Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
Ted Audio Collective. Thanks
0:07
to Staples for sponsoring this episode. Hey,
0:13
everyone, it's Adam Grant. Welcome back to Rethinking,
0:15
my podcast on the science of what makes
0:18
us tick. I'm an organizational
0:20
psychologist, and I'm taking you inside the
0:22
minds of fascinating people to explore new
0:24
thoughts and new ways of thinking. My
0:27
guests today are Susan Magsimin and Ivy
0:30
Ross, authors of the New
0:32
York Times bestseller, Your Brain on Art.
0:35
Ivy is vice president of hardware design at Google.
0:38
She's also an accomplished jewelry designer. Her
0:41
work is featured at museums around the world, including
0:43
the Smithsonian. Susan
0:46
is the executive director of the International
0:48
Arts Plus Mind Lab at Johns Hopkins
0:50
University, where she brings together
0:52
scientists and artists to grow the emerging
0:54
field of neuro aesthetics. Our
0:57
conversation is about the cognitive effects of art
0:59
and some creative ways of opening our minds.
1:12
It's not every day I get to
1:14
talk with a neuro aesthetics expert and
1:17
a star jewelry designer turned
1:19
Google hardware specialist. Really? You
1:22
don't talk to those people every day? I mean,
1:24
to be honest, Susan, I didn't even know those
1:26
categories of people existed. It's good. We're still creating
1:28
new worlds. So I
1:30
have so many questions for both of you and
1:32
a ton to learn in this conversation. But let
1:35
me begin by asking, how did you get
1:37
interested in the neuroscience of
1:39
art? So maybe I'll
1:41
start. You know, I've always been
1:44
really moved by nature. Nature
1:46
has been kind of a through line for
1:48
me my whole life. And I think feeling
1:51
sun on my face and the smell of
1:53
flowers and I felt most alive
1:55
there. But when I am a twin,
1:57
and when I was 12 years old,
2:00
My sister had a very serious
2:02
farming accident and almost lost her
2:04
leg. And if you know
2:06
anything about twins, you know that we understand
2:08
each other without words, we can send messages
2:10
to each other. We
2:13
just read each other and we're
2:15
born in relationship. And so
2:17
when that happened, my sister really shut down. Now
2:20
we know the BRCA region of her brain shut
2:22
down. She wasn't able to find words for
2:24
what was happening to her. And
2:27
I really felt very disconnected to the
2:29
person that I was closest to. And
2:32
so my mom suggested that she
2:34
start drawing to just get
2:36
stuff out. My mom's a poet, not a
2:38
professional poet, but was always writing poetry and
2:41
that was really helpful for her. But
2:43
my sister started to draw these things that there
2:45
were no words for. And
2:48
they were symbols and metaphors and they became
2:50
ways for her to access what she was
2:52
feeling. But it was also ways for me
2:54
to know what she was feeling. As
2:57
a very young age, I realized that
2:59
there's lots of ways to share ourselves
3:01
besides yapping and talking and trying
3:03
to find the right words. And
3:06
that really, really changed my life and changed
3:08
how I started to understand the world around
3:11
me. Amazing. And Ivy?
3:14
Yeah. And I
3:16
started as an artist and was
3:18
always a little creative creature in
3:20
my bedroom making things as
3:22
a way of expressing myself. And then
3:25
as I entered the corporate design world
3:27
and most recently, instead
3:29
of talking to the team
3:32
about design thinking, started
3:34
talking about design feelings. Let's talk
3:36
about how objects and
3:38
things feel because I
3:40
think we've been optimizing for productivity
3:42
and efficiency since the Industrial Revolution
3:44
and pushed some of the sensorial
3:48
nature of ourselves aside.
3:50
And then I could just feel that
3:52
we are craving that. And so even
3:55
in how we design
3:57
our hardware at Google, it's...
4:00
What textures can we add
4:02
to a product so it's not just
4:04
one surface? I too did not know
4:06
of this word called neuroaesthetics. I
4:09
was just intuitively understanding
4:12
it until Susan reached
4:14
out on LinkedIn
4:16
and said she was
4:19
with the Arts and Mind Lab and I
4:21
was like, what is that? Two of my
4:23
favorite subjects together because I studied
4:25
Jungian Psychology and I was an artist and
4:27
it's like wow, in one place. I
4:30
swiped right and what was supposed to
4:33
be a 30-minute conversation led to a
4:35
three-hour conversation that led to
4:37
a salon in my home between artists and
4:39
scientists which led to this book. Wow,
4:43
that's quite a connection. Well, I have
4:45
to say, I think this book is
4:48
maybe the best case I've ever read for putting an A
4:50
in STEM. I came away from
4:52
the book thinking science,
4:54
technology, engineering and math are incomplete
4:57
without the arts. And
4:59
I imagine I'm preaching to the choir on that one.
