Podchaser Logo
Home
Your brain on art with Ivy Ross and Susan Magsamen

Your brain on art with Ivy Ross and Susan Magsamen

Released Tuesday, 12th December 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Your brain on art with Ivy Ross and Susan Magsamen

Your brain on art with Ivy Ross and Susan Magsamen

Your brain on art with Ivy Ross and Susan Magsamen

Your brain on art with Ivy Ross and Susan Magsamen

Tuesday, 12th December 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

Ted Audio Collective. Thanks

0:07

to Staples for sponsoring this episode. Hey,

0:13

everyone, it's Adam Grant. Welcome back to Rethinking,

0:15

my podcast on the science of what makes

0:18

us tick. I'm an organizational

0:20

psychologist, and I'm taking you inside the

0:22

minds of fascinating people to explore new

0:24

thoughts and new ways of thinking. My

0:27

guests today are Susan Magsimin and Ivy

0:30

Ross, authors of the New

0:32

York Times bestseller, Your Brain on Art.

0:35

Ivy is vice president of hardware design at Google.

0:38

She's also an accomplished jewelry designer. Her

0:41

work is featured at museums around the world, including

0:43

the Smithsonian. Susan

0:46

is the executive director of the International

0:48

Arts Plus Mind Lab at Johns Hopkins

0:50

University, where she brings together

0:52

scientists and artists to grow the emerging

0:54

field of neuro aesthetics. Our

0:57

conversation is about the cognitive effects of art

0:59

and some creative ways of opening our minds.

1:12

It's not every day I get to

1:14

talk with a neuro aesthetics expert and

1:17

a star jewelry designer turned

1:19

Google hardware specialist. Really? You

1:22

don't talk to those people every day? I mean,

1:24

to be honest, Susan, I didn't even know those

1:26

categories of people existed. It's good. We're still creating

1:28

new worlds. So I

1:30

have so many questions for both of you and

1:32

a ton to learn in this conversation. But let

1:35

me begin by asking, how did you get

1:37

interested in the neuroscience of

1:39

art? So maybe I'll

1:41

start. You know, I've always been

1:44

really moved by nature. Nature

1:46

has been kind of a through line for

1:48

me my whole life. And I think feeling

1:51

sun on my face and the smell of

1:53

flowers and I felt most alive

1:55

there. But when I am a twin,

1:57

and when I was 12 years old,

2:00

My sister had a very serious

2:02

farming accident and almost lost her

2:04

leg. And if you know

2:06

anything about twins, you know that we understand

2:08

each other without words, we can send messages

2:10

to each other. We

2:13

just read each other and we're

2:15

born in relationship. And so

2:17

when that happened, my sister really shut down. Now

2:20

we know the BRCA region of her brain shut

2:22

down. She wasn't able to find words for

2:24

what was happening to her. And

2:27

I really felt very disconnected to the

2:29

person that I was closest to. And

2:32

so my mom suggested that she

2:34

start drawing to just get

2:36

stuff out. My mom's a poet, not a

2:38

professional poet, but was always writing poetry and

2:41

that was really helpful for her. But

2:43

my sister started to draw these things that there

2:45

were no words for. And

2:48

they were symbols and metaphors and they became

2:50

ways for her to access what she was

2:52

feeling. But it was also ways for me

2:54

to know what she was feeling. As

2:57

a very young age, I realized that

2:59

there's lots of ways to share ourselves

3:01

besides yapping and talking and trying

3:03

to find the right words. And

3:06

that really, really changed my life and changed

3:08

how I started to understand the world around

3:11

me. Amazing. And Ivy?

3:14

Yeah. And I

3:16

started as an artist and was

3:18

always a little creative creature in

3:20

my bedroom making things as

3:22

a way of expressing myself. And then

3:25

as I entered the corporate design world

3:27

and most recently, instead

3:29

of talking to the team

3:32

about design thinking, started

3:34

talking about design feelings. Let's talk

3:36

about how objects and

3:38

things feel because I

3:40

think we've been optimizing for productivity

3:42

and efficiency since the Industrial Revolution

3:44

and pushed some of the sensorial

3:48

nature of ourselves aside.

3:50

And then I could just feel that

3:52

we are craving that. And so even

3:55

in how we design

3:57

our hardware at Google, it's...

