Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
Ted Audio Collective. You're
0:08
growing a business and you can't
0:10
afford to slow down. If anything,
0:12
you could probably use a few
0:14
more hours in the day. That's
0:16
where the most successful growing businesses
0:19
are working together in Slack. Slack
0:21
is where work happens with all
0:23
your people, data and information in
0:25
one A I powered place. Start
0:27
a call instantly in huddles and
0:29
ditch cumbersome calendar invites or build
0:31
an automation with work Flow builder
0:33
to take routine tasks off your
0:35
plate. No coding required. Grow your
0:37
Business in Slack! Visit. slack.com to
0:39
get started. This.
0:43
Episode is brought to buy progressive.
0:46
Most. Of you aren't just listening right
0:48
now. you're driving, cleaning, and even exercising.
0:50
But what if you could be saving
0:53
money by switching to Progressive Drivers Who
0:55
saved by switching? Save nearly seven hundred
0:57
and fifty dollars on average and auto
1:00
customers qualify for an average of seven
1:02
discounts multitask right now. quote today at
1:04
progressive.com Progressive Casualty Insurance Company in Affiliates
1:06
National average twelve months savings of seven
1:09
hundred forty four dollars by new customer
1:11
service Who saved with Progressive between June
1:13
twenty twenty Two and May twenty Twenty
1:16
three. Potential savings will vary discounts
1:18
not available in all states and
1:20
situations. Canvasser presents
1:22
unexplained appearances. It was
1:25
an ordinary work until.
1:27
That presentation appeared out of thin
1:29
air. Also, it's early on
1:31
bland way do that agenda just
1:34
right. It sell. Words appear,
1:36
making this unexplainable can.
1:38
Explain a whole. It's. Canvas Ai
1:40
tools. I can generate slides and
1:42
words and seconds. Really, the
1:44
real Mr. Hughes why I'm only
1:47
learning is now. Canada com
1:49
designed for. Work we gotta
1:51
as a culture and as a
1:54
country except or else and grow
1:56
grow from rails. Am.
1:59
Com. The loser our say thank you.
2:04
Everyone is that. I'm looking back to
2:07
rethinking my podcast and the science of
2:09
what makes us tick with its head
2:11
audio collective. I'm an organizational psychology and
2:13
his new inside the minds of fascinating
2:16
people. food for new songs and new
2:18
ways to think. It's. By
2:23
guess today's David Duchovny, you probably know
2:25
invest As an actor, he went Golden
2:27
Globes for his starring roles in the
2:29
X Files in California Cases, and had
2:31
iconic appearances in A Blender and A
2:34
Chance, But he's also the best selling
2:36
author of for novels and a screen
2:38
writer, director, and singer songwriter. and he's
2:40
been the subject of a songs and
2:42
unusually catchy one by Breeze Sharp. Witted
3:17
new film is backing of thing that.
3:20
And. His the host of a new podcast
3:22
fail better there were going to talk about
3:24
failure. David.
3:27
Let me start by asking, you did you
3:29
wake up one morning and think. I
3:31
know what the world needs. Another
3:33
podcast Lox were first hey I'm
3:35
the only person in the world
3:37
without a test so I guess
3:39
I should have one of the
3:41
big Samuel Beckett fan cause big
3:43
fan of failure in a weird
3:45
way. not in a in a
3:47
sudden Friday way. not no way
3:49
of i go you fucker you
3:51
failed but more just like. The
3:54
bittersweet and services you man the of because
3:56
we all go through it brother and sister
3:59
hood of it. And
4:01
I said if I'm going to have
4:03
a partisan talk to people, can I
4:05
talk number failure? Can we release some
4:08
shame around failure? Can we talk about
4:10
resilience? And we looked around and we
4:12
saw there are these by tests which
4:15
I find objectionable. They're all about business
4:17
failure and ah or how I started
4:19
one business and then I'd learned from
4:21
my cellar and now my crypto billionaire
4:24
or cycle. That's not what I'm interested
4:26
in. and all I'm not. I'm not
4:28
interested in making money or talking about
4:30
people making money. So. The
4:33
yeah, I guess we figured we
4:36
sell into a place that hadn't
4:38
quite been tried over so many
4:40
times. And in the world of
4:42
access, there will definitely be people
4:44
wondering what is a successful actor,
4:46
filmmaker, novelist, Princeton Summa Grad possibly
4:49
know about failure? We. Can
4:51
go through the world thinking that words
4:53
correspond reality one sacked it's just an
4:55
illusion. We both decided to believe. And.