5:02
Well, thank you for saying that because that
5:04
is the greatest gift. We just spoke at
5:06
a women in data science conference and
5:08
we said to the woman organizing it,
5:10
why do you want us to be
5:12
the keynote speaker? And she said because
5:14
you wouldn't believe this Ivy but people
5:16
who are studying computer science and data
5:18
science, they have dropped doing
5:21
art or playing their guitar, kind of
5:24
what their soul was happy doing because
5:27
they're led to believe like oh my
5:29
God, we have to focus on just
5:31
computer science or just understanding data. And
5:33
it's quite opposite because to your point,
5:35
we all have to be whole people
5:38
and we need the other side. And the
5:41
scary thing is also people who are
5:43
coding and getting into this field to
5:45
not have the balance of the arts,
5:48
we're going to be in trouble, not only for
5:50
their own health and wellness because we now know
5:52
what it does to our brain and body but
5:55
for the sake of society.
5:57
It's how we are physiologically,
5:59
psychologically wired. you can't learn well
6:01
without these kinds of stimuli. You can't
6:03
find, you can't be creative. We've left
6:05
so much of our human capacity on
6:08
the table because we've sort of stripped
6:10
this out in all these different areas
6:12
of our lives. And I
6:14
think, you know, it's data scientists, but
6:16
it's also people that are going into
6:18
different fields, all fields that are starting
6:20
to understand that this makes them more
6:24
collaborative, more creative, more connected. And
6:26
I think that we're starting to
6:28
see a shift back towards the
6:31
beginning, barely at the beginning of
6:33
understanding the profound neurobiological impacts
6:35
of these things that we've just
6:38
kind of been told aren't as
6:40
essential. Or people stopped making
6:42
art because they felt they weren't good
6:44
at it, quote unquote, and really to
6:46
learn that it's not about being proficient
6:49
at something, it's the act of doing
6:51
it that changes the brain and
6:53
body. So so many people have written us
6:55
and said, thank you for giving me permission
6:58
to make art again. You mentioned creativity
7:00
as one of the benefits of engaging with
7:02
the arts. And I
7:04
immediately started thinking about this root
7:06
Bernstein et al finding about what
7:09
differentiates Nobel prize winning scientists from
7:11
their peers. And
7:13
there's a stunning set of patterns
7:15
around just the likelihood of having
7:17
artistic hobbies. Nobel prize winners
7:20
are twice as likely to play a musical
7:22
instrument as their peers. They're seven
7:24
times as likely to draw or paint, 12 times
7:27
as likely to write fiction or poetry,
7:30
and get this 22 times as likely
7:32
to perform as actors, dancers, or
7:35
yes, magicians. As
7:37
a former magician, I was tremendously excited by
7:39
that last finding. But I love that. My
7:41
first instinct as a psychologist is to say
7:44
correlation is not causation. This
7:46
is probably just a signal of a
7:48
creative personality and the kinds of people
7:51
who have breakthrough scientific insights are also
7:53
drawn to expressing themselves creatively and being
7:55
curious about the arts. I
7:58
think your work suggests. another
8:00
factor at play here, which is there may
8:03
actually be at least a small
8:05
causal effect of engagement in the arts on
8:07
your scientific creativity. Talk to me about that.
8:09
That's really interesting. Well, you know, Jonah
8:11
Salk, when he
8:14
was really struggling to work
8:16
on the polio vaccine, you know, he
8:18
was working like in a basement in
8:20
New Jersey and it was not the
8:22
greatest environment. He went to Umbria and
8:24
walked the cloister and really believed
8:27
that it was that space and
8:29
that aesthetic experience that allowing his
8:31
brain to go to kind of
8:33
a resting state that
8:35
really allowed him to be able to come
8:37
back and have that aha moment. And we've
8:40
seen that, you know, over and over again
8:42
where there's this need for
8:44
a different
8:46
way of knowing and moving into
8:48
a flow state, moving into a
8:51
timeless liminal space, which is where
8:53
you go when you're really engaged in some
8:55
kind of art experience. And as Ivy
8:57
said, whether you're the maker or the beholder,
8:59
that's really sort of an incredible thing. And
9:01
so, you know, I think we often, too,
9:03
think that researchers are so
9:06
logical and so cognitive, but researchers
9:08
and scientists, you know, some of
9:11
these Nobel Prize winners in different
9:13
categories are incredibly creative, right? That's
9:16
how they get to their solutions. That's how they
9:18
get to their problem-solving and trying trial and error,
9:20
seeing what works and doesn't work. And I think
9:23
we sort of categorized
9:26
artists as the creative and
9:28
then everybody else isn't.