4:00

What textures can we add

4:02

to a product so it's not just

4:04

one surface? I too did not know

4:06

of this word called neuroaesthetics. I

4:09

was just intuitively understanding

4:12

it until Susan reached

4:14

out on LinkedIn

4:16

and said she was

4:19

with the Arts and Mind Lab and I

4:21

was like, what is that? Two of my

4:23

favorite subjects together because I studied

4:25

Jungian Psychology and I was an artist and

4:27

it's like wow, in one place. I

4:30

swiped right and what was supposed to

4:33

be a 30-minute conversation led to a

4:35

three-hour conversation that led to

4:37

a salon in my home between artists and

4:39

scientists which led to this book. Wow,

4:43

that's quite a connection. Well, I have

4:45

to say, I think this book is

4:48

maybe the best case I've ever read for putting an A

4:50

in STEM. I came away from

4:52

the book thinking science,

4:54

technology, engineering and math are incomplete

4:57

without the arts. And

4:59

I imagine I'm preaching to the choir on that one.

5:02

Well, thank you for saying that because that

5:04

is the greatest gift. We just spoke at

5:06

a women in data science conference and

5:08

we said to the woman organizing it,

5:10

why do you want us to be

5:12

the keynote speaker? And she said because

5:14

you wouldn't believe this Ivy but people

5:16

who are studying computer science and data

5:18

science, they have dropped doing

5:21

art or playing their guitar, kind of

5:24

what their soul was happy doing because

5:27

they're led to believe like oh my

5:29

God, we have to focus on just

5:31

computer science or just understanding data. And

5:33

it's quite opposite because to your point,

5:35

we all have to be whole people

5:38

and we need the other side. And the

5:41

scary thing is also people who are

5:43

coding and getting into this field to

5:45

not have the balance of the arts,

5:48

we're going to be in trouble, not only for

5:50

their own health and wellness because we now know

5:52

what it does to our brain and body but

5:55

for the sake of society.

5:57

It's how we are physiologically,

5:59

psychologically wired. you can't learn well

6:01

without these kinds of stimuli. You can't

6:03

find, you can't be creative. We've left

6:05

so much of our human capacity on

6:08

the table because we've sort of stripped

6:10

this out in all these different areas

6:12

of our lives. And I

6:14

think, you know, it's data scientists, but

6:16

it's also people that are going into

6:18

different fields, all fields that are starting

6:20

to understand that this makes them more

6:24

collaborative, more creative, more connected. And

6:26

I think that we're starting to

6:28

see a shift back towards the

6:31

beginning, barely at the beginning of

6:33

understanding the profound neurobiological impacts

6:35

of these things that we've just

6:38

kind of been told aren't as

6:40

essential. Or people stopped making

6:42

art because they felt they weren't good

6:44

at it, quote unquote, and really to

6:46

learn that it's not about being proficient

6:49

at something, it's the act of doing

6:51

it that changes the brain and

6:53

body. So so many people have written us

6:55

and said, thank you for giving me permission

6:58

to make art again. You mentioned creativity

7:00

as one of the benefits of engaging with

7:02

the arts. And I

7:04

immediately started thinking about this root

7:06

Bernstein et al finding about what

7:09

differentiates Nobel prize winning scientists from

7:11

their peers. And

7:13

there's a stunning set of patterns

7:15

around just the likelihood of having

7:17

artistic hobbies. Nobel prize winners

7:20

are twice as likely to play a musical

7:22

instrument as their peers. They're seven

7:24

times as likely to draw or paint, 12 times

7:27

as likely to write fiction or poetry,

7:30

and get this 22 times as likely

7:32

to perform as actors, dancers, or

7:35

yes, magicians. As

7:37

a former magician, I was tremendously excited by

7:39

that last finding. But I love that. My

7:41

first instinct as a psychologist is to say

7:44

correlation is not causation. This

7:46

is probably just a signal of a

7:48

creative personality and the kinds of people

7:51

who have breakthrough scientific insights are also

7:53

drawn to expressing themselves creatively and being

7:55

curious about the arts. I

7:58

think your work suggests. another

8:00

factor at play here, which is there may

8:03

actually be at least a small

8:05

causal effect of engagement in the arts on

8:07

your scientific creativity. Talk to me about that.

