I just made a

32:35

bunch of low bids and scooped up

32:37

a whole bunch of shares of

32:39

Brock Stewart and Trevor McGill. Yeah,

32:42

the hardest decision for me was I had

32:44

James MacArthur and was staring at Brock Stewart

32:46

and McGill. And so what I ended up

32:48

doing is just low bids on

32:50

Stewart and McGill because I knew that worst

32:53

case scenario, I still have MacArthur. In

32:56

the places I was most at first steals, for saves,

32:58

I tried to get Stewart and McGill on

33:04

alongside MacArthur. But

33:06

again, I bid like 12 bucks

33:08

each on those guys and just

33:10

tried to get lucky on a cheap

33:13

one. But yeah,

33:15

Luis Hill, I'm going to put

33:17

him behind Jones and Hicks in

33:19

this weird grouping of players

33:21

that I've put together just from

33:24

DMs and discord questions and stuff.

33:28

But they're hot names. The reason I want

33:30

to put Hill just behind Jones is that

33:33

I think they're mostly fastball slider guys. Heel's

33:35

change up is better than Jones' third pitch.

33:38

However, Jones' milieu

33:42

is way better. His park

33:44

is way better. His opponents are

33:46

going to be worse. I

33:48

think Jones is just more set up for success

33:51

right away. We could watch one start

33:53

of Hill and I'll feel like an idiot. Maybe

33:55

he'll just dominate. But yeah,

33:58

it's a tough park and it's a tough

34:00

division. He's going up against the Red Sox

34:02

offense, the Blue Jays offense, the Orioles offense,

34:04

you know. I don't think

34:06

that, you know, Jared Jones has the same problems.

34:09

I think there's a lot about

34:11

Heels profile that reminds me of

34:13

Hicks mostly when you see big-time

34:15

K-rates next to problematic

34:17

walk rates and

34:20

you say, okay, well there have been some

34:22

health issues. There's been a more consistent you're

34:25

a starter in the eyes of the

34:27

organization role where, you know, Heels appearances

34:29

outside of, geez, I

34:31

don't, has he had any relief appearances? I

34:33

think he had a couple spring appearances that

34:35

weren't starts but that's just because that's how

34:37

your innings show up over the course of

34:39

the year. There's only been a handful of

34:42

times the Yankees have used him as

34:44

a non-starter across all of his

34:46

time in their organization so they

34:48

at least see him as someone that is

34:50

worth trying to stretch out. The

34:53

K's should be there, the floor looks nice, I

34:55

do think the park makes things difficult but

34:57

yeah. You also take a look at a small

35:00

sample of a lower walk rate than he's ever

35:02

posted from what he did this spring

35:04

and you start to get a little bit optimistic.

35:06

So if I can learn Jones's walk rate went the

35:08

other direction and went back, back up. Yeah,

35:10

I think if I have Hicks

35:13

on my roster and I've got him a

35:15

couple places already and I'm looking at Jones

35:17

and Heel and Meyer, is there a clear

35:19

upgrade there? Probably not. Would I consider doing

35:21

the thing where I bid very low on

35:24

all three of the other more exciting options?

35:27

I probably would because I think

35:30

Max Meyer is the guy I actually want of the

35:32

group. I'm not worried about the

35:34

other Marlon starters all getting healthy. I think if

35:36

Meyer pitches well he could make

35:39

his case and keep a spot anyway, they

35:41

could trade pitching that's always an option for

35:43

them too. Whereas Heel has you know Will

35:45

Warren potentially looking over his shoulder. Eventually

35:48

Garrett Cole should be back in the fold and by

35:50

the way I had a draft last night, 260 budget,

35:53

15 team league, Garrett

35:55

Cole went for seven bucks. Is

35:58

that a risk worth taking at this point? Yes,

36:00

good cuz I got him I Didn't

36:06

have any plan of going in and adding Garrett

36:08

Cole on that team I'm like seven bucks for

36:11

four months of Garrett Cole. Yeah, I could figure

36:13

that out But

36:16

I think I'm Meyer Like

36:19

a Meyer Jones heel

36:21

in terms of long-term value

36:23

short-term value Good

36:26

luck I mean there's just so little that separates them

36:28

For me in the short term that I would have

36:31

very similar bids on all of them if I was

36:33

trying to replace someone that Was just

36:35

similar but not quite as exciting and Hicks is

36:37

pretty darn exciting even throwing out what he did

36:39

on Monday night We

36:42

have some we have some spring stuff

36:44

just to bring that into the mix

36:46

Max Myers slider 133

36:48

stuff plus great Max Myers forcing

36:50

fast all 83 stuff plus Change

36:54

up 71 so he's definitely one of these guys

36:56

who's gonna be pitching off of the slider However,

36:59

there's plenty of people who

37:01

have taken this package and run with it I

37:04

mean, it's a British is a guy who comes

37:06

to mind plus you've got the nice

37:08

really nice home park That

37:11

you can fall back on Luis

37:14

heel forcing fast all 149 stuff plus Slider

37:18

115 change of 108. This is the thing I saw 87

37:20

location plus on that change up And

37:25

so he tries to use

37:27

it as a freeze pitch because he's

37:29

very north-south With his rest

37:31

of his stuff and the change of his a power

37:33

sideways And so I think batters

37:35

mostly say I'm not gonna swing at this He

37:38

almost hit Trey Turner in the face with a 90 mile an

37:40

hour change up So he does not have

37:42

good command of that But when when

37:44

he does if he can just throw it in his

37:46

own, he'll get called strikes that line I

37:49

just a seven location plus meets my eye

37:51

test. I was like he cannot command that

37:53

pitch So then he becomes this

37:55

two pitch pitcher Why does he have high walk rates

37:57

and a lot of games start in the minor leagues?

