Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:04
Welcome to real world real estate, where we will
0:06
explore, examine and explain the
0:08
real process of buying or selling real estate.
0:11
Here's your host, Steven Clyde,
0:14
Steven Clyde here with your host of real world real
0:16
estate with team Clyde and
0:18
Remax preferred Remax at cherry Hill today,
0:21
we're be sitting down and speaking with
0:24
Linda Hinkle , who is
0:26
an attorney that specializes in family
0:28
law, custody support,
0:31
domestic violence, LGBT
0:33
, uh , adoption, elder
0:35
law guardianships , the state administration
0:37
wills and estate litigation as well.
0:40
Uh, she's a true Jersey girl. She comes
0:42
out of Collingswood . Um, she has
0:45
her J D from Rutgers as
0:47
well as a master's in English and a master
0:49
in teaching from Rowan university currently
0:52
lives in cherry home practices to in Camden
0:54
County. We actually just
0:56
had a wonderful 30 minute conversation,
0:58
but it wasn't recorded for any of you to hear
1:00
. So that one will be done through osmosis
1:02
and maybe some seances, but Linda,
1:05
I greatly apologize for wasting that 30
1:07
minutes. It was a great conversation, but I thank
1:09
you for allowing me to redo this again
1:11
for everybody. So
1:16
we were having a wonderful conversation about
1:18
real estate and relationships and
1:20
real estate and wills. So,
1:23
you know, obviously when it comes to divorce,
1:26
real estate is usually the primary
1:28
property dispute that we come into.
1:31
And I foresee moving forward as
1:33
we've discussed earlier, and now we're going to read
1:35
the SKUs . So I'm going to have fun with this now is we
1:38
record it . You know, we've had a very strange real
1:40
estate market through the pandemic.
1:42
We've , we've seen the great migration, everybody's
1:44
vacating cities and
1:47
moving to the burbs. They either need more space
1:49
or they want a yard. They want out of the condo. They
1:51
want out of the apartment. They need
1:53
the bigger home because they're both working from home
1:56
and they're homeschooling their children in a lot of
1:58
cases. And I foresee
2:01
over the next year to two years, that
2:03
that's going to be the biggest part
2:05
of our real estate market is
2:07
these couples that were forced
2:09
to be together. 24, seven, three 65
2:12
in confined spaces is
2:14
going to drive a divorce issue that
2:16
we're going to shoot see shortly. Right?
2:19
And are you , you're seeing the same thing because you should
2:21
be the leading indicator on this and we're going
2:23
to be the lagging indicator on this.
2:25
Right? Right. So I would agree. There's absolutely
2:27
a divorcing them happening. Uh , China
2:30
had a divorce week before us because
2:32
they had the, they had the disease before us.
2:34
So we sort of knew it was coming and
2:37
it absolutely is happening. People
2:39
are reacting differently to divorce in
2:41
some cases now than they were doing
2:43
prior to COVID. Because
2:46
for example, in some cases they
2:48
don't have the financial means or security
2:51
to leave the home, even though they want a divorce.
2:53
So they're , they're living together or
2:56
they're living together because they share children
2:59
under COVID restrictions, they're working
3:01
together on the homeschooling,
3:03
or they just want to make a pod to protect
3:06
themselves against COVID. So they're
3:08
staying together on the short term, even though
3:10
they're going through a divorce so that
3:12
they can do , they can achieve those
3:14
goals also because
3:16
the financial situation is so influx
3:19
for some people they can't afford
3:21
to move, or in some cases
3:23
they're really excited to move quickly
3:25
because the market is doing so
3:28
well that they're going to make more equity
3:30
than that they were going to make before. And
3:32
they need that, that cash infusion
3:35
to handle things that are going on
3:37
, um, you know, in their, their economic
3:39
life or their job life. So lots
3:42
of changes about how divorce
3:44
is happening , um, and
3:46
lots of changes in how COVID
3:48
affects their ability to
3:50
work together with , with kids and , and things
3:52
like that. But , um,
3:54
definitely I do think we're going to see
3:57
more of a real estate boom,
4:00
going forward as people do
4:02
separate and as their financial
4:04
situation start to stabilize more.
4:07
So let's get , say, yeah , my wife
4:09
has a line that she says, she loves me, but
4:11
she doesn't like me today. It's an,
4:13
it's an ongoing joke in our household. But
4:16
if she came up and said,
4:18
you know, we're done, I've had enough of you. I want to divorce
4:22
in those situations with COVID
4:24
and all the quarantines and the lockdowns
4:26
and the closures are the courts
4:28
even open for someone to pursue this
4:30
Avenue at this point?
