Podchaser Logo
Home
Viral History with A/Prof Gregory (376)

Viral History with A/Prof Gregory (376)

Released Sunday, 24th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Viral History with A/Prof Gregory (376)

Viral History with A/Prof Gregory (376)

Viral History with A/Prof Gregory (376)

Viral History with A/Prof Gregory (376)

Sunday, 24th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

I'm Dr Karl coming to you from

0:02

the lands of the Gadigal people of

0:04

the Eora nation. I acknowledge Aboriginal and

0:06

Torres Strait Islander peoples as the first

0:09

Australians and traditional custodians of the lands

0:11

where we live, learn and work. G'day

0:15

Dr Karl, Shuttleers of Science, University

0:17

of Sydney here with an insight

0:20

about life. Oh my god and where

0:22

it came from and how we discovered

0:24

it. So let me introduce the microphone

0:26

associate professor Gregory J Morgan. Hello I

0:29

am at Stevens Institute of Technology

0:31

which is in Hoboken, New Jersey

0:34

just over the Hudson River from Manhattan. It's an

0:36

engineering school and I teach in the history and

0:38

philosophy of science. This is the weird insight and

0:41

I'm just going to give it to everybody right

0:43

now and then we'll try and understand it. So

0:46

you're a philosopher person working in

0:48

a school full of engineers and

0:50

you've written a book called Cancer

0:53

Virus Hunters. To

0:55

my surprise the way we've discovered this thing

0:57

called life you know DNA and the ladder

0:59

of life and all that sort of stuff

1:03

it's been driven by viruses that

1:05

cause cancer. By looking at viruses

1:07

that cause cancer we've made a

1:09

huge number of our discoveries. It's

1:11

pushed us along the pathway of

1:13

working out how this complicated thing

1:15

called DNA works. Is that a

1:17

correct summary? I think that's a nice summary. We were

1:20

sort of lucky in picking the viruses that

1:22

we studied and because viruses were nice and

1:24

simple they were like a little package of

1:26

life and had a limited number of

1:28

genes in them. We focused on

1:31

genes that were really important to the

1:33

cell cycle and to how cells reproduce

1:35

themselves. A significant number

1:37

of discoveries in the last

1:39

half century have come from looking

1:41

at these viruses. In the early

1:43

days of molecular biology so DNA is

1:46

discovered in 1953 it's

1:48

a big long-wieldy molecule but

1:51

viruses are a small piece of it so they're like

1:53

a sort of a small package of life with

1:55

a limited number of genes. The

1:57

cancer viruses they can take over a cell

2:00

and make it reproduce uncontrollably so they interact

2:02

with the cell in a certain way. And

2:05

so looking at the interaction we made all these

2:07

discoveries. The

2:09

virus is simple and then

2:11

we turn to cell cancerous and we apologise

2:13

for the poor patient who suffers from or

2:16

animal or whatever that suffers from it. It

2:18

causes a specific pathway that we

2:20

can then look at and it reproduces and we

2:22

can look at it really carefully and think, oh

2:24

we've just discovered something new about the DNA. Is

2:26

that what you're saying? Yes

2:29

exactly. At one point there are

2:31

genes in the virus itself which

2:33

help make a cancer cell cancerous that

2:36

turn a normal cell into a cancer

2:38

cell and then there's also the interactions

2:40

between whatever the virus is doing with

2:42

the cellular machinery itself. And

2:45

today we know these things, we'd

2:47

call them oncogenes and tumour suppressor

2:49

genes. And even our DNA.

