Podchaser Logo
Home
Large Study of ME/CFS Patients Reveals Measurable Physical Changes

Large Study of ME/CFS Patients Reveals Measurable Physical Changes

Released Thursday, 14th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Large Study of ME/CFS Patients Reveals Measurable Physical Changes

Large Study of ME/CFS Patients Reveals Measurable Physical Changes

Large Study of ME/CFS Patients Reveals Measurable Physical Changes

Large Study of ME/CFS Patients Reveals Measurable Physical Changes

Thursday, 14th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Hey there! Did you know Kroger always gives

0:02

you savings and rewards on top of our

0:04

lower than low prices? And when you download

0:06

the Kroger app, you'll enjoy over $500 in

0:09

savings And when you download the Kroger app, you'll enjoy over $500 in savings every

0:11

week with digital coupons. And don't forget FuelPoints

0:13

to help you save up to $1 per

0:15

gallon at the pump. Want to

0:17

save even more? With a Boost membership, you'll

0:20

get double FuelPoints and free delivery! So

0:22

shop and save big at Kroger today! Kroger,

0:24

fresh for everyone! Savings may vary

0:26

by state. Restrictions apply. Seasight for

0:29

details. Hi,

0:31

this is Your Health Quickly, a Scientific

0:33

American podcast series. We bring you

0:36

the latest vital health news, discoveries that

0:38

affect your body and your mind. And

0:40

we break down the medical research to help you stay

0:42

healthy. I'm Tanya Lewis. I'm

0:44

Josh Fishman. We're

0:47

Scientific American senior health editors. Today,

0:51

we are delving into the disease

0:53

originally known as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.

0:55

Now it's called ME CFS. Recently,

0:58

a big study looked at people who

1:00

got the illness after an infection, and

1:03

it turned up a few clues

1:05

about what might be causing their

1:07

debilitating and often lifelong symptoms. The

1:13

disease once called Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

1:15

has historically been dismissed by doctors

1:18

and other healthcare professionals as a

1:20

psychosomatic illness without any real physiological

1:22

causes. In recent years,

1:24

researchers have begun to take the

1:26

disease, whose official name is now

1:28

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis slash Chronic Fatigue Syndrome,

1:31

or ME CFS for short. More

1:33

seriously. That really is a mouthful,

1:35

and I'm not even going to try it, but

1:37

Tanya, what does it mean? Well, it

1:40

comes from myalgia, which means muscle

1:42

pain, and encephalomyelitis, which is inflammation

1:44

of the brain and spinal cord

1:46

due to an infection. And

1:48

while it's sometimes referred to as just Chronic

1:50

Fatigue Syndrome, people with ME CFS prefer to

1:52

call it ME because it's really more than

1:55

just fatigue. And during the

1:57

COVID pandemic, millions of people developed

1:59

something that was very,

2:01

very similar to ME CFS

2:03

symptoms. And that's a long COVID. So

2:06

scientists started taking that a lot more

2:08

seriously. Even before the pandemic, I know

2:11

the National Institutes of Health was

2:13

starting to study ME CFS. Yeah,

2:15

that's right. So Francis Collins, who

2:18

was the director of NIH at the time,

2:20

approached a scientist named Avindra Nast and asked

2:22

him to launch a comprehensive study of people

2:24

with ME CFS to really try and find

2:27

some clues as to what was causing

2:29

their exhausting symptoms. Yeah, like you said,

2:31

in addition to fatigue, there's a whole

2:33

bunch of other very serious problems.

2:36

People with ME CFS often

2:38

experience brain fog, hypersensitivity to

2:40

light, and short-term memory problems.

2:43

And another really common issue is

2:45

something called post-exertional malaise. It's

2:47

basically a worsening of your symptoms after

2:49

any kind of physical activity. And

2:52

there really aren't any good treatments for it.