8:09

That's really interesting. Well, you know, Jonah

8:11

Salk, when he

8:14

was really struggling to work

8:16

on the polio vaccine, you know, he

8:18

was working like in a basement in

8:20

New Jersey and it was not the

8:22

greatest environment. He went to Umbria and

8:24

walked the cloister and really believed

8:27

that it was that space and

8:29

that aesthetic experience that allowing his

8:31

brain to go to kind of

8:33

a resting state that

8:35

really allowed him to be able to come

8:37

back and have that aha moment. And we've

8:40

seen that, you know, over and over again

8:42

where there's this need for

8:44

a different

8:46

way of knowing and moving into

8:48

a flow state, moving into a

8:51

timeless liminal space, which is where

8:53

you go when you're really engaged in some

8:55

kind of art experience. And as Ivy

8:57

said, whether you're the maker or the beholder,

8:59

that's really sort of an incredible thing. And

9:01

so, you know, I think we often, too,

9:03

think that researchers are so

9:06

logical and so cognitive, but researchers

9:08

and scientists, you know, some of

9:11

these Nobel Prize winners in different

9:13

categories are incredibly creative, right? That's

9:16

how they get to their solutions. That's how they

9:18

get to their problem-solving and trying trial and error,

9:20

seeing what works and doesn't work. And I think

9:23

we sort of categorized

9:26

artists as the creative and

9:28

then everybody else isn't.

9:30

And so I think we've got to change

9:32

that paradigm, too, because it doesn't hold

9:34

when you really start to untangle it. Art

9:38

experiences tend to

9:40

be salient experiences that

9:43

literally make new synapses in the brain.

9:46

So I think being engaged in

9:48

the arts not only gets

9:51

you more in touch with yourself and

9:54

self-expression, but it's also

9:56

almost exercising that muscle of firing

9:58

these new synapses. because

10:01

they're new experiences, which is

10:04

helpful when you're trying to create breakthrough

10:08

moments. And I

10:10

think that's where experiential learning is

10:12

so important too. Like you can't

10:14

have enough wonderful experiences that are

10:16

really building those strong neural pathways.

10:20

I love the phrase, your brain on art. I guess

10:23

it reminded me of watching those your brain

10:25

on drugs commercials as a kid. And this

10:27

is a positive alternative. What happens to

10:29

my brain on art? So it's

10:31

a lot of neurons that you

10:33

come into this world with. And

10:35

the only way that you really

10:37

create those synaptic connections and strong

10:39

neural pathways is through your sensory

10:42

systems, right? So how you bring

10:44

the world in. It turns out

10:46

that the most salient experiences are

10:48

these highly aesthetic experiences and arts

10:50

fall into that category. Now sometimes

10:52

salient experiences can be traumatic too,

10:54

right? So it's not

10:56

all salient experiences are positive

10:58

and not all art experiences

11:00

necessarily are positive, but they are

11:02

the ones that resonate and build

11:04

these synaptic connections that create, that

11:06

connect the neurons. And we're starting

11:09

to see those neural pathways are

11:11

the things that connect all the

11:13

different parts of the brain. And

11:15

so when you're thinking about structure

11:17

and function, there's neural pathways that

11:19

are being built. But you're also

11:21

activating other physiological systems like

11:23

the circulatory system, the

11:26

respiratory system, the endocrine and

11:28

muscular systems. And so what's

11:30

amazing about these art experiences

11:33

is they have a

11:35

neurobiological, physiological impact and

11:38

it's simultaneous. So where you

11:40

know certain drugs might activate

11:43

a particular neurotransmitter. Different arts

11:45

experiences might be igniting the

11:47

reward system. So it's igniting

11:49

things like dopamine or

11:51

serotonin or oxytocin. But it

11:53

may also at the same time

11:55

be activating something like cortisol and

11:57

lower in cortisol. So the complete

14:00

to apply some of the scientific methods

14:02

that are helping to understand why that

14:04

works, you kind of go,

14:06

oh my God, the things that, you know,

14:09

we were told not to do, that were

14:11

a waste of time or that seemed irrelevant,

14:13

turn out to be incredibly important, like humming

14:15

and doodling and singing in the shower. This

14:18

tuning fork piece is interesting to me because

14:21

you could say, oh, well, it's a placebo effect. What

14:23

we do know is that sound

14:25

is vibration and we are so

14:28

wired for resonance. You

14:30

know, we're 60% water. So

14:32

it makes so much sense. And I think that's

14:34

what a lot of people also have resonated

14:37

with the book is that these

14:39

are things that we've intuitively felt

14:41

and new worked. But now

14:43

we're really being able to add another layer of

14:46

knowing to this work where you go, ah, I

14:48

can understand why I could use this as a

14:50

tool in my pocket to help with something that

14:53

has felt intractable and that doesn't require

14:55

different kinds of other interventions, like whether

14:58

that's pharmacological or surgeries. I mean, it's

15:00

kind of a yes and. And so

15:02

I think that's also really one of

15:04

the things the book is lifting up.

