Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Welcome to the Sense-making in a Changing World Podcast, where we explore the kind of thinking we need to navigate a positive way forward. I’m your host Morag Gamble.. Permaculture Educator, and Global Ambassador, Filmmaker, Eco villager, Food Forester, Mother, Practivist and all around lover of thinking, communicating and acting regeneratively. For a long time it's been clear to me that to shift trajectory to a thriving one planet way of life we first need to shift our thinking, the way we perceive ourselves in relation to nature, self, and community is the core. So this is true now more than ever. And even the way change is changing, is changing. Unprecedented changes are happening all around us at a rapid pace. So how do we make sense of this? To know which way to turn, to know what action to focus on? So our efforts are worthwile and nourishing and are working towards resilience, regeneration, and reconnection. What better way to make sense than to join together with others in open generative conversation. In
0:56
this podcast, I'll share conversations with my friends and colleagues, people who inspire and challenge me in their ways of thinking, connecting and acting. These wonderful people thinkers, doers, activists, scholars, writers, leaders, farmers, educators, people whose work informs permaculture and spark the imagination of what a post-COVID, climate-resilient, socially just future could look like. Their ideas and projects help us to make sense in this changing world to compost and digest the ideas and to nurture the fertile ground for new ideas, connections and actions. Together we'll open up conversations in the world of permaculture design, regenerative thinking community action, earth, repair, eco-literacy, and much more. I can't wait to share these conversations with you. Over
1:54
the last three decades of personally making sense of the multiple crises we face I always returned to the practical and positive world of permaculture with its ethics of earth care, people care and fair share. I've seen firsthand how adaptable and responsive it can be in all contexts from urban to rural, from refugee camps to suburbs. It helps people make sense of what's happening around them and to learn accessible design tools, to shape their habitat positively and to contribute to cultural and ecological regeneration. This is why I've created the Permaculture Educators Program to help thousands of people to become permaculture teachers everywhere through an interactive online dual certificate of permaculture design and teaching. We sponsor global Permayouth programs, women's self help groups in the global South and teens in refugee camps. So anyway, this podcast is sponsored by the Permaculture Education Institute and our Permaculture Educators Program. If you'd like to find more about permaculture, I've created a four-part permaculture video series to explain what permaculture is and also how you can make it your livelihood as well as your way of life. We'd love to invite you to join our wonderfully inspiring, friendly and supportive global learning community. So I welcome you to share each of these conversations, and I'd also like to suggest you create a local conversation circle to explore the ideas shared in each show and discuss together how this makes sense in your local community and environment. I'd like to acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land on which I meet and speak with you today.. The Gubbi Gubbi people and pay my respects to their elders past, present and emerging. So
3:28
thanks so much for joining me this morning,
3:30
Amanda. It's absolutely wonderful. And
3:32
I'd like to introduce Amanda to all of you who are watching
3:34
this because Amanda has been a longtime friend
3:37
of mine, but most extraordinary woman who
3:39
has inspired me so much with the work
3:41
that she does. So I just tell you a little bit
3:43
about her first. So Amanda is
3:45
the executive director of
3:47
the Next Economy, and she'll be telling
3:50
us all about that. Um, she,
3:52
she was also the founder of , um,
3:55
The Center for Social Change. She's
3:57
a Churchill fellow. Um,
3:59
she's an Associate of the Sydney
4:01
Policy Lab and or UQ , she
4:04
, um, advised , uh,
4:07
Damon Gameau on the 2040
4:09
movie and was featured in that too. Um,
4:12
her work has taken her to many places
4:15
around the world , uh , and worked with , uh,
4:17
communities in so many
4:20
different contexts and that's really part of the
4:22
core of your work. Isn't it? Actually looking at
4:24
what is change , how change happens,
4:27
how we can transition to a
4:29
society into a way of living that
4:31
is actually going to be , uh , supporting
4:34
wellbeing of people on the planet is essentially
4:36
what I understand your work to do. But so
4:38
maybe we could start there really about
4:40
what is the Next Economy and what
4:43
is the kind of work that you do that the
4:45
Next Economy?
4:46
Yeah, we do lots of different things. So it's
4:49
sometimes a bit hard to, even for
4:51
me to get my head around, but basically what
4:53
we're trying to do is work with
4:55
governments and business and communities
4:58
, um, around that question
5:00
of how do we transition to an economy that works
5:02
for both people and planet. So
5:05
I guess we're a bit different to a lot of organizations
5:08
around at the moment because there's kind of this acceptance
5:11
of particularly now since the Coronavirus
5:14
hit and the economy does need to change. It's not
5:16
working for a lot of people. Um,
5:19
and a lot of organizations focus on trying to build
5:21
that power build a movement around
5:24
the need to change, to convince leaders that
5:26
we need to change. We kind of come in at
5:28
a different angle around , um,
5:30
working with people when they,
5:33
they kind of realize that they changed , but they don't
5:35
know where to go. So we're kind
5:37
of not focused on trying to convince people we need to change.
5:39
We're focused on helping
5:41
people navigate that , that change no matter
5:43
where they're at. So where's the opening
5:45
where people are ready and then how do we help
5:48
them access the knowledge, resources
5:50
, um , skills or other
5:52
people that they need to actually like
5:55
a step in the right direction.
