Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Ron An Aian.
0:01
Part of the problem in diagnosing a vehicle.
0:03
For me, it gets to be emotional.
0:05
If we are to truly discover the meaning of these
0:07
events.
0:08
Absolution for
0:10
the turn being.
0:13
Lent them on the.
0:14
Phone the car Doctor.
0:15
If you let your emotions get involved, this
0:18
car's a piece of junk. This car's a piece of junk.
0:20
This car's a piece of junk. And it's not like that
0:23
that has to go to the back of your mind. It has
0:25
to be what's the source of the problem. What
0:27
steps am I going to take to resolve?
0:29
Are you incapable of restraining ourselves? Would
0:31
you take pride in being an insufferable.
0:33
Knowitable Welcome to the radio
0:35
home of ron Anian the Car Doctor.
0:38
Since nineteen ninety one, this is where
0:40
car owners the world overturned to for
0:43
their definitive opinion on automotive
0:45
repair. If your mechanics giving
0:47
you a busy signal, pick up the phone
0:49
and call in. The garage doors.
0:52
Are open, but I am here to take your call at
0:54
eight five five five six ninety.
0:56
Nine hundred and now he is
1:00
running.
1:02
Welcome listeners, good to be here with you today. We're
1:04
going to dive right into it once again. We welcome
1:06
back Mark Mills, and we're gonna be talking electric
1:09
vehicles. So sit down, stay tuned,
1:11
and get ready for a shock, no pun intended.
1:13
Mark, welcome back, sir, Hope all
1:15
as well, Yes, sir, thank you very much. It's good
1:17
to have you. Yep, let's dive
1:19
right into it. You know, in the news recently,
1:22
well, two things I want to talk about in the news. Keep
1:25
in mind, I want to talk a little bit before the end of this hour
1:27
with you. Germany just did something
1:30
very interesting with EV's right, they dropped
1:32
the subsidies
1:35
I think it was, But I also want to I also want to talk a little
1:37
bit about you know, I keep reading
1:39
how coming out of Washington, the government
1:41
is trying these mandates on appliances. And I know that's
1:44
not necessarily a car show story
1:46
or an EV story, but that
1:48
appliance mentality about trying to make
1:51
all the appliances green. There's
1:54
an EV guideline to that
1:57
also, is there not? I mean, don't they tie them together?
2:00
Well, they're tied together first philosophically
2:03
in this sense that we have Washington
2:06
bureaucrats mandating
2:10
what kind of products you can use or have, not
2:13
not regulating if you like
2:15
their physical safety, you know, like
2:17
underwriter's lapse, but mandating what
2:19
you're allowed to buy, banning your ability to purchase
2:22
certain kinds of products, So it's exactly
2:24
the same the idea. Many states have tried this,
2:26
a number half certain California that Big
2:28
Main is going to do it next is make
2:30
it illegal for you to purchase a gas water
2:33
heater or a gas furnace or
2:35
gas appliance or stole for your home.
2:38
So a product that is in widespread
2:40
use for well we'll
2:43
call it centuries certainly and
2:47
globally in widespread use, it will
2:49
now be banned. And it's like banning
2:51
cigarettes, I mean the people, and we didn't.
2:53
By the way, not to use
2:56
a HAMDHND analogy, cigarettes
2:59
are not banned, even though
3:02
there probably isn't a single listener listening who doesn't
3:04
think, even if they're smokers, the cigarettes don't hurt
3:06
you. I mean, come on, you
3:09
could do lots of things that hurt you that you enjoy. I
3:11
get that for human But
3:13
the government is long held that cigarettes
3:16
are dangerous, and we didn't ban cigarettes,
3:19
which affirmatively hurt people and
3:21
cause insurance costs go up in the health industry,
3:24
healthcare industry. So here
3:26
we come along, and for the putative
3:30
assumption that some
3:32
small incremental benefit to the far
3:34
future from not burning natural
3:36
gas in your home in emitting carbon dioxide,
3:39
we should ban a product.
3:42
I mean, I never
3:44
mind the motivation, the idea
3:46
behind it is really offensive.
3:49
So I save for cars. I'm going to ban the sale of internal
3:52
combustion engines. So far in twelve
3:54
states, d C is just getting ready
3:56
to do it next in at least a dozen countries
3:58
have stood up to do that, and the
4:00
EPA's new rule would
4:03
expectively ban internal combustion sales
4:05
for sort of seventy eighty percent of all vehicles
4:08
by twenty thirty two. I think it is so, this
4:11
is this is a phenomenal overreach.
4:14
The only time we've had bands
4:16
of the scale it was one time in
4:18
American history, which is, of course, the ban on
4:21
alcohol consumption.
4:22
You know, I think I think about that.