15:07

We realized when did even the word

15:09

art come into play? Because

15:12

before we had the word, it

15:14

was the way we lived. We sang,

15:16

we danced, we told stories, we did

15:18

graphics in caves. We didn't have to

15:21

call it art. It was the way

15:23

we expressed ourselves. And so there's

15:25

something there. I do believe we're at a time where we

15:27

have to go back a little to move forward. This

15:30

goes to the question of does the media matter?

15:32

What are the implications of different types of art?

15:36

So maybe to lead into this, one of

15:38

my favorite findings for personality psychology is that

15:40

if you're interested in markers of

15:43

openness to new experiences and curiosity,

15:45

one of the clearest ones across

15:47

cultures is having aesthetic chills. The

15:50

shivers on your spine are goosebumps. And

15:52

some people get them when listening to

15:55

beautiful music or when engaging with poetry

15:57

or when going to a museum. I

16:01

get them mostly when looking

16:03

at nature or sometimes outer

16:05

space or extraordinary architecture, but

16:08

more often from what I think is a

16:10

brilliant idea. I'm like, okay,

16:12

wait a minute. So these

16:15

experiences are not all created equal, even

16:17

though physiologically we might all look the

16:19

same when we have these aesthetic chills.

16:21

So I wondered how

16:24

you think about that and how I

16:26

know what kind of artistic engagement is

16:28

relevant to me. Anjan Chatterjee,

16:31

who is at the University of Pennsylvania,

16:34

started to look at some of this

16:36

with his aesthetic triad, the theoretical model

16:38

that kind of says, why is my

16:40

perch uniquely my perch? And

16:42

he combined kind of three circles in

16:45

a Venn diagram with that peak experience

16:47

at the middle, which as you're describing

16:49

it, I'm hearing all. And it's kind

16:51

of a combination of things that you

16:54

know, so where you come from and

16:56

what you've experienced, your sensorial responses to

16:58

those, and they can be very

17:01

different, right? Like you might

17:03

have better hearing acuity or better visual acuity, where

17:05

I might have more tactile acuity.

17:08

We all have sort of a honing

17:10

of our physiology that's uniquely ours,

17:12

as is our cultural backgrounds and

17:14

our likes of experiences. And

17:17

then the third is like, what matters to

17:19

you? What's important to you? And

17:21

how do you sort of value that in

17:23

terms of importance? And at the center of

17:25

those is this sort of peak experience. And

17:28

so I think that the arts and

17:30

aesthetics probably are one of the most

17:32

personalized medicines we can have because it

17:35

really does reflect us individually. And I

17:37

love that. And I'll just give one

17:39

other example that I think illustrates this.

17:41

There's so many great anecdotal

17:44

reports around autobiographical music

17:46

and dementia or Alzheimer's, where people just

17:49

light up and they wake up. This

17:51

is much of an awakening for that

17:53

time. But it's

17:55

different music based on where you come from,

17:57

what you know, what you've experienced.

18:00

And I have to say, Adam,

18:02

I absolutely get those chills. I've

18:04

made business decisions based on those

18:06

chills. So I use it

18:08

as my guiding light. I know exactly what

18:10

you mean. But the beauty of this is

18:13

that when we say art, it's

18:15

not just visual art. It's

18:17

architecture as well as all of these

18:20

art modalities, singing, dancing,

18:22

painting, sculpting. It's

18:24

really about what makes you more

18:26

connected to yourself and allows you

18:28

to self-express. And there are art

18:30

forms that are being used for

18:33

specific things. So the form may

18:35

be like singing for Alzheimer's as

18:37

an example, but it's the contextual

18:39

cultural element that differentiates

18:41

or dancing in Parkinson's, right? We

18:43

know that dancing in Parkinson's increases

18:46

gait and cognition and mood and

18:48

even sleep. So there are art

18:51

forms that are being used for specific

18:53

things. What Ivy's also talking about, though,

18:55

is how you use art as practice,

18:58

how you use it in your daily

19:00

life for flourishing, for creating a sense

19:02

of ease or comfort or relaxing. And

19:04

so I think what's so amazing about

19:07

this work to me is that it's

19:09

ubiquitous. It really does fit in every part

19:12

of our life if we allow for that.

19:14

And I just love that you said curiosity

19:16

because I think that is one

19:18

of the drivers in this work

19:20

is being curious and being willing

19:22

to play around and explore kind

19:25

of your sensory systems and to be a

19:27

maker and a beholder. That's what Ivy and

19:29

I call the aesthetic mindset. And so being

19:32

open to that is really important. And

19:34

we learned even from Sharon Salzberg that

19:36

art is the highest form of meditation.