4:32
Absolutely. So is it moving
4:34
quickly? Not in every case, some
4:37
of the vintages I work with
4:39
picked up on working from home and
4:41
getting things done really quick,
4:43
and they're doing pretty well. Other vintages,
4:46
not so much, actually, and you really
4:49
can't get a lot done. Um,
4:51
Camden County is struggling right now because
4:53
they're down a judge and , uh
4:55
, most of the work is being done by
4:57
two or three judges and it's, it's,
5:00
they're behind , uh, trying the best,
5:02
but it's rough. Um, so
5:04
there's definitely mechanisms to
5:07
move forward. Uh, if you
5:09
can agree on things, then you
5:11
can get things done a lot quicker than
5:13
if you're going to fight to the bitter end over
5:15
everything for sure, because I can get an uncontested
5:18
divorce done in a couple of months, but if
5:20
we're going to trial, you could be looking at quite awhile
5:23
.
5:23
So when you are going to trial, are you going to
5:25
trial the way you and I are talking
5:28
today via zoom? Or are you still
5:30
actually going into the courtroom in front of the judge?
5:33
No, we're definitely doing mostly zoom.
5:35
There are judges that have started
5:37
doing some in-person , um,
5:40
a couple of judges who , who prefer
5:42
that. Uh, but it is, it
5:44
is a significantly small percentage.
5:47
The majority of work of the judiciary
5:50
at this point in New Jersey is done via
5:52
zoom or
5:54
There's all kinds of different steps. I'm sure in the
5:56
divorce, luckily I've never
5:58
had to experience that. And as my wife
6:00
has told me since day one, I'll need an undertaker,
6:03
not a divorce attorney. So it's very
6:05
clear to me that I don't want to go down that Avenue,
6:07
but, you know, as they make
6:10
these steps, obviously they , they, you
6:12
know, you want to reach out to an attorney, but
6:14
is there, is it a mediation and
6:16
then a court or mediation of settlement
6:18
then the judge, or do they skip
6:20
mediation now? And we're just going right to court.
6:23
So in New Jersey, there's a
6:25
requirement for mediation when
6:27
you have a custody dispute
6:29
of any kind. Um, but
6:32
there's no requirement for mediation, for
6:34
economic differences. So
6:36
you can choose to do mediation.
6:38
If you like. And in some cases I
6:40
have found that is beneficial.
6:43
Even when you have attorneys to
6:45
involve a mediator, when you're just stuck on
6:47
an issue and you, you think you can get there
6:50
without going to child, which is much more expensive
6:53
than a couple hours in the mediator. Um,
6:55
but the steps are just, you know,
6:58
somebody who's going to file usually , uh
7:00
, somebody gets to answer you exchange discovery.
7:02
You either come to a , you either come to
7:04
an agreement or you end up going
7:07
to something called an MESP where you
7:10
talk to two attorneys who just attorneys
7:12
like me, who happened to volunteer
7:14
in that role to tell you what they think a
7:16
court would do. If you can agree to that,
7:19
you can get divorced. If you can't agree,
7:21
then your next step is moving toward
7:23
trial. But like I said, that takes a good year
7:25
or more , um, under normal
7:27
conditions , uh, under the current
7:29
conditions, it can be longer. So
7:32
I think that probably
7:34
only 10% of divorces go
7:37
to trial and most shouldn't, they're really
7:39
very rare cases where I think it makes
7:41
sense to go to trial. If there's a dispute
7:43
over, over alimony
7:46
numbers, if there's a dispute over a business
7:48
that's significant or custody,
7:51
those are really the only reasons that people
7:53
should ever go to trial because honestly,
7:55
everything else is pretty, it's pretty
7:57
easy to figure out what to do,
7:59
especially real estate. They're going to divide
8:02
the real estate that is , um,
8:05
you know, 50 50, if you've , if you
8:07
bought it during the marriage, if somebody
8:09
brought it premarital early , then if
8:11
you bought it in contemplation of marriage,
8:13
that's the term. Um, then
8:16
a judge might find that some or all
8:18
are subject to equitable distribution,
8:21
or , um , if you bought at premarital early
8:23
and you lived in it for a while beforehand
8:25
and nobody, and then the other partner didn't
8:27
contribute to it, you probably don't have
8:29
to include it in the distribution of
8:31
the assets.