2:54

I've known some people with ME CFS, and

2:58

it can be really devastating. Yeah, it

3:00

really can. So starting in

3:03

2016, Avi and his colleagues set out to study

3:05

this, but since ME CFS is sort of an

3:07

umbrella term for a wide array of disease forms,

3:10

they wanted to find a group of

3:12

people who fit a very specific patient

3:14

profile. They specifically recruited people who had

3:16

developed the disease after an infection, and

3:19

they also had to be well enough to travel to

3:21

NIH for the experiments. They ended up with a total

3:23

of 17 participants with ME

3:25

CFS and 21 healthy volunteers.

3:28

Next, they set about putting the participants through

3:30

a whole series of tests of

3:32

pretty much every organ system. I'm

3:35

Avi Nath. I'm the Clinical Director of

3:37

the National Institute of Neurological

3:39

Disorders and Stroke, and also the Chief

3:41

of the Section of Infections of the

3:43

Nervous System. We did a very thorough

3:46

investigation, looking at MRI

3:48

scans, cognitive function. We did spinal

3:50

taps, lots of blood draws. At

3:53

various time points, we looked

3:55

at the immune function metabolomics.

3:57

We looked at the gut microbiome. We looked at...

4:00

their heart rates and blood

4:02

pressures and autonomic function. I

4:05

know that it was a really complete workup.

4:08

What did they find? A lot of this

4:10

is described in an online news story written by

4:12

Kamal Nahas, which we'll link to in the transcript.

4:15

Here's Avi. We found that

4:17

there were multiple systems that were

4:19

involved. It wasn't a single abnormal

4:22

observation. We found that there were

4:24

a number of abnormalities. Then

4:26

we found that there was activation of the

4:28

immune system in the ME CFS patients. It

4:31

was almost like the immune system was

4:33

exhausted from being chronically activated. And

4:36

interestingly, we found that there were differences

4:38

between men and women, such that

4:40

women had predominantly B cell pathways that were

4:42

activated, and in men it was predominantly T

4:45

cell. And so

4:47

that in itself is a very important

4:49

observation because it tells us that what

4:51

may work for women may not work for men. ME

4:54

CFS occurs predominantly in women, but men can

4:56

obviously get it too. So treatment

4:58

could look different for men versus women. The

5:01

researchers also found differences in the brains and

5:03

nervous systems of people with ME CFS. We

5:06

found a lot of abnormalities in

5:08

the metabolites and the neurotransmitters. We

5:11

tested the brain in many different ways

5:14

by stimulating the brain with transcranial magnetic

5:16

stimulation and a functional

5:18

MRI scan. And whereby

5:20

you can look at the metabolism of

5:22

the brain in a resting

5:24

state when you exercise the brain.

5:27

In order to exercise the brain, we did

5:29

a simple motor task. We

5:31

found that the motor cortex itself was

5:33

fine, but there's an area

5:36

of the brain that integrates

5:39

all the information together, and

5:41

it's at the junction of the temporal and the parietal

5:43

lobe. And we found that

5:45

that was inactive. It's not a

5:47

structural abnormality, it's a functional abnormality.

5:50

Avi says this functional brain abnormality

5:52

might explain the post-exertional malaise that

5:54

many people with ME CFS experience.

5:58

But it's a pretty preliminary finding. Right,

6:00

that doesn't really seem like it

6:02

would explain the whole story. Right,

6:05

probably not. I actually talked to

6:07

one of the study participants, a journalist named

6:09

Brian Fosthogg. Oh, Brian is

6:11

actually a friend of mine. He's

6:14

the reason that NIH started doing

6:16

this study because he wrote

6:18

a op-ed in The Washington Post

6:21

complaining that scientists weren't studying ME-CFS

6:23

enough. That's really interesting. I know

6:25

he's been a big activist for

6:28

people with ME-CFS. I've

6:30

known Brian for a long time.

6:32

I've known him before he got

6:34

sick and after

6:36

he got sick. And I can tell you

6:38

it's made a huge

6:41

difference in his life. He was

6:43

a great journalist and

6:47

then he couldn't do that

6:49

anymore. He's a really bright,

6:51

very curious, and

6:53

very intelligent person.

