Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This episode is brought to you by Progressive Insurance.
0:03
What if comparing car insurance rates was
0:05
as easy as putting on your favorite
0:07
podcast? With Progressive, it is. Just
0:10
visit the Progressive website to quote with all
0:12
the coverages you want. You'll see Progressive's direct
0:14
rate. Then their tool will provide options from
0:16
other companies so you can compare. All
0:19
you need to do is choose the rate and coverage you like.
0:22
Quote today at progressive.com to join the
0:24
over 28 million drivers who trust Progressive.
0:27
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates. Comparison
0:29
rates not available in all states or
0:32
situations. Prices vary based on how you
0:34
buy. Can
0:38
we change math's reputation for being
0:40
boring? Math doesn't have
0:42
to be this challenging, cold, hard
0:45
calculating subject that you remembered in
0:47
school. It can be
0:49
something that's fun and inspiring. It's
0:52
Thursday, March 14th, and let
0:54
me check my calendar. Oh,
0:56
yep, today is Science
0:59
Friday. I'm
1:01
Sci-fi producer Kathleen Davis. I
1:03
have never liked math. I know that's
1:06
a controversial statement, but it's always been
1:08
really hard for me. Memorizing
1:10
equations and multiplication tables,
1:13
it left me with a bad taste for the
1:16
subject. One person trying
1:18
to break math's dry reputation is
1:20
not your traditional math teacher, Kine
1:23
Santos, who's a drag queen and
1:25
a mathematician. Ira
1:27
speaks to Kine about her new
1:29
book, Math in Drag. Kine is
1:31
based in Kitchener, Ontario. Welcome back to
1:33
Science Friday. Hi, Ira. Thanks
1:35
so much for having me. You're quite
1:37
welcome. All right, you know, at first
1:39
glance, I don't see a lot of similarities
1:42
between math and drag, but your book
1:44
is an argument that they are similar.
1:47
Tell us about that. Yeah,
1:49
you know, people think that these
1:51
are two such separate worlds, right? We
1:53
have drag, which is art, and art
1:55
has no rules, whereas people think that
1:57
math is just full of arbitrary. rules.
2:00
But what the book tries to
2:02
argue is really that math is
2:05
about thinking creatively and, and working
2:07
collaboratively and thinking innovatively and questioning
2:10
our pre held stereotypes and
2:12
beliefs. Yeah. So
2:14
tell me about your personal background with
2:16
math. Did you always love it? I
2:19
remember always being pretty good at it. It was always
2:21
my best subject ever since I was a little boy.
2:23
Really? You know, my dad was Yeah, my dad was
2:25
an engineer, he would just do my math homework with
2:28
me. And I just always wanted to impress him. I
2:31
started liking math and thinking that
2:33
it was beautiful. When I was in
2:35
high school, my math teachers encouraged me
2:37
to start writing math contests, which were
2:39
like these extracurricular math tests didn't
2:42
count for your grades. They were just like
2:44
an extra challenge. I know everyone was
2:46
listening and thinking, Where can I sign
2:48
up? But you know, I loved it.
2:50
And I saw through it a
2:52
different side of math, where it wasn't just about using
2:55
an algorithm that your teacher taught you. It
2:57
was about problem solving and thinking on the
2:59
spot thinking outside the box. Yeah, my I
3:01
had a great math teacher who used to
3:03
describe geometry
3:05
as elegant. It's
3:07
a the proof was elegant. So I
3:10
really I really enjoyed that. And for a
3:13
long time, math has been considered a
3:15
boys club. Was it like that to be a
3:17
math lover who didn't sit that little
3:20
box? Yeah, and I mean,
3:22
I guess, you know, growing up as a boy,
3:24
I sort of had the privilege of feeling like
3:26
math was sort of open to me in that
3:28
respect. I know that math is, as you say,
3:31
a bit of a boys club, I
3:33
in particular thought it was a bit of
3:35
a straight boys club, I felt that if
3:37
I came out as gay, that people wouldn't
3:40
really take me very seriously. You know, I
3:42
always thought that the stereotype behind gay people
3:44
were that they were just sort of flamboyant,
3:46
very vapid. I didn't really think
3:49
that they could become mathematicians or scientists.
