Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Knowing how to speak and understand any
0:02
language can be an invaluable tool when
0:04
traveling, meeting new friends, or just even
0:06
a master new skill. But it's not
0:08
always simple when you're bogged down by
0:10
text books and structure classes. That's why
0:13
so many people trust Rosetta Stone. Rosetta
0:15
Stone is the most trusted language learning
0:17
program available on desktop or is an
0:19
app. It truly immersive you in the
0:21
language you want to learn like Spanish,
0:23
French, Italian, Chinese, and more. You won't
0:26
just be studying English translations there was
0:28
at a Stone. Intuitive process helps. You
0:30
pick up a language naturally, first
0:32
with words, then phrases, then sentences.
0:34
Don't put off learning that language.
0:36
There's no better time than right
0:38
now to get started. For a
0:41
very limited time, listeners can get
0:43
Rosetta Stone lifetime membership. For fifty
0:45
percent off visit Rosetta stone.com/rs Ten.
0:47
That's fifty percent off unlimited access
0:49
to twenty five language courses for
0:51
the rest of your life. Redeem
0:53
your fifty percent off at Rosetta
0:55
stone.com/rs Ten today. Do. You wake
0:58
up in a cold sweat from your work
1:00
dreams. Have a coworker who keeps inviting you
1:02
to do ski rooms can't get a coworker
1:04
to agree to do escape rooms? Or are
1:06
you just genuinely not sure how to take
1:08
the next step in your career? I'm K
1:10
and I'm Kim and together we run Amy
1:12
Poehler Company Paper Kite Production. We've been friends
1:14
and colleagues for years so we know how
1:16
important it is to feel like someone has
1:18
your back at work and we want to
1:20
be that for you. So we're hosting a
1:22
weekly advice show where we answer all your
1:24
work related questions. Something amazing happened. I got
1:27
offered my dream job of how my broker
1:29
bring of up you on about hurting feelings
1:31
or should I do. I. Wanna give the
1:33
pleasantries without being and whole care for
1:35
money and friends that don't mix bad
1:37
sale and don't work with your friends
1:39
and need your friends at. Work or
1:41
and I can't believe I'm going in
1:43
favor but that was actually million dollar
1:46
advice. Whether you need advice or just
1:48
love to listen to other people's problems,
1:50
this show is for you. Listen and
1:52
follow Million Dollar advice. And Odyssey Podcast
1:54
available now for free on the Odyssey
1:56
app and wherever you get your podcast.
2:24
Hello! Hi When
2:26
the great thing is messed up over
2:29
here arms try to fix it or
2:31
why? Oh okay,
2:33
can you hear it? He has.
2:36
Earlier this week assigned to a certain
2:38
in the surname Sarah he okay boys
2:40
asking people to send in questions for
2:42
the show. The thing I should warn
2:44
you of listener she did as. A
2:47
make higher follow ups. Where are we
2:49
talking about? Where are you? I'm in my
2:51
car. Outside of
2:54
a library. I come here
2:56
to use their Why Fi while my kid
2:58
is at their little. Montessori.
3:00
Preschool program. Oh that's
3:02
really nice. Sarah. Woods and
3:04
had a New York we're talking Monday when
3:07
everybody smalltalk have been orbiting the same topic
3:09
what are you doing for the Eclipses I.
3:12
I don't know actually because the eclipse
3:14
is during nap time my kidnaps early
3:16
release so I don't Yeah I don't
3:19
know what we're gonna do. I guess
3:21
I can like look outside and with
3:23
intuit a half year old that a
3:25
close out a reason to rouse a
3:27
child. Or. Absolutely not about
3:29
the upper, upper, upper. Haight.
3:36
So tell me what is your
3:38
question? Yes, the my question is
3:40
what's going on with these yard
3:42
signs I'd like to do. They
3:45
work and wire. There's so many.
3:47
Of them. And when you say
3:49
yards as you me like vote for blah
3:51
blah blah like the Political Yard said, Uma
3:54
A Political Yard. Signs of that. This
3:56
came up last year which was just local
3:58
elections, but we had a. Very
4:00
contentious District Attorney election.