19:39

I'm really drawn to the idea that nature

19:41

has a universal effect, but art has a

19:44

much more particular and idiosyncratic one. And

19:46

you're making me feel like it's not entirely

19:48

a terrible thing that I walk

19:51

into a museum and I look at

19:53

a painting and I think it's amazing

19:55

that you could create that, but I don't know

19:57

why you wanted to. And I

19:59

feel nothing looking at this. Why am I

20:01

cooped up in a room when I could

20:04

be looking at the actual landscape

20:06

or mountain or ocean that you painted? It

20:08

doesn't do anything for me. The average

20:10

amount of time that someone looks at a piece of art

20:13

in a museum is seconds. So

20:15

if you spend time really

20:17

understanding how it makes you feel,

20:19

and I think it's

20:21

about personal growth but also about understanding

20:24

the other, so empathy and perspective taking,

20:26

and how that can help us be

20:28

more whole human beings and this idea

20:31

of meaning making. I think

20:33

that right now the world is really

20:35

crazy and maybe crazier than ever. And how

20:37

do you make sense? How do you make

20:39

meaning? How do you get a respite? And

20:42

that's where I think beholding can

20:44

be also helpful as well as

20:46

making. And you know, nature is

20:48

the most neuroaesthetic place you could

20:50

be because it alivens the senses.

20:52

It has shape, texture,

20:55

temperature, sound. It encompasses all of

20:58

your sensory systems,

21:01

which as E.O. Wilson says,

21:04

we have grown up there. And so

21:06

it's no wonder that these systems are

21:08

so important for us to feel healthy

21:10

and alive. And nature is a great

21:12

place to feel that. There's

21:15

a Grady and Lieberman paper that

21:17

looks at what happens

21:19

to paintings that artists make

21:21

in the year after losing a relative or a

21:23

close friend. And not

21:26

only do they fail to find evidence for a

21:28

benefit of being a tortured artist, they find a

21:30

cost. I think on average the paintings they do

21:32

in the first year, this is French and American

21:35

artists, the paintings they do in the first year

21:37

after losing someone close to them sell for about

21:40

50% less. Now, we

21:42

don't know whether people find the topics sad

21:45

or whether the grief actually constrained their creativity.

21:47

But that does not track with the idea

21:49

that artists have To

21:52

suffer from mental health challenges in order to be creative. I

21:54

Do think there's some. And

22:00

how it's being a potential acceptance

22:02

that I'm that there is a

22:05

possibility that in their most impressive

22:07

periods sometimes the the poignancy of

22:09

their poetry increased. That's. Interesting

22:11

because professional artists that are making

22:14

their living at arts there is

22:16

a financial value that's put on

22:18

that work rate. Which isn't to

22:20

say that it's not incredibly valuable

22:22

to the artist to make that

22:25

work, but whether it's gonna sell,

22:27

whether it seemed as commercially viable

22:29

or aesthetically pleasing, whatever that means

22:31

rights is a different question. Yet

22:34

you look at some be like,

22:36

then go who suffered mightily and

22:38

and he didn't sell painting when

22:40

he. Was alive. You know if people

22:42

didn't get it and it will and

22:45

then his You know his brother inherited

22:47

the work and and his brother died

22:49

and the sister in law was the

22:51

one that went to gallery owner and

22:53

said this work moves me I get

22:55

this, I feel these emotions and when

22:57

when goes Work finally came out and

22:59

it was. Touching. That. Ceilings.

23:02

People really responded to a but it

23:05

took a long time for that to

23:07

cling to happen and I think it

23:09

can be very arbitrary. You know what?

23:11

what becomes popular? You.

23:16

Did not show up on the first day of school and other. A

23:18

trapper keeper. There's. An

23:20

emotional connection. People have a pen

23:22

that they like, they have a

23:24

you know, have had that they

23:26

choose. Office supplies seemed kind of

23:28

turn key or commoditized, but the

23:30

reality is people actually do care.

23:33

Maybe it starts right when you start with school

23:35

supplies and making sure you have those re items,

23:37

what you choose to agree with how you choose

23:40

to take notes. The whole thing is. Very first.