38:00

because he's probably working on that change up. I

38:03

think he can man the other two pitches. Who

38:06

else do we have here? Hicks, I don't know

38:08

that I need to break this out. Yeah, Hicks,

38:10

we have an established situation where it's great

38:12

stuff numbers on all its pitches, even the splitter and

38:16

in poor location numbers. And then

38:18

Jared Jones, Jared Jones and Heel

38:21

actually were tied in stuff plus and

38:23

like at third and fourth among track

38:25

pitchers in the major leagues in spring

38:27

training. Jared Jones 148 stuff

38:30

plus on the fourth team, 123 on the cutter, 121 on the slider,

38:35

and 98 on the curve ball. If

38:37

he really does have four distinct pitches like that,

38:40

then I think long

38:42

terms, I want Jones. I

38:44

think there's arguments to be made for

38:47

anybody in that group because they're all

38:49

interesting for slightly different reasons. The

38:52

other guy that's not part of that conversation now,

38:54

but could be part of a conversation like this

38:56

in the future is Paul Skeens, because he's gonna

38:58

start the season at Triple A. Bailey

39:00

Falter, I believe, has a spot in the rotation

39:03

for the Pirates right now. That

39:05

would be the, who

39:07

could cough up a spot for Paul

39:09

Skeens? I think Bailey Falter would be

39:12

my first choice of like most likely to be shifted into

39:15

more of a long relief rule. Because Contreras

39:18

and Luis Ortiz,

39:20

interestingly, guys who have popped in stuff

39:22

plus in the past, but Contreras

39:24

couldn't keep his fastball shape. Ortiz

39:27

couldn't command it, look

39:29

like they're in the bullpen. Ortiz could

39:31

come back out of it, I think easier than Contreras.

39:35

But they've also got Quinn Priester, and

39:38

they even signed Domingo-Hermont. So there's other

39:41

options that Bailey Falter hold on

39:44

that position seems like

39:46

it could falter quickly. Yeah, nice

39:49

first start of the season too for Jared

39:51

Jones. I think he gets the Marlins during

39:53

the opening weekend. So probably has some streaming

39:55

appeal even in some of those more shadow

39:57

leagues out there that have first-hand, first-hand, first-hand.

40:00

First served moves some

40:02

other injuries to get to how about Paul Seawall

40:04

the grade two oblique strain So we're right back

40:06

to where we were You know this time last

40:08

year looking at this Arizona bullpen and trying to

40:11

figure out who actually is the

40:13

likely Candidate for most

40:15

saves names include Kevin

40:17

ginkle Ryan Thompson Scott

40:19

McGuff Maybe there's other

40:22

sleepers in there. I think it's gotta be a

40:24

ginkle Thompson you've got

40:26

that that The very

40:28

few closers have had that arm

40:30

slot Yeah, you know real

40:32

low and if it leads

40:34

to platoon splits It's it's not a power

40:36

pitcher people want a power pitcher. Kevin ginkle

40:38

was a power pitcher I mean

40:40

Justin Martinez, I think he got sent

40:42

down Yeah,

40:45

really good stuff but look very very low

40:47

grades on the command right now Yeah, they

40:50

they optioned him they option him on the

40:52

10th of March. So he wasn't even hanging

40:55

around for long so

40:58

It's ginkle for me Maybe Martinez comes

41:00

up for the roster slot and becomes part

41:02

of that bullpen But I you know that

41:05

I guess they can't depend on his command

41:07

in the night That's

41:09

getting cool for me. Are you ready to

41:11

throw? 1520 plus

41:13

percent here budget at Kevin ginkle like doesn't that

41:16

that drive you a little bit nuts when it comes

41:18

to fantasy baseball Where you have this

41:20

player that you outside of like NL only leagues

41:22

or draft and hold you you wouldn't have stashed

41:24

away Because Paul see you all the pretty solid

41:26

closer See you all gets hurt and

41:28

all of a sudden. Nope. There goes 20% of

41:31

my fab budget if I need saves like that's I don't

41:33

know. It's something about that's frustrating. I've just never

41:35

I've never I won't do it even

41:38

10% I Like

41:41

I said, I I put you

41:43

know $15 out of a thousand on

41:46

Brock Stewart What I

41:48

want to do is get that guy a week

41:50

early. Yeah, you know So

41:54

I tend to have I tend to

41:56

just dedicate one dense slot to prospecting

42:00

on saves so that I can spend $15 rather

42:02

than $200. I

42:04

don't ever want to spend $200. You could spend $200 on

42:06

Ginkle, get four saves, and

42:09

then Seawall's back. I mean,

42:11

with a grade two oblique strain, the window's a

42:13

little bit longer, but it's still a situation where

42:15

Seawall should be the guy once he gets back.

42:18

That hopefully will temper the biz a little bit

42:20

on Ginkle. But I'm with you. I think Ginkle

42:22

is the clear cut next option up for

42:25

the Dbacks. Jordan Romano is likely

42:27

to begin the season on the IEL with

42:29

what they're calling elbow inflammation. So similar to

42:31

the Yuri Perez diagnosis in that, it doesn't

42:33

seem like there's a structural problem in play

42:35

here. And given that he's

42:37

a veteran reliever as opposed to a very

42:40

young future ace, maybe

42:43

there's a quicker return for

42:45

Romano. The other problem for the Jays

42:47

in the short term, though, is Eric

42:49

Swanson, who might be the next option

42:51

up ordinarily, is down with a forearm

42:53

injury right now. So is it Yemi

42:55

Garcia, Chad Green, or somebody else that

42:57

you're looking at as a short term

42:59

replacement for Romano in Toronto? I

43:02

was talking to a Blue Jays coach,

43:04

and I think it's Yemi,

43:08

really. Yes.

43:12

Don't trust me. I'll

43:15

call him Garcia for now. Garcia

43:19

has had a good spring. Stuff-wise,

43:21

I really like Chad Green, and

43:24

I think he could do the job. I

43:27

think that we are all humans,

43:29

though, and you're

43:31

going to look at that 7-8 ERA for Chad

43:33

Green and

43:36

be influenced by it, even if you think his stuff is

43:38

good. So I'm

43:40

thinking Green is the setup guy, and

43:43

Garcia is the closer. I think there's even been

43:45

some comments to that effect. Yeah, it

43:47

does seem like Garcia has the inside track. On

43:51

a personal note, I think Igariega is

43:53

the most ridiculous letter in the alphabet

43:55

in Spanish. It's just the letter Y,

43:57

but it doesn't appear in a

43:59

lot of words. You know stand

44:01

alone. It means and like there's just there's a

44:03

lot going on there So I

44:05

need to go take another Spanish class and

44:07

wasn't there even some discussion with Jordan Alvarez

44:10

is actually Jordan Alvarez I remember that beginning

44:12

his career and everyone's still calling him your

44:14

Don. So I don't know Take

44:17

a lot of Spanish. No one ever told me to pronounce

44:19

wise like J's Yeah, but

44:21

it was like regional differences. There's right Rico.