8:33
All right . So contemplation
8:35
of marriage, how do you, how does it a lawyer
8:37
in that respect or how does
8:39
a judge determine mindset? Right. If
8:41
I bought the house while I was dating my
8:43
wife, then we got engaged and then we got married.
8:46
How do you prove if I was buying that house in anticipation
8:49
of being married or contemplation where
8:51
I was just buying a piece of real estate?
8:53
Yeah . I mean, it's , it's all pretty circumstantial
8:55
and it really has to do with, how long
8:58
did you had a beforehand? Did you both move
9:00
into it right away? Was
9:02
there talk of the marriage, you both testifying
9:05
to what your intent was at the time and the
9:07
judge calls the, what who's
9:09
telling the truth, the situation.
9:11
All right . So let's say, let's say I just bought the real estate.
9:13
I own it. It's we
9:15
get married and say, I do.
9:17
And we move into that residence.
9:20
It becomes the marital residence at that point. Is
9:22
that from that point forward, are we
9:24
50 50 in the house? Or is it still mine
9:27
Based on what you just described? It sounds like
9:29
you didn't, you purchased it while
9:32
engaged with the intent of moving in
9:34
while married. So that would, that would be a marital
9:36
asset.
9:37
Okay. So I owned it before
9:39
I met my wife, you know,
9:41
and we decided to make it our moule to home.
9:44
We say I do from that day
9:46
forward, is it the equity prior
9:48
is mine and the equity after is ours.
9:50
So if you had it, let's see how to , for two years
9:53
you were living there and then she moves in
9:55
after the marriage, that's still yours.
9:58
And the only time then that she has
10:00
a claim to it, or a portion
10:02
of it is if during the marriage, there's significant
10:05
improvements that change the value
10:07
of the house. So you put on a $50,000
10:10
deck, and now you have more equity during
10:12
the marriage, then that's subject to equity distribution,
10:15
but the original home is not
10:18
Okay. So it's not like a , you know, an,
10:20
a mistake. We do a date of death valuation.
10:23
So we're not doing like a date of marriage value.
10:25
It was where 300. When you got married, when you
10:27
got divorced, it was where 400.
10:29
No, no. The asset itself
10:32
becomes a protected asset, but
10:34
that is adjusted only by
10:37
changes that were made to her during the marriage
10:39
that the marital estate contributed
10:41
to.
10:42
Wow. Okay. So that's a myth,
10:45
lack of a better term that I thought was in place.
10:47
That's not, Oh , I love that. I learned something
10:49
new every day. Uh , so
10:53
relationship wise , and I know when we were speaking of this prerecording,
10:56
we talked a little bit about it, but we've streamlined it
10:58
a little bit if you're in
11:00
a relationship, but you're not married.
11:02
You don't know if you're going to get married, but you do want
11:05
to cohabitate with each other and buy
11:07
a piece of real estate together. The
11:10
first step, probably I would think even before
11:12
meeting with me as your real estate agent
11:14
would be to sit down with an attorney and come up with
11:16
a plan for that real estate. They need to sit
11:18
down with you first, then me, right. Or
11:21
the two of us together
11:22
Smarter. But , um, it's
11:25
also equally valid to have
11:27
that conversation once
11:29
you've decided on a property, but not purchased
11:31
it. So , um, you know, if,
11:33
for example , um, you
11:36
know, I mean, definitely before you signed on
11:38
that dotted line, you should be
11:40
having some kind of clear plan about what
11:42
you're going to do. Um, if
11:44
one partner is going to have
11:46
their name on it, it only is there
11:48
is, has there been a contribution
11:50
by the other party that needs to be because
11:53
if you know , you ever want to get that money
11:55
back, you're not going to get it back.
11:57
If you haven't laid that out clearly,
12:00
unless you get married and then you can prove it
12:03
maybe in correlator , but that's, you know, again,
12:05
keep your records. People don't keep records.
12:08
They don't keep a record of what money was put
12:11
into the down payment, on a house. Even
12:13
if you're doing it while you , while you're married,
12:16
if you're taking premarital money and
12:18
putting it into a down payment, keep
12:20
your records. Because if you get divorced, that
12:22
may be a reason why you get more of a contribution
12:25
out of the house. Okay. Um
12:27
,
12:28
And you're , you're going down this road and
12:31
from everything we've talked about before,
12:34
I would think even though you're in your thirties or your
12:36
late twenties or whatever age you are, not
12:38
only are you planning for that house, but you better be setting
12:41
up your state plan simultaneously pertaining
12:43
to that house.