9:30
And so I think we've got to change
9:32
that paradigm, too, because it doesn't hold
9:34
when you really start to untangle it. Art
9:38
experiences tend to
9:40
be salient experiences that
9:43
literally make new synapses in the brain.
9:46
So I think being engaged in
9:48
the arts not only gets
9:51
you more in touch with yourself and
9:54
self-expression, but it's also
9:56
almost exercising that muscle of firing
9:58
these new synapses. because
10:01
they're new experiences, which is
10:04
helpful when you're trying to create breakthrough
10:08
moments. And I
10:10
think that's where experiential learning is
10:12
so important too. Like you can't
10:14
have enough wonderful experiences that are
10:16
really building those strong neural pathways.
10:20
I love the phrase, your brain on art. I guess
10:23
it reminded me of watching those your brain
10:25
on drugs commercials as a kid. And this
10:27
is a positive alternative. What happens to
10:29
my brain on art? So it's
10:31
a lot of neurons that you
10:33
come into this world with. And
10:35
the only way that you really
10:37
create those synaptic connections and strong
10:39
neural pathways is through your sensory
10:42
systems, right? So how you bring
10:44
the world in. It turns out
10:46
that the most salient experiences are
10:48
these highly aesthetic experiences and arts
10:50
fall into that category. Now sometimes
10:52
salient experiences can be traumatic too,
10:54
right? So it's not
10:56
all salient experiences are positive
10:58
and not all art experiences
11:00
necessarily are positive, but they are
11:02
the ones that resonate and build
11:04
these synaptic connections that create, that
11:06
connect the neurons. And we're starting
11:09
to see those neural pathways are
11:11
the things that connect all the
11:13
different parts of the brain. And
11:15
so when you're thinking about structure
11:17
and function, there's neural pathways that
11:19
are being built. But you're also
11:21
activating other physiological systems like
11:23
the circulatory system, the
11:26
respiratory system, the endocrine and
11:28
muscular systems. And so what's
11:30
amazing about these art experiences
11:33
is they have a
11:35
neurobiological, physiological impact and
11:38
it's simultaneous. So where you
11:40
know certain drugs might activate
11:43
a particular neurotransmitter. Different arts
11:45
experiences might be igniting the
11:47
reward system. So it's igniting
11:49
things like dopamine or
11:51
serotonin or oxytocin. But it
11:53
may also at the same time
11:55
be activating something like cortisol and
11:57
lower in cortisol. So the complete
14:00
to apply some of the scientific methods
14:02
that are helping to understand why that
14:04
works, you kind of go,
14:06
oh my God, the things that, you know,
14:09
we were told not to do, that were
14:11
a waste of time or that seemed irrelevant,
14:13
turn out to be incredibly important, like humming
14:15
and doodling and singing in the shower. This
14:18
tuning fork piece is interesting to me because
14:21
you could say, oh, well, it's a placebo effect. What
14:23
we do know is that sound
14:25
is vibration and we are so
14:28
wired for resonance. You
14:30
know, we're 60% water. So
14:32
it makes so much sense. And I think that's
14:34
what a lot of people also have resonated
14:37
with the book is that these
14:39
are things that we've intuitively felt
14:41
and new worked. But now
14:43
we're really being able to add another layer of
14:46
knowing to this work where you go, ah, I
14:48
can understand why I could use this as a
14:50
tool in my pocket to help with something that
14:53
has felt intractable and that doesn't require
14:55
different kinds of other interventions, like whether
14:58
that's pharmacological or surgeries. I mean, it's
15:00
kind of a yes and. And so
15:02
I think that's also really one of
15:04
the things the book is lifting up.
15:07
We realized when did even the word
15:09
art come into play? Because
15:12
before we had the word, it
15:14
was the way we lived. We sang,
15:16
we danced, we told stories, we did
15:18
graphics in caves. We didn't have to
15:21
call it art. It was the way
15:23
we expressed ourselves. And so there's
15:25
something there. I do believe we're at a time where we
15:27
have to go back a little to move forward. This
15:30
goes to the question of does the media matter?