4:03
And it was just ridiculous. The
4:05
number of signs, In
4:07
her email to the show sir had
4:09
said that this question that had come
4:11
up a few times when talking to
4:14
her friends and family in particular her
4:16
mom was going upset about the signs
4:18
towards rage was used and how did
4:20
you the old saying a yards as
4:22
you feel any way about them. I
4:25
feel like it's a lot of visual. Clutter.
4:29
Like I'm I'm a visual artist and so
4:31
I pay attention to what I'm seeing out
4:33
in the world. And it just seemed like there were
4:35
a lot. There. Would be for signs
4:37
for one of the candidates and then a
4:40
little bit later like there before or
4:42
for the other candidate to. And now it's
4:44
like is it cancelling them out What's
4:46
happening here. Yeah I've driven in
4:48
neighborhoods were like you can feel like
4:50
visually you're seeing like a noisy or
4:52
even the happening and it's sort of
4:55
unpleasant Yes and it starts to feel
4:57
like is this. Is this
4:59
something that we're doing? I don't
5:01
know. like it's a tradition or
5:03
is it like sports? Where
5:06
people are like really into their team?
5:08
Oh so the question is like does
5:11
is haven't actually guilty or is this
5:13
about like people signaling what tried? They're.
5:16
Totally yelling are we doing? Nothing has is
5:18
actually use or like should I be putting.
5:20
Signs in my yard. Is this
5:22
actually saying that sending mine or
5:24
is this is something that people
5:26
are doing because. That's what they've always
5:29
done and it feels like you're doing
5:31
something. There you're just being the math says.
5:35
right? And what's your suspicion? that
5:38
I'm just nothing about my personality?
5:40
Lends. Itself. Like I
5:42
always indoors you get a political yards I'd
5:45
like. I'd just like is nothing is where
5:47
opposite of my feelings about the world the
5:49
like. I. Always assumed that
5:51
they don't work and I've never driven by
5:53
of and like oh wait. Davis. For
5:56
comptroller I guess that's what I'm doing. Plate
5:58
I feel like your squeezes a dirt. Not
6:00
doing something. My suspicion is that
6:02
they're not doing something. Yes, He
6:07
said i don't even know you would
6:09
get one. So my neighbor Ah is
6:11
one of the people that gives them
6:13
out the see her reports like sees
6:15
one of the Chatham Democrats is a
6:17
very into best. She's very involved politically
6:19
and so. Caesar. At like a
6:22
location that people com. To pick up
6:24
signs for our local representative. And
6:27
so I think it's maybe more on my
6:29
mind because of that, you say right
6:31
by the speaker of a big ass, the
6:33
i'm like I'm I'm near a distribution center
6:36
for this, the thing that's happening and I'm
6:38
wondering. Should. I be putting
6:40
signs on my yard because if it
6:42
did make a difference. Like. It's
6:44
a pretty low. Effort
6:46
Saying. I don't know. Are
6:49
you go over whether we could write out. After
6:56
these ads, a series of experiments
6:58
plus a mysterious fellow named and
7:00
Griffin you may have heard of.
7:05
That after the break. He
7:27
their, did you know Krueger always
7:29
gives you savings? And
7:33
when you download the Kroger app, you'll enjoy
7:36
over $500 in savings every week with digital
7:38
coupons. And don't forget FuelPoints to help you
7:40
save up to $1 per gallon at the
7:43
pump. Want to save even more?
7:45
With a Boost membership, you'll get double FuelPoints
7:47
and free delivery! So shop and save big at
7:49
Kroger today. Kroger, fresh for
7:51
everyone. Savings may vary by state. Restrictions
7:53
apply. See site for details. Purchase
7:58
new wiper blades from O'Reilly Auto Parts
8:00
today and we'll install them for free.