4:25
Not then I'm a I'm not a huge drinker, but
4:27
I remember that. You know, you
4:29
start making the comparison that, yeah,
4:31
we had prohibition, and yeah that
4:34
that didn't that didn't end too well, Because
4:36
here we are it's available again.
4:38
Right, not available again?
4:40
What it did the law, the law on intended
4:42
consequences about laws, well,
4:44
you try to ban something it's widely consumed and
4:46
used, you create all sorts
4:49
of unintended consequences, not least the
4:51
criminality that surrounded everybody's
4:54
still consuming alcohol and traded underground
4:56
industry. The other band,
4:58
by the way, which is relevant to the domain
5:01
or cars in general, was the
5:04
banner driving quickly in nineteen
5:06
seventy three, when we ban
5:09
banned ability to drive at normal speeds i
5:11
e. Over fifty five miles an hour. And
5:13
what that did is that it
5:15
was the It was even more even a more
5:17
widely flouted law than
5:20
the ban and consuming alcohol because
5:23
people simply ignored it, and you
5:25
know, a lot more speeding tickets. A lot of cops
5:27
just ignored it. Some didn't. But
5:30
it really is a
5:32
very dangerous thing to ban things that
5:34
are silly, to ban that people
5:36
will ignore and create under you know, all
5:38
kinds of unintended consequences. But anyway,
5:41
the ban on appliances is no different
5:43
than the ban on cars. It's motivated by the same
5:45
thing, the same bad instincts to
5:48
have status control over consumer
5:50
choices that are you know, convenient
5:53
and sensible.
5:54
I think. I think the sad thing about the appliance
5:56
ban and what they're trying to take away
5:58
from is that they might be able to achieve
6:01
it, because yeah,
6:04
I can get this, but I can't get that. The problem
6:06
is going to be, you know, if you
6:08
don't have you know, the
6:11
electric cost. Right, we're back there because they want to convert
6:13
every appliance to electric something or electric
6:16
water heater, or minimize the amount
6:18
of natural gas flowing through the natural
6:20
gas device. And it's
6:22
like the ev situation. And this is where I think
6:24
the analogy in my mind where I was trying to put
6:26
the two together, is we
6:29
don't have the resources. It's not you
6:31
know, it's like we keep saying we want to go back in time. I
6:33
want to be eighteen again. It just it just can't happen.
6:35
It's not it's not physically possible.
6:38
Well, if you shift, if you shift that much energy
6:40
demand from gas to electric,
6:43
which is what the goal is, then
6:45
you're right. You have to build electric infrastructure to
6:47
handle it, and we're not just
6:51
flat and to do it takes time and
6:53
also cost money. And of course
6:55
you've now you've increased
6:57
risks to society. One of the benefits of having
7:00
two fuels to your house when does power
7:02
out, is that you still have hot wire,
7:04
you still have sos it works fireplace
7:07
they could use that doesn't
7:09
happen in the electric world, which
7:11
is which is high risk by definition.
7:14
You know, when are they gonna when are they going to prevent us from lighting
7:16
fires in the fireplace?
7:18
Well that you know, well, Colorado
7:20
long time ago banned new
7:22
house construction with with with with fireplaces.
7:25
Yeah really I didn't know that ready,
7:28
Yeah, I didn't know that
7:30
that. Just bring a board. Another thing to mind,
7:32
I was watching this show on Netflix the
7:34
other day. They were talking about
7:36
food and beef and cows
7:38
and how cows emit. I don't know if this
7:41
is true or not. I get it must be true. I
7:43
saw it on TV. You
7:45
know, cows emit. The
7:47
current population of cows in the United
7:49
States emit more greenhouse
7:52
gases than the entire transportation
7:55
industry. It was some astounding claim
7:57
that cows are more deadly to the environment
8:00
than the automobile, and.
8:02
They want to ban milk
8:04
and beef. So what they're referring to
8:06
is the fact that the ruminant bacteria
8:08
in the cow's gut, the
8:12
digestion of grasses by cows
8:14
and all all that class of creatures
8:17
emits methane. Methane is a more
8:21
powerful in the greenhouse lexicon, more powerful
8:23
greenhouse casts and co two by
8:26
it depending how you measure by a fact for twenty, so
8:28
you know a pound of methane amid it is like twenty pounds of carbon
8:30
dioxide. It's shorter
8:32
lived in the atmosphere, but it's that's what it
8:34
does. So that's some of
8:36
the rules that
8:38
are being promulgated are directed not just the carbon
8:41
dioxide emissions from combustion, and
8:43
it's not from cow farts. It is commonly
8:46
that smell of sulfur dioxide
8:48
for the college kids that remember what the misbehaviors
8:51
and enjoyment they had at the
8:54
flatulence, But it's methane burps.