15:32
What are the implications of different types of art?
15:36
So maybe to lead into this, one of
15:38
my favorite findings for personality psychology is that
15:40
if you're interested in markers of
15:43
openness to new experiences and curiosity,
15:45
one of the clearest ones across
15:47
cultures is having aesthetic chills. The
15:50
shivers on your spine are goosebumps. And
15:52
some people get them when listening to
15:55
beautiful music or when engaging with poetry
15:57
or when going to a museum. I
16:01
get them mostly when looking
16:03
at nature or sometimes outer
16:05
space or extraordinary architecture, but
16:08
more often from what I think is a
16:10
brilliant idea. I'm like, okay,
16:12
wait a minute. So these
16:15
experiences are not all created equal, even
16:17
though physiologically we might all look the
16:19
same when we have these aesthetic chills.
16:21
So I wondered how
16:24
you think about that and how I
16:26
know what kind of artistic engagement is
16:28
relevant to me. Anjan Chatterjee,
16:31
who is at the University of Pennsylvania,
16:34
started to look at some of this
16:36
with his aesthetic triad, the theoretical model
16:38
that kind of says, why is my
16:40
perch uniquely my perch? And
16:42
he combined kind of three circles in
16:45
a Venn diagram with that peak experience
16:47
at the middle, which as you're describing
16:49
it, I'm hearing all. And it's kind
16:51
of a combination of things that you
16:54
know, so where you come from and
16:56
what you've experienced, your sensorial responses to
16:58
those, and they can be very
17:01
different, right? Like you might
17:03
have better hearing acuity or better visual acuity, where
17:05
I might have more tactile acuity.
17:08
We all have sort of a honing
17:10
of our physiology that's uniquely ours,
17:12
as is our cultural backgrounds and
17:14
our likes of experiences. And
17:17
then the third is like, what matters to
17:19
you? What's important to you? And
17:21
how do you sort of value that in
17:23
terms of importance? And at the center of
17:25
those is this sort of peak experience. And
17:28
so I think that the arts and
17:30
aesthetics probably are one of the most
17:32
personalized medicines we can have because it
17:35
really does reflect us individually. And I
17:37
love that. And I'll just give one
17:39
other example that I think illustrates this.
17:41
There's so many great anecdotal
17:44
reports around autobiographical music
17:46
and dementia or Alzheimer's, where people just
17:49
light up and they wake up. This
17:51
is much of an awakening for that
17:53
time. But it's
17:55
different music based on where you come from,
17:57
what you know, what you've experienced.
18:00
And I have to say, Adam,
18:02
I absolutely get those chills. I've
18:04
made business decisions based on those
18:06
chills. So I use it
18:08
as my guiding light. I know exactly what
18:10
you mean. But the beauty of this is
18:13
that when we say art, it's
18:15
not just visual art. It's
18:17
architecture as well as all of these
18:20
art modalities, singing, dancing,
18:22
painting, sculpting. It's
18:24
really about what makes you more
18:26
connected to yourself and allows you
18:28
to self-express. And there are art
18:30
forms that are being used for
18:33
specific things. So the form may
18:35
be like singing for Alzheimer's as
18:37
an example, but it's the contextual
18:39
cultural element that differentiates
18:41
or dancing in Parkinson's, right? We
18:43
know that dancing in Parkinson's increases
18:46
gait and cognition and mood and
18:48
even sleep. So there are art
18:51
forms that are being used for specific
18:53
things. What Ivy's also talking about, though,
18:55
is how you use art as practice,
18:58
how you use it in your daily
19:00
life for flourishing, for creating a sense
19:02
of ease or comfort or relaxing. And
19:04
so I think what's so amazing about
19:07
this work to me is that it's
19:09
ubiquitous. It really does fit in every part
19:12
of our life if we allow for that.
19:14
And I just love that you said curiosity
19:16
because I think that is one
19:18
of the drivers in this work
19:20
is being curious and being willing
19:22
to play around and explore kind
19:25
of your sensory systems and to be a
19:27
maker and a beholder. That's what Ivy and
19:29
I call the aesthetic mindset. And so being
19:32
open to that is really important. And
19:34
we learned even from Sharon Salzberg that
19:36
art is the highest form of meditation.