23:42

Meet. Amy Becker. She leads the

23:44

private brand for Staples. in

23:47

my role i am actually responsible for

23:49

developing an bring to market products that

23:51

are under our brand we have a

23:54

very keen focus on innovation so bringing

23:56

products to market that are new and

23:58

different and really make the way of

24:00

work easier. Staples isn't just

24:02

for back to school shopping. A big part of

24:05

their model is providing products for other companies. Although

24:07

our physical retail stores are important and

24:09

they play that role for the consumer

24:12

every day, we are actually a huge

24:14

B2B organization delivering for businesses every day.

24:16

Whether it starts when you're going back

24:18

to school or when you start a

24:20

new job or when you're in your

24:22

job for 20 years, these are tools

24:24

that you need to be successful, to

24:26

be productive. And that's really the role

24:29

Staples plays now across, I would call

24:31

it business essentials, as opposed to just

24:33

office supplies or back to school

24:35

supplies. What makes these business

24:37

essentials successful is Staples' commitment to innovation.

24:39

From markers designed to not roll off

24:41

your desk to pens that won't smudge

24:44

if you're a lefty. Another product

24:46

that I've been excited about is

24:48

taking something that everybody's using every day

24:50

and making it better. So we actually

24:52

have a stapler that holds

24:55

an extra sleeve of Staples. It has

24:57

a staple remover attached to it. It

24:59

has different finishes for how the Staples

25:01

will finish on a document. A staple

25:03

is a staple, a paperclip's a paperclip.

25:06

But that doesn't mean they're not ripe for innovation. When

25:08

we think of innovation, we normally think of

25:10

radical leaps. The research shows

25:12

that a great deal of progress comes not

25:14

through major breakthroughs, but through more

25:17

minor incremental advances, like putting

25:19

wheels on a suitcase. We designed these

25:21

scissors. They're titanium coated. They stay sharp.

25:23

They don't rust. So I

25:25

put them through the dishwasher. Wait, you

25:27

put scissors in the dishwasher? I did. I

25:30

did. I put these scissors through the dishwasher. Did the

25:32

spoons come out all cut up? The

25:34

spoons survived. Forks not so

25:36

much. Staples is all about finding new

25:38

ways to improve on classic products. These

25:41

are not products that you're using, you

25:43

know, once a month or once a

25:45

year. They're, you know, once

25:47

an hour. I think sometimes we forget

25:49

that because you're that engaged

25:52

with this product on such

25:54

a fundamental level for

25:56

so many moments during your day that it

25:58

matters. That's, I think,

26:00

the key, right, is that we want to

26:02

make sure that we don't forget that the consumer

26:05

cares and that we

26:07

can't lose sight of the things that are

26:09

potential pain points that we could be making

26:11

better for them or improving for them in

26:13

their everyday life. Staple's

26:16

Business Advantage uses today's latest

26:18

innovations plus their team's experience

26:20

to make business easier for

26:22

you. Learn more and sign

26:24

up today at staplesbusinessadvantage.com. Staple's

26:27

Business Advantage, business is

26:29

human. So

26:33

I think it's time for a lightning round if you're up

26:35

for it. First question is, what is

26:37

the worst advice you've ever gotten? Don't

26:39

express yourself. Ditto. Touche.

26:44

What's a form of art that more of

26:46

us should engage with or even be aware

26:48

of? Dancing, dancing.

26:51

Favorite artist? Mary Oliver. Do

26:53

you have a favorite exhibit? There

26:55

was one called Ashes and Snow

26:58

by a photographer, Gregory Colbert,

27:00

years ago that was in a shipping container.

27:02

It was an incredible

27:04

immersive environment. It was sound, images.

27:08

I mean, it was the most

27:10

neurostatic experience and I think this was about

27:12

20 years ago in New York, but it

27:14

was called Ashes and Snow. I'm

27:16

going to say the Sagrada Familia because I was just there

27:19

and if you want to be in awe,

27:22

everybody's head was up. Is

27:24

that something you've rethought over the course of doing

27:26

all this work on art in the brain? I

27:29

think I've doubled down on this

27:31

idea of feeling. People talk

27:33

sometimes about six main feelings. We probably have more

27:35

like 30,000 feelings

27:38

is that the complexity of human

27:40

nature is so extraordinary

27:42

and to be open to

27:45

all of these feelings, which takes bravery,

27:47

right? And to be connected to others

27:49

who are also having these

27:51

feelings that maybe they don't express

27:54

or share, but to really think

27:56

about what self-expression is of

27:58

your true self. your truest sense,

28:00

your truest feelings, and what that

28:02

does for us in terms of connecting

28:05

us to each other. And I would

28:07

say it renewed my need

28:09

to play more. And what's the

28:11

question you have for me? What's your

28:13

favorite art form? Well, magic, clearly.