2:52

They are in every cell in your

2:54

body and they regulate how cells reproduce

2:56

themselves and when they stop reproducing. Cancer

3:00

is effectively uncontrolled reproduction of the

3:02

cell. What the virus does

3:04

is it disables all that machinery and allows

3:06

for the cell to keep reproducing uncontrollably. Well

3:09

that was a big surprise for me because

3:11

I always thought before I did medicine that

3:13

cancer was some sort of external disease that

3:15

came upon you. It can be caused by

3:17

these viruses, I'll get back to them in

3:19

a second, but basically cancer is your own

3:21

cells not following the rules to grow

3:23

so far and then stop. And

3:25

so instead of growing so far and

3:27

stopping they just keep on growing uncontrollably,

3:29

I guess the advantage for the virus

3:31

is that it's got multiple copies of

3:33

itself and nothing personal like they say in

3:35

the mafia, it's just business, it just wants

3:37

to make more copies of itself. Now

3:40

I only know of three viruses that

3:43

cause cancer. This is before I read

3:45

your book. There's hepatitis B and

3:48

then there's Epstein-Barr virus or

3:50

glandular fever and then HBV

3:53

cervical cancer. And can

3:55

you just name a few more? It seems like there's

3:57

a short load of them. causes

4:01

tumors in chickens and

4:03

it was a very important virus. Another one SV40 can

4:06

cause tumors in newborn mice and other

4:09

things so they were more important for

4:11

the research. In terms of actually

4:13

human cancer I think you've named the big

4:15

ones there that there's multiple strains of HPV

4:17

which cause various types of cancer not just

4:20

cervical cancer but cancers of the throat and

4:22

the anus and other places and

4:24

I thought that maybe as many as 20%

4:27

of all cancers are caused by viruses. Are

4:30

we talking humans or animals or

4:32

both? 20% of human cancers are

4:34

thought to be caused by viruses.

4:36

Wow I mean viruses can

4:38

cause cancers maybe a couple but

4:41

from your work you're you because you've done

4:43

this really exhaustively you've interviewed so many of

4:45

the people it really fits in with the

4:47

whole history and philosophy of science. You're saying

4:49

20%? Yes 20% it's maybe slightly

4:53

higher in the underdeveloped world and

4:55

slightly lower in the developed countries

4:57

like Australia but it's still a

4:59

significant percentage. It turns

5:02

out that the only reason we

5:04

have such profusion of chickens today

5:06

is that we came up with

5:08

a vaccine against the coronavirus. We

5:11

started attacking chickens like

5:13

crazy in the early 1900s and kill

5:15

100% of a flock within 24 hours. There's

5:18

a long period when a chicken was

5:21

a really special meal that you

5:23

would offer to somebody own leaves. They were

5:25

really wonderful and that was because the only

5:27

way we could deal with this incredibly infective

5:29

coronavirus that was killing chickens around the world

5:32

was by having a little chicken

5:34

farm here and another one over

5:36

there and using isolation which

5:38

meant that we had small numbers of chickens which

5:40

meant that chickens were special and now chickens are

5:42

almost compulsory everywhere and it turns out that the

5:45

weight of chickens is more than the weight of

5:47

all the other birds on the planet. So this

5:49

chicken virus would be very

5:51

important and the one sv40 was

5:53

that vaguely related to AIDS research?

5:57

sv40 is a very well studied virus and pieces

5:59

of it are used in various tools

6:01

for molecular biologists. So you might have

6:04

heard of the promoter out of the

6:06

genome that's been used in other things

6:08

including some vaccines. It was a very

6:10

controversial virus actually because during the manufacture

6:13

of the polio vaccine, it turns out

6:15

that it was injected into millions of

6:17

people that got the polio vaccine. But

6:20

luckily, it's only cancerous if you don't

6:22

have a well-developed immune system. So it

6:24

causes cancer in mice if you inject

6:27

them before their immune systems boot up.

6:30

It's safer on adult animals and

6:32

adult humans. I'm guessing

6:34

there would have been a few adult humans and

6:37

children humans who had compromised immune

6:39

systems who end up getting cancers

6:41

as a result of this unwitting

6:43

contaminant. I don't know if

6:45

we know that for sure actually. At the

6:48

time, they had to make a judgement call

6:50

about what was more important trying to wipe

6:52

out polio or this very small risk that

6:54

you're creating more cancers in humans. Majority

6:57

of biologists think it didn't have any effect,

6:59

but you can find people out there that think it

7:02

did. When

7:04

I was a kid in school, every class

7:06

had a kid with polio and it

7:08

just got wiped out. The risk-benefit ratio

7:10

would be huge there. So how did

7:13

we actually discover viruses in the early

7:15

days? Well, the first viruses

7:17

were just things that reproduced or had some

7:19

sort of effect that you could filter with

7:22

very, very fine filters. So it would

7:24

be a filter that would filter out all the

7:26

cells and anything smaller than a cell, if it

7:29

got through, had a certain effect, we

7:31

called a lot of those things viruses.