12:44
Absolutely. Absolutely. You intend
12:46
for your partner to inherit and
12:49
you don't have the kind of deed that's going to
12:51
immediately just transfer that property
12:53
over because you've joined it. You're you're joined
12:55
together. Um, you
12:57
want to make sure that you're clear about that. I
12:59
have done a lot of litigation where partners
13:02
have been together for 20, 30 years. Just
13:05
didn't think about it, but they were going to live forever.
13:08
Uh , the partner who owns the property dies,
13:11
the partner left behind is thrown
13:13
out by the kids or whoever
13:15
else, the state , um,
13:17
you know, because they just don't have a claim
13:19
to that house and they lose everything. And
13:22
I'm certain that the person that loved them
13:24
did not intend that it just didn't make
13:26
it through.
13:28
Well, like we were talked about before we had a client
13:30
that's two years in the process of it. They
13:33
bought the , they did the right thing when they bought it,
13:35
but they didn't take the next step. So they bought,
13:37
you know , tenants in common. So they each own 50%
13:40
of it equally, their shares went
13:42
to their respective estates. They
13:44
had no problem over 10 years until
13:47
one of them passed and they hadn't pre-planned.
13:50
So now the remaining homeowner
13:53
is partners in that home with that
13:55
person's children that he
13:57
has no relationship with. And
14:00
he has to, you know, they want to keep the house
14:02
and he wants to sell the house. And
14:04
they're in, they're spending a lot
14:06
of money and most of the equity
14:08
in litigation over these
14:10
steps, because that next step wasn't taking
14:12
in the pre-planning of
14:15
a state ,
14:16
Absolutely. And estate litigation is
14:18
so much more expensive
14:20
than divorces or anything I do. And family,
14:23
honestly, because , um,
14:25
because that particular kind of court
14:28
takes a very long time, many
14:30
appearances, lots of discovery,
14:32
lots of different avenues that take
14:34
place. It , I mean, you could easily
14:37
eat up an entire state, even
14:39
a largest state fighting over
14:42
minimal things. And so,
14:44
but a state plan, if you
14:46
plan, it costs so much
14:49
less. So the smart
14:51
thing to do,
14:53
All right , so you're , you're, you're planning on
14:55
buying the ring or you're planning on receiving the
14:57
ring. There should be a stop
15:00
the attorney before you enter the real estate side.
15:02
So now when
15:04
we, when, when they're doing this right,
15:06
they're not a couple, so there are two
15:09
individuals. Can they meet with one attorney
15:11
or do they need to have two separate attorneys?
15:14
So they don't have to have two separate
15:16
attorneys, but an attorney can only
15:18
represent one party. So for
15:20
example, Joe and Jill wanted
15:22
to get married. And , um, they're
15:25
thinking about getting married in the future, but they want to purchase
15:27
this house together. Now, Joe can come
15:30
to me and I can advise him and I can create a
15:32
contract and Jill can choose
15:34
to take it to an attorney to review, or Jill
15:36
can say, I know what I'm doing. And I
15:38
agree to it either way.
15:40
Okay. But this, a lot of this
15:42
stuff is outside general
15:45
practitioners, right? And
15:48
I'm not trying to disperse general practitioner
15:50
attorneys, but I see it a lot here
15:52
where general practitioners, aren't really
15:54
good just in the real estate side of things.
15:57
When we, when we bump into them, right.
15:59
Real as true real estate attorneys are great at
16:01
it. There's a lot of GPS
16:03
that, you know, when they , they send me change
16:06
letters, I'm quoting back
16:08
the case law to them that they didn't know because
16:10
I made it so much. I'm assuming
16:12
that the exact same thing applies to
16:14
your special realities here, right.
16:16
Family law, and a state law that there's
16:19
so many nuances to it that you can't be
16:21
specialized in everything right.
16:23
Land when it comes to a state. Um, there
16:25
are, there are some finer
16:28
points that I don't do and I'll
16:30
refer to someone else because there's
16:32
so much there. And so many different
16:34
kinds of things that you can do. Um,
16:36
and you know, there's tax planning
16:39
involved sometimes that I might need to refer
16:41
somebody out on. So there's, there's
16:43
really some complex , complex stuff, but
16:45
absolutely when it comes to family , um,
16:48
no other, no other
16:50
practitioners should be doing family.
16:52
Unfortunately I have had those adversaries
16:55
and saved them many times from creating
16:57
ethics violations for themselves because what
17:00
they're doing and it's such a mess.