28:15

But after magic, it's probably poetry

28:18

and musical theater. I

28:21

would love to know, before

28:24

you read this book, did

28:26

you intuitively know how

28:29

important the arts were from

28:32

your other studies? I think I've felt

28:35

like the arts have gotten short shrift. And

28:37

I feel that way about the humanities, too, in

28:40

an increasingly technological world. I

28:43

hadn't thought hard about the neuroscience component,

28:45

and really unpacking the

28:48

physiology of why engaging with

28:50

art affects the way

28:52

we think, feel, and act. That

28:55

was a big takeaway for me of your book.

28:58

Can I ask you, what, if anything, are

29:01

you doing differently or seeing differently

29:03

because you now know that information?

29:07

One thing I started doing that I wasn't doing

29:09

before was playing color cue with our kids. It's

29:13

Sudoku, more or less. It feels

29:15

like there's a little bit of aesthetic engagement, but

29:17

it also appeals to, I guess, my

29:20

left brain tendency to want

29:22

to solve puzzles and use

29:24

logical reasoning to rule out

29:26

options. And it's been a lot

29:29

of fun. And what I've really loved about it is the way

29:31

that sometimes you just look at a

29:33

pattern and you immediately know what's

29:36

missing or what belongs. And

29:38

thinking it through won't get you there. That's

29:41

beautiful. I think you make a

29:43

compelling case that even 15 or 45 minutes

29:47

of art, not

29:49

even having to do it daily, but

29:51

monthly art experiences can have a whole

29:53

range of psychological benefits. What

29:55

should parents do with that knowledge, with their kids at

29:57

home? Home is a place to be.

30:00

where there's a lot of different states of

30:02

mind that are really important for kids. So

30:04

I think of food, for example, as

30:07

a way to really use an

30:09

aesthetic experience. Think about how you

30:11

prepare food, how you think about

30:14

a taste, you know, how you

30:16

come together in rituals and traditions

30:18

around food. Eating together creates

30:20

more collaboration. It makes people more generous.

30:22

It makes them more tolerant. How do

30:24

you start to help kids learn those

30:27

social skills that are so important and

30:29

using something like food and

30:31

mealtime in those rituals I think is really important.

30:34

I think tapping into the parasympathetic nervous

30:36

system with young people is really important.

30:38

So helping them understand that getting in

30:41

the shower, taking a bath is really

30:43

lowering their cortisol. Helping them regulate their

30:45

emotions is super important for young kids

30:48

and showing them that light sources,

30:50

lowering light sources, finding the right light

30:52

sources, certain scents. And

30:54

you don't have to preach it to kids. One of my kids

30:56

always says to me, you know, mom, this is not a teaching

30:58

moment. But you can model it,

31:00

right? You can do it. And I think if

31:02

you start to set those things up for kids,

31:05

it makes a really big difference about

31:07

how they start to take on those

31:09

activities as part of their rituals and

31:11

their practices. And I would say

31:14

expose them to as many

31:16

different kinds of art

31:18

modalities, crayons, clay, collage.

31:20

I know something my dad did is

31:22

he paid attention to what got my

31:25

attention. And then the next day,

31:27

I had more of that on my doorstep in

31:29

my room because this idea about

31:32

giving kids a selection

31:34

of ways to make and

31:36

express themselves. And then

31:38

when you find what they connect with, because

31:41

those little souls, they know exactly who they

31:43

are. I think as they get older, we

31:46

do things to them that strips them of

31:48

that. But while they know who

31:50

they are, to amplify that

31:52

at all costs so that they

31:55

stay true to that would be my

31:57

advice. school.

32:00

It seems like art is the

32:02

first thing to go when there's a budget

32:05

cut or a financial crisis.

32:07

And I think that leaves a lot of teachers scrambling

32:10

to try to figure out how do we fill in

32:12

those gaps. Yeah, in fact, we just spoke at the

32:14

Getty Museum to 500 California school

32:16

superintendents because California is putting

32:19

money into getting one art teacher

32:22

into every school. And what

32:24

we begged them to do is not

32:26

just check the box to get an

32:29

art teacher, but use that mindset of

32:31

art throughout the entire program. Because art

32:34

is about embodying things. And so

32:36

whether it's science or math, to

32:39

use art as a way

32:41

to embody ideas is what

32:43

I think we should be doing in our

32:45

school system. Also not

32:47

slapping kids' hands for doodling, because actually

32:49

a fun fact I found out through

32:51

doing this book with Susan is that

32:54

when you are doodling, you're actually

32:56

remembering what you're listening to much

32:59

better. And also, I think

33:01

the spaces that schools create make

33:03

a huge difference. These ideas around

33:05

enriched environments and making sure that

33:07

the spaces really are enriched. They're

33:09

novel. They have surprise. They change.