44:24

There's Cuba Again,

44:26

maybe didn't take enough years of Spanish needs

44:28

maybe more So they

44:30

didn't have a poor degree. I don't know

44:33

now. I've got it. We got to dig in even further

44:36

Some other news Brian Wu will begin

44:39

the year on the aisle with elbow

44:41

inflammation news came down Like

44:44

I was clicking Brian I

44:46

clicked Brian Wu to pick him and then some of the

44:48

chat goes you didn't see the news And

44:50

I click over to see the news and I was

44:52

like that news came in like a minute

44:55

ago you Like

44:58

you saw this news so you have like Big

45:01

trade forces something open watch draft man I

45:04

should have but I was trying to draft

45:06

from a little league baseball game. So sorry

45:08

I know I didn't see the news dang

45:10

it limited screen resources drafting from a game

45:13

like that Came right

45:15

after I took verlander where I was like, he's

45:17

an injury stash. We got unlimited. I know it's

45:19

perfect Yeah injury

45:21

guy injury guy nice Later

45:24

I took the Grom just to just to throw it

45:26

all in there Might as well if

45:28

you got the spots to stash them away With

45:31

Wu the good news here is they did

45:33

have him go through an MRI it came

45:35

back clean They're hoping seven to ten days

45:37

of rest. He'll start throwing again. So Emerson

45:39

Hancock steps in for now, but it may

45:41

be April or even

45:43

just part of April before Wu was back

45:45

in the equation for Seattle Yeah,

45:48

I'm hoping you know when I was doing

45:50

my main event draft Which

45:53

I just completed we kind

45:55

of had pitchers in two buckets one was

45:57

missus a month Where

45:59

it's just a little bit harder to like hold

46:01

them and think about them and maybe it's gonna

46:03

get worse you know and misses a couple weeks

46:06

and we we had a little bit of distinction

46:08

there I I think we was

46:10

on that side closer to the couple of weeks

46:12

than the full month yeah based on we know

46:14

right now I would agree with

46:16

that assessment circling back to

46:18

the Diamondbacks Eduardo Rodriguez has a lat

46:20

injury so he was placed on the

46:23

aisle that opened up a spot for

46:25

both Ryan Nelson and Tommy Henry to

46:27

begin the season the more I look

46:29

at that bullpen or that rotation the

46:32

more I think Ryan Nelson's probably the

46:34

permanent fifth starter once erod comes back

46:37

because it was sort of announced that Henry

46:39

was in because of the Eduardo Rodriguez right

46:41

which sort of assumes that Nelson's in already

46:45

and the lat strains are this is

46:47

a this is difficult for a lot of reasons

46:49

one is that it

46:51

sounds like back but it's really kind

46:54

of part of the shoulder apparatus like

46:57

it's really it's all tied together it's you know

46:59

it's it's hard to be like oh this is

47:01

a very distinct injury but

47:04

also and whatnot yeah exactly but also

47:06

it's an actual injury was we just

47:08

talked with that who and

47:10

Cabrera impingement is close

47:14

but you know some of these inflammations are

47:17

are less likely to be an

47:19

actual injury they may turn into an injury or they may

47:21

be hiding an injury sometimes you do a scan if you

47:23

have the information we heard learn this a little bit we

47:26

were talking about this whichever may which is like if

47:28

you have swelling if you have inflammation sometimes you don't catch

47:31

the actual injury so it could turn

47:33

out that some of these inflammations or

47:35

injuries but I will take inflammation over

47:38

an actual strain so if

47:40

I had Eduardo Rodriguez and there were options

47:42

out there on the wire and it wasn't

47:44

a Kiever League I've

47:46

already been the low man but I would just

47:48

drop Eduardo Rodriguez that's

47:50

the easy way to go in

47:52

shallow leagues deeper leagues a little

47:54

tougher again a 15-teamer he's is

47:57

he good enough to hold on to like he's right on

47:59

that borderline for me. I wouldn't,

48:01

I think I have a great 60th,

48:04

so I feel like he's pretty close to the

48:06

streaming line anyway. Yeah, if he's that close to

48:08

the streaming line for you when healthy, then I

48:10

think it's an easier drop for you. I think

48:12

I'm a little higher on E-Rod, but tough

48:15

call to make for sure. A

48:17

few more news and notes here. Jackson Holiday

48:19

falls short of the Orioles opening day roster.

48:21

It seems like he was heating up as

48:23

the camp went along as well, but the

48:25

question for most people is, how long do

48:28

you think we're going to have to stash

48:30

Jackson Holiday in redraft leagues before he breaks

48:32

through with the Orioles? I

48:35

believe that the kind of

48:38

Super 2 area,

48:41

like the extra year of team

48:43

control, whatever, is May

48:45

25th for

48:48

players who don't have any time. So

48:52

he could be magically ready in late May.

48:56

There was a 30% strikeout rate this spring

48:58

that was pretty surprising to everybody because it

49:00

came with a 19% whiff rate where he

49:03

had 8s and 9s before. So

49:06

I'm sure that was part of the

49:08

sort of surprising underlying numbers that they

49:12

just wanted to see him go back to AA

49:14

or go back to AAA and mash again. There's

49:19

also the question of who's

49:22

he replacing? So if

49:24

Westburg's playing fine, then

49:27

what's the deal? What do you need to pick him up

49:29

for? I guess you're

49:31

playing Ureas at third. Yeah.

49:35

It's just not that high of a bar. I think

49:37

if he goes to AAA, mashes for

49:39

a couple of weeks, gets the K rate down,

49:41

they could say, let's just go for

49:43

the rookie of the year award. Let's go for

49:46

that draft pick compensation and play it that way.

49:48

Oh, I had somebody point out this. This is

49:50

interesting. On holiday, I

49:52

don't know that you're going to platoon him, but he

49:54

is a lefty batter and there's a weird twist of

49:56

the schedule. I think the ores start

49:59

with like four. lefties in the first five or

50:01

six games. So,

50:03

uh, it's possible that you just

50:05

would want this guy to hit the ground

50:08

running and not, you know, Hey,

50:10

opening day, you've got five lefties in a

50:12

row. That's fair.

50:14

Yeah. And I think with where he was

50:16

going in read draft, I think you, you

50:18

knew this was a possible outcome and you

50:20

probably had a fixed number of lineup periods

50:22

that you hoped you'd be able

50:24

to stash him for, I would guess

50:26

the month for most people, if it's not up

50:28

by the end of April and you don't have enough

50:30

bench. You're not going to wait all the way to May 25th.