6:57

And all of a sudden,

6:59

he just didn't have this body

7:01

that would let him follow through with

7:04

the things that he wanted to find out

7:07

about. Because he just

7:10

didn't have the physical ability. It was

7:12

kind of like having

7:14

this really bright mind locked in

7:16

this body that wouldn't

7:19

work anymore. Again, he doesn't

7:21

really know what caused it. I

7:23

had a sudden fever. It basically went

7:25

from being well to being sick in like

7:27

five minutes. It went very stark. He

7:30

actually had a false positive test for

7:32

West Nile virus, but they never actually

7:34

found the true pathogen. And I

7:37

asked him what he thought about the

7:39

study. I don't think he was too

7:41

thrilled about the results that Nath

7:43

was talking about before. The findings

7:45

were pretty meager. He

7:48

was so conflicted about how the study turned out. Yeah,

7:50

I mean he's glad they did the study, but he

7:52

didn't really think it found a whole lot that was

7:54

new. He also took issue

7:56

with the fMRI findings, which he thought was

7:58

not an appropriate test. and was only based

8:01

on a handful of participants. Overall

8:03

though, the study just may have been too small to

8:05

draw out strong conclusions. That

8:08

said, he did think the study helps

8:10

validate that ME CFS is a real

8:12

illness with real biological causes. And

8:14

that's important given that many doctors still dismiss

8:17

people with the disease, and we don't really

8:19

have that many treatments. Okay, that's

8:21

Brian. What about Avi? Does Avi think

8:23

the study will help lead to potential

8:26

treatments? Avi really hopes that this will

8:28

lead to treatments. Even though the

8:30

study didn't find so-called autoantibodies, which are a

8:32

sign that the body is attacking itself, like

8:34

some studies have found, it did

8:36

find signs of B and T cell wonkiness,

8:39

if you will. And the treatments

8:41

could depend on your sex. So in

8:43

women, you could try things like checkpoint

8:45

inhibitors, which are used as a type of

8:47

immunotherapy for cancer. And for

8:49

men, you might be able to try various T

8:51

cell therapies. I feel like they

8:54

need to do treatment trials, like that needs

8:56

to be the next step. Patients need

8:58

to do treatment. We can't just wait

9:00

to figure out the entire path of

9:02

physiology that we need to start. So

9:05

researchers are already testing some of these

9:07

therapies. Well, I'm glad to hear

9:10

that they're starting. But what about

9:12

long COVID? Could this research

9:14

benefit people with that? Yeah,

9:16

it might. There's certainly a lot

9:18

more interest in these conditions now, given how many

9:20

people have long COVID. That's really

9:23

important because ME, CFS, and long

9:25

COVID both take a real toll.

9:27

They ruin lives. I want people

9:29

to know that this is a

9:31

matter of life success.

9:34

You know, you try 100 different medicines, and

9:36

nothing ever helps you. It's really hard to

9:38

keep going. Your

9:42

Health Quickly is produced by Timmy Broderick,

9:45

Talika Bose, Jeff Delvicio, and by us.

9:48

It's edited by Ella Federer and Alexa Limb.

9:51

Our music is composed by Dominic Smith. Our

9:54

show is part of Scientific American's podcast, Science

9:56

Quickly. Subscribe wherever you get

9:58

your podcasts. If you like the show,

10:00

give us a rating or a review. And

10:03

if you have a topic you want us to cover,

10:05

you can email us at yourhealthquickly at sciam.com. That's

10:08

yourhealthquickly at sciam.com.

10:11

Just a quick request. My colleague, Lauren Young,

10:14

and I are working on a podcast series

10:16

on caregiving for older family members and

10:19

the challenges of navigating care at home

10:21

versus institutional care. We're

10:23

hoping to speak with people who have experience caring

10:25

for their own family members. Please

10:28

email yourhealthquickly at sciam.com with the

10:30

subject caregiving if you're interested. For

10:35

Your Health Quickly, I'm Tanya Lewis. And

10:38

I'm Josh Gifton. See you next time.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features