Podchaser Logo
Home
A New Book Puts ‘Math in Drag’

A New Book Puts ‘Math in Drag’

Released Thursday, 14th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
A New Book Puts ‘Math in Drag’

A New Book Puts ‘Math in Drag’

A New Book Puts ‘Math in Drag’

A New Book Puts ‘Math in Drag’

Thursday, 14th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance.

0:03

What if comparing car insurance rates was

0:05

as easy as putting on your favorite

0:07

podcast? With Progressive, it is. Just

0:10

visit the Progressive website to quote with all

0:12

the coverages you want. You'll see Progressive's direct

0:14

rate. Then their tool will provide options from

0:16

other companies so you can compare. All

0:19

you need to do is choose the rate and coverage you like.

0:22

Quote today at progressive.com to join the

0:24

over 28 million drivers who trust Progressive.

0:27

Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Comparison

0:29

rates not available in all states or

0:32

situations. Prices vary based on how you

0:34

buy. Can

0:38

we change math's reputation for being

0:40

boring? Math doesn't have

0:42

to be this challenging, cold, hard

0:45

calculating subject that you remembered in

0:47

school. It can be

0:49

something that's fun and inspiring. It's

0:52

Thursday, March 14th, and let

0:54

me check my calendar. Oh,

0:56

yep, today is Science

0:59

Friday. I'm

1:01

Sci-fi producer Kathleen Davis. I

1:03

have never liked math. I know that's

1:06

a controversial statement, but it's always been

1:08

really hard for me. Memorizing

1:10

equations and multiplication tables,

1:13

it left me with a bad taste for the

1:16

subject. One person trying

1:18

to break math's dry reputation is

1:20

not your traditional math teacher, Kine

1:23

Santos, who's a drag queen and

1:25

a mathematician. Ira

1:27

speaks to Kine about her new

1:29

book, Math in Drag. Kine is

1:31

based in Kitchener, Ontario. Welcome back to

1:33

Science Friday. Hi, Ira. Thanks

1:35

so much for having me. You're quite

1:37

welcome. All right, you know, at first

1:39

glance, I don't see a lot of similarities

1:42

between math and drag, but your book

1:44

is an argument that they are similar.

1:47

Tell us about that. Yeah,

1:49

you know, people think that these

1:51

are two such separate worlds, right? We

1:53

have drag, which is art, and art

1:55

has no rules, whereas people think that

1:57

math is just full of arbitrary. rules.

2:00

But what the book tries to

2:02

argue is really that math is

2:05

about thinking creatively and, and working

2:07

collaboratively and thinking innovatively and questioning

2:10

our pre held stereotypes and

2:12

beliefs. Yeah. So

2:14

tell me about your personal background with

2:16

math. Did you always love it? I

2:19

remember always being pretty good at it. It was always

2:21

my best subject ever since I was a little boy.

2:23

Really? You know, my dad was Yeah, my dad was

2:25

an engineer, he would just do my math homework with

2:28

me. And I just always wanted to impress him. I

2:31

started liking math and thinking that

2:33

it was beautiful. When I was in

2:35

high school, my math teachers encouraged me

2:37

to start writing math contests, which were

2:39

like these extracurricular math tests didn't

2:42

count for your grades. They were just like

2:44

an extra challenge. I know everyone was

2:46

listening and thinking, Where can I sign

2:48

up? But you know, I loved it.

2:50

And I saw through it a

2:52

different side of math, where it wasn't just about using

2:55

an algorithm that your teacher taught you. It

2:57

was about problem solving and thinking on the

2:59

spot thinking outside the box. Yeah, my I

3:01

had a great math teacher who used to

3:03

describe geometry

3:05

as elegant. It's

3:07

a the proof was elegant. So I

3:10

really I really enjoyed that. And for a

3:13

long time, math has been considered a

3:15

boys club. Was it like that to be a

3:17

math lover who didn't sit that little

3:20

box? Yeah, and I mean,

3:22

I guess, you know, growing up as a boy,

3:24

I sort of had the privilege of feeling like

3:26

math was sort of open to me in that

3:28

respect. I know that math is, as you say,

3:31

a bit of a boys club, I

3:33

in particular thought it was a bit of

3:35

a straight boys club, I felt that if

3:37

I came out as gay, that people wouldn't

3:40

really take me very seriously. You know, I

3:42

always thought that the stereotype behind gay people

3:44

were that they were just sort of flamboyant,

3:46

very vapid. I didn't really think

3:49

that they could become mathematicians or scientists.

