Podchaser Logo
Home
The Car Doctor - 1/13/24 Hour 2 - A Chat with Mark Mills

The Car Doctor - 1/13/24 Hour 2 - A Chat with Mark Mills

Released Saturday, 13th January 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
The Car Doctor - 1/13/24 Hour 2 - A Chat with Mark Mills

The Car Doctor - 1/13/24 Hour 2 - A Chat with Mark Mills

The Car Doctor - 1/13/24 Hour 2 - A Chat with Mark Mills

The Car Doctor - 1/13/24 Hour 2 - A Chat with Mark Mills

Saturday, 13th January 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Ron An Aian.

0:01

Part of the problem in diagnosing a vehicle.

0:03

For me, it gets to be emotional.

0:05

If we are to truly discover the meaning of these

0:07

events.

0:08

Absolution for

0:10

the turn being.

0:13

Lent them on the.

0:14

Phone the car Doctor.

0:15

If you let your emotions get involved, this

0:18

car's a piece of junk. This car's a piece of junk.

0:20

This car's a piece of junk. And it's not like that

0:23

that has to go to the back of your mind. It has

0:25

to be what's the source of the problem. What

0:27

steps am I going to take to resolve?

0:29

Are you incapable of restraining ourselves? Would

0:31

you take pride in being an insufferable.

0:33

Knowitable Welcome to the radio

0:35

home of ron Anian the Car Doctor.

0:38

Since nineteen ninety one, this is where

0:40

car owners the world overturned to for

0:43

their definitive opinion on automotive

0:45

repair. If your mechanics giving

0:47

you a busy signal, pick up the phone

0:49

and call in. The garage doors.

0:52

Are open, but I am here to take your call at

0:54

eight five five five six ninety.

0:56

Nine hundred and now he is

1:00

running.

1:02

Welcome listeners, good to be here with you today. We're

1:04

going to dive right into it once again. We welcome

1:06

back Mark Mills, and we're gonna be talking electric

1:09

vehicles. So sit down, stay tuned,

1:11

and get ready for a shock, no pun intended.

1:13

Mark, welcome back, sir, Hope all

1:15

as well, Yes, sir, thank you very much. It's good

1:17

to have you. Yep, let's dive

1:19

right into it. You know, in the news recently,

1:22

well, two things I want to talk about in the news. Keep

1:25

in mind, I want to talk a little bit before the end of this hour

1:27

with you. Germany just did something

1:30

very interesting with EV's right, they dropped

1:32

the subsidies

1:35

I think it was, But I also want to I also want to talk a little

1:37

bit about you know, I keep reading

1:39

how coming out of Washington, the government

1:41

is trying these mandates on appliances. And I know that's

1:44

not necessarily a car show story

1:46

or an EV story, but that

1:48

appliance mentality about trying to make

1:51

all the appliances green. There's

1:54

an EV guideline to that

1:57

also, is there not? I mean, don't they tie them together?

2:00

Well, they're tied together first philosophically

2:03

in this sense that we have Washington

2:06

bureaucrats mandating

2:10

what kind of products you can use or have, not

2:13

not regulating if you like

2:15

their physical safety, you know, like

2:17

underwriter's lapse, but mandating what

2:19

you're allowed to buy, banning your ability to purchase

2:22

certain kinds of products, So it's exactly

2:24

the same the idea. Many states have tried this,

2:26

a number half certain California that Big

2:28

Main is going to do it next is make

2:30

it illegal for you to purchase a gas water

2:33

heater or a gas furnace or

2:35

gas appliance or stole for your home.

2:38

So a product that is in widespread

2:40

use for well we'll

2:43

call it centuries certainly and

2:47

globally in widespread use, it will

2:49

now be banned. And it's like banning

2:51

cigarettes, I mean the people, and we didn't.

2:53

By the way, not to use

2:56

a HAMDHND analogy, cigarettes

2:59

are not banned, even though

3:02

there probably isn't a single listener listening who doesn't

3:04

think, even if they're smokers, the cigarettes don't hurt

3:06

you. I mean, come on, you

3:09

could do lots of things that hurt you that you enjoy. I

3:11

get that for human But

3:13

the government is long held that cigarettes

3:16

are dangerous, and we didn't ban cigarettes,

3:19

which affirmatively hurt people and

3:21

cause insurance costs go up in the health industry,

3:24

healthcare industry. So here

3:26

we come along, and for the putative

3:30

assumption that some

3:32

small incremental benefit to the far

3:34

future from not burning natural

3:36

gas in your home in emitting carbon dioxide,

3:39

we should ban a product.

3:42

I mean, I never

3:44

mind the motivation, the idea

3:46

behind it is really offensive.