8:02
See better and drive safer with O'Reilly
8:04
Auto Parts. Oh, oh,
8:07
oh, O'Reilly Auto
8:10
Parts. Hey
8:12
there. Did you know Kroger always gives
8:14
you savings and rewards on top of
8:16
our lower than low prices? Doctor
8:20
Cindy can dress and experimental. Research lab
8:23
at Vanderbilt for work. focuses on political
8:25
psychology and public opinion. Wings see drives
8:27
past the odd yard sign the way
8:30
a geologist my pick up an unusual
8:32
conglomerate rock before doctors him started studying
8:34
art science says he wondered about them
8:36
in very much the same way. or
8:39
us or Sarah had. As
8:43
a typical American in L,
8:45
I thought yard signs pop
8:47
up around election time. Yeah,
8:50
I was pregnant with my
8:52
son's in two thousand and
8:54
ten and there was a
8:56
very noisy election happening in
8:58
my area. Between the. Candidates
9:02
whose last name was Henry
9:04
and he had signs everywhere.
9:06
Everyone knew that Henry was
9:09
running for election. And. There
9:11
was sort of a no name Salazar
9:13
to was trying to unseat Henry. Well
9:15
Henry one. Now he was it. In
9:18
some bet he had tons assigns. The
9:20
a couple months later I gave birth
9:22
to my son and his name was
9:25
Century. Did. Was
9:27
did the yard signs beam your sun. Sets
9:30
I think is one of these
9:32
things where you start to see
9:34
a name and it becomes more
9:36
familiar to you. It is more
9:38
pleasant and he a test or
9:40
liking it. So I just
9:42
like what I hear you saying is
9:45
the theory of the Yard Sign his
9:47
name or suspicion? Correct. So
9:51
the psychological process as called
9:53
perceptual fluency for substances. You
9:55
know the first time you
9:57
hear a song that he
9:59
thing. A lot of a good
10:01
fan and. Then. You hear it again and
10:03
you hear it again and it becomes
10:06
much easier for you to listen to
10:08
it via perceptual fluency. means that the
10:10
more you're exposed to something, the more
10:13
familiar it becomes. And before you have
10:15
a net, you like it. Talking.
10:18
To doctors and become a nurse. How
10:20
essential he says. A student of the
10:22
lease, rational parts her mines. The.
10:25
Birds we might call our gut instinct
10:27
but which are usually really as possible
10:29
said ourselves. To. Believe we know
10:31
something. we don't actually know it all. I.
10:34
Was curious how she figured out a
10:37
method for studying this particular question. You.
10:39
Can't run the same? Listen twice: You're not going
10:42
to been some city councilor to not use yard
10:44
signs so that you can learn a little bit
10:46
more about the world. There.
10:48
Will be a concrete answer to this
10:50
yard signs question, but before that, I
10:53
just appreciate the process of getting their
10:55
how doctor. Cheerfully. Methodically
10:57
devices ways to measure
10:59
human irrationality. Well
11:02
that's one of the fun about
11:04
being a political scientist is that
11:06
we get to think creatively as
11:09
that ways to get at our
11:11
questions in multiple ways to their
11:13
hearts. And some political scientists who
11:16
has collaborated with campaigns and decided
11:18
to randomly closed. Yard.
11:20
Signs in one district versus another
11:23
for example, or in one neighborhood
11:25
versus another, and they are able
11:28
to then estimate how effective that
11:30
yard soon as. That
11:32
is a be a presley
11:34
tet now. My colleague live set
11:37
Nicer and I are political
11:39
psychologists so given we wanted to
11:41
study the psychological processes. We
11:44
went to our laboratory. Is
11:49
one in the lab. So
11:52
the background for our study
11:54
comes from the psychological tradition.
11:56
There are these really interesting
11:58
psychological studies that has so
12:00
for example that. His.
12:03
Research subjects are asked to read
12:05
a random list of names on
12:07
one day. Then
12:10
they come back the next day. And
12:12
they are asked to look at
12:14
a bunch of different names Analysts
12:17
They decide that the ones that.
12:19
Seem kind of the million to them.