7:33

Virus sort of meant something like poison

7:35

in the 19th century and in the

7:37

1890s we found some plant viruses that

7:39

would cause mottled features of leaves on

7:42

tobacco plants and that was one

7:44

of the first perhaps tobacco mosaic virus. So

7:46

I could tell the invention of electron microscopy

7:49

before we could actually see anything. We couldn't

7:51

see the viruses that are too small for

7:53

light microscopes. It's not really until the 30s

7:55

and 40s that we start actually thinking of

7:57

them in these little spheres or cemilos. But

8:01

we knew that they were there because they

8:03

could pass through an incredibly fine ceramic

8:05

filter like unglazed porcelain

8:07

for example and there were cells, bacteria would

8:09

stay on one side but the liquid would

8:12

go through and blow me

8:14

down. There was something there that could cause disease

8:16

so there was some sort of living thing in

8:18

it. Yes, 1908 and Rouse

8:20

did that exact experiment with the first

8:22

cancer virus. He took a chicken

8:25

tumour and he ground it up and

8:27

minced it up and then filtered it through a fine

8:29

filter and found that whatever went through the filter if

8:31

you inject it into a chicken it would cause cancer

8:34

in that next chicken and you can do this again

8:36

and again and again. And you mentioned

8:38

in your book there were a few tricks there

8:40

as well that it had to be a chicken

8:42

of a certain age or something. Initially it had

8:44

to be a closely related chicken but it turns

8:46

out that if you do this long enough the

8:48

virus is able to jump to

8:50

other chickens and actually eventually to other species

8:53

as well like rodents,

8:55

other birds and things. So the

8:57

virus gets better at jumping species

8:59

boundaries. You mentioned

9:02

there's something about cat leukemia. Cats

9:04

can get a leukemia which is a cancer type

9:06

thing from a virus. It's contagious

9:08

actually. It's a virus that causes leukemia

9:10

in cats which is a blood cancer.

9:13

It was discovered in the 1960s in

9:15

Scotland by a veterinarian called Jared

9:18

and he was even to show that cat

9:20

ladies that had large collections of cats if

9:22

they had one cat with leukemia it would

9:24

eventually transmit to the other cats and eventually

9:27

they would all get it. This

9:29

led to a lot of money being poured

9:31

into this area because we wondered if there

9:33

were human leukemia viruses too. And

9:36

so the US government spent millions and millions

9:38

of dollars looking for it and funded a

9:40

lot of the early tumor virology but they

9:42

didn't find one in humans, nothing like the

9:44

cat version. And you've got a wonderful chapter

9:46

there, Insights from the Field with I see

9:48

the names Epstein and Burkert.