4:58
Therefore, anything I feel saying.
5:03
Move inside. Has. To
5:05
be translated into words and is
5:07
already failed. There's already been a
5:09
failure on the way and them
5:11
for me. That's the heart of
5:13
it. You know it's not a psycho that book
5:15
did well. or that book got reviewed well, or
5:17
that performance got reviewed well. or that movie bombed.
5:21
His. Sister this sense of human
5:23
expression for me. whether it's acting
5:25
director in writing by music, Whatever
5:28
that the inspiration has to be
5:30
translated into the human expression. and
5:33
there's a failure that happens immediately,
5:35
and that's how you navigate that
5:37
that makes you a better or
5:40
of a less vile artist. I
5:42
think. That's. Fascinating. When you first
5:44
are describing that, I thought you were going
5:46
to talk about the game of telephone that
5:49
we end up playing were what you've expressed
5:51
is not what I hear, but you're talking
5:53
about have a much earlier failure as what's
5:55
in your header in your experience not being
5:57
translated accurately and a language. Can.
6:00
I mean, language is an approximation. As
6:02
an organizational psychologist, I spent most of
6:04
my career studying professional success and failure.
6:07
I'd love to hear about what you think is your
6:10
biggest professional failure and how you dealt with it. Failure
6:13
has so many different aspects
6:15
to it. You could call it a box office
6:17
failure. You could call it an artistic failure.
6:20
You could call it an editing
6:22
failure, a scoring failure, an audience
6:24
failure, a timing failure. I
6:27
did a movie called House of D
6:29
that I wrote and directed and acted in,
6:31
in like 2000, I don't know,
6:33
three or four. And it was
6:35
not well received. It was
6:38
a very different thing for me to do because
6:40
I was coming off of this
6:42
global hit of
6:45
The X-Files, like a generational television
6:47
show. There really
6:49
is no comparison to the breadth
6:51
of the audience that
6:53
it found globally. And the
6:56
movie I made was very small, very personal,
6:58
and just a
7:00
coming-of-age movie. And
7:03
I just think it
7:05
was confusing. When House of
7:08
D didn't do well, the
7:10
failure was very personal to
7:12
me because I was being authentic with it.
7:15
In retrospect, I can see that I was
7:17
dooming myself, but I
7:19
had no other expressive
7:21
or artistic choice at the time because I
7:23
was coming out of being
7:26
associated with this huge show. And I was
7:28
like, well, here's what I want to do.
7:30
This is my vision. This is
7:33
the kind of stuff that I want to do.
7:36
And people didn't want it. It
7:39
seems that, at least from a commercial
7:41
perspective, you come out of The X-Files
7:43
and nothing you possibly do
7:46
could ever be that successful again. Right.
7:50
It hurt a lot. And it hurt
7:52
a lot for a while. And it
7:54
still hurts to this day, not like
7:56
it did, but it
7:59
lives on. in that way in many
8:01
ways. So how have you dealt
8:03
with that over the last two decades? Well,
8:07
I just kept working for one. I
8:10
didn't give up. I just
8:12
kept moving forward. I tried to
8:14
look at whatever lessons, critical
8:16
lessons I might learn from it as
8:18
a craftsman, as a maker of things.
8:21
Hard to do in the moment when you're smarting
8:23
and leading. I
8:26
tried to look at
8:28
my willfulness in making a
8:31
small movie after coming off such a big show.