3:51
So, you know, the book is really
3:53
aimed at at people who,
3:55
you know, need to unravel the stereotype,
3:57
I want to show people that any.
4:00
Anybody can be a math person no matter who you
4:02
are or what you look like. That's
4:04
really good. I want to get into some
4:06
examples then of how math can be flashy
4:09
and fun. Tell me about the
4:11
different levels of infinity. I
4:13
know when I was back in
4:15
school studying George Cantor's Olaf sets, right?
4:17
There were different infinities, right? Is that
4:20
what you're talking about? Yeah, the book
4:22
talks about Georg Cantor and these different
4:24
levels of infinity. I mean, first of
4:26
all, we have there are infinite numbers.
4:28
You know, you can start from one,
4:30
two, three, four, five, and then they
4:33
never stop. But that's what we call
4:35
countable infinity because you can put them
4:37
on a list. Right. There's an uncountable
4:39
infinity, which is all the numbers just
4:41
between one and two. All the decimal
4:43
numbers like point one, point one,
4:46
five, point zero, zero one. It
4:48
turns out there's an even greater infinity
4:50
of numbers just between one and two.
4:53
And the book explains why that is. That
4:55
is a mind blower to think that one
4:57
infinity can be bigger than the other. Yeah.
5:01
Yeah, not only that, but there are
5:03
greater infinities even than that. You can
5:05
keep taking an infinite set and then
5:08
using that to build an even larger
5:10
infinite set. Like there are
5:12
infinite infinities. I
5:15
love it. Let's talk about OK, let's
5:17
speaking of infinity, let's talk about one
5:19
number with infinite digits, which we all
5:21
love. Pi. Pi
5:23
day is coming up very soon, right?
5:26
This is a concept that most people
5:28
are probably familiar with. And you use
5:30
the concept of pi to make drag
5:32
outfits for yourself. Wow. Yeah.
5:34
Yeah. Well, pi is the relationship between a
5:37
circle of circumference and a circle of diameter.
5:39
So, you know, if you're making a skirt
5:41
that you want to fit nicely around your
5:43
waist, you can take a measuring tape, measure
5:45
around your waist. That's the circumference. But when
5:47
you go to the fabric to cut it
5:49
out, you're cutting out a radius to
5:52
make the circle. So you have to use
5:54
pi in that equation. Wow. And so I
5:57
was reading the parts where you were talking about cutting out
5:59
different kinds of circles. circles that fit different
6:01
different body forms. Yeah, yeah. Well,
6:03
pi is the same, whether
6:05
it's a large circle or a small
6:07
circle, the conference is always pi times
6:09
the diameter of any circle. Wow. And
6:12
you devote a chapter in your book
6:14
to what you call celebrity
6:16
numbers, the rebels and the punks over
6:18
the number world. Give me an example
6:21
of a celebrity number. That's
6:23
right. Pi is one of them. The
6:25
others are zero and I, the imaginary
6:27
number, and I call them celebrity numbers
6:29
and I call them punks because these
6:31
are numbers that challenge our ideas of
6:33
what a number is. You know, we
6:35
used to think that numbers were just
6:37
things you could count, like you had
6:39
one sheep, two sheep. The
6:42
idea that nothingness could be a number was
6:44
something that was a bit
6:46
novel to the Romans. And so that
6:48
that's why there is no Roman numeral
6:50
for zero. There was no year zero.
6:52
Zero had to be invented, right? Yeah,
6:54
it had to be invented. And so,
6:56
you know, the fact that there are
6:58
numbers that that we don't know exist,
7:01
but that do fit into the framework. Once
7:03
we do accept the idea of zero as
7:05
a number, it also opens the door to
7:07
negative numbers, which is a hard
7:09
thing to wrap your head around. But once
7:12
you do, it's like, yeah, it works perfectly
7:14
for describing debt, for describing below
7:16
zero temperatures. And it's
7:18
a great analogy to drag because just as
7:20
there are new sorts of numbers
7:23
that we may not understand, there are
7:25
all sorts of people that at first, when
7:27
we meet them, we don't always understand who
7:29
they are or why they're like that. But
7:32
you want to have an open mind when it comes to math
7:34
and when it comes to life. Yeah,
7:36
especially when you get into imaginary numbers,
7:38
which I've always had a lot of
7:41
trouble with. Yeah,
7:44
students have a hard time wrapping their heads
7:46
around that. You know, I did as well
7:48
the idea that you can take the square
7:50
root of a negative, you
7:52
know, it's hard to imagine,
7:54
no pun intended, because, you know, a negative
7:57
times a negative is a positive, zero times
7:59
zero is zero and a positive times a
8:01
positive is positive. So how do you multiply
8:03
a number by itself and get a negative
8:05
number? Well, you just invent it
8:08
and it turns out that it works
8:10
quite well in math. We can use
8:12
it in computer science and electrical engineering
8:14
and physics. And it has all of
8:16
these applications and it actually
8:18
works quite well, just like how negative
8:20
numbers fit into our framework quite well.