9:50

It turns out that the same

9:53

virus called the Epson bar virus

9:55

causes lymphoma in African type people,

9:58

glandular fever in western. type

10:00

people and in my

10:02

medical studies I was taught that it

10:04

gave nato-faryngeal cancers of people

10:06

in Hong Kong. You say here is

10:09

the first human tumor virus can you

10:11

tell us about that? Birkett caught himself

10:13

a bush surgeon in Africa and he

10:15

noticed that he was getting these young African

10:17

children that would have these cancers of the

10:19

jaw effectively that have these big growths on

10:21

their jaws and it was

10:24

often fatal and what was

10:26

really curious about it was that it only

10:28

occurred in certain geographical areas and

10:30

it turns out it really only happens where

10:32

there is climate that's conducive to mosquitoes. So

10:35

it looked like it could be transmitted by

10:37

mosquitoes and Epstein back in England thought well

10:39

it must be a virus so he said

10:41

about trying to find the virus and he

10:44

spent a long time looking and he

10:46

eventually with Yvonne Barr, a great Australian by

10:48

the way, was able to find this

10:50

virus which was sort of a herpes-like virus. Epstein

10:53

Barr virus is associated with many

10:56

different diseases including more recently multiple

10:58

sclerosis perhaps. That was interesting

11:00

with the United States military being

11:03

able to look at blood samples that have

11:05

been kept in storage for the better part

11:07

of a century. Is my memory right on

11:09

that? Yeah they did. They went back and

11:11

looked at samples that have been stored to

11:13

see who had been infected and they spent

11:15

a lot of time actually in Africa trying

11:17

to show that the virus was a causative

11:19

feature of this type of cancer but took

11:21

thousands and thousands of samples. Along

11:24

the way as we look at

11:26

each virus and the cancers that are

11:28

caused we discover yet another little thing

11:30

about the DNA. You mentioned here

11:32

hepatitis B virus. I remember being among

11:35

the first people as a medical doctor

11:37

to get the hepatitis B vaccine.

11:39

The interesting thing about hepatitis B virus

11:41

is that when it reproduces it makes

11:44

a fully functional virus and

11:46

occasionally it also makes just

11:48

the protein shell that's empty.

11:51

The hepatitis B virus, one of the

11:53

first human viruses that caused liver cancer,

11:56

it causes hepatitis mostly but occasionally that

11:58

leads to liver cancer. It turns

12:00

out you can make a vaccine by just taking

12:02

the protein coat of the virus

12:04

and not using any genetic material

12:07

and injecting that into people. It's a

12:09

cancer vaccine effectively. We don't talk about it like

12:12

that but if you've got a

12:14

hepatitis B vaccine you're less likely

12:16

to get liver cancer. I had no idea

12:18

that that was the trick that you got this

12:20

hollow shell which will get into a human

12:22

cell then you just chuck what you want inside

12:24

it and I do remember at the time

12:26

when I got the vaccine I said proudly to

12:29

my family and so forth, hey I've had

12:31

an anti-cancer vaccine. Yeah I mean

12:33

a number of virus have that

12:35

feature actually where they reproduce themselves

12:37

so fast that occasionally they make

12:39

just a shell without the deadly

12:41

genetic material inside it. It's an

12:43

effective way of making a vaccine.

12:46

We can use it for HPV as well

12:48

and a similar strategy to hepatitis B virus.

12:51

Now you mentioned and I do remember

12:53

learning about this but I've now forgotten

12:55

reverse transcriptase.

12:58

Assume that our audience is a 10 year

13:00

old who has a good sense of curiosity.

13:02

Can you explain it to them and me

13:04

of course accidentally? Right. Turns out

13:07

there's two different sorts of tumiviruses. There's

13:09

some that are called DNA tumiviruses and

13:12

some that are called RNA tumiviruses

13:14

and they've got different genetic material. The

13:17

RNA ones evolve faster. There's one reason

13:19

that SARS-CoV-2 is such a problem right?

13:21

It evolves very quickly because it's an

13:23

RNA virus. The

13:26

RNA virus has sort of presented a

13:28

puzzle to biologists. How do they reproduce

13:30

themselves? Because the central dogma of molecular

13:33

biology said that you start with DNA,

13:36

the DNA makes RNA and the RNA

13:38

makes protein. For a long

13:40

time we slowly painfully built up this

13:42

knowledge. You've got this ladder of life

13:45

that's got two side rails and it's

13:47

got all these rungs and there's about

13:49

three billion rungs and we call that

13:52

DNA. DNA then makes RNA

13:55

which then makes protein. The painfully one

13:57

knowledge was that that's the part of

13:59

it. halfway it goes and now

14:01

you're telling me something with the word

14:04

reversed in it? So the question was

14:06

how do these RNA viruses reproduce themselves?