8:56
It's the burping cows, the
8:58
biodigestion by bacteria of
9:01
grasses, and of course termites forget
9:05
meat and beef, the termite termites
9:07
emit methane as well, and the
9:09
one of the largest sources of methane emissions globally
9:12
are from termites. We don't count them
9:14
because we don't eat termites, we don't grow termites,
9:17
so they're irrelevant. But yet we want to regulate
9:19
cows because you know, we grow cows.
9:22
I mean, it's the path
9:24
is uh. You know,
9:26
I would use the word in saying because it's
9:28
probably the right word to use, this
9:31
path towards trying to find every possible source
9:33
of human emissions of greenhouse
9:36
gases and regulator to pan. It's really
9:38
it's not going to end well because you
9:40
can't do it. I mean, it's just no matter
9:43
what people are saying, it just can't be done.
9:45
So does you know, going back to where we
9:47
started our conversation, does the appliance
9:49
controls we see currently being applied
9:52
by Washington is that a reflection
9:54
of the mentality of what they expect from
9:56
the electric vehicle? And that's why they're dragging us.
9:58
I mean you in that direction. I mean you
10:01
just said another You know, Washington d C is going to
10:03
add the band or Washington is going to add the ban. I
10:05
don't know if you meant DC or the state. But you
10:08
know we're we're again, and
10:11
yet some states are saying, hey, we can't do this, it's
10:13
not going to work right.
10:15
Well, if you number of states are, they're not all on
10:17
board, but Washington d C Is
10:19
de facto banning internal
10:22
combustion engines through the EPA's proposed
10:25
rule, and that's
10:27
being challenged, but that'll, you know, we'll see how it goes.
10:30
I never no governments can do a lot. The
10:32
District of Columbia, it South has
10:35
joined California, New York, Maine, and other
10:37
states in banning the ability
10:40
as a resident of that state to
10:42
purchase an internal combustion engine by the year twenty
10:44
thirty two. I think it is so,
10:47
you know, long before we get
10:49
to that point in time. If those laws
10:51
and those bands stay on the books long
10:54
before we get to that period, this is only only
10:56
eight years out. Long before
10:58
then, automakers, if those fan stay in
11:00
place, we'll have to think about
11:03
whether they shut down a lot of factories because they'll
11:05
be overproducing internal combustion engines,
11:07
and those decisions will have to be made a few years from
11:10
now, not seven eight years from now,
11:12
but a few years from now. You have to get ahead of that
11:14
curve. So they really think those bands will stay
11:16
in place, Then you'll
11:18
begin to see auto industry production ramping
11:20
down because you won't be able to sell the products
11:22
and you've got to start thinking strategically about
11:25
what you can close and quickly you can close
11:27
it. And of course the effect of that will be to
11:29
raise the costs of vehicles,
11:31
will be fewer vehicles available preemptively,
11:34
and will raise the cost of used cars as we've talked
11:36
about before, and raise the
11:38
cost of repairing use cars because people are going
11:40
to keep the cars longer, and it's
11:43
going to be a
11:45
very vicious downward spiral
11:48
of high costs and inconveniences
11:50
that will begin again, not in
11:53
twenty thirty two when the bands are proposed,
11:55
but before it by.
11:56
Years sonless unless we
11:58
come back to the same side of the coin.
12:00
So makes this election. You're very
12:02
very interesting. You're listening to Ronnani and the Card
12:04
Doctor. I'm talking to Mark Mills of the Manhattan Institute,
12:07
and we're chatting away about EV's and
12:09
a bunch of other topics this hour. So stay
12:11
put Mark's stay on the side there. I'm running any of
12:13
the Card Doctor. We'll both be back right after this.
12:15
Don't go away.
12:22
You need
12:30
advice on how to maintain that classic gt
12:33
O. Ron is the guy eight five five
12:35
five six zero nine nine zero zero.
12:37
Here's Ron.
12:39
Welcome back.
12:39
Listeners, Ronnie and the card Doctor are here with
12:41
the often imitated,
12:43
never duplicated, underappreciated
12:46
Mark Mills of the Manhattan Institute. Or
12:49
you're hanging in there, Mark, I had to give you that one, right,
12:52
good.
12:53
You know it's good. I'll
12:55
take I'll take it all. I do.
12:57
Have to go ahead.
12:59
I'm sorry.
13:00
I want to correct one thing I should have told you at the outset.
13:03
Uh first of the year, I left the Manhattan
13:06
Institute, my beloved Manhattan suit where I'm supposed
13:08
contributing editor to its
13:10
great city journal. But now I am a distinguished
13:13
and you'll have to treat me with more respect. Now we're on.