12:22
Must be famous. Said. That
12:24
called the fall semester so
12:26
we have the sense that
12:28
you know being exposed to
12:31
things right and downs of
12:33
subsequent to scissors. Okay, the
12:35
counter or brother sort of like the
12:37
argument against this idea would be. If
12:40
I believe as a totally rational, fully informed
12:42
person was I, I know that they can
12:44
be either that or Juri. But if I
12:46
were. The idea that
12:48
a politician as well known would not
12:50
be reasonable for them because when my
12:52
rational mind the tell his debut on
12:54
on for anything. most politicians at least
12:56
on a local level are well known
12:58
like it shouldn't matter where you're testing
13:01
other does. Guess so
13:03
in an idealized democracy citizens
13:05
are all now and developed
13:07
as much time as they
13:10
can to been coming fully
13:12
informed or when it comes
13:14
time to vote one they
13:17
turn out and to they
13:19
cast slowly informed that that
13:21
are consistent say with underlying
13:24
value or policy preferences. So
13:26
that says he's hoping we did not
13:28
live in a live on an idealized
13:30
Mcafee. You're measuring what we have and
13:32
what do you what? what happens. So.
13:35
Instead of imagining you know this
13:37
paradise. We. Want to know
13:39
in the real world what happens. But. Before
13:41
we get to the real world, we want to Now.
13:44
In. The Laboratory can we capture
13:46
a psychological. Processes. The
13:49
funny thing about our said he is that we
13:52
exposed people to names. That we
13:54
did it subliminally. How do you do that?
13:56
Our research subjects are seated in front
13:58
of a computer. Hey
14:01
I told you will see some
14:03
words or it matters Flash and
14:05
son of you. Ignore those. This
14:07
is as part of the Fall.
14:11
So they're off to just
14:13
watch the screen for about
14:15
thirty seconds. Instead that
14:17
thirty seconds, they are randomly
14:19
assigned to receive a nonsensical
14:21
set of letters. Or.
14:25
Alone. Food. So.
14:27
Our candidates name is Ben Griffin. We
14:29
selected this name because we wanted a
14:31
name that would not be so unusual
14:33
that people would notice that with afford
14:35
this sort of a name that seems
14:37
reasonably common. Yeah. So
14:39
in the experiment are we: For subjects
14:42
who are randomly assigned to receive the
14:44
name. They're sitting there, they're looking at
14:46
a screen and Griffin is popping up
14:49
hidden amongst a bunch of other letters
14:51
strings so that it is not visible
14:53
to you know, someone who is just
14:55
looking at the screen. It's presented subliminally
14:58
in my for a second. This. Year
15:01
later. We ask them
15:03
where political psychologists were interested.
15:05
Election: So imagine there's a
15:07
hypothetical lox and between two
15:09
candidates. There's. One candidate. Mike
15:11
Williams and other sort of this kind
15:13
of com and name. Yeah. And then
15:16
there's another candidate. His name is Ben
15:18
Garrison. Would you be willing to vote
15:20
for this candidate or the other candidates?
15:22
Have you given them any other information?
15:25
These hypothetical candidates know. In this
15:27
baseline experiment, we give them no
15:29
information and so the fully rational
15:31
person would say. I have no
15:33
idea. I have no information
15:35
and I'll flip a coin in
15:37
a we're not doing a decently rational
15:40
people So we signed a ten percentage
15:42
point increase and willingness to vote
15:44
for Ben Griffin. Him percentage
15:46
point. Correct. Intersect
15:48
and that would hold for that's a
15:51
real effect. You get ten for says
15:53
with off of I've heard the same
15:55
before. That's. Correct and people don't
15:57
know that they've heard it before. Because
16:00
it's subliminally exposed. To
16:02
they're not say themselves out this is a bank of
16:04
and who I liked or disliked. I just have a
16:06
feeling and I can explain it. That's craft.
16:09
Yes, So we have the
16:11
ceilings and a duck flying at
16:14
that. Yeah, out his name is
16:16
kind of familiar. Elena Worth hundred.
16:18
and yeah, I guess the line
16:21
of us had this guy. so
16:23
that's what we found in our
16:25
first experiment was that subliminally priming
16:28
a set of our respondents with
16:30
the last name Griffin increase their
16:32
willingness to support then Griffin and
16:35
we did follow up questions asking.
16:38
People. To distinguish between
16:40
the two candidates on
16:42
their traits spare experience,
16:45
And. Their viability. Have you given
16:47
that any information about the reasons. Given them
16:49
no information without. A.
16:55
License Ham and her colleagues asked
16:57
voters powered questions about Ben Griffin's
16:59
trades for the trades and has
17:01
made up competitors. Did better than
17:03
see more empathetic, did bends of
17:05
and see more experience. Voters.