3:49

So I save for cars. I'm going to ban the sale of internal

3:52

combustion engines. So far in twelve

3:54

states, d C is just getting ready

3:56

to do it next in at least a dozen countries

3:58

have stood up to do that, and the

4:00

EPA's new rule would

4:03

expectively ban internal combustion sales

4:05

for sort of seventy eighty percent of all vehicles

4:08

by twenty thirty two. I think it is so, this

4:11

is this is a phenomenal overreach.

4:14

The only time we've had bands

4:16

of the scale it was one time in

4:18

American history, which is, of course, the ban on

4:21

alcohol consumption.

4:22

You know, I think I think about that.

4:25

Not then I'm a I'm not a huge drinker, but

4:27

I remember that. You know, you

4:29

start making the comparison that, yeah,

4:31

we had prohibition, and yeah that

4:34

that didn't that didn't end too well, Because

4:36

here we are it's available again.

4:38

Right, not available again?

4:40

What it did the law, the law on intended

4:42

consequences about laws, well,

4:44

you try to ban something it's widely consumed and

4:46

used, you create all sorts

4:49

of unintended consequences, not least the

4:51

criminality that surrounded everybody's

4:54

still consuming alcohol and traded underground

4:56

industry. The other band,

4:58

by the way, which is relevant to the domain

5:01

or cars in general, was the

5:04

banner driving quickly in nineteen

5:06

seventy three, when we ban

5:09

banned ability to drive at normal speeds i

5:11

e. Over fifty five miles an hour. And

5:13

what that did is that it

5:15

was the It was even more even a more

5:17

widely flouted law than

5:20

the ban and consuming alcohol because

5:23

people simply ignored it, and you

5:25

know, a lot more speeding tickets. A lot of cops

5:27

just ignored it. Some didn't. But

5:30

it really is a

5:32

very dangerous thing to ban things that

5:34

are silly, to ban that people

5:36

will ignore and create under you know, all

5:38

kinds of unintended consequences. But anyway,

5:41

the ban on appliances is no different

5:43

than the ban on cars. It's motivated by the same

5:45

thing, the same bad instincts to

5:48

have status control over consumer

5:50

choices that are you know, convenient

5:53

and sensible.

5:54

I think. I think the sad thing about the appliance

5:56

ban and what they're trying to take away

5:58

from is that they might be able to achieve

6:01

it, because yeah,

6:04

I can get this, but I can't get that. The problem

6:06

is going to be, you know, if you

6:08

don't have you know, the

6:11

electric cost. Right, we're back there because they want to convert

6:13

every appliance to electric something or electric

6:16

water heater, or minimize the amount

6:18

of natural gas flowing through the natural

6:20

gas device. And it's

6:22

like the ev situation. And this is where I think

6:24

the analogy in my mind where I was trying to put

6:26

the two together, is we

6:29

don't have the resources. It's not you

6:31

know, it's like we keep saying we want to go back in time. I

6:33

want to be eighteen again. It just it just can't happen.

6:35

It's not it's not physically possible.

6:38

Well, if you shift, if you shift that much energy

6:40

demand from gas to electric,

6:43

which is what the goal is, then

6:45

you're right. You have to build electric infrastructure to

6:47

handle it, and we're not just

6:51

flat and to do it takes time and

6:53

also cost money. And of course

6:55

you've now you've increased

6:57

risks to society. One of the benefits of having

7:00

two fuels to your house when does power

7:02

out, is that you still have hot wire,

7:04

you still have sos it works fireplace

7:07

they could use that doesn't

7:09

happen in the electric world, which

7:11

is which is high risk by definition.

7:14

You know, when are they gonna when are they going to prevent us from lighting

7:16

fires in the fireplace?

7:18

Well that you know, well, Colorado

7:20

long time ago banned new

7:22

house construction with with with with fireplaces.

7:25

Yeah really I didn't know that ready,

7:28

Yeah, I didn't know that

7:30

that. Just bring a board. Another thing to mind,

7:32

I was watching this show on Netflix the

7:34

other day. They were talking about

7:36

food and beef and cows

7:38

and how cows emit. I don't know if this

7:41

is true or not. I get it must be true. I

7:43

saw it on TV. You

7:45

know, cows emit. The

7:47

current population of cows in the United

7:49

States emit more greenhouse

7:52

gases than the entire transportation

7:55

industry. It was some astounding claim

7:57

that cows are more deadly to the environment

8:00

than the automobile, and.

8:02

They want to ban milk

8:04

and beef. So what they're referring to

8:06

is the fact that the ruminant bacteria

8:08

in the cow's gut, the

8:12

digestion of grasses by cows

8:14

and all all that class of creatures

8:17

emits methane. Methane is a more

8:21

powerful in the greenhouse lexicon, more powerful

8:23

greenhouse casts and co two by

8:26

it depending how you measure by a fact for twenty, so

8:28

you know a pound of methane amid it is like twenty pounds of carbon

8:30

dioxide. It's shorter

8:32

lived in the atmosphere, but it's that's what it

8:34

does. So that's some of

8:36

the rules that

8:38

are being promulgated are directed not just the carbon

8:41

dioxide emissions from combustion, and

8:43

it's not from cow farts. It is commonly

8:46

that smell of sulfur dioxide

8:48

for the college kids that remember what the misbehaviors

8:51

and enjoyment they had at the

8:54

flatulence, But it's methane burps.