13:16
I am a dis distinguished senior
13:18
fellow with the Texas Public
13:20
Policy Foundation. I've changed
13:24
courses because they
13:26
made me an offer to come
13:28
and play with them, but especially to
13:31
help build out a new national energy initiative
13:34
think tank of some kind based in Washington.
13:36
It's not a Texas based activity,
13:38
but a Texas sponsored activity,
13:41
because well, Texas is
13:43
the energy giant of America and in
13:45
fact of.
13:46
The world, and they and they realize what's
13:48
at stake.
13:49
They do right.
13:51
One last thing from our last conversation, and
13:53
by the way, congratulations for that. I don't want to just ignore
13:55
that. That's kind of neat.
13:58
You know, about two
14:00
weeks ago in the news, Germany decided
14:03
to do away with the incentive for purchasing
14:06
or supporting evs.
14:08
What was that all about?
14:10
Money? Inherently what
14:13
a shock. Yeah, I mean, you can't subsidize
14:15
everything forever. And what it
14:17
was all about is the it
14:19
made a lie of the trope that
14:23
if you subsidize EV's, the volumes
14:25
will go up and they'll get cheaper. And
14:27
evs are inherently more expensive
14:30
than conventional cars, except
14:33
for in the luxury market, which is functionally
14:36
irrelevant to most of the world.
14:38
So for the everyday car, evs
14:40
are inherently more expensive, and they are now being
14:43
produced at scale. We're no
14:45
longer talking about a nascent industry. There
14:47
are millions of them being manufactured. Tessel
14:50
did you know, over a million a year themselves
14:53
last year. It's a mature,
14:55
a large industry, and it still requires
14:59
massive subsidies to get people
15:01
to buy them, which means governments
15:03
are facing the prospect if they
15:05
push evs, is the only vehicle
15:07
you're allowed to buy? Is subsidizing
15:10
every car everybody buys. So it's
15:13
it's unsustainable. You can't you can't do
15:15
these kinds of things, and the
15:17
lie that they get cheap is not true.
15:19
So wait, you're telling me that Germany woke up and
15:21
said, wait, we can't afford to continue in this path,
15:23
let's just let's eliminate it and stop it here.
15:26
Yeah, they they did other things. Remember, they are
15:28
pursuing this aggressive wind and solar
15:30
path on their grids, and there
15:33
there's a sense, you know, I believe last year there was
15:36
no net new orders in Europe for turbans
15:38
wind turbans, and they are reactivating
15:41
coal plants in Germany, digging up more coal,
15:44
and the costs of the natural gas is soaring
15:46
because of their because of the
15:49
understandable policy to de link from Russian
15:51
gas. But that means instead
15:53
of the geopolitical discounts
15:56
that Putin was giving Germany,
15:58
they're gone. So energy
16:01
got more expensive and their economy
16:03
is shrinking and they're de industrializing
16:06
and so on. The at all of this on the
16:08
backs of bad energy policy. That's
16:10
where all came from, and all it all comes
16:13
back to bad energy
16:15
policy being mandated by the government. Unaffordable.
16:18
So the next Domino is
16:21
the one that just fail, which is knocking out
16:23
EV subsidies.
16:24
So when does that fall here now?
16:27
And that's a good question. I mean,
16:29
I well, you know, if
16:32
it takes as long to happen here as it did
16:34
there, we're in for a few more
16:36
years. I think a
16:38
fiscal sanity will rather
16:41
than somebody deciding that
16:43
boops, we were wrong. We don't like evs. That's
16:45
not going to happen. I like evs, as you know, we've
16:47
talked about the performance
16:50
opportunities and different kind of flexibility
16:52
were nice. They're great fun.
16:55
But that's not the same thing as mandating
16:57
everybody have one and subsidizing it.
16:59
So I think fiscal reality will
17:01
will come back into play here faster
17:05
than it did in Germany for a whole
17:07
lot of reasons. And so if I were picking it,
17:09
if we wanted to take it over under Bet,
17:13
I'd take two years. I'd say,
17:15
I'd say two years the subsidies go away,
17:19
even if there's a even if even if Democrats
17:22
have a white House, I think it's going to
17:24
be financially unsustainable. That's
17:26
what I think will happen.
17:27
All right, Well, I'll take that prediction.
17:29
We'll we'll we'll talk again in two years.
17:31
Personally, I think it's going to be a person I think it's going to be
17:33
eleven months. But we'll
17:36
kind of take that, will kind of take it
17:39
comes.
17:40
You're setting aside who wins
17:42
the election eleven months, even if
17:44
the red team instead of the Blue team wins. Uh,
17:47
there's a lag because
17:49
the you know, we've got then not till
17:52
a year from this January before the
17:54
next inauguration, and then you have
17:57
school off time which takes six months.