5:57
So, so you've worked a lot
5:59
in this world of
6:02
transition. So what,
6:04
what do we mean by transition? What is the,
6:06
what, what are we transitioning
6:09
from and where is it that we're actually
6:11
looking to transition to ? I
6:13
know that's a very broad, big question,
6:15
but I think it's a key
6:18
thing at the moment, isn't it that, you know , change is
6:20
happening and transition is happening
6:22
in and around us. And how do we shape that,
6:25
that type of transition that we, that
6:27
we really would like to see in the world. So in
6:29
your mind, the kind of work that you're doing, what, what
6:31
is transition and how can you,
6:35
how can you support people to transition
6:40
in the ways that they would like to see that happen?
6:41
I guess,
6:44
yeah, I use transition as a shorthand
6:46
, because actually we're always in transition, there's
6:48
never a stage where we're
6:50
standing still, we're always moving. Things
6:53
are always changing and it's not linear either. I think
6:55
often we think we're transitioning from,
6:57
you know , um , often we'll talk about transitioning
7:00
from the need from , uh , an economy that's
7:02
based on extraction of value , um,
7:05
from people, the planet or the land or the
7:07
water resources , um , for profit
7:10
to something that is about investing or
7:12
regenerating , um, land, water,
7:14
and people in communities, but
7:17
change doesn't actually happen that way. There's kind of openings
7:19
where things there's a crack that appears
7:22
and whether or not that gets
7:24
papered over and we try and keep going with the status quo
7:27
or whether that crack appears. And something goes
7:29
through that crack is kind
7:31
of that question. So I don't think, u m, I
7:34
guess I u se the word transition, but
7:36
really it's about how do we
7:38
find our way through change? So
7:41
probably the analogy
7:43
that we're using i n the next economy is the
7:45
difference between say navigating
7:48
using a map versus wayfinding,
7:50
which is sort of the ancient art,
7:52
or, u m, e ither navigating by the stars
7:55
o r like s eafarers used to use or indigenous
7:58
p eople still use today where you kind of look
8:00
for signs, u m, in nature
8:02
or science actually w
8:04
ill say go this way. Not
8:06
knowing necessarily where the end destination
8:09
is, but having an idea of where you want to end up.
8:11
So being guided by those principles around,
8:14
u m, that we need to, we need to move to a
8:16
system that is regenerating the planet
8:19
a nd people, u m, that
8:21
is more just, that means that an
8:23
equitable that people have access to what
8:25
they need, not just to survive, but
8:27
to thrive in the world. So what does that look
8:29
like? We need to act on climate change.
8:31
So how c an we reduce? So these are
8:33
the kinds of principles and things t hat we
8:35
want to see in the economy that we're trying
8:37
to build, accepting that it's never
8:40
going to be this direct when you pass to get this.
8:42
So it's meeting people
8:44
where they're at and then going, okay, if we want to head to
8:46
this direction, what's the next
8:48
step based on where you're at. Cause it's g
8:50
onna look very different for a m
8:52
inister or government department to a local community group.
8:55
Um, they're very different. The
8:58
work looks different, but actually the support
9:01
around them and h elping them take that step is very similar.
9:04
Just as you're speaking
9:07
and the type of change
9:09
or the type.. The way in which you're
9:11
working with communities is completely different
9:13
and it's old and it's
9:16
new at the same time. So what is, what , where
9:18
did the inspiration for you come
9:20
from? I mean, obviously you've worked in this field for
9:22
decades and where do the old different
9:24
sorts of communities from all different kinds of backgrounds?
9:28
Where do you feel like sort
9:30
of, kind of the roots of this, this way
9:33
that you're working with is coming from?
9:34
Yeah, probably
9:36
, um , so many places,
9:39
but I think , um, from
9:42
a really personal level, I actually
9:44
went to a one teacher school. So I grew up in the bush
9:47
and at the one teacher a school you don't have
9:49
access to a teacher who's like stepping you through things
9:51
all the time. So often we were given kind
9:54
of a lesson plan or a sort
9:56
of a workbook to work through. And
9:58
if you got to finish that your work
10:00
quickly, you could actually help other people. I
10:02
had three or four other people in my grade.
10:04
You could help them with that activity or
10:07
you can go and help the other grades, the younger grades with
10:09
their reading and writing. And I learned at a very young age
10:11
that you couldn't just tell someone what to do.
10:14
You had to figure out where they were at
10:16
and how they were thinking about that,
10:18
and then start with where they're
10:21
at and then introduce something new , help them to play
10:23
with that and experiment take the next step. So
10:25
I think I've worked out that that's kind of where
10:28
it probably first came from, but
10:30
then that was strengthened through
10:32
work I was doing , um, I
10:35
went to Brazil when I was 17 and started
10:37
working with a women's group there. And there were the women
10:39
who were in the poorest section of the town, helping
10:41
themselves. They went , Oh , we're just
10:43
pulling together the resources that they had to
10:45
actually meet needs of their neighbors. They weren't
10:47
waiting for someone to come and save them that were just
10:50
doing that. And I turned up and
10:52
, um , just wanted to do something
10:54
, um, because
10:57
I've walked down the street one day and just sort
10:59
of just
11:02
couldn't handle it anymore sort
11:04
of very idealistic 17 year old, burst into
11:06
tears and walked into the nearest
11:08
church and said, you guys are going to be doing something about
11:10
this work . What can I do? And
11:13
the priest pointed me to church up the
11:15
road that had women's group. And I
11:17
turned up and they were like, well, what can you do?