8:34
I tried to look at my contrariness. But
8:37
other than that, it's just like, okay, well, I
8:39
know what I was trying to do. And
8:42
I know as a first time filmmaker that
8:44
I was gonna make some missteps
8:46
and I could see those. And I
8:49
learned so much just in the doing of it
8:52
that I had more confidence no matter what
8:54
happened afterwards. And
8:57
if I do things for the right reasons, which
8:59
I don't always do, and I'm aware when I'm
9:01
doing things for the wrong reasons, but if I
9:03
do certain things for the right reasons,
9:05
then whatever happens,
9:07
it's okay. I'm
9:10
reminded of some recent work in psychology suggesting that
9:12
one of the reasons it's so hard for many
9:14
of us to take failure and criticism is we
9:17
immediately focus on feeling better, as
9:20
opposed to asking, how can I do better? And
9:23
when you wanna feel better, what I think most of us
9:26
instinctively do is we say, okay, I'm
9:28
gonna distract myself. I'm
9:30
gonna avoid the pain altogether. And then we
9:32
fail to learn the lessons. It
9:34
sounds like you didn't do that. I
9:36
felt like I'd been punched in the stomach, but
9:40
I also had young kids and they didn't
9:42
give a fuck. Nobody that
9:44
loved me really cared. So
9:46
there were people around me, I'm not talking
9:48
about an illusory bubble of people telling me
9:51
I'm fantastic, but it was just people telling
9:53
me there are other things in life. I
9:56
don't know what the lesson is ever except
9:58
that failure just
10:01
opens up other doors,
10:03
if only because it makes you think
10:05
in different ways. Success is a terrible
10:08
thing to happen to anybody. Easy
10:10
to say as a successful person, isn't it? It
10:14
is, yeah. And it's somewhat
10:16
glib, of course. But
10:18
in terms of what
10:21
you learn as a person about life
10:23
or about your soul or about anything,
10:25
success is not a teacher. Success
10:27
is something else. I think it's
10:29
fair to say that the winner's curse is real, that
10:32
oftentimes success makes people complacent. It
10:35
sounds like one of your lessons from failure is not
10:38
to put all your eggs in one identity basket. That's
10:41
certainly my nature. One
10:43
of the blessings of being a performer
10:46
is you get to do different jobs all the time.
10:48
And then if you add to that other expressive
10:52
aspects like fiction writing or
10:54
music or whatever, then I
10:56
have all these ways in which to
10:58
fail, but also all these places where
11:00
I'm learning something. I'm 50, whatever, and
11:03
I'm learning something, and
11:06
my brain feels like it's 19 or 20. I
11:09
know it's not. And I know I
11:12
can't ever be as good a guitar player as
11:14
if I had started when I was young. But
11:17
to get to do
11:19
something that's in my beginner's mind, that
11:22
phrase, I'm reminded of that all the
11:24
time. The fountain of youth on
11:26
the inside, it's just like, oh my God, I'm
11:28
so excited to do this really
11:30
simple thing. It's new to
11:34
me. I think this
11:36
is for a lot of people part of the
11:38
appeal of a portfolio career, that
11:40
if you have a range of different projects going,
11:43
you don't end up over invested in any
11:45
one of them. That's the
11:47
first time I've ever heard that phrase
11:49
portfolio career. And
11:51
I kind of want to hate it, just to be honest.
11:54
What do you hate about it? I hate
11:56
that it's a strategy, when it's
11:58
something like... I
12:01
feel like I just kind
12:03
of intuited my way through it. I mean,
12:05
I don't know how you can actually strategize
12:07
a portfolio career. You either want to do
12:09
multiple things or you don't. Okay,
12:12
this goes to something else I wanted to ask you
12:14
about, which is I wanted to get a sense of
12:16
how you decide a role or a project is worth
12:18
doing. I think one of my
12:20
favorite moments in your career arc, as I know
12:22
it, was when you landed in Zoolander as a
12:24
hand model. Which might be
12:27
my favorite David Duchovny role of all time, just
12:29
because it was so unexpected. Yeah. And
12:32
so hilariously deadpan. Why
12:34
did you want to be in it? What did you see
12:36
in Zoolander? Because I don't think it was expected to be
12:38
a big hit. It was relatively low budget. It was not
12:41
heralded. What did you notice there? Well,
12:43
it was never a hit. It came out
12:47
a week or two after 9-11. So
12:49
it didn't do great business at
12:51
first. It didn't do much business
12:54
at all. It was just in the afterlife of
12:56
movies that it became a cult
12:58
thing and then the hit that it is
13:01
in people's minds. What did
13:03
I see? I mean, I just really
13:05
liked what Ben was doing. And for
13:07
me, it was very important, again, reacting
13:10
to coming off the X-Files or
13:12
ending the X-Files. I wanted
13:14
to do comedy. And I wanted to exist in
13:16
the comedy world. So I was like, here's
13:19
that world. It wasn't the kind of
13:21
comedy that I would ever write or ever conceive of,
13:25
but I thought I can play in that sandbox.