19:39
I'm really drawn to the idea that nature
19:41
has a universal effect, but art has a
19:44
much more particular and idiosyncratic one. And
19:46
you're making me feel like it's not entirely
19:48
a terrible thing that I walk
19:51
into a museum and I look at
19:53
a painting and I think it's amazing
19:55
that you could create that, but I don't know
19:57
why you wanted to. And I
19:59
feel nothing looking at this. Why am I
20:01
cooped up in a room when I could
20:04
be looking at the actual landscape
20:06
or mountain or ocean that you painted? It
20:08
doesn't do anything for me. The average
20:10
amount of time that someone looks at a piece of art
20:13
in a museum is seconds. So
20:15
if you spend time really
20:17
understanding how it makes you feel,
20:19
and I think it's
20:21
about personal growth but also about understanding
20:24
the other, so empathy and perspective taking,
20:26
and how that can help us be
20:28
more whole human beings and this idea
20:31
of meaning making. I think
20:33
that right now the world is really
20:35
crazy and maybe crazier than ever. And how
20:37
do you make sense? How do you make
20:39
meaning? How do you get a respite? And
20:42
that's where I think beholding can
20:44
be also helpful as well as
20:46
making. And you know, nature is
20:48
the most neuroaesthetic place you could
20:50
be because it alivens the senses.
20:52
It has shape, texture,
20:55
temperature, sound. It encompasses all of
20:58
your sensory systems,
21:01
which as E.O. Wilson says,
21:04
we have grown up there. And so
21:06
it's no wonder that these systems are
21:08
so important for us to feel healthy
21:10
and alive. And nature is a great
21:12
place to feel that. There's
21:15
a Grady and Lieberman paper that
21:17
looks at what happens
21:19
to paintings that artists make
21:21
in the year after losing a relative or a
21:23
close friend. And not
21:26
only do they fail to find evidence for a
21:28
benefit of being a tortured artist, they find a
21:30
cost. I think on average the paintings they do
21:32
in the first year, this is French and American
21:35
artists, the paintings they do in the first year
21:37
after losing someone close to them sell for about
21:40
50% less. Now, we
21:42
don't know whether people find the topics sad
21:45
or whether the grief actually constrained their creativity.
21:47
But that does not track with the idea
21:49
that artists have To
21:52
suffer from mental health challenges in order to be creative. I
21:54
Do think there's some. And
22:00
how it's being a potential acceptance
22:02
that I'm that there is a
22:05
possibility that in their most impressive
22:07
periods sometimes the the poignancy of
22:09
their poetry increased. That's. Interesting
22:11
because professional artists that are making
22:14
their living at arts there is
22:16
a financial value that's put on
22:18
that work rate. Which isn't to
22:20
say that it's not incredibly valuable
22:22
to the artist to make that
22:25
work, but whether it's gonna sell,
22:27
whether it seemed as commercially viable
22:29
or aesthetically pleasing, whatever that means
22:31
rights is a different question. Yet
22:34
you look at some be like,
22:36
then go who suffered mightily and
22:38
and he didn't sell painting when
22:40
he. Was alive. You know if people
22:42
didn't get it and it will and
22:45
then his You know his brother inherited
22:47
the work and and his brother died
22:49
and the sister in law was the
22:51
one that went to gallery owner and
22:53
said this work moves me I get
22:55
this, I feel these emotions and when
22:57
when goes Work finally came out and
22:59
it was. Touching. That. Ceilings.
23:02
People really responded to a but it
23:05
took a long time for that to
23:07
cling to happen and I think it
23:09
can be very arbitrary. You know what?
23:11
what becomes popular? You.
23:16
Did not show up on the first day of school and other. A
23:18
trapper keeper. There's. An
23:20
emotional connection. People have a pen
23:22
that they like, they have a
23:24
you know, have had that they
23:26
choose. Office supplies seemed kind of
23:28
turn key or commoditized, but the
23:30
reality is people actually do care.
23:33
Maybe it starts right when you start with school
23:35
supplies and making sure you have those re items,
23:37
what you choose to agree with how you choose
23:40
to take notes. The whole thing is. Very first.
23:42
Meet. Amy Becker. She leads the
23:44
private brand for Staples. in
23:47
my role i am actually responsible for
23:49
developing an bring to market products that
23:51
are under our brand we have a
23:54
very keen focus on innovation so bringing
23:56
products to market that are new and
23:58
different and really make the way of
24:00
work easier. Staples isn't just
24:02
for back to school shopping. A big part of
24:05
their model is providing products for other companies. Although
24:07
our physical retail stores are important and
24:09
they play that role for the consumer
24:12
every day, we are actually a huge
24:14
B2B organization delivering for businesses every day.