8:23
You can say, you know, numbers are this
8:25
and this is our framework and that doesn't
8:27
work, or you can expand your framework
8:29
and make it all the more fabulous
8:32
and wonderful. We're taught that
8:34
math has very rigid rules, but you
8:36
say it doesn't have to be that way. No,
8:39
no. You know, this is, I think the
8:41
problem of how math is taught. We teach
8:43
math as if we were teaching
8:45
kids to paint by having them paint a fence.
8:48
It's just all about like following
8:50
these rote rules where really math is
8:53
about thinking creatively. And you
8:55
know, the idea of accepting new source of
8:57
numbers is one example. Um, but
8:59
a lot of, you know, modern mathematicians
9:01
are thinking creatively and working on
9:04
original ideas and they're questioning axioms
9:06
and tinkering with, well, if we
9:08
tweak this, then what happens here
9:10
and finding these connections? Right.
9:13
Cause you always have these things where
9:15
if you're doing multiplication, a long string of
9:17
numbers or addition, you do
9:19
this stuff inside the parentheses first, right?
9:22
They, that's stuff on the outside. So
9:24
you have those rules, but they're
9:26
all, they're not always agreed upon. No.
9:29
And listen, drag has rules too. You know,
9:31
if you, if you watch RuPaul's drag race
9:33
or if you go to a drag pageant,
9:35
there are rules that drag queens have to
9:37
abide by as well. So, you know, there,
9:39
there are these constraints that we put
9:41
on to sort of help
9:44
us understand, you know, what drag is about
9:46
and how drag is different from other art
9:48
forms constraints oftentimes can help you
9:50
be even more creative. And speaking of
9:52
that, this concept of illegal numbers makes
9:55
me think of drag and the
9:57
way it's been made into a bad guy in
9:59
the, I. of some people. Oh, yeah.
10:01
I mean, I go on and on talking
10:03
about, you know, my experience with the trolls
10:06
online, people coming up to drag queens. You
10:08
know, I talk about in the book how
10:11
math has been controversial and how numbers
10:13
have been illegal. You know, when zero was
10:15
first invented, people had a hard time grappling
10:17
with that, that zero and the
10:20
rest of the Hindu Arabic numerals were also
10:22
illegal at one point. Yeah.
10:24
So how do you keep
10:27
your head up against the people who
10:29
say drag queens should not be teaching
10:31
kids about math or even existing at
10:34
all? You know, I just
10:36
have to keep my head up and I just, you
10:38
know, have to lead with positivity and light. I know
10:40
that what I do is not
10:42
for everyone and I'm not going to change everybody's
10:44
mind. But I just
10:46
want to lead with love and positivity and
10:48
and be a good role model and show
10:51
people that we're
10:53
more than just a stereotype. Really
10:55
my goal is to change
10:57
people's opinions about math and also
10:59
change people's opinions about drag. Mm
11:02
hmm. Mm hmm. Speaking of which, let's
11:04
talk about your very popular TikTok
11:06
page. Yeah, where you teach math concepts
11:09
in a really fun and visually engaging
11:11
way. I want to ask
11:13
you about the Mobius strips, which is something
11:15
that you talk about on your channel a
11:18
lot. Tell us what a Mobius strip is. Yeah.
11:22
The Mobius strips are great because they're a
11:24
great visual example. You can make one with
11:26
a piece of paper. You just cut out
11:29
a long rectangle. You flip it 180 degrees
11:31
and then tape it back together. And
11:33
then you get this thing that you can play with that
11:35
is one sided. If you trace
11:37
your finger all the way around, you end
11:40
up back where you started having touched both
11:42
sides because it's it's all one side.