8:56

It's the burping cows, the

8:58

biodigestion by bacteria of

9:01

grasses, and of course termites forget

9:05

meat and beef, the termite termites

9:07

emit methane as well, and the

9:09

one of the largest sources of methane emissions globally

9:12

are from termites. We don't count them

9:14

because we don't eat termites, we don't grow termites,

9:17

so they're irrelevant. But yet we want to regulate

9:19

cows because you know, we grow cows.

9:22

I mean, it's the path

9:24

is uh. You know,

9:26

I would use the word in saying because it's

9:28

probably the right word to use, this

9:31

path towards trying to find every possible source

9:33

of human emissions of greenhouse

9:36

gases and regulator to pan. It's really

9:38

it's not going to end well because you

9:40

can't do it. I mean, it's just no matter

9:43

what people are saying, it just can't be done.

9:45

So does you know, going back to where we

9:47

started our conversation, does the appliance

9:49

controls we see currently being applied

9:52

by Washington is that a reflection

9:54

of the mentality of what they expect from

9:56

the electric vehicle? And that's why they're dragging us.

9:58

I mean you in that direction. I mean you

10:01

just said another You know, Washington d C is going to

10:03

add the band or Washington is going to add the ban. I

10:05

don't know if you meant DC or the state. But you

10:08

know we're we're again, and

10:11

yet some states are saying, hey, we can't do this, it's

10:13

not going to work right.

10:15

Well, if you number of states are, they're not all on

10:17

board, but Washington d C Is

10:19

de facto banning internal

10:22

combustion engines through the EPA's proposed

10:25

rule, and that's

10:27

being challenged, but that'll, you know, we'll see how it goes.

10:30

I never no governments can do a lot. The

10:32

District of Columbia, it South has

10:35

joined California, New York, Maine, and other

10:37

states in banning the ability

10:40

as a resident of that state to

10:42

purchase an internal combustion engine by the year twenty

10:44

thirty two. I think it is so,

10:47

you know, long before we get

10:49

to that point in time. If those laws

10:51

and those bands stay on the books long

10:54

before we get to that period, this is only only

10:56

eight years out. Long before

10:58

then, automakers, if those fan stay in

11:00

place, we'll have to think about

11:03

whether they shut down a lot of factories because they'll

11:05

be overproducing internal combustion engines,

11:07

and those decisions will have to be made a few years from

11:10

now, not seven eight years from now,

11:12

but a few years from now. You have to get ahead of that

11:14

curve. So they really think those bands will stay

11:16

in place, Then you'll

11:18

begin to see auto industry production ramping

11:20

down because you won't be able to sell the products

11:22

and you've got to start thinking strategically about

11:25

what you can close and quickly you can close

11:27

it. And of course the effect of that will be to

11:29

raise the costs of vehicles,

11:31

will be fewer vehicles available preemptively,

11:34

and will raise the cost of used cars as we've talked

11:36

about before, and raise the

11:38

cost of repairing use cars because people are going

11:40

to keep the cars longer, and it's

11:43

going to be a

11:45

very vicious downward spiral

11:48

of high costs and inconveniences

11:50

that will begin again, not in

11:53

twenty thirty two when the bands are proposed,

11:55

but before it by.

11:56

Years sonless unless we

11:58

come back to the same side of the coin.

12:00

So makes this election. You're very

12:02

very interesting. You're listening to Ronnani and the Card

12:04

Doctor. I'm talking to Mark Mills of the Manhattan Institute,

12:07

and we're chatting away about EV's and

12:09

a bunch of other topics this hour. So stay

12:11

put Mark's stay on the side there. I'm running any of

12:13

the Card Doctor. We'll both be back right after this.

12:15

Don't go away.

12:22

You need

12:30

advice on how to maintain that classic gt

12:33

O. Ron is the guy eight five five

12:35

five six zero nine nine zero zero.

12:37

Here's Ron.

12:39

Welcome back.

12:39

Listeners, Ronnie and the card Doctor are here with

12:41

the often imitated,

12:43

never duplicated, underappreciated

12:46

Mark Mills of the Manhattan Institute. Or

12:49

you're hanging in there, Mark, I had to give you that one, right,

12:52

good.

12:53

You know it's good. I'll

12:55

take I'll take it all. I do.

12:57

Have to go ahead.

12:59

I'm sorry.