17:05
It was funny. I was at a closing once and there was
17:07
a GP representing
17:09
the , the other side of it. And so we call them GPS
17:11
like we would a doctor or the whole
17:15
ball . Yeah. And there was
17:17
a, you know, probably the premier specialized
17:19
real estate attorney in cherry Hill on my
17:21
side of the table. And I, I,
17:24
my wife and I still joke about it. The other attorney
17:26
was flipping through the contract,
17:28
trying to find his point and
17:30
the other, the , the real estate attorney said,
17:33
you're looking for this paragraph, but it
17:35
doesn't apply here because of this and
17:38
get started rattling off the top of his head.
17:40
Right. Like, and I joked saying,
17:42
you know , that attorney was , was very active
17:45
for the board in drafting these contracts. He
17:47
knows it like the back of his hand, just
17:49
like I wouldn't enter into,
17:52
you know, high-end commercial
17:54
real estate, you know, the lower end of
17:56
the stuff is very close to what I do. But there's
17:59
a point where you reach a level in that side
18:01
of it where the, I can't play there anymore.
18:03
Right. It's outside my expertise. I
18:05
bring nothing to the table. Or
18:08
when clients asked me, do you handle Philly also?
18:10
And I say, no, because I bring no expertise
18:13
to it. Right. I don't know the difference between the street and that
18:15
street. And then , so the same thing I think
18:17
applies in the law. So they need to be
18:19
with a specialist like yourself.
18:22
They may also need a real estate attorney as well,
18:24
but they need someone like you, a
18:26
real estate attorney handling the contract and the transaction,
18:29
but someone like you setting up the, after
18:31
the closing part of it, right.
18:32
I mean, I , I have done for
18:35
divorce clients or whatever, like a review of
18:37
simple real estate documents, but
18:39
I don't do closings. Um,
18:41
except I had to do one when I was the
18:44
, uh, when I was appointed as the administrator
18:46
of an estate. So I was actually selling. But
18:48
, um, but I don't do closings and
18:51
use if you're going to have a lawyer for closing,
18:53
which not everybody does, especially in South Jersey.
18:56
But if you're going to, you should
18:58
see a specialist in real estate law because
19:00
they're , they're just going to know what they're doing. And people
19:02
like me are going to know the basics,
19:04
but we're not going to be able to get you out of some significant
19:07
issues.
19:08
And there's, there's a , I mean, so from a relationship
19:10
standpoint, there's a lot of hidden issues that they need
19:12
to talk to an attorney on and
19:14
we could be here all day and probably not cover
19:17
all of them. Sure. Then as
19:20
, as you and I spoke offline, my
19:22
wife and I, and structuring our state
19:25
and not only what I could see
19:27
is making sure that those assets
19:29
are being left to the people we want them to go to. So
19:31
we get the will in place, but also
19:33
we need to start planning for a
19:37
long-term care and disability
19:41
and losing all of that
19:43
wealth that was, or that equity that was
19:45
built up for lack of planning.
19:47
Right. So the sooner we set that up,
19:49
the safer we are. Right. Okay .
19:51
Right. And, you know, let me
19:53
also add, because you're young
19:55
yet. And you know, I say this
19:57
to everybody, they
20:00
also good time to look at life insurance, if you can get
20:02
it because , um , life insurance
20:04
is tax-free and it is a great, it
20:07
provides a number of first
20:09
off. It's quick to get, it
20:11
goes outside of will . You don't have to wait. So
20:14
your life insurance company can,
20:16
can turn a check around really quickly to
20:18
help keep things moving while the
20:20
state's being dealt with. Um, secondly,
20:23
you can , you know , you can get your funeral expenses
20:25
paid out . You know, they'll just look at a life
20:27
insurance policy and say, okay, you have it and
20:29
they'll take care of it. So if you have
20:32
children that don't have a lot of money,
20:34
that's a godsend for them
20:36
to have the ability to take care of your,
20:39
your last wishes and,
20:41
and have the money available to take care of that.
20:43
And finally, it's just a great way of
20:45
pointing and directing to certain
20:48
people , um, outside of
20:50
a will. Uh, so you were talking
20:52
about, you wanted to make sure your grandkids
20:54
, uh, inherited, and you can do
20:56
that by setting up trusts and
20:58
things like that. So that, that money goes to them no
21:00
matter what happens to your spouse or
21:02
your spouses choices after you pass.
21:05
But there's also life insurance to
21:07
make sure that , that the little ones
21:10
get very specific numbers
21:12
of gifts. Um , you
21:14
know, that that's not going to in any way
21:17
be harmed by anyone else's interests
21:19
.