24:16
Whether it starts when you're going back
24:18
to school or when you start a
24:20
new job or when you're in your
24:22
job for 20 years, these are tools
24:24
that you need to be successful, to
24:26
be productive. And that's really the role
24:29
Staples plays now across, I would call
24:31
it business essentials, as opposed to just
24:33
office supplies or back to school
24:35
supplies. What makes these business
24:37
essentials successful is Staples' commitment to innovation.
24:39
From markers designed to not roll off
24:41
your desk to pens that won't smudge
24:44
if you're a lefty. Another product
24:46
that I've been excited about is
24:48
taking something that everybody's using every day
24:50
and making it better. So we actually
24:52
have a stapler that holds
24:55
an extra sleeve of Staples. It has
24:57
a staple remover attached to it. It
24:59
has different finishes for how the Staples
25:01
will finish on a document. A staple
25:03
is a staple, a paperclip's a paperclip.
25:06
But that doesn't mean they're not ripe for innovation. When
25:08
we think of innovation, we normally think of
25:10
radical leaps. The research shows
25:12
that a great deal of progress comes not
25:14
through major breakthroughs, but through more
25:17
minor incremental advances, like putting
25:19
wheels on a suitcase. We designed these
25:21
scissors. They're titanium coated. They stay sharp.
25:23
They don't rust. So I
25:25
put them through the dishwasher. Wait, you
25:27
put scissors in the dishwasher? I did. I
25:30
did. I put these scissors through the dishwasher. Did the
25:32
spoons come out all cut up? The
25:34
spoons survived. Forks not so
25:36
much. Staples is all about finding new
25:38
ways to improve on classic products. These
25:41
are not products that you're using, you
25:43
know, once a month or once a
25:45
year. They're, you know, once
25:47
an hour. I think sometimes we forget
25:49
that because you're that engaged
25:52
with this product on such
25:54
a fundamental level for
25:56
so many moments during your day that it
25:58
matters. That's, I think,
26:00
the key, right, is that we want to
26:02
make sure that we don't forget that the consumer
26:05
cares and that we
26:07
can't lose sight of the things that are
26:09
potential pain points that we could be making
26:11
better for them or improving for them in
26:13
their everyday life. Staple's
26:16
Business Advantage uses today's latest
26:18
innovations plus their team's experience
26:20
to make business easier for
26:22
you. Learn more and sign
26:24
up today at staplesbusinessadvantage.com. Staple's
26:27
Business Advantage, business is
26:29
human. So
26:33
I think it's time for a lightning round if you're up
26:35
for it. First question is, what is
26:37
the worst advice you've ever gotten? Don't
26:39
express yourself. Ditto. Touche.
26:44
What's a form of art that more of
26:46
us should engage with or even be aware
26:48
of? Dancing, dancing.
26:51
Favorite artist? Mary Oliver. Do
26:53
you have a favorite exhibit? There
26:55
was one called Ashes and Snow
26:58
by a photographer, Gregory Colbert,
27:00
years ago that was in a shipping container.
27:02
It was an incredible
27:04
immersive environment. It was sound, images.
27:08
I mean, it was the most
27:10
neurostatic experience and I think this was about
27:12
20 years ago in New York, but it
27:14
was called Ashes and Snow. I'm
27:16
going to say the Sagrada Familia because I was just there
27:19
and if you want to be in awe,
27:22
everybody's head was up. Is
27:24
that something you've rethought over the course of doing
27:26
all this work on art in the brain? I
27:29
think I've doubled down on this
27:31
idea of feeling. People talk
27:33
sometimes about six main feelings. We probably have more
27:35
like 30,000 feelings
27:38
is that the complexity of human
27:40
nature is so extraordinary
27:42
and to be open to
27:45
all of these feelings, which takes bravery,
27:47
right? And to be connected to others
27:49
who are also having these
27:51
feelings that maybe they don't express
27:54
or share, but to really think
27:56
about what self-expression is of
27:58
your true self. your truest sense,
28:00
your truest feelings, and what that
28:02
does for us in terms of connecting
28:05
us to each other. And I would
28:07
say it renewed my need
28:09
to play more. And what's the
28:11
question you have for me? What's your
28:13
favorite art form? Well, magic, clearly.