13:00

I want to correct one thing I should have told you at the outset.

13:03

Uh first of the year, I left the Manhattan

13:06

Institute, my beloved Manhattan suit where I'm supposed

13:08

contributing editor to its

13:10

great city journal. But now I am a distinguished

13:13

and you'll have to treat me with more respect. Now we're on.

13:16

I am a dis distinguished senior

13:18

fellow with the Texas Public

13:20

Policy Foundation. I've changed

13:24

courses because they

13:26

made me an offer to come

13:28

and play with them, but especially to

13:31

help build out a new national energy initiative

13:34

think tank of some kind based in Washington.

13:36

It's not a Texas based activity,

13:38

but a Texas sponsored activity,

13:41

because well, Texas is

13:43

the energy giant of America and in

13:45

fact of.

13:46

The world, and they and they realize what's

13:48

at stake.

13:49

They do right.

13:51

One last thing from our last conversation, and

13:53

by the way, congratulations for that. I don't want to just ignore

13:55

that. That's kind of neat.

13:58

You know, about two

14:00

weeks ago in the news, Germany decided

14:03

to do away with the incentive for purchasing

14:06

or supporting evs.

14:08

What was that all about?

14:10

Money? Inherently what

14:13

a shock. Yeah, I mean, you can't subsidize

14:15

everything forever. And what it

14:17

was all about is the it

14:19

made a lie of the trope that

14:23

if you subsidize EV's, the volumes

14:25

will go up and they'll get cheaper. And

14:27

evs are inherently more expensive

14:30

than conventional cars, except

14:33

for in the luxury market, which is functionally

14:36

irrelevant to most of the world.

14:38

So for the everyday car, evs

14:40

are inherently more expensive, and they are now being

14:43

produced at scale. We're no

14:45

longer talking about a nascent industry. There

14:47

are millions of them being manufactured. Tessel

14:50

did you know, over a million a year themselves

14:53

last year. It's a mature,

14:55

a large industry, and it still requires

14:59

massive subsidies to get people

15:01

to buy them, which means governments

15:03

are facing the prospect if they

15:05

push evs, is the only vehicle

15:07

you're allowed to buy? Is subsidizing

15:10

every car everybody buys. So it's

15:13

it's unsustainable. You can't you can't do

15:15

these kinds of things, and the

15:17

lie that they get cheap is not true.

15:19

So wait, you're telling me that Germany woke up and

15:21

said, wait, we can't afford to continue in this path,

15:23

let's just let's eliminate it and stop it here.

15:26

Yeah, they they did other things. Remember, they are

15:28

pursuing this aggressive wind and solar

15:30

path on their grids, and there

15:33

there's a sense, you know, I believe last year there was

15:36

no net new orders in Europe for turbans

15:38

wind turbans, and they are reactivating

15:41

coal plants in Germany, digging up more coal,

15:44

and the costs of the natural gas is soaring

15:46

because of their because of the

15:49

understandable policy to de link from Russian

15:51

gas. But that means instead

15:53

of the geopolitical discounts

15:56

that Putin was giving Germany,

15:58

they're gone. So energy

16:01

got more expensive and their economy

16:03

is shrinking and they're de industrializing

16:06

and so on. The at all of this on the

16:08

backs of bad energy policy. That's

16:10

where all came from, and all it all comes

16:13

back to bad energy

16:15

policy being mandated by the government. Unaffordable.

16:18

So the next Domino is

16:21

the one that just fail, which is knocking out

16:23

EV subsidies.

16:24

So when does that fall here now?

16:27

And that's a good question. I mean,

16:29

I well, you know, if

16:32

it takes as long to happen here as it did

16:34

there, we're in for a few more

16:36

years. I think a

16:38

fiscal sanity will rather

16:41

than somebody deciding that

16:43

boops, we were wrong. We don't like evs. That's

16:45

not going to happen. I like evs, as you know, we've

16:47

talked about the performance

16:50

opportunities and different kind of flexibility

16:52

were nice. They're great fun.

16:55

But that's not the same thing as mandating

16:57

everybody have one and subsidizing it.

16:59

So I think fiscal reality will

17:01

will come back into play here faster

17:05

than it did in Germany for a whole

17:07

lot of reasons. And so if I were picking it,

17:09

if we wanted to take it over under Bet,

17:13

I'd take two years. I'd say,

17:15

I'd say two years the subsidies go away,

17:19

even if there's a even if even if Democrats

17:22

have a white House, I think it's going to

17:24

be financially unsustainable. That's

17:26

what I think will happen.

17:27

All right, Well, I'll take that prediction.

17:29

We'll we'll we'll talk again in two years.

17:31

Personally, I think it's going to be a person I think it's going to be

17:33

eleven months. But we'll

17:36

kind of take that, will kind of take it

17:39

comes.