17:08
Did not say Ben was more
17:10
experience or more empathetic to just
17:12
seemed for some reason with a
17:15
more viable candidate. Touch.
17:17
With him said, there are limits
17:19
of course to the benefits of
17:21
name recognition. Comptrollers had Bundy sentence
17:23
is unlikely to sweep. And
17:26
there are other effects They can overpower
17:28
name recognition. For. Instance doctors,
17:30
hims team rent other studies and
17:32
which voters were given more information
17:34
about these other faiths Candidates: In
17:37
these studies they were told that the
17:39
candidate namely westernized was now running against
17:41
and incumbent. A person using the didn't
17:43
know but who they were told was
17:45
already in power. In
17:47
these studies, the name recognition advantage
17:49
to the way. It
17:52
felt like the team now understood the power
17:54
and the limits of this name recognition of
17:56
fact. And the strength of a yard
17:58
sign. At least in a lab.
18:01
Now. They're ready to move onto the next
18:03
phase. Days
18:09
you. Out in the real world. Sell
18:12
Our first three studies are
18:15
the is very clean laboratory
18:17
studies with undergraduates and from
18:20
and academics standpoint. they have
18:22
high causal leverage. We can
18:25
really say that exposing people
18:27
to these subliminal primes. A
18:30
sex the road Choice or in the
18:32
case of states and three does not
18:34
affect their vote choice because they are
18:36
relying on the incumbent kids. The Up:
18:39
But the follow up question is does that
18:41
make a difference in the real world. right?
18:45
So. How do you has that? We.
18:48
Came up with a design
18:50
that exploits natural variation in
18:53
the real world among parents
18:55
who are dropping their kids
18:57
off. For. School. So what do you me was that.
19:00
There is a local
19:02
school where half of
19:04
the parents are randomly
19:06
assigned to enter the
19:08
school using say streets.
19:10
Egg. And then the
19:13
other half of this parents are
19:15
told to use. Street and beat.
19:17
oh this is just as a school
19:19
as end up with like a huge
19:21
clustered not correct oh but you can
19:23
I see they're targeting says he means
19:25
you can play yard signs on one
19:27
of these two approaches. That's right.
19:29
So we took advantage of
19:31
a schools this isn't to
19:33
manage traffic using one pass
19:35
versus another pass. Producer and of
19:38
the as a more aggressive it's a to fight
19:40
with the school was a just like someone who
19:42
was due to say you're like by the way
19:44
they have to do this for my kids Anyway
19:46
yes. I have
19:48
a very smart. Said
19:50
this is one of these days where
19:52
it's helpful to be in the real
19:55
world and be thinking about oh how
19:57
do we actually do this in the
19:59
real world And what are the ways
20:01
than one the people are assigned to
20:04
tag particular pass life them? So weird.
20:06
Why did this natural variation and we
20:08
places three yard signs for Ben Griffin
20:10
in front of a homes that happen
20:12
to be alone. One of the to.
20:15
Browse via the three times.
20:17
Stayed there for three days.
20:20
the we. Took them off
20:22
and then we launched a survey
20:24
and we included a key question
20:26
on our survey which asked the
20:28
parents which route and took to
20:30
school. And then the
20:32
included or own questions which were.
20:36
Coming City Council this.
20:39
Said the upcoming city council race
20:41
was a complicated one where I
20:43
believe they were. Eight
20:45
candidates on the ballot. We
20:48
included two additional one on
20:50
the list in our search.
20:52
Least said. here are the
20:55
candidates running for election in
20:57
the city council and then
21:00
we had our to name.
21:02
Him that. And
21:08
I'm assuming one was named Bromyard side and
21:10
what is a totally made up named it's
21:12
also for the road Bit of a one
21:14
wasn't yard signs correct. Cel. Ben.
21:17
Greyson and know sanctions. Were
21:19
inserted in the lists of
21:22
city council candidates. Spenders.
21:24
And as the person or the
21:26
name for whom we posted the
21:29
signs, notes and Kansas considered the
21:31
placebo name, we're another sickening. So.