28:15
But after magic, it's probably poetry
28:18
and musical theater. I
28:21
would love to know, before
28:24
you read this book, did
28:26
you intuitively know how
28:29
important the arts were from
28:32
your other studies? I think I've felt
28:35
like the arts have gotten short shrift. And
28:37
I feel that way about the humanities, too, in
28:40
an increasingly technological world. I
28:43
hadn't thought hard about the neuroscience component,
28:45
and really unpacking the
28:48
physiology of why engaging with
28:50
art affects the way
28:52
we think, feel, and act. That
28:55
was a big takeaway for me of your book.
28:58
Can I ask you, what, if anything, are
29:01
you doing differently or seeing differently
29:03
because you now know that information?
29:07
One thing I started doing that I wasn't doing
29:09
before was playing color cue with our kids. It's
29:13
Sudoku, more or less. It feels
29:15
like there's a little bit of aesthetic engagement, but
29:17
it also appeals to, I guess, my
29:20
left brain tendency to want
29:22
to solve puzzles and use
29:24
logical reasoning to rule out
29:26
options. And it's been a lot
29:29
of fun. And what I've really loved about it is the way
29:31
that sometimes you just look at a
29:33
pattern and you immediately know what's
29:36
missing or what belongs. And
29:38
thinking it through won't get you there. That's
29:41
beautiful. I think you make a
29:43
compelling case that even 15 or 45 minutes
29:47
of art, not
29:49
even having to do it daily, but
29:51
monthly art experiences can have a whole
29:53
range of psychological benefits. What
29:55
should parents do with that knowledge, with their kids at
29:57
home? Home is a place to be.
30:00
where there's a lot of different states of
30:02
mind that are really important for kids. So
30:04
I think of food, for example, as
30:07
a way to really use an
30:09
aesthetic experience. Think about how you
30:11
prepare food, how you think about
30:14
a taste, you know, how you
30:16
come together in rituals and traditions
30:18
around food. Eating together creates
30:20
more collaboration. It makes people more generous.
30:22
It makes them more tolerant. How do
30:24
you start to help kids learn those
30:27
social skills that are so important and
30:29
using something like food and
30:31
mealtime in those rituals I think is really important.
30:34
I think tapping into the parasympathetic nervous
30:36
system with young people is really important.
30:38
So helping them understand that getting in
30:41
the shower, taking a bath is really
30:43
lowering their cortisol. Helping them regulate their
30:45
emotions is super important for young kids
30:48
and showing them that light sources,
30:50
lowering light sources, finding the right light
30:52
sources, certain scents. And
30:54
you don't have to preach it to kids. One of my kids
30:56
always says to me, you know, mom, this is not a teaching
30:58
moment. But you can model it,
31:00
right? You can do it. And I think if
31:02
you start to set those things up for kids,
31:05
it makes a really big difference about
31:07
how they start to take on those
31:09
activities as part of their rituals and
31:11
their practices. And I would say
31:14
expose them to as many
31:16
different kinds of art
31:18
modalities, crayons, clay, collage.
31:20
I know something my dad did is
31:22
he paid attention to what got my
31:25
attention. And then the next day,
31:27
I had more of that on my doorstep in
31:29
my room because this idea about
31:32
giving kids a selection
31:34
of ways to make and
31:36
express themselves. And then
31:38
when you find what they connect with, because
31:41
those little souls, they know exactly who they
31:43
are. I think as they get older, we
31:46
do things to them that strips them of
31:48
that. But while they know who
31:50
they are, to amplify that
31:52
at all costs so that they
31:55
stay true to that would be my
31:57
advice. school.
32:00
It seems like art is the
32:02
first thing to go when there's a budget
32:05
cut or a financial crisis.
32:07
And I think that leaves a lot of teachers scrambling
32:10
to try to figure out how do we fill in
32:12
those gaps. Yeah, in fact, we just spoke at the
32:14
Getty Museum to 500 California school
32:16
superintendents because California is putting
32:19
money into getting one art teacher
32:22
into every school. And what
32:24
we begged them to do is not
32:26
just check the box to get an
32:29
art teacher, but use that mindset of
32:31
art throughout the entire program. Because art
32:34
is about embodying things. And so
32:36
whether it's science or math, to
32:39
use art as a way
32:41
to embody ideas is what
32:43
I think we should be doing in our
32:45
school system. Also not
32:47
slapping kids' hands for doodling, because actually
32:49
a fun fact I found out through
32:51
doing this book with Susan is that
32:54
when you are doodling, you're actually
32:56
remembering what you're listening to much
32:59
better. And also, I think
33:01
the spaces that schools create make
33:03
a huge difference. These ideas around
33:05
enriched environments and making sure that
33:07
the spaces really are enriched. They're
33:09
novel. They have surprise. They change.