17:40

You're setting aside who wins

17:42

the election eleven months, even if

17:44

the red team instead of the Blue team wins. Uh,

17:47

there's a lag because

17:49

the you know, we've got then not till

17:52

a year from this January before the

17:54

next inauguration, and then you have

17:57

school off time which takes six months.

18:00

But you know, President, it could could end

18:02

by secutive order up the dyes for sure.

18:04

Yeah, I get it.

18:05

They could try it.

18:06

I could try it.

18:07

I don't know if they could get could get away with it because it's

18:09

you know, there's legislation because who has a House

18:11

and Senate. It's messy. I guess

18:13

my point is.

18:14

It becomes political. Mark, let's pull over, take a

18:16

pause. I'm Ronnini and the guard doctor here with Mark Mills.

18:18

We'll both be back right after this. Don't go up.

18:41

She's real, find my phone.

18:43

Nice, she's real, find my

18:46

phone, my phone, look

18:52

back, Dane, I card doctor here. We're talking

18:54

Mark with Mark Mills, we're talking e VS

18:56

and all the peripheral conversations

18:58

that go along with that statement. And

19:02

as we roll along, Mark, we you know,

19:04

I knew, and I could probably talk a lot longer than the time

19:06

we always have. I want to get into insurance

19:09

costs. We've never really done

19:11

a deep dive, but you know there's

19:13

a lot of things that go along with that term insurance

19:15

costs and evs. Electric vehicles

19:18

enlighten us.

19:20

Yeah, Well, the big wildcard here,

19:24

as you know, is ensuring the most expensive

19:26

part of that vehicle, which is the battery. And

19:28

unlike an internal combustion engine car,

19:31

there's no single component that has

19:34

such a high proportion of the cost of the vehicle. So

19:37

roughly speaking, the batteries fifteen thousand dollars

19:39

could be a smaller car ten thousand.

19:42

That's a manufacturer's cost, so

19:44

fifteen thousand. Then the big ones could be

19:46

twenty thousand. There's a lot of money.

19:49

And the battery structure

19:52

is extremely important for safety reasons.

19:54

So if there's any mechanical damage to the

19:56

battery pack, it's a huge thing in the

19:58

floor, you know, the pan

20:00

of the car. Since it's a write off,

20:03

the batteries can't be repaired the way an internal combustion

20:05

engine. Can you know it's a very complex

20:08

machine. People think it's simple. It's not a box

20:10

of goos, it's not an empty tank. There's

20:12

thousands of components, thousands of wells, power

20:14

electronics, cooling systems, structural systems,

20:17

safety systems. It's more complex

20:19

than an internal combustion engine and made from lots

20:22

of exotic stuff, unlike an engine which

20:24

is cast iron steel. Very

20:26

easy to fix them, frankly comparatively,

20:29

and you can fix them so that

20:32

cost is not really showing

20:34

up yet in the data. Except

20:37

this is my theory. Generally

20:39

speaking, overall car insurance costs have been rising

20:42

across the country. It's not just that it's

20:44

getting more expensive to repair cars. I

20:46

think what's going on is the percentage

20:48

of cars that are being totaled for minor

20:51

accidents. It's far

20:53

higher with EBS. We know this for a fact,

20:56

and that cost is being passed on to all

20:58

other insurance payers

21:00

because insurance gime's going to put the money

21:02

somewhere, so they haven't yet made

21:05

ev makers. I don't think pay

21:08

the actual underwritten

21:10

cost of ensuring a vehicle

21:12

that gets into an accident that can be written

21:15

off much more quickly. And there's

21:17

another feature, by the way, for Tesla's particularly

21:19

and if other automakers follow this, is that Elon

21:22

Musk is nothing brilliant made that cheaper to

21:24

make his car because his frame is

21:27

a single aluminum casting. No

21:29

one else has been to achieve that. It's a really

21:32

incredible engineering achievement, and good on him

21:34

and his team. I mean, it really is. It's amazing.

21:37

But the problem with that is that the aluminum

21:39

is, you know, it's fragile relatively speaking.

21:41

I mean, if you get into an accident

21:44

and do damage to the frame of a steel

21:46

car, you can bend it back, you

21:48

can replace a part. We can't

21:50

do that to a Tesla. You're right off the frame,

21:53

right And that's that's so you got two

21:55

things you're facing that are changed. The insurance

21:58

underwriting, and they'll you know,

22:00

that will show up. It has to rope eventually as

22:03

you get more and more evs on the road, and I think what

22:05

solution is uncomplicated. The

22:07

electric car owner will pay for the insurance

22:09

higher insurance costs. Ultimately, that's what will happen,

22:12

and then insurance companies will be blamed for

22:16

impeding the eed revolution, for.

22:18

Gouging and gouging,

22:20

gouging, and all of a sudden, it will become their fault.