14:08

Because we think reproduction requires DNA and

14:11

there would need to be an enzyme

14:13

that took you from RNA back to

14:15

DNA and most biologists in the 1960s

14:18

thought that was just impossible. Luckily we

14:20

had a very tenacious researcher called Howard

14:22

Terman who searched this for a long

14:24

time and he concurrently with David Baltimore

14:26

they found an enzyme that would take

14:29

RNA and make DNA and they

14:31

called that virus reverse transcriptase. The

14:33

transcription was the process where you

14:36

went from DNA to RNA and

14:38

reverse transcription goes from RNA back to

14:40

DNA and takes the information from RNA

14:42

and puts it into DNA. This

14:45

is an example of where looking

14:47

at viruses that can cause cancer

14:50

in various creatures gives us

14:52

more knowledge? Yeah it modified what was

14:54

called the central dogma of molecular biology

14:56

but perhaps even more importantly it gave

14:58

us a tool because now

15:00

we could move the information from RNA and put

15:02

it in DNA and that's incredibly

15:05

important for the HIV

15:07

pandemic because it allows us a

15:09

tool to detect if you have

15:11

a virus or not. If

15:13

you can find any instances where

15:15

this RNA being transcribed into DNA

15:18

with that enzyme that it's come from a

15:20

virus because we humans don't have that enzyme

15:22

only the viruses have it. Reverse

15:25

transcriptase, ASE, the ending ASE means

15:27

it's an enzyme. Yeah so it's

15:29

a really important tool that molecular

15:31

biologists now use all the time

15:33

partly because RNA is super unstable

15:36

and it breaks down very quickly and DNA is

15:39

quite stable it lasts for a long time. Actually

15:41

I remember when I was working in a lab that

15:44

they kind of made fun of people work on RNA

15:46

because it's so difficult to work on if you accidentally

15:48

heat it up it would degrade. One thing you

15:50

talk about are oncogenes and this has

15:52

always bothered me is an oncogenes something

15:54

in our DNA that can cause cancer

15:56

is that right? Yeah

15:58

I mean what we have in our genes are

16:01

sometimes called proto-oncogenes. So

16:03

it's a gene that has a normal function.

16:06

It's part of this machinery that

16:08

tells the cell when to stop reproducing.

16:12

If it gets mutated in the right way,

16:14

it turns from a proto-oncogene to an oncogene,

16:16

and then it can cause cancer. And

16:19

the reason that's important in my story is

16:21

that it turns out that Roush sarcoma virus

16:25

not only has viral genes in the genome, it

16:27

also carries with it some genes from the host.

16:30

And it happened to pick up a

16:32

proto-oncogene that then mutated into an oncogene.

16:34

And so now when you have this

16:36

gene that when it gets inserted into

16:38

your cells, it will cause cancer. Why

16:42

do we have part

16:44

of our DNA having the

16:46

potential to cause cancer? What's

16:49

that all about? Isn't that a bit of a design

16:51

fault? Can we take it back to the manufacturer and

16:53

get a new one under warranty or something? Yeah, well,

16:56

it's a bit like why do you have an accelerator in

16:58

your car if it gets stuck down

17:00

and it can cause accidents? But

17:02

you need the accelerator for normal use of

17:04

your car. And just like that,

17:06

you need these proto-oncogenes for your cells to

17:09

work properly. It's just when they get broken

17:11

and mutated, that causes the problems. That

17:14

can be caused by a virus or it

17:16

can be caused by other things like smoking

17:18

tobacco or spending too much time in UV

17:20

light when you're sunbathing. That

17:22

can also cause the same mutations in those same

17:25

genes and it will cause cancer in those cells

17:27

too. That's a fantastic

17:29

explanation. I now realise that the problem is

17:31

not with the oncogene, but the name, if

17:34

you jump across to a car, instead of calling

17:36

it an accelerator, if you call it the, it

17:39

will kill you if you hold a down pedal

17:41

or the pedal of death as part of a

17:43

balance. So can you

17:45

tell me about the other side of the

17:47

coin then, the anti-cancer gene? Yeah,

17:50

there's a very famous one that was discovered

17:52

by a tumovirologist called P53. And

17:55

it's called P53 because it's about 53 kilodaltons

17:58

in size. and

18:00

adultin? Adultin is a measure of mass

18:02

that we use to measure proteins and

18:04

how big they are. And so a

18:06

hydrogen atom is one and carbon

18:08

is 12 and oxygen

18:10

is 16. So this one's 53,000. To use the current

18:14

allergy the p53 is a bit like the

18:17

brake in your car. Even

18:19

if the accelerator is stuck on you could

18:21

still maybe stop if you've got a working brake.

18:23

If the brake is broken too then you've

18:26

got a real problem and that's what happens

18:28

in many tumors. You have oncogenes that are

18:30

activated and tumour suppressor genes that are

18:32

broken and when you get those two things happen then

18:35

you've got a bad case of cancer unfortunately. And this

18:37

p53 is possibly implicated in the pitot

18:42

paradox, pitot paradox which is how come elephants

18:44

which have got many hundreds of times our

18:46

weight they do not have 100 times cancer.