21:36
We asked the parents in
21:38
upcoming this for city council
21:40
to are your top three
21:43
choices for city council. And
21:46
what it is that it turns. Out
21:48
that than good sense. Received
21:50
a fair offer up on
21:52
Us ally but increase among.
21:54
Those who are assigned
21:57
to take that travel
21:59
that. Go to the very
22:01
flirty effect even in the real
22:03
world. Correct ten percentage points. Ten
22:10
percentage points. Which means arrows know
22:12
Sarah from Saddam was back door
22:14
to her. Signs apply neighbor pick
22:16
up a plastic piece of junk
22:18
dammit in the soil of her
22:20
yard and assuming enough of her
22:22
friends to the same thing and
22:25
assuming it's a relatively low information
22:27
kind of election they might reasonably
22:29
hope. That is where the outcome
22:31
at Ten Percentage Points I'm sorry.
22:33
that is a strange reality to
22:35
be forced to consider. After
22:39
the break, how exactly should we
22:41
feel about that Doctor Camps interpretation?
22:44
Not at all. But
22:47
as I've. Said.
23:32
So I once knew thing I usually want
23:34
to know when I went from things: if
23:36
yard signs are powerful enough to have a
23:38
ten percentage point about how my supposed to
23:41
feel than that. I
23:44
know we don't live in a utopia
23:46
and I know that Visitors or Ben
23:48
Griffin is not the world's best city
23:50
councilor. Like the world doesn't end tomorrow.
23:52
But there's also a part of me
23:54
that is slightly. Freaked
23:57
out by the as i guess like a house with the
23:59
film. A political. Scientist
24:01
I think assassinate. Suffer
24:03
for and put it out as as it
24:05
as much. As. Well
24:08
as a citizen as in a democracy
24:11
I will say when as we have
24:13
idealize no sense of what citizens are
24:15
to do and the second as do
24:17
we wanna know the truth to the
24:20
been on a know empirically that is
24:22
how do people actually make this isn't.
24:24
Yeah any. Apps and ah of
24:27
controlling other and from a some
24:29
people do rely on no mechanism.
24:39
Some. Names over others. And
24:42
that's not something that we
24:44
do because in our studies,
24:46
we experimentally manipulate that exists.
24:51
In. The real world had some candidates
24:53
had their names out there right for
24:56
whatever reasons, that as they're doing more
24:58
to raise money, they're doing more to
25:00
reach out to candidates, they're doing more
25:02
to be out on. The Media says
25:05
it's possible that name recognition ten the
25:07
efficient and a secessionist death in the
25:09
absence of all information because As or
25:12
candidates who are very invested in the
25:14
race and who are doing their best
25:16
to get their names out there. Yeah.
25:19
I will also say though, that
25:21
there are. Yell ways that
25:23
people can learn about candidates. And
25:26
if they learn more information
25:28
about candidates, The name
25:30
or he missed some really doesn't matter. And and
25:33
when you see there are ways that people
25:35
can learn more, I assume you mean make
25:37
either they can read journalism, big wants to
25:39
babes and that in. Say
25:41
a presidential election. There's
25:44
so much information. Whether the
25:46
emergence you get bad accurate
25:48
not, you were directly making
25:50
more informed decisions. In a
25:53
license to get more attention and coverage.
25:55
Correct. My. Son's here
25:57
is that name recognition matters on the.
26:00
Margins in the absence
26:02
as. Other sources of
26:04
information. That also scissors
26:06
people are not choosing
26:08
randomly. Oh maybe that's
26:10
a minimal concerts there has a
26:13
set of the guy does about
26:15
do than simply flipping coins. People
26:17
are using their debts and some
26:19
of these guys are may be
26:21
informed by real behaviors by the
26:23
candidates and the media. Have
26:25
you seen? I mean your work has
26:27
been published. Have you seen? Political.
26:31
Campaigns own eyes were weaponize,
26:34
but. They. Have
26:36
you seen people use that the findings from
26:38
your work in the real world and awaited
26:40
either win or nebulae a license. Know
26:42
I have not. It is a few
26:44
rows like oh. If. I found a
26:46
frenzy enough election and just really
26:48
really when hard with yard signs.
26:51
It's not impossible to imagine wedding or.