11:44
And I think that people like it because it's this
11:46
visual thing that they can really connect to. You
11:49
know, TikTok has just been so magical because it's
11:52
allowed me to reach millions and millions
11:54
of people, people who wouldn't have otherwise
11:57
looked up a math video, people who
11:59
have graduated. graduated from school and probably
12:01
thought they would never want to take a
12:03
math class again are suddenly now interested in
12:05
math and wanting to talk about it in
12:07
the comment section, talk about it at the
12:10
dinner table. Hmm. And what's your strategy for
12:12
teaching a really complicated math concept
12:14
to people who maybe have no
12:17
background in the subject? How do
12:19
you break things down in
12:21
a way that's so to speak,
12:23
digestible for people? I think
12:25
the key is really, I don't
12:28
try to get them to memorize it like we
12:30
do in school. What I
12:33
explain is, you know, why these concepts
12:35
are the way they are. I try
12:37
to really explain the logic behind things
12:39
and also how they're used in the
12:41
real world. I think that's what's maybe
12:43
missing from our education system. Everybody's
12:48
got a story about a piece of music. I thought
12:50
this is the greatest thing I've ever heard. It's
12:52
about pure experience, pure
12:55
connection, pure joy. This
12:57
song allowed me to
13:00
survive. I'm Terrence McKnight
13:02
with a new season of the Open Ears
13:04
Project. Every Monday in under 20
13:06
minutes, you'll hear a different guest share
13:08
their story. So you can start your
13:10
week on the right note. Listen wherever
13:12
you get podcasts. Not
13:16
only are you a mathematician and
13:18
a drag queen, but you're also
13:20
a musician. Let's talk about music
13:22
theory. Because right now we know
13:24
that musicians and mathematicians really have
13:26
an intersection there. Yeah,
13:28
okay. Well, I wouldn't call myself a musician.
13:30
I suppose I'm a music lover. I'll
13:33
take that. I'll take that close enough.
13:36
Yeah, well, I mean, over the holidays,
13:38
I was just learning about math and
13:40
music. And what's amazing is
13:42
that music, something else that we think
13:44
is so artistic, actually
13:47
has a lot of math
13:49
behind it, behind the way a piano was tuned,
13:51
even a sound wave.
13:54
Whoever is listening to this right now, you
13:56
know, so much math has to happen for the
13:58
sound waves to be fed to the microphone
14:00
and then through the speakers and then fed
14:03
through the wires as encoded
14:05
in zeros and ones. It's really brilliant
14:07
to think about it. So
14:10
then music could be possibly a good
14:12
way in, like a door for
14:14
people. Yeah, I mean, I think what's
14:16
great about music is that everybody
14:19
can connect to it. You know, people
14:21
realize that you don't have to be
14:23
a music expert in order to listen
14:25
to music on the radio and really
14:27
appreciate it. And I
14:30
want to say that you don't have to be
14:32
a mathematician to appreciate math and to enjoy the
14:34
masterpieces of math. And who would
14:36
you say, because people always ask authors,
14:39
who did you write this book for? Do you
14:42
have a specific audience in mind here? I
14:44
wrote this book for college
14:46
students, high school students, adults,
14:49
people who maybe
14:52
don't have a great relationship with math.
14:54
I want to help repair that relationship and show
14:57
them that math doesn't
14:59
have to be this challenging, cold,
15:01
hard, calculating subject that you remembered
15:03
in school. It can be something
15:06
that's fun and inspiring
15:08
and is actually present in
15:10
everywhere we look around the world around us. I
15:14
just want to show people that
15:16
you can just love this universe and
15:18
math is the language of our universe.
15:21
Yeah, that's another way of saying, and
15:23
you say this in your book, that
15:25
math is magical. Yeah, it
15:28
is magical. You
15:30
rarely hear people who are not mathematicians
15:32
who are not involved with math talking
15:34
about it being magical. Make an argument
15:37
for me about math being magical. I
15:39
mean, I'll talk about pie since we talked about that.
15:42
Pie is everywhere. You can use it to make a dress.