18:48

In fact they have less. It may be

18:50

part of it. I don't think it's the

18:52

whole story with that paradox because it's all

18:54

about how much DNA repair genes

18:57

and things you have going on. So

18:59

can you recover from mutations? But some

19:01

animals will have more copies of

19:03

p53 than others and

19:06

you might think it's all of benefit but there

19:08

can be some costs too if you have too

19:10

much of it. It's like drinking water. A little

19:12

bit is good but too much. People have found

19:14

this in a marathon. Drinking too

19:16

much can kill you. So with the

19:18

elephant it's 100

19:20

times our weight. It's got 100 times more

19:22

cells and if you assume

19:24

cancer happens in cells that divide and

19:27

do it wrongly, why does it live

19:29

for our lifetime instead of only

19:31

seven years? Well it's got 100 times more

19:33

cells. Surely we'd be getting 100 times more

19:35

cancer. And apparently some of their

19:37

cells can have up to 22 copies of

19:40

the p53 gene and I've idly

19:42

kind of thought what would

19:44

happen if we could modify humans so

19:46

that instead of having just one copy

19:48

or so we've got a

19:51

couple. There's many people that

19:53

kind of think we can hack the genome so

19:55

to speak right and do things to make us

19:57

live longer and in theory it sounds

19:59

good. They can practice what you find

20:01

this when you start putting extra chains and

20:03

the chain imo have some unforeseen effects that

20:06

won't be good as well. so it's not

20:08

quite as easy as that sounds. I would

20:10

guess. Celebrate with hundred coming to the into

20:12

their time here and we didn't get a

20:15

chance to talk that a seal the and

20:17

Hiv spit odors when people read your book

20:19

is silly academically. Yeah, what I tried to

20:21

do was include a lot of. Biographical.

20:24

Material of the people that did all the research.

20:27

And science And they're trying to sort

20:29

of square the circle and having a

20:31

book as popular and readable. That.

20:33

Doesn't dumbed down the science too much.

20:35

is exhaustive and deep and also a

20:38

good dude. Best in lieu buys the

20:40

but now to buy now seats loses

20:42

Think about it's about time ago to

20:44

the and I'm seeking says this is

20:47

how that happened in the audience. This

20:49

so many viruses that is a can

20:51

cause cancer and divorces simple system and

20:54

and also because it interacts with the

20:56

potent cellular machinery. As gotta

20:58

do thanks to the south are already

21:00

interacts with really important proteins and the

21:02

cell pay Fifty three was discovered because

21:04

it was interacting with something that the

21:06

virus was making so video want to

21:08

understand molecular biology? It's and as essential

21:10

as really pick up how we got

21:12

the it's This is the book. So

21:15

tense a virus hunters I'm guessing Amazon

21:17

good books of the you live separately

21:19

says how they get hold of it.

21:21

Johns Hopkins University Press has a website

21:23

to better yet Amazon I think is

21:25

probably the easiest way. Thousand people who

21:27

follow. You and you'll find

21:29

work, Twitter and Threads and

21:32

just recently Blue Sky at

21:34

Doctor Gregory. Morgan. trying

21:36

to think about which my rabbit some

21:39

other my keep up periods and they

21:41

are some of them sign a hot

21:43

spot as i that doctor gregory morgan

21:45

with or without periods and between the

21:47

doctor and and the gregory on threads

21:49

blue sky and twitter or x i

21:51

guess you so much professor grigory to

21:53

take me through this and for it's

21:56

blowing my mind it so much of

21:58

the knowledge that we have game about

22:00

molecular biology and life itself has come

22:02

from looking at viruses that can cause

22:05

cancers in various creatures. I had no

22:07

idea. Yeah, I think it's a victory

22:09

for what you might call reductionism in

22:11

biology. Looking at simple systems first to

22:13

see what you can learn. Thank you very

22:16

much. Thank you for having me. Shirtloads

22:18

of science is washed, spun and aired

22:20

by the University of Sydney.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features