21:20
That's I mean, so if there's a lot of planning involved
21:23
in this, and like I said, I think
21:25
we could speak for hours and only touch
21:27
the surface on it. And I know you have
21:29
a hard time coming up, so I don't want to hold you
21:31
too much. If a young couple
21:33
or a young individual
21:36
they're in a relationship and they're looking to start entering
21:38
into the real estate, what would be the best
21:40
advice you could give them off the bat?
21:43
So are these , is this young couple married or not married
21:45
? Okay. Um, get a contract
21:48
, uh, maybe even form an
21:50
LLC together if you're going to purchase
21:52
real estate together. Um, so
21:54
that you have clear, easy
21:57
ways of dealing with the contracts
21:59
and dealing with a dissolution. If
22:01
the two of you break up, be very
22:03
clear about what money went in, where
22:06
keep your records , uh, keep,
22:08
be very clear about who's putting in
22:10
money to maintain or
22:12
improve the property. Um,
22:14
don't , uh, don't
22:16
assume that everything's going to work out
22:18
because you just don't know, but
22:21
also, you know, COVID
22:23
has taught us younger . Not things
22:25
can happen. So have your estate
22:27
plan ready to, to handle anything that
22:29
might come up and if
22:31
there's minimal assets and
22:34
you're young, there's absolutely no reason
22:36
why you shouldn't get life insurance to protect that
22:38
property. Because if
22:41
you know, the two of you are making $30,000
22:43
a year each, and you have to pay this mortgage.
22:46
Um, if one of you passes away, the other
22:49
one's going to struggle. So a
22:51
life insurance policy for
22:53
enough money to cover that mortgage
22:55
is going to set that other person that you love
22:58
up for their life.
22:59
Good advice. So we're going to hope
23:01
for the best plan for the worst as we should
23:03
, everything in life, especially when we're talking about relationships,
23:06
because marriage is what a greater than 50%
23:08
fail rate for the most part. So
23:11
There's different, there's different ways of approaching that
23:13
statistic. But for certain, we know a lot
23:15
of people get divorced sometimes more
23:17
often than once.
23:20
Well, yeah. Well , I joke with some friends
23:22
that are going on their third, I said, you know, if you're over
23:24
three, you're the problem, not the people
23:26
you're marrying. Right. You're
23:30
the constant doubt . So
23:35
in all of our show notes, we're have the contact
23:38
information for Linda. If you
23:40
have any questions on estate planning or
23:43
marital assets , um, consultations,
23:45
are they, you know, are they,
23:48
do you do free consultations or is there a fee involved
23:50
or a retainer
23:51
Free initial consultations? If
23:54
you need a second one, sometimes, you
23:56
know , people just want to pay for like a half hour of my time. I
23:58
can do that if you just need to talk things through.
24:01
Um, so we, we do all of that, you know, trying
24:03
to help people get things going in their life.
24:06
Okay. All right. So we have all of our contact
24:08
in emails , the best way or Facebook messenger
24:11
or WhatsApp
24:13
Call emails , send a Lama
24:15
with a little gift, whatever, whatever
24:17
it takes,
24:19
You're like me, call me whatever you want. And
24:22
I'll answer it. Just make sure you call. Alright
24:24
, great. I appreciate your time. I know
24:26
you're very busy. I know your time is extremely valuable.
24:29
Truly appreciate it. And I think
24:31
maybe we should come back at a later date
24:33
with a second one of these and dive in a little bit deeper,
24:35
especially on the elder care and
24:38
the estate planning when it comes to real estate. And
24:40
there's a lot of pitfalls there for people that
24:42
I've seen, you know, where the , the
24:45
equity's taken by Medicare and it's gone. And what
24:47
was thought to be an inheritance to children
24:50
is history now. And there was a huge
24:52
penalty charged , backed by
24:54
Medicare against the estate when it
24:56
was sold and distributed. So there's a
24:58
lot there that I think we should talk about. And I think we could spend
25:00
hours talking about relationships in real estate,
25:03
but I can't hold you up. I know you've
25:05
got a time to go. I want to thank you.
25:07
And I'd love to get together. And I
25:09
am going to reach out to you and schedule that meeting
25:12
with you. Me and my wife, to start setting up our
25:14
state because I'm not going to procrastinate
25:16
it anymore. Sounds like a flap . Take
25:18
advantage of it, Linda. Thank you very much.
25:20
Have a great day. Stay safe,
25:23
wash our hands, wear our masks.
25:26
Thank you.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More