22:23

You know.

22:23

I heard a story recently in the news that

22:26

someone with a Rivian vehicle

22:28

Rivian truck. Now I think I think

22:30

the analogy was the damage if it was a

22:32

gas vehicle would have been half the price.

22:34

It was a twenty six thousand dollars repair,

22:37

and the debate was do you fix it? And

22:40

and it's it's

22:42

it just goes on every day. I've

22:44

heard stories where insurance carriers

22:47

are pulling out of the state of Florida because of the

22:49

cost. Some of it's obviously due to, you know,

22:51

the losses they encountered over the last couple

22:53

of years with weather and hurricanes and so forth,

22:55

but you know, it's it's also because when

22:58

an EV you know, when a hurricane

23:00

hits Florida, and how many evs get

23:02

wiped out as they did in the last couple

23:04

of storms, right, all of a sudden,

23:06

the losses multiply at such a rate

23:09

that the insurance company can't

23:11

make a rate of return on their investment. You know,

23:13

they you know, let's talk how does an insurance

23:15

company make money. My understanding is Obviously

23:18

they're taking the money from you and I and everybody

23:20

else, and then they're investing it. They're putting it into the stock

23:22

market, they're putting it in places. And when

23:24

the market goes down, So now the market

23:26

goes down, the EV cost to repair

23:28

goes up. It's like the perfect storm for you. We

23:31

don't want to do this anymore.

23:33

Yeah, it's a problem, and some

23:35

of it is higher repair costs inherent in the fact

23:37

that the parts are more expensive or less available,

23:39

the mechanics aren't available. But

23:42

that, to be fair, some of

23:44

that works out over time in the sense

23:47

that the training and availability

23:49

of mechanics and parts improves

23:51

over time, but it takes a long time. It's

23:53

not going to happen overnight. And so

23:56

those those are pretty typical features

23:58

of any new product. But the

24:01

fact is, the inherent cost of

24:04

so many of the components in an EV are higher

24:06

than the inherent cost of the conventional

24:09

car. So by definition, it's

24:11

going to be more expensive to repair. And then

24:13

when you add to that this other feature I mentioned,

24:15

which is, you know, there's no single

24:18

components

24:20

as expensive in a conventional car as

24:22

there isn't an EV. When as is

24:24

the battery, and that's that's a pretty

24:27

big risk. You got one thing that

24:29

if it's damaged in a way that's going to make it unsafe,

24:32

you have to write the vehicle off. And of

24:34

course that's I had a friend who's whose

24:36

wife drives a Tesla three.

24:38

It's a nice car. I've driven them a small

24:41

minor fender bender, and they

24:43

wrote it off. Minor says

24:45

nobody was hurt. It was, but it

24:48

caused enough potential damage to the integrity

24:50

of the battery that is it vendor

24:52

bender. It's obviously a little more than that, but

24:55

they wrote it off and it would never have been a write off

24:57

it had been been a conventional vehicle.

25:00

If you're standing in

25:02

in front of two dealerships EV or

25:05

Guess, and you're trying to think about the cost

25:07

of ownership the Guess version, the

25:09

internal combustion engine. You're familiar with that.

25:11

If you've been driving a while, you know.

25:12

What the costs are.

25:14

You know what are the hidden costs with

25:16

that EV that you know people

25:18

need to think about and make a decision based on

25:20

that. You know the things, the things they're not telling

25:23

us. You know, insurance is one of them. Might cost

25:25

to repair as the other.

25:27

Well here, sure,

25:30

but here's the thing. In the current

25:32

environment, given

25:34

what we're doing, how we're subsidizing evs,

25:36

how we're subsidizing the recharging,

25:39

and if you haven't have a garage, there's a brick

25:41

compelling argument to be made for your

25:43

second or third guard to be an ev frankly

25:46

right now, because everybody else's

25:48

is carrying the costs for you. And if

25:50

you, if you, if you're one of the owners that your

25:53

at least you're at lease at lease, are not a buyer,

25:55

and you want to have a car for a few years, you

25:58

know, all all of the digital

26:00

value risk is taken by the less or

26:02

not you in the lease. You get

26:04

the full credit on the lease in

26:06

the first few years of a vehicle. Every vehicle's ownership

26:09

is you know, as long as quality controls reason well, you don't

26:11

how many you don't have high repair costs not

26:13

till later, so you you don't have to worry

26:15

about that. So it's the it's the lease holder's

26:17

problem when they take the vehicle back, so

26:20

and they're refueling costs

26:22

are subsidized. Right now, you're not paying

26:25

road taxes, which you will have to eventually

26:27

but right now you're not. And

26:29

if you could charge it home, your your lecture utility

26:31

is subsidizing the electricity for you.