3:51

So, you know, the book is really

3:53

aimed at at people who,

3:55

you know, need to unravel the stereotype,

3:57

I want to show people that any.

4:00

Anybody can be a math person no matter who you

4:02

are or what you look like. That's

4:04

really good. I want to get into some

4:06

examples then of how math can be flashy

4:09

and fun. Tell me about the

4:11

different levels of infinity. I

4:13

know when I was back in

4:15

school studying George Cantor's Olaf sets, right?

4:17

There were different infinities, right? Is that

4:20

what you're talking about? Yeah, the book

4:22

talks about Georg Cantor and these different

4:24

levels of infinity. I mean, first of

4:26

all, we have there are infinite numbers.

4:28

You know, you can start from one,

4:30

two, three, four, five, and then they

4:33

never stop. But that's what we call

4:35

countable infinity because you can put them

4:37

on a list. Right. There's an uncountable

4:39

infinity, which is all the numbers just

4:41

between one and two. All the decimal

4:43

numbers like point one, point one,

4:46

five, point zero, zero one. It

4:48

turns out there's an even greater infinity

4:50

of numbers just between one and two.

4:53

And the book explains why that is. That

4:55

is a mind blower to think that one

4:57

infinity can be bigger than the other. Yeah.

5:01

Yeah, not only that, but there are

5:03

greater infinities even than that. You can

5:05

keep taking an infinite set and then

5:08

using that to build an even larger

5:10

infinite set. Like there are

5:12

infinite infinities. I

5:15

love it. Let's talk about OK, let's

5:17

speaking of infinity, let's talk about one

5:19

number with infinite digits, which we all

5:21

love. Pi. Pi

5:23

day is coming up very soon, right?

5:26

This is a concept that most people

5:28

are probably familiar with. And you use

5:30

the concept of pi to make drag

5:32

outfits for yourself. Wow. Yeah.

5:34

Yeah. Well, pi is the relationship between a

5:37

circle of circumference and a circle of diameter.

5:39

So, you know, if you're making a skirt

5:41

that you want to fit nicely around your

5:43

waist, you can take a measuring tape, measure

5:45

around your waist. That's the circumference. But when

5:47

you go to the fabric to cut it

5:49

out, you're cutting out a radius to

5:52

make the circle. So you have to use

5:54

pi in that equation. Wow. And so I

5:57

was reading the parts where you were talking about cutting out

5:59

different kinds of circles. circles that fit different

6:01

different body forms. Yeah, yeah. Well,

6:03

pi is the same, whether

6:05

it's a large circle or a small

6:07

circle, the conference is always pi times

6:09

the diameter of any circle. Wow. And

6:12

you devote a chapter in your book

6:14

to what you call celebrity

6:16

numbers, the rebels and the punks over

6:18

the number world. Give me an example

6:21

of a celebrity number. That's

6:23

right. Pi is one of them. The

6:25

others are zero and I, the imaginary

6:27

number, and I call them celebrity numbers

6:29

and I call them punks because these

6:31

are numbers that challenge our ideas of

6:33

what a number is. You know, we

6:35

used to think that numbers were just

6:37

things you could count, like you had

6:39

one sheep, two sheep. The

6:42

idea that nothingness could be a number was

6:44

something that was a bit

6:46

novel to the Romans. And so that

6:48

that's why there is no Roman numeral

6:50

for zero. There was no year zero.