11:21
And one of the things that they did was a sewing group.
11:24
I went, well, I know how to sew . And they're like, great, here's a
11:26
sewing machine. We need 130
11:28
nappies. I was like, okay, it's
11:32
that kind of, I guess it's a more feminine
11:34
approach to just work with what you've got
11:36
and more of an emergent kind of way
11:38
of problem-solving. Um,
11:40
and that was reiterated again, when I worked with Aboriginal
11:43
people and Aboriginal health in Australia,
11:46
about 2001 , again,
11:48
it was people saying you're an outsider. You're never going to
11:50
understand that culture. Don't think that you can never tell
11:52
us what to do. And I was like very
11:54
young at the time. So they're like, you know, it's,
11:57
you do not speak. You
11:59
sit listen and we'll tell you what we need.
12:02
So it's those processes of working with
12:04
amazing leaders and a lot of different
12:06
countries actually that are saying you
12:08
have something that we need, but we're
12:10
in charge of this process. So
12:13
actually meeting that and supporting that.
12:16
Yeah. And similarly,
12:20
so the experiences I've had to kind of process
12:23
of listening first, I think is
12:25
such an important part. And,
12:27
but I know too , that emerging
12:29
from that grounding and that
12:31
understanding, you have
12:34
been exploring a lot of the ideas around,
12:37
around change and around leadership.
12:40
And so what
12:42
is the kind of leadership that we need now?
12:45
So there's, you know, there's one of actually being
12:47
, uh, you
12:50
know, being present and, and listening
12:52
and that's sort of part of engaging,
12:55
but what
12:57
type of leadership do we need in , in
12:59
our world today considering
13:02
what's going on, considering
13:05
that the kind of leadership that we're seeing in many parts
13:07
of the world is actually not taking us in the direction
13:10
that we need to go in. And yet we're seeing
13:12
other types of leadership that is really
13:14
starting to work well. What is,
13:17
what is a leader within
13:19
this frame? What is, what
13:22
is a good and
13:25
is leader the right word as well? You
13:27
know, I'm just wondering.
13:30
Right. It's definitely a need for leadership. I
13:32
think , uh , I've , it's been a long journey
13:34
for me. I think we've, we've talked about this
13:36
before. Um, I started
13:38
out as a facilitator. So my
13:40
role wasn't to my
13:43
role was to hold a space for people to figure
13:45
out what they wanted it wasn't to sort of
13:47
set the agenda and then
13:49
get people to act in a certain way to get
13:51
to a certain outcome. Although, you know,
13:53
there's a bit of a gray area with facilitation too
13:56
. Um, cause you are there for a purpose.
13:59
Um, but I've seen over time
14:01
that even
14:04
when people are willing and you see this little time
14:06
with community groups on the ground, people
14:08
can say that there's a problem. They've got
14:11
some , they want to start taking action. Um
14:13
, but they not, everyone has
14:17
the big picture vision that
14:20
it's needed that or the ability to bring lots
14:22
of people along and coordinate that
14:24
action , um, to keep
14:26
an eye on the end goal. Um,
14:28
the confidence just to
14:31
an , a presence that actually inspires people
14:33
to trust. I think so all of these things,
14:35
I think the need for
14:37
leadership is still really important, I
14:39
think we can have really good processes
14:42
that enable a lot more participation
14:44
a nd equal and democracy a nd our decision making.
14:47
But I still think there's a role for someone who pulls
14:49
that together and can
14:51
own that. And I think what now more
14:53
than ever in a time where we're
14:55
seeing around the world, very that strong m
14:57
an leadership, that kind of autocratic t
15:00
op-down follow me leadership, u
15:02
m, is a sign that people are looking for leadership
15:05
and that they are scared and that they need
15:08
someone who can kind of hold things together
15:11
to enable them to have enough [
15:13
inaudible] to be able to take a risk, to trust
15:16
enough, to take a step, to take a risk. So
15:18
that sort of leadership is more important than ever,
15:20
but we
15:22
d on't have to throw the baby out with the bath water, like
15:25
I don't think, and it's really interesting seeing how
15:27
COVID is playing out where you've got
15:30
those leaders who a re very top down and very strong.
15:33
U m, and
15:35
we're not seeing really great results in terms
15:37
of how things are playing out because people
15:39
are become paralyzed, waiting
15:42
for direction. U
15:44
m, and sometimes those calls have been great
15:47
because there's no way that any one leader
15:49
or even government can be across all of those issues.
15:52
So there's a different kind of leadership. Like
15:54
you look at, u m, people like Jacinda
15:58
d one in New Zealand where
16:01
right from the beginning, she s pelt out
16:03
the problem. And then she
16:05
explained to people that there were stages
16:07
around how they were going to manage it. And
16:09
she gave people t he information u p f ront saying
16:12
there are, I t hink, four stages to this response.