50:33

I don't think so. I mean, most likely your roster is

50:35

not going to hold out. They

50:38

take time to hold shape that long. Worked

50:40

that way. Um, they did put Colton couser

50:42

on the opening day roster. He had a

50:44

huge spring. The playing time questions in

50:47

the outfield or are just as interesting as what we've

50:49

seen in the outfield and with couser, he's a lefty

50:51

in an outfield that has a few

50:53

different options between, you know, Mullins being the center

50:55

fielder. Sontagner being a switch hitter

50:58

and Austin Hayes being a

51:00

righty, like that looks like the best

51:02

path is wrestling playing time away from

51:04

Hayes. And then of course, you know,

51:06

pushing someone else into the DH mix

51:08

along with Ryan Mountcastle, but between

51:10

O'Hern and Mountcastle at first base in DH.

51:12

That's the other spot you could look at

51:15

and say something could give with one of

51:17

those guys, you shift everybody around a little

51:19

bit and suddenly Colton couser ends up with

51:21

a spot to call his own. So another

51:23

kind of fluid aspect of what the Orioles

51:25

have right now. Yeah.

51:28

Uh, jumping ahead again to

51:30

my player shares, Cedric Mullins,

51:32

I have five shares and

51:35

I've, I've got, uh, an

51:37

ongoing conversation, uh, with

51:39

somebody in my, in my DMS about,

51:42

uh, we've got a beer riding on

51:44

it now. I

51:47

use the reason, my reasoning for taking him

51:49

is he's, uh, usually available after pick one

51:52

50. Um, so

51:54

I usually get him in the 10th, 11th,

51:56

12th rounds. And he represents to me, a

51:58

guy, uh, who should hit. at least 15

52:00

homers and steal 30 bags. So,

52:02

you know, I pick 150 makes a lot of sense.

52:06

His line of reasoning is they're playing

52:08

Kouser in center. He's not

52:10

a platoon fit with Mullens cause they're both

52:12

lefties and his defense is not

52:14

as good as Mullens. So I think

52:17

the Kouser in center was just, can we play

52:20

him there sometimes? And

52:22

maybe they play him against lefties over

52:25

Mullens cause he's just a

52:27

little bit better against lefties than Mullens. I

52:31

still think Mullens is at least getting two thirds

52:33

and I think center field is a place you'd

52:35

rather just stick someone all the time. So

52:38

I'm also looking at this roster and saying,

52:40

you know, who is the guy, is there

52:42

somebody here that they're trying to sneak into

52:44

the organization? This is something that like Farhan

52:46

does where somebody makes the opening

52:49

day roster and then gets cut like two

52:51

weeks into the season because it's easier to

52:53

sneak someone through waivers once

52:55

the rosters are set and all the

52:57

other teams are like, no, I've got my roster. Do

53:00

I really want Nevan? I might've liked Nevan two

53:02

weeks ago but I made a decision

53:05

from this guy. So to me, it's maybe Tyler Nevan

53:08

cause I was looking, did Nick Mayton make this roster? No.

53:11

And who is the bottom

53:13

guy on this roster that made it? And

53:15

it's Tyler Nevan for me. Yeah, I think

53:18

it's Nevan and then Matteo. But

53:22

Rios and Matteo have like real

53:24

solid use cases. Yeah,

53:27

I think Rios' use case is better

53:29

for this roster. But

53:32

Matteo is infield-outfield. Right.

53:36

Which is really useful. So Tyler

53:38

Nevan is just a backup first baseman, Thursday's

53:40

an outfielder. That's

53:42

the Jackson holiday spot because you can play

53:44

Jackson at second where he was

53:46

playing all spring and play Westburg and Uris at third.

53:50

It's gonna work itself out. I'm pretty confident we're

53:52

still gonna see the guys that we wanna see

53:54

in Baltimore for most of the season even though

53:56

we're gonna wait just a little bit longer for

53:58

Jackson holiday to get that opportunity. We

54:00

may have a late shift in St. Louis as a

54:02

result of the collision in the outfield. I happen to

54:04

be watching this game on Monday afternoon. Jordan

54:07

Walker and Dylan Carlson conversed on the ball

54:09

in the gap. And kind of at the

54:11

last minute Walker tried to dive out of

54:13

the way and kind of went low on

54:15

Dylan Carlson. Carlson hurt his shoulder. I haven't

54:17

seen any follow ups yet as far as

54:20

whether or not there's structural damage. But if

54:22

Carlson were to miss time, they may have to

54:24

turn to Victor Scott earlier than they anticipated in

54:26

St. Louis. Yeah, I

54:28

saw some early bids, speculating on that. Victor Scott

54:30

is a burner, 105 steals across all the levels

54:32

last year or something like that.

54:37

He's a son of

54:39

sprinters. He was

54:41

telling me a cool thing about how his

54:43

dad used to hold an iron pole out

54:45

15 yards away

54:47

from him and tell him to sprint. And

54:52

he held it out so that he had to go under it. Because

54:55

it's good to stay low at first when you sprint

54:57

and then come up high and not just like come

54:59

up high right away. So he had

55:01

this like whole dad with the iron

55:03

pole that I thought was interesting. But

55:06

yeah, no, I think he's really

55:09

interesting. I think he has non-zero

55:11

power. So I think he's 10 to 15 homers, 50, 60

55:15

steals if you gave him a full year. Obviously

55:19

for me, the best defensive center fielder

55:21

that they have as an option. Yeah,

55:24

it'd be a tough break for Carlson if he

55:27

loses this job while he's hurt. But

55:29

at least it's a possibility because Scott

55:32

really looks like the future in center field

55:34

for the Cardinals. Matt

55:36

McLean dealing with a shoulder injury, still not

55:38

sure what the result of his examination on

55:41

Monday will reveal, but just another

55:43

problem. It's so bad because the

55:45

bad words were uttered, surgery

55:48

is on the table. Yeah. So

55:50

this one, he's been dropping to a bench

55:52

pick where people are like, well, I'll drop

55:54

him if he has surgery. Yeah,

55:56

it kind of feels like that's the direction. That

55:58

story is headed. Garrett Mitchell

56:00

injury could actually open up more

56:02

time gonna lead off. Yeah,

56:05

it's gonna make the team So

56:08

Brewer's Twitter is still kind of in

56:10

me how good is Garrett Mitchell phase

56:12

Which is fair because it's

56:14

been a limited sample. He's been productive with

56:17

a really high k-rate That doesn't quite seem

56:19

like who he is the player Now

56:22

with Mitchell having a fractured left hand that's

56:24

gonna be a For

56:26

the six-week injury you're

56:28

probably gonna see Sal Freelik go back from the

56:30

dirt To center field and then

56:33

you see more Joey or T's at third

56:35

base That would be my my guess as

56:37

to like what the most common adjustment would

56:39

be roster Mitchell injury wemer comes back up

56:42

Yeah, wemer would be the extra outfielder

56:45

if they need another center fielder on

56:47

the roster. Yeah, but we were

56:49

wouldn't play much in that

56:51

configuration because of handedness

56:54

Right. Yeah, it'd be like mostly small side platoon.