6:52

Zero had to be invented, right? Yeah,

6:54

it had to be invented. And so,

6:56

you know, the fact that there are

6:58

numbers that that we don't know exist,

7:01

but that do fit into the framework. Once

7:03

we do accept the idea of zero as

7:05

a number, it also opens the door to

7:07

negative numbers, which is a hard

7:09

thing to wrap your head around. But once

7:12

you do, it's like, yeah, it works perfectly

7:14

for describing debt, for describing below

7:16

zero temperatures. And it's

7:18

a great analogy to drag because just as

7:20

there are new sorts of numbers

7:23

that we may not understand, there are

7:25

all sorts of people that at first, when

7:27

we meet them, we don't always understand who

7:29

they are or why they're like that. But

7:32

you want to have an open mind when it comes to math

7:34

and when it comes to life. Yeah,

7:36

especially when you get into imaginary numbers,

7:38

which I've always had a lot of

7:41

trouble with. Yeah,

7:44

students have a hard time wrapping their heads

7:46

around that. You know, I did as well

7:48

the idea that you can take the square

7:50

root of a negative, you

7:52

know, it's hard to imagine,

7:54

no pun intended, because, you know, a negative

7:57

times a negative is a positive, zero times

7:59

zero is zero and a positive times a

8:01

positive is positive. So how do you multiply

8:03

a number by itself and get a negative

8:05

number? Well, you just invent it

8:08

and it turns out that it works

8:10

quite well in math. We can use

8:12

it in computer science and electrical engineering

8:14

and physics. And it has all of

8:16

these applications and it actually

8:18

works quite well, just like how negative

8:20

numbers fit into our framework quite well.

8:23

You can say, you know, numbers are this

8:25

and this is our framework and that doesn't

8:27

work, or you can expand your framework

8:29

and make it all the more fabulous

8:32

and wonderful. We're taught that

8:34

math has very rigid rules, but you

8:36

say it doesn't have to be that way. No,

8:39

no. You know, this is, I think the

8:41

problem of how math is taught. We teach

8:43

math as if we were teaching

8:45

kids to paint by having them paint a fence.

8:48

It's just all about like following

8:50

these rote rules where really math is

8:53

about thinking creatively. And you

8:55

know, the idea of accepting new source of

8:57

numbers is one example. Um, but

8:59

a lot of, you know, modern mathematicians

9:01

are thinking creatively and working on

9:04

original ideas and they're questioning axioms

9:06

and tinkering with, well, if we

9:08

tweak this, then what happens here

9:10

and finding these connections? Right.

9:13

Cause you always have these things where

9:15

if you're doing multiplication, a long string of

9:17

numbers or addition, you do

9:19

this stuff inside the parentheses first, right?

9:22

They, that's stuff on the outside. So

9:24

you have those rules, but they're

9:26

all, they're not always agreed upon. No.

9:29

And listen, drag has rules too. You know,

9:31

if you, if you watch RuPaul's drag race

9:33

or if you go to a drag pageant,

9:35

there are rules that drag queens have to

9:37

abide by as well. So, you know, there,

9:39

there are these constraints that we put

9:41

on to sort of help

9:44

us understand, you know, what drag is about

9:46

and how drag is different from other art

9:48

forms constraints oftentimes can help you

9:50

be even more creative. And speaking of

9:52

that, this concept of illegal numbers makes

9:55

me think of drag and the

9:57

way it's been made into a bad guy in

9:59

the, I. of some people. Oh, yeah.

10:01

I mean, I go on and on talking

10:03

about, you know, my experience with the trolls

10:06

online, people coming up to drag queens. You

10:08

know, I talk about in the book how

10:11

math has been controversial and how numbers

10:13

have been illegal. You know, when zero was

10:15

first invented, people had a hard time grappling

10:17

with that, that zero and the

10:20

rest of the Hindu Arabic numerals were also

10:22

illegal at one point. Yeah.

10:24

So how do you keep

10:27

your head up against the people who

10:29

say drag queens should not be teaching

10:31

kids about math or even existing at

10:34

all? You know, I just

10:36

have to keep my head up and I just, you

10:38

know, have to lead with positivity and light. I know

10:40

that what I do is not

10:42

for everyone and I'm not going to change everybody's

10:44

mind. But I just

10:46

want to lead with love and positivity and

10:48

and be a good role model and show

10:51

people that we're

10:53

more than just a stereotype. Really

10:55

my goal is to change

10:57

people's opinions about math and also

10:59

change people's opinions about drag. Mm

11:02

hmm. Mm hmm. Speaking of which, let's

11:04

talk about your very popular TikTok

11:06

page. Yeah, where you teach math concepts

11:09

in a really fun and visually engaging

11:11

way. I want to ask

11:13

you about the Mobius strips, which is something

11:15

that you talk about on your channel a

11:18

lot. Tell us what a Mobius strip is. Yeah.