18:00
But you know, President, it could could end
18:02
by secutive order up the dyes for sure.
18:04
Yeah, I get it.
18:05
They could try it.
18:06
I could try it.
18:07
I don't know if they could get could get away with it because it's
18:09
you know, there's legislation because who has a House
18:11
and Senate. It's messy. I guess
18:13
my point is.
18:14
It becomes political. Mark, let's pull over, take a
18:16
pause. I'm Ronnini and the guard doctor here with Mark Mills.
18:18
We'll both be back right after this. Don't go up.
18:41
She's real, find my phone.
18:43
Nice, she's real, find my
18:46
phone, my phone, look
18:52
back, Dane, I card doctor here. We're talking
18:54
Mark with Mark Mills, we're talking e VS
18:56
and all the peripheral conversations
18:58
that go along with that statement. And
19:02
as we roll along, Mark, we you know,
19:04
I knew, and I could probably talk a lot longer than the time
19:06
we always have. I want to get into insurance
19:09
costs. We've never really done
19:11
a deep dive, but you know there's
19:13
a lot of things that go along with that term insurance
19:15
costs and evs. Electric vehicles
19:18
enlighten us.
19:20
Yeah, Well, the big wildcard here,
19:24
as you know, is ensuring the most expensive
19:26
part of that vehicle, which is the battery. And
19:28
unlike an internal combustion engine car,
19:31
there's no single component that has
19:34
such a high proportion of the cost of the vehicle. So
19:37
roughly speaking, the batteries fifteen thousand dollars
19:39
could be a smaller car ten thousand.
19:42
That's a manufacturer's cost, so
19:44
fifteen thousand. Then the big ones could be
19:46
twenty thousand. There's a lot of money.
19:49
And the battery structure
19:52
is extremely important for safety reasons.
19:54
So if there's any mechanical damage to the
19:56
battery pack, it's a huge thing in the
19:58
floor, you know, the pan
20:00
of the car. Since it's a write off,
20:03
the batteries can't be repaired the way an internal combustion
20:05
engine. Can you know it's a very complex
20:08
machine. People think it's simple. It's not a box
20:10
of goos, it's not an empty tank. There's
20:12
thousands of components, thousands of wells, power
20:14
electronics, cooling systems, structural systems,
20:17
safety systems. It's more complex
20:19
than an internal combustion engine and made from lots
20:22
of exotic stuff, unlike an engine which
20:24
is cast iron steel. Very
20:26
easy to fix them, frankly comparatively,
20:29
and you can fix them so that
20:32
cost is not really showing
20:34
up yet in the data. Except
20:37
this is my theory. Generally
20:39
speaking, overall car insurance costs have been rising
20:42
across the country. It's not just that it's
20:44
getting more expensive to repair cars. I
20:46
think what's going on is the percentage
20:48
of cars that are being totaled for minor
20:51
accidents. It's far
20:53
higher with EBS. We know this for a fact,
20:56
and that cost is being passed on to all
20:58
other insurance payers
21:00
because insurance gime's going to put the money
21:02
somewhere, so they haven't yet made
21:05
ev makers. I don't think pay
21:08
the actual underwritten
21:10
cost of ensuring a vehicle
21:12
that gets into an accident that can be written
21:15
off much more quickly. And there's
21:17
another feature, by the way, for Tesla's particularly
21:19
and if other automakers follow this, is that Elon
21:22
Musk is nothing brilliant made that cheaper to
21:24
make his car because his frame is
21:27
a single aluminum casting. No
21:29
one else has been to achieve that. It's a really
21:32
incredible engineering achievement, and good on him
21:34
and his team. I mean, it really is. It's amazing.
21:37
But the problem with that is that the aluminum
21:39
is, you know, it's fragile relatively speaking.
21:41
I mean, if you get into an accident
21:44
and do damage to the frame of a steel
21:46
car, you can bend it back, you
21:48
can replace a part. We can't
21:50
do that to a Tesla. You're right off the frame,
21:53
right And that's that's so you got two
21:55
things you're facing that are changed. The insurance
21:58
underwriting, and they'll you know,
22:00
that will show up. It has to rope eventually as
22:03
you get more and more evs on the road, and I think what
22:05
solution is uncomplicated. The
22:07
electric car owner will pay for the insurance
22:09
higher insurance costs. Ultimately, that's what will happen,
22:12
and then insurance companies will be blamed for
22:16
impeding the eed revolution, for.
22:18
Gouging and gouging,
22:20
gouging, and all of a sudden, it will become their fault.
22:23
You know.
22:23
I heard a story recently in the news that
22:26
someone with a Rivian vehicle
22:28
Rivian truck. Now I think I think
22:30
the analogy was the damage if it was a
22:32
gas vehicle would have been half the price.