56:56

I don't even know how much they're gonna sit Freelik against

56:58

lefties I think they're gonna let free look play against lefties,

57:01

but they were trying to get him in the lineup Yeah,

57:04

and I think with Freelik I think he makes a

57:06

lot more sense to me as a table setter in

57:08

the one spot than he did in the heart of

57:10

the Order last year where they were hitting him after

57:12

they brought him up. Oh, yeah

57:14

I mean, he's the contact guy

57:16

without much power high OBP speed

57:18

occasional power fits really well I

57:20

think at the top of

57:22

that lineup that appears to be the fallout of

57:24

the Garrett Mitchell injury We didn't get a chance

57:26

to talk about this yet either J.D. Martinez has

57:29

joined the Mets on a one-year deal and that

57:31

looks like it was the reason why Mark Vientos

57:33

has been optioned back to triple-a to start the

57:35

season it's awesome tweet that was like There

57:39

was like it showed a picture of the

57:41

Antos and J.D. Martinez talking to cage and

57:43

then underneath it said You

57:45

know J.D. Martinez Sorry for taking

57:48

your job kid and then the Antos

57:50

saying back. Well, you know, they

57:52

you know, it hasn't been determined You know,

57:54

you know, we'll see what happens and then

57:56

Jason Martinez says sorry for taking your job

58:02

Let me be a bummer to have a spot

58:05

that you think is going to be yours all

58:07

spring in the last 10 days, last week a

58:09

veteran comes in and you just know crap that

58:11

is. It's a lot of playing time that just

58:14

got chewed up by a signing where JD is

58:16

probably going to hit cleanup in this lineup. So

58:18

if there was a late draft season drop in

58:20

terms of where he was going, that

58:23

probably gets corrected over the last week. He's also not expected

58:25

to be ready for opening day. It's going to take a

58:27

little more time to get ready, but not

58:30

long after opening day, JD Martinez probably

58:32

hitting behind Pita Lanzo for the Mets.

58:35

And JD Martinez took the job, the

58:37

offer from the Mets over the

58:40

Giants. Both

58:42

of them have pitching friendly parks and

58:46

somebody was pointing out that the

58:49

different park factors and such and such.

58:51

But the one thing about park factors that

58:53

doesn't quite capture it all, and this is

58:55

something that players have actually literally asked me

58:57

to model for them, which isn't quite out

59:00

in the space. So if you want an

59:02

idea that isn't quite out there, is

59:05

more granular park factors. I

59:07

think I've seen some stuff about like sort of

59:09

center right or whatever, but like

59:12

doing a better job of like mapping expected

59:15

home runs and expected

59:18

output specifically with their

59:20

swings and their sort

59:22

of heat maps in

59:25

general, because he said specifically in the thing, particularly

59:28

those that go to right center. And

59:30

I have to say right handers that go

59:33

to right center do not fare that well

59:35

in San Francisco. That's called

59:37

triple's out. It's not

59:39

called home run now. No, and

59:41

JD Martinez isn't going to turn the double.

59:46

No, that's the downside. I mean, at this stage of his

59:49

career. If

59:51

you kind of look at his spray chart

59:53

from 2023, 11 homers were to dead center

59:55

and to right center. He had four that

59:57

were completely oppo to right. It

1:00:00

should be a little better for him at City Field than

1:00:02

it would have been in San Francisco.

1:00:04

I also think it would be a little weird

1:00:06

to have J.B. and Jorge Soler on

1:00:08

the same roster. Like, you don't want to play Jorge

1:00:10

Soler in the outfield a lot. Maybe that

1:00:12

offer is on the table for Soler. Yeah, it

1:00:15

might have been back then, but I

1:00:17

don't know. I'm okay with J.B. Martinez. He's

1:00:19

36 now. I think he's got that. Could

1:00:22

slip pretty quickly, even though the quality of

1:00:24

contact is so good. Injuries

1:00:26

have kind of been an on-again-off-again problem for him

1:00:29

too, so I'm not saying he's

1:00:31

a must-grab sort of player, but I'm

1:00:33

a little worried, especially with the K-rate jumping last

1:00:35

year. 31% K-rate's

1:00:37

a big, big leap for J.D. Martinez.

1:00:41

Could this team win a wildcard? Yes,

1:00:43

it could. All right, last

1:00:46

topic for today. Your most

1:00:48

heavily-rostered players for this season.