26:34

So it's, you know, not to

26:36

be facetious, but it's true. I've told

26:39

family members that this is if you want

26:41

to second or third car to drive around

26:43

town for convenience. But I have like one

26:45

of the better quality you have, Bookswagen or the

26:47

TESTA three or the Hundai's are

26:49

nice on too. They're they're nice, they're well make cars,

26:52

especially in the first few years of lights. They're they're

26:55

not as quite as reliable. You're not driving them

26:57

as much, so you don't have to worry about as much. You're not driving a long distance

26:59

because you're using it for local driving. But

27:01

that what that masks is that

27:04

what we're really talking about is not whether an

27:06

individual should buy an EV for their particular

27:09

lifestyle choice. It's when

27:11

the government is saying to us that you could only buy an

27:13

EV and everybody's going to drive one, and that's when

27:15

the hidden costs show up. If the entire

27:17

fuel system for vehicles to switch from

27:19

gasoline to electric, we

27:21

are talking about hundreds

27:23

of billions of dollars of infrastructure

27:26

costs which is not being factored in

27:29

for the charging networks. Hundreds of billions,

27:31

not billions, half a trillion dollars

27:33

to upgrade the electric grid

27:35

to charge all these vehicles, and another

27:37

half a trillion dollars of

27:41

high speed chargers which will be needed on the road.

27:44

So the current plan is to spend seven

27:46

billion dollars I need the chargers out of the Inflation

27:48

Reduction Act. That's a drop in the bucket

27:50

we're going to We're going to need to spend hundreds of billions

27:52

of dollars to get enough of them on the road. Those

27:55

those are where the hidden costs come in that are

27:57

being completely ignored, and

28:00

that that's non trivial. We're talking

28:02

trillion dollars of infrastructure

28:05

that needs to be put in place to

28:08

have a significant share. In

28:10

fact, the majority of vehicles become electric

28:13

fuel instead of gasoline fueled. It's

28:16

these are electrical engineering challenges.

28:18

They're not amenable to, you

28:20

know, magic waving a wand saying, oh, it'll get

28:22

better soon. We know how to do this stuff now, we know

28:24

what it costs now, and then you have not to

28:26

miss.

28:27

About then you have to think about the cost of

28:30

what it's going to take, you know, to the land,

28:32

to the environment to build these things. Trees,

28:34

forests that have to be knocked down a lot.

28:36

There, Mark, let's pull over, take a pause for our last break.

28:39

I'm running Ny in the Car Doctor. We're here with Mark Mills.

28:41

We'll return right after this. Welcome

28:53

back, listeners, Running in the Car Doctor. Here

28:55

with Mark Mills. Mark, let's let's go where

28:57

our original conversation was. At the star

29:00

of this hour. We wanted to talk about EV

29:02

batteries and do a little

29:04

bit of a deep dwell. I'll tell you it's you know, they gave

29:06

us ten hours. We could talk ten hours. You

29:09

know, let's talk a little about the true cost.

29:11

I want to build an EV battery. What's it going to take?

29:15

Well, that's the true cost that EV's costs.

29:17

It's entirely about the battery's It

29:20

takes a lot of stuff, a lot of metals

29:22

and minerals, a lot of chemicals. And this is

29:24

what people if they do a little

29:26

research with the magic Google machine, they can

29:28

figure this out. But the typical battery weighs

29:31

a half a ton, just a battery

29:34

car, which is why the EV's way more and

29:36

why EV's use more aluminum in the frame to cut

29:39

down on the weight penalty from the battery.

29:41

So to replace about sixty

29:43

gallons of gasolane, you know, sixties

29:45

or sixty pounds of gasoline you

29:48

got, you got one thousand pound battery. In

29:50

terms of what they're you know, transporting

29:53

around and that requires digging

29:55

up somewhere on Earth. Are about two

29:57

hundred and fifty tons of the earth said

30:00

this before to get the metals

30:02

and materials to make one battery. That's

30:05

where the money relies is. They're digging up all

30:07

the earth

30:10

to get the copper, to get the aluminum, to get the manganese,

30:12

to get the graphite, to get

30:14

the illuminum

30:17

for the frame, and for the catholic

30:19

and anodes. All that costs

30:21

money. All of it costs more than the iron

30:23

and steel that dominated regular car. A

30:25

regular car, three quarters of its weight, it's iron

30:28

and steel. That's not true for an EV.

30:30

For an EV three quarter of its weight

30:32

are exotic metals and minerals at all cost

30:35

more. You know, copper, the manganese,

30:37

lift him, cobalt often, So

30:40

where will the cost go in the future for

30:42

these complex heavy you know, fuel

30:45

tanks. The battery. They're not going

30:47

down significantly. They crept up

30:49

and then they crept down. Right now, they finished

30:52

their cost curve decline from

30:54

invention, and now the costs are going to

30:56

start creeping up because the marginal

30:59

cost of the next ton of copper,

31:01

the next ton of manganese is rising.