15:46
But it's also got infinitely many
15:48
digits. And yet, we only need
15:50
a few of them to make a dress. And
15:52
we only need even 15 of
15:55
them to land rockets on the moon. The
15:58
first 40 digits of pie, you can use it to make a dress. can
16:00
estimate the circumference of the entire observable
16:03
universe within atoms with
16:05
a margin of error and yet it
16:08
has infinitely many digits and it may
16:10
or may not have your phone number,
16:13
your credit card number encoded within it
16:15
could be the entire works of Shakespeare
16:17
and the Bible. I think
16:20
infinity is just this magical
16:22
concept and yet it
16:24
exists in our own heads. Yeah
16:27
and and speaking of Pa you talk in
16:29
the book about how many different cultures discovered
16:32
it independently. How you you
16:34
know that it was something that
16:36
had to be discovered. Yeah I think the
16:39
the other magical thing about it is if
16:42
it is in our heads then why did
16:44
so many people discover it independently around
16:46
the world you know you had the
16:48
ancient Egyptians, the ancient Greeks, ancient
16:51
China, India, Mesoamerica all
16:54
coming up with number systems all coming up
16:56
with their own expressions of pi
16:59
and algebra and sort of landing on
17:01
on these similar math concepts you know
17:03
there's two schools of thought you can
17:05
say that math is sort of invented
17:07
by us and exists in our heads or
17:09
it's out there in the real world. Yeah.
17:13
If it's invented in our heads well
17:15
it works really well and it
17:18
is so good at describing the universe
17:20
and if it's out there then where
17:22
is it? Is it in the sky? Is it
17:24
in the out where is it
17:26
out there if it's a physical thing I don't
17:29
know. Yeah it's kind
17:31
of spooky I mean in a good
17:33
way. Yeah so what do
17:35
you say to people who
17:37
aren't good at math but would like to
17:39
be good at math would like
17:41
to discover what you have discovered? I
17:44
would say that learning never stops
17:46
at any age even when you
17:48
graduate school and you get your diploma for
17:51
me I'm a lifelong learner and I've always
17:53
just wanted to learn more about this
17:55
universe and the people we shared with and
17:58
you should never put any limiting belief on yourself
18:00
and say, you know, I'll never learn math. It's
18:03
like saying I'll never learn another language or I'll
18:05
never read another book. Why say that to yourself?
18:07
I think we should all embrace an
18:10
enthusiasm for learning because what else are we here
18:12
on this planet for? And it
18:14
also takes a good teacher like yourself
18:17
to be able to explain it to people who
18:19
really want to know about it. I appreciate that.
18:21
Thank you. And I, and I, you know, want
18:23
to give a shout out to all the other
18:25
teachers out there in the world, you know, working
18:27
in the classrooms because they're molding the minds of
18:29
this next generation of humans. And there
18:31
you have it, Kyne. Thank you for, for what you
18:33
do and for taking time to be with us. Thanks
18:36
for having me. You're welcome. Kyne
18:38
Santos, author of Math in Drag,
18:41
a really cool new book out
18:43
this week. Kyne is based in
18:45
Kitchener, Ontario. And we have an
18:47
excerpt of the book on our
18:50
website. Yes, sciencefriday.com/math in drag. Check
18:52
it out. That's all
18:54
the time that we have for now. A
18:56
lot of folks helped make the show happen,
18:58
including Annie Nero, Jason
19:01
Rosenberg, Rasha Aridi, Shoshana
19:04
Bugsbaum, and many more.
19:06
Tomorrow, we'll check in on the biggest
19:08
science stories of the week. But for
19:10
now, I'm SciFri producer Kathleen Davis. Thanks
19:13
for listening. At
19:17
Radiolab, we love nothing
19:19
more than nerding out
19:21
about science, neuroscience, chemistry.
19:24
But we do also like to
19:26
get into other kinds of stories.
19:28
Stories about policing or politics, country
19:30
music, hockey, sex, of
19:32
bugs. Regardless of whether we're
19:35
looking at science or not science, we
19:37
bring a rigorous curiosity to get you
19:39
the answers. And hopefully make you see the world
19:41
anew. Radiolab, adventures on the edge of
19:43
what we think we know. Wherever
19:46
you get your podcasts.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More