1:00:51

Who is important to several

1:00:53

of your teams? And before

1:00:55

we started recording, you

1:00:57

gave me a crack at the number one name on the list. I

1:01:00

think I narrowly missed, but number one is

1:01:02

not a surprise. If you listen to the

1:01:04

show, if you had three

1:01:06

guesses, I would say most of our listeners would

1:01:08

pretty confidently land it. Put a

1:01:10

name in your head now. Think for a minute. Who

1:01:13

do you think Eno's most-rostered player is so far in

1:01:15

2024? As

1:01:17

a run-up to this, I

1:01:19

just want to say that most-rostered players are interesting because

1:01:21

they are not going to be the players that you

1:01:24

necessarily think are the best. Because

1:01:27

the best players you

1:01:29

require, maybe it's a keeper league

1:01:32

situation, and Acuna's kept. I

1:01:34

obviously think Acuna is the best player in the big

1:01:36

leagues this year in terms of position players. Definitely easiest,

1:01:38

the best player. But how many times do I get

1:01:40

the first pick? That

1:01:42

actually happens to be a big deal in

1:01:44

the first 20 to 30 picks. If

1:01:48

I pick one, there's going to be picks

1:01:50

that I'm not accessible, like I can't get after

1:01:53

that. What ends up

1:01:55

happening is these lists end up telling you who

1:01:58

do you like late in a draft. That's

1:02:01

what you're doing because it's late in the

1:02:03

draft. You can jump a guy a round

1:02:05

or two off of ADP because it doesn't

1:02:07

matter as much. You know, like you're in

1:02:09

the draft taking the YOLO part of the

1:02:11

draft. So this is my

1:02:13

YOLO list and my number one is the

1:02:15

most boring player ever. It's not a YOLO

1:02:18

at all. It's Seth Lugo. Of

1:02:20

course it's Seth Lugo. And the reason

1:02:22

that he has shown up on so

1:02:24

many set places is that I

1:02:27

do take risk in my pitching staff. And

1:02:30

I see Lugo as one of the last

1:02:32

guys that is not that risky. I don't

1:02:34

think he's got great upside, but I think

1:02:37

I will start him 75% of the time

1:02:39

when I own it. I

1:02:41

think I'll start him for almost every start in Kansas

1:02:44

City and I'll start him half the time on the

1:02:46

road. And

1:02:48

a 75% starter where

1:02:50

he goes, he goes among the streamers, the 50%ers,

1:02:52

the guys that may not

1:02:55

even make the opening day roster. He

1:02:58

goes against the guys that you may drop two starts

1:03:00

in. So that's, I

1:03:02

take, okay,

1:03:04

so a couple spots down. Actually

1:03:07

next because there's a tie. So

1:03:09

I have seven shares of Seth Lugo. I

1:03:12

have five shares of Edward Cabrera. Now that

1:03:15

makes a lot more sense to

1:03:17

people being like, oh yeah, YOLO. But

1:03:21

Lugo and Cabrera are a package

1:03:23

deal. You know what I mean?

1:03:25

Lugo is the one that's going to make the

1:03:27

starts. Edward Cabrera is the one that I may

1:03:29

actually have to drop now. But

1:03:32

you know what I mean? Like it's the,

1:03:34

that's the pairing. And so Matt

1:03:36

Manning, I have five shares. That

1:03:38

one didn't work out. We'll see how long I hold on to

1:03:40

him. A lot of, and then a lot of these shares are

1:03:42

in different types of leagues. So I have Matt Manning and keeper

1:03:45

leagues where I just, I just hold on to him until he

1:03:47

comes back up. And he was,

1:03:49

he was, didn't cost anything. I'm Matt Manning and draft and

1:03:51

holds. Fine. I'm going

1:03:53

to do some innings at some point in the season. You know,

1:03:55

I'm not that worried to get sent down, but

1:03:59

Tanner Halk. He pairs with

1:04:01

Seth Lugo really well. You take a

1:04:03

Seth Lugo, you take a Tanner Hulk. You're hoping Tanner

1:04:05

Hulk is really really good

1:04:07

and you're hoping Seth Lugo just

1:04:10

stays healthy. That's the different, it's

1:04:12

like you know having different approaches.

1:04:14

So that's those are my, and then you

1:04:17

know I have what I have

1:04:20

four shares each of a

1:04:22

couple closers and it's funny

1:04:24

they're not what I think of the best closers but

1:04:26

I've been doing this thing where I take a top

1:04:28

closer and then I take a cheap closer

1:04:31

right and I take a real cheap closer. So

1:04:33

my most roaster roaster closers are

1:04:35

not the ones I think of the best

1:04:38

again but they are Robert Suarez, Hunter Harvey

1:04:40

and Carlos Estebes. Why? Because I look

1:04:42

up in the you know 20th round and

1:04:44

say which closers are left and

1:04:48

these are the ones that I actually I like them a little

1:04:50

bit. So if you want a late

1:04:52

closer Suarez Harvey and Estebes are

1:04:54

fine for me. Interesting

1:04:57

yeah I mean it makes sense like we've talked

1:04:59

about this a few different draft seasons now and

1:05:01

you end up with these later players that are

1:05:03

generally easier to get on your roster as your

1:05:05

most rostered players when you play a lot. Lugo

1:05:08

is just one that I'm happy you have them

1:05:10

as many places as you do because I know

1:05:12

sometimes you're in a room people know who you

1:05:14

like. He actually got tonight from me a couple

1:05:17

times. I could have had 10 chairs. I've got

1:05:19

like jeez four different sites I'm playing

1:05:25

on right now and I've got fewer

1:05:27

NFBC teams than usual but I got

1:05:31

four on the NFBC platform so far.