13:28
There was even like a love of language in my
13:30
character that I really responded to. Zoolander
13:33
says, but you're a model. And I
13:36
say something like, I'm
13:40
a finger jockey. A
13:43
finger jockey. We don't think the
13:45
same way the face and body boys do.
13:47
But like finger jockey to me, I'd go
13:50
anywhere with that writer. Somebody who
13:52
came up and pulled
13:54
a hand model of finger jockey, that's
13:56
a comedic mind that's working in
13:58
language. And I was like, yeah. It
14:01
must have been after watching the chair and
14:04
seeing you play that hysterical caricature of yourself
14:06
that I wondered how much of that is
14:08
real and I looked up
14:10
your backstory, had no idea that you'd been
14:12
a PhD student in English literature at Yale.
14:16
Yeah. Why? Why
14:18
were you there? Why did you walk away without
14:20
finishing your dissertation? That's a question
14:22
my mom asked me until she died. I
14:26
thought not being a gambler by nature, I
14:28
thought, well, if I get a PhD, I'll
14:30
have a job. If
14:33
I can get tenure, I'll really have a job
14:36
and then I'll have three or four months
14:38
off a year. So that's why I
14:40
was in graduate school. I couldn't be
14:42
a pro basketball player. That would have been my first
14:44
choice. I couldn't be a doctor. I
14:47
didn't want to be a lawyer. You
14:49
talk about strategy. That was my strategy was
14:52
find a way to make a
14:55
living that
14:57
affords me the freedom and time
14:59
to pursue a life
15:02
of creative writing. Why
15:05
did you then abandon it? I always
15:07
knew that my heart wasn't in it in a way.
15:09
I always knew that I could do it and I
15:11
think I was a decent teacher, but
15:14
I knew I wasn't going to be a great
15:16
literary critic. There were just people around
15:18
me who were better and
15:20
I knew it wasn't authentic to me.
15:23
Something called me that
15:26
that would be like a death in life in
15:28
a way and that's no criticism of criticism. That's
15:30
no knock on academia at
15:32
all. It's more of a knock on me. Why
15:36
did your mom want you to finish? Because
15:38
my mom grew up in a
15:40
small town of Scotland where nobody went to
15:43
college in a class system,
15:46
Great Britain in the early 20th
15:49
century. The only way
15:51
for a person to advance out of
15:53
those circumstances was education. That's
15:56
the vision that she had for
15:59
her kids even though the world had changed and
16:01
America was a little different than
16:04
the circumstances in which she grew up. For
16:06
her, that's what a poor person could do
16:08
with hard work, was be a
16:12
knowledgeable person. And it was also
16:14
just, you know, finish what you started. That's a
16:16
parental thing. You started that thing. Finish it, you
16:18
know. And I
16:20
think it would take me years. It would take
16:22
me years unless the idea really excited me. I
16:25
don't think it would be a good use of my time. No,
16:27
I think the opportunity cost goes up quite a
16:30
bit over time. You
16:32
found an alternate path to
16:34
get the creative freedom you wanted. So
16:37
why invest in something that six people
16:39
might read? Well, what's
16:41
interesting about the dissertation that never was,
16:43
it was called, the
16:46
thing that doesn't exist, is called
16:48
magic and technology and contemporary American
16:50
fiction and poetry. And
16:53
when I think about my subsequent years
16:55
as an actor, whatever you think
16:57
about, even the X-Files, magic and
16:59
technology kind of fits into
17:01
that area. And I think now that
17:04
everybody's concerned with AI and all that,
17:06
what I thought I was going to
17:09
be writing about in the dissertation was
17:11
how magic was a primitive technology. Magic
17:13
was how people did things that technology
17:15
now does for us. Fly through the
17:17
air, turn water into wine, do
17:19
all these things that magicians and
17:22
prophets used to do with their
17:24
magic. But there
17:26
was always a sense of good magic and
17:28
bad magic. And
17:30
there was a moral to magic. Dr.