22:34
It was a twenty six thousand dollars repair,
22:37
and the debate was do you fix it? And
22:40
and it's it's
22:42
it just goes on every day. I've
22:44
heard stories where insurance carriers
22:47
are pulling out of the state of Florida because of the
22:49
cost. Some of it's obviously due to, you know,
22:51
the losses they encountered over the last couple
22:53
of years with weather and hurricanes and so forth,
22:55
but you know, it's it's also because when
22:58
an EV you know, when a hurricane
23:00
hits Florida, and how many evs get
23:02
wiped out as they did in the last couple
23:04
of storms, right, all of a sudden,
23:06
the losses multiply at such a rate
23:09
that the insurance company can't
23:11
make a rate of return on their investment. You know,
23:13
they you know, let's talk how does an insurance
23:15
company make money. My understanding is Obviously
23:18
they're taking the money from you and I and everybody
23:20
else, and then they're investing it. They're putting it into the stock
23:22
market, they're putting it in places. And when
23:24
the market goes down, So now the market
23:26
goes down, the EV cost to repair
23:28
goes up. It's like the perfect storm for you. We
23:31
don't want to do this anymore.
23:33
Yeah, it's a problem, and some
23:35
of it is higher repair costs inherent in the fact
23:37
that the parts are more expensive or less available,
23:39
the mechanics aren't available. But
23:42
that, to be fair, some of
23:44
that works out over time in the sense
23:47
that the training and availability
23:49
of mechanics and parts improves
23:51
over time, but it takes a long time. It's
23:53
not going to happen overnight. And so
23:56
those those are pretty typical features
23:58
of any new product. But the
24:01
fact is, the inherent cost of
24:04
so many of the components in an EV are higher
24:06
than the inherent cost of the conventional
24:09
car. So by definition, it's
24:11
going to be more expensive to repair. And then
24:13
when you add to that this other feature I mentioned,
24:15
which is, you know, there's no single
24:18
components
24:20
as expensive in a conventional car as
24:22
there isn't an EV. When as is
24:24
the battery, and that's that's a pretty
24:27
big risk. You got one thing that
24:29
if it's damaged in a way that's going to make it unsafe,
24:32
you have to write the vehicle off. And of
24:34
course that's I had a friend who's whose
24:36
wife drives a Tesla three.
24:38
It's a nice car. I've driven them a small
24:41
minor fender bender, and they
24:43
wrote it off. Minor says
24:45
nobody was hurt. It was, but it
24:48
caused enough potential damage to the integrity
24:50
of the battery that is it vendor
24:52
bender. It's obviously a little more than that, but
24:55
they wrote it off and it would never have been a write off
24:57
it had been been a conventional vehicle.
25:00
If you're standing in
25:02
in front of two dealerships EV or
25:05
Guess, and you're trying to think about the cost
25:07
of ownership the Guess version, the
25:09
internal combustion engine. You're familiar with that.
25:11
If you've been driving a while, you know.
25:12
What the costs are.
25:14
You know what are the hidden costs with
25:16
that EV that you know people
25:18
need to think about and make a decision based on
25:20
that. You know the things, the things they're not telling
25:23
us. You know, insurance is one of them. Might cost
25:25
to repair as the other.
25:27
Well here, sure,
25:30
but here's the thing. In the current
25:32
environment, given
25:34
what we're doing, how we're subsidizing evs,
25:36
how we're subsidizing the recharging,
25:39
and if you haven't have a garage, there's a brick
25:41
compelling argument to be made for your
25:43
second or third guard to be an ev frankly
25:46
right now, because everybody else's
25:48
is carrying the costs for you. And if
25:50
you, if you, if you're one of the owners that your
25:53
at least you're at lease at lease, are not a buyer,
25:55
and you want to have a car for a few years, you
25:58
know, all all of the digital
26:00
value risk is taken by the less or
26:02
not you in the lease. You get
26:04
the full credit on the lease in
26:06
the first few years of a vehicle. Every vehicle's ownership
26:09
is you know, as long as quality controls reason well, you don't
26:11
how many you don't have high repair costs not
26:13
till later, so you you don't have to worry
26:15
about that. So it's the it's the lease holder's
26:17
problem when they take the vehicle back, so
26:20
and they're refueling costs
26:22
are subsidized. Right now, you're not paying
26:25
road taxes, which you will have to eventually
26:27
but right now you're not. And
26:29
if you could charge it home, your your lecture utility
26:31
is subsidizing the electricity for you.