1:05:33

Luis Severino is on three and

1:05:37

I've got Severino in labor. I

1:05:39

got Severino in that auction from last night

1:05:41

like there's just he

1:05:44

is my most rostered player. I am

1:05:46

convinced and we talked about it throughout the

1:05:48

draft season that the struggles last year with

1:05:50

the Yankees were the function of tipping pitches

1:05:53

they were not the function of having really

1:05:55

lost stuff or lossy with the command

1:05:57

things and the floor

1:05:59

to me Is so much safer for

1:06:01

him at city field than it was

1:06:03

at Yankee State if you stay to Yankee I

1:06:06

would still have him in a couple places I would

1:06:08

not have him in this many places because it can

1:06:10

go so sideways when it's not

1:06:13

going well in a park like that Yeah,

1:06:16

no, I think that that's a great one. Do

1:06:18

I have a Luis Severino type picture

1:06:21

here? Oh, I have a Luis

1:06:23

Severino type. His name is Tyler O'Neill

1:06:27

Yeah, I'm kind of a similar hit her side. Yeah guy

1:06:29

that's like you own it before I mean Going

1:06:32

to a better park for his skills, you know

1:06:36

But I also I have

1:06:39

five shares of Reese Hoskins which

1:06:42

just sort of snuck up on me and I

1:06:45

think it's just because I

1:06:48

like that the projections say he's gonna be fine

1:06:51

and I'm just not that worried about that kind

1:06:53

of an injury for first baseman You know Yeah,

1:06:57

I think he's gonna roll out of bed and

1:06:59

mash again. I think it's you know another 30

1:07:02

type homers and a 250 average and I've

1:07:05

done a lot of builds where I can afford to take

1:07:07

a little hit on the batting average there and He

1:07:11

also represents a weird spot in

1:07:13

the first base rankings where he's the last one

1:07:17

that You know sort

1:07:19

of upper tier or like he's sort

1:07:21

of a tear break You know, and so

1:07:23

I end up being like well, I don't

1:07:26

really want Jamer Candelario is my

1:07:28

starting first baseman You

1:07:31

know, so I'm gonna go with Hoskins here

1:07:34

Yeah, I think that makes sense That's the

1:07:36

the last chance of a tier last chance

1:07:38

of a player type that definitely seems like

1:07:41

something good end up with a lot Cuz

1:07:43

it even if you use similar builds some

1:07:45

of those players fit multiple Foundations to the

1:07:48

do everything type players O'Neill's a little bit of

1:07:50

a do everything type So he makes sense of

1:07:52

someone you could always say this this helps me

1:07:54

rather than maybe batting average This is gonna help

1:07:56

me in all the other categories doesn't really matter

1:07:58

what I did at the start I'm

1:08:00

gonna go ahead and throw him on my roster here. I've

1:08:03

got a lot of Richie Palacios I missed out on

1:08:05

him last night because of Jason Colette not a surprise

1:08:07

Tried to sneak him through early for a dollar that

1:08:09

didn't work Had money trouble

1:08:11

as I often do in auctions spending too much

1:08:13

early I think about for the first

1:08:16

seven players for like a hundred and forty

1:08:18

bucks Yours

1:08:20

yeah That's

1:08:23

a Derek Van Riper build right

1:08:25

there. Yeah, it was the draft started at

1:08:27

bedtime build So if I get pulled away at it,

1:08:29

so I don't want there to be consequences for stepping

1:08:31

away If I got the foundation I like

1:08:33

you get all her guys on the wire Yeah,

1:08:36

I could miss five or six players, and I

1:08:38

probably wasn't gonna be on those players anyway I

1:08:41

do like playing that way and I did get

1:08:43

players I liked at prices I like it just

1:08:45

it was one of those things were like well

1:08:47

I'm aggressive here this won't be the worst time

1:08:49

to be aggressive given life factors I

1:08:51

ended up with a little bit of Starley Marte because of you

1:08:53

that's your Your four

1:08:56

four for me. Yeah, I'm more like two I

1:08:58

think two or three Across

1:09:00

all the rosters it would really help if I could like Multiple

1:09:03

I can make a spreadsheet I know how

1:09:05

but it'd be great if I could

1:09:07

just click a button and it would just be done for

1:09:10

me So I don't have to do it manually. Yeah, I

1:09:12

actually comb through all my different teams to add to my

1:09:14

it was it was not the most Scientifically

1:09:17

rigorous so I may have may

1:09:19

have lost some guys But I just sort of did

1:09:21

it by I started my days interesting to me just

1:09:23

because last year he was hurt

1:09:27

He was terrible. He's 35 and he stole 24 backs Hmm

1:09:33

in 344 played events, so it's like that's

1:09:35

a that's just a steel play for me

1:09:37

I'm just like hey, that's that's

1:09:39

the worst case scenario. I just get 25

1:09:41

bags in half a season. Yeah, man I'll

1:09:44

take it 25 bags 25 bags.

1:09:46

I need those it'll be nice Yeah,

1:09:48

you're done Alvarez on four teams. That's kind

1:09:51

of unusual That's

1:09:53

pretty high up. I think my highest up guide

1:09:55

is like that is Ellie do I cruise I

1:09:57

ended up with four shares I will say

1:09:59

two of them are keeper leagues. So

1:10:02

that means I picked them up as a prospect or

1:10:04

you know I once had a

1:10:06

birdie a whisper in my ear, and so I

1:10:08

went and picked him up as well. I think I

1:10:14

even said that on this pod at some point a

1:10:16

long time ago. So if anybody's

1:10:19

been listening for a while they know

1:10:21

that I've loved Ellie since that moment

1:10:23

because hitting the ball hard is I want

1:10:26

you to do two things. I want you to make

1:10:28

contact and I want to hit the ball hard. That's why I tell my kid. I

1:10:31

want you to do two things. I want you to make contact and

1:10:33

hit the ball hard. Play

1:10:35

split is good but you can

1:10:37

learn it over time. So Ellie's

1:10:39

my foreshare. Yordon, I would rather

1:10:41

have foreshares of Yordon, but

1:10:45

the cookie didn't crumble that way. Yeah,

1:10:47

I had a lot of late draft positions

1:10:49

over the course of draft season so far.

1:10:51

It just reminds me of 2022. That was

1:10:53

the year I had a bunch of Aaron

1:10:55

judge that year. Just I don't

1:10:57

know, like how do you not like a guy

1:10:59

that hits for average nearly 40 home runs of the

1:11:01

year before, steals a few bases, plays

1:11:04

in a great hitter friendly park, like ticked all the

1:11:06

boxes. I didn't expect the 16 steals or the 62

1:11:08

home runs, but it just

1:11:10

felt like a super safe player

1:11:13

could have one of those years where he pops. That's sort

1:11:15

of the mindset I think that

1:11:17

pushed me towards Yordon in so many of those

1:11:19

leagues. There's a statistical argument for

1:11:21

it too, which is just that home

1:11:25

runs are co-related. Co-related.

1:11:28

There's a co-correlation between home runs, runs batted

1:11:30

in, and runs. And

1:11:40

batting average really. I mean it's still a hit. So

1:11:44

there's more co-correlations with the

1:11:47

traditional five by five stats for a home

1:11:49

run than there is for a stolen base.

1:11:52

Stolen base is lightly correlated to runs, but

1:11:54

it doesn't mean you get a run right

1:11:56

away. So it's not even that. And you

1:11:59

can get runs. from guys that don't

1:12:01

steal bases, you know? It's,

1:12:03

so, you know, that's the

1:12:05

argument for punting stolen bases is that you

1:12:07

don't accidentally punt three

1:12:10

categories just by punting stolen bases. If

1:12:12

you punt homers, you're

1:12:15

punting like two or three categories. Like, it's

1:12:17

never a good idea to punt homers, I'm

1:12:19

pretty sure. If you're in a five by

1:12:21

five league and you punt homers, you are

1:12:23

probably not going to win that league. That's

1:12:25

what I think. It's very hard to find

1:12:27

a combination of players that does well in

1:12:29

everything else but is bottom of the pack

1:12:31

in power. And

1:12:33

the league also just doesn't reward

1:12:35

those players anymore. Maybe

1:12:38

in the 70s you could have had like

1:12:40

the all speedster, you know, shortstop guys, you

1:12:42

know, who hit 15 homers, 10 homers, but

1:12:45

the league doesn't play those guys anymore. You

1:12:48

know, my kid was asked about Brian Turing

1:12:50

last night, and he goes, don't

1:12:53

you think he could just keep playing because he's great at defense?

1:12:55

And I'm like, yeah, as a backup, like

1:12:58

I just, like that type of player doesn't usually

1:13:00

get a starting job anymore. There's very few

1:13:02

players like that. Even Victor Scott, the

1:13:04

reason I like him is because I keep saying he

1:13:07

has non-zero power. If he had zero power, it'd be

1:13:09

hard for him. What are we seeing with

1:13:11

Istori Ruiz? He's going to be platooned this year. It

1:13:14

has already begun. The

1:13:16

key difference for me with Ruiz and

1:13:18

even Tarang is that Tarang is a

1:13:20

premium defender and Ruiz is not. Ruiz

1:13:22

is not. And I think your only

1:13:24

path out of a part-time role with

1:13:27

that sort of profile as a hitter is to

1:13:29

be a phenomenal defender up the middle. And it

1:13:31

has to be its center or short or catcher.