17:32
Faustus, you know, he made a deal with the
17:35
devil for that power. But
17:37
with technology, there was never a weapon.
17:39
There's never been a weapon that the
17:42
human race has created that hasn't been
17:44
employed, right? So there's never been a
17:46
sense in which somebody says to technology,
17:49
you know, toasts are bad. And I
17:51
was saying that these creative writers, these
17:53
novel poets that I was going to
17:55
be writing about, were actually looking at
17:57
technology and trying to discuss it in ways.
18:00
that were prophetically morally
18:02
judged, like we're trying
18:05
to do with AI now. So
18:07
your non-dissertation of the 80s
18:09
was anticipating the moral
18:11
technological dilemmas of the 2020s? You
18:15
could say that, but since it was never written, you
18:17
really can't say that. Hey,
18:22
Rethinking listeners, we're supported by our
18:24
friends at Working Smarter, a new
18:26
podcast from Dropbox exploring the exciting
18:29
potential of AI in the workplace.
18:32
Working Smarter talks with founders, researchers, and
18:34
engineers about the things they're building and
18:36
the problems they're solving with the help
18:38
of the latest AI tools. Tools
18:41
that can save them time, improve collaboration,
18:43
and create more space for the work
18:45
that matters most. On
18:47
Working Smarter, hear practical discussions about what
18:49
AI can do so that you can
18:52
work smarter, too. Listen to Working
18:54
Smarter on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or
18:56
wherever you get your podcasts. Or
18:59
visit WorkingSmarter.ai. Welcome
19:02
to the Canva guided meditation for
19:04
stress at work. Impending
19:07
deadline? Generate Canva presentations
19:09
in seconds. So fast.
19:12
Brainstorm got too big? Summarize
19:15
with AI in a click.
19:19
Writer's block? Release
19:21
with Canva MagicWrite. Magical.
19:25
Stress less and save time at
19:27
canva.com. Designed for work.
19:30
Canva. David,
19:34
let's move to a lightning round. You ready?
19:37
I think so. Okay, first question. What
19:39
is the worst career advice you've ever gotten?
19:42
Take an auditioning class. That
19:44
was bad advice? Yeah. Why?
19:47
Auditioning isn't acting. What is it?
19:49
Is it selling? It is. What
19:52
is your favorite X-Files character? Who
19:56
is your favorite X-Files character? Yeah.
19:58
Or what? Could go
20:00
either way. The fluke man are wonderful.
20:02
Writer Dan Morgan played a six foot
20:05
and test them warm. I
20:08
did not anticipate that as
20:10
a gets what is something
20:12
that you've been rethinking lately.
20:15
The. Magic antagonizing contemporary American
20:17
fiction Poetry. To
20:20
say. What's.
20:23
The question you have for me as a psychologist. Can
20:26
we Really? Find
20:28
solutions to talking. When
20:31
most of our emotional life and
20:34
chemical life has some verbal. Sick.
20:36
For a question. Yes,
20:41
That's a great answer. Selfless. It's leave us
20:43
much as a kid can we get it
20:45
perfectly? based on what I know about. How
20:48
you think? Are you ever going to be
20:50
satisfied? With. The.
20:53
The amount of slippage that exists
20:55
between or of sub conscious experience
20:57
in our conscious expression probably not.
20:59
Can we get closer? I
21:01
think yes. Because.
21:03
I. Have this! Fundamental.
21:07
Intuitive sense of failure between.