16:14
We're starting here. Once we see these
16:17
kinds of things, we'll w rap it up and we need your
16:19
cooperation with this. It's only g oing t o work with
16:21
you. So there was an invitation in, there
16:24
was trust of the people to give them
16:26
information so that they can make decisions
16:29
for themselves. And it was enrolling
16:31
their confidence. It was saying, are you going to work with
16:33
us to make this happen? Because you are part
16:35
of a whole, and i t's, it's a
16:37
very different kind of leadership model. Even
16:39
within the climate movement. I noticed t here's like a lot
16:41
of campaigning organizations are f
16:44
eel the pressure to come up with the answer,
16:46
the campaign we're going to push for this
16:48
one thing. We're going to build power around
16:50
it and make this happen. U
16:52
m, and that's important a
16:54
nd i t's, it can happen very, especially when things
16:56
need to have a very quickly, but at
16:58
the same time, I think we m issed an opportunity
17:01
where there might be opportunities for real transformative
17:03
change by actually
17:06
going okay, h ere a re some principles that
17:08
we can work behind. Here's the vision that we
17:10
all agree that we're working together, e
17:12
ngage people around that conversation a bout what they want,
17:15
which enables people to then go out and start
17:17
taking action in concert.
17:19
So it's more like an orchestra, like people are
17:21
doing different things, people playing with different instruments.
17:24
But if you look at the whole, they're creating beautiful
17:26
music because it's, it's aligned with,
17:29
u m, a certain direction. And in that case, the
17:31
leadership is more like a conductor of an orchestra.
17:33
It's a very important role. U
17:36
m, but i t's, they're not there to
17:38
tell each instrument each musician
17:40
how to play the instrument.
17:42
And I think you touched on a
17:44
really important point, right? At the beginning of , of
17:46
how you describing that too , was about
17:49
taking the fear out of it. And , and
17:52
that, you know, when you get sort of
17:54
a sense of like, Oh, I've got to wait until I'm,
17:56
you know, I know what's happening in the leadership
17:58
will tell me what's going on and it's kind
18:00
of secret and we'll find out when we need
18:02
to, whereas actually having this transparency
18:05
and having the capacity to be
18:07
part of that decision making process
18:10
and to , to actually feel uplifted
18:12
and supported and enabled and empowered
18:16
through the leadership that exists, I
18:18
think is a really amazing thing. And like
18:20
you're saying, it's when you see that happen in
18:22
community groups too. I mean, I know from , uh
18:24
, even from community garden groups that I've worked with,
18:27
when there is an engaging inclusive
18:29
process that people understand and that they're taken
18:32
along, it doesn't really, there's sort of
18:34
no real, even no real central
18:36
boss at that point, you know? And like it's really important
18:38
that there's that understanding from
18:40
a , from a group perspective about, about
18:43
how change happens in about how you
18:45
can engage in that and , and , and step
18:47
in and out if you want to not always have to be
18:50
part of it. I mean, I think there's a lot of stress
18:52
and pressure that's put on groups when they feel
18:54
like, Oh, I've got to be part of this committee. And then there's all these
18:57
rules that apply. And then, you know, it just
18:59
kind of sort of fall in on
19:01
themselves where a different type of
19:03
leadership I think is really needed in , in
19:05
all scales, from, from our governments
19:08
through to our community organizations,
19:11
whether they be formal or informal groups.
19:13
So you mentioned a few , um , principals
19:16
before. Do you want to just touch a little bit more,
19:18
what you feel those principles
19:21
of change our
19:23
leadership? Um , how are you describing those
19:25
that ..
19:25
With a
19:29
few different things in my head? So just going back to, I guess what
19:31
you were just saying then it's , um, I
19:34
guess a question around always questioning,
19:38
like who needs to be involved at
19:41
what time, for what purpose? I
19:43
think there's something, we are the go, we need
19:45
a complete flat structure, or we need a top down
19:47
kind of leadership structure, but actually
19:49
there are ways to engage people, the
19:52
right people at the right time to
19:54
the right level, because I think sometimes we go too far
19:57
with the community groups and everyone,
19:59
like you said, everyone has to be involved in every decision. Then
20:01
there's endless meetings and nothing
20:03
actually gets done. Um, and
20:05
there's a really good paper that was written, I think in
20:08
the mid 70s, by someone in the feminist
20:10
movement called the Tyranny of Structurelessness,
20:12
which is available online, which I recommend
20:15
everyone have a read off because, you
20:17
know, we're so committed to principles around democracy
20:19
and participation and equity
20:22
, um, that sometimes we
20:24
don't have the right processes set up to
20:27
enable people to do what they need to do at
20:30
the level that they want to get engaged in. Cause
20:32
particularly between that society wide change,
20:35
not everyone wants to be involved. Some people just want
20:37
to get on with it and that's fair enough. Like I
20:39
don't actually want to have
20:41
to manage all of my own
20:43
water systems and energy systems.
20:45
I want people who know what they're doing to take care
20:48
of that so I can get on and do what I do. So
20:50
I think that's a really good principle around
20:52
leadership and groups, I guess,
20:55
change. I'm thinking
20:58
about change. I think in terms
21:00
of working with people, knowing that the
21:02
nexus between leadership and change, I think about
21:04
change from a sort of stages
21:06
of change model, which I learned about
21:08
when I was doing health promotion work with
21:11
Aboriginal communities, which
21:13
is accepting that different people are on that , um
21:15
, different stages of that change cycle . Some
21:17
people , um , even
21:19
aware of the need for change.