26:34
So it's, you know, not to
26:36
be facetious, but it's true. I've told
26:39
family members that this is if you want
26:41
to second or third car to drive around
26:43
town for convenience. But I have like one
26:45
of the better quality you have, Bookswagen or the
26:47
TESTA three or the Hundai's are
26:49
nice on too. They're they're nice, they're well make cars,
26:52
especially in the first few years of lights. They're they're
26:55
not as quite as reliable. You're not driving them
26:57
as much, so you don't have to worry about as much. You're not driving a long distance
26:59
because you're using it for local driving. But
27:01
that what that masks is that
27:04
what we're really talking about is not whether an
27:06
individual should buy an EV for their particular
27:09
lifestyle choice. It's when
27:11
the government is saying to us that you could only buy an
27:13
EV and everybody's going to drive one, and that's when
27:15
the hidden costs show up. If the entire
27:17
fuel system for vehicles to switch from
27:19
gasoline to electric, we
27:21
are talking about hundreds
27:23
of billions of dollars of infrastructure
27:26
costs which is not being factored in
27:29
for the charging networks. Hundreds of billions,
27:31
not billions, half a trillion dollars
27:33
to upgrade the electric grid
27:35
to charge all these vehicles, and another
27:37
half a trillion dollars of
27:41
high speed chargers which will be needed on the road.
27:44
So the current plan is to spend seven
27:46
billion dollars I need the chargers out of the Inflation
27:48
Reduction Act. That's a drop in the bucket
27:50
we're going to We're going to need to spend hundreds of billions
27:52
of dollars to get enough of them on the road. Those
27:55
those are where the hidden costs come in that are
27:57
being completely ignored, and
28:00
that that's non trivial. We're talking
28:02
trillion dollars of infrastructure
28:05
that needs to be put in place to
28:08
have a significant share. In
28:10
fact, the majority of vehicles become electric
28:13
fuel instead of gasoline fueled. It's
28:16
these are electrical engineering challenges.
28:18
They're not amenable to, you
28:20
know, magic waving a wand saying, oh, it'll get
28:22
better soon. We know how to do this stuff now, we know
28:24
what it costs now, and then you have not to
28:26
miss.
28:27
About then you have to think about the cost of
28:30
what it's going to take, you know, to the land,
28:32
to the environment to build these things. Trees,
28:34
forests that have to be knocked down a lot.
28:36
There, Mark, let's pull over, take a pause for our last break.
28:39
I'm running Ny in the Car Doctor. We're here with Mark Mills.
28:41
We'll return right after this. Welcome
28:53
back, listeners, Running in the Car Doctor. Here
28:55
with Mark Mills. Mark, let's let's go where
28:57
our original conversation was. At the star
29:00
of this hour. We wanted to talk about EV
29:02
batteries and do a little
29:04
bit of a deep dwell. I'll tell you it's you know, they gave
29:06
us ten hours. We could talk ten hours. You
29:09
know, let's talk a little about the true cost.
29:11
I want to build an EV battery. What's it going to take?
29:15
Well, that's the true cost that EV's costs.
29:17
It's entirely about the battery's It
29:20
takes a lot of stuff, a lot of metals
29:22
and minerals, a lot of chemicals. And this is
29:24
what people if they do a little
29:26
research with the magic Google machine, they can
29:28
figure this out. But the typical battery weighs
29:31
a half a ton, just a battery
29:34
car, which is why the EV's way more and
29:36
why EV's use more aluminum in the frame to cut
29:39
down on the weight penalty from the battery.
29:41
So to replace about sixty
29:43
gallons of gasolane, you know, sixties
29:45
or sixty pounds of gasoline you
29:48
got, you got one thousand pound battery. In
29:50
terms of what they're you know, transporting
29:53
around and that requires digging
29:55
up somewhere on Earth. Are about two
29:57
hundred and fifty tons of the earth said
30:00
this before to get the metals
30:02
and materials to make one battery. That's
30:05
where the money relies is. They're digging up all
30:07
the earth
30:10
to get the copper, to get the aluminum, to get the manganese,
30:12
to get the graphite, to get
30:14
the illuminum
30:17
for the frame, and for the catholic
30:19
and anodes. All that costs
30:21
money. All of it costs more than the iron
30:23
and steel that dominated regular car. A
30:25
regular car, three quarters of its weight, it's iron
30:28
and steel. That's not true for an EV.
30:30
For an EV three quarter of its weight
30:32
are exotic metals and minerals at all cost
30:35
more. You know, copper, the manganese,
30:37
lift him, cobalt often, So
30:40
where will the cost go in the future for
30:42
these complex heavy you know, fuel
30:45
tanks. The battery. They're not going
30:47
down significantly. They crept up
30:49
and then they crept down. Right now, they finished
30:52
their cost curve decline from
30:54
invention, and now the costs are going to
30:56
start creeping up because the marginal
30:59
cost of the next ton of copper,
31:01
the next ton of manganese is rising.