33:11

And I think helping educators feel more

33:14

comfortable with that. So it's not the

33:16

art teacher. It's not enrichment. But it's

33:18

really integrated into all of these different

33:21

spaces. And if you buy this argument

33:23

that we're making, which is that we're

33:25

wired for art and it's how we

33:28

learn and grow and change, kids

33:31

will learn better. And that's really what

33:33

you want. You want them to be

33:35

great learners and to have that neuroplasticity

33:37

and to have resiliency, to have better

33:40

SEL, you know, social emotional skills. And

33:43

that happens through these art experiences.

33:46

And also to help them understand the world

33:48

is full of possibilities, because right now that's

33:50

what we need. We need people to be

33:52

imaginative and understand

33:54

possibilities. Well

33:56

I have to say, I'm pretty

33:59

encouraged. by one of these

34:01

revelations in particular as a lifelong doodler.

34:03

Oh really? Great. I think

34:05

this is relevant at work, not just at school.

34:08

Oh yeah. I can't tell you how many times I've been sitting

34:10

in a meeting and started

34:12

drawing cubes or faces and then

34:15

I feel like I have to cover the paper

34:17

because somebody is going to think that I'm distracted

34:19

or not paying attention. No, this is how I

34:21

focus. Exactly. Exactly.

34:24

It's amazing once you understand how the brain works.

34:27

And we don't learn that, right? We don't

34:29

learn sensory literacy. We don't learn brain literacy.

34:32

We don't know it as kids. We don't

34:34

know it as adults. And so when you

34:36

do, you make better decisions. And there's also

34:38

some great epidemiology work that talks

34:41

about how when youth make art and

34:43

they make it on a consistent

34:45

basis, they actually stay in school longer,

34:47

they do better in school, and they

34:50

actually make better decisions across their lives.

34:53

One other thing I didn't expect from reading

34:55

your book was it actually gave me a

34:57

new lens on podcasting. I

34:59

never thought about it as an aesthetic experience

35:01

for people. I guess I never really thought

35:03

about sound as an aesthetic medium, but one

35:05

of the things I've learned from our producers

35:08

over the years is that some of

35:10

the work they do is making audio art. And

35:12

I think that's what a great

35:14

podcast often does. So thank

35:17

you for that. Absolutely. Dialing

35:19

in and tuning in is an art

35:21

form in terms of the

35:23

depth of the sound, the range of

35:25

sound. Absolutely. And I think we're not

35:28

conscious of it, but you can tell

35:30

the good ones between the person's voice

35:32

and the technical work. Also,

35:35

besides the sound, which I think is

35:37

a really beautiful thing, the

35:39

way your voice resonates and really

35:42

flows into us, this is

35:44

an improv. I don't know what you're

35:46

going to say. Ivy doesn't know what you're

35:48

going to say. It is improv, right? And

35:50

so we're creating something wholly new. And I

35:53

think that's really powerful too. We're

35:55

making art together and conversation

35:58

is art. And so... There's

36:00

something really beautiful about that and the nature of

36:02

it. I think so too. And

36:04

yeah, I mean, I love improv, so this

36:06

is obviously a natural fit for

36:09

scratching that itch. But

36:11

I just want to thank you both for

36:13

helping us all appreciate the importance of aesthetics

36:15

in our lives. And the stress-reducing benefits are

36:17

clear. The creativity upsides are clear. But

36:21

also, it just leads to a richer

36:23

conversation. So thank you both. Thank

36:26

you. Thank you. Thank you for appreciating

36:28

it. Make more magic. I won't

36:30

say that literally. But thank you. My

36:37

takeaway from this discussion is that we need to stop

36:39

thinking about art as just a hobby,

36:41

and start treating it as an important priority.

36:45

Not just because it's enjoyable, but because

36:47

it expands our minds. Rethinking

36:55

is hosted by me, Adam Grant, and

36:57

produced by Ted with Cosmic Standard. Our

36:59

team includes Colin Helm, Eliza Smith, Jacob

37:02

Winning, Asia Simpson, Samaya Adams, Michelle Quinn,

37:04

Ben Van Ting, Hannah Kingsley-M This

37:14

episode was produced and mixed by Cosmic Standard. Thank

37:27

you.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features