21:22
And so the work that you do with them is about
21:24
, um, you know, raising that
21:26
awareness. Um , some people are aware
21:29
that there's a problem and things need to change. Um,
21:31
but they don't see how it's important
21:34
to them. So how do you actually get that
21:36
point where they're concerned or they can see how
21:38
it's relevant to them? That's the work that needs to be done.
21:40
And then when they get to a point going, Oh,
21:42
something needs to change. Um,
21:45
then it's what DNA to arm
21:47
them with intent . So they can actually take measures
21:51
to move in the right direction. So that's at capacity
21:53
building or resourcing stage. Then
21:55
people can go through that and then go, actually,
21:58
I'm , I'm ready to , um , not
22:01
just take action, but to lead other people, we'll bring
22:03
community together. That's a different kind of , um,
22:06
support that you need to provide people like
22:09
that. And so, and then people move around
22:11
that, that cycle of change and coming into different
22:13
parts or move backwards. So I
22:16
think that , um, that's what we're trying to do is meet
22:18
people where they're at on that cycle
22:20
and then give them the resources they need
22:22
or the knowledge they need or the core networks
22:25
that they need to actually , um,
22:27
keep moving along that cycle.
22:28
So what does that look
22:30
like when you..people work
22:33
with you? So you get invited to come and work with
22:35
, uh , with a community
22:38
and, and then what do you do?
22:40
How does, how does it actually work?
22:43
Um , well, I guess it's like, you've probably divided
22:45
up the way I can afford. So one,
22:47
the, the actual, what most people know
22:49
about what we do is we go and work in regional
22:52
areas. Um , so far we've
22:54
been going since beginning of 2018 with the
22:56
Next Economy. So most of that work has
22:58
been focused on , um,
23:01
how the energy transition and how reducing
23:03
and absorbing emissions across all sectors of
23:05
the economy can create jobs
23:08
and opportunities in regional areas. Um,
23:11
so sometimes that's a workshop , um,
23:13
that we've had have been funded by government to do,
23:16
or a local group, maybe an environment
23:18
group, or the local councils to do some
23:21
training or presentation , um,
23:24
around those aspects. So,
23:27
and sometimes that's supporting projects
23:29
on the ground. So Byron Bay, for example,
23:32
particularly there was going to zero emissions within 10
23:34
years. So we supported them on that
23:36
process, project management side of that.
23:39
Um , so this work on the ground, we do
23:41
a lot of , um, sort of more what
23:44
we're calling education. So actually
23:46
doing work to try and highlight
23:48
that we've got so many different economic
23:51
possibilities and options to build a
23:53
different kind of economy. So that's more that public
23:55
facing presentations, media webinars,
23:58
things like that. Um , increasingly
24:01
we're doing a lot of work with decision makers
24:03
within often state government whether in a movement or industry
24:08
like energy companies who
24:10
are trying to get their head around what
24:12
their options are. So we've done some policy
24:15
design work , um,
24:17
or just helping the strategy. I actual
24:19
direct advice around what
24:21
the next steps are, and we're developing a report
24:23
for the Queensland government right now around
24:26
economic stimulus ideas. Um,
24:28
and then finally, it's sort of a new
24:31
area that we've worked out that there's actually
24:33
lots of amazing people out there who are
24:35
working on that edge of economic transformation
24:38
, whether they're in the food movement or housing,
24:40
or they're often small
24:42
organizations, often isolated,
24:44
very under resourced and, but doing amazing
24:47
work. So we're trying to figure out
24:49
how do we actually provide a coordination
24:51
or support role to the leaders who
24:53
are already there trying to do
24:55
systems change, work, to amplify
24:58
their efforts . And we're looking at some programs
25:01
like for what that leadership program looks
25:03
like next year.
25:05
Amazing amount of workAnd I
25:13
it's quite, it's, it's
25:15
such , um, the
25:18
change that's happening in the world is changing. Things
25:21
are changing so fast and I'm wondering, you
25:23
know, like you, you had been focused before
25:25
on, on, you know, it was the energy
25:28
transition. I know you still are. Um,
25:30
and particularly, you know, looking at the
25:34
work and how it influences our
25:36
response to climate change
25:39
and all of that's embedded within there
25:41
and, and, you know , um , uh
25:43
, women's empowerment and all these, you know, health
25:46
and wellbeing, all of these different themes
25:48
that kind of embedded within what you are
25:50
calling this sort of this economic transition.
25:52
And, you know, maybe, maybe you
25:54
could just speak a little bit to , um
25:57
, was sort of two questions starting to emerge here. One
25:59
was about why is it that you've
26:01
picked? Uh , you know, this may seem
26:03
really obvious to you, but I'd love if you do just kind of
26:05
articulated, is that, why have you picked the
26:08
economy as the thing that you talk about
26:11
that represents all of the rest of this?
26:13
And then , um , how is your response
26:17
changed or has it not
26:20
with what's happening now
26:22
with the Coronavirus has that changed
26:25
the way that you're working in the way that you see
26:27
that your work emerging from now on. Two questions
26:31
bundled up there.
26:32
They're great questions. Um,
26:34
so the economy , um, well,
26:38
the way, I guess the way I think about
26:41
the economy, it's just how it's
26:43
just the systems and processes we use
26:45
to produce things,
26:47
exchange them, consume them , um
26:50
, organize work, and also
26:52
what we do with any surplus or profit that
26:55
comes out of that. So , um,
26:58
we're trying to let , so to me, it's how we live
27:00
. It's how we do all those things that actually support our living.