26:54
Increasing. The odds. Yes, so
26:56
there is a little an
26:58
that I've heard of that
27:00
have not their aside the
27:02
athletes as in a small
27:04
northeastern town. A.
27:07
A young man decided he was
27:10
going to run. I believe it
27:12
was for something like city council.
27:15
He was interested in politics. that
27:17
either, as a sort of twenty
27:19
something, had not really have had
27:22
much experience and politics. But
27:24
his uncle was a sign maker and it
27:26
turns out he won the a Lesson. Obviously.
27:30
The search engine team, never one
27:32
to miss an opportunity to overeat
27:34
or something, tried to fact check
27:36
this fun, possibly apocryphal story. We.
27:39
Weren't able to confirm it with did results.
27:41
The politician that Cindy had heard this rumor
27:43
about, They did. I get back to us.
27:46
Perhaps. It was true and didn't want
27:48
to talk about it. Perhaps it was untrue
27:50
and they thought we were drains. Regardless,
27:53
I had gone into this interview expecting
27:56
honestly to learn that yard signs didn't
27:58
really work or rarely worse. I
28:00
still didn't know what to make a
28:03
the fact that according to Doctor Cindy
28:05
Cancer Research they have a measurable and
28:07
consistent sacked. How. Does your work
28:09
make you feel personally just about. Democracy.
28:14
And pausing because that's a really
28:16
interesting question. As empirical social scientists,
28:18
we don't really think about how
28:21
we feel about democracy. We just
28:23
want to explore how it works.
28:25
Yeah. I. Would say. It's
28:28
a healthy step forward for the
28:30
sealed not to be hung up
28:32
on idealized for sense of what
28:34
would happen. Any to tell the
28:36
yeah, but rather to think about
28:39
how ordinary people make decisions in
28:41
the context of their realize. right?
28:44
So. It's like. I mean square
28:46
I feel about democracy as. I
28:48
really like it. I really worry about it. And
28:50
it sounds like one reason that you
28:53
do the work you do is because
28:55
you're underlying belief is. If
28:57
we understand how this actually works, cited and
28:59
how it would work in a perfect world,
29:01
we decide how we feel about that. We
29:03
seem to decided for now that actually there
29:05
are elections were okay. If it's seven percentage
29:07
of the decision of who ends up in
29:09
our is just like. Yard.
29:11
Sides and because And but we could change that if
29:14
we wanted to. But we couldn't change it unless we
29:16
understood that was what was going on. He
29:18
I agree that that I think that
29:20
and. With helpless to know.
29:23
How. Did people make decisions and
29:25
then what? Or maybe some interventions
29:27
that could be made to improve
29:29
the quality of their decision making?
29:33
One. Possibility is to think about
29:36
these elections for people don't have
29:38
a lot of information and to
29:40
think plan. Is there a way
29:42
that we can provide them with
29:44
more information or to said we
29:46
reduce the burden on citizens. And.
29:49
Hadn't some of these businesses be
29:51
appointed said by people who are
29:53
elected? When voters actually do pay
29:55
attention. Oh interesting, so that
29:58
you could have a world where. Rather,
30:01
Than voting for. The.
30:03
Dog Catcher yeah maybe the dog
30:05
catcher does not have to the
30:07
someone who is on a ballot
30:10
rights one of the things that
30:12
that American electoral. Decisions.
30:14
Is that one? Whereas.
30:16
To do them a lot and
30:19
to the ballots are extremely long.
30:21
Yeah, and this is a unique
30:23
and different from the Clinton said
30:25
the rest of the world. still.
30:27
On the one hand, more democracy
30:29
seems like it's better having more
30:32
choices and more Absence yes is
30:34
more democratic. On the other hand,
30:36
there is a burden of decision
30:38
making of choice right? and sometimes
30:40
people get overwhelmed with having too
30:42
many. Choices. His interview. You're describing
30:44
a world where there's a paradox. Were him?
30:47
If you have a super abundance
30:49
of democratic choices, eventually the world
30:51
becomes less. Democratic. In
30:53
a sense of. You. Overwhelm people and
30:55
they either don't shoes are they
30:58
to somewhat randomly and the system
31:00
becomes very. Imperfect.
31:03
Yes, it is psychological phenomenon as well.