21:09
The. Expression and the execution. I'm not
21:12
a perfectionist, and I'm quite happy with
21:14
the stabbed that I make in the
21:16
dark. I. Think that's a
21:18
healthy attitude. There's a buyer of research
21:20
on what's called referential processing, which is
21:22
how fluidly you translate images into words
21:24
and vice versa. So I think a
21:26
master would be an art critics for
21:28
example, and I have noted that ability
21:30
I can go to a museum, stared
21:32
a painting, and I came come up
21:34
with the word, but when we added
21:36
we both know people who are gifted
21:38
of that, and I would say if
21:40
we study how those people do, it
21:43
is probably more of a teachable skill
21:45
than than we realize and image. Maybe
21:47
that is. In some sense
21:49
that the forgotten and soon to be
21:51
rediscovered value of the humanities they're gonna
21:53
help people build that skill and say
21:56
look if you're increasing the artificial intelligence
21:58
is gonna is gonna handle. Lot
22:00
of the the processing of information that
22:02
we used to have to do ourselves
22:05
on what left for humans to do
22:07
uniquely. or one thing that's left is
22:09
for us to be able to access
22:11
experiences that A I can't have left.
22:14
And. Figure out how to articulate them. As
22:17
very sad. if a I don't know,
22:19
I think I think it's kind of
22:22
interesting. I agree with you. but if
22:24
it's sad to think we're pushing ourselves
22:26
out of existence or or utility. but
22:28
I totally agree with you as a.
22:31
Creative. Person. I'm not very much
22:33
afraid of a I don't think I
22:35
will ever. Make a masterpiece.
22:38
And. Even if it did, I just wouldn't
22:40
care that much. And the evidence of
22:43
it not being a masterpiece of in fact that she
22:45
didn't care that much. But. Then again,
22:48
Masterpieces slippery weren't. It
22:50
certainly as as the to about the
22:53
Watson created horror movie trailers to be
22:55
seen as no effort. Caitlyn? maybe twenty
22:57
eighteen or twenty nineteen. So before the
22:59
generative at to a I waved it's
23:02
picked up the last year and. They.
23:04
Work Schilling I can not believe
23:07
that they were created by an
23:09
algorithm. I'm actively but as soon
23:11
as I found out and s.
23:13
At a really want to watch this I want to
23:15
be scared by a person, the nervous. I
23:17
don't want to denigrate. The. Car
23:19
and isn't like that but I guess
23:22
something that makes it is bread and
23:24
butter by scaring the shit out. A
23:26
probably. Is more
23:28
easily attainable by an algorithm
23:30
and something that as a
23:32
more complicated. Yeah,
23:37
I I love division. For
23:39
this film. You. Have a
23:41
character Ted who's trying to reconnect
23:44
with his father has a huge
23:46
Red Sox fan in the nineteen
23:48
seventies. basically in order to salvage
23:50
their relationship and his father's failing
23:52
health. Ted. Sort
23:55
of creates an illusion that the Red Sox
23:57
are winning. Well. As a reason
23:59
that. Does this is because his
24:01
father is dying of cancer, but
24:04
he is convinced. That.
24:06
He can't die until the Red Sox win it
24:08
all. and the Sox are doing very well that
24:10
year. So he thinks he's going to die at
24:13
the end of that year, but he's going to
24:15
live until that happens. And
24:18
his health seems to start
24:20
to suffer as the socks
24:22
begin to choke back there
24:24
leave. And so his son.
24:27
In order to try to keep his house.
24:30
Starts. Faking the outcomes in the
24:32
hopes that the sauce to come back
24:34
eventually and he can bring his father
24:36
back into the real world. But for
24:39
me, the movies about failure the socks
24:41
at least until the two thousands were
24:43
the epitome of a failed franchise. and
24:45
there was even a backstory that they
24:48
had traded away the greatest player to
24:50
ever play Babe Ruth to the aggies
24:52
and they were cursed. And they were
24:55
losers. The movement of the film. Is
24:58
really about. Loving the
25:00
losers because we're all losers. Ultimately, we
25:02
all die. That's the final boss, But
25:04
we all go through heart ache, will
25:07
go through loss. And.