27:02
And I'm not just talking about the cash-based, capitalist
27:05
society. Um, if we took all
27:07
of the volunteers, unpaid volunteers,
27:10
formal volunteer programs out of our
27:12
economy, it would collapse like w uh
27:14
, hospitals at schools. Everything relies on that.
27:17
Um, households the
27:20
amount of unpaid labor and caring
27:22
work that's important. So it's actually
27:24
, um, to me having really
27:26
creative conversations about, well, how do we do
27:28
things? How do we get, what we need
27:30
to live is
27:32
, is the basis of everything. Um,
27:35
so we can do it so many different ways.
27:37
We have so many different options. We can be
27:39
so much more creative about that in terms
27:42
of how things have changed with the current moment.
27:44
Um, I guess, I mean,
27:48
doing this work for a long time, and even at
27:50
the center for social change, we're talking about economic change.
27:53
And even with the energy transition, we
27:55
couldn't get cut through, like people were like, Oh, that's
27:57
interesting, but you
28:00
know, people aren't ready to talk about it . When I first
28:02
started talking about the energy transition work in
28:04
2014, literally had government
28:06
leaders saying, Oh , people aren't ready
28:08
to talk about that yet. Maybe in five years yet , we know
28:11
we need to try to change, to transition,
28:13
but, you know, later, and
28:15
I think, and even the public, people think it's really
28:18
interesting, but they couldn't say the, how,
28:20
how are we going to take actions on it? Um,
28:23
so for example, there's been discussions about
28:25
things like the Universal Basic
28:27
Income or job guarantees
28:30
or cooperatives, but
28:32
it wasn't landing in Australia because a lot
28:34
of people were too comfortable and
28:37
there wasn't really that push to
28:40
actually make radical change or
28:43
it seemed a bit risky. Now,
28:45
I think everyone's kind of everything's up
28:48
for grabs. Um, and
28:50
a lot of the assumptions we had about the economy
28:52
have been shattered. So even
28:54
that the role that government is playing right now is completely
28:57
different to what they were saying six months ago. Like
28:59
it was like governments shouldn't be involved in the economy
29:01
and now dictating everything that's
29:04
g onna happen. So, u
29:06
m, I guess for us, it's meant I've I
29:09
had to be very about
29:11
th e e conomy it was and why we focus so
29:13
much on the energy transition was because
29:16
people were sort of saying, well, what
29:18
should we do about the energy transition? There
29:20
was sort of, we had to be pragmatic
29:22
and ma ke w hat people we re n eeding and what
29:24
they're asking for. And even in coal
29:27
mining communities we re a sking yo u t o come and talk
29:29
about th e s hift to renewable energy.
29:31
So I met that need
29:33
there, but I think now there's
29:35
an opening to actually have much bolder,
29:38
more radical conversations about how
29:40
the whole system needs to change, rather than
29:42
just whether we get electricity from th
29:44
is s ource to that source. We can actually
29:46
be more direct about saying, we need
29:48
to think about how we do that. Like, are
29:51
we just backing in big private companies
29:54
and doing business as usual? Should we take public
29:56
control over all of our utilities to
29:58
make sure everyone has access as a public right,
30:00
or service or human ri ghts? Or should
30:02
we be going to small scale cooperative
30:04
community owned systems that have a whole
30:07
economic democracy element to it? Or
30:10
is it a combination of all those? We can actually be much
30:12
more ambitious
30:14
now about saying, look, we've
30:16
got an opportunity here to, to
30:19
shape the economy in a c ompletely an
30:21
d s hift the direction in a different way.
30:24
I think, you know , that the opportunity that's presented
30:27
right now to, to,
30:30
to put things on the table that they've been on
30:32
the, been around the periphery for a long
30:34
time, you know, decades, these ideas
30:36
have been around and they've been experimented with,
30:39
you know, child around the world,
30:42
you know, experienced communities that are doing
30:44
amazing things, but it's always been
30:47
seen as something that's fringe. And I really
30:49
feel like now is a possibility
30:52
to , to bring those, like you said, into, into
30:54
part of that mix into to inform
30:57
something that might happen. And I'm really
30:59
curious because you talk to people
31:01
in all different levels of government all the time. Now,
31:04
do you feel like there's an openness to this?
31:06
I mean, you're saying that this is what you're wanting to put forward, but,
31:09
you know, have you bounced these ideas off
31:11
them yet and , and seeing what
31:13
they, how they respond?
31:16
Uh , there's sort of two levels to that. So
31:18
even before the coronavirus
31:19
hit um,
31:22
we were doing some regional work and
31:25
what's really surprising to me that
31:27
, um, people in local
31:29
councils and just
31:32
general business community people
31:34
, it just people in, you know, in places like
31:36
central Queensland or Southeast Queensland. So
31:38
Southwest Queensland, where they
31:40
were the ones bringing up things like , um,
31:43
UBI and , um,
31:46
things like cooperatives taking
31:49
and community owned, renewable energy, or
31:52
, um, completely different
31:54
radical approaches to waste and zero waste
31:56
. So these, these terms were like coming out
31:58
of people's mouths that we weren't raising,
32:00
they were raising. So I think
32:03
there was an appetite and it was all around resilience
32:06
and the feeling that people have been left,
32:09
especially in regional areas of doing a tough
32:11
one , a number of fronts, and they didn't have that resilience
32:14
on the basics that they needed. So
32:16
people were talking about food justice and local
32:18
food systems, for example,
32:20
and what's happened to agriculture and
32:23
, um , the power of the supermarkets
32:25
and taking away people's ability
32:28
to just buy and grow food locally.