31:04

Is the world's demand starts to rise. And

31:06

it's because we're not opening minds fast enough.

31:08

This whole thing, everything about the future

31:11

price of an EV, the future costume EV,

31:14

can be distilled to a single thing. You want

31:16

to try to predict how fast will

31:18

the world's miners open new minds

31:21

to mine the mega tons of metals

31:23

we need to make EV batteries. We

31:26

know the answer to that. They're not opening them quickly

31:28

right now, they're not investating in them.

31:30

So my guess is they know something

31:33

that the automakers don't know. So they

31:35

they know the mandates are going to end, and

31:37

they're not about to get out of their skis with hundreds

31:40

of billions of dollars of investment to build

31:42

mines over the next decade when the demand

31:45

for those metals is not going to appear because

31:47

no one is going to want to pay the prices

31:49

that are going to be demanded, you know, for

31:51

the batteries. So that's that's

31:54

just sort of the reality that we're living

31:56

with. And this is a mining question. This is not a tech

31:58

This is not a technology

32:01

question. To understand the future price of batteries,

32:03

you need to study the mining industry and the refining

32:05

industry. It's an industry dominated

32:08

by slow cycles, long times

32:10

to build things, billion billions

32:12

and hundreds of billions of dollars of investments, mostly

32:15

foreign. The minds that are all being expanded

32:17

are in Africa, South America, and Asia, mostly

32:20

Chinese. China dominates, utterly,

32:23

utterly dominates the refining of

32:25

the key battery minerals. That

32:28

dominates, I mean they have double

32:30

the market share globally in battery

32:32

minerals that OPEC has. An oil utterly

32:35

dominate the battery minerals market. It will

32:37

for a decade.

32:38

It sort of sounds like it's all about making

32:40

money. Mark. That's about all the time we've got

32:42

right now going. We can continue

32:45

this again if the listeners want, where can they follow

32:47

you and your escapades and what you're

32:49

trying to accomplish, And we appreciate that, is

32:51

there a website they can go to and find out more about

32:53

you and what's going on.

32:55

Yeah, I keep archive all my writings and

32:57

speeches at tech hyphenpundit dot

32:59

com, tech Hyphenpunda dot com.

33:01

It's everything's there, all free,

33:04

easy to find, except for the paywalt stuff. But you

33:06

know, I apologize. I can't control that well. I

33:08

mean, like Wall Street Journal bands,

33:10

those are paywalld yep.

33:11

Gotcha, all right, kettle, Hey, listen, you'll be

33:13

well and we'll talk again real soon. Take good

33:15

care, Thank you, You're

33:17

very welcome. I'm Ronning Any and the card Doctor. I'm back

33:20

right after this. Welcome

33:32

back listeners, you know, ron and Any the car

33:34

Doctor. It's it's always informative,

33:37

to say the least. Talking to Mark

33:39

Mills, and it's going to be interesting

33:41

to see if his two year prediction comes true about

33:44

when the financial hard

33:47

wall or financial brick wall that

33:49

we're supposed to hit with EVS in terms

33:51

of unfeasibility actually comes.

33:53

And I bet you it does, all right. Mark's

33:55

pretty accurate about these things. He's got a good sense of

33:57

where this is going. One of the things he's

34:00

said to me off air was and I

34:02

we're gonna bring them back to talk about this in the

34:04

future at at a higher level, is that

34:07

there's no definitive proof. This

34:09

is kind of staggering. There's no definitive

34:12

proof that evs

34:15

will help reduce CO two emissions,

34:18

and I would

34:20

like to see it if it's out there, because what

34:22

he's saying is there's an offset.

34:24

We create a vehicle that doesn't burn

34:27

fuel, doesn't you know it's it's an electric

34:29

vehicle. But the cost to

34:31

produce that in terms of

34:34

the bulldozer that digs up the dirt, the

34:36

coal plant that produces the electricity,

34:38

the way the materials are manufactured, the

34:40

way you know, we cut down certain

34:42

parts of vegetation and

34:45

forests and things like that. You

34:47

know, it's there's the offset, so you

34:49

know, it's it's it's it's a wash,

34:52

and all we're doing is spending trillions

34:54

of dollars and it just

34:57

it just makes me wonder. I know, from

34:59

a mechanic perspective, at a you

35:01

know, as a garage mechanic level, as I consider

35:03

myself to be, you know, street level mechanic,

35:06

I question who's going to fix all these cars and

35:08

the technology that's there. But that's a that's

35:10

a story for another day. I've had an absolute

35:13

pleasure being with you this weekend, and I thank

35:15

you for being here till the next time. I'm ronning Ady

35:17

in the car doctor, reminding you good mechanics aren't

35:19

expensive, They're priceless. See it.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features