25:09
That's what joins the songs. Very similar
25:11
to the podcast idea and I have
25:13
many ideas but I can spread them
25:15
out over different formats and make it
25:17
look like I got a few. The
25:21
other. Aspect of the film
25:23
that was interesting to me as a
25:25
as a writer was this idea of
25:27
of changing narrative focus. The Father: he's
25:30
trying to write the story of his
25:32
life. He's trying to change the story
25:34
of his life. He's been the victim.
25:37
He's been the villain. He's
25:39
been the scapegoat. And.
25:42
He wants to die a hero. You
25:44
know, and it's the same story. But
25:47
it's a different way of telling it,
25:49
and I think that's something that I've
25:52
come to later in life. As said,
25:54
you know we can all share the
25:56
same facts. about
25:58
ourselves But
26:01
real mental health and spiritual health
26:03
and even physical health comes from the way in
26:05
which we tell the stories of our lives to
26:08
ourselves and to those around us. And I'm not
26:10
talking about lying. I'm
26:12
talking about telling a story in a way
26:14
that benefits the most people. It
26:17
seems to me that there is such a thing as
26:19
objective failure. Your team loses the
26:21
game. A surgeon
26:23
fails to save a patient on the operating
26:26
table. But most
26:28
failures in life are subjective. You
26:30
created a goal, which is a fiction. It's
26:33
an expectation of how things are going to go, which
26:35
has your hopes and dreams built into it. And
26:39
then you fall short of that expectation, which
26:41
was just in your imagination, and you count
26:43
that experience of failure. And
26:46
then to your point, people end up telling themselves
26:48
all kinds of lies to convince themselves that they
26:50
didn't fail. When to me,
26:52
so many of those failures were actually in
26:55
the expectations that were set to begin with. I'll
26:58
give you a quick personal example on this
27:00
one. During COVID, I wrote the most read
27:02
New York Times article of the year. And
27:06
I didn't set out to do it. I was
27:08
trying to name this experience of languishing that people
27:11
were going through of feeling empty and sort
27:13
of stuck. And when the
27:15
article went viral, I immediately knew I
27:18
will never write an article that's successful ever again. I'm
27:21
a psychologist. I don't write op-eds for a
27:23
living. And if I set myself the goal
27:25
of having the most successful article of the
27:27
year, I'm going to feel like a failure
27:29
with every subsequent article I write. So
27:32
I sat down and said, I have to redefine my
27:34
goals. If I get an idea out there that helps
27:36
somebody, that matters much more than the number of people
27:39
it reaches. And
27:41
in doing that, I feel like I'm protecting myself
27:43
from the arbitrary feeling of failure every time I
27:45
release an article that falls short. So
27:48
that's, I guess, my reflection on the fiction
27:50
of failure. How do you react
27:52
to that? And do you play the same game? There's
27:55
a saying that goes expectations are future
27:57
resentments. And I Think that that's... The
28:00
good rule to live by. Hard not to
28:02
have expectations but the tricky and they can
28:04
be dangerous. You. Wrote an
28:06
article that was authentic. It came from.
28:10
A need. He. Set out to
28:12
communicate something authentically and that must
28:14
have been. And it's Dna and
28:16
I would say that helps. It
28:18
gets a widely disseminated because you
28:20
didn't have an angle on it.
28:22
He didn't set out to be
28:24
popular. It just
28:26
it just reminds me a lot of what
28:28
I was time earlier in of there is
28:31
no way to ever have a success like
28:33
the Exiles It it. It doesn't happen. Can't
28:35
happen. Certainly not gonna happen to me. but
28:37
I don't think everybody else either. I mean
28:39
it's us, we're in a different. World
28:41
now in terms of consensus
28:43
and culture And that way
28:45
so. To. Play That game is just
28:48
a losing game. And you gotta
28:50
figure out. My friend Gary sailing said
28:52
i think he made it up but it's a
28:54
really good phrase which is he said people as
28:56
a nice guys finish last don't know where the
28:59
finish line as but it's kind of like you
29:01
gotta know where the finish line is you know?
29:03
and it's not. The day
29:05
after you had the most popular article and
29:08
it's not the day after he had the
29:10
least popular is a continuum. The you have
29:12
to keep your eye on the past and
29:14
the horizon while living in the present, which
29:16
is difficult, but you do it. People.