11:22

The Mobius strips are great because they're a

11:24

great visual example. You can make one with

11:26

a piece of paper. You just cut out

11:29

a long rectangle. You flip it 180 degrees

11:31

and then tape it back together. And

11:33

then you get this thing that you can play with that

11:35

is one sided. If you trace

11:37

your finger all the way around, you end

11:40

up back where you started having touched both

11:42

sides because it's it's all one side.

11:44

And I think that people like it because it's this

11:46

visual thing that they can really connect to. You

11:49

know, TikTok has just been so magical because it's

11:52

allowed me to reach millions and millions

11:54

of people, people who wouldn't have otherwise

11:57

looked up a math video, people who

11:59

have graduated. graduated from school and probably

12:01

thought they would never want to take a

12:03

math class again are suddenly now interested in

12:05

math and wanting to talk about it in

12:07

the comment section, talk about it at the

12:10

dinner table. Hmm. And what's your strategy for

12:12

teaching a really complicated math concept

12:14

to people who maybe have no

12:17

background in the subject? How do

12:19

you break things down in

12:21

a way that's so to speak,

12:23

digestible for people? I think

12:25

the key is really, I don't

12:28

try to get them to memorize it like we

12:30

do in school. What I

12:33

explain is, you know, why these concepts

12:35

are the way they are. I try

12:37

to really explain the logic behind things

12:39

and also how they're used in the

12:41

real world. I think that's what's maybe

12:43

missing from our education system. Everybody's

12:48

got a story about a piece of music. I thought

12:50

this is the greatest thing I've ever heard. It's

12:52

about pure experience, pure

12:55

connection, pure joy. This

12:57

song allowed me to

13:00

survive. I'm Terrence McKnight

13:02

with a new season of the Open Ears

13:04

Project. Every Monday in under 20

13:06

minutes, you'll hear a different guest share

13:08

their story. So you can start your

13:10

week on the right note. Listen wherever

13:12

you get podcasts. Not

13:16

only are you a mathematician and

13:18

a drag queen, but you're also

13:20

a musician. Let's talk about music

13:22

theory. Because right now we know

13:24

that musicians and mathematicians really have

13:26

an intersection there. Yeah,

13:28

okay. Well, I wouldn't call myself a musician.

13:30

I suppose I'm a music lover. I'll

13:33

take that. I'll take that close enough.

13:36

Yeah, well, I mean, over the holidays,

13:38

I was just learning about math and

13:40

music. And what's amazing is

13:42

that music, something else that we think

13:44

is so artistic, actually

13:47

has a lot of math

13:49

behind it, behind the way a piano was tuned,

13:51

even a sound wave.

13:54

Whoever is listening to this right now, you

13:56

know, so much math has to happen for the

13:58

sound waves to be fed to the microphone

14:00

and then through the speakers and then fed

14:03

through the wires as encoded

14:05

in zeros and ones. It's really brilliant

14:07

to think about it. So

14:10

then music could be possibly a good

14:12

way in, like a door for

14:14

people. Yeah, I mean, I think what's

14:16

great about music is that everybody

14:19

can connect to it. You know, people

14:21

realize that you don't have to be

14:23

a music expert in order to listen

14:25

to music on the radio and really

14:27

appreciate it. And I

14:30

want to say that you don't have to be

14:32

a mathematician to appreciate math and to enjoy the

14:34

masterpieces of math. And who would

14:36

you say, because people always ask authors,

14:39

who did you write this book for? Do you

14:42

have a specific audience in mind here? I

14:44

wrote this book for college

14:46

students, high school students, adults,

14:49

people who maybe

14:52

don't have a great relationship with math.

14:54

I want to help repair that relationship and show

14:57

them that math doesn't

14:59

have to be this challenging, cold,

15:01

hard, calculating subject that you remembered

15:03

in school. It can be something

15:06

that's fun and inspiring

15:08

and is actually present in

15:10

everywhere we look around the world around us. I

15:14

just want to show people that

15:16

you can just love this universe and

15:18

math is the language of our universe.

15:21

Yeah, that's another way of saying, and

15:23

you say this in your book, that

15:25

math is magical. Yeah, it

15:28

is magical. You

15:30

rarely hear people who are not mathematicians

15:32

who are not involved with math talking

15:34

about it being magical. Make an argument

15:37

for me about math being magical. I

15:39

mean, I'll talk about pie since we talked about that.