1:13:34

Right. And Tarang, I think, got away with

1:13:36

it at second in part because the Brewers

1:13:38

had an everyday shortstop, and it

1:13:40

could reach a point where Tarang is a shortstop for

1:13:42

somebody because his defense is that good. I think they're

1:13:45

even holding him around in case he's the shortstop after

1:13:47

it down. I

1:13:49

think having Joey Ortiz there now

1:13:52

takes a lot of pressure away

1:13:54

from Tarang. It makes it quite

1:13:56

a bit less likely that Tarang's that guy now. Or

1:13:59

that Tarang. even plays. Yeah,

1:14:02

it's a legit concern. Other pitchers that have a

1:14:04

lot of places, Shane Bos by the way, like

1:14:07

four leagues now because I just have a fair amount of

1:14:09

I think a three or four shares. The timetable

1:14:12

is gonna be as long as everyone expects

1:14:14

it to be. I

1:14:17

think it's just massaging his innings. Well

1:14:19

yeah, you're backloading them because you wanted to be in

1:14:21

your rotation in the playoffs. Yeah,

1:14:23

I have other ones that won't surprise them. I have four

1:14:25

shares of Dean Kramer. Four

1:14:28

shares of JP France. JP France

1:14:30

is a little bit like Kramer where I'm like, hey,

1:14:32

do you know that he led the league in strikeouts

1:14:34

the year before he came up and struck nobody out?

1:14:37

I think, you know, and what he did in the

1:14:39

minors for France is he used the breaking balls a

1:14:41

lot and then he got to the big leagues and

1:14:43

I don't know maybe gave him a homer off a

1:14:45

breaking ball or something and just went to the changeup

1:14:47

a ton. I think he still has those breaking balls.

1:14:49

I still believe in France. I've

1:14:52

got four shares of Trevor Rodgers. Three

1:14:55

of Grayson Rodriguez. Three

1:14:58

of Joe Boyle has walked everybody

1:15:00

this spring. Yay, super excited for

1:15:02

those three shares. In the defense

1:15:04

of Joe Boyle, at least he

1:15:06

kind of showed you that

1:15:09

flaw before nine. Yeah, I

1:15:11

knew that. You knew going

1:15:13

in. And I didn't spend big picks on

1:15:15

them. Those are some real late picks. Some

1:15:17

higher ones that might surprise you. I have

1:15:19

three of Kirby. When

1:15:22

I could get him, I got him.

1:15:24

And then three of

1:15:27

Verlander where I

1:15:29

just think he's good and I know

1:15:31

he's a little behind but I put him a little bit

1:15:33

more towards the two weeks than

1:15:36

the four weeks. There

1:15:38

was never really an injury announced. It

1:15:40

was just that he's behind. So I like

1:15:44

Verlander there. And here's one that may really

1:15:46

surprise people. I haven't talked about him a

1:15:48

lot. I have three shares

1:15:50

of Michael Soroka. Yeah. We've

1:15:54

talked about him a little bit but I think

1:15:57

he's changed his pitch mix. I don't

1:15:59

have... spring training stuff numbers really, but

1:16:02

the strikeout rate is way up this spring,

1:16:05

and he's got all the road he can handle,

1:16:07

and I'm gonna give him some

1:16:10

of it. He's still only

1:16:12

26 years old, after

1:16:14

all the injuries and all the miss time, and

1:16:17

did it with different stuff and got great results, but this

1:16:19

might be a path for him to also

1:16:21

miss more bats, and we've talked about it. The

1:16:23

White Sox need him to take the ball as

1:16:26

often as he's physically able to, so

1:16:28

no pressure if things aren't going well for

1:16:30

a stretch. They'll keep letting him start, I

1:16:33

think, so long as he's healthy. So yeah, good kind

1:16:36

of late riser, I think, in draft

1:16:38

season, as someone who became a bit more interesting

1:16:40

in March than he might have been throughout most

1:16:42

of the winter. We'll

1:16:44

get to a few more players, I'm sure,

1:16:46

at some point. Maybe the players we regret

1:16:48

not having once the season officially starts. One

1:16:50

last thing is just, I have three hitters

1:16:52

here that do some things well, and I'm

1:16:54

just like, what have you added the next

1:16:56

thing? That's Ty France,

1:16:58

MJ Melendez, and Parker Meadows. I

1:17:01

have three shares each of those. It's like, you do

1:17:03

some good stuff. What if you hit the

1:17:05

ball a little bit harder? What if you struck out a little

1:17:07

less? What if you did this? So

1:17:09

I like taking guys

1:17:12

with medium ceiling, too. That's the kind of thing

1:17:14

I do, is these guys have medium floor, medium

1:17:16

ceiling. I don't expect any of them to be

1:17:18

stars, but their

1:17:20

prices are pretty low, and they do stuff. They

1:17:25

probably play, too. Yeah,

1:17:27

I think those are all pretty intriguing options

1:17:30

where they go mostly after pick 200, and

1:17:32

I think Melendez is gonna play

1:17:34

a lot. He doesn't have that catcher eligibility in

1:17:36

most leagues anymore, but I still like what he

1:17:39

brings to the table, hits the ball very hard,

1:17:41

could unlock a little more power this year

1:17:44

as part of that. Improving Kansas City lineup.

1:17:46

We are gonna go on our way out the door. A

1:17:48

reminder, get a subscription to The Athletic for

1:17:50

$2 a month for the first year. theathletic.com/rates

1:17:53

and barrels. Join the Discord, the link is

1:17:55

in the show description. Be

1:17:57

sure to like this video if you watched us on YouTube. Subscribe to the

1:17:59

YouTube channel. channel if you haven't done so already.

1:18:01

Schedule for the rest of the week. We're

1:18:04

on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. Friday live with

1:18:06

Trevor May at 1 o'clock Eastern. We got

1:18:08

that back on the calendar pretty much every

1:18:10

week all season barring some unforeseen schedule related

1:18:12

stuff that comes up and I don't have

1:18:15

any stuff on the schedule. It's pretty pretty

1:18:17

consistent around here these days so that's gonna

1:18:19

do it for this episode of rates and

1:18:21

barrels. We're back with you on Wednesday. Thanks

1:18:24

for listening.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features