32:31
Um, so these radical ideas where we're
32:33
bubbling there. So there's definitely
32:35
an openness there in
32:37
terms of , um, second federal government.
32:40
I think that it's been surprising
32:42
to me , um,
32:45
how open they are to hearing the ideas
32:48
from regional areas about how they can build economic
32:50
resilience. Um , so I , I
32:52
literally sent a whole bunch of emails to
32:54
advise ministerial advisors , uh,
32:57
the state and some federal level thinking
33:00
that this was about six weeks ago thinking
33:02
they would , um, if I got
33:04
a response, it would be come back to us in a couple of
33:06
months when things have settled down, I
33:08
literally got three emails within five minutes
33:10
back from ministerial advisors, like
33:12
top advisors and saying, I'm really sorry. I can't
33:14
talk to you today. Do you have time tomorrow? And
33:17
I was like, Whoa, but it was unexpected.
33:19
I'm not ready to do it . Um
33:24
, yeah. So I think they're desperate. I think,
33:27
you know, and I was framing it as look we've been doing
33:29
work on at a regional level on
33:32
energy transition ideas. Um,
33:35
you know, I think you can keep moving in the direction that,
33:37
you know, you need to go in because behind
33:39
closed doors, they all say, yes, we know
33:41
we need to act on climate change, but it's whether
33:43
or not they feel like they've built the political commission
33:46
to do what has been the block. Whereas
33:48
now they're like, can you show us how we can do
33:50
what we need to do and bring people
33:52
along with us, but that window,
33:55
you know, how long that's going to be open? I don't
33:57
know.
33:58
So that was my next question is like, so
34:00
the community saying, this is what we want,
34:03
governments are saying, we're looking for a different
34:05
way forward and we get it. What's
34:08
the next step? How , you know
34:11
, how does then this change
34:13
actually happen because we're kind of at this, I
34:16
feel like, well, I mean, it's a simplification.
34:18
We were at this point now this bifurcation point,
34:20
whereas everything's
34:23
fluid at the moment. And then
34:25
as we emerge out of,
34:28
out of this crisis that we're in right now,
34:31
there can be this , um, recovery
34:35
project. That's, you know, an amplification
34:37
of, of business as usual to try and get people
34:39
back on track. Or it can be
34:41
something more along what you're talking about.
34:44
So what is what needs to happen right
34:46
now to see
34:48
his head on the path that
34:51
you're describing? The community's asking
34:53
for that, you know, governments
34:55
are saying, they know the need that we know
34:57
that, you know, society
34:59
needs communities need the planet needs.
35:03
How can, what, what needs
35:06
to happen right now? I mean, I know that this is a
35:08
huge question and I don't expect that you can answer
35:10
because that's like the whole [inaudible] problems,
35:14
but, you know, but it is
35:16
a big question, isn't it? Because right
35:19
now it feels like there's a sense of urgency
35:21
about speaking
35:23
up right now
35:25
about the things that matter and putting on the table
35:28
firmly, real and
35:30
viable alternatives that
35:32
work that people want. And
35:34
that economically actually makes sense.
35:39
Um, well I think it's going to be
35:41
messy and I
35:44
think that I'm already starting to see just
35:46
in the last week or so, the number of voices
35:48
who are clamoring for attention around their economic
35:51
stimulus ideas have expanded
35:53
exponentially. We do know that
35:55
the minerals council of Australia, for example, has been
35:57
very quick off the Mark in putting in their
36:00
ideas and demands for how economic recovery
36:02
should go. And they've got direct access to the
36:04
prime minister's office. Um, you
36:06
know, the head of this COVID , um,
36:09
advisory group is,
36:11
you know. So it,
36:14
you know, that they're and
36:18
how much that, but I, I know
36:20
, I think something has fundamentally shifted. The Prime
36:23
Minister himself is saying we
36:25
can't go back to business as usual. So,
36:28
but what does he mean by that? I don't know.
36:31
We've got big groups like , um,
36:33
get up and some of the climate action, climate
36:35
groups , um , and environment
36:38
groups, and mobilizing their membership
36:40
around key demands and trying to encourage
36:43
people to get directly in contact with to
36:46
say, you know, we want you to build back better.
36:48
We don't want you to build back to the status quo. There's
36:51
a movement called #gobackbetter, u
36:54
m, s tarted circulating through social media.
36:56
So I think there's a
36:58
momentum and an energy around different
37:01
ideas and people wanting something
37:03
different is definitely there.
37:05
And I think the politicians are hearing it. U
37:09
m, which ideas take
37:11
hold, you
37:13
know, who knows what's
37:15
g oing t o take hold? U
37:18
m, I think that's how change happens.
37:20
Y eah. It's kind of, k
37:22
ind o f that sort of things bubbling underneath
37:24
the surface. And then which
37:26
thing pops up and i s g oing t o actually take root
37:28
a nd h oles and g row into something. S o it's
37:31
just going to get squashed or, u
37:33
m, covered
37:35
or..