29:19
Who say nice guys finish last, don't know
29:21
where the finish line is. Yeah.
29:23
He like that as profound as the
29:25
system. That was
29:28
Garry Shandling Man, he was a genius.
29:30
To tell me what that means to
29:32
you is my first reaction to it
29:34
is yeah, yeah, you're focusing too much
29:36
on a short term outcomes. and
29:38
to little on long term character. I've
29:40
never really tried to unpack it. I just
29:42
heard it knows like true. And.
29:44
Like. To. Think about where
29:46
is the finish line? And. One's life.
29:49
It's not death. In. That's
29:51
not what he means. it's. Something. Else.
29:54
To. Me it, it signals. Let's think about
29:56
what really counts as opposed to as easy
29:58
to count. know. Well.
30:00
As as I reflect on a couple
30:02
of the arsonist conversation, it seems to
30:05
me that a mix of success and
30:07
failure however you define it. Is
30:10
more of a life well lived. Than.
30:12
A life of just. Accumulating
30:14
and accelerating successes because as
30:17
much as success gratifies, it
30:19
seems that failures the better
30:21
motivator and a better teacher.
30:24
Will so success alienates. You
30:27
know sets you apart. In
30:29
a failure gives you many brothers
30:32
and sisters, and failure creates empathy
30:34
failure should and gender empathy. I
30:36
think I'm in our country now.
30:39
Failure and genders mockery. And that's
30:41
one of the things that I
30:43
wanted to kind of. Address
30:46
With the podcast and the movie
30:48
and the novel Bucky Fucking that
30:50
you know it's really our inability
30:52
to accept our own failures that
30:54
makes us such as Saddam Friday.
30:57
Kind. Of Culture and you
30:59
look at somebody like and
31:02
a Donald Trump who. Cannot
31:05
accept. An hour is hop.
31:08
Presidential. Run as like not
31:10
accepting his out. And
31:13
there's nearly half the country that's
31:15
going to get behind this. With
31:17
it it it seems like then
31:19
years. Your hypothesis is that. People's
31:22
desire to take others down. Is.
31:25
Because. They're They're so ashamed by their
31:28
own losses. It's a lot of
31:30
what we do we project onto the other.
31:33
The. Fears that we have about ourselves?
31:35
Interesting and this this notion that
31:38
success can make you lonely that
31:40
it alienates would advise you have
31:42
for coping with that. For all
31:44
the poor, struggling, successful people at
31:47
the fact that fuck the have
31:49
a physicist they're fine. They'll
31:51
come back. Bomb failure. They'll come back to
31:54
earth. So get their. Love.
31:56
It would it David This has been really fun
31:58
and fascinating. I think your mind is is a
32:00
really the unusual an interesting place. Ah,
32:03
Well. Thank you. Such
32:09
a powerful sentiment that people who believe nice
32:11
guys finish last don't know where the finish
32:13
line is. Personally, I like the idea that
32:16
there is no finish line, but if I
32:18
had to draw one for me, it's not
32:20
about what you achieve, it's about what you
32:22
contribute and how you treat others along the
32:25
well. Rethinking
32:29
is hosted by me Adam Grand This
32:32
show is part of the Had Audio
32:34
Collective and this episode was produced in
32:36
mixed by Cosmic Standard. A Producers are
32:38
Henna Kingsley mom and Asia Census or
32:41
Editor as I Hunter Salazar or Fact
32:43
Checkers Paul Durban Original music that Hunter
32:45
See and Allison they can friend Athena
32:48
since Eliza Smith sake of winning Smile
32:50
Adams Michelle Quinn Fun been saying see
32:52
as a person and with a Pennington
32:55
Rodgers. So.
33:00
It sounds like she was worried that A B
33:02
D didn't have the same test say as Pst.
33:05
Yeah, don't. I don't know that
33:07
A B D really exists. You know, because
33:09
everything else is in Latin and A B
33:11
D This means of a dissertation. That's how
33:13
bad. That. Moniker of.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More