31:06
call the paradox of choice. For.
31:08
Having too much choice can be
31:10
this has signed to people can
31:12
make them adverse to Tuesday. but
31:15
on the other hand, having choice
31:17
is so classically democratic. Yeah so
31:19
it it is a real conundrum.
31:23
There's this concept of like some the
31:25
low information voters you know the person
31:27
who is I like to an obsessive
31:29
happy attention. I know that. People
31:32
who do political science use that term
31:34
descriptive late. in the world of journalism,
31:36
I suppose you're journalists use that term
31:38
pejoratively of like what What surprises me
31:41
about the way you talk about it
31:43
is that I think often. The.
31:45
Implied solution is. Everyone
31:47
just need to be a better democratic
31:49
citizen. You know people, people should spend
31:51
more time, worry about their club, whatever
31:53
and I feel like what I hear
31:56
you using your work is lake shore.
31:58
That's one way to do it for
32:00
the Rio the as it's not what
32:02
is always are often happenings and perhaps.
32:04
We might consider. Fixing
32:07
this by looking at the system are
32:09
presenting people rather than expecting human nature
32:11
to suddenly change. Yes, I
32:13
think one of the. Ways. That
32:15
we can approach. That. Are decision
32:18
making is tough to try to rehabilitate
32:20
the voter. Hurt. Or
32:22
to try to create setser that
32:24
work with food. A voter is.
32:26
I me so. One other ways to think
32:28
about this also as we encourage people to
32:31
turn out to vote that we should also
32:33
be encouraging them when they do turn out
32:35
to vote to think that you know what
32:37
are the races said I want to vote
32:39
for and it's a totally some blankets they
32:41
don't have an opinion. Myself
32:51
thinking about some his observation in
32:53
a not settled way for a
32:55
while after this conversation in America
32:57
democracies both are system of government
33:00
and an affirmative value. something all
33:02
of us minus I guess if
33:04
you pro monarchy people on subside
33:07
publicly agree is good and I
33:09
do too. So I've never asked
33:11
what's the right amount democracy or
33:14
is there an amount of democracy
33:16
and which things become the last
33:18
democratic where the wisdom. Of
33:20
the crowd becomes decreasingly ways
33:23
yards per se. A
33:25
concept I expect I'll sit with for awhile. And
33:29
a businessperson why do you think
33:31
is that the Lizard road and
33:33
he was describing how and her
33:35
family is yards eyes were provoking
33:38
wage I financial that way waiting
33:40
for sending. Somebody
33:42
victory be like i don't know there's even
33:44
appointed as and I'm mad about it that
33:47
say our politics as. A
33:50
That's a good episode. of
33:54
they users for. Tigers. Are this my
33:56
pleasure? Professor
34:03
Researcher and William are keen in junior
34:05
to your. Your
34:44
children is a presentation of Odyssey and
34:46
takes up residence. We have a premium
34:49
version of our show called entirely either
34:51
mode. If you've already subscribe, thank you
34:53
so much You are helping keep the
34:55
thing running. If you'd like to sign
34:57
up or just learn about that many
35:00
benefits and tiny amount, you've learned more
35:02
a search engine.show this week or new.
35:04
A subscriber is Pablo from Stockholm. Thank
35:06
you Pablo from Zoc. Had never been
35:08
this Autumn. I am a huge had.
35:12
To show was created by me to devote. And
35:14
received Money and as Priests by
35:16
Garrett Graham and Know John Succession
35:18
by Mary Mathis Team original composition
35:21
and mixing by I'm In Bizarre
35:23
In Or Executive producers are Generates
35:25
Berman and the A Recent and
35:27
s thanks to the team It's
35:29
exotic, our give with Grow and
35:31
John Smith and to the team
35:33
at Odyssey City Crowley Brom Randy
35:35
said Cox Air Donnelly, Kids Hutchison
35:38
that casey more at home just
35:40
venus as as could colony and
35:42
hurry Sauce or agent is Purim
35:44
Rosenbaum. A Gtx. Follow and listen
35:46
to search engines. Peter vote on the
35:48
Odyssey up or rather get your process
35:50
does it for this week. Thank you
35:53
for listening to See an Exit.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More