37:35
What do you see happening around
37:38
the world at the moment in those sorts of
37:41
things that are popping up. I mean, there's things popping up
37:43
in Australia, but you're seeing other things happening
37:45
in other parts that we could, you
37:48
know, bring forward part of our conversation
37:50
more here.
37:52
Tell you the truth. I haven't been looking
37:54
at that much. We've actually, we've planning
37:57
to do a webinar series through the
37:59
next economy, looking at
38:01
how different countries are responding to the economic
38:03
stimulus, but interviewing people who are
38:06
working very much on economic transformation
38:08
and have been for decades to get their commentary
38:10
on what the opportunities are to
38:12
do things differently. And what's popping up in terms
38:14
of different economic movements. Um,
38:17
so if people interested in that they should sign
38:19
up, I guess, to the next economy page. And we
38:21
can talk about that.
38:22
How do they get on to finding.. How do
38:25
they get onto your list of information.
38:28
Can you share..
38:29
If you just go to the Next Economy's
38:31
website which is nexteconomy.com.au there's
38:34
a subscribe button, and then we'll send
38:36
you out any notifications of activities.
38:39
Um , so that's the webinar series. We'll
38:41
be directly , um , talking about that.
38:43
But , um, at the moment I haven't
38:45
actually been looking, I've been trying to spend
38:48
the time , um, where things
38:50
are slowing down on . I'm not traveling like a crazy
38:52
person to
38:54
actually just come back
38:57
, um , and reflect
39:00
on where we're at.
39:02
Um, and try and make sense of the
39:04
local first. So I haven't been
39:07
really looking globally at , but I
39:09
know there's been some really interesting webinars that
39:11
Naomi Klein's been doing. Um,
39:13
there was one that the Australia Institute this morning
39:16
interviewing Joseph Stiglitz, which apparently
39:18
haven't looked at yet, but it's quite revolutionary
39:20
and quite inspiring. Um,
39:23
u h, I think we c ould also not just look at how r
39:26
esponse i s happening now, but also previous responses,
39:28
like in times when G reece was
39:30
facing the austerity, how
39:32
communities organized and mobilized,
39:34
u m, and that led to political change.
39:37
There's been some interesting stuff in Spain as
39:39
well. U m, Argentina
39:41
about 20 years ago where we had workers taking
39:43
back over factories when they were closed. So
39:45
I think it's also looking at other times and looking
39:48
at how communities w ould responded. Detroit
39:50
and the growth of the food movement in Detroit.
39:53
U m, so I think there's plenty of examples
39:55
that we can, we can look to.
39:58
And even it's not such
40:00
a sort of an immediate thing,
40:02
but even looking at what's what happened in Maleny
40:04
for example, you know, it was a dying rural town.
40:07
How did it rebuild itself through these
40:09
of cooperatives and women's groups and, you know
40:11
, local banks and local economic systems.
40:13
And, you know, it's quite an interesting
40:16
story, the Maleny story, even, you
40:18
know , here in Queensland.
40:20
Yeah. And there's other examples popping up
40:22
now with a very similar model. Like you've
40:24
got Preston, but they're called movements
40:27
or , um, you
40:29
know yeah. There's things happening all over
40:32
the world right now. Yeah .
40:34
So, you know, sharing the, sharing these
40:36
and , and , um , sharing the stories of these . Cause,
40:38
you know, I , I don't know how much
40:41
the stories of other ones being told, but I know the story
40:43
of Maleny really hasn't been shared that very
40:45
much at all. And it's quite a remarkable story.
40:54
Well, thank
40:56
you so much for joining me today
40:58
and , um , um, I look forward to our ongoing
41:01
conversations because I know that , um,
41:03
you know, that's something that we do all the time.
41:05
We get on and have a chat about
41:08
what's going on in the world, what leadership is , where
41:11
the change needs to happen and, and I'm constantly
41:13
inspired by the work that you do. And
41:15
, and I know that everyone
41:18
who's listening to this is going to be signing up for
41:20
, um, for the webinar series and
41:22
, uh , do you have a newsletter as well that you
41:24
send out? Or what , how does it work?
41:26
Yes, we've got one in
41:28
process at the moment.
41:31
Excellent. Yeah.
41:31
Well maybe next time I can
41:33
interview you.
41:34
Yeah, let's do that. That sounds
41:39
like fun. Well
41:41
thank you so much. And I'll put
41:44
down all the links of things that you've mentioned
41:46
and , um , ways to get in touch with Amanda
41:49
as well. Well take
41:51
care and thanks for everything
41:53
you're doing. So
42:01
thanks for tuning in to the sense-
42:05
making in a changing world podcast today, it's been
42:08
a real pleasure to have your company.
42:10
I invite you to subscribe and
42:13
receive notification of each new
42:15
weekly episode with more
42:17
wonderful stories, ideas, inspiration, and
42:20
common sense for living and
42:22
working regenerative and core positive
42:24
permaculture thinking of design
42:26
interaction in this changing world. I'm including
42:28
a transcript below and a
42:31
link also to my four-part permaculture
42:33
series, really looking at what is permaculture and how
42:36
to make it your livelihood too. So
42:39
join me again in the next
42:41
episode where we talk with another fascinating guest, I look forward to seeing you there.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More