31:04
Is the world's demand starts to rise. And
31:06
it's because we're not opening minds fast enough.
31:08
This whole thing, everything about the future
31:11
price of an EV, the future costume EV,
31:14
can be distilled to a single thing. You want
31:16
to try to predict how fast will
31:18
the world's miners open new minds
31:21
to mine the mega tons of metals
31:23
we need to make EV batteries. We
31:26
know the answer to that. They're not opening them quickly
31:28
right now, they're not investating in them.
31:30
So my guess is they know something
31:33
that the automakers don't know. So they
31:35
they know the mandates are going to end, and
31:37
they're not about to get out of their skis with hundreds
31:40
of billions of dollars of investment to build
31:42
mines over the next decade when the demand
31:45
for those metals is not going to appear because
31:47
no one is going to want to pay the prices
31:49
that are going to be demanded, you know, for
31:51
the batteries. So that's that's
31:54
just sort of the reality that we're living
31:56
with. And this is a mining question. This is not a tech
31:58
This is not a technology
32:01
question. To understand the future price of batteries,
32:03
you need to study the mining industry and the refining
32:05
industry. It's an industry dominated
32:08
by slow cycles, long times
32:10
to build things, billion billions
32:12
and hundreds of billions of dollars of investments, mostly
32:15
foreign. The minds that are all being expanded
32:17
are in Africa, South America, and Asia, mostly
32:20
Chinese. China dominates, utterly,
32:23
utterly dominates the refining of
32:25
the key battery minerals. That
32:28
dominates, I mean they have double
32:30
the market share globally in battery
32:32
minerals that OPEC has. An oil utterly
32:35
dominate the battery minerals market. It will
32:37
for a decade.
32:38
It sort of sounds like it's all about making
32:40
money. Mark. That's about all the time we've got
32:42
right now going. We can continue
32:45
this again if the listeners want, where can they follow
32:47
you and your escapades and what you're
32:49
trying to accomplish, And we appreciate that, is
32:51
there a website they can go to and find out more about
32:53
you and what's going on.
32:55
Yeah, I keep archive all my writings and
32:57
speeches at tech hyphenpundit dot
32:59
com, tech Hyphenpunda dot com.
33:01
It's everything's there, all free,
33:04
easy to find, except for the paywalt stuff. But you
33:06
know, I apologize. I can't control that well. I
33:08
mean, like Wall Street Journal bands,
33:10
those are paywalld yep.
33:11
Gotcha, all right, kettle, Hey, listen, you'll be
33:13
well and we'll talk again real soon. Take good
33:15
care, Thank you, You're
33:17
very welcome. I'm Ronning Any and the card Doctor. I'm back
33:20
right after this. Welcome
33:32
back listeners, you know, ron and Any the car
33:34
Doctor. It's it's always informative,
33:37
to say the least. Talking to Mark
33:39
Mills, and it's going to be interesting
33:41
to see if his two year prediction comes true about
33:44
when the financial hard
33:47
wall or financial brick wall that
33:49
we're supposed to hit with EVS in terms
33:51
of unfeasibility actually comes.
33:53
And I bet you it does, all right. Mark's
33:55
pretty accurate about these things. He's got a good sense of
33:57
where this is going. One of the things he's
34:00
said to me off air was and I
34:02
we're gonna bring them back to talk about this in the
34:04
future at at a higher level, is that
34:07
there's no definitive proof. This
34:09
is kind of staggering. There's no definitive
34:12
proof that evs
34:15
will help reduce CO two emissions,
34:18
and I would
34:20
like to see it if it's out there, because what
34:22
he's saying is there's an offset.
34:24
We create a vehicle that doesn't burn
34:27
fuel, doesn't you know it's it's an electric
34:29
vehicle. But the cost to
34:31
produce that in terms of
34:34
the bulldozer that digs up the dirt, the
34:36
coal plant that produces the electricity,
34:38
the way the materials are manufactured, the
34:40
way you know, we cut down certain
34:42
parts of vegetation and
34:45
forests and things like that. You
34:47
know, it's there's the offset, so you
34:49
know, it's it's it's it's a wash,
34:52
and all we're doing is spending trillions
34:54
of dollars and it just
34:57
it just makes me wonder. I know, from
34:59
a mechanic perspective, at a you
35:01
know, as a garage mechanic level, as I consider
35:03
myself to be, you know, street level mechanic,
35:06
I question who's going to fix all these cars and
35:08
the technology that's there. But that's a that's
35:10
a story for another day. I've had an absolute
35:13
pleasure being with you this weekend, and I thank
35:15
you for being here till the next time. I'm ronning Ady
35:17
in the car doctor, reminding you good mechanics aren't
35:19
expensive, They're priceless. See it.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More