33:11
And I think helping educators feel more
33:14
comfortable with that. So it's not the
33:16
art teacher. It's not enrichment. But it's
33:18
really integrated into all of these different
33:21
spaces. And if you buy this argument
33:23
that we're making, which is that we're
33:25
wired for art and it's how we
33:28
learn and grow and change, kids
33:31
will learn better. And that's really what
33:33
you want. You want them to be
33:35
great learners and to have that neuroplasticity
33:37
and to have resiliency, to have better
33:40
SEL, you know, social emotional skills. And
33:43
that happens through these art experiences.
33:46
And also to help them understand the world
33:48
is full of possibilities, because right now that's
33:50
what we need. We need people to be
33:52
imaginative and understand
33:54
possibilities. Well
33:56
I have to say, I'm pretty
33:59
encouraged. by one of these
34:01
revelations in particular as a lifelong doodler.
34:03
Oh really? Great. I think
34:05
this is relevant at work, not just at school.
34:08
Oh yeah. I can't tell you how many times I've been sitting
34:10
in a meeting and started
34:12
drawing cubes or faces and then
34:15
I feel like I have to cover the paper
34:17
because somebody is going to think that I'm distracted
34:19
or not paying attention. No, this is how I
34:21
focus. Exactly. Exactly.
34:24
It's amazing once you understand how the brain works.
34:27
And we don't learn that, right? We don't
34:29
learn sensory literacy. We don't learn brain literacy.
34:32
We don't know it as kids. We don't
34:34
know it as adults. And so when you
34:36
do, you make better decisions. And there's also
34:38
some great epidemiology work that talks
34:41
about how when youth make art and
34:43
they make it on a consistent
34:45
basis, they actually stay in school longer,
34:47
they do better in school, and they
34:50
actually make better decisions across their lives.
34:53
One other thing I didn't expect from reading
34:55
your book was it actually gave me a
34:57
new lens on podcasting. I
34:59
never thought about it as an aesthetic experience
35:01
for people. I guess I never really thought
35:03
about sound as an aesthetic medium, but one
35:05
of the things I've learned from our producers
35:08
over the years is that some of
35:10
the work they do is making audio art. And
35:12
I think that's what a great
35:14
podcast often does. So thank
35:17
you for that. Absolutely. Dialing
35:19
in and tuning in is an art
35:21
form in terms of the
35:23
depth of the sound, the range of
35:25
sound. Absolutely. And I think we're not
35:28
conscious of it, but you can tell
35:30
the good ones between the person's voice
35:32
and the technical work. Also,
35:35
besides the sound, which I think is
35:37
a really beautiful thing, the
35:39
way your voice resonates and really
35:42
flows into us, this is
35:44
an improv. I don't know what you're
35:46
going to say. Ivy doesn't know what you're
35:48
going to say. It is improv, right? And
35:50
so we're creating something wholly new. And I
35:53
think that's really powerful too. We're
35:55
making art together and conversation
35:58
is art. And so... There's
36:00
something really beautiful about that and the nature of
36:02
it. I think so too. And
36:04
yeah, I mean, I love improv, so this
36:06
is obviously a natural fit for
36:09
scratching that itch. But
36:11
I just want to thank you both for
36:13
helping us all appreciate the importance of aesthetics
36:15
in our lives. And the stress-reducing benefits are
36:17
clear. The creativity upsides are clear. But
36:21
also, it just leads to a richer
36:23
conversation. So thank you both. Thank
36:26
you. Thank you. Thank you for appreciating
36:28
it. Make more magic. I won't
36:30
say that literally. But thank you. My
36:37
takeaway from this discussion is that we need to stop
36:39
thinking about art as just a hobby,
36:41
and start treating it as an important priority.
36:45
Not just because it's enjoyable, but because
36:47
it expands our minds. Rethinking
36:55
is hosted by me, Adam Grant, and
36:57
produced by Ted with Cosmic Standard. Our
36:59
team includes Colin Helm, Eliza Smith, Jacob
37:02
Winning, Asia Simpson, Samaya Adams, Michelle Quinn,
37:04
Ben Van Ting, Hannah Kingsley-M This
37:14
episode was produced and mixed by Cosmic Standard. Thank
37:27
you.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More