15:42

Pie is everywhere. You can use it to make a dress.

15:46

But it's also got infinitely many

15:48

digits. And yet, we only need

15:50

a few of them to make a dress. And

15:52

we only need even 15 of

15:55

them to land rockets on the moon. The

15:58

first 40 digits of pie, you can use it to make a dress. can

16:00

estimate the circumference of the entire observable

16:03

universe within atoms with

16:05

a margin of error and yet it

16:08

has infinitely many digits and it may

16:10

or may not have your phone number,

16:13

your credit card number encoded within it

16:15

could be the entire works of Shakespeare

16:17

and the Bible. I think

16:20

infinity is just this magical

16:22

concept and yet it

16:24

exists in our own heads. Yeah

16:27

and and speaking of Pa you talk in

16:29

the book about how many different cultures discovered

16:32

it independently. How you you

16:34

know that it was something that

16:36

had to be discovered. Yeah I think the

16:39

the other magical thing about it is if

16:42

it is in our heads then why did

16:44

so many people discover it independently around

16:46

the world you know you had the

16:48

ancient Egyptians, the ancient Greeks, ancient

16:51

China, India, Mesoamerica all

16:54

coming up with number systems all coming up

16:56

with their own expressions of pi

16:59

and algebra and sort of landing on

17:01

on these similar math concepts you know

17:03

there's two schools of thought you can

17:05

say that math is sort of invented

17:07

by us and exists in our heads or

17:09

it's out there in the real world. Yeah.

17:13

If it's invented in our heads well

17:15

it works really well and it

17:18

is so good at describing the universe

17:20

and if it's out there then where

17:22

is it? Is it in the sky? Is it

17:24

in the out where is it

17:26

out there if it's a physical thing I don't

17:29

know. Yeah it's kind

17:31

of spooky I mean in a good

17:33

way. Yeah so what do

17:35

you say to people who

17:37

aren't good at math but would like to

17:39

be good at math would like

17:41

to discover what you have discovered? I

17:44

would say that learning never stops

17:46

at any age even when you

17:48

graduate school and you get your diploma for

17:51

me I'm a lifelong learner and I've always

17:53

just wanted to learn more about this

17:55

universe and the people we shared with and

17:58

you should never put any limiting belief on yourself

18:00

and say, you know, I'll never learn math. It's

18:03

like saying I'll never learn another language or I'll

18:05

never read another book. Why say that to yourself?

18:07

I think we should all embrace an

18:10

enthusiasm for learning because what else are we here

18:12

on this planet for? And it

18:14

also takes a good teacher like yourself

18:17

to be able to explain it to people who

18:19

really want to know about it. I appreciate that.

18:21

Thank you. And I, and I, you know, want

18:23

to give a shout out to all the other

18:25

teachers out there in the world, you know, working

18:27

in the classrooms because they're molding the minds of

18:29

this next generation of humans. And there

18:31

you have it, Kyne. Thank you for, for what you

18:33

do and for taking time to be with us. Thanks

18:36

for having me. You're welcome. Kyne

18:38

Santos, author of Math in Drag,

18:41

a really cool new book out

18:43

this week. Kyne is based in

18:45

Kitchener, Ontario. And we have an

18:47

excerpt of the book on our

18:50

website. Yes, sciencefriday.com/math in drag. Check

18:52

it out. That's all

18:54

the time that we have for now. A

18:56

lot of folks helped make the show happen,

18:58

including Annie Nero, Jason

19:01

Rosenberg, Rasha Aridi, Shoshana

19:04

Bugsbaum, and many more.

19:06

Tomorrow, we'll check in on the biggest

19:08

science stories of the week. But for

19:10

now, I'm SciFri producer Kathleen Davis. Thanks

19:13

for listening. At

19:17

Radiolab, we love nothing

19:19

more than nerding out

19:21

about science, neuroscience, chemistry.

19:24

But we do also like to

19:26

get into other kinds of stories.

19:28

Stories about policing or politics, country

19:30

music, hockey, sex, of

19:32

bugs. Regardless of whether we're

19:35

looking at science or not science, we

19:37

bring a rigorous curiosity to get you

19:39

the answers. And hopefully make you see the world

19:41

anew. Radiolab, adventures on the edge of

19:43

what we think we know. Wherever

19:46

you get your podcasts.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features